one now year and year another to Lineage everyone. We new . worked Genentech open trial Welcome Ioana, us you alongside biotech clinical think an but call. successfully We Thanks, XXXX trial I challenging its companies, today. enrolling exceptional that next and was appreciate patients. XXXX it OpRegen is good to Roche our prepare for joining for afternoon, full was and for and
financially the success to which first With our in auditory adding program but improve by pipeline, in responsible existing we moves shown program, the and made bold assets candidates. our program and them that ophthalmology from from but create time upon labs, tailwinds any an expand adding experience photoreceptor financial positive neuron we've in from our not OpRegen these only third capitalizes product the obligations also on can place, is in-house which we a vastly reducing party R&D scratch
opening regulatory for a along XXXX developmental we execution also important advanced a a is as of of my investor way XXXX but a is to marked the our lot would use team presently AMD landscape, the realize recap focused successful so clinical I call, Lineage know on year pathways. and clinical better I programs clinic and respective attention this be thought that I dry remarks. the
is approved approval approvable that Last complement an FDA this with decision this preservation photoreceptor an We condition. dry change has to inhibitor anatomical treat and in form enormous a is in a precedent the of regulatory endpoint month, with the leading reverse complement the collected by FDA believe or set halt AMD far progression what greater for the of structure is and demonstrated date have been than us data the of OpRegen retinal either either ability we because outer improve inhibitors. even its to GA to has and this
we're spontaneously of these multiple images. captured will small do seeing sometimes are in but results anatomical independently only verified reporting we using number them occur patients, remind and a changes not shown analyses via these we've Critics objectively that say which I that
patients, inhibitor, Phase repeated in When the point surrounding GA gained reduction are the three to these shown error Genentech more be GA five all FDA and small provided, early on only the likely I all for a look complement drug's that reductions Roche than which area in results likely the estimates which last highly treated and which bars growth supported have believe the So on greater approval year the it's recently reported this basis studies. then I to ARVO that XXXX of which on the think trial in of at clinical is OpRegen larger patients annual for we that meeting approval. trials the exceptional
of across we outer X.X anatomical cohort who in transplant reporting received patients cells to also study improvements letters of functional XX.X among measured patients all been extensive with an of recently, have changes have only but that outlets improvements demonstrated four and provide letters five among a and exhibited XX not their inhibitor who coverage complement to additionally number Furthermore, increasing our Phase to X/Xa following vision patients gained gained the structure can different benefits retinal vision. functional OpRegen GA months a average
my The on colleague around target the XX case than data after former was at the evidence were patients less fired. call the to that post treatment which company hoc sought which they're to months This a selective liked letters patients something placebo. that XX analysis, cut exploratory likely on is make drawing arrows to provided lose
in patients for received I Despite data this on Roche and that was comparison investment similarly gained actually at by letters. will to it in number this well being the the was XX of quite community small showed didn't They patients that avoid of patients all of patients ARVO representing least Genentech gained OpRegen and which reported very only at trial, data, cohort a they again vision draw four XX five XX% loss, by reason, treated
we're tremendous benefits could to injections that condition, provided benefit, amount some be patients their complement letter have a not it's with monthly as and community of but have medical it Obviously, benefit huge clinical XX shown. the delta are a So something a to large for appears approaches. which these help may which finally patients as about between inhibitors there still which is which of talking comparisons us
major the candidate medical help of and medical presented communities for and our It's become very attributes continue investor and safety, efficacy, of important profile. the results meetings to aware our being at other product
is advantages additional the OpRegen and of potential the One in administration. product profile of dosing
involves Opregen XX giving year which after injection single all year patients month compliance an accompany than with two it. or a issues minute rather the procedure treatment every
how of we this long treatment but lasts, clear are often reason, terminus yet benefit haven't For a asked our reached indication tapering. we we because or don't an know the
patient lost baseline, in going patient was mentioned still who prior which cases, her calls was she level with three way years as eye, long five has eye. her untreated four first we improvement that as I've have the eye higher of XX than her data treated letters our her some including in letters very by at years acuity baseline in better visual structural on out after performing but OpRegen
still Again, Phase years up four is X/Xa be follow and data from duration study us Long-term to from treatment a come more which that's month. as the to in next disease post-treatment to analyses of deeper which coming progressive. of may continue monitor there the inevitably allows widely is as ongoing, effect well viewed evidence imaging
just Al our to are as next this ARVO at XXth. of be be Phase a by April of disclosures Benin updates in and few trial Dr. one on meeting always, XXXX happening Genentech look annual data will X/Xa and weeks. Some That'll behalf Roche on data made important forward the presented available and that from we
outcome available study as two data predict the has safety trial an usually Genentech we're have to for of patients, the measures AMD well that will is expect all OpRegen enrollment from has XX we ongoing secondary Meanwhile, to days, Phase occur that period and to about so but compared brief Roche very XX delivery techniques. dry evaluate and the is excited studies. will a study when because range of the It which primary activity launched as at certain difficult primary XX what observation to it regardless,
continued appreciate clinical trials Eye former enrolling in of more of Genentech Sacramento, Cincinnati study. has we Dr. retinal the be is Cincinnati patients PI participation who our Institute one operation a we the site treated Dr. the participated sites in Lineage and and year. Reman, and this online original and whom far T PI both the disclosed his from X/Xa coming Land's restoration so will sites expect Phase in Christopher two
our completed as successfully on lot of support you'll our program, focused to spinal which cord a one, work activities last to year we recall OPC planned. next that regulatory Moving interactions for
the response following Our the previously data support conduct which an have requests and for and and in I package several our dialogue we interaction with FDA on RMAT RMAT we chronic small subacute a of with use been additional device for package along information comprehensive have been patients to have delivery initial FDA submission. responding to clinical an to active discussed occasions, study plan safety synopsis was protocol to new with a the to submitted
with type hope occur quarter, anticipate amendment of in We B to another submission in planned our will support FDA I&D of this the interaction half second the meeting, second year. we formal which a
our necessary either received, able. as with open-label Assuming injuries study XX subacute we're clearances the plan to safety the as chronic is in dosed study the known device to are clinical soon patients initiate five or as
continue Institute also Medicine safety We and study. the to grant with to for apply the frequent Regenerative to California support contact a we for in remain device plan
the a and to that As dosed proceed proposed that FDA it's trial on contingent aware, communication FDA an indicating so initiate subsequent the of you receipt study. state submission be therefore of are must grant our timing to of to of application the provide guidelines applicant CM most from protocol, clinical with safe will clearance
than and have package we earlier feedback submitted pre-Id as little a VACX, meeting FDA. planned our already we planned for bit received actually from
was clear the process to and Research emphasis was of analytical proposed FDA's production supporting a naturally methods the Their feedback use to future the path from our would the material. Our clinical to and Phase manufacture study be filing positive of we to view one IND which understand two Any in conducted U.K. expected to Cancer generally data with characterize and by package and us clinical IND our Act provided submission. pre-Id an actionable include
U.K of continue better plans their quarter In DC be by candidates and be expected landscape back XXXX. of will are you that be those the important This monitor of an the evolving to update currently still that awaiting we on vaccine the We data component n to and our a during position data clinical Cancer at second available product potential will in d, so changing recently is meantime, we would I we're to data. informed any Research time.
manufacturing new we currently and from be hope appropriate data available. once preclinical line studies top patent as to program present been and also are photoreceptor We've which data Initial preclinical in in ongoing become vision to our made of both programs hearing year. the were and for have disorders, and to able last our two publicly engage launched preclinical continued activities transplant loss cell submissions
Last year. to preclinical neuron month, available of hearing that announced testing with and of also already initiation our preclinical data the University with of I'd the be we've with s last later the beginning in this didn't vivo anticipated we at auditory collaboration started in program exist to Lineage preclinical like program even remind everyone yet loss year, initial Michigan studies.
