Healthcare Trust (HTIA) S-11Registration of securities for real estate companies

The Series A Preferred Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Global Market. An active and liquid trading market for the Series A Preferred Stock may not develop or be sustained. Because the Series A Preferred Stock has no stated maturity date and is not subject to mandatory redemption, investors seeking liquidity may be limited to selling their shares of Series A Preferred Stock in the secondary market. The market price and liquidity of the Series A Preferred Stock may be adversely affected by the absence of an active trading market. The market price for the Series A Preferred Stock may not equal or exceed the price you pay for your shares.

Our ability to continue to pay dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock (and distributions on our common stock commencing in the Commencement Quarter, if it occurs) depends on the availability of liquidity necessary to meet our capital needs, which is not assured. See “— Risks Related to Our Indebtedness — Our Credit Facility contains various covenants that may restrict our ability to take certain actions and may restrict our ability to use our cash and make investments.” As with the similar restriction in effect prior to the amendment to our Credit Facility in August 2020, we may still pay any cash distributions necessary to maintain our status as a REIT and may not pay any cash distributions (including dividends on Series A Preferred Stock) if a default or event of default exists or would result therefrom. The covenants restricting payment of distributions to a threshold based on Modified FFO and requiring maintenance of a minimum ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to consolidated total asset value and a minimum ratio of adjusted consolidated EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges did not apply for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2020. In addition, the lenders waived any defaults or event of defaults under those covenants that may have occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2020 as well as any additional default or event of default resulting therefrom prior to August 10, 2020. There can be no assurance our lenders will consent to any amendments or waivers that may become necessary to comply with our Credit Facility in the

Currently, the maximum tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is 23.8%, including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income. Dividends payable by REITs to these noncorporate stockholders, however, generally are not eligible for this reduced rate and, through December 31, 2025, will be subject to an effective rate of 29.6%, including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income, and taking into account the 20% deduction. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our stock. Tax rates could be changed in future legislation.

Holders of Series A Preferred Stock have limited voting rights. Our common stock is the only class or series of our capital stock currently outstanding that has full voting rights. Voting rights for holders of Series A Preferred Stock exist primarily with respect to the ability to elect two additional directors to our board if six or more quarterly dividends (whether or not consecutive) payable on the Series A Preferred Stock are in arrears, and with respect to voting on amendments to our charter, including the articles supplementary relating to the Series A Preferred Stock, that materially and adversely affect the rights of the Series A Preferred Stock or create additional classes or series of shares of our capital stock that are senior to the Series A Preferred Stock. Other than these limited circumstances, holders of Series A Preferred Stock do not have any voting rights.

We have not sought to obtain a rating for the Series A Preferred Stock. One or more rating agencies may, however, independently decide to issue a rating that may adversely affect the market price of Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, we may elect in the future to obtain a rating for the Series A Preferred Stock or elect to issue other securities for which we may seek to obtain a rating, each of which could adversely impact the market price of Series A Preferred Stock. Ratings only reflect the views of the rating agency or agencies issuing the ratings and could at any time be revised downward or withdrawn entirely at the discretion of the issuing rating agency if in its judgment circumstances so warrant. Any downward revision or withdrawal of a rating could have an adverse effect on the market price of Series A Preferred Stock. Further, a rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold any particular security, including the Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, ratings do not reflect market prices or the suitability of a security for a particular investor and any future rating of the Series A Preferred Stock may not reflect all risks related to us and our business, or the structure or market value of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

Holders of Series A Preferred Stock have no redemption rights. In addition, holders of Series A Preferred Stock have no right to convert the shares of Series A Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock in connection with a Delisting Event, unless a Change of Control occurs during a continuing Delisting Event. Therefore, holders of Series A Preferred Stock may have to hold their shares for an indefinite period of time if a Delisting Event occurs.

Further, certain of our tenants or our third-party operators may not be eligible for or may not be successful in securing stimulus funds under government stimulus programs which may impact their ability to pay their obligations including any obligations to us. We received $3.6 million under a government program during the year ended December 31, 2020 related to four of our properties. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we received an additional $5.1 million in funding through the CARES Act. There can be no assurance that we will be able to qualify for, or receive, funds under this or any other governmental program established in response to COVID-19.

As a result of these and other factors, tenants or operators that experience deteriorating financial conditions as a result of the outbreak of COVID-19 have been, or may, in the future be, unwilling or unable to pay us in full or on a timely basis due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, lack of funding, operational failures, or for other reasons. We reported cash collections of nearly 100% for the MOB and triple-net leased healthcare facilities segments, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020 as of February 15, 2021. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our tenants and operators and thus our ability to collect rents in future periods cannot be determined as present and the amount of cash rent collected during 2020 may not be indicative of any future period. In addition, there is no assurance that we will be able to collect the cash rent that is due in the future months including the deferred 2020 rent amounts due in 2021 under the deferral agreements we have entered into with our tenants.

The impact on our tenants and operators in our SHOP segment cannot be determined at present. We may face defaults and additional requests for rent deferrals or abatements or other allowances particularly if our tenants continue to experience financial distress and increased operating costs or if healthcare facilities and SHOPs continue to experience downward pressures on occupancy and increased costs. Furthermore, if we declare any tenants in default for non-payment of rent or other potential breaches of their leases with us, we might not be able to recover and may experience delays and additional costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us. Our ability to recover amounts under the terms of our leases may

In addition to the impacts on us, our tenants and operators described above, the COVID-19 pandemic has also impacted us in other ways and enhanced certain risks that could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay dividends (including dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock) and other distributions to our stockholders including:

Our general liability coverage, property insurance coverage and umbrella liability coverage on all our properties may not be adequate to insure against liability claims and provide for the costs of defense. Similarly, we may not have adequate coverage against the risk of direct physical damage or to reimburse us on a replacement cost basis for costs incurred to repair or rebuild each property. Moreover, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with such catastrophic events could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims.

