(d) In the event that any legal proceedings are brought in the courts of Mexico, a Spanish translation of the documents required in such proceedings, prepared by a court-approved translator, would have to be approved by the court after the defendant had been given an opportunity to be heard with respect to the accuracy of the translation, and proceedings would thereafter be based upon the translated documents;
(e) The exercise of any prerogatives of the parties, although they may be discretionary, should be supported by the factual assumptions required for their reasonable exercise; in addition, under Mexican law, the Company will have the right to contest in court any notice or certificate of such party purporting to be conclusive and binding;
(f) Claims may become barred under the statutes of limitation or may be or become subject to defenses ofset-off or counterclaim;
(g) As to the provisions contained in the Base Indenture regarding service of process, it should be noted that service of process by mail does not constitute personal service under Mexican law and, since such service is considered to be a basic procedural requirement under such law, if for purposes of proceedings outside Mexico service of process is made by mail, a final judgment based on such service of process would not be enforced by the courts of Mexico;
(h) With respect to the provisions contained in the Base Indenture regarding service of process, I note that the irrevocability of the appointment of CT Corporation System as the authorized agent for service of process of the Company and the Guarantor may not be enforceable under Mexican law and, as a consequence, such appointment may be legally revoked;
(i) I express no opinion as to Sections 505 (Trustee May Enforce Claims Without Possession of Securities), 509 (Restoration of Rights and Remedies) and 1009 (Indemnification of Judgment Currency) of the Base Indenture;
(j) I note that any covenants of the Company which purport to bind them on matters reserved by law to shareholders or owners of equity interests, or which purport to bind shareholders or owners of equity interests to vote or refrain from voting their shares or equity interests in the Company, are not enforceable, under Mexican law, through specific performance;
(k) In the event any legal proceedings are brought in the courts of Mexico to enforce a holder’s rights under the Securities or the Indenture, the Mexican courts would apply Mexican procedural law; and
(l) Except as specifically stated herein, I make no comment with regard to any representation which may be made by the Company in any of the documents referred to above or otherwise.
I express no opinion as to the laws of any jurisdiction other than Mexico and I have assumed that there is nothing in any other law that affects my opinion, which is delivered, based upon Mexican law applicable on the date hereof. In particular, I have made no independent investigation of the laws of the United States of America or any state or other political subdivision thereof or therein as a basis for the opinions stated herein and do not express or imply any opinion on or based on such laws. To the extent that the federal laws of the United
3