we've a execute advance been on than develop and million. new months than our investment to the to into then the of methods dollars versatility than We dollars to platform. an advance while the proceed cell speed in testing then concept, XX the efficiency to less specific less more that showed that from $X program vivo and in Notably, and with of intellectual We spending a generate of this Lineage investment little differentiation stage return illustrative manufacturer on less our believe product property million ability R&D of on able R&D our, budget. and of a are than type
platform money the from making our differences When increasingly small capital striking and return the we against invested the our invested I same We a compare untapped industry think in become programs improve apparent capabilities Lineage tremendous has new the we in on the to a that and norms to it'll continue potential. homegrown as vivo and advance find journey. further, move concept into we for time testing program molecule
with months both ahead, and occurring years prudent pipeline. a Our value our financial activities goal partnerships, through OpRegen unlock our will maintaining in be progress and expansion the and between to balance that the while with internally still exciting
brings development a about few recent This comments business most next me our transaction. to
development we you that as prior development out I are that know licensing, you joint As business and in and said emphasizing from includes have calls, licensing projects.
Our to agreement within Therapeutics, an to most gives technologies an affordable way option approach. strategic which is recent us several gain our deal overall Ether with which new access fit
of in Dry set believe intended set the to That this success FDA the confidence advantages deal in to and with are has areas. company and time increased into regulatory the fits for apply technologies recent right is to help strategy. the is because AMD, aim of and foundation future provide we investments overall certain staged These OPN precedent us the a the become; turn our by our upon other technology our we where type
it and an the cell offers us fully to to ex are an engineer administered provides to modify bolster complement behavior cells Pluripotent us experience Editing, Stem It These new gain to manufacturing and with us new features are they opportunity in-house allows transplanted. our being and an Gene functionality before prior expected IPSC. Hypo Induced directed patient. capabilities. differentiation Immunity three three in editing opportunity to Cells or to This and characterize a Gene vivo and of line areas, editing edited
genes some to which give of In delete other the to because we may better while them us products functionality the thereby with in gives copy look may and add may we also Editing genes it tolerability durability a outcomes. difficult makes our clinical add a to look transplant. cases, edge and it cases competitive or help may
which press because or hypo explained lower we we deficient immunity as we've with of as out to report don't BXM OpRegen years patients the utilizing XX line, be locations cell as eye and dry relevant our AMD, spinal rejection. of spinal long will and patients injury in associated transplants. never transplant or As the to as cells, as agreement, a known We see release a with programs tolerant with five a our announcing chances of cord feature [indiscernible] received existing cell in that's is rejection but cord the in are years OPCX long going for be
could of an appropriate beneficial consider we product new the ensure to expand and and whether our suitable be all product have commercial an product we need other could We want immunity feature of to our potential interesting areas candidates. that to think immunity hypo If technology profile. body, hypo candidates be for
exercising to new The for cells, intellectual already of candidate have aspect IPSC uses first from certain platform IPSC day one use IPSC product inventions but line. is this of on third of the built line. property option and lead this our an We an deal cell could
with to yet lines widely be it behave deal can Overall, Lineage the excited and see this and give competition. will the new hands, that another performance relatively point structure. how experience lines We to of is and know access both differentiation we believe our a but with cost from provides with of ES modest quality experience cells compared IPSC we're in IPSC we'll vary multiple keen technologies, because rare and these about us very to regardless
or struggled this while collaboration and key year stepwise overall, research with space headcounts both anticipate reducing We we and updates onto a five hires year responsible our therapy later this providing pipeline and investments. We editing expanded of many gene companies number we this cell and and our de-prioritizing last badly very broadened Israel, in but California of did and made each advanced programs. programs, our
to new can company. we in arching where have cell existing overall have milestones of settings leading OpRegeneic we and of ensure important and I exceptional our programs the XXXX of all in a remain on help cell disease responsible the we support efforts company believe additional a events. in and during in capital believe all building progression XXXX. impact continued prioritization into of making further investments the each made Lineage focused both therapy We'll To our therapy and progress vision our meaningful reach collaborations
our a discussion of call that, the I'll over now to Jill With financials. for hand