This risk is particularly relevant with respect to potential acts of terrorism. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (the “TRIA”), under which the U.S. federal government bears a significant portion of insured losses caused by terrorism, will expire on December 31, 2027, and there can be no assurance that Congress will act to renew or replace the TRIA following its expiration. In the event that the TRIA is not renewed or replaced, terrorism insurance may become difficult or impossible to obtain at reasonable costs or at all, which may result in adverse impacts and additional costs to us.

Changes in the cost or availability of insurance due to the non-renewal of the TRIA or for other reasons could expose us to uninsured casualty losses. If any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our assets will be reduced by any uninsured loss. In addition, other than any

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations that (a) regulate certain activities and operations that may have environmental or health and safety effects, such as the management, generation, release or disposal of regulated materials, substances or wastes, (b) impose liability for the costs of cleaning up, and damages to natural resources from, past spills, waste disposals on and off-site, or other releases of hazardous materials or regulated substances, and (c) regulate workplace safety. Compliance with these laws and regulations could increase our operational costs. Violation of these laws may subject us to significant fines, penalties or disposal costs, which could negatively impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws (including those of foreign jurisdictions), a current or previous owner or operator of currently or formerly owned, leased or operated real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removing or remediating could be substantial. These laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of, and exposure to, hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. In addition, when excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing, as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property or development project. Accordingly, we may incur significant costs to defend against claims of liability, to comply with environmental regulatory requirements, to remediate any contaminated property, or to pay personal injury claims.

Moreover, environmental laws also may impose liens on property or other restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us or our Property Manager and its assignees from operating such properties.

The income we generate from SHOPs is subject to a number of operational risks including fluctuations in occupancy levels and resident fee levels, increases in the cost of food, materials, energy, labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise) or other services, rent control regulations, national and regional economic conditions, the imposition of new or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements, professional and general liability claims, and the availability and cost of professional and general liability insurance. As noted herein, we have experienced declines in occupancy at our SHOPs during 2020 that may continue in 2021. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, we rely on the personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment of our operators to set appropriate resident fees, provide accurate property-level financial results for our properties in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our SHOPs in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. We also depend on our operators to attract and retain skilled management personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our SHOPs. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force the operator to enhance pay and benefit packages to compete effectively for personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added costs by increasing the rates charged to residents. Any increase in labor costs and other property operating expenses, any failure to attract and retain qualified personnel, or significant changes in the operator’s senior management or equity ownership could adversely affect the income we receive from our SHOPs.

The operator, which is our TRS when we use this type of lease structure, of a healthcare facility is generally required to be the holder of the applicable healthcare license. Any delay in obtaining the license,

We have made investments in certain assets through joint ventures and may continue to enter into joint ventures, partnerships and other co-ownership arrangements (including preferred equity investments) in the future. In such event, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the joint venture. Investments in joint ventures may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present were a third-party not involved, including the possibility that partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt or fail to fund their required capital contributions. Co-venturers may have economic or other business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. These investments may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor the co-venturer would have full control over the joint venture. Disputes between us and co-venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers or directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. Consequently, actions by or disputes with co-venturers might result in subjecting properties owned by the joint venture to additional risk. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our co-venturers.

Our properties are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “Disabilities Act”). Under the Disabilities Act, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The Disabilities Act has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services, including restaurants and retail stores, be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The Disabilities Act’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties, or, in some cases, an award of damages. A determination that our properties do not comply with the Disabilities Act could result in liability for both governmental fines and damages. If we are required to make unanticipated major modifications to any of our properties to comply with the Disabilities Act which are determined not to be the responsibility of our tenants, we could incur unanticipated expenses that could have an adverse impact upon our cash flow.

Some of our rental income is generated by net leases, which generally provide the tenant greater discretion in using the leased property than ordinary property leases, such as the right to freely sublease the property, to make alterations in the leased premises and to terminate the lease prior to its expiration under specified circumstances. Furthermore, net leases typically have longer lease terms and, thus, there is an increased risk that contractual rental increases in future years will fail to result in fair market rental rates during those years. Moreover, inflation could erode the value of long-term leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions.

The expansion in health insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act is likely going to continue to erode in 2020 as cuts in advertising and outreach during the marketplace open-enrollment periods, shorter open enrollment periods, and other changes have left many Americans uncertain about their ability to access and be eligible for coverage. Additionally, the repeal of the individual mandate penalty included in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”), recent actions to increase the availability of insurance policies that do not include Affordable Care Act minimum benefit standards, and support for Medicaid work requirements will likely impact the market. Accordingly, current and future payments under federal and state healthcare programs may not be sufficient to sustain a facility’s operations, which could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its contractual obligations, including making rental payments under, and otherwise complying with the terms of, the facility’s leases and other agreements with us.

The Affordable Care Act includes program integrity provisions that both create new authorities and expand existing authorities for federal and state governments to address fraud, waste and abuse in federal health programs. In addition, the Affordable Care Act expands reporting requirements and responsibilities related to facility ownership and management, patient safety and care quality. In the ordinary course of their businesses, our operators may be regularly subjected to inquiries, investigations and audits by federal and state agencies that oversee these laws and regulations. If they do not comply with the additional reporting requirements and responsibilities, the ability of our operators to participate in federal health programs may be adversely affected. Moreover, there may be other aspects of the comprehensive healthcare reform legislation for which regulations have not yet been adopted, which, depending on how they are implemented, could materially and adversely affect our operators.

