for to open welcome, call. and Q&A. by will the expectations. will that which was the call operator, our to Kleiman quarter with share me quarter highlighting Burkart third of FFO begin everyone, to third you, midpoint represents earnings guidance, quarter XXXX. our compared quarter Thank our better our comments Angela Core follow and conference the John exceeded before growth than we I the $X.XX third per results of X.X%
of guidance compared provide the time improved at the summer share more dramatically will a guidance the are start the the This is continued details Angela leasing year midpoint. this guidance, by execution increase of to and $X.XX about core year remarks. We full raise which core quarter capital team. and to pleased FFO third the in year solid season, our increased our by and we've our cost full attributable Essex John to per is to FFO year their the
expectations XXXX Turning to our the markets. in for rent West Coast growth
throughout that impact In of resulting years, California's the scenario high based of our more urban job from third-party level of periods macro is our and S-XX is areas, metros. submarket we continued apartment supplemental. sources. obtained rental concentrated the key research recent U.S. a become on ground-up apartment Page this providing concessions as practice power. substantially on This scenario Key have to supply in budgeting that We our baseline forecasts, assumptions on and growth pricing GDP often intended to such supply in be has Essex
the grow targeting year very market Essex invaluable to a XXXX supply important adjusted by again, estimates acquisitions rents than in average long-term we ago. more forecast for and proven near X.X% August our look estimates growth areas unemployment Overall, of expect much we labor XXXX compared of we Overall, apartment of have expect and Once XXXX, supply rental in to our a delay in an market conditions, S-XX continuation XXXX. representing Therefore, averages. dispositions. are rate ever, expect targeted X.X% X% low tight very of exemplified as the to like
The for XX X.X% from is and ago to compared is XXXX. nation basis should in expected continue with to to outpace significantly XXXX points year a tech and job reduce California expected job This Northern market growth down slightly Seattle. growth X% in the
Essex deliveries Our markets, apartments supply indicators XXXX supply certain County our and forecast. with and the outlook factors are and Orange higher in XXXX positive lower including around to XXXX metros, apartment compared contemplates in in in that of XX,XXX San There total confirming Jose. a several for Oakland supply impact and variations meaningful apartment for similar Seattle supply in
higher. constrained may but growth, markets they incomes push labor Tight job also
pressure issue will expenses, housing pressure the constrained also on that they help operating affordability years. for wages higher rates will While several past growth the has relieve
several the the Coast in the historical this of demonstrate outpaced Essex the percentage growth quarter Slides for past accelerated the XX to context and supplemental rest to added cumulative a this nation have decade country. to markets the and West in points job growth on by has We S-XX.X years. the has income basis compared superior Income
continues Office healthy to a at development pace. expand
feet average markets San have the our rent had and ago, of of the with nearly just existing and compares of compared which year million Seattle All national X%, as of development third growth X% well office very square positive are X absorption out Bay Each pre-leasing under Jose XX% strong quarter XX our space demand. to strong growth of in office as Area solid X%. space up and markets to respectively. currently office office or inventory, accommodate and rents building to new offers, Seattle office
it's the And at Facebook headquartered in the openings has as to that top very Lake continues job over of openings South and Amazon's now X,XXX up tech market, Hiring have These to an are in XX% market, X compared firms, also year Washington Essex which expanding XX Seattle in while be in California are quarter with of XXXX. also third the in Washington, and all compared currently job strong. companies rapidly up are Union. Apple XX% ago. employees notable Google XX,XXX
We the the transaction our in activity. XXXX of acquisition transitioned throughout market property to a in being seller net dramatic net year. and XXXX buyer in from cost capital to a given a of improvement Turning
this a acquisition As closed for acquisition a deals force our XX, and result, is through the expect for become has remain to million exceeded to market $XXX guidance we acquisition range year, competitive powerful of active with remainder of leverage The the housing. year. positive we pleased have increasingly multifamily high are of the September end as
early down trend The higher slight rates upward rates, XX with basis for quickly cap to has XXXX XX points. on to We reacting has that by value more about this apartments reversed XXXX, and cap market by being there property was conditions. we added marketed. accompanied changing In pressure believe demand been and late a
trading in properties cap XX terms between indicates B rate A rates, X.X% cap wider. XX basis A a locations activity of In to B and X.X% trade that typically points locations recent in with properties
significant we including with in relationships sheet robust and track advantages, and research, strong liquidity. and balance have selective record and remain a this we great ample will, environment, We
headwind continue equity to significant because a yields rental As noted NOI the that to and several for years growth development. increases cost we are direct over have construction previous on calls, development direct primarily compressing investments preferred past rates represent given favor exceeded
Most the to laws Assembly AB Bill to this to I new like CPI comment call intended before measure. XXXX, Governor turn on month. of XX by build California's housing, of X into signed were over will bills Lastly, remove that the Newsom and and anti-gouging to housing-related barriers passage John, I'd affordable housing earlier expected these housing plus as incentivize to an XXXX increases are X% of rent generally is production. cap fund more law
policies. With to have country, we've legislation of a legislatures and our Essex, had advocate continue At regulation we impact not theme to amongst expect a housing rent on for a across longstanding limiting will California rents to renewal this practice and the XX% results. committed recurring to remain do material smart
over our Burkart. John to COO, With that, call I'll turn the