on we today’s And Steve. Thanks, appreciate joining everyone us call.
lower the second quarter mild a quarter. in progress spring year’s. substantial remains the and with have made Still our last important to second during lead company to energy noted, track sales financial did on wet several we for year, on Steve targets the meet compared As the initiatives
X.X% we customer first XX increase rate at end strong noted of at the X.X% of over see that This X, remains months. quarter. is an the the a growth Slide On past from the growth
driver growth Power As service opportunities. area, in company a move benefits our new to continued Idaho The economic development and affordable customers from our energy our sales reliable, for remains increased further clean, key provides region. energy business
of growth large – square-foot $XX online during the projects including particularly in a robust by me, technology business continues Syngenta’s Boise. of Several Nampa, finalized facility Syngenta most in second expansion a manufacturing corn Corp and of North will pipeline million Boise excuse notable it large peaking west load. processing, American east work, winter be conversion in the production and quarter, and food came the customers, Power manage sectors. to Idaho of experience new potential load XXX,XXX trade will
energized southern and service for city the that new region treatment Oak of our wastewater a a area of significant expansion has also load We the been Valley facility in Dairy of large business. project major recipient a in the increase Jerome, a in for Burley
service later expect additional We beyond. year this begin commercial to and projects also taking
product of year, service Idaho in forecast upward remains an this Power now service our X.X% region employed, last record. at trend. predicts Moody’s area Compared has current area also time with growth in on employment X.X% X.X% and people within Power in Idaho domestic within Employment grown new with XXXX another XXX,XXX XXXX. gross
quarter the to risk potential of plan X.X% IRP. filed line needs. transmission over XX the per sources megawatts a a the company resource service or identifies XX-year next the Power per Unemployment current and service average capacity second an with compared in integrated X.X% XX,XXX area plan Idaho the the a XXXX year. resource energy meeting to is its load expects XXX to IRP by Hemingway of recently the Idaho energy reliability at average The more IRP decades, demand. Power With moving was needed nationally. cost, two than projected end to Boardman resources that customers company’s of preferred additional serve the increase needs examines growing to XX each year area new for grow kilovolt and year megawatts The our peak as and
The future entire of an resource This interconnection modeling first find was system to interconnection simulates conditions. use economic a portfolio. range a to long-term western to Idaho expansion XXXX system capacity IRP portfolios IRP resource Power’s optimized under model the identify system Western
modeling about software, an inquiries Power-specific modeling by there to perform used XXXX to concluded to was we the a optimize need filing Idaho IRP, After and methodology the the we system. IRP the had additional that
and currently simulations to now, from results modeling Power the the IRP Power-specific optimization Idaho expect information analysis So further filed system and is view. conducting additional XXXX and with we Idaho supplement
alter If additions additional with which the it could retirements. portfolio, results the could identified timing of and XXXX the modeling, in planned modify we the differences identify anticipated in significant resource associated the IRP preferred
to end the We updated expect October. have information by of
Hells Canyon to continues relicensing progress.
the certifications both regarding earlier Act there XXX in issued filed filed signed Oregon of court Several by the Water Idaho. been fixed XXX though following were in parties settlement no year. and lawsuits assets in Idaho certifications state Oregon challenges agreement related Clean the Section Section Our to this have states Federal
progress Commission actively and to FERC Power in or the or continues Canyon progress long-term a new Regulatory process relicensing license Energy obtaining for monitor Hells Idaho make will as continues. from relicensing beyond. We to continue pursue XXXX FERC to the Federal
and line Hemingway continues final site of The which of the forward. order milestones or to order proposal a the BXH next major a which year Department are proposed anticipate XXXX we certificate order move later draft issuance transmission issued we in XXXX. early a to in this also expect The or Oregon Energy Boardman and project May,
in Idaho we As I energy in goal our Power play XXX% planning have significant BXH as as well its XXXX to clean calls, by process. achieve previous a long-term on expect mentioned role helping IRP
plan I at next the stated file play XX all remains growth that general roles constructive regulatory Oregon we timing significant case in expenses true combined months. did in we XX need Idaho Steady and months. the a load last our next the case. look with or That to next look not management as base, customer our prudent quarter rate and in of general increases as we rate outcomes operating at today
X, Slide temperatures or of Oceanic current XX% the from equal chance the Atmospheric National to and head below the and present normal of Administration above summer we above and that levels normal fall. into XX% precipitation of projections as suggests chance a On remainder an for we
the earlier, Steve reservoir hydropower. storage provide for low-cost generation of indicated should As levels favorable conditions
power As in our to costs a our volatility greatly supply Oregon fluctuate earnings Idaho resource power cost adjustment and and related due mix mechanisms that changes significantly can in weather. reminder, associated to reduced
the for I Idaho recent and less mid-sized score among Residential Utility a Electric Customer among XXXX the Power results. We achieved wanted utilities places Satisfaction closing, acknowledge to J.D. our the utilities. top that nationally second record Power company In
emphasis to reliability, customers. our citizenship impacts corporate continued have positive and continues service of on price, in Our areas customer
be Steve you any questions happy and and that, call to I may on would others With the have. answer