The Affordable Care Act also requires the reporting and return of overpayments. Healthcare providers that fail to report and return an overpayment could face potential liability under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law (“CMPL”) and exclusion from federal healthcare programs. Accordingly, if our operators fail to comply with the Affordable Care Act’s requirements, they may be subject to significant monetary penalties and excluded from participation in Medicare and Medicaid, which could materially and adversely affect their ability to pay rent and satisfy other financial obligations to us.

Our tenants may receive payments from the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations, among others. Efforts by such payors to reduce healthcare costs have intensified in recent years and will likely continue, which may result in reductions or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenants. The Medicare and Medicaid programs have adopted a variety of initiatives which have been incorporated and expanded by private insurance carriers, including health maintenance organizations and other health plans, to extract greater discounts and impose more stringent cost controls upon healthcare provider operations. Examples include, but are not limited to, changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, such as bundled payments, capitation payments and discounted fee structures. As a result, our tenants and operators may face significant limits on the reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees. All of these changes could impact the ability of our operators and tenants to pay rent or other obligations to us. In addition, operators and tenants in certain states have experienced delays; some of which are, have been, and may be late in receiving reimbursements, which have adversely affected their ability to make rent payments to us. Further, failure of any of our operators or tenants to comply with various laws and regulations could jeopardize their ability to continue participating in Medicare, Medicaid and other government-sponsored payment programs.

Transfers of healthcare facilities to successor tenants or operators are typically subject to regulatory approvals or ratifications, including, but not limited to, change of ownership approvals, zoning approvals, and Medicare and Medicaid provider arrangements that are either not required, or enjoy reduced requirements, in connection with transfers of other types of commercial operations and other types of real estate. The replacement of any tenant or operator could be delayed by the regulatory approval process of any federal, state or local government agency necessary for the transfer of the facility or the replacement of the operator licensed to manage the facility. If we are unable to find a suitable replacement tenant or operator upon favorable terms, or at all, we may take possession of a facility, which could expose us to successor liability, require us to indemnify subsequent operators to whom we transfer the operating rights and licenses, or require us to spend substantial time and funds to preserve the value of the property and adapt the facility to another use. Furthermore, transitioning to a new tenant or operator could cause disruptions at the operations of the properties and, if there is a delay in the new tenant or operator obtaining its Medicare license, delays in our ability to receive reimbursements from Medicare.

Several government initiatives have resulted in reductions in funding of the Medicare and Medicaid programs and additional changes in reimbursement regulations by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), contributing to enhanced pressure to contain healthcare costs and additional operational requirements, which has impacted the ability of our tenants and operators to make rent payments to us. The Medicare and Medicaid programs have adopted a variety of initiatives which have been incorporated and expanded by private insurance carriers, including health maintenance organizations and other health plans, to extract greater discounts and impose more stringent cost controls upon healthcare provider operations. As a result, our tenants and operators may face reductions in reimbursement rates and fees. Operators in certain states have experienced delays in receiving reimbursements, which has adversely affected

There have been numerous initiatives on the federal and state levels for comprehensive reforms affecting the payment for and availability of healthcare services. We may own and acquire skilled nursing facility assets that rely on revenue from Medicaid or Medicare. Our tenants have and may experience limited increases or reductions in Medicare payments and aspects of certain of these government initiatives, such as further reductions in funding of the Medicare and Medicaid programs, additional changes in reimbursement regulations by CMS, enhanced pressure to contain healthcare costs by Medicare, Medicaid and other payors, and additional operational requirements may adversely affect their ability to make rental payments. For example, CMS is focused on reducing what it considers to be payment errors by identifying, reporting, and implementing actions to reduce payment error vulnerabilities.

In addition, CMS is currently in the midst of transitioning Medicare from traditional fee for service reimbursement models to a capitated system, which means medical providers are given a set fee per patient regardless of treatment required, and value-based and bundled payment approaches, where the government pays a set amount for each beneficiary for a defined period of time, based on that person’s underlying medical needs, rather than based on the actual services provided. Providers and facilities are increasing responsible to care for and be financially responsible for certain populations of patients under the population health models and this shift in patient management paradigm is creating and will continue to create unprecedented challenges for providers and impact their ability to pay rent to us.

Certain of our facilities may be subject to periodic pre- and post-payment reviews and audits by governmental authorities. If the review or audit shows a facility is not in compliance with federal and state requirements, previous payments to the facility may be recouped and future payments may be denied or delayed. Recoupments, denials or delay of payments could adversely affect the profitability of our tenants and hinder their ability to make rent payments to us.

Assisted and independent living services generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Most of the resident fee revenues generated by our SHOPs, therefore, are derived from private pay sources consisting of the income or assets of residents or their family members. The rates for these residents are set by the facilities based on local market conditions and operating costs. In light of the significant expense associated with building new properties and staffing and other costs of providing services, typically only seniors with income or assets that meet or exceed the comparable region median can afford the daily resident and care fees at our SHOPs. A weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If the operators of our SHOPs are unable to attract and retain seniors that have sufficient income, assets or other resources to pay the fees associated with assisted and independent living services, the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations of our SHOPs could decline.

State regulations generally require assisted living communities to have a written lease agreement with each resident that permits the resident to terminate his or her lease for any reason on reasonable notice, unlike typical apartment lease agreements that have initial terms of one year or longer. Due to these lease termination rights and the advanced age of the residents, the resident turnover rate in our SHOPs may be difficult to predict. A large number of resident lease agreements may terminate at or around the same time, and the affected units may remain unoccupied.

There are various federal and state laws prohibiting fraudulent and abusive business practices by healthcare providers who participate in, receive payments from or are in a position to make referrals in connection with government-sponsored healthcare programs, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Our lease arrangements with certain tenants may also be subject to these fraud and abuse laws. These laws include the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce, the referral of any item or service reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid; the Federal Physician Self-Referral Prohibition (commonly referred to as the “Stark Law”), which, subject to specific exceptions, restricts physicians from making referrals for specifically designated health services for which payment may be made under Medicare or Medicaid programs to an entity with which the physician, or an immediate family member, has a financial relationship; the FCA, which prohibits any person from knowingly presenting false or fraudulent claims for payment to the federal government, including claims paid by the Medicare and Medicaid programs; and the CMPL, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to impose monetary penalties for certain fraudulent acts.

Each of these laws includes substantial criminal or civil penalties for violations that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Certain laws, such as the FCA, allow for individuals to bring whistleblower actions on behalf of the government for violations thereof. Individuals have tremendous potential financial gain in bringing whistleblower claims as the FCA statute provides that the individual will receive a portion of the money recouped. Additionally, violations of the FCA can result in treble damages. Significant enforcement activity has been the result of actions brought by these individuals. Additionally, certain states in which the facilities are located also have similar fraud and abuse laws. Federal and state adoption and enforcement of such laws increase the regulatory burden and costs, and potential liability, of healthcare providers. Investigation by a federal or state governmental body for violation of fraud and abuse laws, and these state laws have their own penalties which may be in additional to federal penalties.

Investigation by a federal or state governmental body for violation of fraud and abuse laws or imposition of any of these penalties upon one of our tenants could jeopardize that tenant’s business, its reputation, and its ability to operate or to make rent payments. Increased funding for investigation and enforcement efforts, accompanied by an increased pressure to eliminate government waste, has led to a significant increase in the number of investigations and enforcement actions over the past several years, a trend which is not anticipated to decrease considerably.

As is typical in the healthcare industry, certain types of tenants of our healthcare-related assets may often become subject to claims that their services have resulted in patient injury or other adverse effects. The insurance coverage maintained by these tenants may not cover all claims made against them or continue to be available at a reasonable cost, if at all. In some states, insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages arising from professional liability and general liability claims or litigation may not, in certain cases, be available to these tenants due to state law prohibitions or limitations of availability. As a result, these types of tenants operating in these states may be liable for punitive damage awards that are either not covered or are in excess of their insurance policy limits. Recently, there has been an increase in governmental investigations of certain healthcare providers, particularly in the area of Medicare/Medicaid false claims, as well as an increase in enforcement actions resulting from these investigations. Insurance may not available to cover such losses. Any adverse determination in a legal proceeding or governmental investigation, whether currently asserted or arising in the future, could have a material adverse effect on a tenant’s financial condition. If a tenant is unable to obtain or maintain insurance coverage, if judgments are obtained in excess of the insurance coverage, if a tenant is required to pay uninsured punitive damages, or if a tenant is subject to an uninsurable

Although our Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations intend to continue to implement industry-standard security measures, there can be no assurance that those measures will be sufficient, and any material adverse effect experienced by our Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations could, in turn, have an adverse impact on us.

We have no employees. Personnel and services that we require are provided to us under contracts with our Advisor and its affiliates including our Property Manager. We depend on our Advisor and our Property Manager to manage our operations and acquire and manage certain of our real estate assets. Our Advisor makes all decisions with respect to the management of our company, subject to the supervision of, and any guidelines established by, the board.

Thus, our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of our executive officers and other key personnel of our Advisor and its affiliates, including Edward M. Weil, Jr., our chief executive officer, and Jason Doyle, our chief financial officer. Neither our Advisor nor any of its affiliates has an employment agreement with these key personnel and we cannot guarantee that all, or any particular one, of these individuals will remain employed by our Advisor or one of its affiliates and otherwise available to continue to perform services for us. Further, we do not maintain key person life insurance on any person. We believe that our success depends, in large part, upon the ability of our Advisor to hire, retain or contract for services of highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for skilled personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that our Advisor will be successful in attracting and retaining skilled personnel. If our Advisor loses or is unable to obtain the services of key personnel, our Advisor’s ability to manage our business and implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered.

Any adverse changes in the financial condition or financial health of, or our relationship with, our Advisor or Property Manager, including any change resulting from an adverse outcome in any litigation could hinder their ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments. Additionally, changes in ownership or management practices, the occurrence of adverse events affecting our Advisor or its affiliates or other companies advised by our Advisor or its affiliates could create adverse publicity and adversely affect us and our relationship with lenders, tenants, operators or counterparties.

We may in the future acquire or originate first mortgage debt loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity or securitized loans, CMBS, preferred equity and other higher-yielding structured debt and equity investments. Doing so would expose us not only to the risks and uncertainties we are currently exposed to through our direct investments in real estate but also to additional risks and uncertainties attendant to investing in and holding these types of investments, such as:

Covenants in our Credit Facility also require us to maintain a combination of cash, cash equivalents and availability for future borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility totaling at least $50.0 million. As of December 31, 2020, we had $72.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, and $48.3 million was available for future borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. Following the amendment in August 2020, our Credit Facility also restricts our sources of liquidity. Pursuant to an amendment to our Credit Facility in August 2020, certain restrictions and conditions will no longer apply starting in the quarter in which we make an election and, as of the day prior to the commencement of the applicable quarter we have a combination of cash, cash equivalents and availability for future borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility totaling at least $100.0 million, giving effect to the aggregate amount of distributions projected to be paid by us during the applicable quarter, and our ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to consolidated total asset value (expressed as a percentage) is less than 62.5% (the “Commencement Quarter”). Until the first day of the Commencement Quarter, we must use all of the net cash proceeds from any capital event (such as an asset sale, financing or equity issuance, including this offering) to prepay amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. We may reborrow any amounts so repaid if all relevant conditions are met, including sufficient availability for future borrowings. There can be no assurance these conditions will be met.

Even if we are ultimately able to reborrow amounts generated by capital events that are required to be used to prepay the Revolving Credit Facility, there still can be no assurance as to the additional amount we will be able to generate from capital events and therefore availability under our Credit Facility giving effect to any required prepayment. Unencumbered real estate investments, at cost as of December 31, 2020 was $231.5 million, although our recently completed development property in Jupiter, Florida — representing

We have entered into, and may continue to enter into, hedging transactions to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or own real estate assets. To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments in connection with these risks, we will be exposed to credit, basis and legal enforceability risks. Derivative financial instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract.

We rely on our Advisor and its executive officers and other key real estate professionals at our Advisor and our Property Manager to identify suitable investment opportunities for us. Several of these individuals are also executive officers or key real estate professionals at AR Global and other entities advised by affiliates of AR Global. Many investment opportunities that are suitable for us may also be suitable for other entities advised by affiliates of AR Global. We do not have any agreements with any of these entities that govern the allocation of investment opportunities. Thus, the executive officers and real estate professionals at our Advisor could direct attractive investment opportunities to other entities advised by affiliates of AR Global.

We and other entities advised by affiliates of AR Global also rely on these executive officers and other key real estate professionals to supervise the property management and leasing of properties. These individuals, as well as AR Global, as an entity are not prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any business or from possessing interests in other businesses and ventures, including businesses and ventures involved in the acquisition, development, ownership, leasing or sale of real estate investments.

In addition, we may acquire properties in geographic areas where other entities advised by affiliates of AR Global own properties, and if we may acquire properties from, or sell properties to, other entities advised by affiliates of AR Global. If one of the other entities advised by affiliates of AR Global attracts a tenant that we are competing for, we could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable tenant.

We may enter into joint ventures with other entities advised by affiliates of AR Global for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties. Our Advisor may have conflicts of interest in determining which entities advised by affiliates of AR Global should enter into any particular joint venture agreement. The co-venturer may have economic or business interests or goals that are or may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. In addition, our Advisor may face a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between our interests and the interest of the affiliated co-venturer and in managing the joint venture. Due to the role of our Advisor and its affiliates, agreements and transactions between the co-venturers with respect to any joint venture will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers, which may result in the co-venturer receiving benefits greater than the benefits that we receive. In addition, we may assume liabilities related to the joint venture that exceeds the percentage of our investment in the joint venture.

Under our advisory agreement, the Advisor is entitled to substantial minimum compensation regardless of performance as well as incentive compensation. The variable base management fee payable to the Advisor under the advisory agreement increases proportionately with the cumulative net proceeds of any equity (including convertible equity and certain convertible debt but excluding proceeds from the DRIP) raised by us. In addition, the limited partnership agreement of our OP requires it to pay a subordinated incentive listing distribution to the Special Limited Partner, an affiliate of our Advisor, in connection with a listing or other liquidity event, such as the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or if we terminate the advisory agreement, even for “cause.” The Special Limited Partner is also entitled to participate in the distribution of net sales proceeds. These arrangements, coupled with the fact that the Advisor does not maintain a significant equity interest in us, may result in the Advisor taking actions or recommending investments that are riskier or more speculative than an advisor with a more significant investment in us might take or recommend. In addition, these fees reduce the cash available for investment or other corporate purposes.

Our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange and there is otherwise no active trading market for the shares and our SRP is suspended. Even if not suspended, our SRP includes numerous restrictions that limit a stockholder’s ability to sell shares of common stock to us, including limiting repurchases only to stockholders that have died or become disabled, limiting the total value of repurchases pursuant to our SRP to the amount of proceeds received from issuances of common stock pursuant to the DRIP and limiting repurchases in any fiscal semester to 2.5% of the average number of shares outstanding during the previous fiscal year. These limits are subject to the authority of the board to identify another source of funds for repurchases under the SRP. The board may also reject any request for repurchase of

The price at which shares of our common stock may be sold under the DRIP and the price at which shares of our common stock may be repurchased by us pursuant to the SRP are based on Estimated Per-Share NAV and may not reflect the price that our stockholders would receive for their shares in a market transaction, the proceeds that would be received upon our liquidation or the price that a third-party would pay to acquire us.

Our board estimates the per-share net asset value of our common stock only on an annual basis. In connection with any valuation, the board estimate of the value of our real estate and real estate-related assets will be partly based on appraisals of our properties. Because the process of making this estimate is conducted annually, this process may not account for material events that occur after the estimate has been completed for that year. Material events could include the appraised value of our properties substantially changing actual property operating results differing from what we originally budgeted or dividends and other distributions to stockholders exceeding cash flow generated by us. Any such material event could cause a change in the Estimated Per-Share NAV that would not be reflected until the next valuation. Also, dividends and other distributions in excess of our cash flows provided by operations could decrease our Estimated Per-Share NAV. Estimated Per-Share NAV will not be adjusted for stock dividends paid or that may be paid in the future until the board determines a new Estimated Per-Share NAV. Dividends paid in the form of additional shares of common stock will, all things equal, cause the value of each share of common stock to decline because the number of shares outstanding will increase when dividends paid in stock are issued; however, each common stockholder will receive the same number of new shares, the total value of our common stockholders’ investment, all things equal, will not change assuming no sales or other transfers.

If the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of the OP as a partnership or disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the OP would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that the OP could make to us. This also would result in our failing to qualify as a REIT, and becoming subject to a corporate-level tax on our income. This substantially would reduce our cash available to pay dividends and other distributions to our stockholders. In addition, if any of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which the OP owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership and is otherwise not disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the partnership or limited liability company would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to the OP. Such a recharacterization of an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain our REIT qualification.

In general, under the REIT rules, we cannot directly operate any of our seniors housing properties that are “qualified health care properties” and can only indirectly participate in the operation of “qualified health care properties” on an after-tax basis by leasing those properties to independent health care facility operators or to TRSs. A “qualified health care property” is any real property (and any personal property incident to that real property) which is, or is necessary or incidental to the use of, a hospital, nursing facility, assisted living facilities, congregate care facility, qualified continuing care facility, or other licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary services to patients and is operated by a provider of those services that is eligible for participation in the Medicare program with respect to that facility. Furthermore, rent paid by a lessee of a “qualified health care property” that is a “related party tenant” of ours will not be qualifying income for purposes of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs. However, a TRS that leases “qualified health care properties” from us will not be treated as a “related party tenant” with respect to our “qualified health care properties” that are managed by an “eligible independent contractor.”

An “eligible independent contractor” is an independent contractor that, at the time such contractor enters into a management or other agreement with a TRS to operate a “qualified health care property,” is actively engaged in the trade or business of operating “qualified health care properties” for any person not related to us or the TRS. Among other requirements to qualify as an independent contractor, a manager must not own, directly or applying attribution provisions of the Code, more than 35% of the shares of our outstanding stock (by value), and no person or group of persons can own more than 35% of the shares of our outstanding stock and 35% of the ownership interests of the manager (taking into account only owners of more than 5% of our shares and, with respect to ownership interest in such managers that are publicly traded, only holders of more than 5% of such ownership interests). The ownership attribution rules that apply for purposes of the 35% thresholds are complex. There can be no assurance that the levels of ownership of our shares by our managers and their owners will not be exceeded.

To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income tests, under which specified percentages of our gross income must be derived from certain sources, such as “rents from real property.” Rent paid by TRSs to the OP pursuant to the lease of our “qualified health care properties” will constitute a substantial portion of our gross income. For that rent to qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of the REIT gross income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. If our leases are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may fail to qualify as a REIT.

Currently, the maximum tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is 23.8%, including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for this reduced rate and, as described above, through December 31, 2025, will be subject to an effective rate of 33.4%, including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income. Although this does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stock of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including shares of our stock. Tax rates could be changed in future legislation.

The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets, or in certain cases to hedge previously acquired hedges entered into to manage risks associated with property that has been disposed of or liabilities that have been extinguished, if properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because the TRS would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in a TRS generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income of the TRS.

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually and that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and certain kinds of mortgage-related securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than securities that qualify for the 75% asset test and securities of qualified REIT subsidiaries and TRSs) generally cannot exceed 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer, 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer, or 5% of the value of our assets as to any one issuer. In addition, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs and no more than 25% of our assets may consist of publicly offered REIT debt instruments that do not otherwise qualify under the 75% asset test. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate assets from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Our charter provides that our board may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. While we intend to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may terminate our REIT election if we determine that qualifying as a REIT is no longer in our best interests. If we cease to be a REIT, we would become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income (as well as any applicable state and local corporate tax) and would no longer be required to distribute most of our taxable

On April 2, 2021, we published an Estimated Per-Share NAV equal to $14.50 as of December 31, 2020. Our previous Estimated Per-Share NAV was equal to $15.75 as of December 31, 2019. Unlike the per share amounts in this prospectus, the Estimated Per-Share NAV has not been retroactively adjusted to reflect the payment of dividends in the form of common stock and will not be adjusted for stock dividends paid or that may be paid in the future until the board determines a new Estimated Per-Share NAV. Dividends paid in the form of additional shares of common stock will, all things equal, cause the value of each share of common stock to decline because the number of shares outstanding will increase when dividends paid in stock are issued; however, each stockholder will receive the same number of new shares, the total value of our common stockholder’s investment, all things equal, will not change assuming no sales or other transfers. Unless we list our common stock on a national securities exchange, we intend to publish Estimated Per-Share NAV at least once annually.

The economic uncertainty created by the COVID-19 global pandemic has created several risks and uncertainties that may impact our business, including our future results of operations and our liquidity. A pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of a contagious disease, such as the ongoing global pandemic of COVID-19 affecting states or regions in which we or our tenants operate could have material and adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The ultimate impact on our results of operations, our liquidity and the ability of our tenants to continue to pay us rent will depend on numerous

The Advisor has responded to the challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Beginning in early March, the Advisor took proactive steps to prepare for and actively mitigate the inevitable disruption COVID-19 would cause, such as enacting safety measures, both required or recommended by local and federal authorities, including remote working policies, cooperation with localized closure or curfew directives, and social distancing measures at all of our properties. Additionally, there has been no material adverse impact on our financial reporting systems or internal controls and procedures and the Advisor’s ability to perform services for us. In light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, we are supplementing the historical discussion of our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 with a current update on the measures we have taken to mitigate the negative impacts of the pandemic on our business and future results of operations.

