As previously disclosed, on February 29, 2024, Everbridge, Inc. (“Everbridge” or the “Company”) entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (“A&R Merger Agreement”), by and among Everbridge, Project Emerson Parent, LLC (“Parent”) and Project Emerson Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), which amends and restates the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 4, 2024, by and among Everbridge, Parent and Merger Sub, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Everbridge (the “Merger”), with Everbridge continuing as the surviving corporation of the Merger and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. Parent and Merger Sub are affiliates of Thoma Bravo Discover Fund IV, L.P., an investment fund managed by Thoma Bravo, L.P.
The Company filed a definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 21, 2024, in connection with, among other things, the A&R Merger Agreement. Qatalyst Partners LP (“Qatalyst Partners”) served as financial advisor to the Company.
Certain Litigation
Following the announcement of the Merger, four complaints have been filed in federal courts in New York and Delaware and a state court in Massachusetts by purported stockholders against, among others, Everbridge and its Board of Directors (the “Board”) in connection with the Merger: Quagliani v. Everbridge, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-02223 (S.D.N.Y. filed March 25, 2024); Finger v. Everbridge, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00414 (D. Del. filed April 2, 2024); and Scott v. Everbridge, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00415 (D. Del. filed April 2, 2024) (collectively, the “Federal Merger Actions”) and Lacoff v. Everbridge, Inc., et al., Case No. 24-cv-815 (the “State Court Action” and, collectively with the Federal Merger Actions, the “Merger Actions”). Each of the Federal Merger Actions assert that the Proxy Statement omitted certain allegedly material information regarding, among other things, the background of the Merger, and Everbridge’s financial projections and Qatalyst Partners’ financial analyses in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 14a-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, rendering the Proxy Statement false and misleading. The State Court Action purports to allege misrepresentation claims under Massachusetts common law relating to the Proxy Statement. The plaintiffs in the Merger Actions seek, among other things, an injunction enjoining consummation of the Merger, rescission of the Merger if consummated, costs of the action, including attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees and expenses, and an order directing the filing of a proxy statement that does not contain any untrue statements of material fact.
As previously disclosed in the Proxy Statement, the Company also received demands on behalf of purported stockholders alleging that the Proxy Statement omitted certain purportedly material information.
While the Company believes that the disclosures set forth in the Proxy Statement comply fully with all applicable law and denies the allegations in the Merger Actions, in order to moot plaintiffs’ disclosure claims, avoid nuisance and possible expense and business delays, and provide additional information to its stockholders, the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement certain disclosures in the Proxy Statement related to plaintiffs’ claims with the supplemental disclosures set forth below (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal merit, necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, the Company specifically denies all allegations that any additional disclosure was or is required or material.
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
The Supplemental Disclosures should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety, including the cautionary notes regarding the risks and limitations associated with relying on prospective financial information. The inclusion in the Supplemental Disclosures to the Proxy Statement of certain summary unaudited prospective financial information should not be regarded as an indication that any of the Company, Parent or their respective affiliates, officers, directors or other representatives, or any other recipient of this information, considered, or now considers, it to be material or to be reliably predictive of actual future results, and the unaudited prospective financial information should not be relied upon as such. To the extent defined terms are used but not defined herein, they have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement.