UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
o REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
o SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 001-39355
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
British Columbia, Canada
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor
New York, New York 10281-1023
(Address of principal executive offices)
Jennifer Mazin
250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor
New York, New York 10281-1023
Telephone: 212-417-7000
enquiries@brookfieldrenewable.com
(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | | | | | | | |
| Title of Class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Class A Exchangeable Subordinate Voting Shares | BEPC | New York Stock Exchange, Toronto Stock Exchange |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
179,651,526 Class A Exchangeable Subordinate Voting Shares as of December 31, 2023
165 Class B Multiple Voting Shares as of December 31, 2023
194,460,874 Class C Non-Voting Shares as of December 31, 2023
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ☐
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer x | | Accelerated filer o | | Non-accelerated filer o |
| | | | |
| | | | Emerging growth company ☐ |
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. x
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
o U.S. GAAP | | x International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board | | o Other |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 o Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| ITEM 16A. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16B. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16C. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16D. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16E. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16F. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16G. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16H. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16I. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16J. | | |
| | | |
| ITEM 16K. | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
INTRODUCTION AND USE OF CERTAIN TERMS
Unless the context requires otherwise, when used in this annual report on Form 20-F (this “Form 20-F”), the terms “our company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Brookfield Renewable Corporation and its direct and indirect operating entities as a group; “Brookfield Renewable” and “our group”, refer to Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and its controlled entities, including BRELP, the Holding Entities, BEPC and the Operating Entities, each as defined in this Form 20-F; “the partnership” refers, unless the context indicates or requires otherwise, to Brookfield Renewable and its controlled subsidiaries, excluding our company; and “Brookfield” refers to Brookfield Corporation and its subsidiaries (other than Brookfield Renewable) and unless the context otherwise requires, includes Brookfield Asset Management (as defined in this Form 20F). All references to “our portfolio” include 100% of the capacity and energy of the facilities even though we do not own 100% of our economic output of such facilities (see the table under Item 4.B. “Business Overview — Our Operations” for details on our portfolio). Unless the context suggests otherwise, references to:
“2011 Bond Indenture” means the amended and restated indenture, dated November 23, 2011, among Canadian Finco. The Bank of New York Mellon and BNY Trust Company of Canada, as amended and restated from time to time, governing the Canadian Bonds.
“2021 Bond Indenture” means the indenture, dated August 11, 2021, between Canadian Finco and Computershare Trust Company of Canada.
“Adjusted EBITDA” means revenues less direct costs (including energy marketing costs) and other income, before the effects of interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, management service costs, non-controlling interests, unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments, non-cash gain or loss from equity-accounted investments, distributions to preferred limited partners and other typical non-recurring items. Our company includes realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or we did not intend to hold over the long-term within Adjusted EBITDA in order to provide additional insight regarding the performance of investments on a cumulative realized basis, including any unrealized fair value adjustments that were recorded in equity and not otherwise reflected in current period net income. Refer to “Cautionary Statement Regarding Use of Non-IFRS Measures”.
“Affiliate” or “affiliate” of any person is a person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such person.
“Asset Management Company” means Brookfield Asset Management ULC, which is owned 75% by Brookfield Corporation and 25% by Brookfield Asset Management.
“base management fee” has the meaning given to it under Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management — The Master Services Agreement — Management Fee”.
“BCBCA” means the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia).
“BEM LP” means Brookfield Energy Marketing LP, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Brookfield Corporation.
“BEP” means, unless the context requires otherwise, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
“BEP call right” has the meaning given to it under Item 10.E “Taxation — Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations”.
“BEP unit convertibles” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Collateral Account”.
“BEP’s Annual Report” means BEP’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, as amended (filed in Canada with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities in lieu of an annual information form), which includes BEP’s audited consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, together with the reports thereon of the independent registered public accounting firm and management’s discussion and analysis of BEP as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023.
“BEP’s general partner” means Brookfield Renewable Partners Limited, which serves as BEP’s general partner.
“BEP’s limited partnership agreement” means the fourth amended and restated limited partnership agreement of BEP, dated May 3, 2016, as amended from time to time.
“BEPC” means, unless the context requires otherwise, Brookfield Renewable Corporation.
“BEPC articles” means the notice of articles and articles of BEPC.
“BEPC audit committee” means the audit committee of the board of directors of BEPC.
“BEPC board” or “our board of directors” means the board of directors of BEPC.
“BEPC class B shares” means the class B multiple voting shares in the capital of BEPC, as further described under Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association — BEPC Class B Shares”, and “BEPC class B share” means any one of them.
“BEPC class C shares” means the class C non-voting shares in the capital of BEPC, as further described under Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Class C Shares”, and “BEPC class C share” means any one of them.
“BEPC committees” means the BEPC audit committee and the BEPC nominating and governance committee.
“BEPC Ethics code” has the meaning given to it under Item 6.C “Board Practices—Code of Business Conduct and Ethics”.
“BEPC exchangeable dividend” has the meaning given to it under Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Dividends”.
“BEPC exchangeable shares” means the class A exchangeable subordinate voting shares in the capital of BEPC, as further described under Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares”, and “BEPC exchangeable share” means any one of them.
“BEPC nominating and governance committee” means the nominating and governance committee of the board of directors of BEPC.
“BEPC notice” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Satisfaction of Secondary Exchange Rights”.
“BEPC pre-approval policy” means the written policy on auditor independence of the BEPC board.
“BEPC preferred shares” has the meaning given to it under Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association”.
“BEPC Voting Agreements” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—BEPC Voting Agreements”.
“Bermuda Partnership Acts” means the Bermuda Exempted Partnerships Act 1992 (as amended) together with the Bermuda Limited Partnership Act 1883 (as amended).
“BESS” means battery energy storage system.
“BPUSHA” means Brookfield Power US Holding America Co.
“BRELP’s limited partnership agreement” means the fourth amended and restated limited partnership agreement of BRELP, dated December 30, 2020, as amended from time to time.
“BRELP” means Brookfield Renewable Energy L.P.
“BRELP Class A Preferred Units” means the Class A Preferred Limited Partnership Units, issuable in series, of BRELP.
“Brookfield” means Brookfield Corporation and its subsidiaries, or any one or more of them, as the context requires, other than entities in our group and unless the context otherwise requires, includes Brookfield Asset Management.
“Brookfield Accounts” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
“Brookfield Asset Management” means Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
“Brookfield Business Partners” means Brookfield Business Partners L.P.
“Brookfield Holders” means Brookfield, Brookfield Reinsurance and their related parties.
“Brookfield Insurance Accounts” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts Relating to Investments”.
“Brookfield Personnel” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
“Brookfield Reinsurance” means Brookfield Reinsurance Ltd. and any subsidiary of Brookfield Reinsurance Ltd., as the context requires.
“Brookfield Relationship Agreement” means the Amended and Restated Relationship Agreement, dated May 5, 2023, by and among Brookfield Corporation, BEP, BRELP, the Service Provider and others.
“Brookfield Renewable” or “our group” means BEP collectively with BRELP, the Holding Entities, BEPC, and the Operating Entities, or any one or more of them, as the context requires.
“BRP Equity” means Brookfield Renewable Power Preferred Equity Inc.
“BRPI” means Brookfield Renewable Power Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Brookfield Corporation.
“BRTM” means Brookfield Renewable Trading and Marketing LP, which is a subsidiary of Brookfield Renewable.
“Cameco” means Cameco Corporation.
“Canada SubCo” means BEP Subco Inc.
“Canadian Bonds” means all outstanding bonds issued by Canadian Finco pursuant to the 2011 Bond Indenture and the 2021 Bond Indenture, as applicable.
“Canadian Finco” means Brookfield Renewable Partners ULC.
“CCS” means carbon capture and storage.
“CDS” means CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc.
“CEE Funds” means the Germany based asset manager that holds renewable energy funds targeting low-risk renewable investments, which is a portfolio company of Brookfield Corporation.
“Class A Preference Shares” means BRP Equity’s Class A Preference Shares, issuable in series.
“Code” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
“CODM” has the meaning given to it under Item 5.A “Operating Results—PART 4—Financial Performance Review on Proportionate Information”.
“collateral account” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Collateral Account”.
“collateral account balance” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Collateral Account”.
“collateral account BEP unit balance” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Collateral Account”.
“Conflicts Protocols” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
“CPI” means the Canadian consumer price index.
“CRA” means the Canada Revenue Agency.
“CSP” means concentrated solar power.
“DG” means distributed generation.
“DTC” means The Depository Trust Company.
“EDGAR” means the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system administered by the SEC.
“EISP” has the meaning given to it under Item 16K “Cybersecurity — Risk Management and Strategy”.
“Energy Marketing Agreement” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Energy Marketing Agreement”.
“Energy Marketing Internalization” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Energy Marketing Internalization”.
“Energy Revenue Agreement” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Energy Revenue Agreement”.
“Equity Commitment Agreement” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Equity Commitment Agreement”.
“ESG” means environmental, social and governance.
“EURIBOR” means the European Interbank Offered Rate.
“Euro Holdco” means Brookfield BRP Europe Holdings (Bermuda) Limited.
“Exchange Act” means the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“exchanging BEPC shareholder notice” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Satisfaction of Secondary Exchange Rights”.
“FATCA” has the meaning given to it under Item 3.D “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Taxation”.
“FCPA” has the meaning given to it under Item 3.D “Risk Factors — General Risk Factors — Our group may suffer a significant loss resulting from fraud, bribery, corruption, other illegal acts, inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, or from external events.”
“FERC” means the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
“FHSA” means first home savings account.
“Form 20-F” means this annual report filed on Form 20-F, unless the context requires otherwise.
“FPA” means the Federal Power Act.
“Funds From Operations” means Adjusted EBITDA less interest, current income taxes, management service costs and distributions to preferred limited partners, before the effects of certain cash items (e.g., acquisition costs and other typical non-recurring cash items) and certain non-cash items (e.g. deferred income taxes, depreciation, non-cash portion of non-controlling interests, unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments, non-cash gain or loss from equity-accounted investments, and other non-cash items) as these are not reflective of the performance of the underlying business. Refer to “Cautionary Statement Regarding Use of Non-IFRS Measures”.
“GLPL” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Other Power Agreements”.
“GW” means gigawatt.
“GWh” means gigawatt hour.
“Holding Entities” means LATAM Holdco, NA Holdco and Euro Holdco and any other direct wholly-owned subsidiary of BRELP created or acquired after the date of BRELP’s limited partnership agreement.
“HSS&E” means Health, Safety, Security and Environmental.
“Hydro Holdings” has the meaning given to it under Item 4.B “Business Overview—Current Operations”.
“IASB” means the International Accounting Standards Board.
“IFRS” means the International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the IASB.
“Inflation Reduction Act” means the United States Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (H.R.5376), as amended, including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“Investment Company Act” means the United States Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated under such Act.
“IRS” means the United States Internal Revenue Service.
“Isagen” means Isagen S.A. E.S.P.
“LATAM Holdco” means BRP Bermuda Holdings I Limited.
“Licensing Agreement” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Licensing Agreement”.
“LP unitholders” or “BEP unitholders” mean holders of BEP units.
“LP units” or “BEP units” mean the non-voting limited partnership units in the capital of BEP, other than the preferred units, including any LP units issued pursuant to the Redemption-Exchange Mechanism or pursuant to the exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares.
“LTA” means long-term average.
“Managing General Partner” means Brookfield Renewable Partners Limited, which serves as BEP’s general partner.
“Master Services Agreement” means the fifth amended and restated master services agreement dated May 5, 2023, among our company, BEP, BRELP, Brookfield Corporation, the Service Recipients, the Service Provider and others, as amended from time to time.
“MI 61-101” means Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions.
“MPT” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Other Power Agreements”.
“MRE” means the hydrological balancing pool administered by the government of Brazil.
“MW” means megawatt.
“MWh” means megawatt hour.
“NA Holdco” means Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc.
“Non-Controlled Affiliate” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
“non-resident holder” has the meaning given to it under Item 10.E “Taxation—Taxation of Holders Not Resident in Canada”.
“Non-U.S. Holder” has the meaning given to it under Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations”.
“NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange.
“Oaktree” means Oaktree Capital Group, LLC together with its affiliates.
“Oaktree Accounts” means Oaktree-managed funds and accounts.
“Operating Entities” means the subsidiaries of the Holding Entities which, from time to time, directly or indirectly hold, or may in the future hold, assets or operations, including any assets or operations held through joint ventures, partnerships and consortium arrangements.
“Perpetual Note Guarantors” means, collectively, BEP, BRELP, LATAM Holdco, Euro Holdco and Canada SubCo.
“Perpetual Notes” means the Series 1 Perpetual Notes and the Series 2 Perpetual Notes issued by NA Holdco.
“PFIC” has the meaning given to it under Item 10.E “Taxation — Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations”.
“PPA” means a power purchase agreement, power guarantee agreement or similar long-term agreement between a seller and buyer of electrical power generation.
“preferred units” means the preferred limited partnership units in the capital of BEP.
“PSG” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
“public TerraForm Power shares” has the meaning given to it under Item 5.A “Operating Results—Continuity of Interest”.
“PUHCA” means the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005.
“RDSP” means registered disability savings plan.
“Redeemable/Exchangeable partnership unit” means a limited partnership unit of BRELP that has the rights of the Redemption-Exchange Mechanism.
“Redemption-Exchange Mechanism” means the mechanism by which Brookfield may request redemption of its limited partnership interests in BRELP in whole or in part in exchange for cash, subject to the right of Brookfield Renewable to acquire such interests (in lieu of such redemption) in exchange for BEP units.
“Registration Rights Agreement” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Registration Rights Agreement”.
“required collateral account balance” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Collateral Account”.
“required collateral account cash balance” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Collateral Account”.
“resident holder” has the meaning given to it in Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of Holders Resident in Canada”.
“RESP” means registered education savings plan.
“rights agent” means Wilmington Trust, National Association.
“RRIF” means registered retirement income fund.
“RRSP” means registered retirement savings plan.
“Sarbanes-Oxley Act” means the United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
“secondary exchange rights” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Appointment of Rights Agent; Term”.
“SEDAR+” means the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval administered by the Canadian Securities Administrators.
“Series 1 Perpetual Notes” means the 4.625% perpetual subordinated notes of NA Holdco issued on April 15, 2021.
“Series 2 Perpetual Notes” means the 4.875% perpetual subordinated notes of NA Holdco issued on December 9, 2021.
“Service Provider” has the meaning ascribed thereto in the Master Services Agreement.
“Service Recipients” has the meaning ascribed thereto in the Master Services Agreement.
“SHPP” means a small hydroelectric power plant, which is a category of hydro power facilities in Brazil with 30 MW of capacity or less.
“SOFR” means the Secured Overnight Financing Rate published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (or a successor administrator).
“special distribution” means the distribution of our BEPC exchangeable shares on July 30, 2020 by BEP to the holders of BEP units of record as of July 27, 2020.
“specified exchange date” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Appointment of Rights Agent; Term”.
“subject BEPC exchangeable share” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement—Appointment of Rights Agent; Term”.
“Subordinated Credit Facilities” has the meaning given to it under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Subordinated Credit Facilities”.
“Tax Act” means the Canadian Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1. (5th Supp), as amended, including the regulations promulgated under such Act.
“TerraForm Power” or “TERP” means TerraForm Power, Inc. and as the context requires its successor entities.
“TerraForm Power acquisition” has the meaning given to it under Item 5.A “Operating Results —Continuity of Interest”.
“TFSA” means tax-free savings account.
“TJLP” means Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo.
“Treasury Regulations” means the U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code.
“TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange.
“TWh” means terawatt hour.
“unpaid accrued dividends” has the meaning given to it under Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Dividends”.
“Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act” means the United States Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (H.R. 1155), as amended, including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“U.S.” or “United States” means the United States of America.
“U.S. GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States that the SEC has identified as having substantial authoritative support, as supplemented by Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act, as amended from time to time.
“U.S. Holder” has the meaning given to it under Item 10.E “Taxation— Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations”.
“U.S. Securities Act” means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“Westinghouse” means Westinghouse Electric Company.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 20-F contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, concerning the business and operations of Brookfield Renewable (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements may include estimates, plans, expectations, opinions, forecasts, projections, guidance or other statements that are not statements of fact. Forward-looking statements in this Form 20-F include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the quality of Brookfield Renewable’s assets and the resiliency of the cash flow they will generate, our anticipated financial performance, future commissioning of assets, contracted portfolio, technology diversification, acquisition opportunities, expected completion of acquisitions and dispositions, future energy prices and demand for electricity, economic recovery, achieving long-term average generation, project development and capital expenditure costs, energy policies, economic growth, growth potential of the renewable asset class, our future growth prospects and distribution profile, our access to capital, future dividends and distributions made to holders of BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “potentially”, “tends”, “continue”, “attempts��, “likely”, “primarily”, “approximately”, “endeavors”, “pursues”, “strives”, “seeks”, “targets”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases, or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. These forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts but reflect our current expectations regarding future results or events and are based on information currently available to us and on assumptions we believe are reasonable.
Although we believe that our anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements and information in this Form 20-F are based upon reasonable assumptions and expectations, we cannot assure you that such expectations will prove to have been correct. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information as such statements and information involve assumptions known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and information. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us or are within our control. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations and our plans and strategies may vary materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements and forward-looking information herein.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
•general economic conditions and risks relating to the economy, including unfavorable changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, inflation and volatility in the financial markets;
•changes to resource availability, as a result of climate change or otherwise, at any of our group’s renewable power facilities;
•supply, demand, volatility and marketing in the energy markets;
•our group’s inability to re-negotiate or replace expiring contracts (including PPA’s, power guarantee agreements or similar long-term agreements between a seller and a buyer of electrical power generation) on similar terms;
•an increase in the amount of uncontracted generation in our group’s renewable power portfolio or a change in the contract profile for future renewable power projects;
•availability and access to interconnection facilities and transmission systems;
•our group’s ability to comply with, secure, replace or renew concessions, licenses, permits and other governmental approvals needed for our operating and development projects;
•our group’s real property rights for our facilities being adversely affected by the rights of lienholders and leaseholders that are superior to those granted to our group;
•increases in the cost of operating our existing facilities and of developing new projects;
•equipment failures and procurement challenges;
•increased regulation of and third party opposition to our group’s nuclear service business’s customers and operations;
•failure of the nuclear power industry to expand;
•insufficient indemnification for our group’s nuclear services business;
•our group’s reliance on computerized business systems, which could expose our group to cyber-attacks;
•dam failures and the costs and potential liabilities associated with such failures;
•uninsurable losses and higher insurance premiums;
•energy marketing risks and our ability to manage commodity and financial risk;
•the termination of, or a change to, the MRE;
•involvement in litigation and other disputes, and governmental and regulatory investigations;
•counterparties to our group’s contracts not fulfilling their obligations;
•the time and expense of enforcing contracts against non-performing counterparties and the uncertainty of success;
•foreign laws or regulation to which our group becomes subject as a result of future acquisitions in new markets;
•our group’s operations being affected by local communities;
•newly developed technologies or new business lines in which our group invests not performing as anticipated;
•advances in technology that impair or eliminate the competitive advantage of our projects;
•increases in water rental costs (or similar fees) or changes to the regulation of water supply;
•labor disruptions and economically unfavorable collective bargaining agreements;
•our group’s inability to finance our operations and fund growth due to the status of the capital markets or our group’s ability to complete capital recycling initiatives;
•operating and financial restrictions imposed on us by our group’s loan, debt and security agreements;
•changes to our group’s credit ratings;
•the incurrence of debt at multiple levels within our group’s organizational structure;
•restrictions on our ability to engage in certain activities or make distributions due to our indebtedness;
•adverse changes in currency exchange rates and our inability to effectively manage foreign currency exposure through our group’s hedging strategy or otherwise;
•our group’s inability to identify sufficient investment opportunities and complete transactions;
•political instability or changes in government policy negatively impacting our business or assets;
•changes to our group’s current business, including through future sustainable solutions investments;
•the growth of our group’s portfolio and our group’s inability to realize the expected benefits of its transactions or acquisitions;
•our group’s inability to develop the projects in our development pipeline;
•delays, cost overruns and other problems associated with the construction and operation of our facilities and risks associated with the arrangements our group enters into with communities and joint venture partners;
•our group does not have control over all of our group’s operations or investments, including certain investments made through joint ventures, partnerships, consortiums or structured arrangements;
•some of our group’s acquisitions may be of distressed companies, which may subject our group to increased risks;
•a decline in the value of our group’s investments in securities, including publicly traded securities of other companies;
•the separation of economic interest from control within our group’s organizational structure;
•our group’s dependence on Brookfield and Brookfield’s significant influence over our group;
•Brookfield’s election not to source acquisition opportunities for our group and our group’s lack of access to all renewable power acquisitions that Brookfield identifies, including by reason of conflicts of interest;
•the departure of some or all of Brookfield’s key professionals;
•Brookfield acting in a way that is not in our group’s best interests or the best interests of our shareholders;
•changes in how Brookfield elects to hold its ownership interests in our group;
•our group’s inability to terminate the Master Services Agreement and the limited liability of the Service Provider under our arrangements with them;
•Brookfield’s relationship with Oaktree;
•any changes in the market price of the BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares;
•the redemption of the BEPC exchangeable shares;
•difference in the trading price of the BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP units;
•the de-listing of the BEPC exchangeable shares;
•future sales or issuances of our securities will result in dilution of existing holders and even the perception of such sales or issuances taking place could depress the trading price of the BEP units or BEP exchangeable shares;
•changes in the amount of cash we can distribute to our shareholders;
•the inability of our shareholders to take part in the management of BEPC;
•limitations on holdings of our shares due to FPA and FERC regulations;
•the termination of the Rights Agreement;
•changes in tax law and practice;
•limits on our shareholders’ ability to obtain favourable judicial forum for disputes related to BEPC or to enforce judgements against us;
•changes to government policies and incentives relating to the renewable power and sustainable solutions industries;
•adverse impacts of inflationary pressures;
•changes in regulatory, political, economic and social conditions in the jurisdictions in which we operate;
•health, safety, security and environmental risks;
•force majeure events;
•foreign currency risk associated with BEPC distributions;
•fraud, bribery, corruption, other illegal acts or inadequate or failed internal processes or systems and restrictions on foreign direct investment;
•increased regulation of our operations
•our group is not subject to the same disclosure requirements as a U.S. domestic issuer;
•changes in our credit ratings;
•new regulatory initiatives related to sustainability and ESG;
•human rights impacts of our business activities;
•being deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act;
•the effectiveness of our group’s internal controls over financial reporting;
•the redemption of BEPC exchangeable shares by us at any time or upon notice from the holder of the BEPC class B shares; and
•other factors described in this Form 20-F, including those set forth under Item 3.D “Risk Factors”, Item 4.B “Business Overview” and Item 5.A “Operating Results”.
We caution that the foregoing list of important factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive. The forward-looking statements represent our views as of the date of this Form 20-F and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Form 20-F. While we anticipate that subsequent events and developments may cause our views to change, we disclaim any obligation to update the forward-looking statements, other than as required by applicable law. For further information on these known and unknown risks, please see Item 3.D “Risk Factors”.
Each BEPC exchangeable share has been structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to one BEP unit. We therefore expect that the market price of the BEPC exchangeable shares will be impacted by the market price of BEP units and the combined business performance of our group as a whole. In addition to carefully considering the disclosure made in this Form 20-F, you should carefully consider the disclosure made by Brookfield Renewable in its continuous disclosure filings. Copies of the BEP’s continuous disclosure filings are available electronically on EDGAR on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
Historical Performance and Market Data
This Form 20-F contains information relating to our business as well as historical performance and market data. When considering this data, you should bear in mind that historical results and market data may not be indicative of the future results that you should expect from us.
Financial Information
The financial information contained in this Form 20-F is presented in U.S. dollars and, unless otherwise indicated, has been prepared in accordance with IFRS. All figures are unaudited unless otherwise indicated. In this Form 20-F, all references to “$” are to U.S. dollars. Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, Brazilian reais, Euros, Colombian pesos, British pounds sterling and Chinese renminbi are identified as “C$”, “A$”, “R$”, “€”, “COP”, “£” and “CNY” respectively.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING THE USE OF NON-IFRS MEASURES
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with IFRS. However, this Form 20-F also contains references to Adjusted EBITDA and Funds From Operations which are not generally accepted accounting measures under IFRS and therefore may differ from definitions of Adjusted EBITDA and Funds From Operations used by other entities. In particular, our definition of Funds From Operations may differ from the definition of funds from operations used by other organizations, as well as the definition of funds from operations used by the Real Property Association of Canada and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”). We believe that Adjusted EBITDA and Funds From Operations are useful supplemental measures that may assist investors in assessing our financial performance. None of Adjusted EBITDA or Funds From Operations should be
considered as the sole measure of our performance and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, analysis of our financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. These non-IFRS measures reflect how we manage our business and, in our opinion, enable the investors and other readers to better understand our business.
Reconciliations of each of Adjusted EBITDA and Funds From Operations to net income (loss) are presented in Item 5.A “Operating Results — Financial Performance Review on Proportionate Information — Reconciliation of non-IFRS measures”.
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
3.A [Reserved]
3.B CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS
Not applicable.
3.C REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
3.D RISK FACTORS
Summary of Risk Factors
The following summarizes some, but not all, of the risks provided below. Please carefully consider all of the information discussed in this Item 3.D “Risk Factors” in this Form 20-F for a more thorough description of these and other risks.
Risks Relating to Our Operations and Our Industry
•Risks relating to resource availability, as a result of climate change or otherwise.
•Risks relating to supply, demand, volatility and marketing in the energy market.
•Risks relating to the amount of uncontracted generation in our portfolio or adverse changes to the MRE.
•Risks relating to ability to access interconnection facilities and transmission systems.
•Risks relating to our expiring contracts, counterparty defaults and renewal of our concessions, licenses and permits.
•Risks relating to our use and enjoyment of real property rights.
•Risks of increased cost of operating our facilities and of developing new facilities.
•Risks relating to equipment failure and procurement challenges and any loss of generating capacity and damage to the environment.
•Risks relating to the perception and regulation of the nuclear power industry.
•Risks relating to cybersecurity.
•Risks relating to uninsurable losses.
•Risks relating to energy marketing and project-level hedging.
•Risks relating to disputes, litigation, enforcement of contracts and governmental and regulatory policies and investigations.
•Risks relating to our facilities being affected by local communities.
•Risks relating to advances and investments in technology.
•Risks relating to increases in water rental costs (or similar fees) or changes to the regulation of water supply.
•Risks relating to future labor disruptions and economically unfavorable collective bargaining agreements.
Risks Relating to Financing
•Risks relating to our ability to finance our operations and fund growth, including completing capital recycling initiatives, compliance with debt covenants, increases in interest rates, changes in our credit ratings, and the incurrence of debt at multiple levels within our organizational structure.
Risks Relating to Our Growth Strategy
•Risks relating to our ability to identify investment opportunities and complete transactions, as planned.
•Risks relating to political instability, changes in government policy, or unfamiliar cultural factors.
•Risks relating to changes to our business, including through sustainable solutions investments.
•Risks relating to integrating new acquisitions.
•Risks relating to our ability to develop projects in our development pipeline.
•Risks relating to our relationship with local communities and partners.
•Risks relating to our transactions and joint ventures, partnerships, consortium arrangements or structured arrangements.
•Risks relating to acquiring distressed companies.
•Risks relating to our investments in securities, including of other public companies.
•Risks relating to our organizational structure and our ability to control our investments.
Risks Relating to Our Relationship with Brookfield and the Partnership
•Risks relating to our dependence on Brookfield, the partnership and the Service Provider, and the conflicts of interests therewith.
•Risks relating to our inability to have access to all renewable power acquisitions that Brookfield identifies.
•Risks relating to the departure of some or all of Brookfield’s professionals.
•Risks relating to Brookfield and the partnership’s ownership interest of our company and their entitlement to our dividends.
•Risks relating to the lack of any fiduciary obligations imposed on Brookfield to act in the best interests of the Service Recipients, our shareholders or the partnership’s unitholders.
•Risks relating to conflicts of interest inherent to our organizational and ownership structure .
•Risks relating to our inability to terminate the BEP Master Services Agreement.
•Risks relating to the limited liability of the Service Provider to the partnership and the other Service Recipients.
•Risks relating to our guarantees of certain debt obligations of the partnership.
•Risks relating to Brookfield’s relationship with Oaktree.
•Risks relating to Brookfield’s ownership position of our company.
Risks Relating to the BEPC Exchangeable Shares
•Risks relating to our ability to redeem the BEPC exchangeable shares and our group’s ability to elect whether shareholders receive cash or BEP units upon a liquidation or exchange events.
•Risks relating to delays and negative market sentiment following exchange requests by holders of BEPC exchangeable shares.
•Risks relating to the trading prices and volatility of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP units.
•Risks relating to the de-listing of our BEPC exchangeable shares.
•Risks or dilution caused by the issuance of additional securities, including BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP units or other senior securities.
•Risks relating to our ability to pay dividends at current levels or at all.
•Risks relating to choice of forum provisions in our articles and BEP’s limited partnership agreement.
•Risks relating to FPA and FERC regulations.
•Risks relating to application of applicable Canadian or U.S. rules relating to takeover bids, issuer bids and tender offers.
•Risks relating to the termination of the Rights Agreement.
Risks Relating to Taxation
•Risks relating to United States and Canadian taxation, and the effects thereof on our business and operations.
General Risk Factors
•Risks relating to changes to government policies and incentives.
•Risks relating to inflationary pressures.
•Risks relating to changes in regulatory, political, economic and social conditions.
•Risks relating to health, safety, security and environmental.
•Risks of force majeure events.
•Risks relating to foreign currency associated with our dividends.
•Risks relating to fraud, bribery, corruption, other illegal acts and restrictions on foreign direct investment.
•Risks relating to increased regulation of our operations.
•Risks relating to the fact that we are not subject to the same disclosure requirements as a U.S. domestic issuer.
•Risks of changes in our credit ratings.
•Risks relating to new regulatory initiatives related to sustainability and ESG.
•Risks of the human rights impacts of our business activities.
•Risks relating to being deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act.
•Risks relating to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information set forth in this Form 20-F. If any of the following risks were actually to occur, our company’s business, financial condition and results of operations prospects could be adversely affected and the value of the BEPC exchangeable shares would likely suffer. Each BEPC exchangeable share has been structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to one LP Unit. We therefore expect that the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares will be impacted by the market price of the BEP units and the combined business performance of our group as a whole. In addition to carefully considering the risks factors contained in this Form 20-F and described below, you should carefully consider the risk factors applicable to the partnership’s business and an investment in BEP units in BEP’s Annual Report.
Risks Relating to Our Operations and Our Industry
Changes to resource availability, as a result of climate change or otherwise, at any of our renewable power facilities could adversely affect the amount of electricity that we are able to generate.
The revenues generated by our facilities are correlated to the amount of electricity produced, which is in turn dependent upon available water flows and upon wind, irradiance and weather conditions generally. Hydrology, wind, irradiance and weather conditions have natural variations from season to season and from year to year and may also change permanently because of climate change or other factors.
If one or more of our generation facilities were to be subject in the future to flooding, extreme weather conditions (including severe wind, storms and droughts), fires, natural disasters, or if unexpected geological or other adverse physical conditions were to develop at any of our generation facilities, the generation capacity of that facility could be significantly reduced or eliminated. For example, our hydroelectric facilities depend on the availability of water flows within the watersheds in which our company operates and could be materially impacted by changes to hydrology patterns, such as droughts. In the event of severe flooding, our hydrology facilities may be damaged. Wind energy and solar energy are highly dependent on weather conditions and, in particular, on wind conditions and irradiance, respectively. The profitability of a wind farm depends not only on observed wind conditions at the site, which are inherently variable, but also on whether observed wind conditions are consistent with assumptions made during the project development phase or when a given project was acquired. Similarly, projections of solar resources depend on assumptions about weather patterns, shading and irradiance, which are inherently variable and may not be consistent with actual conditions at the site. A sustained decline in water flow at our hydroelectric facilities in wind conditions at our wind energy facilities or of irradiance at our solar facilities could lead to an adverse change in the volume of electricity generated, and to revenues and cash flow.
Climate change may increase the frequency and severity of severe weather conditions and may change existing weather patterns in ways that are difficult to anticipate, which could result in more frequent and severe disruptions to our generation facilities (including as a result of extreme flooding that may be above the normal design parameters of our hydroelectric facilities) and the power markets in which we operate. In addition, customers’ energy needs generally vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity. To the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, customers’ energy use could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of changing weather conditions, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Supply and demand in energy markets are volatile and such volatility could have an adverse impact on electricity prices and an adverse effect on Brookfield Renewable’s assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
A portion of our revenues are tied, either directly or indirectly, to the wholesale market price for electricity in the energy markets in which we operate. Wholesale market electricity prices are impacted by a number of factors
including: the management of generation and the amount of excess generating capacity relative to load in a particular market; the cost of controlling emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants; the structure of the electricity market; weather conditions (such as extremely hot or cold weather) that impact electrical load; the price of fuel (such as natural gas) that is used to generate electricity; and political instability (such as the conflict between Ukraine and Russia and the disruptive impact that related sanctions and other related events might have on European energy markets).
In the long term, there is uncertainty surrounding the trend in electricity demand growth, which is influenced by macroeconomic conditions, absolute and relative energy prices, energy conservation and demand-side management. Correspondingly, from a supply perspective, there are uncertainties associated with long term plans for the construction of baseload generation capacity, the timing of generating plant retirements (e.g., coal) and with the scale, pace and structure of replacement capacity, again reflecting a complex interaction of economic and political pressures and environmental preferences. This volatility and uncertainty in power markets generally, including non-renewable power markets, could have an adverse effect on Brookfield Renewable’s assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
As our contracts expire, we may not be able to replace them with agreements on similar terms.
Certain long-term contracts in our portfolio will be subject to re-contracting in the future. For example, with respect to PPAs in our renewable power portfolio, if the price of electricity in power markets is declining at the time of such re-contracting, it may impact our ability to re-negotiate or replace these contracts on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. In addition, a concentrated pool of potential buyers for electricity generated by our renewable energy facilities in certain jurisdictions may restrict our ability to negotiate favorable terms under new PPAs or existing PPAs that are subject to re-contracting. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to re-negotiate or replace these contracts once they expire, and even if we are able to do so, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to obtain the same prices or terms we currently receive. If we are unable to re-negotiate or replace these contracts, or unable to secure prices at least equal to the current prices we receive, our business, financial condition, results of operation and prospects could be adversely affected. Conversely, what may appear to be an attractive price at the time of recontracting could, if prices significantly rise over the contract’s term, result in us having committed to sell power or other goods or services in the future at below then-market rates.
The amount of uncontracted generation in our renewable power portfolio may increase and the contract profile for future renewable power projects may change.
In 2023, approximately 90% of our group’s generation (on a proportionate basis) was contracted in each of those calendar years under long term fixed-price contracts with creditworthy counterparties. The portion of our group’s renewable power portfolio that is uncontracted may increase gradually over time. We may sell electricity from our uncontracted generation into the spot-market or other competitive power markets from time to time. With respect to such transactions, we are not guaranteed any rate of return on our capital investments through mandated rates, and revenues and results of operations are likely to depend, in large part, upon prevailing market prices. These market prices are driven by factors outside of our control and may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time. Additionally, future renewable power projects may be contracted with different types of counterparties (including commercial and industrial users) and using different contract structures compared to our group’s historical projects. Such increased uncontracted generation and changing contract profiles could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our ability to deliver electricity to our various counterparties and buildout our renewable power development pipeline requires the availability of (and access to) interconnection facilities and transmission systems.
Our ability to sell electricity is impacted by the availability of, and access to, the various transmission systems to deliver power to a contractual delivery point and the arrangements and facilities necessary to connect renewable generation projects to the transmission systems. The absence of this availability and access, our inability to obtain reasonable terms and conditions for interconnection and transmission agreements, the operational failure or decommissioning of existing interconnection facilities or transmission facilities, the lack of adequate capacity on such interconnection or transmission facilities, curtailment as a result of transmission facility downtime, or the failure of any relevant jurisdiction to expand transmission facilities, may have an adverse effect on our ability to deliver electricity to our various counterparties or the requirement of counterparties to accept and pay for energy
delivery. Insufficient access to transmission and interconnection systems may also constrain our ability to develop new utility-scale projects, which require transmission systems to have available interconnection points and the overall capacity necessary to transmit the energy expected to be generated by a development project once it achieves commercial operation. Lack of access to transmission systems could accordingly adversely affect our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
There is a risk that our concessions and licenses will not be renewed or that, where concessions are required to build out our development pipeline, they may not be granted or awarded.
We hold concessions and licenses and we have rights to operate our facilities (including, for example, in respect of our hydroelectric projects, rights to the land and water required for power generation), and which are subject to renewal at the end of their terms. We generally expect that our concessions and licenses will be renewed. However, if we are not granted renewal rights, or if our concessions or licenses are renewed subject to conditions which impose additional costs, or impose additional restrictions (including, for example, setting a price ceiling for energy sales), our profitability and operational activity could be adversely impacted. In addition, concessions may be required to advance projects in our development pipeline. There can be no assurance that we will be granted any concession that we require with respect to any given project or on what timelines or conditions.
We may fail to comply with conditions in, or may not be able to maintain, governmental permits, licenses or approvals, and we may not receive new governmental permits, licenses or approvals that we require.
Our operating and development projects are, and any assets which we may acquire will be, required to comply with numerous supranational, federal, regional, state, provincial and local statutory and regulatory standards and to maintain numerous licenses, permits and governmental approvals. Some of the licenses, permits and governmental approvals that have been issued to our operating and development projects contain conditions and restrictions, or may have limited terms. If we fail to satisfy the conditions or comply with the restrictions imposed by our licenses, permits and governmental approvals, or the restrictions imposed by any statutory or regulatory requirements, we may become subject to regulatory enforcement or be subject to fines, penalties or additional costs or revocation of regulatory approvals, permits or licenses. In addition, if we are not able to renew, maintain or obtain all necessary licenses, permits and governmental approvals required for the continued operation or further development of our projects, the operation or development of our assets may be limited or suspended. Our failure to renew, maintain or obtain all necessary licenses, permits or governmental approvals may have an adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Our use and enjoyment of real property rights for our facilities may be adversely affected by the rights of lienholders and leaseholders that are superior to those of the grantors of those real property rights to our company.
Wind and solar renewable energy facilities, as well as certain facilities in our sustainable solutions businesses, are generally located on land occupied by the facility pursuant to long-term easements and leases. The ownership interests in the land subject to these easements and leases may be subject to mortgages securing loans or other liens (such as tax liens) and other easement and lease rights of third parties (such as leases of oil or mineral rights) that were created prior to the facility’s easements and leases. As a result, the facility’s rights under these easements or leases may be subject, and subordinate, to the rights of those third parties. Although we take certain measures to protect ourselves against these risks, such measures may, however, be inadequate to protect our company against all risk of loss of our rights to use the land on which our facilities are located, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The cost of operating our facilities or developing new facilities could increase for reasons beyond our control.
While we currently believe that we maintain an appropriate and competitive cost position, there is a risk that increases in our cost structure that are beyond our control could adversely impact our financial performance. Examples of such costs include compliance with new conditions imposed during a relicensing process, municipal property taxes, water rental fees, hazardous waste disposal, decommissioning costs and the cost of procuring materials, spare parts and services required for our operating and maintenance activities, as well as other inflationary pressures. In some cases we have outsourced certain aspects of operation and maintenance to third parties under long term service agreements and other arrangements in order to, among other things, improve project performance and reduce and stabilize costs. However, there can be no assurance that such contractors will meet the contractual
performance standards set out in these services agreements and we accordingly may not be able to fully realize these anticipated cost reductions and improvements in project performance or at all.
Our operating assets and businesses may not perform as expected and may experience equipment failure.
Our operating assets may not continue to perform as they have in the past and there is a risk of equipment failure due to wear and tear, latent defect, design error, operator error, extreme weather events or early obsolescence, among other things, which could have an adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Equipment failure at our assets could also result in significant personal injury or loss of life, damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment and contamination of, or damage to, the environment and suspension of operations. In our renewable power portfolio, this could be on a large scale, such as a breach of a dam, the failure of a wind turbine blade or the collapse of a wind turbine tower. This could also be on a small scale, such as equipment catching on fire or panels being blown off of the rooftop of one of our DG facilities, which are typically located within population centers. In our group’s sustainable solutions investments, this could include a failure or release at a renewable natural gas digester, a release of pressurized gas at a carbon, capture and storage facility or an injury caused by industrial equipment at a recycling facility. The occurrence of any one of these events may result in our group being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for substantial damages, including for environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and property damage and fines and/or penalties as well as reputational harm.
In addition, through our group’s investment in Westinghouse, our group’s nuclear services business, our group is also exposed to performance and operational risks in respect of certain nuclear technologies. Westinghouse produces highly sophisticated products and provides specialized services that incorporate or use complex technology, including both hardware and software. Many of Westinghouse’s products and services involve complex industrial machinery or infrastructure projects, such as nuclear power generation and the manufacture of nuclear fuel rods. While Westinghouse’s products and services meet rigorous quality standards, there can be no assurance that such products or services will not experience operational process or product failures and other problems, including as a result of outdated technology, or through manufacturing or design defects, process or other failures of contractors or third-party suppliers, cyber-attacks or other intentional acts that could result in potential product, safety, regulatory or environmental risks.
Equipment that we need, including spare parts and components required for project development, may become unavailable or difficult to procure, inhibiting our ability to maintain full availability of existing plants and also our ability to complete development projects on scope, schedule and budget.
Equipment and spare parts, including panels, inverters, racking and trackers for solar projects, turbines, towers and blades for wind projects, transformers and generator components for hydroelectric projects, and batteries for BESS projects may become unavailable or difficult to procure on terms consistent with those that we have budgeted for. For example, some jurisdictions in which we operate have experienced supply chain challenges resulting from bottlenecks caused by, among other things, increases in demand and challenges involved with ramping up to meet this demand. While supply chain disruptions that occurred globally in recent years did not materially impact our group’s business or operations, supply chains could be further disrupted in the future by factors outside of our control. This could include (1) a reduction in the supply or availability of the commodities required to produce the parts and components that we need to maintain existing projects and develop new projects from our group’s development pipeline, like polysilicon which is required for panels that are necessary for the construction of solar energy projects, (2) the potential physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, precipitation, floods and other climatic events and their impact on transportation networks and manufacturing centers, and (3) economic sanctions or embargoes, including those relating to human rights concerns in jurisdictions that produce key materials, components or parts.
For example, in 2022 in the U.S., The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act was signed into law, which restricts the import of goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region due to concerns about forced labor practices in the region. This region of China provides by some measures up to half of the world’s polysilicon supply, a key component in many solar panels. In 2023, the U.S. Department of Commerce, following an anti-dumping and countervailing duty circumvention investigation, determined that certain solar panels imported from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam were improperly using parts and components produced in China as a way to
circumvent existing restrictions, and ordered that solar cells and modules imported to the U.S. from those four countries will be subject to anti-dumping and countervailing duties following the expiration of a moratorium in June 2024. These and similar legislative or regulatory initiatives or investigations, in the U.S. or otherwise, related to the purchase of materials or equipment that are necessary to sustain the buildout of our group’s development pipeline, may adversely impact project timelines, increase overall equipment costs, and require complex procurement process changes to ensure that our group’s supply chain remains compliant with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. Similarly, our group could suffer adverse financial and reputational impacts if our group or our group’s contract counterparties even inadvertently breach these and other similar laws, rules or regulations. Any material delays in procuring equipment or significant cost increases could adversely impact our business and financial condition.
Our group’s nuclear services business and its customers operate in a politically sensitive environment, and the public perception of nuclear power and radioactive materials can affect such business’s customers and our group.
Westinghouse operates in a politically sensitive environment. Opposition by third parties to particular projects, including in connection with any incident involving the potential discharge of radioactive materials, could affect Westinghouse’s customers and operations. Adverse public reaction could also lead to increased regulation, limitations on the activities of Westinghouse’s customers, more onerous operating requirements or other conditions that could have a material adverse impact on Westinghouse customers and operations.
While Westinghouse does not own or operate nuclear power plants, nuclear power plant operations are potentially subject to disruption by a nuclear accident. A future accident at a nuclear reactor anywhere in the world could result in the shutdown of existing plants or impact the continued acceptance by the public and regulatory authorities of nuclear energy and the future prospects for nuclear generators, each of which could have a material adverse impact on Westinghouse.
Furthermore, accidents, terrorism, natural disasters or other incidents occurring at nuclear facilities or involving shipments of nuclear materials or technological changes could reduce the demand for nuclear services.
A failure of the nuclear power industry to expand could adversely affect our group’s nuclear services business.
The expansion of nuclear power depends on the pace of deployment and there are substantial uncertainties about the pace of these deployments. In addition, nuclear energy competes with other sources of energy, including natural gas, coal and hydroelectricity. These other energy sources are to some extent interchangeable with nuclear energy, particularly over the longer term. Sustained lower prices of natural gas, coal and hydroelectricity, as well as the possibility of developing other low cost sources for energy, may result in lower demand for nuclear energy. Additionally, further advances in nuclear power technology could impair or eliminate Westinghouse’s competitive advantage as a leading OEM and technology provider to the global nuclear power industry, which could negatively impact such business’s market share.
If the nuclear power industry fails to expand, if there is a reduction in demand by electric utilities for nuclear fuel rods for any reason or if Westinghouse’s market share is reduced, it would adversely affect Westinghouse’s operations and its results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
If our group’s nuclear services business does not have adequate indemnification for its nuclear services, it could adversely affect such business’s results of operations and financial condition.
The Price-Anderson Act (the “PAA”) is a U.S. federal law, which, among other things, regulates radioactive materials and the nuclear energy industry, including liability and compensation in the event of nuclear related incidents. The PAA provides certain protections and indemnification to nuclear energy plant operators and U.S. Department of Energy contractors. The PAA protections and indemnification apply to Westinghouse. Westinghouse also offers similar services in other jurisdictions outside the U.S. For those jurisdictions, varying levels of nuclear liability protection is provided by international treaties, and/or domestic laws. If an incident or evacuation is not covered under PAA indemnification, international treaties and/or domestic laws, Westinghouse could be held liable for damages, regardless of fault. Although Westinghouse expects to have insurance coverage for such liabilities, such coverage may not be sufficient, and accordingly such liabilities could have an adverse effect on Westinghouse’s results of operations and financial condition.
Our group relies on computerized business systems, which could expose us to cyber-attacks.
Our business relies on information technology. In addition, our business relies upon telecommunication services to remotely monitor and control our assets and interface with regulatory agencies, wholesale power markets and customers. The information and embedded systems of key business partners, third-party service providers (including suppliers of the information technology systems on which we rely), and regulatory agencies are also important to our operations. In light of this, our group’s computer systems may face ongoing cybersecurity threats and attacks, which could result in the failure of such systems, and we may be subject to cyber-terrorism or other cybersecurity risks or other breaches of information technology system security intended to obtain unauthorized access to our proprietary information, personally identifiable information or to client or third-party data stored on our systems, destroy or disable our data and/or that of our business partners, disclose confidential data in breach of data privacy legislation, destroy data or disable, degrade, or sabotage these systems through the introduction of computer viruses, cyber attacks and other means. Such attacks could originate from a wide variety of sources including internal or unknown third parties.
The sophistication of the threats continue to evolve and grow, including the risk associated with the use of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing, for nefarious purposes. We cannot predict what effects such cyber-attacks or compromises or shut-downs may have on our business and on the privacy of the individuals or entities affected, and the consequences could be material. A significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent, unauthorized or accidental use or misuse of investor, employee or other personally identifiable or proprietary business data, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation and regulatory actions against us by governments, various regulatory organizations or exchanges, or affected individuals, in addition to significant reputational harm and/or financial loss, and it may not be possible to recover losses suffered from such incidents under our insurance policies.
A breach of our cybersecurity measures, or those of third-party service providers, or the failure or malfunction of any of our computerized business systems, associated backup or data storage systems could cause us to suffer a disruption in one or more parts of our business and experience, among other things, financial loss, reputational damage, a loss of business opportunities, the unplanned shutdown of our operating facilities, misappropriation or unauthorized release of confidential or personal information, damage to our technology systems and those with whom we do business, violation of privacy and other laws, litigation, regulatory penalties and remediation and restoration costs as well as increased costs to maintain our systems. Cybersecurity breaches or failures of our information technology systems could have an adverse effect on our business operations, financial reporting, financial condition and results of operations, and result in reputational damage. Although our group is continuing to enhance defenses to such attacks, our group can provide no assurance that its efforts or those of third-party service providers will be successful in preventing or ameliorating damage from such an attack on our group and, as the manner in which cyberattacks are undertaken has become more sophisticated, there is a risk that the occurrence of cyberattack may remain undetected for an extended period.
We are reliant on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our business, including for certain information systems and technology platforms, legal services, technology, administration, tax, accounting and compliance matters. A disaster, disruption or compromise in technology or infrastructure that supports our businesses, including a disruption involving electronic communications or other services used by us, our vendors or third parties with whom we conduct business, may have an adverse impact on our ability to continue to operate our businesses without interruption which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition to the fact that these third-party service providers could also face ongoing cybersecurity threats and compromises of their systems, we generally have less control over the delivery of such third-party services, and as a result, we may face disruptions to our ability to operate a business as a result of interruptions of such services. A prolonged global failure of cloud services provided by a variety of cloud services providers that we engage could result in cascading systems failures for us.
Data protection and privacy rules have become a focus for regulators globally. For instance, the European General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) sets out data protection rules for individuals that are residents of the E.U. GDPR imposes stringent rules and penalties for non-compliance, as does similar legislation in certain U.S. states and Canadian provinces in which we operate and in Brazil, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
The occurrence of dam failures could result in a loss of generating capacity and damage to the environment, third parties or the public, which could require us to expend significant amounts of capital and other resources and expose us to significant liability.
The occurrence of dam failures at any of our hydroelectric generating stations or the occurrence of dam failures at other generating stations or dams operated by third parties whether upstream or downstream of our hydroelectric generating stations could result in a loss of generating capacity until the failure has been repaired. If the failure is at one of our facilities, repairing such failure could require us to expend significant amounts of capital and other resources. As noted above, severe failures could also result in harm to third parties or the environment, either of which could expose us to significant liability. A dam failure at a generating station or dam operated by a third party that is upstream of one of our facilities could result in a loss of revenue due to short term disruption to expected water flows. Even if the failure is not at an upstream facility, it could result in new and potentially onerous regulations that could impact our group’s facilities. Any such new regulations could require material capital expenditures to maintain compliance and our financial position could be adversely affected.
We may be exposed to uninsurable losses and may become subject to higher insurance premiums.
While we maintain certain insurance coverage, such insurance may not continue to be offered on an economically feasible basis, may not cover all events that could give rise to a loss or claim involving our assets or operations, and may not cover all of our assets. If our insurance coverage is insufficient and we are forced to bear such losses or claims, our financial position could be adversely affected. Brookfield Renewable participates in certain shared insurance arrangements with Brookfield, allowing our company to benefit from lower premiums and other economies of scale. In particular, we share third party excess liability, crime, employee dishonesty, directors and officers liability, auto liability and errors and omissions insurance coverage. Under such shared policies, policy limits may be shared between us and Brookfield meaning that any claim by one insured party in a given year may reduce the amount that each other insured party can claim. Consequently, there is a risk that Brookfield Renewable’s ability to claim in a given year could be eroded by claims made by Brookfield affiliates who are also covered by a shared policy but that are not part of our company, which could have an adverse effect on our financial position. Our insurance policies may cover losses as a result of certain types of natural disasters or sabotage, among other things, but such coverage is not always available in the insurance market on commercially reasonable terms and is often capped at predetermined limits that may not be adequate. Our insurance policies are subject to review by our insurers and may not be renewed on similar or favorable terms or at all.
Changes in regulatory, political, economic and social conditions in South America could adversely affect our company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Our company’s financial performance may be negatively affected by regulatory, political, economic and social conditions in South American countries in which our operations or projects are located. In many of these jurisdictions, our company is exposed to various risks such as potential renegotiation, nullification or forced modification of existing contracts, expropriation or nationalization of property, foreign exchange controls, changes in local laws, regulations and policies, political instability, bribery, extortion, corruption, civil strife, acts of war, guerilla activities and terrorism. Our company also faces the risk of having to submit to the jurisdiction of a foreign court or arbitration panel or having to enforce a judgment against a sovereign nation within its own territory. Actual or potential political or social changes and changes in economic policy may undermine investor confidence, which may hamper investment and thereby reduce economic growth, and otherwise may adversely affect the economic and other conditions under which our company operates in ways that could have a materially negative effect on our business.
Further, governments in South America may impose new taxes, raise existing taxes, reduce tax exemptions and benefits, request or force renegotiation of tax stabilization agreements or change the basis on which taxes are calculated in a manner that is unfavorable to our company. Governments that have committed to provide a stable taxation or regulatory environment may alter those commitments or shorten their duration. The imposition of or increase in such taxes or charges can significantly increase the risk profile and costs of operations in those jurisdictions. Our company may also be subject to rising trends of resource nationalism in certain countries in which we operate that can result in constraints on our operations, increased taxation or even expropriations and nationalizations.
Energy marketing risks may have an adverse effect on our business.
Our energy marketing business involves the establishment of positions in the wholesale and retail energy markets. To the extent that we enter into forward purchase contracts or take long positions in the energy markets, a downturn in market prices could result in losses from a decline in the value of such long positions. Conversely, to the extent that we enter into forward sales contracts or take short positions in the energy markets, an upturn in market prices could expose us to losses as we attempt to cover any short positions by acquiring energy in a rising market.
Our energy marketing strategies also depend on counterparties fulfilling their obligations to us and on the quality of the collateral that they post. Our positions can be impacted by volatility in the energy markets that, in turn, depend on various factors, including weather in various geographical areas and short-term supply and demand imbalances, which cannot be predicted with any certainty. A shift in the energy markets could adversely affect our positions which could also have an adverse effect on our business.
Although we employ a number of risk management controls in order to limit exposure to risks arising from trading activities, we cannot guarantee that losses will not occur and such losses may be outside the parameters of our risk controls.
Our project level hedging activities may not adequately manage our exposure to commodity and financial risk, which could result in significant losses or require us to use cash collateral to meet margin requirements.
Certain of our operating projects are party to financial swaps or other similarly structured project level hedging arrangements (“swaps”). We may also acquire additional assets with similar hedging arrangements in the future. Under the terms of such arrangements, our operating projects receive payments for specified quantities of electricity based on a fixed-price and are obligated to deliver (if physically settled) or pay (if financially settled) the counterparty the market price for the same quantities of electricity. Gains or losses under the swaps are designed to be offset by decreases or increases in a facility’s revenues from spot sales of electricity in liquid markets. However, the actual amount of electricity a facility generates from operations may be materially different from our estimates for a variety of reasons, including variable conditions and plant availability. If a plant does not generate the volume of electricity required by the associated contract, we could incur losses if electricity prices in the market rise substantially above the fixed-price provided for in the swap arrangement.
The MRE could be terminated or changed or our company’s reference amount revised downward.
In Brazil, hydroelectric power generators have access to the MRE, which seeks to stabilize hydrology by assuring that all participant plants in the MRE receive a reference amount of electricity it is expected to be generated annually, approximating long-term average regardless of the actual volume of energy generated. Substantially all of our assets in Brazil are part of that pool. In cases of nationwide drought, when the pool as a whole is in shortfall relative to the long-term average, an asset can expect to share the nationwide shortfall pro-rata with the rest of the pool. The energy reference amount for plants with capacity of over 50 MW is assessed every 5 years, according to the criteria of such regulation and can be adjusted positively or negatively. For plants with capacity of 50 MW or lower, the energy reference amount assessment process is currently suspended until legal proceedings initiated by certain owners of these smaller plants are resolved. These smaller plants receive the full energy reference amount, subject to any adjustments resulting from the outcome of these proceedings. If our company’s reference amount is revised, our share of the balancing pool could be reduced. If the MRE is terminated or adversely changed, our financial results would be more exposed to variations in hydrology at certain hydroelectric facilities in Brazil. In either case, this could have an adverse effect on our company’s results of operations and cash flows.
We are involved in litigation and other disputes and may be subject to governmental and regulatory investigations.
In the normal course of our operations, we and our affiliates are involved in various legal actions such as contractual disputes and other litigation that could expose us to liability for damages and potential negative publicity associated with such legal actions. The outcome with respect to outstanding, pending or future actions cannot be predicted with certainty and may be adverse to us and, as a result, could have an adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and reputation. We and our affiliates are also subject to governmental or regulatory investigations from time to time. Governmental and regulatory
investigations, regardless of its outcome, are generally costly, divert management attention, and have the potential to damage our reputation. The unfavorable resolution of any governmental or regulatory investigation could result in criminal liability, fines, penalties or other monetary or non-monetary remedies and could materially affect our business or results of operations.
Counterparties to our contracts may not fulfill their obligations.
In the course of our business, we enter into a wide range of contracts including but not limited to PPAs, engineering, procurement and construction contracts, long term service agreements, supply agreements, contracts to purchase equipment and joint venture agreements. If our counterparties do not perform as expected under these contracts, it may have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations. For example, if purchasers of power under our PPAs are unable or unwilling to fulfill their contractual obligations under the relevant PPA or if they refuse to accept delivery of power pursuant to the relevant PPA, our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be adversely affected as we may not be able to replace the agreement with an agreement on equivalent terms and conditions. Similarly, external events, such as a severe economic downturn, could impair the ability of some counterparties to the PPAs or some customers to pay for electricity received.
This is true of our DG assets, which are smaller in scale and typically each sell power directly to a retail customer who also is the site owner and lessor of the land or rooftop on which the asset is located. These customers may have a different credit profile than utility-scale customers and the collection of unpaid amounts may be more challenging given of the small scale and large number of individual sites and customers in our portfolio. If a DG facility ceases operations and the PPA is terminated, the company’s assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be adversely affected. The PPA terms may require that we remove the asset, including fixing or reimbursing the site owner for any damages caused by the assets or the removal of such assets. Alternatively, we may agree to sell the assets to the site owner, but the sale price may not be sufficient to replace the revenue previously generated by the solar generation facility. In addition, we enter into joint ventures and other commercial arrangements with counterparties. To the extent such counterparties do not fulfill their obligations to us under such contracts we may not achieve the expected benefits from the relevant arrangement.
Seeking to enforce a contract through the courts may take significant amounts of time and expense with no certainty of success.
Our company’s business could be adversely affected if we are required to enforce contracts through the courts and we are unsuccessful or incur significant amounts of time and expenses seeking to do so. High litigation costs and long delays make resolving commercial disputes in court both time consuming and expensive. Such costs can be difficult to calculate with certainty. In certain jurisdictions in which we currently conduct business or may seek to conduct business in the future, there can be uncertainty regarding the interpretation and application of laws and regulations relating to the enforceability of contractual rights. Similarly, certain of our contract counterparties will be based, or their principal assets will be based, in jurisdictions where it may be difficult to enforce contracts or juridical or arbitral awards.
A significant portion of our current operations and related assets are subject to foreign laws and regulations, and we may pursue acquisitions in new markets that are subject to foreign laws or regulations that are more onerous or uncertain than the laws and regulations our company is currently subject to.
A significant portion of our current operations and related assets are in Brazil and Colombia, and we may pursue acquisitions in new foreign markets that are regulated by foreign governments and regulatory authorities and subject to foreign laws. Foreign laws or regulations may not provide for the same type of legal certainty and rights in connection with their contractual relationships in such countries as are afforded to projects in, for example, the United States, which may adversely affect their ability to receive revenues or enforce their rights in connection with their foreign operations. In addition, the laws and regulations of some countries may limit our ability to hold a majority interest in some of the assets that we may develop or acquire, thus limiting our ability to control the development, construction and operation of such assets. Any existing or new operations may be subject to significant political, economic and financial risks, which vary by country, and may include: (i) changes in government policies, including protectionist policies, or personnel; (ii) changes in general economic conditions; (iii) restrictions on currency transfer or convertibility; (iv) changes in labor relations; (v) political instability and civil unrest; (vi) regulatory or other changes in the local market; (vii) less developed or efficient financial markets than in
North America; (viii) the absence of uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and disclosure requirements; (ix) less government supervision and regulation; (x) a less developed legal or regulatory environment; (xi) heightened exposure to corruption risk; (xii) political hostility to investments by foreign investors; (xiii) less publicly available information in respect of companies; (xiv) adversely higher or lower rates of inflation; (xv) higher transaction costs; (xvi) difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, breach or repudiation of important contractual undertakings by governmental entities and expropriation and confiscation of assets and facilities for less than fair market value; and (xvii) fewer investor protections. For example, through our group’s investment in Westinghouse, our group is exposed to complex new legal and regulatory regimes in new jurisdictions. Westinghouse operates in an industry that is highly regulated both by U.S. federal and state governments and also by numerous foreign governments, including the E.U., and could be significantly impacted by changes in government policies and priorities.
The operation of our company’s facilities could be affected by local communities.
The interests of local communities and stakeholders, including in some cases, Indigenous peoples, may impact the operation of our facilities. Certain of these communities may have or may develop interests or objectives which are different from or even in conflict with our objectives, including the use of our company’s project lands and waterways near our facilities. Any such differences could have a negative impact on the successful operation of our facilities. As well, disputes surrounding, and settlements of, Indigenous land claims regarding lands on or near our generating assets could interfere with operations and/or result in additional operating costs or restrictions, as well as adversely impact the use and enjoyment of our real property rights with respect to our assets.
There can be no guarantee that newly developed technologies or new business lines that our company invests in will perform as anticipated.
We may invest in and use newly developed, less proven, technologies in our development projects or in maintaining, repowering or otherwise enhancing our existing assets. We may also invest in a business line or asset class that differs from those our group has historically invested in (for example, our group’s recent investment in Westinghouse). There is no guarantee that such new technologies, business lines or assets will perform as anticipated. The failure of a new technology, business line or asset to perform as anticipated could adversely affect the profitability of a particular investment.
Advances in technology could impair or eliminate the competitive advantage of our company’s projects.
Technologies related to the production of renewable power and conventional power generation are continually advancing, resulting in a gradual decline in the cost of producing electricity. If advances in technology further reduce the cost of producing power, the competitive advantage of our existing renewable power projects may be impaired or eliminated and our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be adversely affected as a result.
Increases in water rental costs (or similar fees) or changes to the regulation of water supply may impose additional obligations on our company.
Water rights are generally owned or controlled by governments that reserve the right to control water levels or impose water-use requirements as a condition of license renewal that differ from those arrangements in place today. Our company is required to pay taxes, make rental payments or pay similar fees for use of water and related rights once our hydroelectric projects are in commercial operation. Significant increases in water rental costs or similar fees or changes in the way that governments regulate water supply could, if imposed at a material number of our assets in our portfolio, have an adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Performance of our company’s operating entities may be harmed by future labor disruptions and economically unfavorable collective bargaining agreements.
Certain of our company’s subsidiaries are parties to collective agreements that expire periodically and those subsidiaries may not be able to renew such collective agreements without labor disruptions or without agreeing to significant increases in labor or other related costs. In the event of a labor disruption such as a strike or lock-out, the ability of our company’s assets to operate may be impaired and our results from operations and cash flow could be adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Financing
Our group's ability to finance its operations and fund growth initiatives is subject to various risks relating to the state of capital markets and to our ability to complete all or some of our capital recycling initiatives.
Our group expects to finance future acquisitions, the development and construction of new facilities and other capital expenditures out of cash generated from our operations, capital recycling, debt and possible future issuances of equity. Disruptions and volatility in capital markets, including those caused by rising interest rates, which continued to increase in 2023, could increase our group’s cost of capital and adversely affect its ability to fund its liquidity and capital needs and fund the growth of the business.
There is debt throughout our corporate structure that will need to be replaced from time to time. For example, BEP, BRELP and the Holding Entities have corporate debt, certain of our Operating Entities have limited recourse project level debt and certain of our portfolio companies, like Isagen, have holding company level debt. Our ability to obtain debt or equity financing to fund our growth, and our ability to refinance existing corporate and non-recourse indebtedness, on favourable terms, if at all, is dependent on, among other factors, the level of future interest rates, the overall state of capital markets (as well as local market conditions, particularly in the case of non-recourse financings), continued operating performance of our assets, future electricity market prices, lenders’ and investors’ assessment of our credit risk and investor appetite for investments in renewable energy and infrastructure assets in general and in Brookfield Renewable’s securities in particular. Also, certain Brookfield Renewable financing agreements contain conditions that limit our ability to repay indebtedness prior to maturity without incurring penalties, which may limit our ability to refinance indebtedness or raise new capital on favorable terms. To the extent that external sources of capital become limited or unavailable or available on onerous terms (including requirements for Brookfield Renewable to provide credit support such as letters of credit or parent guarantees), our ability to fund acquisitions and make necessary capital investments to construct new or maintain existing facilities may be impaired, and as a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected.
We seek to recycle capital to fund acquisitions and the development and construction of new projects by selling certain assets or an interest in certain assets, including our portfolio companies. However, we may not be able to complete all or some of our capital recycling initiatives on our desired timelines, at favorable prices or at all. For example, adverse market conditions or other factors beyond our control might mean that we are unable to complete an asset sale at a price that is aligned with our business plan resulting in a decision to transact at a lower price or to abandon the sales process altogether. Increases in interest rates could also make it more difficult to locate and consummate investments because other potential buyers, including operating companies acting as strategic buyers, may be able to bid for an asset at a higher price due to a lower overall cost of capital or their ability to benefit from a higher amount of cost savings following the acquisition of the asset. If our capital recycling initiatives do not proceed as planned this could reduce the liquidity available to fund future growth, which could in turn limit our ability to grow our distributions in line with our stated goals and the market value of our Units could decline.
Our group is subject to operating and financial restrictions through covenants in its loan, debt and security agreements.
Brookfield Renewable and its subsidiaries are subject to operating and financial restrictions through covenants in its loan, debt and security agreements. These restrictions prohibit or limit our group's ability to, among other things, incur additional debt, provide guarantees for indebtedness, grant liens, dispose of assets, liquidate, dissolve, amalgamate, consolidate or effect corporate or capital reorganizations, declare distributions, issue equity interests, and create subsidiaries. A financial covenant in our group's corporate bonds and in our group's corporate bank credit facilities limits our overall indebtedness to a percentage of total capitalization, a restriction which may limit our group's ability to obtain additional financing, withstand downturns in our group's business and take advantage of business and development opportunities. If our group breaches its covenants, its credit facilities may be terminated or come due and such event may cause our group's credit rating to deteriorate and subject Brookfield Renewable to higher interest and financing costs. From time to time, our group also acquires businesses and assets that have debt obligations that are in default. Our group may also be required to seek additional debt financing on terms that include more restrictive covenants and/or higher interest rates, change of control restrictions, require repayment on an accelerated schedule or impose other obligations that limit our group's ability to grow its business, acquire needed
assets, exit investments in assets or portfolio companies or take other actions that our group might otherwise consider appropriate or desirable.
Changes in our group’s credit ratings may have an adverse effect on our financial position and ability to raise capital.
The credit rating assigned to BEP, BEPC or any of their respective subsidiaries’ debt securities may be changed or withdrawn entirely by the relevant rating agency. A lowering or withdrawal of such ratings may have an adverse effect on our group's financial position and ability to raise capital and fund the growth of the business.
Our group may be subject to the risks commonly associated with the incurrence of debt at multiple levels within an organizational structure.
Debt incurred at multiple levels within the chain of control could exacerbate the separation of economic interest from controlling interest at such levels, thereby creating an incentive to leverage our group and its investments. Any such increase in debt would also make our group more sensitive to declines in revenues, increases in expenses and interest rates, and adverse market conditions. The servicing of any such debt would also reduce the amount of funds available to pay distributions to our company and ultimately to our shareholders.
We use leverage and such indebtedness may result in our company or our operating businesses being subject to certain covenants that restrict our ability to engage in certain types of activities or to make distributions to equity.
Many of our operating subsidiaries have entered into or will enter into credit facilities or have incurred or will incur other forms of debt, including to finance acquisitions. The total quantum of exposure to debt within our company is significant, and our company may become more leveraged in the future. Leveraged assets are more sensitive to declines in revenues, increases in expenses and interest rates, and adverse economic market and industry developments. A leveraged company’s income and net assets also tend to increase or decrease at a greater rate than would otherwise be the case if money had not been borrowed. As a result, the risk of loss associated with a leveraged company, all other things being equal, is generally greater than for companies with comparatively less debt. In addition, the use of indebtedness in connection with an acquisition may give rise to negative tax consequences to certain investors. Leverage may also result in a requirement for short-term liquidity, which may force the sale of assets at times of low demand and/or prices for such assets. This may mean that our company is unable to realize fair value for the assets in a sale.
An increase in either the general levels of interest rates or in the risk spread demanded by sources of indebtedness would make it more expensive to finance our investments. Additionally, certain of our group’s financings are, and future financings may be exposed to floating interest rate risks, and if interest rates increase, an increased proportion of our group’s cash flow may be required to service indebtedness. In addition, a portion of the indebtedness used to finance private equity investments often includes high-yield debt securities issued in the capital markets. Disruptions and volatility in capital markets, including those caused by rising interest rates, could increase our group’s cost of capital and adversely affect our group’s ability to fund its liquidity and capital needs and fund the growth of the business. If our group is unable to obtain committed debt financing for potential acquisitions or can only obtain debt at high interest rates or on other unfavorable terms, our group may have difficulty completing acquisitions or may generate profits that are lower than would otherwise be the case.
Our company’s credit facilities also contain, and may contain in the future, covenants applicable to the relevant borrower and events of default. Covenants can relate to matters including limitations on financial indebtedness, dividends, acquisitions, or minimum amounts for interest coverage, Adjusted EBITDA, cash flow or net worth. If an event of default occurs, or a minimum covenant requirement is not satisfied, this can result in a requirement to immediately repay any drawn amounts or the imposition of new restrictions, including a prohibition on the payment of distributions to equity.
We are subject to foreign currency risk which may adversely affect the performance of our operations and our ability to manage such risk depends, in part, on our ability to implement an effective hedging strategy.
A significant portion of our current operations are in countries where the U.S. dollar is not the functional currency. These operations pay distributions in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, which we must convert to U.S. dollars prior to making such distributions. A significant depreciation in the value of such foreign currencies, measures introduced by foreign governments to control inflation or deflation, currency exchange or export controls
may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. When managing our exposure to currency risks, we use foreign currency forward contracts and other strategies to mitigate currency risk and there can be no assurances that these strategies will be successful.
Risks Relating to Our Growth Strategy
Our group may be unable to identify sufficient investment opportunities and complete transactions, as planned.
Our group’s strategy for building value for BEP unitholders and BEPC shareholders is to seek to acquire or develop high-quality assets and businesses that generate sustainable and increasing cash flows, with the objective of achieving appropriate risk-adjusted returns on our group’s invested capital over the long-term. However, there is no certainty that our group will be able to find sufficient investment opportunities and complete transactions that meet our group’s investment criteria. Our group’s investment criteria consider, among other things, the financial, operating, governance and strategic merits of a proposed acquisition including whether our group expects it will meet our targeted return hurdle and, as such, there is no certainty that our group will be able to continue growing our group’s business by making acquisitions or developing assets at attractive returns. Competition for assets is significant and competition from other well-capitalized investors or companies may significantly increase the purchase price or prevent our group from completing an acquisition. Our group may also decline opportunities that our group does not believe meet our group’s investment criteria, which our competition may pursue instead.
Our group’s growth initiatives may be subject to a number of closing conditions, including, as applicable, third party consents, regulatory approvals (including from competition authorities) and other third-party approvals or actions that are beyond our group’s control. In particular, many jurisdictions in which we seek to invest impose government consent requirements on investments by foreign persons. Consents and approvals may not be obtained, may be obtained subject to conditions which adversely affect anticipated returns, and/or may be delayed and delay or ultimately preclude the completion of acquisitions, dispositions and other transactions. Government policies and attitudes in relation to foreign investment may change, making it more difficult to complete acquisitions, dispositions and other transactions in such jurisdictions. Furthermore, interested stakeholders could take legal steps to prevent transactions from being completed. Our group may also be unable to secure financing on acceptable terms (or at all) for our proposed acquisitions.
If all or some of our group’s acquisitions and other transactions are unable to be completed on the terms agreed, our group may need to modify or delay or, in some cases, abandon these transactions altogether (which may result in the payment of significant break-up fees). If our group is unable to achieve the expected benefits of transactions, the market value of the BEP units or BEPC exchangeable shares may decline.
Political instability, changes in government policy, or unfamiliar cultural factors could adversely impact the value of our group’s investments.
Our group is subject to the risk of geopolitical uncertainties in certain jurisdictions in which it operates. Our group makes investments in businesses globally and can pursue investments in new, non-core markets, which may expose our group to additional risks. Our group may not properly adjust to the local culture and business practices in such markets, and there is the prospect that our group may hire personnel or partner with local persons who might not comply with our culture and ethical business practices; either scenario could result in the failure of our group’s initiatives in new markets and lead to financial losses for us and our group’s managed entities. There are risks of political instability in several of the jurisdictions in which we conduct business, including, for example, from factors such as political conflict, tariffs and other protectionist trade policies, including the encouragement of the onshoring of manufacturing in the U.S. and other countries, income inequality, refugee migration, terrorism, the potential break-up of countries or political-economic unions, and political corruption. For example, the conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East and the global response to each, including the imposition of economic and other sanctions, has significantly impacted the global economy and financial markets, resulted in volatility in fuel prices, amplified existing supply chain challenges caused by increases in shipping costs (including as a result of conflicts and other attacks in or near shipping channels) and heightened cybersecurity disruptions and threats.
While recent energy market volatility in Europe has not directly adversely impacted our group’s business (principally because our power generation facilities in Europe rely on renewable inputs like wind and sunshine rather than inputs with volatile prices like gas and coal) the rising cost of power has generally increased the costs of conducting business in Europe and caused economic hardship and uncertainty and political tensions in the countries
in which our group operates. Further economic and political instability and the escalation or expansion of armed conflict in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, or elsewhere in the world, could result in local, regional and/or global instability that could adversely impact our group’s business, including through the disruption of free movement of goods, services and people, or a destabilization of energy markets. The materialization of one or more of these risks could negatively affect our group’s financial performance.
Our operations in the future may be different from our current business, including through future sustainable solutions investments.
Our group’s operations today primarily include hydroelectric, wind, utility solar and distributed generation power generation as well as biomass power generation, cogeneration, storage and nuclear services businesses in North and South America, Europe and Asia. Our development pipeline includes renewable power generation projects as well as carbon capture and storage projects, renewable natural gas and recycling projects. We may acquire interests in other businesses, and we may seek to divest of certain of our existing operations in the future. In addition, pursuant to the Relationship Agreement with Brookfield, Brookfield may (but is not required to) offer us the opportunity to acquire: (i) an integrated utility even if a significant component of such utility’s operations consist of a non-renewable power generation operation or development, such as a power generation operation that uses coal or natural gas, (ii) a portfolio of power operations, even if a significant component of such portfolio’s operations consist of non-renewable power generation, or (iii) renewable power generation operations or developments that comprise part of a broader enterprise.
In addition, we believe that our group’s relationship with Brookfield means that we are well positioned to execute on what Brookfield has identified as the multi-decade opportunity to advance decarbonization and assist with the transition of global electricity grids to a more sustainable future. We continue to expect that future clean energy acquisitions identified by Brookfield may be funded with commitments pursuant to Brookfield sponsored funds and that Brookfield Renewable would fund Brookfield’s participation in such funds where renewable power or other energy transition investments are made by such funds. We expect this would be the case even if such energy transition investments differ from our investments in operating and development stage renewable power generation that have to date been our primary focus. These energy transition investments include investments in nuclear services, carbon capture and storage projects, renewable natural gas, recycling, offshore wind generation, hydrogen and ammonia production and investments focused on enhancing the energy efficiency of existing infrastructure, among others.
Such energy transition investments may include businesses that at the time of the acquisition are relatively carbon-intensive, including power generation from thermal facilities (including coal-fired generation), with the goal of transitioning them to a less carbon intensive model over time. The success of any such transition plan would depend on a number of factors outside of our control and even if successful, may still require the operation of carbon intensive and other non-renewable power generation assets for an extended period of time. Accordingly, the risks associated with our group’s current operations may differ materially from those associated with our future operations.
The completion of new acquisitions can have the effect of significantly increasing the scale and scope of our operations, including operations in new geographic areas and industry sectors, and the Service Provider may have difficulty managing these additional operations. In addition, acquisitions involve risks to our business.
A key part of our group’s strategy will involve seeking acquisition opportunities upon Brookfield’s recommendation and allocation of opportunities to our company. Acquisitions may increase the scale, scope and diversity of our company’s operating businesses. We depend on the diligence and skill of Brookfield’s and our company’s professionals to effectively manage our company, integrating acquired businesses with our existing operations. These individuals may have difficulty managing additional acquired businesses and may have other responsibilities within Brookfield’s asset management business. If any such acquired businesses are not effectively integrated and managed, our company’s existing business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Future acquisitions will likely involve some or all of the following risks, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations: the difficulty of integrating the acquired operations and personnel into our current operations; potential disruption of our current operations; diversion of resources,
including Brookfield’s time and attention; the difficulty of managing the growth of a larger organization; the risk of entering markets in which our company has little experience; the risk of becoming involved in labor, commercial or regulatory disputes or litigation related to the new enterprise, risk of environmental or other liabilities associated with the acquired business; and the risk of a change of control resulting from an acquisition triggering rights of third parties or government agencies under contracts with, or authorizations held by the operating business being acquired. While it is our group’s practice to conduct extensive due diligence investigations into businesses being acquired, it is possible that due diligence may fail to uncover all material risks in the business being acquired, or to identify a change of control trigger in a material contract or authorization, or that a contractual counterparty or government agency may take a different view on the interpretation of such a provision to that taken by our company and the partnership, thereby resulting in a dispute. The discovery of any material liabilities subsequent to an acquisition, as well as the failure of an acquisition to perform according to expectations, could have an adverse effect on Brookfield Renewable’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, if returns are lower than anticipated from new acquisitions, our group may not be able to achieve growth in its distributions in line with its stated goals and the market value of our group's securities may decline.
Not all of the projects in our development pipeline will achieve commercial operation.
We have a large development pipeline that includes projects. at different level of advancement, from early stage projects which may not yet have the permits, licenses or other government approvals that are required, to later stage projects that we believe have a path to construction readiness, to under-construction projects that are in the process of being built. Our development pipeline also includes projects that we don’t own 100% of or, in certain circumstances, control. While the likelihood of a project being built increases when it receives, for example, required permits, licenses or other government approvals, when it signs construction and equipment supply agreements, and when it signs an offtake agreement, there can be no assurance that any one or a specific percentage of the projects in our development pipeline will be built or on what timeline.
With respect to our renewable power assets, our ability to realize our development growth plans is dependent on our ability to develop existing sites, to repower existing projects that are nearing the end of their useful lives, and to find new sites suitable for development into viable projects. Our ability to maintain a development permit often requires specific development steps to be undertaken. Successful development of renewable power projects is typically dependent on a number of factors, including: the ability to secure or renew our rights to an attractive site on reasonable terms, often following lengthy negotiations and/or competitive bidding processes; accurately measuring resource availability at levels deemed economically attractive for continued project development; the ability to secure new or renewed approvals, licenses and permits; the acceptance of local stakeholders, including in some cases, Indigenous peoples; the ability to secure transmission interconnection access or agreements; the ability to successfully integrate new projects or technologies into existing assets; the ability to acquire suitable labor, equipment and construction services on acceptable terms; the ability to attract construction project financing, including from tax equity investors and through tax and other government incentives such as those provided in the U.S. through the Inflation Reduction Act; and the ability to secure a long-term PPA or other sales contract on reasonable terms. Each of these factors can be critical in determining whether or not a particular development project might ultimately be suitable for construction and some of these factors are outside of our control. Failure to achieve any one of these elements may prevent the development and construction of a renewable power project, or otherwise cause such project to become obligated to make delay or termination payments or become obligated for other damages under contracts, experience the loss of tax credits or tax incentives, or experience diminished returns. When this occurs we may lose all of our investment in development expenditures and may ultimately be required to write-off project development assets and costs, which could adversely impact our group’s ability to achieve its development growth plans, deliver energy and generate revenues.
Our ability to develop projects is subject to construction risks and risks associated with the arrangements we enter into with communities and joint venture partners.
Our ability to develop an economically successful project is dependent on, among other things, our ability to construct a particular project on-time and on-budget. For example, the construction and development of a renewable power generating facility, whether as a greenfield project or by way of a repowering of an existing project, is subject to environmental, engineering and construction risks that could result in cost-overruns, delays and reduced performance. A number of factors that could cause delays, cost over-runs or reduced performance include, but are
not limited to, changes in local laws or difficulties in obtaining permits, rights of way or approvals, changing engineering and design requirements, construction costs exceeding estimates for various reasons, including inaccurate engineering and planning, failures to properly estimate the cost of raw materials, components, equipment, labor or the inability to timely obtain them, unanticipated problems with project start-up, the performance of contractors, the insolvency of the head contractor, a major subcontractor and/or a key equipment supplier, labor disruptions, inclement weather, defects in design, engineering or construction (including, without limitation, latent defects that do not materialize during an applicable warranty or limitation period) and project modifications. A delay in the projected completion of a project can result in a material increase in total project construction costs through higher capitalized interest charges, additional labor and other expenses, and a resultant delay in the commencement of cash flow. In addition, such unexpected issues may result in increased debt service costs, operations and maintenance expenses and damage payments for late delivery or the failure to meet agreed upon generation levels. This may result in an inability of the project to meet the higher interest and principal repayments arising from the additional debt required. Protracted delays could also result in a given project being in default of other terms of any applicable construction financing arrangements.
Development projects may also require large areas of land on which the new projects are to be constructed and operated. Rights to use land can be obtained through freehold title, leases and other rights of use. Land title systems vary by jurisdiction and in some cases it may not be possible to ascertain definitively who has the legal right to enter into land tenure arrangements with the asset owner or to secure the consent of all land owners. A government, court, regulator, Indigenous group, landowner or other stakeholder may make a decision or take action that adversely affects the development of a project or the demand for its services. For example, a regulator may restrict our access to an asset, or may require us to provide third parties with access. The restriction or curtailment of our rights with respect to an asset by a regulator or otherwise may negatively impact the success of our projects.
We may enter into various types of arrangements with communities and joint venture partners, including in some cases, Indigenous peoples, for the development of projects. In some circumstances, we may be required to notify, consult, or obtain the consent of certain stakeholders, such as Indigenous peoples, landowners, and/or municipalities. In some jurisdictions, it may be possible to claim Indigenous rights to land and the existence or declaration of Indigenous title may affect the existing or future activities of our projects and impact their business, financial condition and results of operations. In Canada, for example, courts have recognized that Indigenous peoples possess constitutionally protected rights in respect of land used or occupied by their ancestors where treaties have not been concluded to deal with these rights. Certain of these communities and partners may have or may develop interests or objectives which are different from or even in conflict with our objectives. Any such differences could have a negative impact on the success of our projects.
Some of our group’s investments and current operations are structured as joint ventures, partnerships, consortiums or structured arrangements, and our group intends to continue to operate in this manner in the future, which may reduce Brookfield’s and our group’s influence over our group’s operating subsidiaries and partners and may subject our group to additional obligations and risks.
Some of our group’s investments and operations are structured as joint ventures, partnerships and consortium arrangements, including its interest in Isagen and its joint venture with Cameco for Westinghouse. An integral part of our group’s strategy is to participate with institutional investors in Brookfield-sponsored or co-sponsored consortiums and as a partner in or alongside Brookfield-sponsored or co-sponsored partnerships that target acquisitions that suit our group’s profile. These arrangements are driven by the magnitude of capital required to complete acquisitions of generating assets, strategic partnering arrangements to access operating expertise, and other industry wide trends that our group believes will continue. Such arrangements involve risks not present where a third party is not involved, including the possibility that partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt or otherwise fail to fund its share of required capital contributions. Additionally, partners or co-venturers might at any time have economic or other business interests or goals different from our group and Brookfield. We may also, together with institutional partners, make non-controlled structured preferred equity or debt investments (“structured investments”) in businesses that feature asset classes or technologies that are at an early stage of development.
While our group’s strategy is to structure these arrangements to afford us certain protective rights in relation to operating and financing activities, joint ventures, partnerships, consortium and structured investments may provide for a reduced level of influence over an acquired company because governance rights are shared with others or such
protective rights do not otherwise provide us with direct operational control over the underlying business. Accordingly, decisions relating to the underlying operations and financing activities, including decisions relating to management and operations, the investment of capital within the arrangement and the timing and nature of any exit, will be made by a majority or super majority vote of the investors, by separate agreements that are reached with respect to individual decisions or, in the case of a structured investment, by agreement with the applicable counterparty. For example, although our company owns a controlling stake in the consortium’s interest in Isagen, the arrangements in place with the Brookfield Renewable consortium partners require that certain actions with respect to our investment in Isagen and our group’s influence over business operations require super majority approval of the consortium. In addition, our ability to continue to exercise control over Isagen depends on Brookfield (including our group) maintaining certain ownership thresholds in the entity entitled to appoint the Isagen board of directors. See Item 4.B “Business Overview—Current Operations—Colombia”. Similarly, although our group, together with institutional partners, owns a 51% stake in a joint venture with Cameco for Westinghouse, certain reserved matters relating to the underlying operations and financing activities of Westinghouse may require the support of both Cameco and Brookfield (including Brookfield Renewable) as long as certain ownership thresholds are met.
As a further example, when our group participates with institutional partners in Brookfield-sponsored or co-sponsored consortiums for asset acquisitions and as a partner in or alongside Brookfield-sponsored or co-sponsored partnerships, there is often a finite term to the investment or a date after which partners are granted liquidity rights, which may lead to the investment being sold prior to the date our group would otherwise choose. In addition, such operations may be subject to the risk that other investors may make business, financial or management decisions with which our group does not agree, or a management team may take risks or otherwise act in a manner that does not serve our group’s interests. We also may make commitments to invest funds in support of the development or other activities of the applicable company that extend over time. Because our group may have a reduced level of influence over such operations, our group may not be able to realize some or all of the benefits that it believes will be created from our group’s and Brookfield’s involvement. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our group’s business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer as a result.
In addition, because some of our group’s transactions and current operations are structured as joint ventures, partnerships or consortium arrangements, the sale or transfer of interests in some of our group’s operations are or may be subject to rights of first refusal or first offer, tag along rights or drag along rights and some agreements provide for buy-sell or similar arrangements. Such rights may be triggered at a time when our group may not want them to be exercised and such rights may inhibit our group’s ability to sell its interest in an entity within our group’s desired time frame or on any other desired basis. In addition, some of our group’s development arrangements rely on activity by a third-party to advance certain of the projects in our group’s pipeline to different stages, which subjects us to the risk that these third parties will not perform to our expectations.
We may acquire distressed companies and these acquisitions may subject our company and the partnership to increased risks, including the incurrence of additional legal or other expenses.
As part of our acquisition strategy, we may acquire distressed companies. This could involve acquisitions of securities of companies in event-driven special situations, such as acquisitions, tender offers, bankruptcies, recapitalizations, spinoffs, corporate and financial restructurings, litigation or other liability impairments, turnarounds, management changes, consolidating industries and other catalyst-oriented situations. Acquisitions of this type involve substantial financial and business risks that can result in substantial or total losses. Among the problems involved in assessing and making acquisitions in troubled issuers is the fact that it frequently may be difficult to obtain information as to the condition of such issuer. If, during the diligence process, we fail to identify issues specific to a company or the environment in which our company operates, we may be forced to later write down or write off assets, restructure its operations, or incur impairment or other charges that may result in other reporting losses.
As a consequence of acquiring distressed companies, we may be subject to increased risk of incurring additional legal, indemnification or other expenses, even if we are not named in any action. In distressed situations, litigation often follows when disgruntled shareholders, creditors and other parties seek to recover losses from poorly performing investments. The enhanced litigation risk in connection with investments in distressed companies is
further elevated by the potential that Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable may have controlling or influential positions in these companies.
We may occasionally make investments in securities, including the publicly listed securities of other companies, the value of which could decline due to factors beyond our control.
Brookfield may periodically recommend that we make investments in securities, including the publicly traded securities or debt of other companies. Investments in publicly traded securities are particularly subject to market volatility and market disruptions, and our investments in securities generally may be subject to changes in interest and currency exchange rates, equity prices and other economic and business factors beyond our control. In addition, at the time of any sales and settlements of securities, the price we ultimately realize will depend on demand and liquidity in the market at that time and may be materially lower than their current fair value. Similarly, some investments in securities, such as a minority position held in a private company, may be illiquid, which in turn may result in our inability to exit the investment on favorable terms or at all. While investments in securities are not expected to account for a large portion of Brookfield Renewable's investments generally, a decline in the value of such securities could result in returns that are lower than anticipated or even in the investment being lost completely, which could mean that we are not be able to achieve growth in our distributions in line with our stated goals and the market value of our securities may decline.
We may be subject to the risks commonly associated with a separation of economic interest from control within an organizational structure.
Our group’s ownership and organizational structure is similar to structures whereby one company controls another company which in turn holds controlling interests in other companies; thereby, the company at the top of the chain may control the company at the bottom of the chain even if its effective equity position in the bottom company is less than a controlling interest. Brookfield is the sole shareholder of the Managing General Partner and, as a result of such ownership of the Managing General Partner, Brookfield will be able to control the appointment and removal of the Managing General Partner’s directors and, accordingly, will exercise substantial influence over our group. In turn, our group often has a majority controlling interest or a significant influence in its investments. Even though the Brookfield Holders, collectively have an effective economic interest in BEP of approximately 47% on a fully-exchanged basis (assuming the exchange of all of the outstanding Redeemable/Exchangeable partnership units and BEPC exchangeable shares), as a result of their ownership of LP units, the Redeemable/Exchangeable partnership units and BEPC exchangeable shares, over time the Brookfield Holders may reduce this economic interest while still maintaining Brookfield’s controlling interest. This could lead to Brookfield using its control rights in a manner that conflicts with the economic interests of our other shareholders or BEP’s unitholders. For example, despite the fact that our group has the Conflicts Protocols in place, which, among other things, sets out requirements for the review and approval of transactions between our group and Brookfield, as well as between BEPC and Brookfield, because Brookfield will be able to exert substantial influence over our group, and, in turn, over our group’s investments, there is a greater risk that our group makes investments on terms that disproportionately benefit Brookfield over Brookfield Renewable and holders of LP units and BEPC exchangeable shares.
Risks Relating to Our Relationship with Brookfield and the Partnership
Brookfield exercises substantial influence over our group and it is highly dependent on the Service Provider.
As of the date of this Form 20-F, the Brookfield Holders, directly and indirectly, collectively hold approximately 25% of the BEPC exchangeable shares. In addition, the partnership, which itself is controlled by Brookfield Corporation, holds all of the issued and outstanding BEPC class B shares, having a 75% voting interest in BEPC, and BEPC class C shares. Through their ownership of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares, the Brookfield Holders and the partnership collectively hold an approximate 81.2% voting interest in our company. As a result, Brookfield Corporation is able to control the appointment and removal of our directors and the directors of BEP’s general partner and, accordingly, exercise substantial influence over our group. In addition, the Service Provider, which include wholly-owned subsidiaries of Brookfield, provide management and administration services to our group pursuant to the Master Services Agreement. With the exception of our group’s operating subsidiaries, our group generally does not have any employees and depends on the management and administration services provided by the Service Provider. The partners, members, shareholders, directors, officers and employees of Brookfield, or Brookfield Personnel, and support staff that provide services to our group are not required to have as
its primary responsibility the management and administration of our group or to act exclusively for our group. Any failure to effectively manage our group’s current operations or to implement its strategy could have a material adverse effect on our group’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Brookfield has no obligation to source acquisition opportunities for our group and our group may not have access to all renewable power acquisitions that Brookfield identifies.
Our group’s ability to grow through acquisitions depends on Brookfield’s ability to identify and present our group with acquisition opportunities. Brookfield established our group to hold and acquire, directly or indirectly, renewable power generating operations and development projects on a global basis. However, Brookfield’s obligations to our group under the Master Services Agreement and the Brookfield Relationship Agreement are subject to a number of exceptions and Brookfield has no obligation to source acquisition opportunities specifically for our group. In addition, Brookfield has not agreed to commit any minimum level of dedicated resources to our group for the pursuit of renewable power-related acquisitions or transition investments. There are a number of factors which could materially and adversely impact the extent to which suitable acquisition opportunities are made available by Brookfield, for example:
•it is an integral part of Brookfield’s (and our group’s) strategy to pursue the acquisition or development of renewable power assets through consortium arrangements with institutional partners, strategic partners and/or financial sponsors and to form partnerships (including private funds, joint ventures and similar arrangements) to pursue such acquisitions on a specialized or global basis. Although Brookfield has agreed that it will not enter any such arrangements that are suitable for our group without giving our group an opportunity to participate in them, there is no minimum level of participation to which our group will be entitled;
•the same professionals within Brookfield’s organization that are involved in sourcing and executing acquisitions that are suitable for our group are responsible for sourcing and executing opportunities for the vehicles, consortiums and partnerships referred to above, as well as having other responsibilities within Brookfield’s broader asset management business. Limits on the availability of such individuals will likewise result in a limitation on the availability of acquisition opportunities for our company;
•Brookfield will only recommend acquisition opportunities that it believes are suitable and appropriate for our group. For example, our focus is typically on assets where an operations-oriented approach can be deployed to create value. Accordingly, opportunities where Brookfield cannot play an active role in influencing the underlying assets may not be consistent with our group’s acquisition strategy and, therefore, may not be suitable for our group, even though it may be attractive from a purely financial perspective. Legal, regulatory, tax and other commercial considerations will likewise be an important consideration in determining whether an opportunity is suitable and/or appropriate for our group and will limit its ability to participate in certain acquisitions; and
•in addition to structural limitations, the question of whether a particular acquisition is suitable and/or appropriate is highly subjective and is dependent on a number of portfolio construction and management factors including our group’s liquidity position at the relevant time, the expected risk return profile of the opportunity, its fit with the balance of its investments and related operations, other opportunities that our group may be pursuing or otherwise considering at the relevant time, Brookfield Renewable’s interest in preserving capital in order to secure other opportunities and/or to meet other obligations, and other factors. If Brookfield determines that an opportunity is not suitable or appropriate for our company, it may still pursue such opportunity on its own behalf, on behalf of the partnership or on behalf of a Brookfield-sponsored vehicle, partnership or consortium.
In making determinations about acquisition opportunities and investments, consortium arrangements or partnerships, Brookfield may be influenced by factors that result in a misalignment or conflict of interest and may take the interests of others into account, as well as our own interests and the interests of the partnership. See Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
We may pursue acquisition opportunities indirectly through investments in Brookfield-sponsored vehicles, consortiums and partnerships or directly (including by investing alongside such vehicles, consortiums and partnerships). Any references to our acquisitions, investments, assets, expenses, portfolio companies or other terms
should be understood to mean such items held, incurred or undertaken directly by our company or indirectly by our company through its investment in such Brookfield-sponsored vehicles, consortiums and partnerships.
The departure of some or all of Brookfield’s professionals could prevent Brookfield Renewable from achieving its objectives.
Our group depends on the diligence, skill and business contacts of Brookfield’s professionals and the information and opportunities they generate during the normal course of their activities. Our group’s future success will depend on the continued service of these individuals, who are not obligated to remain employed with Brookfield. Brookfield has experienced departures of key professionals in the past and may do so in the future, and our group cannot predict the impact that any such departures will have on our group’s ability to achieve its objectives. The departure of a significant number of Brookfield’s professionals for any reason, or the failure to appoint qualified or effective successors in the event of such departures, could have a material adverse effect on our group’s ability to achieve its objectives. The Master Services Agreement does not require Brookfield to maintain the employment of any of its professionals or to cause any particular professionals to provide services to our company or on our group’s behalf.
Brookfield’s and the partnership’s ownership position of our company entitles them to a significant percentage of our dividends, and Brookfield may increase its ownership relative to other shareholders.
As of the date of this Form 20-F, the Brookfield Holders collectively own, directly and indirectly, approximately 25% of the BEPC exchangeable shares, entitling them to the same dividends that other BEPC exchangeable shareholders will receive. In addition, the partnership owns all of the issued and outstanding BEPC class B shares, which represent a 75% voting interest in BEPC, and all of the issued and outstanding BEPC class C shares which entitle the partnership to all of the residual value in our company after payment in full of the amount due to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares and subject to the prior rights of holders of BEPC preferred shares. Together, the Brookfield Holders and the partnership hold an approximate 81.2% voting interest in our company. The partnership’s ownership of BEPC class C shares will entitle it to receive dividends as and when declared by our board of directors. Accordingly, the Brookfield Holders and the partnership’s ownership position of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class C shares allows them to receive a substantial percentage of BEPC dividends. In addition, the Brookfield Holders may increase their ownership position in our company. The Brookfield Holders may purchase additional BEPC exchangeable shares in the open market or pursuant to a private placement, which may result in the Brookfield Holders increasing their ownership of BEPC exchangeable shares relative to other shareholders, which could reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to public shareholders.
None of British Columbia corporate law, the Master Services Agreement and our other arrangements with Brookfield impose on Brookfield any fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of our shareholders or BEP’s unitholders.
None of British Columbia corporate law, the Master Services Agreement and our other arrangements with Brookfield impose on Brookfield any duty (statutory or otherwise) to act in the best interests of the Service Recipients, nor do they impose other duties that are fiduciary in nature.
Our organizational and ownership structure may create significant conflicts of interest that may be resolved in a manner that is not in the best interests of our company or the best interests of our shareholders.
Our organizational and ownership structure involves a number of relationships that may give rise to conflicts of interest between our company and our shareholders, on the one hand, and Brookfield and the partnership, on the other hand. For example, our board of directors mirrors the board of the general partner of BEP, except for two additional non-overlapping board members that assist our company with, among other things, resolving any conflicts of interest that may arise from our relationship with the partnership. Mr. Carvalho Filho and Mr. MacEwen are currently the non-overlapping members of our board of directors. Mr. Carvalho Filho previously served on the board of directors of the general partner of BEP from 2013 until just prior to the completion of the special distribution. In certain instances, the interests of Brookfield or the partnership may differ from the interests of our company and our shareholders, including with respect to the types of acquisitions made, the timing and amount of dividends by our company, the reinvestment of returns generated by our operations, the use of leverage when making acquisitions and the appointment of outside advisors and service providers. Further, Brookfield may make decisions, including with
respect to tax or other reporting positions, from time to time that may be more beneficial to one type of investor or beneficiary than another, or to Brookfield rather than to our company and our shareholders.
In accordance with our articles, the holders of the BEPC class B shares are entitled to cast, in the aggregate, a number of votes equal to three times the number of votes attached to the BEPC exchangeable shares (which carry one vote per BEPC exchangeable share), and except as otherwise expressly provided in our articles or as required by law, the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares will vote together and not as separate classes. The partnership, which itself is controlled by Brookfield, holds all of the issued and outstanding BEPC class B shares, having a 75% voting interest in BEPC, and BEPC class C shares, which entitle the partnership to all of the residual value in our company after payment in full of the amount due to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares, subject to the prior rights of holders of any BEPC preferred shares. As a result, Brookfield is able to control the election and removal of our directors and the directors of BEP’s general partner and, accordingly, exercises substantial influence over our group.
In addition, the Service Provider, an affiliate of Brookfield, will provide management services to our company pursuant to the Master Services Agreement. Pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, in exchange for the management services provided to our group by the Service Provider, the partnership pays an annual base management fee to the Service Provider of $20 million (adjusted annually for inflation at an inflation factor based on year-over-year United States consumer price index) plus 1.25% of the amount by which the market value of our group exceeds an initial reference value. The base management fee is calculated and paid on a quarterly basis. We pay for our proportionate share of such fee. Our proportionate share of the base management fee is calculated on the basis of the value of our business relative to that of the partnership. For purposes of calculating the base management fee, the market value of the partnership is equal to the aggregate value of all outstanding BEP units on a fully-diluted basis, preferred units and securities of the other Service Recipients (including BEPC exchangeable shares) that are not held by the partnership, plus all outstanding third-party debt with recourse to a Service Recipient, less all cash held by such entities. BRP Bermuda GP Limited, an affiliate of Brookfield, also receives incentive distributions based on the amount by which quarterly distributions on BRELP units (other than BRELP Class A Preferred Units) as well as economically equivalent securities, such as the BEPC exchangeable shares, of the other Service Recipients exceed specified target levels as set forth in BRELP’s limited partnership agreement. This relationship may give rise to conflicts of interest between our company and our shareholders, on the one hand, and Brookfield, on the other, as Brookfield’s interests may differ from the interests of the partnership, our company or our shareholders.
In addition, Brookfield may seek from time to time to transfer its LP Units and BEPC exchangeable shares to subsidiaries of Brookfield Reinsurance. Subsidiaries of Brookfield Reinsurance may also from time to time decide to participate in BEP or BEPC’s equity offerings. For example, in June 2023, a subsidiary of Brookfield Reinsurance participated in a private placement of LP Units, and in September 2023, BRPI transferred certain BEPC exchangeable shares to a subsidiary of Brookfield Reinsurance. Any such offerings and transfers to Brookfield Reinsurance may change Brookfield’s interests and incentives as described above. Similarly, from time to time Brookfield Reinsurance and its related entities may provide non-recourse financing to subsidiaries of Brookfield Renewable. Such financing agreements may contain change of control restrictions that could impact our group’s ability to exit investments in assets or portfolio companies. See Item 7.A “Major Shareholders”.
The partnership’s arrangements with Brookfield, which also apply to our company, were negotiated in the context of an affiliated relationship and may contain terms that are less favorable than those which otherwise might have been obtained from unrelated parties.
The terms of the partnership’s arrangements with Brookfield, that also apply to our company, were effectively determined by Brookfield. These terms, including terms relating to compensation, contractual or fiduciary duties, conflicts of interest and Brookfield’s ability to engage in outside activities, including activities that compete with our company, our activities and limitations on liability and indemnification, may be less favorable than otherwise might have resulted if the negotiations had involved unrelated parties.
Our company is not entitled to terminate the Master Services Agreement. Only the general partner of BEP may terminate the Master Services Agreement, and it may be unable or unwilling to do so.
Our company is not entitled to terminate the Master Services Agreement. Only the general partner of BEP may terminate the Master Services Agreement, and it may be unable or unwilling to do so. The Master Services Agreement provides that the Service Recipients may terminate the agreement only if: the Service Provider defaults in the performance or observance of any material term, condition or covenant contained in the agreement in a manner that results in material harm to the Service Recipients and the default continues unremedied for a period of sixty (60) days after written notice of the breach is given to the Service Provider; the Service Provider engages in any act of fraud, misappropriation of funds or embezzlement against any Service Recipient that results in material harm to our company; the Service Provider is grossly negligent in the performance of their duties under the agreement and such negligence results in material harm to the Service Recipients; or upon the happening of certain events relating to the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Service Provider. The Master Services Agreement cannot be terminated for any other reason, including if the Service Provider or Brookfield Corporation experience a change of control or due solely to the poor performance or under-performance of our group’s operations or assets, and the agreement continues in perpetuity, until terminated in accordance with its terms. Because the general partner of BEP is an affiliate of Brookfield, it may be unwilling to terminate the Master Services Agreement, even in the case of a default. If the Service Provider’s performance does not meet the expectations of investors, and the general partner of BEP is unable or unwilling to terminate the Master Services Agreement, our group is not entitled to terminate the agreement and the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares or the BEP units could suffer. See Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Brookfield Relationship Agreement” and Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Licensing Agreement” for more details.
The liability of the Service Provider is limited under our arrangements with them and our company and the other Service Recipients, including the partnership, have agreed to indemnify the Service Provider against claims that they it face in connection with such arrangements, which may lead them to assume greater risks when making decisions relating to our company than they otherwise would if acting solely for their own account.
Under the Master Services Agreement, the Service Provider has not assumed any responsibility other than to provide or arrange for the provision of the services described in the Master Services Agreement in good faith and will not be responsible for any action that our company takes in following or declining to follow their advice or recommendations. The liability of the Service Provider under the Master Services Agreement is limited to the fullest extent permitted by law to conduct involving bad faith, fraud or willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, action that was known to have been unlawful, except that the Service Provider is also liable for liabilities arising from gross negligence. In addition, our company and the other Service Recipients, including the partnership, have agreed to indemnify the Service Provider to the fullest extent permitted by law from and against any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses incurred by an indemnified person or threatened in connection with our operations, investments and activities or in respect of or arising from the Master Services Agreement or the services provided by the Service Provider, except to the extent that the claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses are determined to have resulted from the conduct in respect of which such persons have liability as described above. These protections may result in the Service Provider tolerating greater risks when making decisions than otherwise would be the case, including when determining whether to use leverage in connection with acquisitions. The indemnification arrangements to which the Service Provider is a party may also give rise to legal claims for indemnification that are adverse to our company and our shareholders.
Our company guarantees certain debt obligations of the partnership, which may adversely affect our financial health and make our company more vulnerable to adverse economic conditions.
Our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary fully and unconditionally guarantees certain unsecured debt securities and preferred securities issued by the partnership, as well as the partnership’s obligations under, certain credit facilities, thereby causing our company to become liable for such obligations. In light of the guarantees, our company is exposed to the credit risk of the partnership. If the partnership is unable or fails to pay any of its indebtedness in respect of which our company has provided a guarantee, we may be required to pay all amounts due under such indebtedness, which may affect our financial health and make our company more vulnerable to adverse economic conditions. See Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support” for more details.
Brookfield and Oaktree operate their respective investment businesses largely independently, and do not expect to coordinate or consult on investment decisions, which may give rise to conflicts of interest and make it more difficult to mitigate certain conflicts of interest.
Brookfield and Oaktree operate their respective investment businesses largely independently pursuant to an information barrier, and Brookfield does not expect to coordinate or consult with Oaktree with respect to investment activities and/or decisions. In addition, neither Brookfield nor Oaktree is expected to be subject to any internal approvals over its investment activities and decisions by any person who would have knowledge and/or decision-making control of the investment decisions of the other. As a result, it is expected that our group, as well as Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in and their portfolio companies, will engage in activities and have business relationships that give rise to conflicts (and potential conflicts) of interests between them, on the one hand, and Oaktree, Oaktree Accounts and their portfolio companies, on the other hand. These conflicts (and potential conflicts) of interests may include: (i) competing from time to time for the same investment opportunities, (ii) the pursuit by Oaktree Accounts of investment opportunities suitable for our group and Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in, without making such opportunities available to our group or those Brookfield Accounts, and (iii) the formation or establishment of new Oaktree Accounts that could compete or otherwise conduct their affairs without regard as to whether or not they adversely impact our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in. Investment teams managing our group's activities and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in are not expected to be aware of, and will not have the ability to manage, such conflicts.
Our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in could be adversely impacted by Oaktree’s activities. Competition from Oaktree Accounts for investment opportunities could also, under certain circumstances, adversely impact the purchase price of our group's (direct and/or indirect) investments. As a result of different investment objectives, views and/or interests in investments, Oaktree will manage certain Oaktree Accounts in a way that is different than from our group's interests and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in, which could adversely impact our group's (direct and/or direct) investments. For more information, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties—Oaktree”.
Brookfield and Oaktree are likely to be deemed to be affiliates for purposes of certain laws and regulations, which may result in, among other things, earlier public disclosure of investments by us and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in.
Brookfield and Oaktree are likely to be deemed to be affiliates for purposes of certain laws and regulations, notwithstanding their operational independence and/or information barrier, and it is anticipated that, from time to time, our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in and Oaktree Accounts may each have significant positions in one or more of the same issuers. As such, Brookfield and Oaktree will likely need to aggregate certain investment holdings, including our group's holdings, Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in and Oaktree Accounts for certain securities law purposes and other regulatory purposes. Consequently, Oaktree’s activities could result in earlier public disclosure of investments by our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in, restrictions on transactions by our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in (including the ability to make or dispose of certain investments at certain times), adverse effects on the prices of investments made by our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in, potential short-swing profit disgorgement, penalties and/or regulatory remedies, among others. For more information, see Item 7.B., “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties—Oaktree”.
Breaches of the information barrier and related internal controls by Brookfield and/or Oaktree could result in significant adverse consequences to Brookfield and Oaktree and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in, amongst others.
Although information barriers have been implemented to address the potential conflicts of interests and regulatory, legal and contractual requirements of our group, Brookfield and Oaktree may decide, at any time and without notice to us or our shareholders, to remove or modify the information barrier between Brookfield and Oaktree. In addition, there may be breaches (including inadvertent breaches) of the information barriers and related internal controls by Brookfield and/or Oaktree.
To the extent that the information barrier is removed or is otherwise ineffective and Brookfield has the ability to access analysis, model and/or information developed by Oaktree and its personnel, Brookfield will not be under any
obligation or other duty to access such information or effect transactions for our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in in accordance with such analysis and models, and in fact may be restricted by securities laws from doing so. In such circumstances, Brookfield may make investment decisions for our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in that differ from those it would have made if Brookfield had pursued such information, which may be disadvantageous to our group and/or Brookfield Accounts that our group is invested in.
The role and ownership of Brookfield may change.
Our group’s arrangements with Brookfield does not require Brookfield to maintain any ownership level in our group, and Brookfield may sell the BEP units or additional BEPC exchangeable shares that it holds in BEP or our company, respectively. Brookfield may sell or transfer all or part of its interests in the Service Provider without the approval of our group, which could result in changes to the management of our group and its current growth strategy. Additionally, our group cannot predict with any certainty the effect that any changes in ownership level of Brookfield of our group would have on the trading price of BEPC exchangeable shares, the BEP units or our group’s ability to raise capital or make investments in the future. As a result, the future of our group would be uncertain and its business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.
Risks Relating to the BEPC Exchangeable Shares
Each BEPC exchangeable share is structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to one LP Unit and therefore we expect that the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares will be impacted by the market price of the LP Units and the combined business performance of our group as a whole.
Each BEPC exchangeable share has been structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to one LP Unit and, in addition to contemplating identical dividends to the distributions paid on the LP Units, each BEPC exchangeable share is exchangeable at the option of the holder for one LP Unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events) or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. Our company and the partnership currently intend to satisfy any exchange requests on the BEPC exchangeable shares through the delivery of LP Units rather than cash. As a result, the business operations of the partnership, and the market price of the LP Units, are expected to have an impact on the market price of the BEPC exchangeable shares, which could be disproportionate in circumstances where the business operations and results of our company on a standalone basis are not indicative of such market trends. BEPC exchangeable shareholders will have no ability to control or influence the decisions or business of the partnership. You should therefore also carefully consider the risk factors applicable to the partnership’s business and an investment in LP Units, as described in BEP’s Annual Report and BEP’s quarterly reports on Form 6-K. For additional information regarding the partnership, see Item 4.C “Organizational Structure—Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.”
We may redeem the BEPC exchangeable shares at any time without the consent of holders thereof.
Our company’s board of directors, in its sole discretion and for any reason, and without the consent of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares, may elect to redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares at any time upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice, including without limitation following the occurrence of any of the following redemption events: (i) the total number of BEPC exchangeable shares outstanding decreases by 50% or more over any twelve-month period; (ii) a person acquires 90% of the LP Units in a take-over bid (as defined by applicable securities law); (iii) unitholders of BEP approve an acquisition of BEP by way of arrangement or amalgamation; (iv) unitholders of BEP approve a restructuring or other reorganization of BEP; (v) there is a sale of all or substantially all of BEP’ assets; (vi) there is a change of law (whether by legislative, governmental or judicial action), administrative practice or interpretation, or a change in circumstances of our company and our shareholders, that may result in adverse tax consequences for our company or our shareholders; or (vii) our board of directors, in its sole discretion, concludes that the unitholders of BEP or holders of BEPC exchangeable shares are adversely impacted by a fact, change or other circumstance relating to our company. For greater certainty, unitholders of BEP do not have the ability to vote on such redemption and our company’s board of directors decision to redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares will be final. In addition, the holder of BEPC class B shares may deliver a notice to us specifying a redemption date upon which we shall redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares, and upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice from our company to holders of the BEPC exchangeable shares and without the consent of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares, we shall be required to redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares on such redemption date. In the event of such redemption, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares will no longer own a direct interest in our company and will become unitholders of BEP, even if such holders desired to remain holders of BEPC exchangeable shares. Such redemption could occur at a time when the trading price of the BEPC exchangeable shares is greater than the trading price of the LP Units, in which case holders would receive LP Units with a lower trading price. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Redemption by Issuer”.
In the event that a BEPC exchangeable share held by a holder is redeemed by our company or exchanged by the holder, the holder will be considered to have disposed of such BEPC exchangeable share for Canadian income tax purposes. See Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations” for more information.
Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares do not have a right to elect whether to receive cash or LP Units upon a liquidation or exchange event. Rather, our group has the right to make such election in its sole discretion.
In the event that (i) there is a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC or BEP, (ii) BEPC or BEP exercises its right to redeem (or cause the redemption of) all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares, or (iii) a holder of BEPC exchangeable shares requests an exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares shall be entitled to receive one LP Unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events described in this Form 20-F and certain other payment obligations in the case of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC or BEP) or in the case of (i) and (iii), its cash equivalent. The form of payment will be determined at the election of our group so a holder will not know whether cash or LP units, as applicable, will be delivered in connection with any of the events described in clauses (i) and (iii) above. Our company and the partnership currently intend to satisfy any exchange requests on the BEPC exchangeable shares through the delivery of LP Units rather than cash. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares”.
Any holder requesting an exchange of their BEPC exchangeable shares for which our company or BEP elects to provide BEP units in satisfaction of the exchange amount may experience a delay in receiving such BEP units, which may affect the value of the BEP units the holder receives in an exchange.
Each BEPC exchangeable share is exchangeable at the option of the holder for one BEP unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events) or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. In the event cash is used to satisfy an exchange request, the amount payable per BEPC exchangeable share will be equal to the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the date that the request for exchange is received by the transfer agent. As a result, any decrease in the value of the BEP units after that date will not affect the amount of cash received. However, any holder whose BEPC exchangeable shares
are exchanged for BEP units will not receive such BEP units for up to ten (10) business days after the applicable request is received. During this period, the market price of BEP units may decrease. Any such decrease would affect the value of the BEP unit consideration to be received by the holder of BEPC exchangeable shares on the effective date of the exchange.
BEP is required to maintain an effective registration statement in the United States in order to exchange any BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units. If a registration statement with respect to the BEP units issuable upon any exchange, redemption or acquisition of BEPC exchangeable shares (including in connection with any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC) is not current or is suspended for use by the SEC, no exchange or redemption of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units may be effected during such period.
The BEPC exchangeable shares may not trade at the same price as the BEP units.
Although the BEPC exchangeable shares are intended to provide an economic return that is equivalent to the BEP units, there can be no assurance that the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares will be equal to the market price of BEP units at any time. For example, using a volume-weighted average price for the 30 trading day period ending February 23, 2024, the prices per BEPC exchangeable share were $26.64 and C$35.86 on the NYSE and TSX, respectively, and the prices per BEP unit were $24.74 and C$33.53 on the NYSE and TSX, respectively. If our company redeems the BEPC exchangeable shares (which can be done without the consent of the holders) at a time when the trading price of the BEPC exchangeable shares is greater than the trading price of the BEP units, holders will receive BEP units with a lower trading price. Factors that have and could cause differences in such market prices may include:
•perception and/or recommendations by analysts, investors and/or other third parties that these securities should be priced differently;
•actual or perceived differences in distributions to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares versus holders of BEP units, including as a result of any legal prohibitions; and
•difficulty in the exchange mechanics between BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP units, including any delays or difficulties experienced by the transfer agent in processing the exchange requests.
If a sufficient amount of BEPC exchangeable shares are exchanged for BEP units, then the BEPC exchangeable shares may be de-listed.
If a sufficient amount of BEPC exchangeable shares are exchanged for BEP units, or we exercise our redemption right at any time including if the total number of BEPC exchangeable shares decreases by 50% or more over any twelve-month period, our company may fail to meet the minimum listing requirements on the NYSE and the TSX, and the NYSE or the TSX may take steps to de-list the BEPC exchangeable shares. Though holders of BEPC exchangeable shares will still be entitled to exchange each such share at any time for one BEP unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events described in this Form 20-F), or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company), a de-listing of the BEPC exchangeable shares would have a significant adverse effect on the liquidity of the BEPC exchangeable shares, and holders thereof may not be able to exit their investments in the market on favorable terms.
The market price of the BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP units may be volatile, and holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and/or BEP units may lose a significant portion of their investment due to drops in the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares and/or BEP units.
The market price of the BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP units may be volatile and holders of such securities may not be able to resell their securities at or above the implied price at which they acquired such securities due to fluctuations in the market price of such securities, including changes in market price caused by factors unrelated to Brookfield Renewable’s operating performance or prospects. Specific factors that may have a significant effect on the market price of the BEPC exchangeable shares and the BEP units:
•changes in stock market analyst recommendations or earnings estimates regarding the BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP units, other companies and partnerships that are comparable to Brookfield Renewable or are in the industries that they serve;
•with respect to the BEPC exchangeable shares, changes in the market price of the BEP units, and vice versa;
•actual or anticipated fluctuations in our company’s and the partnership’s operating results or future prospects;
•reactions to public announcements by Brookfield Renewable;
•strategic actions taken by Brookfield Renewable;
•adverse conditions in the financial market or general U.S. or international economic conditions, including those resulting from pandemic, war, incidents of terrorism and responses to such events; and
•sales of such securities by Brookfield Renewable or significant shareholders.
Exchanges of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units may negatively affect the market price of the BEP units, and additional issuances of BEPC exchangeable shares would be dilutive to the BEP units.
Each BEPC exchangeable share is exchangeable by the holder thereof for one BEP unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events) or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. If our group elects to deliver BEP units in satisfaction of any such exchange request, a significant number of additional BEP units may be issued from time to time which could have a negative impact on the market price for BEP units. Additionally, any BEPC exchangeable shares issued by us in the future will also be exchangeable for BEP units, and, accordingly, any future exchanges satisfied by the delivery of BEP units would dilute the percentage interest of existing holders of the BEP units and may reduce the market price of the BEP units.
We or BEP may issue additional BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP units in the future, including in lieu of incurring indebtedness, which may dilute holders of our company’s and BEP’s equity securities. Our company or BEP may also issue securities that have rights and privileges that are more favorable than the rights and privileges accorded to our company’s and BEP’s equity holders.
Subject to the terms of any of our company’s securities then outstanding, we may issue additional securities, including BEPC exchangeable shares, BEPC class B shares, BEPC class C shares, preference shares, options, rights and warrants for any purpose and for such consideration and on such terms and conditions as our board of directors may determine. Subject to the terms of any of our company’s securities then outstanding, our board of directors will be able to determine the class, designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties of any additional securities, including any rights to share in our profits, losses and dividends, any rights to receive our assets upon BEPC’s dissolution or liquidation and any redemption, conversion and exchange rights. Subject to the terms of any of our company’s securities then outstanding, our board of directors may use such authority to issue such additional securities, which would dilute holders of such securities, or to issue securities with rights and privileges that are more favorable than those of the BEPC exchangeable shares.
Similarly, under BEP’s limited partnership agreement, subject to the terms of any preferred units then outstanding, BEP’s general partner may issue additional partnership securities, including BEP units, preferred units, options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to partnership securities for any purpose and for such consideration and on such terms and conditions as the board of BEP’s general partner may determine. Subject to the terms of any of BEP securities then outstanding, the board of BEP’s general partner will be able to determine the class, designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties of any additional partnership securities, including any rights to share in BEP’s profits, losses and dividends, any rights to receive BEP’s assets upon its dissolution or liquidation and any redemption, conversion and exchange rights. Subject to the terms of any of BEP securities then outstanding, the board of BEP’s general partner may use such authority to issue such additional partnership securities, which would dilute holders of such securities, or to issue securities with rights and privileges that are more favorable than those of the BEP units.
The sale or issuance of a substantial number of BEPC exchangeable shares, the BEP units or other equity securities of our company or BEP in the public markets, or the perception that such sales or issuances could occur, could depress the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale
of additional BEPC exchangeable shares. We cannot predict the effect that future sales or issuances of BEPC exchangeable shares, BEP units or other equity securities would have on the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares. Subject to the terms of any of our company’s securities then outstanding, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares will not have any pre-emptive right or any right to consent to or otherwise approve the issuance of any securities or the terms on which any such securities may be issued.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to pay dividends equal to the levels currently paid by BEP and holders of BEPC exchangeable shares may not receive dividends equal to the distributions paid on the BEP units and, accordingly, may not receive the intended economic equivalence of those securities.
The BEPC exchangeable shares are intended to provide an economic return per BEPC exchangeable share equivalent to one BEP unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. Pursuant to the equity commitment, BEP has agreed that it will not declare or pay any distribution on the BEP units if on such date we do not have sufficient funds or other assets to enable the declaration and payment of an equivalent dividend on the BEPC exchangeable shares. However, dividends are at the discretion of our board of directors and unforeseen circumstances (including legal prohibitions) may prevent the same dividends from being paid on each security. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that dividends and distributions will be identical for each BEPC exchangeable share and BEP unit, respectively, in the future, which may impact the market price of these securities. Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares may not equal the levels currently paid by BEP for various reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:
•We may not have enough unrestricted funds to pay such dividends due to changes in our cash requirements, capital spending plans, cash flow or financial position;
•decisions on whether, when and in which amounts to make any future dividends will be dependent on then-existing conditions, including our financial conditions, earnings, legal requirements, including limitations under British Columbia law, restrictions on our borrowing agreements that limit its ability to pay dividends and other factors we deem relevant; and
•We may desire to retain cash to improve our credit profile or for other reasons.
U.S. investors in BEPC exchangeable shares may find it difficult or impossible to enforce service of process and enforcement of judgments against our company, our board of directors and the Service Provider.
Our company was established under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, and a significant number of our subsidiaries are organized in jurisdictions outside of the United States. In addition, our executive officers are located outside of the United States. Certain of our directors and officers and the Service Provider resides outside of the United States. A substantial portion of our assets are, and the assets of our directors and officers and the Service Provider may be located outside of the United States. It may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon our directors and officers and the Service Provider. It may also not be possible to enforce against our company, or our directors and officers and the Service Provider, judgments obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of applicable securities law in the United States.
Our company is a holding company and our material assets consist solely of interests in our operating subsidiaries.
Our company has no independent means of generating revenue. We depend on distributions and other payments from our operating businesses to provide us with the funds necessary to meet our financial obligations. Our operating businesses are legally distinct from our company and some of them are or may become restricted in their ability to pay dividends and distributions or otherwise make funds available to our company pursuant to local law, regulatory requirements and their contractual agreements, including agreements governing their financing arrangements. Our operating businesses will generally be required to service their debt obligations before making distributions to our company.
As a result of the FPA and FERC’s regulations in respect of transfers of control, absent prior authorization by FERC, an investor in our company will generally not be permitted to obtain a direct and/or indirect voting
interest of 10% or more in BEPC, and a violation of this limitation could result in civil or criminal penalties under the FPA and possible further sanctions imposed by FERC under the FPA.
Some of our U.S. operating subsidiaries are “public utilities” (as defined in the FPA) and, therefore, subject to FERC’s jurisdiction under the FPA. As a result, the FPA requires BEPC to (i) obtain prior authorization from FERC to transfer an amount of issued and outstanding voting securities sufficient to convey direct or indirect control over any of our public utility subsidiaries or (ii) qualify for a blanket authorization granted under or an exemption from FERC’s regulations in respect of transfers of control.
Similar restrictions apply to purchasers of BEPC exchangeable shares who are a “holding company” under PUHCA in a holding company system that includes a transmitting utility or an electric utility, or an “electric holding company” regardless of whether BEPC exchangeable shares are received pursuant to subsequent offerings, in open market transactions or otherwise. A purchaser of BEPC exchangeable shares would be a “holding company” under the PUHCA and an electric holding company if the purchaser acquired direct or indirect control over BEPC exchangeable shares which would give such purchaser a 10% or more voting interest in BEPC or if FERC otherwise determined that the purchaser could directly or indirectly exercise control over our management or policies (e.g., as a result of contractual board or approval rights). Under the PUHCA, a “public-utility company” is defined to include an “electric utility company,” which is any company that owns or operates facilities used for the generation, transmission or distribution of electric energy for sale. Accordingly, absent prior authorization by FERC or a general increase to the applicable percentage ownership under a blanket authorization, for the purposes of sell-side transactions by BEPC and buy-side transactions involving purchasers of BEPC exchangeable shares that are electric holding companies, no purchaser can acquire such number of BEPC exchangeable shares that would give such purchaser a 10% or more voting interest in BEPC. A violation of these regulations by BEPC, as seller, or an investor, as a purchaser of BEPC exchangeable shares, could subject the party in violation to civil or criminal penalties under the FPA, including civil penalties of up to $1 million per day per violation and other possible sanctions imposed by FERC under the FPA.
As a result of the FPA and FERC’s regulations in respect of transfers of control, and consistent with the requirements for blanket authorizations granted thereunder or exemptions therefrom, absent prior authorization by FERC, whether BEPC exchangeable shares are received in subsequent offerings, in open market transactions or otherwise, no investor will be permitted to receive or purchase such number of BEPC exchangeable shares that would cause such investor and its affiliate and associate companies to collectively hold a 10% or more voting interest in BEPC. Additionally, investors should manage their investment in BEPC in a manner consistent with FERC’s regulations in respect of obtaining direct or indirect “control” of BEPC. Accordingly, absent prior authorization by FERC, investors in BEPC exchangeable shares that are electric holding companies are advised not to acquire such number of BEPC exchangeable shares that would give such investor a 10% or more voting interest in BEPC.
Our articles and BEP’s limited partnership agreement provide that the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the U.S. Securities Act. This choice of forum provision could limit our shareholders and BEP’s unitholders ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with directors, officers or employees.
Our articles and BEP’s limited partnership agreement provide, that, unless we or BEP consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the U.S. Securities Act. In the absence of these provisions, under the U.S. Securities Act, U.S. federal and state courts have been found to have concurrent jurisdiction over suits brought to enforce duties or liabilities created by the U.S. Securities Act. This choice of forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce duties or liabilities created by the Exchange Act, which already provides that such federal district courts have exclusive jurisdictions over such suits. Additionally, investors cannot waive our and the partnership’s compliance with federal securities laws of the United States and the rules and regulations thereunder.
The choice of forum provision contained in our articles and BEP’s limited partnership agreement may limit our shareholder’s or BEP unitholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with our company, the partnership or their directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against the partnership, our company and their directors, officers and other employees. However, the enforceability
of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ governing documents has been challenged in recent legal proceedings, and it is possible that a court in the relevant jurisdictions with respect to BEP and our company could find the choice of forum provision contained in our articles and BEP’s limited partnership agreement to be inapplicable or unenforceable. While the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that U.S. federal forum selection provisions purporting to require claims under the U.S. Securities Act be brought in a U.S. federal court are “facially valid” under Delaware law, there can be no assurance that the courts in Canada (including in the Province of British Columbia) and Bermuda, and other courts within the United States, reach a similar determination regarding the choice of forum provision contained in our articles and BEP’s limited partnership agreement. If the relevant court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our articles or BEP’s limited partnership agreement to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, the partnership and our company may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could materially adversely affect their business, financial condition and operating results.
The BEPC exchangeable shares are not BEP units and will not be treated as BEP units for purposes of the application of applicable Canadian or U.S. rules relating to takeover bids, issuer bids and tender offers.
BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares are not securities of the same class. As a result, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares will not be entitled to participate in an offer or bid made to acquire BEP units, and holders of BEP units will not be entitled to participate in an offer or bid made to acquire BEPC exchangeable shares. In the event of a takeover bid for BEP units, a holder of BEPC exchangeable shares who would like to participate would be required to tender his or her BEPC exchangeable shares for exchange, in order to receive a BEP unit, or the cash equivalent, at the election of our group, pursuant to the exchange right. If an issuer tender offer or issuer bid is made for the BEP units at a price in excess of the market price of the BEP units and a comparable offer is not made for the BEPC exchangeable shares, then the conversion factor for the BEPC exchangeable shares may be adjusted. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events” for more information on the circumstances in which adjustments may be made to the conversion factor.
The Rights Agreement may terminate on July 30, 2027.
The Rights Agreement will automatically renew for successive periods of two years following July 30, 2027, unless Brookfield provides the rights agent with written notice of termination in accordance with the terms of the Rights Agreement or the Rights Agreement is otherwise terminated pursuant to its terms. Consequently, after such date, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares may no longer have the benefit of protections provided for by the Rights Agreement and will be reliant on the rights provided for in our articles. In the event that our company or BEP fails to satisfy a request for exchange after the expiry of the Rights Agreement, a tendering holder will not be entitled to rely on the secondary exchange rights. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Exchange by Holder” and Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement”.
Risks Relating to Taxation
General
Changes in tax law and practice may have a material adverse effect on the operations of BEP, BEPC, the Holding Entities, and the Operating Entities and, as a consequence, the value of the Brookfield Renewable assets and the ability of BEP and BEPC to make distributions to holders of BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares, respectively.
The Brookfield Renewable structure, including the structure of the Holding Entities and the Operating Entities, is based on prevailing taxation law and practice in the local jurisdictions in which Brookfield Renewable operates. These jurisdictions include Canada, the U.S., Brazil, the Republic of Ireland, the United Kingdom, Colombia, India and China. Any change in tax legislation (including in relation to taxation rates) and practice in these jurisdictions could adversely affect these entities, as well as the ability of BEP and BEPC to make distributions to holders of BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares, respectively. Taxes and other constraints that would apply to the Brookfield Renewable entities in such jurisdictions may not apply to local institutions or other parties, and such parties may therefore have a significantly lower effective cost of capital and a corresponding competitive advantage in pursuing such acquisitions.
We may be exposed to transfer pricing risks.
To the extent that BEP, BEPC, BRELP, the Holding Entities or the Operating Entities enter into transactions or arrangements with other Brookfield entities, the relevant tax authorities may seek to adjust the quantum or nature of the amounts included in or deducted from taxable income by such entities if they consider that the terms and conditions of such transactions or arrangements differ from those that would have been made between persons dealing at arm’s length. This could result in more tax (and penalties and interest) being paid by such entities, and therefore the return to holders of BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares could be reduced.
We believe that the base management fee and any other amount that is paid to the Service Provider will be commensurate with the value of the services being provided by the Service Provider and comparable to the fees or other amounts that would be agreed to in an arm’s length arrangement. However, no assurance can be given in this regard.
United States
The exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units may result in the U.S. federal income taxation of any gain realized by a U.S. Holder.
Depending on the facts and circumstances, a U.S. Holder’s exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units may result in the U.S. federal income taxation of any gain realized by such U.S. Holder. In general, a U.S. Holder exchanging BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units pursuant to the exercise of the exchange right will recognize capital gain or loss (i) if the exchange request is satisfied by the delivery of BEP units by BAM pursuant to the Rights Agreement or (ii) if the exchange request is satisfied by the delivery of BEP units by BEPC and the exchange is, within the meaning of Section 302(b) of the Code, in “complete redemption” of the U.S. Holder’s equity interest in BEPC, a “substantially disproportionate” redemption of stock, or “not essentially equivalent to a dividend”, applying certain constructive ownership rules that take into account not only the BEPC exchangeable shares and other equity interests in BEPC actually owned but also other equity interests in BEPC treated as constructively owned by such U.S. Holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If an exchange request satisfied by the delivery of BEP units by BEPC is not treated as a sale or exchange under the foregoing rules, then it will be treated as a distribution equal to the amount of cash and the fair market value of property received (such as BEP units), taxable under the rules generally applicable to distributions on stock of a corporation.
In general, if BEP satisfies an exchange request by delivering BEP units to a U.S. Holder pursuant to BEP’s exercise of the BEP call right, then the U.S. Holder’s exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units will qualify as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code, unless, at the time of such exchange, BEP (i) is a publicly traded partnership treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes or (ii) would be an “investment company” if it were incorporated for purposes of Section 721(b) of the Code. In the case described in (i) or (ii) of the preceding sentence, a U.S. Holder may recognize gain upon the exchange. BEPC understands that the general partner of BEP believes that BEP will be treated as a partnership and not as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, based on the shareholders’ rights in the event of the liquidation or dissolution of BEPC (or BEP) and the terms of the BEPC exchangeable shares, which are intended to provide an economic return equivalent to the economic return on BEP units (including identical distributions), and taking into account the expected relative values of BEP’s assets and its ratable share of the assets of its subsidiaries for the foreseeable future, BEPC understands that the general partner of BEP currently expects that a U.S. Holder’s exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units pursuant to the exercise of the BEP call right will not be treated as a transfer to an investment company for purposes of Section 721(b) of the Code. Accordingly, BEPC understands that the general partner of BEP currently expects a U.S. Holder’s exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units pursuant to BEP’s exercise of the BEP call right to qualify as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code. However, no definitive determination can be made as to whether any such future exchange will qualify as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code, as this will depend on the facts and circumstances at the time of the exchange. Many of these facts and circumstances are not within the control of BEP, and no assurance can be provided as to the position, if any, taken by the general partner of BEP with regard to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of any such exchange. Nor can any assurance be given that the IRS will not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any future position taken by BEP. If Section 721(a) of the Code does not apply, then a U.S. Holder who exchanges BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units pursuant to BEP’s exercise of the BEP call right will be treated as if such holder had sold its BEPC exchangeable shares to BEP in a taxable transaction for cash in an amount equal to the value of the BEP units received.
Even if a U.S. Holder’s transfer of BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for BEP units pursuant to BEP’s exercise of the BEP call right qualifies as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code, such U.S. Holder will be
subject to special rules that may result in the recognition of additional taxable gain or income. Under Section 704(c)(1) of the Code, if appreciated property is contributed to a partnership, the contributing partner must recognize any gain that was realized but not recognized for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to the property at the time of the contribution (referred to as “built-in gain”) if the partnership sells such property (or otherwise transfers such property in a taxable exchange) at any time thereafter or distributes such property to another partner within seven years of the contribution in a transaction that does not otherwise result in the recognition of “built-in gain” by the partnership. Under Section 737 of the Code, such U.S. Holder could be required to recognize built-in gain if BEP were to distribute any BEP property other than money (or, in certain circumstances, BEPC exchangeable shares) to such former holder of BEPC exchangeable shares within seven years of exercise of the BEP call right. Under Section 707(a) of the Code, such U.S. Holder could be required to recognize built-in gain if BEP were to make distributions (other than “operating cash flow distributions”, unless another exception were to apply) to such U.S. Holder within two years of exercise of the BEP call right. If a distribution to a U.S. Holder within two years of the transfer of BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for BEP units is treated as part of a deemed sale transaction under Section 707(a) of the Code, such U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss in the year of the transfer of BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for BEP units, and, if such U.S. Holder has already filed a tax return for such year, such holder may be required to file an amended return. In such a case, the U.S. Holder may also be required to report some amount of imputed interest income.
For a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units, see Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares” below. The U.S. federal income tax consequences of exchanging BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult an independent tax advisor regarding such consequences in light of such holder’s particular circumstances.
Distributions on BEPC exchangeable shares made to Non-U.S. Holders may be subject to U.S. withholding tax if Section 871(m) of the Code applies.
Distributions on BEPC exchangeable shares made to Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, except that U.S. withholding tax may apply to any portion of a distribution made on BEPC exchangeable shares that is treated as a deemed dividend under Section 871(m) of the Code. Specifically, a 30% withholding tax generally applies to deemed dividend amounts (“dividend equivalents”) with respect to certain contractual arrangements held by non-U.S. persons which reference any interest in an entity if that interest could give rise to a U.S.-source dividend. Under Treasury Regulations, a Section 871(m) transaction is treated as directly referencing the assets of a partnership that holds significant investments in certain securities (such as stock of a U.S. corporation). BEP indirectly holds stock of a U.S. corporation through BRELP, and the BEPC exchangeable shares are intended to be structured so that distributions are identical to distributions on BEP units. Accordingly, the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares could be subject to Section 871(m) of the Code, as discussed below.
Whether U.S. withholding tax applies with respect to a Section 871(m) transaction depends, in part, on whether it is classified for purposes of Section 871(m) of the Code as a “simple” contract or “complex” contract. No direct authority addresses whether the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares constitute a simple contract or a complex contract. BEPC intends to take the position and believes that such contractual arrangements do not constitute a simple contract. In such case, under Treasury Regulations, as modified by an IRS Notice, such contractual arrangements should not be subject to Section 871(m) of the Code before January 1, 2025, and no portion of a distribution made on BEPC exchangeable shares before such date should be subject to U.S. withholding tax by reason of treatment as a dividend equivalent under Section 871(m). For distributions made on BEPC exchangeable shares on or after January 1, 2025, Section 871(m) of the Code will apply if the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares meet a “substantial equivalence” test. If this is the case, U.S. federal withholding tax (generally at a rate of 30%) is expected to apply to any portion of a distribution on BEPC exchangeable shares that is treated as a dividend equivalent and paid on or after January 1, 2025.
This 30% withholding tax may be reduced or eliminated under the Code or an applicable income tax treaty, provided that the Non-U.S. Holder properly certifies its eligibility by providing an IRS Form W-8. If, notwithstanding the foregoing, BEPC is unable to accurately or timely determine the tax status of a Non-U.S. Holder for purposes of establishing whether reduced rates of withholding apply, then U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30% may apply to any portion of a distribution on BEPC exchangeable shares that is treated as a dividend equivalent
under Section 871(m) of the Code. A dividend equivalent may also be subject to a 30% withholding tax under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance provisions of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act of 2010 (“FATCA”), unless a Non-U.S. Holder properly certifies its FATCA status on IRS Form W-8 or other applicable form and satisfies any additional requirements under FATCA.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, BEPC’s position that the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares do not constitute a simple contract does not bind the IRS. The Treasury Regulations under Section 871(m) of the Code require complex determinations with respect to contractual arrangements linked to U.S. equities, and the application of these regulations to the BEPC exchangeable shares is uncertain. Accordingly, the IRS could challenge BEPC’s position and assert that the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares constitute a simple contract, in which case U.S. withholding tax currently would apply, generally at a rate of 30% (subject to reduction or elimination under the Code or an applicable income tax treaty), to that portion, if any, of a distribution on BEPC exchangeable shares that is treated as referencing a U.S.-source dividend paid to BEP or BRELP. Each Non-U.S. Holder should consult an independent tax advisor regarding the implications of Section 871(m) of the Code and FATCA for the ownership of BEPC exchangeable shares with respect to such holder’s particular circumstances.
For a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences to Non-U.S. Holders of owning BEPC exchangeable shares, see Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares” below. The U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning BEPC exchangeable shares are complex, and each Non-U.S. Holder should consult an independent tax advisor regarding such consequences in light of such holder’s particular circumstances.
Canada
Canadian federal income tax considerations described herein may be materially and adversely impacted by certain events.
If BEPC ceases to qualify as a “mutual fund corporation” under the Tax Act, the income tax considerations described under the heading Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations” would be materially and adversely different in certain respects.
In general, there can be no assurance that Canadian federal income tax laws respecting the treatment of mutual fund corporations or otherwise respecting the treatment of our company will not be changed in a manner that adversely affects our shareholders, or that such tax laws will not be administered in a way that is less advantageous to our company or our shareholders.
General Risk Factors
Government policies providing incentives that we may rely upon could change at any time.
Renewable power and sustainable solutions assets and businesses and the overall growth of the industries in which we operate have generally benefited from the support of state or provincial, national, supranational and international policies and incentives that promote and support investment. For example, the attractiveness of renewable energy to purchasers of a solar power project, as well as the economic return available to project sponsors, is often enhanced by such incentives. Similarly, carbon capture and storage projects are economically viable in certain jurisdictions because of the existence of a government regulated price on carbon and, in other jurisdictions, because of tax or other government incentives favoring carbon capture and storage project development. Particularly in light of political changes in certain jurisdictions, there is a risk that regulations that provide incentives for our renewable energy and sustainable solutions assets and businesses could change or expire in a manner that adversely impacts the market more generally. For example, the passage into law of the Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022 provided significant support for the renewables industry in the U.S., in large part by providing tax and other incentives to renewable and other energy transition projects. These incentives are not universally supported in the U.S. and there is a risk that these incentives could be revoked, and the Inflation Reduction Act repealed, which could have an adverse effect on businesses that relied on the act to make investment decisions. Political changes in the jurisdictions in which we operate might impact the competitiveness of clean energy generally and the economic value of certain of our projects in particular.
From time to time, our group underwrites and structures investments on the assumption that projects will be entitled to receive government incentives. The failure to obtain or the subsequent revocation of, incentives that our group relied on in making investment decisions could adversely impact our group’s ability to develop projects and generate revenues.
Inflationary pressures could adversely impact our group’s businesses
Our group’s operating businesses are impacted by heightened inflationary pressures. Higher inflation rates continued to drive tightening in monetary policies by major central banks in 2023, posing risks to economic growth ahead. Central banks in various countries may continue to raise interest rates in response to concerns about inflation, which, coupled with reduced government spending and volatility in financial markets, may have the effect of further increasing economic uncertainty and heightening these risks. Interest rate increases or other government actions taken to reduce inflation could also result in recessionary pressures in many parts of the world. Interest rate risk poses a significant market risk to our group as a result of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities held by our group and its operating businesses. Higher interest rates or elevated interest rates for a sustained period could also result in an economic slowdown. Economic contraction or further deceleration in the rate of growth in certain industries, sectors or geographies may contribute to poor financial results at our operating businesses
A significant portion of the upward pressure on prices has been attributed to the rising costs of labor, energy, food, motor vehicles and housing and continuing global supply chain disruptions. Inflation increases may or may not be transitory and future inflation may be impacted by labor market constraints reducing, supply-chain disruptions easing and commodity prices moderating. While inflation-linked contracts (including PPAs) in our group’s portfolio provide significant protection against inflationary pressures, any sustained upward trajectory in the inflation rate may still have an impact on our group’s operating businesses and our group’s investors, and could impact our group’s ability to source suitable investment opportunities, match or exceed prior investment strategy performance and secure attractive debt financing, all of which could adversely impact our group’s operating businesses and our group’s growth and capital recycling initiatives.
There are general industry risks associated with the power markets in which we operate.
Our operating subsidiaries currently operate in power markets in the United States, Europe and South America, each of which is affected by competition, price, supply of and demand for power, the location of import/export transmission lines and overall political, economic and social conditions and policies. Our renewable power operations are also largely concentrated in a relatively small number of countries, and accordingly are exposed to country-specific risks (such as weather conditions, local economic conditions or political/regulatory environments) that could disproportionately affect us. A general and extended decline in the North American, European or South American economies, or in the economies of the countries in which we operate, or sustained conservation efforts to reduce electricity consumption, could have the effect of reducing demand for electricity and could thereby have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations are exposed to health, safety, security and environmental risks.
The ownership, construction and operation of our assets carry an inherent risk of liability related to health, safety, security and the environment, including the risk of government-imposed orders to remedy unsafe conditions and/or to remediate or otherwise address environmental contamination or damage. We could also be exposed to potential penalties for contravention of health, safety, security and environmental laws and potential civil liability. In the ordinary course of business, we incur capital and operating expenditures to comply with health, safety, security and environmental laws, to obtain and comply with licenses, permits and other approvals and to assess and manage related risks. The cost of compliance with these laws (and any future laws or amendments enacted) may increase over time and result in additional material expenditures. We may become subject to government orders, investigations, inquiries or other proceedings (including civil claims) relating to health, safety, security and environmental matters as a result of which its operations may be limited or suspended. The occurrence of any of these events or any changes, additions to or more rigorous enforcement of health, safety, security and environmental laws could have an adverse impact on operations and result in additional material expenditures. Additional environmental, health and safety issues relating to presently known or unknown matters may require unanticipated expenditures, or result in fines, penalties or other consequences (including changes to operations) that may be adverse to our business and results of operations.
We may be exposed to force majeure events.
The occurrence of a significant event that disrupts the operation of our assets for an extended period, including events which preclude renewable power customers from purchasing electricity, could have an adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Force majeure events affecting our assets could result in damage to the environment or harm to third parties or the public, which could expose us to significant liability. Similarly, force majeure events could impact our contract counterparties, preventing them from performing under their contracts, which could in turn cause delays to project construction schedules or result in our operating projects being unable to perform as expected, all of which could have an adverse effect on our operating performance and cash flows. Our assets could be exposed to severe weather conditions, natural disasters, epidemics and potentially catastrophic events. An assault or an act of malicious destruction, cyber-attacks, sabotage or terrorism committed on our assets could also disrupt our ability to operate our assets, including the ability of our renewable power assets to generate or sell power. In certain cases, there is the potential that some events may not excuse our group from performing its obligations pursuant to agreements with third parties and therefore may expose our group to liability. Depending on the event in question, no insurance or contractual protections may be available to compensate us for damages we may suffer as a result of such events. In addition, certain of our assets are located in remote areas which may make access for repair of damage difficult.
Non-U.S. shareholders will be subject to foreign currency risk associated with our dividends.
A significant number of our shareholders reside in countries where the U.S. dollar is not the functional currency. Our dividends are denominated in U.S. dollars but are settled in the local currency of the shareholder receiving the dividend. For each non-U.S. shareholder, the value received in the local currency from the dividend will be determined based on the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the applicable local currency at the time of payment. As such, if the U.S. dollar depreciates significantly against the local currency of the non-U.S. shareholder, the value received by such shareholder in its local currency will be adversely affected.
Federal, state and foreign anti-corruption and trade sanctions laws and restrictions on foreign direct investment applicable to our group and its operating businesses create the potential for significant liabilities and penalties, the inability to complete transactions, imposition of significant costs and burdens, and reputational harm
Our group may suffer a significant loss resulting from fraud, bribery, corruption, other illegal acts, inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, or from external events, such as security threats affecting its ability to operate. Our group operates in multiple jurisdictions and it is possible that its operations will expand into new jurisdictions. Doing business in multiple jurisdictions requires our group to comply with the laws and regulations of the U.S. government as well as those of various non-U.S. jurisdictions, and the number of jurisdictions in which our group is operating has grown in recent years. These laws and regulations may apply to our company, our Service Provider, our subsidiaries, individual directors, officers, employees and third-party agents. In particular, our non-U.S. operations are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption laws and regulations, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the “FCPA”) and similar laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions, such as the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act. This global focus on anti-bribery and corruption enforcement may also lead to more investigations, both formal and informal, in this area, the results of which cannot be predicted. The FCPA prohibits bribery of non-U.S. officials, candidates for office and political parties, and requires U.S. companies to keep books and records that accurately reflect those companies’ transactions. Similar laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions, such as the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, as well as other applicable anti-bribery, anti-corruption or related laws in the United States and abroad, may also impose stricter or more onerous requirements than the FCPA, and implementing them may disrupt our group’s business or cause our group to incur significantly more costs to comply with those laws. Our company and our officers, directors, employees and third-party agents regularly deal with government bodies and government owned and controlled businesses, the employees and representatives of which may be considered foreign officials for purposes of the FCPA. Also, as we make acquisitions, we may expose ourselves to the FCPA or other corruption related risks if its due diligence processes are unable to uncover or detect violations of applicable anti-corruption laws.
Instances of bribery, fraud, accounting irregularities and other improper, illegal or corrupt practices can be difficult to detect, in particular when conducting due diligence in connection with acquisitions, and fraud and other deceptive practices can be widespread in certain jurisdictions. Our group invests in emerging market countries that
may not have established stringent anti-bribery and corruption laws and regulations, where existing laws and regulations may not be consistently enforced, or that are perceived to have materially higher levels of corruption according to international rating standards. Due diligence on investment opportunities in these jurisdictions is frequently more challenging because consistent and uniform commercial practices in such locations may not have developed or do not meet international standards. Bribery, fraud, accounting irregularities and corrupt practices can be especially difficult to detect in such locations. When acquiring assets in distress, the quality of financial information of the target may also make it difficult to identify irregularities.
We rely on our infrastructure, controls, systems and personnel, as well as central groups focusing on enterprise-wide management of specific operational risks such as fraud, trading, outsourcing, and business disruption, to manage the risk of illegal and corrupt acts or failed systems. We also rely on our employees and certain third parties to comply with our policies and processes as well as applicable laws. Specific programs, policies, standards, methodologies and training have been developed to support the management of these risks and, as we expand into new markets and makes new investments, and as we have increased our focus on development activities, we update and implement our programs, policies, standards, methodologies and training to address the risks that we perceive. The infrastructure, controls, systems and personnel we rely on, and the policies and procedures we have implemented to protect against non-compliance with anti-bribery and corruption legislation may be inadequate. If we fail to comply with such laws and regulations, we could be exposed to claims for damages, financial penalties, incarceration of our employees, reputational harm, restrictions on our operations and other liabilities, which could negatively affect our operating results and financial condition. In addition, we may be subject to successor liability for violations under these laws or other acts of bribery committed by our operating businesses. The failure to adequately identify or manage these risks could result in direct or indirect financial loss, regulatory censure and/or harm to the reputation of our company. The acquisition of businesses with weak internal controls to manage the risk of illegal or corrupt acts may create additional risk of financial loss, regulatory censure and/or harm to the reputation of our company. In addition, programs, policies, standards, methodologies and training, no matter how well designed, do not provide absolute assurance of effectiveness.
We are also subject to laws and regulations governing trade and economic sanctions. The Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“OFAC”), the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Department of State administer and enforce various trade control laws and regulations, including economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign states, organizations and individuals. These laws and regulations implicate a number of aspects of our business, including servicing existing fund investors, finding new fund investors, and sourcing new investments, as well as activities by the portfolio companies in our investment portfolio or other controlled investments. Some of these regulations provide that penalties can be imposed on us for the conduct of a portfolio company, even if we have not ourselves violated any regulation. Similar laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions, such as the Special Economic Measures Act (Canada) and EU sanctions, may also impose restrictions or requirements on us or our operating businesses. Applicable laws of various jurisdictions may contain conflicting provisions, making our compliance more difficult. For example, Canada has adopted measures, such as the Canadian Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act, that could restrict certain persons and entities subject to Canadian jurisdiction from complying with extra-territorial sanctions imposed by other jurisdictions, such as the U.S.
In addition, the U.S. and many non-U.S. countries have laws designed to protect national security or to restrict foreign direct investment. For example, under the U.S. Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (“FIRRMA”), the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) has the authority to review, block or impose conditions on investments by non-U.S. persons in U.S. companies or real estate assets deemed critical or sensitive to the United States. Many non-U.S. jurisdictions have similar laws. For example, the EU has adopted an EU-wide mechanism to screen foreign investment on national security grounds and most EU member states now have a foreign investment screening mechanism in place or has initiated a consultative or legislative process expected to result in the adoption of a new mechanism or amendments to an existing mechanism, adopted a regulation aimed at regulation of foreign subsidies that could distort the internal EU market. Beginning in February 2022, the United States and other countries began imposing meaningful sanctions targeting Russia as a result of actions taken by Russia in Ukraine. We and our portfolio companies are required to comply with these and potentially additional sanctions imposed by the United States and by other countries, for which the full costs,
burdens, and limitations on our and our operating businesses and prospects are currently unknown and may become significant.
Under these laws, governments have the authority to impose a variety of actions, including requirements for the advance screening or notification of certain transactions, blocking or imposing conditions on certain transactions, limiting the size of foreign equity investments or control by foreign investors, and restricting the employment of foreigners as key personnel. These actions could limit our ability to find suitable investments, cause delays in consummating transactions, result in the abandonment of transactions, and impose burdensome operational requirements on our portfolio companies. These laws may make it difficult for us to identify suitable buyers for our investments that we want to exit and could constrain the universe of exit opportunities generally. Complying with these laws imposes potentially significant costs and complex additional burdens, and any failure by us or our portfolio companies to comply with them could expose us significant penalties, sanctions, loss of future investment opportunities, additional regulatory scrutiny, and reputational harm.
Our operations are highly regulated and may be exposed to increased regulation, which could result in additional costs to our company.
Most of our assets are subject to extensive regulation by various government agencies and regulatory bodies in different countries at the federal, regional, state, provincial and local level. As legal requirements frequently change and are subject to interpretation and discretion, we may be unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these requirements or their effect on our operations. Any new law, rule or regulation could require additional expenditure to achieve or maintain compliance or could adversely impact our ability to operate our assets, including our ability to generate and deliver energy. Also, operations that are not currently regulated may become subject to regulation, which could result in additional cost to our business. Further, changes in wholesale market structures or rules, such as generation curtailment requirements or limitations to access the power grid with respect to our renewable power assets, could have an adverse effect on our ability to generate revenues from our facilities. For example, in North America, many of our renewable power assets are subject to the operating and market-setting rules determined by independent system operators. These independent system operators could introduce rules that adversely impact our operations. With an increasing global focus and public sensitivity to environmental sustainability and environmental regulation becoming more stringent, we could also be subject to increasing environmental related responsibilities and more onerous permitting requirements. These changes may result in increased costs to our operations.
In addition, our group is exposed, through Westinghouse, to complex new legal and regulatory regimes in respect of nuclear technology, including those administered by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the “NRC”), the U.S. Department of Energy and pursuant to state and foreign laws. The NRC and other regulators have granted licenses to certain of Westinghouse’s facilities which are necessary for the ongoing operations of such facilities. The NRC has the authority to issue notices of violation for violations of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, the NRC regulations and conditions of licenses, certificates of compliance, or orders. The NRC also has the authority to impose civil penalties or additional requirements and to order cessation of operations for such violations. Penalties under the NRC regulations could include substantial fines, imposition of additional requirements or withdrawal or suspension of licenses or certificates. Any penalties imposed could have an adverse effect on Westinghouse’s nuclear technology services operations’ business, financial condition, and results of operations. The NRC also has the authority to issue new regulatory requirements or to change existing requirements. Changes to the regulatory requirements could also adversely affect Westinghouse’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. Westinghouse’s operations are also subject to U.S. Department of Energy regulations and contractual requirements, and certain of its facilities are regulated by various state laws. State or federal agencies may have the authority to impose civil penalties and additional requirements which could adversely affect Westinghouse’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. Changes in U.S. or foreign government policies and priorities can impact Westinghouse’s operations and the nuclear power industry in general. These include changes in interpretations of regulatory requirements, increased inspection or enforcement activities, changes in budgetary priorities, changes in tax laws and regulations and other actions. Any such changes could also adversely affect Westinghouse’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our company is a “foreign private issuer” under U.S. securities law. Therefore, our company is exempt from requirements applicable to U.S. domestic registrants listed on the NYSE.
Although our company is subject to the periodic reporting requirement of the Exchange Act, the periodic disclosure required of foreign private issuers under the Exchange Act is different from periodic disclosure required of U.S. domestic registrants. Therefore, there may be less publicly available information about our company than is regularly published by or about other companies in the United States. Our company is exempt from certain other sections of the Exchange Act to which U.S. domestic issuers are subject, including the requirement to provide our shareholders with information statements or proxy statements that comply with the Exchange Act. In addition, insiders and large shareholders of our company are not obligated to file reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and our company and the partnership will be permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices (being Bermuda and British Columbia for the partnership and our company, respectively) instead of those otherwise required under the NYSE Listed Company Manual for domestic issuers. Our company currently follows the same corporate practices as would be applicable to U.S. domestic companies under the U.S. federal securities laws and NYSE corporate governance standards; however, as our company is externally managed by the Service Provider pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, we do not have a compensation committee. However, our company may in the future elect to follow home country law for certain of our other corporate governance practices, as permitted by the rules of the NYSE, in which case our company’s shareholders would not be afforded the same protection as provided under NYSE corporate governance standards to U.S. domestic registrants. Following our company’s home country governance practices as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a U.S. domestic company listed on the NYSE may provide less protection than is accorded to investors of U.S. domestic issuers.
Changes in our company’s credit ratings may have an adverse effect on our financial position and ability to raise capital.
We cannot assure you that any credit rating assigned to our company or any of its portfolio companies, operating subsidiaries or other subsidiaries or their debt securities or the partnership will remain in effect for any given period of time or that any rating will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by the relevant rating agency. A lowering or withdrawal of such ratings may have an adverse effect on our financial position and ability to raise capital.
New regulatory initiatives related to sustainability, ESG and/or changing market perception of our businesses could adversely impact our business.
While we believe that regulatory initiatives and market trends towards an increased focus on ESG are generally beneficial to our group, any such regulatory initiatives also have the potential to adversely impact us. For example, regulatory initiatives seeking to reorient investment toward sustainability by regulating green financial products could have the effect of increasing disclosure requirements around ESG and prescribing approaches to ESG policies that are inconsistent with our current practices. If regulators disagree with our ESG disclosures, for example because they believe them to be incomplete or misleading, we may face regulatory enforcement action, and our business or reputation could be adversely affected. There is also a risk that a significant reorientation in the market following the implementation of any such measures could be adverse to our business if we are perceived to be presenting a product or business as having green or sustainable characteristics where this is not, in fact, the case (i.e., “greenwashing”). Additionally, compliance with any new regulations or laws generally increases our regulatory burden and could make compliance more difficult and expensive thereby adversely impacting our financial position.
There is also a risk that investor sentiment regarding which of our assets have desirable non-financial characteristics (related to decarbonization or otherwise) could change over time. This could include changing perceptions of which assets in our current portfolio are considered sustainable or ethical, and could result in assets, segments or businesses, or aspects thereof that we currently present as, for example, sustainable or ethical, being considered unsustainable or unethical by investors in the future. Changes in our group’s business model that see us taking a more active approach to certain decarbonization investments could have a similar result. For example, the acquisition of coal-fired power plants or other carbon emitting assets could be negatively received by investors even if our group’s publicly stated business plan for these assets is to seek to decarbonize them. Our group’s business, reputation and the market price of the BEP units and the BEPC exchangeable shares could be adversely affected by any such changes in investor sentiment.
We may not be able to identify and assess all potential human rights impacts of our business activities.
While we pride ourselves on our commitment to ethical business practices and the controls, policies and practices that we have in place with respect to such practices, we may not be able to identify and assess all potential human rights impacts of our investment activities, operations and supply chain. Any potential human rights abuses that occur and are in any way associated with our business, whether through third party business relationships or otherwise, could have an adverse impact on our reputation, as well as present legal and financial risks.
Our company is not, and does not intend to become, regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act (and similar legislation in other jurisdictions) and, if our company were deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for our company to operate as contemplated.
The Investment Company Act (and similar legislation in other jurisdictions) provides certain protections to investors and imposes certain restrictions on companies that are required to be regulated as investment companies. Among other things, such rules limit or prohibit transactions with affiliates, impose limitations on the issuance of debt and equity securities and impose certain governance requirements. Our company has not been and does not intend to become regulated as an investment company and we intend to conduct our activities so our company will not be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act (and similar legislation in other jurisdictions). In order to ensure that our company is not deemed to be an investment company, we may be required to materially restrict or limit the scope of our operations or plans. Our company is and will be limited in the types of acquisitions that it may make, and we may need to modify our organizational structure or dispose of assets which our company would not otherwise dispose of. Moreover, if anything were to happen which would cause our company to be deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act, it would be impractical for our company to operate as contemplated. Agreements and arrangements between and among our company and Brookfield would be impaired, the type and number of acquisitions that our company would be able to make as a principal would be limited and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. Accordingly, our company would be required to take extraordinary steps to address the situation, such as the amendment or termination of the Master Services Agreement, the restructuring of our company and our operating subsidiaries, the amendment of our company’s governing documents or the dissolution of our company, any of which could materially adversely affect the value of BEPC exchangeable shares.
Our company’s failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business in the future and the price of BEPC exchangeable shares.
As a public company in the United States and Canada, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, stock exchange rules promulgated in response to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and corresponding securities legislation in Canada. A number of our current operating subsidiaries are, and potential future acquisitions will be, private companies and their systems of internal controls over financial reporting may be less developed as compared to public company requirements. Any failure to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting or to implement required, new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could cause material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting and could result in errors or misstatements in our consolidated financial statements that could be material. If we or our independent registered public accounting firm were to conclude that our company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not effective, investors could lose confidence in our company’s reported financial information and the price of BEPC exchangeable shares could decline. Our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our company’s business, our company’s ability to access capital markets and investors’ perception of our company. In addition, material weaknesses in our internal controls could require significant expense and management time to remediate.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
4.A HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
Overview
Our company is a Canadian corporation incorporated on September 9, 2019 under the laws of British Columbia. Our company was established by the partnership to be an alternative investment vehicle for investors who prefer owning securities through a corporate structure. We became a separately-traded public company upon completion of the special distribution in July 2020. While our operations are primarily located in Brazil, Colombia, the United
States, and Europe, shareholders will, on economic terms, have exposure to all regions BEP operates in as a result of the exchange feature attaching to the BEPC exchangeable shares.
Each BEPC exchangeable share has been structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to one BEP unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events), including identical dividends on a per share basis as are paid on each BEP unit, and is exchangeable at the option of the holder for one BEP unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events) or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company), as more fully described in this Form 20-F. BEP may elect to satisfy its exchange obligation by acquiring such tendered BEPC exchangeable shares for an equivalent number of BEP units (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events) or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our group). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. Our company and the partnership currently intend to satisfy any exchange requests on the BEPC exchangeable shares through the delivery of BEP units rather than cash. We therefore expect that the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares will be impacted by the market price of the BEP units and the combined business performance of our group as a whole. However, there are certain material differences between the rights of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and holders of the BEP units under the governing documents of our company and the partnership and applicable law, such as the right of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares to request an exchange of their BEPC exchangeable shares for an equivalent number of BEP units or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company) and the redemption right of our company. These material differences are described in the section entitled Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—Comparison of Rights of Holders of BEPC Exchangeable Shares and BEP Units”.
Further, the BEPC exchangeable shares are held by public shareholders and the Brookfield Holders, and the BEPC class B shares and BEPC class C shares are held by the partnership. Dividends on each BEPC exchangeable share are expected to continue to be declared and paid at the same time and in the same amount per share as distributions on each BEP unit. The partnership’s ownership of BEPC class C shares entitle it to receive dividends as and when declared by our board of directors. The holders of the BEPC exchangeable shares are entitled to one vote for each BEPC exchangeable share held at all meetings of our company’s shareholders, except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series of shares of our company are entitled to vote separately as a class or series. The holders of the BEPC class B shares will be entitled to cast, in the aggregate, a number of votes equal to three times the number of votes attached to the BEPC exchangeable shares. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the BEPC articles or as required by law, the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares will vote together and not as separate classes. Holders of BEPC class C shares have no voting rights. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares”.
Our company’s current operations consist of approximately 19,161 MW of installed hydroelectric, wind, solar, storage and ancillary capacity across Brazil, Colombia, North America and Europe.
As a controlled subsidiary of the partnership, an integral part of our strategy is to participate along with institutional investors in Brookfield-sponsored funds, consortia, joint ventures and other arrangements, that target acquisitions that suit our company’s profile. Across our group’s business, our group leverages its extensive operating experience to maintain and enhance the value of assets, grow cash flows on an annual basis and cultivate positive relations with local stakeholders. Our group also makes investments in sustainable solutions businesses, which are generally comprised of emerging transition asset classes where our group’s initial investment positions it for potential future large-scale decarbonization investments.
Brookfield Renewable targets a total return of 12% to 15% per annum on the renewable assets that they own, measured over the long term. Our group intends to generate this return from the in-place cash flows from our operations plus growth through investments in upgrades and expansions of our asset base, as well as acquisitions. The partnership determines its distributions based primarily on an assessment of our operating performance. Our group uses FFO to assess operating performance and can be used on a per unit basis as a proxy for future distribution growth over the long-term.
The BEPC exchangeable shares are listed on the NYSE and the TSX under the symbol “BEPC”.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other information as a foreign private issuer with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information relating to our company. The site is located at http://www.sec.gov. Similar information can also be found on our website at https://bep.brookfield.com/bepc. In addition to carefully considering the disclosure made in this document, shareholders are strongly encouraged to carefully review the partnership’s periodic reporting. The partnership is required to file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the SEC. The partnership’s SEC filings are available to the public from the SEC’s website noted above. Copies of documents that have been filed with the Canadian securities authorities can be obtained at www.sedarplus.ca. Information about the partnership, including its SEC filings, is also available on its website at https://bep.brookfield.com. The information found on, or accessible through, our or the partnership’s website does not form part of this annual report on Form 20-F. See also Item 10.H “Documents on Display”.
History and Development of Our Business
On July 30, 2020, the partnership completed the special distribution of BEPC exchangeable shares to holders of BEP units of record on July 27, 2020. Prior to completing the special distribution, our company acquired the Business (as defined herein) from certain of the partnership’s subsidiaries (excluding a 10% interest in certain Brazilian and Colombian operations, which continue to be held by the partnership). The partnership directly and indirectly controlled the Business prior to the special distribution and will continue to control the Business subsequent to the special distribution through its interests in our company. See Item 5.A “Operating Results—Continuity of Interest”.
On July 31, 2020, Brookfield Renewable completed the TerraForm Power acquisition pursuant to which Brookfield Renewable acquired all of the public TerraForm Power shares, representing a 38% interest in TerraForm Power. Pursuant to the TerraForm Power acquisition, each holder of public TerraForm Power shares received 0.47625 of a BEPC exchangeable share or of a BEP unit for each public TerraForm Power share held by such holder. The TerraForm Power acquisition was completed in exchange for 55,552,862 BEPC exchangeable shares and 6,051,704 BEP units, on a post-split basis.
Simultaneously with the completion of the TerraForm Power acquisition, our company entered into voting agreements with the partnership and certain indirect subsidiaries of Brookfield to transfer the power to vote their respective shares held in TerraForm Power to our company. As a result, our company controls and consolidates TerraForm Power. The transfer of control of TerraForm Power to our company is considered to be a transaction between entities under common control and was valued based on Brookfield’s carrying value in TerraForm Power. The results of TerraForm Power that was not owned by our company will be presented as non-controlling interests to our company retrospectively to October 17, 2017, corresponding to all historical periods that TerraForm Power was under common control.
Recent Transactions
In March 2023, Brookfield Renewable issued C$400 million of Series 16 medium-term notes (green bonds) at a fixed rate of 5.292%. The Series 16 medium-term notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by BEP and certain of its subsidiaries.
In March 2023, our institutional partners completed the sale of a 50% interest in a 378 MW hydroelectric portfolio in the United States. Brookfield Renewable continues to retain its 22% interest in the portfolio and accordingly did not receive proceeds from the sale.
In June 2023, BEP issued 8,200,000 LP units at a price of $30.35 per LP unit, and BEPC issued 7,430,000 BEPC exchangeable shares at a price of $33.80 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $500 million. Concurrently, a subsidiary of Brookfield Reinsurance agreed to purchase 5,148,270 LP units at a price of $30.35 per LP unit (net of underwriting commissions) for total gross proceeds of approximately $150 million. The total aggregate gross proceeds were approximately $650 million.
In September 2023, Brookfield Renewable, together with its institutional partners, completed the sale of a 95 MW portfolio of wind assets in Uruguay for proceeds of $112 million ($65 million net to Brookfield Renewable).
In October 2023, Brookfield Renewable, together with institutional partners, acquired a fully integrated developer and operator of renewable power assets in the United States with 5,900 MW of operating and under construction assets, and a 6,100 MW development pipeline for $1.08 billion (approximately $308 million net to Brookfield Renewable). Brookfield Renewable is expected to hold an approximate 28% interest.
In December 2023, the TSX accepted a notice of BEPC’s intention to renew its normal course issuer bid for the BEPC exchangeable shares, which permits BEPC to repurchase up to 8,982,586 of its issued and outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares for a one-year period.
In January 2024, Brookfield Renewable issued C$400 million of Series 17 medium-term notes (green bonds) at a fixed rate of 5.318%. The Series 17 medium-term notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by BEP and certain of its subsidiaries.
4.B BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Our Operations
Our company’s current operations consist of approximately 19,161 MW of installed hydroelectric, wind, utility-scale solar, and distributed energy and sustainable solutions capacity across the North America, South America and Europe.
We intend to generate a stable, predictable cash flow profile sourced from a portfolio of low operating cost, hydroelectric, wind and solar assets that sell electricity under contracts with creditworthy counterparties. As a controlled subsidiary of the partnership, an integral part of our strategy is to participate along with institutional investors in Brookfield-sponsored funds, consortia, joint ventures and other arrangements, that target acquisitions that suit our company’s profile.
The table below outlines our hydroelectric, wind, utility-scale solar and distributed energy & sustainable solutions power asset portfolio as at December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| River
Systems | | Facilities | | Capacity
(MW) | | Storage
Capacity
(GWh) |
| Hydroelectric | | | | | | | |
United States(1) | 30 | | | 139 | | | 2,921 | | | 2,559 | |
Colombia(2) | 11 | | | 22 | | | 3,053 | | | 3,703 | |
| Brazil | 27 | | | 43 | | | 940 | | | — | |
| Total | 68 | | | 204 | | | 6,914 | | | 6,262 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Wind | | | | | | | |
| United States | — | | | 32 | | | 4,674 | | | — | |
| Canada | — | | | 1 | | | 78 | | | — | |
| Europe | — | | | 25 | | | 682 | | | — | |
| Brazil | — | | | 20 | | | 515 | | | — | |
| Total | — | | | 78 | | | 5,949 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
| Utility-scale solar | — | | | 176 | | | 4,611 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | 1 | | | 4,903 | | | 1,687 | | | 1,095 | |
| 69 | | | 5,361 | | | 19,161 | | | 7,357 | |
(1) Includes three battery storage facilities in North America (36 MW).
(2) Includes two wind plants (32 MW) and five solar plants (100 MW) in Colombia.
The electricity generated by our facilities is dependent upon available water flows and upon wind and weather conditions generally. Hydrology, wind and weather conditions have natural variations from season to season and from year to year and may also change permanently because of climate change or other factors. See Item 3.D “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Operations and Our Industry—Changes to resource availability, as a result of
climate change or otherwise, at any of our renewable power facilities could adversely affect the amount of electricity that we are able to generate”
Current Operations
United States
Our company is strategically focused on power markets in the United States. The majority of our company’s hydroelectric capacity in the United States is located in New York, Pennsylvania and New England. In New York, our company is one of the largest independent power producers with 74 hydroelectric facilities with an aggregate installed capacity of 711 MW. In Pennsylvania, our company has four hydroelectric facilities with an aggregate installed capacity of 747 MW. In New England, our company has 48 hydroelectric facilities with an aggregate installed capacity of 700 MW.
A number of our company’s U.S. hydroelectric assets have water storage reservoirs that can collectively store approximately 2,500 GWh, or approximately 38% of their annualized long-term average generation. Our company also benefits from a 50% joint-venture interest in a 666 MW hydroelectric pumped storage facility located in Massachusetts. Pumped storage is a form of hydroelectric power that allows energy to be stored by pumping water up into a reservoir, and then producing power by releasing the water when power prices are higher.
Through our subsidiary TerraForm Power, we have a geographically diverse portfolio of utility-scale wind and solar platforms located principally in California, Illinois, Texas and New York with an aggregate installed capacity of approximately 2,336 MW, including 78 MW of wind assets and 59 MW of solar assets in Canada and 101 MW of solar assets in Chile. TerraForm Power also has a 724 MW distributed generation solar portfolio in the U.S.
In October 2023, we, together with our institutional partners, acquired Deriva Energy (formerly Duke Energy Renewables), a fully integrated wind, utility-scale solar and storage platform with 5,013 MW of operating capacity and a 11,500 MW development pipeline.
Our right to operate our generation facilities in the United States are secured primarily through long-term licenses from FERC, the federal agency that regulates the licensing of substantially all power plants in the United States. FERC has oversight of substantially all of our ongoing project operations. Our ability to sell power from certain of our generation facilities is also subject to the receipt and maintenance of certain approvals from FERC, including the authority to sell power at market-based rates.
In August 2022, we, together with our institutional partners, committed to invest up to $137 million ($28 net to the company) into a joint venture with California Resources Corporation to develop CCS projects in California, with the option to invest a further $363 million ($73 million net to the company) in approved CCS projects in California. We together with our institutional partners have to date funded $64 million ($13 million net to the company). The company holds an approximate 10% economic interest.
Market Opportunity
Over the last decade, the United States has maintained consistent, broad-based policy momentum to transition the country’s electricity production to cleaner generation and promote increased energy independence. The United States is the world’s second largest wind market with approximately 140,000 MW of installed wind capacity. One of the most significant drivers of renewable power growth in the United States has been the adoption of RPS targets in 36 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Guam. In addition, growth has been driven by various government incentive programs and by corporate demand supporting investment in new renewables. For example, there are now 420 members of the “RE100” group of companies that have committed to transition their electricity supply to 100 percent renewable by at least 2050.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was signed into law. It provides extensions of the tax credits for wind and solar projects, almost $300 billion of investment in renewables, and creates new tax credits for standalone energy storage, clean hydrogen, and certain advanced manufacturing, all of which provides a significant tailwind for the renewables industry in the country. Other legislative developments include The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which came into force in 2022 and seeks to restrict U.S. entities from importing goods produced by forced labor in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, a region which is a large producer of
polysilicon, a key component in many solar modules. The direct impact of The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act on our group’s business has been limited given our group’s robust procurement processes that seek to ensure the integrity of our group’s supply chain. In August 2023, the U.S. Department of Commerce, following an anti-dumping and countervailing duty circumvention investigation, determined that certain solar panels imported from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam were improperly using parts and components produced in China as a way to circumvent existing restrictions and ordered that solar cells and modules imported to the U.S. from those four countries will be subject to anti-dumping and countervailing duties following the expiration of a moratorium in June 2024. We do not expect this to have a material impact on our business when the grace period on imports from the impacted companies ends, given our robust procurement processes that seek to ensure the integrity of our supply chain. Also see Item 3.D “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Operations and Our Industry”.
In the United States, while we are primarily focused on power markets in the northeast (New York, New England), the mid-Atlantic (including the PJM ISO and north SERC regions) and California, we have grown our asset base through the acquisition of Deriva Energy (formerly Duke Energy Renewables). Together these key markets cover approximately 70% of the U.S. population, and most have strong competitive wholesale markets and RPS targets, aging electricity infrastructure and/or pressure to retire coal generation, providing clear opportunities for sustained renewable generation growth. We are also seeing increasing demand for decarbonization-as-a-service, which we expect to be a multi-billion opportunity over the next decade, with investment driven by ambitious sustainability targets and as potential customers face pressure to decarbonize through renewable power, electrification and reduced energy consumption.
Europe
Our Spanish business has 538 MW of wind, 350 MW of CSP and 64 MW of conventional solar PV generation capacity. The principal revenues generated by our Spanish business’ wind and solar assets in Spain are received pursuant to a “regulated return” that is set by Spanish legislation. All of our assets in Spain are entitled to a regulated rate of 7.39% through December 31, 2031, except for 44 MW of solar PV assets and 150 MW of CSP assets, both of which are entitled to a regulated return rate of 7.09% through December 31, 2025. The regulated return rate is set every six years.
Our European business also includes a 144 MW wind portfolio in Portugal. In Portugal, our assets benefit from feed-in tariff contracts that fix payment terms for the duration of our PPAs. Incentives are also in place for repowering existing capacity at a lower rate.
Market Opportunity
Europe is one of the largest renewable energy markets in the world and represents a significant growth opportunity for our group’s business. Across the E.U. and U.K., a population of approximately 500 million is served by a power system with a capacity of approximately 1,000 GW, generating approximately 3,000 TWh annually. Renewable generation technologies account for over half of total installed capacity, including approximately 160 GW of hydroelectric, 230 GW of wind and 210 GW of solar PV capacity. Brookfield Renewable’s investment and growth strategy in Europe focuses on larger, low-sovereign risk markets that have both a record of reliable renewable policies and renewable assets with attractive long-term fundamental value and scarcity attributes.
Europe has long been at the forefront in adopting policies to support renewables development. In 2022, the E.U. further increased renewable deployment and decarbonization ambitions as part of a package of measures with the goal of cutting Russian gas imports to zero before 2030. In the REPower EU plan, the E.U. committed to increasing renewables deployment targets for 2030 by another 10% compared to the previous targets, which would roughly require over 274 GW of additional wind-equivalent power capacity and 379 GW of additional solar capacity by 2030 across the E.U. Historically, individual member states have sought to meet binding E.U. targets through incentive programs such as the use of long-term contracts for differences, as in Germany, U.K. and Poland. This has been complemented by growth in demand for PPAs from corporate counterparties looking to decarbonize as well as hedge their power costs. Over 12 GW of corporate PPAs were entered into in Europe in 2023.
The E.U.’s carbon emissions cap-and-trade program and national policies like the U.K.’s carbon price floor mechanism enhance the competitive position of renewables generators by increasing the operating costs of conventional thermal generators. In January 2020, the U.K. formally withdrew from the E.U. The subsequent Trade
and Co-operation Agreement saw commitments from both sides on energy market rules and access that are generally in-line with previous arrangements and agreed to maintain or increase their climate and renewable targets.
Spain and Portugal
Spain and Portugal are among the largest renewable markets in Europe and prospects of growth are significant based on the National Energy and Climate plans submitted to the European Commission. Both markets have stable and favorable contractual frameworks for renewables. Our regulated Spanish assets benefit from a “return on investment” based regime by which they receive an overall payment equivalent to all the costs and initial investment to develop the project plus a reasonable regulated return on investment (7.4% for most of our assets). Additionally, a significant part of this regulated payment is based on capacity which provides significant certainty of cash flows to producers as the market and volume risk is reduced. In the case of our Portuguese assets they benefit from a Feed-in-Tariff ensuring generators are remunerated with a proper electricity price, indexed by inflation annually over a contract term of 15 years plus an extension of 7 years in a cap-and-floor system with reduced market risk given current electricity prices. Both governments are promoting auction-based renewable support schemes, confirming their long-term commitment to renewable power.
Colombia
Brookfield Renewable’s 2016 acquisition of Isagen with its institutional partners marked our group’s entry into the Colombian market. The Brookfield Renewable consortium’s current ownership interest in Isagen is over 99% with Brookfield Renewable’s share being approximately 23%. Isagen’s principal office is located in Medellín. Isagen’s Colombian National System Control Center is also located in Medellín and allows for the remote monitoring and control of Brookfield Renewable’s assets in the country.
The consortium holds its interest in Isagen through an entity (“Hydro Holdings”), which is entitled to appoint a majority of the board of directors of Isagen. The general partner of Hydro Holdings is a controlled subsidiary of our company. We are entitled to appoint a majority of Hydro Holdings’ board of directors, provided that Brookfield Corporation and its subsidiaries (including Brookfield Renewable) collectively are (i) the largest holder of Hydro Holdings’ limited partnership interests, and (ii) hold over 30% of Hydro Holdings’ limited partnership interests. Brookfield Corporation and its subsidiaries (including our group) currently meet such ownership test and is entitled to appoint a majority of the board of directors.
Isagen is Colombia’s third-largest power generation company and owns and operates a 3,053 MW portfolio. This portfolio accounts for approximately 16% of Colombia’s generating capacity and principally consists of large reservoir-based, hydroelectric facilities. The hydroelectric assets include the largest reservoir by volume in Colombia and are collectively able to store approximately 23% of their annualized long-term average generation. Isagen’s portfolio also includes approximately 200 MW of near to medium-term hydro and solar development projects.
Isagen owns all of its power generating assets in perpetuity and holds requisite water usage and other rights in respect of each of its assets.
In Colombia, revenues are typically secured through one to five-year bilateral contracts with local distribution companies in the “regulated market”, and with large industrial users in the unregulated market. Isagen’s current long-term contracts’ average term is four years. These contracts reduce the exposure of both suppliers and end-users to price volatility in the spot market by fixing the price payable for given amount of committed energy. Isagen’s 2023 revenues are approximately 70% contracted.
Market Opportunity
Colombia’s real gross domestic product has grown at an average rate of approximately 4% per year, while growth in demand for electricity has averaged just under 3%. Over the long-term, we anticipate that electricity demand growth will be approximately 2.5% per year, reflecting our long-term view of gross domestic product growth and a view that per capita power consumption will converge with neighboring countries. Per capita power consumption of approximately 1,300 kWh per year in Colombia is well below that of most regional peers and only 10% of that in the United States.
As at December 31, 2023, Colombia had a total installed capacity of over 19.7 GW with hydro accounting for almost 70% of the supply mix and the remainder being supplied by natural gas, coal, and diesel. We expect that meeting Colombia’s growing demand for firm energy will become more difficult over time as recent challenges with the construction and operation of a dam near Ituango has made large-scale hydro development more challenging (despite significant untapped hydro resources) and natural gas imports are increasingly required to meet domestic needs due to falling natural gas production in Colombia. We believe we will be able to leverage our underlying hydro business to help the country meet its energy needs by extending the duration of contracts with customers and participating in opportunistic acquisitions and development projects.
Brazil
In aggregate our company owns and operates facilities totaling 3,346 MW located in 12 Brazilian states, representing approximately 74% of the country’s population and approximately 81% of the economic activity (in GDP terms). As such, we believe Brookfield Renewable’s business in Brazil is particularly well positioned to participate in a large and diversified economy with further developmental potential. Since 2003, we have developed and built 38 facilities totaling approximately 2 GW of capacity and we have several projects in various stages of development.
Rights to hydroelectric sites are secured to Brazil by obtaining authorizations (such as water use leases) and concessions from the Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy through the National Agency for Electric Energy (“ANEEL”). We generally focus on SHPPs, a category of hydroelectric power plant with less than 30 MW of capacity. SHPP plants can be secured directly from ANEEL, whereas sites for hydroelectric plants above 50 MW can only be granted by public auction, requiring developers to bid the lowest tariff in order to win the concession and a PPA with local utilities. Of our authorizations and concessions, 91% have remaining terms of more than ten years. Generally, our hydroelectric authorizations provide for an initial term of 35 years and the possibility to renew for an additional 30-year period subject to payment of certain amounts under a water lease. Similarly, hydroelectric concessions provide for an initial term of 30 years with the possibility to renew the concession for an additional 20-year period. On the other hand, wind and solar authorizations provide for a fixed 35-year, non-renewable term.
In the Brazilian electricity market, energy is typically sold under long-term contracts to either load-serving distribution companies in the regulated market or smaller “free customers” in the free customer market. In the regulated market, we have typically entered into 20 year PPAs with distribution companies. In the “free customer” market, we have typically entered into PPAs with two to six year terms with industrial and commercial customers primarily engaged in well-established, stable industries like telecommunications, food services, sanitation and pharmaceuticals. As of 2023, “free customers” whose load is between 0.5 MW and 1.0 MW can only purchase power from renewable sources. Our PPAs in Brazil typically provide a fixed price that is fully indexed to inflation annually. Our Brazilian portfolio has a weighted average remaining contract term of approximately 9 years.
Market Opportunity
With the world’s seventh largest population and ninth largest economy, Brazil retains strong long-term growth potential despite the near-term economic challenges. Electricity consumption has sustained an average annual growth rate of approximately 3% over the last 30 years, a trend that is likely to continue in the long-term given that per capita consumption is still less than one-fifth of that in the United States.
The Brazilian energy planning agency estimates an average annual demand growth of 3.5% between 2022 and 2031. By 2031, the agency projects that approximately 43 GW of new generation will be required to service increased demand. In 2022 and 2023, 15 GW of new projects were commissioned, over 78% of which were wind and solar projects. In line with the government’s ten-year planning projections, the renewable power industry will still be responsible for the majority of the capacity expansion in this period
We believe there are two additional aspects of the Brazilian market that make our business there compelling. First, the majority of our hydroelectric facilities participate in the MRE, which significantly reduces the impact of variations in hydrology on our cash flows. Second, our SHPPs and our wind and solar assets in operation and under construction operate in a segment of the market that benefits from certain preferred economic and regulatory rights. Customers that purchase power from these plants benefit from a special discount for the use of the distribution system which, in turn, enables generators like us to capture a portion of this discount through higher prices to end-user customers.
Operating Philosophy
Like the partnership, our company employs a hands-on, operations-oriented, long-term owner’s approach to managing our company’s portfolio. We believe this approach ensures that we maintain and, where possible, enhance the value of our assets by being able to identify and manage technical, economic or stakeholder issues that may arise. The operation of our generating facilities is largely decentralized across North America, Europe and South America. Our company supports our company’s operators with a corporate team that provides global oversight of Brookfield Renewable and, among other things, establishes consistent global policies on compliance, sustainability, information technology, health, safety and security, human resources, stakeholder relations, procurement, human rights, climate, governance and anti-bribery and anti-corruption.
Our company also benefits from the expertise of Brookfield which provides strategic direction, corporate oversight, commercial and business development expertise, and oversees decisions regarding the funding and growth of our business. We believe this approach leads to a strong decision-making culture and long-term owner-oriented investment philosophy to build value.
Capital Expenditures
Our principal capital expenditures relate to the construction and maintenance of our renewable power generation fleet. The table below summarizes the amounts invested in capital expenditures for the periods presented.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| US$ Millions | For the year ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| $ | 1,028 | | | $ | 847 | | | $ | 1,354 | |
These capital expenditures have been financed with working capital generated and retained within our business, supplemented by non-recourse debt sized to investment grade coverage and covenant thresholds. There were no material divestitures within the periods presented above and there are no material divestitures that are currently the subject of a definitive agreement.
Our Competitive Strengths
One of the largest, public decarbonization businesses globally. Brookfield Renewable has a 23-year track record as a publicly traded operator and investor in renewable power and sustainable solution assets. Today our group has a large, multi-technology and globally diversified portfolio that is supported by approximately 4,770 experienced employees (inclusive of employees employed by our group’s consolidated portfolio companies). Brookfield Renewable invests in assets directly, as well as with institutional partners, joint venture partners and through other arrangements. Our group has also made investments in our group’s sustainable solutions portfolio comprised of assets and businesses that enable the transition to net-zero where we can leverage our access to capital and partnerships to accelerate growth, and emerging transition asset classes where our group’s initial investment positions us for potential future large-scale decarbonization investment. Our group’s sustainable solutions portfolio also includes investments in power transformation opportunities where we have invested in businesses to enable the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through the deployment of traditional renewables.
Helping to accelerate the decarbonization and stability of the electricity grids. Climate change and energy security are viewed as two of the most significant and urgent issues facing the global economy, posing immense risks to the safety and security of communities and to our collective and economic prosperity. In response, governments and businesses have adopted ambitious plans to support a transition to a decarbonized economy. We believe that our group’s scale and global operating, development and investing capabilities make us well positioned to partner with governments and businesses to help them achieve their decarbonization goals.
Diverse and high-quality portfolio of renewable power and sustainable solutions assets. Brookfield Renewable has a complementary portfolio of hydroelectric, wind, utility-scale solar, and other sustainable solutions assets, including distributed generation solar and energy storage:
•Hydroelectric Power. Today, hydroelectric power is the largest segment in our group’s portfolio and continues to be a premium technology as one of the longest life, lowest-cost and cleanest most
environmentally-preferred forms of power generation. Hydroelectric plants have high cash margins, storage capacity with the ability to dispatch power at all hours of the day.
•Wind & Solar Power. Our group’s wind, utility-scale solar, and distributed generation facilities provide exposure to two of the fastest growing renewable power sectors, with high cash margins, zero fuel input cost, and diverse and scalable applications including distributed generation. Wind and solar are now among the lowest cost forms of power generation available globally.
•Energy Storage & Sustainable Solutions. Our group’s energy storage facilities provide the markets in which they are located with critical services to the grid and dispatchable generation. Our group’s other sustainable solutions assets, such as carbon capture and our group’s nuclear service business, are helping businesses and countries achieve their net-zero goals.
With our group’s scale, diversity and the quality of our group’s assets, our group is competitively positioned relative to other renewable power and transition companies. Our group’s large pipeline and differentiated capabilities provide significant scarcity value and growth potential for our group’s investors.
Best-in class operators and developers. Brookfield Renewable has approximately 4,770 experienced operators (inclusive of employees employed by our group’s consolidated portfolio companies) and approximately 120 power marketing experts that are located across the globe to help optimize the performance and maximize the returns of all our group’s assets. Our group’s experience operating, developing, and managing power generation facilities span over 120 years. We continue to accelerate our group’s development activities as our group builds out Brookfield Renewable’s approximately 155,400 MW renewable power pipeline, and further enhance our group’s decarbonization offering to our group’s customers through the build out of our group’s sustainable solutions assets. Increasingly, our group’s operating and developing capabilities combined with our growth pipeline is differentiating our group’s business as the partner of choice for buyers of clean power and entities looking to decarbonize, driving the growth of our group’s business.
Strong financial profile and conservative financing strategy. Brookfield Renewable maintains a robust balance sheet, strong investment grade rating, and access to global capital markets to ensure cash flow resiliency through the cycle. Our group’s approach to financing is to raise the majority of our group’s debt in the form of asset-specific, non-recourse borrowings at our group’s subsidiaries on an investment grade basis with no financial maintenance covenants.
Well positioned for cash flow growth and an attractive long term distribution profile. Our group is focused on delivering resilient, stable distributions with meaningful growth of 5% to 9% annually through all market cycles from existing operations and new investment. Our group is fully funded by internally generated cash flows, with inflation escalations in the vast majority of our group’s contracts, potential margin expansion through revenue growth and cost reduction initiatives, and the building out our group’s development pipeline at premium returns. Our group also supplements this organic growth through acquisitions, leveraging Brookfield’s team of over 100 investment professionals globally who are dedicated to sourcing and underwriting accretive acquisitions on an opportunistic basis
Disciplined and contrarian investment strategy. Our group’s global scale and multi-technology capabilities allows our group to rotate capital where it is scarce in order to earn strong risk-adjusted returns. Our group takes a disciplined approach to allocating capital into development and acquisitions with a focus on downside protection and preservation of capital. Our group’s ability to develop and acquire assets is strengthened by our group’s operating and project development teams across the globe, strategic relationship with Brookfield, and our group’s liquidity and capitalization profile.
Conservative approach to asset development and asset management. Our group employs a conservative approach with respect to asset development and management whereby our group looks to remove what we call “basis risk” before committing significant capital. To do this, our group looks to secure financing, customer agreements and engineering, procurement and construction contracts concurrently so our group has strong visibility on cash flows and can lock-in our group’s target returns. Where possible, our group looks to secure fixed rate financing, inflation indexed customer agreements and full wrap construction contracts to minimize uncertainty.
Decarbonization Growth Opportunity
Demand for clean energy and other decarbonization solutions continues to accelerate with corporate net-zero targets, an increased focus on energy security and the improving competitive nature of these technologies, which are now among the lowest cost energy sources globally. Our group has seen a shift in the driver for demand from a government incentivized push to a corporate pull, which is contributing to increased demand for transition solutions broadly, expanding beyond just traditional renewable energy. Advancing the transition to a lower carbon future is expected to require substantial capital – in excess of $200 trillion over the next three decades – and will require significant expertise and investment in both clean energy and electrification and investment to convert carbon-intensive industries to cleaner and more sustainable methods of production.
Global Clean Energy Drivers
We believe that strong continuing growth in renewable power generation and other decarbonization investment opportunities will be driven by the following:
Renewable energy is an increasingly cost-effective way of generating electricity and diversifying fuel risk. Renewable power continues to be the lowest cost source of bulk electricity in most markets around the world. Renewables as a part of the energy mix have continued to climb over the past several years and reached approximately 30% of global generation compared to approximately 21% in 2012, while coal, gas, and oil fell from a combined approximately 68% down to approximately 61% over the same period. We expect that utilities will increasingly seek to limit exposure to potential fuel cost volatility by looking to renewable technologies that offer stable price terms, particularly hydroelectric, wind and solar energy.
Consistent policy and supportive regulation. Regulatory support for the development of clean energy typically includes renewable portfolio standards (“RPS”), which require electricity distributors to obtain a minimum percentage of their power from renewable energy resources by specified target dates, and tax incentives or direct subsidies. Globally, at least 160 countries, including the U.K., and the 27 E.U. countries, have national targets for renewable energy supply. Similarly, 36 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and eight Canadian provinces have either RPS targets or other policy goals that require or encourage load-serving utilities to supply portions of their customer electricity demand from renewable sources. Additionally, as of November 2023, around 145 countries covering 90% of global emissions had announced or were considering net-zero targets, and to achieve these goals there will need to be significant investment to increase the supply of energy from renewables. In 2022, the U.S. government passed the largest federal climate bill in U.S. history, the Inflation Reduction Act, which will directly invest almost $300 billion into energy transition technologies over the next decade. The climate bill has helped increase investment in renewables and decarbonization technologies in the U.S. and has had a knock-on effect for policy makers globally looking to attract investment in their jurisdictions. For example, in February 2023 the E.U. presented the Green Deal Industrial Plan to enhance the competitiveness of Europe’s net-zero industry and
accelerate the transition to climate neutrality. As of 2023, there were at least 73 carbon pricing initiatives (carbon taxes and emissions trading schemes) that have been implemented worldwide covering 39 national jurisdictions and approximately 23% of global GHG emissions. Additional carbon pricing initiatives continue to be considered throughout South America, Southeast Asia, and Central Asia.
Mainstream recognition of climate change risk and serious commitment to action. Global support for decarbonization – and by implication the further promotion of renewable technologies – was solidified in December 2015 as 197 countries agreed at the COP21 Conference in Paris to develop national strategies consistent with limiting the increase in global temperature by 2050 to less than two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. Since signing, the Paris Agreement has been ratified by over 190 countries. The recent COP28 Conference in the UAE saw further commitments made by the international community, and notably participants undertook the first ever global “stocktake”. The global stocktake is a process for countries and stakeholders to see where they are collectively making progress towards meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement. Part of the outcome of the stocktake was a proposal that further recognized the need for a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and called on parties to contribute to the global effort to triple renewable energy capacity globally and double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements by 2030.
Energy security is now an urgent priority for governments globally. Since the onset of the conflict in Ukraine in February 2022, there has been a renewed focus on energy security in Europe but now focusing on renewable deployment to reduce dependence on imported gas and energy costs. In May 2022, the E.U. released its REPower EU strategy which aims to make Europe independent from Russian gas imports by 2027. The strategy increased wind and solar generation targets to over 1,200 GW of total installed capacity by 2030 to reduce gas consumption for power generation and further support green hydrogen production to reduce industrial gas consumption. Beyond Europe, this year there has also been an increase in ambition for renewable deployment in China, India, and the United States to reduce their dependence on imported gas and reduce energy costs.
Enabling growth in cloud computing and deployment of AI enabled applications through the powering of data centers. With the emergence of artificial intelligence and growth in cloud computing, technology companies are investing heavily in data center development to support the roll out of new products and digitalization globally. The increased computing power and energy requirements from AI is resulting in accelerating demand for power. The technology companies, who have 100% green power targets, are increasingly looking for reliable partners to deliver scale renewable power solutions globally.
Competition and Marketing
Brookfield Renewable operates in various North American, European, Colombian and Brazilian power markets. The nature and extent of competition we face varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Brookfield Renewable’s main competition in its electricity markets are coal, nuclear, oil and natural gas electricity generators as well as other renewable energy generators who use hydro, wind, geothermal, solar PV and solar DG technologies. The market price of commodities, such as natural gas and coal, are important drivers of energy pricing and competition in most energy markets, especially in Brazil, Colombia and the United States.
In the United States, our group’s energy marketing activities are managed and performed by our subsidiary BRTM. These businesses operate 24 hours/day, 365 days/year and our energy marketing business performs transaction execution, risk management, settlement, information technology, regulatory, legal and human resource functions. This business also provides our group with valuable market intelligence regarding pricing dynamics, regulatory regimes and market participants.
Our marketing efforts focus on leveraging our competitive advantages described in Item 4.B “Business Overview” and our group’s world-class operating businesses described in Item 4.B “Business Overview—Operating Philosophy”.
Our group also leverages its relationship with Brookfield, which our group believes provides a unique competitive advantage considering Brookfield’s strong reputation in the energy marketing, asset management, infrastructure and global real estate industries. See Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Licensing Agreement”.
Intellectual Property
Brookfield Renewable, as licensee, entered into the Licensing Agreement with Brookfield pursuant to which Brookfield granted our group a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Brookfield” and the Brookfield logo worldwide. Other than under this limited license, our group does not have a legal right to the “Brookfield” name and the Brookfield logo. Brookfield may terminate the Licensing Agreement immediately upon termination of the Master Services Agreement and it may be terminated in the circumstances described under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Licensing Agreement”.
Governmental, Legal and Arbitration Proceedings
Our group is occasionally named as a party in various claims and legal proceedings that arise during the normal course of our business. With respect to claims and proceedings, our group reviews each of these matters, including the nature of the claim, the amount in dispute or claimed and the availability of insurance coverage. Although there can be no assurance as to the resolution of any particular matter, our group does not believe that the outcome of any matters or potential matters of which our group is currently aware would have a material adverse effect on our group’s businesses.
Regulation
Various activities of Brookfield Renewable require registrations, permits, licenses, inspections and approvals from governmental agencies and regulatory authorities and our group strives to comply with all regulations applicable to our group’s operations. Water rights are generally owned or controlled by governments that reserve the right to control water levels or may impose water-use requirements. Our group holds concessions, licenses and permits to operate our facilities, which generally include rights to the land and water required for power generation. Wholesale market structures or rules provide our group with rights to access the power grid.
Our group is also subject to various laws and regulations relating to health, safety, security and environmental matters. These laws and regulations may change and our group may become subject to more stringent laws and regulations in the future. Compliance with more stringent laws and regulations could have an adverse effect on our group’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Our group has established policies and procedures for environmental management and compliance, and our group has incurred and will continue to incur significant capital and operating expenditures to comply with health, safety, security and environmental laws and to obtain and comply with licenses, permits and other approvals and to assess and manage potential liability exposure. See also information contained under Item 3.D “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Operations and our Industry”.
Employees and Offices
Brookfield Renewable does not employ the individuals who provide management services to our group under the Master Services Agreement, including the individuals who serve as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our company and the general partner of BEP. The personnel that carry out these activities are employees of Brookfield, and their services are provided to Brookfield Renewable, including for the benefit of our company, under the Master Services Agreement. For a discussion of the individuals from Brookfield’s management team that are involved in our renewable power business, see Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement” and for a discussion of our employees, see Item 6.D “Employees”. and for a discussion of our employees see Item 6.D “Employees”.
Our Group’s Approach to Sustainability
Our group approach to sustainability is a key part of how our group conducts its business as an investor, owner and operator of one of the world’s largest publicly traded, platforms for renewable power, sustainable solutions and decarbonization solutions. Brookfield Renewable believes that strong sustainability principles, practices and performance support creating a resilient business and generating long-term value for our group’s stakeholders.
Our group embeds sustainability throughout its investment process, starting with due diligence and through to our group’s exit from the investment. Brookfield Renewable tailors sustainability due diligence, leveraging our group’s investment and operating expertise and using guidance from the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. Our group seeks to proactively identify material sustainability risks and opportunities most relevant to the investment and tailor our group’s due diligence work accordingly. After acquiring or investing in an asset, our group implements a tailored integration plan that, includes material sustainability-related priorities. The management teams
within each regional business are accountable for integrating new investments and managing sustainability risks and opportunities through the investment’s life cycle. Sustainability integration and performance are reviewed centrally on a regular basis through our group’s formal governance processes. Finally, as part of our group’s divestiture process, Brookfield Renewable outlines potential value creation from several different factors, including sustainability considerations.
Environment
Decarbonization is a global goal shared by many governments, corporations and investors. As a leading owner and developer of clean energy, Brookfield Renewable built its position in this sector over many decades and will leverage our group’s operational expertise to support the multi-decade transition required for global decarbonization. Our group’s clean energy assets already support others globally to reduce their emissions and our group will continue to partner to drive emissions reduction.
Brookfield Renewable recognizes the importance of reducing the emissions from our group’s own business. Brookfield Renewable has set an ambition to deliver net zero emissions across our group’s existing renewable operations by 2050 or sooner and to accelerate the global transition. The ambition is aligned with our group’s strategy and underpinned by three goals:
•Achieve net zero for Scope 1 & Scope 2 market-based emissions by 2030 across our group’s existing renewable operations. This target is supported by established plans with a primary focus on emissions reductions, including increasing the use of renewable energy to power our group’s assets and offices. In addition, our group is working to enhance the reporting of Scope 3 emissions across our wider value chain and aim to set a Scope 3 target in the future.
•From 2022, develop an additional 21,000 MW of new clean energy capacity by 2030, which would represent a doubling of our operating portfolio to 42,000 MW. In 2023, our group developed approximately 5,000 MW of new clean energy capacity, and our group has developed approximately 8,000 MW since setting its target. Our group expects to accomplish the remaining capacity growth by executing on opportunities in its existing development pipeline as well as continuing to pursue acquisitions. See Item 3.D “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Growth Strategy.”
•Set emissions reduction targets and plans to align with the Paris Agreement for 100% of carbon intensive investments. Our group seeks opportunities to help businesses – primarily those in the energy, utility and industrial sectors – to align with the goals of the Paris Agreement by setting interim and long-term targets against Paris-aligned pathways and integrating these targets into the strategy, business plan and governance processes of new acquisitions.
Our group integrates wider environmental considerations, including biodiversity protection and water and waste management, into our group’s decision-making and activities, while striving for continuous improvement in our group’s environmental management system and overall performance. Our group’s engagement and collaboration with stakeholders, including communities, Indigenous peoples, local agencies and environmental NGOs, enhance our group’s understanding of ecosystems, the potential environmental impacts of our group’s facilities and development of associated management plans.
Brookfield Renewable also supports the market for green financing products, helping to accelerate the transformation and decarbonization of global electricity generation, while reducing the cost of our group’s borrowing. Brookfield Renewable’s Green Financing Committee, comprised of representatives from our group’s Capital Markets and Treasury teams, manages our group’s sustainable financing strategy in collaboration with Brookfield Renewable’s Sustainability Team. The Chief Financial Officer of our group’s Service Provider oversees our group’s strategy and includes these matters in reports to the board of directors of the Managing General Partner.
In 2023, Brookfield Renewable issued approximately $5 billion of green financings at both the corporate and project levels. This brought our group’s aggregate green issuances to approximately $15 billion, as of December 31, 2023. Additionally, in January 2024, Brookfield Renewable issued an additional C$400 million in green financings at the corporate level. Our group updated its Green Financing Framework which received a medium green overall rating by second-party opinion provider S&P, with all of our eligible investment categories receiving medium or dark green classifications under S&P’s Shade of Green methodology. All of our group’s project-level green bonds
received over 90 out of 100 Green Evaluation scores from S&P. S&P cited that Brookfield Renewable’s environmental stewardship, commitment to renewable power and use of proceeds towards renewable power generation contributed to this top score.
Social
Brookfield Renewable seeks to make a positive difference for our group’s people and the communities in which our group operates. Within our group’s operations, we maintain a strong focus on health and safety, support the development of our group’s employees and strive to create an open and inclusive work environment for our teams to thrive. Brookfield Renewable continuously strives to achieve excellence in health and safety performance and to be industry leaders in risk management and incident prevention. Brookfield Renewable’s health and safety management philosophy emphasizes the importance of leadership, line management accountability, a managed system approach and the identification and elimination of high-risk hazards as the cornerstones of exceptional performance.
Across our group’s value chain, Brookfield Renewable strives to build strong relationships with its community partners. Our group proactively engages with communities and strives to create shared value. Our group believes having transparent and well-established relationships with local stakeholders is key to successfully developing and operating our group’s facilities. When considering investing in or building a new facility, our group conducts assessments and due diligence to identify local stakeholders. Stakeholders can include communities, landowners, business owners, municipalities, recreational organizations, NGOs or others potentially affected by or interested in our group’s operations. Brookfield Renewable consults and works proactively with local stakeholders to ensure that their interests and safety are appropriately integrated into our group’s decision-making, developments and operations.
Brookfield Renewable is dedicated to treating stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the communities in which our group operates with dignity and respect. Our group’s human rights policy and program includes adhering to all laws and regulations that apply to our group’s operations regarding fair labor and employment conditions and making efforts within our group’s business to enhance due diligence, key contract terms, policies, procedures and collaboration with respect to human rights and the supply chain. Our group’s commitment to human rights is integrated throughout our group’s decision-making and operations.
Governance
Brookfield Renewable maintains high ethical standards across our group’s organization, key elements of which include our group’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy, a whistleblower hotline, and supporting controls and procedures. To ensure best practices are adopted by our group’s contractors, Brookfield Renewable has established a Vendor Code of Conduct to better ensure that our group’s contractors’ values, priorities and business practices are aligned with our own. The standards set by these policies are designed to meet or exceed applicable law and regulation. Brookfield Renewable recognizes the importance of transparently reporting our group’s sustainability programs and our group’s ESG progress to stakeholders including our group’s investors. As such, Brookfield Renewable began publishing an annual sustainability report in 2020 detailing how our group embeds environmental, social and governance principles into our group’s business and continue to report in alignment with the recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
Oversight of Brookfield Renewable’s sustainability matters resides with our group’s board of directors and senior leadership team:
•Board of Directors: The board of directors of our group and its committees oversee Brookfield Renewable’s sustainability strategy, which is focused on decarbonization, and reviews Brookfield Renewable’s sustainability approach and performance throughout the year. It also reviews global policies related to sustainability and monitors the performance of our group’s regional businesses. The board of directors of our group receives quarterly updates on sustainability performance.
•Executive Management Team: The Chief Executive Officer of our group’s Service Provider has ultimate accountability for implementing strategy for the business, including the delivery of sustainability programs and goals. The Chief Executive Officer of our group’s Service Provider and the executive management team set and provide oversight for delivery of the strategic vision and priorities of our group’s business.
•Regional Business Leads: The Chief Executive Officers of our group’s regional businesses implements local objectives within their business and are accountable for sustainability performance.
•Sustainability Steering Committee: Our group’s Sustainability Steering Committee sets sustainability goals, shares best practices, monitors progress and performance against Brookfield Renewable’s goals and seeks opportunities for improvement. The committee includes the Chief Executive Officers of our group’s regional operating businesses, our group’s Chief Sustainability Officer, and our group’s Chief Risk Officer along with various sustainability and operations experts from across our group’s businesses.
•HSS&E Steering Committee: Our group’s HSS&E Steering Committee manages Brookfield Renewable’s strategic health and safety framework. The committee sets our group’s comprehensive health and safety policies, upholds our group’s robust health and safety culture and management system, shares best practices, seeks opportunities to continuously improve our group’s safety performance and monitors performance against our group’s goal to achieve zero high-risk incidents.
•Investment Review: The Service Provider incorporates sustainability factors, including climate-related considerations, into the due diligence process for potential investments, including reviewing material sutainability and other findings from due diligence, prior to investment decisions being made.
A proactive and focused approach continuing to build upon our high sustainability standards creates value in Brookfield Renewable’s business. The initiatives our group undertakes and the investments Brookfield Renewable makes in building our group’s business are guided by our group’s core set of values around sustainability, as Brookfield Renewable creates a culture and organization that our group believes can be successful today and in the future. For a discussion of the individuals from Brookfield’s management team that are expected to be involved in our business, see Item 6.A. “Directors and Senior Management — Our Management”. Also see Item 3.D “Risk Factors — General Risk Factors — New regulatory initiatives related to sustainability, ESG and/or changing market perception of our businesses could adversely impact our business.”
Emerging Markets Operations
Brookfield and its predecessor corporations have been invested in Brazil for over 100 years and re-entered the Brazilian renewable power market in 2003. The partnership entered the Colombian market in 2016 with its acquisition of Isagen. Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield employ a number of key practices in managing the various risks associated with the emerging markets in which they operate, including Brazil and Colombia. These practices include the following:
Oversight of Subsidiaries. Brookfield Renewable’s corporate structure has been designed to ensure that Brookfield Renewable controls, or has an appropriate measure of direct oversight over, the operations of the operating entities in Brazil and Colombia. As direct or indirect subsidiaries of Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Renewable will directly or indirectly control the appointment of a sufficient number of the directors to ensure control over its subsidiaries.
Transfer of Funds. Since the subsidiaries operating in Brazil and Colombia are controlled by our group, Brookfield Renewable is able to determine if and when funds are distributed. Brookfield Renewable maintains internal policies and systems which allows it to monitor the activities of its subsidiaries. In practice, funds are transferred by foreign subsidiaries to our group pursuant to a variety of methods.
Local Management. Local management is appointed by Brookfield Renewable. In addition, from time to time, an operating entity is staffed and managed by several personnel seconded from Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield to subsidiaries in Brazil or Colombia and who become resident in the local jurisdiction, which ensures a degree of oversight and control in the day-to-day operations which would not be present in a passive investment.
Internal Audit. As part of Brookfield Renewable’s internal audit plan, each year Brookfield Renewable’s internal auditor conducts an on-site internal audit with respect to specific matters as instructed by its audit committee. The audit report is reviewed and discussed by the audit committee.
Strategic Direction. The board of directors of the general partner of BEP is responsible for the overall stewardship of Brookfield Renewable and, as such, supervises the management of the business and affairs of Brookfield Renewable. The board of directors of the general partner of BEP and our board of directors is responsible
for reviewing the strategic business plans and corporate objectives, and approving acquisitions, dispositions, investments, capital expenditures and other transactions and matters that are thought to be material to the partnership and our company, respectively.
In addition to the above practices, many of Brookfield Renewable’s directors and Brookfield’s directors and executive officers have acquired experience conducting business in Brazil and Colombia. The boards of directors of the general partner of BEP and our company are composed of directors residing in Canada, the United States, Bermuda, Brazil and the United Kingdom who have experience with various international issuers. In addition, Brookfield has a global presence and an international network of corporate and regional offices that allows it to work with local management and oversee the operations of our group’s subsidiaries in Brazil, Colombia and elsewhere in the world.
Dividend Policy
Our board of directors may declare dividends at its discretion. However, the BEPC exchangeable shares have been structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to the BEP units and it is expected that dividends on the BEPC exchangeable shares will continue to be declared at the same time and in the same amount as distributions made on the BEP units to provide holders of the BEPC exchangeable shares with an economic return equivalent to holders of the BEP units. In the event dividends are not declared and paid concurrently with a distribution on the BEP units, then the undeclared or unpaid amount of such BEPC exchangeable share dividend will accrue and accumulate. Pursuant to the equity commitment, BEP has also agreed not to declare or pay any distribution on the BEP units if on such date our company does not have sufficient funds or other assets to enable the declaration and payment of an equivalent dividend on the BEPC exchangeable shares. Brookfield Renewable’s distributions are underpinned by stable, highly regulated and contracted cash flows generated from operations. Brookfield Renewable’s objective is to pay a distribution that is sustainable on a long-term basis and has set its target payout ratio at approximately 70% of Brookfield Renewable’s FFO.
Future distributions by the partnership will be at the discretion of the board of directors of its general partner, and dividends on the BEPC exchangeable shares also will be made at the discretion of the BEPC board of directors, and while the partnership expects future distributions to be made in accordance with its distribution policy, there can be no assurance that the partnership or our company will make comparable distributions or dividends in the future or at all. See Item 3.D “Risk Factors—We cannot assure you that we will be able to pay dividends equal to the levels currently paid by BEP and holders of BEPC exchangeable shares may not receive dividends equal to the distributions paid on the BEP units and, accordingly, may not receive the intended economic equivalence of those securities”. We cannot assure investors that we will be able to pay dividends equal to the levels currently paid by BEP and holders of BEPC exchangeable shares may not receive dividends equal to the distributions paid on the BEP units and, accordingly, may not receive the intended economic equivalence of those securities.
Brookfield Renewable targets a 5% to 9% annual distribution growth rate in light of growth it foresees in its operations. As a result of the special distribution, BEP’s regular quarterly distribution per BEP unit was reduced to $0.434 such that the aggregate distribution received by a holder of BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares, when taken together, remained approximately the same as it would have been had the special distribution never been made. The distribution and dividend rates for our company and the partnership have been further adjusted to reflect the three-for-two unit/share split of BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares completed on December 11, 2020, and the board of directors of our company and of the general partner of BEP approved a further 5% increase in their annual distributions and dividends to $1.42 per BEP unit and $1.42 per BEPC exchangeable share, or $0.355 per BEP unit and $0.355 per BEPC exchangeable share quarterly, respectively, starting with the distribution to be paid on March 28, 2024 to holders of record as at the close of business on February 29, 2024.
The Service Provider
Brookfield
Brookfield Corporation is focused on deploying its capital on a value basis and compounding it over the long term. This capital is allocated across its three core pillars of asset management, insurance solutions and operating businesses. Employing a disciplined investment approach, Brookfield Corporation leverages its deep expertise as an owner and operator of real assets, as well as the scale and flexibility of capital, to create value and deliver strong risk-adjusted returns across market cycles. With significant capital underpinned by a conservatively capitalized
balance sheet, we believe Brookfield Corporation is well positioned to pursue significant opportunities for growth. Brookfield’s global alternative asset management business is owned 75% by Brookfield Corporation and 25% by Brookfield Asset Management through their ownership of common shares of the Asset Management Company, which is the indirect parent of certain Service Provider entities.
Brookfield Renewable is Brookfield’s primary vehicle through which it will, directly or indirectly, acquire renewable power assets on a global basis, subject to certain exceptions set out in the Management Services Agreement and Relationship Agreement, and we benefit from its reputation and global platform to grow our business. We may also participate in decarbonization investments sourced by Brookfield.
We believe that our ongoing relationship with Brookfield provide us and the partnership with a unique competitive advantage as well as access to opportunities that would otherwise not be available to BEPC. See Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions” for more information.
4.C ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Organizational Chart
The following diagram provides an illustration of the simplified corporate structure of our group. All ownership is 100% unless otherwise indicated.
(1) Brookfield’s general partner interest is held through Brookfield Renewable Partners Limited, a Bermuda company that is indirectly wholly-owned by Brookfield Corporation.
(2) Brookfield’s limited partnership interest in BRELP, held in redeemable/exchangeable partnership units, is redeemable for cash or exchangeable for LP Units in accordance with the redemption-exchange mechanism contained in BRELP’s limited partnership agreement, which could result in the Brookfield Holders collectively owning approximately 56% of BEP's issued and outstanding LP units assuming exchange of the redeemable/exchangeable partnership units (and including the issued and outstanding LP units that Brookfield currently also owns).
(3) As of February 23, 2024, the Brookfield Holders, collectively, own approximately 47% of BEP on a fully-exchanged basis, assuming the exchange of all of the outstanding redeemable/exchangeable partnership units and all of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares.
(4) Brookfield has provided an aggregate of $5 million of working capital to certain Holding Entities through a subscription for shares.
(5) Canadian Bond Guarantors and Preference Share Guarantors.
(6) Perpetual Note Guarantors.
(7) Preferred Unit Guarantors.
(8) Certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Asset Management Company, which is owned 75% by Brookfield Corporation and 25% by Brookfield Asset Management, are Service Provider entities and provide services to the Service Recipients.
(9) BEP has voting control of BRELP by way of a voting agreement.
(10) As of February 23, 2024, the Brookfield Holders collectively hold approximately 25% of the BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP owns all of BEPC's class B shares and class C shares. BEPC exchangeable shares and class B shares control 25% and 75%, respectively, of the aggregate voting rights of the shares of BEPC. Through their ownership of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC’s class B shares, the Brookfield Holders and BEP collectively hold an approximate 81.2% voting interest in BEPC.
Brookfield Renewable Corporation
Our company is a Canadian corporation incorporated on September 9, 2019 under the laws of British Columbia and was established to be an alternative investment vehicle for investors who prefer owning securities through a corporate structure. We became a separated-traded public company upon completion of the special distribution in July 2020. The BEPC exchangeable shares are listed on the TSX and the NYSE under the symbol “BEPC”. While our operations are primarily located in the United States, Brazil, Colombia, and Europe, shareholders will, on economic terms, have exposure to all regions that BEP operates in as a result of the exchange feature attaching to the BEPC exchangeable shares, whereby BEPC has the option to meet an exchange request by delivering cash or an LP unit. Our BEPC exchangeable shares are structured with the intention of being economically equivalent to the LP units. We believe economic equivalence is achievable through identical dividends and distributions on the BEPC exchangeable shares and LP units and each BEPC exchangeable share being exchangeable at the option of the holder for one LP unit at any time. Given the intended economic equivalence, we expect that the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares will be impacted by the market price of the LP units and the combined business performance of Brookfield Renewable as a whole.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
BEP is a Bermuda exempted limited partnership that was established on June 27, 2011 under the provisions of the Bermuda Partnership Acts. BEP’s registered and head office is 73 Front Street, 5th Floor, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda, and its telephone number is +1 441-294-3304.
The partnership operates one of the world’s largest publicly traded, renewable power and transition platforms. Brookfield Renewable’s portfolio consists of hydroelectric, wind, solar, distributed generation and storage facilities in North America, South America, Europe and Asia. Brookfield Renewable has also made investments in our sustainable solutions portfolio comprised of assets and businesses that enable the transition to net-zero through established but emerging technologies that require capital to scale. The partnership is focused on leveraging its extensive operating experience to maintain and enhance the value of assets, grow cash flows on an annual basis and cultivate positive relations with local stakeholders. The LP units are listed on the NYSE and the TSX and the preferred units are listed on the TSX. Additionally, one series of the preferred units is listed on the NYSE.
NA Holdco
NA Holdco is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of BEP incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on March 8, 2011. In April 2021, NA Holdco issued $350 million of green Series 1 Perpetual Notes at a fixed rate of 4.625%, and in December 2021, NA Holdco issued $260 million of green Series 2 Perpetual Notes at a fixed rate of 4.875%. In addition to the approximately $610 million aggregate principal amount of publicly issued Perpetual Notes, NA Holdco indirectly holds most of Brookfield Renewable’s North American operating assets as well as its interest in BEPC. The Perpetual Notes are guaranteed by the Perpetual Note Guarantors, including Canada SubCo.
In November 2023, Brookfield Renewable Investments Limited, formerly a Perpetual Note Guarantor, continued from Bermuda into Ontario and subsequently amalgamated with Canada Subco pursuant to the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario). The continuing entity, Canada Subco, is a Perpetual Note Guarantor.
The Asset Management Company
Certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Asset Management Company, which is owned 75% by Brookfield Corporation and 25% by Brookfield Asset Management, provide services to the Service Recipients. See Item 4.B “Business Overview—The Service Provider” and Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement” for more information on Brookfield and these arrangements.
Inter-Corporate Relationships
The following table provides the name, the percentage of voting securities owned, or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, by us, and the jurisdiction of incorporation, continuance, formation or organization of our significant subsidiaries as at December 31, 2023.
| | | | | | | | | |
| Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization | Percentage of voting securities owned or controlled (%) | |
| BP Brazil US Subco LLC | Delaware | 100 | |
| Brookfield Power US Holding America Co. | Delaware | 100 | |
Isagen S.A. E.S.P.(1) | Colombia | 99.7 | |
TerraForm Power Parent, LLC(1) | New York | 100 | |
(1)Voting control held, in whole or in part, through voting agreements with Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield.
4.D PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Our company’s head office is at 250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor, New York NY 10281-1023 and our company’s registered office is at 1055 West Georgia Street, Suite 1500, P.O. Box 11117, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 4N7. Our company is a holding company and our material assets consist solely of interests in our operating subsidiaries. See also the information contained in this Form 20-F under Item 3.D “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Operations and Our Industry” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
5.A OPERATING RESULTS
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements of Brookfield Renewable Corporation (“our company“) are prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB, which require estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities as at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting periods.
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
Organization of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis
| | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Proportionate results for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Dividend Policy | |
| |
| Capital Expenditures | |
| | | | | |
|
|
| Consolidated statements of cash flows | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Historical operational and financial information | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
PART 1 – OVERVIEW
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
BEPC is a Canadian corporation incorporated on September 9, 2019 under the laws of British Columbia. Our company was established by Brookfield Renewable to be an alternative investment vehicle for investors who prefer owning securities through a corporate structure. While our operations are primarily located in the United States, Brazil, Colombia, and Europe, shareholders will, on economic terms, have exposure to all regions BEP operates in as a result of the exchange feature attaching to the Class A exchangeable subordinate voting shares (“BEPC exchangeable shares”), whereby BEPC will have the option to meet an exchange request by delivering cash or non-voting limited partnership units of BEP (“LP units”).
The BEPC exchangeable shares of our company are structured with the intention of being economically equivalent to the LP units. We believe economic equivalence is achieved through identical dividends and distributions on the BEPC exchangeable shares and the LP units and each BEPC exchangeable share being exchangeable at the option of the holder for one LP unit at any time. Given the economic equivalence, we expect that the market price of the BEPC exchangeable shares will be significantly impacted by the market price of the LP units and the combined business performance of our company and Brookfield Renewable as a whole. In addition to carefully considering the disclosure made in this document, shareholders are strongly encouraged to carefully review the partnership’s periodic reporting. The partnership is required to file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The partnership’s SEC filings are available to the public from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of documents that have been filed with the Canadian securities authorities can be obtained at http://www.sedarplus.ca. Information about the partnership, including its SEC filings, is also available on its website at https://bep.brookfield.com. The information found on, or accessible through https://bep.brookfield.com is not incorporated into and does not form a part of this MD&A.
Our company, our subsidiaries and Brookfield Renewable, (together our “Group”), target a total return of 12% to 15% per annum on the renewable assets that we own, measured over the long-term. Our group intends to generate this return from cash flows from our operations plus growth through investments in upgrades and expansions of our asset base, as well as acquisitions and capital recycling initiatives. Brookfield Renewable determines its distributions based primarily on an assessment of its operating performance. Our group uses Funds From Operations (“FFO”) to assess operating performance which can be used on a per unit basis as a proxy for future distribution growth over the long-term. For further details, see the “Performance Disclosures” section of this MD&A.
PART 2 – FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW ON CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION
The following table reflects key financial data for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS, EXCEPT AS NOTED) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenues | $ | 3,967 | | | $ | 3,778 | | | $ | 3,367 | |
| Direct operating costs | (1,466) | | | (1,174) | | | (1,185) | |
| Management service costs | (88) | | | (169) | | | (175) | |
| Interest expense | (1,258) | | | (1,032) | | | (900) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Depreciation | (1,342) | | | (1,179) | | | (1,115) | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | (106) | | | 1,800 | | | 1,267 | |
| Income tax expense | (73) | | | (118) | | | (87) | |
| Net income (loss) | 308 | | | 1,850 | | | 930 | |
| Average FX rates to USD |
| | | | | |
| € | 0.92 | | | 0.95 | | | 0.85 | |
| R$ | 4.99 | | | 5.16 | | | 5.40 | |
| COP | 4,328 | | | 4,253 | | | 3,742 | |
Current Year Variance Analysis (2023 vs 2022)
Revenues totaling $3,967 million represents an increase of $189 million over the same period in the prior year due to the growth of our business and higher realized prices. Recently acquired and commissioned facilities contributed 2,833 GWh of generation and $163 million of revenues, which was partly offset by recently completed asset sales that reduced generation by 1,134 GWh and revenues by $89 million. On a same store, constant currency basis, revenues increased by $92 million as the benefits from higher realized prices across most markets on the back of inflation escalation and commercial initiatives were partially offset by lower hydrology at our Colombian hydroelectric assets and lower average revenue per MWh at our European wind and solar assets as a result of adjustments to the regulated price earned in Spain that decreased revenue in the short term but has no impact on the value of the asset given the regulatory construct.
The weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to the prior year across most currencies increased revenues by $23 million, offset by a $28 million unfavorable foreign exchange impact on our operating and interest expenses.
Direct operating costs totaling $1,466 million, represents an increase of $292 million compared to prior year due to additional costs from our recently acquired and commissioned facilities and higher power purchases in Colombia, which are passed through to our customers, partly offset by our recently completed asset sales and the above noted strengthening of the U.S. dollar.
Management service costs totaling $88 million represents a decrease of $81 million over the same period in the prior year.
Interest expense totaling $1,258 million represents an increase of $226 million over the same period in the prior year due to growth in our portfolio and upfinancings completed in the prior year at our North American and South American hydroelectric assets to fund the growth of our business.
Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable shares resulted in a $106 million loss due to the movement in the LP unit price during the period.
Depreciation expense totaling $1,342 million represents an increase of $163 million over the same period in the prior year due to the growth of our business.
Net income totaling $308 million represents an increase of $1,542 million over the same period in the prior year due to the above noted items, other income relating to non-recurring income and a gain on sale of non-core wind assets.
Prior Year Variance Analysis (2022 vs 2021)
Revenues totaling $3,778 million represents an increase of $411 million over the same period in the prior year due to the growth of our business and higher power prices. Recently acquired and commissioned facilities contributed 2,083 GWh of generation and $131 million to revenue, which was partly offset by recently completed asset sales that reduced generation by 624 GWh and revenues by $62 million. On a same store, constant currency basis, revenue increased by $467 million primarily due to higher average realized revenue per MWh due to inflation indexation, recontracting initiatives, and higher global merchant power, as well as stronger hydrology across our fleet.
The strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the prior period, primarily against the Euro and Colombia peso, decreased revenues by approximately $125 million, which was partly offset by $73 million favorable foreign exchange impact on our operating and interest expenses.
Direct operating costs totaling $1,174 million, represents a decrease of $11 million over the same period in the prior year as impact from the growth of our business was more than offset due to cost saving initiatives across our business, recently completed asset sales and the impact of foreign exchange movement noted above.
Management service costs totaling $169 million represents a decrease of $6 million over the same period in the prior year.
Interest expense totaling $1,032 million represents an increase of $132 million over the same period in the prior year due to the growth in our portfolio and accelerated financing initiatives in Colombia.
Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable shares resulted in a $1,800 million gain due to the movement in the LP unit price during the period.
Depreciation expense totaling $1,179 million represents an increase of $64 million over the same period in the prior year due to the growth of our business.
Net income totaling $1,850 million represents an increase of $920 million over the same period in the prior year due to the above noted items.
PART 3 – ADDITIONAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
The following table provides a summary of the key line items on the audited annual consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| Assets held for sale | $ | — | | | $ | 698 | |
| Current assets | 3,298 | | | 3,426 | |
| Equity-accounted investments | 644 | | | 451 | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | 44,038 | | | 37,828 | |
| Total assets | 49,421 | | | 43,288 | |
| Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale | — | | | 217 | |
| | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | 16,072 | | | 13,715 | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 5,819 | | | 5,263 | |
| BEPC exchangeable shares and class B shares | 4,721 | | | 4,364 | |
| Total equity in net assets | 17,129 | | | 16,824 | |
| Total liabilities and equity | 49,421 | | | 43,288 | |
| FX rates to USD |
| € | 0.91 | | | 0.93 | |
| R$ | 4.84 | | | 5.22 | |
| COP | 3,822 | | | 4,810 | |
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment totaled $44.0 billion as at December 31, 2023 compared to $37.8 billion as at December 31, 2022, representing an increase of $6.2 billion. Our acquisitions during the year, included a 136 MW portfolio of operating wind assets in Brazil, a fully integrated developer and operator of renewable power assets in the United States with 5,900 MW of operating and under construction assets, with a 6,100 MW development pipeline and a 60 MW portfolio of operating wind assets in Brazil, increasing property plant and equipment by $3.7 billion.Our continued investments in the development of power generation assets and our sustaining capital expenditure increased property, plant and equipment by $1.3 billion. The weakening of the U.S. dollar versus the Colombian Peso and Brazilian Reais increased property, plant and equipment by $2.6 billion. The increase was partly offset by $1.3 billion depreciation expense associated with property, plant and equipment.
See Note 12 – Property, plant and equipment, at fair value in our audited annual consolidated financial statements for information on the revaluation assumptions used and sensitivity analysis.
Assets held for sale and Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale
Assets held for sale and Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale totaled nil and nil, respectively, as at December 31, 2023 compared to $698 million and $217 million, respectively, as at December 31, 2022.
In the first quarter of 2023, the company’s institutional partners completed the sale of a 78% interest in a 378 MW operating hydroelectric portfolio in the U.S., of which 28% was sold to affiliates of Brookfield Corporation. The company retained its 22% interest in the investment and accordingly, did not receive proceeds from the sale. Subsequent to the completion of the sale, the company no longer consolidates this investment and recognized its interest as an equity accounted investment.
In the third quarter of 2023, Brookfield Renewable completed the sale of its 100% interest in a 95 MW portfolio of wind assets in Uruguay.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our company’s related party transactions are in the normal course of business, are recorded at the exchange amount, and are primarily with the partnership and Brookfield.
Since inception, our parent company has had a Master Services Agreement with Brookfield. The Master Services Agreement was amended in connection with the completion of the special distribution to include, among other things, our company as a service recipient.
Our company sells electricity to Brookfield through a single long-term PPA across our New York hydroelectric facilities.
In 2011, on formation of Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield transferred certain development projects to subsidiaries of our company for no upfront consideration but is entitled to receive variable consideration on commercial operation or sale of these projects. These projects have been transferred to our company as part of the special distribution.
Our company has entered into voting agreements with Brookfield and the partnership, whereby our company gained control of the entities that own certain renewable power generating facilities in the United States and Brazil, as well as TerraForm Power. Our company has also entered into a voting agreement with its consortium partners in respect of the Colombian business. The voting agreements provide our company the authority to direct the election of the Boards of Directors of the relevant entities, among other things, and therefore provide our company with control. Accordingly, our company consolidates the accounts of these entities.
Our company participates with institutional partners in Brookfield Americas Infrastructure Fund, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund II, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund III, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund IV, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund V, Brookfield Infrastructure Income Fund, Brookfield Global Transition Fund I, Brookfield Global Transition Fund II, and Brookfield Infrastructure Debt Fund (“Private Funds”), each of which is a Brookfield sponsored fund, and in connection therewith, our company, together with our institutional partners, has access to financing using the Private Funds’ credit facilities.
From time to time, in order to facilitate investment activities in a timely and efficient manner, our company will fund deposits or incur other costs and expenses (including by use of loan facilities to consummate, support, guarantee or issue letters of credit) in respect of an investment that ultimately will be shared with or made entirely by Brookfield sponsored vehicles, consortiums and/or partnerships (including private funds, joint ventures and similar arrangements), our company, or by co-investors.
Brookfield has provided a $400 million committed unsecured revolving credit facility maturing in December 2024 and the draws bear interest at the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus a margin. During the current period, there were no draws on the committed unsecured revolving credit facility provided by Brookfield. Brookfield may from time to time place funds on deposit with the company which are repayable on demand including any interest accrued. There were nil funds placed on deposit with the company as at December 31, 2023 (December 31, 2022: nil). The interest expense on the Brookfield revolving credit facility and deposit for the year ended December 31, 2023 totaled nil (2022: nil and 2021: nil).
In addition, our company has executed, amended, or terminated other agreements with the partnership and Brookfield that are described in the company’s December 31, 2022 audited consolidated financial statements. For a description of certain of our agreements with Brookfield and the partnership, please see Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions” in our Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2023.
The following table reflects the related party agreements and transactions in the audited annual consolidated statements of income (loss), for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenues | | | | | |
| Power purchase and revenue agreements | $ | 10 | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 163 | |
| | | | | | |
| Direct operating costs | | | | | |
Energy purchases(1) | $ | (19) | | | $ | (22) | | | $ | (62) | |
| Energy marketing fee & other services | (2) | | | (7) | | | (11) | |
Insurance expense(2) | — | | | — | | | (20) | |
| | $ | (21) | | | $ | (29) | | | $ | (93) | |
| | | | | |
| Interest expense | | | | | |
| Borrowings | $ | (19) | | | $ | (17) | | | $ | (29) | |
| | | | | |
| Other | | | | | |
| Interest income | $ | 29 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 10 | |
| Dividend income | $ | 7 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Other related party services | $ | 3 | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | (13) | |
| Financial instrument gain | $ | 9 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | |
| Management service costs | $ | (88) | | | $ | (169) | | | $ | (175) | |
(1)Certain subsidiaries that the company controls, through a voting agreement, have entered into agreements to appoint the partnership as their agent in entering into certain derivative transactions with external counterparties to hedge against fluctuations in power purchase prices. The company recognized nil (2022: nil 2021: $62 million) gains associated with agency arrangements which have been excluded from energy purchases. As of April 1, 2021, the agency arrangements were transferred from the partnership to the company upon the closing of Energy Marketing Internalization.
(2)Prior to November 2021, insurance services were paid to external insurance service providers through subsidiaries of Brookfield Corporation. The fees paid to the subsidiaries of Brookfield Corporation in 2023 were 0.00 (2022: 0.00 2021:$20 million). As of November 2021, Brookfield, through a regulated subsidiary, began providing insurance coverage through third-party commercial insurers for the benefits of certain entities in North America. The premiums and claims are not included in the table above.
The following table reflects the impact of the related party agreements and transactions on the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Related party | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Current assets | | | | | |
| Due from related parties | | | | | |
| Amounts due from | Brookfield | | $ | 39 | | | $ | 41 | |
| The partnership | | 1,366 | | | 563 | |
| | Equity-accounted investments and other | | 22 | | | 11 | |
| | | | $ | 1,427 | | | $ | 615 | |
| | | | | |
| Non-current assets | | | | | |
| Financial instrument assets | Brookfield | | $ | 170 | | | $ | 292 | |
| | | | | |
| Due from related parties | | | | | |
| Amounts due from | Equity-accounted investments and other | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 9 | |
| | | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | | | |
| Due to related parties | | | | | |
| Amounts due to | Brookfield | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 37 | |
| The partnership | | 238 | | | 315 | |
| | Equity-accounted investments and other | | 8 | | | 12 | |
| Brookfield Reinsurance | | 184 | | | 100 | |
| | | | 456 | | | 464 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Non-current liabilities | | | | | |
| Due to related parties | | | | | |
| Amounts due to | Brookfield | | $ | 79 | | | $ | — | |
| The partnership | | $ | 850 | | | $ | — | |
| Equity-accounted investments and other | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | Brookfield Reinsurance and associates | | 14 | | | 15 | |
| | | | | |
PART 4 – FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW ON PROPORTIONATE INFORMATION
SEGMENTED DISCLOSURES
Segmented information is prepared on the same basis that our company’s chief operating decision maker, which we refer to as “CODM”, manages our company, evaluates financial results, and makes key operating decisions. See “Part 9 – Presentation to Stakeholders and Performance Measurement” for information on segments and an explanation on the calculation and relevance of proportionate information.
PROPORTIONATE RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
The following chart reflects the generation and summary financial figures on a proportionate basis for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (GWh) | | | (MILLIONS) |
| Actual Generation | | | Revenues | | | Adjusted EBITDA(1) | | | Funds From Operations | | |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | | | |
| Hydroelectric | 14,449 | | | 14,567 | | | | $ | 1,212 | | | $ | 1,095 | | | | $ | 787 | | | $ | 713 | | | | $ | 504 | | | $ | 504 | | | | | |
| Wind | 1,728 | | | 1,872 | | | | 152 | | | 176 | | | | 138 | | | 132 | | | | 108 | | | 101 | | | | | |
| Utility-scale solar | 1,261 | | | 870 | | | | 165 | | | 167 | | | | 146 | | | 165 | | | | 94 | | | 114 | | | | | |
Distributed energy & sustainable solutions(2) | 886 | | | 753 | | | | 125 | | | 146 | | | | 101 | | | 84 | | | | 80 | | | 64 | | | | | |
| Corporate | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | | 15 | | | (5) | | | | (70) | | | (171) | | | | | |
| Total | 18,324 | | | 18,062 | | | | $ | 1,654 | | | $ | 1,584 | | | | $ | 1,187 | | | $ | 1,089 | | | | $ | 716 | | | $ | 612 | | | | | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
(2)Actual generation includes 623 GWh (2022: 466 GWh) from facilities that do not have a corresponding long-term average. See Part 9 – Presentation to Stakeholders and Performance Measurement for why we do not consider long-term average for certain of our facilities.
HYDROELECTRIC OPERATIONS ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS
The following table presents our proportionate results for hydroelectric operations for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Revenue | $ | 1,212 | | | $ | 1,095 | |
| Other income | 51 | | | 44 | |
| Direct operating costs | (476) | | | (426) | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | 787 | | | 713 | |
| Interest expense | (261) | | | (175) | |
| Current income taxes | (22) | | | (34) | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 504 | | | $ | 504 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Generation (GWh) – actual | 14,449 | | | 14,567 | |
| Average revenue per MWh | 78 | | | 72 | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Funds From Operations at our hydroelectric business was $504 million versus $504 million in the prior year as the benefit of higher average revenue per MWh due to inflation indexation on our contracted generation, favorable hydrology conditions in the United States and Brazil were offset by lower resources in Colombia as the prior year benefited from well above LTA conditions and higher interest expense due to financing initiatives completed to fund growth.
WIND OPERATIONS ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS
The following table presents our proportionate results for wind operations for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Revenue | $ | 152 | | | $ | 176 | |
| Other income | 33 | | | 10 | |
| Direct operating costs | (47) | | | (54) | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | 138 | | | 132 | |
| Interest expense | (28) | | | (29) | |
| Current income taxes | (2) | | | (2) | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 108 | | | $ | 101 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Generation (GWh) – actual | 1,728 | | | 1,872 | |
| Average revenue per MWh | 74 | | | 67 | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Funds From Operations at our wind business was $108 million versus $101 million in the prior year primarily due to the benefits from our newly acquired and commissioned facilities, inflation indexation on our contracted generation, and gains on sale of non-core assets and the partial sale of certain North American development assets, partially offset by lower resources and lower prices earned by our Spanish assets as a result of adjustments to the regulated price that decreased revenues in the short term but has no impact on value given the regulatory construct.
UTILITY-SCALE SOLAR OPERATIONS ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS
The following table presents our proportionate results for utility-scale solar operations for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Revenue | $ | 165 | | | $ | 167 | |
| Other income | 23 | | | 37 | |
| Direct operating costs | (42) | | | (39) | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | 146 | | | 165 | |
| Interest expense | (50) | | | (50) | |
| Current income taxes | (2) | | | (1) | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 94 | | | $ | 114 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Generation (GWh) – actual | 1,261 | | | 870 | |
| Average revenue per MWh | 129 | | | 189 | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Funds From Operations at our utility-scale solar business was $94 million versus $114 million in the prior year as the benefits from newly acquired and commissioned facilities was more than offset by lower generation on a same store basis and lower average revenue per MWh due to adjustments to the regulated price earned by our Spanish assets that decreased revenues in the short term but has no impact on value given the regulatory construct.
DISTRIBUTED ENERGY & SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS OPERATIONS ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS
The following table presents our proportionate results for distributed energy & sustainable solutions for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Revenue | $ | 125 | | | $ | 146 | |
| Other income | 18 | | | 8 | |
| Direct operating costs | (42) | | | (70) | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | 101 | | | 84 | |
| Interest expense | (21) | | | (20) | |
| | | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 80 | | | $ | 64 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Generation (GWh) – actual | 886 | | | 753 | |
| Average revenue per MWh | 141 | | | 188 | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Funds From Operations at our distributed energy & sustainable solutions business was $80 million versus $64 million in the prior year as the benefits from stronger resources were partly offset by a decrease in average revenue per MWh due to generation mix and lower grid stability prices at our pumped storage facility driven by lower pricing volatility.
PROPORTIONATE RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 AND 2021
The following chart reflects the generation and summary financial figures on a proportionate basis for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (GWh) | | | (MILLIONS) |
| Actual Generation | | | Revenues | | | Adjusted EBITDA(1) | | | Funds From Operations | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | | |
| Hydroelectric | 14,567 | | | 13,947 | | | | 1,095 | | | 992 | | | | 713 | | | 623 | | | | 504 | | | 472 | | | | | |
| Wind | 1,872 | | | 2,180 | | | | 176 | | | 199 | | | | 132 | | | 166 | | | | 101 | | | 129 | | | | | |
| Utility-scale solar | 870 | | | 745 | | | | 167 | | | 166 | | | | 165 | | | 139 | | | | 114 | | | 85 | | | | | |
Distributed energy & sustainable solutions(2) | 753 | | | 734 | | | | 146 | | | 126 | | | | 84 | | | 78 | | | | 64 | | | 59 | | | | | |
| Corporate | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | | (5) | | | — | | | | (171) | | | (191) | | | | | |
| Total | 18,062 | | | 17,606 | | | | 1,584 | | | 1,483 | | | | 1,089 | | | 1,006 | | | | 612 | | | 554 | | | | | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
(2)Actual generation includes 623 GWh (2022: 466 GWh) from facilities that do not have a corresponding long-term average. See Part 9 – Presentation to Stakeholders and Performance Measurement for why we do not consider long-term average for certain of our facilities.
HYDROELECTRIC OPERATIONS ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS
The following table presents our proportionate results for hydroelectric operations for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenue | $ | 1,095 | | | $ | 992 | |
| Other income | 44 | | | 55 | |
| Direct operating costs | (426) | | | (424) | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | 713 | | | 623 | |
| Interest expense | (175) | | | (140) | |
| Current income taxes | (34) | | | (11) | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 504 | | | $ | 472 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Generation (GWh) – actual | 14,567 | | | 13,947 | |
| Average revenue per MWh | 72 | | | 63 | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Funds From Operations at our hydroelectric business was $504 million versus $472 million in the prior year as the benefit of higher average revenue per MWh due to inflation indexation on our contracted generation and strong market pricing environment in the United States, favorable generation that was 2% above prior year, as well as contribution from newly acquired and commissioned facilities during the year ($15 million and 294 GWh). The increases was partly offset by higher interest expense in Colombia as a result of accelerated refinancing initiatives.
WIND OPERATIONS ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS
The following table presents our proportionate results for wind operations for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenue | $ | 176 | | | $ | 199 | |
| Other income | 10 | | | 26 | |
| Direct operating costs | (54) | | | (59) | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | 132 | | | 166 | |
| Interest expense | (29) | | | (35) | |
| Current income taxes | (2) | | | (2) | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 101 | | | $ | 129 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Generation (GWh) – actual | 1,872 | | | 2,180 | |
| Average revenue per MWh | 67 | | | 85 | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Funds From Operations at our wind business was $101 million versus $129 million in the prior year. On a same store basis, net of asset sales ($41 million and 291 GWh), Funds From Operations was higher than the prior year due to the benefit of higher average revenue per MWh from higher market prices in Spain, partly offset by lower resources.
UTILITY-SCALE SOLAR OPERATIONS ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS
The following table presents our proportionate results for utility-scale solar operations for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenue | $ | 167 | | | $ | 166 | |
| Other income | 37 | | | 15 | |
| Direct operating costs | (39) | | | (42) | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | 165 | | | 139 | |
| Interest expense | (50) | | | (53) | |
| Current income taxes | (1) | | | (1) | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 114 | | | $ | 85 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Generation (GWh) – actual | 870 | | | 745 | |
| Average revenue per MWh | 189 | | | 196 | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Funds From Operations at our utility-scale solar business was $114 million versus $85 million million in the prior year as the benefit from newly commissioned facilities ($3 million and 162 GWh) and higher market prices in Spain was partly offset by lower resources.
DISTRIBUTED ENERGY & SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS OPERATIONS ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS
The following table presents our proportionate results for distributed energy & sustainable solutions for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenue | $ | 146 | | | $ | 126 | |
| Other income | 8 | | | 2 | |
| Direct operating costs | (70) | | | (50) | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | 84 | | | 78 | |
| Interest expense | (20) | | | (20) | |
| Current income taxes | — | | | 1 | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 64 | | | $ | 59 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Generation (GWh) – actual | 753 | | | 734 | |
| Average revenue per MWh | 188 | | | 197 | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Funds From Operations at our distributed energy & sustainable solutions business was $64 million versus $59 million in the prior year due to higher pricing for grid stability services provided by our pumped storage facilities in the United States on the back of higher and more volatile power prices.
RECONCILIATION OF NON-IFRS MEASURES
The following table reconciles the non-IFRS financial measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures. Net income (loss) is reconciled to Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Attributable to the partnership |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale Solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 493 | | | $ | 116 | | | $ | 200 | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | (499) | | | $ | 308 | |
| Add back or deduct the following: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 542 | | | 384 | | | 322 | | | 94 | | | — | | | 1,342 | |
| Deferred income tax expense (recovery) | (8) | | | (4) | | | (24) | | | 2 | | | (6) | | | (40) | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instrument loss (gain) | (140) | | | (7) | | | (6) | | | 5 | | | (11) | | | (159) | |
Other(1) | 31 | | | (162) | | | (191) | | | 2 | | | 11 | | | (309) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares(2) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 241 | | | 241 | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 106 | | | 106 | |
| Management service costs | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 88 | | | 88 | |
Interest expense(2) | 626 | | | 137 | | | 205 | | | 46 | | | 3 | | | 1,017 | |
| Current income tax expense | 84 | | | 14 | | | 12 | | | — | | | 3 | | | 113 | |
Amount attributable to equity accounted investments and non-controlling interests(3) | (841) | | | (340) | | | (372) | | | (46) | | | 79 | | | $ | (1,520) | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 787 | | | $ | 138 | | | $ | 146 | | | $ | 101 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 1,187 | |
(1)Other corresponds to certain non-recurring other income items as well as certain non-recurring amounts that are not related to the revenue earning activities and are not normal, recurring cash operating expenses necessary for business operations. Refer to Note 7 - Other Income in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Also refer to Note 9 - Other in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on the other balance, which includes the company’s economic share of certain non-cash items foreign currency hedges and realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term.
(2)Total interest expense of $1,258 million is comprised of amounts on Interest expense and Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares.
(3)Amount attributable to equity accounted investments corresponds to the adjusted EBITDA to the company that are generated by its investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method. Amounts attributable to non-controlling interest are calculated based on the economic ownership interest held by non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. By adjusting Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest, our company is able to remove the portion of Funds From Operations earned at non-wholly owned subsidiaries that are not attributable to our company.
The following table reconciles the non-IFRS financial measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures. Net income (loss) is reconciled to Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Attributable to the partnership |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale Solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 368 | | | $ | (3) | | | $ | 38 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 1,403 | | | $ | 1,850 | |
| Add back or deduct the following: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 502 | | | 305 | | | 275 | | | 97 | | | — | | | 1,179 | |
| Deferred income tax expense (recovery) | (69) | | | 55 | | | (8) | | | 7 | | | — | | | (15) | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instrument loss (gain) | 170 | | | (71) | | | (27) | | | (3) | | | (4) | | | 65 | |
Other(1) | 66 | | | 59 | | | 96 | | | 17 | | | 4 | | | 242 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares(2) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 220 | | | 220 | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,800) | | | (1,800) | |
| Management service costs | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 169 | | | 169 | |
Interest expense(2) | 474 | | | 127 | | | 162 | | | 44 | | | 5 | | | 812 | |
| Current income tax expense | 123 | | | 8 | | | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | 133 | |
Amount attributable to equity accounted investments and non-controlling interests(3) | (921) | | | (348) | | | (373) | | | (122) | | | (2) | | | $ | (1,766) | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 713 | | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 165 | | | $ | 84 | | | $ | (5) | | | $ | 1,089 | |
(1)Other corresponds to amounts that are not related to the revenue earning activities and are not normal, recurring cash operating expenses necessary for business operations. Refer to Note 9 - Other in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on the other balance, which includes the company’s economic share of certain non-cash items foreign currency hedges and realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term.
(2)Total interest expense of $1,032 million is comprised of amounts on Interest expense and Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares.
(3)Amount attributable to equity accounted investments corresponds to the adjusted EBITDA to the company that are generated by its investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method. Amounts attributable to non-controlling interest are calculated based on the economic ownership interest held by non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. By adjusting Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest, our company is able to remove the portion of Funds From Operations earned at non-wholly owned subsidiaries that are not attributable to our company.
The following table reconciles the non-IFRS financial measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures. Net income (loss) is reconciled to Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2021: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Attributable to Brookfield Renewable |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale Solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 318 | | | $ | (155) | | | $ | (19) | | | $ | 34 | | | $ | 752 | | | $ | 930 | |
| Add back or deduct the following: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 437 | | | 353 | | | 247 | | | 78 | | | — | | | 1,115 | |
| Deferred income tax expense (recovery) | 140 | | | (32) | | | (30) | | | (14) | | | (8) | | | 56 | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instrument loss (gain) | 7 | | | 44 | | | (29) | | | 6 | | | (34) | | | (6) | |
Other(1) | 80 | | | 109 | | | 78 | | | 32 | | | 157 | | | 456 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares(2) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 209 | | | 209 | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,267) | | | (1,267) | |
| Management service costs | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 175 | | | 175 | |
Interest expense(2) | 322 | | | 133 | | | 174 | | | 46 | | | 16 | | | 691 | |
| Current income tax expense | 24 | | | 6 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 31 | |
Amount attributable to equity accounted investments and non-controlling interests(3) | $ | (705) | | | $ | (292) | | | $ | (283) | | | $ | (104) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,384) | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 623 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | 139 | | | $ | 78 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,006 | |
(1)Other corresponds to amounts that are not related to the revenue earning activities and are not normal, recurring cash operating expenses necessary for business operations. Refer to Note 9 - Other in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on the other balance, which includes the company’s economic share of certain non-cash items foreign currency hedges and realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term.
(2)Total interest expense of $900 million is comprised of amounts on Interest expense and Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares.
(3)Amount attributable to equity accounted investments corresponds to the adjusted EBITDA to the company that are generated by its investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method. Amounts attributable to non-controlling interest are calculated based on the economic ownership interest held by non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. By adjusting Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest, our company is able to remove the portion of Funds From Operations earned at non-wholly owned subsidiaries that are not attributable to our company.
The following table reconciles non-IFRS financial measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures. Net income (loss) is reconciled to Funds From Operations for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS, EXCEPT AS NOTED) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Net income | $ | 308 | | | $ | 1,850 | | | $ | 930 | |
| Add back or deduct the following: | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 1,342 | | | 1,179 | | | 1,115 | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instruments loss (gain) | (159) | | | 65 | | | 27 | |
| Deferred income tax expense (recovery) | (40) | | | (15) | | | 56 | |
Other(1) | (316) | | | 242 | | | 456 | |
| | | | | |
| Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares | 241 | | | 220 | | | 209 | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | 106 | | | (1,800) | | | (1,267) | |
Amount attributable to equity accounted investments and non-controlling interest(2) | (766) | | | (1,129) | | | (972) | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 716 | | | $ | 612 | | | $ | 554 | |
(1)Other corresponds to certain non-recurring other income items as well as certain non-recurring amounts that are not related to the revenue earning activities and are not normal, recurring cash operating expenses necessary for business operations. Refer to Note 7 - Other Income in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Also refer to Note 9 - Other in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on the other balance, which includes the company’s economic share of certain non-cash items foreign currency hedges and realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term.
(2)Amount attributable to equity accounted investments corresponds to the Funds From Operations that are generated by its investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method. Amounts attributable to non-controlling interest are calculated based on the economic ownership interest held by non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. By adjusting Funds From Operations attributable to non-controlling interest, our company is able to remove the portion of Funds From Operations earned at non-wholly owned subsidiaries that are not attributable to our company.
PART 5 – LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
AVAILABLE LIQUIDITY
Our company assesses liquidity on a group-wide basis, consistent with the partnership, because shareholders have exposure to a broader base of renewable investments by virtue of the exchange feature of BEPC exchangeable shares. Our group-wide liquidity consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| Our company's share of cash and cash equivalents | $ | 249 | | | $ | 197 | |
Authorized credit facilities(1) | 2,375 | | | 2,375 | |
| 2,624 | | | 2,572 | |
| Available portion of subsidiary credit facilities | 104 | | | 134 | |
| Brookfield Renewable group liquidity on a proportionate basis | 1,393 | | | 989 | |
| Available liquidity | $ | 4,121 | | | $ | 3,695 | |
(1)Includes the $1,975 million Subordinated Credit Facilities with the partnership and a $400 million revolving credit facility with Brookfield Corporation.
We operate with sufficient liquidity to enable us to fund growth initiatives, capital expenditures, distributions and withstand sudden adverse changes in economic circumstances or short-term fluctuations in generation. We maintain a strong, investment grade balance sheet characterized by a conservative capital structure, access to multiple funding levers including a focus on capital recycling on an opportunistic basis, and diverse sources of capital. Principal sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, our credit facilities, upfinancings on non-recourse borrowings and proceeds from the issuance of various securities through public markets.
DIVIDEND POLICY
The BEPC board may declare dividends at its discretion. However, the BEPC exchangeable shares have been structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to the LP units and it is expected that dividends on the BEPC exchangeable shares will be declared at the same time and in the same amount as distributions made on the LP units. In the event dividends are not declared and paid concurrently with a distribution on the LP units, then the undeclared or unpaid amount of such BEPC exchangeable share dividend will accrue and accumulate. Pursuant to the equity commitment agreement, the partnership has also agreed not to declare or pay any distribution on the LP units if on such date our company does not have sufficient funds or other assets to enable the declaration and payment of an equivalent dividend on the BEPC exchangeable shares. See Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions – BEPC relationship with the partnership – Equity Commitment Agreement” of our Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2023. Brookfield Renewable’s distributions are underpinned by stable, highly regulated and contracted cash flows generated from operations. Brookfield Renewable’s objective is to pay a distribution that is sustainable on a long-term basis and has set its target payout ratio at approximately 70% of Brookfield Renewable’s Funds From Operations.
The board of directors of the general partner of Brookfield Renewable approved a 5% increase in its annual distribution to $1.42 per LP unit, or $0.3550 per LP unit quarterly, starting with the distribution paid in March 2024, an increase from $1.35 per LP unit in 2023 (2022: $1.28 per LP unit and 2021: $1.22 per LP unit). This increase reflects the forecasted contribution from Brookfield Renewable's recently commissioned capital projects, as well as the expected cash yield on recent acquisitions. Brookfield Renewable targets a 5% to 9% annual distribution growth in light of growth it foresees in its operations.
BORROWINGS
The composition of debt obligations, overall maturity profile, and average interest rates associated with our borrowings and credit facilities on a proportionate basis as at December 31 is presented in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
| Weighted-average | | | | Weighted-average | | |
| (MILLIONS, EXCEPT AS NOTED) | Interest rate (%)(1) | | Term (years) | | Total(1) | | Interest rate (%)(1) | | Term
(years) | | Total(1) |
Proportionate non-recourse borrowings(2) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hydroelectric | 7.2 | % | | 6 | | 3,013 | | | 6.9 | % | | 7 | | $ | 2,894 | |
| Wind | 6.3 | % | | 10 | | 1,088 | | | 5.0 | % | | 9 | | 613 | |
| Utility-scale solar | 5.9 | % | | 14 | | 1,786 | | | 5.2 | % | | 13 | | 1,025 | |
| Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | 5.6 | % | | 12 | | 312 | | | 4.8 | % | | 8 | | 371 | |
| 6.6 | % | | 9 | | 6,199 | | | 6.1 | % | | 9 | | 4,903 | |
| Proportionate unamortized financing fees, net of unamortized premiums | | (45) | | | | | | | (45) | |
| | | | | 6,154 | | | | | | | 4,858 | |
| Equity-accounted borrowings | | (163) | | | | | | | (161) | |
Non-controlling interests and other(3) | | 10,081 | | | | | | | 9,018 | |
| As per IFRS Statements | | $ | 16,072 | | | | | | | $ | 13,715 | |
(1)Includes cash yields on tax equity.
(2)See “Part 9 – Presentation to Stakeholders and Performance Measurement” for information on proportionate debt.
(3)Includes tax equity adjustments.
The following table summarizes our undiscounted principal repayments, scheduled amortization and interest payable on a proportionate basis as at December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | 2028 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Debt Principal repayments | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Credit facilities | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Hydroelectric | 78 | | | 270 | | | 210 | | | 130 | | | 102 | | | 1,071 | | | 1,861 | |
| Wind | 64 | | | 13 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 125 | | | 201 | | | 405 | |
| Utility-scale solar | 2 | | | 20 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 137 | | | 194 | | | 355 | |
Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 45 | | | 71 | | | 116 | |
| 144 | | | 303 | | | 212 | | | 132 | | | 409 | | | 1,537 | | | 2,737 | |
| Amortizing debt principal repayments | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hydroelectric | 112 | | | 106 | | | 118 | | | 97 | | | 110 | | | 610 | | | 1,153 | |
| Wind | 95 | | | 78 | | | 73 | | | 67 | | | 56 | | | 315 | | | 684 | |
| Utility-scale Solar | 104 | | | 108 | | | 107 | | | 108 | | | 105 | | | 897 | | | 1,429 | |
Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | 19 | | | 17 | | | 15 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 114 | | | 196 | |
| 330 | | | 309 | | | 313 | | | 287 | | | 287 | | | 1,936 | | | 3,462 | |
| Total | $ | 474 | | | $ | 612 | | | $ | 525 | | | $ | 419 | | | $ | 696 | | | $ | 3,473 | | | $ | 6,199 | |
Interest payable(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hydroelectric | $ | 208 | | | $ | 189 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 128 | | | $ | 406 | | | $ | 1,239 | |
| Wind | 52 | | | 40 | | | 36 | | | 33 | | | 26 | | | 56 | | | 243 | |
| Utility-scale Solar | 73 | | | 75 | | | 70 | | | 65 | | | 57 | | | 245 | | | 585 | |
Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | 13 | | | 13 | | | 12 | | | 11 | | | 10 | | | 19 | | | 78 | |
| Total | $ | 346 | | | $ | 317 | | | $ | 284 | | | $ | 251 | | | $ | 221 | | | $ | 726 | | | $ | 2,145 | |
(1)Represents aggregate interest payable expected to be paid over the entire term of the obligations, if held to maturity. Variable-rate interest payments have been calculated based on estimated interest rates.
We remain focused on refinancing near-term facilities on acceptable terms and maintaining a manageable maturity ladder. We do not anticipate material issues in refinancing our borrowings through 2028 on acceptable terms and will do so opportunistically based on the prevailing interest rate environment.
Proportionate debt is presented to assist investors in understanding the capital structure of the underlying investments of our company that are consolidated in its financial statements but are not wholly-owned. When used in conjunction with Funds from Operations, proportionate debt is expected to provide useful information as to how our company has financed its businesses at the asset-level. The only difference between consolidated debt presented under IFRS and proportionate debt is the adjustment to remove the share of debt of consolidated investments not attributable to our company and the adjustment to include share of debt attributable to the equity-accounted investments of our company. Management utilizes proportionate debt in understanding the capital structure of the underlying investments that are consolidated in its financial statements but are not wholly-owned. Proportionate debt provides useful information as to how our company has financed its businesses at the asset-level and provides a view into the return on the capital that it invests at a given degree of leverage.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
We fund growth capital expenditures with cash flow generated from operations, supplemented by non-recourse debt sized to investment grade coverage and covenant thresholds. This is designed to ensure that our investments have stable capital structures supported by a substantial level of equity and that cash flows at the asset level can be remitted freely to our company. This strategy also underpins our investment grade profile.
To fund large scale development projects and acquisitions, we will evaluate a variety of capital sources including proceeds from selling mature businesses, in addition to raising money in the capital markets through equity, debt and preferred share issuances. Furthermore, our company has $2.38 billion of committed revolving credit facilities available for investments and acquisitions, as well as funding the equity component of organic growth initiatives. The facilities are intended, and have historically been used, as a bridge to a long-term financing strategy rather than a permanent source of capital. We believe these capital sources will be sufficient to permit us to deploy the necessary capital for our contractual commitments (see Note 26 - Commitments, contingencies and guarantees in the audited annual consolidated financial statements) and our company’s share of anticipated transactions by our group.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
The following table summarizes the key items in the audited annual consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Cash flow provided by (used in): | | | | | |
| Operating activities | $ | 1,603 | | | $ | 1,284 | | | $ | 395 | |
| Financing activities | (636) | | | (402) | | | 678 | |
| Investing activities | (1,018) | | | (738) | | | (1,027) | |
| Foreign exchange gain (loss) on cash | 36 | | | (19) | | | (33) | |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (15) | | | $ | 125 | | | $ | 13 | |
Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 totaled $1,603 million compared to $1,284 million in 2022 and $395 million in 2021, reflecting the strong operating performance of our business during the periods.
Financing Activities
Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $636 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The strength of our balance sheet allowed us to raise proceeds of approximately $3,041 million, including $251 million from equity financing net of transaction fees through a bought deal of BEPC exchangeable shares during the second quarter of 2023. The proceeds raised to fund the growth of our business through the investing activities noted below were offset by the repayment of borrowings. Distributions paid during the year to the partnership and participating non-controlling interest in operating subsidiaries totaled $669 million.
Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $402 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as the proceeds raised from non-recourse financings and capital contributions from non-controlling interest, net of capital return (totaling $1,204 million) to fund the growth of our business were more than offset by distributions paid during the year to the partnership and participating non-controlling interest in operating subsidiaries totaling $1,364 million.
Cash flows provided by financing activities totaled $678 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The strength of our balance sheet and access to diverse sources of capital allowed us to fund the growth of our business and generate $1,492 million of net proceeds raised from non-recourse financings. Distributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2021 to the partnership and distributions paid to participating non-controlling interests in operating subsidiaries totaled $675 million.
Investing Activities
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $1,018 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. During the year, we invested $180 million into growth, including a 136 MW portfolio of operating wind assets in Brazil, a fully integrated developer and operator of renewable power assets in the United States with 5,900 MW of operating and under construction assets, with a 6,100 MW development pipeline, and a 60 MW portfolio of operating wind assets in Brazil. Our continued investment in our property, plant and equipment, including 248 MW of wind development projects in Brazil, 200 MW of wind development projects in the U.S. and 60 MW of solar assets in Colombia totaled $1,028 million, partially offset by proceeds of $243 million generated from the sale of non-core wind assets and financial securities for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $738 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. Our continued investment in our organic development pipeline and our property, plant and equipment, including the construction of a 1,200 MW utility-scale solar facility in Brazil, was $847 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, which was funded by our financing activities noted above including recycling capital from the sale of a hydroelectric portfolio in Brazil, which closed in the second quarter of 2022 for $92 million.
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $1,027 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. During the year, we recycled capital from the sale of a wind portfolio in the United States, which closed in the third quarter of 2021 for $376 million, into accretive growth opportunities, amongst others, the purchase of 189 MW hydroelectric assets in Colombia. Our continued investment in our property, plant and equipment, including investing into the construction of 1,800 MW of utility-scale solar developments projects in Brazil, of which 357 MW reached commercial operations during the year, and the continuing initiative to repower existing wind power projects, totaling $1,354 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, which were funded by our financing activities noted above.
SHARES AND UNITS OUTSTANDING
Our company’s equity interests include BEPC exchangeable shares held by the public shareholders and BEPC class B and BEPC class C shares held by the partnership. Dividends on each of our BEPC exchangeable shares are expected to be declared and paid at the same time and in the same amount per share as distributions on each LP unit of the partnership. Ownership of BEPC class C shares will entitle holders to receive dividends as and when declared by our board.
On June 16, 2023, the company completed the issuance of 7,430,000 BEPC exchangeable shares on a bought deal basis at a price of $33.80 per Exchangeable Share for gross proceeds of $251 million. The company recorded $10 million related to transaction costs inclusive of fees paid to underwriters in Other on the consolidated statements of income.
Our company’s capital structure is comprised of the following shares:
| | | | | |
| (SHARES) | December 31, 2023 |
| BEPC exchangeable shares | 179,651,526 | |
| BEPC class B shares | 165 |
| BEPC class C shares | 194,460,874 | |
BEPC exchangeable shares are exchangeable at the option of the holder at any time at a price equal to the market price of an LP unit. Our company has the option to satisfy the exchange either by delivering an LP unit or the cash equivalent of an LP unit. For more information, see Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association – BEPC Exchangeable Shares” of our Form 20-F for the annual period ending December 31, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2023, our shareholders exchanged 8,465 (2022: 12,308 and 2021: 16,071) BEPC exchangeable shares for an equivalent number of LP units, on a post-split basis. BEPC class B and BEPC class C shares are redeemable for cash in an amount equal to the market price of an LP unit. There have been no redemptions of BEPC class B or BEPC class C shares to date. Due to the exchange feature of the BEPC exchangeable shares and the cash redemption feature of the BEPC class B and BEPC class C shares, the BEPC exchangeable shares, BEPC class B shares, and BEPC class C shares are classified as financial liabilities. However, BEPC class C shares, the most subordinated class of all common shares, meet certain qualifying criteria and are presented as equity instruments given the narrow scope presentation exceptions existing in IAS 32.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, our company declared dividends of $241 million (2022: $220 million and 2021: $209 million) on its outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares. Dividends on our BEPC exchangeable shares are presented as interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. No dividends were declared on BEPC class B shares or BEPC class C shares during the year.
As at December 31, 2023, Brookfield Holders held a direct and indirect interest of approximately 25% of the company. Brookfield Holders own, directly and indirectly, 44,813,835 BEPC exchangeable shares on a combined basis and the remaining is held by public investors.
Our company may from time-to-time, subject to applicable law, purchase shares for cancellation in the open market, provided that any necessary approval has been obtained.
In December 2023, the company renewed its normal course issuer bid for its outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares. The company is authorized to repurchase up to 8.9 million BEPC Exchangeable shares, representing 5% of its issued and outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares. The bids will expire on December 17, 2024, or earlier should the company complete its repurchases prior to such date. There were no BEPC exchangeable shares repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2023.
As at the date of this report, Brookfield and its affiliates, including the partnership, through its ownership of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares, holds an approximate 81.2% voting interest in our company. Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares, excluding Brookfield and its affiliates, including the partnership, hold an approximate 18.8% aggregate voting interest in BEPC.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Please see Note 26 – Commitments, contingencies and guarantees in the audited annual consolidated financial statements, for further details on the following:
•Commitments – Water, land, and dam usage agreements, and agreements and conditions on committed acquisitions of operating portfolios and development projects;
•Contingencies – Legal proceedings, arbitrations and actions arising in the normal course of business, and providing for letters of credit; and
•Guarantees – Nature of all the indemnification undertakings and guarantees to third-parties for certain transactions.
OFF-STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION ARRANGEMENTS
Our company does not have any off-statement of financial position arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Our company issues letters of credit from its corporate credit facilities for general corporate purposes which include, but are not limited to, security deposits, performance bonds and guarantees for reserve accounts. As at December 31, 2023, letters of credit issued amounted to $1,135 million (2022: $994 million).
Two direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of our company have fully and unconditionally guaranteed (i) any and all present and future unsecured debt securities issued by Brookfield Renewable Partners ULC, in each case as to payment of principal, premium (if any) and interest when and as the same will become due and payable under or in respect of the trust indenture under which such securities are issued, (ii) all present and future senior preferred shares of Brookfield Renewable Power Preferred Equity Inc. (“BRP Equity”) as to the payment of dividends when due, the payment of amounts due on redemption and the payment of amounts due on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BRP Equity, (iii) certain of BEP’s preferred units, as to payment of distributions when due, the payment of amounts due on redemption and the payment of amounts due on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEP, (iv) the obligations of all present and future bilateral credit facilities established for the benefit of Brookfield Renewable, and (v) notes issued by Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc. under its U.S. commercial paper program. BRP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (“BBHI”) and BEP Subco Inc. subsidiaries of the company have guaranteed the perpetual subordinated notes issued by Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc. These arrangements do not have or are not reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
PART 6 – SELECTED QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL INFORMATION
HISTORICAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PARTNERSHIP
As the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares is expected to be significantly impacted by the market price of the LP units and the combined business performance of Brookfield Renewable as a whole, we are providing the following historical operational and financial information regarding Brookfield Renewable. For further details please review the partnership’s periodic reporting referenced in the introductory section of this MD&A.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
(MILLIONS, EXCEPT AS NOTED) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | | |
| Operational information: | | | | | | | | | |
| Capacity (MW) | 32,949 | | 25,377 | | 21,049 | | | | |
| Total generation (GWh) | | | | | | | | | |
| Long-term average generation | 75,584 | | 63,656 | | 58,913 | | | | |
| Actual generation | 69,704 | | 63,036 | | 56,629 | | | | |
| Proportionate generation (GWh) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Actual generation | 29,467 | | 28,669 | | 27,150 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Additional financial information: | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to Unitholders | $ (100) | | $ (295) | | $ (368) | | | | |
Basic loss per LP unit(1) | (0.32) | | (0.60) | | (0.69) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Proportionate Adjusted EBITDA(2) | 2,182 | | 2,002 | | 1,876 | | | | |
Funds From Operations(2) | 1,095 | | 1,005 | | 934 | | | | |
Funds From Operations per Unit(2)(3) | 1.67 | | 1.56 | | 1.45 | | | | |
Distribution per LP unit(3) | 1.35 | | 1.28 | | 1.22 | | | | |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
(MILLIONS, EXCEPT AS NOTED) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | $ 64,005 | | $ 54,283 | | $ 49,432 | | | | |
| Equity-accounted investments | 2,546 | | 1,392 | | 1,107 | | | | |
| Total assets | 76,128 | | 64,111 | | 55,867 | | | | |
| Total borrowings | 29,702 | | 24,850 | | 21,529 | | | | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 7,174 | | 6,507 | | 6,215 | | | | |
| Other liabilities | 9,273 | | 6,468 | | 4,127 | | | | |
| Participating non-controlling interests – in operating subsidiaries | 18,863 | | 14,755 | | 12,303 | | | | |
| General partnership interest in a holding subsidiary held by Brookfield | 55 | | 59 | | 59 | | | | |
| Participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary – Redeemable/Exchangeable units held by Brookfield | 2,684 | | 2,892 | | 2,894 | | | | |
| BEPC exchangeable shares | 2,479 | | 2,561 | | 2,562 | | | | |
| Preferred equity | 583 | | 571 | | 613 | | | | |
| Perpetual subordinated notes | 592 | | 592 | | 592 | | | | |
| Preferred limited partners’ equity | 760 | | 760 | | 881 | | | | |
| Limited partners’ equity | 3,963 | | 4,096 | | 4,092 | | | | |
| Total liabilities and equity | 76,128 | | 64,111 | | 55,867 | | | | |
Debt-to-total capitalization (market value)(4) | 40 | % | | 39 | % | | 33 | % | | | | |
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2023, average LP units totaled 282.4 million (2022: 275.2 million and 2021: 271.1 million)
(2)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Use of Non-IFRS Measures” and “PART 4 – Financial Performance Review on Proportionate Information – Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures”.
(3)Average Units outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2023 totaled 657.1 million (2022: 645.9 million and 2021: 609.5 million), being inclusive of LP units, Redeemable/Exchangeable partnership units, BEPC exchangeable shares and GP interest.
(4)Based on market values of Preferred equity, Perpetual subordinated notes, Preferred limited partners’ equity, and Unitholder equity.
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL QUARTERLY RESULTS
The following is a summary of unaudited quarterly financial information of our company for the last eight consecutive quarters:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | |
| (MILLIONS) | | Q4 | | Q3 | | Q2 | | Q1 | | Q4 | | Q3 | | Q2 | | Q1 | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | | $ | 1,066 | | | $ | 934 | | | $ | 901 | | | $ | 1,066 | | | $ | 956 | | | $ | 896 | | | $ | 997 | | | $ | 929 | | | | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | | (502) | | | 1,370 | | | 360 | | | (920) | | | 1,078 | | | 517 | | | 1,137 | | | (882) | | | | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income attributable to the partnership | | (747) | | | 1,340 | | | 291 | | | (1,065) | | | 953 | | | 480 | | | 1,046 | | | (976) | | | | | | | | | |
PROPORTIONATE RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023 and 2022
The following chart reflects the generation and summary financial figures of our company on a proportionate basis for the three months ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (GWh) | | (MILLIONS) |
| Actual Generation | | Revenues | | Adjusted EBITDA(1) | | Funds From Operations | | |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | | | |
| Hydroelectric | 3,219 | | | 3,657 | | | $ | 273 | | | $ | 270 | | | $ | 173 | | | $ | 176 | | | $ | 103 | | | $ | 125 | | | | | |
| Wind | 621 | | | 460 | | | 45 | | | 45 | | | 29 | | | 30 | | | 22 | | | 22 | | | | | |
| Utility-scale Solar | 362 | | | 211 | | | 43 | | | 24 | | | 32 | | | 25 | | | 19 | | | 12 | | | | | |
Distributed energy & sustainable solutions(2) | 218 | | | 139 | | | 23 | | | 36 | | | 24 | | | 20 | | | 19 | | | 15 | | | | | |
| Corporate | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 5 | | | (35) | | | | | |
| Total | 4,420 | | | 4,467 | | | $ | 384 | | | $ | 375 | | | $ | 259 | | | $ | 251 | | | $ | 168 | | | $ | 139 | | | | | |
(1)Non-IFRS measures. For reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measure see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
(2)Actual generation includes 173 GWh (2022: 87 GWh) from facilities that do not have a corresponding long-term average. See Part 9 – Presentation to Stakeholders and Performance Measurement for why we do not consider long-term average for certain of our facilities.
RECONCILIATION OF NON-IFRS MEASURES
The following table reflects Adjusted EBITDA and Funds From Operations and provides reconciliation to net income (loss) for the three months ended December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Attributable to the partnership |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 98 | | | $ | 102 | | | $ | 159 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | (871) | | | $ | (502) | |
| Add back or deduct the following: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 142 | | | 136 | | | 87 | | | 24 | | | — | | | 389 | |
| Deferred income tax recovery | (13) | | | (45) | | | (7) | | | (2) | | | (2) | | | (69) | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instrument loss (gain) | (50) | | | 39 | | | (5) | | | (2) | | | (12) | | | (30) | |
Other(1) | 4 | | | (191) | | | (177) | | | (19) | | | — | | | (383) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares(2) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 61 | | | 61 | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 816 | | | 816 | |
| Management service costs | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (6) | | | (6) | |
Interest expense(2) | 163 | | | 36 | | | 52 | | | 11 | | | 6 | | | 268 | |
| Current income tax expense | 17 | | | 8 | | | 6 | | | — | | | 3 | | | 34 | |
Amount attributable to equity accounted investments and non-controlling interests(3) | (188) | | | (56) | | | (83) | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | $ | (319) | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 173 | | | $ | 29 | | | $ | 32 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 259 | |
(1)Other corresponds to certain non-recurring other income items as well as certain non-recurring amounts that are not related to the revenue earning activities and are not normal, recurring cash operating expenses necessary for business operations. Refer to Note 7 - Other Income in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Also refer to Note 9 - Other in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on the other balance, which includes the company’s economic share of certain non-cash items foreign currency hedges and realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term.
(2)Total interest expense of $329 million is comprised of amounts on Interest expense and Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares.
(3)Amount attributable to equity accounted investments corresponds to the adjusted EBITDA to the company that are generated by its investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method. Amounts attributable to non-controlling interest are calculated based on the economic ownership interest held by non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. By adjusting Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest, our company is able to remove the portion of Funds From Operations earned at non-wholly owned subsidiaries that are not attributable to our company.
The following table reflects Adjusted EBITDA and Funds From Operations and provides reconciliation to net income (loss) for the three months ended December 31, 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Attributable to the partnership |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale Solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 155 | | | $ | 21 | | | $ | (36) | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 933 | | | $ | 1,078 | |
| Add back or deduct the following: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 125 | | | 76 | | | 86 | | | 22 | | | — | | | 309 | |
| Deferred income tax expense (recovery) | (52) | | | 13 | | | (5) | | | 4 | | | — | | | (40) | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instrument loss (gain) | (18) | | | (14) | | | 6 | | | (2) | | | (5) | | | (33) | |
Other(1) | 64 | | | (17) | | | 3 | | | 12 | | | 6 | | | 68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares(2) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 55 | | | 55 | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,026) | | | (1,026) | |
| Management service costs | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 37 | | | 37 | |
Interest expense(2) | 138 | | | 34 | | | 47 | | | 11 | | | — | | | 230 | |
| Current income tax expense (recovery) | 31 | | | 3 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 35 | |
Amount attributable to equity accounted investments and non-controlling interests(3) | (267) | | | (86) | | | (77) | | | (32) | | | — | | | $ | (462) | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 176 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 20 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 251 | |
(1)Other corresponds to amounts that are not related to the revenue earning activities and are not normal, recurring cash operating expenses necessary for business operations. Refer to Note 9 - Other in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on the other balance, which includes the company’s economic share of certain non-cash items foreign currency hedges and realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term.
(2)Total interest expense of $285 million is comprised of amounts on Interest expense and Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares.
(3)Amount attributable to equity accounted investments corresponds to the adjusted EBITDA to the company that are generated by its investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method. Amounts attributable to non-controlling interest are calculated based on the economic ownership interest held by non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. By adjusting Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest, our company is able to remove the portion of Funds From Operations earned at non-wholly owned subsidiaries that are not attributable to our company.
The following table reconciles non-IFRS financial measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures. Net income (loss) is reconciled to Funds From Operations for the three months ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS, EXCEPT AS NOTED) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Net income (loss) | $ | (502) | | | $ | 1,078 | |
| Add back or deduct the following: | | | |
| Depreciation | 389 | | | 309 | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instruments gain | (30) | | | (33) | |
| Deferred income tax recovery | (69) | | | (40) | |
Other(1) | (383) | | | 68 | |
| | | |
| Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares | 61 | | | 55 | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | 816 | | | (1,026) | |
Amount attributable to equity accounted investments and non-controlling interest(2) | (114) | | | (272) | |
| Funds From Operations | $ | 168 | | | $ | 139 | |
(1)Other corresponds to certain non-recurring other income items as well as certain non-recurring amounts that are not related to the revenue earning activities and are not normal, recurring cash operating expenses necessary for business operations. Refer to Note 7 - Other Income in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Also refer to Note 9 - Other in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on the other balance, which includes the company’s economic share of certain non-cash items foreign currency hedges and realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term.
(2)Amount attributable to equity accounted investments corresponds to the Funds From Operations that are generated by its investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method. Amounts attributable to non-controlling interest are calculated based on the economic ownership interest held by non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. By adjusting Funds From Operations attributable to non-controlling interest, our company is able to remove the portion of Funds From Operations earned at non-wholly owned subsidiaries that are not attributable to our company.
PART 7 – BUSINESS RISKS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Management’s objectives are to protect our company against material economic exposures and variability of results from various financial risks that include electricity price risk, foreign currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, and liquidity risk. These risks are further discussed in Note 5 – Risk management and financial instruments in the audited annual consolidated financial statements.
The following table outlines our company’s financial risks and how they are managed:
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Risk | Description of Risk | Management of Risk |
| Electricity price | We have exposure to movements in the market price of electricity. | '- Enter into long-term contracts that specify the price at which electricity is sold - Maintain a portfolio of short, medium, and long-term financial contracts to mitigate our exposure to short-term fluctuations in electricity prices - Ensure limits and controls are in place for trading activities - As of December 31, 2023, we had on a proportionate basis approximately 88% of 2024 generation (2022: 92% of 2023 generation) contracted under power purchase agreements and financial contracts excluding Brazil and Colombia. In Brazil and Colombia, on a proportionate basis, we had approximately 93% and 70% of 2024 generation (2022: 90% and 67% of 2023 generation, respectively) contracted under power purchase agreements, respectively. See “Part 4 – Financial Performance Review on Proportionate Information” |
| Foreign currency | We are exposed to foreign currency risk – including Canadian dollar, Brazilian real, Euro, and Colombian peso – related to operations, anticipated transactions, and certain foreign currency debt. | '- Enter into foreign currency contracts designed to minimize the exposure to foreign currency fluctuations - 60% of cash flow is generated in the United States while Canadian Dollar and Euro exposure, representing 10% of our portfolio cash flow, is proactively managed through foreign currency contracts - Limited foreign currency contracts to hedge our exposure currencies in South America – representing 30% of our portfolio cash flow – due to the high costs of hedging certain currencies. However, these specific exposures are mitigated by the annual inflation-linked escalations in our power purchase agreements |
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Risk | Description of Risk | Management of Risk |
| Interest rate | We are exposed to risk on the interest rates of our variable-rate debt. | '- Assets largely consist of long duration physical assets, and financial liabilities consist primarily of long-term fixed-rate debt or floating-rate debt that has been swapped to fixed-rates with interest rate financial instruments to minimize the exposure to interest rate fluctuations - Enter into interest rate contracts to lock-in fixed-rates on certain anticipated future debt issuances and on floating rate debts - Our proportionate floating rate exposure represents 21% of our total debt, after affecting for variable-rate debt that has been hedged through the use of interest rate swaps. Our variable-rate exposure arises primarily from our South American operations, as we have limited opportunities to raise fixed-rate debt or hedge due to the high associated costs |
| Credit | We are exposed to credit risk from operating activities and certain financing activities, the maximum exposure of which is represented by the carrying amounts reported in the statements of financial position. We are exposed to credit risk if counterparties to our energy contracts, interest rate swaps, forward foreign exchange contracts and physical electricity and gas transactions as well as trade receivables are unable to meet their obligations. | '- Diverse counterparty base with long standing credit histories - Exposure to counterparties with investment-grade credit ratings - Use of standard trading contracts and other standard credit risk mitigation techniques - As at December 31, 2023, 92% (2022: 96%) of the company’s trade receivables were current |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Risk | Description of Risk | Management of Risk |
| Liquidity | We are exposed to liquidity risk for financial liabilities.
We are also subject to internal liquidity risk because we conduct our business activities through separate legal entities (subsidiaries and affiliates) and are dependent on receipts of cash from those entities to defray corporate expenses and to make dividend payments to shareholders. Under the credit agreements for subsidiary debt, it is conventional for distributions of cash to our company to be prohibited if the loan is in default (notably for non-payment of principal or interest) or if the entity fails to achieve a benchmark debt service coverage ratio. Refer to Note 17 – Capital Management of the annual audited consolidated financial statements for further disclosures. | '- As at December 31, 2023, available group liquidity was $4.1 billion. Liquidity is comprised of the group's proportionate share of cash and cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, the available portion of the corporate credit facilities, and share of subsidiary credit facilities. Details of the available portion of credit facilities and debt maturity ladder are included in “PART 5 – Liquidity and Capital Resources” - Effective and regular monitoring of debt covenants and cooperation with lenders to cure any defaults - Target investment grade debt or debt with investment grade characteristics with the ability to absorb volatility in cash flows - Long-term duration of debt instruments and the diversification in maturity dates over an extended period of time - Sufficient cash from operating activities, access to undrawn credit facilities, and possible capital markets financing to fund our operations and fulfill our obligations as they become due - Ensure access to public capital markets and maintain a strong investment grade credit rating |
| | |
| | |
PART 8 – CRITICAL ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS IN APPLYING ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The audited consolidated financial statements of Brookfield Renewable Corporation as at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 and for each of the years in the three years ended December 31, 2023 are prepared in accordance with IFRS, which require the use of estimates and judgments in reporting assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and contingencies. In the judgment of management, none of the estimates outlined in Note 1 – Basis of presentation and material accounting policy information in the audited consolidated financial statements are considered critical accounting estimates with the exception of the estimates related to the valuation of property, plant and equipment, financial instruments, deferred income tax liabilities, decommissioning liabilities and impairment of goodwill. These assumptions include estimates of future electricity prices, discount rates, expected long-term average generation, inflation rates, terminal year, the amount and timing of operating and capital costs and the income tax rates of future income tax provisions. Estimates also include determination of accruals, provision, purchase price allocations, useful lives, asset valuations, asset impairment testing and those relevant to the defined benefit pension and non-pension benefit plans. Estimates are based on historical experience, current trends and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
In making estimates, management relies on external information and observable conditions where possible, supplemented by internal analysis, as required. These estimates have been applied in a manner consistent with that in the prior year and there are no known trends, commitments, events or uncertainties that we believe will materially affect the methodology or assumptions utilized in this MD&A. These estimates are impacted by, among other things, future power prices, movements in interest rates, foreign exchange volatility and other factors, some of which are highly uncertain, as described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2023. The interrelated nature of these factors prevents us from quantifying the overall impact of these movements on our company’s financial statements in a meaningful way. These sources of estimation uncertainty relate in varying degrees to substantially all asset and liability account balances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
CRITICAL ESTIMATES
Our company makes estimates and assumptions that affect the carrying value of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amount of income and other comprehensive income for the year. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The estimates and assumptions that are critical to the determination of the amounts reported in the audited consolidated financial statements relate to the following:
(i)Property, plant and equipment
The fair value of our company’s property, plant and equipment is calculated using estimates and assumptions about future electricity prices from renewable sources, anticipated long-term average generation, estimated operating and capital expenditures, future inflation rates and discount rates, as described in Note 12 – Property, plant and equipment, at fair value in our company's audited annual consolidated financial statements. Judgment is involved in determining the appropriate estimates and assumptions in the valuation of our company’s property, plant and equipment. See Note 1(s)(iii) – Critical judgments in applying accounting policies – Property, plant and equipment in our company's audited annual consolidated financial statements for further details.
Estimates of useful lives and residual values are used in determining depreciation and amortization. To ensure the accuracy of useful lives and residual values, these estimates are reviewed on an annual basis.
(ii)Financial instruments
Our company makes estimates and assumptions that affect the carrying value of its financial instruments, including estimates and assumptions about future electricity prices, long-term average generation, capacity prices, discount rates, the timing of energy delivery and the elements affecting fair value of the tax equity financings. The fair value of interest rate swaps is the estimated amount that another party would receive or pay to terminate the swap agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current market interest rates. This valuation technique approximates the net present value of future cash flows. See Note 5 – Risk management and financial instruments in our audited annual consolidated financial statements for more details.
(iii)Deferred income taxes
The audited consolidated financial statements include estimates and assumptions for determining the future tax rates applicable to subsidiaries and identifying the temporary differences that relate to each subsidiary. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply during the year when the assets are realized or the liabilities settled, using the tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the audited consolidated statements of financial position dates. Operating plans and forecasts are used to estimate when the temporary difference will reverse based on future taxable income.
(iv) Decommissioning liabilities
Decommissioning costs will be incurred at the end of the operating life of some of the company’s assets. These obligations are typically many years in the future and require judgment to estimate. The estimate of decommissioning costs can vary in response to many factors including changes in relevant legal, regulatory, and environmental requirements, the emergence of new restoration techniques or experience at other power generating facilities. Inherent in the calculations of these costs are assumptions and estimates including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, discount rates, and timing of settlements.
(v) Impairment of goodwill
The impairment assessment of goodwill requires estimation of the value-in-use or fair value less costs of disposal of the CGUs or groups of CGUs to which goodwill has been allocated.
CRITICAL JUDGMENTS IN APPLYING ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following are the critical judgments that have been made in applying the accounting policies used in the audited consolidated financial statements that have the most significant effect on the amounts in the audited consolidated financial statements:
(i) Preparation of consolidated financial statements
These consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of our company. Our company exercises judgment in determining whether non-wholly owned subsidiaries are controlled by our company. Our company’s judgment included the determination of (i) how the relevant activities of the subsidiary are directed; (ii) whether the rights of shareholdings are substantive or protective in nature; and (iii) our company’s ability to influence the returns of the subsidiary.
(ii) Common control transactions
Common control business combinations specifically fall outside of scope of IFRS 3 and as such management has used its judgment to determine an appropriate policy to account for these transactions by considering other relevant accounting guidance that is within the framework of principles in IFRS and that reflects the economic reality of the transactions. The company’s policy is to record assets and liabilities recognized as a result of transactions between entities under common control at the carrying value on the transferor’s financial statements, and to have the consolidated statements of income (loss), consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), consolidated statements of financial position, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows reflect the results of the combined entities for all periods presented for which the entities were under the transferor’s common control, irrespective of when the combination takes place. Differences between the consideration given and the assets and liabilities received are recorded directly to equity.
(iii) Property, plant and equipment
The accounting policy relating to our company’s property, plant and equipment is described in Note 1(g) – Property, plant and equipment and revaluation method in the audited consolidated financial statements of our company. In applying this policy, judgment is used in determining whether certain costs are additions to the carrying amount of the property, plant and equipment as opposed to repairs and maintenance that are expensed when incurred. If an asset has been developed, judgment is required to identify the point at which the asset is capable of being used as intended and to identify the directly attributable costs to be included in the carrying value of the development asset. The useful lives of property, plant and equipment are determined by independent engineers periodically with an annual review by management.
Annually, our company determines the fair value of its property, plant and equipment using a methodology that it has judged to be reasonable. The methodology for hydroelectric assets is generally a twenty-year discounted cash flow model. Twenty years is the period considered reasonable as our company has twenty-year capital plans, and it believes a reasonable third party would be indifferent between extending the cash flows further in the model versus using a discounted terminal value. The methodology for wind, solar and other assets is to align the model length with the expected remaining useful life of the subject assets.
The valuation model incorporates future cash flows from long-term power purchase agreements that are in place where it is determined that the power purchase agreements are linked specifically to the related power generating assets. With respect to estimated future generation that does not incorporate long-term power purchase agreement pricing, the cash flow model uses estimates of future electricity prices using broker quotes from independent sources for the years in which there is a liquid market. The valuation of generation not linked to long-term power purchase agreements also requires the development of a long-term estimate of future electricity prices. In this regard the valuation model uses a discount to the all-in cost of construction with a reasonable return to secure energy from a new renewable resource with a similar generation profile to the asset being valued as the benchmark that will establish the market price for electricity for renewable resources.
Our company’s long-term view is anchored to the cost of securing new energy from renewable sources to meet future demand growth by the years 2027 to 2035 in North America, 2030 in Colombia and 2027 in Brazil. The year of new entry is viewed as the point when generators must build additional capacity to maintain system reliability and provide an adequate level of reserve generation with the retirement of older coal-fired plants and rising environmental compliance costs in North America, and overall increasing demand in Colombia and Brazil. For the North American business, the company has estimated a discount to these new-build renewable asset prices to determine renewable electricity prices for hydroelectric, solar and wind facilities. In Brazil and Colombia, the estimate of future electricity prices is based on a similar approach as applied in North America using a forecast of the all-in cost of development.
Terminal values are included in the valuation of hydroelectric assets in North America and Colombia. For the hydroelectric assets in Brazil, cash flows have been included based on the duration of the authorization or useful life of a concession asset with consideration of a one-time thirty-year renewal on qualifying hydroelectric assets.
Discount rates are determined each year by considering the current interest rates, average market cost of capital as well as the price risk and the geographical location of the operational facilities as judged by management. Inflation rates are also determined by considering the current inflation rates and the expectations of future rates by economists. Operating costs are based on long-term budgets escalated for inflation. Each operational facility has a twenty-year capital plan that it follows to ensure the maximum life of its assets is achieved. Foreign exchange rates are forecasted by using the spot rates and the available forward rates, extrapolated beyond the period available. The inputs described above to the discounted cash flow model require management to consider facts, trends and plans in making its judgments as to what derives a reasonable fair value of its property, plant and equipment.
(iv) Financial instruments
The accounting policy relating to our company’s financial instruments is described in Note 1(l) – Financial instruments. In applying the policy, judgments are made in applying the criteria set out in IFRS 9 to record financial instruments at fair value through profit and loss, fair value through other comprehensive income and the assessments of the effectiveness of hedging relationships.
For power purchase agreements accounted for under IFRS 9 (“IFRS 9 PPAs”) that have unobservable values, Brookfield Renewable determines the fair value of these IFRS 9 PPAs using a discounted cash flow model based on the term of the contract and applies judgements surrounding the inputs used within the valuation model. The valuation model incorporates various inputs and assumptions including future power prices, contractual prices, contractual volumes and discount rates. Future power prices are based on broker quotes from independent sources and for IFRS 9 PPAs with no available broker quotes, future fuel driven merchant prices are incorporated within the model. Contractual prices are stipulated within each individual agreement, contractual volumes are either specified
within the agreement or determined using future generation of the power generating assets and discount rate used in the valuation model is the credit adjusted risk free rate.
(v) Deferred income taxes
The accounting policy relating to our company’s income taxes is described in Note 1(n) – Income taxes in the audited consolidated financial statements of our company. In applying this policy, judgments are made in determining the probability of whether deductions, tax credits and tax losses can be utilized.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
International Tax Reform - Amendments to IAS 12 - Pillar Two model rules
In May 2023, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 12 “Income Taxes” to give entities temporary mandatory relief from accounting for deferred taxes arising from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Developments (“OECD”) international tax reform. The amendments are effective immediately upon their issue and retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors,” except for some targeted disclosure requirements which become effective for annual reporting periods on or after January 1, 2023. The company operates in countries which have enacted new legislation to implement the global minimum top-up tax. The company has applied the temporary mandatory relief from recognizing and disclosing information related to the top-up tax and will account for it as a current tax when it is incurred. The newly enacted legislation is effective from January 1, 2024 and there is no current tax impact for the year ended December 31, 2023. The global minimum top-up tax is not anticipated to have a significant impact on the financial position of the company.
FUTURE CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Amendments to IAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements (“IAS 1”)
The amendments clarify how to classify debt and other liabilities as current or non-current. The amendments to IAS 1 apply to annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024. The company is currently assessing the impact of these amendments.
There are currently no other future changes to IFRS with potential impact on the company.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
No changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2023, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART 9 – PRESENTATION TO STAKEHOLDERS AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
PRESENTATION TO PUBLIC STAKEHOLDERS
Actual Generation
For assets acquired, disposed or reached commercial operation during the year, reported generation is calculated from the acquisition, disposition or commercial operation date and is not annualized. Generation on a same store basis refers to the generation of assets that were owned during both periods presented. As it relates to Colombia only, generation includes both hydroelectric and cogeneration facilities. distributed energy & sustainable solutions includes generation from our distributed generation, pumped storage, North America cogeneration and Brazil biomass assets.
Our risk of a generation shortfall in Brazil continues to be minimized by participation in a hydrological balancing pool administered by the government of Brazil. This program mitigates hydrology risk by assuring that all participants receive, at any particular point in time, an assured energy amount, irrespective of the actual volume of energy generated. The program reallocates energy, transferring surplus energy from those who generated an excess to those who generate less than their assured energy, up to the total generation within the pool. Periodically, low precipitation across the entire country’s system could result in a temporary reduction of generation available for sale. During these periods, we expect that a higher proportion of thermal generation would be needed to balance supply and demand in the country, potentially leading to higher overall spot market prices.
Voting Agreements with Affiliates
Our company has entered into voting agreements with Brookfield and the partnership, whereby our company gained control of the entities that own certain renewable power generating facilities in the United States and Brazil, as well as TerraForm Power. Our company has also entered into a voting agreement with its consortium partners in respect of our Colombian business. The voting agreements provide our company the authority to direct the election of the boards of directors of the relevant entities, among other things, and therefore provide our company with control. Accordingly, our company consolidates the accounts of these entities.
For entities previously controlled by Brookfield Corporation the voting agreements entered into do not represent business combinations in accordance with IFRS 3, as all combining businesses are ultimately controlled by Brookfield Corporation both before and after the transactions were completed. Our company accounts for these transactions involving entities under common control in a manner similar to a pooling of interest, which requires the presentation of pre-voting agreement financial information as if the transactions had always been in place. Refer to Note 1(s)(ii) – Critical judgments in applying accounting policies – Common control transactions in our audited annual consolidated financial statements for our policy on accounting for transactions under common control.
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Segment Information
Our operations are segmented by – 1) hydroelectric, 2) wind, 3) utility-scale solar, 4) distributed energy & sustainable solutions (distributed generation, pumped storage, carbon capture and storage, cogeneration and biomass), and 5) corporate. This best reflects the way in which the CODM reviews results, manages operations and allocates resources.
We report our results in accordance with these segments and present prior period segmented information in a consistent manner. See Note 6 – Segmented information in our audited annual consolidated financial statements.
One of our primary business objectives is to generate stable and growing cash flows while minimizing risk for the benefit of all stakeholders. We monitor our performance in this regard through three key metrics — i) Net Income (Loss), ii) Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), and iii) Funds From Operations.
It is important to highlight that Adjusted EBITDA and Funds From Operations do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other
companies and have limitations as analytical tools. We provide additional information below on how we determine Adjusted EBITDA and Funds From Operations. We also provide reconciliations to Net income (loss). See “Part 4 – Financial Performance Review on Proportionate Information – Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” and “Part 6 – Selected Quarterly and Annual Information – Reconciliation of Non-IFRS measures”.
Proportionate Information
Reporting to the CODM on the measures utilized to assess performance and allocate resources has been provided on a proportionate basis. Information on a proportionate basis reflects our company’s share from facilities which it accounts for using consolidation and the equity method whereby our company either controls or exercises significant influence or joint control over the investment, respectively. Proportionate information provides a shareholder perspective that the CODM considers important when performing internal analyses and making strategic and operating decisions. The CODM also believes that providing proportionate information helps investors understand the impacts of decisions made by management and financial results that can be allocated to shareholders.
Proportionate financial information is not, and is not intended to be, presented in accordance with IFRS. Tables reconciling IFRS data with data presented on a proportionate basis have been disclosed. Segment revenues, other income, direct operating costs, interest expense, depreciation, current and deferred income taxes, and other are items that will differ from results presented in accordance with IFRS as these items (1) include our company’s proportionate share of earnings (loss) from equity-accounted investments attributable to each of the above-noted items, and (2) exclude the proportionate share of earnings (loss) of consolidated investments not held by us apportioned to each of the above-noted items.
The presentation of proportionate results has limitations as an analytical tool, including the following:
•The amounts shown on the individual line items were derived by applying our overall economic ownership interest percentage and do not necessarily represent our legal claim to the assets and liabilities, or the revenues and expenses; and
•Other companies may calculate proportionate results differently than we do.
Because of these limitations, our proportionate financial information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our financial statements as reported under IFRS.
Our company does not control those entities that have not been consolidated and as such, have been presented as equity-accounted investments in its financial statements. The presentation of the assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses do not represent our company’s legal claim to such items, and the removal of financial statement amounts that are attributable to non-controlling interests does not extinguish our company’s legal claims or exposures to such items.
Unless the context indicates or requires otherwise, information with respect to the MW attributable to our company’s facilities, including development assets, is presented on a consolidated basis, including with respect to facilities whereby our company either controls or jointly controls the applicable facility.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) is calculated in accordance with IFRS.
Net income (loss) is an important measure of profitability, in particular because it has a standardized meaning under IFRS. The presentation of net income (loss) on an IFRS basis for our business will often lead to the recognition of a loss even though the underlying cash flows generated by the assets are supported by strong margins and stable, long-term power purchase agreements. The primary reason for this is that accounting rules require us to recognize a significantly higher level of depreciation for our assets than we are required to reinvest in the business as sustaining capital expenditures.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure used by investors to analyze the operating performance of companies.
Our company uses Adjusted EBITDA to assess the performance of our company before the effects of interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, management service costs, non-controlling interests, unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments, non-cash income or loss from equity-accounted investments, distributions to preferred shareholders, preferred limited partnership unit holders, perpetual subordinated noteholders and other typical non-recurring items. Our company adjusts for these factors as they may be non-cash, unusual in nature and/or are not factors used by management for evaluating operating performance. Our company includes realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term within Adjusted EBITDA in order to provide additional insight regarding the performance of investments on a cumulative realized basis, including any unrealized fair value adjustments that were recorded in equity and not otherwise reflected in current period Adjusted EBITDA.
Our company believes that presentation of this measure will enhance an investor’s ability to evaluate our financial and operating performance on an allocable basis.
Funds From Operations
Funds From Operations is a non-IFRS measure used by investors to analyze net earnings from operations without the effects of certain volatile items that generally have no current financial impact or items not directly related to the performance of the business.
Our company uses Funds From Operations to assess the performance of our company before the effects of certain cash items (e.g. acquisition costs and other typical non-recurring cash items) and certain non-cash items (e.g. deferred income taxes, depreciation, non-cash portion of non-controlling interests, unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments, non-cash gain or loss from equity-accounted investments, and other non-cash items) as these are not reflective of the performance of the underlying business. In the audited annual consolidated financial statements of our company, the revaluation approach is used in accordance with IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, whereby depreciation is determined based on a revalued amount, thereby reducing comparability with peers who do not report under IFRS as issued by the IASB or who do not employ the revaluation approach to measuring property, plant and equipment. Management adds back deferred income taxes on the basis that they do not believe this item reflects the present value of the actual tax obligations that they expect our company to incur over the long-term investment horizon of our company.
Our company believes that analysis and presentation of Funds From Operations on this basis will enhance an investor’s understanding of the performance of the business.
Funds From Operations is not a generally accepted accounting measure under IFRS and therefore may differ from definitions of Funds From Operations used by other entities, as well as the definition of funds from operations used by the Real Property Association of Canada (“REALPAC”) and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”). Furthermore, this measure is not used by the CODM to assess our company’s liquidity.
Proportionate Debt
Proportionate debt is presented based on the proportionate share of borrowings obligations relating to the investments of our company in various portfolio businesses. The proportionate financial information is not, and is not intended to be, presented in accordance with IFRS. Proportionate debt measures are provided because management believes it assists investors and analysts in estimating the overall performance and understanding the leverage pertaining specifically to our company's share of its invested capital in a given investment. When used in conjunction with proportionate Adjusted EBITDA, proportionate debt is expected to provide useful information as to how our company has financed its businesses at the asset-level. Management believes that the proportionate presentation, when read in conjunction with our company’s reported results under IFRS, including consolidated debt, provides a more meaningful assessment of how the operations of our company are performing and capital is being managed.
The presentation of proportionate results has limitations as an analytical tool, including the following:
•Proportionate debt amounts do not represent the consolidated obligation for debt underlying a consolidated investment. If an individual project does not generate sufficient cash flows to service the entire amount of its debt payments, management may determine, in their discretion, to pay the shortfall
through an equity injection to Brookfield Renewable Corporation to avoid defaulting on the obligation. Such a shortfall may not be apparent from or may not equal the difference between aggregate proportionate Adjusted EBITDA for all of the portfolio investments of our company and aggregate proportionate debt for all of the portfolio investments of our company; and
•Other companies may calculate proportionate debt differently.
Because of these limitations, the proportionate financial information of our company should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial statements of our company as reported under IFRS.
5.B LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
See Item 5.A “Operating Results – Liquidity and Capital Resources”
PRICE RANGE AND TRADING VOLUME OF THE BEP UNITS
The BEP units are listed and posted for trading on the NYSE under the symbol “BEP”. The following table sets forth the price ranges and trading volumes of the BEP units as reported by the NYSE for the periods indicated, in United States dollars (see Item 4.A “History and Development of the Company—History and Development of Our Business”):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | BEP Units | | | |
| | High | | Low | | Volume | | | |
| | ($) | | ($) | | | | | |
| 2024 | | | | | | | | | |
| January 1, 2024 – February 23, 2024 | | 27.47 | | 22.9 | | 14,519,588 | | | | |
| 2023 | | | | | | | | | |
| January 1, 2023 – March 31, 2023 | | 31.6 | | 25.5 | | 20,360,920 | | | | |
| April 1, 2023 – June 30, 2023 | | 32.76 | | 28.57 | | 15,120,812 | | | | |
| July 1, 2023 – September 30, 2023 | | 30.32 | | 21.46 | | 23,404,551 | | | | |
| October 1, 2023 – December 31, 2023 | | 27.81 | | 25.5 | | 20,360,920 | | | | |
| 2022 | | | | | | | | | |
| January 1, 2022 – March 31, 2022 | | 41.66 | | 30.93 | | 28,395,267 | | | | |
| April 1, 2022 – June 30, 2022 | | 41.95 | | 32.78 | | 18,962,568 | | | | |
| July 1, 2022 – September 30, 2022 | | 41.3 | | 30.85 | | 15,205,028 | | | | |
| October 1, 2022 – December 31, 2022 | | 32.85 | | 24.13 | | 27,219,586 | | | | |
| 2021 | | | | | | | | | |
| January 1, 2021 – March 31, 2021 | | 49.87 | | 37.74 | | 34,278,278 | | | | |
| April 1, 2021 – June 30, 2021 | | 44.3 | | 34.55 | | 21,954,383 | | | | |
| July 1, 2021 – September 30, 2021 | | 41.77 | | 35.61 | | 15,305,484 | | | | |
| October 1, 2021 – December 31, 2021 | | 40.86 | | 32.85 | | 23,136,088 | | | | |
The BEP units are listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the symbol “BEP.UN”. The following table sets forth the price ranges and trading volumes of the BEP units as reported by the TSX for the periods indicated, in Canadian dollars (see Item 4.A “History and Development of the Company—History and Development of Our Business”):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | BEP Units | | |
| | High | | Low | | Volume | | |
| | (C$) | | (C$) | | | | |
| 2024 | | | | | | | | |
| January 1, 2024 – February 23, 2024 | | 36.76 | | 30.94 | | 7,641,245 | | | |
| 2023 | | | | | | | | |
| January 1, 2023 – March 31, 2023 | | 42.74 | | 34.74 | | 13,663,336 | | | |
| April 1, 2023 – June 30, 2023 | | 44.13 | | 37.89 | | 9,648,693 | | | |
| July 1, 2023 – September 30, 2023 | | 39.9 | | 29.15 | | 12,267,967 | | | |
| October 1, 2023 – December 31, 2023 | | 37.24 | | 27.43 | | 18,516,932 | | | |
| 2022 | | | | | | | | |
| January 1, 2022 – March 31, 2022 | | 52.98 | | 39.24 | | 20,351,742 | | | |
| April 1, 2022 – June 30, 2022 | | 52.38 | | 42.77 | | 14,555,802 | | | |
| July 1, 2022 – September 30, 2022 | | 53.09 | | 42.24 | | 11,832,868 | | | |
| October 1, 2022 – December 31, 2022 | | 44.81 | | 32.58 | | 21,022,986 | | | |
| 2021 | | | | | | | | |
| January 1, 2021 – March 31, 2021 | | 63.39 | | 47.87 | | 20,522,570 | | | |
| April 1, 2021 – June 30, 2021 | | 55.4 | | 41.88 | | 16,416,651 | | | |
| July 1, 2021 – September 30, 2021 | | 52.41 | | 45.5 | | 10,533,934 | | | |
| October 1, 2021 – December 31, 2021 | | 50.54 | | 42.05 | | 13,947,076 | | | |
5.C RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.
None.
5.D TREND INFORMATION
See Item 4.B “Business Overview — Renewable Power Growth Opportunity” to understand our global renewable power drivers, core markets and growth opportunities.
See Item 5.A “Operating Results” for information on the following trend information:
•“— Financial Performance Review on Proportionate Information” (variability of generation);
•“— Liquidity and Capital Resources” (funding of growth initiatives, capital expenditures, distributions and general business purposes); and
•“— Contract Profile” (Funds From Operations).
5.E CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
See Item 5.A, “Operating Results - Part 8 - Critical Estimates and Accounting Policies”.
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
6.A DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
The BEPC Board of Directors
The following table presents certain information concerning the board of directors of BEPC: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Residence(1) | | Age | | Position | | Principal Occupation | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey Blidner
Ontario, Canada | | 75 | | Chair | | Vice Chair of Brookfield | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Scott Cutler
Utah, United States | | 54 | | Director | | Chief Executive Officer of StockX | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Eleazar de Carvalho Filho(2)(5) Sao Paulo, Brazil | | 66 | | Director | | Founder of Virtus BR Partners; director of TechnipFMC plc, Grupo Pão de Açúcar; Chairman of Oi S.A. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sarah Deasley
London, United Kingdom | | 54 | | Director | | Executive Director of Frontier Economics | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nancy Dorn(3) Georgia, United States | | 65 | | Director | | Director | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
David Mann(2)(3)(4) Nova Scotia, Canada | | 84 | | Director | | Director | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Randy MacEwen (5) British Columbia, Canada | | 55 | | Director | | President and Chief Executive Officer of Ballard Power Systems | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lou Maroun(3) Warwick, Bermuda | | 73 | | Director | | Chairman of Sigma Capital Corporation | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stephen Westwell(2) London, United Kingdom | | 65 | | Director | | Director | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Patricia Zuccotti(2) Washington, United States | | 76 | | Director | | Director | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)The business address for each of the directors is 73 Front Street, Hamilton, HM 12, Bermuda.
(2)Member of the BEPC audit committee. Patricia Zuccotti is the chair of the BEPC audit committee and is the BEPC “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. Each member of the BEPC audit committee is financially literate.
(3)Member of the BEPC nominating and governance committee. David Mann is the chair of the BEPC nominating and governance committee.
(4)Lead independent director.
(5)Non-overlapping board member of BEPC who will assist BEPC with, among other things, resolving any conflicts of interest that may arise from its relationship with the partnership. Mr. de Carvalho de Filho served on the board of directors of the general partner of BEP since November 2011 and resigned from such board of directors shortly before the completion of the special distribution.
BEPC Directors
Set forth below is biographical information for the BEPC directors.
Jeffrey Blidner. Mr. Blidner is the Chair of the board of directors of BEPC since the completion of the special distribution. Mr. Blidner is a Vice Chair and a director of Brookfield Corporation. He serves as Chair of the general partner of BEP and Chair of the general partner of Brookfield Business Partners. He also serves as a director of the general partner of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P., the general partner of Brookfield Property Partners L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation, Brookfield Business Corporation and Brookfield Property REIT Inc. Prior to joining Brookfield in 2000, Mr. Blidner was a senior partner at a Canadian law firm where his practice focused on merchant banking transactions, public offerings, mergers and acquisitions, management buy-outs and private equity transactions. Mr. Blidner received his LL.B from Osgoode Hall Law School and was called to the Bar in Ontario as a Gold Medalist. Mr. Blidner is not considered an independent director because of his role at Brookfield.
Scott Cutler. Mr. Cutler is a director of BEPC since 2020 and is also a director of the general partner of BEP. Mr. Cutler is the Chief Executive Officer of StockX, a leading e-commerce company. Prior to joining StockX, Mr. Cutler served as Senior Vice President of the Americas at eBay, Inc. (2017- 2019) and served as President of StubHub (2015-2017). Before joining StubHub, Mr. Cutler spent nine years as an Executive Vice President at the NYSE. He also serves on the board of Vibrant Emotional Health. Before joining the board of the general partner of BEP, Mr. Cutler served on the board of the general partner of Brookfield Property Partners L.P. Mr. Cutler holds a Bachelor of Science in economics from Brigham Young University and a Juris Doctor from the University of California, Hastings College of Law.
Eleazar de Carvalho Filho. Mr. de Carvalho Filho is a director of BEPC since the completion of the special distribution and is a former director of the general partner of BEP, serving from 2011 until shortly before completion of the special distribution. Mr. de Carvalho Filho is a founding partner of Virtus BR Partners, an independent advisory company. He was formerly the President and Managing Director of the Brazilian National Development Bank and has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Unibanco Investment Bank. Mr. de Carvalho Filho served as the non-executive Chairman of BHP Billiton Brazil (2006-2011) and served on the board of directors of Petrobras, Eletrobrás and Vale, among others. Mr. de Carvalho Filho is currently Chairman of Oi S.A. He also serves on the board of directors of TechnipFMC plc and Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição (Grupo Pão de Açúcar). Mr. de Carvalho Filho is the President of the Board of Trustees of the Brazilian Symphony Orchestra. Mr. de Carvalho Filho holds a Master of Arts in International Relations from The Johns Hopkins University in Washington, D.C. and a Bachelor of Arts with a major in Economics from New York University.
Sarah Deasley. Dr. Deasley is a director of BEPC since 2022 and is also a director of the general partner of BEP. Dr. Deasley began her career as an economist with the U.K.’s newly created electricity regulator before moving to consultancy in 1994. She is recognized for her work on the implications of the move to a low-carbon economy, including in the areas of hydrogen transition, renewables, heat decarbonization and carbon capture, utilization and storage. In 2013, she was appointed an Executive Director of Frontier Economics, one of Europe’s largest economic consultancies, where she focuses predominantly on the energy sector, and she was also appointed as a Non-Executive Director at the North Sea Transition Authority in 2020 where she serves on Nomination, Remuneration and the Audit and Risk Committees. Dr. Deasley has served as a trustee of Sustainability First since 2015 and a member of Carbon Connect’s Advisory Board since 2018. Dr. Deasley has a PhD in Economics from Imperial College, London.
Nancy Dorn. Ms. Dorn is a director of BEPC since completion of the special distribution and is also a director of the general partner of BEP. Ms. Dorn is a retired corporate executive and U.S. government official now serving on several private sector, governmental and non-profit boards. Ms. Dorn retired from the General Electric Company in 2017 after serving for 14 years as the leader of the company’s government affairs and policy group. Prior to her career at General Electric Company, she served in a number of high-ranking positions in the U.S. Government, including Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President George W. Bush and Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) under President George H.W. Bush. She also worked in the Reagan Administration as Special Assistant to the President and in the State and Defense Departments. Ms. Dorn serves on the Board of Governors of the Argonne National Laboratory and on the Saint Simons Island Land Trust in Saint Simons, Georgia. Ms. Dorn is a graduate of Baylor University.
David Mann. Mr. Mann is the lead independent director of BEPC since completion of the special distribution and is also the lead independent director of the general partner of BEP. Mr. Mann formerly served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Nova Scotia Power Inc. (1996-2004) and Vice Chairman (2004-2005) and President and Chief Executive Officer (1998-2004) of Emera Inc., a TSX-listed energy and services company that invests in electrical generation, transmission and distribution. Mr. Mann is a Corporate Director and prior to January 1, 2016, served as Counsel at the law firm Cox & Palmer. He has over 30 years of experience in the practice of corporate and commercial law, with a particular emphasis on corporate finance and public utility regulation. Mr. Mann holds a Bachelor of Commerce and an LL.B from Dalhousie University and an LL.M from the University of London.
Lou Maroun. Mr. Maroun is a director of BEPC since completion of the special distribution and is also a director of the general partner of BEP. Mr. Maroun was formerly the Executive Chairman of ING Real Estate Canada, and held executive positions in a number of real estate companies where he was responsible for overseeing operations, real estate transactions, financial oversight and management, asset and property management, as well as many other related functions. Mr. Maroun is a director of the general partner of Brookfield Property Partners L.P. where he is a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Maroun is also Chairman of Sigma Capital Corporation with an emphasis on business strategy and strategic directions, capital markets management and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Maroun graduated from the University of New Brunswick with a Bachelor’s degree, majoring in psychology, followed by a series of post graduate studies in finance and mortgage underwriting. In 2020, Mr. Maroun received an honorary doctorate from the University of Cape Breton, where he sits on the university’s Business Advisory Board. Mr. Maroun is a Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
Randy MacEwen. Mr. MacEwen is a director of BEPC since 2021. He is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ballard Power Systems and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Ballard Power Systems. Mr. MacEwen has held executive roles in clean energy companies for 20 years, including in hydrogen, fuel cells and solar. In his earlier career, Mr. MacEwen was a lawyer specializing in mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance. He represents Ballard as a supporting member of the Hydrogen Council. Mr. MacEwen holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and a Bachelor of Law degree.
Stephen Westwell. Mr. Westwell is a director of BEPC since completion of the special distribution and is also a director of the general partner of BEP. Mr. Westwell was formerly the Chief Executive Officer of EFR Group BV, a European fuel distributor and retailer (2015-2016) and the Chief Executive Officer of Silver Ridge Power Inc., a global solar power company (2013-2014). Mr. Westwell held various management and executive positions for BP plc in South Africa, the United States and the United Kingdom (1988-2007). These executive positions included Chief Executive Officer for BP Solar and Chief Executive Officer for BP Alternative Energy. He served as Group Chief of Staff and member of BP Plc’s executive management team in the United Kingdom (2008-2011). Mr. Westwell also worked for Eskom Holdings Limited, the South African power utility, in several operational capacities. Mr. Westwell is the Interim Chair of the board of directors of Sasol Pty Limited, a global oil and chemical company, where he serves as Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee. Mr. Westwell holds a Bachelor of Science, Engineering from the University of Natal, a Master of Business Administration from the University of Cape Town and a Master of Science in Management from Stanford University.
Patricia Zuccotti. Ms. Zuccotti is a director of BEPC since completion of the special distribution and is also a director of the general partner of BEP. Ms. Zuccotti was formerly Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Expedia, Inc. (2005-2011). Prior to joining Expedia, Ms. Zuccotti was the Director, Enterprise Risk Services of Deloitte & Touche LLP (2003-2005). Ms. Zuccotti is a director of the general partner of Brookfield Business Partners L.P. and also a director of Brookfield Business Corporation where she is the Chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Zuccotti is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and received her Master of Business Administration, majoring in accounting and finance, from the University of Washington and a Bachelor of Arts, majoring in political science, from Trinity College.
Compensation
Our directors are entitled to an annual retainer of $165,000 for their service on the board of directors and committees of the general partner of BEP and the board of directors and committees of BEPC, and reimbursement of expenses incurred in attending meetings. For the year ended December 31, 2022, each of the directors received $165,000 for their service on the board of directors and committees of the general partner and the board of directors and committees of BEPC, and reimbursement of expenses incurred in attending meetings. Additionally, effective
January 1, 2024, in recognition of the time commitment required by certain directors for travel to attend board meetings in Bermuda, directors resident in certain locations receive an annual long distance travel stipend of $15,000.
The chair of the audit committee of the general partner of BEP and BEPC received an additional $20,000, the chair of the nominating and governance committee of the general partner of BEP and BEPC received an additional $10,000 and the lead independent director of the general partner of BEP and BEPC received an additional $10,000 for serving in such positions. Directors who are not independent due to their employment with Brookfield receive no fees for their services on the board of BEPC or the general partner of BEP.
In coordination with the partnership, the BEPC nominating and governance committee periodically reviews board compensation in relation to its peers and other similarly-sized companies and is responsible for approving changes in compensation for non-employee directors.
Neither the partnership nor our company have any employees, other than employees of its operating subsidiaries. Brookfield Renewable has entered into a Master Services Agreement with the Service Provider pursuant to which the Service Provider provides or arranges for other service providers to provide day-to-day management and administrative services for Brookfield Renewable and the other Service Recipients. For additional information, see Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—BEPC Management” and Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement”.
Members of Brookfield’s senior management and other individuals from Brookfield’s global affiliates are and will be drawn upon to fulfill obligations under the Master Services Agreement. However, these individuals are not and will not be compensated by our company or the partnership. Instead, they are and will continue to be compensated by Brookfield.
Director Share Ownership Requirements
BEPC believes that the directors of BEPC can better represent its shareholders if they have economic exposure to BEPC themselves. BEPC expects that independent directors of BEPC hold sufficient BEPC exchangeable shares and/or BEP units such that the acquisition costs of BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP units held by such directors is equal to at least two times their aggregate annual retainer, for serving as a director of BEPC or the general partner of BEP, as applicable, as determined by the BEPC board from time to time. Directors of BEPC are required to meet this requirement within five years of their date of appointment. All of BEPC’s external directors are in compliance with the ownership requirement.
Additional Information About Directors and Officers
To our knowledge, within the past ten years, and except as set forth below, no director or executive officer of the company and no employee of the Service Provider who performs an executive function for BEPC has (a) served as a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company that was subject to a “cease trade” or similar order, or an order denying the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, which remained in effect for more than 30 consecutive days, and that was issued (i) while he or she was acting as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer, or (ii) after he or she ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while he or she was a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer, (b) served as a director or executive officer of any company that, while he or she was acting in that capacity, or within a year after he or she ceased to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the company’s assets, or (c) become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his or her assets. In January 2018, after serving as a strategic advisor to certain bondholders, Mr. de Carvalho Filho was appointed to the transitional board of directors of Oi S.A., a telecommunications company in Brazil under bankruptcy protection. In September 2018, Mr. de Carvalho Filho was elected to the board of directors of Oi S.A. for a two-year term and was elected Chairman. Mr. de Carvalho Filho was re-elected as a director and Chairman of Oi S.A. in October 2020 and in March 2023. As of the date of this Form 20-F, Oi S.A. remains under bankruptcy protection. Mr. de Carvalho Filho was not on the board of directors at the time that Oi S.A. entered bankruptcy protection.
To our knowledge, no director or executive officer of BEPC and no employee of the Service Provider who performs an executive function for BEPC, nor any personal holding company thereof owned or controlled by them, (i) has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority, or (ii) has been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.
To our knowledge, within the past ten years, no director or executive officer of the company and no employee of the Service Provider who performs an executive function for BEPC, nor any personal holding company thereof owned or controlled by them, has become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, has become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his or her assets or the assets of his or her holding company.
BEPC Management
The Service Provider currently provides management services to our group pursuant to the Master Services Agreement. Members of Brookfield’s senior management and other individuals from Brookfield’s global affiliates are drawn upon to fulfill the Service Provider’s obligations to provide Brookfield Renewable with management services under the Master Services Agreement.
Pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, in exchange for the management services provided to our group by the Service Provider, the partnership pays an annual management fee to the Service Provider of $20 million (adjusted annually for inflation at an inflation factor based on year-over-year United States consumer price index) plus 1.25% of the amount by which the market value of our group exceeds an initial reference value. The base management fee is calculated and paid on a quarterly basis. For purposes of calculating the base management fee, the market value of our group is equal to the aggregate value of all outstanding BEP units on a fully-diluted basis, preferred units and securities of the other Service Recipients (including BEPC exchangeable shares) that are not held by the partnership, plus all outstanding third party debt with recourse to a Service Recipient, less all cash held by such entities. BRP Bermuda GP Limited L.P., a subsidiary of Brookfield, also receives incentive distributions based on the amount by which quarterly distributions on BRELP units (other than BRELP Class A Preferred Units), as well as economically equivalent securities of the other Service Recipients, including BEPC, exceed specified target levels as set forth in BRELP’s limited partnership agreement.
BEPC, like the partnership, is externally managed by the Service Provider. BEPC is responsible for its proportionate share of the base management fee. Our proportionate share of the base management fee is calculated on the basis of the value of our business relative to that of the partnership.
BEPC does not have any employees, other than employees of its operating subsidiaries. Instead, similar to the partnership, members of Brookfield’s senior management and other individuals from Brookfield’s global affiliates are drawn upon to fulfil the Service Provider’s obligations under the Master Services Agreement. See Item 4.B “Business Overview - About Brookfield” and Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions” for more information.
The following table presents certain information concerning the individuals who are principally responsible for our operations and their positions with the Service Provider as of the date of this Form 20-F.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Name
| Years of Experience in industry or role | Years at Brookfield | Current Position with the Service Provider |
| Connor Teskey | 14 | 11 | Chief Executive Officer |
| Wyatt Hartley | 18 | 14 | Chief Financial Officer |
| Jennifer Mazin | 25 | 10 | General Counsel |
| | | |
Each of the members of our core senior management team has substantial operational and transaction origination and execution expertise.
Connor Teskey. Mr. Teskey is the Chief Executive Officer of the Service Provider, a Managing Partner of Brookfield and the President of Brookfield Asset Management. Mr. Teskey has oversight of Brookfield Renewable’s
growth and capitalization, on a global basis. He is responsible for investments, operations and the expansion of the Renewable Power and Transition business. Mr. Teskey holds a Bachelor of Business Administration (Honors) from the University of Western Ontario.
Wyatt Hartley. Mr. Hartley is the Chief Financial Officer of the Service Provider and a Managing Partner of Brookfield. He directs all capital markets activities, accounting, financial reporting, treasury, taxation and investor relations of Brookfield Renewable on a global basis. Mr. Hartley holds a Bachelor of Science from Queen’s University and is a member of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA, CA).
Jennifer Mazin. Ms. Mazin is General Counsel of the Service Provider and a Managing Partner of Brookfield. Ms. Mazin provides oversight of Brookfield Renewable’s legal matters on a global basis, including transactional execution, corporate governance and compliance. Ms. Mazin received her Bachelor of Arts from the University of Western Ontario and her law degree from the University of Toronto. She is called to the bars of the State of New York and the Province of Ontario.
See also information contained under Item 3.D “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Relationship with Brookfield and the Partnership” and Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions”.
Management Diversity
BEPC is externally managed by the Service Provider, and accordingly, BEPC does not evaluate, determine or make any hiring or promotion decisions for the Service Provider. The Service Provider makes hiring and promotion decisions based solely on merit, so that each officer and employee possess the necessary skills, knowledge and experience to do his or her job. The Service Provider is committed to workplace diversity, including but not limited to, providing opportunities and support to promote success for female employees and promoting diversity of gender, culture, geography, and skills. The Service Provider appreciates the benefits of leveraging a range of diverse talents and perspectives and they actively support the development and advancement of a diverse group of employees capable of achieving management roles, including executive officer positions. The Service Provider does not have targets for the representation of women in executive officer positions because such targets do not accurately reflect the full range of factors considered in hiring or promoting executive officers. Currently, 33% of Brookfield Renewable’s executive management team are women.
The Master Services Agreement
BEPC, like the partnership, is externally managed by the Service Provider. The Master Services Agreement provides the Service Provider for oversight of our business and provides the services of senior officers to BEPC for a management service fee, comparable to the services provided to the partnership by the Service Provider. BEPC is responsible for its proportionate share of the base management fee. Our proportionate share of the base management fee is calculated on the basis of the value of our business relative to that of the partnership. See also Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Incentive Distributions”.
The following is a summary of certain provisions of the Master Services Agreement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all of the provisions of the agreement. Because this description is only a summary of the Master Services Agreement, it does not necessarily contain all of the information that an investor may find useful. BEPC therefore urges investors to review the Master Services Agreement in its entirety. The Master Services Agreement is filed as an exhibit to this Form 20-F.
Appointment of the Service Provider and Services Rendered
Under the Master Services Agreement, the Service Recipients have appointed the Service Provider, as the service provider, to provide the following services, or arrange for their provision by an appropriate service provider:
•causing or supervising the carrying out of all day-to-day management, secretarial, accounting, banking, treasury, administrative, liaison, representative, regulatory and reporting functions and obligations;
•providing overall strategic advice to the Holding Entities and BEPC including advising with respect to the expansion of their business into new markets;
•establishing and maintaining or supervising the establishment and maintenance of books and records;
•identifying, evaluating and recommending to the Service Recipients acquisitions or dispositions from time to time and, where requested to do so, assisting in negotiating the terms of such acquisitions or dispositions;
•recommending and, where requested to do so, assisting in the raising of funds whether by way of debt, equity or otherwise, including the preparation, review or distribution of any prospectus or offering memorandum in respect thereof and assisting with communications support in connection therewith;
•causing or supervising the preparation and implementation of any operating plan, capital expenditure plan or marketing plan;
•recommending to the Service Recipients suitable candidates to serve on the boards of directors or their equivalents of the operating entities;
•making recommendations with respect to the exercise of any voting rights to which the Service Recipients are entitled in respect of the Operating Entities and BEPC;
•making recommendations with respect to the payment of dividends by the Holding Entities or other distributions by the Service Recipients, including distributions by BEPC to shareholders of BEPC;
•monitoring and/or oversight of the applicable Service Recipient’s accountants, legal counsel and other accounting, financial or legal advisors and technical, commercial, marketing and other independent experts, and managing litigation in which a Service Recipient is sued or commencing litigation after consulting with, and subject to the approval of, the relevant board of directors or its equivalent;
•attending to all matters necessary for any reorganization, bankruptcy proceedings, dissolution or winding up of a Service Recipient, subject to approval by the relevant board of directors or its equivalent;
•supervising the timely calculation and payment of taxes payable, and the filing of all tax returns due, by each Service Recipient;
•causing or supervising the preparation of the Service Recipients’ annual consolidated financial statements, quarterly interim financial statements and other public disclosures;
•making recommendations in relation to and effecting the entry into insurance of each Service Recipient’s assets, together with other insurances against other risks, including directors and officers insurance as the relevant service provider and the relevant board of directors or its equivalent may from time to time agree;
•arranging for individuals to carry out the functions of the principal executive, accounting and financial officers for the partnership and our company only for purposes of applicable securities laws;
•providing individuals to act as senior officers of Service Recipients as agreed from time to time, subject to the approval of the relevant board of directors or its equivalent;
•advising the Service Recipients regarding the maintenance of compliance with applicable laws and other obligations; and
•providing all such other services as may from time to time be agreed with the Service Recipients that are reasonably related to the Service Recipient’s day-to-day operations.
Notwithstanding the forgoing, all Investment Advisor Services (as defined in the Master Services Agreement) must be provided solely to BRELP. The Service Provider’s activities are subject to the supervision of the BEPC board of directors and of the equivalent governing bodies of each of the other Service Recipients, as applicable. The Service Provider has agreed to exercise the power and discharge the duties conferred under our Master Services Agreement honestly and in good faith, and will exercise the degree of care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances, subject to, and after taking into account, the terms and conditions of the Relationship Agreement.
The Service Provider may, from time to time, appoint an affiliate of Brookfield to act as a new Service Provider under the Master Services Agreement, effective upon the execution of a joinder agreement by the new Service Provider.
Management Fee
Pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, in exchange for the management services provided to our group by the Service Provider, the partnership pays an annual management fee to the Service Provider of $20 million (adjusted annually for inflation at an inflation factor based on year-over-year United States consumer price index) plus 1.25% of the amount by which the market value of our group exceeds an initial reference value (the “base management fee”). The base management fee is calculated and paid on a quarterly basis. For purposes of calculating the base management fee, the market value of Brookfield Renewable is equal to the aggregate value of all outstanding BEP units on a fully-diluted basis, preferred units and securities of the other Service Recipients (including BEPC exchangeable shares) that are not held by Brookfield Renewable, plus all outstanding third party debt with recourse to a Service Recipient, less all cash held by such entities. BRP Bermuda GP Limited, a subsidiary of Brookfield, also receives incentive distributions based on the amount by which quarterly distributions on BRELP units (other than BRELP Class A Preferred Units), as well as economically equivalent securities of the other Service Recipients, including BEPC, exceed specified target levels as set forth in BRELP’s limited partnership agreement, which specified target levels were amended in connection with the special distribution.
The table below sets forth the management fees for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, all of which were paid by BRELP.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the year ended December 31, |
| $ MILLIONS | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
| Base management fee | $205 | $243 | $288 |
To the extent that under any other arrangement BEPC is obligated to pay a base management fee (directly or indirectly through an equivalent arrangement) to the Service Provider (or any affiliate) on a portion of BEPC’s capital that is comparable to the base management fee, the base management fee payable for each quarter in respect thereof will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by BEPC’s proportionate share of the comparable base management fee (or equivalent amount) under such other arrangement for that quarter.
Reimbursement of Expenses and Certain Taxes
The Service Recipients, including BEPC, also reimburse the Service Provider for any out-of-pocket fees, costs and expenses incurred in the provision of the management and administration services. However, the Service Recipients are not required to reimburse the Service Provider for the salaries and other remuneration of their management, personnel or support staff who carry out any services or functions for such Service Recipients or overhead for such persons.
The relevant Service Recipient is required to pay the Service Provider for all other out-of-pocket fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of the services including those of any third party and to reimburse the Service Provider for any such fees, costs and expenses. Such out-of-pocket fees, costs and expenses include, among other things, (i) fees, costs and expenses relating to any debt or equity financing; (ii) out-of-pocket fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the general administration of any Service Recipient; (iii) taxes, licenses and other statutory fees or penalties levied against or in respect of a Service Recipient; (iv) amounts owed under indemnification, contribution or similar arrangements; (v) fees, costs and expenses relating to BEPC’s financial reporting, regulatory filings and investor relations and the fees, costs and expenses of agents, advisors and other persons who provide services to or on behalf of a Service Recipient; and (vi) any other fees, costs and expenses incurred by the Service Provider that are reasonably necessary for the performance by the Service Provider of its duties and functions under the Master Services Agreement.
In addition, the Service Recipients are required to pay all fees, expenses and costs incurred in connection with the investigation, acquisition, holding or disposal of any acquisition that is made or that is proposed to be made by one of more of the Service Recipients. Where the acquisition or proposed acquisition involves a joint acquisition that is made alongside one or more other persons, the Service Provider will be required to allocate such fees, costs and expenses in proportion to the notional amount of the acquisition made (or that would have been made in the case of an unconsummated acquisition) among all joint investors. Such additional fees, expenses and costs represent out-of-pocket costs associated with investment activities that are undertaken pursuant to the Master Services Agreement.
The Service Recipients are also required to pay or reimburse the Service Provider for all sales, use, value added, withholding or other taxes or customs duties or other governmental charges levied or imposed by reason of the
Master Services Agreement or any agreement it contemplates, other than income taxes, corporation taxes, capital taxes or other similar taxes payable by the Service Provider, which are personal to the Service Provider.
Termination
The Master Services Agreement has no fixed term. However, the Service Recipients, including BEPC, may terminate the Master Services Agreement effective upon written notice of termination to the Service Provider if any of the following occurs:
•the Service Provider defaults in the performance or observance of any material term, condition or covenant contained in the agreement in a manner that results in material harm to the Service Recipients and the default continues unremedied for a period of sixty (60) days after written notice of the breach is given to the Service Provider;
•the Service Provider engages in any act of fraud, misappropriation of funds or embezzlement against any Service Recipient that results in material harm to the Service Recipients;
•the Service Provider is grossly negligent in the performance of its duties under the agreement and such gross negligence results in material harm to the Service Recipients; or
•certain events relating to the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Service Provider.
The Service Recipients have no right to terminate for any other reason, including if the Service Provider or Brookfield experiences a change of control. The general partner of BEP may only terminate the Master Services Agreement on behalf of the Service Recipients with the prior unanimous approval of the general partner of BEP’s independent directors.
The Master Services Agreement expressly provides that the agreement may not be terminated by the Service Recipients due solely to the poor performance or the underperformance of any of BEPC’s operations.
The Service Provider may terminate the Master Services Agreement effective upon written notice of termination to BEPC if any Service Recipient defaults in the performance or observance of any material term, condition or covenant contained in the agreement in a manner that results in material harm to the Service Provider and the default continues unremedied for a period of sixty (60) days after written notice of the breach is given to the Service Recipients. The Service Provider may also terminate the Master Services Agreement upon the occurrence of certain events relating to the bankruptcy or insolvency of any Service Recipient.
If the Master Services Agreement is terminated, the Licensing Agreement, the Brookfield Relationship Agreement and any of Brookfield’s obligations under the Brookfield Relationship Agreement would also terminate. See Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Licensing Agreement” and Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Brookfield Relationship Agreement” for further details.
Indemnification and Limitations on Liability
Under the Master Services Agreement, the Service Provider has not assumed and will not assume any responsibility other than to provide or arrange for the provision of the services called for under such agreement in good faith and will not be responsible for any action that the Service Recipients take in following or declining to follow the advice or recommendations of the Service Provider. The Service Provider has agreed to indemnify each of the Service Recipients and its affiliates, and its directors, officers, agents, members, partners, shareholders, employees and other representatives to the fullest extent permitted by law from and against any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including legal fees) resulting from the Service Provider’s bad faith, fraud, willful misconduct, gross negligence and, in the case of a criminal matter, conduct undertaken with the knowledge that the conduct was unlawful. The maximum amount of the aggregate liability of the Service Provider and its affiliates, the directors, officers, employees, contractors, agents, advisors and other representatives of the Service Provider and their affiliates, will be equal to the amounts previously paid in respect of services pursuant to the Master Services Agreement or any other agreement or arrangement contemplated by the Master Services Agreement in the two most recent calendar years by the Service Recipients. The Service Recipients have also agreed to indemnify each of the Service Provider, Brookfield and their directors, officers, agents, subcontractors, delegates, members, partners, shareholders and employees to the fullest extent permitted by law from and against any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including legal fees) incurred by an indemnified person or threatened
in connection with their respective businesses, investments and activities or in respect of or arising from the Master Services Agreement or the services provided by the Service Provider, except to the extent that the claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses are determined to have resulted from the indemnified person’s bad faith, fraud, willful misconduct, gross negligence or in the case of a criminal matter, action that the indemnified person knew to have been unlawful. In addition, under the Master Services Agreement, the indemnified persons will not be liable to the Service Recipients to the fullest extent permitted by law, except for conduct that involved bad faith, fraud, willful misconduct, gross negligence, or in the case of a criminal matter, conduct that the indemnified person knew to have been unlawful.
Outside Activities
The Master Services Agreement does not prohibit the Service Provider or its affiliates from pursuing other business activities or providing services to third parties that compete directly or indirectly with BEPC.
6.B COMPENSATION
Our Management
Neither the partnership nor our company has any employees, other than employees of its operating subsidiaries. Brookfield Renewable has entered into a Master Services Agreement with the Service Provider pursuant to which the Service Provider provides or arranges for other service providers to provide day-to-day management and administrative services for Brookfield Renewable and the other Service Recipients. For additional information, see Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—BEPC Management” and Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement”.
Members of Brookfield’s senior management and other individuals from Brookfield’s global affiliates are and will be drawn upon to fulfill obligations under the Master Services Agreement. However, these individuals are not and will not be compensated by our company or the partnership. Instead, they are and will continue to be compensated by Brookfield.
Board of Directors of Our Company
See Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—Compensation” and Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—Director Share Ownership Requirements”.
The BEPC nominating and governance committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to our board of directors concerning the remuneration of directors and committee members. See Item 6.C “Board Practices—Committees of the Board of Directors—BEPC Nominating and Governance Committee”.
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers
As at the date of this Form 20-F, and at all times since January 1, 2023, none of the directors, officers, employees and former directors, officers and employees of our Company, the Service Provider or any of their respective subsidiaries, nor any of their associates, has or had any indebtedness owing to Brookfield Renewable.
6.C BOARD PRACTICES
Board Structure, Practices and Committees
The structure, practices and committees of the BEPC board, including matters relating to the size, independence and composition of the BEPC board, the election and removal of directors, requirements relating to board action and the powers delegated to the BEPC board committees, mirror the practices of the partnership and are governed by the BEPC articles and policies adopted by the BEPC board. The BEPC board is responsible for exercising the management, control, power and authority of BEPC except as required by applicable law or the BEPC articles. The following is a summary of certain provisions of the BEPC articles and policies that affect BEPC’s governance.
Size, Independence and Composition of the BEPC Board
The BEPC board is currently comprised of ten (10) directors. The BEPC board may consist of between three (3) and eleven (11) directors or such other number of directors as may be determined from time to time by a resolution of the shareholders of BEPC and subject to the BEPC articles. At least three (3) directors and at least a majority of the directors holding office must be independent of BEPC and Brookfield, as determined by the full BEPC board
using the standards for independence established by the NYSE. Our board of directors mirrors the board of the general partner of BEP, except that our board has two additional non-overlapping board members to assist BEPC with, among other things, resolving conflicts of interest, if any, that may arise from its relationship with the partnership.
If the death, resignation or removal of an independent director results in the BEPC board consisting of less than a majority of independent directors, the vacancy must be filled promptly. Pending the filling of such vacancy, the BEPC board may temporarily consist of less than a majority of independent directors and those directors who do not meet the standards for independence may continue to hold office.
Election and Removal of Directors
The BEPC board is elected by the shareholders of BEPC and each of BEPC’s current directors will serve until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders of BEPC or his or her death, resignation or removal from office, whichever occurs first. Vacancies on the BEPC board may be filled and additional directors may be added by a resolution of the shareholders of BEPC or a vote of the directors then in office. A director may be removed from office by a resolution duly passed by the shareholders of BEPC. A director will be automatically removed from the BEPC board if he or she becomes bankrupt, insolvent or suspends payments to his or her creditors or becomes prohibited by law from acting as a director. The partnership, through its ownership of BEPC class B shares, will have a 75% voting interest in BEPC and will be able to control the election and removal of directors serving on the BEPC board. See Item 3.D “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to BEPC’s Relationship with Brookfield and the Partnership—Brookfield exercises substantial influence over our group and it is highly dependent on the Service Provider”.
Term Limits and Board Renewal
The BEPC nominating and governance committee reviews and assesses the qualifications of candidates to join the BEPC board with the goal, among other things, of reflecting a balance between the experience that comes with longevity of service on the BEPC board and the need for renewal and fresh perspectives.
The BEPC board does not have a mandatory age for the retirement of directors and there are no term limits nor any other mechanisms in place that operate to compel board turnover. While BEPC believes that mandatory retirement ages, director term limits and other board turnover mechanisms are overly prescriptive, periodically adding new voices to the BEPC board can help BEPC adapt to a changing business environment.
As such, the BEPC nominating and governance committee reviews the composition of the BEPC board on a regular basis in relation to approved director criteria and skill requirements and recommends changes as appropriate.
Board Diversity Policy
BEPC has a board diversity policy. The diversity policy is informed by our company’s and the partnership’s deep roots in many global jurisdictions and the belief that the BEPC board should reflect a diversity of backgrounds relevant to its strategic priorities. When we consider diversity this includes (but is not limited to) such factors as diversity based on gender, race and ethnicity, as well as diversity of business expertise and international experience.
All board of director appointments will be based solely on merit, having due regard for the benefits of diversity, so that each nominee possesses the necessary skills, knowledge and experience to serve effectively as a director. Therefore, in the director identification and selection process, gender diversity influences succession planning and is one criterion in adding new members to the BEPC board. BEPC appreciates the benefits of leveraging a range of diverse talents and perspectives and is committed to pursuing the spirit and letter of the diversity policy. The BEPC nominating and governance committee is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the diversity policy and for monitoring progress towards achieving its objectives. The BEPC board is currently comprised of ten (10) directors. Of the ten (10) directors, nine (9) are independent and three (3) are female (each of whom are independent directors). Accordingly, 30% of BEPC’s directors are women and women represent one third of such independent directors. The diversity policy does not set any formal targets on diversity for directors at this time, because of the current need for geographic diversity of directors and the emphasis on subject matter expertise.
Action by the BEPC Board of Directors
The BEPC board may take action in a duly convened meeting at which a quorum is present or by a written resolution signed by all directors then holding office. The BEPC board will hold a minimum of four meetings per year. When action is to be taken at a meeting of the BEPC board, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required for any action to be taken.
Transactions Requiring Approval by Independent Directors
BEPC’s independent directors have approved Conflicts Protocols which addresses the approval and other requirements for transactions in which there is greater potential for a conflict of interest to arise. These transactions include:
•any material amendment to the Master Services Agreement;
•any material service agreement or other arrangement pursuant to which Brookfield will be paid a fee, or other consideration other than any agreement or arrangement contemplated by the Master Services Agreement;
•acquisitions by BEPC from, and dispositions by BEPC to, Brookfield;
•approval of the protocol governing the allocation of employees between BEPC and the Service Provider;
•any other material transaction involving BEPC and Brookfield; and
•termination of, or any determinations regarding indemnification under, the Master Services Agreement.
BEPC’s Conflicts Protocols require certain transactions including those described above to be approved by a majority of BEPC’s independent directors. Pursuant to BEPC’s Conflicts Protocols, independent directors may grant approvals for any such transactions in the form of general guidelines, policies or procedures in which case no further special approval will be required in connection with a particular transaction or matter permitted thereby.
Transactions in which a Director has an Interest
A director who directly or indirectly has an interest in a contract, transaction or arrangement with BEPC or certain of BEPC’s affiliates is required to disclose the nature of his or her interest to the full BEPC board. Such disclosure may take the form of a general notice given to the BEPC board to the effect that the director has an interest in a specified company or firm and is to be regarded as interested in any contract, transaction or arrangement which may after the date of the notice be made with that company or firm or its affiliates. A director may participate in any meeting called to discuss or any vote called to approve the transaction in which the director has an interest and any transaction approved by the BEPC board will not be void or voidable solely because the director was present at or participates in the meeting in which the approval was given provided that the BEPC board or a board committee authorizes the transaction in good faith after the director’s interest has been disclosed or the transaction is fair to BEPC at the time it is approved.
Transactions Requiring Shareholder Approval
Shareholders have consent rights with respect to certain fundamental matters and on any other matters that require their approval in accordance with applicable corporate laws, securities laws, stock exchanges rules, and the BEPC articles.
Service Contracts
There are no service contracts with directors that provide benefits upon termination of office or services.
Indemnification and Limitations on Liability
Articles
Subject to the BCBCA, under the BEPC articles, BEPC is required to indemnify each individual (each an “eligible party”) who is or was a director or officer of BEPC and each individual who is or was a director or officer of an affiliate of BEPC and such individual’s heirs and legal personal representatives against all judgments, penalties and fines to which such person is or may be liable, and BEPC must, after the final disposition of a proceeding, pay the expenses actually and reasonably incurred by such person in respect of that proceeding.
Subject to any restrictions in the BCBCA, BEPC may agree to indemnify and may indemnify any person (including an eligible party) against judgments, penalties and fines and pay expenses incurred in connection with the performance of services by that person for BEPC.
Insurance
BEPC has the benefit of insurance coverage under which the directors of BEPC are insured, subject to the limits of the policy, against certain losses arising from claims made against such directors by reason of any acts or omissions covered under the policy in their respective capacities as directors of BEPC, including certain liabilities under securities laws.
Corporate Governance Disclosure
The BEPC board encourages sound corporate governance practices designed to promote the well-being and ongoing development of BEPC, including advancing the best interests of BEPC.
The BEPC board is of the view that its corporate governance policies and practices, outlined below, are comprehensive and consistent with the guidelines for corporate governance adopted by Canadian securities administrators. The BEPC board is also of the view that these policies and practices are consistent with the requirements of the NYSE and the applicable provisions under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Board of Directors
Mandate of the Board of Directors
The BEPC board oversees the management of BEPC’s affairs directly and through two existing standing committees. The responsibilities of the BEPC board and each committee are set out in written charters, which are reviewed and approved annually.
In fulfilling its mandate, the BEPC board is, among other things, responsible for the following:
•assessing the principal risks of BEPC’s business and reviewing, approving and monitoring the systems in place to manage these risks;
•reviewing and approving the reports issued to shareholders of, including annual and interim financial statements; and
•promoting the effective operation of the BEPC board.
Meetings of the Board of Directors
The BEPC board meets at least four times each year, with additional meetings held to consider specific items of business or as deemed necessary. Meeting frequency and agenda items may change depending on the opportunities or risks faced by BEPC. The BEPC board is responsible for its agenda. Prior to each board meeting, the chair of the BEPC board discusses agenda items for the meeting with Brookfield. At all quarterly meetings, the independent directors hold meetings without the presence of management and the directors that are not independent.
Size and Composition of the Board of Directors
The BEPC board is comprised of ten (10) directors. See Item 6.C “Board Structure, Practices and Committees—Size, Independence and Composition of the BEPC Board of Directors”.
Independent Directors
At least three directors and at least a majority of the directors holding office must be independent of BEP’s general partner and Brookfield, as determined by the BEPC board using the standards for independence established under applicable securities laws. See Item 6.C “Board Structure, Practices and Committees—Size, Independence and Composition of the BEPC Board of Directors”.
The following table describes the independence status of the directors of our company.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Director | | Independence Status | | Reason for Related Status |
| Jeffrey Blidner | | Related | | Mr. Blidner is a Vice Chair of Brookfield Corporation |
| Scott Cutler | | Independent | | |
| Eleazar de Carvalho Filho | | Independent | | |
| Sarah Deasley | | Independent | | |
| Nancy Dorn | | Independent | | |
| David Mann | | Independent | | |
| Randy MacEwen | | Independent | | |
| Lou Maroun | | Independent | | |
| Stephen Westwell | | Independent | | |
| Patricia Zuccotti | | Independent | | |
The Chair of the BEPC board is Jeffrey Blidner, who is not an independent director. However, each of the BEPC committees is fully comprised of independent directors and the BEPC board has a lead independent director, David Mann. In addition, special committees of independent directors may be formed from time to time to review particular matters or transactions. The BEPC board encourages regular open dialogue between the independent directors and the Chair to discuss matters raised by independent directors.
At all quarterly meetings, the independent directors hold meetings without the presence of management and the directors that are not independent. The BEPC board has also adopted the conflicts management policies to govern its practices in circumstances in which conflicts of interest with Brookfield may arise. See Item 6.C “Board Practices—Transactions Requiring Approval by Independent Directors” and See Item 6.C “Board Practices—Transactions Requiring Approval by Independent Directors—Transactions in Which a Director Has an Interest”, and Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
Other Directorships
The following directors of BEPC are also directors of other reporting issuers (or the equivalent in foreign jurisdictions):
•Jeffrey Blidner: Brookfield Corporation; Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation; Brookfield Business Corporation; the general partner of each of BEP, Brookfield Property Partners L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. and Brookfield Business Partners L.P.
•Scott Cutler: the general partner of BEP
•Eleazar de Carvalho Filho: TechnipFMC plc; Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição (Grupo Pão de Açúcar); Oi S.A.
•Sarah Deasley: the general partner of BEP
•Nancy Dorn: the general partner of BEP
•Randy MacEwen: Ballard Power Systems
•David Mann: the general partner of BEP
•Lou Maroun: the general partner of each of BEP and Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
•Stephen Westwell: the general partner of BEP; Sasol (Pty) Limited
•Patricia Zuccotti: the general partner of each of BEP and Brookfield Business Partners L.P. and Brookfield Business Corporation
Director Orientation and Education
New directors of BEPC are provided with comprehensive information about BEPC and its affiliates. Arrangements are made for specific briefing sessions from appropriate senior personnel to help new directors better
understand BEPC’s strategies and operations. They also participate in the continuing education measures discussed below.
The BEPC board receives annual operating plans for each of BEPC’s strategic business units and more detailed presentations on particular strategies. Existing directors are invited to join the orientation sessions for new directors as a refresher. The directors are also invited to participate in guided tours of BEPC’s various operational facilities. They have the opportunity to meet and participate in work sessions with management to obtain insight into the operations of BEPC and its affiliates. Directors are regularly briefed to help better understand industry-related issues such as accounting rule changes, transaction activity, capital markets initiatives, significant regulatory developments, as well as trends in corporate governance.
Director Expectations
The BEPC board has adopted a Charter of Expectations for Directors, which sets out the expectations in regard to personal and professional competencies, BEPC exchangeable share and/or BEP unit ownership, meeting attendance, conflicts of interest, changes of circumstance and resignation events.
Directors are expected to identify in advance any potential conflict of interest regarding a matter coming before the BEPC board or its committees, bring these to the attention of the BEPC board or committee chair and refrain from voting on such matters. Directors are also expected to submit their resignations to the Chair of the BEPC board if they become unable to attend at least 75% of the BEPC board’s regularly scheduled meetings or if they become involved in a legal dispute, regulatory or similar proceedings, take on new responsibilities or experience other changes in personal or professional circumstances that could adversely impact BEPC or their ability to serve as director. Further information on director BEPC exchangeable share and/or BEP unit ownership requirements is set out in Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—Director Share Ownership Requirements”.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The BEPC board believes that its committees assist in the effective functioning of the BEPC board and help ensure that the views of independent directors are effectively represented.
The BEPC board has two committees:
•the BEPC audit committee; and
•the BEPC nominating and governance committee.
The responsibilities of these committees are set out in written charters, which are reviewed and approved annually by the BEPC board. The charters of these committees can be found on our website at https://bep.brookfield.com/bepc/corporate-governance/governance-documents. Special committees may be formed from time to time as required to review particular matters or transactions. BEPC does not have a compensation committee as compensation is determined by Brookfield, as employer of the personnel who carry out the management and activities of BEPC’s renewable power business. While the BEPC board retains overall responsibility for corporate governance matters, the BEPC audit committee and the BEPC nominating and governance committee each have specific responsibilities for certain aspects of corporate governance, in addition to its other responsibilities as described below.
BEPC Audit Committee
The BEPC board is required to maintain at all times an audit committee that operates pursuant to a written charter. The audit committee is required to consist solely of independent directors and each member must be financially literate and at least one member must be designated as an audit committee financial expert. Collectively, the BEPC audit committee has the education and experience to fulfill the responsibilities outlined in the BEPC audit committee charter. The education and past experience of each BEPC audit committee member that is relevant to the performance of his or her responsibilities as a BEPC audit committee member can be found in the biographical information about the applicable member under Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The BEPC Board of Directors”. BEPC Audit committee members may not serve on more than two other public company audit committees, except with the prior approval of the BEPC board. The BEPC audit committee is responsible for assisting and advising the BEPC board with matters relating to:
•BEPC’s accounting and financial reporting processes;
•the integrity and audits of BEPC’s financial statements;
•BEPC’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
•BEPC’s cybersecurity program and practices; and
•the qualifications, performance and independence of BEPC’s independent accountants.
The audit committee is also responsible for engaging BEPC’s independent accountants, reviewing the plans and results of each audit engagement with BEPC’s independent accountants, approving professional services provided by BEPC’s independent accountants, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees charged by BEPC’s independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of BEPC’s internal accounting controls.
As of the date of this Form 20-F, the audit committee was comprised of the following four directors: Patricia Zuccotti (Chair), Eleazar de Carvalho Filho, David Mann and Stephen Westwell, all of whom are independent directors.
The audit committee had four regular quarterly meetings in 2023 as well as one special meeting. All of the committee members were present in person or by telephone. Four regular quarterly meetings are scheduled for 2024.
The BEPC board has adopted a written policy on auditor independence (“BEPC pre-approval policy”). Under the BEPC pre-approval policy, except in very limited circumstances, all audit and permitted non-audit services are required to be pre-approved by the BEPC audit committee. The BEPC pre-approval policy prohibits the auditors from providing the following types of non-audit services:
•bookkeeping or other services related to BEPC’s accounting records or financial statements;
•appraisal or valuation services or fairness opinions;
•actuarial services;
•management functions or human resources;
•legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit;
•internal audit outsourcing;
•financial information systems design and implementation; and
•certain tax services.
The BEPC pre-approval policy permits the auditors to provide other types of non-audit services, but only if approved in advance by the BEPC audit committee, subject to limited exceptions. The BEPC pre-approval policy also addresses issues relating to the disclosure of fees paid to the auditors. See Item 16.C “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” for a summary of our external auditor service fees.
The BEPC audit committee consists solely of independent directors, each of whom are persons determined by BEPC to be financially literate within the meaning of National Instrument 52-110—Audit Committees. Each of the BEPC audit committee members has the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by BEPC’s financial statements.
BEPC Nominating and Governance Committee
The BEPC board is required to establish and maintain at all times a nominating and governance committee that operates pursuant to a written charter. The nominating and governance committee is required to consist of a majority of independent directors.
The BEPC nominating and governance committee is responsible for recommending the appointment by the BEPC board of a person to the office of director and for recommending a slate of nominees for election as directors by shareholders. The BEPC nominating and governance committee is also responsible for assisting and advising the BEPC board with respect to matters relating to the general operation of the BEPC board, BEPC’s governance and
the performance of the BEPC board, individual directors and the Service Provider. The BEPC nominating and governance committee must also assess the size and composition of the BEPC board and its committees, review the effectiveness of the BEPC Board’s relations with the Service Provider. The BEPC nominating and governance committee annually reviews the performance of the BEPC board and its committees and the individual contribution of directors through a self-survey.
The BEPC nominating and governance committee had four regular quarterly meetings in 2023. All of the committee members were present in person or by telephone. Four regular quarterly meetings are scheduled for 2024. As if the date of this Form 20-F, the BEPC nominating and governance committee is comprised of the following three directors, David Mann (Chair), Lou Maroun and Nancy Dorn, all of whom are independent directors.
As the Brookfield Holders collectively hold approximately 81.2% of the votes to elect the directors of BEPC, the directors consult with the partnership and Brookfield to identify and assess the credentials of appropriate individuals with the skills, knowledge, experience and talents needed to act as an independent member of the board of directors, including the need for the BEPC board as a whole to have a diversity of perspectives. Brookfield maintains an “evergreen” list of potential independent board members to ensure that outstanding candidates with the needed skills can be quickly identified to fill planned or unplanned vacancies. Candidates from that list and any other candidates familiar to Brookfield or BEPC are assessed to ensure the BEPC board has the appropriate mix of talent, quality, skills and other requirements necessary to promote sound governance and board effectiveness. Individuals who meet those requirements are recommended by Brookfield to the BEPC nominating and governance committee for its review as potential candidates for nomination to the BEPC board. The BEPC nominating and governance committee also recommends to the BEPC board the appointment of an independent director as the lead independent director where the Chair of the BEPC board is not independent.
The BEPC nominating and governance committee is also responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the BEPC board concerning the remuneration of BEPC’s directors and committee members. On recommendation of the BEPC nominating and governance committee, the BEPC board will set compensation of the directors by seeking to ensure that the compensation reflects the responsibilities and risks involved in being a director and aligns the interests of the directors with the best interests of BEPC and its shareholders. Compensation of the directors will be periodically assessed by the BEPC nominating and governance committee and the BEPC board to ensure that it is competitive in the marketplace and fair in relation to the scope of the duties and responsibilities of the directors.
BEPC does not have any executive officers. As the Service Provider manages BEPC pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, the compensation of BEPC’s core senior management team is determined by Brookfield. The BEPC nominating and governance committee is responsible for supervising any changes in the fees to be paid pursuant to the Master Services Agreement. See Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—BEPC Management” and Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—About Brookfield”.
The BEPC nominating and governance committee is responsible for approving the appointment by the sitting directors of a person to the office of director and for recommending a slate of nominees for election as directors by shareholders of BEPC. The BEPC nominating and governance committee is also responsible for assisting and advising the BEPC board with respect to matters relating to the general operation of the BEPC board, the governance of BEPC and the performance of its board and individual directors. The BEPC nominating and governance committee is also responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the BEPC board concerning the remuneration of directors and committee members and supervising any changes in the fees to be paid pursuant to the Master Services Agreement.
Board of Directors, Committees and Director Evaluation
The BEPC board believes that a regular and formal process of evaluation improves the performance of the BEPC board as a whole, its committees and individual directors. Each year, a survey is sent to directors regarding the effectiveness of the BEPC board and its committees, inviting comments and suggestions on areas for improvement. The results of this survey are reviewed by the BEPC nominating and governance committee, which makes recommendations to the BEPC board as required. Each director also receives a list of questions for completing a self-assessment. The chair of the BEPC board also holds private interviews with each director annually
to discuss the operations of the BEPC board and its committees and to provide any feedback on the individual director’s contributions.
Board of Directors and Management Responsibilities
The BEPC board has not developed written position descriptions for the chair of the board, the role of lead independent director or the chair of any of the committees of the BEPC board. However, each chair takes responsibility for ensuring the BEPC board or committee, as applicable, addresses the matters within its written charter. The lead independent director similarly takes responsibility for promoting and safeguarding the independence of the independent directors.
The BEPC board has not developed a written position description for any members of BEPC’s core senior management team. Similar to the partnership, the services of BEPC’s core senior management team are provided by the Service Provider pursuant to the Master Services Agreement.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The BEPC board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“BEPC Ethics code”), a copy of which is available on, and on BEPC’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca and EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov and is available on our website at https://bep.brookfield.com/bepc/corporate-governance/governance-documents. The BEPC Ethics code provides guidelines to ensure that all employees, including BEPC’s directors, respect our group’s commitment to conducting business relationships with respect, openness and integrity. Management provides regular instructions and updates to the BEPC Ethics code to BEPC’s employees, as appropriate, and has provided training and e-learning tools to support the understanding of the BEPC Ethics code throughout the organization. Employees may report activities which they feel are not consistent with the spirit and intent of the BEPC Ethics code through a hotline or through a designated ethics reporting website (in each case on an anonymous basis), or alternatively, to designated members of management. Monitoring of calls and of the ethics reporting website is managed by an independent third party called Navex. The BEPC audit committee is to be notified of any significant reports of activities that are not consistent with the BEPC Ethics code by Brookfield’s internal auditor. If the BEPC audit committee considers it appropriate, it will notify the BEPC nominating and governance committee and/or the BEPC board of such reports. The BEPC board has not granted any waivers of the BEPC Ethics code to date.
The BEPC board promotes the highest ethical business conduct. The BEPC board has taken measures to ensure directors exercise independent judgment in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which a director or BEPC’s core senior management team has a material interest. Any director with a material interest in a transaction declares his or her interest and refrains from voting on such matter. Significant related party transactions, if any, are reviewed and approved by an independent committee made up of independent directors who may be advised by independent counsel and independent advisors.
Personal Trading Policy
Brookfield has adopted a personal trading policy (the “Brookfield Trading Policy”) that applies to the directors and employees of Brookfield and its controlled public affiliates, in the partnership and our company. The Brookfield Trading Policy sets forth basis guidelines for trading in the securities of Brookfield, the partnership and our company and prohibits trading on the basis of material non-public information. The Brookfield Trading Policy features “blackout” periods during which insiders and other persons who are subject to the policy are prohibited from trading in the securities of Brookfield, the partnership and our company. Regular trading blackout periods will generally commence at the close of business on the last business day of a quarter and end on the beginning of the first business day following the earnings call discussing the quarterly results. We have adopted the personal trading policy of Brookfield that applies to our directors and officers and the officers and directors of our subsidiaries. See Item 16J. “Insider Trading Policies”
6.D EMPLOYEES
Our principal head office is located in New York, New York with our operations being carried out in Brazil, Colombia, the United States and Europe. Our registered office is located in British Columbia, Canada.
We do not employ the individuals who provide management services to us under the Master Services Agreement, including the individuals who serve as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our
company and the general partner of BEP. The personnel that carry out these activities are employees of Brookfield, and their services are provided to Brookfield Renewable, including for the benefit of our company, under the Master Services Agreement. For a discussion of the individuals from Brookfield’s management team that are involved in our renewable power business, see Item 6.B “Compensation—Our Management”.
We lease the principal office of our Brazil business, which is located in São Paulo. This office oversees our operations in Brazil, as well as Chile, with approximately 527 employees. Our Brazilian National System Control Center is located in Rio de Janeiro and allows for the remote monitoring and control of nearly all of our assets in the country. All of our employees in Brazil are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We have experienced positive relations with our unionized work force in Brazil.
We lease the principal office of our Colombian business, which is located in Medellín. Our Colombia business employs approximately 614 full time employees, of which approximately 88% are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
The principal office of our European operations is located in London, in the U.K.. Our European business, which includes an office in Madrid, Spain, employs approximately 235 employees comprising operating, finance, project development, market research, power marketing and support functions. None of these employees are covered by collective agreements.
Our principal office in the United States is located in New York, New York. Our U.S. National System Control Center is located in Queensbury, New York and allows for the remote monitoring and control of nearly all of our assets in the country. Our U.S. business employs approximately 740 people, approximately 31% of whom are covered by collective agreements. We have experienced positive relations with our unionized workforce in the United States. See Item 4.B “Business Overview—Employees and Offices”.
6.E SHARE OWNERSHIP
Except as described below under Item 7.A “Major Shareholders”, as of the date of this Form 20-F, the directors and officers of our company and the employees of the Service Provider who perform executive functions for our company, and their respective associates, as a group, beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or exercised control or direction over, less than one percent of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares.
6.F DISCLOSURE OF A REGISTRANT’S ACTION TO RECOVER ERRONEOUSLY AWARDED COMPENSATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
7.A MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
The following table presents information as of February 23, 2024 regarding the beneficial ownership of BEPC exchangeable shares by each person or entity that beneficially own 5% or more of BEPC exchangeable shares. The BEPC exchangeable shares held by our group’s principal shareholders do not entitle such shareholders to different voting rights than those of other holders of BEPC exchangeable shares. However, the BEPC exchangeable shares and the BEPC class B shares have different voting rights. Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares hold a 25% voting interest in BEPC and holders of the BEPC class B shares hold a 75% voting interest in BEPC. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Voting” and Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Class B Shares—Voting”.
Each of our directors and the individuals at the Service Provider who are principally responsible for our operations (see Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—About Brookfield”), individual and collectively, beneficially own less than 1% of our BEPC exchangeable shares.
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC Exchangeable Shares (1)(2) |
| Name and Address | Number | Percentage |
Brookfield Corporation(3) | 44,813,835 | 25% |
Blackrock, Inc.(4) | 9,282,708 | | 5 | % |
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. BEPC exchangeable shares relating to securities currently exercisable or exercisable within sixty (60) days of the date of this table are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.
(2) The percentages shown are based on 179,649,643 BEPC exchangeable shares outstanding as of February 23, 2024.
(3) As reported in Brookfield Corporation’s Schedule 13D/A filed on our EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov on November 15, 2023. Brookfield Corporation may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 44,813,835 BEPC exchangeable shares that it holds through wholly owned subsidiaries. Included in the BEPC exchangeable shares that Brookfield and its related parties beneficially own are 10,094,152 BEPC exchangeable shares held by subsidiaries of Brookfield Reinsurance. Brookfield Corporation and Brookfield Reinsurance have agreed that all decisions to be made by subsidiaries of Brookfield Reinsurance with respect to the voting of the BEPC exchangeable shares held by subsidiaries of Brookfield Reinsurance will be made jointly by mutual agreement of the applicable Brookfield Reinsurance subsidiary and Brookfield Corporation. In addition, BAM Partners Trust (the “BN Partnership”) may be deemed a beneficial owner of such BEPC exchangeable shares. BN Partnership is a trust established under the laws of Ontario and is the sole owner of the Class B limited voting shares of Brookfield Corporation. The BN Partnership has the ability to appoint one half of the board of directors of Brookfield Corporation and approve all other matters requiring shareholder approval of Brookfield Corporation with no single individual or entity controlling the BN Partnership. As such, the BN Partnership may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of 44,813,835 BEPC exchangeable shares. The business address of Brookfield and the BN Partnership is Brookfield Place, 181 Bay Street, Suite 100, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2T3.
(4) As reported in Blackrock, Inc.’s Schedule 13G/A filed on our EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov on on February 12, 2024. The business address of BlackRock, Inc. is 50 Hudson Yards, New York, New York 10001.
The partnership holds all of the BEPC class B shares, having a 75% voting interest, and BEPC class C shares, which entitle the partnership to all of the residual value in BEPC after payment in full of the amount due to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares, subject to the prior rights of holders of BEPC preferred shares.
As of February 23, 2024, 6,442 of our outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares were held by 12 holders of record in the United States, not including BEPC exchangeable shares held of record by DTC. As of February 23, 2024, DTC was the holder of record of 78,456,648 BEPC exchangeable shares.
7.B RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Brookfield Corporation is focused on deploying its capital on a value basis and compounding it over the long term. This capital is allocated across its three core pillars of asset management, insurance solutions and its operating businesses. Employing a disciplined investment approach, Brookfield Corporation leverages its deep expertise as an owner and operator of real assets, as well as the scale and flexibility of its capital, to create value and deliver strong risk-adjusted returns across market cycles. Brookfield Corporation is listed on the NYSE and on the TSX under the symbol “BN”.
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager with over $900 billion of assets under management across real estate, infrastructure, renewable power, and transition, private equity and credit. It invests client capital for the long-term with a focus on real assets and essential service businesses that form the backbone of the global economy. It offers a range of alternative investment products to investors around the world -— including public and private pension plans, endowments and foundations, sovereign wealth funds, financial institutions, insurance companies and private wealth investors. It draws on Brookfield’s heritage as an owner and operator to invest for value and seeks to generate strong returns for its clients, across economic cycles.
Brookfield’s global alternative asset management business is owned 75% by Brookfield Corporation and 25% by Brookfield Asset Management through their ownership of common shares of the Asset Management Company.
Brookfield is an affiliate of our Company. We have entered into a number of agreements and arrangements with Brookfield in order to enable us to be established as a separate entity and to pursue our vision of being a leading owner and operator of high-quality clean energy assets. While we believe that this ongoing relationship with Brookfield provides us with a strong competitive advantage as well as access to opportunities that would otherwise not be available to us, we operate as an independent, stand-alone entity. We describe below these relationships as well as potential conflicts of interest (and the methods for resolving them) and other material considerations arising from our relationship with Brookfield.
See also the information contained in this Form 20-F under Item 3.D “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Relationship with Brookfield”, Item 5.A “Operating Results — Related Party Transactions”, Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management”, Item 6.C “Board Practices” and Item 7.A “Major Shareholders” and notes to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Brookfield Relationship Agreement
Our group, BRELP, the Service Provider, Brookfield Corporation and others have entered into a relationship agreement (“Brookfield Relationship Agreement”), which governs aspects of the relationship among them. BEPC, being a controlled subsidiary of the partnership, is automatically entitled to the benefits and subject to certain obligations under the Brookfield Relationship Agreement. Pursuant to the Brookfield Relationship Agreement, Brookfield has agreed that our group will serve as its primary (though not exclusive) public vehicle through which it will, directly or indirectly, acquire renewable power assets on a global basis alongside other Brookfield Accounts, as further described herein. Our group’s acquisition strategy focuses on large scale transactions, for which it believes there is less competition and where Brookfield has sufficient influence or control so that Brookfield’s operations-oriented approach can be deployed to create value. An integral part of our group’s strategy is to participate with institutional investors in Brookfield Accounts for acquisitions that fit our group’s strategy. Brookfield has a strong track record of leading Brookfield Accounts and actively managing underlying assets to improve performance. Currently, Brookfield manages, among others, the Brookfield Americas Infrastructure Fund, a $2.7 billion infrastructure fund focused on the Americas, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund II, a $7 billion global infrastructure fund, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund III, a $14 billion global infrastructure fund, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund IV, an approximately $20 billion global infrastructure fund, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund V, an approximately $20 billion global infrastructure fund, Brookfield Infrastructure Debt Fund, an infrastructure fund focused on credit investments, Brookfield Global Transition Fund, a $15 billion global fund focusing on energy transition investments and Brookfield Global Transition Fund II, a global fund focusing on energy transition investments. Brookfield is the manager of each such Brookfield Account and typically commits to invest approximately 20% to 30% of the capital of each account alongside its third-party investors. It is currently intended that Brookfield Renewable will be allocated such commitments to Brookfield Accounts that are suitable for Brookfield Renewable’s investment mandate and, in this fashion, Brookfield Renewable will participate in future renewable power acquisitions
identified by Brookfield and that are allocated to such accounts (i.e. Brookfield Renewable would fund Brookfield’s participation in such accounts with respect to renewable power investments made by such accounts). Brookfield’s commitment to our group and our group’s ability to take advantage of opportunities is subject to a number of inherent limitations such as our group’s financial capacity, the suitability of funds and acquisition opportunities for our group in terms of the underlying investment characteristics, fit with our group’s strategy and other portfolio construction considerations, limitations arising from the tax and regulatory regimes that govern our group’s affairs and certain other restrictions. See Item 3.D “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Relationship with Brookfield and the Partnership”.
Under the terms of the Brookfield Relationship Agreement, our group acknowledges and agrees that, subject to providing the opportunity to participate on the basis described above, Brookfield (including its directors, officers, agents, members, partners, shareholders and employees) is able to pursue and engage in other business activities (including investing its own capital and managing other Brookfield Accounts) and provide investment and operational services to third parties that compete directly or indirectly with the activities engaged in by our group as well as the services provided by Brookfield to our group. In addition, Brookfield has established and/or advised, and expects to continue to establish and/or advise other Brookfield Accounts that rely on the diligence, skill and business contacts of Brookfield’s professionals and the information and acquisition opportunities they generate during the normal course of their activities.
Our group acknowledges and agrees that some of these Brookfield Accounts have objectives that overlap with our group’s objectives and/or will acquire renewable power assets or businesses that could be considered appropriate acquisitions for our group, and that Brookfield could have greater financial incentives to assist those other entities over BEPC. Due to the foregoing, our group expects to compete from time to time with Brookfield or other third parties for access to the benefits that it expects to realize from Brookfield’s involvement in its business. See “Related Party Transactions – Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties” below.
Members of Brookfield carry on a diverse range of businesses worldwide, including the development, ownership and/or management of power, transmission and other infrastructure assets, and investing and advising on investing in any of the foregoing and/or loans, debt instruments and other securities with underlying infrastructure collateral or exposure including renewable power generation operations and/or developments, through Brookfield Accounts separate from our group, and Brookfield will not be obligated to provide our group with any opportunities to participate in these investment activities except as described above. Except as explicitly provided in the Brookfield Relationship Agreement, the Brookfield Relationship Agreement will not in any way limit or restrict members of Brookfield from carrying on their respective business. In the event of the termination of the Master Services Agreement, the Brookfield Relationship Agreement would also terminate, including Brookfield’s commitments to provide our group with acquisition opportunities, as described above. BEPC is not entitled to terminate the Master Services Agreement or the Brookfield Relationship Agreement.
Pursuant to the Brookfield Relationship Agreement, Brookfield Renewable will generally be provided with voting rights over investments in which it participates. These voting rights will be exercised by Brookfield personnel, on behalf of all Brookfield Accounts that participate in such investments alongside Brookfield Renewable. As a result, Brookfield Renewable will consolidate these investments in its financial statements and for purposes of calculating its assets under management, despite the fact that Brookfield Renewable does not own 100% of the investments. With respect to its assets under management calculation, Brookfield Renewable includes 100% of the total fair value of the investments in the calculation if it consolidates an investment for accounting purposes, or does not consolidate an investment but has significant influence over the investment by virtue of one or more attributes (e.g., Brookfield Renewable being the largest investor in the investment, Brookfield Renewable having the largest representation on the investment’s governance body, Brookfield being the primary manager and/or operator of the investment, and/or Brookfield having other significant influence attributes). In these circumstances, its calculation takes into account the investment’s full capital structure (both equity and debt) on a gross asset value basis, even if Brookfield Renewable does not own 100% of the investment. Furthermore, Brookfield also will consolidate these investments in its financial statements and for purposes of calculating its assets under management in light of Brookfield’s control over our group. Brookfield will rely on our financial statements to prepare its own financial records, and will not reimburse our group for the expenses associated with preparing our financial statements and calculating our group’s assets under management.
Under the Brookfield Relationship Agreement, the partnership has agreed that none of Brookfield or the Service Provider, nor any director, officer, agent, member, partner, shareholder or employee of Brookfield or the Service Provider, will be liable to BEPC for any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including legal fees) arising in connection with the business, investments and activities in respect of or arising from the Brookfield Relationship Agreement. The maximum amount of the aggregate liability of Brookfield, or of any director, officer, employee, contractor, agent, advisor or other representative of Brookfield, will be equal to the amounts previously paid in the two most recent calendar years by the Service Recipients pursuant to the Master Services Agreement. U.S. federal and state securities laws may impose liability under certain circumstances on persons that fail to act in good faith. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Brookfield Relationship Agreement, nothing in the Brookfield Relationship Agreement is intended to, or will, constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies that a Brookfield Account or investors may have under such laws.
Management Services
As disclosed elsewhere in this Form 20-F, the Service Provider currently provides to Brookfield Renewable management services pursuant to the Master Services Agreement. See Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement”. In addition, the Service Provider has agreed to provide investment advisory services to Brookfield Renewable, including services to certain of our group’s operating subsidiaries. To the extent that under these or any other arrangements our group is obligated to pay a base management fee (directly or indirectly through an equivalent arrangement) to the Service Provider (or any affiliate) on a portion of our group’s capital that is comparable to the base management fee, the base management fee payable for each quarter in respect thereof will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by our group’s proportionate share of the comparable base management fee (or equivalent amount) under such other arrangement for that quarter. For a detailed description of our Master Services Agreement, see Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement”. For components of the management fee, see Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement—Management Fee”.
Other Services and Arrangements
Brookfield may provide to BEPC services which are outside the scope of the Master Services Agreement under arrangements that are on market terms and conditions and pursuant to which Brookfield will receive fees. The services provided under these arrangements include financial advisory, operations and maintenance, development, operations management and other services. Pursuant to BEPC’s conflict of interest guidelines, those arrangements may require prior approval by a majority of the independent directors, which may be granted in the form of general guidelines, policies or procedures. See below under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
Rights Agreement
Brookfield Corporation entered into the Rights Agreement on July 30, 2020 with the rights agent pursuant to which Brookfield Corporation has agreed that, until July 30, 2027 (and as will be automatically renewed for successive periods of two years, unless Brookfield Corporation provides the rights agent with written notice of termination in accordance with the terms of the Rights Agreement), upon an exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares, if BEPC has not satisfied its obligation under the BEPC articles by delivering the BEP unit amount or its cash equivalent amount and BEP has not, upon its election in its sole and absolute discretion, acquired such exchanged BEPC exchangeable shares from the holder thereof and delivered the BEP unit amount, Brookfield Corporation will satisfy, or cause to be satisfy, the obligations pursuant to the BEPC articles to exchange such BEPC exchangeable shares for the BEP unit amount or its cash equivalent. Brookfield Corporation currently intends to satisfy any exchange requests on the BEPC exchangeable shares through the delivery of BEP units. In connection with the special distribution, the Master Services Agreement was also amended to provide that, so long as Brookfield Corporation is a party to the Rights Agreement, Brookfield Corporation shall have a consent right prior to the issuance by BEPC of any BEPC exchangeable shares, subject to certain exceptions. U.S. federal and state securities laws may impose liability under certain circumstances on persons that fail to act in good faith. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these agreements, nothing in these agreements is intended to, or will, constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies that a Brookfield Account or any investors may have under such laws.
Appointment of Rights Agent; Term. The rights agent has agreed to act as the rights agent for the holders, as a class and not individually, of the BEPC exchangeable shares. Pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the BEPC articles, a holder of BEPC exchangeable shares may request to exchange each BEPC exchangeable share (“subject BEPC exchangeable share”) for one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events” below)). Upon receipt of a notice of exchange, BEPC shall, within ten (10) business days after the date that the notice of exchange is received by BEPC’s transfer agent (the “specified exchange date”) deliver to the tendering holder of BEPC exchangeable shares, such BEP unit or cash amount. Pursuant to the Rights Agreement, Brookfield Corporation has agreed that, in the event that, on the applicable specified exchange date with respect to any subject BEPC exchangeable shares, (i) BEPC has not satisfied its obligation under the BEPC articles by delivering the BEP unit or cash amount and (ii) BEP has not, upon its election in its sole and absolute discretion, acquired such subject BEPC exchangeable share from the holder thereof and delivered the BEP unit or cash amount, Brookfield Corporation will satisfy, or cause to be satisfied, the obligations pursuant to the BEPC articles to exchange such subject BEPC exchangeable shares for the BEP unit amount or the cash amount. The holders of BEPC exchangeable shares have a right to receive the BEP unit amount or the cash amount in such circumstances (the “secondary exchange rights”).
The secondary exchange rights are a part of the terms of the BEPC exchangeable shares and may not be evidenced, transferred or assigned separate or apart from the BEPC exchangeable shares. The obligations of the rights agent under the Rights Agreement became effective on July 30, 2020.
This Rights Agreement will automatically renew for successive periods of two years following July 30, 2027, unless Brookfield Corporation provides the rights agent with written notice of termination in accordance with the terms of the Rights Agreement or otherwise terminated pursuant to its terms as described below.
Satisfaction of Secondary Exchange Rights. In accordance with the Rights Agreement, Brookfield Corporation has agreed to satisfy, or cause to be satisfied, the obligations with respect to the secondary exchange rights contained in the BEPC articles. The rights agent has established a collateral account, and Brookfield Corporation has contributed an amount of cash or securities in accordance with the Rights Agreement (as further described below) in order to enable the rights agent to exchange subject BEPC exchangeable shares for the cash amount or the BEP unit amount in accordance with the Rights Agreement.
In accordance with the BEPC articles, BEPC is required to deliver a notice (“BEPC notice”) to the rights agent and Brookfield Corporation on the specified exchange date if the conditions to the exercise of the secondary exchange rights with respect to any subject BEPC exchangeable shares have been satisfied. The BEPC notice must set forth the BEP unit amount and the cash amount for such subject BEPC exchangeable shares and any necessary wire transfer or other delivery instructions. Brookfield Corporation may provide notice to the rights agent by the business day immediately following receipt of the BEPC notice, providing that Brookfield Corporation has elected, in Brookfield Corporation’s sole discretion, to fund the cash amount. If the rights agent has not received such signed written notice from Brookfield Corporation, the rights agent must exchange the subject BEPC exchangeable shares for a number of BEP units held in the collateral account equal to the BEP unit amount and promptly, and in any event within two (2) business days, deliver such BEP units from the collateral account to the holder of the subject BEPC exchangeable shares. If there are not enough BEP units in the collateral account to satisfy the BEP unit amount with respect to one or more of such subject BEPC exchangeable shares, the rights agent will exchange such subject BEPC exchangeable shares for an amount of cash from the collateral account equal to the cash amount and promptly, and in any event within two (2) business days, deliver the cash amount to the holder of the subject BEPC exchangeable shares.
If the holder of the subject BEPC exchangeable shares has not received the BEP units amount or the cash amount by the specified exchange date, the holder of subject BEPC exchangeable shares may deliver, or cause to be delivered, a notice (the “exchanging BEPC shareholder notice”) to the rights agent and Brookfield Corporation. The exchanging BEPC shareholder notice must set forth the number of such subject BEPC exchangeable shares and any necessary wire transfer or other delivery instructions and be in a format that is acceptable to the rights agent. As promptly as practicable and in any event on or prior to the next business day immediately following receipt of the exchanging BEPC shareholder notice, Brookfield Corporation will provide notice to the rights agent (i) setting forth
the BEP unit amount and the cash amount for such subject BEPC exchangeable shares and (ii) either (a) providing that Brookfield Corporation has elected, in Brookfield Corporation’s sole discretion, to fund the cash amount or (b) instructing the rights agent to exchange each subject BEPC exchangeable share. Brookfield Corporation is not obligated to deliver such notice if it has determined in good faith that the conditions to the exercise of the secondary exchange right have not been satisfied. On or prior to the second business day following receipt by the rights agent of such instruction by Brookfield Corporation, the exchanging BEPC shareholder notice and the subject BEPC exchangeable shares, the rights agent will exchange such subject BEPC exchangeable shares for the BEP unit amount from the collateral account or, if there are not enough BEP units in the collateral account, for the cash amount from the collateral account.
With respect to any exchange of subject BEPC exchangeable shares, Brookfield Corporation may elect to instruct the rights agent to exchange the subject BEPC exchangeable shares for the cash amount. If Brookfield Corporation makes such an election and there is not a sufficient amount of cash in the collateral account, Brookfield Corporation must deposit the required amount into the collateral account simultaneously with such election.
In connection with the exercise by a holder of the secondary exchange right with respect to any subject BEPC exchangeable shares held through the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), or another depository, such holder will deliver to the rights agent such subject BEPC exchangeable shares pursuant to DTC’s or such other depository’s applicable procedures. In addition, such holder will deliver to the rights agent via e-mail on the business day prior to delivery of such subject BEPC exchangeable shares a copy of the exchanging BEPC shareholder notice, if applicable.
Receipt of Subject BEPC Exchangeable Shares; Withholding. Holders of subject BEPC exchangeable shares will deliver such shares free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, and should any such liens, claims and encumbrances exist with respect to such subject BEPC exchangeable shares, the holder of such subject BEPC exchangeable shares will not be entitled to exercise its secondary exchange rights with respect to such shares. Each holder of subject BEPC exchangeable shares will pay to Brookfield Corporation the amount of any tax withholding due upon the exchange of such shares and, in the event Brookfield Corporation elects to acquire some or all of the subject BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for the cash amount, will authorize Brookfield Corporation to retain a portion of the cash amount to satisfy tax withholding obligations. If Brookfield Corporation elects to acquire some or all of the subject BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for the BEP unit amount, Brookfield Corporation may elect to either satisfy the amount of any tax withholding by retaining BEP units with a fair market value equal to the amount of such obligation, or satisfy such tax withholding obligation using amounts paid by Brookfield Corporation, which amounts will be treated as a loan by Brookfield Corporation to the holder of the subject BEPC exchangeable shares, in each case, unless the holder, at the holder’s election, has made arrangements to pay the amount of any such tax withholding.
BEP Units Record Date. Each former holder of subject BEPC exchangeable shares who receives the BEP unit amount will be deemed to have become the owner of the BEP units as of the date upon which such subject BEPC exchangeable shares are duly surrendered in accordance with the Rights Agreement.
Collateral Account. Brookfield has established a non-interest -bearing trust account that is administered by the rights agent (the “collateral account”). In accordance with the terms of the Rights Agreement, Brookfield Corporation will ensure that the aggregate of (i) the BEP units in the collateral account plus the number of BEP units issuable upon conversion or redemption of BEP unit convertibles (the “collateral account BEP unit balance”) and (ii) the number of BEP units equal to the aggregate amount of cash in the collateral account divided by the value of a BEP unit (the “collateral cash balance” and, together with the collateral account BEP unit balance, the “collateral account balance”) will at all times be equal to or exceed the number of BEP units that is equal to the product of the total number of BEPC exchangeable shares outstanding (excluding those owned by Brookfield Corporation or its affiliates) multiplied by the conversion factor in accordance with the BEPC articles (the “required collateral account balance”).
If the collateral account balance is at any time less than the required collateral account balance, Brookfield Corporation will, within two (2) business days, deposit or cause to be deposited into the collateral account either (i) a number of BEP units or any security convertible into or redeemable for BEP units (other than BEPC exchangeable shares) (the “BEP unit convertibles”), or (ii) an amount of cash or cash equivalents, in each case in an amount necessary to cause the collateral account balance to be at least equal to the required collateral account balance. To
the extent that conversion or redemption of a BEP unit convertible results in the imposition of any fees, payments, premiums or penalties, such fees, payments, premiums or penalties will be borne by Brookfield Corporation or its affiliates, and must either be satisfied directly by Brookfield Corporation or such affiliates or will be deemed to reduce the collateral account balance. Brookfield Corporation must keep the rights agent informed of the collateral account balance and the required collateral account balance in writing on a regular basis, and must inform the rights agent in writing within two (2) business days of any change in the collateral account balance or the required collateral account balance for any reason, including as a result of an adjustment to the conversion factor pursuant to the BEPC articles.
Brookfield Corporation and its affiliates will not be entitled to withdraw any BEP unit or BEP unit convertible from the collateral account, except (i) if the collateral account balance exceeds the required collateral account balance, either as a result of a change in the conversion factor pursuant to the BEPC articles or a decrease in the number of BEPC exchangeable shares outstanding (excluding BEPC exchangeable shares held by Brookfield Corporation or its affiliates) or (ii) upon the deposit by Brookfield Corporation or its affiliates in the collateral account of an amount in cash or cash equivalents equal to one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of the value of the BEP units withdrawn or the number of BEP unit convertibles that are convertible into or redeemable for such BEP units.
If the collateral account contains any amount of cash in lieu of BEP units, such cash amount is required to be no less than the product of the required collateral account balance minus the collateral account BEP unit balance, multiplied by one hundred and twenty-five percent (125%) of the value of a BEP unit (the “required collateral account cash balance”). If at any time the collateral account cash balance is less than the required collateral account cash balance, Brookfield Corporation will within two (2) business days deposit or cause to be deposited cash or cash equivalents in the collateral account in an amount sufficient to cause the collateral account cash balance to be at least equal to the required collateral account cash balance.
Brookfield Corporation and its affiliates will not be entitled to withdraw any cash or cash equivalents from the collateral account, except (i) to the extent the collateral account cash balance is greater than one hundred and twenty percent (120%) of the required collateral account cash balance or (ii) upon the deposit in the collateral account of a corresponding number of BEP units or BEP unit convertibles.
Registration of BEP Units. Brookfield Corporation has agreed that if a shelf registration statement has not been effective for five (5) consecutive business days with respect to all of the BEP units in the collateral account, including BEP units issuable from time to time upon conversion of or redemption for BEP unit convertibles, and the transfer of such BEP units from the collateral account to a holder of subject BEPC exchangeable shares, Brookfield Corporation will deposit or cause to be deposited into the collateral account an amount of cash or cash equivalents equal to one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of the value of all BEP units (including BEP units issuable from time to time upon conversion of or redemption for BEP unit convertibles) held in the collateral account at such time; provided, however, no such deposit is required to the extent all of the BEP units in the collateral account, including BEP units issuable from time to time upon conversion of or redemption for BEP unit convertibles, and the transfer of such BEP units from the collateral account to a holder of subject BEPC exchangeable shares, are registered under an effective shelf registration statement (currently, such units are registered on Form F-3 (File. No. 333-237996), which was declared effective by the SEC on July 29, 2020).
Termination or Amendment. The Rights Agreement will terminate automatically on the earliest of (i) the date on which there are no BEPC exchangeable shares outstanding, other than BEPC exchangeable shares owned by Brookfield Corporation or its affiliates, (ii) written notice of termination at least 60 days prior to the expiry of the applicable term, or (iii) the affirmative consent or vote of holders of at least two-thirds (2⁄3rds) of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares not held by Brookfield, BEP or their controlled affiliates, voting as a class, and the approval of a majority of the independent directors of BEPC. Brookfield Corporation may not, without the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds (2⁄3rds) of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares not held by Brookfield Corporation, voting as a class, and the approval of a majority of the independent directors of BEPC, materially amend, modify, or alter the Rights Agreement or repeal, terminate or waive any rights under the Rights Agreement. Any amendment or modification that would reasonably be expected to impact the economic equivalence of a BEPC exchangeable share with a BEP unit requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares not held by Brookfield Corporation, the partnership or their affiliates, voting
as a class or, in the event that there is more than one non-overlapping director of BEPC, the approval of a majority of such non-overlapping directors. After the termination of the Rights Agreement, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares will continue to have all of the rights provided for in the BEPC articles but will no longer be entitled to rely on the secondary exchange rights.
Registration Rights Agreement
We entered into a registration rights agreement with BEP and Brookfield (the “Registration Rights Agreement“), pursuant to which we agreed that, upon the request of Brookfield, we will file one or more registration statements or prospectuses to register for sale and qualify for distribution under applicable securities laws any of BEPC exchangeable shares held by Brookfield. We have agreed to pay certain expenses in connection with such registration and sales and will indemnify Brookfield for material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement or prospectus.
Incentive Distributions
Brookfield’s general partner interest in BRELP, through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary BRP Bermuda GP Limited’s, entitles it to incentive distribution rights that are based on the amount by which quarterly distributions on BRELP’s units (including securities such as BEPC exchangeable shares that are the economic equivalent of a BEP unit, but excluding BRELP’s class A preferred units) exceed specified target levels. To the extent distributions on BRELP’s units (including securities such as BEPC exchangeable shares that are the economic equivalent of a BEP unit, but excluding BRELP’s class A preferred units) exceed $0.375 per quarter, the incentive distribution rights entitle BREP Holding L.P. to 15% of incremental distributions above this threshold. To the extent that distributions on BRELP’s units (including securities such as BEPC exchangeable shares that are the economic equivalent of a BEP unit, but excluding BRELP’s class A preferred units) exceed $0.4225 per quarter, the incentive distribution rights entitle BREP Holding L.P. to 25% of incremental distributions above this threshold. BRP Bermuda GP Limited may elect to reinvest any of the incentive distributions from its general partner interest in additional redeemable partnership units. The above thresholds of $0.375 and $0.4225 were reduced on the completion of the special distribution to give effect to the special distribution, to $0.300 and $0.338. The thresholds were further reduced on completion of the three-for-two stock-split to $0.200 and $0.2253. To the extent that Brookfield Renewable pays to Brookfield any comparable performance or incentive distribution, the amount of any future incentive distributions will be reduced in an equitable manner to avoid duplication of distributions.
BEPC is responsible for its proportionate share of the base management fee. Our proportionate share of the base management fee will be calculated on the basis of the value of our business relative to that of the partnership.
Indemnification Arrangements
Subject to certain limitations, Brookfield and its directors, officers, agents, members, partners, shareholders and employees generally benefit from indemnification provisions and limitations on liability that are included in the BEPC articles and other arrangements with Brookfield. See Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement—Indemnification and Limitations on Liability” and Item 6.C “Board Practices—Indemnification and Limitations on Liability”. U.S. federal and state securities laws may impose liability under certain circumstances on persons that fail to act in good faith. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these agreements, nothing in these agreements is intended to, or will, constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies that a Brookfield Account or any investors may have under such laws.
Energy Marketing Internalization
In 2018, Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield internalized all energy marketing capabilities in North America into Brookfield Renewable (the “Energy Marketing Internalization”). The Energy Marketing Internalization closed in September 2019, resulting in the transfer of Brookfield’s existing energy marketing business to Brookfield Renewable’s subsidiary, BRTM, including the marketing, purchasing and trading of energy and energy related products in North America, the provision of energy marketing services to our North American operating vehicles, and all matters incidental thereto. The Energy Marketing Internalization also resulted in the assignment of all third party energy trading contracts and certain internal related party power purchase and revenue support agreements from BEM LP to BRTM.
As part of the Energy Marketing Internalization, Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield entered into an agreement pursuant to which BRTM provides energy marketing services to Brookfield for a fee. See “Energy Marketing Agreement”.
In 2021, two long-term power purchase agreements between Brookfield and the Province of Ontario for the sale of energy generated by hydroelectric facilities owned by Great Lakes Power Limited (“GLPL”) and Mississagi Power Trust (“MPT”) were amended and assigned by Brookfield to Brookfield Renewable, and power purchase agreements between Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield pursuant to which Brookfield supported the price that Brookfield Renewable received from the sale of energy generated by GLPL and MPT were terminated. Brookfield Renewable will have an option to extend a fixed price commitment to GLPL from Brookfield from December 1, 2029 through 2044 at a price of C$60 per MWh. See also “Related Party Transactions – Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties”.
Energy Revenue Agreement
On November 23, 2011, BEM LP, a subsidiary of Brookfield Corporation, and BPUSHA, a subsidiary of BRELP that indirectly owns most of our U.S. facilities, entered into an energy revenue agreement (“Energy Revenue Agreement”) pursuant to which BEM LP agreed to support the price that BPUSHA receives for the energy generated from certain of those facilities. BEM LP agreed to pay BPUSHA each month an amount equal to the difference between the Fixed Amount and the total revenues received by BPUSHA from certain of those facilities. The “Fixed Amount” is calculated as the energy generated by those facilities multiplied by a price of $75/MWh (subject to an annual adjustment, equal to 40% of the increase in the U.S. Consumer Price Index during the previous year, but capped at a 3% increase in the fixed price per year). Should the total revenues received by these facilities from sales of electricity and all ancillary services, capacity and green credits for any month be more than the calculated Fixed Amount at the end of any month, BEM LP receives from BPUSHA an amount equal to such excess.
In the Energy Revenue Agreement, BEM LP agreed that at all times that it does not have a minimum net worth of $500 million, it will provide a guarantee or other acceptable security of a person with a minimum net worth of $500 million. This guarantee is currently being provided by Brookfield Corporation.
The Energy Revenue Agreement has an initial term of 20 years, with automatic renewals for successive 20-year periods unless 180 days before the end of the applicable term (i) both parties agree in writing not to renew the agreement or (ii) BEM LP provides written notice that the agreement shall terminate with respect to one or more facilities five years after the end of the applicable term. The Energy Revenue Agreement is subject to customary termination provisions in the event of a failure to pay or an insolvency event of BPUSHA or BEM LP.
In connection with the Energy Marketing Internalization, Brookfield and Brookfield Renewable agreed to effectively reduce the price guaranteed by Brookfield under the Energy Revenue Agreement by $3 per MWh for the period from 2021 to 2025 and by $5.03 per MWh for 2026, and BEM LP and BPUSHA agreed that the term of the Energy Revenue Agreement may be extended to 2046. The realized price on this contract between Brookfield and Brookfield Renewable was $74 per MWh in 2023.
Energy Marketing Agreement
As part of the Energy Marketing Internalization, BEM LP, a subsidiary of Brookfield Corporation, and BRTM, a subsidiary of Brookfield Renewable, entered into an energy marketing services agreement pursuant to which BRTM has agreed to provide energy marketing services to BEM LP (the “Energy Marketing Agreement”). Under the Energy Marketing Agreement, BRTM provides energy marketing services to BEM LP specifically related to the power generating facilities that are subject to the Energy Revenue Agreement. The energy marketing services provided by BRTM to BEM LP include preparing and assisting with compliance with an annual marketing plan and preparing and assisting with compliance with a risk management policy. Pursuant to the Energy Marketing Agreement, BEM LP pays BRTM a base annual marketing fee equal to $1.3 million, which is subject to increase by a specified inflation factor (with the first such increase having been made on January 1, 2020), paid in equal monthly installments. The Energy Marketing Agreement terminates on the expiry of the Energy Revenue Agreement (the term of which is currently scheduled to expire on November 23, 2031, but may be extended to 2046). The Energy Marketing Agreement is subject to customary termination provisions in the event of a failure to pay or insolvency of one of the parties.
The Energy Marketing Agreement does not prohibit BRTM or its affiliates from pursuing other business activities that compete directly or indirectly with BEM LP. For a description of related aspects of the relationship between Brookfield and Brookfield Renewable, see Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Brookfield Relationship Agreement”.
The energy marketing agreement between BEM LP and certain subsidiaries of Brookfield Renewable, pursuant to which BEM LP previously provided such subsidiaries with energy marketing services, was effectively terminated upon closing of the Energy Marketing Internalization.
Brazil Development Projects
The partnership indirectly acquired a number of early stage development projects in Brazil from Brookfield in November 2011. To further align interests and incentivize continued development success with respect to these specific projects, Brookfield received no upfront proceeds for the transfer of these projects, but is entitled to receive on commercial operation or sale of the projects, in each case if developed or sold in the 25 years following the acquisition, up to 100% of the development costs that it contributed to each project and 50% of the fair market value of the projects in excess of a priority return on each party’s invested capital. These amounts will only be payable on projects upon substantial completion or sale of the project. Fair market value means Brookfield Renewable’s, as applicable, pro rata percentage of the fair market value of a development project, as determined by the Service Provider and the independent directors of NA Holdco, on the date on which substantial completion of the development project has been achieved, or, if earlier, the date that the project is sold. With respect to these Brazil development projects, Brookfield subscribed for special shares which contain a redemption feature that provides for the reimbursement of expenses as well as the sharing of the fair market value of a given project. These development projects were transferred to our company as part of the reorganization in connection with the special distribution.
Licensing Agreement
BEPC is automatically entitled to the benefits and certain obligations under the licensing agreement that the partnership has entered into with Brookfield (the “Licensing Agreement“), by virtue of the fact that BEPC is a controlled subsidiary of the partnership. Pursuant to the Licensing Agreement, Brookfield has granted a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Brookfield” and the Brookfield logo. Other than under this limited license, BEPC does not have a legal right to the “Brookfield” name and the Brookfield logo on a global basis.
The Licensing Agreement may be terminated by the partnership upon thirty (30) days’ prior written notice if Brookfield defaults in the performance of any material term, condition or agreement contained in the agreement and the default continues for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of termination of the breach is given to Brookfield. Brookfield may terminate the Licensing Agreement effective immediately upon termination of the Master Services Agreement or with respect to any licensee upon thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of termination if any of the following occurs:
•the licensee defaults in the performance of any material term, condition or agreement contained in the agreement and the default continues for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of termination of the breach is given to the licensee;
•the licensee assigns, sublicenses, pledges, mortgages or otherwise encumbers the intellectual property rights granted to it pursuant to the Licensing Agreement;
•certain events relating to a bankruptcy or insolvency of the licensee; or
•the licensee ceases to be an affiliate of Brookfield.
A termination of the Licensing Agreement with respect to one or more licensees will not affect the validity or enforceability of the agreement with respect to any other licensee.
Agreement to Acquire Nuclear Services Operations
In November 2023, BEP, together with institutional partners, completed the acquisition of Westinghouse from Brookfield Business Partners and its institutional partners through a strategic partnership with Cameco for approximately $4.37 billion ($442 million net to Brookfield Renewable). Since BEP and Brookfield Business
Partners are both affiliates of Brookfield Corporation, Brookfield Business Partners is a “related party” of BEP and the transaction constituted a “related party transaction” of BEP as defined in MI 61-101.
BEPC Relationship with the Partnership
Each BEPC exchangeable share is structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to one BEP unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events), including identical dividends on a per share basis as are paid on each BEP unit, and is exchangeable at the option of the holder for one BEP unit (subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events) or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. The partnership and our company expect that the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares will be impacted by the market price of the BEP units and the combined business performance of our group as a whole. The partnership holds a 75% voting interest in BEPC through its holding of BEPC class B shares and owns all of the BEPC class C shares, which entitle the partnership to all of the residual value in BEPC after payment in full of the amount due to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares and subject to the prior rights of holders of BEPC preferred shares.
Credit Support
Certain subsidiaries of BEPC fully and unconditionally guarantee (i) any all present and future unsecured debt securities issued by Brookfield Renewable Partners ULC (“Canadian Finco”), in each case as to payment of principal, premium (if any) and interest when and as the same will become due and payable under or in respect of the trust indenture under which such securities are issued, (ii) the all present and future senior preferred shares of BRP Equity as to the payment of dividends when due, the payment of amounts due on redemption and the payment of amounts due on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BRP Equity, (iii) from time to time, certain of BEP’s preferred units, as to payment of distributions when due, the payment of amounts due on redemption and the payment of amounts due on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEP, and (iv) the obligations of under all present and future bilateral credit facilities established for the benefit of our group.
Subscription Agreement
BEPC has entered or will enter into subscription agreements with the partnership from time to time, pursuant to which BEPC has or will subscribe for such number of BEP units necessary to satisfy its obligations in respect of requests for exchange made by BEPC exchangeable shareholders, as and when they arise, or a redemption of BEPC exchangeable shares by BEPC, in each case at a price per BEP unit equal to the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the date that the applicable request for exchange is received by BEPC’s transfer agent, or the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the trading day immediately preceding the announcement of a redemption, as the case may be.
Subordinated Credit Facilities
BEPC has entered into two credit agreements with the partnership, one as borrower and one as lender (the “Subordinated Credit Facilities”), each providing for a ten-year revolving $1.75 billion credit facility to facilitate the movement of cash within our group. One credit facility permits BEPC to borrow up to $1.75 billion from the partnership and the other constitutes an operating credit facility that permits the partnership to borrow up to $1.75 billion from BEPC.
The Subordinated Credit Facilities are available in U.S. or Canadian dollars, and advances are made by way of SOFR, base rate, bankers’ acceptance rate or prime rate loans. In addition, each credit facility contemplates potential deposit arrangements pursuant to which the lender thereunder would, with the consent of a borrower, deposit funds on a demand basis to such borrower’s account at a reduced rate of interest.
Any amendment, modification or waiver to such credit agreements that would reasonably be expected to adversely impact the applicable borrower’s ability to use the applicable credit facility for the purpose of making distributions to BEPC, and as a result, the economic equivalence of a BEPC exchangeable share with a BEP unit, requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares not held by Brookfield or its affiliates, voting as a class or, in the event that there is more than one non-overlapping director, the approval of a majority of such non-overlapping directors.
Equity Commitment Agreement
The partnership provides to BEPC an equity commitment in the amount of $1 billion pursuant to an equity commitment agreement (the “Equity Commitment Agreement”). The equity commitment may be called by BEPC in exchange for the issuance of a number of BEPC class C shares to the partnership, corresponding to the amount of the equity commitment called divided by the volume-weighted average of the trading price for one BEPC exchangeable share on the principal stock exchange on which BEPC exchangeable shares are listed for the five (5) days immediately preceding the date of the call. The equity commitment is available in minimum amounts of $10 million and the amount available under the equity commitment will be reduced permanently by the amount so called. Before funds may be called on the equity commitment, a number of conditions precedent must be met, including that the partnership continues to control BEPC and has the ability to elect a majority of the BEPC board.
Pursuant to the Equity Commitment Agreement, BEP covenants and agrees that it will not declare or pay any distribution on the BEP units if on such date BEPC does not have sufficient funds or other assets to enable the declaration and payment of an equivalent dividend on the BEPC exchangeable shares.
Any amendment, modification or waiver to the Equity Commitment Agreement that would reasonably be expected to impact the economic equivalence of a BEPC exchangeable share with a BEP unit requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares not held by Brookfield or its affiliates, voting as a class or, in the event that there is more than one non-overlapping director, the approval of a majority of such non-overlapping directors. The equity commitment will terminate in the event that all of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares are held by Brookfield, the partnership, or their controlled affiliates.
BEPC Voting Agreements
Brookfield and the partnership have determined that it is desirable for our company to have control over certain of the partnership’s entities through which the partnership hold its interest in its operating subsidiaries. Accordingly, we have entered into voting agreements (“BEPC Voting Agreements”) to provide our company with voting rights over such entities.
Pursuant to the BEPC Voting Agreements, voting rights with respect to any of the applicable entities will be voted in accordance with the direction of our company with respect to certain matters, including: (i) the election of directors; (ii) any sale of all or substantially all of its assets; (iii) any merger, amalgamation, consolidation, business combination or other material corporate transaction, except in connection with any internal reorganization that does not result in a change of control; (iv) any plan or proposal for a complete or partial liquidation or dissolution, or any reorganization or any case, proceeding or action seeking relief under any existing laws or future laws relating to bankruptcy or insolvency; (v) any amendment to its governing documents; or (vi) any commitment or agreement to do any of the foregoing.
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
Brookfield is a global alternative asset manager with significant assets under management and a long history of owning, managing and operating assets, businesses and investment vehicles across various industries, sectors, geographies and strategies. As noted throughout this Form 20-F, a key element of the strategy of our investment activities, and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, is to leverage Brookfield’s experience, expertise, broad reach, relationships and position in the market for investment opportunities and deal flow, financial resources, access to capital markets and operating needs. Brookfield believes that this is in the best interests of Brookfield Renewable and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. However, being part of this broader platform, as well as activities of and other considerations relating to Brookfield Accounts, gives rise to actual and potential conflicts of interest between Brookfield Renewable, our shareholders and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, on the one hand, and Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts, on the other hand, that may not be managed or resolved in the most favorable manner to the interests of Brookfield Renewable and/or of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
The discussion below describes certain conflicts of interest considerations that are expected to arise between Brookfield Activities, on the one hand, and Brookfield’s management of us and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, on the other hand. These conflicts of interest are not a complete list or explanation of all actual and potential conflicts of interest that could arise. While Brookfield acts in good faith to manage or resolve conflicts considerations in a manner that is fair and equitable taking into account the facts and circumstances known to it at the time, there can be no assurance that any recommendation or determination made by Brookfield will be most beneficial or favorable to us or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, or would not have been different if
additional information were available to it. Conflicts of interest considerations generally will be managed or resolved (i) in accordance with (A) the principles summarized herein and as described in the relevant Brookfield Form ADV, and (B) Brookfield’s policies for adequately addressing conflicts of interest considerations that arise in managing its business activities, the governing documents of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and our Conflicts Protocols that have been approved by our independent directors or (ii) alternatively, in Brookfield’s sole discretion, in a manner specifically approved by our independent directors.
Brookfield’s activities include, among others: investment and asset management; managing and investing proprietary as well as insurance and reinsurance capital; sponsoring, offering and managing private and public investment vehicles that invest in the global fixed income, currency, commodity, equities, private equity and other markets; developing, constructing, owning, managing, operating and servicing real estate, renewable power, infrastructure and other companies and assets, including among others residential, commercial, storage and mixed-use real estate, data centers, transportation facilities, electric utilities, industrial and manufacturing facilities, energy companies, metals and mining companies, timberlands and agrilands, natural gas pipelines, and other assets; providing capital and financing solutions, as well as financial advisory, business development and other financial services; and other activities (collectively, “Brookfield Activities”). It is expected that Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will benefit from Brookfield’s expertise, market positioning and connectivity that arise from Brookfield Activities. At the same time, in the ordinary course of its business, Brookfield’s and other Brookfield Accounts’ interests are expected to conflict with the interests of Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, notwithstanding Brookfield’s direct or indirect participation in Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Renewable’s investments and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. While Brookfield expects that its expertise as a global real asset operator will directly impact the ability of Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest to identify, access and assess investment opportunities, and that we and the Brookfield Accounts’ investments will benefit from the greater Brookfield ecosystem, there can be no assurance of any such successful collaboration or synergies. A lack of successful collaboration or synergies, whether as a result of concerns related to conflicts or otherwise, could impact Brookfield Renewable’s ability to successfully implement its strategies or achieve its investment objectives.
As described further below under this Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Resolution of Conflicts”, our group maintains conflicts protocols, guidelines and principles (the “Conflicts Protocols”) for addressing conflicts and potential conflicts and for providing guidelines for the completion of certain transactions, and which was put in place in recognition of the benefit to Brookfield Renewable of our relationship with Brookfield and our intent to seek to maximize the benefits from this relationship. The protocols generally provide for potential conflicts to be managed or resolved on the basis of transparency and, in certain circumstances, third-party validation and approvals. Addressing conflicts of interest is complex, and it is not possible to predict all of the types of conflicts that may arise over time. Accordingly, the Conflicts Protocols focus on addressing the principal activities that are expected to give rise to potential and/or actual conflicts of interest, including our investment activities, our participation in Brookfield Accounts, transactions with Brookfield (and Brookfield Accounts), and engagements of Brookfield affiliates. Pursuant to our Conflicts Protocols, certain conflicts of interest do not require the approval of our independent directors provided they are addressed in accordance with pre-approved parameters, while other conflicts require the specific approval of our independent directors. By acquiring our BEPC exchangeable shares, each investor will be deemed to have acknowledged the existence of these actual and potential conflicts of interest and to have waived any and all claims with respect to them and any actions taken or proposed to be taken in respect of them. Conflicts may not be managed or resolved in a manner that is favourable to Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest or our shareholders. Prospective investors are encouraged to seek the advice of independent legal counsel in evaluating the conflicts involved in an investment in BEPC exchangeable shares and the operation of Brookfield Renewable.
As described elsewhere herein, we pursue investment opportunities and investments in various ways, including indirectly through investments in Brookfield Accounts or directly by investing alongside Brookfield Accounts or otherwise. Any references in this Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties” to our investments, assets, expenses, portfolio companies or other terms should be understood to mean such terms held, incurred or undertaken directly by us or indirectly by us through our investment in one or more Brookfield Accounts.
Brookfield Renewable will generally be provided with voting rights over investments that it participates in. These voting rights will be exercised by Brookfield personnel, on behalf of all Brookfield-managed vehicles that are invested in such investments alongside Brookfield Renewable. As a result, Brookfield Renewable will consolidate the underlying assets of such other Brookfield-managed vehicles into Brookfield Renewable’s financial records and calculation of its assets under management, despite the fact that Brookfield Renewable does not hold 100% of the assets of such other Brookfield-managed vehicles. Furthermore, Brookfield will rely on the financial records and calculation of assets under management prepared by Brookfield Renewable for purposes of completing its own financial records, and will not reimburse Brookfield Renewable for the expenses associated with such calculation and preparation.
ALLOCATION OF INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
•Allocation of Investment Opportunities. Brookfield provides investment advice and performs related services for itself and other Brookfield Accounts (including, among others, for its own account and/or accounts that are being seeded and/or incubated), which are similar to the advice provided and services performed by Brookfield for Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. Certain Brookfield Accounts have (and additional future Brookfield Accounts will in the future have) investment mandates that overlap with those of Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and will compete with and/or have priority over Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) in respect of particular investment opportunities, As a result, certain opportunities sourced by Brookfield that would otherwise be suitable for Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) are not expected to be available to us, we (and/or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) will receive a smaller allocation of such opportunities than would otherwise have been the case, or we will receive an allocation of such opportunities on different terms than Brookfield or other Brookfield Accounts which may be less favorable to Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) than otherwise would have been the case.
Further to the foregoing, Brookfield manages and participates in, and will in the future manage and participate in, Brookfield Accounts that have or will have overlapping investment mandates with Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). By way of example only, these include Brookfield Accounts that focus on (i) equity and debt investments in renewable power (and infrastructure) companies and assets, such as the Brookfield Infrastructure series of funds, Brookfield Super-Core Infrastructure fund, the CEE Funds, and the Brookfield Infrastructure Debt series of funds; (ii) infrastructure secondary investments, which include, among other things, third-party general partner-led recapitalizations of assets and/or investment vehicles (including closed-end funds, joint ventures and other vehicles) where the third-party general partner maintains day-to-day asset management responsibilities, investments in pooled investment vehicles managed by third parties and co-investments alongside such investment vehicles, structured solutions and/or preferred equity investments in assets managed by third-party general partners, recapitalization of third-party managed investment vehicles (in whole or in part), and related separately managed accounts, such as Brookfield Infrastructure Sponsor Solutions; (iii) startup investments in technology business and growth investments in late-stage technology-enabled service companies, such as Brookfield Technology Partners; (iv) investments in the transition to a net-zero carbon emissions global economy, such as Brookfield Global Transition Fund; (v) energy transition investments in emerging markets with higher target risk-return profiles, such as Catalytic Transition Fund; and (vi) infrastructure and infrastructure-related investments (including among others provision of capital solutions to third-parties). In addition, Brookfield expects to continue to manage and participate in new businesses and strategies, potentially including one or more Brookfield Accounts with an investment mandate of developing and/or holding renewable power assets in China. Each Brookfield Account generally has priority with respect to investment opportunities that meet its investment mandate. It is expected that Brookfield Renewable will invest in Brookfield Accounts that are deemed to be suitable and appropriate for its investment mandate, taking into account portfolio construction related considerations (including availability of capital for investment), as determined by Brookfield from time to time in its sole discretion and as approved by our independent directors.
Investment opportunities generally will be allocated pursuant to (and in accordance with) Brookfield Accounts’ investment priorities (if any). Under certain circumstances, where the investment mandate of Brookfield Renewable (or of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) overlaps with the investment mandate of one or more other Brookfield Accounts, any investment opportunity that is suitable for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield
Account in which we invest) and one or more other Brookfield Account(s) may be allocated among Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and such other Brookfield Account(s) on a basis that Brookfield determines in good faith is fair and equitable taking into account one or more factors (the “Allocation Factors”), as it deems relevant in its discretion including (among others) (i) the size, nature and type of the investment opportunity (including the risk and return profiles of the opportunity, expected holding period and other attributes) as well as its fit within each Brookfield Account’s investment focus, (ii) the nature of the investment focus, objectives, strategies and target rates of return of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and such other Brookfield Account(s), as adjusted from time to time over the life of our group (and such Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and such other Brookfield Account(s), (iii) the geographic location of the investment opportunity, and Brookfield’s determination of the appropriateness of the risks of investing in such location for Brookfield Renewable (and such Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and such other Brookfield Account(s), (iv) the relative amounts of capital available for investment, (v) principles of diversification of assets and portfolios (e.g., sector, geographic, risk and/or asset concentration considerations), (vi) expected future capacity of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and such other Brookfield Account(s), (vii) cash and liquidity needs, including for active pursuit of pipeline and staged draw investments (including funding obligations with respect to such investments that are contingent upon the achievement of certain milestones) by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and such other Brookfield Account(s), (viii) the availability of other appropriate or similar investment opportunities,(ix) the extent to which the investment professionals involved in managing Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or such other Account(s) participated in the sourcing and/or diligencing of the investment opportunity and as a result their knowledge and understanding of the investment opportunity, (x) the management of any actual or potential conflict of interest, and/or (xi) other considerations deemed relevant by Brookfield (including, among others, legal, regulatory, tax, structuring, compliance, investment-specific, timing and similar considerations). To the extent that Brookfield determines that an overlap situation is likely to be recurring for particular types of investment opportunities, Brookfield could (but will not be required to) determine to apply the Allocation Factors in accordance with a formulaic or other systematic approach for any period of time, as it deems appropriate in its sole discretion.
The determination of whether an investment is within the scope of the investment mandate of Brookfield Renewable (or of a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or is more suitable for another Brookfield Account will be made in the discretion of Brookfield. Further, if Brookfield determines that investment opportunities in respect of a particular sector (which can be comprised of multiple industries) or region are expected (in the fullness of time) to exceed the investment limitations (or appropriate portfolio concentration) of one or more Brookfield Account(s), Brookfield may sponsor, act as general partner and/or manager to, and otherwise participate in, sidecar vehicles that participate in such opportunities, and such opportunities and any investment opportunity related thereto (e.g., follow-on investment opportunities) will be allocated between Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and the applicable sidecar vehicle on a basis that Brookfield believes is fair and equitable taking into account various factors that it deems relevant in its discretion, including the Allocation Factors (which may include allocating investment opportunities in accordance with a formula or other systematic approach that Brookfield determines to be fair and equitable at the time such sector- or region-specific sidecar fund is formed).
From time to time, in applying the principles described above, Brookfield could determine that an investment opportunity will be shared among two or more Brookfield Accounts by causing one Brookfield Account to acquire certain portions of the investment opportunity while one or more other Brookfield Accounts acquire other portions. In such cases, given its varying economic interests in different Brookfield Accounts, Brookfield will face conflicts of interests in valuing portions of an investment opportunity that is allocated among different Brookfield Accounts, in particular where a portion of the opportunity is to be allocated to a Brookfield Account in which Brookfield has a larger economic interest relative to the other Brookfield Account that is participating in the opportunity. Brookfield will value the portion of the opportunity allocated to each Brookfield Account (which will impact the purchase price paid by such Brookfield Account) and allocate transaction expenses among such Brookfield Accounts in accordance with its fiduciary duties to the Brookfield Accounts, consistent with each Brookfield Account’s governing documents and Brookfield’s internal policies and procedures, in particular those relating to the underwriting and valuation of investment opportunities and allocation of fees and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Brookfield generally will not, unless otherwise required to pursuant to applicable law and/or regulation, seek independent review, opinion, support and/or appraisal for such allocation and/or valuation determinations, including in situations where Brookfield has different economic interests in the participating Brookfield Account(s). See also
“Determinations of Value” below. Among other things, if one Brookfield Account is unable to make an additional investment in a particular asset in which it has previously invested, such investment opportunity could be allocated to another Brookfield Account. In such circumstances, the liabilities (including certain expenses related to the investment) will be allocated across such Brookfield Accounts, though there may not be a clear delineation between the expenses and liabilities attributable to each Brookfield Account’s portion, and as a result, one of the Brookfield Accounts could be responsible for more than its share of any shared expenses.
The process for making allocation determinations is inherently subjective and the factors considered by Brookfield in allocating investments among Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and other Brookfield Accounts are expected to change over time (including to consider new, additional factors) and one or more different factors are likely to be emphasized or be considered less relevant with respect to different investments depending on the then-existing facts-and-circumstances deemed relevant by Brookfield and taking into account the broader facts and circumstances and portfolio construction considerations applicable to each Brookfield Account. In some cases, this will result in certain transactions being shared among two or more Brookfield Accounts, (including, for example, on a rotational, pro rata or other basis), while in other cases it will result in one or more Brookfield Accounts being excluded from an investment entirely. In some instances, Brookfield may receive new, different or additional information regarding an investment opportunity during the course of performing continued due diligence on such investment opportunity. To the extent such investment opportunity had already been allocated to one or more Brookfield Accounts pursuant to the allocation methodology described above, Brookfield is not obligated to reconsider its allocation decision, and could elect not to do so, including in cases where structuring work has already been undertaken with respect to the initial allocation or changing the allocation would otherwise be costly or burdensome.
Since certain Brookfield Accounts represent Brookfield's proprietary investments activities, the fact that investment opportunities deemed unsuitable for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could be pursued by Brookfield itself presents a conflict of interest when making such suitability determination. Brookfield will make such suitability determination in a manner consistent with its fiduciary duties to Brookfield Renewable (and/or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), but will not be required to disclose to the board of directors or the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares the specific instances in which Brookfield has pursued an investment on a proprietary basis after having deemed it unsuitable for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). Additionally, from time to time, Brookfield may identify an investment opportunity that could otherwise be suitable for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), but which, as a result of the particular facts and circumstances surrounding such investment opportunity at such time, Brookfield determines is not appropriate for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and instead invests on its own behalf (for example, if such investment opportunity falls within a sector, industry or geography that is relatively new to Brookfield and therefore Brookfield determines it does not have sufficient expertise, knowledge or scale to invest prudently on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest)). In such cases, subsequent similar investment opportunities could be allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), even when the original similar investment opportunities were pursued by Brookfield on a proprietary basis.
In addition, it is possible that there will be a period of time when both a successor Brookfield Account (in which we invest) and a predecessor fund of such Brookfield Account (in which we have a different level of investment) have capital available to make new investments, particularly because the predecessor Brookfield Account will have recycled capital available to invest. In such instances, Brookfield will determine the extent to which the predecessor account will invest such available capital (including reinvest its recycled capital) in new investments, which could result in investments being allocated to the predecessor account, rather than the successor account, using its available capital in order to make such investments. Brookfield will make such determinations and allocate investments among successor and predecessor accounts taking into account the factors described above (including, in particular, the pipeline of investment opportunities, recycled capital and portfolio construction considerations). In making such allocation decisions, Brookfield may allocate an investment opportunity to a predecessor account even if such opportunity could have been allocated entirely to the successor account, or may, in its discretion, allocate an investment opportunity to both accounts on a shared basis. Decisions to allocate an investment opportunity among predecessor and successor accounts (or both) will be made at the time the investment opportunity arises, and, in
Brookfield’s discretion, may or may not be revisited in the event of further developments in investment diligence, pipeline attrition, changes in available capital and other factors.
Moreover, it is possible that prospective investment opportunities may be re-allocated (in whole or in part) among Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Account(s) in which we invest) in circumstances that, due to timing (e.g., a delay of certain regulatory approvals or other third party consents) or other considerations, such prospective investment opportunity becomes more suitable for a different Brookfield Account than the one it was originally allocated (or expected to be allocated) to, as determined by Brookfield in its discretion. In such circumstances, if a Brookfield Account is ultimately allocated the full investment opportunity, and such investment is completed, then such Brookfield Account will reimburse the Brookfield Account that was originally allocated (or expected to be allocated) the opportunity for deposits or other costs or expenses incurred. However, in the instance that such prospective investment opportunity is not completed, both Brookfield Accounts will bear the costs actually borne by them in connection with such prospective investment opportunity.
Further, Brookfield may be offered a future investment opportunity related to, or arising from, an existing investment (including opportunities that align with and/or are otherwise synergistic with existing investments), and such future investment opportunity may be allocated to a different Brookfield Account than the one that holds the original investment (which could be Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) because of timing (e.g., too late in the term of the Brookfield Account in which we are invested) or it is otherwise capped from pursuing follow-on investments. These subsequent investments may dilute or otherwise adversely affect the interests of the Brookfield Account that holds the existing investment (including Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest)).
As a result of the foregoing, opportunities sourced by Brookfield that would otherwise be suitable for Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest may not be available to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) in their entirety and/or Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may receive a smaller allocation of such opportunities than would otherwise have been the case. See “Allocation of Co-Investments” below. Approval from holders of BEPC exchangeable shares or of the independent directors will not be required in connection with such allocation determinations. However, as noted throughout this Form 20-F, it is a key element of Brookfield Renewable’s strategy to leverage Brookfield’s experience, expertise, broad reach, relationships and position in the market for investment opportunities, deal flow, financial resources, access to capital markets and operating needs, which we believe is in the best interests of Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
For the avoidance of doubt, any investment opportunity allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may not ultimately be made by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), or may be made in an amount that was less than initially allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), due to portfolio construction or other similar considerations (including the time remaining under the Brookfield Account’s term, the availability of capital (or lack thereof), any applicable investment limitations or other concentration considerations), as determined by Brookfield in its discretion. As a result, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may not invest the full amount of any investment opportunity that was allocated to it.
From time to time, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may fund deposits or incur other costs and expenses in respect of an investment opportunity that is ultimately shared with or made entirely by another Brookfield Account. In such cases, such other Brookfield Account would be expected to reimburse Brookfield Renewable (or the applicable Brookfield Account in which we invest) for such deposits or other costs or expenses. Any such reimbursements are expected, but not guaranteed, to include interest and other expenses related to borrowings, regardless of whether Brookfield Renewable (or the applicable Brookfield Account in which we invest) actually borrowed to fund such deposit or other costs or expenses, which interest will generally be set at a rate aligned with such Brookfield Account’s loan facility, the preferred return of such Brookfield Account or another rate determined by Brookfield to be reasonably applicable (which rate may be higher or lower than the rate applicable to the reimbursing Brookfield Account’s loan facility). The approval of investors, the Managing General Partner’s independent directors and/or Brookfield Accounts’ limited partner advisory committees will not be required in connection with such transactions.
•Incentive to Allocate Investment Opportunities to Co-Investment Vehicles and Other Brookfield Accounts. Brookfield will generally have different economic interests in different Brookfield Accounts, including among other things because certain Brookfield Accounts are wholly-owned by Brookfield; Brookfield makes different capital commitments to different Brookfield Accounts; certain Brookfield Accounts pay carried interest at different rates, and/or are more (or less) likely to generate any carried interest at all (or to generate carried interest earlier (or later) in time; and/or because certain Brookfield Accounts charge management fees that are calculated based on their amount of capital deployed. As a result, there could be circumstances in which the aggregate economic benefit to Brookfield from allocating an investment opportunity in whole or in part to another Brookfield Account (including, for example, a co‑investment vehicle) is (or is expected to be) greater than if the particular investment were allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). For example, Brookfield is not required to offset certain transaction fees, break-up fees and other fees against management fees charged to certain co-investment vehicles. Similarly, given its varying economic interests in different Brookfield Accounts, Brookfield will face conflicts of interests in valuing portions of an investment opportunity that is allocated among different Brookfield Accounts, in a particular where a portion of the opportunity is to be allocated to a Brookfield Account in which Brookfield has a significantly larger economic interest relative to the other Brookfield Account that is participating in the opportunity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Brookfield will make allocation and valuation decisions in accordance with its fiduciary duties to Brookfield Accounts, consistent with each Brookfield Account’s governing documents and Brookfield’s internal policies and procedures.
In addition, Brookfield anticipates entering into formal or informal arrangements (including with one or more co-investors and/or strategic investors) pursuant to which Brookfield benefits economically, directly or indirectly, from offering co-investment opportunities to such investors. Such arrangements will grant certain rights not offered to other investors, including, (a) reducing fees and/or incentive compensation (or providing a rebate thereof) in respect of their investment in a Brookfield Account and (b) offering priority co-investment opportunities alongside a Brookfield Account with a minimum target allocation and reducing fees and/or incentive compensation (or providing a rebate thereof) where such minimum targets are not met. In connection with such arrangements, Brookfield could agree to provide reduced fees and/or incentive compensation (or a rebate thereof), including in respect of such investors’ investments in Brookfield Accounts, in the instance that such investor is not allocated its full allocation of co-investment opportunities. As a result of any such circumstances, in certain circumstances Brookfield will be incentivized to allocate a greater portion of an investment opportunity to a co-investor than it would otherwise allocate in the absence of such economic circumstances. In addition, Brookfield’s allocation of any co-investment opportunities could benefit Brookfield in other ways, including increased investments by such investors in one or more Brookfield Accounts
•Allocation of Co-Investments. Investing in Brookfield Renewable (and our investment in any Brookfield Account) does not entitle any shareholder to co-investment opportunities, and holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP’s unitholders will not have any right to receive co-investments. Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP’s unitholders will generally be exposed to co-investment opportunities only indirectly to the extent a Brookfield Account in which we invest allocates a co-investment opportunity to Brookfield Renewable.
To the extent Brookfield determines, in its discretion, that an investment opportunity that is to be offered to and executed by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), in accordance with “Allocation of Investment Opportunities” above, exceeds the amount appropriate for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), which will, in some cases, as determined by Brookfield in its discretion, be less than the maximum concentration permitted under the relevant Brookfield Account’s governing agreement, Brookfield may, in its sole and absolute discretion, offer to one or more investors and/or third parties, including, in each case, Brookfield Accounts, Brookfield Renewable (as an investor in a Brookfield Account), or Brookfield employees, the ability to participate in such opportunity as a co-investor on such terms and conditions as Brookfield determines. In addition, Brookfield could offer and in the past has offered potential co-investment opportunities to investors that are potentially of strategic benefit to the applicable investment opportunity, including Brookfield Renewable (as an investor in a Brookfield Account) and/or other Brookfield Accounts (collectively, “Strategic Co‑Investors”). Co-investment opportunities may be offered to Strategic Co-Investors irrespective of whether the
available investment opportunity exceeds the amount that would otherwise be appropriate for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), and therefore, participation of a Strategic Co‑Investor will reduce the amount of the investment opportunity available to Brookfield Renewable (or that Brookfield Account)
Where Brookfield determines to offer a co-investment opportunity to one or more investors and/or one or more third parties (including, in each case, Brookfield Accounts, our group (as an investor in a Brookfield Account) or Brookfield employees), Brookfield generally has broad discretion in determining to whom and in what relative amounts to allocate co-investment opportunities. Co-investment opportunities may, and typically will, be offered to some but not other investors or to third parties who are not investors (including, in each case, Brookfield Accounts, Brookfield Renewable (as an investor in a Brookfield Account) or Brookfield employees). To the extent Brookfield determines to allocate co-investment opportunities to investors, decisions regarding whether and to which investors to offer co-investment opportunities are made at the discretion of Brookfield and will be based on a number of factors, including an investor’s expressed interest in co-investments, the size of an investor’s capital commitment to Brookfield Accounts, an investor’s willingness to pay fees, carry or broken deal expenses, whether an investor has a history of participating in co-investment opportunities with Brookfield, whether an investor has demonstrated, or has the potential to demonstrate, a long-term and/or continuing commitment to the potential success of Brookfield and/or Brookfield Accounts, an investor’s contractual rights (if any) to co-investment opportunities that are made available, the jurisdiction of the investor, the investor’s impact on tax, regulatory, legal and similar considerations, the overall strategic value to Brookfield of offering a co-investment opportunity to such investor, and Brookfield’s assessment of an investor’s ability to timely execute and fund the co-investment opportunity. A decision regarding the allocation of a co-investment opportunity will be made based on the then-existing facts-and-circumstances and then-existing factors deemed relevant by Brookfield in its sole discretion (including factors that require subjective decision-making by Brookfield), and could be different from those used in determining the allocation of any other co-investment opportunity, including based on tax, regulatory, legal and similar considerations. For the avoidance of doubt, Brookfield and Brookfield Renewable will generally be offered co-investment opportunities directly and/or in their capacity as investors in Brookfield Accounts, and Brookfield’s portion of any co-investment opportunity may be made through any affiliate, Brookfield Insurance Account or Oaktree Account (as defined below).,
To the extent potential co-investors determine not to participate in a co-investment opportunity offered to them, there may be excess opportunity available. In such circumstances, Brookfield will allocate such excess in its sole discretion and Brookfield Accounts (including our group) and/or other co-investors, including investors who are not investors in the relevant Brookfield Account, may assume such excess in lieu of offering it to other investors (including Brookfield Renewable). Conversely, Brookfield (on behalf of our group) and/or other potential co-investors may determine that they will not, or cannot, participate (either at all or up to their full proportionate amount) in a co-investment opportunity offered to them. As a result, our group’s aggregate percentage interest in certain investments may be different than its proportionate share of the applicable Brookfield Account had it only satisfied the Brookfield Commitment with respect to such investments. Brookfield also may assign Brookfield Renewable’s right to participate in a co-investment opportunity to any other individual or entity, including other Brookfield Accounts.
In addition, but subject to the foregoing, Brookfield may also, without notice to the investors or the Managing General Partner’s independent directors, determine to provide priority rights with respect to all or a select geographic, industry or other subset of co-investment opportunities generally to certain investors (including other Brookfield Accounts, but not to Brookfield Renewable and/or other similarly situated investors) pursuant to contracts or other arrangements with such investors. Brookfield may form and manage one or more investment vehicles or accounts through which investors participate in co-investment opportunities. Inclusion in, and the terms of, such a program will be determined by Brookfield in its discretion, which may include some or all of the factors described above. Except to the extent an investor has entered into an agreement with Brookfield pursuant to which Brookfield has granted such investor a right with respect to co-investment opportunities, investors should be aware that they have no such right, and should not expect that they will be offered any co-investment opportunities.
The allocation of a co-investment opportunity may give rise to certain additional potential conflicts of interest, including that Brookfield may allocate such co-investment opportunity in a manner that benefits Brookfield other than as a result of receiving fees and/or incentive compensation from a co-investor (including by allocating such co-investment opportunity to a person in order to encourage such person to enter into a relationship with, or expand its relationship, with Brookfield) and that, if the co-investment opportunity is granted with respect to an existing
investment, the amount paid directly or indirectly by investors participating in such co-investment opportunity to Brookfield in respect of such investment will be determined by Brookfield.
Historical allocation decisions are not necessarily indicative of future allocation decisions and the actual number of co-investment opportunities made available to Brookfield Renewable directly or indirectly as an investor in Brookfield Accounts may be significantly higher or lower than those made available to it historically. In addition, in certain circumstances Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) will bear costs related to unconsummated co-investments. See “Co-Investment Expenses” and “Facilitation of Investments and Co-Investments” below. Notwithstanding the foregoing incentives, Brookfield endeavors at all times to allocate co-investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner consistent with its fiduciary duties and disclosures set out in the relevant Brookfield Account’s governing documents.
Brookfield Renewable’s returns with respect to co-investment opportunities may exceed its returns generally, or with respect to the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest or other specific investments made by such Brookfield Accounts, particularly for co-investment opportunities whose investments are not subject to any (or are subject to reduced) management fees, carry distributions or similar compensation payable to Brookfield. Additionally, the form of consideration paid by co-investors may be different from the form of consideration paid by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) in connection with a co-investment opportunity (for example, the co-investors and/or our group (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may participate in the investment using securities), which would also be expected to create conflicts of interest.
In addition, there is no requirement that any co-investment be made or disposed of at the same time or on the same terms for each co-investor or those of the relevant Brookfield Account. For example, investors (including Brookfield Renewable) may participate in co‑investment opportunities at different times (e.g., Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could provide interim debt or equity financing or otherwise facilitate a co-investment in advance of co-investors’ participation in such co-investment opportunity), which will impact returns realized by co-investors. When Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) holds an investment alongside co-investors, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may also provide certain guarantees under financing or refinancing arrangements (including non-recourse carve-out, environmental, and interest and expenses guarantees) on behalf of the entire investment, while co-investors may bear their pro rata shares of any amounts to be paid via such guarantees through a backstop indemnity to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). If such a guarantee is required to be funded, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) will be responsible for the entire amount and will separately be required to seek to collect the co-investor’s portion from the co-investment vehicle. In some cases, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may make a follow-on investment with respect to an investment (or an investment may otherwise seek to raise additional capital) and co-investors or other Brookfield Accounts that have also participated in the investment may elect not to participate in such follow-on investment or capital raise or may not be offered the opportunity to participate in such follow-on investment or capital raise. Furthermore, in connection with a co-investment, co-investors may receive certain governance rights, minority protections and/or additional liquidity rights that would not otherwise be afforded to the investors in respect of their investment in such co-investment opportunity through Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest).
In the event Brookfield and/or Brookfield Renewable participates in co-investment opportunities, Brookfield may determine that it and/or Brookfield Renewable (as applicable) fund all or a portion of its capital contributions in respect thereof using securities without the consent of any other co-investors. Brookfield will make such determination with respect to the form of its and/or Brookfield Renewable’s funding in its sole discretion, taking into account factors it deems relevant under the circumstances and with a view to facilitating the consummation of the applicable transaction, including, but not limited to: (a) whether the relevant Brookfield Account and its co-investors are capable of funding the applicable investment in cash, (b) whether the applicable contribution of securities is expected to be attractive to the seller of the applicable asset, and/or (c) whether the applicable contribution of securities is expected to be accretive to the applicable co-investor(s). Such determination to fund using securities may be in Brookfield’s interest alone, as opposed to the interests of the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares, BEP’s unitholders and other co-investors, and it is possible that such determination could lead to adverse consequences, including a lower likelihood of transaction execution and/or a higher purchase price for the asset. Brookfield, in its sole discretion, will determine the value of its contributed securities, which could be based
on the volume weighted average price of the shares over a certain period of time, the closing price of the shares as of the applicable transaction closing date, or such other valuation it deems fair and reasonable under the circumstances. See also “Allocation of Investment Opportunities” above and “Determinations of Value” below. Furthermore, in the event that a Brookfield Account (including Brookfield Renewable) participates in co-investment opportunities, Brookfield may determine to not dispose of their portion of such co-investment at the same time or on the same terms as other investors (including Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), which may create conflicts of interests. For example, if Brookfield determines to sell one Brookfield Account’s investment later than Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), when selecting a potential purchaser of the applicable investment for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), Brookfield may be incentivized (as a result of its interest as a co-investor) to take into consideration any such purchaser’s strategic value to the applicable portfolio company and the impact on the future value of the portfolio company rather than solely obtaining the highest purchase price in respect of the interests of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) interests. Further, Brookfield determining to hold a Brookfield Account’s interest in a portfolio company for longer than Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may result in a smaller pool of potential buyers or a decreased purchase price as a result of potential buyers being required to buy less than all of the applicable portfolio company and to have a large minority owner post-acquisition. While Brookfield believes that such conflicts are mitigated by its significant commitment to Brookfield Renewable (and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and its potential entitlement to an incentive allocation/carried interest that is tied to the performance of Brookfield Renewable (and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), such conflicts of interest are nonetheless present.
•Co-Investment Expenses.Co-investors (including (a) third-party co-investors that invest in a co-investment opportunity offered by Brookfield Renewable, and (b) Brookfield Renewable to the extent it co-invests in an opportunity offered by a Brookfield Account in which it invests) will typically bear their pro rata share of fees, costs and expenses related to their co-investments, including those incurred in connection with the discovery, investigation, development, acquisition or consummation, ownership, maintenance, monitoring, hedging, financing and disposition of their co-investments.
Brookfield will endeavor to allocate such fees, costs and expenses among Brookfield Renewable and its co-investors (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest and its co-investors, including Brookfield Renewable) on a pro rata basis. Notwithstanding the foregoing, third-party co-investors (including co-investors that contractually committed to participate in the co-investment opportunity through a co-investment vehicle or program managed by Brookfield) are generally not expected to pay or otherwise bear fees, costs and expenses related to unconsummated co-investment opportunities (collectively referred to as “broken deal fees, costs and expenses”) and, in such cases, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) is likely to bear fees, costs and expenses attributable to potential co-investors even if Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could not (for investment concentration limits or otherwise) complete the full investment on its own. This will be the case for a number of reasons, including because, at the time that the co-investment opportunity ceases to be pursued, third-party co-investors (a) were not yet identified (or their anticipated allocation was not yet identified), (b) were not yet committed to the potential investment, or (c) did not contractually agree to bear such fees, costs and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in all instances, Brookfield (in its capacity as a co-investor or prospective co-investor alongside Brookfield Renewable) and Brookfield Renewable (in its capacity as a co-investor or prospective co-investor alongside a Brookfield Account in which it invests) will bear their pro rata share of broken deal fees, costs and expenses based on the amount they committed to co-invest as of the time a binding offer is made with respect to the potential investment. For the avoidance of doubt, Brookfield (in its capacity as a co-investor or prospective co-investor alongside Brookfield Renewable) and Brookfield Renewable (in its capacity as a co-investor or prospective co-investor alongside a Brookfield Account in which it invests) will not bear the broken-deal fees, costs and expenses relating to (a) any portion of an excess opportunity that it agrees to support (via a backstop or similar arrangement) with a view to syndication of such portion of the excess opportunity to third-party co-investors, and (b) its pro-rata share of an investment opportunity in its capacity as co-investor or prospective co-investor to the extent the opportunity ceases to be pursued prior to a binding offer in respect of the opportunity having been made.
•Facilitation of Investments and Co-Investments. From time to time, in order to facilitate investment activities in a timely and efficient manner, Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable or another Brookfield
Account will fund deposits or incur other costs and expenses (including, among other things, by use of loan facilities and/or issuance of guarantees or letters of credit) in respect of an investment that ultimately will be shared with or made entirely by Brookfield Renewable, another Brookfield Account (including a Brookfield Account in which we invest), or co-investors and/or Brookfield and/or our group (including a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could fund obligations and/or incur other costs and expenses in order to facilitate an investment that is ultimately shared with co-investors. These financing arrangements are provided to facilitate investments that Brookfield has determined to be in our best interests (or the best interests of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). But for these forms of support, Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest could lose access to investment opportunities (if, for example, a Brookfield Account has not yet completed its fundraising and has insufficient capital to consummate the opportunity, or if co-investors have not yet been identified for an excess investment opportunity). Brookfield believes that facilitating investments in this manner and by investors that are part of Brookfield’s platform or that have demonstrated a consistent and long-term commitment to Brookfield (including Brookfield Renewable and other Brookfield Accounts) provides benefits overall to Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and improves the attractiveness of our units through the ability to participate in and benefit from these synergistic arrangements. These arrangements, however, give rise to conflicts of interest considerations.
Under these arrangements, the relevant ultimate investor (whether Brookfield Renewable, another Brookfield Account or co‑investors) will be expected to reimburse the relevant financing provider (whether Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable or another Brookfield Account) for the deposits and other fees, costs and expenses incurred, as well as carrying charges applicable to such funding activity pursuant to the terms agreed to with such investor. Such investor is expected to repay any amounts that come due and payable under loan facilities or letters of credit issued for its benefit, although there can be no assurance that any such investor will bear such fees, costs and expenses or not default on its obligations to repay such amounts, in which case, such amounts would be borne disproportionately by the financing provider. In certain situations, such as short-term funding durations, these arrangements will not include any interest or other compensation payable to the party funding the investment, as deemed appropriate by Brookfield, in its discretion, under the circumstances.
From time to time, Brookfield will agree to support via a backstop (or similar arrangement) a portion of an excess investment opportunity that has been allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) to facilitate the closing of such investment, with a view to syndication of such backstopped portion of the excess investment opportunity to third-party co-investors prior to or following closing. Brookfield’s backstopped portion of the investment opportunity will be reduced to the extent the investment is further syndicated to third-party co-investors or additional proceeds from the investment become available (for example, Brookfield Renewable (or the Brookfield Account in which we invest) could use debt proceeds on the investment or proceeds from the sale of a portion of the investment to reduce Brookfield’s backstopped portion).
In certain situations, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) will close the investment transaction (in whole or in part) using funding from its loan facilities (or similar credit arrangements) prior to the completion of syndication to co-investors, and Brookfield will take nominal ownership of its backstopped portion of the investment at such time. Brookfield (or a third-party co-investor) will repay its pro rata portion of the amounts that come due and payable under such loan facilities in connection with the backstopped portion of the investment from such closing date. Alternatively, in situations where Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) is not able to close on Brookfield’s backstopped portion of the investment transaction (in whole or in part) using funding from its loan facilities (or similar credit arrangements) prior to the completion of syndication to co-investors, Brookfield could choose to fund the backstopped portion (in whole or in part) at closing. To the extent Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) becomes able to use funding from its loan facilities, we (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may reimburse Brookfield (via a loan or a similar financing arrangement) for the backstopped portion of the investment that Brookfield has already funded on equivalent terms as if such backstopped portion had been paid using funding from the loan facilities at closing. In addition, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) is permitted to provide interim debt or equity financing (including among others emergency funding or as part of a follow-on investment) for the purpose of bridging a potential co-investment or a follow-on investment related to an existing co‑investment (including prior to allocating and/or syndicating the co-investment or follow-on investment, as applicable, to co-
investors) but only to the extent that Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) would have been permitted to make such investment. In connection with any such financing, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could incur fees, costs and expenses, including among others in connection with borrowing and/or hedging activities (e.g., hedging of currency, interest rate or other exposures). To the extent the potential investment is not consummated, these fees, costs and expenses will be treated as broken deal fees, costs and expenses (see “Co-Investment Expenses” above). In addition, to the extent the investment is consummated, the terms of the sale or transfer of such investment to co-investors may not be favorable to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and may result in better terms for such co-investors than Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) had when it made (or facilitated) the investment. For example, there is no guarantee that any co-investor will ultimately agree to bear its pro rata portion of the fees, costs and/or expenses associated with any such hedging or borrowing activities, in which case Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) would bear a greater amount of expenses than if they were allocated on a pro rata basis. Similarly, if an investment depreciates during the period when Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) holds it, co-investors may negotiate a lower price and we (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may take a loss on the portion of an investment we were holding on behalf of (or with a view to syndication to) co-investors (including with respect to fees, costs and expenses and/or carry costs related to an investment). In these types of situations, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may nonetheless sell the investment to co-investors on the terms negotiated (and agreed to with) by such co-investors at the relevant time in the event that Brookfield determines it is in our best interest, for example out of a desire to reduce our exposure to such investment or to include other participants in the investment.
•Client and Other Relationships. Brookfield and Oaktree (as defined below) each have long-term relationships with a significant number of developers, institutions, corporations and other market participants and their advisers (collectively, “Brookfield Client Relationships”). These Brookfield Client Relationships may hold or may have held investments similar to the investments that are held and pursued by Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, including certain investments that may represent appropriate investment opportunities for Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. These Brookfield Client Relationships may compete with Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) for investment opportunities. Brookfield will seek to maintain such Brookfield Client Relationships, including after the establishment of new Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. In determining whether to pursue a particular opportunity on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), our company could consider these relationships, and there may be certain potential opportunities which are not pursued on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) in view of such relationships. In addition, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could invest or enter into joint ventures or other similar arrangements with Brookfield Client Relationships in particular investments, and the relationship with such clients may influence the decisions made by our company with respect to such investments.
•Conflicts with Secondary Funds. Brookfield sponsors, manages and invests in certain Brookfield Accounts that focus on making secondary investments (such Brookfield Accounts, “Secondary Funds”), including investments in pooled investment vehicles managed by third parties (“Third Party Vehicles”), recapitalizations of Third Party Vehicles and related investments (collectively, “Secondary Investments”). These Secondary Investments are subject to significant governance, control and/or minority protection rights in favor of the Secondary Funds. Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and their portfolio investments are expected to compete with such Third Party Vehicles for investment opportunities and are expected to manage competing assets. For example, in a competitive auction process, the Third Party Vehicles, on the one hand, and Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, on the other hand, could be potential bidders. Similarly, a Third-Party Vehicle could invest in an asset that competes with an asset held by Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest for market share or other matters.
In order to mitigate potential conflicts of interest in these situations, Brookfield may but will not be obligated to take one or more of the following actions (as it determines in its sole discretion): (i) causing the Secondary Fund to remain passive in, or recuse itself from, a situation in which it is otherwise entitled to vote, which would mean that the Secondary Fund defers to the decision or judgment of the Third Party Vehicles or third-party investor(s) in its
managed vehicles with respect to certain decisions; (ii) causing the Secondary Fund to hold only non-controlling interests in an investment without governance rights; (iii) referring the matter to one or more persons that is not affiliated with Brookfield; (iv) consulting with and seeking the consent of Brookfield Renewable’s independent directors, the advisory committee of the Brookfield Account in which we are invested, the limited partners of the Secondary Fund and/or the advisory committee of the Secondary Fund (as deemed appropriate by Brookfield) on such matter; or (v) establishing ethical screens or information barriers (which can be temporary and of limited purpose) designed to separate Brookfield investment professionals to act independently on behalf of the Secondary Fund, on the one hand, and Brookfield Renewable and/or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, on the other hand, in each case with support of separate legal counsel and other advisers.
At all times, Brookfield will endeavor to treat all Brookfield Accounts fairly, equitably and in an impartial manner. However, there can be no assurance that any action or measure pursued by Brookfield will be feasible or effective in any particular situation, or that its own interests won’t influence its conduct, and it is possible that the outcome for the Brookfield Account will be less favorable than otherwise would have been the case if Brookfield did not face these conflicts of interest. In addition, the actions and measures that Brookfield pursues are expected to vary based on the particular facts and circumstances of each situation and, as such, there will be some degree of variation and potentially inconsistency in the manner in which these situations are addressed.
•Pursuit of Investment Opportunities by Certain Non-Controlled Affiliates. Certain companies affiliated with Brookfield (a) are controlled, in whole or in part, by persons other than Brookfield or entities controlled by it, including, for example, joint ventures or similar arrangements with third parties where Brookfield does not have complete control or (b) do not coordinate or consult with Brookfield with respect to investment decisions (together, “Non-Controlled Affiliates”). Such Non-Controlled Affiliates are likely to have investment objectives which overlap with Brookfield Renewable’s or Brookfield Accounts’ in which we invest’s investment objectives and conflicts are likely to arise therefrom. For example, from time to time such Non-Controlled Affiliates or investment vehicles managed by such Non-Controlled Affiliates will pursue investment opportunities which are suitable for Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest but which are not made available to us or such Brookfield Accounts since such Non-Controlled Affiliates do not consult with and/or are not controlled by Brookfield.
CONFLICTS RELATING TO INVESTMENTS
As noted throughout this Form 20-F, Brookfield Renewable is expected to benefit from its affiliation with Brookfield and Brookfield’s expertise and resources. Brookfield believes that operating within its integrated investment platform is in the best interests of all of its clients, including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. However, being part of the broader Brookfield platform gives rise to actual and potential conflicts.
•Advice to Other Brookfield Accounts May Conflict with Brookfield Renewable’s Interests. In light of the extensive scope of Brookfield’s investment and related business activities: (i) Brookfield and its personnel will give advice, and take actions, with respect to current or future Brookfield Accounts (including proprietary accounts of Brookfield) that could compete or conflict with the advice Brookfield gives to Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested, or that will involve a different timing or nature of action than that taken with respect to Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested, and (ii) investments by Brookfield Accounts and/or Brookfield could have the effect of diluting or otherwise disadvantaging the values, prices and/or investment strategies of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested. For example, when another Brookfield Account either manages or implements a portfolio decision ahead of, or contemporaneously with, portfolio decisions for Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable is invested, market impact, liquidity constraints and/or other factors could result in us receiving less favorable results, paying higher transaction costs, or being otherwise disadvantaged.
In making certain decisions with regard to our investments or those of Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested that compete with or differ from the interests of one or more other Brookfield Accounts, Brookfield could face certain conflicts of interest between the interests of Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested) and the interests of such other Brookfield Accounts. These potential conflicts will be exacerbated in situations where Brookfield is entitled to higher fees from other Brookfield Accounts than from us
and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested, where portfolio managers making an allocation decision are entitled to higher performance-based compensation from other Brookfield Accounts than from us and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested, where Brookfield (and/or the Related-Party Investor) has larger proprietary investments in other Brookfield Accounts than in Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested, or where there are capacity constraints with respect to a particular strategy or opportunity as a result of, for example, position limits and/or regulatory reporting obligations applicable to Brookfield. In addition, as an investment changes over time, additional conflicts of interest are expected to arise, including as a result of earlier investment allocation decisions. Brookfield will determine the appropriate investment decision for Brookfield Renewable, each Brookfield Account in which we are invested, and other Brookfield Accounts taking into account the mandate and interests of such accounts (where applicable) and, when applicable, in accordance with Brookfield’s investment allocation protocols and such Brookfield Accounts’ governing documents. The investment and divestment decisions made with respect to other Brookfield Accounts may be made without regard to the interests of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested, even where such decisions are informed by our (direct or indirect) investment activities and/or adversely affect us (directly or indirectly).
In addition, certain Brookfield Accounts (and/or portfolio companies of such Brookfield Accounts) may provide investment banking and other advisory services to third parties with respect to assets in which Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may be invested or seek to invest. The interests of such Brookfield Accounts (and/or portfolio companies of such Brookfield Accounts) in such circumstances could conflict with those of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), and Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could compete with such Brookfield Accounts in pursuing certain investments.
Different business units and teams within Brookfield may take views, and make decisions or recommendations, that are different than other areas of Brookfield. Different portfolio management teams within Brookfield may make decisions or take (or refrain from taking) actions with respect to Brookfield Accounts they advise in a manner that may be different than or adverse to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). Such teams might not share information with the portfolio management team of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), including as a result of certain information barriers. See “Integrated Investment Platform, Information Sharing and related Trading Restrictions” below.
In particular, Brookfield Accounts that focus on making secondary investments are expected to invest in Third Party Vehicles. While such Brookfield Accounts are expected to negotiate for certain control rights over (and to offer strategic advice to) such Third Party Vehicles, such Third Party Vehicles will not be “Brookfield Accounts” and will not be considered “affiliates” of Brookfield for purposes of the provisions of the governing documents that limit the ability of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) to transact with Brookfield affiliates. As a result, Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) will not be restricted from purchasing investments from, selling investments to, or otherwise transacting with or alongside such third-party funds or other investment vehicles. The interests of such Brookfield Accounts and the Third Party Vehicles in which they invest may conflict with those of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), including in circumstances in which such other Brookfield Accounts exercise (or decline to exercise) control rights over, or otherwise offer strategic advice to, such Third Party Vehicles in a manner that differs from Brookfield’s advice to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest).
•Allocation of Personnel. Brookfield will devote such time as it deems necessary to conduct the business affairs of Brookfield Renewable and each Brookfield Account in which we invest in an appropriate manner. However, the various teams and personnel working on one Brookfield Account will also work on matters related to other Brookfield Accounts. Accordingly, conflicts may arise in the allocation of personnel among Brookfield Renewable and other Brookfield Accounts and such other strategies. For example, certain of the investment professionals who are expected to devote their business time to Brookfield Renewable are also contractually required to, and will, devote substantial portions of their business time to the management and operation of other Brookfield Accounts, and such circumstances may result in conflicts of interest for such portfolio managers and/or other personnel who are in a similar position.
•Integrated Investment Platform, Information Sharing and related Trading Restrictions. As noted elsewhere herein, Brookfield is a global alternative asset manager with significant assets under management and a long history of owning, managing and operating assets, businesses and investment
vehicles across various industries, sectors, geographies and strategies. Except as otherwise noted, Brookfield generally manages its investment and business lines in an integrated fashion with no information barriers that other firms may implement to separate certain investment teams so that one team’s activities won’t restrict or otherwise influence the other’s. Brookfield believes that managing its investment and asset management platforms in an integrated fashion is in the best interests of Brookfield Accounts, including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, by enabling them to leverage Brookfield’s experience, expertise, broad reach, relationships and position in the market for investment opportunities and deal flow, financial resources, access to capital markets and management and operating needs. Among other things, Brookfield will have access to information across its platform relating to business operations, trends, budgets, customers or users, assets, funding and other metrics that Brookfield has or acquires through its management of Brookfield Accounts and/or its own business and investment activities that is used by Brookfield to identify and/or evaluate potential investments for Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and to facilitate the management of investments, including through operational improvements. Conversely, Brookfield uses data and information that it has or acquires in connection with activities on behalf of Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest for the benefit of other Brookfield Accounts’ (including Brookfield proprietary accounts’) business and investment activities. From time to time, Brookfield expects to commission third-party research, at the expense of Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest, in connection with its diligence of an investment opportunity for Brookfield Renewable or such Brookfield Account or in connection with its investment, and such research is expected to subsequently be available to other Brookfield Accounts and Oaktree Accounts (who will generally not be required to compensate Brookfield Renewable or the applicable Brookfield Account in which we invest for the benefit they receive from such research). Such benefits could be material and Brookfield will have no duty, contractual, fiduciary or otherwise, to keep such information confidential from, or not use such information in connection with the business and investment activities of itself, other Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies.
Brookfield believes that managing its broader investment and asset management platform in an integrated fashion, which includes sharing of information and data obtained through the platform, provides Brookfield Accounts with greater transaction sourcing, investment and asset management capabilities, and related synergies, including the ability to better anticipate macroeconomic and other trends, and make more informed decisions for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest).
At the same time, this level of integration results in certain regulatory, legal, contractual and other considerations that, under certain circumstances, restrict certain activities that would not otherwise arise if Brookfield managed its platform in a different fashion (e.g., in a walled environment) and that Brookfield is required to manage in the ordinary course. For example, from time to time, our ability (and the ability of Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested) to buy or sell certain securities will be restricted by applicable securities laws, regulatory requirements, information held by Brookfield, contractual obligations applicable to Brookfield, and potential reputational risks relating to Brookfield and Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), as well as Brookfield’s internal policies designed to comply with these and similar requirements. As a result, from time to time, Brookfield will not engage in transactions or other activities for, or enforce certain rights in favor of, Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested) due to Brookfield’s activities outside Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested), regulatory requirements, policies and reputational risk assessments.
Brookfield will possess material, non-public information about companies that will limit our (and Brookfield Accounts’) ability to buy and sell securities related to those companies (or, potentially, other companies) during certain times. For example, Brookfield makes control investments in various companies and assets across its platform and its personnel take seats on boards of directors of, or have board of directors observer rights with respect to, portfolio companies in which Brookfield invests (including on behalf of Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested). In addition, Brookfield often obtains confidential information relating to investment opportunities that it considers across its platform. As a result, Brookfield will be limited and/or restricted in its ability to trade in securities of companies about which it has material non-public information, even if the information was not obtained
for the benefit of the Brookfield Account that is restricted from making the investment. This will adversely affect our ability to make and/or dispose of certain investments during certain times.
Furthermore, Brookfield, Brookfield businesses that are separated by information barriers (e.g., PSG and Oaktree) and their accounts, and Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable) are deemed to be affiliates for purposes of certain laws and regulations. As such, it is anticipated that, from time to time, Brookfield, Brookfield businesses that are separated by information barriers and their accounts, and Brookfield Accounts will have positions (which in some cases will be significant) in one or more of the same issuers. As such, Brookfield needs to aggregate such investment holdings for certain securities laws purposes (including trading restrictions under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, complying with reporting obligations under Section 13 of the Exchange Act and the reporting and short-swing profit disgorgement obligations under Section 16 of the Exchange Act) and other regulatory purposes (including: (i) public utility companies and public utility holding companies; (ii) bank holding companies; (iii) owners of broadcast licenses, airlines, railroads, water carriers and trucking concerns; (iv) casinos and gaming businesses; and (v) public service companies (such as those providing gas, electric or telephone services)). Consequently, activities by Brookfield, Brookfield businesses that are separated by information barriers, and/or other Brookfield Accounts could result in earlier public disclosure of investments by Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in, restrictions on transactions by Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in (including the ability to make or dispose of certain investments at certain times), adverse effects on the prices of investments made by Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in, potential short-swing profit disgorgement, penalties and/or regulatory remedies, or otherwise create conflicts of interests for Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in.
As a result of the foregoing, Brookfield could restrict, limit or reduce the amount of Brookfield Renewable’s investments (or investments of Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in) under certain circumstances. In addition, certain of the investments made by Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest could become subject to legal and/or other restrictions on transfer following their acquisition. When faced with the foregoing limitations, Brookfield will generally avoid exceeding the threshold because exceeding the threshold could have an adverse impact on the ability of Brookfield to efficiently conduct its business activities. Brookfield could also reduce our (and Brookfield Accounts’) interest in, or restrict Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested) from participating in, an investment opportunity that has limited availability or where Brookfield has determined to cap its aggregate investment in consideration of certain regulatory or other requirements so that other Brookfield Accounts that pursue similar investment strategies are able to acquire an interest in the investment opportunity. Brookfield could determine not to engage in certain transactions or activities which may be beneficial to us (or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested) because engaging in such transactions or activities in compliance with applicable law would result in significant cost to, or administrative burden on, Brookfield or create the potential risk of trade or other errors.
In addition, certain potential conflicts considerations will arise for Brookfield in managing its investment and asset management platform in an integrated fashion. For example, in seeking to manage business activities efficiently across all Brookfield Accounts, Brookfield could determine, in its discretion, to apply certain restrictions during certain times to certain Brookfield Accounts, but not to others, taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances it deems appropriate. Moreover, while Brookfield will have or obtain information from across the platform (including all Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies, strategies, businesses and operations), Brookfield also will use such information for the benefit of its own business and investment activities as well as those of Brookfield Accounts.
Brookfield believes that it will be better able to anticipate macroeconomic and other trends, and otherwise make more informed investment and other decisions for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) as a result of its access to (and rights regarding) the data and information that it has or obtains through the business and investment activities of all Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies. Brookfield will also make investment and other decisions for Brookfield Accounts (including itself, Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, other Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies) on the basis of information Brookfield has or obtains through all Brookfield Accounts’ investment activities. Brookfield believes that using this data and information from across Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies will provide overall benefits to, and improve Brookfield’s management of, Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), including their investment
activities. For example, data analytics based on inputs from a portfolio company of one Brookfield Account could inform business decisions for another Brookfield Account. In addition, aggregating data provides Brookfield with opportunities to obtain bulk discounts for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, other Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies) on products and services if that data shows significant demand across multiple Brookfield Accounts and/or portfolio companies. Any such discounts would be allocated among Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies on a fair and equitable basis as determined by Brookfield in its sole discretion, with Brookfield able to make corrective allocations should it determine subsequently that such corrections were necessary or advisable. This practice gives rise to conflicts of interest, however, because in some cases, this will result in certain Brookfield Accounts and/or portfolio companies taking positions that are different from, and potentially adverse to, positions taken for Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested or their portfolio companies, or result in certain Brookfield Accounts and/or portfolio companies benefiting from the business and investment activities of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest (or vice versa). For example, Brookfield’s ability to invest on behalf of another Brookfield Account in a particular company could be enhanced by information obtained from a portfolio company of Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest in the same or a related industry. Such investments can be expected to provide a material benefit to certain Brookfield Accounts and portfolio companies (including proprietary Brookfield accounts) without compensation or other benefits to, or participation by the Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invested) whose information is being used, because Brookfield shares information regarding Brookfield Accounts and their investors and the benefits received by certain Brookfield Accounts (and/or Brookfield) will not offset management fees or otherwise be shared with Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest or their investors.
As a result, Brookfield has an incentive to pursue and manage investments for Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) that have data and information that can be utilized in a manner that benefits Brookfield’s broader business platform, including investments that Brookfield would not otherwise invested in or investments on terms less favorable than Brookfield otherwise would have sought in the ordinary course. Brookfield has implemented policies and procedures designed to mitigate conflicts of interest and address certain regulatory requirements and contractual restrictions with respect to its use and sharing of data and information. Brookfield is also subject to contractual obligations and legal limitations on its use and sharing of data and information. Such policies and procedures, obligations and limitations generally reduce synergies across Brookfield’s various activities and negatively affect Brookfield’s and the Brookfield Accounts’ ability to pursue and manage investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to Brookfield or the Brookfield Accounts if such policies and procedures were not implemented. From time to time, these policies and procedures also will result in Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest having reduced investment opportunities or investment flexibility, or otherwise restrict Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest or Brookfield in its management and investment activities with respect to such information, such as the ability of Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest or a portfolio company to make certain investments.
While Brookfield will manage its investment and asset management platform in an integrated basis, there is no assurance that the investment professionals managing the investment activities of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will have access to and/or knowledge of all information that Brookfield is privy to at any given point in time. Conversely, operating in an integrated environment may provide Brookfield with access to and knowledge of information that Brookfield may have obtained in connection with an investment for another Brookfield Account, which may provide benefits to such other Brookfield Accounts that would not exist but for its position within Brookfield’s platform. Brookfield will not be under any obligation or other duty to make all such information available for the benefit of Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or any portfolio companies.
Regardless of the existence of information barriers, Brookfield will not have any obligation or other duty to make available for the benefit of any Brookfield Account (including Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest or their investments) any information regarding Brookfield’s broader investment activities, strategies or views, or the activities, strategies or views used for other Brookfield Accounts. Brookfield may share any information relating to a Brookfield Account or its investments with its affiliates, including those that are managed independently (in accordance with information barriers and related protocols). Furthermore, to the
extent that Brookfield has access to analyses, models and/or information developed by other parts of Brookfield and/or its personnel, Brookfield will not be under any obligation or other duty to effect transactions on behalf of Brookfield Renewable, any Brookfield Account in which we invest or its investments in accordance with such analysis and models and in some cases (such as research) may be prohibited from disseminating information between areas within Brookfield. In the event Brookfield does not share certain information with a Brookfield Account’s investment team, such Brookfield Account may make investments or other decisions that differ from those it would have made if its investment team had such information, which may be disadvantageous to the Brookfield Account.
•Trade Errors. Brookfield will not be responsible for any losses resulting from any trade errors made by Brookfield in respect of the investments of Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, except to the extent such parties are liable pursuant to the applicable governing documents of the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. Trade errors might include, for example, keystroke errors that occur when entering trades into an electronic system or typographical or drafting errors related to derivatives contracts or similar agreements. Investors should assume that trade errors (and similar errors or deviations from accuracy or correctness in the trade process) will occur and that Brookfield will not be responsible for any resulting losses, even if such loss results from negligence (but not gross negligence), unless it has breached its standard of care as set out in applicable laws or regulations as well as the applicable limited partnership agreement, investment management agreement, prospectus or other offering document of the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
•Data Management. To the extent it deems necessary or appropriate, in its sole discretion, Brookfield may provide data management services to us and our investments and/or other Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies (collectively, “Data Holders”). Such services could include, among other things, assistance with obtaining, analyzing, curating, processing, packaging, organizing, mapping, holding, transforming, enhancing, marketing and selling data for monetization through licensing and/or sale arrangements with third parties and/or directly with Data Holders. To the extent provided, these services would be subject to the limitations discussed below and applicable contractual and/or legal obligations or limitations, including on the use of material non-public information. Moreover, where an arrangement is with Brookfield Renewable or one of our investments, we would directly or indirectly bear our appropriate share of related compensation. In addition, in Brookfield’s sole discretion, data from one Data Holder may be pooled with data from other Data Holders, subject to applicable laws and regulations (including privacy laws and regulations), and any revenues arising from such pooled data sets would be allocated among Brookfield and the applicable Data Holders on a fair and equitable basis as determined by Brookfield in its sole discretion, with Brookfield able to make corrective allocations should it determine subsequently that such corrections were necessary or advisable.
Brookfield’s compensation for any data management services could include a percentage of the revenues generated through any licensing and/or sale arrangements, fees, royalties and cost and expense reimbursement (including start-up costs and allocable overhead associated with personnel working on relevant matters (including salaries, benefits and other similar expenses)). This compensation will not offset management or other fees or otherwise be shared with the Data Holders, Brookfield Renewable, other Brookfield Accounts, their portfolio companies, shareholders or BEP's unitholders. Brookfield may share the products from its data management services within Brookfield (including other Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies) at no charge and, in such cases, the Data Holders are not expected to receive any financial or other benefit from having provided their data to Brookfield. The provision of data management services will create incentives for Brookfield to pursue and make investments that generate a significant amount of data, including on behalf of Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested. While all investments will be within our (or the relevant Brookfield Account’s) investment mandate and consistent with our (or the relevant Brookfield Account’s) investment objectives, they could include investments that Brookfield might not otherwise have made or investments on terms less favorable than Brookfield otherwise would have sought to obtain had it not been providing data management services.
•Terms of an Investment by a Brookfield Account May Benefit or Disadvantage Another Brookfield Account. From time to time, in making investment decisions for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or another Brookfield Account, Brookfield will face certain conflicts of interest between the interests of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), on
the one hand, and the interests of the other Brookfield Account. For example, subject to applicable law and any limitations contained in the governing documents, Brookfield from time to time could cause Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) to invest in securities, bank loans or other obligations of companies or properties affiliated with or advised by Brookfield or in which Brookfield Accounts have an equity, debt or other interest, or to engage in investment transactions that result in other Brookfield Accounts getting an economic benefit, being relieved of obligations or divested of investments. For example, from time to time, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could make debt or equity investments in entities which are expected to use the proceeds of such investment to repay loans from another Brookfield Account. Depending on the circumstance, such other Brookfield Account would benefit if Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) invested more money, thus providing sufficient funds to repay such other Brookfield Account, or it would benefit if the loans remained outstanding and such Brookfield Account continued to receive payment under the existing loans, if the loans were on attractive terms (including an attractive interest rate) from the perspective of such Brookfield Account. Alternatively, from time to time another Brookfield Account is in the position of making an investment that could be used to repay loans from Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (which could occur earlier than otherwise expected for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest)), which would present the opposite conflict. Similarly, such conflicts are also present in other situations. For example, in certain circumstances, a Brookfield Account will pursue a take-private, asset purchase or other material transaction with an issuer in which Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) is invested, which will result in a benefit to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). In situations where the activities of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) enhance the profitability of other Brookfield Accounts with respect to their investment in and activities relating to companies, Brookfield could take the interests of such other Brookfield Accounts into consideration in connection with actions it takes on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). See “Investments with Related Parties,” below.
Additionally, there may be instances where Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or another Brookfield Account or one of their investments may enter into agreements with third parties (or invest in assets or portfolio companies that have pre-existing agreements with third parties) that restrict the ability of other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) to engage in potentially competitive actions, such as developing competing assets within a defined geographical area, which could adversely impact Brookfield Renewable’s (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest’s) investment opportunities. In cases where Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or one of its investments has entered into such a restriction, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may from time to time seek to induce its counterparty to waive such restriction for the benefit of another Brookfield Account. No consent or notification will be provided to the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares or our board of directors in these situations.
•Conflicts among Portfolio Companies and Brookfield Accounts. There will be conflicts between Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or one of our (direct or indirect) investments, on the one hand, and other Brookfield Accounts and/or one or more of their investments, on the other hand. For example, a portfolio company of another Brookfield Account may be a competitor, customer, service provider or supplier of one or more of our (direct or indirect through a Brookfield Account) investments. There may also be circumstances where a tenant or a prospective tenant in connection with an investment may also be interested in or eligible to be a tenant or prospective tenant at a property owned by another Brookfield Account. In such circumstances, the other Brookfield Account and/or portfolio company thereof are likely to take actions that have adverse consequences for Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and/or one of our (direct or indirect) investments, such as seeking to increase their market share to our detriment, withdrawing business from our investment in favor of a competitor that offers the same product or service at a more competitive price, or increasing prices of their products in their capacity as a supplier to our (direct or indirect) investment, or commencing litigation against our (direct or indirect) investment. In addition, in such circumstances, Brookfield may not pursue certain actions on behalf of Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested or our (direct or indirect) portfolio companies, which could result in a benefit to
another Brookfield Account (or vice versa). Brookfield has implemented policies and procedures designed to mitigate such potential conflicts of interest. Such policies and procedures could reduce the business activity among the portfolio companies of Brookfield Accounts, which would negatively affect portfolio companies of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and, therefore, Brookfield Renewable, or a Brookfield Account in which we invest, as a whole. Another Brookfield Account or portfolio company thereof may nonetheless continue to take such actions that have adverse consequences for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or its portfolio companies, and Brookfield will not have any obligation or duty in this regard.
•Investments with Related Parties. In light of the extensive scope of Brookfield’s activities, in certain circumstances we will invest (directly or indirectly through a Brookfield Account) in assets or companies in which Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts (including a co-investment account) hold an equity or debt position or in which Brookfield or another Brookfield Account invests (either in equity or debt positions) subsequent to our investment. For example, from time to time Brookfield and/or another Brookfield Account (including a co-investment account) will: (a) enter into a joint transaction with us (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest); (b) in their discretion, invest alongside us (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) in order to facilitate an investment (e.g., to the extent there is excess capacity) or to facilitate compliance with specific legal, regulatory or similar requirements; (c) be borrowers of certain investments or lenders in respect of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest); and/or (d) invest in different levels of an issuer’s capital structure. As a result of the various conflicts and related issues described herein, we (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could sustain losses during periods in which Brookfield or other Brookfield Accounts achieve profits generally or with respect to particular investments, or could achieve lower profits or higher losses than would have been the case had the conflicts described herein not existed.
Brookfield and other Brookfield Accounts invest in a broad range of asset classes throughout the corporate capital structure, including debt positions (either junior or senior to the positions of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest)) and equity securities (either common or preferred). It is possible that Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or one or more of its portfolio companies will hold an interest in one part of a company’s capital structure while another Brookfield Account or one or more of its portfolio companies holds an interest in another. In situations where such company or property is experiencing distress or bankruptcy, such conflicts of interest will be exacerbated. In such scenarios, other Brookfield Accounts or other consortiums, including Brookfield, Brookfield Insurance Accounts, Oaktree or Oaktree Accounts, could hold interests that are more senior in priority to that of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and could seek to take over such company or property. In such circumstances, Brookfield Accounts, Brookfield Insurance Accounts, Oaktree and/or Oaktree Accounts that participate in such asset could take actions that are adverse to the interests of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). Alternatively, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may make an investment in a company in which Brookfield or another Brookfield Account invests and such company may already be experiencing (or may in the future experience) distress or bankruptcy. Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may, or may not, be successful in managing it out of such distress. The conflicts between such parties and Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) will be more pronounced where the asset is near default on existing loans and Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may not have the ability to call additional capital or use reserves or other sources of capital in order to sustain its position in the asset (either because Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) is out of available Commitments or other limitations). In this case, Brookfield, Brookfield Insurance Accounts, Brookfield Accounts, Oaktree and/or Oaktree Accounts could, for a relatively small investment, obtain a stake in such company or take over the management of (and risk relating to) such company to the detriment of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest).
The interests of Brookfield Accounts and other consortium members in certain investments could differ from those of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and could be acquired at different times, at different prices, with a different view (including different investment objectives and other considerations) and be subject to different terms and conditions. Furthermore, to the extent that Brookfield Renewable (or a
Brookfield Account in which we invest) acquires an interest in assets or companies subsequent to another Brookfield Account, it is possible that participation by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) could result in a direct or indirect financial benefit to such Brookfield Account which would not have otherwise obtained. In addition, Brookfield Accounts and other consortium members could dispose of their interests in applicable investments at different times and on different terms than Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), including in situations where Brookfield Accounts facilitated an investment with a view to reselling their portion of such investment to third-parties following the closing of the transaction (which could, in certain situations, result in the Brookfield Account receiving compensation for (or related to) such sale) or where Brookfield Accounts and/or such consortium members seek to reallocate capital to other opportunities, de-risk of exposures, or otherwise manage their investments differently than Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), which could have an adverse effect on the value and/or liquidity of the investment of Brookfield Renewable (or of a Brookfield Account in which we invest). In any such circumstances, such Brookfield Accounts or other consortium members will likely sell interests at different values, and possibly higher values, than Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) will be able to when disposing of the applicable investment. Where Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) invests alongside another Brookfield Account, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may desire to manage its investment differently than such Brookfield Account, but may be restrained from doing so because of the Brookfield Account.
Moreover, from time to time, we, a Brookfield Account in which we are invested, and/or another Brookfield Account could jointly acquire a portfolio of assets between them with a view to dividing up the assets in accordance with their investment mandates. In this circumstance, Brookfield will determine the terms and conditions relating to the investment, including the purchase price associated with each asset, which price may not represent the price we (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) would have paid if the transaction had involved the acquisition only of the assets we (or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested) ultimately retain. In certain circumstances, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) could have residual liability for assets that were allocated to Brookfield or another Brookfield Account, including potential tax liabilities. Additionally, from time to time, Brookfield will seek to sell assets on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) and one or more other Brookfield Accounts together, including because Brookfield deems it to be in the best interests of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) and each participating Brookfield Account to do so and/or because it believes Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) and each applicable Brookfield Account would generate excess value as part of a joint portfolio or platform sale. In this circumstance, Brookfield will determine the terms and conditions relating to such disposition, including the manner of sale, the ultimate sale price associated with each property and/or other asset and the allocation of the sale price among Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) and the other participating Brookfield Accounts, which will be based on one or more factors, as deemed appropriate by Brookfield in its discretion, including among others internal carrying values of the relevant assets, appraisals and/or valuations of the relevant assets, the advice of external consultants and/or advisers, and/or the values attributed to the various assets by one or more of the bidders for the portfolio. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Brookfield’s ultimate allocation of the sale price among Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) and the other participating Brookfield Accounts could be different than any one particular factor utilized in its determination, including the values attributed to the various assets by the ultimate purchaser of the assets. These types of transactions will not require the approval of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP’s unitholders. Furthermore, from time to time, we, a Brookfield Account in which we are invested, Brookfield and/or a Brookfield Account will jointly enter into a binding agreement to acquire an investment. If Brookfield or such Brookfield Account is unable to consummate the investment, we (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) could be subject to additional liabilities, including the potential loss of any deposit or the obligation to fund the entire investment. Similarly, to the extent that indebtedness in connection with an investment is structured such that both Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested), Brookfield and/or another Brookfield Account are jointly responsible on a cross-collateralized, joint borrower, joint guarantor or similar basis for the repayment of the indebtedness, the failure of Brookfield and/or the other Brookfield Account to repay such indebtedness or meet other obligations could result in Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) being required to fund more than their pro rata share of the indebtedness.
If Brookfield or another Brookfield Account participates as a lender in borrowings by Brookfield Renewable, a Brookfield Account in which we are invested or portfolio companies, Brookfield’s (or the other Brookfield Account’s) interests may conflict with the interests of Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Account in which we are invested and/or the applicable portfolio company. In this situation, Brookfield Renewable’s assets may be pledged to such Brookfield Account as security for the loan. In its capacity as a lender, Brookfield or the relevant Brookfield Account may act in its own interest, without regard for the interests of Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Account in which we are invested, our portfolio companies, our shareholders or BEP's unitholders, which may materially and adversely affect Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Account in which we are invested and our portfolio companies and, in certain circumstances such as an event of default, ultimately may result in realization of assets held by Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested at a loss, including loss of the entire investment of our shareholders or BEP's unitholders.
In situations in which Brookfield and/or another Brookfield Account holds an interest in an investment that differs from that of Brookfield Renewable and/or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested, conflicts of interest will arise in connection with, among other things, the following: (i) the nature, timing and terms of each Brookfield Account’s investment, (ii) the allocation of control and other governance rights among the Brookfield Accounts, (iii) the strategic objectives and/or timing underlying each Brookfield Account’s investments, (iv) differing disposition rights, views and/or needs for all or part of an investment, (v) resolution of liabilities in connection with an investment among the Brookfield Accounts, (vi) allocation of jointly held resources (e.g., intellectual property, pooled funds, etc.), and/or (vii) other considerations related to the investment. In certain situations, Brookfield Accounts will invest in follow-on investments of other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). Where certain Brookfield Accounts and other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which our group invests) hold different interests in an investment, there will be conflicts from various factors, including, among other things, investments in different levels of the capital structure, different measurements of control, different risk profiles, different rights with respect to disposition alternatives, different investment objectives, strategies and horizons, different target rates of return, rights in connection with co-investors and/or other factors. Brookfield will resolve these matters in a fair and reasonable manner consistent with its fiduciary duty to each account. However, there can be no assurance that Brookfield will resolve these matters in any particular manner or that it would resolve these matters in the same manner that it would have resolved them had these conflicts considerations not arisen
As noted above, from time to time Brookfield Renewable and/or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested, on the one hand, and other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield proprietary accounts and/or co-investment accounts), on the other hand, will invest in different classes or types of securities of the same company (or other assets, instruments or obligations issued by such company) or otherwise on different terms thereby creating divergent interests. If the company or asset experiences financial distress, bankruptcy or a similar situation, a Brookfield Account’s interest (including interest of Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) may be subordinated or otherwise adversely affected by virtue of another Brookfield Account’s involvement and actions relating to their investment to the extent their interest is more senior to, or has different contractual rights than, the interest of Brookfield Renewable and/or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested. In these situations, Brookfield will face conflicts in managing each side’s investment with a view to maximizing its value and, in connection therewith, pursuing or enforcing rights or activities. At all times, Brookfield will seek to treat each Brookfield Account (including Brookfield Renewable and/or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested) fairly, equitably and consistent with its investment mandate in pursuing and managing these investments. However, these factors could result in our (direct and indirect) interests and those of Brookfield and other Brookfield Accounts being managed differently under certain circumstances and Brookfield Renewable and/or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested realizing different returns (including, possibly lower returns) on their investment than Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts on theirs.
In addition, Brookfield is expected to advise other Brookfield Accounts with respect to different parts of the capital structure of an investment. As a result, Brookfield could pursue or enforce rights or activities, or refrain from pursuing or enforcing rights or activities, with respect to a particular investment in which Brookfield Renewable and/or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested has a position. Brookfield Renewable and/or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested could be negatively affected by these activities, and transactions on behalf of Brookfield Renewable and/or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested could be executed at prices or terms
that are less favorable than would otherwise have been the case. In addition, in the event that Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts hold voting securities of an issuer in which we (directly or indirectly) hold loans, bonds, or other credit-related securities, Brookfield or such other Brookfield Accounts could have the right to vote on certain matters that could have an adverse effect on the positions held by Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
As a result of the various conflicts and related issues described above, we could sustain (direct or indirect) losses during periods in which Brookfield or other Brookfield Accounts achieve profits generally or with respect to particular holdings, or could achieve lower profits or higher losses than would have been the case had the conflicts described above not existed.
In order to mitigate potential conflicts of interest in these situations, Brookfield could but will not be obligated to take one or more actions on behalf of itself, Brookfield Renewable and/or other Brookfield Accounts, including one or more of the following as it determines in its sole discretion: (i) forbearance of rights, such as causing Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable and/or other Brookfield Accounts to remain passive in a situation in which it is otherwise entitled to vote, which could mean that Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable, a Brookfield Account in which we are invested and/or other Brookfield Accounts (as applicable) defer to the decision or judgment of an independent, third-party investor in the same class of securities with respect to decisions regarding defaults, foreclosures, workouts, restructurings, and/or similar matters, including actions taken by a trustee or administrative or other agent of the investment, such as a release, waiver, forgiveness or reduction of any claim for principal or interest, extension of maturity date or due date of any payment of any principal or interest, release or substitution of any material collateral, release, waiver, termination or modification of any material provision of any guaranty or indemnity, subordination of any lien, and release, waiver or permission with respect to any covenants; (ii) causing Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable, a Brookfield Account in which we are invested and/or other Brookfield Accounts to hold only non-controlling interests in any such investment; (iii) referring the matter to one or more persons that is not affiliated with Brookfield, such as a third-party loan servicer, administrative agent or other agent to review and/or approve of an intended course of action; (iv) consulting with investors and/or seeking approval of our independent directors on such matter (and similar bodies of other accounts); (v) establishing ethical screens or information barriers (which can be temporary and of limited purpose) designed to separate Brookfield investment professionals to act independently on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested), on the one hand, and Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts, on the other hand, in each case with support of separate legal counsel and other advisers; (vi) seeking to ensure that Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable, a Brookfield Account in which we are invested, and/or other Brookfield Accounts own interests in the same securities or financial instruments and in the same proportions so as to preserve an alignment of interests; and/or (vii) causing Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable, a Brookfield Account in which we are invested, and/or other Brookfield Accounts to divest of an investment that it otherwise could have held on to, including without limitation causing Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) to sell its position to Brookfield or another Brookfield Account (or vice versa).
At all times, Brookfield will endeavor to treat all Brookfield-managed accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and any Brookfield Account in which we are invested) fairly, equitably and in an impartial manner and consistent with its investment mandate in pursuing and managing in these investments. However, there can be no assurance that any action or measure pursued by Brookfield will be feasible or effective in any particular situation, or that its own interests won’t influence its conduct, and it is possible that the outcome for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) will be less favorable than otherwise would have been the case if Brookfield did not face these conflicts of interest. In addition, the actions and measures that Brookfield pursues are expected to vary based on the particular facts and circumstances of each situation and, as such, there will be some degree of variation and potentially inconsistency in the manner in which these situations are addressed. Furthermore, from time to time Brookfield intends to enter into a voting agreement with one or more other Brookfield Accounts alongside which Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) is invested, which, among other things, would allocate (upon such Brookfield Account’s election), directly or indirectly, certain voting rights of Brookfield with respect to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) or with respect to one or more properties or portfolio companies to such affiliates. However, for the avoidance of doubt, Brookfield will in all circumstances control Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested).
From time to time, Brookfield may declare a distribution-in-kind of an investment of a Brookfield Account in which Brookfield Renewable is invested or a portion thereof. Pursuant to any such distribution-in-kind, the investors in the Brookfield Account (including third-party investors, other Brookfield Accounts and Brookfield personnel that are invested in the relevant Brookfield Account) will receive their pro rata portions of the distribution, and Brookfield will receive a portion of the distribution in respect of its incentive distributions (if applicable). Upon receipt of such interests, certain recipients (including other Brookfield Accounts and Brookfield personnel) generally will be free to sell its interests in their sole discretion, which may have an adverse impact on the value and/or liquidity of other recipients’ (including Brookfield Renewable’s) interests. For the avoidance of doubt, the value of the investment upon a distribution in-kind to investors (and the value used for determining Brookfield’s entitlement to incentive distributions) may exceed the value ultimately received by investors (including Brookfield Renewable) when they dispose of such interests for cash. In addition, each recipient will likely sell its interests at a different value, and it is possible that other Brookfield Accounts and Brookfield personnel are able to sell their interests at higher prices than other investors (including Brookfield Renewable) are able to. It is likely that certain investors will elect to have Brookfield dispose of such interests for cash on their behalf while Brookfield will retain the securities for certain Brookfield Accounts (or vice versa), which may exacerbate the risks and conflicts identified herein. In the event of a partial distribution-in-kind, other Brookfield Accounts and Brookfield personnel will be free to sell the interests that they received in advance of any sales by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which Brookfield Renewable is invested) of the remaining portion of the investment, which may adversely impact the value and/or liquidity of Brookfield Renewable’s or the relevant Brookfield Account’s remaining position and may be at higher prices than Brookfield Renewable or the relevant Brookfield Account in which Brookfield Renewable is invested ultimately sells the remaining portion of the investment. Additionally, in connection with any restructuring of a Brookfield Account in which we are invested or any of its investments (such as the formation of a continuation vehicle or participation in other similar transactions), Brookfield may charge management fees and receive incentive distributions in connection with any continuation vehicle or similar structure established to hold the investments for a longer term. As a result, such transactions will result in conflicts of interest in determining whether to utilize a continuation vehicle when structuring a Brookfield Account’s exit from any investment, and there can be no assurance that such conflicts of interest will be resolved in a manner favorable to the Brookfield Account in which we are invested or to investors who do not elect to participate.
•Definitions of “Investment” and “Disposition”. The governing documents of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest generally provide that an “investment” of such account typically includes any direct or indirect investment in companies or other assets. The governing documents generally further note that Brookfield has discretion regarding whether to treat assets or securities that have been acquired as part of a portfolio of assets, portfolio of companies or a platform as separate Investments or as a single Investment. Further to the foregoing, a single Investment could include a collection of related assets and/or multiple securities (whether acquired in a single transaction or over time), a series of investments in a portfolio company’s securities (including investments made in different parts of an issuer’s capital structure in a single transaction or over time), investments acquired as a portfolio and/or portfolios (whether acquired in a single transaction or over time) via an asset aggregation strategy or otherwise, in each case as reasonably determined by Brookfield.
Brookfield will use its discretion in determining whether multiple assets and/or multiple securities are considered a single “investment” for purposes of the governing documents of the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, taking into account all factors and circumstances it deems relevant to such determination. As a general matter, Brookfield expects to consider each series of related assets and/or securities as a single “investment”. However, even when a series of assets and/or securities are treated as a single Investment for certain purposes, Brookfield may still treat such assets and/or securities as multiple investments for other purposes of the governing documents (to the extent that Brookfield believes that doing so is consistent with the intention of the relevant provisions of such governing documents). For example, Brookfield could determine to assess each asset within a portfolio on a “look-through” basis for the purpose of certain definitions while treating the portfolio as a single “investment” in the relevant Brookfield Account’s investor reporting and for other purposes of its governing documents, including for purposes of calculating and charging management fees. For the avoidance of doubt, Brookfield will determine whether or not to apply such a “look-through” approach on a case-by-case basis based on the relevant facts and circumstances, and expects that it will take different approaches to different Investments.
The treatment of assets and/or securities as a single “investment” will affect the calculation of the management fee in certain circumstances, in particular in cases in which one or more assets or securities forming part of the “investment” are subject to a “disposition” or partial disposition (since an investment that has been subject to a disposition or partial disposition generally is no longer included in the calculation of the management fee (or included at a reduced amount) after the commitment period of the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). The governing documents of the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest generally define “disposition” to include a situation in which an investment has been written down to zero, and also provide that in the case of a disposition of all or any part of an investment, the remaining portion will be treated as a separate investment for purposes of calculating the relevant Brookfield Account’s management fee. However, if a collection of assets or securities is treated as a single Investment, and one or more of those assets or securities is written down to zero, Brookfield will use its discretion, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances, in determining whether to treat such event as a partial disposition and therefore reduce the management fees payable by the relevant Brookfield Account.
Furthermore, in connection with a series of investments made in different parts of a portfolio company’s capital structure that is treated as a single investment, certain of such investments (for example, investments in the equity of the company) over time could be written down to a fair value of zero, while other investments (for example, investments in debt issued by the company) retain some value. In such cases, Brookfield expects to treat such series of investments as a single “investment” and does not expect to treat such Investment as being written down to zero or as having been subject to a partial disposition. As a result, Brookfield will continue to collect management fees on the full amount of capital deployed in the investment (even in situations where a substantial majority of the relevant Brookfield Account’s original investment was made in securities that have been written down to zero, for example in equity of a company that has been subject to bankruptcy, so long as the Brookfield Account holds other securities in the portfolio company that retain value).
In addition, from time to time an asset or security held by a Brookfield Account in which we invest will be substituted or exchanged for another asset or security, including potentially in connection with or as a result of a refinancing or other repayment, reorganization, merger, foreclosure, deed-in-lieu or other exchange or arrangement, whether or not in bankruptcy. In such cases, the governing documents of the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest generally provide Brookfield with discretion as to whether or not to treat such transaction as a “disposition” or partial disposition, and as a result whether the amount invested in such original asset or security will continue to be counted in full or in part towards the applicable Brookfield Account’s funded commitments and therefore be subject to management fees. For example, to the extent a Brookfield Account in which we invest holds debt securities that are converted to equity pursuant to a bankruptcy proceeding, Brookfield does not expect to treat such event as a full or partial disposition (even if the relevant Brookfield Account in which we invest also held equity in such portfolio company, as part of the same investment, that was written down to zero in such bankruptcy proceeding).
For these reasons, Brookfield will be conflicted in its determination of whether assets and/or securities are treated as a single “investment” and whether or not a full or partial “disposition” has occurred, and Brookfield will have an incentive to exercise its discretion such that the fees payable to it would not be reduced. Moreover, Brookfield will not be obligated to (and, in certain circumstances, does not expect to) resolve such conflict in favor of the investors, but rather will resolve it based on its determination, taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances of whether the assets and/or securities are part of a single investment and whether a full or partial disposition has occurred. For the avoidance of doubt, Brookfield’s determinations are not subject to consent of any investor (or our independent directors or the limited partner advisory committee of any Brookfield Account), including any determination by Brookfield to treat assets and/or securities as a single “investment” and that a full or partial “disposition” has not occurred such that the management fees payable by the Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested are not reduced under the relevant facts and circumstances (as described herein).
Even in circumstances in which Brookfield determines to treat assets and/or securities as multiple “investments” for purposes of the calculation of management fees, in certain cases (in particular, where the portfolio was acquired as a single portfolio with an aggregate purchase price), Brookfield will use its discretion (and, at times, will make reasonable estimates) in attributing a portion of the purchase price and additional capital invested into the assets or portfolio following the initial acquisition to individual assets and/or securities (which will affect the amount by which management fees are reduced upon the realization or write down to zero of an individual asset within the portfolio). Brookfield will be similarly conflicted in making such attribution.
In addition, in certain situations, Brookfield could determine to write an investment down to zero for a period of time and subsequently increase its value above zero due to changed circumstances. In such cases, the management fees will resume and be calculated on the basis of the investment’s original “funded commitments”, beginning with the period that the investment is no longer written down to zero.
•Insurance and Reinsurance Capital. Brookfield currently manages, and expects in the future to manage, one or more Brookfield Accounts that focus on investing insurance- and reinsurance-related capital (including, for the avoidance of doubt, Brookfield Reinsurance (and together with any other insurance and reinsurance-related Brookfield Accounts, the “Brookfield Insurance Accounts”). Among other things, Brookfield Insurance Accounts are expected to invest in securities of issuers affiliated with Brookfield Accounts, including securities issued by portfolio companies such as investment grade, high-yield and other debt securities, and certain equity investments. For example, from time to time, Brookfield Insurance Accounts could invest in asset-backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, and other debt securities and instruments issued by Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or their investments (as part of a Brookfield Account’s financing of an underlying investment). Brookfield Insurance Accounts could also provide financing to parties that purchase investments from Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
Brookfield Insurance Accounts’ investments generally will be made on terms determined to be arm’s length market terms (based on terms negotiated with third-party investors or terms that Brookfield otherwise determines to be consistent with arm’s length market terms). However, Brookfield Insurance Accounts’ investments in debt securities and/or instruments will result in Brookfield Insurance Accounts and other Brookfield Accounts being invested in different levels of an issuer’s capital structure. To the extent a Brookfield Insurance Account is invested in an asset held by Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest indirectly via a structure that is not controlled by or affiliated with Brookfield, such investment will generally not be considered an affiliate transaction. For the avoidance of doubt, interest, fees and other amounts earned by Brookfield Insurance Accounts in respect of these investments will not offset or otherwise reduce the management fees payable to Brookfield by Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. These situations will give rise to conflicts of interests and potential adverse impacts on Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, which are described in more detail (including as to the manner in which Brookfield will manage these situations) in “Investments with Related Parties” above.
Because Brookfield manages Brookfield Insurance Accounts, certain transactions (such as, for example, cross trades or other transactions involving a Brookfield Account, on the one hand, and a Brookfield Insurance Account, on the other hand) present conflicts of interest. No transaction involving Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest (or a portfolio company), on the one hand, and a Brookfield Insurance Account, on the other hand, will require approval by our independent directors or advisory committee of a Brookfield Account in which Brookfield Renewable is invested, unless otherwise determined by Brookfield in its sole discretion.
•Brookfield Capital Solutions. Brookfield Capital Solutions (“BCS”) is a separate business within Brookfield that focuses on: (i) sourcing investment opportunities for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and their respective portfolio investments; (ii) maintaining relationships with the capital markets community in an effort to help Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and their respective portfolio investments to, among other things, raise debt and equity capital and optimize capital structures through creative financing solutions generally on terms and conditions that are viewed as fair, reasonable and equitable from the perspective of Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and their respective portfolio investments, as applicable; and (iii) structuring capital solutions in an effort to enhance, among other things, the ability to syndicate, place or otherwise transfer loans, securities and other financial instruments arising from financings where Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and/or their respective portfolio investments are borrowers/issuers and/or lenders/creditors (the “BCS Business”).
The BCS Business is conducted via subsidiaries of Brookfield Reinsurance, which is economically linked to Brookfield Corporation. The BCS business includes (among others): (i) a securities broker and dealer registered with
the SEC and admitted to membership in FINRA, and (ii) a subsidiary that provides a variety of services with respect to non-security financial instruments, including loans, such as sourcing/originating, arranging, underwriting, structuring, and distributing/syndicating loans, debt advisory services and other similar services. Fees received by the BCS Business are not applied to reduce management fees payable by Brookfield Accounts and are not otherwise shared with Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and/or their respective portfolio investments that are recipients of the services.
Among others, BCS performs the following services: (i) underwriting firm and best efforts offerings of securities and non-security instruments on a referral basis; (ii) the resale of securities under Rule 144A under the Securities Act on a referral basis; (iii) merger and acquisition and corporate finance advisory services; (iv) private placements of securities and non-security instruments; (v) non-exchange member arranging for transactions in listed securities by an exchange member, on a referral basis; (vi) trading securities for its own account; (vii) broker or dealer selling corporate debt securities on a referral basis; and (viii) broker or dealer selling interests in mortgages, receivables or other asset-backed securities on a referral basis. The BCS Business is expected to, from time to time, expand the services that it performs and the activities in which it engages. In addition, Brookfield could in the future develop new businesses, such as providing additional investment banking, advisory, and other services to corporations, financial sponsors, management, or other persons, which could be part of the BCS Business.
Any such services could relate to transactions that could give rise to investment opportunities that are suitable for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and/or their portfolio investments or, alternatively, that preclude investment opportunities for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and/or their portfolio investments (including because the BCS Business’s participation could change the tax characteristics of an investment opportunity for Brookfield Accounts). The BCS Business will not be obligated to decline any such engagements in order to make an investment opportunity available to any Brookfield Account (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and/or their portfolio investments. It is also possible that Brookfield will come into the possession of information through BCS that limits the ability of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and/or their portfolio companies to engage in potential transactions.
Underwriting services are provided to existing and potential portfolio investments of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) as well as to third parties on occasion. Where the BCS Business serves as underwriter with respect to a portfolio company’s securities, a Brookfield Account will generally be subject to a “lock-up” period following the offering under applicable regulations or agreements during which time its ability to sell any securities that it continues to hold is restricted. This could prejudice such Brookfield Account’s ability to dispose of such securities at an opportune time.
Syndication services include, among other things, identifying potential third-party investors (including potential syndication participants and/or financing counterparties), assisting in structuring the transaction so that it will be more marketable to third-party investors and/or financing counterparties, preparing marketing materials, performing outreach, executing on a syndication and sell-down strategy, arranging financing and providing post-closing support to Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) and/or their respective portfolio investments. These services could be required (and the BCS Business will be compensated for providing them) even in situations where ultimately there is no allocation, syndication, sell-down to third-party investors or financing (e.g., when it is unclear at the outset of negotiating a transaction whether there will be sufficient capacity (or demand) to provide the full amount of the financing sought by the borrower or issuer (or its sponsor).
Generally, the role of the BCS Business in a syndication of securities and/or non-security financial instruments (including loans) for portfolio investments is that of a co-manager and not as lead underwriter, but it could also serve in such capacity from time to time. The BCS Business can also resell corporate debt or equity securities to Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests) or otherwise assist in structuring or facilitating the initial resales of debt or equity securities under Rule 144A of the Securities Act, or pursuant to a private placement exemption from Securities Act registration.
In addition to capital raising services, the BCS Business also provides capital markets and debt advisory services to portfolio investments of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts
in which Brookfield Renewable invests), including in respect of restructurings and work-outs. The BCS Business will generally be engaged either by the borrower or issuer (or its sponsor) and receive its fees and expense reimbursement directly from the borrower or issuer (or its sponsor) for services rendered.
A framework for the provision of services by the BCS Business to Brookfield Renewable, a Brookfield Account in which we invest or to existing or potential portfolio investments and the allocated compensation, including the process to ensure that all fee terms will reflect then-current arm’s length market terms, will be subject to the review and consent of the Managing General Partner, but not the review by or consent of the Brookfield Account’s limited partner advisory committee or investors. Individual mandates entered into pursuant to such framework approved by the independent directors of the Managing General Partner will not be subject to review by or consent of the independent directors of the Managing General Partner, the Brookfield Account’s limited partner advisory committee or investors. In general, fees that are received by the BCS Business in connection with its provision of merger and acquisition transaction advisory services to Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which our group invests (or its portfolio investments) are applied to reduce management fees owed to Brookfield from Brookfield Renewable or such Brookfield Account in which our group invests. However, fees received by the BCS Business in connection with the provision of private placement, underwriting, arranging, structuring, syndication, origination, sourcing, collateral management, administration, debt advisory, commitment, facility, float or other services (including other broker-dealer services such as facilitating initial resales of debt or equity securities under Rule 144A under the Securities Act) are not applied to reduce management fees (or otherwise be shared with Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Accounts in which our group invests).
The relationship between Brookfield, on the one hand, and the BCS Business, on the other hand, gives rise to conflicts of interest considerations, both in connection with (i) engagements by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or their respective portfolio investments of the BCS Business for services, and/or (ii) participation by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) in an investment opportunity issued (or originated) by a third-party issuer (or borrower) in respect of which the BCS Business provides services. Such conflicts considerations include, but are not limited to: (i) in connection with Brookfield Accounts’ or their respective portfolio investments’ engagement of the BCS Business for services, the terms of the engagement (including the compensation to be paid to the BCS Business, which is expected to include fees and expense reimbursement); and (ii) in connection with Brookfield Accounts’ participation in an investment opportunity issued (or originated) by a third-party issuer (or borrower) in respect of which the BCS Business provides services, the BCS Business’ interest in the transaction, including its entitlement to remuneration in respect thereof.
Moreover, in circumstances where a third-party issuer (or borrower) becomes distressed and the participants in an offering undertaken by such issuer (or borrower), including Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, have a valid claim against the underwriter, Brookfield would have a conflict in determining whether to commence litigation or other proceedings against the BCS Business. In addition, because of the relationships that the BCS Business has with other non-affiliate broker-dealers, in circumstances where a non-affiliate broker-dealer has underwritten an offering, the issuer of which becomes distressed, Brookfield will also have a conflict in determining whether to bring a claim, taking into account the entirety of Brookfield’s relationship with the broker-dealer.
Brookfield maintains policies and procedures designed to address and to seek to mitigate these conflicts considerations. Among other things: (i) the engagement by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) or their respective portfolio investments) of the BCS Business for services will be in accordance with the requirements for affiliated services for the relevant account, including the determination of the compensation to be paid to the BCS Business in that respect; and (ii) each engagement of the BCS Business for services by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or investment by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) in a BCS originated/syndicated investment opportunity will be subject to review and approval by Brookfield’s Investment Committee for the relevant account and/or the portfolio management team managing portfolio investments of the account, which is comprised of different personnel from those managing the BCS Business, to ensure that the engagement and/or investment is suitable and appropriate for the relevant account’s investment mandate, as well as the Conflicts Committee to ensure that the conflicts considerations relating to the engagement and/or investment are appropriately addressed.
However, there can be no assurance that the terms agreed to will reflect then-current arm’s length terms, be as favorable to the relevant Brookfield Account or portfolio investment as otherwise would be the case if BCS was not part of the underwriter syndicate, be the same as those that other Brookfield Accounts or their portfolio investments receive in other transactions or be benchmarked in any manner. In some circumstances, the terms agreed to may be better than then-current arm’s length terms; in other cases, these terms may be worse. In selecting counterparties for any particular transaction and negotiating the terms (including fees) with such counterparties, Brookfield will do so in accordance with its fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the relevant Brookfield Account taking into account the totality of the circumstances, but will not be required to (and is not expected to) cause the Brookfield Account (or portfolio investment thereof) to select counterparties solely on the basis of the fees and other financial terms offered by the counterparties. In cases where Brookfield Accounts or their portfolio investments agree to pay counterparties a higher fee than may have been offered by other prospective counterparties, BCS (and other co-managers) will accordingly also receive higher compensation. While Brookfield personnel advising the Brookfield Account or its portfolio investment with respect to its engagement of an underwriting syndicate are expected to be distinct from the personnel who manage the BCS Business, they will generally be aware of BCS’s interest in the transaction, and – like Brookfield personnel across the organization – will be compensated in part with incentive compensation tied to the performance of Brookfield’s publicly traded affiliates, certain of which will be impacted by revenue generated by the BCS Business, and/or otherwise hold economic interests in such affiliates.
The BCS Business expects to provide services (including financing, capital markets, and advisory services) to third parties from time to time. Such third parties could include competitors of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or their respective portfolio investments. Services to third parties in this manner present additional conflicts of interest. For example, the BCS Business could act as placement agent or underwriter of securities for a third party that could be acquired by a Brookfield Account. The BCS Business also could come into possession of information that it (and Brookfield) is prohibited from acting on (including on behalf of Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which Brookfield Renewable is invested) or disclosing to Brookfield as a result of applicable confidentiality requirements or applicable law, even though such action or disclosure would be in the best interest of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or respective portfolio investments.
•Structuring of Investments and Subsidiaries. Brookfield is the largest unitholder in Brookfield Renewable and is entitled to receive management fees and other compensation from Brookfield Renewable. As a result, Brookfield will take its interests into account structuring Brookfield Renewable’s investments and other operations, while also taking into account the interests of the relevant Brookfield Accounts.
•From time to time, Brookfield may implement bespoke structures for one or a group of investors, including Brookfield Renewable, other Brookfield Accounts and third-party investors to facilitate their participation in particular investments in a manner that addresses tax, regulatory or other concerns (such as forming an alternative investment vehicle for an individual investor). These structures will generally require additional expenses to be borne by the relevant Brookfield Accounts and such expenses are generally shared among all investors in such accounts. In light of the time and expense required in connection with bespoke structures, in some cases Brookfield may make such structures available only to certain investors even when other similarly-situated investors could also benefit from them. Brookfield will decide in its discretion which investors will benefit from such bespoke structuring based on factors such as the amount of an investor’s investment, contractual agreements with such holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP’s unitholders and the particular tax, regulatory or other circumstances applicable to an investor. Investors for whom Brookfield engages in such bespoke structuring are expected to benefit from more favorable tax or other outcomes than other similarly-situated investors who do not benefit from such structuring.
•Restrictions on Brookfield Renewable’s Activities. Brookfield is subject to certain protocols, obligations and restrictions in managing Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, including conflicts-management protocols, aggregated regulatory reporting obligations and other regulatory restrictions such as real estate investment trust affiliate rules and regulations (which also apply with respect to certain Brookfield businesses that are separated by an information barrier, including PSG and Oaktree (in each case, as defined and described above)) and certain investment-related restrictions, which could in certain situations have an adverse effect on Brookfield Renewable.
•Buying and Selling Assets. Subject to certain exceptions, such as the transfer of an investment among Brookfield Accounts where such accounts are intended to co-invest alongside each other in the investment or are ultimately intended to invest in different assets that are acquired as part of a portfolio of assets or platform, without obtaining the approval of our independent directors or a Brookfield Account’s limited partner advisory committee (as applicable), Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will not invest (directly or indirectly) in any securities issued by, or acquire investments from or sell investments to, other Brookfield Accounts (excluding, for this purpose, any portfolio companies of Brookfield Accounts). Brookfield may offer an investment to co-investors after a Brookfield Account (including Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) has closed on such investment, even if not originally acquired with the intent to offer the investment as a co-investment opportunity. Such sales to co-investors do not require the approval of our independent directors or a Brookfield Account’s limited partner advisory committee (as applicable). These purchases and sales could give rise to conflicts of interest, including with respect to the consideration offered and the obligation of such accounts. Additionally, Brookfield may, in its discretion, determine not to pursue a transaction on behalf of a Brookfield Account (including Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) that would otherwise be within the investment objective of the Brookfield Account if the approval of our independent directors or a Brookfield Account’s limited partner advisory committee (as applicable) would be required in connection with such transaction and, in such circumstance, other Brookfield Accounts may pursue and invest in such transaction.
•Financing to Counterparties of Brookfield Accounts. There may be situations in which a Brookfield Account or a Brookfield Insurance Account will offer and/or commit to provide financing to one or more third parties that are expected to bid for and/or purchase an investment (in whole or in part) from Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested. This type of financing could be provided through pre-arranged financing packages arranged and offered by a Brookfield Account or a Brookfield Insurance Account to potential bidders in the relevant sales process or otherwise pursuant to bilateral negotiations between one or more bidders and Brookfield and/or the Brookfield Account. For example, where Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested seeks to sell an investment (in whole or in part) to a third party in the normal course, a Brookfield Account or a Brookfield Insurance Account may offer the third party debt financing to facilitate its bid and potential purchase of the investment.
This type of arrangement will only be offered in situations in which Brookfield believes it is neutral to or provides benefits to Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested by supporting third parties in their efforts to successfully bid for and/or acquire our investments. However, acquisition financing arranged and offered by Brookfield Accounts or Brookfield Insurance Accounts also creates potential conflicts of interest. In particular, such account’s participation as a potential lender in the sales process could create an incentive to select a third-party bidder that uses financing arranged by a Brookfield Account or a Brookfield Insurance Account to our potential detriment.
In order to mitigate potential conflicts of interest in these situations, Brookfield generally will seek to take one or more of the following actions (as it determines in its sole discretion) in satisfaction of its duties to Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested: (i) offer investments for sale in the normal course via competitive and blind bidding processes designed to maximize the sales value for Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested, (ii) engage one or more independent advisers, such as sell-side bankers, on behalf of Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested to administer and facilitate a commercially fair and equitable sales process, (iii) consult with and/or seek approval of our independent directors or investors in the Brookfield Account in which we are invested (or their advisory committee), as applicable, with respect to a recommended and/or intended course of action; (iv) establish ethical screens or information barriers (which can be temporary and of limited purpose) to separate the Brookfield investment professionals that act on behalf of Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested, on the one hand, from the Brookfield investment professionals that act on behalf of the other Brookfield Account and/or the Brookfield Insurance Account arranging and offering the acquisition financing, on the other hand, and (v) such other actions that Brookfield deems necessary or appropriate taking into account the relevant facts-and-circumstances. However, there can be no assurance that any particular action will be feasible or effective in any particular situation,
or that Brookfield’s own interests won’t influence its conduct, and it is possible that the outcome for Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested will be less favorable than otherwise would have been the case if Brookfield did not face these conflicts of interest. In addition, the actions that Brookfield pursues are expected to vary based on the particular facts and circumstances of each situation and, as such, there will be some degree of variation and potentially inconsistency in the manner in which these situations are addressed.
In addition, in certain situations Brookfield may accept a bid for an investment from a bidder that received acquisition financing from a Brookfield Account or Brookfield Insurance Account that is at a lower price than an offer that it received from a party that has independent financing sources. For example, although price is often the deciding factor in selecting whom to sell an investment to, other factors frequently influence the seller, including, among other things, closing conditions, lack of committed financing sources, regulatory or other consent requirements, and such other factors that increase the risk of the higher-priced bidder being able to complete or close the transaction under the circumstances. Brookfield could therefore cause Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested to sell an asset to a third party that has received financing from another Brookfield Account or Brookfield Insurance Account even when such third party has not offered the most attractive price.
In exercising its discretion hereunder, Brookfield will seek to ensure that Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested obtains the most favorable sale package (including sales price and certainty and speed of closing) on the basis of a commercially fair and equitable sales process. However, no sale of an investment (in whole or in part) involving acquisition financing provided by a Brookfield Account will require approval by Brookfield Renewable or the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares.
•Linked Transactions/Arrangements. Brookfield from time to time contracts with third parties for various linked business transactions and/or arrangements (e.g., agreements to supply power to a third party while at the same time agreeing to procure technology services from such third party) as a part of broader business or other similar relationships with such third parties. Such transactions and/or arrangements (and related benefits) generally will be for the benefit of Brookfield’s broader business platform and will be allocated in accordance with Brookfield’s allocation policies and procedures in a fair and reasonable manner. In connection with these transactions and/or arrangements, Brookfield will allocate certain transactions (e.g., power supply agreements) among various Brookfield Accounts, including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested, and may in connection therewith commit Brookfield Renewable and such Brookfield Accounts to purchase and/or backstop certain services or products provided by such third parties. In addition, Brookfield expects to receive discounts and other special economic benefits in respect of the services and/or products provided by the third parties, which will be allocated among Brookfield and various Brookfield Accounts in a fair and reasonable manner, including Brookfield and Brookfield Accounts that do not participate in providing goods and/or services to the third parties.
•Investments by Brookfield Personnel. Brookfield personnel that participate in Brookfield’s advisory business activities, including partners, members, shareholders, directors, officers and other employees of Brookfield (“Brookfield Personnel”), are permitted to buy and sell securities or other investments for their own accounts (including through Brookfield Accounts) or accounts of their family members, including trusts and other controlled entities. Positions may be taken by such Brookfield Personnel that are the same, different from, or made at different times than positions taken directly or indirectly for us and Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested. To reduce the possibility of (i) potential conflicts between our investment activities and those of Brookfield Personnel, and (ii) our activities being materially adversely affected by personal trading activities described above, Brookfield has established policies and procedures relating to personal securities trading. To this end, Brookfield Personnel that participate in managing our investment activities are generally restricted from engaging in personal trading activities (unless such activities are conducted through accounts over which Brookfield Personnel have no influence or control), and other Brookfield Personnel generally must pre-clear proposed personal trades. In addition, Brookfield’s policies include prohibitions on insider trading, front running, trading in securities that are on Brookfield’s securities watch list, trading in securities that are subject to a black-out period and other restrictions.
•Investments by the Related-Party Investor. Certain executives and former executives of Brookfield own a substantial majority of an investment vehicle (the “Related-Party Investor”) whose investment mandate
is managed by such executives, Brookfield, Oaktree and PSG. The Related-Party Investor’s investments include, among other things, interests in companies that Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in) have invested in, are investing in, and/or will in the future invest in, including in certain cases investments made alongside Brookfield Accounts. There is no information barrier between the personnel managing the Related-Party Investor’s activities and the rest of Brookfield (with the exception of Oaktree and PSG, which are walled off). Brookfield has adopted protocols designed to ensure that the Related-Party Investor’s activities do not materially conflict with or adversely affect the activities of Brookfield Renewable (or any other Brookfield Account) and to ensure that the interests of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable’s and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in) are, to the extent feasible, prioritized relative to the Related-Party Investor’s interests, including among others in connection with the allocation of investment opportunities and the timing of execution of investments.
•Brookfield’s Public Securities Group. Brookfield is an active participant, as agent and principal, in the global fixed income, currency, commodity, equities and other markets. Certain of Brookfield’s investment activities are managed independently of, and carried out without any reference to, the management of Brookfield Renewable and other Brookfield Accounts. For example, Brookfield invests, trades or makes a market in the equity, debt or other interests of certain investments without regard to the impact of such activities on us, other Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies. In particular, Brookfield’s Public Securities Group (“PSG”) manages investment funds and accounts that invest in public debt and equity markets. There is currently an information barrier in place pursuant to which Brookfield and PSG manage their investment operations independently of each other and do not generally share information relating to such activities. Consequently, Brookfield and PSG generally do not consult each other about, or have awareness of, investment decisions made by the other, and neither is subject to any internal approvals over its investment decisions by any person who would have knowledge of the investment decisions of the other. As a result, PSG will not share with Brookfield investment opportunities that would otherwise be suitable for Brookfield Renewable or any other Brookfield Account, and Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) will have no rights with respect to such opportunities. In addition, in certain circumstances, funds and/or accounts managed by PSG will hold an interest in one of our (or Brookfield Accounts’) investments (or potential investments). In such situations, PSG funds and/or accounts may benefit from our activities (and the activities of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). In addition, as a result of different investment objectives and views, PSG is likely to manage its interests in a way that is different from Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest (including, for example, by investing in different portions of an issuer’s capital structure, short selling securities, voting securities in a different manner, and/or selling its interests at different times than us or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest).
The potential conflicts of interest described herein are magnified as a result of the information sharing barrier because Brookfield’s investment teams generally will not be aware of, and will not have the ability to manage such conflicts. Brookfield has discretion at any time, and without notice to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares, to remove or modify such information barrier. In the event that the information barrier is removed or modified, Brookfield would be subject to certain protocols, obligations and restrictions in managing Brookfield Renewable and other Brookfield Accounts, including, for example, conflicts-management protocols and certain potential investment-relate restrictions.
•Oaktree. Brookfield holds a significant interest in Oaktree, which is a global investment manager with significant assets under management, emphasizing an opportunistic, value-oriented and risk-controlled approach to investments in credit, private equity, real assets and listed equities. Brookfield and Oaktree operate their respective investment businesses largely independently pursuant to an information barrier, with each remaining under its current brand and led by separate management and investment teams.
It is expected that Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in) and their portfolio companies will engage in activities and have business relationships that give rise to conflicts (and potential conflicts) of interest between them, on the one hand, and Oaktree, Oaktree-managed funds and accounts (collectively, “Oaktree Accounts”) and their portfolio companies, on the other hand. For so long as Brookfield and Oaktree manage their investment operations independently of each other pursuant to
an information barrier, Oaktree, Oaktree Accounts and their respective portfolio companies generally will not be treated as affiliates of Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies, and conflicts (and potential conflicts) considerations, including in connection with allocation of investment opportunities, investment and trading activities, and agreements, transactions and other arrangements entered into with Oaktree, Oaktree Accounts and their portfolio companies, generally will be managed as summarized herein.
There is (and in the future will continue to be) some degree of overlap in investment strategies and investments pursued by Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest (in both cases, directly and indirectly) and Oaktree Accounts. Nevertheless, Brookfield generally does not expect to coordinate or consult with Oaktree with respect to investment activities and/or decisions. This absence of coordination and consultation, and the information barrier described above, will in some respects mitigate conflicts of interests between Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, on the one hand, and Oaktree Accounts, on the other hand; however, these same factors also will give rise to certain conflicts and risks in connection with our and Oaktree’s investment activities, and make it more difficult to mitigate, ameliorate or avoid such situations. For example, because Brookfield and Oaktree are not expected to coordinate or consult with each other about investment activities and/or decisions, and neither Brookfield nor Oaktree is expected to be subject to any internal approvals over its investment activities and decisions by any person who would have knowledge and/or decision-making control of the investment decisions of the other, Oaktree Accounts will be entitled to pursue investment opportunities that are suitable for Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in, but which are not made available to us or those Brookfield Accounts. Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in, on the one hand, and Oaktree Accounts, on the other hand, are also expected to compete, from time to time, for the same investment opportunities. Such competition could, under certain circumstances, adversely impact the purchase price of our (direct and/or indirect) investments. Oaktree will have no obligation to, and generally will not, share investment opportunities that may be suitable for Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in with Brookfield, and Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in will have no rights with respect to any such opportunities.
In addition, Oaktree will not be restricted from forming or establishing new Oaktree Accounts, such as additional funds or successor funds. Moreover, Brookfield expects to provide Oaktree, from time to time, with (i) access to marketing-related support, including, for example, strategy sessions, introductions to investor relationships and other marketing facilitation activities, and (ii) strategic oversight and business development support, including general market expertise and introductions to market participants such as portfolio companies, their management teams and other relationships. Certain such Oaktree Accounts could compete with or otherwise conduct their affairs without regard as to whether or not they adversely impact Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we invest in.
Oaktree Accounts will be permitted to make investments of the type that are suitable for Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in without the consent of Brookfield. From time to time, Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we invest in, on the one hand, and Oaktree Accounts, on the other hand, are expected to purchase or sell an investment from each other, as well as jointly pursue one or more investments. In addition, from time to time, Oaktree Accounts are expected to hold an interest in an investment held by (or potential investment of) Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we invest in, and/or subsequently purchase (or sell) an interest in an investment held by (or potential investment of) Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in, including in different parts of the capital structure. For example, we (or a Brookfield Account that we are invested in) may hold the equity of a portfolio company of an Oaktree Account. In such situations, Oaktree Accounts could benefit from our (direct or indirect) activities. Conversely, Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in could be adversely impacted by Oaktree’s activities. In addition, as a result of different investment objectives, views and/or interests in investments, it is expected that Oaktree will manage certain Oaktree Accounts’ interests in a way that is different from the interests of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in (including, for example, by investing in different portions of an issuer’s capital structure, short selling securities, voting securities or exercising rights it holds in a different manner, and/or selling its interests at different times than Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in), which could adversely impact our (direct and/or indirect) interests. Oaktree and Oaktree Accounts are also expected to take positions, give advice and provide recommendations that are different, and potentially contrary to those which are taken by, or given or provided to, Brookfield Renewable and/or
Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in, and are expected to hold interests that potentially are adverse to those held by Brookfield Renewable (directly or indirectly). Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in, on the one hand, and Oaktree Accounts, on the other hand, will in certain cases have divergent interests, including the possibility that the interests of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in are subordinated to Oaktree Accounts’ interests or are otherwise adversely affected by Oaktree Accounts’ involvement in and actions related to the investment. Oaktree will not have any obligation or other duty to make available for the benefit of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in any information regarding its activities, strategies and/or views.
Oaktree may provide similar information, support and/or knowledge to Brookfield, and the conflicts (and potential conflicts) of interest described above will apply equally in those circumstances.
The potential conflicts of interest described herein are expected to be magnified as a result of the lack of information sharing and coordination between Brookfield and Oaktree. Investment teams managing the activities of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in are not expected to be aware of, and will not have the ability to manage such conflicts. This will be the case even if they are aware of Oaktree’s investment activities through public information.
Brookfield and Oaktree may decide, at any time and without notice to Brookfield Renewable or holders of BEPC exchangeable shares, to remove or modify the information barrier between Brookfield and Oaktree. In the event that the information barrier is removed or modified, it would be expected that Brookfield and Oaktree will adopt certain protocols designed to address potential conflicts and other considerations relating to the management of their investment activities in a different or modified framework.
Breaches (including inadvertent breaches) of the information barrier and related internal controls by Brookfield and/or Oaktree could result in significant consequences to Brookfield (and Oaktree) as well as have a significant adverse impact on Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in, including, among other things, potential regulatory investigations and claims for securities laws violations in connection with our direct and/or indirect investment activities. These events could have adverse effects on Brookfield’s reputation, result in the imposition of regulatory or financial sanctions, negatively impact Brookfield’s ability to provide investment management services to Brookfield Accounts, all of which could result in negative financial impact to the investment activities of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in.
To the extent that the information barrier is removed or otherwise ineffective and Brookfield has the ability to access analysis, models and/or information developed by Oaktree and its personnel, Brookfield will not be under any obligation or other duty to access such information or effect transactions on behalf of Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in in accordance with such analysis and models, and in fact may be restricted by securities laws from doing so. Brookfield may make investment decisions that differ from those it would have made if it had pursued such information, which may be disadvantageous to us and/or Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in.
Brookfield may from time to time engage Oaktree, Oaktree Accounts and/or their portfolio companies to provide certain services to Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies, including without limitation non-investment management related services and other services that would otherwise be provided by third-party service providers or Brookfield, as the case may be. For example, an Oaktree Account may be a lender to an investment owned by Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest, or alternative investment fund manager owned by Brookfield and Oaktree may serve as an alternative investment fund manager of Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest and provide services such as risk management. If engaged by Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest, such alternative investment fund manager may provide such services at different rates than those charged to Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest or their affiliates than it will charge to the Oaktree Accounts. While Brookfield will determine in good faith what rates and expenses it believes are acceptable for the services being provided to Brookfield Accounts (including based on similar services provided, or previously provided, to other Brookfield Accounts and/or rates approved by other Brookfield Accounts), there can be no assurances that the rates and expenses charged to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) will not be greater than those that would be charged in alternative circumstances. Each such engagement will be in accordance with disclosures set out in the governing documents and this Form 20-F and in the applicable governing documents. Companies in which
Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) has invested may enter into lease agreements and other similar agreements with Oaktree, Oaktree Accounts and/or their portfolio companies. In addition, Brookfield could be retained by Oaktree or a portfolio company thereof to perform services that it also provides to Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. The rates charged by Brookfield for such services to Oaktree are expected to be different than (and could be less than) those charged to the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
This does not purport to be a complete list or explanation of all actual or potential conflicts that could arise as a result of the Oaktree acquisition, and additional conflicts not yet known by Brookfield or Oaktree may arise in the future and those conflicts will not necessarily be resolved in favor of Brookfield Renewable’s interests (or the interests of Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested). Because of the extensive scope of both Brookfield’s and Oaktree’s activities and the complexities involved in combining certain aspects of existing businesses, the policies and procedures to identify and resolve such conflicts of interest will continue to be developed over time.
•Cross Trades and Principal Trades. When permitted by applicable law and subject to and in accordance with the terms of the governing documents of the applicable Brookfield Account, Brookfield may (but is under no obligation to) cause Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) to acquire or dispose of investments in cross trades between Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and other Brookfield Accounts or effect principal transactions where Brookfield causes Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) to purchase investments from or sell investments to Brookfield, provided that any such transaction be approved to the extent required by the governing documents and applicable law. Under our governing documents, where Brookfield Renewable engages in cross trades with other Brookfield Accounts or effects principal transactions with Brookfield, such transactions are subject to the approval of the independent directors (subject to certain exceptions), which approval is deemed to constitute the approval of, and binding upon, Brookfield Renewable. Our independent directors have generally approved cross trades between Brookfield Renewable and other Brookfield Accounts provided they are executed in accordance with parameters described in this Form 20-F. Principal trades between Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts are generally subject to approval by our independent directors on a case-by-case basis. Similarly, we (and other investors in Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) have generally approved cross trades between such Brookfield Accounts and other Brookfield Accounts provided they are executed in accordance with parameters described in the applicable Brookfield Accounts’ governing documents, while principal trades between such Brookfield Accounts and other Brookfield Accounts are subject to their investors’ consent on a case-by-case basis (which is generally obtained via their limited partner advisory committees or other analogous bodies), which approvals will be deemed to constitute the approval of, and be binding upon, the Brookfield Account in which we invest. Whether a transaction is a “principal trade” under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and therefore requires independent approval (i.e., by our independent directors on our behalf or the limited partner advisory committee of a Brookfield Account on such account’s behalf), depends on the precise structure of such transaction. In certain circumstances, Brookfield will structure a transaction in a manner so that it is not considered a “principal trade”.
There may be potential conflicts of interest or regulatory issues relating to these transactions which could limit Brookfield’s decision to engage in these transactions for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). In connection with a cross trade or a principal transaction, Brookfield and its affiliates have a potentially conflicting division of loyalties and responsibilities regarding Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and the other parties to the trade and have developed policies and procedures in relation to such transactions and conflicts. However, there can be no assurance that such transactions will be effected, or that such transactions will be effected in the manner that is most favorable to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) as a party to any such transaction. By virtue of its investment, a shareholder consents to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) entering into cross trades and, subject to consent by the independent directors (or by the limited partner advisory committee or other analogous body in the case of a transaction entered into by a Brookfield Account in which we invest), principal transactions to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law. For the avoidance of doubt, acquisitions or dispositions among certain portfolio companies of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and portfolio companies owned by other Brookfield Accounts, PSG, Oaktree or Non-Controlled Affiliates will not be treated as cross trades
or principal transactions and will not require the approval of the independent directors or any other consent. See “Affiliated Services and Transactions” below
•Excess Funds Liquidity Arrangement with Related Parties. We have an arrangement in place with Brookfield pursuant to which we lend Brookfield excess funds from time to time and it lends us excess funds from time to time. This arrangement is intended to enhance the use of excess funds between us and Brookfield when the lender has excess funds and the borrower has a business need for the capital (including, without limitation, to fund operating and/or investment activities and/or to pay down higher cost capital), and provides: (i) to the lender, a higher rate of return on the funds than it otherwise would be able to achieve in the market and (ii) to the borrower, a lower cost of funds than it otherwise would be able to obtain in the market.
Brookfield, in its capacity as our service provider, determines when it is appropriate for us to lend excess funds to, or borrow excess funds from, Brookfield. Brookfield has similar arrangements with other affiliates for whom it serves in one or more capacities, including (among others) promoter, principal investor and investment manager. It is therefore possible that, from time to time and to the extent that Brookfield determines this to be in the best interests of the parties: (i) funds that are placed on deposit with Brookfield by Brookfield Renewable will, in the discretion of Brookfield on a case-by-case basis, be lent on to other affiliates of Brookfield and (ii) funds that are placed on deposit with Brookfield by other Brookfield affiliates will, in the discretion of Brookfield on a case-by-case basis, be lent on to Brookfield Renewable. Because the interest rates charged are reflective of the credit ratings of the applicable borrowers, any loans by Brookfield to its affiliates, including Brookfield Renewable (as applicable), generally will be at higher interest rates than the rates then applicable to any balances deposited with Brookfield by Brookfield Renewable or other Brookfield affiliates (as applicable). These differentials are approved according to protocols described below. Accordingly, Brookfield also benefits from these arrangements and will earn a profit as a result of the differential in lending rates.
Amounts we lend to or borrow from Brookfield pursuant to this arrangement generally are repayable at any time upon either side’s request, and Brookfield generally ensures that the borrower has sufficient available capital from another source in order meet potential repayment demands. As noted above, Brookfield determines the interest rate to be applied to borrowed/ loaned amounts taking into account each party’s credit rating and the interest rate that would otherwise be available to it in similar transactions on an arms’ length basis with unrelated parties.
Conflicts of interest arising for Brookfield under this arrangement have been approved by our independent directors in accordance with our Conflicts Protocols for managing and resolving potential conflicts of interest.
•Arrangements with Brookfield. Our relationship with Brookfield involves a number of arrangements pursuant to which Brookfield provides various services to Brookfield Renewable, including access to financing arrangements and investment opportunities, and Brookfield Renewable supports Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies in various ways. Certain of these arrangements were effectively determined by Brookfield in the context of the spin-off, and could contain terms that are less favorable than those which otherwise might have been negotiated between unrelated parties. However, Brookfield believes that these arrangements are in the best interests of Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
Circumstances may arise in which these arrangements will need to be amended or new arrangements will need to be entered into, and conflicts of interest between Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield will arise in negotiating such new or amended arrangements. Any such negotiations will be subject to review and approval by our independent directors.
Brookfield is generally entitled to share in the returns generated by our operations, which creates an incentive for it to assume greater risks when making decisions for Brookfield Renewable than it otherwise would in the absence of such arrangements. In addition, our investment in and support of Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies provides Brookfield with certain ancillary benefits, such as satisfying Brookfield’s commitment to invest in such accounts (which Brookfield would otherwise need to satisfy from different sources), assisting Brookfield in marketing Brookfield Accounts and facilitating more efficient management of their portfolio companies’ operations.
•Limited Liability of Brookfield. The liability of Brookfield and its officers and directors is limited under our arrangements with them, and we have agreed to indemnify Brookfield and its officers and directors
against claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses which they may face in connection with those arrangements, which may lead them to assume greater risks when making decisions than they otherwise would if such decisions were being made solely for Brookfield’s own account, or may give rise to legal claims for indemnification that are adverse to the interests of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares. U.S. federal and state securities laws may impose liability under certain circumstances on persons that fail to act in good faith. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these arrangements, nothing in these arrangements is intended to, or will, constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies that a Brookfield Account or any investors may have under such laws.
DECISIONS MADE AND ACTIONS TAKEN THAT MAY RAISE POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
•Reputational Considerations. Given the nature of its broader platform, Brookfield has an interest in preserving its reputation, including with respect to our status as a publicly traded vehicle and, in certain circumstances, such reputational considerations may conflict with the interests of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested). Brookfield will likely make decisions on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) for reputational reasons that may not be directly aligned with the interests of investors or consistent with the determination Brookfield otherwise would have made absent its interest in Brookfield’s broader reputation. For example, Brookfield may limit transactions and activities on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) for reputational or other reasons, including where Brookfield is providing (or may provide) advice or services to an entity involved in such activity or transaction, where another Brookfield Account is or may be engaged in the same or a related activity or transaction to that being considered on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested), where another Brookfield Account has an interest in an entity involved in such activity or transaction, or where such activity or transaction on behalf of or in respect of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) could affect Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts or their activities. Additionally, by way of example, Brookfield may take into account the potential environmental and/or social impact when making decisions regarding the selection, management and disposal of investments and make take additional actions with respect to an investment motivated by environmental and social considerations beneficial to the reputation of Brookfield’s broader platform. Such decisions and actions may result in Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) achieving lower financial returns had Brookfield not engaged in such decisions and actions. Conversely, while ESG considerations are integrated into Brookfield investment process, Brookfield may determine in any particular situation to take actions to preserve financial returns of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), notwithstanding any adverse ESG impact on the investments of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest).
•Warehoused Investments and Initial Investments. Brookfield (or Brookfield Renewable) may purchase one or more warehoused investments on behalf of a Brookfield Account in which we invest. Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable, as applicable, is expected to sell each warehoused investment to a Brookfield Account in which we invest either prior to or following the initial closing of the account for a purchase price equal to the cost to Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable, as applicable, with respect to such warehoused investment, including any expenses attributable thereto and taking into account the impact of any currency fluctuations, plus an annually compounded rate of return on the capital deployed by Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable, as applicable, as set out in the relevant Brookfield Account’s governing documents, in respect of such warehoused investments, net of any cash distributions received by Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable, as applicable, with respect to such warehoused investment (but the cost of carry will not in any event be reduced below zero). Brookfield Accounts in which we invest may make initial investments. The purchase price (and any related deposits and expenses) of any initial investment may be funded by amounts borrowed pursuant to a loan facility. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if upon the initial closing of the Brookfield Account in which we invested, there has been a significant event relating to any initial investment or warehoused investment (such as a partial realization or a material change in value), Brookfield may, in its discretion, exclude such initial investment or warehoused investment from being purchased by the Brookfield Account in which we invest or adjust the interests of
investors in such Brookfield Account in, or the purchase price of, such initial investment or warehoused investments. In addition, Brookfield may hold an initial closing of a Brookfield Account in which we invest in respect of the Brookfield commitment (which may be satisfied by Brookfield Renewable) to establish a subscription backed loan facility to facilitate the purchase of certain initial investments by the Brookfield Account in which we invest; provided, however, that if upon the initial closing, there has been a significant event relating to any initial investment (such as a partial realization or a material change in value), Brookfield may, in its discretion, adjust the interests of investors in such Brookfield Account in, or the purchase price of, such initial investments. If an initial investment is funded using such a subscription backed loan facility, a Brookfield Account in which we invest will be responsible for payments of any interest thereon. In the event a Brookfield Account in which we invest is unable to purchase a warehoused investment from Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable, or Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable is unable to sell a warehoused investment to a Brookfield Account in which we invest for any legal, tax, regulatory or other reason, then such investment will not be treated as a warehoused investment for purposes of the governing documents and Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable will be permitted to own, syndicate, sell or take any other action with respect to such investment even if such actions benefit Brookfield.
Certain conflicts of interest are inherent in the foregoing transactions between Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, including in respect of the terms of the agreement between Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable, as applicable, and the Brookfield Account in which we invest regarding the sale of the warehoused investment (including as to representations, warranties, indemnities and remedies therein). In addition, where Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable acquires a warehoused investment for a Brookfield Account in which we invest, the Brookfield Account in which we invest will generally be obligated to purchase such warehoused investment from Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable regardless of any subsequent events affecting the value of such asset or deficiencies in such warehoused investment discovered after its acquisition by Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable. Although the prices at which warehoused investments are expected to be acquired by a Brookfield Account in which we invest will be determined based on the formula described above, (a) such prices may not be as favorable as those in a negotiated transaction with a third party and (b) under the circumstances, such prices may be adjusted to reflect significant events relating to any warehoused investment. Moreover, a Brookfield Account in which we invest will acquire the warehoused investments through privately negotiated transactions with Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable, in which prior due diligence may be limited and the persons controlling the Brookfield Account in which we invest may be conflicted in such transactions. As a result, there is no guarantee that the terms of such transactions will be as favorable as those that could be obtained from a third party or that the properties and interests that will comprise the warehoused investments will not carry with them undisclosed liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest).
In connection with the warehoused investments, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will be indemnified by Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable, as applicable, for claims made with respect to breaches of certain representations, warranties or covenants. Such indemnification is limited, however, and the Brookfield Account in which we invest is not entitled to any other indemnification in connection with the warehoused investments. Brookfield Accounts in which we invest are subject to the risk that Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable may experience material financial distress and be unable to satisfy one or more of these obligations. In addition, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest are reliant on Brookfield and therefore Brookfield Accounts in which we invest may choose to enforce less vigorously their rights under these arrangements, which could have a material adverse effect on their value. U.S. federal and state securities laws may impose liability under certain circumstances on persons that fail to act in good faith. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the above, nothing in these arrangements is intended to, or will, constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies that a Brookfield Account or any investors may have under such laws.
•Material, Non-Public Information; Trading Restrictions; Information Not Made Available. The ability of Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest to buy or sell certain securities or take other actions is expected to be restricted in certain circumstances, including by applicable securities laws, regulatory requirements, contractual obligations and/or reputational risk considerations applicable to Brookfield (and/or its internal policies designed to comply with these and similar requirements). For example, Brookfield will possess material, non-public information about issuers that
would limit the ability of Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest to buy and sell securities related to those issuers.
Furthermore, Brookfield (including PSG, Oaktree and any other Brookfield businesses that are separated by information barriers) and other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) are deemed to be affiliates for purposes of certain laws and regulations (notwithstanding that PSG, Oaktree and other such Brookfield businesses will generally not be treated as affiliates under the governing documents of Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and it is anticipated that, from time to time, Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will each have positions (which in some cases will be significant) in one or more of the same issuers. As such, Brookfield may need to aggregate certain investment holdings, including holdings of Brookfield Accounts, for certain securities laws purposes (including trading restrictions under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, complying with reporting obligations under Section 13 of the Exchange Act and the reporting and short-swing profit disgorgement obligations under Section 16 of the Exchange Act) and other regulatory purposes (including: (a) public utility companies and public utility holding companies; (b) bank holding companies; (c) owners of broadcast licenses, airlines, railroads, water carriers and trucking concerns; (d) casinos and gaming businesses; and (e) public service companies (such as those providing gas, electric or telephone services)). Consequently, activities by one Brookfield Account could result in earlier public disclosure of investments by other Brookfield Accounts, restrictions on transactions of other Brookfield Accounts (including the ability to make or dispose of certain investments at certain times), adverse effects on the prices of investments made by Brookfield Accounts, potential short-swing profit disgorgement, penalties and/or regulatory remedies, or otherwise create conflicts of interests for Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
As a result of the foregoing, Brookfield may restrict, limit or reduce the amount of investments made on behalf of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). In addition, certain investments may become subject to legal or other restrictions on transfer following their acquisition. When faced with the foregoing limitations, Brookfield will generally seek to avoid exceeding the threshold because exceeding the threshold could have an adverse impact on the ability of Brookfield to conduct its business activities. Brookfield may also reduce certain Brookfield Accounts’ interest in, or from participating in, an investment opportunity that has limited availability or where Brookfield has determined to cap its aggregate investment in consideration of certain regulatory or other requirements so that other Brookfield Accounts that pursue similar investment strategies are able to acquire an interest in the investment opportunity. Brookfield could determine not to engage in certain transactions or activities which may be beneficial to Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) because engaging in such transactions or activities in compliance with applicable law would result in significant cost to, or administrative burden on, Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts or create the potential risk of trade or other errors.
Brookfield (including PSG, Oaktree and any other Brookfield businesses that are separated by information barriers) may become subject to additional restrictions on its business activities that could have an impact on the activities of Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. In addition, Brookfield may restrict investment decisions and activities on behalf of Brookfield Renewable or certain, but not all, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest (in addition to other Brookfield Accounts sponsored, managed or advised by Brookfield, PSG or Oaktree).
•Affiliated Services and Transactions. Where it deems appropriate, relevant and/or necessary, in its sole discretion, Brookfield will perform or will engage its affiliates and/or related parties to provide a variety of different services and products in connection with the operation and/or management of Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and/or their investments, potential investments and/or investment entities, that would otherwise be provided by independent third parties, including (among others): lending and loan special servicing, arranging, negotiating and managing financing, refinancing, hedging, derivative, managing workouts and foreclosures and other treasury and capital markets arrangements; investment banking (including participation by Brookfield-affiliated broker dealers in the underwriting and syndications of securities, loans and other financial instruments issued by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or portfolio companies); investment support, including investment backstop, guarantees and similar investment support arrangements; advisory, consulting, brokerage, market research, appraisal, valuation, risk management,
assurance, and audit services (including related to investments, assets, commodities, good and services); acting as alternative investment fund manager and/or other similar type of manager in jurisdictions where such services are necessary and/or beneficial and services relating to the use of entities that maintain a permanent residence in certain jurisdictions; financial planning, cash flow modeling and forecasting, consolidation, reporting, books and records, bank account and cash management, controls and other financial operations services; transaction support, assisting with review, underwriting, analytics, due diligence and pursuit of investments and potential investments; anti-bribery and corruption, anti-money laundering and “know your customer” reviews, assessments and compliance measures; investment onboarding (including training employees of investments on relevant policies and procedures relating to risks); legal, compliance, regulatory, tax and corporate secretarial services; fund administration, accounting and reporting (including coordinating, supervising and administering onboarding, due diligence, reporting and other administrative services, including those associated with the third party fund administrator and placement agents of Brookfield Renewable (or of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest)) and client onboarding (including review of subscription materials and coordination of anti-bribery and corruption, anti-money laundering or “know your customer” reviews and assessments); preparation and review of fund documents, negotiation with prospective investors and other services that would be considered organizational expenses of a Brookfield Account if performed by a third party; portfolio company and asset/property operations and management (and oversight thereof); data generation, data analytics, data analysis, data collection and data management services; participation in and/or advice on a range of activities by strategic and/or operations professionals with established industry expertise, including among others in connection with (or with respect to) the origination, identification, assessment, pursuit, coordination, execution and consummation of investment opportunities, including project planning, engineering and other technical analysis, securing site control, preparing and managing approvals and permits, financial analysis and managing related-stakeholder matters; real estate, leasing and/or asset/facility management; development management (including predevelopment, market and site analysis, modeling, zoning, entitlements, land use, pre-construction, community and government relations, design, environmental review and approvals, securing and administering compliance with governmental agreements, government approvals and incentive programs, permitting, site safety planning and construction); marketing (including of power or other output by an underlying asset/portfolio company); environmental and sustainability services; the placement and provision of various insurance policies and coverage and/or reinsurance thereof, including via risk retention, insurance captives and/or alternative insurance solutions; system controls; human resources, payroll and welfare benefits services; health, life and physical safety, security, operations, maintenance and other technical specialties; supply and/or procurement of power, energy and/or other commodities/goods/products; information technology services, risk management and innovation (including cyber/digital security and related services); all services contemplated by a Rate Schedule; other operational, back office, administrative and governance related services; oversight and supervision of the provision, whether by a Brookfield affiliate/related party or a third-party, of the above-referenced services and products; and any other services that Brookfield deems appropriate, relevant and/or necessary in connection with the operations and/or management of Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and/or their investors, investments, potential investments and/or the investment entities (such services, collectively, “Affiliated Services”). The types of Affiliated Services that Brookfield provides will not remain fixed and are expected to change and/or evolve over time as determined by Brookfield in its sole discretion.
Some of these services give rise to additional conflicts of interest considerations because they are similar to the services provided by Brookfield to Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). However, Brookfield deems these services to be appropriate for and value enhancing to the operations and/or management of investments, potential investments, Brookfield Renewable, and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and these services otherwise would be provided by third parties engaged to provide the services. Amounts charged to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or investments for Affiliated Services will be in addition to other compensation payable to Brookfield, will not be shared with Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or holders of BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP’s unitholders (or be offset against other compensation payable to Brookfield), will increase the overall costs and expenses borne
indirectly by investors in Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), and are expected to be substantial.
The fee potential, both current and future, inherent in a particular transaction could be an incentive for Brookfield to seek to refer or recommend a transaction to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested). Furthermore, providing services or products to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and its investments is expected to enhance Brookfield’s relationships with various parties, facilitate additional business development and enable Brookfield to obtain additional business and generate additional revenue.
To the extent Brookfield (including any of its affiliates and/or personnel, other than portfolio companies of other Brookfield Accounts) provides an Affiliated Service, the amount charged for such service will be: (a) at a rate no greater than the applicable rate for such service as agreed to with Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) pursuant to an affiliated services rate schedule (“Rate Schedule”), (b) at a rate for the relevant service that Brookfield reasonably believes is consistent with an arm’s length market rate (the “Affiliate Service Rate”); (c) at cost (including an allocable share of internal costs), plus an administrative fee of 5-10%, or (d) at any other rates with consent from the independent directors (with respect to services provided to Brookfield Renewable) or the advisory committees of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest (with respect to services provided to such Brookfield Accounts). A portion of any fees paid to Brookfield affiliates in accordance with the Rate Schedule may be paid as a pass-through of payroll costs for the Brookfield personnel providing such services (in which case the amount payable as a fee in accordance with the Rate Schedule will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis). To the extent Brookfield charges an Affiliate Service Rate or cost plus an administrative fee in respect an Affiliated Service, the Affiliate Services Rate or cost (as applicable) will be determined as set out in more detail in this Form 20-F. For the avoidance of doubt, Brookfield has discretion to decide when to charge cost plus an administrative fee of 5% instead of using the Rate Schedule or the Affiliate Service Rate, including in situations where cost plus 5% results in a higher fee.
With respect to Affiliated Services, the costs of personnel managing day to day operations of an investment (collectively, “Operating Personnel”), in each case whether employed by Brookfield or a third-party and whether performing services on site or off site, will be charged to the investment at cost (including an allocable share of internal costs) in addition to the fees that are prescribed by the Rate Schedule or the Affiliate Service Rate, as applicable. For the avoidance of doubt, the fees so charged will not be reduced by the costs of Operating Personnel. The passed-through costs of such Operating Personnel are often substantial, and in certain cases, are expected to exceed the amount of fees charged in accordance with the Rate Schedule or the Affiliate Services Rate, as applicable.
In certain cases, Brookfield will oversee and/or supervise third-party service providers who provide services that, if performed by Brookfield, would be charged to a Brookfield Account in which we invest in accordance with the Rate Schedule and/or the Affiliate Service Rate; in such cases, Brookfield may charge, (i) fees that, when combined with the fees charged by the third party services provider, are at a rate equal to or less than those set out in the Rate Schedule, or (ii) at cost (including an allocable share of internal costs) plus an administrative fee of 5% in addition to the third-party service provider's fees, which amounts may in the aggregate exceed the rates set forth on the Rate Schedule.
If an Affiliated Service is charged at the Affiliate Service Rate, Brookfield will determine the Affiliate Service Rate in good faith at the time of engagement based on one or more factors, including, among others: (i) the rate that one or more comparable service providers (which may or may not be a competitor of Brookfield) charge third-parties for the similar services on an arm’s length basis; (ii) market knowledge (which could be based on internal knowledge or inquiries with one or more market participants); (iii) the rate charged by Brookfield to one or more third-parties for similar services (or the methodology used by Brookfield to set such rate); (iv) advice of and/or information provided by one or more third-party agents, consultants and/or other market participants, including fee data and benchmark analyses (which could be based on proprietary models that utilize various inputs, assumptions and/or estimates deemed relevant by the third-party); (v) commodity or other rate forecasting; (vi) the rate agreed to pursuant to a competitive arm’s length bidding process (which may not reflect the lowest rate bid during the process, but that is inherent in an engagement that is deemed by Brookfield to be in the best interests of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) and/or their investments taking into account the
totality of factors relating thereto); (vii) the rate required to meet certain regulatory requirements or qualify for particular governmental programs; (viii) in the case of services which Brookfield provides as part of a syndicate, such as investment banking or brokerage services, the rate that is negotiated and/or determined by a third-party member of the syndicate; (ix) the rate that a third-party agreed to provide the service at pursuant to a term sheet or similar agreement or understanding; and/or (x) other subjective and/or objective metrics deemed relevant by Brookfield (in its sole discretion) in determining an arm’s length market rate for a particular service.
For the avoidance of doubt, the costs to be paid in respect of Affiliated Services and therefore an expense of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (whether such Affiliated Services are provided in accordance with a Rate Schedule, at the Affiliate Service Rate, cost plus an administrative fee, or otherwise) will include, among other components: (i) personnel compensation costs and expenses (e.g., salary, benefits (including, among others, paid time off)), (ii) short- and long-term incentive compensation (including management promote, incentive fee and/or other performance-based compensation), (iii) costs and expenses of professional development, professional certifications, professional fees, training, business travel (including, among others, transportation, lodging and meals) and related matters, (iv) an allocable share of corporate costs and expenses associated with employment, including (among others) office rent, human resources personnel, talent acquisition fees and expenses, and office services costs, and (v) an allocable share of technology costs and expenses associated with employment of personnel, including, among others, information technology hardware, human resources technology, computing power and/or storage, software, cybersecurity, and related costs. These costs and expenses are expected to be substantial and will, in certain cases, be based on estimates made by Brookfield, both in respect of the total amount of costs and expenses relating to a particular service as well as the shares of such costs and expenses allocable to Brookfield Accounts (including, among others, Brookfield and Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested)). To the extent Brookfield retains the services of a third-party consultant, agent or other market participant to advise on or otherwise assist in determining an Affiliate Service Rate and/or the estimated costs and expenses of providing an Affiliated Service to a Brookfield Account, the fees and costs (including expenses) of such third-party will be borne by such Brookfield Account.
At all times, Brookfield will endeavor to determine the costs and expenses and/or the Affiliate Service Rate applicable with respect to a particular Affiliated Service, in a fair, reasonable and impartial manner. However, there can be no assurance that any such determination will accurately reflect the actual cost and/or arm’s length market rate of an Affiliated Service in any particular situation, that Brookfield’s own interests won’t influence its determination, and/or that a different methodology would not have also been fair, reasonable and/or yield a different (including more accurate) result. Among other things, the determination of cost and expenses generally will be based on estimates (which are inherently subjective) and, in determining an Affiliate Service Rate, there are variances in the marketplace for similar services based on an array of factors that affect rates for services, including, among others, loss leader pricing strategies, other marketing and competitive practices, integration efficiencies, geographic market differences, and the quality of the services provided. As a result, there can be no assurances that the amounts charged by Brookfield for any Affiliated Service will not be greater (or lower) than the rate that would be charged had Brookfield determined the rate via a different methodology or engaged a similarly-situated third-party service provider to provide the services. The Affiliate Service Rate charged for any Affiliated Service at any given time following the relevant engagement could be higher (or lower) than the then-current market rate for the service because the market rate has decreased (or increased) over time. However, Brookfield generally will not adjust (i.e., decrease or increase) the Affiliate Service Rate in any particular case. Brookfield’s methodology of estimating the costs and expenses attributable to a particular Affiliated Service could be higher (or lower) than the actual cost of providing the service, particularly as Brookfield will rely on estimates of costs and expenses (including, among others, estimates of budgets, expected services, relative sizes (or other metric) of assets and/or businesses, and/or time periods) and blended rates of employees. However, unless otherwise determined by Brookfield, in its sole discretion, the associated charges to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or an investment will not be subject to true-up once the relevant Affiliated Services are completed or periodically throughout the services period.
Where Affiliated Services are in place prior to Brookfield Renewable’s (or a Brookfield Account’s in which we are invested) ownership of an investment and cannot be amended without the consent of an unaffiliated third party, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) will inherit the pre-existing rates for such Affiliated Services until (X) such time at which third-party consent is no longer required, or (Y) Brookfield
Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) seeks consent from the unaffiliated third party to amend such rates. Accordingly, while Brookfield could seek consent of the unaffiliated third party to amend any pre-existing fee rates, Brookfield will be incentivized to seek to amend the pre-existing fee arrangement in certain circumstances and dis-incentivized to do so in others. For example, Brookfield will be incentivized to seek consent to amend the rate in circumstances where the amended fee would be higher than the pre-existing rate, and conversely could choose not to (and will not be required to) seek consent to amend any pre-existing fee rates if the amended rate would be lower than the pre-existing rate.
From time to time, Brookfield will terminate Affiliated Services arrangements entered into between Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (and/or its investment(s)), on the one hand, and Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts (and/or their investment(s)), on the other hand, including prior to the expected termination or expiration of the arrangements. In such instances, Brookfield will endeavor to act fairly and reasonably taking into account the interests of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (and/or its investment(s)) as well as its counterparties and the applicable facts and circumstances at such time. However, there can be no assurance that any such termination will be effected in such manner as it otherwise would have been had the counterparty not been a Brookfield related entity and/or that Brookfield’s own interests won’t influence the manner of such termination. In particular, Brookfield could determine to waive and/or otherwise negotiate certain terms relating to the termination, including early termination fees and related provisions, in a manner that it would not have pursued if the counterparty were not a Brookfield related entity. In addition, it is possible that Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or a particular investment could bear a larger portion of the termination costs than it otherwise would have if Brookfield did not face the conflicts of interest considerations discussed herein.
For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing procedures and limitations regarding compensation for transactions will not apply to transactions for services and/or products between the investments of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and portfolio companies of another Brookfield Account, PSG, Oaktree, Oaktree Account and/or a Non-Controlled Affiliate, which are described in further detail in “Transactions with Portfolio Companies” (though Brookfield could nonetheless determine, in its sole discretion, to apply a Rate Schedule, an Affiliate Service Rate and/or an estimated cost plus an administrative fee methodology in these situations).
Historically, certain Affiliated Services were performed by Brookfield (including by its direct personnel, operating partners, servicers, brokers and/or other third-party vendors) without being charged to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) and/or its investments. Brookfield believes that providing these Affiliated Services results in increased focus, attention, efficiencies and related synergies that facilitate alignment of interest and the ability to offer customized solutions and value creation that would not be available from third-party providers. While Brookfield believes that the cost of the Affiliated Services will be reasonable, the extensive and specialized nature of services could result in such costs being higher than those charged for similar services (to the extent available) by third-party providers. Brookfield generally will not evaluate alternative providers or otherwise benchmark the costs of such Affiliated Services. While Brookfield believes that this enhances the overall services that Brookfield provides to Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and its investments in a cost-efficient manner, the arrangement gives rise to conflicts of interest considerations, including among others in connection with the methodologies employed to determine the cost and expenses of the services provided to Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) (and/or its investments) and/or the determination of the portion of the costs and expenses relating to support services to be allocated among Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) (and its investments), on the one hand, and other Brookfield Accounts (and their investments), on the other hand, including Brookfield.
In addition to the services discussed previously in this section, where it deems appropriate, relevant and/or necessary, in its sole discretion, Brookfield will engage Brookfield Renewable to provide services to other Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and investments of such other Brookfield Accounts. These engagements generally will be on a cost recovery basis, which may be lower than applicable market rates for the services or the rates that Brookfield Renewable would charge a different counterparty for similar services. However, in light of the broader relationship between Brookfield and Brookfield Renewable and the overall alignment of our interests, and our objective of maximizing the value of our investments and those of the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, we believe such arrangements are in our overall best interests.
•Allocation of Costs and Expenses. In the ordinary course, Brookfield is required to decide whether costs and expenses (including, among, others, those incurred in connection with Affiliated Services, Internal Audits and engagements of third-party service providers) are to be borne by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or their investments or potential investments, on the one hand, or other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield), on the other hand, and/or whether such costs and expenses should be allocated among Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield). These costs and expenses include organizational expenses, operating expenses and expenses charged to investments, including (among others) fees, costs and expenses payable to service providers, including related parties, affiliates of Brookfield and/or third-party service providers. Brookfield expects to allocate costs and expenses to or among the Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or Brookfield) that benefit from such costs and expenses in a fair and reasonable manner using its good faith judgment, which is inherently subjective. Additional detail regarding costs and expenses is set out, among others, in the “Affiliated Services and Transactions,” “Service Providers,” “Transfers and Secondments,” “Insurance” and “Internal Audit” subsections in the Conflicts of Interest section of this Form 20-F.
Brookfield generally will utilize one or more methodologies (that it determines, in its sole discretion, to be fair and reasonable) to determine (i) the costs and expenses relating to a particular service (that are not otherwise provided pursuant to a fixed rate) and (ii) the allocation of costs and expenses (including, among others, Affiliated Services and other fees charged by third-party service providers) among Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or Brookfield). These methodologies are expected to include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: (i) quarterly, semi-annual, annual or other periodic estimates (including budgetary estimates) of (A) the amount of time spent by or to be spent by employees on provision of a service to one or more Brookfield Accounts, and/or (B) the level of effort required to provide a particular service relative to other services provided by the same employees (for instance, costs and expenses relating to financial reporting services could be allocated based on the estimated level of effort required for audited versus unaudited financial statements) and Brookfield is not required to subject such estimates to true-up once the relevant costs or expenses have been completed; (ii) the relative size (e.g., value or invested equity), number, output, complexity and/or other characteristic relating to the Brookfield Accounts, investments and/or potential investments to which the services relate; (iii) where services are provided by groups of employees, utilization of blended compensation rates across such employees; and/or (iv) any other methodology deemed fair and reasonable by Brookfield in determining (and/or estimating) the cost and expenses relating to the provision of a particular service.
The methodologies that Brookfield utilizes to determine the costs and expenses relating to a particular service and the allocation of costs and expenses (including, among others, Affiliated Services and other fees charged by third-party service providers) among Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield) are expected to vary based on the particular facts and circumstances of each situation (including potentially analogous situations) and over time, and as such there will be some degree of variation in the manner in which situations are addressed (including similar situations over time). As a result of the foregoing, there can be no assurance that any such determination will accurately reflect the actual cost of a service in any particular situation, that Brookfield’s own interests won’t influence its determination, and/or that a different methodology would not have also been fair, reasonable and/or yield a different (including more accurate) result. Moreover, it is possible that Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or their investments or potential investments could be allocated a larger portion of costs and expenses relating to one or more services, including services provided by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield) and/or services that are provided to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and other Brookfield Account(s), than they otherwise would have if Brookfield did not face the conflicts of interest considerations discussed herein. Among other things, the determination of costs and expenses generally will be based on estimates (which are inherently subjective) and/or blended rates determined by blending and averaging employee costs. As a result, there can be no assurances that the amounts charged by Brookfield to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or their investments for any service will not be greater (or lower) than the amount that would be charged had Brookfield determined the costs and expenses relating to the service(s) and/or the allocation of such costs and expenses among Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield) via a different methodology or engaged a similarly-situated third-party service provider to provide the services.
Costs and expenses that are suitable for only Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (and/or their investments or potential investments) or another Brookfield Account (and/or its investments) are expected to be allocated only to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or such other Brookfield Account, as applicable. Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing to the contrary, in certain situations costs and expenses are expected to be allocated only to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (and/or their investments) despite the fact that the incurrence of such costs and expenses did not or will not directly relate solely to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and could, in fact, also benefit other Brookfield Accounts or not ultimately benefit Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (and/or their investments or potential investments) at all. For example, costs and expenses could be allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) in respect of a specific legal, regulatory, tax, commercial and/or other matter, structure and/or negotiation that does not relate solely to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or was addressed prior to the launch of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and Brookfield could determine to allocate all or a significant portion of such costs and expenses to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) based on factors that it deems reasonable in its sole discretion, regardless of the amount of capital raised for and/or number of investors (if any) who ultimately invest in, Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) in connection with such matter, structure and/or negotiation, and regardless of the extent to which other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield) ultimately benefit from such matter, structure and/or negotiation. Costs and expenses incurred in connection with a matter, structure and/or negotiation unrelated to a Brookfield Account in which we invest could therefore be allocated to a Brookfield Account in which we invest even if such costs and expenses were incurred prior to the existence of a Brookfield Account in which we invest. Similarly, costs and expenses that are expected to be borne by a particular investor in a Brookfield Account in which we invest or a third party could be allocated to a Brookfield Account in which we invest to the extent such costs and expenses are not ultimately charged to or paid by such investor or third party, including, for example, costs and expenses related to a transfer of an interest in a Brookfield Account in which we invest, bespoke reporting and/or other arrangements.
In certain circumstances, in order to create efficiencies and optimize performance, Brookfield expects that one or more investments, potential investments, portfolio companies and/or assets of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) will share the operational, legal, financial, back-office and/or other resources of another investment, potential investment, portfolio company and/or asset of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or other Brookfield Accounts, including Brookfield. Brookfield will determine the costs and expenses as well as the allocation of such costs and expenses among the relevant Brookfield Accounts (and/or their assets) utilizing the methodologies set forth above.
Where a potential investment is pursued on behalf of one or more Brookfield Accounts, including Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), the Brookfield Account(s) that ultimately make(s) the investment will generally be allocated the costs and expenses related to such investment on a pro-rata basis based on their proportionate interests in the investment. In the case of a potential investment that is not consummated, Brookfield expects to allocate the broken deal costs and expenses relating to such potential investment among the Brookfield Account(s) that Brookfield expected to participate in such investment on a pro-rata basis based on their expected proportionate interests in the investment, provided that pro-rata interests that were expected to be allocated to (a) other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield) so as to facilitate a closing of the investment (i.e., with the expectation that such interests would be further syndicated to third-party investors post-closing) and (b) potential third-party co-investors that did not agree to bear broken deal costs and expenses, will be allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) for purposes of allocating such broken deal costs and expenses. In any event, Brookfield’s allocation of costs and expenses relating to a consummated or unconsummated investment may result in Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) reimbursing other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield) for costs and expenses, or vice versa, so as to achieve an allocation of such costs and expenses that Brookfield determines, in its discretion, to be fair and reasonable, as described above.
Examples of broken deal costs and expenses include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) research costs and expenses, (b) fees and expenses of legal, financial, accounting, risk, technology, consulting or other advisers (including Brookfield) in connection with conducting due diligence or otherwise pursuing a particular non-consummated transaction, (c) fees and expenses in connection with arranging financing for a particular non-consummated transaction, (d) travel costs, (e) deposits or down payments that are forfeited in connection with, or
amounts paid as a penalty for, a particular non-consummated transaction, and (f) other costs and expenses incurred in connection with activities related to a particular non-consummated transaction (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any relevant Affiliated Service). . Brookfield intends to make allocation determinations in its discretion, and it may modify or change its allocation methodologies from time to time to the extent it determines such modifications or changes are necessary or advisable to achieve a fair and reasonable allocation, and such modifications or changes could result in Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) and/or other Brookfield Accounts bearing less (or more) costs and expenses than it otherwise would have borne without such modifications and/or pursuant to a different allocation methodology.
The list of operating expenses included in Brookfield Renewable’s and Brookfield Accounts’ disclosure documents is based on Brookfield’s past experiences and current expectations of the types of costs and expenses to be incurred by Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). Additional and/or new costs and expenses are expected to arise over time and Brookfield will allocate such costs and expenses to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (or among Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and other Brookfield Accounts) as it determines, in its discretion, to be fair and reasonable. In addition, although organizational expenses of Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable invests generally are subject to a cap, certain costs and expenses that are to be borne as operating expenses, which are not subject to a cap, include costs and expenses related to organizational matters, such as costs and expenses relating to distributing and implementing applicable elections pursuant to any “most favored nations” clauses in side letters, and fees, costs and expenses of anti-bribery and corruption, anti-money laundering and/or “know your customer” compliance, tax diligence expenses and costs and expenses of ongoing related procedures. Brookfield has engaged a compliance consulting firm and could engage similar firms to provide services in connection with its investor relations operations, including the review of diligence and marketing materials; such costs and expenses incurred in relation to the formation and organization of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will be treated as organizational expenses subject to the caps of such Brookfield Accounts, and thereafter in respect of the ongoing operation or administration of the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will be treated as operating expenses.
•Intangible Benefits and Discounts. Brookfield and its personnel can be expected to receive certain benefits and/or perquisites arising or resulting from their activities on behalf of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) which will not reduce management fees or otherwise be shared with Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), their investors and/or investments. Such benefits will inure exclusively to Brookfield and/or its personnel receiving them, even if they are significant or difficult to value and even though the cost of the underlying service is borne by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or their respective investments (as an expense). For example, certain affiliates may receive portions of fees paid by third parties that relate to transactions involving properties and/or tenants, such as a portion of broker commissions paid by sellers of properties, and portions of the insurance premiums and fees paid by tenants to insurance providers. In addition, airline travel or hotel stays incurred as expenses by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) typically result in “miles” or “points” or credit in loyalty/status programs and such benefits and/or amounts will, whether or not de minimis or difficult to value, inure exclusively to Brookfield and/or such personnel (and not to Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, investors and/or investments) even though the cost of the underlying service is borne by Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or investments. Similarly, the volume of work that service providers receive from Brookfield results in discounts for such services that Brookfield will benefit from, while Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or their respective investments will not be able to benefit from certain discounts that apply to Brookfield. Brookfield and/or its employees will, from time to time, make or receive employment referrals for certain contacts and/or their family members, including those contacts that relate to Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and investments). Such referrals may result in employment that benefits the contacts and/or their family members and the financial benefit of that employment will not be individually disclosed to Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or shared with such Brookfield Accounts, investors and/or investments. In addition, Brookfield has in the past and expects to continue to make available certain discount programs to its employees as a result of Brookfield’s relationship with an
investment (e.g., “friends and family” discounts), which discounts are not available to the investors. The size of these discounts on products and services provided by investments (and, potentially, customers or suppliers of such investments) could be significant. The potential to receive such discounts could provide an incentive for Brookfield to cause Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or investments to enter into transactions that may or may not have otherwise been entered into in the absence of these arrangements and benefits. Financial benefits that Brookfield and its personnel derive from such transactions will generally not be shared with Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), investors and/or investments. Such discounts include, among others, the ability to lease units in multifamily buildings owned by Brookfield Accounts, stay at hotels owned by Brookfield Accounts, utilize services and/or programs offered by assets owned by Brookfield Accounts, in each case at significantly discounted rates. Brookfield also offers referral bonuses to its employees who refer customers to assets owned by Brookfield Accounts, including referrals of tenants to buildings. In certain cases, Brookfield will be engaged by the purchaser of an investment to provide various services, including operations and management services (and oversight thereof), with respect to such investment for an interim period following the disposition of such investments until such functions are fully transitioned to the purchaser’s service providers. Any such services will be provided on rates agreed with the purchaser (which may be different from (and potentially higher than) the rates charged for Affiliated Services) and such compensation will not be shared with Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), including the Brookfield Account that sold the investment, or reduce management or other fees owed by Brookfield Accounts. For a discussion regarding the resolution of the conflicts of interest noted above, see “Resolution of Conflicts Generally” below.
•Transactions with Portfolio Companies. In addition to any Affiliated Services provided by Brookfield or Brookfield Renewable (as described above), certain of our investments and/or portfolio companies of Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested will in the ordinary course of business provide services or goods to, receive services or goods from, lease space to or from, or participate in agreements, transactions or other arrangements with (including the purchase and sale of assets and other matters that would otherwise be transacted with independent third parties), portfolio companies owned by other Brookfield Accounts, PSG, Oaktree, Oaktree Accounts and Non-Controlled Affiliates. Some of these agreements, transactions and other arrangements would not have been entered into but for the affiliation or relationship with Brookfield and, in certain cases, are expected to replace agreements, transactions and/or arrangements with third parties. These agreements, transactions and other arrangements will involve payment and/or receipt of fees, expenses and other amounts and/or other benefits to or from the portfolio companies of such other Brookfield Accounts, PSG, Oaktree, Oaktree Accounts and Non-Controlled Affiliates (including, in certain cases, performance-based compensation). In certain cases, Brookfield’s investment thesis with respect to an investment will include attempting to create value by actively facilitating relationships between the investment and portfolio companies or assets owned by other Brookfield Accounts, PSG, Oaktree, Oaktree Accounts and Non-Controlled Affiliates. In these and other cases, these agreements, transactions and other arrangements will be entered into either with active participation by Brookfield or the portfolio companies’ management teams independent of Brookfield. While such arrangements and/or transactions and the fees or compensation involved have the potential for inherent conflicts of interest, Brookfield believes that the access to Brookfield (including portfolio companies of Brookfield Accounts and Oaktree Accounts) enhances our capabilities (and the capabilities of Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested) and is an integral part of our (and other Brookfield Accounts’) operations. Each transaction will be entered into to satisfy a legitimate business need.
Portfolio companies of Brookfield Accounts and Oaktree Accounts generally are not Brookfield’s and Brookfield Renewable’s affiliates for purposes of our governing agreements. As a result, the restrictions and conditions contained therein that relate specifically to Brookfield and/or our affiliates do not apply to arrangements and/or transactions among portfolio companies of Brookfield Accounts and/or Oaktree Accounts, even if we (or a Brookfield Account) have a significant economic interest in a portfolio company and/or Brookfield ultimately controls it. For example, in the event that a portfolio company of one Brookfield Account enters into a transaction with a portfolio company of another Brookfield Account (or an Oaktree Account), such transaction generally would not trigger potential cross trade, principal transaction and/or other affiliate transaction considerations.
In all cases in which Brookfield actively participates in such agreements, transactions or other arrangements, Brookfield will seek to ensure that the agreements, transactions or other arrangements are in the best interests of the applicable Brookfield Accounts’ portfolio companies, with terms to be determined in good faith as fair, reasonable and equitable under the circumstances. However, there can be no assurance that the terms of any such agreement, transaction or other arrangement will be executed on an arm’s length basis, be as favorable to the applicable portfolio company as otherwise would be the case if the counterparty were not related to Brookfield, or be the same as those that other Brookfield Accounts’ portfolio companies receive from the applicable counterparty or benchmarked in any manner. In some circumstances, our investments and portfolio companies of Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested may receive better terms from a portfolio company of another Brookfield Account or an Oaktree Account than from an independent counterparty. In other cases, these terms may be worse.
All such agreements, transactions or other arrangements described in this section are expected to be entered into in the ordinary course without obtaining consent of our independent directors or holders of BEPC exchangeable shares or of investors in other Brookfield Accounts and such arrangements will not impact the management fee payable to Brookfield or any fee for Affiliated Services payable to Brookfield or a Brookfield Account (i.e., the portfolio companies and Non-Controlled Affiliates will be free to transact in the ordinary course of their businesses without limitations, including by charging their ordinary rates for the relevant transactions).
Furthermore, Brookfield (or other Brookfield Accounts, Oaktree Accounts and/or their businesses will from time to time make equity or other investments in companies or businesses that provide services to or otherwise contract with Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and/or their portfolio companies. In particular, Brookfield has in the past entered into, and expects to continue to enter into, relationships with companies in the technology, real assets services and other sectors and industries in which Brookfield has broad expertise and knowledge, whereby Brookfield or a Brookfield Account acquires an equity or other interest in such companies that may, in turn, transact with Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and/or their portfolio companies. For example, Brookfield (through an investment program referred to as Brookfield Technology Partners) invests in emerging technology companies that develop and offer technology products that are expected to be of relevance to Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and portfolio companies (as well as to third-party companies operating in similar sectors and industries). In connection with such relationships, Brookfield expects to refer, introduce or otherwise facilitate transactions between such companies and Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and portfolio companies, which would result in benefits to Brookfield (or Brookfield Accounts, Oaktree Accounts or their businesses) including via increased profitability of the relevant company, as well as financial incentives and/or milestones which benefit Brookfield Accounts or businesses (including through increased equity allotments), which are likely in some cases to be significant. Such financial incentives that inure to or benefit Brookfield and Brookfield Accounts pose an incentive for Brookfield to cause Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and/or their portfolio companies to enter into such transactions that may or may not have otherwise been entered into. Financial incentives derived from such transactions will generally not be shared with Brookfield Renewable, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP's unitholders. Furthermore, such transactions are likely to contribute to the development of expertise, reputational benefits and/or the development of new products or services by Brookfield (or Oaktree, Brookfield Accounts, Oaktree Accounts and/or their businesses), which Brookfield will seek to capitalize on to generate additional benefits that are likely to inure solely to Brookfield (or Oaktree, Brookfield Accounts, Oaktree Accounts, and/or their businesses) and not to Brookfield Renewable, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP's unitholders.
Brookfield (or the portfolio companies’ management teams, as applicable) will seek to ensure that each transaction or other arrangement that Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and/or their portfolio companies enter into with these companies satisfies a legitimate business need of Brookfield Renewable, the applicable Brookfield Account and/or the applicable portfolio company, with terms to be determined in good faith as fair, reasonable and equitable under the circumstances based on Brookfield Renewable’s, the applicable Brookfield Account and/or their portfolio companies’ normal course process for evaluating potential business transactions and counterparties. In making these determinations, Brookfield or the management teams of the portfolio companies will take into account such factors that they deem relevant, which will include the potential benefits and synergies of transacting with a Brookfield related party. Brookfield may take its own interests (or the interests of other Brookfield Accounts or businesses) into account in considering and making determinations
regarding these matters. In certain cases, these transactions will be entered into with active participation by Brookfield and in other cases by the portfolio companies’ management teams independently of Brookfield. Moreover, any fees or other financial incentives paid to the relevant company will not offset or otherwise reduce the management fee or other compensation paid to Brookfield, will not otherwise be shared with Brookfield Renewable, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares or BEP's unitholders and will not be subject to the Affiliate Service Rates.
However, there can be no assurance that the terms of any such transaction or other arrangement will be executed on an arm’s length basis, be as favorable to us, the applicable Brookfield Account or portfolio company as otherwise would be the case if the counterparty were not related to Brookfield, be benchmarked in any particular manner, or be the same as those that other Brookfield Accounts’ or portfolio companies receive from the applicable counterparty. In some circumstances, Brookfield Renewable, a Brookfield Account in which we are invested and portfolio companies may receive better terms (including economic terms) than they would from an independent counterparty. In other cases, these terms may be worse.
While these agreements, transactions and/or arrangements raise potential conflicts of interest, Brookfield believes that our access to Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies, as well as to Brookfield related parties and companies in which Brookfield has an interest enhances our, Brookfield Accounts’ and portfolio companies’ capabilities, is an integral part of our operations and will provide benefits to us, Brookfield Accounts and portfolio companies that would not exist but for our affiliation with Brookfield.
•Transfers and Secondments. From time to time, Brookfield facilitates transfers and/or secondments of personnel to (or from) Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or their portfolio investments from (or to) Brookfield or another Brookfield Account (and/or its portfolio investments). A transfer refers to the termination of an employee’s employment with their employer company and their transfer to a new employer company. A secondment refers to the temporary assignment of an employee from their employer company to another company, typically for a period of two years or less.
Such movements are designed to fill roles at the companies to which individuals are transferred and/or seconded and provide value to personnel (via facilitation of individual career development objectives), the companies to which personnel are transferred / seconded (via filling of essential roles with suitable candidates), and the companies from which personnel are transferred / seconded (via optimization of the workforce).
Brookfield has adopted policies designed to ensure that such personnel movements are effected in accordance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and that the conflicts considerations that arise in connection therewith are appropriately resolved. Among other things, for each transfer or secondment, Brookfield will seek to ensure that: (a) the company to which an individual is transferred or seconded has a legitimate business need for the position that the individual is to fill, (b) the individual is suitable for the position that they are to fill; and (c) if the transfer or secondment is to a client account: (I) the position does not involve an activity that Brookfield, as manager of the client account, is required to perform; and (II) the compensation to be paid for the position by the company to which the individual is being transferred / seconded is within the market compensation range for such position (up to, and including, the top end of such market compensation range).
In connection with each transfer or secondment, the company to which an individual is transferred or seconded will bear the compensation and overhead expenses relating to the employee (including salary, benefits, and long- and short-incentive compensation, among other things). As noted, Brookfield generally will seek to ensure that the compensation proposed to be paid for the position by the company to which the individual is being transferred or seconded is within the market compensation range for such position. In determining the market compensation range for the position, Brookfield generally will take into account factors that it deems relevant, including (among others): the company’s industry and geography; compensation paid by the company (or one or more similar companies) to one or more employees filling comparable positions; compensation paid by the company (or one or more similar companies) to one or more employees recently hired to fill (or terminated from) comparable positions; independent compensation benchmarking data, such as a third-party market compensation study; and/or third-party (e.g., recruiter, compensation consultant or other adviser) guidance regarding the market compensation range for the position; and/or other objective and/or subjective factors deemed reasonable by Brookfield under the circumstances.
Where Brookfield takes into account independent compensation benchmarking data, such as a third-party market compensation study, Brookfield generally will rely on the most recent study that it is utilizing for recruitment and compensation benchmarking purposes in the relevant company’s industry and/or geography. However, such compensation benchmarking data will, in certain cases, be from a different year than the year in which the transfer or secondment is effected because Brookfield and/or the relevant portfolio investment are not generally expected to participate in (and purchase) market studies every year, as the market does not generally vary significantly from year to year. In interim periods between market studies, Brookfield expects to use information such as changes in consumer price index, insight from recruitment efforts and/or other factors to adjust (as necessary) compensation ranges.
Secondments will be on a full-time or part-time basis, as determined by Brookfield taking into account relevant facts-and-circumstances. Generally, part-time secondments will be based on the amount of time Brookfield estimates that the individual will spend between the two (or more) Brookfield Accounts (i.e., the “secondment split”). These estimates will be based on subjective determinations, which could be based on the estimated number of days per week that the individual will spend working for each Brookfield Account or another estimate deemed fair and reasonable under the then-existing facts-and-circumstances. The compensation expenses recovered from the company to which an employee is seconded will be appropriately pro-rated based on: (a) the length of the secondment period during the applicable calendar year and (b) in the case of a part-time secondment, the secondment split.
For clarity, pursuant to the foregoing, Brookfield expects to, among other things, transfer and/or second certain of its employees to companies held by Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. As noted, the companies to which such individuals are transferred and/or seconded to will bear the employees’ applicable compensation expenses. In certain cases, Brookfield will advance compensation to such employees and be subsequently reimbursed by Brookfield Renewable or the applicable Brookfield Accounts (and/or their respective investments). Any such compensation expenses borne by Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or their respective investments will not be credited against or otherwise reduce the management fee and incentive distributions that are payable to Brookfield. Additionally, the method for determining how (i) certain compensation arrangements are structured and valued (particularly with respect to the structure of various forms of incentive compensation that vest over time and whose value upon payment is based on estimates) and (ii) overhead expenses are allocated, in each case require certain judgments and assumptions, and as a result Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and their respective investments may bear higher costs than they would have had such expenses been valued, allocated or charged differently.
Brookfield could benefit from arrangements where Brookfield employees are hired or retained by, or seconded to, one or more investments or a Brookfield affiliate on behalf of an investment (for example, in the case where an investment makes a fixed payment to Brookfield to compensate Brookfield for a portion of an employee’s incentive compensation, but such employee does not ultimately collect such incentive compensation). Additionally, there could be a circumstance where an employee of Brookfield or a portfolio company of a Brookfield Account, PSG, Oaktree or an Oaktree Account may become an employee or secondee of one or more of portfolio companies of Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest (or vice versa) and, in connection therewith, be entitled to retain unvested incentive compensation received from the company it is transferring or being seconded from. While such incentive compensation would be subject to forfeiture under other circumstances, given the prior employment by a Brookfield related company, such incentive compensation may continue to vest as if such employee continued to be an employee of the company from which it is transferring. The arrangements described herein will take place in accordance with parameters approved by the Managing General Partner’s independent directors in the Conflicts Protocols, but will not be subject to approval by the Unitholders, and such amounts will not be considered fees received by Brookfield or its affiliates that offset or otherwise reduce the management fee.
Brookfield may take its own interests into account in considering and making determinations regarding the matters outlined in this section as well as in “Transactions with Portfolio Companies” and “Affiliated Services and Transactions” above. Additionally, the aggregate economic benefit to Brookfield or its affiliates as a result of the transactions outlined herein and therein could influence investment allocation decisions made by Brookfield in certain circumstances (i.e., if the financial incentives as a result of such transactions are greater if the investment opportunity is allocated to one Brookfield Account rather than another). However, as noted elsewhere herein, Brookfield believes that our access to Brookfield’s broader asset management platform enhances our, such
Brookfield Accounts’ and portfolio investments’ capabilities, is an integral part of our and such Brookfield Accounts’ operations and will provide benefits to us, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and their respective portfolio investments that would not exist but their respective affiliations with Brookfield
•Protective Loans. Brookfield may loan capital to Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest in connection with an investment or potential investment if Brookfield determines in good faith that it is advisable to invest capital in an investment or potential investment and (x) for timing reasons it is not able to issue a capital call, (y) for Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, for any reason there are insufficient unfunded commitments that are able to be called for an existing investment or potential investment or (z) either the amount of such capital is immaterial or the time period during which such capital would be loaned by Brookfield is expected to be less than 30 days (“Protective Loans”). Any such Protective Loan will be made at a rate equal to that agreed to with the relevant Brookfield Account. In connection therewith, in the case of a Protective Loan pursuant to clauses (x) and (z) above, Brookfield will cause Brookfield Renewable and/or the Brookfield Account in which we invest to repay such Protective Loan or, in the case of any other Protective Loan, offer to investors in the relevant Brookfield Account (including Brookfield Renewable) the opportunity to acquire an interest in such Protective Loan. Brookfield’s ability to make Protective Loans on the conditions noted above could give rise to conflicts of interest considerations. To the extent an investor does not have sufficient available capital to acquire an interest in such a Protective Loan, or chooses not to acquire such an interest, Brookfield will retain or syndicate such interest. Any Protective Loan may be repaid by the applicable investment in priority to any distributions to the relevant Brookfield Account, or be converted into an equity interest in such investment on a dollar-for-dollar basis using an appraisal or arm’s length valuation. Brookfield will have no obligation to provide a Protective Loan, including where doing so would be beneficial to Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, or an investment.
•Possible Future Activities. Brookfield expects to expand the range of services that it provides over time. Except as provided herein, Brookfield will not be restricted in the scope of its business or in the performance of any services (whether now offered or undertaken in the future) even if such activities could give rise to conflicts of interest, and whether or not such conflicts are described herein. Brookfield has, and will continue to develop, relationships with a significant number of companies, financial sponsors and their senior managers, including relationships with companies that hold or may have held investments similar to those that have been (or are intended to be) made by us and Brookfield Accounts that we are invested in as well as companies that compete with our direct and indirect investments. These companies may themselves represent appropriate investment opportunities for us or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested or may compete with us for investment opportunities and other business activities.
•Advisors. Brookfield from time to time engages or retains strategic advisors, senior advisors, operating partners, executive advisors, consultants and/or other professionals who are not employees or affiliates of Brookfield, but which include former Brookfield employees as well as current and former officers of Brookfield portfolio companies (collectively, “Consultants”). Consultants generally have established industry expertise and are expected to advise on a range of investment-related activities, including by providing services that may be similar in nature to those provided by Brookfield’s investment teams, such as sourcing, consideration and pursuit of investment opportunities, strategies to achieve investment objectives, development and implementation of business plans, and recruiting for portfolio companies, and to serve on boards of portfolio companies. Additionally, Brookfield’s decision to initially perform certain services in-house for Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) at a particular point in time will not preclude a later decision to outsource such services, or any additional services, in whole or in part, to any Consultants, and Brookfield has no obligation to inform Brookfield Renewable or any other Brookfield Account of such a change. Brookfield believes that these arrangements benefit its investment activities. However, they also give rise to certain conflicts of interest considerations.
Consultants are expected, from time to time, to receive payments from, or allocations of performance-based compensation with respect to, Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and portfolio companies. In such circumstances, payments from, or allocations or performance-based compensation with respect to, Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and/or portfolio companies generally will be treated as expenses of the applicable entity and will not, even if they have the effect of reducing
retainers or minimum amounts otherwise payable by Brookfield, be subject to management fee offset provisions. Additionally, while Brookfield believes such compensation arrangements will be reasonable and generally at market rates for the relevant services provided, exclusive arrangements or other factors may result in such compensation arrangements not always being comparable to costs, fees and/or expenses charged by other third parties. In addition to any compensation arrangements, Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested may also generally bear its share of any travel costs or other out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Consultants in connection with the provision of their services. Accounting, network, communications, administration and other support benefits, including office space, may be provided by Brookfield, Brookfield Renewable and/or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested to Consultants without charge, and any costs associated with such support may be borne by Brookfield Renewable and/or such Brookfield Account.
Brookfield expects from time to time to offer Consultants the ability to co-invest alongside Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested, including in those investments in which they are involved (and for which they may be entitled to receive performance-based compensation, which will reduce our returns), or otherwise participate in equity plans for management of a portfolio company or invest directly in Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), or in a vehicle controlled by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) subject to reduced or waived management fees and/or carried interest distributions, including after the termination of their engagement (or other status) with Brookfield.
In certain cases, these persons are likely to have certain attributes of Brookfield “employees” (e.g., they have dedicated offices at Brookfield, receive access to Brookfield information, systems and meetings for Brookfield personnel, work on Brookfield matters as their primary or sole business activity, have Brookfield-related email addresses, business cards and titles, and/or participate in certain benefit arrangements typically reserved for Brookfield employees) even though they are not considered Brookfield employees, affiliates or personnel. In this scenario, a Consultant would be subject to Brookfield’s compliance policies and procedures. Where applicable, Brookfield allocate to us, the Brookfield Accounts and/or portfolio companies the costs of such personnel or the fees paid to such personnel in connection with the applicable services , and such expenses or fees, to the extent allocated to a Brookfield Account, would generally be treated as expenses of such Brookfield Account. Payments or allocations to Consultants will not be subject to management fee offset provisions and can be expected to increase the overall costs and expenses borne indirectly by holders of BEPC exchangeable shares. There can be no assurance that any of the Consultants will continue to serve in such roles and/or continue their arrangements with Brookfield and/or any Brookfield Accounts or portfolio companies throughout the terms of the relevant Brookfield Accounts.
•Transaction and Other Fees. Brookfield and its employees may receive certain transaction fees, consulting fees, advisory fees, directors’ fees, monitoring fees, or similar fees, in connection with investments or prospective investments. 100% of Brookfield Renewable’s or other Brookfield Account’s proportionate share of such fees, net of applicable expenses, will be credited against future payments of the management fee. Such fees will not be subject to the Affiliate Service Rates described in “Affiliated Services and Transactions” above. For the avoidance of doubt, (a) the allocable share of such fees attributable to any investor (including any Brookfield Account and any co-investor) that does not pay management fees is not expected to be credited to such investor (and will be retained by Brookfield and/or its employees) and (b) to the extent that multiple Brookfield Accounts (including co-investment vehicles) participate in an investment, any fees received by Brookfield in respect of one Brookfield Account will not offset the management fee received by Brookfield from any other Brookfield Account (regardless of whether or not any amount of such fees is credited to the investors in such Brookfield Accounts, by means of a management fee offset or otherwise). As a result, Brookfield will be more incentivized to take any such fees where there is (or expected to be) significant co-investment alongside Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest by co-investors that do not pay management fees.
•Travel Expenses. We will reimburse Brookfield for out-of-pocket travel expenses, including air travel (generally business class), car services, meals and hotels (generally business or luxury class accommodations), incurred in identifying, evaluating, sourcing, researching, structuring, negotiating, acquiring, making, holding, developing, operating, managing, selling or potentially selling, restructuring or otherwise disposing of proposed or actual investments of Brookfield Renewable and/or of Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested (including fees for attendance of industry conferences, the primary purpose of which is sourcing investments), in connection with the formation, marketing, offering and
management of Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested. In addition, travel expenses incurred in the formation, marketing and offering of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will generally be considered organizational expenses, including where such travel expenses relate to an existing or potential arrangement with any placement agent regarding the offering of interests in a Brookfield Account or the offering of a feeder fund of a Brookfield Account.
•Service Providers. In managing business activities, Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and portfolio companies utilize and rely on various independent service providers, including attorneys, accountants, fund administrators, consultants, financial and other advisors, deal sources, lenders, brokers and outside directors. Brookfield relies on these service providers’ independence from Brookfield for various purposes, including (among other things) audits of Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies as well as transaction related services, benchmarking analyses, fairness and similar opinions of value, and/or verification of arm’s length terms, in each case designed to facilitate resolution of conflicts of interest considerations relating to transactions between Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies with Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies.
Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies have various business relationships and engage in various activities with these service providers and/or their affiliates, which give rise to conflicts of interest considerations relating to the selection of the service providers. For example, service providers and/or their personnel could: (a) be investors in Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies, (b) provide services to multiple Brookfield business lines, Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies, (c) be engaged to provide various different types of services to Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies, (d) provide certain services, such as introductions to prospective investors and/or counterparties, to Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies at favorable rates or no additional cost, (e) be counterparties to transactions with Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies. In addition, certain service providers (particularly large global service providers, such as law firms, accounting firms and financial institutions) employ family members of personnel of Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies. Moreover, in the regular course of business, personnel of Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies give (or receive) gifts and entertainment to (or from) personnel of service providers.
Notwithstanding these relationships and/or activities with service providers, Brookfield has policies and procedures designed to address these conflicts of interest considerations and to ensure that its personnel select service providers for Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and portfolio companies that they believe are appropriate for and in the best interests of Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies (as the case may be) in accordance with Brookfield’s legal and regulatory obligations, provided that (for the avoidance of doubt) Brookfield often will not seek out the lowest-cost option when engaging such service providers as other factors or considerations typically prevail over cost.
Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, and other Brookfield Accounts) and their portfolio companies often engage common providers of goods and/or services. These common providers sometimes provide bulk discounts or other fee discount arrangements, which could be based on an expectation of a certain amount of aggregate engagements by Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and portfolio companies over a period of time. Brookfield generally extends these fee discount arrangements to Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies in a fair and equitable manner.
In certain cases, a service provider (e.g., a law firm) will provide all Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies a bulk discount on fees that is applicable only prospectively (within an annual period) once a certain aggregate spending threshold has been met by the group during the relevant annual period. As a result, Brookfield Accounts and portfolio companies that engage the service provider after the aggregate spending threshold has been met will get the benefit of the discount and, as a result, pay lower rates than the rates paid by Brookfield Accounts and portfolio companies that engaged the same provider prior to the discount being triggered.
The engagement of common providers for Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies and the related fee discount arrangements give rise to conflicts of interest considerations. For example, as a result of these arrangements, Brookfield will face conflicts of interest in determining which providers to engage on behalf of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable) and portfolio companies and when to engage such providers, including an incentive to engage certain providers for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield
Renewable) and portfolio companies because it will result in the maintenance or enhancement of a discounted fee arrangement that benefits Brookfield, other Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies. Notwithstanding these conflicts considerations, Brookfield makes these determinations in a manner that it believes is appropriate for and in the best interests of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or their portfolio companies taking into account all applicable facts and circumstances.
In the normal course, common providers (e.g., law firms) will staff engagements based on the particular needs of the engagement and charge such staff’s then-applicable rates, subject to any negotiated discounts. While these rates will be the same as the rates such providers would charge Brookfield for the same engagement, Brookfield generally engages providers for different needs than Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or their portfolio companies, and the total fees charged for different engagements are expected to vary.
In addition, as a result of the foregoing, the overall rates paid by Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested and portfolio companies over a period of time to a common provider could be higher (or lower) than the overall rates paid to the same provider by Brookfield, other Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies.
These relationships, activities and discounts described herein are part of normal course business operations and are not considered additional fees received by Brookfield that would offset or otherwise reduce the fees (including management fees) owed by Brookfield Accounts and/or their portfolio companies to Brookfield.
•Investment Platforms. Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), alone or co-investing alongside other Brookfield Accounts or third parties develop, organize and/or acquire assets that serve as a platform for investments in a particular sector, geographic area or other niche (such arrangements, “Investment Platforms”), including investments held in different proportions across various Brookfield Accounts. The management teams for such Investment Platforms (“Platform Management Teams”) are owned and controlled by Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested), other Brookfield Accounts and/or third parties, and are established through recruitment, contract and/or the acquisition of one or more portfolio companies and/or assets. In certain cases, such as investments made by Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) alongside third parties, the executives, officers, directors, shareholders and other personnel of the relevant Platform Management Teams will represent other financial investors with whom Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and Brookfield are not affiliated and whose interests could conflict with the interests of Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or have other interests that conflict with the interests of Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). In addition, Platform Management Teams are expected to provide services to, and facilitate investments by, other Brookfield Accounts, including investments in which Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) or an investment does not participate. The costs and expenses of Platform Management Teams will include, among others, overhead, personnel compensation, diligence and other operational costs and expenses incurred in connection with the development, organization, acquisition, support, and ongoing administration and management of the Platform Management Teams and related Investment Platforms. For the avoidance of doubt, compensation to be paid in respect of Platform Management Teams will include, among other components, incentive distributions, management promote, incentive fee and/or other performance-based compensation based on (or linked to) the profits of the relevant Investment Platforms, including profits realized in connection with the disposition of asset(s) and co-investments held alongside Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest).
Among other things, Platform Management Teams are expected to participate in and/or advise on a range of activities related to investments, potential investments and/or Investment Platforms given their strategic and/or operational expertise, including, among others, activities in connection with (or with respect to) the origination, identification, assessment, pursuit, coordination, execution and consummation of investment opportunities, such as project planning, engineering and other technical analysis, securing site control, preparing and managing approvals and permits, financial analysis and managing related-stakeholder matters. These services give rise to additional conflicts of interest considerations because they are similar to the services provided by Brookfield to Brookfield
Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested). However, Brookfield deems these services to be appropriate for and value enhancing to the operations and/or management of investments and Investment Platforms and these services otherwise would be provided by third parties engaged to provide the services.
Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we are invested) bear their allocable share of Platform Management Teams’ costs and expenses (as determined by Brookfield, in its sole discretion, to be fair and reasonable) and such costs and expenses are treated as expenses for Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), investment-level expenses and/or broken deal expenses, as applicable. These costs and expenses are in addition to the compensation payable to Brookfield, are not shared with Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or the Unitholders (or be offset against compensation payable to Brookfield), will increase the overall costs and expenses borne indirectly by Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), and are expected to be substantial.
From time to time, Platform Management Teams (or portions thereof) that are held by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) and/or their portfolio companies could be transferred to other Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield) for strategic, operational and/or other reasons, including reasons that relate solely to other Brookfield Accounts. Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), its Investment Platforms, investments and/or our shareholders, will not be compensated for any such transfer.
See additional detail regarding: the methodologies that Brookfield will utilize for determining Brookfield Accounts’ (including of Brookfield Renewable (and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and of Brookfield) allocable shares of such costs and expenses, and additional conflicts considerations regarding transactions with Brookfield related parties, in “Allocation of Costs and Expenses” and “Affiliated Services and Transactions”.
•Line of Credit Utilization. Use of leverage arrangements provides Brookfield with an incentive to fund investments or otherwise utilize borrowings in lieu of capital contributions. For example, calculations of net IRRs in respect of performance data with respect to Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest as reported to investors from time to time are based on the funding of capital contributions by and distributions to the investors. For example, in instances where a Brookfield Account in which we invest utilizes borrowings under a subscription-based loan facility or asset-backed facility (or other facility, including a hybrid or net asset value facility), use of such facility will likely result in a higher reported net IRR than if the facility had not been utilized because such borrowings were used in lieu of capital contributions or in advance of related capital contributions that would only be made at a later date. From time to time, Brookfield makes distributions prior to the repayment of outstanding borrowings. In addition, in the event a Brookfield Account in which we invest incurs such indebtedness, the preferred return accruing in respect of investors will be less than otherwise would have been the case in the absence of such indebtedness, and the applicable Brookfield Account will bear the costs of any expenses related to such indebtedness or any interest that accrues. As a result, Brookfield could be entitled (a) to receive incentive distributions earlier than it otherwise would have and (b) in certain circumstances, to receive more incentive distributions than it otherwise would have, in each case had the Brookfield Account in which we invest not incurred such indebtedness and, instead, had required the investors to make additional capital contributions.
In addition, Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest may provide for the repayment of indebtedness and/or the satisfaction of guarantees on behalf of co-investment vehicles in connection with investments made by such vehicles. Certain Brookfield Accounts may also use other Brookfield Accounts’ (including our) loan facilities to issue letters of credit in connection with investments that are expected to be, or have been allocated to co-investment vehicles, and the co-investors would be expected to bear their share of any expenses incurred in connection with such letters of credit. However, in each scenario above, certain investors in such vehicles will benefit from such provision for repayment of indebtedness and/or the satisfaction of guarantees even though those investors do not provide the same level of credit support as Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. In the event any such co-investment vehicle does not satisfy its share of any payment in respect of any such borrowing, Brookfield Renewable or the relevant Brookfield Account in which we invest will be contractually obligated to satisfy its share even if Brookfield Renewable or such Brookfield Account does not have recourse against such co-investment vehicle. In addition, Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invest may provide a guarantee in connection with a potential or existing
investment, and one Brookfield Account may replace Brookfield Renewable or another Brookfield Account as the guarantor.
•Recourse to Brookfield Renewable and Other Brookfield Accounts’ Assets. The assets of Brookfield Renewable (and, in the case of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, of such Brookfield Accounts), including unused capital and investments, are available to satisfy all liabilities and other obligations of Brookfield Renewable (and, in the case of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, of such Brookfield Accounts), for any proper purpose relating to the activities of Brookfield Renewable (and, in the case of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, of such Brookfield Accounts), including, without limitation, with respect to investments, payment of expenses, indemnification obligations, and making of distributions. If Brookfield Renewable (or, in the case of a Brookfield Account in which we invest, such Brookfield Account) becomes subject to a liability, parties seeking to have the liability satisfied could have recourse to Brookfield Renewable’s (or, in the case of a Brookfield Account in which we invest, such Brookfield Account’s) assets generally and might not be limited to any particular asset, such as the asset comprising the investment giving rise to the liability. In such situations, in connection with our investments Brookfield Renewable makes in other Brookfield Accounts, investors in such accounts (including Brookfield Renewable) are often required to make additional capital contributions, including to recontribute funds previously distributed by such Brookfield Accounts, in each case subject to the specific limitations set forth in such Brookfield Account’s governing documents.
The financing arrangements of Brookfield Renewable (and, in the case of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, of such Brookfield Accounts), including financing facilities, borrowings made thereunder, and guarantees and other credit support obligations in relation thereto, are often structured generally as part of a portfolio financing arrangement where all or certain investments provide security for such financing on a cross-collateralized basis and multiple investments are subject to the risk of loss in the event of a default. There likely will be circumstances in which investors have varying sharing percentages with respect to certain of the investments of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), including as a result of investments made on different dates, the exercise of excuse or exclusion rights or otherwise and, as a result, could have sharing percentages (including in the aggregate) in investments or otherwise with respect to investment proceeds generated by the investments of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) to which third parties have recourse in respect of such Brookfield Accounts’ liability that are higher or lower than such investors’ sharing percentages in the investment giving rise to the liability. As a result of the potential recourse obligations described above, liabilities relating to investments in which an investor has, for example, a small sharing percentage, could adversely impact investments in which such investor holds a greater sharing percentage. In addition, where co-investors or other third-party investors participate in an investment, Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will at times (where Brookfield deems appropriate and subject to the governing documents of Brookfield Renewable or the relevant Brookfield Account) guarantee an amount in excess of its proportionate interest in the investment, including amounts in respect of the interests of co-investors or other third parties, which could remain outstanding on a temporary or ongoing basis over the term of the investment. In these circumstances, Brookfield Renewable and/or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest will bear a disproportionate amount of the liabilities and costs associated with the relevant guarantee or other credit support, and such Brookfield Account’s assets, as applicable, including the relevant investment as well as the Brookfield Account’s assets generally (including unused capital) would be available to satisfy such liabilities and costs.
•Other Activities of Brookfield and its Personnel. Brookfield employees that play key roles in managing Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in, as well as employees of portfolio companies that Brookfield Renewable and other Brookfield Accounts invest in, will all spend a portion of their time on matters other than or only tangentially related to Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. Time will be spent on managing other Brookfield Accounts, including Brookfield proprietary accounts, and their investment activities. Such obligations of these individuals could conflict with their responsibilities to Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which invest. These potential conflicts are exacerbated in situations where employees are entitled to greater incentive compensation or other remuneration in connection with their responsibilities to certain accounts relative to their responsibilities to Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, or where there
are differences in proprietary investments in certain Brookfield Accounts relative to Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest.
•Use of Brookfield Arrangements. Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) may seek to use a swap, currency conversion, hedging arrangement, line of credit or other financing that Brookfield has in place for its own benefit or the benefit of other Brookfield Accounts. In this case, Brookfield will pass through the terms of such arrangement to Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) as if Brookfield Renewable (or the relevant Brookfield Accounts) had entered into the transaction itself. However, in such cases, we (and/or the relevant Brookfield Accounts) will be exposed to Brookfield’s credit risk since we will not have direct contractual privity with the counterparty. Further, it is possible that Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) would have been able to obtain more favorable terms for themselves if they had entered into the arrangement directly with the counterparty.
•Determinations of Value. Valuations of the investments (or of assets or property received in exchange for any investment, as applicable) will ultimately be calculated and/or determined by Brookfield in good faith in accordance with guidelines prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards or U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and reviewed by the independent accountants of Brookfield Renewable and/or the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest. The valuation methodologies used by Brookfield to value any investment involve subjective determinations, judgments, projections and opinions, including about future events, which could turn out to be incorrect. As a result, valuations may not be accurate and/or third parties (including investors) could disagree with such valuations. Accordingly, the carrying value of an investment will not necessarily reflect the price at which the investment could be (or ultimately is) sold in the market, and the difference between carrying value and the ultimate sales price could be material. Ultimate realization of the value of an investment depends to a great extent on economic, market and other conditions beyond Brookfield’s control. Generally, there will be no retroactive adjustment in the valuation of any investment or the performance-based compensation or management fees paid to Brookfield to the extent any valuation proves to not accurately reflect the realizable value of an investment.
Additionally, under certain limited circumstances set forth in the governing documents of Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, distributions in kind of investments for which market quotations are not readily available could be made. The valuation of such investments will be determined by Brookfield in accordance with the governing documents of Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and as set forth above. Under the terms of the governing documents of Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, Brookfield will generally receive performance-based compensation based on such valuation.
Brookfield makes use of, and relies on, valuation information and data developed and provided by certain third parties. Such valuations sometimes vary from similar valuations performed by other independent third parties for similar types of securities or assets. In addition, Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest may rely on the valuations or valuation information provided by, or determined in consultation with, the Managing General Partner, relevant general partner or their affiliates, as applicable.
The valuation of investments affects, under certain circumstances, Brookfield’s entitlement to incentive distributions from Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, the amount of management fees that Brookfield collects from Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, the decision of potential investors to subscribe for units in Brookfield Renewable or interests in the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or Brookfield’s marketing of and ability to raise future Brookfield Accounts in which Brookfield Renewable will invest. As a result, and as noted herein, the valuation of investments involves conflicts and Brookfield is incentivized to determine valuations that are higher than the actual fair value of the investments.
•Transactions with Potential and Actual Investors. In light of the breadth of Brookfield’s operations and its significant institutional investor base, including investors that pursue investment programs and operations similar to Brookfield’s, Brookfield and Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable) from time to time engage in transactions with prospective and actual investors in Brookfield Renewable and
other Brookfield Accounts that entail business benefits to such investors. Such transactions may be entered into prior to, in connection with or after an investor’s investment in Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account. The nature of such transactions can be diverse and may include benefits relating to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest), other Brookfield Accounts and their respective issuers or portfolio companies.
•Insurance. Brookfield has caused Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest to purchase and/or bear premiums, fees, costs and expenses (including the premiums, costs, expenses and/or fees of Brookfield affiliates and non-affiliates for insurance coverage and for placement and administration of insurance coverage) with respect to insurance coverage for the benefit of Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, Brookfield and its affiliates (as service providers to Brookfield Accounts), their employees, affiliates, agents and representatives, as well as limited partner advisory committee members and other indemnified parties with respect to matters (including directors and officers liability insurance, errors and omissions insurance, and any other insurance which Brookfield determines to be required or market standard), or for the benefit of Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, as well as to portfolio companies with respect to investment-related matters (including terrorism, property, title, liability, marine, environmental, professional, cyber, transactional, fire insurance and/or extended or specialized coverage)
Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and their respective portfolio companies and other investments will utilize Brookfield affiliates for placement, administration, and provision of insurance coverage in connection with all or part of their insurance coverage and Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) is expected to leverage the scale of Brookfield by participating in shared, or umbrella, insurance policies as part of a broader group of entities affiliated with Brookfield (including Brookfield and other Brookfield Accounts). Any insurance policy purchased by or on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) (including policies covering Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, Brookfield and other Brookfield Accounts) may provide coverage for situations where Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) would not provide indemnification, including situations involving culpable conduct by the Brookfield. Nonetheless, the share of the premiums, costs, fees and expenses of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) in respect of insurance coverage will not be reduced to account for these types of situations. Where possible, Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) generally leverage Brookfield’s scale by participating in shared, or umbrella, insurance policies that cover a broad group of entities (including Brookfield, other Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies) under a single policy.
The total cost of any shared or umbrella insurance policy is allocated among all participants covered by the policy in a fair and equitable manner taking into consideration applicable facts and circumstances, including the value of each covered account’s asset value and/or the risk that the account poses to the insurance provider. While Brookfield takes into account certain objective criteria in determining how to allocate the cost of umbrella insurance coverage among covered accounts, the assessment of the risk that each account poses to the insurance provider is more subjective in nature. In addition, Brookfield’s participation in umbrella policies gives risk to conflicts in determining the proper allocation of the costs of such policies.
Brookfield insurance companies (each, a “Captive”) that provide insurance coverage for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and assets held directly or indirectly by Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) generally will be utilized for all or a portion of insurance coverage needs (e.g., primary layer of insurance for certain assets, supplemental coverage to coverage provided by third-party carriers, etc.). Captives are expected to provide benefits to Brookfield Accounts that may not be available from a third-party insurance provider. In determining whether to utilize a Captive as an insurance provider for Brookfield Renewable, a Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or their investments, Brookfield will take into account such factors as it determines appropriate in its discretion under the then-existing facts-and-circumstances. It is expected that each Captive will charge premiums at the Affiliate Service Rate applicable to the insurance provided by such Captive. The determination of such rates will be based on third-party pricing data, pricing mandated by regulation, or an opinion of a third-party insurance adviser (including advisers that provide other insurance related services to Brookfield and the Brookfield Accounts). The engagement of a Captive will give rise to certain potential conflicts of interest, including in connection with the
allocation of premiums and the evaluation and payment of claims. In order to mitigate potential conflicts of interest related thereto, an independent third-party insurance carrier generally will be responsible for claims management and payment.
Captives could seek reinsurance for all or a portion of the coverage, which could result in Brookfield earning and retaining fees, commissions and/or a portion of the premiums associated with such insurance while not retaining all or a commensurate portion of the risk insured. Captives may also earn and retain fees, commissions, and/or a portion of the premiums associated with insurance covering types of damages for which a government entity and/or other third party may reimburse the captive (e.g., damage caused by certain terrorist events), which may result in the captives not retaining all or a commensurate portion of the risk of insuring against such types of damage.
To the extent an insurance policy or Captive insurance policy provides coverage with respect to matters relating to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or their investments, all or a portion of the fees and expenses (including premiums) of such insurance policy and its placement will be allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or their investments. The amount of any such insurance-related fees and expenses allocated to Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) or their investments will be determined by Brookfield in its discretion taking into consideration facts and circumstances deemed relevant, including in umbrella policies the value of each covered account’s investments and capital commitments (if applicable) and/or risk that the accounts and/or its investments pose to the insurance provider. While Brookfield expects to consider certain objective criteria when determining how to allocate the cost of insurance coverage that applies to multiple accounts (including Brookfield and Brookfield Accounts), because of the uncertainty of whether claims will arise in the future and the timing and the amount that may be involved in any such claim, the determination of how to allocate such fees and expenses also requires Brookfield to take into consideration other facts and circumstances that are more subjective in nature. In addition, because Brookfield will bear a portion of such fees and expenses and has differing investment interests in the Brookfield Accounts it manages, conflicts exist in the determination of the proper allocation of such fees and expenses among Brookfield and such accounts. It is unlikely that Brookfield will be able to accurately allocate the fees and expenses of any such insurance based on the actual claims of a particular account, including Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest). Brookfield may, if it determines it to be necessary, consult with one or more third parties to ensure that the allocation of such fees and expenses is done in a fair and reasonable manner.
While shared insurance policies (including those issued by Captives) may be cost effective, claims made by any entities affiliated with Brookfield could result in increased costs to Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts that we invest in, and such policies may have an overall cap on coverage. To the extent insurable event(s) result in claims in excess of such cap, Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) may not receive as much in insurance proceeds as it would have received if separate insurance policies had been purchased for each party, and Brookfield could face a conflict of interest in properly allocating insurance proceeds across all claimants, which could result in Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) receiving less in insurance proceeds than if separate insurance policies had been purchased for each insured party individually. In these cases, Brookfield will seek to allocate the proceeds from claims in respect of insurance policies and resolve any conflicts of interests, as applicable, in a manner it determines to be fair and reasonable. In that regard, Brookfield may, if it determines it to be necessary, consult with one or more third parties to ensure that the allocation of such proceeds is done in a fair and reasonable manner. Similarly, insurable events may occur sequentially in time while subject to a single overall cap. In this case, Brookfield expects to process claims on a first-come-first-serve basis or in any other manner deemed appropriate by Brookfield. To the extent insurance proceeds for one such event are applied towards a cap and Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) experiences an insurable loss after such event, Brookfield Renewable’s (or Brookfield Account’s) receipts from such insurance policy could be diminished and/or Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Account) may not receive any insurance proceeds. A shared insurance policy could also make it less likely that Brookfield will make a claim against such policy on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest)
Brookfield on behalf of Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we invest) may need to determine whether or not to initiate litigation (including potentially litigation adverse to Brookfield where it is the broker or provider of such insurance) in order to collect from an insurance provider, which may be lengthy and expensive and which ultimately may not result in a financial award. The potential for Brookfield to be a counterparty in any litigation or other proceedings regarding insurance claims creates a further potential conflict of
interest. Furthermore, in providing such insurance, Brookfield may seek reinsurance for all or a portion of the coverage, which could result in Brookfield earning and retaining fees and/or a portion of the premiums associated with such insurance while not retaining all or a commensurate portion of the risk insured.
Brookfield will seek to allocate the costs of such insurance and proceeds from claims in respect of such insurance policies and resolve any conflicts of interest, as applicable, in a manner it determines to be fair. In that regard, Brookfield may, if it determines it to be necessary, consult with one or more third parties in allocating such costs and proceeds and resolving such conflicts.
•Diverse Interests. In certain circumstances, the various types of investors in Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), including Brookfield in its capacity as an investor in Brookfield Accounts, will have conflicting investment, tax and other interests with respect to (a) their interests across Brookfield Accounts and (b) the interests of other investors in such accounts, including Brookfield Accounts that participate in the same investments. The conflicting interests of particular investors could relate to or arise from, among other things, the nature of investments made by Brookfield Accounts, the residency or domicile of the investors, the entities through which such investors make their investments, the structuring of the acquisition (including the utilization of a REIT subsidiary), ownership and disposition of investments, the timing of disposition of investments, the transfer or disposition by an investor of its investment and specific tax considerations, including the manner in which current earnings and disposition transactions in connection with one or more investments are reported for tax purposes and the timing of distributions or deemed distributions thereof. To the extent that one or more investors (including Brookfield) request that Brookfield delay certain distributions to them (for tax or other similar reasons) Brookfield may (but is not obligated to) agree to do so (while continuing to make the scheduled distribution to other investors). In such cases, Brookfield would deem a distribution to have occurred to such investors at the time the distribution was made to the other investors, for purposes of the calculation of incentive distributions and management fees. As a consequence, in certain circumstances, conflicts of interest will arise in connection with Brookfield decisions regarding these matters, including with respect to tax matters or the nature, structuring, or reporting of such investments, which may be adverse to investors in Brookfield Renewable generally (or to Brookfield Renewable in connection with its investments in Brookfield Accounts), or may be more beneficial to certain investors (including Brookfield) over others, including with respect to investors’ particular tax situations.
In selecting and structuring potential investments appropriate for Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), Brookfield will consider the investment and tax objectives of the relevant Brookfield Accounts and their investors as a whole, not the investment, tax or other objectives of any investor individually. However, conflicts could arise if certain investors have objectives that conflict with those of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). In addition, Brookfield may face certain tax risks based on positions taken by Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest, including as a withholding agent. In connection therewith, Brookfield could take certain actions, including withholding amounts to cover actual or potential tax liabilities, that it may not have taken in the absence of such tax risks.
Further, in connection with the investment activities of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable’s and those of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), we or the Brookfield Account (or portfolio companies) may make political donations or other contributions to support ballot initiatives, lobbyist efforts, memberships in certain political organizations, referendums or other legal, regulatory, tax or policy changes that Brookfield believes will ultimately benefit Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account. However, there is no guarantee that any particular Unitholder (or investor in a Brookfield Account) will agree with any such action or would independently choose to financially support such an endeavor. Further, any such changes may have long-term benefits to Brookfield and/or other Brookfield Accounts (in some cases, such benefits may be greater than the benefits to Brookfield Renewable or the Brookfield Account in which we are invested), even though Brookfield or such Brookfield Accounts did not contribute to such initiative or reimburse Brookfield Renewable or the relevant Brookfield Account or portfolio company for the contributions.
•Conflicts with Issuers of Investments. As part of Brookfield’s management and oversight of investments, Brookfield appoints its personnel as directors and officers of portfolio companies of Brookfield Accounts
(including of Brookfield Renewable and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and, in that capacity, is required to make decisions that consider the best interests of such portfolio investments and their respective shareholders or other stakeholders. In certain circumstances, for example in situations involving bankruptcy or near insolvency of a portfolio company, decisions and actions that may be in the best interest of the portfolio company may not be in the best interests of Brookfield Accounts individually (including Brookfield Renewable and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), and vice versa. Accordingly, in these situations, there will be conflicts of interest between such individuals’ duties as an officer or employee of Brookfield and such individuals’ duties as a director or officer of the portfolio company. Similar conflicts considerations will arise in connection with Brookfield employees that are transferred and/or seconded to provide services to portfolio companies in the normal course.
•Listing and Distribution of Brookfield. Brookfield Asset Management Inc. changed its name to Brookfield Corporation on December 9, 2022, pursuant to a corporate restructuring (the “Transaction”), as a result of which, its asset management business (“Asset Management Business”) is now held 100% by the Asset Management Company. The Asset Management Company is owned 75% by Brookfield Corporation and 25% by a newly established company Brookfield Asset Management. Each of Brookfield Corporation and Brookfield Asset Management have the right to nominate 50% of the directors of the Asset Management Company, and the shareholders of Brookfield Corporation received shares of Brookfield Asset Management as consideration for the transfer of the 25% interest in the Asset Management Business. Brookfield Corporation continues to be listed on the NYSE and TSX under the new ticker “BN” and Brookfield Asset Management is newly listed on both stock exchanges under the ticker “BAM”.
Since completion of the Transaction, certain employees, including senior level executives previously employed by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. have become employees of the Asset Management Business, and in such capacity provide services to all the entities conducting the Asset Management Business activities. While employees, senior level management and boards of directors of each of Brookfield Corporation and the Asset Management Business are expected to be separate and distinct from one another (other than Bruce Flatt, who is the CEO of Brookfield Corporation and of the Asset Management Business), Brookfield Corporation will have senior management involvement/participation in the Asset Management Business, including by being a part of investment committees and being available to propose and discuss various investment opportunities. In addition, Brookfield Corporation will receive certain transition services from the Asset Management Business and the Asset Management Business will receive transition services from Brookfield Corporation for a period of time, with the intended result of ensuring continuity of operations. The Transaction did not result in a change of control of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. or require the consent of the investors of any Brookfield Account.
While the foregoing describes the current process for the corporate structure and delineation of roles since completion of the Transaction, such process and structure are subject to change. In addition, while it is not anticipated to be the case, it is possible that the Transaction will create unintended and unanticipated risks or conflicts that are material to investors in Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). There can be no guarantee that the foregoing changes in corporate structure since the Transaction will have no impact on the management of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). While it is intended that the asset management employees and senior level executives formerly employed by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. who were transferred to the Asset Management Business will continue existing asset management practices following such transfer, it is expected that the Asset Management Business will, in the normal course, enact policies and procedures that differ from those formerly in place at Brookfield Asset Management Inc. In addition, while the Transaction is not intended to have adverse consequences on any investor in any Brookfield Account (including Brookfield Renewable and any Brookfield Account in which we invest), the Transaction provides existing and new public shareholders access to a new class of securities linked to the standalone asset management business of Brookfield Asset Management.
OTHER CONFLICTS
•Internal Audit. Brookfield Corporation, Brookfield Asset Management and certain of their affiliates are publicly traded companies subject to requirements to maintain an internal audit function and to complete internal audit reviews of their investments and related operations. In certain instances, Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and portfolio companies of Brookfield
Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) are expected to perform internal audit reviews of their operations and related activities, either in connection with their own regulatory requirements, because they are consolidated into Brookfield or one of its listed affiliates, or otherwise for corporate governance purposes, as determined by Brookfield in its capacity as manager of the Brookfield Accounts. Such portfolio company internal audit work is expected to be carried out by the employees of such portfolio companies, by Brookfield employees and/or by third-party advisors, and the expenses related to such work by all such persons are generally expected to be charged to the portfolio company. While the product of such portfolio company internal audit work is expected to be relied on and utilized, where applicable, in meeting Brookfield’s and its listed affiliates’ internal audit obligations, Brookfield and its listed affiliates generally will not share in the expenses of such portfolio company internal audits (except in their capacity as indirect equity owners of the portfolio company). Further to the disclosure above in “Allocation of Costs and Expenses”, it is expected that internal audit costs will be allocated to Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) based on a blended rate of the personnel involved in providing such services, such that the amount charged to Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and their respective portfolio companies may be greater or lesser than the actual cost of the specific personnel performing the services for Brookfield Renewable, the Brookfield Accounts in which we invest and/or their respective portfolio companies.
•Performance-Based Compensation. Brookfield’s entitlement to performance-based compensation from Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest could incentivize Brookfield to make investments on behalf of Brookfield Renewable and such Brookfield Accounts that are riskier or more speculative than it would otherwise make in the absence of such performance-based compensation. In addition, Brookfield is generally taxed at preferable tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains on its performance-based compensation with respect to investments that have been held by Brookfield Renewable (or a Brookfield Account in which we are invested) for more than three years. The required holding period and/or or other laws (including non-U.S. tax laws) applicable to carried interest could create an incentive for Brookfield to make different decisions regarding the timing and manner of the realization of investments than would be made in the absence of such laws, including if long-term capital gain from the sale or disposition of capital assets (as it relates to Brookfield’s receipt of carried interest) did not require a three-year holding period.
•Calculation Errors, True-Ups and/or Repayments. The calculation of amounts due to Brookfield and/or Brookfield Accounts in respect of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and/or their portfolio investments (including amounts owed in respect of performance-based compensation, Affiliated Services, protective loans, cost allocations, and other matters) is complex and at times based on estimates and/or subject to periodic (post-transaction) reconciliations. Brookfield may make errors in calculating such amounts, and/or recognize over- or under-estimates of such amounts in performing routine reconciliations and/or other internal reviews. When such an error or under- or over-estimate that disadvantaged Brookfield Renewable or a Brookfield Account in which we invested is discovered, Brookfield will make Brookfield Renewable (or the Brookfield Account) whole for such amount based on the particular situation, which may involve a return of distributions or fees or a waiver of future distributions or fees, in each case in an amount necessary to reimburse Brookfield Renewable (or the Brookfield Account) for such over-payment. As a general matter, Brookfield does not expect to pay interest on such amounts. Likewise, when an error or under- or over-estimate that advantaged a Brookfield Account is discovered, Brookfield will make itself whole for such amount, as applicable, and generally will not charge interest in connection with any such make-whole payment.
MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS
•Brookfield Conflicts Management and Resolution Process. Brookfield is a global alternative asset manager with significant assets under management and a long history of owning, managing and operating assets, businesses and investment vehicles across various industries, sectors, geographies and strategies through and on behalf of Brookfield Accounts (including proprietary accounts). In addition, Brookfield’s business activities continuously grow and evolve over time. As noted throughout this Form 20-F, a key element of the strategy of Brookfield Renewable (and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) is to leverage Brookfield’s experience, expertise, broad reach, relationships and position in the market for
investment opportunities and deal flow, financial resources, access to capital markets and operating needs. Brookfield believes that this is in the best interest of Brookfield Renewable (and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and their investments. However, being part of this broader (and evolving) platform, as well as activities of and other considerations relating to Brookfield Accounts, gives rise to conflicts of interest situations. Dealing with conflicts of interest is difficult and complex, and it is not possible to predict all of the types of conflicts that will arise over the course of the life of Brookfield Renewable (and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), particularly as a result of the potential growth and evolution of Brookfield’s business activities. Brookfield will monitor conflicts of interest and manage such conflicts of interest as set out in this Form 20-F, in accordance with its fiduciary duty to Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) and other Brookfield Accounts; however, conflicts will not necessarily be resolved in a manner that is favorable to Brookfield Renewable (and/or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest).
In managing conflicts of interest situations that arise from time to time, Brookfield generally will be guided by its internal policies and procedures and applicable regulatory requirements, including its fiduciary obligations as set out in Brookfield Accounts’ offering documents. Among other things, Brookfield has formed a Conflicts Committee, which is comprised of senior Brookfield executives, to oversee the management and resolution of conflicts of interest considerations that arise in the management of Brookfield’s business activities, including the management of Brookfield Accounts (including Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). The Conflicts Committee seeks to ensure that conflicts considerations are addressed in accordance with Brookfield’s internal policies and procedures and applicable regulatory requirements, including its fiduciary duties to Brookfield Accounts as set out in such accounts’ offering documents. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Conflicts Committee may, as it deems appropriate, review and approve specific matters presented to it and/or review and approve frameworks (and related parameters) for execution of particular types of transactions. In connection with the latter, the Conflicts Committee will (as it deems appropriate) appoint one or more individuals, pursuant to delegated authority, to oversee implementation of the frameworks and is deemed to approve transactions that are executed in accordance with pre-approved frameworks.
There can be no assurance that all conflicts of interest matters will be presented to the Conflicts Committee. In addition, the Conflicts Committee is comprised of senior executives of Brookfield that are not independent of Brookfield. As such, the Conflicts Committee itself is subject to conflicts of interest considerations. The Conflicts Committee will seek to act in good faith and to manage or resolve conflicts of interest considerations in a manner that it deems is fair and balanced, taking into account the facts and circumstances known to it at the time, and in accordance with Brookfield’s policies and procedures and applicable regulatory requirements. However, there is no guarantee that the Conflicts Committee will make a decision that is most beneficial or favorable to Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) or the Unitholders in connection with any particular conflict situation, or that it would not have reached a different decision if additional information were available to it.
As noted elsewhere in this Form 20-F, Brookfield is not required to and generally does not expect to seek approval from the Managing General Partner’s board of directors or from other Unitholders to manage the conflicts of interest situations that will arise from time to time (including conflicts of interest situations that were not contemplated in this Form 20-F) unless required by applicable law or as otherwise set out in this Form 20-F or the governing documents. By acquiring Units in Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), each Unitholder will be deemed to have acknowledged and agreed to Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) being part of Brookfield’s broader platform, the strategy of Brookfield Renewable (and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) leveraging Brookfield’s broader platform, conflicts of interest situations (including situations not contemplated in this Form 20-F) arising in the course of the life of Brookfield Renewable (and of Brookfield Accounts in which we invest), Brookfield’s resolution of such conflicts situations as set out in this Form 20-F, and to have waived any and all claims with respect to the existence of any such conflicts of interest and any actions taken or proposed to be taken in respect thereof as set out herein.
The foregoing list of potential and actual conflicts of interest does not purport to be a complete enumeration or explanation of the conflicts attendant to an investment in Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest). Additional conflicts may exist that are not presently known to the Managing General Partner, Brookfield or their respective affiliates or are deemed immaterial. In addition, as the Brookfield Activities and the investment program of Brookfield Renewable (and Brookfield Accounts in
which we invest) develop and change over time, an investment in Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) may be subject to additional and different actual and potential conflicts of interest. Additional information about potential conflicts of interest regarding the Brookfield will be set forth in Brookfield’s Form ADV, which prospective investors should review prior to purchasing BEPC exchangeable shares. Prospective investors should consult with their own advisers regarding the possible implications on their investment in Brookfield Renewable (or Brookfield Accounts in which we invest) of the conflicts of interest described herein.
In certain circumstances, these transactions may be related party transactions for the purposes of, and subject to certain requirements of MI 61-101. MI 61-101 provides a number of circumstances in which a transaction between an issuer and a related party may be subject to valuation and minority approval requirements. An exemption from such requirements is available when the fair market value of the transaction is not more than 25% of the market capitalization of the issuer. BEP has been granted exemptive relief from the requirements of MI 61-101 that, subject to certain conditions, permits it to be exempt from the minority approval and valuation requirements for transactions that would have a value of less than 25% of BEP’s market capitalization, if Brookfield’s indirect equity interest in BEP, which is held in the form of Redeemable/Exchangeable partnership units, and the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares, are included in the calculation of BEP’s market capitalization. As a result, the 25% threshold, above which the minority approval and valuation requirements apply, is increased to include the indirect interest in BEP held by Brookfield in the form of Redeemable/Exchangeable partnership units and the BEPC exchangeable shares that may be outstanding from time to time. BEP has also been granted relief from the requirements of MI 61-101 for any related party transactions of BEP with BEPC or any of BEPC’s subsidiaries, and BEPC has been granted relief from the requirements of MI 61-101 for any related party transactions of BEPC with BEP or any of its subsidiaries. BEPC has also been granted relief from the requirements of MI 61-101 for any related party transactions of BEPC with persons other than BEP or any of BEP’s subsidiaries, provided that, amongst other conditions, BEP complies with the requirements of MI 61-101 for each such related party transaction of BEPC as though BEP entered into such other related party transactions directly.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST WITH BEP
Given our group’s ownership structure, the rationale for the formation of BEPC and because each BEPC exchangeable share is structured with the intention of providing an economic return equivalent to one BEP unit, our group expects that the interests of BEPC and the partnership will typically be aligned.
However, conflicts of interest might arise between BEPC, on the one hand, and the partnership, on the other hand. In order to assist BEPC in addressing such conflicts, the BEPC board of directors includes two non-overlapping directors. Eleazar de Carvalho Filho and Randy MacEwen currently serve as the non-overlapping members of the BEPC board of directors. Mr. de Carvalho Filho previously served on the board of directors the general partner of BEP since November 2011 and resigned from such board of directors shortly prior to the completion of the special distribution. As with conflicts between BEPC and Brookfield, potential conflicts will be approached in a manner that (i) is fair and balanced taking into account the facts and circumstances known at the time, (ii) complies with applicable law, including, for example, independent approvals and advice or validation, if required in the circumstances (iii) supports and reinforces BEPC’s ownership structure, the rationale for the formation of BEPC and the economic equivalence between the BEPC exchangeable shares and BEP units. BEPC and BEP will not generally consider it a conflict for BEPC and the partnership to form part of Brookfield Renewable, including participating in acquisitions together, or to complete transactions contemplated by the agreements entered into prior to closing.
See Item 3.D “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Relationship with Brookfield and the Partnership”.
Other Related Party Transactions
Brookfield, through a regulated subsidiary, provides certain reinsurance coverage to Brookfield Renewable through third-party commercial insurers for the benefit of certain Brookfield Renewable entities in North America. The premiums charged pursuant to these arrangements are at or lower than market rates and are held in reserve by Brookfield to be paid toward insured losses. For the year ended December 31, 2023, there were approximately $8 million of unamortized premiums to Brookfield’s regulated subsidiary (2022: approximately $7.7 million).
In November 2023, Brookfield Renewable, together with institutional partners, and in partnership with Cameco, acquired Westinghouse, one of the world’s largest nuclear services businesses, from our affiliate Brookfield Business Partners and its institutional partners for approximately $4.37 billion ($437 million net to Brookfield Renewable). Brookfield Renewable, together with institutional partners, owns an aggregate 51% interest (10% net to Brookfield Renewable) with Cameco owning 49%. See Item 3.D “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Growth Strategy”.
As at December 31, 2023, the aggregate and largest amount of debt outstanding during the past three-year period to Brookfield by Brookfield Renewable’s key management and other applicable personnel, including any guarantees provided by Brookfield on behalf of such personnel, was approximately $1.004 million which loans bear interest at a minimum rate of 1.6%. The purpose of such loans is to enable certain Brookfield employees to fund certain near-term expenses without monetizing previously granted equity awards under Brookfield’s long-term share ownership plan, thereby preserving long-term alignment of such employees with Brookfield.
From time to time, Brookfield and its related entities may purchase securities sold by Brookfield Renewable and its affiliates as part of public offerings of such securities. Such purchases are typically made at the market price of such securities less any underwriting fee. Similarly, from time to time Brookfield Reinsurance and its related entities may provide non-recourse financing to subsidiaries of Brookfield Renewable. Such financing is typically provided at the market rates.
In December 2023, a subsidiary of the partnership transferred a 13.75% interest in TerraForm Power to BEPC in exchange for a promissory note in the amount of $225 million and the issuance by BEPC to BEP of 4,860,874 BEPC class C shares. As at February 23, 2024, the full principal amount of the promissory note remained outstanding. See also Note 28 in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
7.C INTEREST OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
8.A CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Financial Statements
See Item 18. “Financial Statements”, which contains our audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Dividend Policy
See Item 5.A “Operating Results—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Dividends Policy”, which contains information regarding our dividend policy. Also see Item 5.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Dividends”.
Legal Proceedings
See Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
8.B SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
A discussion of the significant changes in our business can be found under Item 4 “Information on the Company”, Item 4.A “History and Development of the Company” and Item 5.A “Operating Results”.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
9.A OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS
The BEPC exchangeable shares are listed on the NYSE and the TSX under the symbol “BEPC”. The BEPC exchangeable shares began trading on the NYSE and the TSX on July 30, 2020.
9.B PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Not applicable.
9.C MARKETS
See Item 9.A. “Offer and Listing Details”.
9.D SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
Not applicable.
9.E DILUTION
Not applicable.
9.F EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
10.A SHARE CAPITAL
Not applicable.
10.B MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
BEPC’s authorized share capital consists of (i) an unlimited number of BEPC exchangeable shares; (ii) an unlimited number of BEPC class B shares; (iii) an unlimited number of BEPC class C shares; (iv) an unlimited number of exchangeable senior preferred shares (issuable in series); and (v) an unlimited number of class B junior preferred shares (issuable in series), which, together with the exchangeable senior preferred shares (“BEPC preferred shares”).
As of February 23, 2024, there were 179,649,643 BEPC exchangeable shares, 165 BEPC class B shares and 194,460,874 BEPC class C shares issued and outstanding.
BEPC Exchangeable Shares
The following description of BEPC exchangeable shares sets forth certain general terms and provisions of BEPC exchangeable shares. This description is in all respects subject to and qualified in its entirety by applicable law and the provisions of the BEPC articles. Through the rights and governance structures described in this Form 20-F, each BEPC exchangeable share is intended to provide its holder with an economic return that is equivalent to that of a BEP unit. Consequently, the partnership expects that the market price of BEPC exchangeable shares will be impacted by the market price of the BEP units and the combined business performance of our group as a whole.
Voting
Except as otherwise expressly provided in the BEPC articles or as required by law, each holder of BEPC exchangeable shares will be entitled to receive notice of, and to attend and vote at, all meetings of the shareholders of BEPC. Each holder of BEPC exchangeable shares will be entitled to cast one vote for each BEPC exchangeable share held at the distribution record date for determination of shareholders entitled to vote on any matter. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the BEPC articles or as required by law, the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares will vote together and not as separate classes.
Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares hold an aggregate 25% voting interest in BEPC.
Dividends
The holders of BEPC exchangeable shares will be entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the BEPC board subject to the special rights of the holders of all classes and series of the BEPC preferred shares and any other shares ranking senior to the BEPC exchangeable shares with respect to priority in payment of dividends. It is expected that each BEPC exchangeable share will receive identical dividends to the distributions paid on each BEP unit. Additionally, pursuant to the Equity Commitment Agreement, BEP has agreed that it will not declare or pay any distribution on the BEP units if on such date BEPC does not have sufficient funds or other assets to enable the declaration and payment of an equivalent dividend on the BEPC exchangeable shares. See Item 5.A “Operating Results—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Dividends Policy”.
Subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes and series of BEPC preferred shares at the time outstanding having prior rights as to dividends, and in preference to the BEPC class C shares, each BEPC exchangeable share
will entitle its holder to cumulative dividends per share in a cash amount equal in value to (i) the amount of any distribution made on a BEP unit multiplied by (ii) the conversion factor (which is currently one, subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP) determined in accordance with the BEPC articles and in effect on the date of declaration of such dividend (the “BEPC exchangeable dividend”). See this Item 10.B “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events” below. The record and payment dates for the dividends on the BEPC exchangeable shares, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law, shall be the same as the record and payment dates for the distributions upon the BEP units.
If the full amount of a BEPC exchangeable dividend is not declared and paid concurrently with a distribution on the BEP units, then the undeclared or unpaid amount of such BEPC exchangeable dividend shall accrue and accumulate (without interest), whether or not BEPC has earnings, whether or not there are funds legally available for the payment thereof and whether or not such BEPC exchangeable dividend has been declared or authorized. Any BEPC exchangeable dividend payment made shall first be credited against the earliest accumulated but unpaid exchangeable dividends due which remain payable (“unpaid accrued dividends”). All BEPC exchangeable dividends shall be paid prior and in preference to any dividends or distributions on BEPC class B or BEPC class C shares. The holders of BEPC exchangeable shares shall not be entitled to any dividends from BEPC other than the BEPC exchangeable dividends.
Exchange by Holder
Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares have the right to exchange all or a portion of their BEPC exchangeable shares for one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described below in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the date that the request for exchange is received by BEPC’s transfer agent (or if not a trading day, the next trading day thereafter) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any (the form of payment to be determined at the sole election of our group). In the event BEP ceases to be a publicly listed entity, the value of a BEP unit will be determined by (i) the last available bid price from an independent source such as an over-the-counter market or an independent investment banking firm; or (ii) if (i) is not applicable, then the amount that a holder of a BEP unit would receive upon the liquidation of BEP and sale of its assets in accordance with the terms of its partnership agreement. Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares that hold such shares through a broker must contact their brokers to request an exchange on their behalf. Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares that are registered holders must contact the transfer agent and follow the process described below.
Each holder of BEPC exchangeable shares who wishes to exchange one or more of his or her BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units or its cash equivalent is required to complete and deliver a notice of exchange in the form available from BEPC’s transfer agent. Upon receipt of a notice of exchange, BEPC shall, within ten (10) business days after the date that the notice of exchange is received by BEPC’s transfer agent, deliver to the tendering holder of BEPC exchangeable shares, in accordance with instructions set forth in the notice of exchange, one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustments in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described below in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the date that the request for exchange is received by BEPC’s transfer agent (or if not a trading day, the next trading day thereafter) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any (the form of payment to be determined at the sole election of our group). Upon completion of the exchange of any BEPC exchangeable shares as described herein, the holder of BEPC exchangeable shares who has exchanged its BEPC exchangeable shares will have no further right, with respect to any BEPC exchangeable shares so exchanged, to receive any dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares with a record date on or after the date on which such BEPC exchangeable shares are exchanged.
Notwithstanding the paragraph above, when a notice of exchange has been delivered to each of BEPC and BEP and, until such time as the Rights Agreement is terminated, Brookfield, by the transfer agent on behalf of a tendering holder of BEPC exchangeable shares, BEPC will promptly, and in any event, within one (1) business day after receipt thereof, deliver to each of Brookfield and BEP a written notification of their receipt of such notice of exchange setting forth the identity of the holder of BEPC exchangeable shares who wishes to exchange such BEPC exchangeable shares and the number of BEPC exchangeable shares to be exchanged. BEP may elect to satisfy its exchange obligation by acquiring all of the tendered BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for one BEP unit per
BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustments in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described below in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the date that the request for exchange is received by BEPC’s transfer agent (or if not a trading day, the next trading day thereafter) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any (the form of payment to be determined at the sole election of our group). If BEP elects to satisfy its exchange obligation, it shall, within three (3) business days from the receipt of the holder’s notice of exchange, provide written notice to BEPC and Brookfield of its intention to satisfy the exchange obligation and shall satisfy such obligation within ten (10) business days from the date that the notice of exchange is received by BEPC’s transfer agent by delivering to such holder of BEPC exchangeable shares the BEP units or its cash equivalent. Unitholders of BEP are not entitled to vote on BEP’s exercise of the overriding call right described in the preceding sentences.
In the event that a tendering holder of BEPC exchangeable shares has not received the number of BEP units or its cash equivalent (the form of payment to be determined by BEPC or BEP in each of their sole discretion) in satisfaction of the tendered BEPC exchangeable shares, then such tendering holder of BEPC exchangeable shares will be entitled to receive the equivalent of such cash amount or BEP units amount from Brookfield Corporation pursuant to the Rights Agreement. In this scenario, the tendered BEPC exchangeable shares will be delivered to the rights agent in exchange for the delivery of the equivalent of the cash amount or BEP units amount from a collateral account of Brookfield Corporation administered by the rights agent. See Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement” for a further description of the Rights Agreement. The partnership has agreed to indemnify Brookfield Corporation for certain liabilities under applicable securities laws concerning selling securityholders, in connection with any BEP units delivered by Brookfield Corporation pursuant to the Rights Agreement.
No Fractional BEP units. No fractional BEP units will be issued or delivered upon exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares. In lieu of any fractional BEP units to which the tendering holder of BEPC exchangeable shares would otherwise be entitled at our group’s election, our group will pay an amount in cash equal to the BEP unit value on the trading day immediately preceding the exchange date multiplied by such fraction of a BEP unit.
Conversion of Tendered BEPC Exchangeable Shares. The partnership is entitled at any time to have any or all BEPC exchangeable shares acquired by the partnership converted into BEPC class C shares on a one-for-one basis. With each acquisition by BEP of BEPC exchangeable shares and/or the election by BEP to convert these acquired shares to BEPC class C shares, the partnership’s indirect ownership interest in our company will increase.
Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events. The conversion factor (which is currently one) will be subject to adjustment in accordance with the BEPC articles to reflect certain capital events, including (i) if BEP and/or BEPC declares or pays a distribution to its unitholders consisting wholly or partly of BEP units or a dividend to its shareholders in BEPC exchangeable shares, as applicable, without a corresponding distribution or dividend, as applicable, being declared or paid by the other entity; (ii) if BEP and/or BEPC splits, subdivides, reverse-splits or combines its outstanding BEP units or BEPC exchangeable shares, as applicable, without a corresponding event occurring at the other entity; (iii) if BEP and/or BEPC distributes any rights, options or warrants to all or substantially all holders of its BEP units or BEPC exchangeable shares to convert into, exchange for or subscribe for or to purchase or to otherwise acquire BEP units or BEPC exchangeable shares (or other securities or rights convertible into, exchangeable for or exercisable for BEP units or BEPC exchangeable shares), as applicable, without a corresponding distribution of rights, options or warrants by the other entity; (iv) if BEP distributes to all or substantially all holders of BEP units evidences of its indebtedness or assets (including securities) or rights, options or warrants to convert into, exchange for or subscribe for or to purchase or to otherwise acquire such securities, but excluding all distributions where a comparable distribution (or the cash equivalent) is made by BEPC; or (v) if BEP or one of its subsidiaries makes a payment in respect of a tender or exchange offer for the BEP units (but excluding for all purposes any exchange or tender offer to exchange BEP units for BEPC exchangeable shares or any other security economically equivalent to BEP units), to the extent that the cash and value of any other consideration included in the payment per BEP unit exceeds certain thresholds.
Redemption by Issuer
The BEPC board has the right upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares to redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares at any time and for any reason, in its sole discretion and subject to applicable law, including without limitation following the occurrence of any of the following redemption events: (i) the total number of BEPC exchangeable shares outstanding decreases by 50% or
more over any twelve-month period; (ii) a person acquires 90% of the BEP units in a take-over bid (as defined by applicable securities law); (iii) unitholders of BEP approve an acquisition of BEP by way of arrangement or amalgamation; (iv) unitholders of BEP approve a restructuring or other reorganization of BEP; (v) there is a sale of all or substantially all of BEP’s assets; (vi) there is a change of law (whether by legislative, governmental or judicial action), administrative practice or interpretation, or a change in circumstances of BEPC and the shareholders of BEPC, that may result in adverse tax consequences for BEPC or the shareholders of BEPC; or (vii) the BEPC board, in its sole discretion, concludes that the unitholders of BEP or holders of BEPC exchangeable shares are adversely impacted by a fact, change or other circumstance relating to BEPC. For greater certainty, unitholders of BEP do not have the ability to vote on such redemption and the BEPC board’s decision to redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares will be final. In addition, the holder of BEPC class B shares may deliver a notice to BEPC specifying a redemption date upon which BEPC shall redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares, and upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice from BEPC to holders of the BEPC exchangeable shares and without the consent of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares, BEPC shall be required to redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares on such redemption date, subject to applicable law.
Upon any such redemption event, the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares shall be entitled to receive pursuant to such redemption one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any redemption event, BEP may elect to acquire all of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”). BEP unitholders are not entitled to vote on BEP’s exercise of the overriding call right described in the preceding sentences.
Liquidation
Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC, and subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes and series of BEPC preferred shares and any other class of shares of BEPC ranking in priority or ratably with the BEPC exchangeable shares and after the payment in full to any holder of BEPC exchangeable shares that has submitted a notice of the exercise of the exchange rights described above or any holder of BEPC class C shares that has submitted a notice of Class C retraction at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up (or in the case of the BEPC class B shares, thirty (30) days prior to the date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up), the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares shall be entitled to one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”.) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the trading day immediately preceding announcement of such liquidation, dissolution or winding up (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company). If, upon any such liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the assets of BEPC are insufficient to make such payment in full, then the assets of BEPC will be distributed among the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares ratably in proportion to the full amounts to which they would otherwise be respectively entitled to receive.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC, BEP may elect to acquire all of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares for one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any. The acquisition by BEP of all the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares will occur on the day prior to the effective date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC. BEP unitholders are not entitled to vote on BEP’s exercise of the overriding call right described in the preceding sentences.
Automatic Redemption upon Liquidation of BEP
Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEP, including where substantially concurrent with a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC, all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares may be automatically redeemed by BEPC, in its sole absolute and discretion, on the day prior to the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEP. In such case each holder of BEPC exchangeable shares shall be entitled to one BEP unit per
BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the trading day immediately preceding the announcement of such redemption plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any such redemption, BEP may elect to acquire all of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any. The acquisition by BEP of all the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares will occur on the day prior to the effective date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEP. BEP unitholders are not entitled to vote on BEP’s exercise of the overriding call right described in the preceding sentences.
Conversion to BEPC Class C Shares
The partnership, or any of its controlled subsidiaries, is entitled to convert each held BEPC exchangeable share to a BEPC class C share on a one-for-one basis.
Book-Based System
The BEPC exchangeable shares may be represented in the form of one or more fully registered share certificates held by, or on behalf of, CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc. (“CDS”) or DTC, as applicable, as custodian of such certificates for the participants of CDS or DTC, registered in the name of CDS or DTC or their respective nominee, and registration of ownership and transfers of the BEPC exchangeable shares may be effected through the book-based system administered by CDS or DTC, as applicable.
Treatment of BEPC exchangeable shares in connection with a Takeover Bid, Issuer Bid or Tender Offer
The BEPC exchangeable shares are not BEP units and will not be treated as BEP units for purposes of the application of applicable Canadian and U.S. rules relating to takeover bids, issuer bids and tender offers. BEP units and BEPC exchangeable shares are not securities of the same class. As a result, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares will not be entitled to participate in an offer or bid made to acquire BEP units, unless such offer is extended to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and holders of BEP units will not be entitled to participate in an offer or bid made to acquire BEPC exchangeable shares, unless such offer is extended to holders of BEP units. In the event of a takeover bid for BEP units, a holder of BEPC exchangeable shares who would like to participate would be required to tender his or her BEPC exchangeable shares for exchange, in order to receive a BEP unit, or the cash equivalent, at the election of our group, pursuant to the exchange right. If an issuer tender offer or issuer bid is made for the BEP units at a price in excess of the market price of the BEP units and a comparable offer is not made for the BEPC exchangeable shares, then the conversion factor for the BEPC exchangeable shares may be adjusted. See Item 10.B “—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events” above for more information on the circumstances in which adjustments may be made to the conversion factor.
Approval Rights
Any amendment or modification that would reasonably be expected to impact the economic equivalence of a BEPC exchangeable share with a BEP unit requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares not held by Brookfield, voting as a class or, in the event that there is more than one non-overlapping director of BEPC, the approval of a majority of such non-overlapping directors.
Transfer Restrictions
No holder of BEPC exchangeable shares shall transfer to any Person such number of BEPC exchangeable shares such that, after giving effect to the transfer, the transferee, together with its affiliates, would hold a direct and/or indirect interest in voting securities carrying 10% or more of the voting rights attached to all voting securities of BEPC without the prior approval of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to the extent required.
Choice of Forum for U.S. Securities Act Claims
The BEPC articles provide that unless BEPC consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the U.S. Securities Act. In the absence of this provision, under the U.S. Securities Act, U.S. federal and state courts have been found to have concurrent jurisdiction over suits brought to enforce duties or liabilities created by the U.S. Securities Act. This choice of forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce duties or liabilities created by the Exchange Act and could be found to be inapplicable or unenforceable if it is challenged in a legal proceeding or otherwise.
BEPC Class B Shares
The following description of BEPC class B shares sets forth certain general terms and provisions of BEPC class B shares. This description is in all respects subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable law and the provisions of the BEPC articles.
Voting
Except as otherwise expressly provided in the BEPC articles or as required by law, each holder of BEPC class B shares will be entitled to receive notice of, and to attend and vote at, all meetings of the shareholders of BEPC. Each holder of BEPC class B shares will be entitled to cast a number of votes per BEPC class B share equal to: (i) the number that is three times the number of BEPC exchangeable shares then issued and outstanding divided by (ii) the number of BEPC class B shares then issued and outstanding. The effect of the foregoing is that the holders of the BEPC class B shares will be entitled to cast, in the aggregate, a number of votes equal to three times the number of votes attached to the BEPC exchangeable shares. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the BEPC articles or as required by law, the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares will vote together and not as separate classes.
Dividends
Except as provided in the following sentence, the holders of BEPC class B shares will not be entitled to receive dividends. In the event a dividend is declared and paid on the BEPC exchangeable shares consisting of BEPC exchangeable shares, the board shall, subject to applicable law, contemporaneously declare and pay an equivalent dividend on the BEPC class B shares consisting of BEPC class B shares.
Liquidation
Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC, subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes and series of BEPC preferred shares and after the payment in full of the amount due to the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares described above in “—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Liquidation”, the holders of BEPC class B shares shall be entitled to be paid out of the assets of BEPC an amount in cash per BEPC class B share equal to the value of one BEP unit (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in “—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) based on the NYSE closing price on the trading day immediately preceding announcement of such liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Redemption by Holder
Holders of BEPC class B shares have the right to tender all or a portion of their BEPC class B shares for cash for each BEPC class B share equal to the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in “—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) on the date of the request for redemption. Upon receipt of a request for redemption, BEPC will have thirty (30) days to deliver the cash amount to the exchanging holder.
Restrictions on Transfer
The BEPC class B shares may only be transferred to the partnership or persons controlled by the partnership.
BEPC Class C Shares
The following description of BEPC class C shares sets forth certain general terms and provisions of BEPC class C shares. This description is in all respects subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable law and the provisions of the BEPC articles.
Voting
Except as otherwise expressly provided in the BEPC articles or as required by law, each holder of a BEPC class C share shall be entitled to notice of, and to attend, any meetings of shareholders of BEPC, but shall not otherwise be entitled to vote at any such meetings.
Dividends
The holders of BEPC class C shares will be entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the BEPC board subject to the special rights of the holders of all classes and series of the BEPC preferred shares, BEPC exchangeable shares any other shares ranking senior to the BEPC class C shares with respect to priority in payment of dividends.
Subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes and series of BEPC preferred shares and the BEPC exchangeable shares at the time outstanding having prior rights as to dividends, each BEPC class C share will entitle its holder to dividends as and when declared by the BEPC board (the “BEPC class C dividend”). The record and payment dates for the dividends or other distributions upon the BEPC class C shares, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law, shall be substantially the same as the record and payment dates for the dividends or other distributions upon the BEP units.
In the event a dividend is declared and paid on the BEPC exchangeable shares consisting of BEPC exchangeable shares, the board shall, subject to applicable law, contemporaneously declare and pay an equivalent dividend on the BEPC class C shares consisting of BEPC class C shares.
Liquidation
Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC, subject to the prior rights of holders of BEPC preferred shares and after the payment in full of the amount due to the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares described under the section above in “—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Liquidation” and the holders of BEPC class B shares described under the section above in “—BEPC Class B Shares—Liquidation”, the remaining assets and property of BEPC will be distributed among the holders of BEPC class C shares.
Redemption by Holder
Holders of BEPC class C shares have the right to tender all or a portion of their BEPC class C shares for cash in an amount for each BEPC class C share equal to the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP as described above in this Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”) on the date of the request for redemption. Upon receipt of a request for redemption, BEPC will have ten (10) days to deliver the cash amount to the exchanging holder.
Restrictions on Transfer
The BEPC class C shares may only be transferred to the partnership or persons controlled by the partnership.
BEPC Preferred Shares
The following description of BEPC preferred shares sets forth certain general terms and provisions of class A senior preferred shares and class B junior preferred shares. The approval of holders of a majority of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares not held by Brookfield, voting as a class, is required prior to issuing any class A senior preferred shares or class B junior preferred shares to Brookfield or the partnership or any of their affiliates. This description is in all respects subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable law and the provisions of the BEPC articles.
Priority
Each series of class A senior preferred shares will rank on a parity with every other series of class A senior preferred shares with respect to dividends and return of capital, and each series of class B junior preferred shares will rank on a parity with every other series of class B junior preferred shares with respect to dividends and return of capital. The BEPC preferred shares shall be entitled to a preference over the BEPC exchangeable shares, the BEPC class B shares, the BEPC class C shares and any other shares ranking junior to the BEPC preferred shares with
respect to priority in payment of dividends and in the distribution of assets in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of BEPC, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any other distribution of the assets of BEPC among the shareholders of BEPC for the specific purpose of winding up BEPC’s affairs. The class A senior preferred shares shall be entitled to preference over the class B junior preferred shares for all such matters.
Directors’ Right to Issue in One or More Series
The BEPC preferred shares may be issued at any time and from time to time in one or more series. Before any shares of a series are issued, the BEPC board shall fix the number of shares that will form such series, if any, and shall, subject to any limitations set out in the BEPC articles or in applicable law, determine the designation, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions to be attached to the BEPC preferred shares as the case may be, of such series.
Voting
Except as hereinafter referred to or as required by law or as specified in the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached from time to time to any series of BEPC preferred shares, the holders of such BEPC preferred shares as a class shall not be entitled as such to receive notice of, to attend or to vote at any meeting of shareholders of BEPC.
Amendment with Approval of Holder of BEPC Preferred Shares
The rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to the BEPC preferred shares as a class may be added to, changed or removed but only with the approval of the holders of such class of BEPC preferred shares given as hereinafter specified and subject to applicable law.
Approval of Holders of BEPC Preferred Shares
The approval of the holders of a class of BEPC preferred shares to add to, change or remove any right, privilege, restriction or condition attaching to such class of BEPC preferred shares as a class or in respect of any other matter requiring the consent of the holders of such class of BEPC preferred shares may be given in such manner as may then be required by law, subject to a minimum requirement that such approval be given by resolution signed by all the holders of such class of BEPC preferred shares or passed by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (2/3rds) of the votes cast at a meeting of the holders of such class of BEPC preferred shares duly called for that purpose.
The formalities to be observed with respect to the giving of notice of any such meeting or any adjourned meeting, the quorum required therefor and the conduct thereof shall be those from time to time required by applicable law as in force at the time of the meeting and those, if any, prescribed by the BEPC articles with respect to meetings of shareholders. On every poll taken at every meeting of the holders of a class of BEPC preferred shares as a class, or at any joint meeting of the holders of two or more series of a class of BEPC preferred shares, each holder of such class of BEPC preferred shares entitled to vote thereat shall have one vote in respect of each such BEPC preferred share held.
Comparison of Rights of Holders of BEPC Exchangeable Shares and BEP Units
BEPC is a corporation existing under British Columbia law. BEP is an exempted limited partnership existing under Bermuda law. The rights of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares are governed by the BCBCA and the BEPC articles. The rights of holders of the BEP units are governed by BEP’s limited partnership agreement and certain provisions of Bermuda law.
The following comparison is a summary of certain material differences between the rights of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and holders of the BEP units under the governing documents of BEPC and BEP and the applicable laws noted above. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the relevant provisions of (i) the BCBCA; (ii) the Bermuda Partnership Acts (iii) the BEPC articles; (iv) BEP’s limited partnership agreement; and (v) the bye-laws of BEP’s general partner.
This section does not include a complete description of all of the differences between the rights of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and holders of the BEP units, nor does it include a complete description of the specific rights of such holders. Furthermore, the identification of some of the differences in the rights of such holders is not intended to indicate that other differences that may be equally important do not exist. You are urged to read carefully
the relevant provisions of British Columbia law and Bermuda law, as well as the governing documents of each of BEPC and BEP, each as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, copies of which are available, without charge, to any person, including any beneficial owner of BEP units to whom this document is delivered.
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Corporate Governance | BEPC is a corporation formed under the laws of the Province of British Columbia. The rights of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares are governed by the BCBCA and the BEPC articles. | BEP is a Bermuda-exempted limited partnership registered under the Bermuda Partnership Acts. BEP’s limited partnership agreement provides for the management and control of BEP by a general partner, BEP’s general partner. |
| Authorized Capital | BEPC is authorized to issue an unlimited number of: (i) BEPC exchangeable shares; (ii) BEPC class B shares; (iii) BEPC class C shares; (iv) class A senior preferred shares, issuable in series, and (v) class B junior preferred shares, issuable in series. All BEPC exchangeable shares, BEPC class B shares, BEPC class C shares, class A senior preferred shares and class B junior preferred shares have or will be issued without par value. The number of authorized BEPC exchangeable shares can be changed in accordance with the BEPC articles or, if the BEPC articles are silent, by special resolution, in accordance with s. 54(3)(c) of the BCBCA. Subject to the BEPC articles, including the terms of the shares then outstanding, the BEPC board has broad rights to issue additional shares (including new classes of shares and options, rights, warrants, and appreciation rights relating to such shares) for any purpose, at any time and on such terms and conditions as it may determine without the approval of any shareholders. Any additional shares may be issued in one or more classes, or one or more series of classes, with such designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties (which may be senior to existing classes and series of shares) as may be determined by the BEPC board in its sole discretion. Any amendment or modification that would reasonably be expected to impact the economic equivalence of a BEPC exchangeable share with a BEP unit requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares not held by Brookfield, voting as a class or, in the event that there is more than one non-overlapping director of BEPC, the approval of a majority of such non-overlapping directors. | BEP’s interests consist of the general partner unit, which represents the general partnership interest, the BEP units and the preferred units, representing limited partnership interests in BEP, and any additional partnership interests representing limited partnership interests that it may issue in the future. BEP’s general partner has broad rights to cause BEP to issue additional partnership interests and may cause BEP to issue additional partnership interests (including new classes of partnership interests and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to such interests) for any partnership purpose, at any time and on such terms and conditions as it may determine without the approval of any limited partners, subject to the terms of any preferred units then outstanding. Any additional partnership interests may be issued in one or more classes, or one or more series of classes, with such designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties (which may be senior to existing classes and series of partnership interests) as may be determined by BEP’s general partner in its sole discretion, all without the approval of BEP’s limited partners. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Voting Rights | Except as otherwise expressly provided in the BEPC articles or as required by law, the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares, will vote together and not as separate classes. Each holder of a BEPC exchangeable share will be entitled to cast one vote per BEPC exchangeable share on all matters submitted to a vote. On each such matter, the holders of BEPC class B shares will be entitled to cast a number of votes per BEPC class B share equal to three times the number of BEPC exchangeable shares issued and outstanding divided by the number of BEPC class B shares then issued and outstanding. As the partnership holds all of the BEPC class B shares, it holds 75% of the votes eligible to be cast on all matters where the BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares vote together. At any time that no BEPC exchangeable shares are outstanding and for any vote held only in respect of the BEPC class B shares, the holder of the BEPC class B shares will be entitled to cast one vote per BEPC class B share. Quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of shareholders is at least two shareholders who, whether present in person or represented by proxy, in the aggregate, hold at least 25% of the votes attached to the shares entitled to be voted at the meeting. If there is only one shareholder entitled to vote at a meeting of shareholders, the quorum will be one holder of BEPC class B shares. | Limited partners are not entitled to vote on matters relating to BEP, although holders of BEP units are entitled to consent to certain matters with respect to certain amendments to BEP’s limited partnership agreement and certain matters with respect to the withdrawal of BEP’s general partner. Each BEP unit entitles the holder thereof to one vote for the purposes of any approvals of holders of BEP units. In addition to their rights under BEP’s limited partnership agreement, limited partners have consent rights with respect to certain fundamental matters and on any other matters that require their approval in accordance with applicable securities laws and stock exchange rules. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Size of Board | The BEPC board is comprised of ten (10) directors. The BEPC board may consist of between three (3) and eleven (11) directors or such other number of directors as may be determined from time to time by a resolution of BEPC’s shareholders and subject to the BEPC articles. The BEPC board mirrors the board of directors of the general partner of BEP, except for two additional non-overlapping directors to assist BEPC with, among other things, resolving any conflicts that may arise from its relationship with the partnership. Eleazar de Carvalho Filho and Randy MacEwen serve as the non-overlapping members of the BEPC board. Mr. de Carvalho Filho has served on the board of directors of the general partner of BEP since November 2011 and resigned from such board of directors in June 2020. At least three (3) directors and at least a majority of the directors holding office must be independent of BEPC, as determined by the full board using the standards for independence established by the NYSE. | BEP’s general partner board is currently set at eight (8) directors. The board may consist of between three (3) and eleven (11) directors or such other number of directors as may be determined from time to time by a resolution of the shareholders of BEP’s general partner and subject to its bye-laws. At least three (3) directors and at least a majority of the directors holding office must be independent of BEP’s general partner and Brookfield, as determined by the full board of directors using the standards of independence established by NYSE. |
Election and Removal of Directors
| The BEPC board is elected by the shareholders of BEPC and each of BEPC’s current directors will serve until immediately before the election or appointment of directors at the next annual meeting of shareholders of BEPC or his or her death, resignation or removal from office, whichever occurs first. Vacancies on the BEPC board may be filled and additional directors may be added by a resolution of BEPC’s shareholders or a vote of the directors then in office. A director may be removed from office by a special resolution duly passed by BEPC’s shareholders or a resolution of the directors if the director is convicted of an indictable offence, or if the director ceases to be qualified to act as a director of BEPC and does not promptly resign. A director will be automatically removed from the BEPC board if he or she becomes bankrupt, insolvent or suspends payments to his or her creditors or becomes disqualified by law from acting as a director pursuant to the BCBCA. | BEP’s general partner’s board of directors was elected by its shareholder and each of its current directors will serve until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders of BEP’s general partner or his or her death, resignation or removal from office, whichever occurs first. Vacancies on BEP’s general partner’s board of directors may be filled and additional directors may be added by a resolution of the shareholders of BEP’s general partner or a vote of the directors then in office. A director may be removed from office by a resolution duly passed by the shareholders of BEP’s general partner or, if the director has been absent without leave from three consecutive meetings of the board of directors, by a written resolution requesting resignation signed by all other directors then holding office. A director will be automatically removed from the board of directors if he or she becomes bankrupt, insolvent or suspends payments to his or her creditors or becomes prohibited by law from acting as a director. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Process to Amend the Governing Instruments | BEPC may from time to time amend, modify or repeal any provision contained in the BEPC articles in a manner authorized by the BCBCA. Under the BCBCA, alteration of the notice of articles generally requires authorization by either court order, by a two-thirds (2/3rds) vote of all voting shares or by the methods specified in the BEPC articles. Certain alterations to matters such as changes to company name or address or a change in directors will not require authorization by the above-mentioned methods. Specific alterations such as those of a nature affecting a particular class or series in a manner that would prejudice or interfere with the rights of such class or series, will entitle the affected class or series to consent by special resolution to the alteration, whether or not such class or series otherwise carries the right to vote. Under the BCBCA, BEPC may resolve to alter the BEPC articles by the type of resolution specified in the BCBCA, if not specified in the BCBCA, by the type of resolution specified in the BEPC articles or if neither the BCBCA or the BEPC articles specify the type of resolution, by a two-thirds (2/3rds) vote of all voting shares; provided however, if such alteration would prejudice or interfere with the rights of a particular class or series, such class or series must consent by special resolution to the alteration, whether or not such class or series otherwise carries the right to vote. | Amendments to BEP’s limited partnership agreement may be proposed only by or with the consent of BEP’s general partner. To adopt a proposed amendment, other than the amendments that do not require limited partner approval discussed below, BEP’s general partner must seek approval of a majority of outstanding BEP units required to approve the amendment, either by way of a meeting of the limited partners to consider and vote upon the proposed amendment or by written approval. No amendment may be made that would: (i) enlarge the obligations of any limited partner without its consent, except any amendment that would have a material adverse effect on the rights or preferences of any class of partnership interests in relation to other classes of partnership interests may be approved by at least a majority of the type or class of partnership interests so affected; or (ii) enlarge the obligations of, restrict in any way any action by or rights of, or reduce in any way the amounts distributable, reimbursable or otherwise payable by BEP to, BEP’s general partner or any of its affiliates without the consent of BEP’s general partner, which may be given or withheld in its sole discretion. The provision of BEP’s limited partnership agreement preventing the amendments having the effects described in clauses (i) and (ii) above can be amended upon the approval of the holders of at least 90% of the outstanding BEP units. Subject to applicable law, BEP’s general partner may generally make amendments to BEP’s limited partnership agreement without the approval of any limited partner to reflect: (i) a change in the name of BEP, the location of its registered office or its registered agent; (ii) the admission, substitution or withdrawal of partners in accordance with BEP’s limited partnership agreement; (iii) a change that BEP’s general partner determines is reasonable and necessary or appropriate for BEP to qualify or to continue its qualification as an exempted limited partnership under the laws of Bermuda or a partnership in which the limited partners have limited liability under the laws of any jurisdiction or is necessary or advisable in the opinion of BEP’s general partner to ensure that BEP will not be treated as an association taxable as a corporation or otherwise taxed as an entity for tax purposes; (iv) an amendment that BEP’s general partner determines to be necessary or appropriate to address certain changes in tax regulations, legislation or interpretation; (v) an amendment that is necessary, |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| | in the opinion of BEP’s counsel, to prevent BEP or BEP’s general partner or its directors or officers, from in any manner being subjected to the provisions of the Investment Company Act, or similar legislation in other jurisdictions; (vi) subject to the terms of any preferred units then outstanding, an amendment that BEP’s general partner determines in its sole discretion to be necessary or appropriate for the creation, authorization or issuance of any class or series of partnership interests or options, rights, warrants or appreciation rights relating to partnership securities; (vii) any amendment expressly permitted in BEP’s limited partnership agreement to be made by BEP’s general partner acting alone; (viii) an amendment effected, necessitated or contemplated by a merger or consolidation of BEP with one or more persons in accordance with the provisions of BEP’s limited partnership agreement; (ix) any amendment that BEP’s general partner determines in its sole discretion to be necessary or appropriate to reflect and account for the formation by BEP of, or its investment in, any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company or other entity, as otherwise permitted by BEP’s limited partnership agreement; (x) a change in BEP’s fiscal year and related changes; or (xi) any other amendments substantially similar to any of the matters described in (i) through (x) above. |
| | In addition, BEP’s general partner may make amendments to BEP’s limited partnership agreement without the approval of any limited partner if those amendments, in the discretion of BEP’s general partner: (i) do not adversely affect BEP’s limited partners considered as a whole (including any particular class of partnership interests as compared to other classes of partnership interests) in any material respect; (ii) are necessary or appropriate to satisfy any requirements, conditions or guidelines contained in any opinion, directive, order, ruling or regulation of any governmental agency or judicial authority; (iii) are necessary or appropriate to facilitate the trading of the BEP units or to comply with any rule, regulation, guideline or requirement of any securities exchange on which the BEP units are or will be listed for trading; (iv) are necessary or appropriate for any action taken by BEP’s general partner relating to splits or combinations of BEP units under the provisions of BEP’s limited partnership agreement; or (v) are required to effect the intent of the provisions of the Combination Agreement (as defined in BEP’s limited partnership agreement), BEP’s limited partnership agreement or are otherwise contemplated by BEP’s limited partnership agreement. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| | BEP’s general partner will not be required to obtain an opinion of counsel that an amendment will not result in a loss of limited liability to the limited partners if one of the amendments described in the preceding two paragraphs should occur. No other amendments to BEP’s limited partnership agreement will become effective without the approval of holders of at least 90% of the BEP units, unless BEP obtains an opinion of counsel to the effect that the amendment will not (i) cause BEP to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation or otherwise taxable as an entity for tax purposes (provided that for U.S. tax purposes BEP’s general partner has not made the election described below under the section entitled “Qualification”), or (ii) affect the limited liability under the Bermuda Partnership Acts of any of BEP’s limited partners. |
| | In addition to the above restrictions, any amendment that would have a material adverse effect on the rights or preferences of any type or class of partnership interests in relation to other classes of partnership interests will also require the approval of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding partnership interests of the class so affected. In addition, any amendment that reduces the voting percentage required to take any action must be approved by the written consent or affirmative vote of limited partners whose aggregate outstanding voting units constitute not less than the voting requirement sought to be reduced. |
Special Meetings of the Shareholders
| A special meeting of the shareholders for any purpose or purposes may be called only by the BEPC board on a date not less than twenty-one (21) days nor more than two (2) months after the sending of the notice of the meeting to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at such meeting. | BEP’s general partner may call special meetings of the limited partners at a time and place outside of Canada determined by BEP’s general partner on a date not less than ten (10) days nor more than sixty (60) days after the mailing of notice of the meeting. The limited partners do not have the ability to call a special meeting. Only holders of record on the date set by BEP’s general partner (which may not be less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the meeting) are entitled to notice of any meeting. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
Written Consent in Lieu of Meeting
| Under the BCBCA, generally, shareholder action without a meeting may only be taken by consent resolution of the shareholders entitled to vote on the resolution: with a written consent executed by shareholders holding two-thirds (2/3rds) of the shares that carry the right to vote at general meetings being effective to approve an action requiring an ordinary resolution; or with a written consent executed by all shareholders that carry the right to vote at general meetings or by all of the shareholders holding shares of the applicable class or series of shares, as the case may be, being effective to approve an action requiring a special resolution or an exceptional resolution. | Written consents may be solicited only by or on behalf of BEP’s general partner. Any such consent solicitation may specify that any written consents must be returned to BEP within the time period, which may not be less than twenty (20) days, specified by BEP’s general partner. For purposes of determining holders of partnership interests entitled to provide consents to any action described above, BEP’s general partner may set a record date, which may be not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the date by which record holders are requested in writing by BEP’s general partner to provide such consents. Only those holders of partnership interests on the record date established by BEP’s general partner will be entitled to provide consents with respect to matters as to which a consent right applies. |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Directors and Officers | No director will be personally liable to BEPC or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, except to the extent such exemption is not permitted under the BCBCA. Under the BCBCA, no provision in the BEPC articles or other contract relieves a director or officer from (i) the duty to act in accordance with the BCBCA and the regulations, or (ii) liability that by virtue of any enactment or rule of law or equity would otherwise attach to that director or officer in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which the director or officer may be guilty in relation to BEPC. | Under BEP’s limited partnership agreement, BEP is required to indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by law BEP’s general partner and any of its affiliates (and their respective officers, directors, agents, shareholders, partners, members and employees), any person who serves on a governing body of a holding entity or operating entity of BEP and any other person designated by BEP’s general partner as an indemnified person, in each case, against all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs or expenses (including legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines, penalties, interest, settlements and other amounts arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, incurred by an indemnified person in connection with BEP’s investments and activities or by reason of their holding such positions, except to the extent that the claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses are determined to have resulted from the indemnified person’s bad faith, fraud or willful misconduct, or in the case of a criminal matter, action that the indemnified person knew to have been unlawful. In addition, under BEP’s limited partnership agreement: (i) the liability of such persons has been limited to the fullest extent permitted by law, except to the extent that their conduct involves bad faith, fraud or willful misconduct, or in the case of a criminal matter, action that the indemnified person knew to have been unlawful; and (ii) any matter that is approved by the independent directors of BEP’s general partner will not constitute a breach of BEP’s limited partnership agreement or any duties stated or implied by law or equity, including fiduciary duties. BEP’s limited partnership agreement requires BEP to advance funds to pay the expenses of an indemnified person in connection with a matter in which indemnification may be sought until it is determined that the indemnified person is not entitled to indemnification. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| To the fullest extent permitted by law, BEPC will indemnify any present or former director or officer of BEPC (or a person serving as a director or officer of another corporation that is or was an affiliate BEPC), who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to, or is otherwise involved in, any threatened, pending or completed action while acting in such capacity, for all liability and loss suffered (including, without limitation, any judgments, fines, or penalties and amounts paid in settlement) and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and disbursements), actually and reasonably incurred.
Subject to the BCBCA, BEPC may agree to indemnify and may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to, or is otherwise involved in, any threatened, pending or completed action relating to the performance of services of such person for BEPC, for all liability and loss suffered (including, without limitation, any judgments, fines, or penalties and amounts paid in settlement) and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and disbursements), actually and reasonably incurred.
BEPC may enter into agreements with any such person to provide such indemnification. The right to indemnification includes the right to be paid by BEPC the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by such person in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition, such that the advances are paid by BEPC within sixty (60) days after the receipt by BEPC of a statement or statements from the claimant requesting such advance or advances from time to time (and subject to filing a written request for indemnification pursuant to the BEPC articles).
BEPC will not indemnify any present or former director or officer of BEPC for acts of bad faith, fraud, willful misfeasance, gross negligence, knowing violation of law or reckless disregard of the director’s duties or for any act for which indemnification is specifically prohibited under the BCBCA. | BEP’s general partner’s bye-laws provide that, as permitted by the laws of Bermuda, it will pay or reimburse an indemnified person’s expenses in advance of a final disposition of a proceeding for which indemnification is sought.
Under BEP’s general partner’s bye-laws, BEP’s general partner is required to indemnify, to the fullest extent permitted by law, its affiliates, directors, officers, resident representatives, shareholders, employees or any of its subsidiaries and certain others against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs or expenses (including legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines, penalties, interest, settlements or other amounts arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, incurred by an indemnified person in connection with BEP’s investments and activities or in respect of or arising from their holding such positions, except to the extent that the claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses are determined to have resulted from the indemnified person’s bad faith, fraud or willful misconduct, or in the case of a criminal matter, action that the indemnified person knew to have been unlawful. In addition, under BEP’s general partner’s bye-laws: (i) the liability of such persons has been limited to the fullest extent permitted by law and except to the extent that their conduct involves bad faith, fraud or willful misconduct, or in the case of a criminal matter, action that the indemnified person knew to have been unlawful; and (ii) any matter that is approved by the independent directors will not constitute a breach of any duties stated or implied by law or equity, including fiduciary duties. BEP’s general partner’s bye-laws require it to advance funds to pay the expenses of an indemnified person in connection with a matter in which indemnification may be sought until it is determined that the indemnified person is not entitled to indemnification. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Dividends and Distributions | Pursuant to the BEPC articles and subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes and series of BEPC preferred shares at the time outstanding having prior rights as to dividends, each BEPC exchangeable share will entitle its holder to the BEPC exchangeable dividend, in a cash amount equal in value to (i) the amount of any distribution made on a BEP unit multiplied by (ii) the conversion factor determined in accordance with the BEPC articles and in effect on the date of declaration of such dividend (which conversion factor will initially be one, subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. The record and payment dates for the dividends upon the BEPC exchangeable shares, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law, shall be substantially the same as the record and payment dates for distributions on the BEP units.
If the full amount of a BEPC exchangeable dividend is not declared and paid concurrent with a distribution on the BEP units, then the undeclared or unpaid amount of such BEPC exchangeable dividend shall accrue and accumulate (without interest), whether or not BEPC has earnings, whether or not there are funds legally available for the payment thereof and whether or not such exchangeable dividend has been declared or authorized. Any BEPC exchangeable dividend payment made shall first be credited against unpaid accrued dividends.
All BEPC exchangeable dividends shall be paid prior and in preference to any dividends or distributions on the BEPC class C shares. Share dividends, if any, paid on the BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class C shares will be declared contemporaneously and paid at the same time in equal numbers of additional shares of the same class and series such that share dividends will be paid in BEPC exchangeable shares, to holders of the BEPC exchangeable shares, and in BEPC class C shares to holders of the BEPC class C shares.
The holders of BEPC exchangeable shares shall not be entitled to any dividends from BEPC other than the BEPC exchangeable dividends. | Distributions to partners of BEP will be made in accordance with their Percentage Interests (as defined in BEP’s limited partnership agreement) only as determined by the general partner in its sole discretion in accordance with BEP’s limited partnership agreement. However, the general partner will not be permitted to cause BEP to make a distribution if BEP does not have sufficient cash on hand to make the distribution, the distribution would render BEP insolvent, or if, in the opinion of the general partner, the distribution would leave BEP with insufficient funds to meet any future or contingent obligations, or the distribution would contravene applicable laws.
Subject to the terms of any preferred units outstanding, the general partner has sole authority to determine whether BEP will make distributions and the amount and timing of these distributions.
BEP has a distribution reinvestment plan for holders of its BEP units who are resident in Canada and the United States. Holders of BEP units who are not resident in Canada or the United States may participate in the distribution reinvestment plan provided that there are not any laws or governmental regulations that may limit or prohibit them from doing so. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Exchange by Holder | Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares have the right to exchange all or a portion of their BEPC exchangeable shares for one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the date of the request for exchange (or if not a trading day, the next trading day thereafter) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”.
BEP may elect to satisfy BEPC’s exchange obligation by acquiring all of the tendered BEPC exchangeable shares for one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the date that the request for exchange is received by BEPC’s transfer agent (or if not a trading day, the next trading day thereafter) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any (the form of payment to be determined at the election of BEP). See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”.
| N/A. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Redemption by Issuer | The BEPC board has the right upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares to redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares at any time and for any reason, in its sole discretion, subject to applicable law, including without limitation following the occurrence of certain redemption events described in Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Redemption by Issuer”. In addition, the holder of BEPC class B shares may deliver a notice to BEPC specifying a redemption date upon which BEPC shall redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares, and upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice from BEPC to holders of the BEPC exchangeable shares and without the consent of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares, BEPC shall be required to redeem all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares on such redemption date, subject to applicable law.
Upon any such redemption event, the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares shall be entitled to one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”.
Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEP, including where substantially concurrent with a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC, all of the then outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares may be automatically redeemed by BEPC, in its sole and absolute discretion on the day prior to the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEP. In such case each holder of BEPC exchangeable shares shall be entitled to one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the trading day immediately preceding announcement of such liquidation, dissolution or winding up (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company) plus all unpaid accrued dividends. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. | N/A. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Qualification | N/A. | If BEP’s general partner determines in its sole discretion that it is no longer in BEP’s best interests to continue as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, BEP’s general partner may elect to treat BEP as an association or as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal (and applicable state) income tax purposes. |
| | |
| Liquidation | Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC, and subject to the prior rights of holders of BEPC preferred shares and any other class of shares of BEPC ranking in priority or ratably with the BEPC exchangeable shares and after the payment in full to (i) any holder of BEPC exchangeable shares that has submitted a notice of the exercise of the exchange rights described above or any holder of BEPC class C shares that has submitted a notice of Class C retraction at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up (or in the case of the BEPC class B shares, thirty (30) days prior to the date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up) and (ii) any unpaid accrued dividends, the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares shall be entitled to one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP described in this document) or its cash equivalent based on the NYSE closing price of one BEP unit on the trading day immediately preceding announcement of such liquidation, dissolution or winding up (the form of payment to be determined at the election of our company). If, upon any such liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the assets of BEPC are insufficient to make such payment in full, then the assets of BEPC will be distributed among the holders of BEPC exchangeable shares ratably in proportion to the full amounts to which they would otherwise be respectively entitled to receive. | BEP will terminate upon the earlier to occur of: (i) the date on which all of BEP’s assets have been disposed of or otherwise realized by BEP and the proceeds of such disposals or realizations have been distributed to partners; (ii) the service of notice by BEP’s general partner, with the special approval of a majority of its independent directors, that in its opinion the coming into force of any law, regulation or binding authority renders illegal or impracticable the continuation of BEP; and (iii) at the election of BEP’s general partner, if BEP, as determined by BEP’s general partner, is required to register as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act or similar legislation in other jurisdictions.
BEP will be dissolved upon the withdrawal of BEP’s general partner as the general partner of BEP (unless a successor entity becomes the general partner pursuant to BEP’s limited partnership agreement) or the date on which any court of competent jurisdiction enters a decree of judicial dissolution of BEP or an order to wind-up or liquidate BEP’s general partner without the appointment of a successor in compliance with BEP’s limited partnership agreement. BEP will be reconstituted and continue without dissolution if within thirty (30) days of the date of dissolution (and provided a notice of dissolution has not been filed with the Bermuda Monetary Authority), a successor general partner executes a transfer deed pursuant to which the new general partner assumes the rights and undertakes the obligations of the general partner, but only if BEP receives an opinion of counsel that the admission of the new general partner will not result in the loss of limited liability of any limited partner. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC, BEP may elect to acquire all of the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares for one BEP unit per BEPC exchangeable share held (subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive or other capital events by BEPC or BEP) plus all unpaid accrued dividends, if any. See Item 10.B “Memorandum and Articles of Association—BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Adjustments to Reflect Certain Capital Events”. The acquisition by BEP of all the outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares will occur on the day prior to the effective date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEPC. | Upon BEP’s dissolution, unless BEP is continued as a new limited partnership, the liquidator authorized to wind-up BEP’s affairs will, acting with all of the powers of BEP’s general partner that the liquidator deems necessary or appropriate in its judgment, liquidate BEP’s assets and apply the proceeds of the liquidation first, to discharge BEP’s liabilities as provided in its limited partnership agreement and by law, then to the preferred units up to the amount of the liquidation entitlement of the preferred units, and thereafter to the partners pro rata according to the percentages of their respective partnership interests as of a record date selected by the liquidator.
The liquidator may defer liquidation of BEP’s assets for a reasonable period of time or distribute assets to partners in kind if it determines that an immediate sale or distribution of all or some of BEP’s assets would be impractical or would cause undue loss to the partners. |
| | |
| Conversion | BEP, or any of its controlled subsidiaries, are entitled to convert each held BEPC exchangeable share into a BEPC class C share on a one-for-one basis. | N/A. |
| | |
| Fiduciary Duties | The directors of BEPC have three principal responsibilities under the BCBCA and the BEPC articles, being (i) the duty to manage, (ii) the fiduciary duty, which is to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of BEPC, and (iii) the duty of care, which is to exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent individual would exercise in comparable circumstances. | A general partner is required to act in good faith and in a manner which it reasonably believes to be in the best interests of a partnership. BEP’s limited partnership agreement contains various express provisions that modify, waive and/or limit the fiduciary duties that might otherwise be owed to BEP and the limited partners. These modifications inter alia restrict the remedies available for actions that might otherwise constitute a breach of fiduciary duty and permit the general partner of BEP to take into account the interests of third parties, including Brookfield, when resolving conflicts of interest. |
| | | | | | | | |
| BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES | BEP UNITS |
| Protection of Shareholders | Under the BCBCA, pursuant to the oppression remedy, any holder of BEPC exchangeable shares may apply to court for an order where the affairs of BEPC are being or have been conducted, or that the powers of the directors are being or have been exercised, in a manner that is oppressive to one or more shareholders, or where there has been some act of BEPC that is unfairly prejudicial to one or more of the shareholders. Under the BCBCA, pursuant to the derivative action remedy, a shareholder (including a beneficial shareholder) may bring an action in the name of and on behalf of BEPC to enforce a right, duty or obligation owed to BEPC that could be enforced by BEPC itself or to obtain damages for any such breach of right, duty or obligation. | There is no oppression remedy or derivative action remedy available under the Bermuda Partnership Acts. Furthermore, BEP’s limited partnership agreement also stipulates that unless otherwise determined by the general partner of BEP, a Person (as defined in the limited partnership agreement) shall not have pre-emptive, preferential or other similar rights in respect to the issuance of a BEP unit. |
| | |
| Takeover Bids. Issuer Bids and Tender Offers | The BEPC exchangeable shares are not BEP units and will not be treated as BEP units for purposes of the application of applicable Canadian or U.S. rules relating to takeover bids, issuer bids and tender offers. As a result, holders of BEPC exchangeable shares will not be entitled to participate in an offer or bid made to acquire BEP units unless such offer has been extended to holders of BEPC exchangeable shares. | The BEP units are not BEPC exchangeable shares and will not be treated as BEPC exchangeable shares for purposes of the application of applicable Canadian or U.S. rules relating to takeover bids, issuer bids and tender offers. As a result, holders of BEP units will not be entitled to participate in an offer or bid made to acquire the BEPC exchangeable shares unless such offer has been extended to holders of BEP units. |
| | |
| Transfer Restrictions | No holder of BEPC exchangeable shares shall transfer to any Person such number of BEPC exchangeable shares such that, after giving effect to the transfer, the transferee, together with its affiliates, would hold a direct and/or indirect interest in voting securities carrying 10% or more of the voting rights attached to all voting securities of BEPC without the prior approval of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to the extent required. | N/A. |
| | |
| | |
About Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
BEP is a Bermuda exempted limited partnership that was established on June 27, 2011 under the provisions of the Bermuda Partnership Acts. BEP’s head and registered office is located at 73 Front Street, 5th Floor, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda and its telephone number at that address is +1 441 294-3304.
BEP’s sole material assets are its approximate 59% LP Interest in BRELP and preferred limited partnership interests in BRELP. BRELP owns, directly or indirectly, all of the common shares of each of (i) Euro Holdco, (ii) NA Holdco, and (iii) LATAM Holdco.
The partnership owns one of the world’s largest, publicly traded, renewable power and transition platforms. Brookfield Renewable invests in renewable power and sustainable solutions assets directly, as well as with institutional partners, joint venture partners and through other arrangements. Across the partnership’s business, Brookfield Renewable leverages its extensive operating experience to maintain and enhance the value of assets,
grow cash flows on an annual basis and cultivate positive relations with local stakeholders. The BEP units are listed on the NYSE and the TSX and the preferred units are listed on the TSX. Additionally, one series of the preferred units is listed on the NYSE.
10.C MATERIAL CONTRACTS
The following are the only material contracts, other than the contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, which (i) have been entered into by BEPC since its formation or (ii) are otherwise material to BEPC:
•Rights Agreement, dated July 30, 2020, between Brookfield Corporation and Wilmington Trust, National Association, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Rights Agreement”.
•Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 30, 2020, between BEPC, BEP and Brookfield Corporation, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Registration Rights Agreement”.
•Amended and Restated Brookfield Relationship Agreement, dated May 5, 2023 as amended from time to time, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—Brookfield Relationship Agreement”.
•Amended and Restated Guarantee Indenture, dated November 25, 2011, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, BRP Equity, Computershare Trust Company of Canada and other guarantor parties from time to time thereto (Class A Preference Shares, Series 1), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Amended and Restated Guarantee Indenture, dated November 25, 2011, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, BRP Equity, Computershare Trust Company of Canada and other guarantor parties from time to time thereto (Class A Preference Shares, Series 2), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee, dated November 23, 2011, by LATAM Holdco in favor of BNY Trust Company of Canada, in respect of debt securities issued by Canadian Finco, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Energy Revenue Agreement, dated November 23, 2011, between BEM LP and BPUSHA (see Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions — Energy Revenue Agreement”).
•Guarantee Indenture, dated October 11, 2012, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, BRP Equity, Computershare Trust Company of Canada and other guarantor parties from time to time thereto (Class A Preference Shares, Series 3), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated October 11, 2012, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, BRP Equity, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Class A Preference Shares, Series 4), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated January 29, 2013, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, BRP Equity, Computershare Trust Company of Canada and other guarantor parties from time to time thereto (Class A Preference Shares, Series 5), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated May 1, 2013, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, BRP Equity, Computershare Trust Company of Canada and other guarantor parties from time to time thereto (Class A Preference Shares, Series 6), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated November 25, 2015, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, Euro Holdco, Brookfield Renewable Investments Limited and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Series 7 Preferred Units), described under Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated November 25, 2015, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, Euro Holdco, Brookfield Renewable Investments Limited and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Series 8 Preferred Units), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated January 16, 2018, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, Euro Holdco, Brookfield Renewable Investments Limited and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Series 13 Preferred Units), described in in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated January 16, 2018, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, Euro Holdco, Brookfield Renewable Investments Limited and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Series 14 Preferred Units), described in in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated March 11, 2019, by and among BEP, BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, Euro Holdco, Brookfield Renewable Investments Limited and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Series 15 Preferred Units), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indenture, dated March 11, 2019, by and among BEP BRELP, NA Holdco, LATAM Holdco, Euro Holdco, Brookfield Renewable Investments Limited and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Series 16 Preferred Units), described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee, dated July 29, 2020, by BEP Subco Inc. in favor of BNY Trust Company of Canada, in respect of the debt securities issued by Canadian Finco, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Guarantee Indentures, each dated July 29, 2020, between BEP Subco Inc., Computershare Trust Company of Canada and other parties, in respect of BEP’s preferred units and preference shares, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Credit Support”.
•Amended and Restated Subordinate Credit Agreement, effective December 31, 2023, between BEP Subco Inc., as borrower, and NA Holdco, as lender, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Subordinated Credit Facilities”.
•Amended and Restated Subordinate Credit Agreement, effective December 31, 2023, between BEP Subco Inc., as lender, and NA Holdco, as borrower, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Subordinated Credit Facilities”.
•Equity Commitment Agreement, dated July 30, 2020, between BEP, BEPC and NA Holdco, described in Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions—BEPC Relationship with the Partnership—Equity Commitment Agreement”.
•Fifth Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated May 5, 2023, as thereafter amended, by and among Brookfield Corporation, BEP, BEPC, BRELP, and others, described in Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management—The Master Services Agreement”.
•Indenture, dated April 15, 2021, by and among NA Holdco, the Perpetual Note Guarantors and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
•First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 15, 2021, by and among NA Holdco, the Perpetual Note Guarantors and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
•Indenture, dated August 11, 2021, between Canadian Finco and Computershare Trust Company of Canada.
•Guarantee, dated August 11, 2021, by and among Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P., Brookfield Renewable Energy L.P., Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc., BRP Bermuda Holdings I Limited,
Brookfield BRP Europe Holdings (Bermuda) Limited, Brookfield Renewable Investments Limited, and BEP Subco Inc.
•Second Supplemental Indenture, dated December 9, 2021, by and among NA Holdco, the Perpetual Note Guarantors and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
•Guarantee Indenture dated April 14, 2022, by and among the Preferred Unit Guarantors from time to time party thereto, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Series 18 Preferred Units).
•First Supplemental Indenture, dated November 9, 2022, by and among Canadian Finco and Computershare Trust Company of Canada.
Copies of the agreements noted above will be provided, free of charge, by our company and are available electronically on our EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov and on our SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca. Written requests for such documents should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at 250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10281-1023, Tel: 212-417-7000.
10.D EXCHANGE CONTROLS
There are currently no governmental laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation of Canada or the United States which restrict the import or export of capital, including the availability of cash and cash equivalents for use by our group and their subsidiaries, or the remittance of distributions, interest or other payments to non-residents of Canada or the United States holding BEPC exchangeable shares.
10.E TAXATION
Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following discussion is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations generally applicable to the ownership and disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares as of the date hereof. This summary is based on provisions of the Code, on the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, and on published administrative rulings, judicial decisions, and other applicable authorities, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary should be read in conjunction with the discussion of the principal U.S. federal income tax considerations associated with the operations of BEP and the purchase, ownership, and disposition of BEP units set forth in Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” and Item 3.D “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Taxation” in BEP’s Annual Report. The following discussion is limited as described in Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” in BEP’s Annual Report and as described herein. This summary is necessarily general and may not apply to all categories of investors, some of whom may be subject to special rules, including, without limitation, any person that owns (directly, indirectly or constructively, applying certain attribution rules) 10% or more of either the total voting power or total value of the stock of BEPC, dealers in securities or currencies, financial institutions or financial services entities, mutual funds, life insurance companies, persons that hold BEPC exchangeable shares as part of a straddle, hedge, constructive sale or conversion transaction with other investments, U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, persons who have elected mark-to-market accounting, persons who hold BEPC exchangeable shares through a partnership or other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons for whom the BEPC exchangeable shares are not a capital asset, persons who are liable for the alternative minimum tax, certain U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States, and persons who are subject to special tax accounting rules under Section 451(b) of the Code. This summary does not address the consequences to U.S. Holders who receive distributions on BEPC exchangeable shares other than in U.S. dollars. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this summary does not address any tax consequences to LP unitholders. The actual tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares will vary depending on a holder’s individual circumstances.
For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of BEPC exchangeable shares that is for U.S. federal tax purposes: (i) an individual citizen or resident of the United States; (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or (iv) a trust (a) the primary supervision of which is subject to a court
within the United States and all substantial decisions of which one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control or (b) that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
A “Non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of BEPC exchangeable shares, other than a U.S. Holder or an entity or an arrangement classified as a partnership or other fiscally transparent entity for U.S. federal tax purposes.
If a partnership (or other entity or arrangement classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds BEPC exchangeable shares, the tax treatment of a partner of such partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners of partnerships that hold BEPC exchangeable shares should consult their own tax advisors.
This discussion does not constitute tax advice and is not intended to be a substitute for tax planning. Each holder of BEPC exchangeable shares should consult its own tax advisor concerning the U.S. federal, state and local income tax consequences particular to the ownership and disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares, as well as any tax consequences under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
Partnership Status of BEP and BRELP
Each of BEP and BRELP has made a protective election to be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal tax purposes. An entity that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal tax purposes generally incurs no U.S. federal income tax liability. Instead, each partner is generally required to take into account its allocable share of items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of the partnership in computing its U.S. federal income tax liability, regardless of whether cash distributions are made. Distributions of cash by a partnership to a partner generally are not taxable unless the amount of cash distributed to a partner is in excess of the partner’s adjusted basis in its partnership interest.
An entity that would otherwise be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes may nonetheless be taxable as a corporation if it is a “publicly traded partnership”, unless an exception applies. BEP units are publicly traded. However, an exception, referred to as the “Qualifying Income Exception”, exists with respect to a publicly traded partnership if (i) at least 90% of such partnership’s gross income for every taxable year consists of “qualifying income” and (ii) the partnership would not be required to register under the Investment Company Act if it were a U.S. corporation. Qualifying income includes certain interest income, dividends, real property rents, gains from the sale or other disposition of real property, and any gain from the sale or disposition of a capital asset or other property held for the production of income that otherwise constitutes qualifying income.
BEPC understands that the general partner of BEP and the general partner of BRELP intend to manage the affairs of BEP and BRELP, respectively, so that BEP will meet the Qualifying Income Exception in each taxable year. Accordingly, BEPC understands that the general partner of BEP believes that BEP will be treated as a partnership and not as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The remainder of this summary assumes that BEP and BRELP will be treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Characterization of the BEPC Exchangeable Shares
The U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the ownership and disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares depend, in part, on whether the BEPC exchangeable shares are, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, treated as stock of BEPC and not as interests in BEP. We intend to take the position and believe that the BEPC exchangeable shares are properly characterized as stock of BEPC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the treatment of the BEPC exchangeable shares as stock of BEPC is not free from doubt, as there is no direct authority regarding the proper U.S. federal income tax treatment of securities similar to the BEPC exchangeable shares. If the BEPC exchangeable shares are not treated as stock of BEPC and are instead treated as BEP units, then a holder of BEPC exchangeable shares generally would be expected to be taxed in the same manner as an LP unitholder. The remainder of this summary assumes that the BEPC exchangeable shares will be treated as stock of BEPC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Consequences to U.S. Holders
Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares
Taxation of Distributions. Subject to the discussion below under Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of
BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations”, the gross amount of a distribution paid to a U.S. Holder with respect to BEPC exchangeable shares (including amounts withheld to pay Canadian withholding taxes) will be included in such U.S. Holder’s gross income as a dividend to the extent paid out of BEPC’s current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). To the extent that the amount of a distribution exceeds BEPC’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, it will be treated first as a tax-free return of a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in its BEPC exchangeable shares, and to the extent the amount of the distribution exceeds such U.S. Holder’s tax basis, the excess will be taxed as capital gain.
Dividends received by individuals and other non-corporate U.S. Holders of BEPC exchangeable shares readily tradable on the NYSE generally will be subject to tax at preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains, provided that such holders meet certain holding period and other requirements and BEPC is not treated as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or for the preceding taxable year. Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the application of the relevant rules in light of such holder’s particular circumstances.
Dividends paid by BEPC generally will constitute foreign-source income for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. A U.S. Holder may be entitled to deduct or credit any Canadian withholding taxes on dividends in determining its U.S. income tax liability, subject to certain limitations (including that the election to deduct or credit foreign taxes applies to all of such U.S. Holder’s foreign taxes for a particular tax year). The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. Dividends distributed by BEPC with respect to BEPC exchangeable shares generally will constitute “passive category income”. The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit with regard to such holder’s particular circumstances.
Sale, Redemption, Exchange, or Other Taxable Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares. Subject to the discussion below under the headings Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Exercise of the BEP Call Right” and Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations”, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon a sale, redemption, exchange at the request of the holder (other than a redemption or exchange that is treated as a distribution, as discussed below), or other taxable disposition of the BEPC exchangeable shares equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the disposition and such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the BEPC exchangeable shares so disposed. The amount realized will equal the amount of cash, if any, plus the fair market value of any property (such as BEP units) received. Any such capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if such holder’s holding period for the BEPC exchangeable shares exceeds one year at the time of disposition. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder generally will be treated as U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. Long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders generally are taxed at preferential rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences described in the preceding paragraph should also apply to a U.S. Holder (i) whose exchange request is satisfied by the delivery of cash or BEP units by Brookfield Corporation pursuant to the Rights Agreement or (ii) whose exchange request is satisfied by the delivery of cash by BEP pursuant to the exercise of the BEP call right. For the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder whose exchange request is satisfied by the delivery of BEP units pursuant to BEP’s exercise of the BEP call right, see the discussion below under Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Exercise of the BEP Call Right”. The U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder whose exchange request is satisfied by the delivery of cash or BEP units by BEPC is described in the following paragraph.
A redemption or exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares satisfied by BEPC will be treated as a sale or exchange as described above if such redemption or exchange is (i) in “complete redemption” of the U.S. Holder’s equity interest in BEPC (within the meaning of Section 302(b)(3) of the Code), (ii) a “substantially disproportionate” redemption of stock (within the meaning of Section 302(b)(2) of the Code), or (iii) “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” (within the meaning of Section 302(b)(1) of the Code). In determining whether any of these tests has been met with respect to the redemption or exchange of the BEPC exchangeable shares, each U.S. Holder may be required to take into account not only the BEPC exchangeable shares and other equity interests in
BEPC actually owned by such holder, but also other equity interests in BEPC that are constructively owned by such holder within the meaning of Section 318 of the Code. If a U.S. Holder owns (actually or constructively) only an insubstantial percentage of the total equity interests in BEPC and exercises no control over BEPC’s corporate affairs, such holder may be entitled to sale or exchange treatment on a redemption or exchange of the BEPC exchangeable shares if such holder experiences a reduction in its equity interest in BEPC (taking into account any constructively owned equity interests) as a result of the redemption or exchange. If a U.S. Holder meets none of the alternative tests of Section 302(b) of the Code, the redemption or exchange will be treated as a distribution subject to the rules described above under Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Taxation of Distributions”. The amount of the distribution will be equal to the amount of cash, if any, and the fair market value of property received (such as BEP units). Because the determination as to whether any of the alternative tests of Section 302(b) of the Code is satisfied with respect to any particular U.S. Holder of BEPC exchangeable shares will depend upon the facts and circumstances as of the time the determination is made, each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the tax treatment of a redemption or exchange, including the calculation of such holder’s tax basis in any remaining BEPC exchangeable shares in the event of a redemption or exchange that is treated as a distribution.
Exercise of the BEP Call Right. BEP has the right to acquire BEPC exchangeable shares directly from a shareholder under certain circumstances in exchange for BEP units or cash (the “BEP call right”). For the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of the exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for cash pursuant to the exercise of the BEP call right, see the discussion above under Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Sale, Redemption, Exchange, or Other Taxable Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares”.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of the exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units pursuant to the exercise of the BEP call right will depend in part on whether the exchange qualifies as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code. For the exchange to so qualify, BEP (i) must be classified as a partnership and not as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and (ii) must not be treated as an investment company for purposes of Section 721(b) of the Code. With respect to the classification of BEP as a partnership, see the discussion above under Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Partnership Status of BEP and BRELP”.
Section 721(b) of the Code provides that Section 721(a) of the Code will not apply to gain realized on a transfer of property to a partnership that would be treated as an investment company (within the meaning of Section 351 of the Code) if the partnership were incorporated. Under Section 351 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder, a transfer of property will be considered a transfer to an investment company only if (i) the transfer results, directly or indirectly, in “diversification” of the transferor’s interests, and (ii) the transferee is a regulated investment company, a real estate investment trust, or a corporation more than 80% of the value of whose assets are held for investment and (subject to certain exclusions) are stock or securities, as defined in Section 351(e) of the Code. For purposes of this determination, the stock and securities of a corporate subsidiary are disregarded and the parent corporation is treated as owning its ratable share of the subsidiary’s assets if the parent corporation owns 50% or more of the subsidiary corporation’s stock by voting power or value. The Treasury Regulations also provide that whether an entity is an investment company ordinarily will be determined by reference to the circumstances in existence immediately after the transfer in question. However, where circumstances change thereafter pursuant to a plan in existence at the time of the transfer, this determination will be made by reference to the later circumstances.
Based on the shareholders’ rights in the event of the liquidation or dissolution of BEPC (or BEP) and the terms of the BEPC exchangeable shares, which are intended to provide an economic return equivalent to the economic return on BEP units (including identical distributions), and taking into account the expected relative values of BEP’s assets and its ratable share of the assets of its subsidiaries for the foreseeable future, BEPC understands that the general partner of BEP currently does not expect a U.S. Holder’s transfer of BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for BEP units pursuant to BEP’s exercise of the BEP call right to be treated as a transfer of property to an investment company within the meaning of Section 721(b) of the Code. Thus, BEPC understands that the general partner of BEP currently expects such exchange to qualify as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code. However, no definitive determination can be made as to whether any such future exchange will qualify as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code, as this will depend on the facts and circumstances at the time of the exchange. Many of these facts and circumstances are not within the control of BEP, and no assurance can be provided as to the position, if any, taken by the general partner of BEP with regard to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of any such exchange.
Nor can any assurance be given that the IRS will not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any future position taken by BEP. If BEP were an investment company immediately following the exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units pursuant to the exercise of the BEP call right, and such exchange were to result in diversification of interests with respect to a U.S. Holder, then Section 721(a) of the Code would not apply with respect to such holder, and such holder would be treated as if such holder had sold its BEPC exchangeable shares to BEP in a taxable transaction for cash in an amount equal to the value of the BEP units received.
Even if a U.S. Holder’s transfer of BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for BEP units pursuant to BEP’s exercise of the BEP call right qualifies as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code, such U.S. Holder will be subject to special rules that may result in the recognition of additional taxable gain or income. Under Section 704(c)(1) of the Code, if appreciated property is contributed to a partnership, the contributing partner must recognize any gain that was realized but not recognized for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to the property at the time of the contribution (referred to as “built-in gain”) if the partnership sells such property (or otherwise transfers such property in a taxable exchange) at any time thereafter or distributes such property to another partner within seven years of the contribution in a transaction that does not otherwise result in the recognition of “built-in gain” by the partnership. If Section 704(c)(1) of the Code applies with respect to a U.S. Holder, and such holder fails to disclose to BEP its basis in BEPC exchangeable shares exchanged for BEP units pursuant to the exercise of the BEP call right, then, solely for the purpose of allocating items of income, gain, loss, or deduction under Section 704(c) of the Code, BEPC understands that the general partner of BEP intends to use a reasonable method to estimate such holder’s basis in the BEPC exchangeable shares exchanged for BEP units pursuant to the exercise of the BEP call right. To ensure compliance with Section 704(c) of the Code, such estimated basis could be lower than a U.S. Holder’s actual basis in its BEPC exchangeable shares. As a result, the amount of gain reported by BEP to the IRS with respect to such U.S. Holder in connection with such subsequent transfers could be greater than the correct amount.
If Section 704(c)(1) does not apply as a result of any such subsequent transfers by BEP or BRELP of BEPC exchangeable shares transferred by a U.S. Holder for BEP units in an exchange qualifying as tax-free under Section 721(a) of the Code, then such U.S. Holder could, nonetheless, be required to recognize part or all of the built-in gain in its BEPC exchangeable shares deferred as a result of such exchange under other provisions of the Code. Under Section 737 of the Code, such U.S. Holder could be required to recognize built-in gain if BEP were to distribute any property of BEP other than money (or, in certain circumstances, BEPC exchangeable shares) to such former holder of BEPC exchangeable shares within seven years of exercise of the BEP call right. Under Section 707(a) of the Code, such U.S. Holder could also be required to recognize built-in gain in certain circumstances. Section 707(a) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder create a presumption that any distributions of cash or other property made by a partnership to a partner that contributed property within two years of the distribution will be treated as a payment in consideration for the property otherwise treated as contributed to the partnership in exchange for a partnership interest, with certain limited exceptions, including an exception for “operating cash flow distributions”. For this purpose, an “operating cash flow distribution” generally is any distribution, including, but not limited to, a complete or partial redemption distribution, that does not exceed the product of the “net cash flow from operations” (as defined in the applicable Treasury Regulations) of the partnership for the year multiplied by the lesser of the partner’s percentage interest in overall partnership profits for that year or the partner’s percentage interest in overall partnership profits for the life of the partnership. If a distribution to a U.S. Holder within two years of the transfer of BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for BEP units is treated as part of a deemed sale transaction under Section 707(a) of the Code, such U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the amount of cash and the fair market value of the property received and (ii) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the BEPC exchangeable shares deemed to have been sold. Such gain or loss will be recognized in the year of the transfer of BEPC exchangeable shares in exchange for BEP units, and, if such U.S. Holder has already filed a tax return for such year, such holder may be required to file an amended return. In such a case, the U.S. Holder may also be required to report some amount of imputed interest income.
If Section 721(a) of the Code applies to a U.S. Holder’s exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units pursuant to the exercise of the BEP call right by BEP and none of the special provisions of the Code described in the two preceding paragraphs applies, then such U.S. Holder generally should not recognize gain or loss with respect to BEPC exchangeable shares treated as contributed to BEP in exchange for BEP units, except as described below under Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares—Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations”. The aggregate tax basis of the BEP units received by such U.S. Holder pursuant to the BEP call
right would be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the BEPC exchangeable shares (or single undivided portion thereof) exchanged therefor, increased by such holder’s share of BEP’s liabilities, if any. The holding period of the BEP units received in exchange for BEPC exchangeable shares would include the holding period of the BEPC exchangeable shares surrendered in exchange therefor. A U.S. Holder who acquired different blocks of BEPC exchangeable shares at different times or different prices should consult its own tax advisor regarding the manner in which gain or loss should be determined in such holder’s particular circumstances and such holder’s holding period in BEP units received in exchange for BEPC exchangeable shares.
For a general discussion of the tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of owning and disposing of BEP units received in exchange for BEPC exchangeable shares, see the discussion in Item 10.E “Taxation—Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” in BEP’s Annual Report. The U.S. federal income tax consequences of exchanging BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units are complex, and each U.S. Holder is urged to consult its own independent tax advisor regarding such consequences in light of such holder’s particular circumstances.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations. Certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to a U.S. Holder if BEPC is treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which the U.S. Holder holds BEPC exchangeable shares. A non-U.S. corporation, such as BEPC, will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either (i) 75% or more of its gross income for such year consists of certain types of “passive” income or (ii) 50% or more of the value of its assets during such year produce or are held for the production of passive income. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities, net gains from the sale or exchange of property producing such income, and net foreign currency gains.
Based on its current and expected income, assets, and activities, BEPC does not expect to be classified as a PFIC in the current taxable year, nor does it expect to become a PFIC for the foreseeable future. However, the determination of whether BEPC is or will be a PFIC for any taxable year is based on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules that are subject to differing interpretations. Because the PFIC determination depends upon the composition of BEPC’s income and assets and the nature of its activities from time to time and must be made annually as of the close of each taxable year, there can be no assurance that BEPC will not be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year, or that the IRS or a court will agree with BEPC’s determination as to its PFIC status.
Subject to certain elections described below, if BEPC were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held BEPC exchangeable shares, then gain recognized by such U.S. Holder upon the sale or other taxable disposition of the BEPC exchangeable shares would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the BEPC exchangeable shares. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other taxable disposition and to any year before BEPC became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as appropriate, for that taxable year, and an interest charge would be imposed on the tax on such amount. Further, to the extent that any distribution received by a U.S. Holder on its BEPC exchangeable shares were to exceed 125% of the average of the annual distributions on the BEPC exchangeable shares received during the preceding three years or the U.S. Holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter, that distribution would be subject to taxation in the same manner as gain, described immediately above. Similar rules would apply with respect to any lower-tier PFICs treated as owned indirectly by a U.S. Holder through such holder’s ownership of BEPC exchangeable shares.
Certain elections may be available to U.S. Holders to mitigate some of the adverse tax consequences resulting from PFIC treatment. If a U.S. Holder were to make an election to treat such holder’s interest in BEPC as a “qualified electing fund” (a “QEF election”) for the first year such holder were treated as holding such interest, then in lieu of the tax consequences described in the paragraph immediately above, the U.S. Holder would be required to include in income each year a portion of the ordinary earnings and net capital gains of BEPC, even if not distributed to the holder. A QEF election must be made by a U.S. Holder on an entity-by-entity basis. To make a QEF election, a U.S. Holder must, among other things, (i) obtain a PFIC annual information statement from BEPC and (ii) prepare and submit IRS Form 8621 with such U.S. Holder’s annual income tax return. To the extent reasonably practicable, BEPC intends to make available information related to the PFIC status of BEPC and any other subsidiary of BEPC that BEPC is able to identify as a PFIC with respect to U.S. Holders, including information necessary to make a QEF election with respect to each such entity.
In the case of a PFIC that is a publicly traded foreign company, and in lieu of making a QEF election, an election may be made to “mark to market” the stock of such publicly traded foreign company on an annual basis. Pursuant to such an election, a U.S. Holder would include in each year as ordinary income the excess, if any, of the
fair market value of such stock over its adjusted basis at the end of the taxable year. No assurance can be provided that BEPC or any of its subsidiaries will qualify as PFICs that are publicly traded or that a mark-to-market election will be available for any such entity.
Subject to certain exceptions, a U.S. person who directly or indirectly owns an interest in a PFIC generally is required to file an annual report with the IRS, and the failure to file such report could result in the imposition of penalties on such U.S. person and in the extension of the statute of limitations with respect to federal income tax returns filed by such U.S. person. The application of the PFIC rules to U.S. Holders is uncertain in certain respects. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the application of the PFIC rules, including the foregoing filing requirements and the advisability of making any available election under the PFIC rules, with respect to such holder’s ownership and disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares.
Additional Tax on Net Investment Income. Certain U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts are subject to a 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their “net investment income”, which may include all or a portion of their dividend income and net gains from the disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares. Each U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate or trust should consult its own tax advisor regarding the applicability of this tax to its income and gains in respect of BEPC exchangeable shares.
Foreign Financial Asset Reporting. Certain U.S. Holders are required to report information relating to an interest in the BEPC exchangeable shares, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for shares held in accounts maintained by certain financial institutions) by filing IRS Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets) with their U.S. federal income tax returns. Significant penalties may apply for the failure to satisfy these reporting obligations. Each U.S. Holder is urged to consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting obligations, if any, with respect to such holder’s ownership and disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding. Distributions on BEPC exchangeable shares made to a U.S. Holder and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares may, under certain circumstances, be subject to information reporting and backup withholding, unless the holder provides proof of an applicable exemption or, in the case of backup withholding, furnishes its taxpayer identification number and otherwise complies with all applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax and generally will be allowed as a refund or credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders
Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares
Distributions on BEPC exchangeable shares made to Non-U.S. Holders and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, except that U.S. withholding tax may apply to any portion of a distribution made on BEPC exchangeable shares that is treated as a deemed dividend under Section 871(m) of the Code. Specifically, a 30% withholding tax generally applies to deemed dividend amounts (“dividend equivalents”) with respect to certain contractual arrangements held by non-U.S. persons which reference any interest in an entity if that interest could give rise to a U.S.-source dividend. Under Treasury Regulations, a Section 871(m) transaction is treated as directly referencing the assets of a partnership that holds significant investments in certain securities (such as stock of a U.S. corporation). BEP indirectly holds stock of a U.S. corporation through BRELP, and the BEPC exchangeable shares are intended to be structured so that distributions are identical to distributions on BEP units. Accordingly, the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares could be subject to Section 871(m) of the Code, as discussed below.
Whether U.S. withholding tax applies with respect to a Section 871(m) transaction depends, in part, on whether it is classified for purposes of Section 871(m) of the Code as a “simple” contract or “complex” contract. No direct authority addresses whether the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares constitute a simple contract or a complex contract. BEPC intends to take the position and believes that such contractual arrangements do not constitute a simple contract. In such case, under Treasury Regulations, as modified by an IRS Notice, such contractual arrangements should not be subject to Section 871(m) of the Code before January 1, 2025, and no portion of a distribution made on BEPC exchangeable shares before such date should be subject to U.S. withholding tax by reason of treatment as a dividend equivalent under Section 871(m). For distributions made on BEPC exchangeable shares on or after January 1, 2025, Section 871(m) of the Code will apply if the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares meet a “substantial equivalence” test. If this is the case, U.S.
federal withholding tax (generally at a rate of 30%) is expected to apply to any portion of a distribution on BEPC exchangeable shares that is treated as a dividend equivalent and paid on or after January 1, 2025.
This 30% withholding tax may be reduced or eliminated under the Code or an applicable income tax treaty, provided that the Non-U.S. Holder properly certifies its eligibility by providing an IRS Form W-8. If, notwithstanding the foregoing, BEPC is unable to accurately or timely determine the tax status of a Non-U.S. Holder for purposes of establishing whether reduced rates of withholding apply, then U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30% may apply to any portion of a distribution on BEPC exchangeable shares that is treated as a dividend equivalent under Section 871(m) of the Code. A dividend equivalent may also be subject to a 30% withholding tax under FATCA, unless a Non-U.S. Holder properly certifies its FATCA status on IRS Form W-8 or other applicable form and satisfies any additional requirements under FATCA.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, BEPC’s position that the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares do not constitute a simple contract does not bind the IRS. The Treasury Regulations under Section 871(m) of the Code require complex determinations with respect to contractual arrangements linked to U.S. equities, and the application of these regulations to the BEPC exchangeable shares is uncertain. Accordingly, the IRS could challenge BEPC’s position and assert that the contractual arrangements relating to the BEPC exchangeable shares constitute a simple contract, in which case U.S. withholding tax currently would apply, generally at a rate of 30% (subject to reduction or elimination under the Code or an applicable income tax treaty), to that portion, if any, of a distribution on BEPC exchangeable shares that is treated as referencing a U.S.-source dividend paid to BEP or BRELP. Each Non-U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the implications of Section 871(m) of the Code and FATCA for the ownership of BEPC exchangeable shares with respect to such holder’s particular circumstances.
Special rules may apply to any Non-U.S. Holder (i) that has an office or fixed place of business in the United States; (ii) that is present in the United States for 183 days or more in a taxable year; or (iii) that is (a) a former citizen or long-term resident of the United States, (b) a foreign insurance company that is treated as holding an interest in BEPC in connection with its U.S. business, (c) a PFIC, (d) a “controlled foreign corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or (e) a corporation that accumulates earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax. Each Non-U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the application of these special rules.
THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR CAREFUL TAX PLANNING. THE TAX MATTERS RELATING TO BEP, BEPC, AND HOLDERS OF BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES ARE COMPLEX AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARYING INTERPRETATIONS. MOREOVER, THE EFFECT OF EXISTING INCOME TAX LAWS, THE MEANING AND IMPACT OF WHICH IS UNCERTAIN, AND OF PROPOSED CHANGES IN INCOME TAX LAWS WILL VARY WITH THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF EACH HOLDER OF BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES, AND IN REVIEWING THIS FORM 20-F THESE MATTERS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. EACH HOLDER OF BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES SHOULD CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES.
Certain Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following describes certain material Canadian federal income tax consequences with respect to the receipt, holding and disposition of the BEPC exchangeable shares acquired by a holder who as beneficial owner, at all relevant times, for the purposes of the Tax Act, (i) deals at arm’s length and is not affiliated with BEPC and (ii) holds the BEPC exchangeable shares as capital property (a “holder”). Generally, the BEPC exchangeable shares will be considered to be capital property to a holder provided the holder does not hold such shares in the course of carrying on a business of trading or dealing in securities and has not acquired them in one or more transactions considered to be an adventure or concern in the nature of trade.
This summary is based upon the current provisions of the Tax Act and the regulations thereunder, and our company’s understanding of the current administrative policies and assessing practices of the CRA, published in writing prior to the date hereof. This summary takes into account all specific proposals to amend the Tax Act and the regulations thereunder publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof (the “proposed amendments”) and assumes that all proposed amendments will be enacted in the form proposed. However, no assurances can be given that the proposed amendments will be enacted as proposed, or at all. This summary does not otherwise take into account or anticipate any changes in law or administrative policy or
assessing practice whether by legislative, administrative or judicial action or decision, nor does it take into account tax legislation or considerations of any province, territory or foreign jurisdiction, which may differ from those discussed herein.
This summary assumes that at all relevant times (i) the BEPC exchangeable shares will be listed on a “designated stock exchange” in Canada for the purposes of the Tax Act (which currently includes the TSX), (ii) not more than 50% of the fair market value of a BEPC exchangeable share or BEP unit is attributable to one or more properties each of which is real property in Canada, a “Canadian resource property” or a “timber resource property”, and (iii) all or substantially all of the property of BEPC and the BEP units will not be “taxable Canadian property” (each as defined in the Tax Act). This summary also assumes that neither BEP nor BEPC is a “tax shelter” or a “tax shelter investment”, each as defined in the Tax Act. However, no assurance can be given in this regard.
Management of BEPC believes that BEPC currently qualifies as a “mutual fund corporation” for the purposes of the Tax Act. To maintain its “mutual fund corporation” status, BEPC is required to comply with specific restrictions under the Tax Act regarding its activities and the investments held by it. If BEPC was to cease to qualify as a “mutual fund corporation”, material, adverse tax consequences to BEPC and the holders may arise. BEPC intends to continue to qualify as a “mutual fund corporation” throughout each taxation year in which BEPC exchangeable shares are outstanding and this summary assumes that will be the case.
This summary is not applicable to a holder: (i) an interest in which would be a “tax shelter investment” or who holds BEP units or acquires BEPC exchangeable shares as a “tax shelter investment”, (ii) that is a “financial institution” for purposes of the “mark-to-market property” rules, (iii) that reports its “Canadian tax results” in a currency other than Canadian currency, (iv) that has entered or will enter into a “derivative forward agreement” in respect of the BEP units or the BEPC exchangeable shares, (each as defined in the Tax Act), or (v) that is a corporation resident in Canada and is, or becomes (or does not deal at arm’s length for purposes of the Tax Act with a corporation that is or becomes) as part of a transaction or event or series of transactions or events that includes the acquisition of BEPC exchangeable shares, controlled by a non-resident person or a group of non-resident persons not dealing with each other at arm’s length for purposes of section 212.3 of the Tax Act. Furthermore, this summary is not applicable to a holder that is a “controlling corporation” of BEPC (for purposes of subsection 191(1) of the Tax Act), a person with whom the controlling corporation does not deal at arm’s length or a partnership or trust of which the controlling corporation or person with whom the controlling corporation does not deal at arm’s length is a member or beneficiary for purposes of the Tax Act. Such holders should consult their own tax advisors. This summary does not address the deductibility of interest on money borrowed to acquire BEPC exchangeable shares.
This summary is of a general nature only and is not, and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular holder, and no representation concerning the tax consequences to any particular holder or prospective holder are made. This summary is not exhaustive of all Canadian federal income tax considerations. Accordingly, prospective holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to an investment in the BEPC exchangeable shares having regard to their particular circumstances.
Generally, for purposes of the Tax Act, all amounts relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition or deemed disposition of a BEPC exchangeable share must be expressed in Canadian currency. Amounts denominated in another currency must be converted into Canadian currency using the applicable rate of exchange (pursuant to the Tax Act) quoted by the Bank of Canada on the date such amounts arose, or such other rate of exchange as is acceptable to the CRA.
Taxation of Holders Resident in Canada
The following portion of the summary is applicable to a holder who, at all relevant times, is resident or is deemed to be resident in Canada under the Tax Act (a “resident holder”). Certain resident holders may be entitled to make, or may have already made, the irrevocable election permitted by subsection 39(4) of the Tax Act the effect of which may be to deem any BEPC exchangeable shares (and all other “Canadian securities”, as defined in the Tax Act) owned by such resident holders to be capital property in the taxation year in which the election is made and in all subsequent taxation years. Resident holders whose BEPC exchangeable shares might not otherwise be considered to be capital property should consult their own tax advisors concerning this election.
Dividends on the BEPC Exchangeable Shares
Taxable dividends received on the BEPC exchangeable shares by a resident holder will be included in computing the resident holder’s income. Dividends on the BEPC exchangeable shares received by a resident holder who is an individual will be included in computing the resident holder’s income subject to the gross-up and dividend tax credit rules normally applicable under the Tax Act to taxable dividends received from taxable Canadian corporations. Such dividends will be eligible for the enhanced gross-up and dividend tax credit if BEPC designates the dividends as “eligible dividends”. There may be limitations on BEPC’s ability to designate taxable dividends as eligible dividends.
Subject to the potential application of subsection 55(2) of the Tax Act, dividends on the BEPC exchangeable shares received by a resident holder that is a corporation (other than a “specified financial institution” for purposes of the Tax Act) will be included in the resident holder’s income and will generally be deductible by the resident holder in computing its taxable income. In certain circumstances, subsection 55(2) of the Tax Act will treat a taxable dividend received by a resident holder that is a corporation as proceeds of disposition or a capital gain. Resident holders that are corporations should consult their own tax advisors having regard to their own circumstances.
In the case of a resident holder that is a “specified financial institution”, taxable dividends received on the BEPC exchangeable shares will be deductible in computing its taxable income only if either:
(a) the specified financial institution did not acquire the BEPC exchangeable shares in the ordinary course of its business; or
(b) at the time of receipt of the taxable dividends by the specified financial institution,
(i) the BEPC exchangeable shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” in Canada for purposes of the Tax Act (which currently includes the TSX); and
(ii) dividends are received in respect of not more than 10% of the issued and outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares by
A. the specified financial institution; or
B. the specified financial institution and persons with whom it does not deal at arm’s length (within the meaning of the Tax Act).
Notwithstanding the discussion above, during the period while the Rights Agreement is in place, the BEPC exchangeable shares will be subject to the “guaranteed share” provisions of the Tax Act. In the case of a resident holder of BEPC exchangeable shares that is a corporation in respect of which dividends on the BEPC exchangeable shares will be included in the resident holder’s income as a taxable dividend, such taxable dividends received on the BEPC exchangeable shares during such period will be deductible in computing its taxable income only if, at the time of receipt of the taxable dividends by the corporation, (a) the BEPC exchangeable shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” for purposes of the Tax Act (which currently includes the TSX and NYSE); and (b) dividends are received in respect of not more than 10% of the issued and outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares by (i) the particular corporation, (ii) persons with whom the particular corporation does not deal at arm’s length for purposes of the Tax Act, or (iii) partnerships or trusts of which the particular corporation or persons with whom it does not deal at arm’s length for purposes of the Tax Act, is a member or beneficiary.
Resident holders should be aware that exchanges at the request of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares may impact the percentage of BEPC exchangeable shares held by such resident holders.
A resident holder of the BEPC exchangeable shares which is a corporation other than a “private corporation” or a “financial intermediary corporation” (each as defined in the Tax Act) will generally be subject to a 10% tax under Part IV.1 of the Tax Act in respect of any taxable dividends received by it on the BEPC exchangeable shares to the extent that such taxable dividends are deductible in computing its taxable income.
A resident holder which is a “private corporation” (as defined in the Tax Act) or any other corporation controlled directly or indirectly by or for the benefit of an individual (other than a trust) or a related group of individuals (other than trusts) may be liable to pay a refundable tax under Part IV of the Tax Act, generally imposed at the rate of 38 1/3%, on taxable dividends received on the BEPC exchangeable shares, to the extent that such dividends are deductible in computing its taxable income. Where Part IV.1 tax also applies to a taxable dividend received by a corporation, the rate of Part IV tax payable by the corporation is reduced by the rate of Part IV.1 tax.
The amount of any dividend that BEPC elects to pay from its “capital gains dividend account” as defined in the Tax Act (a “capital gains dividend”), received by a resident holder of the BEPC exchangeable shares from BEPC will be considered to be a capital gain of such holder from the disposition of capital property in the taxation year of the resident holder in which the capital gains dividend is received.
Having regard to the dividend policy of BEPC, a resident holder acquiring BEPC exchangeable shares may become taxable on income or capital gains accrued or realized before such resident holder acquired such BEPC exchangeable shares.
Taxable dividends or capital gains dividends paid to a resident holder that is an individual (other than certain trusts) may give rise to a liability for alternative minimum tax.
Resident holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the availability of a credit against their income tax liability or a deduction from income under the Tax Act in the event of any future U.S. federal withholding tax on dividends. For further information in this respect, see Item 10.E “Certain Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders—Ownership and Disposition of BEPC Exchangeable Shares”.
Redemptions, Exchanges and Other Dispositions of the BEPC Exchangeable Shares
A resident holder who disposes of, or who is deemed to dispose of, a BEPC exchangeable share, including a disposition to BEPC (whether on a redemption by BEPC, an exchange at the request of the holder or otherwise), will realize a capital gain (or sustain a capital loss) equal to the amount by which the proceeds of disposition exceed (or are exceeded by) the aggregate of the resident holder’s adjusted cost base of such share and any reasonable costs of disposition. On an exchange of BEPC exchangeable shares for BEP units, such resident holder’s proceeds of disposition will equal the fair market value of the BEPC shares so exchanged.
In general, one-half of a capital gain realized by a resident holder in a taxation year must be included in income as a taxable capital gain. One-half of a capital loss realized by a resident holder in a taxation year generally must be deducted as an “allowable capital loss” against taxable capital gains realized in the year. Allowable capital losses in excess of taxable capital gains realized in a taxation year may be carried back and deducted in any of the three preceding taxation years or carried forward and deducted in any subsequent taxation year against net taxable capital gains realized in such years in accordance with the provisions of the Tax Act.
The amount of any capital loss realized by a resident holder that is a corporation on the disposition of a BEPC exchangeable share may be reduced by the amount of any deductible dividends received or deemed to be received by the resident holder on such BEPC exchangeable share to the extent and under the circumstances described in the Tax Act. Similar rules may apply where a BEPC exchangeable share is owned by a partnership or trust of which a corporation, partnership or trust is a member or beneficiary. Such resident holders should consult their own advisors.
A taxable capital gain realized by a resident holder that is an individual (other than certain trusts) may give rise to a liability for alternative minimum tax.
The cost to a resident holder of a BEP unit received on the exchange of a BEPC exchangeable share will equal the fair market value of the BEPC exchangeable share for which it was exchanged at the time of the exchange. The adjusted cost base to a resident holder of BEP units at any time will be determined by averaging the cost of such BEP units with the adjusted cost base of any other BEP units owned by the resident holder as capital property at the time.
For a description of the Canadian federal income tax considerations of holding and disposing of BEP units, please see Item 10.E “Taxation — Certain Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations” in BEP’s Annual Report.
Additional Refundable Tax
A resident holder that is throughout its taxation year a “Canadian-controlled private corporation” (as defined in the Tax Act) will be liable to pay an additional refundable tax (refundable in certain circumstances) on its “aggregate investment income”, which includes an amount in respect of net taxable capital gains. This additional tax and refund mechanism in respect of “aggregate investment income” would also apply to “substantive CCPCs”, as defined in the proposed amendments (including pursuant to anti-avoidance rules in the proposed amendments). Resident holders are advised to consult their own tax advisors in this regard.
Eligibility for Investment
Based on the current provisions of the Tax Act, provided that the BEPC exchangeable shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” as defined in the Tax Act (which currently includes the TSX and the NYSE), the BEPC exchangeable shares will be “qualified investments” under the Tax Act for a trust governed by a TFSA, FHSA, RDSP, RRSP, RRIF, RESP, or deferred profit sharing plan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the holder of a TFSA, FHSA or RDSP, the annuitant under an RRSP or RRIF or the subscriber of an RESP, as the case may be, will be subject to a penalty tax if such BEPC exchangeable shares held in the TFSA, FHSA, RDSP, RRSP, RRIF or RESP are a “prohibited investment” (as defined in subsection 207.01(1) of the Tax Act) for the TFSA, FHSA, RDSP, RRSP, RRIF or RESP, as the case may be. Generally, the BEPC exchangeable shares will generally not be a “prohibited investment” if the holder of the TFSA, FHSA or RDSP, the annuitant under the RRSP or RRIF or the subscriber of the RESP, as applicable, deals at arm’s length with BEPC for purposes of the Tax Act and does not have a “significant interest” as defined in the Tax Act for purposes of the “prohibited investment” rules in section 207.01 of the Tax Act, in BEPC. Any such annuitant, holder or subscriber should be aware that exchanges at the request of holders of BEPC exchangeable shares may impact the percentage of total BEPC exchangeable shares held by such annuitant, holder or subscriber.
Holders of TFSAs, FHSAs or RDSPs, annuitants under RRSPs or RRIFs and subscribers of RESPs should consult their own tax advisors as to whether such BEPC exchangeable shares will be such a “prohibited investment”, including with respect to whether the BEPC exchangeable shares would be “excluded property” for the purposes of such rules in their particular circumstances.
Taxation of Holders Not Resident in Canada
The following portion of the summary is generally applicable to a holder who, at all relevant times, for the purposes of the Tax Act, is not, and is not deemed to be, resident in Canada and does not use or hold the BEPC exchangeable shares in a business carried on in Canada (a “non-resident holder”). Special rules, which are not discussed in this summary, may apply to a non-resident holder that is an insurer that carries on an insurance business in Canada and elsewhere.
Dividends on the BEPC Exchangeable Shares
Dividends, other than capital gains dividends, paid or credited on the BEPC exchangeable shares or deemed to be paid or credited on the BEPC exchangeable shares to a non-resident holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax at a rate of 25%, subject to any reduction in the rate of withholding to which the non-resident holder is entitled under any applicable income tax convention between Canada and the country in which the non-resident holder is resident.
The same Canadian withholding tax consequences apply to a capital gains dividend to the extent of the lesser of the amount of the dividend received by the non-resident holder and the non-resident holder’s portion (as determined under the Tax Act) of the “TCP gains balance” (as defined in the Tax Act) of BEPC, unless 5% or less of the dividend is received by or on behalf of shareholders each of whom is a non-resident person or is a partnership that is not a “Canadian partnership” for purposes of the Tax Act. In general, BEPC’s “TCP gains balance” is the amount of BEPC’s net capital gains from dispositions of “taxable Canadian property” (as defined in the Tax Act), minus an amount of certain dividends paid previously relating to such net capital gains. BEPC expects that it will not dispose of any “taxable Canadian property” in circumstances that would give rise to a “TCP gains balance”. Capital gains dividends are otherwise not subject to Canadian withholding tax and capital gains dividends received by a non-resident holder will be considered to be a capital gain of the non-resident holder from the disposition of capital property in the taxation year of the non-resident holder in which the capital gains dividend is received. The non-resident holder will not be subject to tax under the Tax Act in respect of such a capital gains dividend.
Redemptions, Exchanges and Other Dispositions of the BEPC Exchangeable Shares
A non-resident holder will not be subject to tax under the Tax Act on a disposition or deemed disposition of BEPC exchangeable shares unless the BEPC exchangeable shares are “taxable Canadian property” of the non-resident holder for purposes of the Tax Act at the time of the disposition or deemed disposition and the non-resident holder is not entitled to relief under an applicable income tax convention between Canada and the country in which the non-resident holder is resident.
Generally, the BEPC exchangeable shares will not constitute “taxable Canadian property” of a non-resident holder at a particular time provided that BEPC is a mutual fund corporation unless, at any particular time during the 60-month period that ends at that time, both of the following conditions are met concurrently: (a) 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of BEPC were owned by or belonged to one or any combination of (i) the non-resident holder, (ii) persons with whom the non-resident holder did not deal at arm’s length for purposes of the Tax Act, and (iii) partnerships in which the non-resident holder or a person described in (ii) holds a membership interest directly or indirectly through one or more partnerships; and (b) more than 50% of the fair market value of the BEPC exchangeable shares was derived, directly or indirectly, from one or any combination of: (i) real or immovable property situated in Canada, (ii) “Canadian resource properties” (as defined in the Tax Act), (iii) “timber resource properties” (as defined in the Tax Act), and (iv) options in respect of, or interests in, or for civil law rights in, property described in any of (b)(i) to (iii), whether or not the property exists. A non-resident holder of BEPC exchangeable shares that also holds one or more BEP units will generally meet the condition in (a) above; however, BEPC does not expect that the condition in (b) will be met.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in certain circumstances set out in the Tax Act, the BEPC exchangeable shares may be deemed to be “taxable Canadian property.” Non-resident holders for whom BEPC exchangeable shares may constitute “taxable Canadian property” should consult their own tax advisors.
The cost to a non-resident holder of a BEP unit received on the exchange of a BEPC exchangeable share will equal the fair market value of the BEPC exchangeable share for which it was exchanged at the time of the exchange. The adjusted cost base to a non-resident holder of BEP units at any time will be determined by averaging the cost of such BEP units with the adjusted cost base of any other BEP units owned by the non-resident holder as capital property at the time.
For a description of the Canadian federal income tax considerations of holding and disposing of BEP units, please see Item 10.E “Taxation — Certain Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations” in BEP’s Annual Report.
10.F DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS
Not applicable.
10.G STATEMENT OF EXPERTS
Not applicable.
10.H DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
Any statement in this Form 20-F about any of our contracts or other documents is not necessarily complete. If the contract or document is filed as an exhibit to this Form 20-F the contract or document is deemed to modify the description contained in this Form 20-F. You must review the exhibits themselves for a complete description of the contract or document.
As a foreign private issuer under the SEC’s regulations, we will file annual reports on a Form 20-F and other reports on Form 6-K. The information disclosed in our reports may be less extensive than that required to be disclosed in annual and quarterly reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. issuers. Moreover, as a foreign private issuer, we will not be subject to the proxy requirements under Section 14 of the Exchange Act, and our directors and principal shareholders are not subject to the insider short swing profit reporting and recovery rules under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
The contracts and other documents referred to in this Form 20-F, and our SEC filings are and will be available on our EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov, and certain of these documents are also available on our website at https://bep.brookfield.com.
In addition, our company is required to file documents required by Canadian securities laws electronically with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and these filings are available on Brookfield Renewable’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca. Written requests for such documents should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at 250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10281-1023, Tel: 212-417-7000.
10.I SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION
Not applicable.
10.J ANNUAL REPORT TO SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See the information contained in this Form 20-F under Item 5.A “Operating Results—Risk Management and Financial Instruments”.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this Form 20-F. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2023, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. While disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting were adequate and effective we continue to implement certain measures to strengthen control processes and procedures.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including persons performing the functions of principal executive and principal financial officers for us, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on evaluation under the foregoing, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023. Management excluded from its design and assessment of the internal controls of investments acquired in 2023, which include a 136 MW portfolio of operating wind assets and a 60 MW portfolio of operating wind assets in Brazil, and a fully integrated developer and operator of renewable power assets with 5900 MW of operating and under construction assets, with a 6100 MW development pipeline in the United States, whose total assets and net assets on a combined basis constitute approximately 9% and 10%, respectively, of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of December 31, 2023 and 3% of revenues for the year then ended.
Internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants, who have also audited our consolidated financial statements, as stated in their reports which are included herein.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Changes in Internal Control
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2023, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16. [RESERVED]
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Our board of directors has determined that Patricia Zuccotti possesses specific accounting and financial management expertise and that she is the audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC, and that she is independent within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE. Our board of directors has also determined that other members of the audit committee have sufficient experience and ability in finance and compliance matters to enable them to adequately discharge their responsibilities.
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
The BEPC board has adopted the BEPC Ethics code, a copy of which is available on BEPC’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca and EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov, and is available on our website at https://bep.brookfield.com/bepc/corporate-governance/governance-documents. See Item 6.C “Board Practices—Code of Business Conduct and Ethics”.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Our company has retained Ernst & Young LLP (PCAOB ID: 1263) to act as our company’s independent registered chartered accountants.
The table below summarizes the fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023. A majority of the fees to Ernst & Young are billed and settled in Canadian dollars. In order to provide comparability with BEPC’s financial statements, which are reported in U.S. dollars, all Canadian dollar amounts in the table have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average annual rate.
| | | | | | | | |
| (THOUSANDS) | 2023(23) | 2022 |
Audit Fees (1) | $ | 11,123 | | $ | 11,012 | |
Audit-related fees (2) | 488 | | 140 | |
Tax fees (3) | 243 | | — | |
| $ | 11,854 | | $ | 11,152 | |
(1)Audit fees include fees for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, internal control over financing reporting and interim reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly interim reports. This fee also includes fees for the audit or review of financial statements for certain of our subsidiaries, including audits of individual assets to comply with lender, joint venture partner or regulatory requirements.
(2)Audit-related fees relate primarily to services pertaining to financial due diligence, capital market transactions, Sarbanes-Oxley readiness activities, Form 20-F and other securities related matters. Audit-related fees also include ESG and other services.
(3)Includes professional services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning in connection with domestic and foreign operations and corresponding tax implications.
The BEPC audit committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided to our company by Ernst & Young LLP.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEE
None.
ITEM16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
BEPC Repurchases
BEPC may from time-to-time, subject to applicable law, purchase BEPC exchangeable shares for cancellation in the open market, provided that any necessary approval has been obtained. In December 2023, the TSX accepted a notice of BEPC’s intention to commence a normal course issuer bid for the BEPC exchangeable shares, which permits BEPC to repurchase up to 8,982,586 of its issued and outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares for a one-year period. The price to be paid for our BEPC exchangeable shares under the normal course issuer bid will be the market price at the time of purchase or such other price as may be permitted. The actual number of BEPC exchangeable shares to be purchased and the timing of such purchases will be determined by BEPC, and all purchases will be made through the facilities of the TSX, the NYSE and/or Canadian and U.S. alternative trading systems, if eligible. For the year ended December 31, 2023, BEPC made no repurchases. A copy of the Notice of Intention for each normal course issuer bid may be obtained without charge by contacting Investor Relations by phone at 1-833-236-0278 or by email at enquiries@brookfieldrenewable.com.
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
None.
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We believe our corporate governance practices are not materially different from those required of U.S. domestic corporations under NYSE listing standards, except that we do not have a compensation committee and compensation decisions are made by our nominating and governance committee and/or the Service Provider, as applicable.
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 16I. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
ITEM 16J. INSIDER TRADING POLICIES
We have adopted the insider trading policy of Brookfield, which governs the purchase, sale and other dispositions of our securities by our directors, officers and other employees. This policy promotes compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, including those that prohibit insider trading. A copy of Brookfield’s Personal Trading Policy is filed as an exhibit to this 20-F. See Item 6.C “Board Practices—Personal Trading Policy”.
ITEM 16K. CYBERSECURITY
Risk Management and Strategy
Our group has a cybersecurity program for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats. This includes compliance with Brookfield Renewable’s Cybersecurity Policy (“CSP”). Our group’s cybersecurity policy defines the expectations and requirements for the secure and reliable operation of information technology and operating technology environments. Cybersecurity is one element of our comprehensive approach to strong governance and risk management practices, which also includes an emphasis on responsible corporate governance and ethical business conduct.
Key highlights of our group’s cybersecurity program include a comprehensive policy framework, reviewed and updated annually; security awareness training for all employees, completed annually; risk assessments for critical technology systems and applications, performed annually and following all changes to these systems; regular vulnerability scans; technology risk assessments and the use of software and technology to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our systems, including the use of end-point detection and response, anti-malware applications and the use of programs that log, monitor and audit system activities.
Our group’s cybersecurity program performance and effectiveness are frequently assessed and audited internally and by third parties. We regularly complete business-wide phishing tests and promptly address any areas of weakness identified. We monitor and assess cybersecurity and data privacy programs business-wide and
regulatory changes in the countries where we operate, as well as monitor and assess cybersecurity threat intelligence for any potential impacts to our business. Where we engage third parties, we have policies and processes to govern third party access and reduce the risks associated with such access.
Our group conducts pre-acquisition due diligence on a potential investment’s cybersecurity and data privacy programs to identify any material risks that may need to be addressed as part of the acquisition or post-acquisition.
No risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, have materially affected our group, our group’s business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. However, we can provide no assurance that our group will not experience any material cybersecurity threats or incidents in the future. See “Item 3D. Risk Factors— Risks Relating to Our Operations and Our Industry”.
Governance
Cybersecurity at Brookfield Renewable is overseen by the board of directors of the Managing General Partner, the Audit Committee and management.
Our group employs a decentralized approach to overseeing cybersecurity at our group’s businesses. The aim is to provide governance and guidance from the center to our group’s regional businesses who have management accountability. Regional management and local experts in each country are responsible for controlling and managing the assets and processes in their business. We believe these individuals maintain the best knowledge of country cybersecurity standards and measures to ensure compliance. Within each business, our group segregates systems that manage critical assets from all other systems and applications, to ensure the resilience and security of information and operating technologies. Members of our group’s senior management team (including the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer) receive regular reports on our program.
The Audit Committees of the Managing General Partner and BEPC are responsible for periodically reviewing our group’s cybersecurity program and practices; overseeing the Service Provider’s processes for assessing, identifying, managing, mitigating and reporting cybersecurity risks, including assessing the likelihood, frequency and severity of cyber-attacks; and reviewing management’s cybersecurity practices and receiving and evaluating reports on cybersecurity from the Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Service Provider on at least a quarterly basis or more frequently, as circumstances may require. The Audit Committees of the Managing General Partner and BEPC will regularly report to the board of directors of the Managing General Partner and the board of directors of BEPC, respectively, on significant matters they have addressed with respect to the partnership’s cybersecurity program.
Our cybersecurity program is led by the Vice President, Cybersecurity, IT Compliance and Privacy, who works closely with senior management, legal counsel and external counsel to develop and monitor Brookfield Renewable’s data protection, privacy and cybersecurity program and policies. The Vice President, Cybersecurity, IT Compliance and Privacy has over 35 years’ experience in cybersecurity oversight.
PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See our financial statements beginning on page F-1, which are filed as part of this Form 20-F.
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
| | | | | |
| Number | Number |
| 1.1 | |
| 2.1 | |
| 4.1 | |
| 4.2 | |
| 4.3 | |
| 4.4 | |
| 4.5 | |
| 4.6 | |
| 4.7 | |
| 4.8 | |
| 4.9 | |
| 4.10 | |
| 4.11 | |
| 4.12 | |
| 4.13 | |
| 4.14 | |
| 4.15 | |
| 4.16 | |
| | | | | |
| 4.17 | |
| 4.18 | |
| 4.19 | |
| 4.20 | |
| 4.21 | |
| 4.22 | |
| 4.23 | |
| 4.24 | |
| 4.25 | |
| 4.26 | |
| 4.27 | |
| 4.28 | |
| 4.29 | |
| 4.30 | |
| | | | | |
| 4.31 | |
| 4.32 | |
| 4.33 | |
| 4.34 | |
| 8.1 | |
| 11.1 | |
| 11.2 | |
| 12.1 | |
| 12.2 | |
| 13.1 | |
| 13.2 | |
| 15.1 | |
| 15.2 | |
| 15.3 | |
| 97.1 | |
| 101 | The following materials from Brookfield Renewable Corporation’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Financial Statements of Brookfield Renewable Corporation and (ii) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Brookfield Renewable Corporation, tagged as blocks of text and in detail |
| |
(1) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Registration Statement on Form 20-F including all amendments thereto, with the last such amendment having been made on May 16, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on November 27, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on January 17, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on March 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on July 29, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference.
(6) Filed as an exhibit to Form 6-K on August 3, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference.
(7) Filed as an exhibit to Form 6-K filed on April 15, 2021, and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on August 12, 2021, and incorporated herein by reference.
(9) Filed as an exhibit to Form 6-K on August 12, 2021, and incorporated herein by reference.
(10) Filed as an exhibit to Form 6-K on December 9, 2021, and incorporated herein by reference.
(11) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on April 14, 2022, and incorporated herein by reference.
(12) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on November 14, 2022, and incorporated herein by reference.
(13) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on March 29, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference.
(14) Filed as an exhibit to Form 6-K on June 2, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference.
(15) Filed as an exhibit to BEP’s Form 6-K on January 10, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference.
(16) Filed herewith.
SIGNATURE
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing this Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Form 20-F on its behalf.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dated: February 29, 2024 | BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION |
| | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Wyatt Hartley |
| | Name: | Wyatt Hartley |
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer of Brookfield Renewable Corporation |
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY
Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Brookfield Renewable Corporation (the “company”) management which is responsible for their integrity, consistency, objectivity and reliability. To fulfill this responsibility, Brookfield Renewable maintains policies, procedures and systems of internal control to ensure that its reporting practices and accounting and administrative procedures are appropriate to provide a high degree of assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced and assets are safeguarded. These controls include the careful selection and training of employees, the establishment of well-defined areas of responsibility and accountability for performance, and the communication of policies and the code of conduct throughout the company.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and, where appropriate, reflect estimates based on management’s judgment.
Ernst & Young LLP, the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm appointed by the directors of the general partner of the company, have audited the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) to enable them to express to the partners their opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Their report outlines the scope of their examination and opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements have been further reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors of the company acting through its Audit Committee, which is comprised of directors who are not officers or employees of the company. The Audit Committee, which meets with the auditors and management to review the activities of each and reports to the Board of Directors, oversees management’s responsibilities for the financial reporting and internal control systems. The auditors have full and direct access to the Audit Committee and meet periodically with the committee both with and without management present to discuss their audit and related findings.
| | | | | | | | |
| /s/ Connor Teskey | | /s/ Wyatt Hartley |
Connor Teskey
Chief Executive Officer | | Wyatt Hartley
Chief Financial Officer |
February 29, 2024
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Brookfield Renewable Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Brookfield Renewable Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023 and 2022, and its financial performance and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 29, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Revaluation of power generating assets |
| Description of the Matter | | The Company measures power generating assets (classified as property, plant and equipment) using the revaluation method under IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment. As at December 31, 2023, property, plant and equipment on the consolidated statement of financial position totaled $44,038 million. Revaluations of property, plant and equipment recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) totaled a loss of $544 million and a loss in the consolidated statement of income (loss) of $46 million for 2023. As discussed in Notes 1(g), 1(r)(i) and 1(s) (iii) and 12 – Property, Plant and Equipment, at Fair Value to the consolidated financial statements, significant estimation and management judgment are involved in assessing the estimates and assumptions regarding the future performance of the power generating assets.
Management applies a dual approach which involves a discounted cash flow model as well as a market evaluation in determining the fair value of the Company’s power generating assets. Significant assumptions included within the discounted cash flow models are future electricity prices, terminal value, discount rates, anticipated long-term average generation and estimated operating and capital expenditures.
Auditing the measurement of power generating assets is complex due to the highly judgmental nature of the significant assumptions described above, which required the involvement of specialists. Changes in these assumptions can have a material effect on the fair value of the power generating assets. |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over management’s processes in determining the fair value of power generating assets. We tested controls over management’s review of the valuation models, including the controls over the review and approval of all significant assumptions.
To test the fair value of the power generating assets, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the Company’s valuation methodology, the significant assumptions used, and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the significant assumptions. For each power generating asset, we analyzed the significant drivers of the change in fair value including the future electricity prices, terminal value and discount rates. With the support of our valuation specialists, we inspected management’s valuation analysis and assessed the estimates of future electricity prices by reference to shorter-term broker price quotes and management’s longer-term market forecasts specific to each region and power generating asset. We also involved our valuation specialists in the evaluation of the terminal value and discount rates, which included consideration of benchmark interest rates, geographic location, whether the asset is contracted or uncontracted and type of technology.
For a sample of power generating assets, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, agreeing contracted power prices to executed power purchase agreements and assessing the anticipated long-term average generation through corroboration with third party engineering reports and historical trends. Further, we assessed the estimated operating and capital expenditures by comparison to historical data and to third party data for a selection of assets and corroboration with third party engineering reports. We also tested the computational accuracy of the fair value model.
With the assistance of our valuation specialists for the same samples, we also performed a sensitivity analysis over the future electricity prices, terminal value and discount rates to evaluate the fair value of power generating assets. We also evaluated the fair values using other market-based evidence by comparing the portfolio as a whole to recent similar transactions and by calculating the revenue and EBITDA multiples of a sample of the power generating assets and comparing them to multiples of comparable public companies.
Furthermore, we evaluated the adequacy of the Company’s disclosures regarding the significant assumptions and sensitivity analysis around the fair value of power generating assets.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Significant acquisitions: wind and solar portfolio |
| Description of the Matter | | During 2023, the Company completed the acquisition of a U.S. Renewable Portfolio for purchase price of $1,083 million. As described in Notes 1(o) and 3 – Acquisitions to the consolidated financial statements, this business combination is accounted for using the acquisition method, and the results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the corresponding date of acquisition.
Auditing the above noted acquisition is complex given that significant estimation is required in determining the fair value of the power generating assets, tax equity liabilities and commodity derivatives acquired. The significant assumptions related to these estimates include but are not limited to future electricity prices, production tax credits, generation volumes, discount rates, terminal value and operating and capital expenditures. These assumptions are forward looking and could be affected by future economic and market conditions.
|
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | | We obtained an understanding and evaluated the design of controls over management’s processes in determining the fair value of power generating assets, tax equity liabilities and commodity derivatives acquired. We tested controls over management’s review of the power generating assets, tax equity and commodity derivative valuation models, including the controls over the review and approval of all significant assumptions.
Our audit procedures included, among others, assessing the significant assumptions described above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data. For example, we evaluated the estimated generation volumes for a sample of power generating assets by comparing them to available engineering reports, benchmarking against publicly available industry generation data, and also considering industry benchmarks for losses that impact generation. Further, with the support of our valuation specialists, we inspected management’s valuation analysis and assessed the estimates of future electricity prices by reference to shorter-term broker price quotes and management’s longer-term market forecasts specific to each region and power generating asset. For production tax credit rates, we assessed management’s future projections against stated guidance for all production tax credit regimes and ensured that management’s projection was reasonable based on published guidance. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in evaluating the valuation methodologies and the significant assumptions, including discount rates and terminal values, used in the Company’s models, which included consideration of benchmark interest rates, geographic location, contracted or uncontracted assets and type of technology, as well as performing sensitivity analysis on such significant assumptions. Further, we assessed the estimated capital expenditures by corroborating against recently signed construction contracts and component supply agreements. We compared operating expenditures to available engineering reports, compared forecasts against industry benchmarks and signed operations and maintenance contracts. We also tested the computational accuracy of the fair value model and considered the adequacy of disclosures made in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in respect of these judgements and estimates. |
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
We have served as Brookfield Renewable’s auditor since 2020.
Toronto, Canada
February 29, 2024
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Brookfield Renewable Corporation. (“our company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and effected by the Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board as defined in Regulation 240.13a–15(f) or 240.15d–15(f).
Management assessed the effectiveness of our company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this assessment, management concludes that, as of December 31, 2023, our company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective. Management excluded from its design and assessment of the internal controls of investments acquired in 2023, which include a 136 MW portfolio of operating wind assets and a 60 MW portfolio of operating wind assets in Brazil, and a fully integrated developer and operator of renewable power assets with 5900 MW of operating and under construction assets, with a 6100 MW development pipeline in the United States, whose total assets and net assets on a combined basis constitute approximately 9% and 10%, respectively, of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of December 31, 2023 and 3% of revenues for the year then ended.
Our company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, who also audited our company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023. As stated in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Ernst & Young LLP expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023.
| | | | | | | | |
| /s/ Connor Teskey | | /s/ Wyatt Hartley |
Connor Teskey
Chief Executive Officer | | Wyatt Hartley
Chief Financial Officer |
February 29, 2024
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Brookfield Renewable Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Brookfield Renewable Corporation’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the COSO criteria.
As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the 12 GW operating and development portfolio of utility-scale solar, wind and battery storage assets in the United States, the 136 MW portfolio of operating wind assets in Brazil, and the 60MW portfolio of operating and wind assets in Brazil. The aforementioned acquisitions are included in the 2023 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted approximately 9% and 10% of total and net assets, respectively on a combined basis as of December 31, 2023 and 3% of revenues for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the aforementioned acquisitions.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the 2023 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated February 29, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 29, 2024
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AS AT DECEMBER 31
(MILLIONS) | Notes | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Assets | | | | | |
| Current assets | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | | $ | 627 | | | $ | 642 | |
| Restricted cash | 20 | | 165 | | | 44 | |
| Trade receivables and other current assets | 21 | | 955 | | | 1,321 | |
| Financial instrument assets | 5 | | 124 | | | 106 | |
| Due from related parties | 27 | | 1,427 | | | 615 | |
| Assets held for sale | 4 | | — | | | 698 | |
| | | 3,298 | | | 3,426 | |
| Financial instrument assets | 5 | | 301 | | | 481 | |
| Equity-accounted investments | 18 | | 644 | | | 451 | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | 12 | | 44,038 | | | 37,828 | |
| | | | | |
| Goodwill | 16 | | 854 | | | 723 | |
| Deferred income tax assets | 11 | | 102 | | | 70 | |
| Other long-term assets | 22 | | 184 | | | 309 | |
| Total Assets | | | $ | 49,421 | | | $ | 43,288 | |
| Liabilities | | | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 23 | | $ | 807 | | | $ | 621 | |
| Financial instrument liabilities | 5 | | 441 | | | 270 | |
| Due to related parties | 27 | | 456 | | | 464 | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | 13 | | 1,891 | | | 1,299 | |
| Provisions | 26 | | 19 | | | 16 | |
| Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale | | | — | | | 217 | |
| BEPC exchangeable and class B shares | 15 | | 4,721 | | | 4,364 | |
| | | 8,335 | | | 7,251 | |
| Financial instrument liabilities | 5 | | 1,376 | | | 578 | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | 13 | | 14,181 | | | 12,416 | |
| | | | | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 11 | | 5,819 | | | 5,263 | |
| Provisions | 24, 26 | | 926 | | | 341 | |
| Due to related parties | 27 | | 930 | | | 2 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 25 | | 725 | | | 613 | |
| Equity | | | | | |
| Non-controlling interests | | | | | |
| Participating non-controlling interests – in operating subsidiaries | 14 | | 11,070 | | | 10,680 | |
| Participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary held by the partnership | 14 | | 272 | | | 271 | |
| The partnership | | | 5,787 | | | 5,873 | |
| Total Equity | | | $ | 17,129 | | | $ | 16,824 | |
| Total Liabilities and Equity | | | $ | 49,421 | | | $ | 43,288 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Approved on behalf of Brookfield Renewable Corporation.:
| | | | | |
| |
Patricia Zuccotti
Director | David Mann
Director |
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
(MILLIONS) | Notes | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenues | 27 | | $ | 3,967 | | | $ | 3,778 | | | $ | 3,367 | |
| Other income | 7 | | 584 | | | 93 | | | 60 | |
Direct operating costs(1) | 8 | | (1,466) | | | (1,174) | | | (1,185) | |
| Management service costs | 27 | | (88) | | | (169) | | | (175) | |
| Interest expense | 13 | | (1,258) | | | (1,032) | | | (900) | |
| Share of earnings (loss) from equity-accounted investments | 18 | | (8) | | | 6 | | | 2 | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instruments (loss) gain | 5 | | 159 | | | (65) | | | (27) | |
| Depreciation | 12 | | (1,342) | | | (1,179) | | | (1,115) | |
| Other | 9 | | (61) | | | (90) | | | (277) | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and class B shares | 15 | | (106) | | | 1,800 | | | 1,267 | |
| Income tax (expense) recovery | | | | | | | |
| Current | 11 | | (113) | | | (133) | | | (31) | |
| Deferred | 11 | | 40 | | | 15 | | | (56) | |
| | | (73) | | | (118) | | | (87) | |
| Net income | | | $ | 308 | | | $ | 1,850 | | | $ | 930 | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to: | | | | | | | |
| Non-controlling interests | | | | | | | |
| Participating non-controlling interests – in operating subsidiaries | 14 | | $ | 481 | | | $ | 336 | | | $ | (23) | |
| Participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary held by the partnership | 14 | | 8 | | | 11 | | | 7 | |
| The partnership | | | (181) | | | 1,503 | | | 946 | |
| | | $ | 308 | | | $ | 1,850 | | | $ | 930 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
(1)Direct operating costs exclude depreciation expense disclosed below.
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
(MILLIONS) | Notes | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Net income | | | $ | 308 | | | $ | 1,850 | | | $ | 930 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) that will not be reclassified to net income | | | | | | | |
| Revaluations of property, plant and equipment | 12 | | (544) | | | 2,588 | | | 3,949 | |
| Actuarial gain (loss) on defined benefit plans | | | (10) | | | 15 | | | 10 | |
| Deferred income taxes on above items | 11 | | 118 | | | (649) | | | (1,047) | |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on investments in equity securities | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | |
| Equity-accounted investments | 18 | | 49 | | | (59) | | | 87 | |
| Total items that will not be reclassified to net income | | | (387) | | | 1,896 | | | 2,999 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) that may be reclassified to net income | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation | 10 | | 1,274 | | | (558) | | | (829) | |
| Gains (losses) arising during the year on financial instruments designated as cash-flow hedges | 5 | | 209 | | | 105 | | | (56) | |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign exchange swaps – net investment hedge | 5 | | (131) | | | 4 | | | 84 | |
| Reclassification adjustments for amounts recognized in net income | 5 | | (106) | | | 148 | | | (16) | |
| Deferred income taxes on above items | 11 | | (6) | | | (70) | | | 3 | |
| Equity-accounted investments | 18 | | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | |
| Total items that may be reclassified subsequently to net income | | | 1,241 | | | (370) | | | (814) | |
| Other comprehensive income | | | 854 | | | 1,526 | | | 2,185 | |
| Comprehensive income | | | $ | 1,162 | | | $ | 3,376 | | | $ | 3,115 | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to: | | | | | | | |
| Non-controlling interests | | | | | | | |
| Participating non-controlling interests – in operating subsidiaries | 14 | | $ | 1,308 | | | $ | 1,118 | | | $ | 578 | |
| Participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary held by the partnership | 14 | | 22 | | | 27 | | | 23 | |
| The partnership | | | (168) | | | 2,231 | | | 2,514 | |
| | | $ | 1,162 | | | $ | 3,376 | | | $ | 3,115 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | Non-controlling interests | | |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
(MILLIONS) | The partnership | | Foreign currency translation | | Revaluation surplus | | Other | | Total | | Participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary held by the partnership | | Participating non-controlling interests – in operating subsidiaries | | Total equity |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2022 | $ | (3,186) | | | $ | (1,582) | | | $ | 10,615 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 5,873 | | | $ | 271 | | | $ | 10,680 | | | $ | 16,824 | |
| Net income (loss) | (181) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (181) | | | 8 | | | 481 | | | 308 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | 327 | | | (361) | | | 47 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 827 | | | 854 | |
| Capital contributions (Note 14) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 589 | | | 589 | |
| Acquisition through business combinations (Note 3) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 343 | | | 343 | |
| Return of capital | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (140) | | | (140) | |
| Disposal (Note 4) | 34 | | | — | | | (34) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (418) | | | (418) | |
| Dividends declared | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (20) | | | (1,353) | | | (1,373) | |
| Other | (144) | | | — | | | 217 | | | 9 | | | 82 | | | (1) | | | 61 | | | 142 | |
| Change in year | (291) | | | 327 | | | (178) | | | 56 | | | (86) | | | 1 | | | 390 | | | 305 | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2023 | $ | (3,477) | | | $ | (1,255) | | | $ | 10,437 | | | $ | 82 | | | $ | 5,787 | | | $ | 272 | | | $ | 11,070 | | | $ | 17,129 | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2021 | $ | (4,834) | | | $ | (1,568) | | | $ | 10,125 | | | $ | (56) | | | 3,667 | | | $ | 261 | | | $ | 10,297 | | | $ | 14,225 | |
| Net income | 1,503 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,503 | | | 11 | | | 336 | | | 1,850 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | (37) | | | 676 | | | 89 | | | 728 | | | 16 | | | 782 | | | 1,526 | |
| Capital contributions | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 569 | | | 569 | |
| Disposal | 27 | | | — | | | (27) | | | — | | | — | | | (2) | | | (54) | | | (56) | |
| Dividends declared | (78) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (78) | | | (18) | | | (1,268) | | | (1,364) | |
| Other | 196 | | | 23 | | | (159) | | | (7) | | | 53 | | | 3 | | | 18 | | | $ | 74 | |
| Change in year | 1,648 | | | (14) | | | 490 | | | 82 | | | 2,206 | | | 10 | | | 383 | | | 2,599 | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2022 | $ | (3,186) | | | $ | (1,582) | | | $ | 10,615 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 5,873 | | | $ | 271 | | | $ | 10,680 | | | $ | 16,824 | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2020 | $ | (5,826) | | | $ | (1,350) | | | $ | 8,381 | | | $ | (28) | | | $ | 1,177 | | | $ | 258 | | | $ | 10,290 | | | $ | 11,725 | |
| Net income (loss) | 946 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 946 | | | 7 | | | (23) | | | 930 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | (216) | | | 1,812 | | | (28) | | | 1,568 | | | 16 | | | 601 | | | 2,185 | |
| Capital contributions | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 65 | | | 65 | |
| Disposals | 60 | | | — | | | (60) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (181) | | | (181) | |
| Dividends declared | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (20) | | | (655) | | | (675) | |
| Other | (14) | | | (2) | | | (8) | | | — | | | $ | (24) | | | — | | | 200 | | | 176 | |
| Change in year | 992 | | | (218) | | | 1,744 | | | (28) | | | 2,490 | | | 3 | | | 7 | | | 2,500 | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2021 | $ | (4,834) | | | $ | (1,568) | | | $ | 10,125 | | | $ | (56) | | | $ | 3,667 | | | $ | 261 | | | $ | 10,297 | | | $ | 14,225 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
(MILLIONS) | Notes | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Operating activities | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | $ | 308 | | | $ | 1,850 | | | $ | 930 | |
| Adjustments for the following non-cash items: | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 12 | | 1,342 | | | 1,179 | | | 1,115 | |
| Unrealized financial instrument (gain) loss | 5 | | (159) | | | 187 | | | 102 | |
| Share of loss (earnings) from equity-accounted investments | 18 | | 8 | | | (6) | | | (2) | |
| Deferred income tax (recovery) expense | 11 | | (40) | | | (15) | | | 56 | |
| Other non-cash items | | | (361) | | | 6 | | | 109 | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and class B shares | 15 | | 106 | | | (1,800) | | | (1,267) | |
| Dividends received from equity-accounted investments | 18 | | 14 | | | 4 | | | 3 | |
| | | 1,218 | | | 1,405 | | | 1,046 | |
| Changes in due to or from related parties | | | (20) | | | (18) | | | (24) | |
| Net change in working capital balances | 28 | | 405 | | | (103) | | | (627) | |
| | | 1,603 | | | 1,284 | | | 395 | |
| Financing activities | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from non-recourse borrowings | 13 | | 2,601 | | | 3,460 | | | 4,133 | |
| Repayment of non-recourse borrowings | 13 | | (2,032) | | | (2,571) | | | (2,641) | |
| Capital contributions from non-controlling interests | 14 | | 189 | | | 369 | | | 65 | |
| Capital repaid to non-controlling interests | | | (169) | | | (54) | | | (181) | |
| Exchangeable share issuance | | | 251 | | | — | | | — | |
| Distributions paid: | | | | | | | |
| To participating non-controlling interests | 14 | | (669) | | | (1,286) | | | (675) | |
| To the partnership | 15 | | — | | | (78) | | | — | |
| Related party borrowings, net | | | (807) | | | (242) | | | (23) | |
| | | (636) | | | (402) | | | 678 | |
| Investing activities | | | | | | | |
| Acquisitions net of cash and cash equivalents in acquired entity | 3 | | (180) | | | — | | | (12) | |
| Acquisitions of equity-accounted investments | | | (22) | | | (48) | | | — | |
| Investment in property, plant and equipment | 12 | | (1,028) | | | (847) | | | (1,354) | |
| Proceeds from disposal of assets | | | 109 | | | 92 | | | 376 | |
| Disposal of securities | | | 134 | | | — | | | — | |
| Restricted cash and other | | | (31) | | | 65 | | | (37) | |
| | | (1,018) | | | (738) | | | (1,027) | |
| Foreign exchange gain (loss) on cash | | | 36 | | | (19) | | | (33) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | |
| Increase (decrease) | | | (15) | | | 125 | | | 13 | |
| Net change in cash classified within assets held for sale | | | — | | | (8) | | | — | |
| Balance, beginning of year | | | 642 | | | 525 | | | 512 | |
| Balance, end of year | | | $ | 627 | | | $ | 642 | | | $ | 525 | |
| Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | | | |
| Interest paid | | | $ | 1,177 | | | $ | 999 | | | $ | 828 | |
| Interest received | | | $ | 101 | | | $ | 32 | | | $ | 20 | |
| Income taxes paid | | | $ | 167 | | | $ | 90 | | | $ | 49 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE AUDITED ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Brookfield Renewable Corporation (“BEPC” or the “company) and its subsidiaries, own and operate a portfolio of renewable power and sustainable solution assets primarily in North America, South America and Europe. BEPC was formed as a corporation established under the British Columbia Business Corporation Act on September 9, 2019 and is a subsidiary of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (“BEP”), or, collectively with its controlled subsidiaries, including BEPC (“Brookfield Renewable”, or, collectively with its controlled subsidiaries, excluding BEPC, (the “partnership”). Brookfield Corporation (“Brookfield Corporation” or together with its controlled subsidiaries, other than Brookfield Renewable, and unless the context otherwise requires, includes Brookfield Corporation, “Brookfield”) is our company’s ultimate parent. The term “Brookfield Holders” means Brookfield, Brookfield Reinsurance and their related parties.
The class A exchangeable subordinate voting shares (“BEPC exchangeable shares”) of Brookfield Renewable Corporation are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “BEPC”.
The registered head office of Brookfield Renewable Corporation is 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY, United States.
| | | | | | | | |
| Notes to consolidated financial statements | Page |
| 1. | Basis of presentation and material accounting policy information | |
| 2. | Principal subsidiaries | |
| 3. | Acquisitions | |
| 4. | Disposal of assets | |
| | |
| 5. | Risk management and financial instruments | |
| 6. | Segmented information | |
| 7. | Other income | 46 | |
| 8. | Direct operating costs | |
| 9. | Other | |
| 10. | Foreign currency translation | |
| 11. | Income taxes | |
| 12. | Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | |
| | |
| 13. | Borrowings | |
| 14. | Non-controlling interests | |
| 15. | BEPC Exchangeable shares, BEPC Class B shares and BEPC Class C shares | |
| 16. | Goodwill | |
| 17. | Capital management | |
| 18. | Equity-accounted investments | |
| 19. | Cash and cash equivalents | |
| 20. | Restricted cash | |
| 21. | Trade receivables and other current assets | |
| 22. | Other long-term assets | |
| 23. | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | |
| 24. | Provisions | |
| 25. | Other long-term liabilities | |
| 26. | Commitments, contingencies and guarantees | |
| 27. | Related party transactions | |
| 28. | Supplemental information | |
| | |
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICY INFORMATION
(a) Statement of compliance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). The accounting policies used in the consolidated financial statements are based on the IFRS applicable as at December 31, 2023, which encompass individual IFRS, International Accounting Standards (“IAS”), and interpretations made by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”) and the Standard Interpretations Committee (“SIC”). The policies set out below are consistently applied to all periods presented, unless otherwise noted.
These consolidated financial statements have been authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors of the company on February 29, 2024.
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
References to $, €, R$, and COP are to United States (“U.S.”) dollars, euros, Brazilian reais and Colombian pesos, respectively.
All figures are presented in millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.
(b) Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of historical cost, except for the revaluation of property, plant and equipment and certain assets and liabilities which have been measured at fair value. Cost is recorded based on the fair value of the consideration given in exchange for assets.
(c) Consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its subsidiaries, which are the entities over which the company has control. An investor controls an investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. Non-controlling interests in the equity of the company’s subsidiaries are shown separately in equity in the consolidated statements of financial position.
The company has entered into voting agreements with Brookfield, whereby the company gained control of the entities that own certain renewable power generating operations. The company has also entered into a voting agreement with its consortium partners in respect of its Colombian operations. These voting agreements provide the company the authority to direct the election of the Boards of Directors of the relevant entities, among other things, and therefore provide the company with control. Accordingly, the company consolidates the accounts of these entities. Refer to Note 27 – Related party transactions for further information.
For entities previously controlled by Brookfield Asset Management, the voting agreements entered into do not represent business combinations in accordance with IFRS 3, Business Combinations (“IFRS 3”), as all combining businesses are ultimately controlled by Brookfield Asset Management both before and after the transactions were completed. the company accounts for these transactions involving entities under common control in a manner similar to a pooling of interest, which requires the presentation of pre-voting agreement financial information as if the transactions had always been in place. Refer to Note 1(s)(ii) – Critical judgments in applying accounting policies – Common control transactions for the company’s policy on accounting for transactions under common control.
Equity-accounted investments
Equity-accounted investments are entities over which the company has significant influence or joint arrangements representing joint ventures. Significant influence is the ability to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee, but without controlling or jointly controlling those investees. Such investments are accounted for using the equity method.
A joint venture is a type of joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the joint venture. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. The company accounts for its interests in joint ventures using the equity method.
Under the equity method, the carrying value of an interest in an investee is initially recognized at cost and adjusted for the company’s share of net income, other comprehensive income (“OCI”), distributions by the equity-accounted investment and other adjustments to the company’s proportionate interest in the investee.
(d) Foreign currency translation
All figures reported in the consolidated financial statements and tabular disclosures to the consolidated financial statements are reflected in millions of U.S. dollars, which is the functional currency of the company. Each of the foreign operations included in these consolidated financial statements determines its own functional currency, and items included in the financial statements of each subsidiary are measured using that functional currency.
Assets and liabilities of foreign operations having a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the rate of exchange prevailing at the reporting date and revenues and expenses at the rate of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions during the period. Gains or losses on translation of foreign subsidiaries are included in OCI. Gains or losses on foreign currency denominated balances are reported in the same manner
In preparing the consolidated financial statements of the company, foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated into the functional currency using the closing rate at the applicable consolidated statement of financial position dates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities, denominated in a foreign currency and measured at fair value, are translated at the rate of exchange prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined and non-monetary assets measured at historical cost are translated at the historical rate. Revenues and expenses are measured in the functional currency at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions with gains or losses included in income.
(e) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash, term deposits and money market instruments with original maturities of less than 90 days.
(f) Restricted cash
Restricted cash includes cash and cash equivalents, where the availability of funds is restricted primarily by credit and construction agreements.
(g) Property, plant and equipment and revaluation method
Power generating assets are classified as property, plant and equipment and are accounted for using the revaluation method under IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment (“IAS 16”). Property, plant and equipment are initially measured at cost and subsequently carried at their revalued amount, being the fair value at the date of the revaluation, less any subsequent accumulated depreciation and any subsequent accumulated impairment losses.
The company generally determines the fair value of its property, plant and equipment by using 20-year discounted cash flow model for hydroelectric assets and the estimated remaining useful life for other technologies. This model incorporates future cash flows from long-term power purchase agreements that are in place where it is determined that the power purchase agreements are linked specifically to the related power generating assets. The model also includes estimates of future electricity prices, anticipated long-term average generation, estimated operating and capital expenditures, and assumptions about future inflation rates and discount rates by geographical location. Construction work-in-progress (“CWIP”) is revalued when sufficient information exists to determine fair value using the discounted cash flow method. Revaluations are made on an annual basis as at December 31 to ensure that the carrying amount does not differ significantly from fair value. For power generating assets acquired through business combinations, the company initially measures the assets at fair value consistent with the policy described in Note 1(o) – Business combinations, with no revaluations at year-end in the year of acquisition unless there is external evidence specific to those assets that would indicate the carrying value of the asset has either increased or decreased materially.
Where the carrying amount of an asset increased as a result of a revaluation, the increase is recognized in income to the extent the increase reverses a previously recognized decrease recorded through income, with the remainder of the increase recognized in OCI and accumulated in equity under revaluation surplus and non-controlling interest. When the carrying amount of an asset decreases, the decrease is recognized in OCI to the extent that a balance exists in revaluation surplus with respect to the asset, with the remainder of the decrease recognized in income.
Depreciation on power generating assets is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the assets, which are as follows:
| | | | | |
| Estimated service lives |
| Dams | Up to 115 years |
| Penstocks | Up to 60 years |
| Powerhouses | Up to 115 years |
| Hydroelectric generating units | Up to 115 years |
| Wind generating units | Up to 30 years |
| Solar generating units | Up to 35 years |
| Gas-fired cogenerating (“Cogeneration”) units | Up to 40 years |
| Other assets | Up to 60 years |
Costs are allocated to significant components of property, plant and equipment. When items of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (significant components) and depreciated separately. To ensure the accuracy of useful lives and residual values, a review is conducted annually.
Depreciation is calculated based on the fair value of the asset less its residual value. Depreciation commences when the asset is in the location and conditions necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. It ceases at the earlier of the date the asset is classified as held-for-sale and the date the asset is derecognized. An item of property, plant and equipment and any significant component is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use. Other assets include equipment, buildings and leasehold improvements. Buildings, furniture and fixtures, leasehold improvements and office equipment are recorded at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. Land and CWIP are not subject to depreciation.
The depreciation of property, plant and equipment in Brazil is based on the duration of the authorization or the useful life of a concession asset. The weighted-average remaining duration at December 31, 2023 is 34 years (2022: 35 years). Since land rights are part of the concession or authorization, this cost is also subject to depreciation.
Any accumulated depreciation at the date of revaluation is eliminated against the gross carrying amount of the asset, and the net amount is applied to the revalued amount of the asset.
Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment are recognized in Other income and Other in the consolidated statements of income (loss), respectively. The revaluation surplus is reclassified within the respective components of equity and not reclassified to net income when the assets are disposed.
(h) Leases
At inception of a contract, the company assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, the company assesses whether:
•the contract specified explicitly or implicitly the use of an identified asset, and that is physically distinct or represents substantially all of the capacity of a physically distinct asset. If the supplier has a substantive substitution right, then the asset is not identified;
•The company has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset throughout the period of use; and the company has the right to direct the use of the asset. The company has this right when it has the decision-making rights that are most relevant to changing how and for what purpose the asset is used. In rare cases where the decisions about how and for what purpose the asset is used are predetermined, the company has the right to direct the use of the asset if either:
◦The company has the right to operate the asset (or to direct others to operate the asset in a manner that it determines) throughout the period of use, without the supplier having the right to change those operating instructions; or
◦The company designed the asset in a way that predetermines how and for what purpose it will be used.
At inception or on reassessment of a contract that contains a lease component, the company allocates the consideration in the contract to each lease component on the basis of their relative stand-alone prices. However, for the leases of land and buildings in which it is a lessee, the company has elected not to separate non-lease components and, therefore, accounts for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component.
The company recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date. The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying asset or the site on which it is located, less any lease incentives received.
The right-of use asset is subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful lives of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. The estimated useful lives of right-of-use assets are determined on the same basis as those of property, plant and equipment. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any, and adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease liability.
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the company’s incremental borrowing rate. Generally, the company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate.
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following:
•Fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments;
•Variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, initially measured using the index or rate as at the commencement date;
•Amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee; and
•The exercise price under a purchase option that the company is reasonably certain to exercise, lease payments in an optional renewable period if the company is reasonably certain to exercise an extension option, and penalties for early termination of a lease unless the company is reasonably certain not to terminate early
The lease liability is measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the company’s estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, or if the company changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option.
When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made either to the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset or, when the adjustment is a reduction to the right-of-use asset, is recorded in the consolidated statements of income (loss) if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to nil.
The company presents right-of-use assets in property, plant and equipment and lease liabilities in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial position.
The company has elected not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a lease term of twelve months or less and leases of low-value assets. The company recognizes the lease payments associated with these leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
(i) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the price paid for the acquisition of an entity over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. Goodwill is allocated to the cash generating unit or units (“CGU”) to which it relates. the Company identifies CGU as identifiable groups of assets that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Impairment is determined for goodwill by assessing if the carrying value of a CGU, including the allocated goodwill, exceeds its recoverable amount determined as the greater of the estimated fair value less costs of disposal or the value in use. Impairment losses recognized in respect of a CGU are first allocated to the carrying value of goodwill and any excess is allocated to the carrying amount of assets in the CGU. Any goodwill impairment is charged to profit or loss in the period in which the impairment is identified. Impairment losses on goodwill are not subsequently reversed. In the year of a business acquisition, the recoverability of the acquired goodwill is assessed by revisiting the assumptions of the related underwriting model.
On disposal of a subsidiary, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination of the gain or loss on disposal of the operation.
(j) Asset impairment
At each statement of financial position date, the company assesses whether for non-financial assets there is any indication that such assets are impaired. This assessment includes a review of internal and external factors which includes, but is not limited to, changes in the technological, political, economic or legal environment in which the entity operates in, structural changes in the industry, changes in the level of demand, physical damage and obsolescence due to technological changes. An impairment is recognized if the recoverable amount, determined as the higher of the estimated fair value less costs of disposal or the discounted future cash flows generated from use and eventual disposal from an asset or CGU is less than its carrying value.
For non-financial assets (including equity-accounted investments), an impairment is recognized if the recoverable amount, determined as the greater of the estimated fair value, less costs of disposal, and the discounted future cash flows generated from use and eventual disposal of an asset or CGU, is less than its carrying value. The projections of future cash flows take into account the relevant operating plans and management’s best estimate of the most probable set of conditions anticipated to prevail. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset or CGU is increased to the lesser of the revised estimate of recoverable amount and the carrying amount that would have been recorded had no impairment loss been recognized previously.
(k) Trade receivables and other current assets
Trade receivables and other current assets are recognized initially at fair value, and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any provision for expected credit losses.
(l) Financial instruments
Initial recognition
Under IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”), regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade date, being the date on which the company commits to purchase or sell the asset. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or have been transferred and the company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.
At initial recognition, the company measures a financial asset at its fair value. In the case of a financial asset not categorized as fair value through profit and loss (“FVPL”), transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset are included at initial recognition. Transaction costs of financial assets carried at FVPL are expensed in income.
Classification and measurement
Subsequent measurement of financial assets depends on the company’s business objective for managing the asset and the cash flow characteristics of the asset. There are three measurement categories into which the company classifies its financial assets:
Amortized cost – Financial assets held for collection of contractual cash flows that represent solely payments of principal and interest are measured at amortized cost. Interest income is recognized as other income in the financial statements, and gains/losses are recognized in income when the asset is derecognized or impaired.
FVOCI – Financial assets held to achieve a particular business objective other than short-term trading are designated at fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”). For equity instruments designated at FVOCI, there is
no recycling of gains or losses through income. Upon derecognition of the asset, accumulated gains or losses are transferred from OCI directly to retained earnings.
FVPL – Financial assets that do not meet the criteria for amortized cost or FVOCI are measured at FVPL. Gains or losses on these types of assets are recognized in income.
The company assesses on a forward-looking basis the expected credit losses (“ECL”) associated with its assets carried at amortized cost and FVOCI. For trade receivables and contract assets, the company applied the simplified approach permitted by IFRS 9, which requires expected lifetime losses to be recognized from initial recognition of the asset. The simplified approach to the recognition of ECL does not require entities to track the changes in credit risk; rather, entities recognize a loss allowance at each reporting date based on the lifetime ECL since the date of initial recognition of the asset.
Evidence of impairment may include:
•Indications that a debtor or group of debtors is experiencing significant financial difficulty;
•A default or delinquency in interest or principal payments;
•Probability that a debtor or a group of debtors will enter into bankruptcy or other financial reorganization;
•Changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults, where observable data indicates that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows.
Trade receivables are reviewed qualitatively on a case-by-case basis to determine if they need to be written off.
ECL are measured as the difference in the present value of the contractual cash flows that are due under contract and the cash flows expected to be received. ECL is measured by considering the risk of default over the contract period and incorporates forward looking information into its measurement.
Financial liabilities are classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss, amortized cost, or derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge. The company determines the classification of its financial liabilities at initial recognition. The company’s financial liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities, corporate borrowings, non-recourse borrowings, derivative liabilities, due to related party balances, and tax equity. Financial liabilities are initially measured at fair value, with subsequent measurement determined based on their classification as follows:
FVPL – Financial liabilities held for trading, such as those acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term, derivative financial instruments entered into by the company that do not meet hedge accounting criteria, and tax equity are classified as fair value through profit and loss. Gains or losses on these types of liabilities are recognized in income.
The company owns and operates certain projects in the U.S. under tax equity structures to finance the construction of solar and wind projects. Such structures are designed to allocate renewable tax incentives, such as investment tax credits (“ITCs”), production tax credits (“PTCs”) and accelerated tax depreciation, to tax equity investors. Generally, tax equity structures grant the tax equity investors the majority of the project's U.S. taxable earnings and renewable tax incentives, along with a smaller portion of the projects’ cash flows, until a contractually determined point at which the allocations are adjusted (the “Flip Point”). Subsequent to the Flip Point the majority of the project’s U.S. taxable earnings, renewable tax incentives and cash flows are allocated to the sponsor. The Flip Point dates are generally dependent on the underlying projects’ reaching an agreed upon after tax investment return, however, from time to time, the Flip Point dates may be dates specified within the contract. At all times, both before and after the projects’ Flip Point, the company retains control over the projects financed with a tax equity structure. In accordance with the substance of the contractual agreements, the amounts paid by the tax equity investors for their equity stakes are classified as financial instrument liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial position and at each reporting date are remeasured to their fair value in accordance with IFRS 9.
The fair value of the tax equity financing is generally comprised of the following elements:
| | | | | | | | |
| Elements affecting the fair value of the tax equity financing | | Description |
| Production tax credits (PTCs) | | Allocation of PTCs to the tax equity investor are derived from the power generated during the period. The PTCs are recognized in foreign exchange and financial instrument gain (loss) with a corresponding reduction to the tax equity liability. |
| Investment tax credits (ITCs) | | Allocation of ITCs to the tax equity investor are derived as a percentage of a projects total cost. Once received, the ITCs are recognized as a reduction to property plant and equipment with a corresponding reduction to the tax equity liability. |
| Taxable loss, including tax attributes such as accelerated tax depreciation | | Under the terms of the tax equity agreements, the company is required to allocate specified percentages of taxable losses to the tax equity investor. As amounts are allocated, the obligation to deliver them is satisfied and a reduction to the tax equity liability is recorded with a corresponding amount recorded within foreign exchange and financial instrument gain (loss) on the consolidated statements of income (loss). |
| Pay-go contributions | | Certain of the contracts contain annual production thresholds. When the thresholds are exceeded, the tax equity investor is required to contribute additional cash amounts. The cash amounts paid increase the value of the tax equity liability. |
| Cash distributions | | Certain of the contracts also require cash distributions to the tax equity investor. Upon payment, the tax equity liability is reduced in the amount of the cash distribution. |
Amortized cost – All other financial liabilities are classified as amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. Gains and losses are recognized in income when the liabilities are derecognized as well as through the amortization process. Remeasurement gains and losses on financial liabilities classified as amortized cost are presented in the consolidated statements of income (loss). Amortized cost is computed using the effective interest method less any principal repayment or reduction. The calculation takes into account any premium or discount on acquisition and includes transaction costs and fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. This category includes trade and other payables, dividends payable, interest-bearing loans and borrowings, and corporate credit facilities.
Derivatives and hedge accounting
Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to their fair value at the end of each reporting period. The accounting for subsequent changes in fair value depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged and the type of hedge relationship designated.
The company designates its derivatives as hedges of:
•Foreign exchange risk associated with the cash flows of highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges);
•Foreign exchange risk associated with net investment in foreign operations (net investment hedges);
•Commodity price risk associated with cash flows of highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges); and
•Floating interest rate risk associated with floating rate debts (cash flow hedges).
At the inception of a hedge relationship, the company formally designates and documents the hedge relationship to which it wishes to apply hedge accounting and the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge.
A hedging relationship qualifies for hedge accounting if it meets all of the following effectiveness requirements:
•There is an ‘economic relationship’ between the hedged item and the hedging instrument;
•The effect of credit risk does not ‘dominate the value changes’ that result from that economic relationship; and
•The hedge ratio of the hedging relationship is the same as that resulting from the quantity of the hedged item that the company actually hedges and the quantity of the hedging instrument that the company actually uses to hedge that quantity of hedged item.
The fair values of various derivative financial instruments used for hedging purposes and movements in the hedge reserve within equity are shown in Note 5 – Risk management and financial instruments.
When a hedging instrument expires, is sold, is terminated, or no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative deferred gain or loss and deferred costs of hedging in equity at that time remain in equity until the forecasted transaction occurs. When the forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss and deferred costs of hedging are immediately reclassified to income.
If the hedge ratio for risk management purposes is no longer optimal but the risk management objective remains unchanged and the hedge continues to qualify for hedge accounting, the hedge relationship will be rebalanced by adjusting either the volume of the hedging instrument or the volume of the hedged item so that the hedge ratio aligns with the ratio used for risk management purposes. Any hedge ineffectiveness is calculated and accounted for in income at the time of the hedge relationship rebalancing.
(i) Cash flow hedges that qualify for hedge accounting
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognized in the cash flow hedge reserve within equity, limited to the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged item on a present value basis from the inception of the hedge. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in income, within foreign exchange and financial instruments gain (loss).
Gains and losses relating to the effective portion of the change in fair value of the entire forward contract are recognized in the cash flow hedge reserve within equity. Amounts accumulated in equity are reclassified in the period when the hedged item affects income.
(ii) Net investment hedges that qualify for hedge accounting
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognized in OCI and accumulated in reserves in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in profit and loss within Foreign exchange and financial instruments gain (loss). Gains and losses accumulated in equity will be reclassified to income when the foreign operation is partially disposed of or sold.
(iii) Hedge ineffectiveness
The company’s hedging policy only allows for the use of derivative instruments that form effective hedge relationships. Sources of hedge effectiveness are determined at the inception of the hedge relationship and measured through periodic prospective effectiveness assessments to ensure that an economic relationship exists between the hedged item and hedging instrument. Where the critical terms of the hedging instrument match exactly with the terms of the hedged item, a qualitative assessment of effectiveness is performed. For other hedge relationships, the hypothetical derivative method to assess effectiveness is used.
(m) Revenue and expense recognition
The majority of revenue is derived from the sale of power and power related ancillary services both under contract and in the open market, sourced from the company’s power generating facilities. The obligations are satisfied over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes benefits as the company delivers electricity and related products. Revenue is recorded based upon the output delivered and capacity provided at rates specified under either contract terms or prevailing market rates. The revenue reflects the consideration the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Costs related to the purchases of power or fuel are recorded upon delivery. All other costs are recorded as incurred.
Details of the revenue recognized per technology are included in Note 6 – Segmented information.
Where available, the company has elected the practical expedient available under IFRS 15 – Revenue from contracts with customers (“IFRS 15”) for measuring progress toward complete satisfaction of a performance obligation and for disclosure requirements of remaining performance obligations. The practical expedient allows an entity to recognize revenue in the amount to which the entity has the right to invoice such that the entity has a right to the consideration in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer for performance completed to date by the entity.
If the consideration in a contract that does not apply the practical expedient available under IFRS 15 for measuring progress toward complete satisfaction of a performance obligation includes a variable amount, the company estimates the amount of consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for transferring the goods to the customer. The variable consideration is estimated at contract inception and constrained until it is highly probable that a significant revenue reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the associated uncertainty with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
The company also sells power and related products under bundled arrangements. Energy, capacity and renewable credits within power purchase agreements are considered to be distinct performance obligations. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied under IFRS 15. The company views the sale of energy and capacity as a series of distinct goods that is substantially the same and has the same pattern of transfer measured by the output method. The company views renewable credits to be performance obligations satisfied at a point in time. During the year ended December 31, 2023, revenues recognized at a point in time corresponding to the sale of renewable credits were $244 million (2022: $259 million and 2021: $181 million). Measurement of satisfaction and transfer of control to the customer of renewable credits in a bundled arrangement coincides with the pattern of revenue recognition of the underlying energy generation.
Revenues recognized that are outside the scope of IFRS 15 include realized gains and losses from derivatives used in the risk management of the company's generation activities related to commodity prices. From time to time, our company also enters into commodity contracts to hedge all or a portion of its estimated revenue stream when selling electricity to an independent system operated market and there is no PPA available. These commodity contracts require periodic settlements in which our company receives a fixed-price based on specified quantities of electricity and pays the counterparty a variable market price based on the same specified quantity of electricity. As these derivatives are accounted for under hedge accounting, the changes in fair value are recorded in operating revenues in the consolidated statements of income (loss). Financial transactions included in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased revenues by $119 million (2022: decreased revenues by $146 million and 2021: decreased revenues by $30 million).
(n) Income taxes
Current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be paid to tax authorities, net of recoveries, based on the tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the statement of financial position dates. Current income tax assets and liabilities are included in trade receivables and other current assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, respectively.
Deferred tax is recognized on taxable temporary differences between the tax basis and the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax is not recognized if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither taxable profit nor accounting profit. Deferred income tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry forwards of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that deductions, tax credits and tax losses can be utilized. The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each statement of financial position date and reduced to the extent it is no longer probable that the income tax assets will be recovered. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the assets are realized or the liabilities settled, using the tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the statement of financial position dates.
Current and deferred income taxes relating to items recognized directly in OCI are also recognized directly in OCI.
(o) Business combinations
The acquisition of a business is accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration for an acquisition is measured at the aggregate of the fair values, at the date of exchange, of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred to former owners of the acquired business, and equity instruments issued by the acquirer in exchange for control of the acquired business. The acquired business’ identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3 – Business combinations (“IFRS 3”), are recognized at their fair values at the acquisition date, except for income taxes which are measured in accordance with IAS 12 – Income taxes (“IAS 12”), share-based payments which are measured in accordance with IFRS 2 – Share-based payment, liabilities and contingent liabilities which are measured under IAS 37 - Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets or IFRIC 21 - Levies and non-current assets that are classified as held-for-sale which are measured at fair value less costs to sell in accordance with IFRS 5 – Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations. The non-controlling interest in the acquiree is initially measured at the non-controlling interest’s proportion of the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognized or when applicable, at the fair value of the shares outstanding.
To the extent that the aggregate of the fair value of consideration paid, the amount of any non-controlling interest and the fair value of any previously held interest in the acquiree exceeds the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, goodwill is recognized. To the extent that this difference is negative, the amount is recognized as a gain in income. Goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes. However, after initial recognition, goodwill will be measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. An impairment assessment will be performed at least annually, and whenever circumstances such as significant declines in expected revenues, earnings or cash flows indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill might be impaired. Goodwill impairment charges are not reversible.
When a business combination is achieved in stages, previously held interests in the acquired entity are re-measured to fair value at the acquisition date, which is the date control is obtained, and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognized in income. Amounts arising from interests in the acquired business prior to the acquisition date that have previously been recognized in OCI are reclassified to income. Upon disposal or loss of control of a subsidiary, the carrying amount of the net assets of the subsidiary (including any OCI relating to the subsidiary) are derecognized with the difference between any proceeds received and the carrying amount of the net assets recognized as a gain or loss in income.
Where applicable, the consideration for the acquisition includes any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement, measured at its acquisition-date fair value. Subsequent changes in fair values are adjusted against the cost of the acquisition where they qualify as measurement period adjustments. All other subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration classified as liabilities will be recognized in the consolidated statements of income (loss), whereas changes in the fair values of contingent consideration classified within equity are not subsequently re-measured.
(p) Assets held for sale
Assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the non-current asset or disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification subject to limited exceptions.
When the company is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control of a subsidiary, all of the assets and liabilities of that subsidiary are classified as held for sale when the criteria described above are met, regardless of whether the company will retain a non-controlling interest in its former subsidiary after the sale.
Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their previous carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Assets classified as held for sale and the assets of a disposal group are presented separately from other assets in the consolidated statements of financial position and are classified as current. The liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale are presented separately from other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial position and are classified as current.
Once classified as held for sale, property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are not depreciated or amortized.
(q) Other items
(i) Capitalized costs
Capitalized costs related to CWIP include eligible expenditures incurred in connection with acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset. A qualifying asset is an asset that takes a substantial period of time to prepare for its intended use. Interest and borrowing costs related to CWIP are capitalized when activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are in progress, expenditures for the asset have been incurred and funds have been used or borrowed to fund the construction or development. Capitalization of costs ceases when the asset is ready for its intended use.
(ii) Pension and employee future benefits
Pension and employee future benefits are recognized in the consolidated financial statements in respect of employees of the operating entities within the company. The costs of retirement benefits for defined benefit plans and post-employment benefits are recognized as the benefits are earned by employees. The projected unit credit method, using the length of service and management’s best estimate assumptions, is used to value pension and other retirement benefits. All actuarial gains and losses are recognized immediately through OCI in order for the net pension asset or liability recognized in the consolidated statements of financial position to reflect the full value of the plan deficit or surplus. Net interest is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit asset or liability. Changes in the net defined benefit obligation related to service costs (comprising of current service costs, past services costs, gains and losses on curtailments and non-routine settlements), and net interest expense or income are recognized in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Re-measurements, comprising of actuarial gains or losses, the effect of the asset ceiling, and the return on plan assets (excluding net interest), are recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of financial position with a corresponding debit or credit to OCI in the period in which they occur. Re-measurements are not reclassified to income in subsequent periods. For defined contribution plans, amounts are expensed based on employee entitlement.
(iii) Decommissioning, restoration and environmental liabilities
Legal and constructive obligations associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment are recorded as liabilities when those obligations are incurred and are measured at the present value of the expected costs to settle the liability, using a discount rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The liability is accreted up to the date the liability will be settled with a corresponding charge to operating expenses. The carrying amount of decommissioning, restoration and environmental liabilities is reviewed annually with changes in the estimates of timing or amount of cash flows added to or deducted from the cost of the related asset.
(iv) Provisions
A provision is a liability of uncertain timing or amount. A provision is recognized if the company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated. Provisions are not recognized for future operating losses. The provision is measured at the present value of the best estimate of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a discount rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. Provisions are re-measured at each statement of financial position date using the current discount rate. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense.
(v) Interest income
Interest income is earned with the passage of time and is recorded on an accrual basis.
(vi) Government grants
The company becomes eligible for government grants by constructing or purchasing renewable power generating assets, and by bringing those assets to commercial operation, coupled with a successful application to the applicable
program or agency. The assessment of whether or not a project has complied with the conditions and that there is reasonable assurance the grants will be received will be undertaken on a case-by-case basis. The company reduces the cost of the asset by the amount of the grant. The grant amounts are recognized in income on a systematic basis as a reduction of depreciation over the periods, and in the proportions, in which depreciation on those assets is charged.
With respect to grants related to income, the government assistance (in the form of the difference between market price and guaranteed fixed price) typically becomes payable once electricity is produced and delivered to the relevant grid. It is at this point that the receipt of the grant becomes reasonably assured, and therefore the grant is recognized as revenue in the month that delivery of the electricity occurs.
(r) Critical estimates
The company makes estimates and assumptions that affect the carrying value of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amount of income and other comprehensive income for the year. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The estimates and assumptions that are critical to the determination of the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements relate to the following:
(i) Property, plant and equipment
The fair value of the company’s property, plant and equipment is calculated using estimates and assumptions about future electricity prices from renewable sources, anticipated long-term average generation, estimated operating and capital expenditures, future inflation rates and discount rates, as described in Note 12 – Property, plant and equipment, at fair value. Judgment is involved in determining the appropriate estimates and assumptions in the valuation of the company’s property, plant and equipment. See Note 1(s)(iii) – Critical judgments in applying accounting policies – Property, plant and equipment for further details.
Estimates of useful lives and residual values are used in determining depreciation and amortization. To ensure the accuracy of useful lives and residual values, these estimates are reviewed on an annual basis.
(ii) Financial instruments
The company makes estimates and assumptions that affect the carrying value of its financial instruments, including estimates and assumptions about future electricity prices, long-term average generation, capacity prices, discount rates, the timing of energy delivery and the elements affecting fair value of the tax equity financings. The fair value of interest rate swaps is the estimated amount that another party would receive or pay to terminate the swap agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current market interest rates. This valuation technique approximates the net present value of future cash flows. See Note 5 – Risk management and financial instruments for more details.
(iii) Deferred income taxes
The consolidated financial statements include estimates and assumptions for determining the future tax rates applicable to subsidiaries and identifying the temporary differences that relate to each subsidiary. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply during the year when the assets are realized or the liabilities settled, using the tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the consolidated statement of financial position dates. Operating plans and forecasts are used to estimate when the temporary difference will reverse based on future taxable income.
(iv) Decommissioning liabilities
Decommissioning costs will be incurred at the end of the operating life of some of the company’s assets. These obligations are typically many years in the future and require judgment to estimate. The estimate of decommissioning costs can vary in response to many factors including changes in relevant legal, regulatory, and environmental requirements, the emergence of new restoration techniques or experience at other power generating facilities. Inherent in the calculations of these costs are assumptions and estimates including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, discount rates, and timing of settlements.
(s) Critical judgments in applying accounting policies
The following are the critical judgments that have been made in applying the accounting policies used in the consolidated financial statements that have the most significant effect on the amounts in the consolidated financial statements:
(i) Preparation of consolidated financial statements
These consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the company. The company exercises judgment in determining whether non-wholly owned subsidiaries are controlled by the company. The company’s judgment included the determination of (i) how the relevant activities of the subsidiary are directed; (ii) whether the rights of shareholdings are substantive or protective in nature; and (iii) the company’s ability to influence the returns of the subsidiary.
(ii) Common control transactions
Common control business combinations specifically fall outside of scope of IFRS 3 and as such management has used its judgment to determine an appropriate policy to account for these transactions by considering other relevant accounting guidance that is within the framework of principles in IFRS and that reflects the economic reality of the transactions. The company’s policy is to record assets and liabilities recognized as a result of transactions between entities under common control at the carrying value on the transferor’s financial statements, and to have the consolidated statements of income (loss), consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), consolidated statements of financial position, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows reflect the results of the combined entities for all periods presented for which the entities were under the transferor’s common control, irrespective of when the combination takes place. Differences between the consideration given and the assets and liabilities received are recorded directly to equity.
(iii) Property, plant and equipment
The accounting policy relating to the company’s property, plant and equipment is described in Note 1(g) – Property, plant and equipment and revaluation method. In applying this policy, judgment is used in determining whether certain costs are additions to the carrying amount of the property, plant and equipment as opposed to repairs and maintenance that are expensed when incurred. If an asset has been developed, judgment is required to identify the point at which the asset is capable of being used as intended and to identify the directly attributable costs to be included in the carrying value of the development asset. The useful lives of property, plant and equipment are determined by independent engineers periodically with an annual review by management.
Annually, the company determines the fair value of its property, plant and equipment using a methodology that it has judged to be reasonable. The methodology for hydroelectric assets is generally a twenty-year discounted cash flow model. Twenty years is the period considered reasonable as the company has twenty-year capital plans and it believes a reasonable third party would be indifferent between extending the cash flows further in the model versus using a discounted terminal value. The methodology for wind, solar and other assets is to align the model length with the expected remaining useful life of the subject assets.
The valuation model incorporates future cash flows from long-term power purchase agreements that are in place where it is determined that the power purchase agreements are linked specifically to the related power generating assets. With respect to estimated future generation that does not incorporate long-term power purchase agreement pricing, the cash flow model uses estimates of future electricity prices using broker quotes from independent sources for the years in which there is a liquid market. The valuation of generation not linked to long-term power purchase agreements also requires the development of a long-term estimate of future electricity prices. In this regard the valuation model uses a discount to the all-in cost of construction with a reasonable return to secure energy from a new renewable resource with a similar generation profile to the asset being valued as the benchmark that will establish the market price for electricity for renewable resources.
The company’s long-term view is anchored to the cost of securing new energy from renewable sources to meet future demand growth by the years 2027 to 2035 in North America, 2030 in Colombia and 2027 in Brazil. The year of new entry is viewed as the point when generators must build additional capacity to maintain system reliability and provide an adequate level of reserve generation with the retirement of older coal-fired plants and rising environmental compliance costs in North America, and overall increasing demand in Colombia and Brazil. For the
North American business, the company has estimated a discount to these new-build renewable asset prices to determine renewable electricity prices for hydroelectric, solar and wind facilities. In Brazil and Colombia, the estimate of future electricity prices is based on a similar approach as applied in North America using a forecast of the all-in cost of development.
Terminal values are included in the valuation of hydroelectric assets in North America and Colombia. For the hydroelectric assets in Brazil, cash flows have been included based on the duration of the authorization or useful life of a concession asset with consideration of a one-time thirty-year renewal on qualifying hydroelectric assets.
Discount rates are determined each year by considering the current interest rates, average market cost of capital as well as the price risk and the geographical location of the operational facilities as judged by management. Inflation rates are also determined by considering the current inflation rates and the expectations of future rates by economists. Operating costs are based on long-term budgets escalated for inflation. Each operational facility has a twenty-year capital plan that it follows to ensure the maximum life of its assets is achieved. Foreign exchange rates are forecasted by using the spot rates and the available forward rates, extrapolated beyond the period available. The inputs described above to the discounted cash flow model require management to consider facts, trends and plans in making its judgments as to what derives a reasonable fair value of its property, plant and equipment.
(iv) Financial instruments
The accounting policy relating to the company’s financial instruments is described in Note 1(l) – Financial instruments. In applying the policy, judgments are made in applying the criteria set out in IFRS 9 to record financial instruments at fair value through profit and loss, fair value through other comprehensive income and the assessments of the effectiveness of hedging relationships.
For power purchase agreements accounted for under IFRS 9 (“IFRS 9 PPAs”) that have unobservable values, Brookfield Renewable determines the fair value of these IFRS 9 PPAs using a discounted cash flow model based on the term of the contract and applies judgements surrounding the inputs used within the valuation model. The valuation model incorporates various inputs and assumptions including future power prices, contractual prices, contractual volumes and discount rates. Future power prices are based on broker quotes from independent sources and for IFRS 9 PPAs with no available broker quotes, future fuel driven merchant prices are incorporated within the model. Contractual prices are stipulated within each individual agreement, contractual volumes are either specified within the agreement or determined using future generation of the power generating assets and discount rate used in the valuation model is the credit adjusted risk free rate.
(v) Deferred income taxes
The accounting policy relating to the company’s income taxes is described in Note 1(n) – Income taxes. In applying this policy, judgments are made in determining the probability of whether deductions, tax credits and tax losses can be utilized.
(vi) Earnings per share
The company‘s basic and diluted earnings per share have not been presented in the consolidated financial statements. Exchangeable and class B shares are classified as financial liabilities, while class C shares are classified as financial liabilities, but presented as equity instruments given the narrow scope presentation exceptions existing in IAS 32. As each share classification represents a financial liability, they do not constitute ordinary shares. Refer to the aforementioned notes for further details.
(t) Recently adopted accounting standards
International Tax Reform - Amendments to IAS 12 - Pillar Two model rules
In May 2023, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 12 “Income Taxes” to give entities temporary mandatory relief from accounting for deferred taxes arising from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Developments (“OECD”) international tax reform. The amendments are effective immediately upon their issue and retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors,” except for some targeted disclosure requirements which become effective for annual reporting periods on or after January 1, 2023. The company operates in countries which have enacted new legislation to implement the global minimum top-up tax. The company has applied the temporary mandatory relief from recognizing and disclosing information related to the top-up tax and will account for it as a current tax when it is incurred. The newly enacted legislation is effective from January 1, 2024 and there is no current tax impact for the year ended December 31, 2023. The global minimum top-up tax is not anticipated to have a significant impact on the financial position of the company.
(s) Future changes in accounting policies
Amendments to IAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements (“IAS 1”)
The amendments clarify how to classify debt and other liabilities as current or non-current. The amendments to IAS 1 apply to annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024. The company is currently assessing the impact of these amendments.
There are currently no other future changes to IFRS with potential impact on the company.
2. PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES
The following table lists the subsidiaries of the company which significantly affect its financial position and results of operations as at December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization | | Percentage of voting securities owned or controlled (%) |
| BP Brazil US Subco LLC | Delaware | | 100 |
| | | |
| | | |
| Brookfield Power US Holding America Co. | Delaware | | 100 |
Isagen S.A. E.S.P.(1) | Colombia | | 99.70 |
TerraForm Power Parent, LLC(1) | New York | | 100.00 |
(1)Voting control held, in whole or in part, through voting agreements with Brookfield.
3. ACQUISITIONS
The following investments were accounted for using the acquisition method, and the results of operations have been included in the audited annual consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
Brazil Wind Portfolio
On March 3, 2023, the company, together with its institutional partners, completed the acquisition of 100% interest in a 136 MW portfolio of wind assets in Brazil. The total purchase price of this acquisition was $95 million (approximately $21 million net to the company), comprising of closing consideration, including working capital and closing adjustments of $90 million (approximately $20 million net to the Company) plus $5 million of deferred consideration (approximately $1 million net to the Company). The company holds an approximately 22.5% economic interest. The total transaction costs related to the acquisition were less than $1 million and have been classified under Other in the consolidated statement of income (loss). If the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the year, the revenue from the Brazil Wind Portfolio would have been $24 million for the year ending December 31, 2023.
U.S. Renewable Portfolio
On October 25 2023, the company, together with its institutional partners, completed the acquisition of a 100% interest in a fully integrated developer and operator of renewable power assets in the United States with 5,900 MW of operating and under construction assets, with a 6,100 MW development pipeline for $1,083 million (approximately $308 million net to the company) $565 million (approximately $161 million net to the company) plus $518 million of deferred consideration (approximately $147 million net to the company). Total fair value of net assets acquired, net of non-controlling interest was $1,453 million. The total transaction costs related to the acquisition were $6 million (approximately $2 million net to the Company) and have been classified under Other in the consolidated statement of income (loss). If the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the year, the revenue from the U.S. Distributed Generation Portfolio would have been $401 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Brazil Wind Portfolio
On November 6, 2023, the company, together with its institutional partners, completed the acquisition of a 100% interest in a 60 MW portfolio of operating wind assets in Brazil for total consideration of R$113 million ($23 million) ( R$25 million ($5 million) net to the company) and have been classified under Other in the consolidated statement of income (loss). The company holds an approximately 22.5% economic interest. The total transaction costs related to the acquisition were less than $1 million. If the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the year, the revenue from the Brazil Wind Portfolio would have been $9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
The purchase price allocations, at fair value, as at December 31, 2023, with respect to the acquisitions are as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Brazil Wind Portfolio | | U.S. Renewable Portfolio(1) | | Brazil Wind Portfolio(1) | | Total |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10 | | | $ | 88 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 99 | |
| Restricted cash | — | | | 111 | | | — | | | 111 | |
| Trade receivables and other current assets | 9 | | | 127 | | | 4 | | | 140 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 130 | | | 3,937 | | | 40 | | | 4,107 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Financial instruments assets | — | | | 38 | | | — | | | 38 | |
| Equity accounted investments | — | | | 36 | | | — | | | 36 | |
| Other non-current assets | 19 | | | 54 | | | 5 | | | 78 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (22) | | | (88) | | | (2) | | | (112) | |
| Current portion of non-recourse borrowings | (4) | | | (187) | | | (2) | | | (193) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Financial instruments liabilities | — | | | (1,037) | | | — | | | (1,037) | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | (45) | | | (905) | | | (17) | | | (967) | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | — | | | (29) | | | — | | | (29) | |
| Provisions | (2) | | | (219) | | | — | | | (221) | |
| Other long-term liabilities | — | | | (130) | | | (6) | | | (136) | |
| Fair value of net assets acquired | 95 | | | 1,796 | | | 23 | | | 1,914 | |
| Non-controlling interests | — | | | (343) | | | — | | | (343) | |
| Total fair value of net assets acquired including goodwill, net of non-controlling interests | $ | 95 | | | $ | 1,453 | | | $ | 23 | | | $ | 1,571 | |
| | | | | | | |
(1)The purchase price allocation is preliminary as at December 31, 2023. Brookfield Renewable is currently assessing the fair value of Property, plant and equipment, Financial instruments, Provisions and Deferred tax, Non-recourse borrowings, Other long-term liabilities and Goodwill for the purchase price allocation and expect to finalize the balances in 2024 within the one year measurement period. Refer to Note 7 - Other income for more details.
Completed in 2022
The following investments were accounted for using the acquisition method, and the results of operations have been included in the audited annual consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
California Resources Corporation
On August 3, 2022, the company, together with its institutional partners, formed a joint venture with California Resources Corporation (“CRC”) to establish a Carbon Management Business that will develop carbon capture and storage in California. The company, together with its institutional partners, has committed to invest up to $500 million to fund the development of identified carbon capture and storage projects in California. This includes an initial investment of approximately $137 million, of which $48 million was deployed during the year ended December 31, 2022, which includes a put option that offers strong downside protection at a pre-determined rate of return. The company holds an approximate 10% economic interest.
4. DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
On March 17, 2023, the company’s institutional partners completed the sale of a 78% interest in a 378 MW operating hydroelectric portfolio in the U.S., of which 28% was sold to affiliates of Brookfield Corporation. The company retained its 22% interest in the investment and accordingly, did not receive proceeds from the sale. Subsequent to the completion of the sale, the company no longer consolidates this investment and recognized its interest as an equity-accounted investment. As a result of the disposition, the company derecognized $667 million of total assets and $191 million of total liabilities from the consolidated statements of financial positions. The company’s post-tax portion of the accumulated revaluation surplus of $34 million was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income directly to equity and presented as a Disposals item in the consolidated statements of changes in equity.
On September 20, 2023, the company, together with its institutional partners completed the sale of its 100% interest in a 95 MW portfolio of wind assets in Uruguay for proceeds of approximately $112 million ($29 million net to the company) net of transaction fees. As a result of the disposition, the company derecognized $238 million of total assets and $193 million of total liabilities from the consolidated statements of financial position. As a result of the disposition, accumulated other comprehensive income of $5 million was reclassified to profit and loss. This resulted in a gain on disposition of $72 million ($18 million net to the company) recognized within Other income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
5. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
RISK MANAGEMENT
The company’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks, including market risk (i.e., commodity price risk, interest rate risk, and foreign currency risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The company uses financial instruments primarily to manage these risks.
The sensitivity analysis discussed below reflects the risks associated with instruments that the company considers are market sensitive and the potential loss resulting from one or more selected hypothetical changes. Therefore, the discussion below is not intended to fully reflect the company’s risk exposure.
(a)Market risk
Market risk is defined for these purposes as the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument held by the company will fluctuate because of changes in market prices.
The company faces market risk from foreign currency assets and liabilities, the impact of changes in interest rates, and floating rate liabilities. Market risk is managed by funding assets with financial liabilities in the same currency and with similar interest rate characteristics and holding financial contracts, such as interest rate swaps and foreign exchange contracts, to minimize residual exposures. Financial instruments held by the company that are subject to market risk include borrowings and financial instruments, such as interest rate, currency and commodity contracts. The categories of financial instruments that can give rise to significant variability are described below:
(i)Electricity price risk
The company aims to sell electricity under long-term contracts to secure stable prices and mitigate its exposure to wholesale markets. Electricity price risk arises from the sale of the company’s uncontracted generation and is mitigated by entering into short-term energy derivative contracts. Electricity price risk is defined for these purposes as the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument held by the company will fluctuate because of changes in electricity prices.
The table below summarizes the impact of changes in the market price of electricity as at December 31. The impact is expressed in terms of the effect on net income and OCI. The sensitivities are based on the assumption that the market price changes by 5% with all other variables held constant.
Impact of a 5% change in the market price of electricity, on outstanding energy derivative contracts and IFRS 9 PPAs, for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Effect on net income(1) | | Effect on OCI(1) |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| 5% increase | $ | (24) | | | $ | (30) | | | $ | (34) | | | $ | (23) | | | $ | (34) | | | $ | (20) | |
| 5% decrease | 24 | | | 30 | | | 34 | | | 23 | | | 34 | | | 20 | |
(1)Amounts represent the potential annual net pretax impact.
(ii)Foreign currency risk
Foreign currency risk is defined for these purposes as the risk that the fair value of a financial instrument held by the company will fluctuate because of changes in foreign currency rates.
The company has exposure to the Canadian dollar, euro, Brazilian real, and Colombian peso through its investments in foreign operations. Consequently, fluctuations in the U.S. dollar exchange rate against these currencies increase the volatility of net income and other comprehensive income. The company holds foreign currency contracts primarily to mitigate this exposure.
The table below summarizes the impact to the company’s financial instruments of changes in the exchange rate as at December 31. The impact is expressed in terms of the effect on income and OCI. The sensitivities are based on the assumption that the currency exchange rate changes by five percent with all other variables held constant.
Impact of a 5% change in U.S. dollar exchange rates, on outstanding foreign exchange swaps, for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Effect on net income(1) | | Effect on OCI(1) |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| 5% increase | $ | 18 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | 21 | | | $ | 163 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 29 | |
| 5% decrease | (18) | | | (18) | | | (21) | | | (163) | | | (44) | | | (29) | |
(1)Amounts represent the potential annual net pretax impact.
(iii)Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is defined for these purposes as the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument held by the company will fluctuate, because of changes in interest rates.
The company’s assets largely consist of long duration physical assets. The company’s financial liabilities consist primarily of long-term fixed-rate debt or variable-rate debt that has been swapped to fixed rates with interest rate financial instruments. All non-derivative financial liabilities are recorded at their amortized cost. The company also holds interest rate contracts to lock-in fixed rates on certain anticipated future debt issuances.
The company will enter into interest rate swaps designed to minimize the exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its variable-rate debt. Fluctuations in interest rates could impact the company’s cash flows, primarily with respect to the interest payable against the company’s variable rate debt, which is limited to certain non-recourse borrowings with a total principal value of $7,766 million (2022: $5,979 million). Of this principal value, $3,423 million (2022: $2,561
million) has been fixed through the use of interest rate contracts. The fair values of the recognized asset and liability for the interest rate swaps were calculated using a valuation model with observable interest rates.
The table below summarizes the impact of changes in the interest rate as at December 31. The impact is expressed in terms of the effect on income and OCI. The sensitivities are based on the assumption that the interest rate changes by 1% with all other variables held constant.
Impact of a 1% change in interest rates, on outstanding interest rate swaps, variable rate debt and tax equity, for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Effect on net income(1) | | Effect on OCI(1) |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| 1% increase | $ | (91) | | | $ | (10) | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 90 | | | $ | 111 | |
| 1% decrease | 92 | | | 10 | | | (11) | | | (95) | | | (95) | | | (121) | |
(1)Amounts represent the potential annual net pretax impact.
(b)Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of a borrower or counterparty to fulfill its contractual obligations. The company’s exposure to credit risk in respect of financial instruments relates primarily to counterparty obligations regarding energy contracts, interest rate swaps, forward foreign exchange contracts and physical electricity transactions.
The company minimizes credit risk with counterparties through the selection, monitoring and diversification of counterparties, and the use of standard trading contracts, and other credit risk mitigation techniques. In addition, the company’s power purchase agreements are reviewed regularly and the majority are with customers having long standing credit histories or investment grade ratings, which limit the risk of non-collection. See Note 21 – Trade receivables and other current assets, for additional details regarding the company’s trade receivables balance.
The maximum credit exposure at December 31 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Trade receivables and other short-term receivables | $ | 645 | | | $ | 647 | |
Financial instrument assets(1) | 254 | | | 292 | |
Due from related parties(1) | 1,436 | | | 624 | |
| Long-term receivables | $ | 110 | | | $ | 38 | |
| $ | 2,445 | | | $ | 1,601 | |
(1)Includes both the current and long-term amounts.
(c)Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the company cannot meet a demand for cash or fund an obligation when due. Liquidity risk is mitigated by the company’s cash and cash equivalent balances and its access to undrawn credit facilities. Details of the available portion of credit facilities are included in Note 13 – Borrowings. The company also ensures that it has access to public capital markets and maintains a strong investment grade credit rating.
The company is also subject to the risk associated with debt financing. This risk is mitigated by the long-term duration of debt instruments and the staggered maturity dates over an extended period of time.
CASH OBLIGATIONS
The table below classifies the cash obligations related to the company’s liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period from the statement of financial position dates to the contractual maturity date. As the amounts are the contractual undiscounted cash flows (gross of unamortized financing fees and accumulated amortization, where applicable), they may not agree with the amounts disclosed in the consolidated statements of financial position.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2023
(MILLIONS) | < 1 year | | 2-5 years | | > 5 years | | Total |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 624 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 624 | |
Financial instrument liabilities(1) | 305 | | | 609 | | | 646 | | | 1,560 | |
Due to related parties(1) | 456 | | | — | | | — | | | 456 | |
Other long-term liabilities – concession payments | 1 | | | 4 | | | 11 | | | 16 | |
Lease liabilities(1) | 31 | | | 235 | | | 235 | | | 501 | |
Non-recourse borrowings(1) | 1,891 | | | 6,363 | | | 7,963 | | | 16,217 | |
Interest payable on borrowings(2) | 1,097 | | | 3,189 | | | 2,491 | | | 6,777 | |
| Total | $ | 4,405 | | | $ | 10,400 | | | $ | 11,346 | | | $ | 26,151 | |
| | | | | | | |
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2022
(MILLIONS) | < 1 year | | 2-5 years | | > 5 years | | Total |
| Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and provisions | $ | 621 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 621 | |
Financial instrument liabilities(1) | 270 | | | 403 | | | 175 | | | 848 | |
Due to related parties(1) | 464 | | | — | | | — | | | 464 | |
Other long-term liabilities – concession payments | 1 | | | 6 | | | 20 | | | 27 | |
Lease liabilities(1) | 26 | | | 60 | | | 278 | | | 364 | |
Non-recourse borrowings(1) | 1,299 | | | 4,122 | | | 8,359 | | | 13,780 | |
Interest payable on borrowings(2) | 813 | | | 2,711 | | | 2,361 | | | 5,885 | |
| Total | $ | 3,494 | | | $ | 7,302 | | | $ | 11,193 | | | $ | 21,989 | |
(1)Includes both the current and long-term amounts.
(2)Represents aggregate interest payable expected to be paid over the entire term of the obligations, if held to maturity. Variable rate interest payments have been calculations based on estimated interest rates.
Fair value disclosures
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Fair values determined using valuation models require the use of assumptions concerning the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and discount rates. In determining those assumptions, management looks primarily to external readily observable market inputs such as interest rate yield curves, currency rates, commodity prices and, as applicable, credit spreads.
A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset is the consideration that would be received in an orderly transaction between market participants, considering the highest and best use of the asset.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized into one of three hierarchy levels, described below. Each level is based on the transparency of the inputs used to measure the fair values of assets and liabilities.
Level 1 – inputs are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2 – inputs, other than quoted prices in Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3 – inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data.
The following table presents the company’s assets and liabilities including energy derivative contracts, power purchase agreements accounted for under IFRS 9 (“IFRS 9 PPAs”), interest rate swaps, foreign exchange swaps and tax equity measured and disclosed at fair value classified by the fair value hierarchy as at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Assets measured at fair value: | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 627 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 627 | | | $ | 642 | |
Restricted cash(1) | 202 | | | — | | | — | | | 202 | | | 68 | |
Financial instrument assets(1) | | | | | | | | | |
| IFRS 9 PPAs | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | 9 | | | 1 | |
| Energy derivative contracts | — | | | 86 | | | — | | | 86 | | | 33 | |
| Interest rate swaps | — | | | 159 | | | — | | | 159 | | | 261 | |
| Foreign exchange swaps | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Investments in equity securities | — | | | — | | | 171 | | | 171 | | | 292 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | — | | | — | | | 44,038 | | | 44,038 | | | 37,828 | |
| Liabilities measured at fair value: | | | | | | | | | |
Financial instrument liabilities(1) | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 9 PPAs(2) | — | | | (56) | | | (444) | | | (500) | | | (189) | |
| Energy derivative contracts | — | | | (74) | | | — | | | (74) | | | (231) | |
| Interest rate swaps | — | | | (24) | | | — | | | (24) | | | (14) | |
| Foreign exchange swaps | — | | | (284) | | | — | | | (284) | | | (61) | |
| Tax equity | — | | | — | | | (935) | | | (935) | | | (353) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Liabilities for which fair value is disclosed: | | | | | | | | | |
BEPC exchangeable and class B shares(3) | (4,721) | | | — | | | — | | | (4,721) | | | (4,364) | |
Non-recourse borrowing(1) | (1,793) | | | (14,450) | | | — | | | (16,243) | | | (12,847) | |
| Total | $ | (5,685) | | | $ | (14,643) | | | $ | 42,839 | | | $ | 22,511 | | | $ | 21,066 | |
(1)Includes both the current amount and long-term amounts.
(2)During the year ended December 31, 2023, $56 million (2022: nil) was transferred to Level 3 to Level 2.
(3)BEPC class C shares are also classified as financial liabilities due to their cash redemption feature. As discussed in Note 15 – BEPC Exchangeable shares, BEPC Class B shares and BEPC Class C shares, the BEPC class C shares meet certain qualifying criteria and are presented as equity.
Financial instruments disclosures
Financial assets and liabilities are offset with the net amount reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, where the company currently has a legally enforceable right to offset and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. The aggregate amount of our company’s net financial instrument positions as at December 31 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial Instruments Assets | | Financial Instruments Liabilities | |
| | | | Instruments not designated as hedges | | | | | | Instruments not designated as hedges | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | | Instruments designated as hedges | | Fair value through profit & loss | | Fair value through OCI | | Total | | Instruments designated as hedges | | Fair value through profit & loss | | Fair value through OCI | | Total | Net Assets
(Liabilities) |
| IFRS 9 PPAs | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (94) | | | $ | (95) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (189) | | $ | (188) | |
| Energy derivative contracts | | 12 | | | 21 | | | — | | | 33 | | | (37) | | | (194) | | | — | | | (231) | | (198) | |
| Interest rate swaps | | 222 | | | 39 | | | — | | | 261 | | | (14) | | | — | | | — | | | (14) | | 247 | |
| Foreign exchange swaps | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (52) | | | (9) | | | — | | | (61) | | (61) | |
| Investments in debt and equity securities | | — | | | — | | | 292 | | | 292 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 292 | |
| Tax equity | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (353) | | | — | | | (353) | | (353) | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2022 | | $ | 234 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 292 | | | $ | 587 | | | $ | (197) | | | $ | (651) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (848) | | $ | (261) | |
| Less: current portion | | | | | | | | (106) | | | | | | | | | 270 | | 164 | |
| Long-term portion | | | | | | | | $ | 481 | | | | | | | | | $ | (578) | | $ | (97) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| IFRS 9 PPAs | | $ | — | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | (40) | | | $ | (460) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (500) | | $ | (491) | |
| Energy derivative contracts | | 102 | | | (16) | | | — | | | 86 | | | — | | | (74) | | | — | | | (74) | | 12 | |
| Interest rate swaps | | 123 | | | 36 | | | — | | | 159 | | | (21) | | | (3) | | | — | | | (24) | | 135 | |
| Foreign exchange swaps | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (268) | | | (16) | | | — | | | (284) | | (284) | |
| Investments in debt and equity securities | | — | | | — | | | 171 | | | 171 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 171 | |
| Tax equity | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (935) | | | — | | | (935) | | (935) | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2023 | | $ | 225 | | | $ | 29 | | | $ | 171 | | | $ | 425 | | | $ | (329) | | | $ | (1,488) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,817) | | $ | (1,392) | |
| Less: current portion | | | | | | | | (124) | | | | | | | | | 441 | | 317 | |
| Long-term portion | | | | | | | | $ | 301 | | | | | | | | | $ | (1,376) | | $ | (1,075) | |
The following table presents the change in the company’s total net financial instrument asset position as at and for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | | Balance as at December 31, 2022 asset (liability) | | Changes in fair value recognized in OCI(1) | | Changes in fair value (hedge ineffectiveness)(2) | | Changes in fair value on financial instruments through profit and loss(2) | | Amounts reclassified from OCI to income | | Acquisitions, settlements and other | | Foreign exchange gain (loss) | | Balance as at December 31, 2023 asset (liability) |
IFRS 9 PPAs(3) | | $ | (188) | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | (9) | | | $ | (32) | | | $ | 13 | | | $ | (292) | | | $ | ��� | | | $ | (491) | |
| Energy derivative contracts | | (198) | | | 220 | | | (2) | | | 92 | | | (110) | | | 10 | | | — | | | 12 | |
| Interest rate swaps | | 247 | | | (7) | | | — | | | 22 | | | (110) | | | (14) | | | (3) | | | 135 | |
| Foreign exchange swaps | | (61) | | | (131) | | | — | | | 2 | | | — | | | (94) | | | — | | | (284) | |
| Investments in debt and equity securities | | 296 | | | — | | | — | | | 11 | | | — | | | (136) | | | — | | | 171 | |
| Tax equity | | (353) | | | — | | | — | | | 94 | | | — | | | (676) | | | — | | | (935) | |
| | $ | (257) | | | $ | 99 | | | $ | (11) | | | $ | 189 | | | $ | (207) | | | $ | (1,202) | | | $ | (3) | | | $ | (1,392) | |
(1)Amounts recognized in Equity-accounted investments, Gains (losses) arising during the year on financial instruments designated as cash-flow hedges and Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign exchange swaps – net investment hedge on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
(2)Amounts recognized in Foreign exchange and financial instruments gain (loss) on the consolidated statements of income (loss) excluding realized gains and losses recorded on foreign exchange.
(3)Level 3 power purchase agreements accounted for as energy derivatives that are either designated as a hedge or not designated as a hedge.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | | Balance as at December 31, 2021 asset (liability) | | Changes in fair value recognized in OCI(1) | | Changes in fair value (hedge ineffectiveness)(2) | | Changes in fair value on derivatives not designated in hedge relationships(2) | | Amounts reclassified from OCI to income | | Acquisitions, settlements and other | | Foreign exchange gain (loss) | | Balance as at December 31, 2022 asset (liability) |
IFRS 9 PPAs(3) | | $ | (29) | | | $ | (75) | | | $ | (13) | | | $ | (111) | | | $ | 22 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (188) | |
| Energy derivative contracts | | (132) | | | (117) | | | 2 | | | (132) | | | 142 | | | 39 | | | — | | | (198) | |
| Interest rate swaps | | (63) | | | 260 | | | (1) | | | 38 | | | 5 | | | 14 | | | (6) | | | 247 | |
| Foreign exchange swaps | | 25 | | | (78) | | | — | | | 87 | | | — | | | (95) | | | — | | | (61) | |
| Investments in debt and equity securities | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4 | | | — | | | 292 | | | — | | | 296 | |
| Tax equity | | (455) | | | — | | | — | | | 83 | | | — | | | 19 | | | — | | | (353) | |
| | $ | (654) | | | $ | (10) | | | $ | (12) | | | $ | (31) | | | $ | 169 | | | $ | 287 | | | $ | (6) | | | $ | (257) | |
(1)Amounts recognized in Equity-accounted investments, Gains (losses) arising during the year on financial instruments designated as cash-flow hedges and Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign exchange swaps – net investment hedge on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
(2)Amounts recognized in Foreign exchange and financial instruments gain (loss) on the consolidated statements of income (loss) excluding realized gains and losses recorded on foreign exchange.
(3)Level 3 power purchase agreements accounted for as energy derivatives that are either designated as a hedge or not designated as a hedge.
(a)Tax equity
The company owns and operates certain projects in the United States under tax equity structures to finance the construction of solar and wind projects. In accordance with the substance of the contractual agreements, the amounts paid by the tax equity investors for their equity stakes are classified as financial instrument liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial position.
Gain or loss on the tax equity liabilities are recognized within foreign exchange and financial instruments (loss) gain in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
(b)Energy derivative contracts and IFRS 9 PPAs
The company has entered into long-term energy derivative contracts primarily to stabilize or eliminate the price risk on the sale of certain future power generation. Certain energy contracts are recorded in the company’s consolidated financial statements at an amount equal to fair value, using quoted market prices or, in their absence, a valuation model using both internal and third-party evidence and forecasts.
There is an economic relationship between the hedged items and the hedging instruments as the terms of the energy derivative contracts match the terms of the expected highly probable forecast transactions (i.e. notional amount and expected payment date). The company has established a hedge ratio of 1:1 for the hedging relationship. To measure the hedge effectiveness, the company uses the hypothetical derivative method and compares changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments against the changes in fair value of the hedged items attributable to the hedged risks. The hedge ineffectiveness can arise from different indexes (and accordingly different curves) linked to the hedged risk of the hedged items and hedging instruments.
Certain subsidiaries that the company controls, through a voting agreement, have entered into agreements appointing the partnership as their agent in entering into certain derivative transactions with external counterparties. Pursuant to each Agreement, the partnership was entitled to be reimbursed for any third party costs incurred in connection with these derivative transactions. Substantially all of the company’s energy contract derivatives are entered into pursuant to these agreements. Upon the closing of the Energy Marketing Internalization on April 1, 2021, all power agency agreements were transferred by the partnership to the company. Refer to Note 27 - Related party transactions for more details.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, loss of $119 million relating to energy derivative contracts were realized and reclassified from OCI to the consolidated statements of income (loss) (2022: $146 million loss and 2021: $32 million gains).
Based on market prices as of December 31, 2023, unrealized losses of $48 million (2022: $37 million loss and 2021: $72 million loss) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) on energy derivative contracts are expected to be settled or reclassified into income in the next twelve months. The actual amount reclassified from AOCI, however, could vary due to future changes in market prices.
The following table summarizes the energy derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Energy derivative contracts and IFRS 9 PPAs | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| Carrying amount (asset/(liability)) | 62 | | | (118) | |
| | | |
| Notional amount – GWh | 10,884 | | | 13,674 | |
| Weighted average hedged rate for the year ($/MWh) | 58 | | | 58 | |
| Maturity dates | 2024-2033 | | 2023-2033 |
| Hedge ratio | 1:1 | | 1:1 |
| Change in discounted spot value of outstanding hedging instruments | 97 | | | (90) | |
| Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness | (172) | | | 64 | |
There is $1 million of hedge ineffectiveness losses recognized in foreign exchange and financial instruments gain (loss) in the consolidated statements of income (loss) related to energy derivative contracts (cash flow hedges) for the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022: $18 million gains and 2021: $7 million gains).
(c)Interest rate hedges
The company has entered into interest rate hedge contracts primarily to minimize exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its variable rate debt or to lock in interest rates on future debt refinancing. All interest rate hedge contracts are recorded in the consolidated financial statements at fair value.
There is an economic relationship between the hedged items and the hedging instruments as the terms of the interest rate hedges match the terms of the respective fixed rate loans (i.e., notional amount, maturity, payment and reset dates). The company established a hedge ratio of 1:1 for the hedging relationship. To measure the hedge effectiveness, the company uses the hypothetical derivative method and compares the changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument against the changes in fair value of the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk.
The hedge ineffectiveness can arise from:
•Different interest rate curves being applied to discount the hedged item and hedging instrument
•Differences in timing of cash flows of the hedged item and hedging instrument
•The counterparties’ credit risk having an asymmetrical impact on the fair value movements of the hedging instrument and hedged item
At December 31, 2023, agreements with a total notional exposure of $3,052 million were outstanding (2022: $2,569 million) including $499 million (2022: $325 million) associated with agreements that are not formally designated as hedging instruments. The weighted-average fixed interest rate resulting from these agreements is 2.9% (2022: 2.6%).
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net movements relating to cash flow hedges realized and reclassified from OCI to interest expense in the consolidated statements of income (loss) were $3 million losses (2022: $2 million losses and 2021: $11 million losses).
Based on market prices as of December 31, 2023, unrealized losses of $37 million (2022: $41 million and 2021: $32 million) recorded in AOCI on interest rate swaps are expected to be settled or reclassified into income in the next twelve months. The actual amount reclassified from AOCI, however, could vary due to future changes in market rates.
The following table summarizes the interest rate hedges designated as hedging instruments:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest rate hedges | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| Carrying amount (asset/(liability)) | 102 | | | 208 | |
| Notional amount – $ | 1,029 | | | 640 | |
Notional amount – COP(1) | 196 | | | 157 | |
Notional amount – C$(1) | 124 | | | 132 | |
Notional amount – €(1) | 1,204 | | | 1,315 | |
| Maturity dates | 2024-2048 | | 2023-2048 |
| Hedge ratio | 1:1 | | 1:1 |
| Change in discounted spot value of outstanding hedging instruments | (101) | | | 259 | |
| Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness | 101 | | | (260) | |
(1)Notional amounts of foreign currency denominated interest rate hedges are presented at the U.S. dollar equivalent value based on the December 31, 2023 foreign currency spot rate
The hedge ineffectiveness gains recognized within foreign exchange and financial instrument gain (loss) in the consolidated statements of income (loss) related to interest rate contracts (cash flow hedges) for the year ended December 31, 2023 was nil (2022: $1 million and 2021: $(3) million).
(d)Foreign exchange swaps
The company has entered into foreign exchange swaps to minimize its exposure to currency fluctuations impacting its investments and earnings in foreign operations, and to fix the exchange rate on certain anticipated transactions denominated in foreign currencies.
There is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument as the net investment or anticipated foreign currency transaction creates a translation risk that will match the respective hedging instrument. The company established a hedge ratio of 1:1 as the underlying risk of the hedging instrument is identical to the hedged risk component.
Certain Brookfield subsidiaries that the company controls, through a voting agreement, have entered into Master Hedge Agreements appointing Brookfield as their agent in entering into certain derivative transactions with external counterparties to hedge against fluctuations in foreign exchange. Pursuant to each Agreement, Brookfield was entitled to be reimbursed for any third party costs incurred in connection with these derivative transactions. Substantially all of the company’s foreign exchange swaps are entered into pursuant to a Master Hedge Agreement.
At December 31, 2023, agreements with a total notional exposure of $3,769 million were outstanding (2022: $2,536 million) including $363 million (2022: $1,641 million) associated with agreements that are not formally designated as hedging instruments.
There are no unrealized gains or losses recorded in AOCI on foreign exchange swaps that are expected to be settled or reclassified into income in the next twelve months (2022: nil and 2021: nil). The actual amount reclassified from AOCI, however, could vary due to future changes in market rates.
The following table summarizes the foreign exchange swaps designated as hedging instruments:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange swaps | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| Carrying amount (asset/(liability)) | (268) | | | (51) | |
Notional amount for hedges of the Colombian Peso(1) | 2,602 | | | 302 | |
Notional amount for hedges of the Euro(1) | 530 | | | 514 | |
Notional amount for hedges of the Brazilian real(1) | 274 | | | 79 | |
| | | |
| Maturity date | 2024 - 2025 | | 2023 - 2024 |
| Hedge ratio | 1:1 | | 1:1 |
| Weighted average hedged rate for the year: | | | |
| COP/$ foreign exchange forward contracts | 4,642 | | | 5,038 | |
| €/$ foreign exchange forward contracts | 1.00 | | | 1.00 | |
| BRL/$ foreign exchange forward contracts | 5.00 | | | 5.69 | |
(1)Notional amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars
6. SEGMENTED INFORMATION
The company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (collectively, the chief operating decision maker or “CODM”) review the results of the operations, manage the operations, and allocate resources based on the type of technology, in conjunction with other segments of Brookfield Renewable.
The operations of the company are segmented by – 1) hydroelectric, 2) wind, 3) utility-scale solar, 4) distributed energy & sustainable solutions (distributed generation, pumped storage, carbon capture and storage, cogeneration and biomass) and 5) corporate. This best reflects the way in which the CODM reviews the results of the company.
In accordance with IFRS 8, Operating Segments, the company discloses information about its reportable segments based upon the measures used by the CODM in assessing performance. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1 – Basis of presentation and material accounting policy information.
Reporting to the CODM on the measures utilized to assess performance and allocate resources is provided on a proportionate basis. Information on a proportionate basis reflects the company’s share from facilities which it accounts for using consolidation and the equity method whereby the company either controls or exercises significant influence or joint control over the investment, respectively. Proportionate information provides shareholders perspective that the CODM considers important when performing internal analyses and making strategic and operating decisions. The CODM also believes that providing proportionate information helps investors understand the impacts of decisions made by management and financial results allocable to the company’s shareholders.
Proportionate financial information is not, and is not intended to be, presented in accordance with IFRS. Tables reconciling IFRS data with data presented on a proportionate consolidation basis have been disclosed below. Segment revenues, other income, direct operating costs, interest expense, depreciation, current and deferred income taxes, and other are items that will differ from results presented in accordance with IFRS as these items include the company’s proportionate share of earnings from equity-accounted investments attributable to each of the above-noted items, and exclude the proportionate share of earnings (loss) of consolidated investments not held by the company apportioned to each of the above-noted items.
The company does not control those entities that have not been consolidated and as such, have been presented as equity-accounted investments in its consolidated financial statements. The presentation of the assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses does not represent the company’s legal claim to such items, and the removal of financial statement amounts that are attributable to non-controlling interests does not extinguish the company’s legal claims or exposures to such items.
The company reports its results in accordance with these segments and presents prior period segmented information in a consistent manner.
The company analyzes the performance of its operating segments based on Funds From Operations. Funds From Operations is not a generally accepted accounting measure under IFRS and therefore may differ from definitions of Funds From Operations used by other entities, as well as the definition of funds from operations used by the Real Property Association of Canada (“REALPAC”) and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”).
The company uses Funds From Operations to assess the performance of the company before the effects of certain cash items (e.g., acquisition costs and other typical non-recurring cash items) and certain non-cash items (e.g., deferred income taxes, depreciation, non-cash portion of non-controlling interests, unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments, non-cash gain or loss from equity-accounted investments, and other non-cash items) as these are not reflective of the performance of the underlying business. The company includes realized disposition gains and losses on assets that we developed and/or did not intend to hold over the long-term within Funds From Operations in order to provide additional insight regarding the performance of investments on a cumulative realized basis, including any unrealized fair value adjustments that were recorded in equity and not otherwise reflected in current period net income.
The following table provides each segment’s results in the format that management organizes its segments to make operating decisions and assess performance and reconciles the company’s proportionate results to the consolidated statements of income (loss) on a line-by-line basis by aggregating the components comprising the earnings from the company’s investments in associates and reflecting the portion of each line item attributable to non-controlling interests for the year ended December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Attributable to the partnership | | Contribution from equity-accounted investments | | Attributable to non-controlling interests and other(1) | | As per IFRS financials(2) |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total | |
| Revenues | $ | 1,212 | | | $ | 152 | | | $ | 165 | | | $ | 125 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,654 | | | $ | (47) | | | $ | 2,360 | | | $ | 3,967 | |
| Other income | 51 | | | 33 | | | 23 | | | 18 | | | 21 | | | 146 | | | (13) | | | 451 | | | 584 | |
| Direct operating costs | (476) | | | (47) | | | (42) | | | (42) | | | (6) | | | (613) | | | 22 | | | (875) | | | (1,466) | |
| Share of revenue, other income and direct operating costs from equity-accounted investments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 38 | | | — | | | 38 | |
| 787 | | | 138 | | | 146 | | | 101 | | | 15 | | | 1,187 | | | — | | | 1,936 | | | |
| Management service costs | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (88) | | | (88) | | | — | | | — | | | (88) | |
Interest expense(1) | (261) | | | (28) | | | (50) | | | (21) | | | 3 | | | (357) | | | 8 | | | (668) | | | (1,017) | |
| Current income taxes | (22) | | | (2) | | | (2) | | | — | | | — | | | (26) | | | — | | | (87) | | | (113) | |
| Share of interest and cash taxes from equity-accounted investments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | — | | | (8) | |
| Share of Funds From Operations attributable to non-controlling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,181) | | | (1,181) | |
| Funds From Operations | 504 | | | 108 | | | 94 | | | 80 | | | (70) | | | 716 | | | — | | | — | | | |
| Depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,342) | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instrument gain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 159 | |
| Deferred income tax recovery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 40 | |
| Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (61) | |
Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (241) | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (106) | |
| Share of loss from equity-accounted investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (38) | |
| Net income attributable to non-controlling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 692 | |
| Net loss attributable to the partnership | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (181) | |
(1)Amounts attributable to non-controlling interests and other includes certain non-recurring other income items. Refer to Note 7 - Other Income.
(2) Share of loss from equity-accounted investments of $8 million is comprised of amounts found on the Share of revenue, other income and direct operating costs, Share of interest and cash taxes and Share of earnings lines. Net income attributable to participating non-controlling interests of $489 million is comprised of amounts found on Share of Funds From Operations attributable to non-controlling interests and Net Income attributable to non-controlling interests. Total interest expense of $1,258 million is comprised of amounts on Interest expense and Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares.
The following table provides each segment’s results in the format that management organizes its segments to make operating decisions and assess performance and reconciles the company’s proportionate results to the consolidated statements of income (loss) on a line-by-line basis by aggregating the components comprising the earnings from the company’s investments in associates and reflecting the portion of each line item attributable to non-controlling interests for the year ended December 31, 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Attributable to the partnership | | Contribution from equity-accounted investments | | Attributable to non-controlling interests | | As per IFRS financials(1) |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total | |
| Revenues | $ | 1,095 | | | $ | 176 | | | $ | 167 | | | $ | 146 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,584 | | | $ | (55) | | | $ | 2,249 | | | $ | 3,778 | |
| Other income | 44 | | | 10 | | | 37 | | | 8 | | | — | | | 99 | | | 1 | | | (7) | | | 93 | |
| Direct operating costs | (426) | | | (54) | | | (39) | | | (70) | | | (5) | | | (594) | | | 30 | | | (610) | | | (1,174) | |
| Share of revenue, other income and direct operating costs from equity-accounted investments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 24 | | | — | | | 24 | |
| 713 | | | 132 | | | 165 | | | 84 | | | (5) | | | 1,089 | | | — | | | 1,632 | | | |
| Management service costs | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (163) | | | (163) | | | — | | | (6) | | | (169) | |
Interest expense(1) | (175) | | | (29) | | | (50) | | | (20) | | | (3) | | | (277) | | | 4 | | | (539) | | | (812) | |
| Current income taxes | (34) | | | (2) | | | (1) | | | — | | | — | | | (37) | | | — | | | (96) | | | (133) | |
| Share of interest and cash taxes from equity-accounted investments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4) | | | — | | | (4) | |
| Share of Funds From Operations attributable to non-controlling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (991) | | | (991) | |
| Funds From Operations | 504 | | | 101 | | | 114 | | | 64 | | | (171) | | | 612 | | | — | | | — | | | |
| Depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,179) | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instrument loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (65) | |
| Deferred income tax recovery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15 | |
| Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (90) | |
Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (220) | |
| Remeasurement of BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,800 | |
| Share of earnings from equity-accounted investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (14) | |
| Net income attributable to non-controlling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 644 | |
| Net income attributable to the partnership | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,503 | |
(1)Share of earnings from equity-accounted investments of $6 million is comprised of amounts found on the Share of revenue, other income and direct operating costs, Share of interest and cash taxes and Share of earnings lines. Net income attributable to participating non-controlling interests of $347 million is comprised of amounts found on Share of Funds From Operations attributable to non-controlling interests and Net Income attributable to non-controlling interests. Total interest expense of $1,032 million is comprised of amounts on Interest expense and Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares.
The following table provides each segment’s results in the format that management organizes its segments to make operating decisions and assess performance and reconciles the company’s proportionate results to the consolidated statements of income (loss) on a line-by-line basis by aggregating the components comprising the earnings from the company’s investments in associates and reflecting the portion of each line item attributable to non-controlling interests for the year ended December 31, 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Attributable to the partnership | | Contribution from equity-accounted investments | | Attributable to non-controlling interests | | As per IFRS financials(1) |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total | |
| Revenues | $ | 992 | | | $ | 199 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | 126 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,483 | | | $ | (40) | | | $ | 1,924 | | | $ | 3,367 | |
| Other income | 55 | | | 26 | | | 15 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 101 | | | (1) | | | (40) | | | 60 | |
| Direct operating costs | (424) | | | (59) | | | (42) | | | (50) | | | (3) | | | (578) | | | 19 | | | (626) | | | (1,185) | |
| Share of revenue, other income and direct operating costs from equity-accounted investments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 22 | | | — | | | 22 | |
| 623 | | | 166 | | | 139 | | | 78 | | | — | | | 1,006 | | | — | | | 1,258 | | | |
| Management service costs | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (175) | | | (175) | | | — | | | — | | | (175) | |
| Interest expense | (140) | | | (35) | | | (53) | | | (20) | | | (16) | | | (264) | | | 6 | | | (433) | | | (691) | |
| Current income taxes | (11) | | | (2) | | | (1) | | | 1 | | | — | | | (13) | | | — | | | (18) | | | (31) | |
| Share of interest and cash taxes from equity-accounted investments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (6) | | | — | | | (6) | |
| Share of Funds From Operations attributable to non-controlling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (807) | | | (807) | |
| Funds From Operations | 472 | | | 129 | | | 85 | | | 59 | | | (191) | | | 554 | | | — | | | — | | | |
| Depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,115) | |
| Foreign exchange and financial instrument loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (27) | |
| Deferred income tax expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (56) | |
| Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (277) | |
Dividends on class A exchangeable shares(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (209) | |
| Remeasurement of exchangeable and class B shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,267 | |
| Share of loss from equity-accounted investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (14) | |
| Net income attributable to non-controlling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 823 | |
| Net income attributable to the partnership | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 946 | |
(1)Share of earnings from equity-accounted investments of $2 million is comprised of amounts found on the Share of revenue, other income and direct operating costs, Share of interest and cash taxes and Share of earnings lines. Net loss attributable to participating non-controlling interests of $16 million is comprised of amounts found on Share of Funds From Operations attributable to non-controlling interests and Net Income attributable to non-controlling interests.
The following table presents information on a segmented basis about certain items in the company’s consolidated statements of financial position and reconciles the company’s proportionate results to the consolidated statements of financial position by aggregating the components comprising the company's investments in associates and reflecting the portion of each line item attributable to non-controlling interests:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Attributable to the partnership | | Contribution from equity-accounted investments | | Attributable to non-controlling interests | | As per IFRS financials |
| (MILLIONS) | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Utility-scale solar | | Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | Corporate | | Total | |
| As at December 31, 2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 89 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 68 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 258 | | | $ | (5) | | | $ | 374 | | | $ | 627 | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | 13,914 | | | 2,713 | | | 2,422 | | | 1,312 | | | — | | | 20,361 | | | (752) | | | 24,429 | | | 44,038 | |
| Total assets | 15,899 | | | 2,986 | | | 2,604 | | | 1,370 | | | 392 | | | 23,251 | | | (222) | | | 26,392 | | | 49,421 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total liabilities | 7,748 | | | 2,206 | | | 2,154 | | | 589 | | | 4,766 | | | 17,463 | | | (222) | | | 15,051 | | | 32,292 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As at December 31, 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 70 | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 60 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 197 | | | $ | (7) | | | $ | 452 | | | $ | 642 | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | 13,709 | | | 1,400 | | | 1,310 | | | 1,084 | | | — | | | 17,503 | | | (557) | | | 20,882 | | | 37,828 | |
| Total assets | 15,604 | | | 1,595 | | | 1,447 | | | 1,138 | | | 307 | | | 20,091 | | | (171) | | | 23,368 | | | 43,288 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total liabilities | 7,257 | | | 955 | | | 1,163 | | | 409 | | | 4,436 | | | 14,220 | | | (171) | | | 12,415 | | | 26,464 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Geographical Information
The following table presents consolidated revenue split by technology for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| (MILLIONS) | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Hydroelectric | | | | | $ | 2,505 | | | $ | 2,307 | | | $ | 1,969 | |
| Wind | | | | | 609 | | | 647 | | | 646 | |
| Utility-scale solar | | | | | 632 | | | 567 | | | 507 | |
| Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | | | | | 221 | | | 257 | | | 245 | |
| | | | | $ | 3,967 | | | $ | 3,778 | | | $ | 3,367 | |
The following table presents consolidated property, plant and equipment and equity-accounted investments split by geographical region: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| North America | $ | 26,082 | | | $ | 22,478 | |
| Colombia | 10,585 | | | 8,264 | |
| Brazil | 4,888 | | | 4,162 | |
| Europe | 3,127 | | | 3,375 | |
| | $ | 44,682 | | | $ | 38,279 | |
7. OTHER INCOME
The company’s other income for the year ended December 31 is comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Interest and other investment income | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 32 | | | $ | 20 | |
| Gain on regulatory and contract settlement | | | 22 | | | 43 | | | 35 | |
| Gain on disposition of non-core assets | | | 72 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
Other(1) | | | 403 | | | 18 | | | 5 | |
| | | $ | 584 | | | $ | 93 | | | $ | 60 | |
(1)During the year ended December 31, 2023, the company’s application of the acquisition method for its completed investments resulted in the recognition of net assets at a fair value that exceeded consideration transferred. The difference in value of $370 million was recorded within Other income in the consolidated statements of income (loss). Refer to Note 3 - Acquisitions for more details.
8. DIRECT OPERATING COSTS
The company’s direct operating costs for the year ended December 31 are comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Notes | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Fuel and power purchases(1)(2) | | | $ | (560) | | | $ | (396) | | | $ | (450) | |
| Salaries and benefits | | | (263) | | | (224) | | | (206) | |
| Operations and maintenance | | | (252) | | | (246) | | | (218) | |
| Water royalties, property taxes and other regulatory fees | | | (169) | | | (159) | | | (163) | |
| Professional fees | | | (70) | | | (24) | | | (26) | |
| Insurance | | | (52) | | | (56) | | | (56) | |
| Other related party services | 27 | | (2) | | | (7) | | | (11) | |
| Other | | | (98) | | | (62) | | | (55) | |
| | | $ | (1,466) | | | $ | (1,174) | | | $ | (1,185) | |
(1)Fuel and power purchases are primarily attributable to our portfolio in Colombia.
(2)Includes $80 million in 2021 relating to the Texas winter storm event which reflect the cost of acquiring energy to cover our contractual obligations for our wind assets that were not generating during the period due to freezing conditions, net of hedging initiatives.
Direct operating costs exclude depreciation expense of $1,342 million (2022: $1,179 million and 2021: $1,115 million) which is presented separately.
9. OTHER
The company’s other for the year ended December 31 is comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Notes | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Change in fair value of property, plant and equipment | | | $ | (46) | | | $ | (5) | | | $ | (73) | |
| Amortization of service concession assets | | | (11) | | | (10) | | | (15) | |
| Share-settlement liability | | | — | | | — | | | (65) | |
| Legal provisions | 26 | | — | | | — | | | (55) | |
| Cash flow hedge associated with the disposal of assets | 4 | | — | | | — | | | (6) | |
| Transaction costs | | | (3) | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
| Other | | | (1) | | | (75) | | | (63) | |
| | | $ | (61) | | | $ | (90) | | | $ | (277) | |
10. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The company’s foreign currency translation for the year ended December 31 shown in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Notes | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Foreign currency translation on: | | | | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | 12 | | $ | 2,640 | | | $ | (1,490) | | | $ | (1,527) | |
| Goodwill | 16 | | 149 | | | (126) | | | (121) | |
| Borrowings | 13 | | (713) | | | 545 | | | 479 | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities and assets | 11 | | (670) | | | 454 | | | 329 | |
| Other assets and liabilities | | | (132) | | | 59 | | | 11 | |
| | | $ | 1,274 | | | $ | (558) | | | $ | (829) | |
11. INCOME TAXES
The major components of income tax recovery (expense) for the year ended December 31 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Income tax recovery (expense) applicable to: | | | | | |
| Current taxes | | | | | |
| Attributed to the current period | $ | (113) | | | $ | (133) | | | $ | (31) | |
| Deferred taxes | | | | | |
| Origination and reversal of temporary differences | 52 | | | (10) | | | 80 | |
| Relating to change in tax rates / imposition of new tax laws | — | | | 10 | | | (142) | |
| Relating to unrecognized temporary differences and tax losses | (12) | | | 15 | | | 6 | |
| 40 | | | 15 | | | (56) | |
| Total income tax expense | $ | (73) | | | $ | (118) | | | $ | (87) | |
The major components of deferred income tax (expense) recovery for the year ended December 31 recorded directly to other comprehensive income are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Deferred income taxes attributed to: | | | | | |
| Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges | $ | (8) | | | $ | (60) | | | $ | 7 | |
| Other | 5 | | | (14) | | | (7) | |
| Revaluation surplus | | | | | |
| Origination and reversal of temporary differences | 115 | | | (679) | | | (882) | |
| Relating to changes in tax rates / imposition of new tax laws | — | | | 34 | | | (162) | |
| $ | 112 | | | $ | (719) | | | $ | (1,044) | |
The company’s effective income tax recovery (expense) for the year ended December 31 is different from its recovery at its statutory income tax rate due to the differences below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Statutory income tax expense (1) | $ | (112) | | | $ | (575) | | | $ | (287) | |
| Reduction (increase) resulting from: | | | | | |
| Increase in tax assets not recognized | (6) | | | (8) | | | (9) | |
| Differences between statutory rate and future tax rate and tax rate changes | — | | | 10 | | | (142) | |
| Non-controlling interest | 87 | | | 19 | | | 7 | |
| Subsidiaries’ income taxed at different rates | 50 | | | 10 | | | 74 | |
| Non-deductible expenses | (93) | | | 426 | | | 271 | |
| Other | 1 | | | — | | | (1) | |
| Effective income tax expense | $ | (73) | | | $ | (118) | | | $ | (87) | |
(1)Statutory income tax expense is calculated using domestic rates applicable to the profits in the relevant country.
The above reconciliation has been prepared by aggregating the information for all of the company’s subsidiaries using the domestic rate in each tax jurisdiction.
The company’s effective income tax rate was 19.2% for the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022: 6.0% and 2021: 8.6%). The effective tax rate is different than the statutory rate primarily due to rate differentials, legislative changes in tax rates during the year, changes in tax assets not recognized, non-deductible expenses, and non-controlling interests’ income not subject to tax.
The following table details the expiry date, if applicable, of the unrecognized deferred tax assets as at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Less than four years | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Thereafter | 133 | | | 122 | | | 126 | |
| | | | | |
The deferred tax assets and liabilities of the following temporary differences have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Non-capital
losses | | Difference
between tax and
carrying value | | Net deferred
tax (liabilities)
assets |
As at January 1, 2021 | $ | 869 | | | $ | (5,029) | | | $ | (4,160) | |
| Recognized in net income (loss) | 5 | | | (61) | | | (56) | |
| Recognized in equity | — | | | (1,046) | | | (1,046) | |
| Business combination | — | | | (1) | | | (1) | |
| Foreign exchange | 5 | | | 324 | | | 329 | |
| As at December 31, 2021 | 879 | | | (5,813) | | | (4,934) | |
| Recognized in net income (loss) | 16 | | | (1) | | | 15 | |
| Recognized in equity | — | | | (728) | | | (728) | |
| Business combination | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Foreign exchange | 2 | | | 452 | | | 454 | |
| As at December 31, 2022 | 897 | | | (6,090) | | | (5,193) | |
| Recognized in net income (loss) | (58) | | | 98 | | | 40 | |
| Recognized in equity | — | | | 117 | | | 117 | |
| Business combination | — | | | (11) | | | (11) | |
| Foreign exchange | — | | | (670) | | | (670) | |
| As at December 31, 2023 | $ | 839 | | | $ | (6,556) | | | $ | (5,717) | |
The deferred income tax liabilities include $5,153 million (2022: $5,178 million and 2021: $4,556 million) of liabilities which relate to property, plant and equipment revaluations included in equity.
The unrecognized taxable temporary difference attributable to the company’s interest in its subsidiaries, branches, associates, and joint ventures is $5,216 million (2022: $4,952 million and 2021: $4,021 million).
12. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, AT FAIR VALUE
The following table presents a reconciliation of property, plant and equipment at fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Notes | | Hydroelectric | | Wind | | Solar | |
Other(1) | | Total |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As at December 31, 2021 | | | $ | 25,496 | | | $ | 4,998 | | | $ | 6,457 | | | $ | 188 | | | $ | 37,139 | |
Additions, net(2) | | | 9 | | | (137) | | | (78) | | | (7) | | | (213) | |
| Transfer from construction work-in-progress | | | 161 | | | 86 | | | 744 | | | 7 | | | 998 | |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | | | (677) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (677) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Disposals(3) | 3 | | (97) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (97) | |
| Items recognized through OCI: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value | | | 2,017 | | | 292 | | | (132) | | | 77 | | | 2,254 | |
| Foreign exchange | 10 | | (1,267) | | | (73) | | | (160) | | | 6 | | | (1,494) | |
| Items recognized through net income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value | | | (2) | | | 16 | | | (7) | | | (2) | | | 5 | |
| Depreciation | | | (501) | | | (307) | | | (343) | | | (28) | | | (1,179) | |
| As at December 31, 2022 | | | 25,139 | | | 4,875 | | | 6,481 | | | 241 | | | 36,736 | |
| Additions | | | 1 | | | 47 | | | 229 | | | — | | | 277 | |
| Transfer from construction work-in-progress | | | 117 | | | 268 | | | 316 | | | 1 | | | 702 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | 3 | | — | | | 2,164 | | | 1,540 | | | — | | | 3,704 | |
Disposals(3) | 4 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (5) | | | (5) | |
| Items recognized through OCI: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value | | | (417) | | | 127 | | | (18) | | | (39) | | | (347) | |
| Foreign exchange | 10 | | 2,296 | | | 94 | | | 174 | | | 14 | | | 2,578 | |
| Items recognized through net income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value | | | (12) | | | (13) | | | (35) | | | 19 | | | (41) | |
| Depreciation | | | (533) | | | (390) | | | (385) | | | (34) | | | (1,342) | |
| As at December 31, 2023 | | | $ | 26,591 | | | $ | 7,172 | | | $ | 8,302 | | | $ | 197 | | | $ | 42,262 | |
| Construction work-in-progress, at fair value | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As at December 31, 2021 | | | $ | 224 | | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 433 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 776 | |
| Additions | | | 150 | | | 237 | | | 592 | | | 5 | | | 984 | |
| Transfer to property, plant and equipment | | | (161) | | | (86) | | | (744) | | | (7) | | | (998) | |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | | | (8) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Items recognized through OCI: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value | | | — | | | 250 | | | 84 | | | — | | | 334 | |
| Foreign exchange | 10 | | 7 | | | (18) | | | 15 | | | — | | | 4 | |
| As at December 31, 2022 | | | 212 | | | 497 | | | 380 | | | 3 | | | 1,092 | |
| Additions | | | 129 | | | 590 | | | 358 | | | 10 | | | 1,087 | |
| Transfer to property, plant and equipment | | | (117) | | | (268) | | | (316) | | | (1) | | | (702) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | 4 | | — | | | 80 | | | 323 | | | — | | | 403 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Items recognized through OCI: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value | | | — | | | (112) | | | (36) | | | — | | | (148) | |
| Foreign exchange | 10 | | (2) | | | 33 | | | 32 | | | (1) | | | 62 | |
| Items recognized through net income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value | | | (1) | | | (17) | | | — | | | — | | | (18) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As at December 31, 2023 | | | $ | 221 | | | $ | 803 | | | $ | 741 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 1,776 | |
| Total property, plant and equipment, at fair value | | | | | | | | | | | |
As at December 31, 2022(4) | | | $ | 25,351 | | | $ | 5,372 | | | $ | 6,861 | | | $ | 244 | | | $ | 37,828 | |
As at December 31, 2023(4) | | | $ | 26,812 | | | $ | 7,975 | | | $ | 9,043 | | | $ | 208 | | | $ | 44,038 | |
(1)Includes biomass and cogeneration
(2)Includes fair value changes to decommissioning assets of nil (2022: $178 million).
(3)Includes disposal of significant assets only.
(4)Includes right-of-use assets not subject to revaluation of $43 million (2022: $49 million) in our hydroelectric segment, $143 million (2022: $127 million) in our wind segment, $277 million (2022: $148 million) in our solar segment and nil (2022: $2 million) in other.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the company, together with its institutional partners, completed the acquisition of the following investment. It is accounted for as an asset acquisition as it does not constitute business combination under IFRS 3:
•A 60 MW portfolio of operating solar facilities in Colombia, with $71 million of property, plant and equipment included in the consolidated statements of financial position at the acquisition date. The company holds a 21% economic interest.
The fair value of the company's property, plant and equipment is calculated as described in Notes 1(g) – Property, plant and equipment and revaluation method and 1(r)(i) – Critical estimates – Property, plant and equipment. Judgment is involved in determining the appropriate estimates and assumptions in the valuation of the company’s property, plant and equipment. See Note 1(s)(iii) – Critical judgments in applying accounting policies – Property, plant and equipment. The company has classified its property, plant and equipment under level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Discount rates, terminal capitalization rates and terminal years used in the valuation methodology are provided in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | Colombia | | Brazil | | Europe |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | | | 2022 |
Discount rate(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contracted | 5.0% - 5.7% | | 4.8% - 5.4% | | 8.7 | % | | 8.5 | % | | 8.4 | % | | 8.2 | % | | 4.8 | % | | | | 4.4 | % |
| Uncontracted | 6.0% - 6.9% | | 5.8% - 6.7% | | 10.0 | % | | 9.7 | % | | 9.7 | % | | 9.5 | % | | 4.8 | % | | | | 4.4 | % |
Terminal capitalization rate(2) | 5.0 | % | | 4.9 | % | | 8.0 | % | | 7.7 | % | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | | | N/A |
Terminal year(3) | 2044 | | 2044 | | 2043 | | 2042 | | 2054 | | 2052 | | 2037 | | | | 2036 |
(1)Discount rates are not adjusted for asset specific risks.
(2)The terminal capitalization rate applies only to hydroelectric assets in the United States and Colombia.
(3)For hydroelectric assets, terminal year refers to the valuation date of the terminal value.
The following table summarizes the impact of a change in discount rates, electricity prices and terminal capitalization rates on the fair value of property, plant and equipment:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 |
| (MILLIONS) | North America | | Colombia | | Brazil | | Europe | | Total |
| 25 bps increase in discount rates | $ | (960) | | | $ | (340) | | | $ | (110) | | | $ | (40) | | | $ | (1,450) | |
| 25 bps decrease in discount rates | 1,030 | | | 380 | | | 120 | | | 40 | | | 1,570 | |
| 5% increase in future energy prices | 890 | | | 540 | | | 120 | | | — | | | 1,550 | |
| 5% decrease in future energy prices | (890) | | | (540) | | | (120) | | | — | | | (1,550) | |
| 25 bps increase in terminal capitalization rate | (320) | | | (80) | | | — | | | — | | | (400) | |
| 25 bps decrease in terminal capitalization rate | 360 | | | 90 | | | — | | | — | | | 450 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2022 |
| (MILLIONS) | North America | | Colombia | | Brazil | | Europe | | Total |
| 25 bps increase in discount rates | $ | (1,110) | | | $ | (310) | | | $ | (100) | | | $ | (50) | | | $ | (1,570) | |
| 25 bps decrease in discount rates | 1,170 | | | 260 | | | 110 | | | 50 | | | 1,590 | |
| 5% increase in future energy prices | 1,010 | | | 440 | | | 110 | | | — | | | 1,560 | |
| 5% decrease in future energy prices | (1,000) | | | (440) | | | (110) | | | — | | | (1,550) | |
| 25 bps increase in terminal capitalization rate | (360) | | | (70) | | | — | | | — | | | (430) | |
| 25 bps decrease in terminal capitalization rate | 390 | | | 80 | | | — | | | — | | | 470 | |
Terminal values are included in the valuation of hydroelectric assets in the United States and Colombia. For the hydroelectric assets in Brazil, cash flows have been included based on the duration of the authorization or useful life of a concession asset plus a one-time 30-year renewal term for the majority of the hydroelectric assets. The
weighted-average remaining duration of the authorization or useful life of a concession asset at December 31, 2023, including a one-time 30-year renewal for applicable hydroelectric assets, is 34 years (2022: 35 years). Consequently, there is no terminal value attributed to the hydroelectric assets in Brazil at the end of the authorization term.
The following table summarizes the percentage of total generation contracted under power purchase agreements as at December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | Colombia | | Brazil | | Europe |
| 1 - 5 years | 66 | % | | 61 | % | | 79 | % | | 100 | % |
| 6 - 10 years | 51 | % | | 29 | % | | 70 | % | | 76 | % |
| 11 - 20 years | 28 | % | | 3 | % | | 46 | % | | 47 | % |
The following table summarizes average power prices from long-term power purchase agreements that are linked specifically to the related power generating assets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Per MWh(1) | North America | | Colombia | | Brazil | | Europe |
| 1 - 10 years | $ | 90 | | | COP | 294,000 | | | R$ | 303 | | | € | 73 | |
| 11 - 20 years | 94 | | | | 357,000 | | | 381 | | | 65 | |
(1)Assumes nominal prices based on weighted-average generation.
The following table summarizes the estimates of future electricity prices:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Per MWh(1) | North America | | Colombia | | Brazil | | Europe |
| 1 - 10 years | $ | 97 | | | COP | 412,000 | | | R$ | 274 | | | € | 62 | |
| 11 - 20 years | 127 | | | | 600,000 | | | 424 | | | 65 | |
(1)Assumes nominal prices based on weighted-average generation.
The company’s long-term view is anchored to the cost of securing new energy from renewable sources to meet future demand growth between 2027 and 2035. A further one year change would increase or decrease the fair value of property, plant and equipment by approximately $125 million (2022: $132 million).
Had the company’s revalued property, plant and equipment been measured on a historical cost basis, the carrying amounts, net of accumulated depreciation would have been as follows at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Hydroelectric | $ | 9,218 | | | $ | 8,478 | |
| Wind | 6,379 | | | 3,980 | |
| Solar | 7,798 | | | 5,514 | |
Other(1) | 163 | | | 147 | |
| $ | 23,558 | | | $ | 18,119 | |
(1)Includes biomass and cogeneration.
13. BORROWINGS
Non-recourse borrowings
Non-recourse borrowings are typically asset-specific, long-term, non-recourse borrowings denominated in the domestic currency of the subsidiary. Non-recourse borrowings in North America and Europe consist of both fixed and floating interest rate debt indexed to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”), the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) and the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”). Brookfield Renewable uses interest rate swap agreements in North America and Europe to minimize its exposure to floating interest rates. Non-recourse borrowings in Brazil consist of floating interest rates of Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo (“TJLP”), the Brazil National Bank for Economic Development’s long-term interest rate, or Interbank Deposit Certificate rate (“CDI”), plus a margin. Non-recourse borrowings in Colombia consist of both fixed and floating interest rates indexed to Indicador Bancario de Referencia rate (“IBR”), the Banco Central de
Colombia short-term interest rate, and Colombian Consumer Price Index (“IPC”), Colombia inflation rate, plus a margin. Non-Recourse borrowings in India consist of both fixed and floating interest indexed to Prime lending rate of lender (“MCLR”). Non-recourse borrowings in China consist of floating interest rates of People's Bank of China (“PBOC”).
Effective January 1, 2022, SONIA replaced the £ London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), and Euro Short-term Rate (“€STR”) replaced € LIBOR. The Canadian Overnight Repo Rate Average (“CORRA”) is expected to replace CDOR after June 28, 2024.
As at December 31, 2023, the company’s floating rate borrowings have not been materially impacted by SONIA and €STR reforms. Brookfield Renewable has completed an assessment and implemented its transition plan to address the impact and effect changes as a result of amendments to the contractual terms for the replacement of US$ LIBOR with the SOFR referenced floating-rate borrowings, interest rate swaps, and updating hedge designations. The adoption did not have a significant impact on the company’s financial reporting.
The composition of non-recourse borrowings as at December 31 is presented in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| Weighted-average | | | | | | Weighted-average | | | | |
| (MILLIONS EXCEPT AS NOTED) | Interest rate (%) | | Term (years)(3) | | Carrying value | | Estimated fair value | | Interest rate (%) | | Term (years) | | Carrying value | | Estimated fair value |
Non-recourse borrowings(1)(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hydroelectric | 8.9 | | | 7 | | $ | 7,413 | | | $ | 7,451 | | | 8.2 | | | 7 | | $ | 6,612 | | | $ | 5,945 | |
| Wind | 6.2 | | | 7 | | 3,260 | | | 3,249 | | | 5.2 | | | 8 | | 2,331 | | | 2,230 | |
| Utility-scale solar | 6.0 | | | 12 | | 4,808 | | | 4,820 | | | 5.5 | | | 13 | | 4,041 | | | 3,926 | |
Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | 5.3 | | | 10 | | 736 | | | 723 | | | 5.1 | | | 11 | | 796 | | | 746 | |
| Total | 7.3 | | | 9 | | $ | 16,217 | | | $ | 16,243 | | | 6.7 | | | 9 | | $ | 13,780 | | | $ | 12,847 | |
Add: Unamortized premiums(discounts)(3) | | (77) | | | | | | | | | 17 | | | |
Less: Unamortized financing fees(3) | | (68) | | | | | | | | | (82) | | | |
| Less: Current portion | | (1,891) | | | | | | | | | (1,299) | | | |
| | | | | $ | 14,181 | | | | | | | | | $ | 12,416 | | | |
(1)Includes $149 million (2022: $1 million) borrowed under a subscription facility of a Brookfield sponsored private fund.
(2)Includes $14 million (2022: $15 million) outstanding to an associate of Brookfield. Refer to Note 27 - Related party transactions for more details.
(3)Unamortized premiums, discounts, and financing fees are amortized over the terms of the borrowing.
Future repayments of the company’s non-recourse borrowings for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | 2028 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Non-recourse borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hydroelectric | $ | 617 | | | $ | 561 | | | $ | 1,489 | | | $ | 629 | | | $ | 544 | | | $ | 3,573 | | | $ | 7,413 | |
| Wind | 719 | | | 378 | | | 217 | | | 241 | | | 486 | | | 1,219 | | | 3,260 | |
| Utility-scale solar | 514 | | | 407 | | | 245 | | | 290 | | | 606 | | | 2,746 | | | 4,808 | |
Distributed energy & sustainable solutions | 41 | | | 38 | | | 34 | | | 49 | | | 149 | | | 425 | | | 736 | |
| $ | 1,891 | | | $ | 1,384 | | | $ | 1,985 | | | $ | 1,209 | | | $ | 1,785 | | | $ | 7,963 | | | $ | 16,217 | |
The following table outlines the change in the unamortized financing fees of non-recourse borrowings for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | | | | | |
| Unamortized financing fees and discounts, beginning of year | $ | (82) | | | $ | (91) | | | |
| Additional financing fees and discounts | (11) | | | (19) | | | |
| Amortization of financing and discounts fees | 13 | | | 14 | | | |
| Foreign exchange translation and other | 12 | | | 14 | | | |
| Unamortized financing fees and discounts, end of year | $ | (68) | | | $ | (82) | | | |
The following table outlines the change in the unamortized premiums (discounts) of non-recourse borrowings for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | | | | | |
| Unamortized premiums and discounts, beginning of year | $ | 17 | | | $ | 55 | | | |
| Additional premiums and discounts | (90) | | | (19) | | | |
| Amortization of premiums and discounts fees | (1) | | | (2) | | | |
| Foreign exchange translation and other | (3) | | | (17) | | | |
| Unamortized premiums fees and discounts, end of year | $ | (77) | | | $ | 17 | | | |
The following table outlines the financing and refinancing completed for the year ended December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period Closed | | Region | | Technology | | Average Interest rate(1) | | | | Maturity | | Carrying Value |
| Q2 2023 | | Brazil | | Wind | | CDI | | Financing | | 2024 | | BRL $450 million ($93 million) |
| Q3 2023 | | Brazil | | Wind | | CDI | | Financing | | 2047 | | BRL $300 million ($60 million) |
| Q3 2023 | | Colombia | | Hydro | | IBR | | Financing | | 2033 | | COP $687 billion ($169 million) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Q4 2023 | | US | | Solar | | SOFR | | Financing | | 2028 | | $48 million |
| Q4 2023 | | US | | Hydro | | 6.16% | | Refinancing | | 2032 | | $80 million |
| Q4 2023 | | US | | Hydro | | 7.75% | | Refinancing | | 2033 | | $125 million |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Q4 2023 | | US | | Wind | | SOFR | | Financing | | 2034 | | $52 million |
| Q4 2023 | | US | | Wind | | SOFR | | Financing | | 2024 | | $140 million |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Q4 2023 | | US | | Various | | SOFR | | Financing | | 2025 | | $200 million |
| Q4 2023 | | US | | Various | | SOFR | | Financing | | 2028 | | $600 million |
| Q4 2023 | | Brazil | | Hydro | | 7.72% | | Refinancing | | 2024 | | BRL $800 million ($164 million) |
| Q4 2023 | | Colombia | | Hydro | | IBR | | Financing | | 2033 | | COP $100 billion ($25 million) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Benchmarked financings bear a variable interest at the applicable rate plus a margin.
(2)Term conversion date in 2024 automatically rolling into a maturity of 2034.
In the second quarter of 2023, the Company extended the maturity of its $650 million credit facility associated with the United States business to mature in 2026.
In the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company extended the maturity of its $46 million credit facility associated with the United States business to mature in 2024.
In the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company extended the maturity of its $64 million credit facility associated with the United States business to mature in 2030.
In the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company extended the maturity of its $25 million credit facility associated with the United States business to mature in 2025.
Supplemental Information
The following table outlines changes in the company's borrowings for the year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | January 1 | | Net cash flows from financing activities(1) | | Non-cash | | |
| Acquisition | | Transfer to Held for sale | | Disposal | | Other(2)(3) | | December 31 |
| 2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | $ | 13,715 | | | 588 | | | 1,160 | | | — | | | (164) | | | 773 | | | $ | 16,072 | |
| 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | $ | 13,512 | | | 926 | | | — | | | (171) | | | — | | | (552) | | | $ | 13,715 | |
(1)Excludes $(19) million (2022: $(20) million) of net cash flow from financing activities related to tax equity recorded on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
(2)Includes foreign exchange and amortization of unamortized premium and financing fees.
(3)Includes $31 million (2022: nil) of non-recourse borrowings acquired through asset acquisitions.
14. NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS
The company’s non-controlling interests are comprised of the following as at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
Participating non-controlling interests – in operating subsidiaries | $ | 11,070 | | | $ | 10,680 | |
Participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary held by the partnership | 272 | | | 271 | |
| $ | 11,342 | | | $ | 10,951 | |
Participating non-controlling interests – in operating subsidiaries
The net change in participating non-controlling interests – in operating subsidiaries is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Brookfield
Americas
Infrastructure
Fund | Brookfield
Infrastructure
Fund II | Brookfield
Infrastructure
Fund III | Brookfield Infrastructure Fund IV | Brookfield Infrastructure Fund V | Isagen institutional partners | Isagen public non-controlling interests | The
Catalyst
Group | TerraForm Power | Other | Total |
| As at December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,002 | | $ | 1,902 | | $ | 3,082 | | $ | 74 | | $ | — | | $ | 2,650 | | $ | 14 | | $ | 97 | | $ | 961 | | $ | 508 | | $ | 10,290 | |
| Net income (loss) | 5 | | (32) | | (20) | | (3) | | — | | 113 | | 1 | | 16 | | (67) | | (36) | | (23) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | (122) | | 411 | | 187 | | 137 | | — | | (107) | | — | | 28 | | (6) | | 73 | | 601 | |
| Capital contributions | — | | 1 | | — | | 64 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 65 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Disposal | (181) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (181) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends declared | (18) | | (31) | | (220) | | (11) | | — | | (214) | | (2) | | (9) | | (105) | | (45) | | (655) | |
| Other | — | | — | | 157 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 70 | | (27) | | 200 | |
| As at December 31, 2021 | 686 | | 2,251 | | 3,186 | | 261 | | — | | 2,442 | | 13 | | 132 | | 853 | | 473 | | 10,297 | |
| Net income (loss) | 19 | | (34) | | 110 | | 1 | | — | | 179 | | 1 | | 11 | | 32 | | 17 | | 336 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | (103) | | 448 | | 156 | | 164 | | — | | 67 | | 1 | | (19) | | 67 | | 1 | | 782 | |
| Capital contributions | — | | 4 | | — | | 276 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 289 | | 569 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Disposal | (54) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (54) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends declared | (71) | | (55) | | (393) | | — | | — | | (524) | | (1) | | (9) | | (123) | | (92) | | (1,268) | |
| Other | — | | 1 | | 2 | | 5 | | — | | (5) | | (1) | | — | | 3 | | 13 | | 18 | |
| As at December 31, 2022 | 477 | | 2,615 | | 3,061 | | 707 | | — | | 2,159 | | 13 | | 115 | | 832 | | 701 | | 10,680 | |
| Net income (loss) | 27 | | 64 | | 65 | | (3) | | 291 | | 98 | | 1 | | 7 | | 9 | | (78) | | 481 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | (43) | | (96) | | 210 | | 205 | | — | | 603 | | 4 | | 3 | | (62) | | 3 | | 827 | |
| Capital contributions | — | | — | | — | | 102 | | 410 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 77 | | 589 | |
| Disposal | (388) | | — | | (14) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (13) | | (3) | | (418) | |
| Return of capital | — | | — | | — | | — | | (140) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (140) | |
| Dividends declared | (25) | | (123) | | (644) | | (6) | | — | | (156) | | (1) | | (3) | | (279) | | (116) | | (1,353) | |
| Acquisition through business combinations | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 343 | | 343 | |
| Other | 27 | | 2 | | (20) | | 2 | | 356 | | — | | — | | — | | (299) | | (7) | | 61 | |
| As at December 31, 2023 | $ | 75 | | $ | 2,462 | | $ | 2,658 | | $ | 1,007 | | $ | 917 | | $ | 2,704 | | $ | 17 | | $ | 122 | | $ | 188 | | $ | 920 | | $ | 11,070 | |
| Interests held by third parties | 75% - 78% | 43% - 60% | 23% - 71% | 75 | % | 71 | % | 53 | % | 0.3 | % | 25 | % | 19 | % | 0.3% - 80% | |
The following tables summarize certain financial information of operating subsidiaries that have non-controlling interests that are material to the company: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Brookfield Americas Infrastructure Fund | Brookfield
Infrastructure
Fund II | Brookfield
Infrastructure
Fund III(1) | Brookfield Infrastructure
Fund IV | Brookfield Infrastructure Fund V | Isagen (2) | The
Catalyst
Group | TerraForm Power(3) | Other | Total |
| Interests held by third parties | 75% - 78% | 43% - 60% | 71 | % | 75 | % | 71 | % | 77 | % | 25 | % | 61 | % | 0.3% - 80% | |
| Place of business | North America,
Brazil | North America,
Brazil | North America | Brazil | North America | Colombia | North America | North America,
South America, Europe | North America,
South America | |
| Year ended December 31, 2021: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue | $ | 137 | | $ | 269 | | $ | 58 | | $ | 25 | | $ | — | | $ | 929 | | $ | 136 | | $ | 1,239 | | $ | 14 | | $ | 2,807 | |
| Net income (loss) | 7 | | (60) | | (3) | | (4) | | — | | 214 | | 62 | | (245) | | 8 | | (21) | |
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | (161) | | 716 | | 332 | | 178 | | — | | 11 | | 173 | | (243) | | 117 | | 1,123 | |
| Net income (loss) allocated to non-controlling interests | 5 | | (32) | | (2) | | (3) | | — | | 162 | | 16 | | (175) | | 6 | | (23) | |
| Year ended December 31, 2022: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue | $ | 120 | | $ | 324 | | $ | 80 | | $ | 112 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,135 | | $ | 131 | | $ | 1,324 | | $ | 10 | | $ | 3,236 | |
| Net income (loss) | 25 | | (71) | | (4) | | 2 | | — | | 340 | | 44 | | 94 | | 21 | | 451 | |
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | (106) | | 726 | | 71 | | 220 | | — | | 467 | | (32) | | 301 | | 23 | | 1,670 | |
| Net income (loss) allocated to non-controlling interests | 19 | | (34) | | (3) | | 1 | | — | | 257 | | 11 | | 63 | | 22 | | 336 | |
| As at December 31, 2022: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | $ | 131 | | $ | 6,224 | | $ | 2,107 | | $ | 1,529 | | $ | — | | $ | 8,264 | | $ | 1,031 | | $ | 10,012 | | $ | 187 | | $ | 29,485 | |
| Total assets | 852 | | 6,367 | | 2,126 | | 1,722 | | — | | 9,178 | | 1,053 | | 11,192 | | 260 | | 32,750 | |
| Total borrowings | 14 | | 1,332 | | 347 | | 675 | | — | | 2,356 | | 476 | | 6,371 | | — | | 11,571 | |
| Total liabilities | 240 | | 1,601 | | 382 | | 780 | | — | | 5,112 | | 491 | | 8,275 | | 74 | | 16,955 | |
| Carrying value of non-controlling interests | 477 | | 2,615 | | 1,245 | | 707 | | — | | 3,146 | | 115 | | 2,283 | | 92 | | 10,680 | |
| Year ended December 31, 2023: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue | $ | 56 | | $ | 339 | | $ | 65 | | $ | 128 | | $ | 45 | | $ | 1,285 | | $ | 102 | | $ | 1,213 | | $ | 60 | | $ | 3,293 | |
| Net income (loss) | 34 | | 118 | | 18 | | (4) | | 411 | | 186 | | 27 | | (27) | | (58) | | 705 | |
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | (19) | | (69) | | 36 | | 269 | | 411 | | 1,331 | | 40 | | (93) | | (210) | | 1,696 | |
| Net income allocated to non-controlling interests | 27 | | 64 | | 13 | | (3) | | 291 | | 144 | | 7 | | (34) | | (28) | | 481 | |
| As at December 31, 2023: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | $ | 106 | | $ | 5,878 | | $ | 2,081 | | $ | 2,286 | | $ | 2,357 | | $ | 10,585 | | $ | 1,024 | | $ | 9,718 | | $ | 1,964 | | $ | 35,999 | |
| Total assets | 112 | | 6,054 | | 2,100 | | 2,508 | | 2,538 | | 11,601 | | 1,036 | | 10,528 | | 2,280 | | 38,757 | |
| Total borrowings | (12) | | (1,320) | | (472) | | (989) | | (462) | | (3,000) | | (439) | | (6,056) | | (834) | | (13,584) | |
| Total liabilities | (18) | | (1,590) | | (480) | | (1,168) | | (1,611) | | (6,498) | | (447) | | (9,106) | | (1,500) | | (22,418) | |
| Carrying value of non-controlling interests | (75) | | (2,462) | | (1,157) | | (1,007) | | (917) | | (3,948) | | (122) | | (1,036) | | (346) | | (11,070) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Excludes information relating to Isagen and TerraForm Power which is presented separately.
(2)The total third parties’ ownership interest in Isagen as of December 31, 2023 was 77.4% and comprised of Brookfield Infrastructure Fund III: 23.0%, Brookfield Global Infrastructure Income Fund: 1.5%, Isagen institutional partners: 52.6% and other non-controlling interests: 0.3%
(3)The total third parties’ ownership interest in TerraForm Power as of December 31, 2023 was 60.7% and comprised of Brookfield Infrastructure Fund III: 34.9%, Brookfield Global Infrastructure Income Fund: 6.8% and the remainder is held by the partnership.
The following table summarizes certain financial information regarding Participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary held by the partnership:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| For the year ended December 31: | | | | | |
| Revenue | $ | 1,627 | | | $ | 1,407 | | | $ | 1,133 | |
| Net income | 217 | | | 475 | | | 334 | |
| Comprehensive income | 1,407 | | | 863 | | | 473 | |
| Net income allocated to participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary held by the partnership | 8 | | | 11 | | | 7 | |
| As at December 31: | | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at fair value | $ | 14,406 | | | $ | 11,357 | | | |
| Total assets | 16,117 | | | 12,887 | | | |
| Total borrowings | 4,346 | | | 3,228 | | | |
| Total liabilities | 8,421 | | | 6,320 | | | |
| Carrying value of participating non-controlling interests – in a holding subsidiary held by the partnership | 272 | | | 271 | | | |
15. BEPC EXCHANGEABLE SHARES, BEPC CLASS B SHARES AND BEPC CLASS C SHARES
The BEPC exchangeable shares and class B shares are classified as liabilities due to their exchange and cash redemption features. The BEPC exchangeable shares and class B shares issued pursuant to the special distribution and the TerraForm Power acquisition were recognized at their fair value of $28.28 per share. Subsequent to initial recognition, the BEPC exchangeable shares and the BEPC class B shares are recognized at amortized cost and remeasured to reflect changes in the contractual cash flows associated with the shares. These contractual cash flows are based on the price of one BEP unit. As at December 31, 2023, the BEPC exchangeable shares and class B shares were remeasured to $26.28 per share to reflect the NYSE closing price of a BEP unit. Remeasurement gains or losses associated with these shares are recorded in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
On June 16, 2023, the company completed the issuance of 7,430,000 BEPC exchangeable shares on a bought deal basis at a price of $33.80 per Exchangeable Share for gross proceeds of $251 million. The company recorded $10 million related to transaction costs inclusive of fees paid to underwriters in Other on the consolidated statements of income.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, our shareholders exchanged 8,465 BEPC exchangeable shares for an equal number of BEP units resulting in a decrease of nil to our financial liability (2022: 12,308 shares resulting in a nil decrease. 2021: 16,071 shares resulting in a $1 million decrease). The company declared and paid dividends of $241 million and $241 million, respectively (2022: $220 million and $220 million, respectively. 2021: $209 million and $207 million, respectively.) on its BEPC exchangeable shares outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2023. Dividends on BEPC exchangeable shares are presented as interest expense in the statement of operating results.
The following table provides a continuity schedule of outstanding BEPC exchangeable and class B shares along with the corresponding liability and remeasurement gains and losses.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| BEPC exchangeable shares outstanding (units) | | BEPC class B shares outstanding (units) | | | | BEPC exchangeable and BEPC class B shares
($ million) |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2021 | 172,203,342 | | | 165 | | | | | $ | 6,163 | |
Share issuance(1) | 27,064 | | | — | | | | | 1 | |
| Share exchanges | (12,308) | | | — | | | | | — | |
| Remeasurement of liability | — | | | — | | | | | (1,800) | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2022 | 172,218,098 | | | 165 | | | | | 4,364 | |
Share issuance(1) | 7,441,893 | | | — | | | | | 251 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Share exchanges | (8,465) | | | — | | | | | — |
| Remeasurement of liability | — | | | — | | | | | 106 | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2023 | 179,651,526 | | | 165 | | | | | $ | 4,721 | |
(1)Includes restricted stock units of TerraForm Power that were assumed by the company as part of the acquisition of TerraForm Power on July 31, 2020, adjusted for the three-for-two share split in December 2020.
Similar to BEPC exchangeable shares and BEPC class B shares, BEPC class C shares are classified as liabilities due to their cash redemption feature. However, BEPC class C shares, the most subordinated class of all common shares, meet certain qualifying criteria and are presented as equity instruments given the narrow scope presentation exceptions existing in IAS 32. There are 194,460,874 BEPC class C shares issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2023 (2022: 189,600,000).
As at December 31, 2023, Brookfield Holders held a direct and indirect interest of approximately 25% of the company. Brookfield Holders own, directly and indirectly, 44,813,835 BEPC exchangeable shares on a combined basis and the remaining is held by public investors.
In December 2023, the company renewed its normal course issuer bid for its outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares. The company is authorized to repurchase up 8.9 million BEPC Exchangeable shares, representing 5% of its issued and outstanding BEPC exchangeable shares. The bids will expire on December 17, 2024, or earlier should the company complete its repurchases prior to such date. There were no BEPC exchangeable shares repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2023.
16. GOODWILL
The following table provides a reconciliation of goodwill:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Notes | | Total |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2021 | | | $ | 849 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Foreign exchange and other | | | (126) | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2022 | | | 723 | |
| | | |
| Disposals | | | (18) | |
| | | |
| Foreign exchange and other | | | 149 | |
| Balance, as at December 31, 2023 | | | $ | 854 | |
As at December 31, 2023, $704 million (2022: $559 million) of goodwill related to the hydroelectric segment was created as a result of recording the deferred tax liabilities assumed in the purchase price allocations of business combinations. The deferred tax liabilities are measured in accordance with IAS 12 in the purchase price allocations rather than at fair value. As a result, the goodwill recorded does not represent ‘core’ goodwill, but rather goodwill created as a result of accounting concepts or ‘non-core’ goodwill. In order to avoid an immediate impairment of this ‘non-core’ goodwill, the company removed from the carrying value any ‘non-core’ goodwill supported by the existence, as of the impairment testing date, of the original deferred tax liability that created the goodwill. As at December 31, 2023, the company performed an impairment test at the level that goodwill is monitored by management. In performing this impairment test, management removed the ‘non-core’ goodwill that continued to be supported by the existence of the original deferred tax liability that gave rise to the goodwill from the carrying value of the applicable assets. The remaining goodwill is not significant to the total balance, and was allocated to the related wind and utility-scale solar assets in Spain ($47 million and $103 million) (2022: $64 million and $100 million), respectively.17. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The company’s primary capital management objectives are to ensure the sustainability of its capital to support continuing operations, meet its financial obligations, allow for growth opportunities and provide stable distributions. The company’s capital is monitored through the debt-to-total capitalization ratio on a consolidated basis. As at December 31, 2023 this ratio was 37% (2022: 34%).
Subsidiaries of the company have provided covenants to certain of their lenders for their non-recourse borrowings. These covenants vary from one credit agreement to another and include ratios that address debt-service coverage. Certain lenders have also put in place requirements that oblige the company and its subsidiaries to maintain debt and capital expenditure reserve accounts. The consequences to the subsidiaries as a result of failure to comply with their covenants could include a limitation of distributions from the subsidiaries to the company, as well as repayment of outstanding debt.
The company’s strategy is to maintain the measures set out in the following schedule as at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
Non-recourse borrowings(1) | $ | 16,217 | | $ | 13,780 |
| | | |
Deferred income tax liabilities, net(2) | 5,717 | | 5,193 |
| BEPC exchangeable and class B shares | 4,721 | | 4,364 |
| Equity | | | |
| Participating non-controlling interest – in operating subsidiaries | 11,070 | | 10,680 |
| Participating non-controlling interest – in a holding subsidiary held by Brookfield Renewable | 272 | | 271 |
| The partnership | 5,787 | | 5,873 |
| Total capitalization | $ | 43,784 | | $ | 40,161 |
| Debt-to-total capitalization | 37 | % | | 34 | % |
(1)Excludes $145 million (2022: $65 million) of deferred financing fees, net of unamortized premiums.
(2)Deferred income tax liabilities less deferred income tax assets.
18. EQUITY-ACCOUNTED INVESTMENTS
The following table outlines the changes in the company’s equity-accounted investments:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 451 | | | $ | 455 | | | |
| Investment | 22 | | | 48 | | | |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | 36 | | | — | | | |
| Share of net income (loss) | (8) | | | 6 | | | |
| Share of other comprehensive income (loss) | 50 | | | (58) | | | |
| Dividends received | (14) | | | (4) | | | |
Change in basis of accounting(1) | 104 | | | — | | | |
| Foreign exchange translation and other | 3 | | | 4 | | | |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 644 | | | $ | 451 | | | |
(1)Includes the recognition of a 378 MW operating hydroelectric portfolio in the U.S. Refer to Note 4 - Disposal of assets for more details.
19. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The company’s cash and cash equivalents as at December 31 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Cash | $ | 393 | | | $ | 433 | |
| Cash subject to restriction | 186 | | | 207 | |
| Short-term deposit | 48 | | | 2 | |
| | $ | 627 | | | $ | 642 | |
20. RESTRICTED CASH
The company’s restricted cash as at December 31 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Operations | | | $ | 163 | | | $ | 27 | |
| Credit obligations | | | 39 | | | 30 | |
| Development projects | | | — | | | 11 | |
| Total | | | 202 | | | 68 | |
| Less: non-current | | | (37) | | | (24) | |
| Current | | | $ | 165 | | | $ | 44 | |
21. TRADE RECEIVABLES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
The company’s trade receivables and other current assets as at December 31 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Trade receivables | $ | 503 | | | $ | 506 | |
Collateral deposits(1) | 169 | | | 603 | |
| Inventory | 65 | | | 18 | |
| Prepaids and other | 76 | | | 53 | |
| Income tax receivables | 57 | | | 66 | |
| Other short-term receivables | 85 | | | 75 | |
| | $ | 955 | | | $ | 1,321 | |
(1) Collateral deposits are related to energy derivative contracts the company enters into in order to mitigate the exposure to wholesale market electricity prices on the future sale of uncontracted generation, as part of the company’s risk management strategy.
As at December 31, 2023, 92% (2022: 96%) of trade receivables were current. The company does not expect issues with collectability of these amounts. Accordingly, as at December 31, 2023 and 2022 an allowance for doubtful accounts for trade receivables was not deemed necessary. Trade receivables are generally on 30-day terms and credit limits are assigned and monitored for all counterparties. In determining the recoverability of trade receivables, management performs a risk analysis considering the type and age of the outstanding receivables and the credit worthiness of the counterparties. Management also reviews trade receivable balances on an ongoing basis.
The company primarily receives payments monthly for invoiced PPA revenues and has no significant aged receivables as of the reporting date. Receivables from contracts with customers are reflected in Trade receivables.
22. OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS
The company’s other long-term assets as at December 31 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Note | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Restricted cash | 20 | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 24 | |
| Long-term receivables | | | 110 | | | 38 | |
| Due from related parties | 27 | | 9 | | | 9 | |
Intangibles(1) | | | 7 | | | 208 | |
| Other | | | 21 | | | 30 | |
| | | $ | 184 | | | $ | 309 | |
(1) Relates to certain power generating facilities that operate under service concession arrangements.At December 31, 2023 and 2022, restricted cash was held primarily to satisfy operations and maintenance reserve requirements, lease payments and credit agreements.
On September 20, 2023, Brookfield Renewable, together with its institutional partners, completed the sale of its 100% interest in a 95 MW portfolio of wind assets in Uruguay that operated under a service concession arrangement. See Note 4 – Disposal of assets, for additional details.
23. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
The company’s accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at December 31 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Operating accrued liabilities | $ | 365 | | | $ | 258 | |
| Accounts payable | 184 | | | 154 | |
| Interest payable on non-recourse borrowings | 152 | | | 85 | |
| Income tax payable | 35 | | | 74 | |
| Current portion of lease liabilities | 31 | | | 26 | |
BEPC exchangeable shares distributions payable(1) | 16 | | | 14 | |
| Other | 24 | | | 10 | |
| $ | 807 | | | $ | 621 | |
(1)Includes amounts payable only to external shareholders. Amounts payable to Brookfield and the partnership are included in due to related parties.
24. PROVISIONS
The following table presents the change in the decommissioning liabilities for the company:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Balance, beginning of the year | $ | 314 | | | $ | 497 | |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | 221 | | | — | |
| Disposals | (1) | | | (1) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Accretion | 11 | | | 11 | |
Changes in estimates(1) | 169 | | | (185) | |
| Foreign exchange and other | 12 | | | (8) | |
| Balance, end of the year | $ | 726 | | | $ | 314 | |
(1)Changes in estimates are driven by changes in underlying assumptions used as inputs to determine the value of the retirement obligation.
The company has recorded decommissioning retirement obligations associated with certain power generating assets. The decommissioning retirement obligation has been established for hydroelectric, wind and utility-scale solar operation sites that are expected to be restored between the years 2031 to 2058. The estimated cost of decommissioning activities is based on a third-party assessment.
For details on other legal provisions, please refer to Note 26 – Commitments, contingencies and guarantees.
Provisions also includes contingent and deferred acquisition consideration of $157 million (2022: nil).
25. OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
The company’s other long-term liabilities as at December 31 are comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | | Note | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Lease liabilities | | | | $ | 470 | | | $ | 338 | |
Regulatory liabilities(1) | | | | 104 | | | 149 | |
| Pension obligations | | | | 57 | | | 43 | |
| Concession payment liability | | | | 2 | | | 10 | |
| Other | | | | 92 | | | 73 | |
| | | | $ | 725 | | | $ | 613 | |
(1) Regulatory liabilities are related to the regulated pricing mechanism at certain of the company’s Spanish assets.
26. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES
Commitments
In the course of its operations, the company has entered into agreements for the use of water, land and dams. Payment under those agreements varies with the amount of power generated. The various agreements can be renewed and are extendable up to 2089.
In the normal course of business, the company will enter into capital expenditure commitments which primarily relate to contracted project costs for various growth initiatives. As at December 31, 2023, the company had $865 million (2022: $505 million) of capital expenditure commitments outstanding, of which $609 million is payable in less than one year, $256 million in two to five years, and nil thereafter.
An integral part of the company’s strategy is to participate with institutional partners in Brookfield-sponsored private equity funds that target acquisitions that suit the company’s profile. In the normal course of business, the company has made commitments to Brookfield-sponsored private equity funds to participate in these target acquisitions in the future, if and when identified. From time to time, in order to facilitate investment activities in a timely and efficient manner, the company will fund deposits or incur other costs and expenses (including by use of loan facilities to consummate, support, guarantee or issue letters of credit) in respect of an investment that ultimately will be shared with or made entirely by Brookfield sponsored vehicles, consortiums and/or partnerships (including private funds, joint ventures and similar arrangements), the company, or by co-investors.
Contingencies
The company and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal proceedings, arbitrations and actions arising in the normal course of business. While the final outcome of such legal proceedings and actions cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the resolution of such proceedings and actions will not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
The company’s subsidiaries themselves have provided letters of credit, which include, but are not limited to, guarantees for debt service reserves, capital reserves, construction completion and performance.
The company, along with institutional partners, has provided letters of credit, which include, but are not limited to, guarantees for debt service reserves, capital reserves, construction completion and performance as it relates to interests in the Brookfield Americas Infrastructure Fund, the Brookfield Infrastructure Fund II, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund III, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund IV, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund V, Brookfield Global Transition Fund and Brookfield Global Transition Fund II. The company’s subsidiaries have similarly provided letters of credit, which include, but are not limited to, guarantees for debt service reserves, capital reserves, construction completion and performance.
Letters of credit issued by the company's subsidiaries as at December 31, 2023 were $1,135 million (2022: $994 million).
Guarantees
In the normal course of operations, the company executes agreements that provide for indemnification and guarantees to third-parties of transactions such as business dispositions, capital project purchases, business acquisitions, power marketing activities such as purchase and sale agreements, swap agreements, sales and purchases of assets and services, and the transfer of tax credits or renewable energy grants from tax equity partnerships. The company has also agreed to indemnify its directors and certain of its officers and employees. The nature of substantially all of the indemnification undertakings and guarantee agreements prevents the company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount that the company could be required to pay third parties as the agreements do not always specify a maximum amount and the amounts are dependent upon the outcome of future contingent events, the nature and likelihood of which cannot be determined at this time.
Two direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of our company have fully and unconditionally guaranteed (i) any and all present and future unsecured debt securities issued by Brookfield Renewable Partners ULC, in each case as to payment of principal, premium (if any) and interest when and as the same will become due and payable under or in respect of the trust indenture under which such securities are issued, (ii) all present and future senior preferred shares of Brookfield Renewable Power Preferred Equity Inc. (“BRP Equity”) as to the payment of dividends when due, the payment of amounts due on redemption and the payment of amounts due on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BRP Equity, (iii) certain of BEP’s preferred units, as to payment of distributions when due, the payment of amounts due on redemption and the payment of amounts due on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of BEP, (iv) the obligations of all present and future bilateral credit facilities established for the benefit of Brookfield Renewable, and (v) notes issued by Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc. under its U.S. commercial paper program. BRP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (“BBHI”) and BEP Subco Inc. subsidiaries of the company have guaranteed the perpetual subordinated notes issued by Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc. These arrangements do not have or are not reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
27. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The company’s related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount. The company’s related party transactions are primarily with the partnership and Brookfield.
Management Agreements
Master Services Agreement
Since inception, our parent company has had a management agreement (the “Master Services Agreement”) with certain service providers (the “Service Provider”), which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Brookfield Asset Management. The Master Services Agreement was amended in connection with the completion of the special distribution to include BEPC as a service recipient.
The company’s annual consolidated financial statements include general corporate expenses of the partnership which were not historically allocated to the company’s operations. These expenses relate to management fees payable to Brookfield Asset Management and direct operating costs incurred by a subsidiary of the partnership. These allocated expenses have been included as appropriate in the company’s consolidated statements of income. Key decision makers of the company are employees of the ultimate parent company who provide management services under the company’s Master Services Agreement. However, the financial statements may not include all of the expenses that would have been incurred and may not reflect the company’s annual consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows had it been a standalone company during the periods presented. It is not practicable to estimate the actual costs that would have been incurred had the company been a standalone business during the periods presented as this would depend on multiple factors, including organizational structure and infrastructure.
Pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, on a quarterly basis, Brookfield Renewable pays a management fee, referred to as the management service costs, to the Service Provider equal to a fixed quarterly component of $5 million per quarter, adjusted for inflation, and a variable component calculated as a percentage of the increase in
the total capitalization value of Brookfield Renewable over an initial reference value (subject to an annual escalation by a specified inflation factor beginning on January 1, 2013) (the "Base Management Fee"). For purposes of calculating the management service costs, the market value of Brookfield Renewable is equal to the aggregate value of all the outstanding units and other securities issued by the service recipients, plus all outstanding third-party debt with recourse to a recipient of services under the Master Services Agreement, less all cash held by such entities. The company will be responsible for reimbursing the partnership or its subsidiaries, as the case may be, for BEPC's proportionate share of the Base Management Fee. BEPC's proportionate share of the Base Management Fee will be calculated on the basis of the value of BEPC's business relative to that of the partnership. The Base Management Fee for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $88 million (2022: $169 million and 2021: $175 million)
Relationship Agreement
Since inception, Brookfield Renewable has had a Relationship Agreement with Brookfield pursuant to which Brookfield has agreed, subject to certain exceptions, that Brookfield Renewable will serve as its primary vehicle through which it will directly or indirectly, acquire renewable power assets on a global basis. The company, being a controlled subsidiary of Brookfield Renewable is entitled to the benefits and subject to certain obligations under the Relationship Agreement.
Power Services Agreements
Energy Marketing Internalization
In the first quarter of 2021, the company and the partnership entered into an agreement to fully internalize all energy marketing capabilities in North America into the company. The agreement provides for the transfer for the partnership's Power Agency Agreements and related party power purchase agreements relating to certain power facilities in Maine and New Hampshire held by Great Lakes Holding America ("GLHA"), which are further described below. Certain third-party power purchase agreements were also transferred to the company as part of the Energy Marketing Internalization of the partnership’s North American energy marketing business.
The agreement became effective on April 1, 2021.
Power Agency Agreements
Certain subsidiaries of the company entered into Power Agency Agreements appointing the partnership as their exclusive agent in respect of the sale of electricity, including the procurement of transmission and other additional services. In addition, the partnership scheduled, dispatched and arranged for transmission of the power produced and the power supplied to third-parties in accordance with prudent industry practice. Pursuant to each Agreement, the partnership was entitled to be reimbursed for any third party costs incurred, and, in certain cases, received an additional fee for its services in connection with the sale of power and for providing the other services.
On closing of the Energy Marketing Internalization, all Power Agency Agreements were transferred by the partnership to the company.
Energy Marketing Agreement
Brookfield had agreed to provide energy marketing services to the company. Under this Agreement, the company paid an annual energy marketing fee commensurate to the services received. See Note 8 - Direct operating costs. On closing of the Energy Marketing Internalization, the Energy Marketing Agreement was transferred from Brookfield to the partnership.
Other Agreements
Other Revenue Agreements
Pursuant to a 20-year power purchase agreement, the partnership purchased all energy from several power facilities in Maine and New Hampshire held by GLHA at $37 per MWh. The energy rates were subject to an annual adjustment equal to 20% of the increase in the CPI during the previous year.
Upon closing of the Energy Marketing Internalization, the power purchase agreement with GLHA was transferred to the company.
Brookfield Renewable from time to time may enter into other power purchase agreements with Brookfield and its subsidiaries to deliver electricity, attributes related to generation and other related services. These agreements are typically entered into at market rates. During the year ended December 31, 2023 Brookfield Renewable recognized $10 million (2022: $72 million) in related party revenue and less than $1 million in financial instrument gains (2022: nil) related to these contracts. As at December 31, 2023 Brookfield Renewable had a financial instrument balance of less than $1 million for such contracts classified under IFRS 9.
Credit facilities and funds on deposit
Brookfield has provided a $400 million committed unsecured revolving credit facility maturing in December 2024 and the draws bear interest at Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus a margin. During the current period, there were no draws on the committed unsecured revolving credit facility provided by Brookfield. Brookfield may from time to time place funds on deposit with the company which are repayable on demand including any interest accrued. There were nil funds placed on deposit with the company as at December 31, 2023 (December 31, 2022: nil). The interest expense on the Brookfield revolving credit facility and deposit for the year ended December 31, 2023 totaled nil (2022: nil. 2021: nil).
The company participates with institutional partners in Brookfield Americas Infrastructure Fund, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund II, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund III, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund IV, Brookfield Infrastructure Fund V, Brookfield Infrastructure Debt Fund, Brookfield Global Transition Fund I, and Brookfield Global Transition Fund II (“Private Funds”), each of which is a Brookfield sponsored fund, and in connection therewith, Brookfield Renewable, together with its institutional partners, has access to financing using the Private Funds’ credit facilities.
Brookfield Reinsurance
From time to time Brookfield Reinsurance and its related entities may participate in capital raises undertaken by the company. These financings are typically provided at the market rates and as at December 31, 2023, $14 million of non-recourse borrowings (2022: $15 million) and nil of corporate borrowings (2022: nil) were due to Brookfield Reinsurance. As at December 31, 2023, the company had $184 million (2022: $100 million) of borrowings from Brookfield Reinsurance classified as due to related party.
Subsidiaries of Brookfield Reinsurance may from time to time decide to participate in the company’s equity offerings.
TERP Ownership Transfer
On December 28, 2023 a subsidiary of Brookfield Renewable transferred 13.75% of its interest in TerraForm Power to the company. The non-controlling interest was transferred at fair value and resulted in an increase of $225 million in due to related parties and a decrease of $225 million to equity. After the transfer, the company continues to control and consolidate Terraform Power and holds a 39.34% economic interest as at December 31, 2023. In conjunction with the transfer, Terraform Power declared a non-cash dividend to its shareholders resulting in a decrease of $704 million in Equity and an increase in due to related parties of $704 million.
The following table reflects the related party agreements and transactions in the consolidated statements of income (loss), for the years ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenues | | | | | |
| Power purchase and revenue agreements | $ | 10 | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 163 | |
| | | | | | |
| Direct operating costs | | | | | |
Energy purchases(1) | $ | (19) | | | $ | (22) | | | $ | (62) | |
| Energy marketing fee & other services | (2) | | | (7) | | | (11) | |
Insurance expense(2) | — | | | — | | | (20) | |
| | $ | (21) | | | $ | (29) | | | $ | (93) | |
| | | | | |
| Interest expense | | | | | |
| Borrowings | $ | (19) | | | $ | (17) | | | $ | (29) | |
| | | | | |
| Other | | | | | |
| Interest income | $ | 29 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 10 | |
| Dividend income | $ | 7 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Other related party services(2) | $ | 3 | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | (13) | |
| Financial instrument gain | $ | 9 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | |
| Management service agreement | $ | (88) | | | $ | (169) | | | $ | (175) | |
(1)Certain subsidiaries that the company controls, through a voting agreement, have entered into agreements to appoint the partnership as their agent in entering into certain derivative transactions with external counterparties to hedge against fluctuations in power purchase prices. The company recognized nil (2022: nil 2021: $62 million) gains associated with agency arrangements which have been excluded from energy purchases. As of April 1, 2021, the agency arrangements were transferred from the partnership to the company upon the closing of Energy Marketing Internalization.
(2)Prior to November 2021, insurance services were paid to external insurance service providers through subsidiaries of Brookfield Corporation. The fees paid to the subsidiaries of Brookfield Corporation in 2023 were nil (2022: nil 2021:$20 million). As of November 2021, Brookfield, through a regulated subsidiary, began providing insurance coverage through third-party commercial insurers for the benefits of certain entities in North America. The premiums and claims are not included in the table above.
The following table reflects the impact of the related party agreements and transactions on the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | Related party | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Current assets | | | | | |
| Due from related parties | | | | | |
| Amounts due from | Brookfield | | $ | 39 | | | $ | 41 | |
| The partnership | | 1,366 | | | 563 | |
| | Equity-accounted investments and other | | 22 | | | 11 | |
| | | | $ | 1,427 | | | $ | 615 | |
| | | | | |
| Non-current assets | | | | | |
| Financial instrument assets | Brookfield | | $ | 170 | | | $ | 292 | |
| | | | | |
| Due from related parties | | | | | |
| Amounts due from | The partnership | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 9 | |
| | | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | | | |
| Due to related parties | | | | | |
| Amounts due to | Brookfield | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 37 | |
| The partnership | | 238 | | | 315 | |
| | Equity-accounted investments and other | | 8 | | | 12 | |
| Brookfield Reinsurance and associates | | 184 | | | $ | 100 | |
| | | | $ | 456 | | | $ | 464 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Non-current liabilities | | | | | |
| Due to related parties | | | | | |
| Amounts due to | Brookfield | | $ | 79 | | | $ | — | |
| The partnership | | $ | 850 | | | $ | — | |
| Equity-accounted investments and other | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | |
| Non-recourse borrowings | Brookfield Reinsurance and associates | | 14 | | | 15 | |
| | | | | |
Current assets
Amounts due from Brookfield and the partnership are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.
Current liabilities
Amounts due to Brookfield and the partnership are unsecured, payable on demand and relate to recurring transactions.
28. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
The net change in working capital balances for the year ended December 31 shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows is comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (MILLIONS) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Trade receivables and other current assets | $ | 535 | | | $ | (270) | | | $ | (467) | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (51) | | | 175 | | | (259) | |
| Other assets and liabilities | (79) | | | (8) | | | 99 | |
| | $ | 405 | | | $ | (103) | | | $ | (627) | |
