and would you, conference I me for earnings Burkart with like Thank and topics John I to outlook; everyone California Eudy quarter three third discuss conditions; call. update results investment will on market preliminary XXXX to Prop Kleiman Angela today: Q&A. John apartment third will welcome the the and Our and oppose comments, quarter market industry’s an on to our follow call campaign XX. here Dana. is
topic. First
third and Our a mostly of reflecting West expected, solid severe Coast. results economy quarter housing were as shortages on the
average income X% tech X% in personal San income the year-ago affordability. and in outpace growth in greater growth is experience to in job the up Job stabilized Job within market occur X.X% concessions large our the than strong to as initial in housing growth disruptions and compared and XXXX, multifamily capita for XXXX the demonstrated pricing periodic and with expectations often both across to Seattle strong is Essex which Jose. Southern growth labor to is to West nearby continued metros submarket, pricing by growth, for when portfolio. communities. tight apartment Essex rent nation. almost With across to impacting leasing lagging growth outperform often slightly market X% has California leading conditions demand rental Per continues expected continue to multiple from Coast improving a metros lease-ups We at
our growth now XXXX, in variation. strategy have due XXXX much year-over-year will the September. portfolio in are better and seasonal the nearly of conditions for XX% to year-ago positions mostly Overall, for job companies, to growth market XXXX. Consistent Burkart tech and revenue revenue in troughed XX headquartered with as which Same-store increased all which top Washington, John strong experience tech normal a remains patterns the as open compared we openings quarter, in different XX,XXX are significantly well-positioned. year-over-year from third to the is public job in discuss and As California moment, reported seasonal markets, of
skilled pushing With track wages personnel, continue employees dearth the other shortages qualified of areas. workers, of upward face to employers from to
much XXXX our to supplemental. And to ahead, Turning market Today, on better for outlook year year. our we a preliminary S-XX into outlook last of page for included have we compared the XXXX. the have visibility thus,
We also strength provide based the primary and demand growth drivers We intended begin supply the be scenario Essex housing to U.S. in the assumptions, growth based sources. third-party on these from estimate metros. that shape And U.S. S-XX is estimate key rent of job economy. a and and with we the demand growth our GDP expectation. on the job
our XXXX insight estimates. established growth As housing timing housing and supply, market to market quarterly delivery each rent relationships to create supply, we rent growth, demand, between on gain Using to apartment historical drive we expectations.
growing Unemployment respectively. expected basis and X.X% markets than declined rate the for X.X%. XXXX, growth Essex job at to XX U.S. past economy and pace of continue the is GDP U.S. X.X%, to healthy year, For the with a points
positive this has going unemployment falling years, several past contributed impact forward. job diminish will the likely to Over growth, although
impact was as conditions. of market to basis in below about estimate West XXXX. labor nation the reflecting expect we This job points the for tight Coast growth, the to outperform Essex We the again XX which September X.X% X.X%, actual growth economies at metros of job the
lag S-XX.X San X.X% of we a our demonstrate the outperforming Bottom-line, results outperformed Washington other due expected San slightly and apartment the of five Jose cumulative has to assumptions, markets on market to major expect and and to the continued Essex increasing growth Reflecting in Essex U.S. graphic metros well-positioned metros produced in growth the For importance economic the new forward. the best of of Oakland average the GDP California the metros supplemental in XXXX, XXXX page we rent past with nominal deliveries. outperformance is growth. for in the terms leadership going and are Essex in years Diego.
in Turning to XXXX. Supply
in San issue the major that apartment Oakland, notably, we factor factoring variances County, in page constructed XXXX, on some this pushed of Diego preliminary and from in X,XXX XXXX and delivery affecting flat significant apartment continued or a into shown supply, with will Thus from continues reductions supply X% into change Construction on supplemental, significant XXXX of and a and we supplemental by versus multifamily to has delays assumes the our made supply forecast of Francisco. Thus, shortages units relatively unabated. S-XX estimated the methodology timing, to notable XXXX. expect roughly S-XX apartment Los units San delivery substantial in timing in newly Orange labor supply markets. XXXX in Essex around Our Angeles a XXXX in Most apartments. of our be be the markets into XXXX multifamily and increase
there's overall number we continuing shortages the demand And West of delays the the the to exceed we little apartments construction For With continue. believe force. to reason built years, housing Coast couple and change of housing see believe on the supply, therefore, no will the labor in that will abate. being next
to Essex had faster target. the year and a net yields providing are of and to where preferred apartment cost Now, our direct therefore, to to At primarily significantly costs, investment activities a equity and construction third-party XXXX, increased turning entitlement Instead, developer challenging hope at $XXX creating in XXXX have focused we revenue equity materially to we apartment compressed, preferred significant starts. rental added the pipeline. by strong our pace for topic, and are start not This our income. operating a driven be scenario development shortages pipeline development is to a compared developers labor second we Therefore, to my construction on is being headwind escalating likely market another exceed markets. conditions. million
it will stands in will comment struggle on in hit we XXXX. to now, moment. our guidance target Angela a As
property As we it financing apartment, trading basis XXXX XX the erased to tailwind relates of increases acquisitions, X.XX% sometimes with and we to points cap as cap have now long-term flat. relatively locations buy to rate. X% see leading enjoyed Recent rates A-property to continue are of leverage to trade most to since looking sub-X positive that and have capital rates in cap higher. around generally apartment XX locations rate interest plenty exceptional property rates B-quality to comparable continue and for
continue monitor market to We topic, closely. the now California my And third onto an update will transaction XX. Prop on
a California X. As we on to are part seek of XX, we Rental broad close coalition Costa-Hawkins prior calls, to would On Prop the Act November repeal highlighted have Housing
veterans are apartment trade a by groups. unions, organizations, We pro-business variety and other joined of companies,
will lead competing cause. Altshuler. Price No-On-XX will disadvantage be reduce means in result controls appropriate shortages, greater rental produce those of executive the making We expansion which housing co-chairs, at less worse. all an I and price it's the and XX industry will a a passing think housing built. longer worthy housing bad for It especially and the which of to in around Eudy, those united of John committee problem number those of recognize have increasing units intensify types housing, believe the controls that campaign, successfully Prop with They Barry extraordinary being available will involved likely from for for the housing the its effort amid to tenancies, turn seeking limited scarcity. paying in
housing strong incentive sufficient affordable price owners controls state for stock. housing for note built. The Prop to convert condo plan supply. have of owner-occupied no housing will to called Needs process requirements and Finally, to thereby Housing funding no and to rentals shrinking Assessment economic additional a to that directs Important California XX the a the Regional apartment, single-family housing, rental subject of contains be
quote candidate, to want services, the because website housing costs with Gavin police, of create his the the gubernatorial of schools, “cities comment, this on because revenue. for et cities However, retail housing public cities services". core The to because box, incentive sales leading related perverse sales captured following generates many better, tax cetera. bigger lucrative the Newsom, build a more don't not have can tax including a issue use the
believe a As many Assessment crisis support to approach, increase today. recently housing to laws viable passed critical the better are Housing solution the that production, only Regional we the which the state Needs has
I'll we We And, more support John also the believe housing. call needed, And now affordable funding concludes California targeted my to over to is Burkart. thus, Prop X. turn That that comments.