Anavex Life Sciences (AVXL) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if
other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.
630 Fifth Avenue, 20^th Floor, New York, NY 10111

Dear Stockholder:

You are invited to attend the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. which will be held at the offices of K&L Gates LLP, 599 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 on Tuesday, June 18, 2024, 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

Details regarding the meeting and the business to be conducted are described in the accompanying proxy statement. The proxy statement contains information on matters to be voted upon at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournments or postponements of that meeting. In addition to considering the matters described in the proxy statement, we will report on matters of interest to our stockholders.

We are pleased to inform you that instead of a paper copy of our proxy materials, most of our stockholders will be mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”). The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how to access proxy materials and how to submit your proxy over the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, if desired. All stockholders who do not receive a Notice of Internet Availability will be mailed a paper copy of the proxy materials. Furnishing proxy materials over the internet allows us to provide our stockholders with the information they need in a timely manner, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting. The proxy statement explains more about proxy voting, so please read it carefully. Please complete, date, sign and return the accompanying proxy in the enclosed envelope, or vote online or by telephone using the instructions included on the proxy card, to ensure the presence of a quorum at the meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, and you attend the meeting, you may, if you prefer, revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you will not be permitted to vote in person at the meeting unless you first obtain a legal proxy issued in your name from the record holder.

On or about May 6, 2024, we expect to mail to our stockholders the Notice of Internet Availability that contains notice of the Meeting and instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the internet, how to vote at the Meeting and how to request printed copies of the proxy materials. The Proxy Statement and 2023 Annual Report will be available at https://www.viewproxy.com/Anavex/2024.

We look forward to your continued support.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE
2024 MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
______________________

Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Anavex,” or the “Company”) is providing these proxy materials in connection with the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (the “2024 Meeting”). This proxy statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the 2024 Meeting.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2024 MEETING

If you hold shares of Common Stock in an account at a broker, bank, trust or other nominee as of the close of business on the Record Date for the 2024 Meeting you are a beneficial owner, rather than a stockholder of record. If you wish to vote in person at the 2024 Meeting but you are not the record holder, you must obtain from your record holder a “legal proxy” issued in your name and bring it to the 2024 Meeting.

If you need assistance voting, please reach out to our Investor Relations department at 844.689.3939.

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

At the 2024 Meeting, a board of six directors will be elected, each to hold office until the succeeding annual meeting of stockholders or until such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified (or, if earlier, such director’s removal or resignation from our Board). All of the director nominees are incumbent directors. Information concerning all director nominees appears below. Management does not anticipate that any of the persons named below will be unable or unwilling to stand for election.

Information Concerning Director Nominees

*as defined by applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules

Background information about the Board’s nominees for election, as well as information regarding additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board to conclude that the nominee should serve on the Board, is set forth below:

Christopher Missling, PhD. Christopher Missling, age 58, has over twenty years of healthcare industry experience in big pharmaceutical, biotech and investment banking. Most recently, from March 2007 until his appointment by our Company, Dr. Missling served as the head of healthcare investment banking at Brimberg & Co. in New York, New York. In addition, Dr. Missling served as the Chief Financial Officer of Curis, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRIS) and ImmunoGen, Inc. (NASDAQ: IMGN). Dr. Missling earned his MS and PhD from the University of Munich and an MBA from Northwestern University Kellogg School of Management and WHU Otto Beisheim School of Management. Dr. Missling has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director for the Company since July 2013.

Jiong Ma, PhD. Jiong Ma, age 60, has over 25 years of experience in investing, building, scaling of companies with focus on innovative product launches in digital health, technology and the new energy transition. Dr. Ma currently serves on the board of SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES), and LinkinVax, a biotech company spin-off from the Vaccine Research Institute in France. Dr. Ma served as senior partner and a member of the investment committee at Braemar Energy Ventures (“Braemar”). While at Braemar, Dr. Ma led investments in more than 15 companies involved in either resource efficiency, e-mobility, industrial digitalization, renewable energy, or deep tech, and has achieved multiple successful exits through M&A and IPO. Dr. Ma has significant knowledge and expertise in the technology industry, including information security. Prior to Braemar Energy Ventures, she was with the Venture Capital Group at 3i Group, a global private equity firm, where she led investments across multiple stages in Digital Health, TMT and Cleantech. Preceding the Venture Capital Group at 3i, Dr. Ma held several senior positions at Lucent Technologies and Bell Labs. Her responsibilities included lead roles in product portfolio strategy, new product launches for Optical and Data Networking, and research and product development. Dr. Ma was also a founding team member of Onetta Inc., a fiber networks company. She has a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University Colorado at Boulder and an MS in Electrical Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Dr. Ma is a Kauffman Fellow. Dr. Ma has served on the Board since May 2021.

Claus van der Velden, PhD. Claus van der Velden, PhD, age 51, brings significant expertise in management, accounting, internal controls, information security and risk management. Since May 2021, he has served as Managing Director (Chief Financial Officer) of NetCologne GmbH, a regional telecommunication provider in Germany. From July 2011 to May 2021, he served as corporate head of Management Accounting, Internal Audit and Risk Management at Stroeer SE & Co KGaA, a publicly listed German digital media company. As the prior head of internal audit at Stroeer SE & Co KGaA, Dr. van der Velden has experience in the area of information security risk assessment, and the internal control tools, processes, and policies needed to counter information security threats. Previously, Dr. van der Velden served as the Director of Corporate Business Controlling for the Nutrition & Health business unit at Cognis, a worldwide supplier of global nutritional ingredients and specialty chemicals. In this position, he was also a compliance representative and a member of the global leadership team. After the acquisition of Cognis by BASF, he was responsible for the management accounting processes of the BASF Nutrition & Health division, developing and producing mostly natural-source ingredients for the food and healthcare industries. Dr. van der Velden started his career as a strategy consultant at an international marketing and strategy consultancy firm. He studied in Kiel and Stockholm and received a degree in economics from the University of Kiel and later obtained his doctorate in business management from the WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management where he also previously taught economics. Dr. van der Velden has served on the Board since March 2018.

Athanasios Skarpelos. Athanasios (Tom) Skarpelos, age 57, is a self-employed investor with over 20 years of experience working with private and public companies with a focus on biotechnology companies involved in drug discovery and drug development projects. His experience has led to relationships with researchers at academic institutes in Europe and North America. Mr. Skarpelos is a founder of Anavex. Mr. Skarpelos has served on the Board since January 2013.

Steffen Thomas, PhD. Steffen Thomas, age 58, has over 15 years of experience as a European patent attorney and is currently practicing at Epping Hermann Fischer, a major intellectual property law firm in Europe. Previously, he worked for Japan-based Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, the largest pharmaceutical company in Asia and a top firm worldwide, as an in-house patent attorney. Prior to that, he worked for Nycomed Pharma, acquired by Takeda in 2011 for approximately USD $10 billion. Dr. Thomas’ legal practice covers drafting of patent applications, prosecuting patent applications before national and international patent offices, defending and challenging patents in opposition, appeal, and nullity proceedings, enforcing patents before the infringement courts, and preparing opinions on patentability and infringement in the technical field of chemistry. Dr. Thomas has particular expertise in small molecule pharmaceuticals. He holds MS and PhD degrees in Chemistry from the University of Munich. Dr. Thomas has served on the Board since June 2015.

Peter Donhauser, D.O., Peter Donhauser, age 58, had more than 20 years of expertise in clinical research prior to practicing osteopathic medicine with an integrated medical approach in private practice beginning in 2000. He worked at the University Hospital of Munich in the fields of geriatrics and neuromusculoskeletal diseases. During this time, he was a clinical trial investigator in multiple Phase 3 studies, including studies sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Boehringer Mannheim, Roche, Servier and Sanofi. He received his human medicine degree at the University of Munich and Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (D.O.) from the German-American Academy for Osteopathy, or DAAO, a member of the European Register for Osteopathic Physicians, or EROP, at the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine. Dr. Donhauser has served on the Board since February 2017.

Corporate Governance

General

This section describes key corporate governance practices that we have adopted. We have adopted a Code of Ethics, which applies to all our officers, directors and employees, and corporate governance guidelines and charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of our Code of Ethics and corporate governance charters are posted on the Investors section of our website, www.anavex.com/corporate-governance, which you can access free of charge. Information contained on the website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered part of, this proxy statement. We intend to disclose on our website any amendments to, or waivers from, our code of business conduct and ethics that are required to be disclosed by law or by Nasdaq listing standards.

Director Independence.

Under the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules, the Board has a responsibility to make an affirmative determination that those members of its Board that serve as independent directors do not have any relationships with the Company and its businesses that would impair their independence. The Board has determined that that Christopher Missling, PhD is not independent as that term is defined by Nasdaq 5605(a)(2) because Dr. Missling serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer, and Secretary.

The Board has determined that Claus van der Velden, Athanasios Skarpelos, Steffen Thomas, Peter Donhauser and Jiong Ma are independent as that term is defined by Nasdaq 5605(a)(2) and the applicable rules of the SEC.

 Director Nominations. Our Board has a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that identifies individuals qualified to become Board members and recommends to the Board proposed nominees for Board membership.

Director candidates are considered based upon a variety of criteria, including demonstrated business and professional skills, experience relevant to our business and strategic direction, concern for long-term stockholder interests, personal integrity, and sound business judgment. The Board seeks men and women from diverse professional backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of relevant industry and strategic experience and expertise that, in concert, offer us and our stockholders diversity of opinion and insight in the areas most important to us and our corporate mission. Notwithstanding the same, we do not have a formal policy concerning the diversity of the Board. All director candidates must have time available to devote to the activities of the Board. We also consider the independence of director candidates, including the appearance of any conflict in serving as a director. A director who does not meet all of these criteria may still be considered for nomination to the Board, if our independent directors believe that the candidate will make an exceptional contribution to us and our stockholders.

Generally, when evaluating and recommending candidates for election to the Board, the Board will conduct candidate interviews, evaluate biographical information and background material, and assess the skills and experience of candidates in the context of the then current needs of the Company. In identifying potential director candidates, the Board may also seek input from the executive officers and may also consider recommendations by employees, community leaders, business contacts, third-party search firms and any other sources deemed appropriate by such directors. The Board will also consider director candidates recommended by stockholders to stand for election at the annual meeting of stockholders so long as such recommendations are submitted in accordance with the procedures described below under “Stockholder Recommendations for Board Candidates.”

Board Leadership Structure. The Board is composed of a majority of independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Our Board has appointed an independent Board Chair, Dr. Jiong Ma. As Board Chair, Dr. Ma has the authority, among other things, to call and preside over meetings of our Board, to set meeting agendas, and to determine materials to be distributed to the Board. The Company believes separation of the positions of Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer reinforces the independence of our Board in its oversight of the business and affairs of the Company. In addition, the Company believes that having an independent Board Chair creates an environment that is more conducive to objective evaluation and oversight of management’s performance, increasing management accountability and improving the ability of our Board to monitor whether management’s actions are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each have oversight over specific areas of responsibility, as discussed further below.

Board Role in Risk Oversight. The Board is responsible for oversight of the Company’s risk management process. The Board administers this oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through the committees of the Board. Areas of focus include economic risk, operational risk, financial risk (accounting, investment or liquidity, and tax), competitive risk, legal and regulatory risk, cybersecurity risk and compliance and reputational risks. The Board is supported by regular reporting by management, which is designed to give the Board visibility over the Company’s operations and activities to adequately identify key risks and understand management’s risk mitigation strategies.

The Audit Committee reviews information regarding liquidity and operations and oversees our management of financial risks. Periodically, the Audit Committee reviews our policies with respect to risk assessment, risk management, loss prevention and regulatory compliance. Oversight by the Audit Committee includes the Principal Financial Officer reporting directly to the Audit Committee at least quarterly to provide an update on management’s efforts to manage risk.

Board Diversity Matrix (as of April 26, 2024)

Total Number of Directors: 6

The Board and Board Committees

The Board. The Board met five times during fiscal 2023. Four of such meetings were regularly scheduled meetings and the other one special Board meeting was held as needed. During fiscal year 2023, each incumbent director attended 75% or more of the Board and relevant Board committee meetings for the periods during which each such director served. Directors are not required to attend annual meetings of our stockholders.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts

The members of the Audit Committee are Claus van der Velden (Committee Chair), Athanasios Skarpelos, Steffen Thomas and Jiong Ma. Our Board has determined that (a) each of the current Audit committee members is independent as defined in the listing standards of Nasdaq, (b) each of the current Audit Committee members is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, and (c) Claus van der Velden is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules.

The Audit Committee oversees and reports to our Board on various auditing and accounting-related matters, including, among other things, the maintenance of the integrity of our financial statements, reporting process and internal controls, the selection, evaluation, compensation and retention of our independent registered public accounting firm, legal and regulatory compliance, including our disclosure controls and procedures, and oversight over our risk management policies and procedures.

The Audit Committee operates under a charter that was adopted by our Board and which is available on our website at www.anavex.com/corporate-governance. The Audit Committee met four times during fiscal 2023.

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with management. The Audit Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered accounting firm its independence from the Company and management. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2023 filed with the SEC on November 27, 2023.

MEMBERS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Claus van der Velden (Committee Chair)

Athanasios Skarpelos

Steffen Thomas

Jiong Ma

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Claus van der Velden (Committee Chair), Steffen Thomas and Peter Donhauser.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “NCG Committee”) is appointed by the Board to oversee and evaluate the Board’s performance and the Company’s compliance with corporate governance regulations, guidelines and principles, to identify individuals qualified to become Board members, to recommend to the Board proposed nominees for Board membership, and to recommend to the Board directors to serve on each standing committee. The NCG Committee seeks to assemble a Board that possesses the appropriate balance of professional and industry knowledge, financial expertise and management experience that is necessary to oversee the Company’s business. The NCG also recognizes the importance of diversity in board composition, including diversity of experience, gender and ethnicity and seeks to continually strive towards optimal diversity.

The NCG Committee operates under a charter that was adopted by our Board and which is available on our website at www.anavex.com/corporate-governance. The NCG Committee did not meet during fiscal 2023 but acted by written consent as required.

Compensation Committee

The members of our Compensation Committee are Claus van der Velden (Committee Chair), Steffen Thomas and Peter Donhauser.

The Compensation Committee assists our Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to compensation of our directors and executive officers. Its responsibilities include, among other things: reviewing, approving and recommending compensation programs and arrangements applicable to our officers, determining the objectives of our executive officer compensation programs, overseeing the evaluation of our senior executives, administering our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, including reviewing and granting equity awards to our executive officers, and reviewing and approving director compensation and benefits. The Compensation Committee can delegate to other members of our Board, or an officer or officers of the Company, the authority to review and grant stock-based compensation for employees who are not executive officers, however it has not done so.

The Compensation Committee has the responsibilities and authority designated by Nasdaq rules. Specifically, the Compensation Committee has the sole discretion to select and receive advice from a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and is directly responsible for oversight of their work. The Compensation Committee must also determine reasonable compensation to be paid to such advisors by us.

The Compensation Committee operates under a charter that was adopted by our Board and which is available on our website at www.anavex.com/corporate-governance. The Compensation Committee met one time during fiscal 2023 and also acted by written consent as required.

Anti-Hedging Policy

We have adopted an insider trading policy that, among other things, expressly prohibits all of our employees, including our named executive officers, as well as our directors, and certain of their family members and related entities, from engaging in short sales of our securities, purchases or sales of puts, calls or other derivative securities based on our securities, and purchases of financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our securities.

Stockholder Recommendations for Board Candidates

Under its charter, the NCG Committee is responsible for considering potential director nominees submitted by stockholders. The NCG Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to the consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders. The NCG Committee will consider a recommendation only if appropriate biographical information and background material are provided on a timely basis, accompanied by a statement as to whether the stockholder or group of stockholders making the recommendation has beneficially owned more than five percent (5%) of our Common Stock for at least one (1) year as of the date that the recommendation is made. To submit a recommendation for a nomination, a stockholder may write to the Board, at our principal office, Attention: Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

The NCG Committee will evaluate any such candidates by following substantially the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria, as for candidates submitted by Board members, assuming that appropriate biographical and background material is provided for candidates recommended by stockholders and the process for submitting the recommendation is followed.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders may, at any time, communicate with any of our directors by mailing a written communication to Anavex Life Sciences Corp., 630 Fifth Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10111, Attention: Christopher Missling, PhD., Chief Executive Officer. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Stockholder-Board Communication” or “Stockholder-Director Communication.” All such letters must identify the author as a stockholder, provide evidence of the sender’s stock ownership and clearly state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board or a particular director or directors. The Corporate Secretary will then forward such correspondence, without editing or alteration, to the Board or to the specified director(s) on or prior to the next scheduled meeting of the Board. The Board will determine the method by which such submissions will be reviewed and considered. The Board may also request the submitting stockholder to furnish additional information it may reasonably require or deem necessary to sufficiently review and consider the submission of such stockholder.

 Vote Required

The six (6) nominees receiving an affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Common Stock having voting power present in person or represented by proxy shall be elected. This Proposal 1 is a “non-discretionary” or “non-routine” item, meaning that brokerage firms cannot vote shares in their discretion on behalf of a client if the client has not given voting instructions. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in street name and fail to instruct your broker to vote your shares, your shares will not be counted as votes cast on this Proposal 1.

PROPOSAL 2 – RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board appointed Grant Thornton LLP on March 3, 2022 to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023. Our stockholders are being provided the opportunity to ratify the appointment for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024. Representatives of Grant Thornton LLP are expected to be present at the 2024 Meeting.

Former Auditors

On March 1, 2022, the Audit Committee of the Board dismissed BDO USA LLP (“BDO”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The reports of BDO on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for each of the two most recently completed fiscal years did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 and the subsequent interim period through March 1, 2022, there were no disagreements with BDO on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosures or auditing scope and procedures that, if not resolved to the satisfaction of BDO, would have caused BDO to make reference to the matter in their reports. There were no reportable events (as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K) during the two most recently completed fiscal years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, or in the subsequent interim period through March 1, 2022.

The Company provided a copy of the foregoing disclosures to BDO and requested that BDO furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether BDO agreed with the above statements. A copy of BDO’s letter was filed with the Commission on a Form 8-K on March 4, 2022.

During the two fiscal years preceding the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023 and in the subsequent interim period through March 3, 2022, the Company has not consulted with Grant Thornton LLP with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that would have been rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, or any matters set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or (ii) of Regulation S-K.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed to our Company for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, Grant Thornton, LLP for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2023 and 2022:

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to our Company for professional services rendered by BDO USA, LLP, our former independent registered public accounting firm, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2023 and 2022:

Audit Fees. Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, reviews of our interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, services performed in connection with regular filings with the Commission for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2023 and 2022 in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Audit Committee pre-approves all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firms. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by our Audit Committee.

Our Audit Committee has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit was compatible with maintaining Grant Thornton LLP’s independence.

Vote Required for Approval

The foregoing Proposal 2 will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders in person or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not be treated as votes cast and will have no impact on the proposal.

PROPOSAL 3 -- ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) added Section 14A to Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules.

Our executive officer compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain our named executive officers, who are critical to our success, while working within the available resources. Our Board believes that they have taken a responsible approach to compensating our named executive officers given our limited resources.

Please read the “Executive and Director Compensation” section of this proxy statement for additional details about our executive compensation. The compensation of our named executive officers is designed to enable us to attract and retain talented and experienced executives to lead us successfully in a competitive environment. Our Board believes that our executive compensation strikes the appropriate balance between utilizing responsible, measured pay practices and effectively incentivizing our named executive officers to dedicate themselves fully to value creation for our stockholders.

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we will ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.”

The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or our Board. At our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Board recommended that our stockholders approve an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (commonly referred to as the “say-on-pay” vote) once every three years, in which a majority of the Common Stock having voting power voted approved. In response, we hold an advisory say-on-pay vote at least once every three years. Our Board values the views of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when determining future compensation arrangements for our named executive officers.

Vote Required for Approval

This Proposal 3 will be approved upon the vote of the holders of a majority of the Common Stock having voting power present in person or represented by proxy.

This Proposal 3 is a “non-discretionary” or “non-routine” item, meaning that brokerage firms cannot vote shares in their discretion on behalf of a client if the client has not given voting instructions. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in street name and fail to instruct your broker to vote your shares, your shares will not be counted as votes cast on this Proposal 3.

Shareholder Proposal

The Company has been notified that one shareholder of the Company intends to present a proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting. The shareholder making this proposal has presented the proposal and supporting statements set forth below, and we are presenting the proposal and the supporting statements as they were submitted to us. While we take issue with certain of the statements contained in the proposals and the supporting statements, we have limited our response to the most important points and have not attempted to address all the statements with which we disagree. The names of co-filing proponents, if any, and address and stock ownership of all proponents will be furnished by the Company’s Secretary to any person, orally or in writing as requested, promptly upon receipt of any oral or written request.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the shareholder proposals will be required for approval of the proposals. Abstentions will be counted as represented and entitled to vote and will have the effect of a negative vote on the shareholder proposals. Broker non-votes (as described under the section titled ”Questions and Answers About the 2024 Meeting”) will not be considered entitled to vote on the shareholder proposals and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval of the proposals. The shareholder proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the proponents.

PROPOSAL 4 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SHAREHOLDER OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE ON EXCESSIVE PARACHUTES

Kenneth Steiner (the “Proponent”), represented by John Chevedden, has notified the Company that he intends to present the following proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting. The Company is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal provided below, which in accordance with SEC rules, is reproduced verbatim as received from the Proponent.

Proposal 4 – Shareholder Opportunity to Vote on Excessive Golden Parachutes

Shareholders request that the Board adopt a policy to seek shareholder approval of senior managers’ new or renewed pay package that provides for golden parachute payments with an estimated value exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s base salary plus target short term bonus. This proposal only applies to Named Executive Officers.

Golden parachute payments include cash, equity or other compensation that is paid out or vests due to a senior executive’s termination for any reason. Payments include those provided under employment agreements, severance plans, and change-in-control clauses in long-term equity plans, but not life insurance, pension benefits, or deferred compensation earned and vested prior to termination.

“Estimated total value” includes: lump-sum payments; payments offsetting tax liabilities; perquisites or benefits not vested under a plan generally available to management employees; post-employment consulting fees or office expense; and equity awards if vesting is accelerated, or a performance condition waived, due to termination.

The Board shall retain the option to seek shareholder approval at an annual meeting after material terms are agreed upon.

Generous performance-based pay can sometimes be justified but shareholder ratification of golden parachutes better aligns management pay with shareholder interests.

This proposal is relevant even if there are current golden parachute limits. A limit on golden parachutes is like a speed limit. A speed limit by itself does not guarantee that the speed limit will never be exceeded. Like this proposal the rules associated with a speed limit provide consequences if the limit is exceeded. With this proposal the consequences are a non-binding shareholder vote is required for unreasonably high golden parachutes.

This proposal places no limit on long-term equity pay or any other type pay. This proposal thus has no impact on the ability to attract executive talent or discourage the use of long-term equity pay because it places no limit on golden parachutes. It simply requires that extra large golden parachutes be subject to a non-binding shareholder vote at a shareholder meeting already scheduled for other matters.

This proposal is relevant because the annual say on executive pay vote does not have a separate section for approving or rejecting golden parachutes.

The topic of this proposal received between 51% and 65% support at:

FedEx

Spirit AeroSystems

Alaska Air

Fiserv

Please vote yes:

Shareholder Opportunity to Vote on Excessive Golden Parachutes – Proposal 4

Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition

The Board has carefully considered this proposal and concluded that its adoption is unnecessary and not in the best interests of the Company or our stockholders. The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “AGAINST” this proposal, as further explained below.

By including long-term incentive awards in the calculation of the proposed limit on severance or termination benefits, the proposal is overly broad, not consistent with market practice, and would place us at a significant disadvantage in terms of attracting and retaining executive talent.

The intent of the Company’s compensation program is to attract and retain talent, to create incentives for and to reward excellent performance. We seek to compensate our executives in a manner that is competitive, rewards performance that creates stockholder value, recognizes individual contributions, and encourages long-term value creation. The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of each executive’s compensation opportunity should be tied to variable compensation and value creation for stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes this mix provides an appropriate balance between the financial security required to attract and retain qualified individuals, and the Compensation Committee’s goal of ensuring that executive compensation rewards performance that benefits stockholders over the long term.

The proposal seeks to include “equity awards if vesting is accelerated” in the proposed limit on severance or termination payments. Such accelerated vesting is expressly contemplated under the Company’s 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2022 Plan”). The proposal would set an arbitrary cap that would be inconsistent with our 2022 Plan.

As described in this Proxy Statement, we consider long-term equity awards an important element of our executive compensation program because they foster share ownership and reward strong performance over multiple years, which in turn drives sustainable value creation for our stockholders. Long-term equity awards also help us to recruit and retain executive talent and are granted and accepted with the expectation that executives will be given a fair opportunity to realize the full value of these awards.

The 2022 Plan contemplates accelerated vesting of long-term equity awards upon a change in control. If the proposal is adopted, it would require the Company to call a special meeting of stockholders to obtain stockholder approval over such accelerated vesting, which was already approved by our stockholders when they approved the 2022 Plan. The Board believes that such a requirement would be expensive, impractical and unnecessary.

The proposal would impose significant limits on our use of severance protections to retain senior executives during a potential change in control and potentially impair our ability to deliver maximum stockholder value in such a transaction. The risk of job loss following a change in control, coupled with a limitation on the value that may be realized from previously granted equity awards, could present an unnecessary distraction for our senior executives and could lead them to seek the certainty of new employment while a transaction is being negotiated or is pending. This could result in a risk of the transaction not being completed or being finalized with less favorable terms for stockholders.

By effectively eliminating an important retention tool by requiring stockholder approval of termination payments, including the value of accelerated vesting of long-term equity awards, the proposal could result in a weakened alignment between the interests of our executives and those of our stockholders in a change in control transaction and create increased risk to our stockholders. It could also have an adverse impact on our ability to recruit and retain executive talent, as it would put us at a competitive disadvantage against other companies that do not face similar restrictions or uncertainty regarding their ability to offer termination protection.

Anavex’s current compensation practices already align the incentives of senior leadership and stockholders.

Our long-term equity incentive awards are a fundamental component of our compensation program and align senior leadership interests with stockholders’ interest by linking a substantial portion of compensation to the achievement of long-term corporate performance and operational efficiency. By requiring stockholder approval for executives to realize the full value of their equity awards upon a qualifying termination, the policy requested by this proposal effectively reduces the recruitment and retention value of long-term equity incentive awards in the executive compensation program. As a result, the proposal directly conflicts with one of the primary principles of our compensation program, namely, the alignment of senior leadership and stockholders’ interests. In addition, implementing the proposal would likely lead to elimination of change of control provisions, which risks potential misalignment between executives and stockholders during a potential change of control transaction with respect to executive retention and deal certainty. Furthermore, implementing this proposal would create additional risk of misalignment between the Company’s executives subject to our current policy and those subject to the policy requested by the proposal.

Anavex engages regularly with stockholders who have the opportunity to express their views on Anavex’s executive compensation programs.

Anavex is committed to maintaining an open and constructive dialogue with stockholders. We conduct annual outreach through various channels, including one-on-one and group meetings, written communications, earnings calls, industry presentations, and maintaining a toll-free investor communication line and email address. We have a strong track record of stockholder support for our executive compensation practices, with over 88% approval at the 2021 annual meeting.

Additionally, as described above, our stockholders strongly supported our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, which expressly the Board, or any committee thereof, to provide for accelerated vesting of equity awards upon certain circumstances.

The proposal would unduly restrict the Board’s ability to appropriately structure compensation programs.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in overseeing the compensation of the Company’s executives and other employees, including with respect to severance and termination payments. The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent, non-employee directors. The proposed requirement that Anavex secure stockholder approval of certain severance arrangements could constrain the Compensation Committee’s ability to exercise its judgment in structuring compensation arrangements in a timely manner and that it believes are in stockholders’ best interests.

The Board believes the Compensation Committee is well qualified to oversee post-termination compensation and should retain the responsibility and flexibility to tailor, assess, and approve compensation structures based on its insights into the Company’s needs and its strategic and operational goals, its access to market information and the independent advice from its compensation consultant.

In sum, our Board believes that the Compensation Committee has designed our current executive compensation policies and practices to be reasonable, consistent with market norms, and appropriate, while effectively aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. The Board remains committed to ensuring stockholder input is incorporated in decisions regarding executive compensation programs. The proposal, if adopted, could prevent the Company from effectively recruiting, motivating and retaining critical talent, and restrict the Board’s ability to structure compensation programs appropriately, and therefore would not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

As a result, the Board believes that the policy requested by this stockholder proposal is not necessary and not in the best interest of our stockholders.

Vote Required for Approval

This Proposal 4 will be approved upon the vote of the holders of a majority of the Common Stock having voting power present in person or represented by proxy.

This Proposal 4 is a “non-discretionary” or “non-routine” item, meaning that brokerage firms cannot vote shares in their discretion on behalf of a client if the client has not given voting instructions. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in street name and fail to instruct your broker to vote your shares, your shares will not be counted as votes cast on this Proposal 4.

INFORMATION CONCERNING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT DIRECTORS

Sandra Boenisch, CPA, CGA, Ms. Boenisch, age 43, is our Principal Financial Officer. She is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CGA) with over 15 years of accounting, audit and financial reporting experience in a variety of industries, both in the United States and Canada. Ms. Boenisch was an independent consultant, providing financial reporting services to a range of public companies in the United States and Canada since January 2012. From 2008 until 2012, Ms. Boenisch was employed at BDO Canada LLP (Vancouver, BC) where she was hired as a Senior Accountant and was later promoted to Manager, Audit Assurance. Ms. Boenisch specialized in managing assurance engagements for public companies in the United States and Canada. Prior to that, Ms. Boenisch worked for another public accounting firm from 2001 to 2008. As an independent consultant, Ms. Boenisch has acquired considerable experience in finance, governance, and regulatory compliance. She holds a BComm from Laurentian University.

There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers.

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Executive Compensation Overview

The Company’s compensation objectives are to offer our named executive officers compensation and benefits that are competitive and meet our goals of attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled, talented management, which is necessary for the Company to achieve its financial and strategic objectives and create long-term value for our stockholders.

A significant portion of our named executive officer’s compensation is related to factors that directly and indirectly influence stockholder value, including long-term stock performance and operational performance. We believe the levels of compensation we provide should be competitive, reasonable and appropriate for our business needs and circumstances. The named executive officers who are the subject of this CD&A are Christopher Missling, PhD, our Chief Executive Officer, and Sandra Boenisch, our Principal Financial Officer.

Our Executive Compensation Program and Philosophy

The intent of the Company’s compensation program for our named executive officers is to attract and retain talent, to create incentives for and to reward excellent performance. We seek to compensate our named executive officers in a manner that is competitive, rewards performance that creates stockholder value, recognizes individual contributions, and encourages long-term value creation.

The Compensation Committee meets at least once per year to review and evaluate the compensation of our named executive officers and each officer’s performance. The Compensation Committee utilizes quantitative and qualitative factors, including the accomplishment of initiatives, attitude, and leadership and applies overall judgment to assess performance, taking into account the financial condition of the Company. In setting compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the outcome of the most recent say-on-pay vote, as well as stockholder feedback throughout the year, when making compensation decisions for our executive officers. In our most recent say-on-pay vote, conducted at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, held on May 25, 2021, our stockholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers on an advisory basis, with 88% of the votes cast in favor of the fiscal 2021 compensation of our named executive officers. Ultimately, the Compensation Committee seeks to evaluate, based on the achievement of financial and nonfinancial objectives, the variable compensation, including special awards, of our named executive officers and decide on the base salary and target discretionary bonus for such persons taking into account relevant benchmark data.

The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of each named executive officer’s compensation opportunity should be tied to variable compensation and value creation for stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes this mix provides an appropriate balance between the financial security required to attract and retain qualified individuals, and the Compensation Committee’s goal of ensuring that the compensation of our named executive officers rewards performance that benefits stockholders over the long term.

Compensation Risk Oversight

In administering the compensation program for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee strives to achieve a balance among the elements of compensation to accomplish the objectives of the program. The Compensation Committee reviews the overall compensation program in the context of the risks that may be presented by the structure of the compensation program and the metrics used to determine compensation under that program. Based upon this review, the Compensation Committee believes that the compensation program for our named executive officers does not create a reasonable likelihood of a material adverse effect on the Company.

Compensation Consultants

The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of our named executive officers, including the structure and design of the compensation programs. The Compensation Committee is responsible for retaining and terminating compensation consultants and determining the terms and conditions of their engagement. During fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee did not engage any compensation consultants.

Elements of Executive Compensation

We focus our named executive officer compensation program on three related but distinct elements: base salary, cash bonuses and stock related compensation.

Base Salary

Base salaries take into consideration a number of factors, including the named executive officer’s job performance, our corporate performance, and compensation practices observed in the market. In its evaluation of performance for the renewal of our Chief Executive Officer’s and Principal Financial Officer’s employment agreements, the Compensation Committee considered our corporate performance, including our increase in market capitalization over the last three years, increases in stockholder value and advances in the Company’s clinical trials. In February 2024, after considering the above factors, the annualized base salary of our Chief Executive Officer remained unchanged at $700,000 and the annualized base salary of our Principal Financial Officer was increased to $279,840 Canadian dollars from $264,000 Canadian dollars.

Annual Discretionary Cash Bonuses

The Company has an annual discretionary cash bonus program. We provide such bonuses to motivate executive officers to perform on behalf of general corporate goals and to perform in their areas of responsibility. The Compensation Committee our Board works with the Chief Executive Officer to evaluate the Company’s financial performance of the prior year, and overall financial condition of the Company to determine if discretionary bonuses are to be paid. In addition, on an annual basis, our Compensation Committee independently evaluates the performance of our Chief Executive Officer in the prior year, as well as the overall financial condition of the Company to determine if a discretionary bonus of up to 20% of base salary shall be paid to the Chief Executive Officer.

Equity Compensation

Only our Board, acting in its sole discretion, or the Compensation Committee may grant stock options to our named executive officers. We view stock options as one of the more important components of our long-term, performance-based compensation philosophy. We provide stock options through initial grants at or near the date of hire and subsequent periodic/annual grants. Generally, initial stock option grants vest over a three-year period and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our stock at the time of grant. Initial grant amounts are based on ranges that take into consideration a named executive officer’s job responsibilities and competitive market data. We grant periodic additional stock options to reflect the individual’s ongoing contributions to the long-term success and growth of the Company, to incentivize individuals to remain with the Company and to provide a long-term incentive to achieve or exceed our corporate goals. We do not have a program, plan or practice to time stock option grants to our named executive officers in coordination with the release of material nonpublic information. We have not re-priced any of our stock options and do not intend to re-price or otherwise adjust outstanding stock options at any time in the future.

Equity compensation includes stock option grants within the terms of our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Each named executive officer is eligible for stock option grants under the 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plans which may vest over a required service period, “Time Based Awards”, or upon achievement of certain performance criteria, “Performance Awards”. Generally, our Compensation Committee grants Time Based Awards at or near the date of hire. Such grants are intended to link compensation with stockholder value over time. Subsequent awards are generally granted as Performance Awards, which are intended to align compensation with the Company’s short-term and long-term objectives. Our Compensation Committee selects performance goals that reflect the Company’s short-term and longer-term objectives to ensure named executive officers are rewarded for the successful and timely accomplishment of these objectives. Generally, these performance criteria include milestones in connection with the successful execution and enrollment of the Company’s clinical trial programs.

In March 2023, our Compensation Committee granted options to our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, which vest in four equal tranches based on four performance milestones including accomplishing (i) Publication of ANAVEX2-73-AD-004 Alzheimer’s disease clinical trial data, (ii) Completion of enrollment of ANAVEX2-73 PET imaging Parkinson’s disease Phase 2 clinical trial, (iii) Completion of ANAVEX2-73 Parkinson’s disease Phase 2b/3 clinical trial and (iv) Completion of enrollment of ANAVEX3-71 Phase 2 clinical trial in Schizophrenia.

Other Compensation

Other components of the compensation of our named executive officers include employee medical benefit plans and 401(k) benefit plan contributions.

Employee Medical Benefit Plans. Our employee medical and welfare benefit plans include medical, dental, life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment insurance.

401(k) Plan. We have a defined-contribution savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan covers all United States based employees. United States based employees eligible to participate in the plan may contribute up to the current statutory limits under the Internal Revenue Service regulations. The 401(k) plan permits the Company to make additional matching contributions on behalf of contributing employees.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee has ever been an officer or employee of the Company. None of the named executive officers currently serves or has served on the Compensation Committee or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more named executive officers serving as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee of the Company.

Managing Compensation-Related Risks

Although a portion of the compensation provided to our executive officers and other employees is performance-based, the executive compensation program does not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking. This is primarily due to the fact that the compensation program is designed to encourage executive officers and other employees to remain focused on both short-term and long-term strategic goals within the context of our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy.

Insider Trading Policy

Our insider trading policy prohibits short sales and derivative transactions of our stock by our named executive officers, directors and all of our employees, including short sales of our securities, including short sales “against the box” (a sale with a delayed delivery); purchases or sales of puts, calls or other derivative securities of the Company; or other hedging or monetization transactions such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, as they involve the establishment of a short position.

In addition, our insider trading policy prohibits our named executive officers, directors and all of our employees from purchasing our securities on margin, borrowing against Company securities held in a margin account, or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.

Clawback Policy

In November 2023, the Board adopted an executive officer compensation clawback policy that may be applied in the event of a material financial restatement. The clawback policy covers all of the named executive officers and includes all incentive-based compensation. Specifically, in the event of an accounting restatement, the Company must recover, reasonably promptly, erroneously awarded compensation in amounts determined pursuant to the policy. Compensation that may be recoverable under the policy includes cash or equity-based compensation for which the grant, payment or vesting (or any portion thereof) is or was predicated upon the achievement of specified financial results that are impacted by the material financial restatement, and the amount of compensation that may be impacted by the clawback policy is the difference between the amount paid or granted, and the amount that should have been paid or granted, if calculated on the updated financials. Recovery under the policy with respect to an executive officer will not require the finding of any misconduct by such executive officer or such executive officer being found responsible for the accounting error leading to an accounting restatement. Our equity awards provide that the Company may annul an award if the grantee incurs a separation from service for “cause” (as defined in the agreements). In such case, all awards and any amounts or benefits received or outstanding shall be subject to cancellation, recoupment, rescission, payback and other action in accordance with the terms of the Company Clawback Policy or any applicable law. In addition, in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the law, whether such noncompliance is the result of misconduct or other circumstances, an employee shall be required to reimburse the Company for any amounts earned or payable with respect to an award granted under the Company’s equity plan to the extent required by law and the Company’s clawback policy.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We do not have any stock ownership guidelines, ownership goals or holding requirements. If and as we succeed in achieving approval for and commercializing our product candidates, we expect that we will adapt the elements of our compensation program as appropriate and may include or substitute other elements in our compensation program. Changes in the elements of our compensation program may also reflect changes in the importance of tax or accounting treatments of a particular element of our compensation program.

Results of 2021 Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote

In 2021, our stockholders approved, in a non-binding advisory vote by 88%, the 2020 compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers. We considered the stockholders’ vote in our review of our compensation programs and in establishing compensation for our named executive officers in 2021.

Compensation Committee Report

The members of the Company’s Compensation Committee hereby state:

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis, required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on this review and discussion, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Summary Compensation

The particulars of compensation paid to our named executive officers for the three most recently completed fiscal years:

Employment Agreements

Christopher Missling

We and Dr. Missling entered into an employment agreement dated July 5, 2013, as amended and extended most recently by the third amendment effective April 7, 2022, whereby we currently pay Dr. Missling an annual base salary of $700,000. In addition, Dr. Missling is eligible to earn an annual cash bonus for each whole or partial calendar year of up to twenty percent of his base salary, and to participate in our employee benefit plans. We have agreed to indemnify Dr. Missling in connection with his provision of services to us.

Sandra Boenisch

We and Ms. Boenisch entered into an amended and restated employment agreement dated October 4, 2017, as amended and extended, whereby we currently pay Ms. Boenisch an annual base salary of $279,840 Canadian dollars. Ms. Boenisch is eligible for discretionary salary increases.

Equity Compensation

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth the awards granted for each named executive officer during the year ended September 30, 2023 under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan:

(1) Amounts reported represent the potential short-term incentive compensation amounts payable in the 2023 fiscal year under our annual cash incentive program. The amounts reported represent each executive officer’s target and maximum possible payments for 2023. Because actual payments to the named executive officers could range from 0% to 100% of their target bonus, the threshold payment amount is $0. The actual short-term incentive bonus amount earned by each named executive officer for 2023 is reported in the Bonus column in the Summary Compensation Table above.

(2) Represents shares of our common stock underlying options awarded. Amounts reported which are subject to performance-based vesting conditions, as described in the section “Elements of Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation” above

(3)Represents the fair value of each equity award on the date of grant, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer and director certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of September 30, 2023.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer awards that were exercised during the year ended September 30, 2023:

Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

There was no nonqualified deferred compensation for our named executive officers in fiscal 2023.

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

We are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO. Based on the information for fiscal year 2023, we reasonably estimate that the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee was 7.7:1. Our pay ratio estimate has been calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K using the data and assumptions summarized below.

We identified the median employee by examining the 2023 annual base salary compensation for all individuals, excluding our CEO. We excluded independent contractors retained on an as needed basis, whose compensation is determined by an unaffiliated third party, and who are therefore are not considered our employees for purposes of the pay ratio calculation.

We included all employees who were employed by us as of September 30, 2023. We selected the determination date and measurement period because they are recent periods for which employee census and compensation information are readily available. Salaries and wages were annualized for those employees who were not employed for the full year of fiscal 2023. We selected annual base salary as our compensation measure because it is readily available in our existing payroll systems, it is consistently calculated for each employee, and because it is a reasonable proxy for total compensation for purposes of determining the median employee. We did not apply any cost-of-living adjustments to the compensation of employees in jurisdictions other than the jurisdiction in which the CEO resides.

Once we identified our median employee, we calculated such employee’s annual total compensation for 2023 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in that employee’s annual total compensation of $512,245. The median employee’s annual total compensation includes annualized base salary, annualized bonus, annualized 401(k) matching contributions, and the fair value of awards granted during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

With respect to the CEO, we used the amount reported as total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement. Any estimates and assumptions used to calculate total annual compensation are described in footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table.

Pay Versus Performance

The following table and supporting narrative contain information regarding “compensation actually paid” to our named executive officers and the relationship to Company performance.

Pay Versus Performance Table

To calculate “compensation actually paid” for our CEO and other named executive officers the following adjustments were made to Summary Compensation Table total pay.

“Compensation Actually Paid” reflects the exclusions and inclusions of equity awards for the PEO and the Non-PEO named executive officer and calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the valuation methodologies and assumptions set forth in the calculation of the grant date fair value of these awards as disclosed in the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year in which equity awards were granted.

Compensation Actually Paid Versus Company Performance

Tabular List of Company Performance Measures

The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to our named executive officers for the most recent fiscal year to the Company’s performance was:

The Company did not use any other financial measures in incentive plans linking performance to compensation actually paid for our named executive officers.

Compensation of Directors

The table below shows the compensation of our directors who were not our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023:

 (1) Includes stock option awards valued based on the aggregate grant date fair value of the award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amounts shown in the table above do not necessarily reflect the actual value that may be realized by the non-employee director upon vesting. On September 30, 2023, the aggregate number of outstanding vested and unvested stock option awards held by each director was as follows: Mr. Skarpelos possessed options to purchase 355,500 shares, Dr. van der Velden possessed options to purchase 305,500 shares, Dr. Thomas possessed options to purchase 405,500 shares, Dr. Donhauser possessed options to purchase 305,500 shares and Dr. Ma possessed options to purchase 160,000 shares.

We currently compensate non-employee directors $25,000 per year, paid quarterly. We compensate Dr. Ma an additional $4,000 per quarter for performing the functions of Chairman of the Board. We compensate Claus van der Velden an additional $4,000 per quarter for performing the functions of Chairman of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

We regularly grant members of the Board awards of options. Each Board member is granted options initially when they join the Board, which options typically vest over a three-year period. Additionally, we grant awards on an annual basis. Annual awards of options typically vest in full on the first anniversary of grant date. In 2023, the annual grant was 50,000 options to each director.

In addition, directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our Board. Our Board may award further special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director.

Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide retirement or similar benefits for our directors or executive officers.

Resignation, Retirement, Other Termination, or Change in Control Arrangements

Potential Payments Upon Termination

The Company is a party to employment contracts with our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer that contain provisions for payment of severance upon termination either by the Company without cause or by the employee for good reason. General terms of these arrangements are described below.

Our CEO Employment Agreement with Dr. Missling contains provisions regarding our obligations upon his termination and upon a Change in Control. Any capitalized term not defined herein is used as defined in the CEO Employment Agreement. If Dr. Missling’s employment is terminated by us without Cause, he is entitled to receive payments by us consisting of (i) reimbursement of any unpaid business expenses to which he is entitled to reimbursement that were incurred prior to the effective date of his termination, (ii) all vested compensation and benefits to which he is entitled as of the Termination Date, (iii) a severance payment consisting of the three times the sum of (a) his annual salary in effect at the time of termination and (b) the average of the annual Bonuses payable to him for the last three completed calendar years prior to the Termination Date, (iv) all outstanding and unvested stock options and all options previously vested will become and remain exercisable for no less than three years from the Termination Date; (v) all of his unvested and outstanding restricted stock, restricted stock units or other equity awards that are unvested and outstanding as of the Termination Date shall vest and be settled within ten business days after the Termination Date, (vi) life insurance coverage until the end of the term of the CEO Employment Agreement; and (vii) continued participation in all medical, dental and hospitalization benefits plans or programs for Dr. Missling and his eligible dependents for 36 months or until he receives similar benefits at a new employer, at his sole cost. If Dr. Missling’s employment is terminated by him for Good Reason, he is entitled to receive the same as the above, however the severance payment will consist of three times his annual salary in effect at the time of termination and two times the average annual Bonuses payable to him for the last three completed calendar years prior to the Termination Date.

If Dr. Missling was terminated by the Company without cause on September 30, 2023, he would have been entitled to a severance payment of $2,444,750. If Dr. Missling terminated his employment for Good Reason on September 30, 2023, he would have been entitled to a severance payment of $2,329,800.

Our CFO Employment Agreement with Ms. Boenisch contains provisions regarding our obligations upon her termination. Any capitalized term not defined herein is used as defined in the CFO Employment Agreement. Under the CFO Employment Agreement, if Ms. Boenisch is terminated without Cause, the Company shall pay Ms. Boenisch severance compensation equal to six months base salary payable by the Company for the six-month period following the Termination. In addition, the Company must provide Ms. Boenisch thirty (30) day notice of her Termination. If the Company opts to have Ms. Boenisch cease providing services to the Company prior to the expiration of the thirty (30) day notice-period (the “Notice Period”), Ms. Boenisch shall receive the Compensation and Benefits for the full length of the Notice Period as if such period was not waived. In addition, any unvested stock options or stock awards vesting in the contract year of Termination held by Ms. Boenisch as of the Date of Termination shall immediately vest.

If Ms. Boenisch was terminated by the Company without cause on September 30, 2023, she would have been entitled to continued salary payments equal to $97,890 in total.

The following table presents accelerated vesting for certain equity awards outstanding at the time of the executive’s termination for each named executive officer, if employment were terminated by either the Company without cause or by Dr. Missling for good reason on September 30, 2023:

(1) Estimated benefit based on the closing stock price of $6.55 at September 30, 2023.

(2) Ms. Boenisch’s unvested stock options at September 30, 2023 all contained performance based vesting conditions, therefore such options would not automatically vest upon Termination.

Potential Payments Upon Change in Control

If the Company is subject to a Change in Control, then the CEO Employment Agreement and the CFO Employment Agreement provide that all previously granted but unvested stock options held by Dr. Missling and Ms. Boenisch shall vest.

The following table presents accelerated vesting for certain equity awards outstanding to the Named Executive Officer, if a change in control had occurred at September 30, 2023:

(1) Estimated benefit based on the closing stock price of $6.55 at September 30, 2023.

For a complete description of these terms and conditions please refer to the CEO Employment Agreement and CFO Employment Agreement (and their amendments) filed as exhibits to the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Commitment to Corporate Responsibility

Anavex is committed to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues.

Environmental Factors: As we continue to expand our operations, we consider our environmental impact, and where feasible, have taken measures to increase our sustainability efforts. Some of our efforts include remote monitoring of vendors, staff and patients, where appropriate, and engagement of local consultants or vendors to oversee projects in foreign jurisdictions. As well, we are always committed to reducing waste within our supply chain, wherever possible.

Social Factors: Our mission is to discover, develop and deliver innovative therapeutics in areas of unmet medical need that improve people’s lives. We aim to accomplish our mission through the collective efforts of talented individuals who work together to advance scientific research. At Anavex, we place a premium on integrity, respect and collaboration. These values have helped us to build a growing company that offers professionally rewarding careers with the opportunity to make a meaningful contribution to people in need. We provide our employees with competitive salaries and bonuses, opportunities for equity ownership, development programs that enable continued learning and growth and a robust employment package that promotes well-being across all aspects of their lives. In addition to salaries, these programs include potential annual discretionary bonuses, stock option awards, a 401(k) plan, healthcare and insurance benefits, paid time off, family leave, and flexible work schedules, among other benefits.

Diversity and Inclusion: Anavex is an equal opportunity employer, and we are committed to building a diverse workforce. We consider all qualified applicants for employment without regard to age, race, color, sex, religion/creed, national origin, marital status, ancestry, citizenship, military, reservist or veteran status, pregnancy, sexual orientation or preference, gender identity, gender expression, physical or mental disability, genetic predisposition or carrier status, or any other category protected under applicable federal, state or local law. As of September 30, 2023, women made up approximately 45% of our workforce and visible or other minorities made up approximately 35% of our workforce across all areas of the Company including management. As of September 30, 2023, our employee pool includes several members who identify as a member of an underrepresented racial or other minority group.

Ethics and Corporate Governance: We aspire to maintain the highest ethical standards. All of our employees are required to adhere to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which provides, among other things, that all of our employees, officers and directors must (i) act with integrity and observe the highest ethical standards of business conduct in his or her dealings with our customers, suppliers, partners, service providers, competitors, employees and anyone else with whom he or she has contact in the course of performing his or her job, and (ii) conduct relationships with colleagues and business relationships with competitors, suppliers and customers free of any discrimination, including based on race, color, creed, religion, age, gender, sex, sexual preference, national origin, marital status, veteran status, handicap or disability.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of April 26, 2024, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and by each of our current directors and our named executive officers and by our current directors and executive officers as a group. We have determined the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by such person in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose.

*Less than 1%

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent (10%) of our outstanding common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with all copies of Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on our review of the forms furnished to us and written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock were complied with in fiscal year 2023.

FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder proposals may be included in our proxy statement for an annual meeting so long as they are provided to us on a timely basis and satisfy the other conditions set forth in SEC regulations under Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. To have a proposal intended to be presented at our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting, a stockholder must deliver written notice of such proposal in writing to the Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters no later than January 6, 2025, which is 120 days before the anniversary of the filing date of this proxy (unless the date of the 2025 annual meeting of Stockholders is not within thirty (30) days of June 18, 2025, in which case the proposal must be received no later than a reasonable period of time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials for our 2025 annual meeting). Such proposal must also comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the Commission for such a proposal to be included in the proxy statement. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.

NO DISSENTERS’ RIGHTS

Under the Nevada Revised Statutes, our holders of Common Stock are not entitled to dissenters’ rights with respect to any of the Proposals, and we will not independently provide such holders with any such right.

CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT

Our Board adopted a code of business ethics and conduct (the “Code of Ethics”), applicable to all of our executives, directors and employees. The Code of Ethics is available in print to any stockholder that requests a copy. Copies may be obtained by contacting Investor Relations at our corporate headquarters. Our Code of Ethics is also available on our website at www.anavex.com/corporate-governance. We intend to make any disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Business Conduct required under Form 8-K by posting such information on our website.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Our Code of Business Conduct and the Audit Committee Charter, each available on our website at www.anavex.com/corporate-governance, set forth our policies and procedures for the review and approval of transactions with related persons, including transactions that would be required to be disclosed in this proxy in accordance with SEC rules.

In circumstances where one of our directors or executive officers, or a family member, has a direct or indirect material interest in a transaction with the Company, our Corporate Governance Committee must review and approve all such proposed transactions. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction with a related person, among the factors the Audit Committee may consider (as applicable) are: the business purpose for entering into the transaction, the size and terms of the transaction; the availability of alternative sources of comparable products or services, whether the transaction could impair the judgment of the related person in performing his or her duties, whether the transaction would be consistent with Nasdaq’s requirements for independent directors, and any other factors the Audit Committee deems relevant.

There have been no transactions, since October 1, 2022, or currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of the following persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

OTHER MATTERS

We know of no other matters to be submitted to the stockholders at the 2024 Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the stockholders at the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote the shares they represent in their discretion.

2024 MEETING PROXY MATERIALS AND RESULTS

Copies of this proxy statement and proxy materials ancillary hereto will be available on our website at www.anavex.com and at https://viewproxy.com/Anavex/2024. We intend to publish final results from the 2024 Meeting in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the Commission within four (4) business days from the 2024 Meeting, or as amended thereafter. You may obtain a copy of this and other reports free of charge at or the Commission at (800) 732-0330 or https://www.sec.gov.

DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS

To reduce costs and reduce the environmental impact of our 2024 Annual Meeting, we have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC known as “householding,” which is available to both registered stockholders and beneficial owners of shares held in street name. Only one proxy statement is being or shall be delivered to two (2) or more stockholders who share an address, unless the Company has received contrary instruction from one (1) or more of such stockholders. The Company will promptly deliver, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered. If you would like to request additional copies of the proxy statement, or if in the future you would like to receive multiple copies of information or proxy statements, or annual reports, or, if you are currently receiving multiple copies of these documents and would, in the future, like to receive only a single copy, please so instruct the Company by writing to us at 630 Fifth Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10111 Attention: Christopher Missling, PhD or telephoning us at 844.689.3939.