Cohen & Company (COHN) 10-K2019 FY Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K 

(Mark One)

☒    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

OR

☐     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                      

Commission file number: 001-32026 

COHEN & COMPANY INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 701-9555 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒ 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files.   Yes   ☒    No   ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes      No   

As of June 30, 2019, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $4.4 million.

As of March 4, 2020, there were 1,246,710 shares of Common Stock of Cohen & Company Inc. outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. 



COHEN & COMPANY INC. 



TABLE OF CONTENTS





Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,”  “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue,” negatives thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, are based on various underlying assumptions and current expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about the following subjects:

These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You should consider the areas of risk and uncertainty described above and discussed under “Item 1A — Risk Factors.” Actual results may differ materially as a result of various factors, some of which are outside our control, including the following:



You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.



Name Change; Common Stock Reverse Stock Split



On September 1, 2017, the Company filed two Articles of Amendment to its charter with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland, pursuant to which the Company (i) changed its name to “Cohen & Company Inc.”; (ii) effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock (“Common Stock”); and (iii) increased the par value of the Common Stock from $0.001 per share to $0.01 per share.  All share and per share amounts for all periods presented herein reflect the reverse split as if it had occurred as of the beginning of the first period presented. 

Certain Terms Used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K



In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise noted or as the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Cohen & Company Inc. (formerly Institutional Financial Markets, Inc.), a Maryland corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis; and “Cohen & Company, LLC” (formerly IFMI, LLC) or the “Operating LLC” refer to the main operating subsidiary of the Company. 

“Cohen Brothers” refers to the pre-merger Cohen Brothers, LLC and its subsidiaries; “AFN” refers to the pre-merger Alesco Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries; “Merger” refers to the December 16, 2009 closing of the merger of AFN, Alesco Financial Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of AFN, with and into Cohen Brothers, which resulted in Cohen Brothers becoming a majority owned subsidiary of the Company.

“JVB Holdings” refers to JVB Financial Holdings, L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating LLC; “JVB” refers to J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC, a wholly owned broker dealer subsidiary of JVB Holdings; “CCFL” refers to Cohen & Company Financial Limited (formerly known as EuroDekania Management LTD), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating LLC regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (formerly known as the Financial Services Authority) in the United Kingdom (the “FCA”); “CCFEL” refers to Cohen & Company Financial (Europe) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating LLC regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland ( the “CBI”); and “EuroDekania” refers to EuroDekania (Cayman) Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company that was externally managed by CCFL.

 “Securities Act”  refers to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; and “Exchange Act” refers to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

PART I

ITEM  1.  BUSINESS.

INFORMATION REGARDING COHEN & COMPANY INC.



Overview



We are a financial services company specializing in the fixed income markets. We were founded in 1999 as an investment firm focused on small-cap banking institutions but have grown to provide an expanding range of capital markets and asset management services. Our business segments are Capital Markets, Asset Management, and Principal Investing. Our Capital Markets business segment consists of fixed income sales, trading, and matched book repo financing as well as new issue placements in corporate and securitized products and advisory services, operating primarily through our subsidiaries, JVB in the United States (the “U.S.”) and CCFL and CCFEL in Europe. Our Asset Management business segment manages assets through investment vehicles, such as collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), managed accounts, joint ventures, and investment funds (collectively, “Investment Vehicles”). As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately $2.8 billion of assets under management (“AUM”) in fixed income assets in a variety of asset classes including U.S. and European bank and insurance trust preferred securities (“TruPS”), debt issued by small and medium sized European, U.S., and Bermuda insurance and reinsurance companies, and equity interests of special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”). A substantial portion of our AUM, 79.7%, was in CDOs we manage, which were all securitized prior to 2008. The remaining portion of our AUM is from a diversified mix of other Investment Vehicles most of which were more recently formed.  Our Principal Investing business segment is comprised primarily of investments that we have made for the purpose of earning an investment return rather than investments made to support our trading, matched book repo, or other capital markets business activity.



In June 2018, in response to the uncertainty surrounding Brexit, we created a new subsidiary, CCFEL (f/k/a Cohen & Company Financial (Ireland) Limited) in Ireland, for the purpose of seeking to become regulated to perform asset management and capital markets activities in Ireland and the European Union. In April 2019, CCFEL received authorization from the CBI under the European Union (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulations 2017 to provide investment services in respect of certain financial instruments including transferable securities, money-market instruments, units in collective investment undertakings and various option, futures, swaps, forward rate agreements, and other derivative contracts (“Financial Instruments”).  The services for which CCFEL received authorization include the receipt and transmission of orders in relation to Financial Instruments, the execution of orders on behalf of clients, portfolio management, investment advice and investment research, and financial analysis.  In addition, CCFEL applied for approval of a French branch, which approval was granted by the CBI and the branch was authorized by the French regulators in April 2019.  Following authorization of the French Branch of CCFEL, various contracts originally entered into by CCFL were novated to the French Branch of CCFEL. The novation of contracts was completed on July 1, 2019.

Capital Markets



Our Capital Markets business segment consists primarily of fixed income sales, trading, and matched book repo financing as well as new issue placements in corporate and securitized products and advisory services and is operated through our subsidiaries, JVB and ViaNova Capital Group LLC (“ViaNova”) in the U.S. and CCFL and CCFEL in Europe.



In 2018, we formed ViaNova for the purpose of building a residential transition loan (“RTL”) business.  RTLs are small balance commercial loans that are secured by first lien mortgages used by professional investors and real estate developers for financing the purchase and rehabilitation of residential properties.  ViaNova’s business plan includes buying, aggregating, and distributing these loans to produce superior risk-adjusted returns for capital partners through the pursuit of opportunities overlooked by commercial banks. 



Our Capital Markets business segment consists of JVB as our sole operating U.S. broker-dealer and our European broker-dealers, CCFL, which is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the United Kingdom, and CCFEL, which is regulated by the CBI.  JVB operates under our JVB Holdings subsidiary and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Securities Industry Protection Corporation (“SIPC”).



Our fixed income sales and trading group provides trade execution to corporate investors, institutional investors, mortgage originators, and other smaller broker-dealers. We specialize in a variety of products, including but not limited to: corporate bonds and loans, asset-backed securities (“ABS”), mortgage backed securities (“MBS”), commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), CDOs, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), municipal securities, to-be-announced securities (“TBAs”) and other forward agency MBS contracts, RTLs, Small Business Administration loans (“SBA loans”), U.S. government bonds, U.S. government agency securities, brokered deposits and certificates of deposit (“CDs”) for small banks, and hybrid capital of financial institutions including TruPS, whole loans, and other structured financial instruments.



In 2012, we established a trading desk for “to-be-announced” securities, or TBAs, as part of our mortgage group. TBAs are forward mortgage-backed securities whose collateral remains unknown until just prior to the trade settlement. The forward collateral types are exclusively issued by U.S. government agencies, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), and the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”). One objective of our mortgage group is to provide capital markets execution services to small and middle market institutional mortgage originators that hedge their mortgage pipelines. In addition to providing credit for MBS trading lines and execution services, our mortgage group offers trading of specified pools and financing for qualified originators. Our mortgage group offers a range of solutions for institutional clients seeking to enhance their mortgage pipeline execution and overall portfolio profitability.  In addition, our mortgage group acts as an intermediary between borrowers and lenders of short-term funds and provides funding for various inventory positions using repurchase agreements.



We have grown our matched book repo business, under which JVB enters into repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements.  In general, JVB lends money to a counterparty after obtaining collateral securities from that counterparty via a reverse repurchase agreement. JVB also borrows money from another counterparty using those same collateral securities via a repurchase agreement. JVB seeks to earn net interest income on these transactions. Currently, we categorize our matched book repo business into two major groups: gestation repo and general collateral funding (“GCF”) repo.







We have been in the Capital Markets business since our inception. Our Capital Markets business segment has transformed over time in response to market opportunities and the needs of our clients. The initial focus was on sales and trading of listed equities of small financial companies with a particular emphasis on bank stocks. Early on, a market opportunity arose for participation in a particular segment of the debt market, the securitization of TruPS. We began assisting small banks in the issuance of TruPS through CDOs. These Investment Vehicles were structured and underwritten by large investment banks while our broker-dealer typically participated as a co-placement agent or selling group member. We also participated in the secondary market trading between institutional clients of the securities issued by these CDOs.



In early 2008, our management team made the strategic decision to restructure our Capital Markets business model from exclusively focusing on TruPS and structured credit products to a more traditional fixed income broker-dealer platform with more diversified revenue streams primarily from trading activity. In the ensuing years, we hired many sales and trading professionals with expertise in areas that complement our core competency in structured credit. In 2011, our acquisitions of JVB and the PrinceRidge Group (“PrinceRidge”) further expanded our Capital Markets platform. As a result of these acquisitions, offset by subsequent downsizings and mergers, our Capital Markets staffing increased from six sales and trading professionals at the beginning of 2008, to over 230 professionals in mid-2011, and decreased to 56 professionals as of December 31, 2019. We continue to explore opportunities to add complementary distribution channels, hire experienced talent, expand our presence across asset classes, and bolster the service capabilities of our Capital Markets business segment.



Our Capital Markets business segment generates revenue through the following activities: (1) trading activities, which include execution and brokerage services, matched book repo, riskless trading activities as well as gains and losses (unrealized and realized), and income and expense earned on securities classified as trading, and (2) new issue and advisory revenue comprised of (a) origination fees for newly created financial instruments originated by us, (b) revenue from advisory services, and (c) new issue revenue associated with arranging and placing the issuance of newly created financial instruments. Our Capital Markets business

segment has offices in Boca Raton (Florida), Cold Spring Harbor (New York), Dublin (Ireland), Hunt Valley (Maryland), London (England), New York City (New York), Paris (France), and Philadelphia (Pennsylvania).



Trades in our Capital Markets business segment can be either “riskless” or risk based. “Riskless trades” are transacted with a customer order in hand, resulting in limited risk to us. “Risk-based trades” involve us owning the securities and thus placing our capital at risk. Such risk-based trading activity may include the use of leverage. In recent years, we began to utilize more leverage in our Capital Markets business segment. We believe that the prudent use of capital to facilitate client orders increases trading volume and profitability. Any gains or losses on trading securities that we have classified as investments-trading are recorded in our Capital Markets business segment, whereas any gains or losses on securities that we classified as other investments, at fair value are recorded in our Principal Investing business segment.



During the first quarter of 2014, we stopped providing investment banking and advisory services in the U.S. as a result of the loss of certain of JVB’s former employees. Currently, JVB’s primary source of new issue revenue is from originating assets into our U.S. insurance investment funds and CCFEL’s primary source of new issue revenue is from originating assets into the PriDe funds as more fully described below.



Asset Management



Our Asset Management business segment manages assets within a variety of Investment Vehicles. We earn management fees for our ongoing asset management services provided to these Investment Vehicles, which may include fees both senior and subordinate to the securities issued by the Investment Vehicles. Management fees are based on the value of the AUM or the investment performance of the vehicle, or both. As of December 31, 2019, we had $2.8 billion in AUM, of which 79.7% was in CDOs we manage., but it has declined year-to-year since 2007. AUM equals the sum of: (1) the gross assets included in the CDOs that we have sponsored and/or manage; plus (2) the net asset value (“NAV”) or gross assets of the Other Investment Vehicles we manage based on whichever measurement serves as the basis for the calculation our management fees. Our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers and, as a result, this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. This definition of AUM is not necessarily identical to any definition of AUM that may be used in our management agreements.



Currently, a substantial portion of our AUM is in CDOs that we manage. A CDO is a form of secured borrowing. The borrowing is secured by different types of fixed income assets such as corporate or mortgage loans or bonds. The borrowing is in the form of a securitization, which means that the lenders are actually investing in notes secured by the assets. In the event of a default, the lender will have recourse only to the assets securing the loan. We have originated assets for, served as co-placement agent for, and continue to manage this type of Investment Vehicle, which is generally structured as a trust or other special purpose vehicle. In addition, we invested in some of the debt and equity securities initially issued by certain CDOs, gains and losses of which are recorded in our Principal Investing business segment.



These structures can hold different types of securities. Historically, we focused on the following asset classes: (1) U.S. and European bank and insurance TruPS and subordinated debt; (2) U.S. ABS, such as MBS and commercial real estate loans; (3) U.S. and European corporate loans; and (4) U.S. obligations of non-profit entities. As of December 31, 2019, our only remaining CDOs under management were backed by U.S. and European bank and insurance TruPS and subordinated debt.



The credit crisis caused available liquidity, particularly through CDOs and other types of securitizations, to decline precipitously. Our ability to accumulate assets for securitization effectively ended with the market disruption. We securitized $14.8 billion of assets in 16 trusts during 2006, $17.8 billion of assets in 16 trusts during 2007, $400 million of assets in one trust during 2008, and zero assets in zero trusts since 2009. 



We generate asset management revenue for our services as an asset manager. Many of our sponsored CDOs, particularly those where the assets are bank TruPS and ABS, have experienced asset deferrals, defaults, and rating agency downgrades that reduce our management fees. In addition, many of the CDOs we manage have experienced high enough levels of deferrals, defaults, and downgrades to reduce our ongoing subordinated management fees to zero. In a typical structure, any failure of a covenant coverage test redirects cash flow to pay down the senior debt until compliance is restored. If compliance is eventually restored, the entity will resume paying subordinated management fees to us, including those that were accrued but remained unpaid during the period of non-compliance.



As of December 31, 2019, we had three subsidiaries that act as collateral managers and investment advisors to the CDOs that we manage. With the exception of CCFL, these entities are registered investment advisors under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Investment Advisers Act”). CCFL is regulated by the FCA in the United Kingdom.







The table below shows changes in our AUM by product line for the last five years.













A description of our CDO product lines that were under management as of December 31, 2019 is set forth below.



Alesco and Dekania. As of December 31, 2019, we managed eight Alesco deals and two Dekania Europe deals, which were initially securitized during 2003 to 2007. CCFM manages our Alesco platform. During 2018, one of the Alesco deals was liquidated after a successful auction. DCM manages the second Dekania Europe deal that was issued and was the manager of the first Dekania Europe deal that was issued until its successful auction and liquidation during 2018. CCFL manages the third Dekania Europe deal that was issued. During 2014, we entered into a sub-advisory agreement to employ Mead Park Advisors, LLC to render advice and assistance with respect to collateral management services to the Alesco portfolios. On March 30, 2017, the sub-advisory agreement with Mead Park Advisors, LLC was terminated, and we entered into a sub-advisory agreement with another unrelated third-party provider effective March 30, 2017. 



In general, our Alesco and Dekania Europe deals have the following terms. We receive senior and subordinate management fees, and there is a potential for incentive fees on certain deals if equity internal rates of return are greater than 15%. We can be removed as manager without cause if 66.7% of the rated note holders voting separately by class and 66.7% of the equity holders vote to remove us, or if 75% of the most senior note holders vote to remove us when certain over-collateralization ratios fall below 100%. We can be removed as manager for cause if a majority of the controlling class of note holders or a majority of equity holders vote to remove us. “Cause” includes unremedied violations of the collateral management agreement or indenture, defaults attributable to certain actions of the manager, misrepresentations or fraud, criminal activity, bankruptcy, insolvency or dissolution. There was a non-call period for the equity holders, which ranged from three to six years. Once this non-call period expires, a majority of the equity holders can trigger an optional redemption as long as the liquidation of the collateral generates sufficient proceeds to pay all principal and accrued interest on the rated notes and all expenses. In ten years after the closing, an auction call will be triggered if the rated notes have not been redeemed in full. In an auction call redemption, an appointee will conduct an auction of the collateral, which will only be executed if the highest bid results in sufficient proceeds to pay all principal and accrued interest on the rated notes and all expenses. If the auction is not successfully completed, all residual interest that would normally be distributed to equity holders will be sequentially applied to reduce the principal of the rated notes. Any failure of an over-collateralization coverage test redirects interest to paying down notes until compliance is restored. The securities mature up to 30 years from closing. An event of default will occur if

certain over-collateralization ratios drop below 100%. While an event of default exists, a majority of the senior note holders can declare the principal and accrued and unpaid interest immediately due and payable.  All of the Alesco and Dekania Europe CDOs that we manage have reached their auction call redemption features, which means the portfolio of collateral for each CDO is subject to an auction on either a quarterly or bi-annual basis. If an auction is successful, the management contract related to such CDO will be terminated in connection with the liquidation of the CDO and we will lose the related management fees.



Munda. CCFL acted as lead and junior investment manager to the Munda CLO, a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands. In September 2012, CCFL assumed the lead investment management role from a large European bank. Munda CLO was comprised of broadly syndicated corporate loans primarily of European companies. Munda CLO was initially securitized in December 2007. In connection with the Mundo CLO, we received senior and subordinate management fees, and there was no potential to earn incentive fees.  In July 2019, the Mundo CLO was liquidated.  In February 2020, we received a final fee and we will no longer receive management fees in connection with this CLO.



A description of our other Investment Vehicles that were under management as of December 31, 2019 is set forth below.



PriDe Funds. In July 2014, we, initially through CCFL and now through CCFEL, became the investment adviser of a newly created French investment fund with total commitments of €238 million (“PriDe Fund I”), and an initial investment period of two years and a maturity date of July 2026.  In January 2017, the second fund in the series of these funds (together with PriDe Fund I, the “PriDe Funds”) closed with total commitments of €303.5 million, and an initial investment period of three years (which was recently extended by one year) and a maturity date of January 2030. The PriDe Funds earn investment returns by investing in a diversified portfolio of debt securities issued by small and medium sized European insurance companies.  CCFEL earns management fees and performance fees depending on the level of returns achieved. We have not made an investment, nor do we expect to make any investment, in the PriDe Funds.  AUM of the PriDe Funds was $456.2 million at December 31, 2019.  In late 2017, we hired an industry veteran to oversee the development of the Company’s U.S. Insurance Asset Management Platform as a complement to our existing focus on insurance related investments.



U.S. Insurance JV. In May 2018, we committed to invest up to $3.0 million in a newly formed joint venture (the “U.S. Insurance JV”) with an outside investor who committed to invest approximately $63.0 million of equity in the U.S. Insurance JV.  The U.S. Insurance JV was formed for the purposes of investing in debt issued by small and medium sized U.S. and Bermuda insurance and reinsurance companies and is managed by DCM. We are required to invest 4.5% of the total equity of the U.S. Insurance JV with an absolute limit of $3.0 million. The U.S. Insurance JV recently arranged a $250 million credit agreement for leverage to grow its assets. As of December 31, 2019, the equity of the U.S. Insurance JV was $49.4 million, we had invested $2.6 million into the U.S. Insurance JV and we had received cumulative distributions of $0.6 million. In addition, the insurance company debt that will be funded by the U.S. Insurance JV may be originated by us and there may be origination fees earned in connection with such transactions. We will also earn management fees as manager of the U.S. Insurance JV.  We are entitled to a quarterly base management fee, an annual incentive fee (if certain return hurdles are met), and an additional incentive fee upon the liquidation of the portfolio (if certain return hurdles are met).



SPAC Funds. In August 2018, we invested in and became the general partner of a series of newly formed partnerships (the “SPAC Funds”), which were created for the purpose of investing in the equity interests of SPACs.  As of December 31, 2019, we had invested $0.6 million in the SPAC Funds. CCFM is the manager of the SPAC Funds and is entitled to a quarterly base management fee based on a percentage of the NAV of the SPAC Funds and an annual incentive allocation based on the actual returns earned by the SPAC Funds. As of December 31, 2019, the NAV of the SPAC Funds was $21.0 million.



Managed Accounts.  We provide investment management services to a number of separately managed accounts. Part of our European CDO team has transitioned to providing investment management services primarily to European family offices, high net worth individuals, and asset managers. The investment focus is on CDO and CLO notes and debt instruments where the investment managers have relevant expertise. For these services, we are paid gross annual base management fees of approximately 1.5% plus a gross annual performance fee of 20% of cash-on-cash returns in excess of an 8% hurdle. There is also an early redemption fee if any of the clients were to terminate their arrangement within the first five years of the relationship. AUM of these European managed accounts was $35.5 million as of December 31, 2019.



In addition, we have historically received revenue shares from certain asset management businesses that we initially sponsored or owned, and subsequently sold or spun-off. A description of our only remaining asset management revenue share as of December 31, 2019 is set forth below.



Infrastructure Finance Business. On March 12, 2012, we entered into an agreement with unrelated third parties whereby we agreed to assist in the establishment of an international infrastructure finance business (“IIFC”). As consideration for our assistance in establishing IIFC, we receive 8.0% of certain revenues of the manager of IIFC. The IIFC revenue share arrangement expires when we have earned a cumulative $20 million in revenue share payments or with the dissolution of IIFC’s management company.  Also, in any particular year, the revenue share earned by us cannot exceed $2.0 million.  In 2019, we earned $0.5 million from the IIFC

revenue share.  From inception through 2019, we have earned $2.7 million.  In addition, in March 2012, we issued 50,000 restricted units of the Common Stock to the managing member of IIFC, which vest 1/3 when we receive $6.0 million of cumulative revenue share payments, 1/3 when we receive $12.0 million of cumulative revenue share payments, and 1/3 when we receive $18.0 million of cumulative revenue share payments. In certain circumstances, we retain the right to deliver fixed amounts of cash to the managing member of IIFC as opposed to vested shares of Common Stock. On March 12, 2022, any remaining unvested restricted units expire.  See note 22 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 



Principal Investing



Our Principal Investing business segment has historically been comprised of investments in the Investment Vehicles we manage, as well as investments in certain other structured products, and the related gains and losses that they generate. In 2014, we refocused our Principal Investing portfolio on products that we do not manage for the purpose of earning an investment return. As of December 31, 2019, our Principal Investing portfolio was valued at $14.9 million and included investments in International Money Express, Inc. (valued at $8.3 million), two CLOs (valued at $2.5 million), the U.S. Insurance JV (valued at $2.2 million),  SPAC equity (valued at $1.1 million), the SPAC Funds (valued at $0.7 million), and other securities (valued at $0.1 million). 



A description of our Principal Investments as of December 31, 2019 is set forth below.



Investments in IMXI Equity. As of December 31, 2019, we owned approximately $8.3 million in fair value of common stock of International Money Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: IMXI), a publicly traded company that was formed as a result of the merger of Intermex Holdings, LLC and FinTech Acquisition Corp. II.



In 2018, we acquired publicly traded shares of Fintech Acquisition Corp. II from an unrelated third-party for a total purchase price of $2.5 million.  In connection with this purchase, we agreed with Fintech Investor Holdings II, LLC to not redeem these shares in advance of the merger between Fintech Acquisition Corp. II and Intermex Holdings II, LLC. In exchange for this agreement to not redeem these shares prior to the merger, as well as the outlay of capital to purchase the publicly traded shares of Fintech Acquisition Corp. II, we received unregistered, restricted shares of common stock of Fintech Acquisition Corp. II from Fintech Investor Holdings II, LLC.  In connection with the merger, Fintech Acquisition Corp. II changed its name to International Money Express, Inc.



On December 30, 2019, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Daniel G. Cohen and a trust established by Mr. Cohen (together, the “Buyer”) to sell to the Buyer an aggregate of 22,429,541 newly issued units of membership interests in the Operating LLC, or LLC Units. In consideration of the Operating LLC issuing the LLC Units, the Buyer transferred an aggregate of 662,361 shares of IMXI common stock to the Company, which were valued at $7.8 million at the time of the transfer. The Company accounted for this transaction by recording an increase of $7.8 million in other investments, at fair value and a corresponding increase in the non-controlling interest. See note 4 and 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Investments in CLO Securities. During 2014, we began investing in CLOs that were not sponsored by us to capitalize on our strengths in structured credit and leveraged finance. The value of these investments is impacted by the performance of the underlying loans in these CLOs as well as the overall CLO market. During 2019, we recorded $0.3 million of investment gains on our investments in CLO securities. As of December 31, 2019, our investments in two CLO securities had approximately $2.5 million in fair value, and we expect to continue to invest additional capital as opportunities arise.



Investment in the U.S. Insurance JV. During 2018, we co-established and committed to invest up to $3.0 million in the U.S. Insurance JV. As of December 31, 2019, we had invested $2.6 million of this commitment, with $0.8 million remaining to be invested. In June 2019, we received a $0.6 million distribution related to a security redemption. As of December 31, 2019, our investment in the U.S. Insurance JV was valued at $2.2 million and the NAV of the U.S. Insurance JV was $49.4 million.



Investments in SPAC Equity. In December 2017, we began investing in SPAC equity positions. As of December 31, 2019, our nine equity positions in publicly traded SPACs were valued at $1.1 million, and we expect to continue to invest additional capital as opportunities arise.



Investment in the SPAC Funds. In August 2018, we established and invested $0.6 million in the SPAC Funds. As of December 31, 2019, our investment in the SPAC Funds was valued at $0.7 million and the NAV of the SPAC Funds was $21.0 million.



Investments in Other Securities. We have invested in various original issuance securities of the deals we have sponsored and certain other deals that we have not sponsored. As of December 31, 2019, our investments in these other securities were valued at $0.1 million. During 2019, we recorded $0.8 million of investment gains on these other securities.



Insurance Acquisition Corp.  We are the sponsor of Insurance Acquisition Corp. (the “Insurance SPAC”), a blank check company seeking to effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses (a “Business Combination”).  The Insurance SPAC is focusing on a Business Combination with a business that provides insurance or insurance related services but is not required to complete a Business Combination with an insurance business.



On March 22, 2019, the Insurance SPAC completed the sale of 15,065,000 units (the “SPAC Units”) in its initial public offering (the “IPO”), including the underwriters’ over-allotment option. Each SPAC Unit consists of one share of the Insurance SPAC’s Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“SPAC Common Stock”), and one-half of one warrant (each, a “SPAC Warrant”), where each whole SPAC Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of SPAC Common Stock for $11.50 per share. The SPAC Units were sold in the IPO at an offering price of $10.00 per SPAC Unit, for gross proceeds of $150.7 million (before underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses). Pursuant to the underwriting agreement in the IPO, the Insurance SPAC granted the underwriters in the IPO (the “Underwriters”) a 45-day option to purchase up to 1,965,000 additional SPAC Units solely to cover over-allotments, if any (the “Over-Allotment Option”); on March 22, 2019, the Underwriters exercised the Over-Allotment Option in full. Immediately following the completion of the IPO, there were an aggregate of 20,653,333 shares of SPAC Common Stock issued and outstanding.



If the Insurance SPAC fails to consummate a Business Combination within the first 18 months following the IPO, its corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up its affairs and liquidating its assets.

The Operating LLC is the manager and a member of each of two entities: Insurance Acquisition Sponsor, LLC and Dioptra Advisors, LLC (together, the “Sponsor Entities”). Insurance Acquisition Sponsor, LLC purchased 375,000 of the Insurance SPAC’s placement units in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the IPO for an aggregate of $3.8 million, or $10.00 per placement unit.  Each placement unit consists of one share of SPAC Common Stock and one-half of one warrant (the “Placement Warrant”).  The placement units are identical to the SPAC Units sold in the IPO except (i) the shares of SPAC Common Stock issued as part of the placement units and the Placement Warrants will not be redeemable by the Insurance SPAC, (ii) the Placement Warrants may be exercised by the holders on a cashless basis, (iii) the shares of SPAC Common Stock issued as part of the placement units, together with the Placement Warrants, are entitled to certain registration rights, and (iv) for so long as they are held by the IPO underwriters, the placement units will not be exercisable more than five years following the effective date of the registration statement filed by the Insurance SPAC in connection with the IPO. Subject to certain limited exceptions, the placement units (including the underlying Placement Warrants and SPAC Common Stock and the shares of SPAC Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Placement Warrants) will not be transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the completion of the initial Business Combination.



Of the $3.8 million invested by Insurance Acquisition Sponsor, LLC in consideration for the above described placement units of the Insurance SPAC, the Sponsor Entities raised $2.6 million from third-party investors and the remaining investment in the private placement was made by the Company.  The Company consolidates the Sponsor Entities and treats its investment in the Insurance SPAC as an equity method investment.  The $2.6 million raised from third-party investors is treated as non-controlling interest.  See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

The proceeds from the placement units were added to the net proceeds from the IPO to be held in a trust account. If the Insurance SPAC does not complete a Business Combination within the first 18 months following the IPO, the proceeds from the sale of the placement units will be used to fund the redemption of the SPAC Common Stock sold as part of the SPAC Units in the IPO (subject to the requirements of applicable law) and the Placement Warrants will expire worthless.

The Sponsor Entities collectively hold 5,103,333 founder shares of the Insurance SPAC.  Subject to certain limited exceptions, placement units held by the Sponsor Entities will not be transferable or salable until 30 days following a Business Combination, and founder shares held by the Sponsor Entities will not be transferable or salable except (a) with respect to 20% of such shares, until consummation of a Business Combination, and (b) with respect to additional 20% tranches of such shares, when the closing price of the SPAC Common Stock exceeds $12.00, $13.50, $15.00, and $17.00, respectively, for 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days following the consummation of a Business Combination, in each case subject to certain limited exceptions. 



As previously disclosed, we loaned to the Insurance SPAC approximately $0.2 million to cover IPO expenses, which was repaid in full at the closing of the IPO.  We committed to loan the Insurance SPAC an additional $0.75 million to cover operating and acquisition related expenses following the IPO.  This loan will bear no interest and, if the Insurance SPAC consummates a Business Combination in the required time frame, the loan is to be repaid from the funds held in the Insurance SPAC’s trust account.  If the Insurance SPAC does not consummate a Business Combination in the required time frame, no funds from the Insurance SPAC’s trust account can be used to repay the loan.



Employees



As of December 31, 2019, we employed a total of 94 full time professionals and support staff. This number includes 56 employees of our JVB subsidiary, 3 employees of our ViaNova subsidiary, 15 employees of our U.S. Asset Management business segment, 6 employees of our European Asset Management business segment, 12 employees of our U.S. support services group, and 2 employees of our European support services group. We consider our employee relations to be good and believe that our compensation and employee benefits are competitive with those offered by other financial services firms. None of our employees is subject to any collective bargaining agreements. Our core asset is our professionals, their intellectual capital, and their dedication to providing the highest quality services to our clients. Prior to joining us, members of our management team held positions with other leading financial services firms, accounting firms, law firms, investment firms, or other public companies. Lester R. Brafman, Daniel G. Cohen, and Joseph W. Pooler, Jr. are our executive operating officers, and biographical information relating to each of these officers is incorporated by reference in “Part III — Item 10 — Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” to the Company’s Proxy Statement, to be filed in connection with the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.





Competition



All areas of our business are intensely competitive, and we expect them to remain so. We believe that the principal factors affecting competition in our business include economic environment, quality and price of our products and services, client relationships, reputation, market focus, and the ability of our professionals.



Our competitors are other public and private asset managers, investment banks, brokerage firms, merchant banks, and financial advisory firms. We compete globally and on a regional, product and niche basis. Many of our competitors have substantially greater capital and resources than we do and offer a broader range of financial products and services. Certain of these competitors continue to raise additional amounts of capital to pursue business strategies that may be similar to ours. Some of these competitors may also have access to liquidity sources that are not available to us, which may pose challenges for us with respect to investment opportunities. In addition, some of these competitors may have higher risk tolerances or make different risk assessments than we do, allowing them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish broader business relationships.



In recent years, there has been substantial consolidation and convergence among companies in the financial services industry, including among many of our former competitors. In particular, a number of large commercial banks have established or acquired broker-dealers or have merged with other financial institutions. Many of these firms have the ability to offer a wider range of products than we offer, including loans, deposit taking, and insurance. Many of these firms also have investment banking services, which may enhance their competitive position. They also have the ability to support investment banking and securities products with commercial banking and other financial services revenue in an effort to gain market share, which could result in pricing pressure in our business. This trend toward consolidation and convergence has significantly increased the capital base and geographic reach of our competitors.



Competition is intense for the recruitment and retention of experienced and qualified professionals. The success of our business and our ability to continue to compete effectively will depend significantly upon our continued ability to retain and motivate our existing professionals and attract new professionals. See “Item 1A — Risk Factors.



Regulation



Certain of our subsidiaries, in the ordinary course of their business, are subject to extensive regulation by government and self-regulatory organizations both in the U.S. and abroad. As a matter of public policy, these regulatory bodies are responsible for safeguarding the integrity of the securities and other financial markets. The regulations promulgated by these regulatory bodies are designed primarily to protect the interests of the investing public generally and thus cannot be expected to protect or further the interests of our company or our stockholders and may have the effect of limiting or curtailing our activities, including activities that might be profitable.



As of December 31, 2019, our regulated subsidiaries include: JVB, a registered broker-dealer regulated by FINRA and subject to oversight by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); CCFL, a U.K. company regulated by the FCA; CCFEL, an Irish company regulated by the CBI; and CCFM and DCM, each of which is a registered investment adviser regulated by the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act. Since our inception, our businesses have been operated within a legal and regulatory framework that is constantly developing and changing, requiring us to be able to monitor and comply with a broad range of legal and regulatory developments that affect our activities.



Certain of our businesses are also subject to compliance with laws and regulations of U.S. federal and state governments, foreign governments, their respective agencies and/or various self-regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to, among other things, the privacy of client information and any failure to comply with these regulations could expose us to liability and/or reputational damage. Additional legislation, changes in rules promulgated by financial authorities and self-regulatory organizations or

changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, either in the U.S. or abroad, may directly affect our mode of operation and profitability.



The U.S. and foreign government agencies and self-regulatory organizations, as well as state securities commissions in the U.S., are empowered to conduct periodic examinations and initiate administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fine, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, and/or the suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer or its directors, officers, or employees. See “Item 1A — Risk Factors” beginning on page 17.



U.S. Regulation. As of December 31, 2019, JVB was registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and was a member of and regulated by FINRA. JVB is subject to the regulations of FINRA and industry standards of practice that cover many aspects of its business, including initial licensing requirements, sales and trading practices, relationships with customers (including the handling of cash and margin accounts), capital structure, capital requirements, record-keeping and reporting procedures, experience and training requirements for certain employees, and supervision of the conduct of affiliated persons, including directors, officers, and employees. FINRA has the power to expel, fine, and otherwise discipline member firms and their employees for violations of these rules and regulations. JVB is also registered as a broker-dealer in certain states, requiring us to comply with the laws, rules, and regulations of each state in which JVB is registered. Each state may revoke the registration to conduct a securities business in that state and may fine or otherwise discipline broker-dealers and their employees for failure to comply with such state’s laws, rules, and regulations.



The SEC, FINRA, and various other regulatory agencies within and outside of the U.S. have stringent rules and regulations with respect to the maintenance of specific levels of net capital by regulated entities. Generally, a broker-dealer’s net capital is net worth plus qualified subordinated debt less deductions for certain types of assets. The net capital rule under the Exchange Act requires that at least a minimum part of a broker-dealer’s assets be maintained in a relatively liquid form. The SEC and FINRA impose rules that require notification when net capital falls below certain predefined criteria. These rules also dictate the ratio of debt to equity in the regulatory capital composition of a broker-dealer and constrain the ability of a broker-dealer to expand its business under certain circumstances. If a firm fails to maintain the required net capital, it may be subject to suspension or revocation of registration by the applicable regulatory agency, and suspension or expulsion by these regulators could ultimately lead to a firm’s liquidation. Additionally, the net capital rule under the Exchange Act and certain FINRA rules impose requirements that may have the effect of prohibiting a broker-dealer from distributing or withdrawing capital and requiring prior notice to the SEC and FINRA for certain capital withdrawals.



If these net capital rules are changed or expanded, or if there is an unusually large charge against our net capital, our operations that require the intensive use of capital would be limited. A large operating loss or charge against our net capital could adversely affect our ability to expand or even maintain current levels of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.



Our investment adviser subsidiaries, CCFM and DCM, are registered with the SEC as investment advisers and are subject to the rules and regulations of the Investment Advisers Act. The Investment Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers including record-keeping, operational and marketing requirements, disclosure obligations, limitations on principal transactions between an adviser and its affiliates and advisory clients, and prohibitions on fraudulent activities. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Investment Advisers Act, ranging from fines and censure to termination of an investment adviser’s registration. Investment advisers are also subject to certain state securities laws and regulations.



We are also subject to the U.S.A PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”), which imposes obligations regarding the prevention and detection of money-laundering activities, including the establishment of customer due diligence, customer verification, and other compliance policies and procedures. These regulations require certain disclosures by, and restrict the activities of, broker-dealers, among others. Failure to comply with these new requirements may result in monetary, regulatory and, in the case of the Patriot Act, criminal penalties.



In July 2010, the federal government passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The Dodd-Frank Act significantly restructures and intensifies regulation in the financial services industry, with provisions that include, among other things, the creation of a new systemic risk oversight body  (i.e., the Financial Stability Oversight Council), expansion of the authority of existing regulators, increased regulation of and restrictions on OTC derivatives markets and transactions, broadening of the reporting and regulation of executive compensation, expansion of the standards for market participants in dealing with clients and customers, and regulation of fiduciary duties owed by municipal advisors or conduit borrowers of municipal securities. In addition, Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act (known as the “Volker Rule”) and section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Act (known as the “swaps push-out rule”) limit proprietary trading of certain securities and swaps by certain banking entities. Although we are not a banking entity and are not otherwise subject to these rules, some of our clients and many of our counterparties are banks or entities affiliated with banks and will be subject to these restrictions.  These sections of the Dodd-Frank Act and the regulations that are adopted to implement them could negatively affect the swaps and securities markets by reducing their depth and liquidity and thereby affect pricing in these markets.  Further, the Dodd-Frank Act as a whole and the intensified regulatory environment will likely alter certain business practices and change the competitive landscape of the financial services industry, which

may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.  We will continue to monitor all applicable developments in the implementation of Dodd-Frank and expect to adapt successfully to any new applicable legislative and regulatory requirements.



U.K. Regulation. Our U.K. subsidiary, CCFL, is authorized and regulated by the FCA. CCFL has FCA permission to carry on the following activities: (1) advising on investments; (2) agreeing to carry on a regulated activity; (3) arranging (bringing about) deals in investments; (4) arranging safeguarding and administration of assets; (5) dealing in investments as agent; (6)  making arrangements with a view to transactions in investments; and (7) managing investments. An overview of key aspects of the U.K.’s regulatory regime, which apply to CCFL, is set out below.



Ongoing regulatory obligations. As an FCA regulated entity, CCFL is subject to the FCA’s ongoing regulatory obligations, which cover the following wide-ranging aspects of its business:



Threshold Conditions: The FCA’s Threshold Conditions Sourcebook sets out five conditions that all U.K. authorized firms, including CCFL, must satisfy in order to become and remain authorized by the FCA. These relate to having a viable and sustainable business model, an appropriate location for the firm’s head office, being capable of being effectively supervised by the FCA, adequate financial and non-financial resources, and the suitability to be and to remain authorized.



Principles for Businesses: CCFL is expected to comply with the FCA’s high-level principles, set out in the Principles for Businesses Sourcebook (the “Principles”). The Principles govern the way in which a regulated firm conducts business and include obligations to conduct business with integrity, due skill, care and diligence, to take reasonable care to organize and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems, to maintain adequate financial resources, to have appropriate regard for customers’ interests, to ensure adequate and appropriate communication with clients, to observe proper standards of market conduct and to ensure appropriate dialogue with regulators (both in the U.K. and overseas).



Systems and Controls: One of the FCA’s Principles requires a regulated firm to take reasonable care to organize and control its affairs responsibly effectively, with adequate risk management systems. Consequently, the FCA imposes overarching responsibilities on the directors and senior management of a regulated firm. The FCA ultimately expects the senior management of a regulated firm to take responsibility for determining what processes and internal organization are appropriate to its business. Key requirements in this context include the need to have adequate systems and controls in relation to: (1) senior management arrangements and general organizational requirements; (2) compliance, internal audit, and financial crime prevention; (3) outsourcing; (4) record keeping; (5) risk management; and (6) managing conflicts of interest.



Conduct of business obligation. The FCA imposes conduct of business rules that set out the obligations to which regulated firms are subject in their dealings with clients and potential clients. CCFL has FCA permission to deal only with eligible counterparties and professional clients in relation to the regulated activities it conducts. The detailed level of the conduct of business rules with which CCFL must comply is dependent on the categorization of its clients, which should be considered in the context of the regulated activity being performed. These rules include requirements relating to the type and level of information that must be provided to clients before business is conducted with or for them, the regulation of financial promotions, procedures for entering into client agreements, obligations relating to the suitability and appropriateness of investments, and rules about managing investments and reporting to clients.  



Reporting. All authorized firms in the U.K. are required to report to the FCA on a periodic basis. CCFL’s reporting requirements are based on its scope of permissions. The FCA will use the information submitted by CCFL to monitor it on an ongoing basis. There are also high-level reporting obligations under the Principles, whereby CCFL is required to deal with the FCA and other regulators in an open and co-operative way and to disclose to regulators appropriately anything relating to it of which the regulators would reasonably expect notice.



FCA’s enforcement powers. The FCA has a wide range of disciplinary and enforcement tools that it can use should a regulated firm fail to comply with its regulatory obligations. The FCA is not only able to investigate and take enforcement action in respect of breaches of FCA rules, but also in respect of insider dealing and market abuse offenses and breaches of anti-money laundering legislation. Formal sanctions vary from public censure to financial penalties to cancellation of an authorized firm’s permissions or withdrawal of an approved person’s approval.



Financial Resources. One of the FCA’s Principles requires a regulated firm to maintain adequate financial resources. Under the FCA rules, the required level of capital depends on CCFL’s prudential categorization, calculated in accordance with the relevant FCA rules. A firm’s prudential categorization is loosely based on the type of regulated activities that it conducts, as this in turn determines the level of risk to which a firm is considered exposed. CCFL is classified as a BIPRU Investment firm. In broad terms, this means that it would be subject to a base capital requirement of the higher of (1) €50,000; or (2) the higher of ¼ of its annual fixed expenses or the sum of its credit risk plus its market risk. There are also detailed ongoing regulatory capital requirements applicable to a regulated firm, including those relating, settlement risk and client monies.



Anti-money Laundering Requirements. A U.K. financial institution is subject to additional client acceptance requirements, which stem from anti-money laundering legislation that requires a firm to identify its clients before conducting business with or for them and to retain appropriate documentary evidence of this process.



Relevant money laundering legislation in the UK is derived from EU Directives. Legislation also includes the UK’s Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on Payer) Regulations, 2017, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (as amended) and the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005.  Further provisions in regard to Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing are contained in the Criminal Finances Bill, the Counter Terrorism Act 2008, The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, Terrorism Act 2000.  In addition, HM Treasury maintains a ‘sanctions list’.



For an FCA regulated firm such as CCFL, there are additional obligations contained in the FCA’s rules. Guidance is also set out in the U.K. Joint Money Laundering Steering Group Guidance Notes, which the FCA may consider when determining compliance by a regulated firm with U.K. money laundering requirements.



As an FCA regulated entity, CCFL is required to ensure that it has adequate systems and controls to enable it to identify, assess, monitor, and manage financial crime risk. CCFL must also ensure that these systems and controls are comprehensive and proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of its activities.



In addition to potential regulatory sanctions from the FCA, failure to comply with the U.K.’s anti-money laundering requirements is a criminal offense; depending on the exact nature of the offense, such a failure is punishable by an unlimited fine, imprisonment, or both.



Approved Persons Regime. Individuals performing certain functions within a regulated entity (known as “controlled functions”) are required to be approved by the FCA. Once approved, the “approved person” becomes subject to the FCA’s Statements of Principle for Approved Persons, which include the obligation to act with integrity, due skill, care & diligence and proper standards of market conduct.



The FCA can take action against an approved person if it appears to it that such person is guilty of misconduct and the FCA is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to take action against such person.



Senior management functions (SMFs) are a type of controlled function under FSMA. They are prescribed in the FCA Handbook and apply to UK-authorized firms and EEA Branches.



CCFL is required to have approved persons performing certain SMF’s. Examples of SMFs include:

Conduct Rules. Apply to all employees within CCFL, not just approved persons. They set basic standards of good personal conduct, against which the FCA can hold people to account.

There are two tiers of Conduct rules which apply. The first is a general set of rules that applies to most employees and directors in CCFL. The second tier consists of rules that only apply to Senior Managers.

First Tier – Individual Conduct Rules:

Second Tier – Senior Manager Conduct Rules:

CCFL is required to ensure that it assesses and monitors the ongoing competence of its approved persons and their fitness and propriety.

Changes in Existing Laws and Rules. Additional legislation and regulations, changes in rules promulgated by the government regulatory bodies, or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of laws and regulations may directly affect the manner of our operation, our net capital requirements, or our profitability. In addition, any expansion of our activities into new areas may subject us to additional regulatory requirements that could adversely affect our business, reputation, and results of operations.



Irish Regulation. Our Irish subsidiary, Cohen & Company Financial (Europe) Limited (“CCFEL”), is authorized and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland (“CBI”). CCFEL has CBI permission to carry on the following activities: (1) receiving/transmitting orders; (2) executing client orders; (3) portfolio management; (4) investment advice; and (5) research and financial analysis.  An overview of key aspects of Ireland’s regulatory regime, which apply to CCFEL, is set out below.



Ongoing regulatory obligations. As a CBI regulated entity, CCFEL is subject to the CBI’s ongoing regulatory obligations, which cover the following wide-ranging aspects of its business.



The CBI’s sets conditions that all Irish authorized firms, including CCFEL, must satisfy in order to become and remain authorized by the CBI. These relate to the firm’s ability to act in the best interests of consumers, ensuring the firm is financially sound and safely managed with sufficient financial resources, that the firm is governed and controlled appropriately, with clear and embedded risk appetites, which drive an appropriate culture within them and have frameworks in place to ensure failed or failing providers go through orderly resolution.



CCFEL is expected to comply with the CBI’s regulatory frameworks. The frameworks govern the way in which a regulated firm conducts business and include obligations to conduct business with integrity, due skill, care and diligence, to take reasonable care to organize and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems, to maintain adequate financial resources, to have appropriate regard for customers’ interests, to ensure adequate and appropriate communication with clients, to observe proper standards of market conduct and to ensure appropriate dialogue with regulators (both in Ireland and overseas).



The CBI’s requires a regulated firm to take reasonable care to organize and control its affairs responsibly effectively, with adequate risk management systems. Consequently, the CBI imposes overarching responsibilities on the directors and senior management of a regulated firm. The CBI ultimately expects the senior management of a regulated firm to take responsibility for determining what processes and internal organization are appropriate to its business. Key requirements in this context include the need to have adequate systems and controls in relation to: (1) senior management arrangements and general organizational requirements; (2) compliance, internal audit, and financial crime prevention; (3) outsourcing; (4) record keeping; (5) risk management; and (6) managing conflicts of interest.



CCFEL has CBI permission to deal only with eligible counterparties and professional clients in relation to the regulated activities it conducts. The level with which CCFEL must comply is dependent on the categorization of its clients, which should be considered in the context of the regulated activity being performed. These rules include requirements relating to the type and level of information that must be provided to clients before business is conducted with or for them, the regulation of financial promotions, procedures for entering into client agreements, obligations relating to the suitability and appropriateness of investments, and rules about managing investments and reporting to clients.



Reporting. All authorized firms in Ireland are required to report to the CBI on a periodic basis. CCFEL’s reporting requirements are based on its scope of permissions. The CBI will use the information submitted by CCFEL to monitor it on an ongoing basis. There are also high-level reporting obligations, whereby CCFEL is required to deal with the CBI and other regulators in an open and co-operative way and to disclose to regulators appropriately anything relating to it of which the regulators would reasonably expect notice.



CBI’s enforcement powers. The CBI has a wide range of disciplinary and enforcement tools that it can use should a regulated firm fail to comply with its regulatory obligations. It uses a wide range of tools to take action against regulated entities and/or individuals which fall short of our expected standards of behavior including:



Financial Resources. As part of the firm regulatory requirements under the CBI it must maintain adequate financial resources. Under CBI rules, the required level of capital depends on CCFEL’s regulatory permissions, calculated in accordance with the relevant CBI rules. A firm’s categorization is loosely based on the type of regulated activities that it conducts, as this in turn determines the level of risk to which a firm is considered exposed. CCFEL is classified as a MIFID Investment firm. In broad terms, this means that it would be subject to a base capital requirement of the higher of (1) €50,000; or (2) the higher of ¼ of its annual fixed expenses or the sum of its credit risk plus its market risk.



Anti-money Laundering Requirements. An Irish financial institution is subject to additional client acceptance requirements, which stem from anti-money laundering legislation that requires a firm to identify its clients before conducting business with or for them and to retain appropriate documentary evidence of this process.



Relevant money laundering legislation in Ireland is derived from EU Directives. Legislation also includes the Ireland’s Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010 (as amended) (“CJA 2010”).  While Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) preventative measures are dealt with together by the Act, it is important to note that a distinction exists in the nature of the two offences.



For a CBI regulated firm such as CCFEL, there are additional obligations contained in the CBI’s rules.



As a CBI regulated entity, CCFEL is required to ensure that it has adequate systems and controls to enable it to identify, assess, monitor, and manage financial crime risk. CCFEL must also ensure that these systems and controls are comprehensive and proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of its activities.



In addition to potential regulatory sanctions for CCFEL from the CBI, individuals, meanwhile, may be subject to:



Under the Fitness and Probity regime, the CBI also has the power to suspend individuals or prohibit them from working in regulated financial services.



Fitness and Probity.  The Fitness and Probity Regime applies to persons in senior positions, known as Controlled Functions (CFs) and Pre-Approval Controlled Functions (PCFs), within Regulated Financial Service Providers (RFSPs). The CBI expects all persons to which the Fitness and Probity Standards apply, to comply with these standards at all times:



CCFEL is required to ensure that it assesses and monitors the ongoing competence of its control staff and their fitness and probity.

Changes in Existing Laws and Rules. Additional legislation and regulations, changes in rules promulgated by the government regulatory bodies, or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of laws and regulations may directly affect the manner of our operation, our net capital requirements, or our profitability. In addition, any expansion of our activities into new areas may subject us to additional regulatory requirements that could adversely affect our business, reputation, and results of operations.



Available Information



Our internet website address is www.cohenandcompany.com. We make available through our website, free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports that we file or furnish pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such information with, or furnish such information to, the SEC.



Our filings can also be obtained for free on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on our website in this filing or in other filings with the SEC, and the information contained on our website is not part of this filing.





ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS.



You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties described below constitute all of the material risks of the Company of which we are currently aware; however, the risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only risks the Company will face. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are presently unaware, or that we do not currently deem to be material, may become important factors that affect us and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of our securities. Investing in the Company’s securities involves risk and the following risk factors, together with the other information contained in this report and the other reports and documents filed by us with the SEC, should be considered carefully.



Risks Related to Our Business



Difficult market conditions have adversely affected our business in many ways and may continue to adversely affect our business in a manner which could materially reduce our revenues.



Our business has been and may continue to be materially affected by conditions in the global financial markets and economic conditions. The financial markets continue to be volatile and continue to present many challenges such as the level and volatility of interest rates, investor sentiment, the availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage and real estate markets, consumer confidence, unemployment and geopolitical issues.



A prolonged economic slowdown, volatility in the markets, a recession, and increasing interest rates could impair our investments and harm our operating results.



Our investments are, and will continue to be, susceptible to economic slowdowns, recessions and rising interest rates, which may lead to financial losses in our investments and a decrease in revenues, net income and asset values. These events may reduce the value of our investments, reduce the number of attractive investment opportunities available to us and harm our operating results, which, in turn, may adversely affect our cash flow from operations.



Our ability to raise capital in the long-term or short-term debt capital markets or the equity markets, or to access secured lending markets, has been and could continue to be adversely affected by conditions in the U.S. and international markets and the economy. Global market and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, disrupted and volatile. In particular, the cost and availability of funding have been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads and volatility of interest rates (including overnight repo). As a result of concern about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers. Continued turbulence in the U.S. and international markets and economy may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition and the willingness of certain counterparties to do business with us.



In addition, global macroeconomic conditions and U.S. financial markets remain vulnerable to the potential risks posed by exogenous shocks, which could include, among other things, political and financial uncertainty in the U.S. and the European Union (the “EU”), renewed concern about China’s economy, complications involving terrorism and armed conflicts around the world, or other challenges to global trade or travel, such as might occur in the event of a wider pandemic involving COVID-19, the illness caused by the novel coronavirus which was identified at the end of 2019. More generally, because our business is closely correlated to the macroeconomic outlook, a significant deterioration in that outlook or an exogenous shock would likely have an immediate negative impact on our overall results of operations.





We may experience write downs of financial instruments and other losses related to the volatile and illiquid market conditions.



The credit markets in the U.S. experienced significant disruption and volatility from mid-2007 through early 2009, and challenging conditions have continued since that time. Although financial markets have become more stable and have generally improved since 2009, there remains a certain degree of uncertainty about a global economic recovery. Available liquidity also declined precipitously during the credit crisis and remains significantly depressed. The disruption in these markets generally, and in the U.S. and European markets in particular, impacted and may continue to impact our business. Furthermore, the asset management revenues we derive from CDOs are based on the outstanding performing principal balance of those investments. Therefore, as adverse market conditions result in defaults within these CDOs, our management fees have declined and may continue to decline. We have exposure to these markets and products, and if market conditions continue to worsen, the fair value of our investments and our management fees could further deteriorate. In addition, market volatility, illiquid market conditions and disruptions in the global credit markets have made it extremely difficult to value certain of our securities. Subsequent valuations, in light of factors then prevailing,

may result in significant changes in the values of these securities, and when such securities are sold, it may be at a price materially lower than the current fair value. Any of these factors could require us to take further write downs in the fair value of our investment portfolio or cause our management fees to decline, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations in future periods.



We have incurred losses for certain periods covered by this report and in the recent past and may incur losses in the future.



The Company recorded a net loss of $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. We may incur additional losses in future periods. If we are unable to finance future losses, those losses may have a significant effect on our liquidity as well as our ability to operate our business.



In addition, the Company has incurred and may continue to incur significant expenses in connection with initiating new business activities or in connection with any expansion or reorganization of our businesses. We may also engage in strategic acquisitions and investments for which we may incur significant expenses. Accordingly, we may need to increase our revenue at a rate greater than our expenses in order to achieve and maintain our profitability. If our revenue does not increase sufficiently, or even if our revenue does increase but we are unable to manage our expenses, we will not achieve and maintain profitability in future periods.



We have experienced difficulties in our Capital Markets segment over the past several years due to intense competition in our industry, which has resulted in significant strain on our administrative, operational and financial resources. These difficulties may continue in the future.



The financial services industry and all of our businesses are intensely competitive, and we expect them to remain so. We compete with commercial banks, brokerage firms, insurance companies, sponsors of mutual funds, hedge funds and other companies offering financial services in the U.S., globally, and through the internet. We compete on the basis of several factors, including transaction execution, capital or access to capital, products and services, innovation, reputation, risk appetite and price. Over time, certain sectors of the financial services industry have become more concentrated as institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms or have declared bankruptcy. These developments could result in our competitors gaining greater capital and other resources such as a broader range of products and services and geographic diversity. We have experienced and may continue to experience pricing pressures in our Capital Markets segment as a result of these factors and as some of our competitors may seek to increase market share by reducing prices.



Both margins and volumes in certain products and markets within the fixed income brokerage business have decreased materially as competition has increased and general market activity has declined. Further, we expect that competition will increase over time, resulting in continued margin pressure. These challenges have materially adversely affected our Capital Markets segment��s results of operations and may continue to do so.



We intend to focus on improving the performance of our Capital Markets segment, which could place additional demands on our resources and increase our expenses. Improving the performance of our Capital Markets segment will depend on, among other things, our ability to successfully identify groups and individuals to join our firm and our ability to successfully grow our existing business lines and platforms and opportunistically expand into other complementary business areas. It may take more than a year for us to determine whether we have successfully integrated new individuals, lines of business and capabilities into our operations. During that time, we may incur significant expenses and expend significant time and resources toward training, integration and business development. If we are unable to hire and retain senior management or other qualified personnel, such as salespeople and traders, we will not be able to grow our business and our financial results may be materially and adversely affected.



There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully improve the operations of our Capital Markets segment, and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenue and control expenses.



The incurrence of additional debt to finance our matched book repo business could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.



The Company has been a full netting member of the FICC’s Government Securities Division since October 2017.  As a member of the FICC, the Company has access to the FICC’s GCF repo service that provides netting and settlement services for repurchase transactions where the underlying security is general collateral (primarily U.S. Treasuries and U.S. Agency securities).  The Company began entering into matched book GCF repo transactions in November 2017.  The borrowers (the reverse repurchase agreement counterparties) are a diverse group of financial institutions including hedge funds, registered investment funds, REITs, and other similar counterparties.  The lender (the repurchase agreement counterparty) is primarily the FICC itself.  In connection with our matched book repo business, we have incurred additional debt  and expect to incur additional debt in the future.  Our level of debt and the limitations imposed upon us by our debt agreements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.



Our matched book repo financing is facilitated through JVB which is subject to various broker-dealer regulations. JVB’s failure to comply with these regulations and its ability to facilitate attractive matched book repo financing and to conduct its business with third parties could adversely affect our funding costs, “haircuts” and/or counterparty exposure.



We have grown our matched book repo business under which JVB enters into repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements.  JVB’s ability to access repo funding and to raise funds through the GCF repo service offered by the FICC requires that it continuously meet the regulatory and membership requirements of FINRA and the FICC, which may change over time. If JVB fails to meet these requirements and is unable to access such funding, we would be required to find alternative funding, which we may be unable to do and our funding costs, “haircuts” and/or counterparty exposure could increase.  This could make our matched book repo business uneconomical and/or could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.



Our matched book repo business remains a relatively new business strategy for us that continues to require significant resources and management attention, and we may not be successful in achieving our strategic goals.



There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to operate our matched book repo business effectively or to operate it profitably over the long term, or that our matched book repo business will result in improved operating results. Furthermore, the matched book repo industry is intensely competitive, and we compete with existing players in this sector, many of whom are established and have significant resources and existing customer relationships. Moreover, we may not be able to consistently ascertain and allocate the appropriate financial and human resources necessary to continue to grow this business area. We have invested and may continue to invest considerable capital in developing our matched book repo business but fail to achieve satisfactory financial return. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that we will realize a profit from this business line or that continuing to divert our management’s attention to this business line will not have a negative impact on our other existing businesses or new business initiatives, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.



U.S. Housing Market



In recent years, our mortgage group has become an increasingly important component of our Capital Markets segment and the Company overall.  The mortgage group primarily earns revenue by providing hedging execution, securities financing, and trade execution services to mortgage originators and other investors in mortgage backed securities.  Therefore, this group’s revenue is highly dependent on the volume of mortgage originations in the U.S. Origination activity is highly sensitive to interest rates, the U.S. job market, housing starts, sale activity of existing housing stock, as well as the general health of the U.S. economy.  In addition, any new regulation that impacts U.S. government agency mortgage backed security issuance activity, residential mortgage underwriting standards, or otherwise impacts mortgage originators will impact our business.  We have no control over these external factors and there is no effective way for us to hedge against these risks.  Our mortgage group’s volumes and profitability will be highly impacted by these external factors.



In addition, in November 2018, we launched a new business platform, ViaNova, which is focused on the purchase and sale of residential transition loans, and we expect to expand ViaNova’s focus to other mortgage related products.  There is no assurance that we will be able to operate this new mortgage trading business effectively or profitably over the long term, or that our mortgage trading business will result in improved operating results. Furthermore, the mortgage trading industry is intensely competitive, and we compete with existing players in this sector, many of whom are established and have significant resources and existing customer relationships.  Moreover, we may not be able to consistently ascertain and allocate the appropriate financial and human resources necessary to continue to grow this business area.  We have invested and may continue to invest considerable capital in developing our mortgage trading business but may nevertheless fail to achieve satisfactory financial return. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that we will realize a profit from this new business line or that continuing to divert our management’s attention to this new business line will not have a negative impact on our existing businesses or other new business initiatives, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.



If we fail to implement our cost management initiatives effectively, our business could be disrupted, and our financial results could be adversely affected.



The Company continues to look for ways to reduce infrastructure costs and reposition itself in the financial services industry. Beginning in 2010 and continuing to the present, the Company executed initiatives that created efficiencies within its business and decreased operating expenses through the realignment of operating facilities, a merger of its two registered U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries, and a restructuring of operating systems and systems support.



Our cost management initiatives have included reducing our workforce, which has placed increased burdens on our management, systems and resources, and generally increased our dependence on key persons and reduced functional back-ups. As a result, our ability to respond to unexpected challenges may be impaired, and we may be unable to take advantage of new opportunities. In addition, if these and other initiatives do not have the desired effects or result in the projected increased efficiencies,

the Company may incur additional or unexpected expenses, reputational damage, or loss of customers which would adversely affect the Company’s operations and revenues.



In response to changes in industry and market conditions, the Company may be required to further strategically realign its resources and consider restructuring, disposing of, or otherwise exiting businesses. We cannot assure you that we will be able to:





Our Capital Markets segment depends significantly on a limited group of customers.



From time to time, based on market conditions, a small number of our customers may account for a significant portion of the revenues earned in our Capital Markets segment. None of our customers is obligated contractually to use our services. Accordingly, these customers may direct their activities to other firms at any time. The loss of or a significant reduction in demand for our services from any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.



If we do not retain our senior management and continue to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may not be able to execute our business strategy.



The members of our senior management team have extensive experience in the financial services industry. Their reputations and relationships with investors, financing sources and members of the business community in our industry, among others, are critical elements in operating and expanding our business. As a result, the loss of the services of one or more members of our senior management team could impair our ability to execute our business strategies, which could hinder our ability to achieve and sustain profitability.  The Company has various employment arrangements with the members of its senior management team, but there can be no assurance that the terms of these employment arrangements will provide sufficient incentives for each of the members of the senior management team to continue employment with us.



We depend on the diligence, experience, skill and network of business contacts of our senior management team and our employees in connection with (1) our Capital Markets segment, (2) our asset management operations, (3) our investment activities, and (4) the evaluation, negotiation, structuring and management of new business opportunities. Our business depends on the expertise of our personnel and their ability to work together as an effective team and our success depends substantially on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Competition for employees with the necessary qualifications is intense, and we may not be successful in our efforts to recruit and retain the required personnel. The inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel could affect our ability to provide an acceptable level of service to our clients and funds, attract new clients, and develop new lines of business, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.



Payment of severance could strain our cash flow.



Certain members of our senior management team have agreements that provide for substantial severance payments. Should several of these senior managers leave our employ under circumstances entitling them to severance, or become disabled or die, the need to pay these severance benefits could put a strain on our cash flow.



Our business will require a significant amount of cash, and if it is not available, our business and financial performance will be significantly harmed.



We require a substantial amount of cash to fund our investments, pay our expenses and hold our assets. More specifically, we require cash to:





Our primary sources of working capital and cash are expected to consist of:





We may not be able to generate a sufficient amount of cash from operations and investing and financing activities in order to successfully execute our business strategy.



Failure to obtain or maintain adequate capital and funding would adversely affect the growth and results of our operations and may, in turn, negatively affect the market price of our Common Stock.



Liquidity is essential to our businesses. We depend upon the availability of adequate funding and capital for our operations. In particular, we may need to raise additional capital in order to significantly grow our business. In recent years, we have engaged in a number of capital raising transactions with Daniel G. Cohen, Chairman of the Board and President and Chief Executive of European operations, and/or persons or entities controlled by or close to Mr. Cohen because the terms of such transactions have been more favorable than terms available from unrelated third parties.  Our liquidity could be substantially adversely affected by our inability to raise funding in the long-term or short-term debt capital markets or the equity capital markets or our inability to access the secured lending markets. Factors that we cannot control, such as continued or additional disruption of the financial markets, or negative views about the financial services industry generally, have limited and may continue to limit our ability to raise capital. In addition, our ability to raise capital could be impaired if lenders develop a negative perception of our long-term or short-term financial prospects or if Mr. Cohen becomes unwilling to continue to fund the Company’s operations. Lenders could develop negative perceptions if we incur large trading losses, we suffer a decline in the level of our business activity, we suffer material litigation losses, regulatory authorities take significant action against us, or we discover significant employee misconduct or illegal activity, among other reasons. Sufficient funding or capital may not be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable, or at all. If we are unable to raise funding using the methods described above, we would likely need to finance or liquidate unencumbered assets, such as our investment and trading portfolios, in order to meet our maturing liabilities. We may be unable to sell some of our assets, or we may have to sell assets at a discount from market value, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.  If we are unable to meet our funding needs on a timely basis, our business would be adversely affected and there may be a negative impact on the market price of our Common Stock.



The lack of liquidity in certain investments may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.



We hold investments in securities of private companies, investment funds, SPACs, CDOs and CLOs. A portion of these securities may be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or may otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises.



In addition, on December 30, 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Daniel G. Cohen and the DGC Family Fintech Trust (the “DGC Trust”).  In connection with the SPA, we purchased an aggregate of 662,361 shares of International Money Express, Inc. (“IMXI”), an unrelated publicly traded company, from Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust.  Of the 662,361 shares, 134,317 shares are unrestricted and 528,044 are subject to sale restrictions.  Of the 528,044 restricted shares, 246,021 shares become freely tradeable if IMXI’s share price equals or exceeds $15.00 per share for 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days or upon a change of control of IMXI, and 264,023 shares become freely tradeable if IMXI’s share price equals or exceed $17.00 per share 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days or upon a change of control of IMXI.  IMXI’s share price closed at $11.89 per share on December 31, 2019.



The United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union may adversely affect our business.

We have a presence in certain European Union countries, including the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”). On June 23, 2016, the U.K. voted in favor of a referendum to leave the EU, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” The U.K. officially left the EU on January 31, 2020, and a transition period of at least 11 months commenced to allow for the negotiation of a new trade agreement.  Following Brexit, CCFL, our subsidiary that is authorized and regulated by the FCA in the U.K., can no longer avail itself of passporting rights to provide services in other European Union member states. Although we have sought to take protective measures and have established a new regulated subsidiary in Dublin, Ireland in order to provide continuing services to clients in the European Union following Brexit, Brexit is expected to significantly affect the fiscal, monetary and regulatory landscape in both the U.K. and European Union and could have a material impact on their economies and the future growth of various industries. The exit of the U.K. from the European could significantly impact the business environment in which we operate, increase the cost of conducting business in both the European Union and the U.K., and introduce significant new uncertainties with respect to the legal and regulatory requirements to which we are subject. Although it is not possible at this point in time to predict fully the effects of the exit of the U.K. from the European Union, any of the

foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, Brexit may impact our ability to comply with the extensive government regulation to which we are subject.

It remains unclear exactly how the U.K.’s status in relation to EU as a result of Brexit.  Accordingly, we have implemented alternative arrangements in EU jurisdictions in order to ensure continued operations in the Eurozone, including our continued ability to market and sell various investment products in the Eurozone. In addition, any other changes in the composition of the EU’s member states may add further complexity to our global risks and operations.



If we are unable to manage the risks of international operations effectively, our business could be adversely affected.



We currently provide services and products to clients in Europe, through offices in Dublin, Paris and London. There are certain additional risks inherent in doing business in international markets, particularly in the regulated brokerage and asset management industries. These risks include:





If we are unable to manage any of these risks effectively, our business could be adversely affected.



In addition, our current international operations expose us to the risk of fluctuations in currency exchange rates generally and fluctuations in the exchange rates for the Euro and the British Pound Sterling in particular. Although we may hedge our foreign currency risk, we may not be able to do so successfully and may incur losses that could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.



The securities settlement process exposes us to risks that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.



We provide brokerage services to our clients in the form of “matched principal transactions” or by providing liquidity by purchasing securities from them on a principal basis. In “matched principal transactions” we act as a “middleman” by serving as a counterparty to both a buyer and a seller in matching reciprocal back-to-back trades. These transactions, which generally involve bonds, are then settled through clearing institutions with which we have a contractual relationship. There is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain existing contractual relationships with clearing institutions on favorable terms or that we will be able to establish relationships with new clearing institutions on favorable terms, or at all.



In executing matched principal transactions, we are exposed to the risk that one of the counterparties to a transaction may fail to fulfill its obligations, either because it is not matched immediately or, even if matched, one party fails to deliver the cash or securities it is obligated to deliver upon settlement. In addition, some of the products we trade or may trade in the future are in less commoditized markets which may exacerbate this risk because transactions in such markets may not settle on a timely basis. Adverse movements in the prices of securities that are the subject of these transactions can increase our risk. In addition, widespread technological or communication failures, as well as actual or perceived credit difficulties, or the insolvency of one or more large or visible market participants, could cause market-wide credit difficulties or other market disruptions. These failures, difficulties or disruptions could result in a large number of market participants not settling transactions or otherwise not performing their obligations.



We are subject to financing risk in these circumstances because if a transaction does not settle on a timely basis, the resulting unmatched position may need to be financed, either directly by us or through one of our clearing organizations at our expense. These charges may not be recoverable from the failing counterparty. Finally, in instances where the unmatched position or failure to deliver is prolonged or widespread due to rapid or widespread declines in liquidity for an instrument, there may also be regulatory capital charges required to be taken by us which, depending on their size and duration, could limit our business flexibility or even force the curtailment of those portions of our business requiring higher levels of capital. Credit or settlement losses of this nature could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.



In the process of executing matched principal transactions, miscommunications and other errors by our clients or by us can arise whereby a transaction is not completed with one or more counterparties to the transaction, leaving us with either a long or short unmatched position. If the unmatched position is promptly discovered and there is a prompt disposition of the unmatched position, the risk to us is usually limited. If the discovery of an out trade is delayed, the risk is heightened by the increased possibility of intervening market movements prior to disposition. Although out trades usually become known at the time of, or later on the day of, the trade, it is possible that they may not be discovered until later in the settlement process. When out trades are discovered, our policy will generally be to have the unmatched position disposed of promptly, whether or not this disposition would result in a loss to us. The occurrence of

unmatched positions generally rises with increases in the volatility of the market and, depending on their number and amount, such out trades have the potential to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.



From time to time, we may also provide brokerage services in the form of agency transactions. In agency transactions, we charge a commission for connecting buyers and sellers and assisting in the negotiation of the price and other material terms of the transaction. After all material terms of a transaction are agreed upon, we identify the buyer and seller to each other and leave them to settle the trade directly. We are exposed to credit risk for commissions we bill to clients for agency brokerage services.



Participation in matched principal, principal, or agency transactions subjects us to disputes, counterparty credit risk, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other market wide or counterparty specific risks. Any losses arising from such risks could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the failure of a significant number of counterparties or a counterparty that holds a significant amount of derivatives exposure, or that has significant financial exposure to, or reliance on, the mortgage, asset-backed or related markets, could have a material adverse effect on the trading volume and liquidity in a particular market for which we provide brokerage services or on the broader financial markets.



We have policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage these risks, through reporting and control procedures and by monitoring credit standards applicable to our clients. These policies and procedures, however, may not be fully effective. Some of our risk management methods will depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible by us. That information may not, in all cases, be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated. If our policies and procedures are not fully effective or we are not always successful in monitoring or evaluating the risks to which we may be exposed, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, we may not be able to obtain insurance to cover all of the types of risks we face and any insurance policies we do obtain may not provide adequate coverage for covered risks.



We are exposed to the risk that third parties that are indebted to us will not perform their obligations.



Credit risk refers to the risk of loss arising from borrower, counterparty or obligor default when a borrower, counterparty or obligor does not meet its obligations. We incur significant credit risk exposure through our Capital Markets segment. This risk may arise from a variety of business activities, including but not limited to extending credit to clients through various lending commitments; providing short or long-term funding that is secured by physical or financial collateral whose value may at times be insufficient to fully cover the loan repayment amount; entering into swap or other derivative contracts under which counterparties have obligations to make payments to us; and posting margin and/or collateral to clearing houses, clearing agencies, exchanges, banks, securities firms and other financial counterparties. We incur credit risk in traded securities and loan pools whereby the value of these assets may fluctuate based on realized or expected defaults on the underlying obligations or loans.



There is a possibility that continued difficult economic conditions may further negatively impact our clients and our current credit exposures. Although we regularly review our credit exposures, default risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect or foresee.



We are exposed to various risks related to margin requirements under repurchase agreements and securities financing arrangements and are highly dependent on our clearing relationships.  



We maintain repurchase agreements with various third-party financial institutions and other counterparties. Under those repurchase agreements we act as both a buyer and a seller of the subject securities. Our business related to these repurchase agreements is predominantly matched, meaning that we do not purchase or sell securities unless there is another institution prepared to simultaneously purchase or sell securities to or from us, as applicable. There are limits to the amount of securities that may be transferred pursuant to these agreements, and available lines both for us and our counterparties for whom we purchase securities are approved on a case-by-case basis after each counterparty has gone through a credit review process. The repurchase agreements we execute with our counterparties include substantive provisions other than those covenants and other customary provisions contained in standard master repurchase agreements. However, while these additional provisions may work to mitigate some of the risks related to repurchase agreement transactions, these additional substantive provisions do not guarantee the performance of a counterparty or alleviate all of the potential risks we could face from entering into repurchase agreement transactions. 



The repurchase agreements generally require a seller under a repurchase agreement to transfer additional securities to the counterparty who is acting as the buyer under the repurchase agreement in the event that the value of the securities then held by the buyer falls below specified levels. Each repurchase agreement contains events of default in cases where a counterparty breaches its obligations under the agreement. When we are acting in the capacity of a seller under these agreements, we receive margin calls from time to time in the ordinary course of business, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to satisfy requests from our counterparties to post additional collateral in the future. Similarly, when we are acting in the capacity of a buyer under these agreements we make margin calls from time to time to our seller counterparties in the ordinary course of business and no assurance can be given that our counterparties will have adequate funds or collateral to satisfy such margin call requirements. Generally, if there

was an event of default under a repurchase agreement, such event of default would provide the non-defaulting counterparty with the option to terminate all outstanding repurchase transactions with us and make all amounts due from the defaulting counterparty immediately payable. However, there can be no assurance that any such defaulting counterparty will have the funds or collateral needed to fully satisfy any such margin call or other amount due. Generally, repurchase obligations are full recourse obligations and if we were to default under a repurchase obligation, the counterparty would have recourse to our other assets if the collateral was insufficient to satisfy our obligation in full.



In addition, our clearing brokers provide securities financing arrangements including margin arrangements and securities borrowing and lending arrangements. These arrangements generally require us to transfer additional securities or cash to the clearing broker in the event that the value of the securities then held by the clearing broker in the margin account falls below specified levels and contain events of default that would be triggered if we were to breach our obligations under such agreements. An event of default under a clearing agreement would give the clearing broker the option to terminate the clearing arrangement and any amounts owed to the clearing broker would be immediately due and payable. These obligations are full recourse to us.



Furthermore, we are highly dependent on our relationships with our clearing brokers. Any termination of our clearing arrangements whether due to a breach of the agreement by us or a default, bankruptcy or reorganization of a clearing broker would result in a significant disruption to our business as we clear all trades through these entities. Any such termination would have a significant negative impact on our dealings and relationship with our customers and there is no guarantee we would be able to replace any such clearing broker on similar terms.



We have market risk exposure from unmatched principal transactions entered into by our brokerage desks, which could result in substantial losses to us and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.



We allow certain of our brokerage desks access to limited amounts of capital to enter into unmatched principal transactions in the ordinary course of business for the purpose of facilitating clients’ execution needs for transactions initiated by such clients or to add liquidity to certain illiquid markets. As a result, we have market risk exposure on these unmatched principal transactions. Our exposure will vary based on the size of the overall positions, the terms and liquidity of the instruments brokered, and the amount of time the positions will be held before we dispose of the positions.



We do not track our exposure to unmatched positions on an intra-day basis. These unmatched positions are intended to be held short-term, however, due to a number of factors, including the nature of a position and access to the market on which we trade, we may not be able to match each position or effectively hedge our exposure and often may be forced to hold a position overnight that has not been hedged. To the extent any unmatched positions are not disposed of intra-day, we mark those positions to market. Adverse movements in the securities underlying the positions or a downturn or disruption in the markets for the positions could result in our sustaining a substantial loss. In addition, any principal gains and losses resulting from these positions could, from time to time, have a disproportionate positive or negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations for a particular reporting period.



Pricing and other competitive pressures may impair the revenues and profitability of our brokerage business.  



In recent years, we have experienced significant pricing pressures on trading margins and commissions, primarily in debt trading. In the fixed income market, regulatory requirements have resulted in greater price transparency, leading to increased price competition and decreased trading margins. The trend toward using alternative trading systems is continuing to grow, which may result in decreased commission and trading revenue, reduce our participation in the trading markets and our ability to access market information, and lead to the creation of new and stronger competitors. Additional pressure on sales and trading revenue may impair the profitability of our brokerage business. We believe that price competition and pricing pressures in these and other areas will continue as institutional investors continue to reduce the amounts they are willing to pay, including reducing the number of brokerage firms they use, and some of our competitors seek to obtain market share by reducing fees, commissions or margins.



Increase in capital commitments in our trading business increases the potential for significant losses.  



We may enter into transactions in which we commit our own capital as part of our trading business. The number and size of these transactions may materially affect our results of operations in a given period. We may also incur significant losses from our trading activities due to market fluctuations and volatility from quarter to quarter. We maintain trading positions in the fixed income markets to facilitate client-trading activities. To the extent that we own security positions, in any of those markets, a downturn in the value of those securities or in those markets could result in losses from a decline in value. Conversely, to the extent that we have sold securities we do not own in any of those markets, an upturn in those markets could expose us to potentially unlimited losses as we attempt to acquire the securities in a rising market. Moreover, taking such positions in times of significant volatility can lead to significant unrealized losses, which further impact our ability to borrow to finance such activities.



Our principal trading and investments expose us to risk of loss.



A significant portion of our revenue is derived from trading in which we act as principal. The Company may incur trading losses relating to the purchase, sale or short sale of corporate and asset-backed fixed income securities and other securities for our own account and from other principal trading. In any period, we may experience losses as a result of price declines, lack of trading volume, general market conditions, employee inexperience, errors or misconduct, or illiquidity. From time to time, we may engage in a large block trade in a single security or maintain large position concentrations in a single security, securities of a single issuer, or securities of issuers engaged in a specific industry. In general, any downward price movement in these securities could result in a reduction of our revenues and profits.



In addition, we may engage in hedging transactions and strategies that may not properly mitigate losses in our principal positions. If the transactions and strategies are not successful, we could suffer significant losses.



Our principal investments are subject to various risks and expose us to a significant risk of capital loss, which may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. 



We use a portion of our own capital in a variety of principal investment activities, each of which involves risks of illiquidity, loss of principal and revaluation of assets. As of December 31, 2019, we had $14.9million in other investments, at fair value.  Our Principal Investment portfolio includes investments in IMXI (valued at $8.3 million), SPAC equity (valued at $1.1 million), two CLOs (valued at $2.5 million), the U.S. Insurance JV (valued at $2.2 million), the SPAC Funds (valued at $0.7million), and other securities (valued at $0.1 million).



We may use our capital, including on a leveraged basis, for principal investments in both private and public company securities that may be illiquid and volatile. The equity securities of any privately held entity in which we make a principal investment are likely to be restricted as to resale and may otherwise be highly illiquid. In the case of fund or similar investments, our investments may be illiquid until such investment vehicles are liquidated. We expect that there will be restrictions on our ability to resell any such securities that we acquire for a period of time after we acquire such securities. Thereafter, a public market sale may be subject to volume limitations or be dependent upon securing a registration statement for an initial, and potentially secondary, public offering of the securities. Even if we make an appropriate investment decision, we cannot be assured that general market conditions will not cause the market value of our investments to decline. For example, an increase in interest rates, a general decline in the equity markets, or other market and industry conditions adverse to the type of investments we make and intend to make could result in a decline in the value of our investments or a total loss of our investment.



There are no regularly quoted market prices for a number of the investments we make. The value of our investments is determined using fair value methodologies described in valuation policies, which may take into consideration, among other things, the nature of the investment, the expected cash flows from the investment, bid or ask prices provided by third parties for the investment, the trading price of recent sales of securities (in the case of publicly traded securities), restrictions on transfer, and other recognized valuation methodologies. The methodologies we use in valuing individual investments are based on estimates and assumptions specific to the particular investments. Therefore, the value of our investments does not necessarily reflect the prices that would actually be obtained by us when such investments are sold. Realizations at values significantly lower than the values at which investments have been previously held would result in loses of potential incentive income and principal investments.

In addition, in our principal investment activities, our concentrated holdings, illiquidity and market volatility may make it difficult to value certain of our investment securities. Subsequent valuations, in light of factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the values of these securities in future periods. In addition, at the time of any sales and settlements of these securities, the price we ultimately realize will depend on the demand and liquidity in the market at that time and may be materially lower than current fair value of such securities. Any of these factors could require us to take write-downs in the value of our investment and securities portfolio, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations in future periods. If we are unable to manage any of these risks effectively, our results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.



Transition away from LIBOR as a benchmark reference for interest rates may affect the cost of capital and may require amending or restructuring existing debt instruments and related hedging arrangements for us, our investment funds and our separately managed accounts, and may impact the value of floating rate securities based on LIBOR we, our investment funds or our separately managed accounts hold or may hold in the future, which may result in additional costs or adversely affect our, our funds’ or our separately managed accounts’ liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

We currently have $48,125 of par value debt which incurs interest based on the London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”). In addition, we have a $25,000 line of credit pursuant to which amounts drawn bear interest based on LIBOR. As of December 31, 2019, there were no amounts drawn under this line of credit. In July 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced that it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. It is unclear whether new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021 and has indicated that market

participants should not rely on LIBOR being available after 2021. As an alternative to LIBOR, for example, the U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, is considering replacing U.S.-dollar LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities. Although there have been a few issuances utilizing SOFR or the Sterling Over Night Index Average, an alternative reference rate that is based on transactions, it is unknown whether any of these alternative reference rates will attain market acceptance as replacements for LIBOR. There is currently no definitive successor reference rate to LIBOR and various industry organizations are still working to develop workable transition mechanisms. As such, it is not possible to predict all potential effects of these changes on U.S. and global credit markets. If LIBOR ceases to exist, we, our investments funds and our separately managed accounts may need to amend or restructure our existing LIBOR-based debt instruments and any related hedging arrangements that extend beyond 2021, which may be difficult, costly and time consuming. In addition, from time to time our investment funds and separately managed accounts invest in floating rate loans and investment securities whose interest rates are indexed to LIBOR. Uncertainty as to the nature of alternative reference rates and as to potential changes or other reforms to LIBOR, or any changes announced with respect to such reforms, may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in the reported LIBOR rates and the value of LIBOR-based loans and securities, including those of other issuers we or our funds currently own or may in the future own, and may impact the availability and cost of hedging instruments and borrowings, including potentially, an increase to our and our funds’ and separately managed accounts’ interest expense and cost of capital. Any increased costs or reduced profits as a result of the foregoing may adversely affect our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

The historical returns of our funds and managed accounts may not be indicative of the future results of our funds and managed accounts.

The historical returns of our funds and managed accounts should not be considered indicative of future results expected from such fund and managed accounts or from any future funds we may raise or managed accounts we may open. Our rates of return reflect unrealized gains, as of the applicable measurement date, which may never be realized due to changes in market and other conditions not in our control that may adversely affect the ultimate valuation of the investments in a fund. The returns of our funds may have also benefited from investment opportunities and general market conditions that may not repeat themselves, and there can be no assurance that our current or future funds will be able to avail themselves of profitable investment opportunities. Furthermore, the historical and potential future returns of the funds we manage also may not necessarily bear any relationship to potential returns on our shares.

There is increasing regulatory supervision of alternative asset management companies.

As noted above, in the past several years, the financial services industry has been the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators around the globe. In particular, the SEC and its staff have focused more narrowly on issues relevant to alternative asset management firms, forming specialized units devoted to examining such firms and, in certain cases, bringing enforcement actions against the firms, their principals and employees. In the last few years, there were a number of enforcement actions within the industry. Recently, the SEC announced that the 2020 examination priorities for the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations include such items as market infrastructure, information security, and anti-money laundering programs, but the SEC also signaled its intention to examine firms in emerging risk areas, such as robo-advice, digital assets, cybersecurity, and new rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended and interpretations on standards of care. It is unclear, however, whether the SEC and its staff will maintain the same level of enforcement if, in the future, there is an effort on the part of the federal government to ease restrictions on business conduct, which could result in significant changes in, and uncertainty with respect to, legislation, regulation and government policy.

Our asset management clients generally may redeem their investments, which could reduce our asset management fee revenues.

Our asset management fund agreements generally permit investors to redeem their investments with us after an initial “lockup” period, during which redemptions are restricted or penalized. However, any such restrictions may be waived by us. Thereafter, redemptions are permitted at quarterly or annual intervals. If the return on the assets under our management does not meet investors’ expectations, investors may elect to redeem their investments and invest their assets elsewhere, including with our competitors. Our management fee revenues correlate directly with the amount of assets under our management; therefore, redemptions may cause our fee revenues to decrease. Investors may decide to reallocate their capital away from us and to other asset managers for a number of reasons, including poor relative investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates that make other investments more attractive, changes in investor perception regarding our focus or alignment of interest, dissatisfaction with changes in or a broadening of a fund’s investment strategy, changes in our reputation, and departures or changes in responsibilities of key investment professionals. For these and other reasons, the pace of redemptions and corresponding reduction in our assets under management could accelerate. In the future, redemptions could require us to liquidate assets under unfavorable circumstances, which would further harm our reputation and results of operations.

The investment management business is intensely competitive, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

We have been working to grow our asset management business and we compete as an investment manager for both fund investors and investment opportunities. The investment management business is highly fragmented, with our competitors consisting primarily

of sponsors of public and private investment funds, real estate development companies, SPACs, BDCs, investment banks, commercial finance companies and operating companies acting as strategic buyers of businesses. We believe that competition for fund investors is based primarily on:

We believe that competition for investment opportunities is based primarily on the pricing, terms and structure of a proposed investment and certainty of execution.

A number of factors serve to increase our competitive risks:

We may lose investment opportunities in the future if we do not match investment prices, structures and terms offered by competitors. Our competitors that are corporate buyers may be able to achieve synergistic cost savings in respect of an investment, which may provide them with a competitive advantage in bidding for an investment.  Alternatively, we may experience decreased investment returns and increased risks of loss if we match investment prices, structures and terms offered by competitors. Moreover, as a result, if we are forced to compete with other investment firms on the basis of price, we may not be able to maintain our current fund fee, carried interest or other terms. There is a risk that fees and carried interest in the alternative investment management industry will decline, without regard to the historical performance of a manager. Fee or carried interest income reductions on existing or future funds, without corresponding decreases in our cost structure, could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

In addition, if interest rates were to rise or if market conditions for competing investment products become or are more favorable and such products begin to offer rates of return superior to those achieved by our funds, the attractiveness of our funds relative to investments in other investment products could decrease. This competitive pressure could materially and adversely affect our ability to

make successful investments and limit our ability to raise future funds, either of which could adversely impact our business, results of operations and cash flow.



If the investments we have made or make on behalf of our investment funds and separately managed accounts perform poorly, we will suffer a decline in our asset management revenue and earnings because some of our fees are subject to the credit performance of the portfolios of assets. In addition, the investors in our investment funds and our separately managed accounts may seek to terminate our management agreements based on poor performance. Any of these results could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to raise capital for future investment funds and separately managed accounts.



Our revenue from our asset management business is partially derived from management fees paid by the investment funds and separate accounts we manage. In the case of the investment funds and separately managed accounts, our management fees are based on the equity of and net income earned by the vehicles, which is substantially based on the performance of the securities in which they invest.



In addition, investment performance is one of the most important factors in retaining existing investors and competing for new asset management business. Investment performance may be poor as a result of current or future difficult market or economic conditions, including changes to interest rates or inflation, terrorism or political uncertainty, our investment style, the particular investments that we make, and other factors beyond our control. In the event that our investment funds or separately managed accounts perform poorly, our asset management revenues and earnings will suffer a decline. We may be unable to raise capital for new investment funds or separately managed accounts to offset any losses we may experience. In addition, our management contracts may be terminated for various reasons.



If the investments we have made on behalf of our CDOs perform poorly, we will suffer a decline in our asset management revenue and earnings because some of our fees are subject to the credit performance of the portfolios of assets. In addition, the investors in our CDOs may seek to terminate our management agreements based on poor performance. We could lose management fee income from the CDOs we manage or client assets under management as a result of the triggering of certain structural protections built into such CDOs.



Our revenue from our asset management business is also derived from fees earned for managing our CDOs. Our CDOs generate three types of fees: (1) senior fees that are generally paid to us before interest is paid on any of the securities in the capital structure; (2) subordinated fees that are generally paid to us after interest is paid on securities in the capital structure; and (3) incentive fees that are generally paid to us after a period of years in the life of the CDO and after the holders of the most junior CDO securities have been paid a specified return. In the event that our CDOs perform poorly, our asset management revenues and earnings will suffer a decline. Our CDO contracts may be terminated for various reasons.



The CDOs we manage generally contain structural provisions including, but not limited to, over-collateralization requirements and/or market value triggers that are meant to protect investors from deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying collateral pool. In certain cases, breaches of these structural provisions can lead to events of default under the indentures governing the CDOs and, ultimately, acceleration of the notes issued by the CDOs and liquidation of the underlying collateral. In the event of a liquidation of the collateral underlying a CDO, we will lose client assets under management and therefore management fees, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings. In addition, all of the CDOs we manage have reached their auction call redemption features which means the portfolio of collateral for each CDO is subject to an auction on either a quarterly or bi-annual basis. If an auction is successful, the management contract related to such CDO will be terminated in connection with the liquidation of the CDO and we will lose the related management fees. 



Our investment in a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, may be subject to forfeiture, and our agreement to indemnify the SPAC against certain claims could negatively affect our financial results.



We are the sponsor of Insurance Acquisition Corp., a SPAC that completed a $150.7 million initial public offering of its units, or the IPO, on March 22, 2019.  The SPAC has 18 months from the date of its IPO prospectus to complete a business combination. If the SPAC fails to consummate a business combination within the required time frame, its corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up its affairs and liquidating its assets. We own privately issued units and privately issued shares of the common stock of the SPAC. Each unit consists of one share of the SPAC’s common stock and one half of one warrant to purchase SPAC common stock.  We have waived our right to receive distributions with respect to those privately issued shares and shares included in the privately issued units upon the liquidation of the SPAC.  If the SPAC does not consummate a business combination within the required time frame, we will not receive a return on our investment and we may lose a portion of or all of our investment.



We have also agreed to indemnify the SPAC for all claims by third parties for services rendered or products sold to the SPAC, or claims by any prospective target business with which the SPAC discusses entering into a transaction agreement, to the extent the claims reduce the amount of funds in the SPAC’s trust account to less than $10.00 per SPAC share, and in each case only if the SPAC fails to obtain waivers from such third parties or prospective target businesses of claims against the SPAC’s trust account. 

Our indemnification of the SPAC with respect to any such claims could negatively affect our financial results.  In addition, if the SPAC liquidates, we may lose the capital we invested in the SPAC and may also be liable to the SPAC under these indemnification obligations.

We may in the future make loans to the SPAC which may not be repaid, in which event our financial results could be adversely affected.



We have agreed to loan the SPAC up to $750 as needed to fund operating expenses of the SPAC following the IPO.  This loan will bear no interest and, if the SPAC consummates a business combination in the required time frame, we expect the loan to be repaid from the funds held in the SPAC’s trust account.  If the SPAC does not consummate a business combination in the required time frame, no funds from the SPAC’s trust account can be used to repay the loan and the loan will not be repaid.  If these loans are not repaid, our financial results could be adversely affected.



If the SPAC is successful in consummating a business combination, the SPAC securities we hold will be subject to transfer restrictions that will limit our ability to liquidate our SPAC common stock.



Our investment in the SPAC consists of privately issued units and shares that are subject to certain transfer restrictions pursuant to a letter agreement we entered into with the SPAC in connection with the IPO.  Under the letter agreement, we agreed not to transfer our placement units until 30 days following the SPAC’s business combination, and not to transfer our private shares (a) with respect to 20% of such shares, until consummation of the SPAC’s business combination, and (b) with respect to additional 20% tranches of such shares, when the closing price of the SPAC’s common stock exceeds $12.00, $13.50, $15.00 and $17.00, respectively, for 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days following the consummation of the SPAC’s business combination, in each case subject to certain limited exceptions.



In addition, our ability to transfer the privately issued units and shares is subject to applicable securities laws, and such units and shares will become freely tradable only after they are registered pursuant to an effective registration statement or otherwise become transferable in accordance with applicable exemptions under the securities laws.  These restrictions will limit our ability to liquidate and realize value from our investment in the SPAC and we may never be able to liquidate the portion of our private shares that are subject to price-based transfer restrictions.  We may also agree to additional restrictions in connection with a proposed business combination, which would further limit our ability to transfer such units and shares



Our executive officers and members of our senior management team may allocate some portion of their time to the business of the SPAC, which may create conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs and may have a negative impact on our business.



Daniel G. Cohen, our Chairman, serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of the SPAC. John Butler, our Managing Director of U.S. Insurance Strategy, serves as the Chief Executive Officer and President of the SPAC. Paul Vernhes, the President of Cohen & Compagnie SAS, serves as the Chief Financial Officer of the SPAC.  Joseph Pooler, our Chief Financial Officer, serves as the Chief Accounting Officer of the SPAC.  If Messrs. Cohen, Butler, Vernhes and Pooler’s involvement in the SPAC’s business affairs require any of them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs, which may have a negative impact on our business.



We may need to offer new investment strategies and products in order to continue to generate revenue.



The asset management industry is subject to rapid change. Strategies and products that had historically been attractive may lose their appeal for various reasons. Thus, strategies and products that have generated fee revenue for us in the past may fail to do so in the future, in which case we would have to develop new strategies and products. It could be both expensive and difficult for us to develop new strategies and products, and we may not be successful in this regard. Since the disruptions in the global financial markets, we have had difficulty expanding our offerings which has inhibited our growth and harmed our competitive position in the asset management industry, and this may continue in the future.



If our risk management systems for our businesses are ineffective, we may be exposed to material unanticipated losses.



We seek to manage, monitor, and control our operational, legal and regulatory risk through operational and compliance reporting systems, internal controls, management review processes and other mechanisms, and may not fully mitigate the risk exposure of our businesses in all economic or market environments or protect against all types of risk. Further, our risk management methods may not effectively predict future risk exposures, which could be significantly greater than the historical measures indicate. In addition, some of our risk management methods are based on an evaluation of information regarding markets, clients, and other matters that are based on assumptions that may no longer be accurate. A failure to adequately manage our growth, or to effectively manage our risk, could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition. In addition, we are deploying our own capital in our funds and in principal investments, and limitations on our ability to withdraw some or all of our investments in these

funds or liquidate our investment positions, whether for legal, reputational, illiquidity or other reasons, may make it more difficult for us to control the risk exposures relating to these investments.



Our failure to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business.



Appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more potential or actual conflicts of interest. It is possible that potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to investor dissatisfaction or litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. In addition, regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest would have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including an inability to raise additional funds, a reluctance of counterparties to do business with us and the costs of defending litigation.



We are highly dependent on information and communications systems. Systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect our operating results.



Our business will depend, to a substantial degree, on the proper functioning of our information and communications systems and our ability to retain the employees and consultants who operate and maintain these systems. Any failure or interruption of our systems, due to systems failures, staff departures or otherwise, could result in delays, increased costs or other problems which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. A disaster, such as water damage to an office, an explosion or a prolonged loss of electrical power, could materially interrupt our business operations and cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability. In addition, if security measures contained in our systems are breached as a result of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, our reputation may be damaged, and our business could suffer. We have developed a business continuity plan, however, there are no assurances that such plan will be successful in preventing, timely and adequately addressing, or mitigating the negative effects of any failure or interruption.



There can be no assurance that our information systems and other technology will continue to be able to accommodate our operations, or that the cost of maintaining the systems and technology will not materially increase from the current level. A failure to accommodate our operations, or a material increase in costs related to information systems and technology, could have a material adverse effect on our business.



We may not be able to keep pace with continuing changes in technology.



Our market is characterized by rapidly changing technology. To be successful, we must adapt to this rapidly changing environment by continually improving the performance, features, and reliability of our services. We could incur substantial costs if we need to modify our services or infrastructure or adapt our technology to respond to these changes. A delay or failure to address technological advances and developments or an increase in costs resulting from these changes could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.



Failure to protect client data or prevent breaches of our information systems could expose us to liability or reputational damage.  



The secure transmission of confidential information over public networks is a critical element of our operations. We are dependent on information technology networks and systems to securely process, transmit and store electronic information and to communicate among our locations and with our clients and vendors. As the breadth and complexity of this infrastructure continue to grow, the potential risk of security breaches and cyber-attacks increases. As a financial services company, we may be subject to cyber-attacks and phishing scams by third parties. In addition, vulnerabilities of our external service providers and other third parties could pose security risks to client information. Such breaches could lead to shutdowns or disruptions of our systems and potential unauthorized disclosure of confidential information.



In providing services to clients, we manage, utilize and store sensitive and confidential client data, including personal data. As a result, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect this information, such as U.S. federal and state laws and foreign regulations governing the protection of personally identifiable information. These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number, change frequently and sometimes conflict. If any person, including any of our employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to client data, or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates that data, we could be subject to significant monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions, fines and/or criminal prosecution in one or more jurisdictions. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client data, whether through systems failure, employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose clients. Similarly, unauthorized access to or through our information systems, whether by our employees or third parties, including a cyber-attack by computer programmers and hackers who may deploy viruses, worms or other malicious software programs, could result in negative publicity, significant remediation costs, legal liability, financial responsibility under our security guarantee to reimburse clients for losses resulting from unauthorized activity in their accounts and damage to our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Further, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) requires entities processing the personal data of individuals in

the European Union to meet certain requirements regarding the handling of that data. Failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in substantial penalties and materially adversely impact our financial results. The occurrence of any of these incidents could result in reputational damage, adverse publicity, loss of consumer confidence, reduced sales and profits, complications in executing our growth initiatives and regulatory and legal risk, including criminal penalties or civil liabilities. In addition, our liability insurance might not be sufficient in type or amount to cover us against claims related to security breaches, cyber-attacks, phishing scams and other related breaches.



We are largely dependent on Pershing LLC to provide clearing services and margin financing. 



Our broker-dealer relies on Pershing LLC to provide clearing services, as well as other operational and support functions that cannot be provided for internally. In addition, currently all of our margin financing is obtained from Pershing LLC.  As of December 31, 2019, our total margin loan payable to Pershing LLC is $208 million.  If our relationship with Pershing LLC is terminated, there can be no assurance that the functions and margin loan financing previously provided could be replaced on comparable economic terms.



We are largely dependent on Bank of New York to provide settlement and clearing services in connection with our matched book repo business.



The Company uses Bank of New York (“BONY”) as its settlement agent for its GCF repo matched book transactions.  The Company is considered self-clearing for this business.  If our relationship with BONY is terminated, there can be no assurance that the functions previously provided by BONY in connection with our matched book repo business could be replaced on comparable economic terms, if at all.



We depend on third-party software licenses and the loss of any of our key licenses could adversely affect our ability to provide our brokerage services.



We license software from third parties, some of which is integral to our electronic brokerage systems and our business. Such licenses are generally terminable if we breach our obligations under the licenses or if the licensor gives us notice in advance of the termination. If any of these relationships were terminated, or if any of these third parties were to cease doing business, we may be forced to spend significant time and money to replace the licensed software. These replacements may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all. A termination of any of these relationships could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.



Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and ability to compete. In addition, our failure to satisfy the financial covenants in our debt agreements could result in a default and acceleration of repayment of the indebtedness thereunder.



Our balance sheet includes approximately $74.7 million par value of recourse indebtedness. Our indebtedness could have important consequences to our stockholders. For example, our indebtedness could:





Under the junior subordinated notes related to the Alesco Capital Trust, we are required to maintain a total debt to capitalization ratio of less than 0.95 to 1.0. Also, because the aggregate amount of our outstanding subordinated debt exceeds 25% of our net worth, we are unable to issue any further subordinated debt.



As of December 31, 2019, we have a substantial amount of debt with variable interest rates. We may experience material increases in our interest expense as a result of increases in general interest rate levels.



In addition, our indebtedness imposes restrictions that limit our discretion with regard to certain business matters, including our ability to engage in consolidations and mergers and our ability to transfer and lease certain of our properties. Such restrictions could make it more difficult for us to expand, finance our operations and engage in other business activities that may be in our interest.



Our ability to comply with these and any other provisions of such agreements will be affected by changes in our operating and financial performance, changes in business conditions or results of operations, adverse regulatory developments or other events beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants could result in a default, which could cause our indebtedness to become due and payable. If the maturity of our indebtedness were accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to pay such indebtedness. Any additional indebtedness we may incur in the future may subject us to similar or even more restrictive conditions.



If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures in the future, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, which could have an adverse effect on our business.



If our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, we may not be able to provide reliable financial information. Because we are a smaller reporting company, we are not required to obtain, nor have we voluntarily obtained, an auditor attestation regarding the effectiveness of our controls as of December 31, 2019. Therefore, as of December 31, 2019, we have only performed management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls and management has determined that our internal controls are effective as of December 31, 2019. Any failure to maintain effective controls in the future could adversely affect our business or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Such non-compliance could also result in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. In addition, perceptions of our business among customers, suppliers, rating agencies, lenders, investors, securities analysts and others could be adversely affected.



Accounting rules for certain of our transactions are highly complex and involve significant judgment and assumptions. Changes in accounting interpretations or assumptions could adversely impact our financial statements.



Accounting rules for transfers of financial assets, income taxes, compensation arrangements including share-based compensation, securitization transactions, consolidation of variable interest entities, determining the fair value of financial instruments and other aspects of our operations are highly complex and involve significant judgment and assumptions. These complexities could lead to delay in preparation of our financial information. Changes in accounting interpretations or assumptions could materially impact our financial statements.



We may change our investment strategy, hedging strategy, asset allocation and operational policies without our stockholders’ consent, which may result in riskier investments and adversely affect the market value of our Common Stock.



We may change our investment strategy, hedging strategy, asset allocation and/or operational policies at any time without the consent of our stockholders. A change in our investment or hedging strategy may increase our exposure to various risks including interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations. Furthermore, our board of directors will determine our operational policies and may amend or revise our policies, including polices with respect to our acquisitions, growth, operations, indebtedness, capitalization and distributions, or our board may approve transactions that deviate from these policies without a vote of, or notice to, our stockholders. Operational policy changes could adversely affect the market value of our Common Stock.



Our business generates a significant amount of interest expense and our ability to deduct interest expense has been adversely impacted as a result of the 2017 Tax Act.



In December 2017, the U.S. congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”). Among other things, this law made substantial changes to the way U.S. corporations are taxed. We are a U.S. corporation and, therefore, we are impacted by these changes. For 2018 and beyond, the main impact to our operations is the TCJA’s limitations on interest expense deductions. We use significant leverage to finance our business and, therefore, we incur significant interest expense. We also generate significant interest income in our repo business as well as from the securities we hold in inventory. The TCJA allows us to deduct interest expense up to the amount of our interest income. Excess interest expense (i.e. interest expense in excess of interest income) is limited in its deductibility. We expect to incur significant non-deductible interest expense in the future. However, so long as we have significant NOL carryforwards, and those carryforwards are not limited by a 382 ownership change as discussed above, we should not suffer adverse tax consequences as a result of this non-deductible interest expense.



Maintenance of our Investment Company Act exemption imposes limits on our operations, and loss of our Investment Company Act exemption would adversely affect our operations.



We seek to conduct our operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Section 3(a)(l)(C) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), defines an “investment company” as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(l) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.



We are a holding company that conducts our business primarily through the Operating LLC as a voting-controlled subsidiary. Whether or not we qualify under the 40% test is primarily based on whether the securities we hold in the Operating LLC are investment securities. If we were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act) and other matters. Such limitations could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. As of December 31, 2019, we are in compliance with and meet the Section 3(a)(1)(C) exclusion.



Insurance may be inadequate to cover risks facing the Company.



Our operations and financial results are subject to risks and uncertainties related to our use of a combination of insurance, self-insured retention and self-insurance for a number of risks, including most significantly: property and casualty, workers’ compensation, errors and omissions liability, general liability and the portion of employee-related health care benefits plans we fund, among others.



While we endeavor to purchase insurance coverage that is appropriate to our assessment of risk, we are unable to predict with certainty the frequency, nature or magnitude of claims for direct or consequential damages. Our business may be negatively affected in the future if our insurance proves to be inadequate or unavailable. In addition, insurance claims may harm our reputation or divert management attention and resources away from operating our business.



Risks Related to Our Industry



The soundness of other financial institutions and intermediaries affects us.



We face the risk of operational failure, termination or capacity constraints of any of the clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries that we use to facilitate our securities transactions. As a result of the consolidation over the years of clearing agents, exchanges and clearing houses, our exposure to certain financial intermediaries has increased and could affect our ability to find adequate and cost-effective alternatives should the need arise. Any failure, termination or constraint of these intermediaries could adversely affect our ability to execute transactions, service our clients and manage our exposure to risk.



Our ability to engage in routine trading and funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, funding, and counterparty or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mortgage originators and other institutional clients. Furthermore, although we do not hold any European sovereign debt, we may do business with and be exposed to financial institutions that have been affected by the recent European sovereign debt crisis. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about the financial condition of, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have historically led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices insufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due us. Although we have not suffered any material or significant losses as a result of the failure of any financial counterparty, any such losses in the future may materially adversely affect our results of operations.



We operate in a highly regulated industry and may face restrictions on, and examination of, the way we conduct certain of our operations.



Our business is subject to extensive government and other regulation, and our relationship with our broker-dealer clients may subject us to increased regulatory scrutiny. These regulations are designed to protect the interests of the investing public generally rather than our stockholders and may result in limitations on our activities. Governmental and self-regulatory organizations, including the SEC, FINRA, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and other agencies and securities exchanges such as the NYSE and NYSE American regulate the U.S. financial services industry, and regulate certain of our operations in the U.S. Some of our international operations are subject to similar regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including rules promulgated by the Central Bank of Ireland (the “CBI”) and the FCA, which apply to entities which are authorized and regulated by the CBI and the FCA, respectively. These regulatory bodies are responsible for safeguarding the integrity of the securities and other financial markets and protecting the interests of investors in those markets. In addition, all records of registered investment advisors and broker-dealers are subject at any time, and from time to time, to examination by the SEC. Some aspects of the business that are subject to extensive regulation and/or examination by regulatory agencies, include:





The SEC, FINRA, the CBI, the FCA and various other domestic and international regulatory agencies also have stringent rules and regulations with respect to the maintenance of specific levels of net capital by broker-dealers. Generally, in the U.S., a broker-dealer’s net capital is defined as its net worth, plus qualified subordinated debt, less deductions for certain types of assets. If these net capital rules are changed or expanded, or if there is an unusually large charge against net capital, our operations that require the intensive use of capital would be limited. Also, our ability to withdraw capital from our regulated subsidiaries is subject to restrictions, which in turn could limit our ability or that of our subsidiaries to pay dividends, repay debt, make distributions and redeem or purchase shares of our Common Stock or other equity interests in our subsidiaries. A large operating loss or charge against net capital could adversely affect our ability to expand or even maintain our expected levels of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we may become subject to net capital requirements in other foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. While we expect to maintain levels of capital in excess of regulatory minimums, we cannot predict our future capital needs or our ability to obtain additional financing.



If we or any of our subsidiaries fail to comply with any of these laws, rules or regulations, we or such subsidiary may be subject to censure, significant fines, cease-and-desist orders, suspension of business, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including revocation of registrations with FINRA, withdrawal of authorizations from the CBI or the FCA or revocation of registrations with other similar international agencies to whose regulation we are subject, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. The adverse publicity arising from the imposition of sanctions against us by regulators, even if the amount of such sanctions is small, could harm our reputation and cause us to lose existing clients or fail to gain new clients.



The authority to operate as a broker-dealer in a jurisdiction is dependent on the registration or authorization in that jurisdiction or the maintenance of a proper exemption from such registration or authorization. Our ability to comply with all applicable laws and rules is largely dependent on our compliance, credit approval, audit and reporting systems and procedures, as well as our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Any growth or expansion of our business may create additional strain on our compliance, credit approval, audit and reporting systems and procedures and could result in increased costs to maintain and improve such systems and procedures.



In addition, new laws or regulations or changes in the enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to us and our clients may adversely affect our business, and our ability to function in this environment will depend on our ability to constantly monitor and react to these changes. Such changes may cause us to change the way we conduct our business, both in the U.S. and internationally. The government agencies that regulate us have broad powers to investigate and enforce compliance and punish noncompliance with their rules, regulations and industry standards of practice. If we and our directors, officers and employees fail to

comply with the rules and regulations of these government agencies, we and they may be subject to claims or actions by such agencies.



Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action could have material adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm, either of which could seriously harm our business.



We face substantial regulatory and litigation risks and conflicts of interests and may face legal liability and reduced revenues and profitability if our business is not regarded as compliant or for other reasons. We are subject to extensive regulation, and many aspects of our business will subject us to substantial risks of liability. We engage in activities in connection with (1) the evaluation, negotiation, structuring, marketing, and sales and management of our investment funds and financial products, (2) our Capital Markets segment, (3) our asset management operations, and (4) our investment activities. Our activities may subject us to the risk of significant legal liabilities under securities or other laws for material omissions or materially false or misleading statements made in connection with securities offerings and other transactions. In addition, to the extent our clients, or investors in our investment funds and financial products, suffer losses, they may claim those losses resulting from our or our officers’, directors’, employees’, agents’ or affiliates’ breach of contract, fraud, negligence, willful misconduct or other similar misconduct, and may bring actions against us under federal or state securities or other applicable laws. Dissatisfied clients may also make claims against us regarding quality of trade execution, improperly settled trades, or mismanagement. We may become subject to these claims as the result of failures or malfunctions of electronic trading platforms or other brokerage services, including failures or malfunctions of third-party providers’ systems which are beyond our control, and third parties may seek recourse against us for any losses. In addition, investors may claim breaches of collateral management agreements, which could lead to our termination as collateral manager under such agreements.



Following the start of the financial crisis in 2007, the volume of claims and amount of damages claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial advisors and asset managers increased. With respect to the asset management business, we make investment decisions on behalf of our clients that could result in, and in some instances in the past have resulted in, substantial losses. In addition, as a manager, we are responsible for clients’ compliance with regulatory requirements. Investment decisions we make on behalf of clients could cause such clients to fail to comply with regulatory requirements and could result in substantial losses. Although the management agreements generally include broad indemnities and provisions designed to limit our exposure to legal claims relating to our services, these provisions may not protect us or may not be enforced in all cases.



In addition, we are exposed to risks of litigation or investigation relating to transactions which present conflicts of interest that are not properly addressed. In such actions, we could be obligated to bear legal, settlement and other costs (which may be in excess of available insurance coverage). Also, with a workforce consisting of many very highly paid professionals, we may face the risk of lawsuits relating to claims for compensation, which may individually or in the aggregate be significant in amount. Similarly, certain corporate events, such as a reduction in our workforce or employee separations, could also result in additional litigation or arbitration. In addition, as a public company, we are subject to the risk of investigation or litigation by regulators or our public stockholders arising from an array of possible claims, including investor dissatisfaction with the performance of our business or our share price, allegations of misconduct by our officers and directors or claims that we inappropriately dealt with conflicts of interest or investment allocations. In addition, we may incur significant expenses in defending claims, even those without merit. If any claims brought against us result in a finding of substantial legal liability and/or require us to incur all or a portion of the costs arising out of litigation or investigation, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Such litigation or investigation, whether resolved in our favor or not or ultimately settled, could cause significant reputational harm, which could seriously harm our business.



The competitive pressures we face as a result of operating in highly competitive markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.



A number of entities conduct asset management, origination, investment, and broker-dealer activities. We compete with public and private funds, SPACs, REITS, commercial and investment banks, savings and loan institutions, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, institutional bankers, governmental bodies, commercial finance companies, traditional asset managers, brokerage firms and other entities.



Many firms offer similar and/or additional products and services to the same types of clients that we target or may target in the future. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have more relevant experience, have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources, and have more personnel than we have. There are few barriers to entry, including a relatively low cost of entering these lines of business, and the successful efforts of new entrants into our expected lines of business, including major banks and other financial institutions, may result in increased competition. Other industry participants may, from time to time, seek to recruit our investment professionals and other employees away from us.



With respect to our asset management activities, our competitors may have more extensive distribution capabilities, more effective marketing strategies, more attractive investment vehicle structures and broader name recognition than we do. Further, other investment managers may offer services at more competitive prices than we do, which could put downward pressure on our fee

structure. With respect to our origination and investment activities, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds, enhanced operating efficiencies, and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than we can. The competitive pressures we face, if not effectively managed, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.



Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive asset management, origination and investment opportunities and, therefore, may not be able to identify and pursue opportunities that are consistent with our business objectives. Competition may limit the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us. It may also result in higher prices, lower yields and a narrower spread of yields over our borrowing costs, making it more difficult for us to acquire new investments on attractive terms. In addition, competition for desirable investments could delay the investment in desirable assets, which may in turn reduce our earnings per share.



With respect to our broker-dealer activities, our revenues could be adversely affected if large institutional clients that we have increase the amount of trading they do directly with each other rather than through our broker-dealer, decrease the amount of trading they do with our broker-dealer because they decide to trade more with our competitors, decrease their trading of certain over-the-counter (“OTC”) products in favor of exchange-traded products, or hire in-house professionals to handle trading that our broker-dealer would otherwise be engaged to do.



We have experienced intense price competition in our fixed income brokerage business in recent years. Some competitors may offer brokerage services to clients at lower prices than we offer, which may force us to reduce our prices or to lose market share and revenue. In addition, we intend to focus primarily on providing brokerage services in markets for less commoditized financial instruments. As the markets for these instruments become more commoditized, we could lose market share to other inter-dealer brokers, exchanges and electronic multi-dealer brokers who specialize in providing brokerage services in more commoditized markets. If a financial instrument for which we provide brokerage services becomes listed on an exchange or if an exchange introduces a competing product to the products, we broker in the OTC market, the need for our services in relation to that instrument could be significantly reduced. Further, the recent consolidation among exchange firms, and expansion by these firms into derivative and other non-equity trading markets, will increase competition for customer trades and place additional pricing pressure on commissions and spreads.



Employee misconduct or error, which can be difficult to detect and deter, could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain clients and by subjecting us to significant legal liability and reputational harm.



There have been a number of highly publicized cases involving fraud, trading on material non-public information, or other misconduct by employees and others in the financial services industry, and there is a risk that our employees could engage in misconduct that adversely affects our business. For example, we may be subject to the risk of significant legal liabilities under securities or other laws for our employees’ material omissions or materially false or misleading statements in connection with securities and other transactions. In addition, our advisory business requires that we deal with confidential matters of great significance to our clients. If our employees were to improperly use or disclose confidential information provided by our clients, we could be subject to regulatory sanctions and could suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial position, current client relationships and ability to attract future clients. We are also subject to extensive regulation under securities laws and other laws in connection with our asset management business. Failure to comply with these legislative and regulatory requirements by any of our employees could adversely affect us and our clients. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and any precautions taken by us to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases.



Furthermore, employee errors, including mistakes in executing, recording or reporting transactions for clients (such as entering into transactions that clients may disavow and refuse to settle) could expose us to financial losses and could seriously harm our reputation and negatively affect our business. The risk of employee error or miscommunication may be greater for products that are new or have non-standardized terms.



Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure and Ownership of Our Common Stock



We could repurchase shares of our Common Stock at price levels considered excessive, the amount of our Common Stock we repurchase may decrease from historical levels, or we may not repurchase any additional shares of our Common Stock in the future.



During 2018 and 2019, 75,081 and 31,890 shares of Common Stock, respectively, were repurchased and retired by us both in accordance with our Rule 10b5-1 trading plan (the “10b5-1 Plan”) and through privately negotiated repurchase transactions. We could repurchase shares of our Common Stock at price levels considered excessive, thereby spending more cash on such repurchases then deemed reasonable and effectively retiring fewer shares than would be retired if repurchases were effected at lower prices.  Further, our future repurchases of shares of our Common Stock, if any, and the number of shares of Common Stock we

may repurchase will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. There can be no assurance that we will continue our practice of repurchasing shares of our Common Stock or that we will have the financial resources to repurchase shares of our Common Stock in the future.



See note 19 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the 10b5-1 Plan.    



We are a holding company whose primary asset is units of membership interests in the Operating LLC, and we are dependent on distributions from the Operating LLC to pay taxes and other obligations.



We are a holding company whose primary asset is units of membership interests in the Operating LLC. Since the Operating LLC is a limited liability company taxed as a partnership, we, as a member of the Operating LLC, could incur tax obligations as a result of our allocable share of the income from the operations of the Operating LLC. In addition, we have convertible senior debt and junior subordinated notes outstanding. The Operating LLC will pay distributions to us in amounts necessary to satisfy our tax obligations and regularly scheduled payments of interest in connection with our convertible senior debt and our junior subordinated notes, and we are dependent on these distributions from the Operating LLC in order to generate the funds necessary to meet these obligations and liabilities. Industry conditions and financial, business and other factors will affect our ability to generate the cash flows we need to make these distributions. There may be circumstances under which the Operating LLC may be restricted from paying dividends to us under applicable law or regulation (for example due to Delaware limited liability company act limitations on the Operating LLC’s ability to make distributions if liabilities of the Operating LLC after the distribution would exceed the value of the Operating LLC’s assets).



As a holding company that does not conduct business operations in its own right, substantially all of the assets of the Company are comprised of our minority ownership interest in the Operating LLC. The Company’s ability to pay any dividends to our stockholders will be dependent on any distributions we receive from the Operating LLC and subject to the Operating LLC’s operating agreement (the “Operating LLC Agreement”). The amount and timing of distributions by the Operating LLC will be at the discretion of the Operating LLC’s board of managers, which is comprised of Daniel G. Cohen, our Chairman and the majority owner of the Operating LLC, Lester Brafman, our Chief Executive Officer and Joseph W. Pooler, Jr., our Chief Financial Officer.



Certain subsidiaries of the Operating LLC have restrictions on the withdrawal of capital and otherwise in making distributions and loans. JVB is subject to net capital restrictions imposed by the SEC and FINRA, which require certain minimum levels of net capital to remain in JVB. In addition, these restrictions could potentially impose notice requirements or limit the Company’s ability to withdraw capital above the required minimum amounts (excess capital) whether through distribution or loan. CCFEL is regulated by the CBI in Ireland and CCFL is regulated by the FCA in the United Kingdom and each must maintain certain minimum levels of capital.



Daniel G. Cohen, our chairman, has significant ownership interests in the Operating LLC and competing duties to other entities that could create potential conflicts of interest and may result in decisions that are not in the best interests of other Cohen & Company Inc. stockholders.



As of December 31, 2019, Daniel G. Cohen, our chairman, through an entity he wholly owns, Cohen Bros. Financial, LLC (“CBF”), owns 17,801,275 units of membership interests, or 45.7% of the membership interests in the Operating LLC.  In addition, the DGC Family Fintech Trust (the “DGC Trust”) owns 9,880,268 or 25.4% units of the membership interests in the Operating LLC.  The DGC Trust was formed by Daniel G. Cohen.  Although Daniel G. Cohen is neither a trustee nor a named beneficiary of the DGC Trust and does not have any voting or dispositive control of securities held by the trust, he may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of all securities held by the DGC Trust as a result of his ability to acquire any of the DGC Trust’s assets, including any securities held by the DGC Trust (and, in turn, the sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to such securities), by substituting other property of an equivalent value without the approval or consent of any person, including any trustee or beneficiary of the DGC Trust.    



Cohen and Company, Inc. also holds units of membership interests in the Operating LLC and has the majority voting power of the LLC through a proxy granted to it by Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust. 



Additionally, Daniel G. Cohen owns 11.8% of our Common Stock.  Further, Mr. Cohen may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of additional shares of our Common Stock representing 6.7%, which is owned by EBC 2013 Family Trust as the result of Mr. Cohen’s position as trustee of the trust.  As noted above, Daniel G. Cohen may control certain actions of the Company. As an owner of interests in the Operating LLC, Daniel G. Cohen may have interests that differ from the stockholders of the Company, including in circumstances in which there may be tax consequence to the members of the Operating LLC. As a result of his ownership in both the Operating LLC and the Company, it is possible that Daniel G. Cohen as a shareholder of the Company could approve or reject actions based on his own interests as a stockholder that may or may not be in the best interests of the other the Company’s stockholders.



We are controlled by Daniel G. Cohen, whose interests in our business may be different than our other stockholders, and, as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the rules of NYSE American, our other stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to certain corporate governance requirements.



Mr. Cohen currently owns approximately 50.2% of the voting power of the Company as a result of his ownership of Common Stock, Series E Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred Stock.  



Further, the DGC Family Fintech Trust (the “DGC Trust”), a trust formed by Mr. Cohen, owns 9,880,268 of our Series F Preferred Stock.  Our Series F Preferred Stock votes together with the holders of our Common Stock on all matters, entitling the holders thereof to one vote for every ten shares of Series F Preferred Stock held.  Accordingly, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock held by the DGC Trust entitle the DGC Trust to 988,026 votes on matters presented to holders of our Common Stock.  Although Daniel G. Cohen is neither a trustee nor a named beneficiary of the DGC Trust and does not have any voting or dispositive control of securities held by the DGC Trust, pursuant to the terms of the DGC Trust, Mr. Cohen has the ability to acquire any of the DGC Trust’s assets, including the 9,880,268 units of the membership interests in the Operating LLC held by the DGC Trust (at any time and without the consent of the trustees or beneficiaries of the DGC Trust) by substituting such assets with other property of equivalent value.  Accordingly, Mr. Cohen, at any time, could become the owner of the 9,880,268 membership interests in the Operating LLC currently held by the DGC Trust and, in turn, an additional 25.1% of the voting power of the Company.



As a result of Mr. Cohen’s voting control of the Company, Mr. Cohen has the right to designate all members of our board of directors and his nominees to our board of directors will have the ability to control the appointment of our management, the entering into of mergers, material acquisitions and dispositions and other extraordinary transactions and to influence amendments to our charter, bylaws and other corporate governance documents. So long as Mr. Cohen continues to own a majority of our voting stock, he will have the ability to control the vote in any election of directors and will have the ability to approve or prevent any transaction that requires stockholder approval regardless of whether others believe the transaction are or are not in our best interests. In any of these matters, the interests of Mr. Cohen may differ from or conflict with the interests of our other stockholders. Moreover, this concentration of voting stock ownership may also adversely affect the trading price for our Common Stock to the extent investors perceive disadvantages in owning stock of a company with a controlling stockholder.



In addition, because Mr. Cohen controls a majority of our voting stock, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of NYSE American. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors and the requirements that the executive compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee each be comprised entirely of independent directors. We may take advantage of certain of these exemptions for as long as we continue to qualify as a “controlled company.” Accordingly, our stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of NYSE American.



Any future distributions to our stockholders will depend upon certain factors affecting our operating results, some of which are beyond our control.



Our board of directors has not declared cash dividends recently. Any future distributions to our stockholders will depend upon certain factors affecting our operating results, some of which are beyond our control.



Our ability to make cash distributions is based on many factors, including the return on our investments, operating expense levels and certain restrictions imposed by Maryland law. Some of these factors are beyond our control and a change in any such factor could affect our ability to make distributions in the future. We may not be able to make distributions. Our stockholders should rely on increases, if any, in the price of our Common Stock for any return on their investment. Furthermore, we are dependent on distributions from the Operating LLC to be able to make distributions. See the risk factor above titled “We are a holding company whose primary asset is units of membership interest in the Operating LLC and we are dependent on distributions from the Operating LLC to pay taxes and other obligations.”



Future sales of our Common Stock in the public market could lower the price of our Common Stock and impair our ability to raise funds in future securities offerings.



Future sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the then prevailing market price of our Common Stock and could make it more difficult for us to raise funds in the future through a public offering of our securities.



Your percentage ownership in the Company may be diluted in the future.



Your percentage ownership in the Company may be diluted in the future because of equity awards that have been, or may be, granted to our directors, officers and employees. We have adopted equity compensation plans that provide for the grant of equity-based awards, including restricted stock, stock options and other equity-based awards to our directors, officers and other employees, advisors and consultants. At December 31, 2019, we had 73,715 shares of restricted stock, 50,000 of restricted units, and 0 stock options outstanding to employees and directors of the Company and there were 306,745 shares available for future awards under our equity compensation plans. Vesting of restricted stock and stock option grants is generally contingent upon performance conditions and/or service conditions. Vesting of those shares of restricted units and stock would dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders. Equity awards will continue to be a source of compensation for employees and directors.



If we raise additional capital, we expect it will be necessary for us to issue additional equity or convertible debt securities. If we issue equity or convertible debt securities, the price at which we offer such securities may not bear any relationship to our value, the net tangible book value per share may decrease, the percentage ownership of our current stockholders would be diluted, and any equity securities we may issue in such offering or upon conversion of convertible debt securities issued in such offering, may have rights, preferences or privileges with respect to liquidation, dividends, redemption, voting and other matters that are senior to or more advantageous than our Common Stock. If we finance acquisitions by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, our existing stockholders will also be diluted.



The issuance of the shares of Common Stock upon the redemption, if any, of the issued and outstanding LLC Units may cause substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and may cause the price of our Common Stock to decline.



There are 38,952,715 units of membership interests in the Operating LLC issued and outstanding, including 17,801,275 units of membership interests in the Operating LLC beneficially owned by Daniel G. Cohen. Subject to certain restrictions, pursuant to the Operating LLC Agreement, a holder of units of membership interests in the Operating LLC may cause the Operating LLC to redeem such units at any time for, at the Company’s option, (A) cash or (B) one share of the Company’s Common Stock for every ten units of membership interests in the Operating LLC.  If the outstanding units of membership interests in the Operating LLC are redeemed by the Company for Common Stock, our existing stockholders could be significantly diluted and the price of our Common Stock may decline.



See note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 



We may not be able to generate sufficient taxable income to fully realize our deferred tax asset, which would also have to be reduced if U.S. federal income tax rates are lowered. 



If we are unable to generate sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of our NOLs, the NOLs would expire unused. Our projections of future taxable income required to fully realize the recorded amount of the net deferred tax asset reflect numerous assumptions about our operating businesses and investments and are subject to change as conditions change specific to our business units, investments or general economic conditions. Changes that are adverse to us could result in the need to increase our deferred tax asset valuation allowance resulting in a charge to results of operations and a decrease to total stockholders’ equity. In addition, any decrease in the federal statutory tax rate, or other changes in federal tax statutes, could also cause a reduction in the economic benefit of the NOL currently available to us.



We may not be able to generate sufficient taxable income to fully realize our deferred tax asset, which would also have to be reduced if U.S. federal income tax rates are lowered. 



If we are unable to generate sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of our NOLs, the NOLs would expire unused. Our projections of future taxable income required to fully realize the recorded amount of the net deferred tax asset reflect numerous assumptions about our operating businesses and investments and are subject to change as conditions change specific to our business units, investments or general economic conditions. Changes that are adverse to us could result in the need to increase our deferred tax asset valuation allowance resulting in a charge to results of operations and a decrease to total stockholders’ equity. In addition, any decrease in the federal statutory tax rate, or other changes in federal tax statutes, could also cause a reduction in the economic benefit of the NOL currently available to us.



The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), and provisions in our charter and bylaws may prevent takeover attempts that could be beneficial to our stockholders.



Provisions of the MGCL and our charter and bylaws could discourage a takeover of us even if a change of control would be beneficial to the interests of our stockholders. These statutory, charter and bylaw provisions include the following:





The market price of our Common Stock may be volatile and may be affected by market conditions beyond our control.



The market price of our Common Stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to, among other factors:





In addition, if the market for stocks in our industry, or the stock market in general, experience a loss of investor confidence, the market price of our Common Stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause the price of our Common Stock to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to the board of directors and management.



Our Common Stock may be delisted, which may have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and value of our Common Stock.



To maintain our listing on the NYSE American, we must meet certain financial and liquidity criteria. The market price of our Common Stock has been and may continue to be subject to significant fluctuation as a result of periodic variations in our revenues and results of operations. If we violate the NYSE American listing requirements, our Common Stock may be delisted. If we fail to meet any of the NYSE American’s listing standards, our Common Stock may be delisted. In addition, our board may determine that the cost of maintaining our listing on a national securities exchange outweighs the benefits of such listing. A delisting of our Common Stock from the NYSE American may materially impair our stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our Common Stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our Common Stock. In addition, the delisting of our Common Stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital.



ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.



None.





ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES.



The following table lists our current leases as of December 31, 2019. 









The properties that we occupy are used either by the Company’s Capital Markets, Asset Management, or Principal Investing segments or all three. We believe that the facilities we occupy are suitable and adequate for our current operations.





ITEM  3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.



The Company’s U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary, J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC is a party to litigation commenced on August 7, 2019, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York under the caption VA Management, LP v. Odeon Capital Group LLC; Janney Montgomery Scott LLC; C&Co/PrinceRidge LLC; and JVB Financial Group LLC.  The plaintiff, VA Management, LP (f/k/a Visium Asset Management, LP) (“Visium”), alleges that the defendants, as third-party broker-dealers, aided and abetted Visium’s portfolio managers’ breaches of their fiduciary duties by assisting in carrying out a fraudulent “mismarking scheme.”  Visium is seeking in excess of $1 billion in damages from the defendants including disgorgement of the compensation paid to Visium’s portfolio managers, restitution of and damages for the investigative and legal fees, administrative wind down costs, and regulatory penalties paid by Visium as a result of the “mismarking scheme,” direct and consequential damages for the destruction of Visium’s business, including lost profits and lost enterprise value, and attorneys’ fees and costs.  JVB filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in lieu of an answer on October 16, 2019.  Visium filed an opposition to JVB’s motion to dismiss on November 15, 2019, and JVB filed a reply brief on November 26, 2019.  Oral argument is scheduled to be heard before Judge Andrew Borrok on April 20, 2020.  The Company intends to defend the action vigorously.



In connection with certain routine exams by FINRA, FINRA claimed that during the period July 2013 through December 2015 (the “Relevant Period”), JVB did not have certain controls in place that were reasonably designed to prevent the entry of (1) orders that exceed appropriate pre-set credit or capital thresholds in the aggregate for each customer and the broker or dealer; and (2) erroneous orders, including duplicative orders.  JVB, without admitting or denying any allegations, consented to a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent to resolve certain alleged deficiencies in its Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3 procedures and its related risk management controls during the Relevant Period.  The agreement was accepted by FINRA on November 6, 2018. As a result, the Company recorded a net expense of $50 during the third quarter of 2018 and paid the fine of $50 during the fourth quarter of 2018.



From time to time, the Company is a party to various routine legal proceedings, claims, and regulatory inquiries arising out of the ordinary course of the Company’s business. Management believes that the results of these routine legal proceedings, claims, and regulatory matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, or on the Company’s operations and cash flows. However, the Company cannot estimate the legal fees and expenses to be incurred in connection with these routine matters and, therefore, is unable to determine whether these future legal fees and expenses will have a material impact on the Company’s operations and cash flows. It is the Company’s policy to expense legal and other fees as incurred.





ITEM  4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.



Not Applicable.

PART II



ITEM  5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.



Market Information for Our Common Stock and Dividends



The closing price of our Common Stock was $[TBD]on March [TBD], 2020. We had [TBD] shares of Common Stock outstanding held by approximately [TBD] holders of record as of March [TBD], 2020.



Commencing on March 22, 2004, our Common Stock began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “SFO.” On October 6, 2006, upon completion of our merger with Alesco Financial Trust and our name change from Sunset Financial Resources, Inc. to Alesco Financial Inc., our NYSE symbol was changed to “AFN.”



On December 16, 2009, we effectuated a 1-for-10 reverse stock split.  Also, our name changed from Alesco Financial Inc. to Cohen & Company Inc., we moved our listing of Common Stock from the NYSE to the NYSE American Stock Exchange (formerly known as the NYSE MKT LLC) and our trading symbol was changed to “COHN.”



Effective January 21, 2011, we changed our name to Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. and our Common Stock began trading on the NYSE American Stock Exchange under the symbol “IFMI.”



On September 1, 2017, we effectuated a second 1-for-10 reverse stock split and changed our name to Cohen & Company Inc. Our trading symbol was changed to “COHN.”

During the third quarter of 2010, our board of directors initiated a dividend of $0.50 per quarter, which was paid regularly through December 31, 2011. Beginning in 2012, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.20 per quarter, which was paid regularly through the first quarter of 2019.  Each time a cash dividend was declared by our board of directors, a pro rata distribution was made to the other members of the Operating LLC upon payment of dividends to our stockholders. 



On August 2, 2019, we announced that our board of directors decided to suspend our quarterly cash dividend.  Any future determination to declare and pay dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, after taking into account a variety of factors, including business, financial, and regulatory considerations as well as any limitations under Maryland law or imposed by any agreements governing our indebtedness.  Going forward, our board of directors will re-assess our capital resources and may or may not determine to reinstate the dividend based on that assessment.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities



None.



Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities













ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.



The following selected financial data is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015.



You should read this selected financial data together with the more detailed information contained in our consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 44.  



  ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.



“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate these estimates, including fair value of financial instruments. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.



All amounts in this disclosure are in thousands (except share, unit, per share, and per unit data) except where otherwise noted.



Name Change; Common Stock Reverse Stock Split



On September 1, 2017, we filed two Articles of Amendment to our charter with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland, pursuant to which we (i) changed our name to “Cohen & Company Inc.”; (ii) effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock; and (iii) increased the par value of our Common Stock from $0.001 per share to $0.01 per share.  All share and per share amounts for all periods presented herein reflect the reverse split as if it had occurred as of the beginning of the first period presented. 



Overview



We are a financial services company specializing in fixed income markets. We were founded in 1999 as an investment firm focused on small-cap banking institutions but have grown to provide an expanding range of capital markets and asset management services. We are organized into three business segments: Capital Markets, Asset Management, and Principal Investing.





We generate our revenue by business segment primarily through the following activities.



Capital Markets:





Asset Management:





Principal Investing:





Business Environment

Our business in general and our Capital Markets business segment in particular, do not produce predictable earnings.  Our results can vary dramatically from year to year and quarter to quarter. 

Our business is materially affected by economic conditions in the financial markets, political conditions, broad trends in business and finance, the housing and mortgage markets, changes in volume and price levels of securities transactions, and changes in interest rates, including overnight funding rates, all of which can affect our profitability and are unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors and companies, including their level of participation in the financial markets and their willingness to participate in corporate transactions. Severe market fluctuations or weak economic conditions could reduce our trading volume and revenues, negatively affect our ability to generate new issue and advisory revenue, and adversely affect our profitability.

As a general rule, our trading business benefits from increased market volatility.  Increased volatility usually results in increased activity from our clients and counterparties.  However, periods of extreme volatility may at times result in clients reducing their trading volumes, which would negatively impact our results.  Also, periods of extreme volatility may result in large fluctuations in securities valuations and we may incur losses on our holdings.  Also, our mortgage group’s business benefits when mortgage volumes increase, and may suffer when mortgage volumes decrease.  Among other things, mortgage volumes are significantly impacted by changes in interest rates. 

In addition, as a smaller firm, we are exposed to intense competition.  Although we provide financing to our customers, larger firms have a much greater capability to provide their clients with financing, giving them a competitive advantage.  We are much more reliant upon our employees’ relationships, networks, and abilities to identify and capitalize on market opportunities.  Therefore, our business may be significantly impacted by the addition or loss of key personnel. 

We try to address these challenges by (i) focusing our business on clients and asset classes that are underserved by the large firms, (ii) continuing to monitor our fixed costs to enhance operating leverage and limit our losses during periods of low volumes, and (iii) attempting to hire and retain entrepreneurial and effective traders and salespeople. 

Our business environment is rapidly changing.  New risks and uncertainties emerge continuously and it is not possible for us to predict all the risks we will face.  This may negatively impact our operating performance. 

A portion of our revenue is generated from net trading activity. We engage in proprietary trading for our own account, provide securities financing for our customers, and execute “riskless” trades with a customer order in hand resulting in limited market risk to us. The inventory of securities held for our own account, as well as held to facilitate customer trades, and our market making activities are sensitive to market movements.

A portion of our revenue is generated from new issue and advisory engagements. The fees charged and volume of these engagements are sensitive to the overall business environment.  We provide investment banking and advisory services in Europe primarily through our subsidiary CCFEL and new issue services in the U.S. through our subsidiary JVB. Currently, our primary source of new issue revenue is from originating assets for our U.S. insurance asset management business and the PriDe funds and managed accounts.

A portion of our revenue is generated from management fees. Our ability to charge management fees and the amount of those fees is dependent upon the underlying investment performance and stability of the Investment Vehicles. If these types of investments do not provide attractive returns to investors, the demand for such instruments will likely fall, thereby reducing our opportunity to earn

new management fees or maintain existing management fees. As of December 31, 2019, 79.7% of our existing AUM were CDOs. The creation of CDOs has depended upon a vibrant securitization market. Since 2008, volumes within the securitization market have dropped significantly and have not fully recovered since that time. We have not completed a new securitization since 2008. The remaining portion of our AUM is from a diversified mix of other Investment Vehicles most of which were more recently formed. 

A substantial portion of our asset management revenue is earned from the management of CDOs.  As a result, our asset management revenue has declined from its historical highs as the assets of the CDOs decline due to maturities, repayments, auction call redemptions, and defaults.  Our ability to complete securitizations in the future will depend upon, among other things, our asset origination capacity and success, our ability to arrange warehouse financing to originate assets, our willingness and capacity to fund required amounts to obtain warehouse financing and securitized financings, and the demand in the markets for such securitizations.     

A portion of our revenues is generated from our principal investing activities. Therefore, our revenues are impacted by the overall market supply and demand of these investments as well as the individual performance of each investment. Our principal investments are included within other investments, at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets.  See note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Margin Pressures in Fixed Income Brokerage Business

Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the overall strength of the economy and financial market activity. Overall market conditions are a product of many factors beyond our control and can be unpredictable. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors including the volatility of the equity and fixed income markets, the level and shape of the various yield curves, and the volume and value of trading in securities.

Margins and volumes in certain products and markets within the fixed income brokerage business continue to decrease materially as competition has increased and general market activity has declined. Further, we continue to expect that competition will increase over time, resulting in continued margin pressure.



Our response to this margin compression has included: (i) building a diversified fixed income trading platform; (ii) acquiring or building out new product lines and expanding existing product lines; (iii) building a hedging execution and funding operation to service mortgage originators; (iv) becoming a full netting member of the FICC enabling us to expand our matched book repo business, and (v) monitoring our fixed costs. Our cost management initiatives are ongoing. However, there can be no certainty that these efforts will be sufficient. If insufficient, we will likely see a decline in profitability.

U.S.  Housing Market

In recent years, our mortgage group has grown in significance to our Capital Markets segment and our company overall.  The mortgage group primarily earns revenue by providing hedging execution, securities financing, and trade execution services to mortgage originators and other investors in mortgage backed securities.  Therefore, this group’s revenue is highly dependent on the volume of mortgage originations in the U.S.  Origination activity is highly sensitive to interest rates, the U.S. job market, housing starts, sale activity of existing housing stock, as well as the general health of the U.S. economy.  In addition, any new regulation that impacts U.S. government agency mortgage backed security issuance activity, residential mortgage underwriting standards, or otherwise impacts mortgage originators will impact our business.  We have no control over these external factors and there is no effective way for us to hedge against these risks.  Our mortgage group’s volumes and profitability will be highly impacted by these external factors.

Other Business and Transactions



The 2019 Senior Notes

On September 25, 2019, we amended and restated the previously outstanding 2013 Convertible Notes that were scheduled to mature on September 25, 2019.  The material terms and conditions of the 2013 Convertible Notes remained substantially the same, except that (i) the maturity date thereof changed from September 25, 2019 to September 25, 2020; (ii) the conversion feature in the 2013 Convertible Notes was removed; (iii) the interest rate thereunder changed from 8% per annum (9% in the event of certain events of default) to 12% per annum (13% in the event of certain events of default); and (iv) the restrictions regarding prepayment were removed.  The post amendment notes are referred to herein as the “2019 Senior Notes” and the pre-amendment notes are referred to herein as the “2013 Convertible Notes.”  See note 33 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for discussion of the issuance of the 2020 Senior Notes and partial repayment of the 2019 Senior Notes. 

Amendments to 2013 Convertible Notes



The original maturity date of the 2013 Convertible Notes was September 25, 2018.  Immediately prior to maturity, the 2013 Convertible Notes were held by three parties.  On September 25, 2018, we fully paid off one holder in the amount of $1,461.  We entered into amendments with the holders of the remaining $6,786 aggregate principal amount of the 2013 Convertible Notes: the Edward E. Cohen IRA and the EBC 2013 Family Trust.  Edward E. Cohen is the benefactor of the Edward E. Cohen IRA and is the father of Daniel G. Cohen, the chairman of our board of directors and the president and chief executive of our European operations and chairman of our board of directors.  Daniel G. Cohen is a trustee of the EBC 2013 Family Trust.  Pursuant to the amendments, (i) the maturity date of each of the 2013 Convertible Notes was extended from September 25, 2018 to September 25, 2019 and (ii) the conversion price under each of the 2013 Convertible Notes was reduced from $30.00 per share of Common Stock to $12.00 per share of Common Stock. See note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



ViaNova

In 2018, we formed a new subsidiary, ViaNova, for the purpose of building a RTL business.  RTLs are small balance commercial loans secured by first lien mortgages used by professional investors and real estate developers to finance the purchase and rehabilitation of residential properties.  ViaNova’s business plan includes buying, aggregating, and distributing these loans to produce superior risk-adjusted returns through the pursuit of opportunities overlooked by commercial banks.  To that end, we have hired four professionals and entered into a line of credit with LegacyTexas Bank.  See notes 4, 19, and 20 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 



U.S. Insurance JV



In May 2018, we committed to invest up to $3,000 in a newly formed joint venture (the “U.S. Insurance JV”) with an outside investor that committed to invest approximately $63,000 of equity in the U.S. Insurance JV.  The U.S. Insurance JV was formed for the purposes of investing in debt issued by small and medium sized U.S. and Bermuda insurance and reinsurance companies and is managed by Dekania Capital Management, LLC, a registered investment adviser subsidiary of the Company (“DCM”). We are required to invest 4.5% of the total equity of the U.S. Insurance JV with an absolute limit of $3,000. The U.S. Insurance JV may use leverage to grow its assets. As of December 31, 2019, we had invested $2,642.

The insurance company debt that will be acquired by the U.S. Insurance JV may be originated by JVB and there may be origination fees earned in connection with such transactions. We also earn management fees as manager of the U.S. Insurance JV.  We are entitled to a quarterly base management fee, an annual incentive fee (if certain return hurdles are met), and an additional incentive fee upon the liquidation of the portfolio (if certain return hurdles are met).  See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 



SPAC Funds

In August 2018, we invested in and became the general partner of a series of newly formed partnerships, the SPAC Funds, for the purposes of investing in the equity securities of SPACs.  Cohen & Company Financial Management, LLC, a registered investment adviser subsidiary of the Company (“CCFM”), is the manager of the SPAC Funds.  As of December 31, 2019, we had invested $646 in the SPAC Funds. We are entitled to a quarterly base management fee based on a percentage of the net asset value of the SPAC Funds and an annual incentive allocation based on the actual returns earned by the SPAC Funds.  See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 



Insurance Acquisition Corporation (the “Insurance SPAC”)



We are the sponsor of the Insurance SPAC, a blank check company seeking to effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses (each a “Business Combination”).



On March 22, 2019, the Insurance SPAC completed the sale of 15,065,000 units (the “SPAC Units”) in its initial public offering (the “IPO”). Each SPAC Unit consists of one share of the SPAC’s Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“SPAC Common Stock”), and one-half of one warrant (each, a “SPAC Warrant”), where each whole SPAC Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Common Stock for $11.50 per share. The SPAC Units were sold in the IPO at an offering price of $10.00 per SPAC Unit, for gross proceeds of $150,650 (before underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses).  Pursuant to the underwriting agreement in the IPO, the Insurance SPAC granted the underwriters in the IPO (the “Underwriters”) a 45-day option to purchase up to 1,965,000 additional SPAC Units solely to cover over-allotments, if any (the “Over-Allotment Option”); and on March 22, 2019, the Underwriters exercised the Over-Allotment Option in full.  Immediately following the completion of the IPO, there were an aggregate of 20,653,333 shares of SPAC Common Stock issued and outstanding.

If the Insurance SPAC fails to consummate a Business Combination within the first 18 months following the IPO, its corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up its affairs and liquidating its assets.

We are the manager and a member of each of two entities: Insurance Acquisition Sponsor, LLC and Dioptra Advisors, LLC (together, the “Sponsor Entities”). The Sponsor Entities purchased 375,000 of the Insurance SPAC’s placement units in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the IPO for an aggregate of $3,750, or $10.00 per placement unit.  Each placement unit consists of one share of SPAC Common Stock and one-half of one warrant (the “Placement Warrant”).  The placement units are identical to the SPAC Units sold in the IPO except (i) the shares of SPAC Common Stock issued as part of the placement units and the Placement Warrants will not be redeemable by the Insurance SPAC, (ii) the Placement Warrants may be exercised by the holders on a cashless basis, (iii) the shares of SPAC Common Stock issued as part of the placement units, together with the Placement Warrants, are entitled to certain registration rights, and (iv) for so long as they are held by the Underwriter, the placement units will not be exercisable more than five years following the effective date of the registration statement filed by the Insurance SPAC in connection with the IPO. Subject to certain limited exceptions, the placement units (including the underlying Placement Warrants and SPAC Common Stock and the shares of SPAC Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Placement Warrants) will not be transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the completion of our initial Business Combination. We have agreed to lend the Insurance SPAC $750 for operating and acquisition related expenses.  No amounts have been lent to date under this facility.



The Sponsor Entities raised $2,550 from third-party investors and the remaining investment in the private placement was made by the Company.  The Company consolidates the Sponsor Entities and treats its investment in the Insurance SPAC as an equity method investment.  The $2,550 raised from third-party investors is treated as non-controlling interest.  See notes 4 and 13 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

The proceeds from the placement units were added to the net proceeds from the IPO to be held in a trust account. If the Insurance SPAC does not complete a Business Combination within the first 18 months following the IPO, the proceeds from the sale of the placement units will be used to fund the redemption of the SPAC Common Stock sold as part of the SPAC Units in the IPO (subject to the requirements of applicable law) and the Placement Warrants will expire worthless.

The Sponsor Entities collectively hold 5,103,333 founder shares of the Insurance SPAC.  Subject to certain limited exceptions, placement units held by the Sponsor Entities will not be transferable or salable until 30 days following a Business Combination, and founder shares held by the Sponsor Entities will not be transferable or salable except (a) with respect to 20% of such shares, until consummation of a Business Combination, and (b) with respect to additional 20% tranches of such shares, when the closing price of the SPAC common stock exceeds $12.00, $13.50, $15.00, and $17.00, respectively, for 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days following the consummation of a Business Combination, in each case subject to certain limited exceptions.



Cohen & Company Financial (Europe) Limited



In June 2018, in response to the uncertainty surrounding Brexit, we formed a new subsidiary, CCFEL in Ireland, for the purpose of seeking to become regulated to perform asset management and capital markets activities in Ireland and the European Union.  In April 2019, CCFEL received authorization from the CBI under the European Union (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulations 2017 to provide investment services in respect of certain financial instruments including transferable securities, money-market instruments, units in collective investment undertakings and various option, futures, swaps, forward rate agreements and other derivative contracts (“Financial Instruments”).  The services for which CCFEL received authorization include the receipt and transmission of orders in relation to Financial Instruments, the execution of orders on behalf of clients, portfolio management, investment advice and investment research, and financial analysis.  In addition, CCFEL applied for approval of a French branch, which approval was granted by the CBI and the branch was authorized by the French regulators in April 2019.  Following authorization of the French Branch of CCFEL, various contracts originally entered into by CCFL were novated to the French Branch of CCFEL.  The novation of contracts was completed on July 1, 2019.



Investment in CK Capital Partners B.V. and AOI



In December 2019, we acquired a 45% interest in CK Capital Partners B.V. (“CK Capital”), a private company incorporated in the Netherlands.  CK Capital provides asset and investment advisory services relating to real estate holdings.  We purchased this interest for $18 (of which $17 was from an entity controlled by our chairman, Daniel G. Cohen.)  In addition, we also acquired a 10% interest in Amersfoort Office Investment I Cooperatief U. A. (“AOI”), a real estate holding company, for $1 and subsequently invested $558.    The investments in AOI and CK Capital Partners are included in equity method investments on the consolidated balance sheets.    See notes 4,12, and 31 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 



Securities Purchase Agreement – Purchase of IMXI shares

On December 30, 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Daniel G. Cohen and the DGC Trust.  In connection with the SPA, we purchased an aggregate of 662,361 shares of International Money Express, Inc. (“IMXI”), an

unrelated publicly traded company, from Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust.  Of the 662,361 shares, 134,317 shares were unrestricted and 528,044 are subject to sale restrictions.  Of the 528,044 restricted shares, 246,021 shares become freely tradeable if IMXI’s share price equals or exceeds $15.00 per share for 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days or upon a change of control of IMXI, and 264,023 shares become freely tradeable if IMXI’s share price equals or exceed $17.00 per share 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days or upon a change of control of IMXI.  IMXI’s share price closed at $11.89 per share on December 31, 2019.  In exchange for the IMXI shares, the Operating LLC issued an aggregate of 22,429,273 newly issued units of membership interests in the Operating LLC to Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust.  These membership interests represent an equity interest in the Operating LLC.  Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, units of membership interests in the Operating LLC are redeemable and, if redeemed, Cohen & Company Inc. can determine to have the Operating LLC pay cash in exchange for the membership interests or Cohen & Company Inc. may instead issue additional Common Shares on a 1 for 10 basis in exchange for the membership interests.  Therefore, the membership interests in the Operating LLC issued in connection with the SPA may be convertible into an aggregate of up to 2,242,927 Common Shares (subject to certain restrictions set forth in the SPA).  We obtained a third-party valuation of the IMXI shares and determined the value of these shares upon closing of the SPA was $7,779.  We recorded this transaction as an increase in other investments, at fair value of $7,779 and an increase in non-controlling interest of $7,779 in our consolidated financial statements.  In connection with the SPA, Cohen & Company Inc. issued an aggregate of 22,429,541 newly issued shares Series F Preferred Stock to Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust.  Our Series F Preferred Stock have no economic rights and entitle the holders thereof to vote together with holders of our Common Stock on all matters presented to the such common stockholders, with each holder of Series F Preferred Stock being entitled to one vote for every ten preferred shares held (i.e., the Series F Preferred Stock issued in connection with the SPA entitle the holder to 2,242,927 votes).  The Series F Preferred Stock do not participate in earnings or dividends. 

Immediately prior to the effectiveness of the SPA, Cohen & Company Inc. owned 67.8% of the outstanding units of membership interests of the Operating LLC.  Immediately subsequent to the effectiveness of the SPA, Cohen & Company Inc. owned 28.75% of the outstanding units of membership interests of the Operating LLC.  As part of the SPA, Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust agreed to grant to Cohen & Company Inc. a proxy to vote, at any meeting of the Operating LLC, the number of the units of membership interests owned by Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust so that Cohen & Company Inc. would have 51.00% of the total votes eligible to vote at such meeting (the “SPA Proxy”).  The actual units of membership interests that are subject to this proxy are determined at any meeting of the Operating LLC that a vote is held as follows:  First, the total number of units of membership interests entitled to vote is determined.  Second, the total number of units of membership interests entitled to vote is multiplied by 51.00% and the total units of membership interests held by Cohen & Company Inc. is subtracted from this amount.  The result represents the total number of units of membership interests owned by Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust which will be subject to the SPA Proxy and that Cohen & Company Inc. will be entitled to vote.  The number of units of membership interests subject to the proxy is allocated between Mr. Cohen and the DGC Trust on a pro rata allocation. 

Therefore, subsequent to the SPA and taking into account the SPA Proxy, Cohen & Company Inc. own 28.75% of the economic interests of the Operating LLC and controls 51.00% of the voting interests of the Operating LLC.  Because Cohen & Company Inc. continues to maintain voting control of the Operating LLC, Cohen & Company Inc. will continue to consolidate the Operating LLC in its consolidated financial statements.  However, earnings shall be allocated to Cohen & Company Inc. and the other members of the Operating LLC based on their respective economic interests.  Accordingly, the non-controlling interest percentage reflected in the consolidated statement of operations will change from 32.22% immediately prior to the effectiveness of the SPA to 71.25% immediately subsequent to the effectiveness of the SPA. 

See notes 21 and 31 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 





Consolidated Results of Operations



The following section provides a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the specified periods. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.



Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2018



The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.



Revenues



Revenues increased by $280, or 1%, to $49,666 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $49,386 for the year ended December 31, 2018. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) an increase of $8,874 in net trading revenue; (ii) a decrease of $4,976 in asset management revenue; (iii) a decrease of $1,148 in new issue and advisory revenue; and (iv) a decrease of $2,470 in principal transactions and other income.



Net Trading



Net trading revenue increased by $8,874, or 30%, to $38,172 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $29,298 for the year ended December 31, 2018.  The following table shows the detail by trading group.







Our net trading revenue includes unrealized gains on our trading investments, as of the applicable measurement date that may never be realized due to changes in market or other conditions not in our control.  This may adversely affect the ultimate value realized from these investments. In addition, our net trading revenue also includes realized gains on certain proprietary trading positions. Our ability to derive trading gains from such trading positions is subject to overall market conditions. Due to volatility and uncertainty in the capital markets, the net trading revenue recognized during the year may not be indicative of future results. Furthermore, from time to time, some of the assets included in the Investments-trading line of our consolidated balance sheets represent level 3 valuations within the FASB valuation hierarchy. Level 3 assets are carried at fair value based on estimates derived using internal valuation models and other estimates. See notes 9 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The fair value estimates made by us may not be indicative of the final sale price at which these assets may be sold.



We consider our matched book repo business to be subject to significant concentration risk.  See note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Asset Management



Assets Under Management



Our AUM equals the sum of: (1) the gross assets included in CDOs that we have sponsored and manage; plus (2) the NAV of investment funds we manage; plus (3) the NAV or gross assets of other accounts we manage.

Our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations used by other asset managers and, as a result, this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. This definition of AUM is not necessarily identical to the definitions of AUM that may be used in our management agreements.







Asset management fees decreased by $4,976, or 40%, to $7,560 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $12,536 for the year ended December 31, 2018, as discussed in more detail below.



CDOs



A substantial portion of our asset management fees are earned from the management of CDOs.  We have not completed a new securitization since 2008.  As a result, our asset management revenue has declined from its historical highs as the assets of the CDOs decline due to maturities, repayments, auction call redemptions, and defaults.  Our ability to complete securitizations in the future will depend upon, among other things, our asset origination capacity and success, our ability to arrange warehouse financing to originate assets, our willingness and capacity to fund required amounts to obtain warehouse financing and securitized financings, and the demand in the markets for such securitizations.



Asset management revenue from Company-sponsored CDOs decreased by $3,891 to $4,028 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $7,919 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The following table summarizes the periods presented by asset class.





Asset management fees for TruPS and insurance company debt – U.S. declined.  In October 2018, the Alesco II CDO had a successful auction of its assets and liquidated.  During 2018, the Company recorded management fee revenue of $3,211 associated with the Alesco II CDO, which included $2,974 earned upon the successful auction.  The remaining reduction in asset management fees for TruPS and insurance company debt – U.S. was a result of average AUM declining due to principal repayments on the assets in these securitizations.

Asset management fees for TruPS and insurance company debt – Europe declined.  In June 2018, the Dekania Europe I CDO had a successful auction of its assets and liquidated.  During 2018, the Company recorded management fee revenue of $435 associated with the Dekania Europe I CDO.  The remaining reduction in asset management fees for TruPS and insurance company debt – Europe was a result a decline in AUM due to principal repayments on the assets in these securitizations.



Asset management fees for broadly syndicated loans – Europe consist of a single CLO.  During August 2019, this CLO liquidated.  Of the revenue earned in 2019, $452 represented fees earned by us upon successful liquidation.  No significant future revenue will be earned related to this management contract. 



Other



Other asset management revenue decreased by $1,085 to $3,532 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $4,617 for the year ended December 31, 2018.  The decrease was primarily due to lower performance fees being earned on managed accounts in 2019 as compared 2018.



New Issue and Advisory Revenue



New issue and advisory revenue decreased by $1,148, or 39%, to $1,831 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $2,979 for the year ended December 31, 2018.



Our revenue earned from new issue and advisory has been, and we expect will continue to be, volatile. We earn revenue from a limited number of engagements. Therefore, a small change in the number of engagements can result in large fluctuations in the revenue recognized. Further, even if the number of engagements remains consistent, the average revenue per engagement can fluctuate considerably. Finally, our revenue is generally earned when an underlying transaction closes (rather than on a monthly or quarterly basis). Therefore, the timing of underlying transactions increases the volatility of our revenue recognition.



In addition, we often incur certain costs related to new issue engagements.  These costs are included as a component of either subscriptions, clearing and execution, or professional fees and other and will generally be recognized in the same period that the related revenue is recognized. 



Principal Transactions and Other Income



Principal transactions and other income decreased by $2,470 to $2,103 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $4,573 for the year ended December 31, 2018.