Item 8.01. Other Events.
This is a supplement to the proxy statement, dated May 20, 2021 (the “definitive proxy statement”), of Luminex Corporation (“Luminex” or the “Company”) that was mailed to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) to be held on June 21, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. at 12212 Technology Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78727. The purpose of the Special Meeting is to consider and vote upon the following proposals: (i) a proposal (the “Merger Proposal”) to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 11, 2021 (as it may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, DiaSorin S.p.A., a società per azioni organized under the laws of the Republic of Italy (“Parent”) and Diagonal Subsidiary Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”) and approve the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent; (ii) a proposal (the “Adjournment Proposal”) to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary and for a minimum period of time reasonable under the circumstances, to ensure that any necessary supplement or amendment to the definitive proxy statement is provided to Company stockholders a reasonable amount of time in advance of the Special Meeting, or to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal; and (iii) a proposal (the “Compensation Proposal”) to approve, by non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation that will or may be paid or become payable to the Company’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger. The Company’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors”) previously established May 14, 2021 as the record date for the purpose of determining the stockholders who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.
After careful consideration, the Board of Directors has (i) determined that the terms of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, are fair to and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, (ii) approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, (iii) resolved to recommend that the Company’s stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, and (iv) directed that the Merger Agreement be submitted to the Company’s stockholders for their adoption. The Board of Directors made its determination after consultation with its legal and financial advisors and consideration of a number of factors as described in the definitive proxy statement. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY VOTE “FOR” THE MERGER PROPOSAL, “FOR” THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL AND “FOR” THE COMPENSATION PROPOSAL.
Litigation relating to the Merger
In connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the following lawsuits have been filed against the Company: (i) a lawsuit captioned Wang v. Luminex Corporation, et al., filed on May 10, 2021, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, (ii) a lawsuit captioned Ciccotelli v. Luminex Corporation, et al., filed on May 14, 2021, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, (iii) a lawsuit captioned Browning v. Luminex Corporation, et al., filed on May 17, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, (iv) a lawsuit captioned Kathleen Finger v. Luminex Corporation, et al., filed on June 7, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, (v) a lawsuit captioned Marcey Curtis v. Luminex Corporation, et al., filed on June 8, 2021, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, and (vi) a lawsuit captioned Matthew Hopkins v. Luminex Corporation, et al., filed on June 9, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The complaints, which also name as defendants the members of the Company’s Board of Directors, are similar and variously allege, among other things, that the Company’s preliminary proxy statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 7, 2021 (the “preliminary proxy statement”) or definitive proxy statement, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2021, contain materially incomplete and misleading information concerning the Company’s financial forecasts and financial analyses, violations of Section 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 14a-9 arising out of the filing of the preliminary proxy statement or definitive proxy statement, and requests for details of employment and retention-related discussions and negotiations. The complaints generally seek to enjoin the Company from proceeding with or consummating the proposed transaction and, in some cases, seek to recover damages in the event the proposed transaction is consummated.
The Company and the other defendants named in the merger litigation believe that the claims asserted in the merger litigation are without merit and no supplemental disclosure is required under applicable law. However, in order to avoid the risk of the