COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | 14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES From time to time, we receive claims from third parties asserting that our technologies, or those of our licensees, infringe on the other parties’ IP rights. Management believes that these claims are without merit. Additionally, periodically, we are involved in routine legal matters and contractual disputes incidental to our normal operations. In management’s opinion, unless we disclosed otherwise, the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. In the normal course of business, we provide indemnification of varying scope to customers, most commonly to licensees in connection with licensing arrangements that include our IP, although these provisions can cover additional matters. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant, and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on our future results of operations. LGE Korean Withholding Tax Matter On October 16, 2017, we received a letter from LG Electronics Inc. (“LGE”) requesting that we reimburse LGE with respect to withholding tax imposed on LGE by the Korean tax authorities following an investigation where the tax authority determined that LGE failed to withhold on LGE’s royalty payments to Immersion Software Ireland, a subsidiary of the Company, from 2012 to 2014 . Pursuant to an agreement reached with LGE, on April 8, 2020, we provided a provisional deposit to LGE in the amount of KRW 5,916,845,454 (approximately $ 5.0 million) representing the amount of such withholding tax that was imposed on LGE, which provisional deposit would be returned to us to the extent we ultimately prevail in the appeal in the Korean courts. In the second quarter of 2020 , we recorded this deposit in Long-term deposits on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets . In the fourth quarter of 2021 , we recorded an impairment charge of $0.8 On November 3, 2017, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Tax Tribunal regarding their findings with respect to the withholding taxes related to the 2012 2019 2022 On April 25, 2023, we received notice from LGE requesting us to reimburse LGE with respect to withholding tax imposed on LGE by the Korean tax authorities following a recent tax audit of LGE for the years 2018 2022 3,024,877,044 2.3 2023 Long-term deposits Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets On June 29, 2023, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Tax Tribunal regarding their findings with respect to the withholding taxes related to the 2018 2022 On August 7, 2023, the Korean tax authority submitted its answer against the tax appeal. On September 8, 2023, on behalf of LGE, the Company submitted its rebuttal brief in response thereto. On September 25, 2023, Korean tax authority submitted an additional response brief, and on November 23, 2023, the Korea Tax Tribunal rendered a decision against LGE, dismissing the claims of the Company on the grounds that its claims are without merit. In response thereto, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Administrative Court on December 29, 2023. On July 25, 2024, the Korea Tax Tribunal rendered a decision against LGE, and deadline for the court appeal of the local income claim is October 21, 2024. In addition, the Korea Administrative Court scheduled a hearing date of August 29, 2024. As of June 30, 2024 0.3 2018 2022 Long-term deposit 2023 Based on th e developments in these cases, we regularly reassess the likelihood that we will prevail in the claims from the Korean tax authorities with respect to the LGE case. To the extent that we determine that it is more likely than not that we will prevail against the claims from the Korean tax authorities, then no additional tax expense is provided for in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income . In the event that we determine that it is more likely than not that we will not prevail against the claims from the Korean tax authorities, or a portion thereof, then we would estimate the anticipated additional tax expense associated with that outcome and record it as additional income tax expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income in the period of the new determination. If the additional income tax expense was related to the periods assessed by Korean tax authorities and for which we recorded a Long-term deposit on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets , then the additional income tax expense would be recorded as an impairment to the Long-term deposits . If the additional income tax expense was not related to the periods assessed by Korean tax authorities and for which we recorded in Long-term deposits on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets , then the additional income tax expense would be accrued as an Other current liabilities . In the event that we do not ultimately prevail in our appeal in the Korean courts with respect to this case, the applicable deposits included in Long-term deposits Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income Immersion Corporation vs. Xiaomi Group On or about March 3, 2023, the Company initiated patent infringement lawsuits against several companies of the Xiaomi-Group in Germany, France and India (the “Xiaomi Litigation”). Immersion filed complaints against Xiaomi-Group companies and their agents in the Düsseldorf Regional Court in Germany, the Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (Paris First Instance Civil Court) in France, and the High Court of Delhi, at New Delhi, in India. The complaints alleged that the Xiaomi-Group’s devices, including the Xiaomi 12, infringed Immersion's patents that cover various uses of haptic effects in connection with such devices. On June 12, 2024, the Company entered into a Patent License Agreement (the “Xiaomi License Agreement”) with the Xiaomi Group, pursuant to which the parties have agreed to terms for resolving the Xiaomi Litigation and the Xiaomi Group will license, on a non-exclusive basis, the Company’s patent portfolio for use in its products. Pursuant to the Xiaomi License Agreement, the Company and the Xiaomi Group have agreed to terms for dismissal by them of the outstanding Xiaomi Litigation. Immersion Corporation vs. Valve Corporation ( “Valve ”) On May 15, 2023, the Company filed a complaint against Valve in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. The complaint alleges that Valve’s AR/VR systems, including the Valve Index, and handheld Steam Deck, infringe seven of our patents that cover various uses of haptic effects in connection with such AR/VR systems and other video game systems. The Company is seeking to enjoin Valve from further infringement and to recover a reasonable royalty for such infringement. The complaint against Valve asserts infringement of the following patents: • U.S. Patent No. 7,336,260: “Method and Apparatus for Providing Tactile Sensations” • U.S. Patent No. 8,749,507: “Systems and Methods for Adaptive Interpretation of Input from a Touch-Sensitive Input Device” • U.S. Patent No. 9,430,042: “Virtual Detents Through Vibrotactile Feedback” • U.S. Patent No. 9,116,546: “System for Haptically Representing Sensor Input” • U.S. Patent No. 10,627,907: “Position Control of a User Input Element Associated With a Haptic Output Device” • U.S. Patent No. 10,665,067: “Systems and Methods for Integrating Haptics Overlay in Augmented Reality” • U.S. Patent No. 11,175,738: “Systems and Methods for Proximity-Based Haptic Feedback” Valve responded to the complaint on July 24, 2023, with a motion to dismiss. Valve re-noted its motion, which changed Immersion’s response deadline from August 14, 2023 to August 21, 2023. Immersion timely filed its response, and Valve filed its reply on August 25, 2023. The Court heard arguments on Valve’s motion on February 8, 2024. The Court entered a case schedule on November 21, 2023. The case schedule did not include a trial date but set the pretrial conference for May 30, 2025. Valve filed inter reviews (“ ”), IPR2024-00477 and IPR2024-00478 on January 19, 2024. These petitions are directed to U.S. Patent . 7,336,260 and 9,430,042 respectively. The Company filed its patent owner preliminary responses to these petitions on April 26, 2024, and April 29, 2024, respectively. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision, granting institution of these petitions on July 24, 2024, and July 25, 2024, respectively. The Company’s patent owner responses to these petitions are due on October 15, 2024 and October 17, 2024, respectively. Valve filed IPR2024-00508 on January 30, 2024, which is directed to U.S. Patent No. 9,116,546. The Company elected not to file a patent owner preliminary response to this petition. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision, granting institution of this petition on August 6, 2024. The Company’s patent owner response to the petition is due on October 31, 2024. Valve filed IPR2024-00556 on February 7, 2024, which is directed to U.S. Patent No. 8,749,507. The Company filed its patent owner preliminary response to this petition on May 15, 2024. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision, granting institution on August 6, 2024. The Company’s patent owner response to the petition is due on October 31, 2024. Valve filed IPR2024-00557 on February 7, 2024, which is directed to U.S. Patent No. 10,665,067. The Company filed its patent owner preliminary response to this petition on May 15, 2024. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision, granting institution on August 13, 2024. Valve filed IPR2024-00582 on February 16, 2024, which is directed to U.S. Patent No. 11,175,738. The Company filed its patent owner preliminary response to this petition on June 27, 2024. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision on whether to institute the petition is expected to issue around September 27, 2024. Valve filed IPR2024-00714 on March 22, 2024, which is directed to U.S. Patent No. 10,627,907. The Company filed its preliminary patent owner preliminary response to this petition on July 30, 2024. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision on whether to institute the petition is expected to issue around October 30, 2024. The parties submitted their joint claim construction statement and respective positions on March 29, 2024. On March 14, 2024, Valve filed a motion to stay the district court case pending the PTAB’s decisions on the IPRs. Immersion opposed the motion on March 25, 2024, and Valve filed its reply brief on March 29, 2024. The Court granted Valve’s motion to stay on April 4, 2024. In connection with that order, the Court struck Valve’s motion to dismiss with leave to refile at a later date. |