We have taken several steps to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on our business. For rent collections, we have been in direct contact with our tenants and operators since the crisis began, cultivating open dialogue and deepening the fundamental relationships that we have carefully developed through prior transactions and historic operations. Based on this approach and the overall financial strength and creditworthiness of our tenants, we believe that we have had positive results in our cash rent collections during this pandemic.

Starting in March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic and measures to prevent its spread began to affect us in a number of ways. In our SHOP portfolio, occupancy has trended lower since the second half of March 2020 as government policies and implementation of infection control best practices and prospective residents’ concerns about communal-setting COVID-19 spread and prospective residents’ concerns about communal-setting COVID-19 spread limited resident move-ins. These and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have affected and could continue to affect our ability to fill vacancies. We have also continued to experience lower inquiry volumes and reduced in-person tours during the pandemic. SHOP occupancy has continued to decline from 84.1% as of March 31, 2020, to 79.5% as of June 30, 2020, to 77.9%, as of September 30, 2020 and 75.1% as of December 31, 2020. The declines in revenue we experienced during the fourth quarter were primarily attributable to this decline in occupancy which also represented a decline from December 31, 2019, when SHOP occupancy was 85.7%. In addition, starting in mid-March, operating costs began to rise materially, including for services, labor and personal protective equipment and other supplies, as our operators took appropriate actions to protect residents and caregivers. At our SHOP facilities, we bear these cost increases. These trends accelerated during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020 and into the beginning of the first quarter of 2021 as the surge of new COVID-19 cases that started in late 2020 crested, and may continue to impact us in the and have a material adverse effect on our revenues and income in the other quarters thereafter. We believe that, as infections decline and more vaccinations are administered during 2021, our occupancy will stop declining, and may start to increase, but there can be no assurance as to when or if we will be able to approach pre-pandemic levels of occupancy.

The pandemic raises the risk of an elevated level of resident exposure to illness and restrictions on move-ins at our SHOPs, which has and could also continue to adversely impact occupancy and revenues as well as increase costs. We believe that the actions we have taken help reduce the incidences of COVID-19 at our properties, but there can be no assurance in this regard. There have been some incidences of COVID-19 among the residents and staff at certain of our seniors housing properties. Further incidences, or the perception that outbreaks may occur, could materially and adversely affect our revenues and income, as well as cause reputational harm to us and our tenants, managers and operators.

The extent to which the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic, including the outbreaks that have occurred and may occur in markets where we own properties, impacts our operations and those of our tenants and third-party operators, will continue to depend on future developments, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, and the actions taken to contain the COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, but could be material.

On March 27, 2020, Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law and it provides funding to Medicare providers in order to provide financial relief during the

The value of in-place leases, exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases, is amortized to expense over the remaining periods of the respective leases.

The value of customer relationship intangibles, if any, is amortized to expense over the initial term and any renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and customer relationship intangibles is charged to expense.

Assumed mortgage premiums or discounts are amortized as an increase or reduction to interest expense over the remaining terms of the respective mortgages.

Capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of revenue from tenants over the remaining terms of the respective leases and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to revenue from tenants over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases. If a tenant with a below-market rent renewal does not renew, any remaining unamortized amount will be taken into income at that time.

Capitalized above-market ground lease values are amortized as a reduction of property operating expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Capitalized below-market ground lease values are amortized as an increase to property operating expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases and expected below-market renewal option periods.

The Company has a stock-based incentive award program for its directors, which is accounted for under the guidance of share based payments. The cost of services received in exchange for these stock awards is measured at the grant date fair value of the award and the expense for such awards is included in general and administrative expenses and is recognized over the service period (i.e., vesting) required or when the requirements for exercise of the award have been met.

See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further discussion.

We operate in three reportable business segments for management and internal financial reporting purposes: MOBs, triple-net leased healthcare facilities, and SHOPs. In our MOB operating segment, we own, manage and lease single and multi-tenant MOBs where tenants are required to pay their pro rata share of property operating expenses, which may be subject to expense exclusions and floors, in addition to base rent. In our triple-net leased healthcare facilities operating segment, we own, manage and lease seniors housing properties, hospitals, post-acute care and skilled nursing facilities throughout the United States under long-term triple-net leases, and tenants are generally directly responsible for all operating costs of the respective properties. Our Property Manager or third party managers manage our MOBs and our triple-net leased healthcare facilities. In our SHOP segment, we invest in seniors housing properties using the RIDEA structure. As of December 31, 2020, we had seven eligible independent contractors operating 59 SHOPs (not including two land parcels). All of our properties across all three business segments are located throughout the United States.

Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $78.8 million and $88.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The following table shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and the year to year change by line item of the consolidated statements of operations:

Some of our properties move between our operating segments, for example if they are converted from being triple-net leased to third parties in our triple-net leased healthcare facilities segment to being leased to our TRS and operated and managed on our behalf by a third-party operator in our SHOP segment. When transfers between segments occur, we reclassify the operating results of the transferred properties to their current segment for both the current and all historical periods in order to present a consistent group of property results. See Note 3 — Real Estate Investments, Net — “Impairments” and “Held for Use Assets” and Note 15 — Segment Reporting to our consolidated financial statements included in elsewhere in this prospectus for additional information.

Over the last three years, we have had properties transfer between operating segments. Upon such transfers the Company retroactively restates the historical operating results for the segment for all periods

In addition, we also generated a portion of our SHOP revenue from skilled nursing facilities (which include ancillary revenue from non-residents) at four of our Same Store SHOPs. This revenue declined $2.1 million from $15.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 to $13.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 as a result of us limiting the services we offer at our skilled nursing facilities, during the COVID-19 pandemic, to protect our residents and on-site staff. We also offered COVID-related rent concessions of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. These revenue decreases were partially offset by $1.3 million in COVID-19 surcharges we began billing residents for Personal Protective Equipment (“PPE”) during the quarter ended September 30, 2020, and less bad debt expense of $3.1 million relating to the LaSalle tenant, as described further below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, property operating and maintenance expenses increased $10.7 million in our SHOP segment as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to an increase of $13.6 million due to our SHOP Acquisition properties and an increase of $3.7 million in our Same Store properties, which includes our Transition Properties. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in property operating and maintenance expenses from our Dispositions of $6.6 million.

The total increase in Same Store operating costs mainly related to costs incurred from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic which totaled $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was partially offset by $3.6 million of funds received through the CARES Act. The full amount of the CARES Act funds was recognized as a reduction to our Same Store property operating expenses in the table above for the year ended December 31, 2020. As a result we experienced an increase in Same Store operating costs of $3.7 million year over year. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we received an additional $5.1 million in funding through the CARES Act which will be recognized as a reduction to our Same Store property operating expenses in the quarter ending March 31, 2021. There can be no assurance that the program will be extended or any further amounts received. See the “— Overview — Management Update on the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic” section above for additional information on the risks and uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and management’s actions taken in response.

On July 1, 2020, we transitioned the LaSalle Properties from our triple-net leased healthcare facilities segment to our SHOP segment, and the LaSalle Properties are now leased to our TRS and operated and managed on our behalf by a third-party operator. Beginning with our reporting for the period ended December 31, 2020 these properties are part of the “Transition Properties” and the resultant change has been applied retrospectively to historical periods.

As of December 31, 2020, the prior tenants at the LaSalle Properties remain in default of a forbearance agreement as described in more detail under “Note 3 — Real Estate Investments, Net — The LaSalle Tenant” and owe us $12.7 million of rent, property taxes, late fees, and interest receivable thereunder.

We have the entire receivable balance, including any monetary damages, and related income from the LaSalle Properties fully reserved as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. We incurred bad debt expense, including straight-line rent write-offs of $0.4 million and $3.5 million, related to the LaSalle Properties during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which is included as a reduction in revenue from tenants on the consolidated statement of operations.

Now that the transition is complete, we have gained more control over the operations of the LaSalle Properties, and we believe this will allow us to improve performance and the cash flows generated by the

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we completed the acquisitions of two multi-tenant MOBs, three single tenant MOBs and four SHOP for an aggregate contract purchase price of $109.6 million. The acquisition of one multi-tenant MOB for a contract purchase price of $5.7 million, was completed during the three months ended December 31, 2020. The properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2020 are located in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida and comprise approximately 340,783 square feet and were funded with proceeds from financings (including amounts borrowed under our Credit Facility), the assumption of the $13.9 million mortgage in an acquisition, and cash on hand.

We acquired one property subsequent to December 31, 2020 for $6.6 million and have signed PSAs to acquire two medical office buildings located in Ohio and Oklahoma, respectively, for an aggregate contract purchase price of approximately $10.1 million. We have also signed an LOI to acquire four medical office buildings located in New York for an aggregate contract purchase price of approximately $19.7 million. We anticipate using cash on hand and proceeds from borrowings under our Credit Facility to fund the consideration required to complete these acquisitions. The PSAs are subject to conditions and the LOI is non-binding. There can be no assurance we will complete any of these acquisitions, or any future acquisitions or other investments, on a timely basis or on acceptable terms and conditions, if at all.

In November 2020, we purchased all of the outstanding membership interests in the joint venture that owns the UnityPoint Clinics in Muscatine, Iowa and Moline, Illinois for approximately $0.6 million, funded with cash on hand. Following this transaction, the properties were wholly owned by us and added to the borrowing base under our Credit Facility.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we sold nine properties (one MOB in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, seven SHOPs in Michigan and one skilled nursing facility in Lutz, Florida) for an aggregate contract price of $40.4 million, which resulted in an aggregate gain on sale of $5.2 million. Eight of these properties (seven SHOPs and one skilled nursing facility) were sold in the fourth quarter of 2020 and had an aggregate purchase price of $31.8 million, which resulted in an aggregate gain on sale of $2.9 million. The property in Lutz, Florida and the four Michigan properties were part of the borrowing base under the Credit Facility, and one of the Michigan properties was part of the Capital One Fannie Mae Credit Facility. The remaining two Michigan properties were unencumbered.

With respect to the sale of the Michigan SHOPs, in November 2020, we received payment of the full $11.8 million sales price for all 11 of the Michigan SHOPs, less $0.8 million held in escrow, and transferred seven of the properties to the buyer. The remaining four properties were transferred to the buyer at a second closing in January 2021 when the $0.8 million held in escrow was released to the buyer. Of the properties transferred at the second closing, three were part of the borrowing base under the Credit Facility until the initial closing and one was unencumbered. At the initial closing, $4.2 million of the net proceeds was used to repay amounts outstanding under the Fannie Mae Master Credit Facility with Capital One, $4.4 million of the net proceeds were used to repay amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility, with the remainder used for closing costs. Following the sale of the skilled nursing facility in Lutz, Florida, all $17.6 million of the net proceeds were used to repay amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility.