Nexalin Technology (NXL) S-1/AIPO registration (amended)

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 15, 2022

Registration No. 333-261989

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

PRE-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Nexalin Technology, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1776 Yorktown, Suite 550

Houston, TX 77056

(713) 660-1100

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Mark White

Chief Executive Officer

Nexalin Technology, Inc.

1776 Yorktown, Suite 550

Houston, TX 77056

(713) 660-1100

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ☐

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company.

See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☒

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment that specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 2022

NEXALIN TECHNOLOGY, INC.

1,500,000 Units

This is a firm commitment initial public offering of our securities. We are offering 1,500,000 units at an anticipate offering price of between $6.00 and $7.00 per unit. Each unit is comprised of one share of our common stock and a redeemable warrant to acquire one share of common stock. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at a price equal to 115% of the offering price of the units, subject to adjustment as described elsewhere in this prospectus. Each warrant is immediately exercisable for a period of three (3) years or earlier upon redemption. Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our securities.

The offering price of the Units will be determined between us and Maxim Group LLC, the representative of the underwriters in connection with this offering, taking into consideration our historical performance and capital structure, prevailing market conditions, our future and intended business opportunities and potential market opportunities for our products and services. Therefore, the assumed public offering price of the Units used throughout this prospectus of $6.00 may not be indicative of the actual public offering price for our Units. In order to satisfy Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards, we will not complete the offering unless we have received gross proceeds equal to at least $9,600,000 and such proceeds will not represent less than 25% of post-closing market value of the listed securities. The number of units. shares and warrants being offered may therefore change based upon the final offering price within the anticipated range (or any different price that may be allowed pursuant to Rule 430 of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations).

The units have no stand-alone rights and will not be certificated or issued as stand-alone securities. The shares of common stock and the warrants comprising the units are immediately separable and will be issued separately in this offering but must be purchased together as a unit. We have applied to list our shares of common stock and warrants on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols, “NXL” and “NXLIW”.

We are an “emerging growth company” under the federal securities laws and, as such, have elected to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements for this prospectus and future filings. See the section titled “Prospectus Summary — Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company and a Smaller Reporting Company.”

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Before buying any shares, you should carefully read the discussion of the material risks of investing in our securities under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16 of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, any state securities commission, nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Our company is headquartered in Houston, Texas. In September 2018, we entered into an agreement with Wider Come Limited, a company formed under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“Wider”), pursuant to which we and Wider have agreed to form a joint venture entity to be domiciled in Hong Kong (the “potential Joint Venture”) to conduct a portion of our clinical research and implement a business distribution plan for our devices in China, Macau, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. We do not have any operations in China other than those which will be conducted through the potential Joint Venture when it is formed, as more fully detailed herein. As of the date of this prospectus, (i) our operations are carried on outside of China; and (ii) the potential Joint Venture does not maintain any variable interest entity structure or operate any data center in China. However, as a result of the intended formation of the potential Joint Venture, we may become subject to laws of The People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) relating to, among other topics, data security and restrictions over foreign investments. Further, as a result of the complexity and vagaries of the legal system in the PRC and recent statements and regulatory actions by the PRC government relating to data security, our ability to operate the potential Joint Venture may be adversely affected or subject to change and adversely impact our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, with the result that our securities may significantly decline or be worthless. We have not obtained the approval from either the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”) or the Cyberspace Administration of China (the “CAC”) for any offering we may make under this prospectus, and we do not intend to obtain the approval from either the CSRC or the CAC in connection with any such offering, since we do not believe that such approval is required under these circumstances or at the present time. There can be no assurance, however, that regulators in China will not take a contrary view or will not subsequently require us to undergo the approval procedures and subject us to penalties for non-compliance.

When and if the Joint Venture is formed and Wider completes sales of our devices in China on behalf of the potential Joint Venture, we believe that there are no regulatory or other restrictions that would restrict either (i) the transfer from China of any proceeds resulting from such sales by Wider to the potential Joint Venture in Hong Kong, other than standard compliance with China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) policies and approval process, as further detailed on page 5 and elsewhere in this prospectus, or (ii) our receipt of our share of such proceeds from Hong Kong to us in the United States, which is not subject to SAFE’s policies and approval process. The Company does not currently believe any of the Company’s scientific data resulting from activities in China by the potential Joint Venture would come fall within the Measures for the Management of Scientific Data promulgated by the General Office of the PRC State Council. We expect to consummate the formation of the potential Joint Venture by the third quarter of 2023. In the event any existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations are modified or promulgated, we and the potential Joint Venture will take all actions to remain in compliance with any such laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations thereof.

In the first quarter of 2022, we had sales of our Gen -2 devices in China which we accomplished through Wider which acted as a distributor of these devices. Our Gen-2 devices have been approved for sales and marketing in China by the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), the equivalent of the United States FDA, for the treatment of insomnia and depression. Wider has agreed to act as a distributor on a limited basis until the potential Joint Venture is established.

Recent statements and regulatory actions by the Chinese government have targeted those companies whose operations involves cross-border data security or anti-monopoly concerns. With regard to data security, China has promulgated several important laws recently. Among them, on June 10, 2021, China promulgated the PRC Data Security Law (“DSL”), which became effective on September 1, 2021. The legislative intent for this law mainly includes regulating data processing activities, ensuring data security, promoting data development and utilization, protecting the data related legitimate rights and interests of individuals and organizations, and safeguarding national sovereignty, security and development interests. Article 36 provides that any Chinese entity that provides the data to foreign judicial or law enforcement agencies (regardless of whether directly or through a foreign entity) without approval from the Chinese authority would likely be deemed to be in violation of DSL. In addition, pursuant to Article 2 of Measures for Cybersecurity Reviews, the procurement of any network product or service by an operator of critical information infrastructure that affects or may affect national security shall be subjected to a cybersecurity review under the Measures. Pursuant to Article 35 of Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China, where “critical information infrastructure operators” purchase network products and services, which may influence national security, the operators are required to be subjected to a cybersecurity review. We do not operate any critical information infrastructure. As a result, we do not believe that these new legal requirements in China are applicable to us, including sales made to date by Wider as a distributor. However, the exact scope of the term “critical information infrastructure operator” remains unclear, so there can be no assurance that the potential Joint Venture when formed will not be subjected to critical information infrastructure operator review in the future. Furthermore, in the event that the potential Joint Venture becomes an operator of critical information infrastructure in the future it may be subjected to the above-described regulation.

With regard to anti-monopoly concerns, Article 3 of Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China prohibits “monopolistic practices,” which include: a) the conclusion of monopoly agreements between operators; b) the abuse of dominant market position by operators; c) concentration of undertakings which has or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting market competition. Also, according to Article 19, the operator(s) will be assumed to have a dominant market position if it has following situation: a) an operator has 50% or higher market share in a relevant market; b) two operators have 66% or higher market share in a relevant market; c) three operators have 75% or higher market share in a relevant market. We believe that we have not conducted any monopolistic practices in China, and that recent statements and regulatory actions by the Chinese government do not impact our ability to conduct business, accept foreign investments, or list on a U.S. or other foreign stock exchange. However, there can be no assurance that regulators in China will not promulgate new laws and regulations or adopt new series of interpretations or regulatory actions which may require the potential Joint Venture to meet new requirements on the issues mentioned above.

Currently, these statements and regulatory actions of China authorities have had no impact on our daily business operation, including the sales and marketing efforts made to date of our Gen-2 devices in China through Wider. We do not believe that these statements and regulatory actions will have any impact on the potential Joint Venture when it is formed. Further, we are a United States’ company with no physical presence in China, and we do not believe that the formation of the potential Joint Venture in Hong Kong and any resultant exposure to China regulatory actions will adversely impact our ability to accept foreign investments or list our securities on a United States or other foreign exchange. However, since these statements and regulatory actions from China authorities are relatively recent, it is highly uncertain how soon legislative or administrative regulation making bodies will respond and what existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations will be modified or promulgated, if any, and the potential impact such modified or new laws and regulations will have on our daily business operation, the ability to accept foreign investments and list our securities on a United States or other foreign exchange. In the event any existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations are modified or promulgated, we and the potential Joint Venture will take any and all actions to remain in compliance with any such laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations thereof. See “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China.”

The following table sets forth the expected proceeds from this offering, assuming an offering price at the minimum of the proposed price range of the units:

We have granted the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to 225,000 additional units from us to cover over- allotments at the initial public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions. If the underwriters exercise the option in full, the total underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us will be $828,000 and the total proceeds to us, before expenses, will be $9,522,000.

The underwriters are offering the units on a firm commitment basis. Maxim Group LLC, acting as the representative of the underwriters, expects to deliver the securities on or about September [●], 2022.

Sole Book-Running Manager

Maxim Group LLC

The date of this prospectus is September 15, 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Neither we nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from, or in addition to, that contained in this prospectus, any amendment or supplement to this perspective or any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you, and neither we nor the underwriters take responsibility for, and can provide no assurances as to the reliability of, any other information others may give you. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, our securities only in jurisdictions where such offers and sales are permitted. The information in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus is accurate only as of its date, regardless of its time of delivery or the time of any sale of our securities. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects may have changed since that date.

For investors outside of the United States: Neither we nor any of the underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus or any free writing prospectus we may provide to you in connection with this offering in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus are required to inform themselves about, and to observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of our securities and the distribution of this prospectus and any such free writing prospectus outside of the United States.

Amendment Number 9 Filing Note: We have made this pre-effective filing of Amendment Number 9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 solely to indicate that in order to satisfy Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards, we will not complete the offering unless we have received gross proceeds equal to at least $9,600,000 and such proceeds will not represent less than 25% of post-closing market value of the listed securities. The number of units, shares and warrants being offered may therefore change based upon the final offering price of the units within the anticipated range (or any different price that may be allowed pursuant to Rule 430 of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations). We are including in this Amendment the following sections of the Registration Statement:

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock is speculative and involves a high degree of risk including the risk of a loss of your entire investment. Before you invest in our common stock, you should carefully consider the following risk factors. These risk factors contain, in addition to historical information, forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. The occurrence of any of the adverse developments described in the following risk factors and in the documents incorporated herein by reference could materially and adversely harm our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. In such event, the value of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or a substantial portion of the money that you pay for our common stock. In addition, the risks and uncertainties discussed below are not the only ones we face. Our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could also be harmed by risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material, and these risks and uncertainties could result in a complete loss of your investment. In assessing the risks and uncertainties described below, you should also refer to the other information contained in this prospectus (as supplemented or amended).

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Capital Needs

We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to incur losses over the next several years and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

We are a Delaware corporation with a limited operating history. We have funded our operations to date primarily with proceeds from the sale of our stock. We have had only limited sales to date.

We have devoted substantially all our financial resources and efforts to research and development, including preclinical studies and clinical trials. We are still in the early stages of development of our products.

We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses over the next several years. Our net losses may fluctuate substantially from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our expenses will increase significantly as we:

To become and remain profitable, we and our collaborators must succeed in developing and eventually commercializing future and existing products that generate significant revenue. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including completing preclinical studies and clinical trials of our products and preclinical program, obtaining regulatory approval, manufacturing, marketing and selling any products for which we may obtain regulatory approval, as well as discovering and developing additional products. Again, we are only in the preliminary stages of most of these activities. We may never succeed in these activities and, even if we do, may never generate revenues that are significant enough to achieve profitability.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of expenses or when, or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. If we are required by regulatory authorities to perform studies in addition to those currently expected, or if there are any delays in the initiation and completion of our clinical trials or the development of any of our products, our expenses could increase.

Even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would depress the value of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, maintain our research and development efforts or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our common stock could also cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm included a “going concern” explanatory paragraph prior to this offering.

Our accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At June 30, 2022, we had a significant accumulated deficit of approximately $71.6 million and a working capital deficit of approximately $2.2 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2022, we had a loss from operations of approximately $0.82 million and negative cash flows from operations of approximately $0.37 million. The Company’s operating activities consume the majority of its cash resources and the limited revenue from sales. We will continue to promote our services to existing and potential customers but anticipate that we will continue to incur operating losses as we execute our development plans through 2023, as well as other potential strategic and business development initiatives. In addition, we have had and expect to have negative cash flows from operations, at least into the near future. The Company previously funded these losses primarily through the sale of equity and issuance of convertible notes. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan along with the net proceeds from this offering will enable the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in its viability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to further implement our business plan and raise additional funds through this offering or otherwise.

Although no assurances can be given as to our ability to deliver on our revenue plans or that unforeseen expenses may arise, management believes that the revenue to be generated from operations, together with the completion of this offering in the near term, will provide the necessary funding for us to continue as a going concern. Management cannot guarantee any future offering will be available on favorable terms or available at all. As such, these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of twelve months from the issue date of this filing. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, or at all, we will need to curtail operations or cease operations.

Our limited operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

We commenced active operations in 2010, and our operations to date have been largely focused on raising capital, identifying and developing our products and preclinical program, broadening our expertise in the development of our products and undertaking preclinical studies and conducting early-stage clinical trials. As a result of the FDA reclassification ruling in December 2019 described elsewhere in this prospectus, we had to suspend marketing of our Gen-1 medical device for the treatment of anxiety and insomnia. We are presently evaluating whether to proceed with amending our prior application with the FDA for the treatment of insomnia.

Although we have developed a second-Generation medical device, it has not completed regulatory filings with the FDA. Consequently, any predictions you make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.

We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known or unknown factors in achieving our business objectives. We will need to transition at some point from a company with a research and development focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities. We may not be successful in such a transition.

We expect our financial condition and operating results to continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, you should not rely upon the results of any quarterly or annual periods as indications of future operating performance.

We may require substantial additional funding to meet our financial needs and to pursue our business objectives. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or altogether cease our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

We are currently not cash flow positive and are not certain when and if we will be cash flow positive. While we believe that the net proceeds from this offering and the use of such net proceeds described elsewhere in this report will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements, we may still need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations and planned activities. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

Identifying potential products and conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to continue our regulatory approvals and achieve product sales. In addition, our products, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from sales of products that are cleared under FDA review. Accordingly, we will need to continue to rely on additional financing to achieve our business objectives. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or altogether cease our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, including purchasers of shares of our common stock in this offering, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or products.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through equity offerings. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a stockholder. Debt financing and equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may be required to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or products or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to a third party to develop and market products that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Risks Related to the Development of Our Products and Preclinical Program

We depend on the success of our future products, some of which are in clinical development but have not completed advanced clinical trials. If we lose our existing or cannot obtain future regulatory approval for and successfully commercialize one or more of our products or if we experience significant delays in doing so, we may never become profitable.

The success of our products and preclinical program will depend on several additional factors, including:

If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our products, which would harm our business.

Our products and product candidates may be subject to reclassification by the FDA, and a change in the classification may have an adverse impact on our revenues or our abilities to obtain necessary regulatory approvals.

Originally, our technology was cleared for the treatment of anxiety, depression and insomnia. Each treatment indication with this technology was classified as class III from a risk tolerance standpoint at the FDA. In December of 2019, the FDA passed a new ruling that separated anxiety and insomnia from the treatment of depression. CES devices that treat anxiety and insomnia were reclassified as class II medical devices and require special control trials to be initiated, as well as the filing of a new 510(k) application for previously approved devices. The FDA continued to classify the treatment of depression for cranial stimulation as a class III high risk device. In order to receive approval for treatment for depression, our devices will require a new pre-market application for this indication. We have decided not to pursue a depression indication for our Gen-1 device at such time.

Any further such reclassification by the FDA of an indication from a certain class of device to another during our development or post-commercialization for that indication could have a significant adverse impact due to the more rigorous and lengthy approval process required for a higher risk class medical device. Such a change in classification

can significantly increase development costs and prolong the time for development and approval, thus delaying revenues. A reclassification of an indication after approval from a certain class of device to another could result in a change in classification for reimbursement, and there could be a significant negative impact on our revenues relatedly.

Success in preclinical studies or clinical trials may not be indicative of results in future clinical trials.

Success in preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will generate the same results or otherwise provide adequate data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of a product candidate. Our products may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy in all clinical trials.

If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrolment of patients in clinical trials, our receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.

We may not be able to initiate, continue or complete clinical trials of any product candidate that we develop if we and our collaborators are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or other comparable regulatory authority. We have limited experience enrolling patients in our clinical trials and cannot predict how successful we will be in enrolling patients in future clinical trials.

Public health threats, including those related to the novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 (which causes the disease now called COVID-19), have had, and could continue to have an adverse effect on our operations.

Public health threats have, and could continue to, adversely affect our ongoing or planned research and development activities. In particular, SARS-CoV-2, which causes the disease now called COVID-19, was first reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China in December 2019, and has since spread globally, including to every state in the United States. On January 31, 2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a Public Health Emergency determination in response to the spread of COVID-19. A Public Health Emergency determination remains in effect for 90 days and can be renewed for additional 90-day periods, which the Secretary of HHS has since done multiple times. The outbreak of COVID-19 has severely impacted global economic activity and caused significant volatility and negative pressure in financial markets. The global impact of the outbreak has been rapidly evolving and many countries, including the United States, have reacted by instituting quarantines, mandating business and school closures and restricting travel. As a result, the COVID-19 pandemic is negatively impacting almost every industry directly or indirectly.

The COVID-19 pandemic has delayed our clinical trials and our receipt of marketing approvals from the FDA. Such pandemic also might have reduced, and continue to reduce, participation in our clinical trials, due to both travel restrictions and a general unwillingness of subjects to travel. We cannot presently predict the scope and severity of any other potential business shutdowns or disruptions, but if we or any of the third parties with whom we engage, including the suppliers, clinical trial sites, regulators and other third parties with whom we conduct business, were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, our ability to conduct our business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could be materially and negatively impacted.

Relatedly, the spread of an infectious disease, including COVID-19, may also result in the inability of our suppliers to deliver components or raw materials on a timely basis. Such events may result in a period of business and manufacturing disruption, and in reduced operations, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

We rely on third parties to conduct the clinical trials for our products, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such trials or failing to comply with applicable regulatory requirements.

We rely on third parties, such as research institutions, to conduct our clinical trials. Our reliance upon research institutions, including hospitals, clinics and academics, provides us with less control over the timing and cost of clinical trials and the ability to recruit subjects. If we are unable to reach agreement with suitable research institutions on acceptable terms, or if any resulting agreement is terminated, we may be unable to quickly replace

the research institution with another qualified institution on acceptable terms. Even if we do replace the institution, we may incur additional costs to conduct the trial at the new institution. We may not be able to secure and maintain suitable research institutions to conduct our clinical trials.

We rely on a collaboration with a third party for the quality assurance of our products, and we may seek additional collaborations in the future. If those collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to capitalize on the market potential of these products.

We are a party to a quality assurance agreement with a third party for the quality assurance of our products and may enter into additional collaborations in the future. We are dependent upon the success of our current and any future collaborators in performing their responsibilities in connection with the relevant collaboration. If we fail to maintain these collaborative relationships for any reason, we would need to perform the activities that we currently anticipate would be performed by our collaborators on our own at our sole expense. This could substantially increase our capital needs, and we may not have the capability or financial capacity to undertake these activities on our own, or we may not be able to find other collaborators on acceptable terms, or at all. This may limit the programs we are able to pursue and result in significant delays in the development, sale and manufacture of our product candidates and products, and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our dependence upon our current and potential future collaborations exposes us to a number of risks, including that our collaborators (i) may fail to cooperate or perform their contractual obligations, including financial obligations, (ii) may choose to undertake differing business strategies or pursue alternative technologies or (iii) may take an opposing view regarding ownership of clinical trial results or intellectual property.

Due to these factors and other possible events, we could suffer delays in the research, development or commercialization of our product candidates and future products or we may become involved in litigation or arbitration, which could be time consuming and expensive. We additionally may be compelled to split revenue with our collaborators, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Risks Related to the Commercialization of Our Products

Even if any of our products receives marketing approval, it may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by healthcare providers, physicians, clinicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.

The degree of market acceptance of our products, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:

Any failure by any of our existing or future products that obtain regulatory approval to achieve market acceptance or commercial success would have a material adverse effect on our business prospects.

We may eventually compete for product sales with other companies, many of which will have greater resources or capabilities than we have, or may succeed in developing better products or in developing products more quickly than we do, and we may not compete successfully with them.

Our industry is competitive and has been evolving rapidly with not only existing treatment options, but also the introduction of new technologies and products as well as the market activities of industry participants. We compete or may eventually compete with other companies and organizations that are marketing or developing therapies for our targeted disease indications, based on traditional pharmaceutical, medical device, or other neurostimulation therapy and technologies.

We also face competition in the neurostimulation field from academic institutions and governmental agencies. Many of our current and potential competitors have greater financial and human resources than we have, including more experience in research and development and more established sales, marketing and distribution capabilities.

We anticipate that competition in our industry will increase. In addition, the health care industry is characterized by rapid technological change, resulting in new product introductions and other technological advancements. Our competitors may develop and market products that render product candidates now or under development by us in the future, or any products manufactured or marketed by us, non-competitive or otherwise obsolete.

Coverage and adequate reimbursement may not be available for our current or any future products, which could make it difficult for us to sell profitably, if approved.

Market acceptance and sales of any products that we commercialize, if approved, will depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from third-party payors, including government health administration authorities, managed care organizations and other private health insurers. Third-party payors decide which therapies they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own coverage and reimbursement policies. However, decisions regarding the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided for any products that we develop will be made on a payor-by-payor basis. One payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage and adequate reimbursement for the product. Additionally, a third-party payor’s decision to provide coverage for a therapy does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Each payor determines whether it will provide coverage for a therapy, what amount it will pay for the therapy and on what tier of its list of covered products, or formulary, it will be placed. The position on a payor’s formulary, generally determines the co-payment that a patient will need to make to obtain the therapy and can strongly influence the adoption of such therapy by patients and physicians. Patients who are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers prescribing such services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Patients are unlikely to use our products, and providers are unlikely to prescribe our products, unless coverage is provided, and reimbursement is adequate to cover a significant portion of the cost of our products and their administration.

A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and limited reimbursement for medications and certain treatments utilizing digital technologies. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any product that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be. Inadequate coverage and reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any product for which we obtain marketing approval. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our current and any future products that we develop.

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.

We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our products in human clinical trials and will face an even greater risk if we commercially sell any products that we may develop. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our products or products caused injuries, we will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

We currently hold $1 million in product liability insurance coverage in the aggregate, with a per incident limit of $1 million, which may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. We may need to increase our insurance coverage as we expand our clinical trials or if we commence commercialization of our products. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise.

Risks Related to Our Business and Managing Our Growth

Our future success depends on our ability to retain key executives and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and clinical personnel and, if we progress the development of any of our products, commercialization, manufacturing and sales and marketing personnel, will be critical to our success. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees could impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives and seriously harm our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Furthermore, replacing executive officers and key employees may be difficult and may take an extended period because of the limited number of individuals in our industry with the breadth of skills and experience required to successfully develop, gain regulatory approval of and commercialize our products. Competition to hire from this limited pool is intense, and we may be unable to hire, train, retain or motivate these key personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous companies for similar personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of scientific and clinical personnel from universities and research institutions. In addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our consultants and advisors may have commitments under consulting or advisory contracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, our ability to pursue our growth strategy will be limited.

We expect to expand our development and regulatory capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

As of August 22, 2022, we had three full-time employees and ten part time employees and consultants. As the clinical development of our products progresses, we also expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of research, product development and regulatory affairs, including a sales and marketing team for our existing products. To manage our anticipated future

growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

Significant disruptions of our information technology systems or data security incidents could result in significant financial, legal, regulatory, business and reputational harm to us.

We are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure, including mobile technologies, to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store, process and transmit large amounts of sensitive information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, personal information and other confidential information. It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availability of such sensitive information. We have also outsourced elements of our operations, including elements of our information technology infrastructure, to third parties and, as a result, we manage a number of third-party vendors who may or could have access to our computer networks or our confidential information. In addition, many of those third parties in turn subcontract or outsource some of their responsibilities to other third parties. While all information technology operations are inherently vulnerable to inadvertent or intentional security breaches, incidents, attacks and exposures, the accessibility and distributed nature of our information technology systems, and the sensitive information stored on those systems, make such systems potentially vulnerable to unintentional or malicious, internal and external attacks on our technology environment. Potential vulnerabilities can be exploited from inadvertent or intentional actions of our employees, third-party vendors, or business partners or by malicious third parties. Attacks of this nature are increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence, sophistication and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives (including industrial espionage) and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hacktivists,” nation states and others. In addition to the extraction of sensitive information, such attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information. In addition, the prevalent use of mobile devices increases the risk of data security incidents.

Significant disruptions of our third-party vendors’ information technology systems or other similar data security incidents could adversely affect our business operations and result in the loss, misappropriation and unauthorized access, use or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, sensitive information, which could result in financial, legal, regulatory, business and reputational harm to us. In addition, information technology system disruptions, whether from attacks on our technology environment or from computer viruses, natural disasters, terrorism, war or telecommunication and electrical failures, could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data.

There is no way of knowing with certainty whether we have experienced any data security incidents that have not been discovered. While we have no reason to believe this to be the case, attackers have become very sophisticated in the way they conceal access to systems, and many companies that have been attacked are not aware that they have been attacked. Any event that leads to unauthorized access, use or disclosure of personal information, including personal information regarding our patients or employees, could disrupt our business, harm our reputation, compel us to comply with applicable federal and state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents, subject us to time-consuming, distracting and expensive litigation, regulatory investigation and oversight or mandatory corrective action, require us to verify the correctness of database contents or otherwise subject us to liability under laws, regulations and contractual obligations, including those that protect the privacy and security of personal information. This could result in increased costs to us, and result in significant legal and financial exposure and reputational harm. In addition, any failure or perceived failure by us or our vendors or business partners to comply with our privacy, confidentiality or data security-related legal or other obligations to third parties, or any further security incidents or other inappropriate access events that result in the unauthorized access, release or transfer of sensitive information, which could include personally identifiable information, may result in governmental investigations, enforcement actions, regulatory fines, litigation or public statements against us by advocacy groups or others, and could cause third parties, including clinical sites, regulators or current and potential partners, to lose trust in us, or we could be subject to claims by third parties that we have breached our privacy- or confidentiality-related obligations. Moreover, data security incidents and other inappropriate access can be difficult to detect, and any delay

in identifying them may lead to increased harm of the type described above. While we have implemented security measures intended to protect our information technology systems and infrastructure, there can be no assurance that such measures will successfully prevent service interruptions or security incidents.

If we engage in future acquisitions or strategic collaborations, this may increase our capital requirements, dilute our stockholders, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities and subject us to other risks.

From time to time, we may evaluate various acquisitions and strategic collaborations, including licensing or acquiring intellectual property rights, technologies or businesses, as deemed appropriate to carry out our business plan. Any potential acquisition or strategic collaboration may entail numerous risks, including:

We are subject to the risks of conducting business internationally.

On February 24, 2022, Russia launched an invasion in Ukraine which may increase the likelihood of supply interruptions and further hinder our ability to find the materials we need to make our products. Supply disruptions could make it harder for us to find favorable pricing and reliable sources for the materials we need, putting upward pressure on our costs and increasing the risk that we may be unable to acquire the materials and services we need to continue to make certain products.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

The medical industry in China is highly regulated and such regulations are subject to change which may affect approval and commercialization of our products.

A material portion of our research is expected to be conducted in China through the potential Joint Venture, which we believe confers clinical, commercial and regulatory advantages, but may subject the potential Joint Venture (and also potentially us) to significant regulatory, liquidity, and enforcement risks. The medical industry in China is subject to comprehensive government regulation and supervision, encompassing the approval, registration, manufacturing, packaging, licensing and marketing of new drugs. In recent years, the regulatory framework in China regarding the medical industry has undergone significant changes, and we expect that it will continue to undergo significant changes. Any such changes or amendments may result in increased compliance costs on our business or cause delays in or prevent the successful development or commercialization of our products in China and reduce the current benefits we believe are available to us from researching our products in China. The People’s Republic of China, or PRC, authorities have become increasingly vigilant in enforcing laws in the medical industry and any failure by us or our partners to maintain compliance with applicable laws and regulations or obtain and maintain required licenses and permits may result in the suspension or termination of our business activities in China. We believe our strategy and approach are aligned with the PRC government’s regulatory policies, but we cannot ensure that our strategy and approach will continue to be aligned. In the event that there are changes, we and the potential Joint Venture will take any and all actions to remain in compliance with any such laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations thereof.

There may be difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions in China against us based on foreign laws.

We expect to conduct a material portion of our research in China through the potential Joint Venture. Also, the potential Joint Venture will be formed under the laws of Hong Kong and is expected to be physically located in Hong Kong. Our partner, Wider, is located in China. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process upon the potential Joint Venture inside China. It may also be difficult to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against the potential Joint Venture. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the PRC would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against the potential Joint Venture predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state.

It may be difficult for us to enforce our rights with respect to the potential Joint Venture. The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other forms of written arrangement with the United States that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, the PRC courts will not enforce a foreign judgment by us against Wider or the potential Joint Venture if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security, or the public interest. As a result, it is uncertain whether and on what basis a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States.

It may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct investigations or collect evidence within China.

It may be difficult for you or overseas regulators, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other authorities of the United States, to conduct investigations or collect evidence within China. For example, in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to obtaining information, documents and materials needed for regulatory investigations or litigation outside China or otherwise with respect to foreign entities. Although the authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such regulatory cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the United States may not be efficient in the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC. Accordingly, without the consent of the competent PRC securities regulators and relevant authorities, no entity or individual may provide the documents and materials relating to securities business activities to overseas parties. While detailed interpretation of or implementing rules under Article 177 have yet to be promulgated, the inability for an overseas securities regulator to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within China may further increase difficulties faced by you in protecting your interests.

The PRC’s economic, political and social conditions, as well as governmental policies, could affect the business environment and financial markets in China, and our ability to operate our business, maintain our liquidity and keep our access to capital.

We expect that a portion of our operations will be conducted in China through the potential Joint Venture. Accordingly, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by economic, political, legal and social conditions in China. China’s economy differs from the economies of developed countries in many respects, including with respect to the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth over the past thirty years, growth has been uneven across different regions and among various economic sectors of China. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic development and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the overall PRC economy but may have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are currently applicable to us. In addition, in the past the PRC government implemented certain measures, including interest rate increases, to control

the pace of economic growth. These measures may cause decreased economic activity in China, which may adversely affect our business and results of operation. More generally, if the business environment in China deteriorates from the perspective of domestic or international investment, our business in China may also be adversely affected.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions under the civil law system may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value.

In 1979, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and regulations governing economic matters in general. The overall effect of legislation over the past four decades has significantly enhanced the protection afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, China has not developed a fully integrated legal system, and recently enacted laws and regulations may not sufficiently cover all aspects of economic activities in China. In particular, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory provisions and contractual terms, it may be difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy. These uncertainties may affect our judgment on the relevance of legal requirements and our ability to enforce our contractual rights or tort claims. In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited or frivolous legal actions or threats in attempts to extract payments or benefits from us.

In addition, any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

In May 2019, the Cyberspace Administration of China (“CAC”) issued strict guidelines for the collection and use of data by operators in China. At this time, Wider does not share any data from any hospital setting or research setting with Nexalin and Nexalin does not share any data from any hospital setting or research setting with Wider. All clinical data, patient data, provider data associated with China and the U.S. do not affect the design or statistical interpretation of preclinical or clinical studies in either country.

Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of Chinese laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to us.

The PRC legal system is based on written statutes and prior court decisions have limited value as precedents. Since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues to rapidly evolve, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties.

From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights, most notably our rights with respect to the potential Joint Venture. However, since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules. As a result, we may not be able to keep ourselves updated with these policies and rules in time. Such uncertainties, including uncertainty over the scope and effect of our contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights, could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.

Restrictions on foreign currency may limit our ability to receive and use our revenue effectively.

The PRC government imposes controls on the conversion of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of foreign currency out of China. To date, the payments we have received from Wider have been in United States dollars, although in the future, payments from Wider or from the potential Joint Venture may be in Renminbi. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval of SAFE, by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, we would need to obtain approval from SAFE to use cash generated from our

operations to pay off any debt in a currency other than Renminbi owed to entities outside China, or to make other capital expenditure payments outside China in a currency other than Renminbi. The PRC government may restrict access to foreign currencies for current account transactions in the future. The foreign exchange control system could prevent us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands.

Fluctuation in exchange rates could have a negative effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions in China and by China’s foreign exchange policies. Since June 2010, the Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. On November 30, 2015, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, completed the regular five-year review of the basket of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right, or the SDR, and decided that with effect from October 1, 2016, the Renminbi is determined to be a freely usable currency and will be included in the SDR basket as a fifth currency, along with the U.S. dollar, the euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. Since the fourth quarter of 2016, the Renminbi has depreciated significantly in the backdrop of a surging U.S. dollar and persistent capital outflows of China. With the development of the foreign exchange market and progress toward interest rate liberalization and Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future announce further changes to the exchange rate system, and we cannot assure you that the Renminbi will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future.

Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency or to convert foreign currency into Renminbi.

The approval of the CSRC, and other compliance procedures may be required in connection with any offering we may make and, if required, we cannot predict whether we will be able to obtain such approval.

We do not have any operations in China and will not have any operations other than the potential Joint Venture following its formation. As of the date of this prospectus, (i) our business operations are carried on outside of China; and (ii) we do not maintain any variable interest entity structure or operate any data center in China. We do not believe that sales of our devices to Wider to date constitute doing business in China. We may still be subject to PRC laws relating to, among others, data security and restrictions over foreign investments due to the complexity of the regulatory regime in China, and the recent statements and regulatory actions by the PRC government relating to data security may affect our business operations in China or even our ability to offer securities in the United States. Our securities are not being offered or sold directly or indirectly in China to or for the benefit of, legal or natural persons of the PRC. Therefore, we have not obtained the approval from either the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”) or the Cyberspace Administration of China (the “CAC”) for any offering we may make under this prospectus and any applicable prospectus supplement, and we do not intend to obtain the approval from either the CSRC or the CAC in connection with any such offering, since we do not believe that such approval is required under these circumstances. Under the PRC’s current legal system, Chinese citizens have the right to purchase securities publicly issued by overseas companies through legal channels and enjoy corresponding benefits of such ownership. Ownership of such securities does not require approval from the CSRC or the CAC.

On the website of the CSRC, the CSRC provides that in accordance with current laws and regulations, domestic Chinese residents can invest in overseas securities markets through legal channels such as purchasing qualified domestic institutional investor (QDII) fund product shares and participating in Shanghai Hong Kong stock transactions.

There can be no assurance however, that regulators in China will not take a contrary view or will not subsequently require us to undergo the approval procedures and subject us to penalties for non-compliance. The approval of the CSRC or the CAC, and other compliance procedures may be required in connection with any offering we may make and, if required, we cannot predict whether we will be able to obtain such approval.

Recent regulatory developments in China may subject the potential Joint Venture to additional regulatory review and disclosure requirement, expose the potential Joint Venture to government interference, or otherwise restrict our ability to offer securities and raise capital outside China, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and the value of our securities.

In light of the recent statements by the Chinese government indicating its intention to exert more oversight and control over overseas offerings of China-based companies and the proposed CAC review for certain data processing operators in China, we may adjust our business operations in the future, to comply with PRC laws regulating our industry and our business operations through the potential Joint Venture. However, such efforts may not be completed in a liability-free manner or at all. We cannot guarantee that we will not be subject to PRC regulatory inspection and/or review relating to cybersecurity, especially when there remains significant uncertainty as to the scope and manner of the regulatory enforcement. If the potential Joint Venture is subject to regulatory inspection and/or review by the CAC or other PRC authorities or are required by them to take any specific actions, it could cause suspension or termination of the future offering of our securities, disruptions to our operations, result in negative publicity regarding our company, and divert our managerial and financial resources. The potential Joint Venture may also be subject to fines or other penalties, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be subject to PRC laws relating to, among others, data security and restrictions over foreign investments in value-added telecommunications services and other industry sectors set out in the Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for the Access of Foreign Investment (2020 Edition). Specifically, we may be subject to PRC laws relating to the collection, use, sharing, retention, security, and transfer of confidential and private information, such as personal information and other data. These PRC laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between us and our wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China, and other parties with which we have commercial relations. These PRC laws and their interpretations and enforcement continue to develop and are subject to change, and the PRC government may adopt other rules and restrictions in the future. The recent regulatory developments in China, in particular with respect to restrictions on China-based companies raising capital offshore, and the government-led cybersecurity reviews of certain companies with VIE structure, may lead to additional regulatory review in China over our financing and capital raising activities in the United States. Pursuant to the PRC Cybersecurity Law, which was promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on November 7, 2016 and took effect on June 1, 2017, personal information and important data collected and generated by a critical information infrastructure operator in the course of its operations in China must be stored in China, and if a critical information infrastructure operator purchases internet products and services that affect or may affect national security, it should be subject to cybersecurity review by the CAC.

The PRC Cybersecurity Law also establishes more stringent requirements applicable to operators of computer networks, especially to operators of networks which involve critical information infrastructure. The PRC Cybersecurity Law contains an overarching framework for regulating Internet security, protection of private and sensitive information, and safeguards for national cyberspace security and provisions for the continued government regulation of the Internet and content available in China. The PRC Cybersecurity Law emphasizes requirements for network products, services, operations and information security, as well as monitoring, early detection, emergency response and reporting. Due to the lack of further interpretations, the exact scope of “critical information infrastructure operator” remains unclear.

On July 10, 2021, the CAC publicly issued the Cybersecurity Review Measures (the “Draft Measures”) for public comments until July 25, 2021. According to the Draft Measures, the scope of cybersecurity reviews is extended to data processing operators engaging in data processing activities that affect or may affect national security. The Draft Measures further requires that any operator applying for listing on a foreign exchange must go through cybersecurity review if it possesses personal information of more than one million users. According to the Draft Measures, a cybersecurity review assesses potential national security risk that may be brought about by any procurement, data processing, or overseas listing. The review focuses on several factors, including, among others, (1) the risk of theft, leakage, corruption, illegal use or export of any core or important data, or a large amount of personal information, and (2) the risk of any critical information infrastructure, core or important data, or a large amount of personal information being affected, controlled or maliciously exploited by a foreign government after a company is listed overseas. While the Draft Measures have been released for consultation purposes, there is still uncertainty regarding the final content of the Draft Measures, its adoption timeline or effective date, its final interpretation and implementation, and other aspects. Furthermore, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress passed

the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC (“PIPL”), which became effective November 1, 2021, and requires general network operators to obtain a personal information protection certification issued by recognized institutions in accordance with the CAC regulation before such information can be transferred out of China.

Additionally, the Company does not currently believe any of the Company’s scientific data resulting from activities in China to be conducted by the potential Joint Venture would fall within the Measures for the Management of Scientific Data promulgated by the General Office of the PRC State Council. Therefore, we do not believe the PRC would prevent us from seeking foreign approval and commercialization of our product candidates. In the event the potential Joint Venture becomes subject to cybersecurity inspection and/or review by the CAC or other PRC authorities or are required by them to take any specific actions, we and the potential Joint Venture will take any and all actions to remain in compliance with any such laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations thereof.

On July 30, 2021, in response to the recent regulatory developments in China and actions adopted by the PRC government, the Chairman of the SEC issued a statement requesting additional disclosures from offshore issuers with China-based operating companies before their registration statements will be declared effective, including detailed disclosure related to VIE structures and whether the VIE and the issuer, when applicable, received or were denied permission from the PRC authorities to list on U.S. exchanges and the risks that such approval could be denied or rescinded.

On August 1, 2021, the CSRC stated that it had taken note of the new disclosure requirements announced by the SEC regarding the listings of Chinese companies and the recent regulatory development in China, and that the securities regulators in both countries should strengthen communications on regulating China-related issuers. In light of our business operations, we should not be required to undergo the CAC review for any offering that we may make. However, if the enacted version of the Draft Measures mandates clearance of cybersecurity review and other specific actions to be completed by companies aiming to offer securities outside China, we cannot assure you that the PRC regulatory authorities will not take a contrary view or will not subsequently require us to undergo the approval procedures and subject us to penalties for non-compliance, or that if we are required to obtain such clearance, such clearance can be timely obtained, or at all. If the potential Joint Venture becomes subject to cybersecurity inspection and/or review by the CAC or other PRC authorities or are required by them to take any specific actions, it could cause suspension or termination of the future offering of our securities, including offerings under this registration statement, disruptions to our operations, result in negative publicity regarding our company, and divert our managerial and financial resources. We may also be subject to significant fines or other penalties, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In the event the potential Joint Venture becomes subject to cybersecurity inspection and/or review by the CAC or other PRC authorities or are required by them to take any specific actions, we and the potential Joint Venture will take any and all actions to remain in compliance with any such laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations thereof.

The PRC government has significant influence by enforcing existing rules and regulation, adopting new ones, or changing relevant industrial policies in a manner that may materially increase our compliance cost, change relevant industry landscape or otherwise cause significant changes to our business operations in China, which could result in material and adverse changes in our operations and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

The PRC government has significant influence by allocating resources, providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies, or imposing industry-wide policies on certain industries. The PRC government may also amend or enforce existing rules and regulation, or adopt ones, which could materially increase our compliance costs of the potential Joint Venture, change the relevant industry landscape, or cause significant changes to the potential Joint Venture business operations in China. In addition, the PRC regulatory system is based in part on government policies and internal guidance, some of which are not published on a timely basis, or at all, and some of which may even have a retroactive effect. We may not be aware of all non-compliance incidents at all times, and we may face regulatory investigation, fines and other penalties as a consequence. As a result of the changes in the industrial policies of the PRC government, including the amendment to and/or enforcement of the related laws and regulations, companies with China-based operations, including us, and the industries in which we operate, face significant compliance and operational risks and uncertainties. For example, on July 24, 2021, Chinese state media, including Xinhua News Agency and China Central Television, announced a broad set of reforms targeting private education companies providing after-school tutoring services and prohibiting foreign investments in institutions providing

such after-school tutoring services. As a result, the market value of certain U.S. listed companies with China-based operations in the affected sectors declined substantially. As of the date of this prospectus, we are not aware of any similar regulations that may be adopted to significantly curtail our business operations. However, if such other adverse regulations or policies are adopted in China, the potential Joint Venture may be materially and adversely affected, which may significantly disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business. In the event any of the foregoing were to occur, we and the potential Joint Venture will take any and all actions to remain in compliance with any such regulations or policies.

We may be subject to anti-monopoly concerns as a result of our doing business in China.

Article 3 of Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China prohibits “monopolistic practices,” which include: a) the conclusion of monopoly agreements between operators; b) the abuse of dominant market position by operators; c) concentration of undertakings which has or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting market competition. Also, according to Article 19, the operator(s) will be assumed to have a dominant market position if it has following situation: a) an operator has 50% or higher market share in a relevant market; b) two operators have 66% or higher market share in a relevant market; c) three operators have 75% or higher market share in a relevant market. We believe we have not conducted any monopolistic practices in China, and that recent statements and regulatory actions by the Chinese government do not impact our ability to conduct business, accept foreign investments, create the potential Joint Venture with Wider or list on a U.S. or other foreign stock exchange. However, there can be no assurance that regulators in China will not promulgate new laws and regulations or adopt new series of regulatory actions which may require us or the potential Joint Venture to meet new requirements on the issues mentioned above.

We may be subject to regulatory and other risks if we were to operate Variable Interest Entities in China

In July 2021, the Chinese government provided new guidance on China-based companies raising capital outside of China, including through arrangements called variable interest entities (“VIEs”). In light of such developments, the SEC has imposed enhanced disclosure requirements on China-based companies seeking to register securities with the SEC. Although we do not have a VIE structure, due to our potential Joint Venture, any future Chinese, U.S. or other rules and regulations that place restrictions on capital raising or other activities may adversely affect our business and results of operations. If the business environment in China deteriorates from the perspective of domestic or international investment, or if relations between China and the United States or other governments deteriorate, the Chinese government may intervene with our operations and our business in China and United States, as well as the market price of our securities, may also be adversely affected.

Our business does not appear to be within the targeted areas of concern by the Chinese government. However, because of our intended potential Joint Venture, there is a risk that the Chinese government may in the future seek to affect operations of any company with any level of operations in Hong Kong or China, including its ability to offer securities to investors, list its securities on a U.S. or other foreign exchange, conduct its business or accept foreign investment. Substantial uncertainties and restrictions with respect to the political and economic policies of the PRC government and PRC laws and regulations could have a significant impact upon the business that we may be able to conduct in the PRC and accordingly on the results of our operations and financial condition. If any or all of the foregoing were to occur, it could, in turn, result in a material change in the Company’s operations and/or the value of its common stock and/or significantly limit or completely hinder its ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. Furthermore, in the event any of the foregoing were to occur or to be interpreted differently, we and the potential Joint Venture will take any and all actions to remain in compliance with any such laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations thereof.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technologies and products, or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technologies and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technologies and products may be impaired.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and other countries with respect to our products. We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent

applications in the United States and abroad related to our technologies and products. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, competitors may be able to use our technologies and erode or negate any competitive advantage that we may have, which could harm our business and ability to achieve profitability. To protect our proprietary positions, we file patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our novel technologies and products that are important to our business. The patent application and prosecution processes are expensive and time-consuming. We and our current licensees, or any future licensors and licensees may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. We or our current licensees, or any future licensors or licensees may also fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Therefore, these and any of our patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. It is possible that defects of form in the preparation or filing of our patents or patent applications may exist, or may arise in the future, such as with respect to proper priority claims, inventorship, claim scope or patent term adjustments. If our current licensees, or any future licensors or licensees, are not fully cooperative or disagree with us as to the prosecution, maintenance or enforcement of any patent rights, such patent rights could be compromised and we might not be able to prevent third parties from making, using and selling competing products. If there are material defects in the form or preparation of our patents or patent applications, such patents or applications may be invalid and unenforceable. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how. Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third parties.

Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Furthermore, recent changes in patent laws in the United States, including the America Invents Act of 2011, may affect the scope, strength and enforceability of our patent rights or the nature of proceedings that may be brought by us related to our patent rights.

We may not be aware of all third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to our current and future our products. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until eighteen months after filing, or in some cases not at all. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our patents or pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. Similarly, should we own any patents or patent applications in the future, we may not be certain that we were the first to file for patent protection for the inventions claimed in such patents or patent applications. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity and commercial value of our patent rights cannot be predicted with any certainty. Moreover, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, or become involved in opposition, derivation, re-examination, inter partes review or interference proceedings, in the United States or elsewhere, challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third-party patent rights.

Our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued that protect our technology or products, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Even if our patent applications issue as patents, they may not issue in a form that will provide us with any meaningful protection against competing products or processes sufficient to achieve our business objectives, prevent competitors from competing with us or otherwise provide us with any competitive advantage. Our competitors may be able to circumvent our owned or licensed patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner. Alternatively, our competitors may seek approval to market their own products similar to or otherwise competitive with our products. In these circumstances, we may need to defend and/or assert our patents, including by filing lawsuits alleging patent infringement. In any of these types of proceedings, a court or other agency with jurisdiction may find our patents invalid and/or unenforceable.

The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and our owned and licensed patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad. Such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar

or identical technologies and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technologies and products. In addition, given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new products, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized.

We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or other intellectual property, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our issued patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming and divert the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel. Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that we infringe their patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property. In addition, in a patent infringement proceeding, there is a risk that a court will decide that a patent of ours is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, and that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue. There is also a risk that, even if the validity of such patents is upheld, the court will construe the patent’s claims narrowly or decide that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the invention. An adverse outcome in a litigation or proceeding involving our patents could limit our ability to assert our patents against those parties or other competitors and may curtail or preclude our ability to exclude third parties from making and selling similar or competitive products. Similarly, if we assert trademark infringement claims, a court may determine that the marks we have asserted are invalid or unenforceable, or that the party against whom we have asserted trademark infringement has superior rights to the marks in question. In this case, we could ultimately be forced to cease use of such trademarks.

In any infringement litigation, any award of monetary damages we receive may not be commercially valuable. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Moreover, there can be no assurance that we will have sufficient financial or other resources to file and pursue such infringement claims, which typically last for years before they are concluded. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios. Even if we ultimately prevail in such claims, the monetary cost of such litigation and the diversion of the attention of our management and scientific personnel could outweigh any benefit we receive as a result of the proceedings.

Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing, misappropriating or successfully challenging our intellectual property rights. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a negative impact on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could significantly harm our business.

Our commercial success depends, in part, on our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell our products and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the intellectual property and other proprietary rights of third parties.

There is potential for a substantial amount of intellectual property litigation in our industry, and we may become party to, or threatened with, litigation or other adversarial proceedings regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our technology or products, including interference proceedings before the USPTO. Intellectual property disputes arise in a number of areas including with respect to patents, use of other proprietary rights and the contractual terms of license arrangements. Third parties may assert claims against us based on existing or future intellectual property rights. The outcome of intellectual property litigation is subject to uncertainties that cannot be adequately quantified in advance.

If we are found to infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights, we could be forced, including by court order, to cease developing, manufacturing or commercializing the infringing product candidate or product. Alternatively, we may be required to obtain a license from such third party in order to use the infringing technology and continue developing, manufacturing or marketing the infringing product candidate.

However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our products or force us to cease some of our business operations. Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative effect on our business.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to seeking patent and trademark protection for our products, we also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures of our intellectual property is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property will be effective. In addition, we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for any such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets.

Moreover, our competitors may independently develop knowledge, methods and know-how equivalent to our trade secrets. Competitors could purchase our products and replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts for technologies on which we do not have patent protection. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position would be harmed.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on products in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States could be less extensive than those in the United States. In some cases, we may not be able to obtain patent protection for certain licensed technology outside the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States, even in jurisdictions where we do pursue patent protection. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States, even in jurisdictions where we do pursue patent protection or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions.

Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not pursued and obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our products and preclinical programs and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biotechnology products, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents, if pursued and obtained, or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us.

We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

Risks Related to Regulatory Approval of Our Products and Other Legal Compliance Matters

Even if we complete the necessary preclinical studies and clinical trials, the regulatory approval process is expensive, time-consuming and uncertain and may prevent us or any future collaborators from obtaining approvals for the commercialization of some or all of our products. As a result, we cannot predict when or if, and in which territories, we, or any future collaborators, will obtain marketing approval to commercialize a product candidate.

Our products and the activities associated with their development and commercialization, including their design, research, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, quality control, recordkeeping, labelling, packaging, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale, distribution, import, export and reporting of safety and other post-market information, are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other foreign regulatory agencies including the NMPA. Failure to obtain marketing approval for a product candidate will prevent us from commercializing the product candidate. As a result of the FDA reclassification ruling in December 2019 which impacted the classification of our devices which are described elsewhere in this prospectus, we had to suspend marketing of our first-Generation medical device for the treatment of anxiety and insomnia. We are presently considering amending our previous 510(k) Application for the treatment of anxiety and insomnia in the United States accordance with the FDA reclassification. Our Gen – 2 medical device has not completed development or regulatory filings with the FDA. Securing marketing approval in the United States from the FDA requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and efficacy. Securing marketing approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the regulatory authorities. Our products may not be effective, may be only moderately effective or may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude our obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use.

In addition, changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment of additional statutes or regulations or changes in regulatory review for each submitted product application may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data is insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical, or other studies. In addition, varying interpretations of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit, or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate. Any marketing approval we ultimately obtain may be limited or subject to restrictions or post-approval commitments that render the approved product not commercially viable.

If we experience delays in obtaining approval or if we fail to obtain approval of our products, the commercial prospects for our products may be harmed and our ability to generate revenues will be impaired.

Failure to obtain marketing approval in foreign jurisdictions would prevent our products from being marketed in these territories. Any approval we are granted for our products in the United States would not assure approval of our products in foreign jurisdictions.

To market and sell our products in China and any other jurisdictions, we must obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ substantially from that required to obtain approval from the FDA in the United States. The regulatory approval process outside the United States generally includes all the risks associated with obtaining approval from the FDA. In addition, in many countries outside the United States, it is required that the product be approved for reimbursement before the product can be approved for sale in that country. We may not obtain approvals from regulatory authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States does not ensure approval by

regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. However, failure to obtain approval in one jurisdiction may impact our ability to obtain approval elsewhere. We may not be able to file for marketing approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.

The U.S. FDA, Chinese National Medical Products Administration and other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from trials conducted in locations outside of their jurisdiction.

We have chosen, and may continue to choose, to conduct international clinical trials. The acceptance of study data by the U.S. FDA, Chinese National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) or other comparable foreign regulatory authority from clinical trials conducted outside of their respective jurisdictions may be subject to certain conditions. In cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (1) the data are applicable to the United States population and United States medical practice; (2) the trials are performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to Current Good Clinical Practice requirements; and (3) the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. The FDA may accept the use of some foreign data to support a marketing approval if the clinical trial meets certain requirements. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical trial requirements, including the adequacy of the subject population studied and statistical powering, must be met. Furthermore, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA, NMPA or any applicable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of its respective jurisdiction. If the FDA, NMPA or any applicable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan, and which may result in our product candidates not receiving approval for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

Even if we obtain marketing approvals for our products, the terms of approvals and ongoing regulation of our products may limit how we manufacture and market our products and compliance with such requirements may involve substantial resources, which could materially impair our ability to generate revenue.

Even if marketing approval of a product candidate is granted, an approved product and its manufacturer and marketer are subject to ongoing review and extensive regulation, including the potential requirements to implement a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy or to conduct costly post-marketing studies or clinical trials and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. We must also comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for any of our products for which we obtain marketing approval. Promotional communications are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and must be consistent with the information in the product’s approved labelling. Thus, we will not be able to promote any products we develop for indications or uses for which they are not approved. In addition, manufacturers of approved products and those manufacturers’ facilities are required to comply with extensive FDA requirements including ensuring quality control and manufacturing procedures, which include requirements relating to quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and documentation and reporting requirements. We and our contract manufacturers could be subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA to monitor and ensure compliance.

Our employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and vendors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct or failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. Misconduct by employees and independent contractors, such as principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and vendors, could include failures to comply with regulations of the FDA and other comparable regulatory authorities, to provide accurate information to such regulators, to comply with manufacturing standards we have established, to comply with healthcare fraud and abuse laws, to report financial information or data accurately or to disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and other business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws may restrict or prohibit a wide range of business activities, including, but not limited to, research, manufacturing, distribution, pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee and independent contractor misconduct could also involve the improper use of individually identifiable information, including, without limitation, information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory

sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. In addition, federal procurement laws impose substantial penalties for misconduct in connection with government contracts and require certain contractors to maintain a code of business ethics and conduct. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee and independent contractor misconduct, and any precautions we take to detect and prevent improper activities may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with such laws. If any such actions are instituted against us, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, disgorgement, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, additional reporting or oversight obligations if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with the law and curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate.

Our current and future relationships with healthcare professionals, principal investigators, consultants, customers and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere may be subject, directly or indirectly, to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, physician payment transparency, health information privacy and security and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to penalties.

Healthcare providers, physicians, clinicians, and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any products for which we obtain marketing approval. Our current and future arrangements with healthcare professionals, principal investigators, consultants, customers and third-party payors may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act, that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we research, sell, market and distribute any products for which we obtain marketing approval. In addition, we may be subject to physician payment transparency laws and patient privacy and security regulation by the federal government and by the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. The applicable federal, state and foreign healthcare laws that may affect our ability to operate include the following:

entities,” including certain healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, as well as their respective “business associates” that create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information;

Further, the ACA, among other things, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and certain criminal statutes governing healthcare fraud. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the ACA provided that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti- Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act.

Efforts to ensure that our future business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations may involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, including, without limitation, damages, monetary fines, disgorgement, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, additional reporting or oversight obligations if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with the law and curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and pursue our strategy. If any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business, including future collaborators, are found not to comply with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from participation in government healthcare programs, which could also affect our business.

Recently enacted and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for us and our collaborators to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize our products and affect the prices we may obtain.

In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent, alter or delay marketing approval of our existing or future products, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to profitably sell any products for which we obtain marketing approval.

Among policy makers and payors in the United States and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and/or expanding access. For example, the ACA, which was enacted in the United States in March 2010, includes measures to change health care delivery, decrease the number of individuals without insurance, ensure access to certain basic health care services, and contain the rising cost of care. The healthcare reform movement, including the enactment

of the ACA, has significantly changed health care financing by both governmental and private insurers in the United States. With respect to pharmaceutical manufacturers, the ACA increased the number of individuals with access to health care coverage, but it simultaneously imposed, among other things, increased liability for rebates and discounts owed to certain entities and government health care programs, and new transparency reporting requirements under the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. For a detailed discussion of the ACA’s provisions of importance to the pharmaceutical industry, as well as a description of reform legislation passed subsequent to the ACA, see the section titled “Business — Government Regulation — Healthcare Reform Efforts.”

Since its enactment, there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, as well as efforts to repeal or replace certain aspects of the ACA. We continue to evaluate the effect that the ACA and its possible repeal and replacement has on our business. It is uncertain the extent to which any such changes may impact our business or financial condition.

In addition to the ACA, other federal health reform measures have been proposed and adopted in the United States. For example, legislation has been enacted to reduce the level of reimbursement paid to providers under the Medicare program over time, as well as phase in alternative payment models for provider services under the Medicare program with the goal of incentivizing the attainment of pre-defined quality measures. As these measures are not fully in effect, and since the U.S. Congress could intervene to prevent their full implementation, at this time, it is unclear how payment reductions or the introduction of the quality payment program will impact overall physician reimbursement under the Medicare program. It is also unclear if changes in Medicare payments to providers would impact such providers’ willingness to prescribe and administer our existing or future products, if approved. Further, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which companies set prices for their marketed products. For example, there have been several recent Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, review the relationship between pricing and patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for products.

We expect that the ACA, as well as other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products.

Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for products. We cannot be sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals of our products, if any, may be. In addition, increased scrutiny by the U.S. Congress of the FDA’s approval process may significantly delay or prevent marketing approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labelling and post-marketing testing and other requirements.

Various new healthcare reform proposals are emerging at the federal and state level. It is also possible that additional governmental action will be taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Any new federal and state healthcare initiatives that may be adopted could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business activities may be subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and similar anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws of other countries in which we operate, as well as U.S. and certain foreign export controls, trade sanctions and import laws and regulations. Compliance with these legal requirements could limit our ability to compete in foreign markets and subject us to liability if we violate them.

If we further expand our operations outside of the United States, we must dedicate additional resources to comply with numerous laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which we plan to operate. Our business activities may be subject to the FCPA and similar anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws, regulations or rules of other countries in which we operate. The FCPA generally prohibits companies and their employees and third-party intermediaries from offering, promising, giving or authorizing the provision of anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a non-U.S. government official in order to influence official action or otherwise obtain or retain business. The FCPA also requires public companies to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the corporation and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. Our business is heavily regulated and therefore involves significant interaction with public officials, including officials of non-U.S.

governments. Additionally, in many other countries, hospitals owned and operated by the government and doctors and other hospital employees would be considered foreign officials under the FCPA. Recently the SEC and DOJ have increased their FCPA enforcement activities with respect to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. There is no certainty that all our employees, agents or contractors, or those of our affiliates, will comply with all applicable laws and regulations, particularly given the high level of complexity of these laws. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures and prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Any such violations could include prohibitions on our ability to offer our products in one or more countries and could materially damage our reputation, our brand, our international activities, our ability to attract and retain employees and our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.

In addition, our products and technology may be subject to U.S. and foreign export controls, trade sanctions and import laws and regulations. Governmental regulation of the import or export of our products and technology, or our failure to obtain any required import or export authorization for our products, when applicable, could harm our international sales and adversely affect our revenue. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements regarding the export of our products may create delays in the introduction of our products in international markets or, in some cases, prevent the export of our products to some countries altogether. Furthermore, U.S. export control laws and economic sanctions prohibit the shipment of certain products and services to countries, governments and persons targeted by U.S. sanctions. If we fail to comply with export and import regulations and such economic sanctions, penalties could be imposed, including fines and/or denial of certain export privileges. Moreover, any new export or import restrictions, new legislation or shifting approaches in the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or in the countries, persons or products targeted by such regulations, could result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased ability to export our products to, existing or potential customers with international operations. Any decreased use of our products or limitation on our ability to export or sell access to our products would likely adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to this Offering, Ownership of Our Common Stock and Warrants and Our Status as a Public Company

An active trading market for our common stock and warrants may not develop and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the initial offering price, if at all.

This offering constitutes the initial public offering of our securities, and no public market has previously existed for our securities. We have applied to list our common stock and warrants on Nasdaq. Any delay in the commencement of trading of our common stock or warrants on Nasdaq would impair the liquidity of the market for the shares and make it more difficult for holders to sell their shares of our common stock or the warrants. If our common stock and warrants are listed and quoted on Nasdaq, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for the shares or warrants will develop or be sustained after this offering is completed.

The initial offering price will be determined by negotiations among the lead underwriters and us. Among the factors to be considered in determining the initial public offering price are our future prospects and the prospects of our industry in general, our revenue, net income and certain other financial and operating information in recent periods, and the market prices of securities and certain financial and operating information of companies engaged in activities similar to ours. However, there can be no assurance that, following the completion of this offering, the shares of our common stock will trade at a price equal to or greater than the public offering price.

Warrants are speculative in nature.

The warrants offered in this offering do not confer any rights of common stock ownership on their holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but rather merely represent the right to acquire shares of our common stock at a fixed price for a limited period of time. Specifically, commencing on the date of issuance, holders of the warrants may exercise their right to acquire the common stock and pay an exercise price of $[6.90] per share [115%] of the assumed public offering price of a unit), prior to three (3) years from the date of issuance, after which date any unexercised warrants will expire and have no further value. In addition, there is no established trading market for the warrants and, although we have been approved to list the warrants on Nasdaq, there can be no assurance that an active trading market will develop.

The warrants may not have any value.

The warrants will be exercisable for three (3) years from the date of initial issuance at an initial exercise price equal to [115%] of the public offering price per unit set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. There can be no assurance that the market price of our shares of common stock will ever equal or exceed the exercise price of the warrants. In the event that the stock price of our shares of common stock does not exceed the exercise price of the warrants during the period when the warrants are exercisable, the warrants may not have any value.

We may redeem your unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.

We have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported sales price of our shares equal or exceed $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share splits, share capitalizations, rights issuances, subdivisions, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date we send the notice of redemption to the warrant holders. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may not exercise our redemption right if the issuance of shares upon exercise of the warrants is not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable state blue sky laws or we are unable to effect such registration or qualification. We will use our best efforts to register or qualify such shares under the blue sky laws of the state of residence in those states in which the warrants were offered by us in this offering. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force you (i) to exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) to sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your warrants.

Holders of the Warrants will have no rights as a common stockholder until they acquire our common stock.

Until holders of the warrants acquire shares of our common stock upon exercise of the warrants, the holders will have no rights with respect to shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Upon exercise of the warrants, the holder will be entitled to exercise the rights of a common stockholder as to the security exercised only as to matters for which the record date occurs after the exercise.

Our Warrant Agreement will designate the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of our Warrants, which could limit the ability of Warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with our Company.

Our Warrant Agreement provides that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the Warrant Agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions of the Warrant Agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our Warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the forum provisions in our Warrant Agreement.

If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope of the forum provisions of the Warrant Agreement, is filed in a court other than courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of our Warrants, such holder shall be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and (y) having service of process made upon such Warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such Warrant holder’s counsel in the foreign action as agent for such Warrant holder.

This choice-of-forum provision may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with our Company, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our Warrant Agreement inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and Board of Directors.

The trading price of our common stock and warrants may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The trading price of our common stock and warrants following this offering is likely to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including limited trading volume. The stock market in general and the market for companies in our industry in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, investors may not be able to sell their shares or warrants at or above the price paid for the units. In addition to the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this prospectus, these factors include:

These and other market and industry factors may cause the market price and demand for our common stock and warrants to fluctuate substantially, regardless of our actual operating performance, which may limit or prevent investors from selling their shares of our common stock and warrants at or above the price paid for the units or the

exercise price of the warrants and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. In addition, the stock market in general, and companies in our industry in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies.

Some companies that have experienced volatility in the trading price of their shares have been the subject of securities class action litigation. Any lawsuit to which we are a party, with or without merit, may result in an unfavorable judgment. We also may decide to settle lawsuits on unfavorable terms. Any such negative outcome could result in payments of substantial damages or fines, damage to our reputation or adverse changes to our business practices. Defending against litigation is costly and time-consuming and could divert our management’s attention and our resources. Furthermore, during litigation, there could be negative public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, which could have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

If equity research analysts do not publish research or reports, or publish unfavorable research or reports, about us, our business or our market, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock and warrants will be influenced by the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business. We do not currently have and may never obtain research coverage by equity research analysts. Equity research analysts may elect not to provide research coverage of our common stock after the completion of this offering, and such lack of research coverage may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and warrants. In the event we do have equity research analyst coverage, we will not have any control over the analysts or the content and opinions included in their reports. The price of our shares and warrants could decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade our shares or issue other unfavorable commentary or research about us. If one or more equity research analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our shares could decrease, which in turn could cause the trading price or trading volume of our common stock and warrants to decline.

If you purchase units in this offering, you will suffer immediate dilution of your investment.

The initial public offering price per unit is substantially higher than the as adjusted net tangible book value per share. Therefore, if you purchase units (comprised of common stock and warrants) in this offering, you will pay a price per share that substantially exceeds our as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering. Based on an assumed initial public offering price of $6.00 per share, and assigning no value to the warrants, which is the minimum of the price range of the units set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, you will experience immediate dilution of $5.15 per share, representing the difference between our as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering and the assumed initial public offering price per share. For further information regarding the dilution resulting from this offering, see the section titled “Dilution” in this prospectus.

A significant portion of our total outstanding shares are restricted from immediate resale but may be sold into the market in the near future. This could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. If our stockholders sell, or the market perceives that our stockholders intend to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market following this offering, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly.

Upon completion of this offering, we will have outstanding 6,464,961 shares of our common stock, based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of August 22, 2022. Of these shares, the 1,500,000 shares sold in this offering will be freely tradable and [1,696,112] pre offering shares will be eligible for sale in the public market immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. An additional [3,145,223] shares of our common stock (including an aggregate of 1,667,856 shares held by officers, directors and affiliates) will be available for sale in the public market beginning 180 days after the date of this prospectus following the expiration of lock-up agreements between our stockholders and the underwriters, subject in certain circumstances to the volume, manner of sale and other limitations under Rule 144 and Rule 701. The representatives of the underwriters may release those stockholders subject to a lock-up agreement from their lock-up agreements with the underwriters at any time, which would allow for earlier sales of shares in the public market.

There can be no assurances that our shares and warrants once listed on Nasdaq will not be subject to potential delisting if we do not continue to maintain the listing requirements of Nasdaq, which could negatively impact the price and value of our securities and your ability to sell them.

We have applied to list the shares of our common stock and warrants on the Capital Market tier of the Nasdaq Capital Market, or Nasdaq, under the symbols “NXL” and “NXLIW”. Nasdaq has rules for continued listing, including, without limitation, minimum market capitalization, minimum stockholders’ equity and other requirements. Failure to maintain our listing (i.e., being de-listed from Nasdaq) could result in significant consequences for us and our security holders including:

Concentration of ownership of our common stock among our existing executive officers, directors and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions and matters submitted to stockholders for approval.

Upon completion of this offering, our executive officers, directors and current beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock and their respective affiliates will, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 25.1% of our outstanding common stock, based on the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of August 22, 2022 (on an as adjusted basis pursuant to our reorganization and excluding warrants outstanding for 21,600 underlying shares with an exercise price of $10.00 per share and the warrants included in the units). As a result, these persons, acting together, would be able to significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors, any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets or other significant corporate transactions. In addition, these persons, acting together, may have the ability to control the management and affairs of our company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may harm the market price of our common stock by:

In addition, some of these persons or entities may have interests different than yours. For example, because many of these stockholders purchased their shares at prices substantially below the price at which shares are being sold in this offering and have held their shares for a longer period, they may be more interested in selling our company to an acquirer than other investors, or they may want us to pursue strategies that deviate from the interests of other stockholders.

Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws that became effective on December 1, 2021 (as amended August 11, 2022) may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions also could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. In addition, because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors. Among other things, these provisions:

Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired more than 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner. These provisions could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock, including transactions that may be in your best interests. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management or limit the price that investors are willing to pay for our stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, including claims under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for:

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation further provides that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.

These exclusive-forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. If a court were to find either exclusive-forum provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions. We note that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such exclusive-forum provision and that provision may result in increased costs for investors to bring a claim. We also note that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and that Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.

We are an “emerging growth company” and as a result of the reduced disclosure and governance requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, our common stock and warrants may be less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, we do not intend to take advantage of some of the exemptions from reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including:

We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock or warrants less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock or warrants less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and warrants and the trading prices for our securities may be more volatile. We may take advantage of these exemptions until the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering. However, if any of the following events occur prior to the end of such five-year period, (i) our annual gross revenue exceeds $1.07 billion, (ii) we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt in any three-year period or (iii) we become a “large accelerated filer,” (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act), we will cease to be an emerging growth company prior to the end of such five-year period. We will be deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” at such time that we (a) have an aggregate worldwide market value of common equity securities held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (b) have been required to file annual and quarterly reports under the Exchange Act, for a period of at least twelve months and (c) have filed at least one annual report pursuant to the Exchange Act. Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” which would allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements including reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in this prospectus and our periodic reports and proxy statements.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are emerging growth companies. As a result, changes in rules of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or their interpretation, the adoption of new guidance or the application of existing guidance to changes in our business could significantly affect our financial position and results of operations.

If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis could be impaired.

After the completion of this offering, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of The Nasdaq Capital Market, or Nasdaq. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Beginning with our second annual report following our initial public offering, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our Form 10-K filing for that year, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This will require that we incur substantial additional professional fees and internal costs to expand our accounting and finance functions and that we expend significant management efforts. Prior to this offering, we have never been required to test our internal controls within a specified period, and, as a result, we may experience difficulty in meeting these reporting requirements in a timely manner.

We may discover weaknesses in our system of internal financial and accounting controls and procedures that could result in a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements. Our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected.

If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner, or if we are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls, we may not be able to produce timely and accurate financial statements. If that were to happen, the market price of our common stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities.

We will have broad discretion in the use of proceeds from this offering and may invest or spend the proceeds in ways with which you do not agree and in ways that may not increase the value of your investment.

Our management will have broad discretion in the application of our cash, including the net proceeds from this offering, and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a negative impact on our business, cause the price of our common stock to decline and delay the development of our products and preclinical program. Pending their use, we may invest our cash, including the net proceeds from this offering, in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” for additional information.

Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gains and you may never receive a return on your investment.

You should not rely on an investment in our common stock to provide dividend income. We have never declared or paid a dividend on our common stock to date, and we currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, on our common stock will be your sole source of gains for the foreseeable future. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock in this offering.

Recent and potential future changes to U.S. and non-U.S. tax laws could materially adversely affect our company.

Existing, new or future changes in tax laws, regulations and treaties, or the interpretation thereof, in addition to tax policy initiatives and reforms under consideration in the United States or internationally and other initiatives could have an adverse effect on the taxation of international businesses. Furthermore, countries where we are subject to taxes, including the United States, are independently evaluating their tax policy and we may see significant changes in legislation and regulations concerning taxation. On December 22, 2019, President Trump signed into law new legislation, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, that significantly revises the Code. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, among other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including reduction of the corporate tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21%, limitation of the tax deduction for interest

expense to 30% of adjusted earnings (except for certain small businesses), limitation of the deduction for net operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income and elimination of net operating loss carry backs, one time taxation of offshore earnings at reduced rates regardless of whether they are repatriated, elimination of U.S. tax on foreign earnings (subject to certain important exceptions), immediate deductions for certain new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, and modifying or repealing many business deductions and credits. Notwithstanding the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the overall impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is uncertain and our business and financial condition could be adversely affected. The impact of this tax reform on holders of our common stock is also uncertain and could be adverse. Other legislative changes could also affect the taxation of holders of our common stock. We are unable to predict what tax reform may be proposed or enacted in the future or what effect such changes would have on our business, but such changes, to the extent they are brought into tax legislation, regulations, policies or practices, could affect our effective tax rates in the future in countries where we have operations and have an adverse effect on our overall tax rate in the future, along with increasing the complexity, burden and cost of tax compliance. We urge our stockholders to consult with their legal and tax advisors with respect to any such legislative changes and the potential tax consequences of investing in or holding our common stock.

Tax authorities may disagree with our positions and conclusions regarding certain tax positions, resulting in unanticipated costs, taxes or non-realization of expected benefits.

A tax authority may disagree with tax positions that we have taken, which could result in increased tax liabilities. For example, the Internal Revenue Service or another tax authority could challenge our allocation of income by tax jurisdiction and the amounts paid between our affiliated companies pursuant to our intercompany arrangements and transfer pricing policies, including amounts paid with respect to our intellectual property development. Similarly, a tax authority could assert that we are subject to tax in a jurisdiction where we believe we have not established a taxable connection, often referred to as a “permanent establishment” under international tax treaties, and such an assertion, if successful, could increase our expected tax liability in one or more jurisdictions. The foregoing are only selected examples of potential challenges, and other tax positions we have taken or may take in the future could become the subject of disputes with one or more tax authorities. A tax authority may take the position that material income tax liabilities, interest and penalties are payable by us, in which case, we expect that we might contest such assessment. Contesting such an assessment may be lengthy and costly and if we were unsuccessful in disputing the assessment, the implications could increase our anticipated effective tax rate, where applicable.

We will incur significantly increased costs as a result of operating as a company whose common stock is publicly traded in the United States, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public company in the United States, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur previously. These expenses will likely be even more significant after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies in the United States, including the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our senior management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, which in turn could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified senior management personnel or members for our board of directors.

However, these rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.

Pursuant to Section 404, we will be required to furnish a report by our senior management on our internal control over financial reporting. However, while we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To prepare for eventual compliance with Section 404, we will be engaged in a process to document

and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that we will not be able to conclude, within the prescribed timeframe or at all, that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section 404. If we identify one or more material weaknesses, it could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our consolidated financial statements.

Recent joint statements by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) proposed rule changes under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act that call for additional and more stringent criteria to be applied to emerging market companies upon assessing the qualification of their auditors, especially the non-U.S. auditors who are not inspected by the PCAOB. These developments could add uncertainties to certain foreign issuers in their continued listing or future offerings of securities in the U.S.

On May 20, 2020, the U.S. Senate passed the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act requiring a foreign company to certify it is not owned or controlled by a foreign government if the PCAOB is unable to audit specified reports because the company uses a foreign auditor not subject to PCAOB inspection. If the PCAOB is unable to inspect the company’s auditors for three consecutive years, the issuer’s securities are prohibited to trade on a national exchange. On December 2, 2020, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. On December 18, 2020, the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act was signed into law.

On March 24, 2021, the SEC adopted interim final rules relating to the implementation of certain disclosure and documentation requirements of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act.

On June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed a bill which, if passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and signed into law, would reduce the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act from three years to two.

The lack of access to the PCAOB inspection in China prevents the PCAOB from fully evaluating audits and quality control procedures of the auditors based in China. As a result, investors may be deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of these accounting firm’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to the PCAOB inspections, which could cause investors and potential investors in certain issuer’s securities to lose confidence in audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of financial statements.

Our auditor, the independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included elsewhere in this annual report and an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. Our auditor is headquartered in the United States and has been inspected by the PCAOB on a regular basis. We are a U.S.-based entity, and we maintain all financial records in the U.S., and we do not maintain any such records in any foreign jurisdictions as of the date of this filing. Furthermore, although we believe that there are no foreseeable risks under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, there may be perceived market risks associated with such act that are beyond our control due to our prospective joint venture arrangements in China as described elsewhere in this filing, as well as any records in the future that may be maintained in China.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY DATA

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy, prospective products, product approvals, research and development costs, future revenue, timing and likelihood of success, plans and objectives of management for future operations, and future results of anticipated products and prospects are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the words “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “objective,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue” and “ongoing,” or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology intended to identify statements about the future. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that we have a reasonable basis for each forward-looking statement contained in this prospectus, we caution you that these statements are based on a combination of facts and factors currently known by us and our expectations of the future, about which we cannot be certain. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

You should read this prospectus (as it may be supplemented or amended) and the documents that we reference herein and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus only. In particular, you should refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this prospectus will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame, or at all. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

This prospectus also contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business, and the markets for our products. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties, and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances that are assumed in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from our own internal estimates and research as well as from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources. While we believe our internal company research is reliable and the market definitions are appropriate, neither such research nor definitions have been verified by an independent source. While we believe that each of these studies and publications is reliable, we have not independently verified market and industry data from third-party sources.

In addition, assumptions and estimates of our and our industry’s future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section titled “Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause our future performance to differ materially from our assumptions and estimates.

USE OF PROCEEDS

Based upon gross proceeds of $9,600,000 from the sale of our securities in this offering (assuming an offering price at the minimum of the range), we estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will be approximately $8,320,000 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares is exercised in full, we estimate that our net proceeds will be approximately increased to $8,960,000. Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed combined initial public offering price of $6.00 per share of common stock would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $1.4 million, assuming that the number of units (and shares of common stock) offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Each increase (decrease) of 100,000 in the number of units (and shares of common stock) we are offering would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, by approximately $0.55 million, assuming the assumed initial public offering price stays the same. The principal purposes of this offering are to raise capital for our operations and research needs, increase our capitalization and financial flexibility, to create a public market for our common stock and to facilitate our future access to the capital markets. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds we receive from this offering.

In order to satisfy Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards, we will not complete the offering unless we have received gross proceeds equal to at least $9,600,000 and such proceeds will not represent less than 25% of post-closing market value of the listed securities. The number of units, shares and warrants being offered may therefore change based upon the final offering price of the units within the anticipated range (or any different price that may be allowed pursuant to Rule 430 of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations).

However, we currently intend to use the net proceeds we receive from this offering over the next 9 to 18 months as follows:

The $2.1 million to be spent on clinical research, trials and development work for future product candidates includes:

The $2.7 million to be spent on working capital includes costs associated with adding several full-time professional staff members including, but not limited to, a director of sales, regulatory and quality control, as well as additional staff and office space.

With respect to repayment of outstanding debt and other expenses, (i) our Chief Executive Officer who holds a promissory note in the amount of $200,000 which was originally due upon completion of this offering, has agreed to defer payment until March 15, 2023 and (ii) U.S. Asian Consulting Group LLC (which is controlled by our Chief Financial Officer and her spouse — see page 108) which is owed the sum of approximately $457,000 as of June 30,2022, has agreed to defer payment of $250,000 until March 15, 2023 and (iii) one creditor who is owed approximately $532,000 in the aggregate, has agreed to defer payment of a total of $332,000 until March 15, 2023.

This expected use of the net proceeds from this offering represents our intentions based upon our current plans and business conditions for the approximately the next 9 to 18 months, which could change in the future as our plans and business conditions evolve. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to in-license, acquire or invest in additional businesses, technologies, products or assets, although currently we have no specific agreements, commitments or understandings in this regard. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot predict with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to be received upon the closing of this offering or the amounts that we will actually spend on the uses set forth above. We expect that as our operations expand and additional research and additional clinical trials requirements become necessary, we will utilize additional funds (either from additional capital raising or debt financing or a combination of both, or any proceeds from the exercise of warrants and remaining working capital funds from this offering) to pay for such costs and expenses.

We are currently not cash flow positive and are uncertain when will be cash flow positive. While we believe that the net proceeds from this offering will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements, if our operations are not cash flow positive, we may need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations and planned activities. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. We may satisfy our future cash needs through the sale of equity securities, debt financings, working capital lines of credit, corporate collaborations or license agreements, grant funding, interest income earned on invested cash balances or a combination of one or more of these sources.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid a dividend, and we do not anticipate declaring or paying dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. Any future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors after considering our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors the board of directors deems relevant, and subject to the restrictions contained in any future financing instruments.

CORPORATE REORGANIZATION

We were originally formed as a Nevada corporation on October 19, 2010 as Nexalin Technology, Inc. On December 1, 2021, we completed the corporate reorganization described under the section titled “Corporate Reorganization,” pursuant to which Nexalin Nevada merged with and into a newly incorporated Delaware company of the same name, Nexalin and, as a result, Nexalin succeeded Nexalin Nevada and our existing shareholders exchanged each of their shares in Nexalin Nevada for one twentieth (1/20^th) of a common share of the newly formed Delaware corporation.

Nexalin had nominal assets and liabilities and did not conduct any operations prior to the reorganization other than its incorporation.

Upon this completion of the corporate reorganization on December 1, 2021, the historical consolidated financial statements of Nexalin Nevada became the historical consolidated financial statements of Nexalin, the entity whose shares of common stock are being sold in this offering, though such historical financial data gives effect to the corporation reorganization. We believe that the corporate reorganization will not have a material effect on our historical results of operations.

Investors in this offering will only acquire, and this prospectus only describes the offering of, shares of the common stock of Nexalin. We refer to the reorganization described herein as our “corporate reorganization.”

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our cash and capitalization as of June 30, 2022 (on an as-adjusted basis pursuant to our reorganization), as follows:

In order to satisfy Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards, we will not complete the offering unless we have received gross proceeds equal to at least $9,600,000 and such proceeds will not represent less than 25% of post-closing market value of the listed securities. The number of units, shares and warrants shares being offered may therefore change based upon the final offering price within the anticipated range (or any different price that may be allowed pursuant to Rule 430 of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations).

Information below on as adjusted basis is illustrative only, and our capitalization following the closing of this offering will be adjusted based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing. You should read this information in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and other financial information contained in this prospectus.

The number of shares of our common stock on an as adjusted basis set forth in the table above is based on shares of our common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2022 and the issuance of the securities underlying the 1,600,000 units in this offering. The foregoing table gives no effect to any exercise of the warrants.

DILUTION

If you invest in units (comprised of shares of common stock and warrants) in this offering, your ownership interest will be immediately diluted to the extent of the difference between the assumed initial public offering price of $6.00 per share of common stock (the minimum of the range appearing on the front cover of this prospectus and assuming no value to the warrants) and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately upon the consummation of this offering. Net tangible book value per share represents the book value of our tangible assets less the book value of our total liabilities divided by the number of shares of common stock then issued and outstanding. For purposes of this Dilution discussion, we have assumed no value to the warrants.

Our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2022 was $(2,249,303) or $(0.46) per share. After giving effect to our sale 1,500,000 units resulting in the issuance of 1,500,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $6.00 per share of common stock, which is the minimum of the price range of the units set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions ($720,000) and estimated offering expenses (in the amount of approximately $564,000) payable by us, our as adjusted net tangible book value as of June 30, 2022 would have been approximately $5,466,725 or approximately $0.85 per share (assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option). This amount represents an immediate and substantial dilution of $5.15 per share to new investors purchasing units in this offering. The following table illustrates this dilution per share:

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed combined initial public offering price of $6.00 per share of our units (the minimum of the range appearing on the front cover of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) the as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $1.4 million, or approximately $0.22 per share, and increase (decrease) the dilution per share to new investors by approximately $0.78 per share, assuming that the number of shares of common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We may also increase or decrease the number of units (and therefore the shares of common stock contained in the units) we are offering. An increase (decrease) of 100,000 shares in the number of shares of common stock offered by us would increase our as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $0.55 million, or $0.07 per share and increase (decrease) the dilution per share to investors purchasing common stock in this offering would be $0.07 per share, assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The as adjusted information discussed above is illustrative only and will change based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

If the underwriters exercise their option in full to purchase up to 225,000 units (resulting in 225,000 additional shares of our common stock) in this offering to cover overallotments, the as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering would be $1.01 per share, and the as adjusted dilution to new investors would be $4.99 per share, in each case assuming a combined initial public offering price of $6.00 per share of common stock, which is the minimum of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses payable by us. The following table summarizes, on an as adjusted basis described above, as of June 30, 2022, the differences between the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid and the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by new investors participating in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $6.00 per share of common stock, which is the minimum of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, before deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. As the table shows, new investors purchasing common stock in this offering will pay an average price per share substantially higher than our existing stockholders paid.

If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase all 225,000 (resulting in 225,000 additional shares of our common stock) to cover overallotments fully, the percentage of shares of common stock held by existing stockholders will decrease to approximately 74% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering, and the number of shares held by new investors will increase to 1,725,000, or approximately 26.0% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2022.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of Nexalin Technology, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and as of June 30, 2022 and for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those financial statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. References in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to “us,” “we,” “our,” and similar terms refer to Nexalin Technology, Inc. This prospectus contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. The events described in forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus may not occur. Generally, these statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of our plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions that may be made by us, or projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings or other aspects of our operating results. The words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” and “continue,” and their opposites and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our control, which may influence the accuracy of the statements and the projections upon which the statements are based. Reference is made to “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16 of this prospectus for a discussion of some of the uncertainties and risks associated with these statements.

Overview

We design and develop innovative neurostimulation products to uniquely and effectively help combat the ongoing global mental health epidemic. We previously developed and sold an easy-to-administer medical device, referred to as Generation 1, or Gen-1, that utilizes bioelectronic medical technology to treat anxiety and insomnia, without the need for drugs or psychotherapy. These types of devices are based upon cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES). Our original Gen-1 devices emit waveform at 4 milliamps during treatment and are now classified by the FDA, as of December 2019 as a Class II device.

Medical professionals have utilized the Gen-1 device to administer CES to patients in clinical settings. While the Gen-1 device had originally been cleared by the FDA to treat depression, anxiety and insomnia, three prevalent and serious diseases, as a result of the FDA’s December 2019 reclassification of CES devices, the Gen-1 device was reclassified as a Class II device for the treatment of anxiety and insomnia. Additionally, we are required to file an amended application under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“510(k) Application”) to be approved by the FDA for the marketing and sales of our devices for the treatment of anxiety and insomnia. We are analyzing whether to proceed with an amendment of our prior applications with the FDA for Gen-1 devices.

In the FDA’s December 2019 ruling, the treatment of depression with our device will remain a class III and require a new PMA (premarket approval) application to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.

We have also designed and developed new advanced waveform technology to be emitted at 15 milliamps through our existing medical device improved with a modern enclosure referred to as Generation 2 or Gen-2 which can penetrate deeper into the brain and stimulate associated structures of mental illness, which we believe will generate enhanced patient response. Gen-2 is presently being tested in clinical trials, for anxiety, insomnia and depression in the United States, and preliminary data provided by the University of California San Diego supports the safety of utilizing our waveform technology at an increased power. Currently, the waveform that comprises the basis of Gen-2 and Gen-3 devices is being tested in a research setting to determine safety data to be provided for review by the FDA for safety and efficacy evaluation. Determinations of the safety and efficacy of our devices are solely within the authority of the FDA.

The Nexalin regulatory team has made a strategic decision to begin developing strategies for a new PMA application for the treatment of depression with our new Gen-2 device. While we continue providing services to medical professionals to support patients’ use of the Gen-1 devices which were in operation prior to December 2019, we are not making new sales of Gen-1 devices in the United States. Servicing consists of warranty coverage, electrode sales, and patient cable replacement. This servicing is included in the monthly lease payment. Providers may continue to use these devices for treatment purposes. We continue to derive revenue from devices which we sold or leased prior to the FDA’s December 2019 reclassification announcements. This revenue consists of monthly license fees and payment for the sale of electrodes to clinical providers of our technology. We have suspended marketing and sales efforts in the United States on the Gen-1 device for treatment of anxiety or insomnia until and if a new 510(k) application is approved by the FDA. Additionally, our regulatory team has informed FDA inspectors that we continue to support the operations of clinical providers that were open and using our Gen-1 devices prior to the December 2019 ruling by the FDA.

We are also currently designing clinical trials for the use of Gen-2 for the treatment of substance use disorders opiates additions, chronic pain, Alzheimer’s disease, and dementia. In part due to increasing incidence attributed to the devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health and cognitive disorders are widespread across the globe and cause substantial health, social and economic losses and hardships accordingly. Our focus is on the continued development of our innovative bioelectronic medical technologies and rapid regulatory approval to help reverse these losses and hardships by safely and effectively treating various mental health disorders.

All our products are non-invasive and undetectable and, critically, can provide relief to those afflicted with mental health issues without adverse side effects. We have a proprietary design of varying voltages, currents, electromagnetic fields and various frequencies — referred to collectively as waveform — particularly our proprietary, patented symmetrical alternating current waveform. Our devices generate a high frequency, charge balanced electrical current waveform that is applied to an array of electrodes on the head. The features of this waveform make the application of the stimulation undetectable to the human body and this technique is proprietary to our devices, which enables the use of a higher current than all other devices in the market.

Our Gen-2 device is equipped with Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology that exchanges electrode usage data with a reader in the main device. The purpose of RFID is to track and maintain control of the proprietary single use electrode. Our electrode chip will be programmed to exchange data with the device and allow activation for a single treatment with a new electrode only. The use of a disposable RFID ensures a recurring revenue stream on the device and protects against any generic knockoffs designed to avoid treatment costs. This upgrade in technology also ensures the proprietary nature of the electrodes that support treatment outcomes are sustained. The revenue projections in Phase 2 are based on device sales and recurring disposable electrode sales.

We will also be developing a new headset design for our products that will offer medical professionals the opportunity to prescribe the headset device — Gen-3 — for use in a patient’s home to increase access to mental health treatment.

We recognize that an additional barrier to treatment in today’s mental health treatment landscape — beyond the concerns about safety, efficacy and discomfort that have been associated with conventional mental health treatments such as drugs, psychotherapy and other forms of electrical stimulation — is stigma. We have received industry reports and feedback that many patients that struggle with mood disorders have a stigma of embarrassment associated with psychotherapy (e.g., counselling with a therapist). Additional stigmas are associated with the side effects of medication prescribed by psychiatrists. To address the embarrassment stigma, we are developing a new headset design to emit our waveform technology which will offer medical professionals the opportunity to prescribe the headset device for use in a patient’s home — referred to as Generation 3 or Gen-3 — to increase access to mental health treatment. We believe that in order to preserve product safety and integrity for home use, the headset device will require physician oversight including prescriptions for use, monthly authorization for continued patient use and monthly physician monitoring through our digital management platform.

According to Infinium Global Research, the global neurostimulation devices market is projected to grow from approximately $4.7 billion in 2018 to approximately $9.8 billion for a CAGR of 10.9% from 2019-2025. There are several drivers of this growth. First, many mental health disorders are treated with psychotherapy or pharmaceutical intervention and have limited efficacy and, in the case of the latter increased awareness of the side effects of medication. Second, the rising number of geriatric patients, particularly with respect to Alzheimer’s disease, will increase demand for mental health treatments. Third, increased diagnosis of cases of anxiety, depression and various other mental health disorders in all age populations will contribute to market expansion. Doctors and patients will seek effective, safer and more cost-effective alternatives to current care standards. Advancements in neurostimulation techniques, such as those we are developing, will provide treatment options that address irregularities in the brain’s functional health. These functional brain health issues are believed to be the underlying cause of many mental health disorders and chronic diseases.

Overall, we believe that our advanced waveform, technological upgrades and the development of a modern headset monitored with our IT management platform, evidenced in our Gen-2 and Gen-3 devices, will position us with the opportunity to disrupt the traditional mental health treatment model. Our mission is to remove the stigma of expensive psychotherapy or pharmaceuticals with the attendant side effects and dependency issues and replace such stigma with clinically proven and cost-effective technology that is easily accessible in the privacy of the patient’s home and monitored by licensed healthcare providers.

Since our inception, we have generated significant losses, we expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for at least the next several years. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from period to period, depending on the timing of our planned clinical trials and expenditures on other research and development activities. We expect our expenses will increase substantially over time as we:

Furthermore, following the completion of this offering, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, accounting, investor relations and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.

Corporate Reorganization

As more fully described in the section of this prospectus titled “Corporate Reorganization,” we completed a corporate reorganization on December 1, 2021, pursuant to which Nexalin Nevada merged with and into a newly incorporated Delaware company of the same name, Nexalin and, as a result, Nexalin succeeded Nexalin Nevada and our existing shareholders exchanged each of their shares in Nexalin Nevada for one twentieth (1/20^th) of a common share of the newly formed Delaware corporation. Nexalin had nominal assets and liabilities and did not conduct any operations prior to the reorganization other than its incorporation.

Our Delaware corporation had nominal assets and liabilities and did not conduct any operations prior to the reorganization other than its incorporation.

Upon the completion of the corporate reorganization, the historical consolidated financial statements of our Nevada corporation became the historical consolidated financial statements of our Delaware corporation. The common shares of our Delaware corporation are now the shares being sold in the offering as part of this prospectus. We expect that the corporate reorganization will not have a material effect on our historical results of operations.

Recent Developments

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

We continue to monitor how the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting our employees, business and clinical trials. Such pandemic has delayed our clinical trials and our receipt of marketing approvals from the FDA. Such pandemic also might have reduced, and continue to reduce, participation in our clinical trials, due to both travel restrictions and a general unwillingness of subjects to travel. We cannot presently predict the scope and severity of any other potential business shutdowns or disruptions, but if we or any of the third parties with whom we engage, including the suppliers, clinical trial sites, regulators and other third parties with whom we conduct business, were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, our ability to conduct our business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could be materially and negatively impacted.

In addition, the spread of an infectious disease, including COVID-19, may also result in the inability of our suppliers to deliver components or raw materials on a timely basis. Such events may result in a period of business and manufacturing disruption, and in reduced operations, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among other things.

China Market

In September 2018, we entered into an agreement with Wider, pursuant to which we and Wider shall form the Joint Venture. The Joint Venture will be formed following the completion of certain funding, clinical study, and publication milestones, which Wider has agreed to undertake. We expect the Joint Venture to be formally formed by the third quarter of 2023. Following its formation, the Joint Venture will design and implement a comprehensive business model and distribution plan for our devices in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan and elsewhere. The first phase of distribution in China includes implementation of a sales strategy by Wider for mainland China and other territories serviced by Wider.

In March 2022, we entered into a second supplement to the Joint Venture agreement with Wider, whereby the parties confirmed that the Joint Venture had not yet been established and is subject to further review and analysis of regulatory issues in China and the United States, trade and political issues between the two countries and potential changes in the use and market for the Company’s products and technology. Pursuant to the second supplement, the parties agreed to use their commercial efforts to complete documentation by September 30, 2022. In light of general economic conditions in China and the United States and the continued impact of regulatory issues in China and the United States and trade and political issues between the two counties, the parties determined to further extend the time frame to complete establishment of the joint venture to September 30, 2023 and entered into a supplement 3 to the Joint Venture Agreement to memorialize such extension. The parties intend to continue to work together to complete the establishment prior to such extended time.

During the first half of 2022, we sold Gen-2 devices in China through Wider which agreed to act as a distributor on a limited basis pending formation of the potential Joint Venture. As a result, we recognized revenue of approximately $624,000 during the first half of 2022. In conjunction with such revenue, during the first half of 2022, we incurred costs of approximately $143,000 for cost of goods sold, delivery and labeling costs. In 2021, we incurred expenses relating to certain development costs associated with these devices sold during the first half of 2022 which were recorded during 2021. The Company expects that the $143,000 of additional costs attributed to the $624,000 sale in the first half of 2022 may not be indicative of our cost of sales in future periods and that beginning in the second half of 2022 gross margins may decrease due to an increase in the costs of components, manufacturing, delivery, sales and marketing. In addition, we expect to derive revenue as a royalty fee from the China based manufacturer of electrodes for electrodes ordered by Wider in connection with the distribution of our devices in China. The manufacturer will pay us a 20% royalty based upon its electrode sales price to Wider in connection with Wider’s device distribution activities. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Joint Venture” at page 111.

In September of 2021, the NMPA, the equivalent of the United States FDA, approved the Gen-2 device for marketing and sale in China for the treatment of insomnia and depression. These treatment indications and clearances from the NMPA have allowed us to market and sell the Gen-2 device in China for the treatment of insomnia and depression.

We do not believe that any other regulatory of governmental approvals are required for the sale of our devices, including the sales made to date, by Wider in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. If and when the potential Joint Venture is formed and it completes sales of our devices in China, there are no regulatory or other restrictions that would restrict either (i) the transfer from China of any proceeds resulting from such sales by Wider to the potential Joint Venture in Hong Kong, other than standard compliance with China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange policies and approval process, or (ii) our receipt of our share of such proceeds from Hong Kong to us in the United States, which is not subject SAFE’s policies and approval process.

According to the SAFE guidelines on foreign exchange management of trade in goods (implemented on August 1, 2012) and the PRC guidelines on foreign exchange business under current account (2020 version) implemented on August 28, 2020, there are no restrictions on the transfer of sales proceeds by Chinese domestic companies to Hong Kong companies or foreign companies as long as a company is in standard compliance with the SAFE’s policies and approval process. The current standard SAFE procedures are as follows:

Although there can be no assurance in light of recent worldwide events such as the Russia and Ukraine war and continuing changes within the China legal system, we expect to consummate the formation of the potential Joint Venture by the third quarter 2023.

As more fully described above in “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China,” recent statements and regulatory actions by the Chinese government may have targeted those companies whose operations involves cross-border data security or anti-monopoly concerns and may have significant regulatory, liquidity, and enforcement risks for us when the potential Joint Venture is formed. With regard to data security, China has promulgated several important laws recently. Among them, on June 10, 2021, China promulgated the PRC Data Security Law (“DSL”), which became effective on September 1, 2021. The legislative intent for this law mainly includes regulating data processing activities, ensuring data security, promoting data development and utilization, protecting the data related legitimate rights and interests of individuals and organizations, and safeguarding national sovereignty, security and development interests. Article 36 provides that any Chinese entity that provides the data to foreign judicial or law enforcement agencies (regardless of whether directly or through a foreign entity) without approval from the Chinese authority would likely be deemed to be in violation of DSL. In addition, pursuant to Article 2 of Measures for Cybersecurity Reviews, the procurement of any network product or service by an operator of critical information infrastructure that affects or may affect national security shall be subjected to a cybersecurity review under the Measures. Pursuant to Article 35 of Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China, where “critical information infrastructure operators” purchase network products and services, which may influence national security, the operators are required to be subjected to a cybersecurity review. We do not operate any critical information infrastructure. As a result, we do not believe that these new legal requirements in China are applicable to us. However, the exact scope of the term “critical information infrastructure operator” remains unclear, so there can be no assurance that the potential Joint Venture will not be subjected to critical information infrastructure operator review in the future. Furthermore, in the event that the potential Joint Venture becomes an operator of critical information infrastructure in the future it may be subjected to the above-described regulation.

The Company does not currently believe any of the Company’s scientific data resulting from activities in China to be conducted by the potential Joint Venture would fall within the Measures for the Management of Scientific Data promulgated by the General Office of the PRC State Council.

Currently, these statements and regulatory actions have had no impact on our daily business operations nor do we believe that they will have an impact on the Joint Venture when it is formed, or our ability to accept foreign investments and list our securities on a U.S. or other foreign exchange. When formed, we believe that the potential Joint Venture will have received all requisite permissions from the PRC to conduct its business and no permissions will have been denied. Currently, once the potential Joint Venture is formed in Hong Kong, it will have a valid business registration certificate issued by the Hong Kong company registry. Once the certificate of registration is duly issued, the potential Joint Venture will have permission to operate as a legal entity under the laws of the PRC and Hong Kong. However, since these statements and regulatory actions are new, it is highly uncertain how soon legislative or administrative regulation making bodies will respond and what existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations will be modified or promulgated, if any, and the potential impact such modified or new laws and regulations will have on our daily business operation, the ability to accept foreign investments and list our securities on a U.S. or other foreign exchange. However, there can be no assurance that regulators in China will not promulgate new laws and regulations or adopt new series of interpretations or regulatory actions which may require the potential Joint Venture to meet new requirements on the issues mentioned above. In the event any existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations are modified or promulgated, or if we have inadvertently concluded that approvals are not required, we and the potential Joint Venture will take any and all actions to remain in compliance with any such laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations thereof.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2020

The following table presents selected items in our audited consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively:

Revenues

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we generated $144,065 and $242,914, respectively, of revenue from licensing and treatment fee agreements with our customers by charging a monthly licensing fee for the duration of the agreement. We also generated revenue from treatment fee agreements by collecting fees based on the number of treatments per month the customer performs. In addition, we also derive revenues from equipment by selling additional individual electrodes to customers for use with our device. The decrease in revenue for 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily due to a large purchase from a single customer in 2020.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, cost of revenues were $21,442 and $29,039, respectively, yielding a gross profit of $122,623 and $213,875, respectively, or 85.1% and 88.0%, respectively. Such decrease was due to our need in 2021 to meet specific standards for shipping that did not apply in 2020. In addition, tooling expenses related to package design and foam molding and then the initial inventory purchase of shipping containers contributed to such decrease.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $6,141,224 and $3,509,329, respectively. The increase was primarily due to increases in professional fees for legal and accounting and the impact of stock-based compensation for the issuance of our common stock to various employees and consultants for services. The increase in legal and accounting fees are primarily due to costs relating to our initial public offering. The increase in stock-based compensation is due to stock issued in accordance with employment and consulting contract obligations

Other Expense

Other expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $59,403 and $108,032, respectively, consisting of $82,319 and $78,681, respectively, of interest expense which was partially offset by $22,916 in PPP loan forgiveness in 2021 and in addition to $29,351 in loss on extinguishment of debt in 2020.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

The following table presents selected items in our audited consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively:

Revenues

For the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, we generated $737,610 and $64,096, respectively, of revenue primarily from the sale of devices, supplies and from the reimbursement of costs. In addition, we generated income from licensing and treatment fee agreements with our customers by charging a monthly licensing fee for the duration of the agreement. We also generated revenue from treatment fee agreements by collecting fees based on the number of treatments per month the customer performs. In addition, we also derive revenues from equipment by selling electrodes to customers for use with our device. The increase in revenue in revenue for 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily due to the sale in 2022 of 120 devices, there were no sales of devices in 2021, and to our cost reimbursements from Wider.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

For the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, cost of revenues were $169,047 and $13,142, respectively, yielding a gross profit of $568,563 and $50,954, respectively, or 77.08% and 79.5%, respectively. Such decrease in gross margin was due to the change in our sources of revenue. In 2021 our revenue was from licensing fees and the sales of electrodes and cables. The licensing fees have no related costs. Our cost of revenue in 2021 included shipping supplies and the cost of the electrodes and cables. In 2022 our revenue was primarily from sales of equipment. The equipment has higher related costs of revenue and related shipping costs.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 were $1,388,783 and $3,696,617, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease of approximately $2,600,000 in stock-based compensation for the issuance of our common stock to various employees and consultants for services, offset by the increases in professional fees for legal and accounting of approximately $176,000 and an increase in salaries of approximately $209,000. The increase in legal and accounting fees are primarily due to costs relating to our initial public offering. The increase in salary is due to hiring of a chief financial officer.

Other Expense

Other expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 were $12,518 and $36,705, respectively, consisting of interest expense net of the PPP loan forgiveness.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

Current assets decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily as a result of cash used for operating expenses offset by (i) an increase in accounts receivable, (ii) an increase in inventory and (iii) an increase in prepaid expenses.

Current liabilities increased for the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily as a result of (i) an increase in accounts payable and (ii) an increase in deferred revenue.

Cash Flows

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in (provided by) operating activities was $365,543 for the six months ended June 30, 2022, as compared to $428,430 for the respective period in 2021, primarily due to the net loss of $832,738 and $3,682,368, respectively, as well as an increase in accounts receivable, prepaid assets, inventory and accounts payable. These amounts were also offset by approximately $269,000 and $2.9 million of stock compensation during the periods, respectively.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 was ($4,900) and $657,940, respectively, which was primarily due to the sale of common stock for cash in 2021.

Uses and Availability of Additional Funds

Our primary uses of capital are, and we expect will continue to be, compensation and related expenses, third-party clinical research and development services, laboratory and related supplies, manufacturing development costs, legal and other regulatory expenses and general administrative costs. See “Use of Proceeds” at page 52 which sets forth out estimates of the use of proceeds over the next 9 to 18 months. The successful development of our products is highly uncertain. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the clinical development of our products and obtain regulatory approvals. We are also unable to predict when, if ever, net cash inflows from revenues will enable us to be cash flow positive. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing products, including, among others, the uncertainty of:

We will not increase revenue from future product sales unless and until we or a collaborator successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approval for such future products. If we obtain regulatory approval for any of our future products that we intend to commercialize on our own, we will incur significant expenses related to commercialization, including developing our internal commercialization capability to support product sales, marketing and distribution. As a result, we may need substantial additional funding to support our continuing operations and to pursue our growth strategy. Until such time, if ever, when we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through this offering and, in the future and if needed, a combination of equity offerings, debt financings and potential collaboration, license and development agreements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, investors’ ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of stockholders.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may be required to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or products or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to a third party to develop and market products that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed would compromise our ability to pursue our business strategy.

We will also incur costs as a public company that we have not previously incurred, including increased fees payable to the non-employee members of our board of directors, increased personnel costs, increased director and officer insurance premiums, audit and legal fees, investor relations fees and expenses for compliance with public-company reporting requirements under the Exchange Act and rules implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate product sales, we may not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and be forced to reduce or terminate our operations. Our operating needs include the planned costs to operate our business, including amounts required to fund working capital and capital expenditures. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including our ability to successfully commercialize our products and services, competing technological and market developments, and the need to enter into collaborations with other companies or acquire other companies or technologies to enhance or complement our product and service offerings.

We believe that the net proceeds from this offering will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for the next 9 to 18 months (until November, 2023). We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we

expect. Without giving effect to the anticipated net proceeds from this offering, we expect that our existing cash will not be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements beyond December, 2022. To finance our operations up to and beyond that point, we will need to raise additional capital, which cannot be assured.

Our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, which contemplate our continuation as a going concern and the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the financial statements do not necessarily purport to represent realizable or settlement values. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Although no assurances can be given as to our ability to deliver on our revenue plans or that unforeseen expenses may arise, management believes that the revenue to be generated from operations, together with the potential closing of the Initial Public Offering in the near term, will provide the necessary funding for us to continue as a going concern. Management cannot guarantee any such Initial Public Offering will be available on favorable terms. As such, these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of twelve months from the issue date of this filing. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, or at all, we will need to curtail operations or cease operations.

Internal Controls

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Prior to this offering, we were a private company and we are currently in the process of reviewing, documenting and testing our internal control over financial reporting. During our internal reviews, we have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

We have not performed an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, nor have we engaged an independent registered accounting firm to perform an audit of our internal control over financial reporting as of any balance sheet date or for any period reported in our financial statements. Presently, we are not an accelerated filer, as such term is defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, and therefore, our management is not presently required to perform an annual assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This requirement will first apply to our second Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our independent public registered accounting firm will first be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the first year we are no longer an “emerging growth company” and not being a smaller reporting company.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, costs and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, we believe that the following accounting policies are those most critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, equity-based transactions, revenue and expenses and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The Company bases its estimates and

assumptions on historical experience, known or expected trends and various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ from these estimates which may cause our future results to be affected.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when our performance obligations with our customers have been satisfied. At contract inception, we determine if the contract is within the scope of ASC Topic 606 and then we evaluate the contract using the following five steps: (1) identify the contract with the customer; (2) identify the performance obligations; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. We only recognize revenue to the extent that it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur in a future period.

We have existing licensing and treatment fee agreements with our customers for the use of our device in their practices. These agreements generally have terms of one year with automatic renewal if certain requirements are met and amounts due per these agreements are billed monthly. We also sell products related to the provision of services. We also sell our Gen-2 devices in China through our acting distributor.

Revenue Streams

We derive revenues from our license agreements by charging a monthly licensing fee for the duration of the agreement. We derive revenues from treatment fee agreements by collecting fees based on the number of treatments per month the customer performs. We derive revenues from equipment by selling electrodes and supplies to our existing customers for use with our device. We derive revenue from the sale, through our acting distributor, of our Gen-2 device in China. We derive revenue from the reimbursement of certain costs from Wider. We derive revenue as a royalty fee from the China based manufacturer for electrodes ordered in China in connection with our China sales.

Performance Obligations

Management identified that subsequent licensing revenue has one performance obligation. That performance obligation is satisfied as long as the licensing contract is remains valid and is not terminated. The licensing revenue is invoiced monthly and is recognized at a point in time in which the invoice is sent to the customer.

Management identified that our equipment revenue has one performance obligation. That performance obligation is satisfied when the electrodes and devices are shipped to the customer. We do not offer a warranty on the electrodes or devices.

Management identified that treatment fee revenue has one performance obligation. The performance obligation is satisfied upon the completion of individual treatments on patients by customers.

Management identified that our royalty fee has one performance obligation. The performance obligation is satisfied as long as the royalty agreement remains valid and is not terminated. The royalty revenue is invoiced and is recognized when the invoice is sent to the customer.

Practical Expedients

As part of ASC 606, the Company has adopted several practical expedients including:

Intangible Assets

We record our intangible assets at cost in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other. Definite lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful life using the straight-line method, which is determined by identifying the period over which the cash flows from the asset are expected to be generated.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted net cash flows of the operation to which the assets relate to the carrying amount. If the operation is determined to be unable to recover the carrying amount of its assets, then these assets are written down first, followed by other long-lived assets of the operation to fair value. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the assets.

Fair Value Measurements

As defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement). This fair value measurement framework applies at both initial and subsequent measurement.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and other current liabilities approximate their fair values, based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of the loans payable approximates the estimated fair value for this financial instrument as management believes that such debt and interest payable on the note approximates our incremental borrowing rate.

Stock-based Compensation

We apply the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees, including employee stock options, in the statements of operations.

For stock options issued to employees and members of the board of directors for their services, we estimate the grant date fair value of each option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to the expected term of the option, the expected volatility of the common stock consistent with the expected life of the option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividend yields of the common stock. For awards subject to service-based vesting conditions, including those with a graded vesting schedule, we recognize stock-based compensation expense equal to the grant date fair value of stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting term. Forfeitures are recorded as they are incurred as opposed to being estimated at the time of grant and revised. Due to our limited history and lack of public market for our common stock, we used the average of historical share prices of similar companies within its industry to calculate volatility for use in the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Pursuant to ASU 2018-07 Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Non-employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, we account for stock options issued to non-employees for their services in accordance with ASC 718. We use valuation methods and assumptions to value the stock options that are in line with the process for valuing employee stock options noted above.

Research and Development

All research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred.

Leases

In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, we recognize a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and corresponding lease liability on our balance sheets for our office space lease agreement. See Note 10 for further discussion, including the impact on our financial statements and related disclosures.

ROU assets include any prepaid lease payments and exclude any lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease if it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Leases in which we are the lessee are comprised of office rental. All of the leases are classified as operating leases.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carry forwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

We utilize ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method to compute the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the related financial amounts, using currently enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax assets will not be realized.

For uncertain tax positions that meet a “more likely than not” threshold, we recognize the benefit of uncertain tax positions in the financial statements. Our practice is to recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense in the statements of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-02, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) and Leases (Topic 842) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 119 and Update

to SEC Section on Effective Date Related to Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which amends the effective date of the original pronouncement for smaller reporting companies. ASU 2016-13 and its amendments will be effective for us for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022. We believe the adoption will modify the way we analyze financial instruments, but we do not anticipate a material impact on results of operations. We are in the process of determining the effects adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements. See footnotes to our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition

The information contained under the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16 of this prospectus provides examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. Readers should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in these risk factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Emerging Growth Company Status

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and we intend to take advantage of some of the exemptions from reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our share price may be more volatile. We may take advantage of these exemptions until the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering. However, if any of the following events occur prior to the end of such five-year period, (i) our annual gross revenue exceeds $1.07 billion, (ii) we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt in any three-year period or (iii) we become a “large accelerated filer,” (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act), we will cease to be an emerging growth company prior to the end of such five-year period. We will be deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” at such time that we (a) have an aggregate worldwide market value of common equity securities held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (b) have been required to file annual and quarterly reports under the Exchange Act, for a period of at least twelve months and (c) have filed at least one annual report pursuant to the Exchange Act. Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” which would allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements including reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in this prospectus and our periodic reports and proxy statements.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are emerging growth companies. As a result, changes in rules of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or their interpretation, the adoption of new guidance or the application of existing guidance to changes in our business could significantly affect our financial position and results of operations.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our cash balance as of June 30 was $291,335. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of interest rates. Because of the short-term nature of the instruments in our portfolio, we would not expect a sudden change in market interest rates to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

BUSINESS

Overview

We design and develop innovative neurostimulation products to uniquely and effectively help combat the ongoing global mental health epidemic. We developed an easy-to-administer medical device — referred to as Generation 1 or Gen-1 — that utilizes bioelectronic medical technology to treat anxiety and insomnia, without the need for drugs or psychotherapy. Our original Gen-1 devices emit waveform at 4 milliamps during treatment and is classified by the FDA as a Class II device.

Medical professionals in the United States have utilized the Gen-1 device to administer to patients in clinical settings. While the Gen-1 device had been cleared by the FDA to treat anxiety and insomnia, two prevalent and serious diseases, as a result of the FDA’s December 2019 reclassification of CES devices that treat anxiety and insomnia described elsewhere in this prospectus we are required to file an amendment application under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“510(k) Application”) to be approved by the FDA. Accordingly, while we continue providing services to medical professionals to support patients’ use of the Gen-1 devices which were in operation prior to December 2019, we are not making new sales of Gen-1 devices in the United States. We have suspended marketing and sales efforts on the Gen-1 device for treatment of anxiety or insomnia until a new 510(k) application is approved by the FDA. We are analysing whether to proceed with an amended application with the FDA for Gen-1 devices for the treatment of insomnia and anxiety. Our regulatory team has informed the FDA of the suspension of marketing and sale of our Gen-1 products to new providers. Additionally, our regulatory team has informed FDA inspectors that we continue to support the operations of clinical providers that were open and using our Gen-1 devices prior to the December 2019 ruling by the FDA.

We have begun discussions with the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Arizona and the University of California to design and structure the special control clinical trials for anxiety and insomnia in accordance with the comments received by the FDA during what is referred to as the “presub” meeting process.

We have designed and developed new advanced waveform technology to be emitted at 15 milliamps through our existing medical device improved with a modern enclosure — referred to as Generation 2 or Gen-2 — which can penetrate deeper into the brain and the associated structures of mental illness, which we believe will generate enhanced patient response. The Nexalin regulatory team is analyzing whether to develop strategies for a new PMA application in the United States for the treatment of depression with our new Gen-2 device. Gen-2 is presently being tested in clinical trials, for anxiety, insomnia and depression in the United States and China. Preliminary data provided by the University of California San Diego supports the safety of utilizing our waveform technology at an increased power however, the determination of safety of medical devices in the United States is subject to clearance by the FDA. The new waveform that is the basis of Gen-2 and Gen-3 devices has been tested in a research setting to determine safety data to be provided for review by the FDA for safety and efficacy evaluation. Determinations of the safety and efficacy of our devices are solely within the authority of the FDA.

We are also currently designing clinical trials for the use of Gen-2 for the treatment of substance use disorders and particularly substance abuse issues related to opiates, Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. In part due to increasing incidence attributed to the devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health and cognitive disorders are widespread across the globe and cause substantial health, social and economic losses and hardships accordingly. Our focus is on the continued development of our innovative bioelectronic medical technologies and rapid regulatory approval to help reverse these losses and hardships by safely and effectively treating various mental health disorders.

All our products are non-invasive and undetectable and, critically, can provide relief to those afflicted with mental health issues without adverse side effects. We have a proprietary design of varying voltages, currents, electromagnetic fields and various frequencies — referred to collectively as waveform — particularly our proprietary, patented symmetrical alternating current waveform. Our devices generate a high frequency, charge balanced electrical current waveform that is applied to an array of electrodes on the head. The features of this waveform make the application of the stimulation undetectable to the human body and this technique is proprietary to our devices, which enables the use of a higher current than all other devices in the market.

Our devices generate a high frequency, charge balanced electrical current waveform that is applied to an array of electrodes on the head. The features of this waveform make the application of the stimulation undetectable to the human body and this technique is proprietary to our devices, which enables the use of a higher current than all other devices in the market. Our design of an advanced waveform is the basis of our treatment and our continuing evolution.

We recognize that an additional barrier to treatment in today’s mental health treatment landscape — beyond the concerns about safety, efficacy and discomfort that have been associated with conventional mental health treatments such as drugs, psychotherapy and other forms of electrical stimulation — is stigma. We have received industry reports and feedback that many patients that struggle with mood disorders have a stigma of embarrassment associated with psychotherapy (e.g., counselling with a therapist). Therefore, we are developing a new headset design to emit our waveform technology which will offer medical professionals the opportunity to prescribe the headset device for use in a patient’s home — referred to as Generation 3 or Gen-3 — to increase access to mental health treatment. We believe that in order to preserve product safety and integrity for home use, the headset device will require physician oversight including prescriptions for use, monthly authorization for continued patient use and monthly physician monitoring through our digital management platform that is in development.

Market and Industry Background

Historically, pharmaceutical solutions have been the first line of treatment for those who suffer from anxiety, insomnia, depression and other mental health disorders. Beginning in 1950, for patients that were not responding to medication, ECT, also called “shock therapy,” became available. Over time, researchers began to look at alternative ways to inject electricity into the human brain. One such method was via implantable neurostimulators that required invasive surgery procedures associated with high cost and high risk. Implantable devices became the potential solution for those who would not take or could no longer take pharmaceuticals. The interest in electricity continued with the creation of small handheld devices powered by a direct current (DC) battery that the consumer could buy without any medical supervision. Clinical versions of DC stimulators, known as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), were developed by researchers; many of these devices are still in research settings without industry support.

In 1992, a new neurostimulation technique emerged called trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This technique evolved into repetitive trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which utilized repetitive magnetic pulse energy to stimulate the brain of patients struggling with depression. The American pharmaceutical industry embraced and funded this technology. The FDA cleared rTMS only for patients who had failed to respond to anti-depressants. Side effects, high cost and moderate efficacy continue to burden this technology sector.

Both insurance companies and healthcare providers are looking for alternative ways to decrease costs while still providing safe and effective treatments.

According to Infinium Global Research, the global neurostimulation devices market is projected to grow from approximately $4.7 billion in 2018 to approximately $9.8 billion for a CAGR of 10.9% from 2019-2025. There are several drivers of this growth. First, many mental health disorders are treated with psychotherapy or pharmaceutical intervention and have limited efficacy and, in the case of the latter increased awareness of the side effects of medication. Second, the rising number of geriatric patients, particularly with respect to Alzheimer’s disease, will increase demand for mental health treatments. Third, increased diagnosis of cases of anxiety, depression and various other mental health disorders in all age populations will contribute to market expansion. Doctors and patients will seek effective, safer and more cost-effective alternatives to current care standards. Advancements in neurostimulation techniques, such as those we are developing, will provide treatment options that address irregularities in the brain’s functional health. These functional brain health issues are believed to be the underlying cause of many mental health disorders and chronic diseases.

Overall, we believe that our marketing and growth strategy which we utilized for our Gen-1 device in combination with our advanced waveform, technological upgrades and the development of a modern headset monitored with our IT management platform, evidenced in our Gen-2 and Gen-3 devices, will position us with the opportunity to disrupt the traditional mental health treatment model. Our mission is to remove the stigma of expensive psychotherapy or pharmaceuticals with the attendant side effects and dependency issues and replace such stigma with clinically proven and cost-effective technology that is undetectable to the patient during treatment.

Anxiety Market

Anxiety disorders are considered the most prevalent of psychiatric disorders. Anxiety disorders include generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and phobias.

The following anxiety facts and statistics support the demand for a safe, effective and low-cost solution for anxiety:

Insomnia Market

Insomnia is a common sleep disorder considered to be responsible for at least $63 billion in direct and indirect healthcare costs each year, according to the Harvard American Insomnia Study. A frightening number of insomnia cases are undiagnosed and untreated, even as the condition becomes a mounting financial burden on America’s employers and the healthcare system. Data surrounding sleep disorders demonstrate that insomnia is a growing problem that shows no signs of slowing down. Relatedly:

These current market conditions present an opportunity to introduce a technology that provides a safe, effective and drug-free alternative for those suffering from insomnia. We believe we have the ability to decrease the number of potentially addictive insomnia prescriptions needed by patients and offer physicians a non-pharmaceutical option to provide their patients. Additionally, we are developing a solution for home-based treatment for chronic insomnia and to improve sleep hygiene for its user.

Depression Market

Depression continues to be the leading cause of medical disability around the world. Poor efficacy, risk and adverse side effects of current anti-depressants are driving the preference for non-pharmacological therapies, which will limit growth for the pharmaceutical sector of the depression treatment market. This limitation will enhance the research and development of novel therapies that treat depression safely and effectively without adverse side effects. Historically, according to the CDC, only one-third of people with severe depression have taken anti-depressants.

Most patients with severe depression remain untreated and the potential market for a safe, effective and affordable solution is significant:

Any decline in the depression medication market should indirectly accelerate the growth of the neurostimulator market. Based on the market data and current trends, the depression market — like the anxiety and insomnia market — has enormous potential our products.

Prior to December 2019, our Gen-1 device was considered a Class III device. Treatment of depression in the United States is limited to Class III devices only. Prior to 2019, our existing Gen-1 medical device had been used to successfully treat depression in the U.S. The Gen-2 version of our device when introduced into the United States will be subject to approximately eighteen months of clinical study before our application for PMA from the FDA and classification as a Class III device. Assuming we will be able to obtain successful classification from the FDA, we expect to market our device in the United States as a treatment for depression.

Over recent years more clinical data has proven that medication approved for the treatment of depression does not provide adequate efficacy. In addition to efficacy challenges, side effects can be overwhelming for patients. Frequently, doctors will prescribe based on the least amount of side effects rather than efficacy. Because of the large number of patients struggling with major depressive disorders and treatment resistant depression, alternative treatments are currently experiencing renewed interest and growth. Specifically, neurostimulation related to electricity and magnetic pulse energy are leading the industry of medical technology for the treatment of mental health disorders.

In 2003, our prior generation device was cleared for anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Over the last 17 years, providers in clinics of our technology have utilized our technology to treat patients struggling with depression and having been resistant to medication. We are now undertaking clinical study of our Gen-2 devices and will seek regulatory approval for such devices.

Substance Use Disorders (Opioid Addiction) Market

According to the NIDA, substance use and substance use disorders cost the United States more than $740 billion a year in healthcare, crime and lost productivity costs; but dollars barely capture the devastating human cost of addiction to individuals, families and communities. According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 19.7 million adults in the United States suffered from a substance use disorder in 2017.

Relatedly, drug overdose is now a leading cause of unintentional fatal injury in our nation, claiming more than 70,630 lives in the United States in 2019, as revealed by the CDC. Significantly, opioids were involved in 49,860 of these overdose deaths in 2019, accounting for 70.6% of all drug overdose deaths. According to the NIDA, between eight and twelve percent of people using an opioid for chronic pain develop an opioid use disorder. Opioid addiction also has broad implications for public health due to secondary complications of opioid use.

According to Reports and Data, the global drug addiction treatment market is forecast to reach $31.17 billion by 2027.

The current success rate of the best drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities is minimal. This represents a significant market opportunity for our company. The disease of addiction is brain-based in its nature. Currently brain-based treatments for the disease are only available to patients who can afford long-term expensive boutique treatment centers. We intend to demonstrate that a brain-based approach to addiction treatment will enhance a patient’s success at long-term recovery. Our hypothesis is that the current pilot study design at the University California San Diego (see below) will provide a source of validation for this treatment modality in in addiction treatment associated with chronic pain patients provides the basis of our hypothesis.

Chronic Pain Market

Originally, our waveform was designed as an electro-analgesic for pain. This refers to the ability to electrically interrupt the pain signaling process in the brain. By interrupting the pain signaling process in the brain, our products can reduce symptoms and discomfort associated with chronic pain. By reducing the symptoms and discomfort associated with chronic pain, physicians can reduce medications and avoid dependency issues related to opiate-based medications.

According to Research and Markets, the global chronic pain treatment market is predicted to progress at a CAGR of 6.5% from 2020 to 2030 and generate revenue of $151.7 billion in 2030.

Currently, we own an electrostimulation patent for a device that will apply electrodes to the brain, spine and the place of injury. The placement of these electrodes in conjunction with our various waveforms creates an opportunity for us to treat chronic pain without medication. Upon funding, we plan to immediately develop a prototype of our existing patented design and introduce it into clinical trials for the treatment of chronic pain. In previous pilot studies, our existing Gen-1 product reduced pain in patients suffering from injuries originating in industrial accidents. However, we plan to use the new advanced waveform emitted at 15 milliamps into the new prototype pain device for new clinical trials for the treatment of chronic pain.

Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia Market

Alzheimer’s disease is a degenerative brain disease and the most common form of dementia. Dementia is not a specific disease, but rather an overall term that describes a group of symptoms. According to the WHO, there are around 50 million people living with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias worldwide.

Additionally, according to the Alzheimer’s Association:

According to Reports and Data, the global Alzheimer’s therapeutics market is projected to reach $13.57 billion by 2027 from $7.42 billion in 2019 with a substantial compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.2% through the forecast period.

We believe our products could be leveraged to extend the quality of life for millions of people.

Products and Services

Our existing Gen-1 treatment consists of an FDA Class II medical device that delivers a transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) via disposable headset electrodes that are placed in a specific pattern on the skull of the patient. The device and disposable headset electrodes transmit a non-invasive, low risk and drug free brain stimulation using a small, pulsed electric frequency to the patient. Essentially, our device utilizes a proprietary, patented symmetrical alternating current waveform. The Gen-1 device was designed to treat patients with anxiety and insomnia. The Gen-1 device is administered to the human brain with a non-invasive procedure that places small adhesive electrodes to the forehead and the mastoids behind each ear. The Gen-1 device’s stimulation is undetectable to the human patient and is not associated with any uncomfortable treatment feelings or sensations of a physical nature. Our devices have the ability to utilize RFID technology that exchanges electrode usage data with a reader in the main device. The purpose of RFID is to track and maintain control of the proprietary single use electrode. Our electrode chip will be programmed to exchange data with the device and allow activation for a single treatment with a new electrode only. This one-use disposable, as well as a monthly subscription model, for the Gen-3 headset is designed to ensure a recurring revenue stream on the device and protect against any generic knockoffs designed to avoid treatment costs.

While the FDA previously had approved the Gen-1 device for the described treatment of depression, insomnia and anxiety, as a result of the FDA reclassification of allowable devises for these uses described elsewhere in this prospectus, we had to suspend marketing and sales efforts on the Gen-1 device for treatment of anxiety or insomnia until and if a new amended 510(k) application is submitted by us and approved by the FDA. Clinical and regulatory strategies to a PMA for the Class III treatment of depression are being analyzed by management of the Company. See “Regulatory Strategy.”

The current proprietary waveform at 77.5 hertz and 4 milliamps stimulates these key mid-brain structures involved in regulating neuromodulators and neurotransmitters. These neurochemicals regulate moods, emotions, sleep and cognition. Our patented waveform and electrode placement distinguish our treatment modality from all comparable electrical stimulators currently available. Our device generates a high frequency, charge balanced electrical current waveform that is applied to an array of electrodes on the head. The features of this waveform make the application of the stimulation undetectable to the human body and this technique is proprietary to our device, which enables the use of a higher current than all other devices in the market.

Our waveform stimulates the hypothalamic region of the brain and its correlating networks responsible for maintaining the functional health of the brain. A major function of the hypothalamus is to maintain homeostasis (balance) by constantly sensing and adapting to information received by the brain. When the body is faced with trauma that is associated with the “fight or flight” response, this region of the brain becomes unable to maintain normal levels of serotonin, dopamine, beta-endorphins and other neurotransmitters. The result of reduced levels of these important neurochemicals can be anxiety, insomnia, depression and other mental health disorders, the symptoms of which can increase in frequency and severity if not treated.

Clinical results indicate that 10 to 15 treatments with our existing technology, for 40 minutes per session, helps stabilize neurochemicals within the hypothalamic region of the brain, a process which has been referred to as “resetting the brain.” Early research involving cerebral spinal fluid has demonstrated that beta-endorphins increased by an average of 350% in healthy subjects following these treatments. Beta-endorphins are powerful neurohormones found in the central nervous system that help to relieve pain and stress and are also involved in other positive responses within the brain and body. The beta-endorphin response associated with the neurostimulation by our technology supports the hypothesis that our treatment is encouraging the brain’s ability to normalize neurochemicals associated with major mood disorders and mental health challenges.

Next Generations of Devices

We have already designed and developed a second Generation of our technology — the Gen-2 device. Our waveform in this next Generation utilizes a new advanced waveform and increases the amperage that the device emits from 4 milliamps to 15 milliamps. Our hypothesis is that the new advanced waveform will allow us to increase the power of the device exponentially without creating any safety risks or patient discomfort. By increasing the power, our waveform can penetrate deeper into the brain and the associated structures encompassing mental illness. In the waveform design of the Gen-2 and Gen-3 products, a power increase will be designed to be 15 milliamps. Our research and clinical teams believe that a more powerful waveform will possibly allow for deeper penetration. Current study protocols and randomized clinical trials are being developed to provide data to submit to the FDA for the purpose of safety and efficacy evaluations in the future. Determinations of the safety and efficacy of our devices are solely within the authority of the FDA.

Our Gen-2 device was recently approved in China by the NMPA for the treatment of insomnia and depression in China. We will continue our full clinical testing for approximately 24 months to achieve PMA from the FDA as a Class III device, which we will then market for the treatment of depression in the United States. This and all other devices will include a disposable for one-time use.

The Gen-2 device has a fresh and modern appearance that meets the technology standards of the digital tech world of 2022. Early adopters of the Gen-1 device will be able to access additional firmware upgrades which are planned to enhance the previously purchased devices to the 15-milliamp waveform.

Our Gen-2 device is equipped with RFID technology that exchanges electrode usage data with a reader in the main device. The purpose of RFID is to track and maintain control of the proprietary single use electrode. Our electrode chip will be programmed to exchange data with the device and allow activation for a single treatment with a new electrode only. This ensures a recurring revenue stream on the device and protects against any generic knockoffs designed to avoid treatment costs. This upgrade in technology also ensures the proprietary nature of the electrodes that support treatment outcomes are sustained.

We will also continue developing a new headset design for our products that will offer medical professionals the opportunity to prescribe the headset device — Gen-3 — for use in a patient’s home to increase access to mental health treatment. We believe that in order to preserve product safety and integrity for home use, the headset device will require physician oversight including prescriptions for use, monthly authorization for continued patient use and monthly physician monitoring through a Nexalin virtual clinic digital management platform utilizing a subscription model.

Marketing and Growth Strategy

Based on our current marketing and growth strategy, sales of our products will follow a three-phase process in the United States.

Phase 1

Upon closing of this offering, the Company will continue to evaluate the filing an amended 510 k for our 4-amp device (Gen -1) for insomnia and anxiety or a new 510K for our Gen-2 15mAmp device (Gen-2).

Our sales team will evaluate a sales model for our devices that directly targets service providers such as licensed professionals and mental health clinics, in specific geographic territories that we believe will generate revenue and lay the foundation for the promotion of our company and products.

During this initial Phase 1, we will evaluate strengthening the clinical case for our treatment by organizing and structuring a portfolio of research and abstracts that originated during the research and development of the waveform and recently completed trials in China and the United States. We believe that this portfolio will include clinical summaries from additional clinicals in the United States and China that are in the manuscript phase with pending submissions for publication.

Additionally, our regulatory team will continue communications with the FDA that originated in “pre-sub” meetings and communications as part of our FDA approval strategy. We will evaluate the results of these communications and meetings as part of our marketing and growth strategy.

We intend to participate in virtual and in-person conventions and meetings, leverage remote sales techniques and promote our company and products in trade publications. We intend to plan to fully participate in trade shows. We will also utilize digital marketing services to promote our products via social media interactions.

While our Phase 1 program has not officially begun, after completion of this offering, we will evaluate and monitor our staffing requirements, regulatory strategies, and market conditions to develop and support the next phase of our sales and marketing plans.

Our current marketing and growth strategy for our devices may be updated as a result of our ongoing evaluations during this initial Phase 1, as well as continuing developments with our Gen-2 device.

Phase 1 Pricing

Current clinical providers of our technology who leased our devices prior to December 2019 pay a license fee of $995 per month and pay $6 per single use electrode. The monthly license fee agreement allows for unlimited use of the device and servicing. Servicing consists of warranty coverage, electrode sales, and patient cable replacement. This servicing is included in the monthly lease payment. The only other charge for use for those who bought devices is related to the single use electrode. During the calendar years of 2019 and 2020, some providers who were leasing the devices prior to December 2019 chose to buy the device for $15,000, rather than continue to pay the monthly usage fee. Currently, we receive approximately $11,000 per month in license fees, monthly lease payments or sales of electrodes.

Phase 2

The second phase of the sales plan will begin with regulatory approval of our Gen-2 device followed thereafter by manufacture of such device. Our marketing and growth strategy from Phase 1 will then transition into the Phase 2 marketing and growth strategy and additional conventions, virtual meetings and marketing strategies will be added. In addition to the licensed medical professional and the licensed psychiatric community, our sales team will add the chiropractic community of 60,000 licensed chiropractors in the United States to the concept of targeted purchasers. Additional marketing will occur in the addiction treatment sector. All sales projections in this phase will include any

Phase 1 sales, new sales from Phase 2 and a transition sales program for providers using the Gen-1 device. Revenues will be derived from the sale of disposables and subscriptions. The sales team has accounted for various market adjustments and attrition rates related to medical device sales.

The Gen-2 device upgrades are in three primary areas — the new waveform, new modern enclosure and the “chipped” single use electrodes for recurring revenue. The waveform in this Gen-2 device is powered at 15 milliamps. The enclosure for the Gen-2 device has completed the design stage and is in prototype casting and initial manufacturing stage. The design will provide a fresh and modern appearance that is associated with technological standards in the digital tech world of 2022.

Our Gen-2 devices will be equipped with RFID technology that exchanges electrode usage data with a reader in the main device. The purpose of RFID is to track and maintain control of the proprietary single use electrode. Our electrode chip will be programmed to exchange data with the device and allow activation for a single treatment with a new electrode only. This ensures a recurring revenue stream on the device and protects against any generic knockoffs designed to avoid treatment costs. This upgrade in technology also ensures the proprietary nature of the electrodes that support treatment outcomes are sustained. The revenue projections in Phase 2 are based on device sales and recurring disposable electrode sales.

Phase 2 sales will include the development and launch of a “Patient Activation Program” that encourages passive patients to become active healthcare consumers interested in our treatment modality. This program will provide a web-based patient recruitment and management platform. The Patient Activation Program is designed as a module that will eventually plug into the virtual clinic digital cloud computing platform — to be developed as part of Gen-3 — that will manage all aspects of our business model including the outpatient headset device for outpatient consumer use in the home.

Phase 2 Pricing

The Gen-2 device and the per treatment charge associated with the disposable electrode will require additional market analysis supported with data from the Phase 1 marketing and growth plan. The current stimulator market is based on two distinct market price points. The high end of the market is dominated by the Neurostar and Brainsway rTMS systems that require large capital expenses between $100,000 and $300,000 per device. The Neurostar system also requires a single use disposable magnet priced at an average of $100 per treatment. The low end of the market is dominated by small plastic handheld devices that are powered with a DC battery and are sold over the internet direct to consumers for an average of $400. Our sales plan is designed to exploit the disparity in the pricing models and will target the mid-market entry point to maximize sales and continuing usage revenue.

Phase 3

This phase of our sales plan provides a long-term scalable business model. Our team will have developed the foundation and marketing assets necessary to launch the new virtual clinic model that will complement the traditional clinic model. Our sales model is to place more than 1,000 Gen-2 devices on the global stage. The momentum and branding strategies of our existing providers will be leveraged to enhance the launch of the Phase 3 global sales plan. The Gen-2 device at 15 milliamps supported by the Gen-3 outpatient headset and our virtual clinic digital management platform is intended to disrupt the current mental healthcare model. The Gen-2 device at 15 milliamps will offer patients a cost effective and efficient treatment model for day-to-day mental health challenges. This device, with its advanced waveform, can treat existing mental health disorders associated with anxiety and insomnia. Additionally, new strategies are in research and development for FDA treatment indications for depression, substance use issues associated with addiction, especially as related to opioids, and alcoholism and chronic pain will be incorporated into our treatment regimen. Additional research and treatment efficacy are being investigated in the Alzheimer’s community for patient care and management.

The Phase 3 sales plan is designed to triangulate and stimulate the physician, consumer, and manufacturer relationship. Trends in healthcare indicate consumers are involved in treatment decisions that concern their mental health. Because of the advancement in healthcare technologies, home-based care with medical supervision provides patients with a cost-effective and efficient treatment option. Home-based care also avoids the stigma associated with treatment for mental health disorders. In the sales plan presented, we will have established a global “provider” network in excess of 1,000 physicians, with 700 such physicians located in the United States. We will leverage this community to establish a network of physicians that prescribe our home-based devices in a virtual clinic setting.

Our goal is that over 40,000 patients will have received a regiment of our treatments by the launch of the outpatient headset device and the IT management platform. Most of the patients treated would be part of a digital community that supports brand awareness and the sharing of anonymous outcomes in a social media setting. The Patient Activation Program will include a robust data gathering system on providers and patients (opt-in) that enhances our marketing strategies.

At this point in the sales plan, we would have developed an extensive patient activation program that is active and driving patients to our products. This patient recruitment system will provide the marketing vehicle to launch our outpatient, home-based headset treatment device. This new treatment option would exist in addition to the clinic-based service. We will continue to build the provider network with our virtual and convention models. In addition to existing providers becoming “prescribers” for our home-based unit, a sales team will recruit additional physicians to become “prescribers” of our home-based unit. This allows market penetration in areas without existing providers.

Our devices in Phase 3 will have modern aesthetics with advanced digital capabilities. In this phase, we will focus on the ability to record and transmit usage data. Advanced power management, network communication and patient-centric design will translate into improved device comfort, efficacy, and consumer compliance. We will also gather data from user habits through cloud-based technology. In addition, real time patient conditions such as brain activity and biometrics will be tracked and recorded. This data will be available in our patient portal for physician monitoring. The data blueprints developed will increase our ability to penetrate the market and contribute to market valuation.

Phase 3 Pricing

A transition program for all our providers will be developed to upgrade their devices to our latest device with the advanced waveform. Depending on the final enclosure and internal hardware components, the target trade-in and transition price is $8,000 for Gen-1 providers to change to becoming Gen-2 providers. Specific pricing of our Gen-2 devices for new providers at 15 milliamps will need further market analysis.

Reimbursement

Reimbursement strategies for this type of technology are complex and vary from one diagnosis to another. We utilize an RFID system that will track doses delivered. This will simplify comparing our devices to pharmaceutical interventions. Beginning in Phase 1, a complete reimbursement assessment will be conducted and evaluated to develop a four-year strategy to acquire reimbursement. We will employ a two-prong approach. The first prong will evaluate the clinic-based product offered by physicians. The second prong will focus on tracking usage and response from the outpatient headset model that is tracked through the virtual platform. Frequently therapies that are used in the home are not classified as durable medical equipment and will fall into a reimbursement gap without coverage. We intend to work to successfully achieve a Level 2 code under the healthcare common procedure coding system. We will work to seek reimbursement for conditions in sequence with the home based and the clinic-based unit that will maximize value of treatment from a financial standpoint as well as monitoring the response by the patient community.

Specific strategies to ensure successful reimbursement will include:

China Market

In September 2018, we entered into an agreement with Wider, pursuant to which we and Wider shall form the Joint Venture. The Joint Venture will be formed following the completion of certain funding, clinical study, and publication milestones, which Wider has agreed to undertake but not yet completed. Following its formation, the Joint Venture will design and implement a comprehensive business model and distribution plan for our devices in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. The first phase of distribution in China includes implementation of a sales strategy by Wider for mainland China and other territories serviced by Wider. We expect the Joint Venture to be formed by the third quarter of 2023.

In March 2022, we entered into a second supplement to the Joint Venture agreement with Wider, whereby the parties confirmed that the Joint Venture had not yet been established and is subject to further review and analysis of regulatory issues in China and the United States, trade and political issues between the two countries and potential changes in the use and market for the Company’s products and technology. Pursuant to the second supplement, the parties agreed to use their commercial efforts to complete documentation by September 30, 2022. In light of general economic conditions in China and the United States and the continued impact of regulatory issues in China and the United States and trade and political issues between the two counties, the parties determined to further extend the time frame to complete establishment of the joint venture to September 30, 2023 and entered into a supplement 3 to the Joint Venture Agreement to memorialize such extension. The parties intend to continue to work together to complete the establishment prior to such extended time.

During the first half of 2022, we sold Gen-2 devices in China through Wider which agreed to act as a distributor on a limited basis pending formation of the Joint Venture. As a result, we recognized revenue of approximately $624,000 during the first half of 2022. In conjunction with such revenue, during the first half of 2022, we incurred costs of approximately $143,000 for cost of goods sold, delivery and labeling costs. In 2021, we incurred expenses relating to certain development costs associated with these devices sold during the first half of 2022 which were recorded during 2021. The Company expects that the $34,000 of additional costs attributed to the $260,000 sale in the first half of 2022 may not be indicative of our cost of sales in future periods and that beginning in the second half of 2022 gross margins may decrease due to an increase in the costs of components, manufacturing, delivery, sales and marketing. In addition, we expect to derive revenue as a royalty fee from the China based manufacturer of electrodes for electrodes ordered by Wider in connection with the distribution of our devices in China. The manufacturer will pay us a 20% royalty based upon its electrode sales price to Wider in connection with Wider’s device distribution activities.

We do not pay Wider any commissions or distributor related fees; it derives profit from its markup of devices it sells. We were not required to obtain any China regulatory approvals with respect to the limited sales of our devices in China by Wider.

In September of 2021, the NMPA, the equivalent of the United States FDA, approved the Gen-2 device for the treatment of insomnia and depression. These treatment indications and clearances from the NMPA have allowed us to market and sell the Gen-2 device for these uses in China.

No other regulatory of governmental approvals are required for the sale of our devices by Wider and the potential Joint Venture in China. We may be required to obtain additional or different approvals in Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. When the Joint Venture is formed and Wider completes sales of our devices in China, there are no regulatory or other restrictions that would restrict either (i) the transfer from China of any proceeds resulting from such sales by Wider to the Joint Venture in Hong Kong, other than standard compliance with China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange policies and approval process, or (ii) our receipt of our share of such proceeds from Hong Kong to us in the United States. According to the SAFE guidelines on foreign exchange management of trade in goods (implemented on August 1, 2012) and the PRC guidelines on foreign exchange business under current account (2020 version) implemented on August 28, 2020, there are no restrictions on the transfer of sales proceeds by Chinese domestic companies to Hong Kong companies or foreign companies as long as the current standard SAFE procedures are followed. The current standard SAFE procedures are as follows:

We expect to consummate the formation of the potential Joint Venture by the third quarter of 2023.

See “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China.”

Research

Summary of Current Clinical Trials in the United States

In 2019, we began a research partnership with the University California San Diego (UCSD). Prior to the pandemic, two pilot clinical studies were undertaken with UCSD, however, these trials were paused due to the shutdown of college campuses in California. In the summer of 2021, new contract negotiations began to explore strategies for special control trials for anxiety and insomnia. Additional strategies are in development for PTSD and Opiate dependency and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Timelines, contracts, study design and research strategies are in progress and are waiting for new comments from the FDA presub in the 4th quarter of 2022.

At UCSD the first clinical is studying the benefits of our Gen-2 device as a treatment for veterans suffering with opiate addiction. This pilot study was designed by UCSD and funded by the department of Veterans Affairs. For this opiate addiction study, the primary endpoint will be alleviating withdrawal symptoms. Secondary endpoints will include decreasing dosages of medication used in opiate addiction cessation, as well as Magnetoencephalography (MEG) gamma band improvement.

The other study at UCSD is focused on veterans suffering from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and is funded by the United States Department of Defense. One of the primary symptoms associated with mTBI is PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder). The primary endpoint associated with this study will be the assessment and reduction of post-concussion symptoms associated with PTSD. A secondary endpoint for the study will be improvement and MEG slow-wave abnormalities. Additional studies are planned for patients and veterans with suicidal thoughts related to mTBI.

In addition to UCSD, we are in negotiations with other academics to initiate further trials to address new FDA guidelines on existing 4 milliamp and safety in our 15-milliamp Gen-2 device. These new trials will support new 510(k)s for anxiety and insomnia at 15 milliamps. These trials are in addition to the special control trials required by the FDA. Contract negotiations and preparations are also in progress with the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Arizona for additional trials for the treatment of insomnia and anxiety. Final contracts are due to be executed after final recommendations are reviewed from the FDA pre-sub meetings projected to take place in the fourth quarter of 2022.

In 2019, another pilot study was completed with the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) at an inpatient psychiatric hospital in the Hackensack meridian healthcare system. The study began with 93 subject patients and was completed by 79 subject patients. The pilot data demonstrated that 73% of patients that received our treatment had a 50% reduction in depression symptoms in a 5-day treatment window. These patients were isolated and secluded in an adult treatment wing at the hospital and were possible candidates for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The patients in the study were not responding to medication treatment and needed to be hospitalized. The follow-up trials recommended by UPenn will build on the observations of this clinical study. In addition to the symptom reduction, other data will be researched and published on the economic savings by adding our treatment instead of continued hospitalization and possible ECT or other implant technology costs. Further trial strategies are in development to address safety with the 15-milliamp Gen-2 device.

A second clinical trial was performed at Xuanwu Hospital in Beijing, China studying our technology for the treatment of depression: “The effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation intervention on depressed patients who have never taken medication.” A total of 30 subjects were enrolled. After four weeks of tACS intervention, the remission ratio of the active group was also higher than that of the control group. In addition, the remission ratio in the fourth week was higher than that in the eighth week, indicating that the acute effect of tACS in reducing the degree of depression was obvious. With the cessation of tACS intervention, the patients’ depression levels rebounded to a certain extent at the end of the next four weeks of follow-up, that is, the eighth week, but the antidepressant effect still had a significant clinical effect and can last until the eighth week.

In conclusion, tACS has the effect of reducing depression with no obvious adverse reactions have been observed. The results of this clinical trial were recently published in the medical journal “BRAIN”. The article was accepted for review in June of 2021 was published in the summer of 2022. An additional insomnia trial performed in China was also accepted for publication in the medical journal “Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics” in December of 2019.

Other areas of research that will be designed and funded relate to the treatment of substance use disorders, Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.

Summary of Current Clinical Trial Strategy

Research and development are the fundamental core of any pharmaceutical or medical device company. Although small trials, with limited patients, can show promise for a treatment, they are generally not acceptable to the FDA for product approval. In order to commercialize a product for widespread use, multiple large-scale trials are required to demonstrate both efficacy and safety. In the past two decades, the cost of conducting such trials has more than doubled, with many small start-up companies unable to raise the necessary capital to complete these vital projects. The increase in cost reflects several variables which are required for successful clinical trial completion.

The various costs can include patient recruitment and retention expenses, physician and nurse expenses, as well as the expenses of other healthcare providers. Various regulations, each more complex than the next, also have added significant cost to the process. Data collection, as well as data analysis, is also a significant portion of the study cost. Additionally, almost all studies are conducted through either a large university, with its underlying overhead for administrative costs and institutional review board approval, or through a contract research organization, which also adds significant overhead costs in addition to the hard cost of the study itself. Latest estimates for the cost per patient for an average trial is approximately $41,000 per patient.

The planned research for the potential Joint Venture would include at least five major areas of research. These studies would be performed over approximately eighteen to twenty-four months, with the goal of publishing the findings in a peer reviewed journal. All research will be controlled by our team, with all trial designs requiring written final approval by our Chief Medical Officer. Clinical updates will be required every two weeks. Frequent in-person inspections will also be performed to ensure the integrity of the research efforts.

In addition to clinical trial work in China and current studies in the United States required by the FDA, further proposed studies will evaluate a large cohort of patients with depression. This trial would include a double-blind study design with active and sham group treatment. These patients would be selected for treatment for major depressive episodes. Patient selection screening will evaluate 100-200 subjects in order to acquire the number of patients needed for a successful trial. Each patient, upon enrollment, will be evaluated extensively prior to initiation of therapy. Patients will be treated a minimum of 15 separate times, with each visit requiring pre- and post-test screening. Moreover, upon completion of therapy, post-test examination will be performed not only immediately thereafter but also over the course of one to three months to establish not only efficacy but durability of the treatment. Recent regulatory changes by the FDA require submission of new clinical studies for continued approval of treatment of depression. We anticipate a large trial, with at least 100 subjects, randomized to active and placebo treatment. In the United States, a trial of this magnitude would cost between $2 million and $3 million, if performed at a leading research hospital. Furthermore, for this particular trial, we will be seeking patients who are pharmaceutically naïve, i.e., patients who have never received antidepressant pharmaceuticals. In the United States, this is a difficult study to populate, as the prevalence of antidepressants in our society leads to very few patients who have not previously received such drugs.

One of the areas of brain stimulation which shows promise is the area of improvement of memory and heightening of mental acuity. Learning can be improved when certain neural circuits are stimulated. Our aim is to demonstrate the effectiveness of our product in memory and learning skills. This study will be conducted in China and will be designed to demonstrate increased capacity for memory and learning with the addition of proper brain stimulation. The study will incorporate multiple patient tasks including both memorization tracking as well as evaluating improvement in physical dexterity. The goal of this research is to have a handheld, at-home device for students in China as well as adults. We anticipate 40-60 patients for the segments of the trial. Current plans are to have at least two different trials, one with memory assessment and the other with manual dexterity evaluation. The trials are difficult to perform, requiring significant hands-on proctorship for each patient. Wider will cover all costs associated with the research required for the consumer product for students in China. These trials will support an aggressive distribution model for the product directly to the consumer in China for the enhancement of memory and learning.

There are multiple transcranial stimulation devices on the market. Few have been studied in terms of their neurophysiology. One of the areas that we wish to explore is the activation of various areas of the brain following stimulation with our device. This evaluation would be performed with sophisticated fMRI equipment evaluating areas of neuronal stimulation, both within the deep and superficial regions of the brain. Blood flow activation models will demonstrate, using sophisticated fMRI mapping, the targeted areas for the brain, looking for both areas of stimulation and neural network changes. Additionally, we will utilize PET scanning to evaluate changes in brain function and activity. Measurements of GABA, an inhibitory neuron chemical, as well as glutamate, an excitatory transmitter, will be performed. Such trials are expensive by definition, as the cost of fMRI as well as PET scanning are quite high. The cost of one small 10-person trial would border on $40,000-$60,000 or more per patient for the radiotracers and scanning times, as well as patient recruitment. We estimate the cost of this trial would be in excess of $1.2 million.

Transcranial stimulation as it affects neuronal function has been studied in multiple diseases. One of the most challenging diseases today is Alzheimer’s disease. As the population’s longevity increases, the disease affects a greater number worldwide. Animal research has shown some promise with various wavelength stimulations of the brain in potentially slowing the progress of the disease.

At the start of 2021, an Alzheimer’s specific clinical trial was underway in China: “Transcranial alternating current stimulation for patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease.” Extensive cognitive pre- and post-evaluations are being performed at the beginning and conclusion of the study, with less rigorous evaluations before and after each therapy session. To date, ten subjects have undergone radioisotope C-11PIB PET-MR examination, thirty-six subjects have undergone MR EEG examination, thirty-four subjects have completed treatment and twenty-one subjects have completed the follow-up. This clinical trial is in progress and expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2023.

Given the nature of their illness, the patients in this study require skilled nursing assistance throughout the study, increasing costs considerably. Estimated cost for completion of this study is approximately $30,000 per patient. We estimate the cost of this trial to be $1.5 million, with such cost being borne solely by Wider.

A final area of study would include evaluation of chemical changes within the brain following transcranial stimulation. Chemicals, which are naturally formed in the brain, control many of our moods and thoughts, modulating feelings of pain, depression and generalized mood. These substances also drive cravings in substance use disorders. One of the areas of research would be to validate changes in cerebrospinal fluid demonstrating serotonin levels. Serotonin is a “feel good” chemical which has also been associated with learning. Other chemicals, such as dopamine, act in a reward center mechanism. Additionally, certain other neurons require specific chemicals to either fire or be inhibited from firing. These areas can be explored through both chemical testing of bodily fluids and utilizing specific radioactive markers in the brain for evaluation with PET MRI scans. Current research plans would allow us access to such sophisticated diagnostic equipment to conduct multiple clinical investigations accordingly. This study would require invasive testing, including blood sample drawings as well as lumbar punctures. These invasive tests will be repeated multiple times upon the same patient, making study recruitment challenging. Estimates for a 20-patient trial are approximately $30,000 per patient, and the total cost of this trial would be in excess of $600,000.

The estimated total investment value of the four clinical trials in China is in excess of $4.8 million, with such costs being borne solely by Wider.

See “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China.”

Development

Devices

Our engineering team is currently working on the design of new generations of the Nexalin clinical device, an outpatient headset device and a consumer device for marketing in China. These new Nexalin devices will include new enclosures, proprietary disposable headset electrodes for revenue control and modern consumer headsets. These new generations of devices will utilize a new advanced waveform with power increased to 15 milliamps. Our team projects a twelve to eighteen month timeline for design and manufacturing files to be completed and prototypes to be tested. A new regulatory and clearance filing with the FDA will require nine to twelve months. Our transition plan will be to support the introduction of the Gen-2 device into the existing marketing and growth strategy.

The next stage for our business in China is to design and manufacture a consumer-based device that can be easily acquired at an affordable price point. The engineering team is designing the new device to market and distribute in the China market for memory enhancement. This consumer device and sales plan will add an additional scalable revenue track. Our engineering and design team will design the consumer device to administer the Nexalin waveform at the precise areas of the brain that have proven clinical efficacy.

The Gen-3 outpatient headset will make use of our investment in the virtual clinic digital management platform. The users will be able to download an application to their mobile devices that will gather data associated with user habits and the initial response to the treatment by the client. The Nexalin app will then communicate with a cloud-based program created to support and modify future waveform and treatment recommendations.

Virtual Clinic Digital Management Platform

We look to capitalize on the post pandemic digital health model. Our team began researching IT digital development firms at the beginning of the pandemic. We have now completed our research and bidding process and have begun contract negotiations with a leading IT design team to begin work on an advanced, proprietary IT management platform that will eventually manage all aspects of the Nexalin clinic model. The vision is to implement a virtual clinic model that will enable providers and clinics to integrate remote outpatients into an overall treatment process. Our IT platform goes well beyond telehealth and is designed to support all aspects of the treatment model in conjunction with various data sets to support marketing, data collection and patient monitoring. Our digital management platform will manage the entire clinical and outpatient headset business model. The proprietary IT platform will manage all aspects of a new virtual health center related to treatment for mental health. As the development of the new generations of our devices and the outpatient headset are developed, the digital platform will eventually manage and triangulate the relationship between the medical professional, the patient and the manufacturer. The digital platform will handle logistics, data collection and user experience data for clinical evaluation. Additionally, there will be an app that the patients will install on their phones that will communicate with the outpatient headset. The app will upload user information that is HIPAA compliant to the IT management platform. Modules will be designed and implemented in the platform to collect biometric data. The biometric data will be utilized to evaluate patient response. A symptom exam for additional clinical validation will also be offered in the app. All data and user information will be stored in a secure, HIPAA compliant cloud computing center and access to the information will be managed through a secure and compliant dashboard management system. The medical professional will have access to all data to monitor outpatient experience, client response and general health and wellness information.

We will leverage our IT investment to create a lead management system for mental health clinics connecting prospective patients with providers. The medical professional will be able to engage in a telehealth virtual appointment with prospective patients to complete an evaluation and assess whether the patient is a candidate for the outpatient headset program. After the professional approves the device for the patient, we will automatically prepare shipment of the device directly to the outpatient consumer from the manufacturer. We will have an internal department to monitor shipment, and to answer questions through a help desk on how to set up and use the device. The medical professional can be reimbursed for the virtual appointment via the outpatient’s insurance for telehealth care which is becoming part of the new normal in the post-pandemic, digital-health world.

Additional design and implementation of modules related to social media marketing, bio-metric data collection and user experience will eventually complete the design of the IT management platform.

Manufacturing

In December 2021, we entered into a quality assurance agreement with Apical Instruments, an FDA-registered manufacturer, to ensure quality assurance of our products. We currently have enough design and manufacturing support to meet all projected company design and sales goals. Our regulatory team works closely with the Apical quality team to ensure all current compliance and testing standards are adhered to. All distribution channels will rely on a collaboration between the Apical and Nexalin teams.

Regulatory Strategy

Our Gen-1 device was originally cleared by the FDA for the treatment of anxiety, insomnia and depression through a 510(k) application. Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act or FFDCA, involves an application submitted to the FDA that demonstrates a medical device is safe and effective because it is substantially equivalent to another legally marketed device that has been cleared previously by the FDA for the same treatment indication. At the time of that original clearance, the 510(k) submission did not require specific clinical data related to the

technology in the submission document. The Nexalin devices are classified by the FDA as a CES device. The CES device category in general was classified as a high-risk Class III medical device. Historically a Class III medical device would require a PMA. A PMA is the FDA process of extreme scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of any Class III medical device. The CES device category of medical devices was exempt from the PMA process and allowed the 510(k) application for treatment without scientific data. The PMA process for a Class III medical device requires 12 to 24 months and a capital investment that frequently exceeds $2 million for each treatment indication. The process of amending a current 510(k) application with new clinical testing data that provides evidence of effectiveness can be completed in 12 to 18 months and requires a capital investment of $700,000 to $800,000 for each treatment indication. We intend on using a portion of the proceeds of this offering to analyze whether to proceed, and the timing and steps necessary, for amending the prior 501(k) application and evaluating strategies to file a new PMA for the treatment of depression.

Beginning in 2016, the FDA began to hold public comment periods to support possible reclassification of CES devices to a Class II medical device. This decision would essentially lower the risk category of CES devices. On December 20, 2019, the FDA issued new rulings related to CES devices for the treatment of anxiety, depression and insomnia. Depression treatment with CES devices will remain a Class III medical device and will now require a full PMA that provides definitive clinical trial evidence of effectiveness and safety. We are currently evaluating strategies to file a new PMA for the treatment of depression with the Gen-2 device that administers a new advanced Nexalin waveform at 15 milliamps. The Gen-1 device was originally cleared by the FDA at 4 milliamps. We will not file a PMA on the Gen-1 4 milliamps device for the treatment of depression.

For the treatment of insomnia and anxiety, the FDA will not require a PMA application; however, it will require our company to amend our current 510(k) application on the Gen-1 device with new clinical testing data that provides evidence of effectiveness. The deadline for submitting this clinical testing data was December 19, 2020. As a result of the pandemic, this deadline has been extended. The Nexalin regulatory team began communicating with the FDA in late 2020 to outline possible timelines for clinical trials that will begin as the country reopens so that patients can safely participate in our clinical trials. We have engaged in “pre-sub” meetings and are in the FDA comment period related to the special control trials for existing treatment indications of anxiety and insomnia. A second pre-sub meeting is currently planned for December of 2022. All our protocols and contracts are on hold with our research partners teams at UCSD, University of Arizona and UPenn until a second pre-sub meeting with the FDA takes place. A second meeting with the FDA will be scheduled to inform the FDA of changes in the protocols and possible strategy modifications for a combined 4 milliamps and 15 milliamps new 510K. The FDA has not officially provided us with any deadline related to the amendment of our current 510K application. We are requesting a second pre-sub meeting the FDA in the fourth quarter of 2022 for the submission of final protocols for the FDA’s review and approval. As a result of the FDA reclassification described elsewhere in this prospectus, we decided to suspend marketing efforts on the Gen-1 device for treatment of anxiety or insomnia until a new amended 510(k) application is approved by the FDA. Our operations team has continued to monitor and support existing clinics in operation in the U.S. Our regulatory team has also informed the FDA of the suspension of marketing our products to new providers. Additionally, our regulatory team informed the FDA inspectors that we continue to support the operations of clinical providers that were open prior to the FDA’s December 2019 rulings.

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2021, continuing to date, we began designing and planning new clinical trial strategies on our Gen-2 15 milliamp device for the treatment of anxiety and insomnia. Additionally, we are exploring new clinical trial strategies with our new Gen-2 device at 15 milliamps for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). In the second quarter of 2022 our regulatory team began soliciting guidance on new 510K’s for Gen-2 and Gen-3 at 15 milliamps for various treatment indications related to substance use disorders (SUD), anxiety and insomnia. Additional guidance has been solicited on designing and planning new 510K’s that will combine the 4 milliamps Gen-1 special control trials and the Gen-2 and Gen-3 new trials to support new 510K’s for anxiety and insomnia.

Intellectual Property

Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to: obtain and maintain proprietary or intellectual property protection for our products, our core technologies and other know-how; operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others; and prevent others from infringing on our proprietary or intellectual property rights. Our policy is to seek to protect our proprietary and intellectual property position by, among other methods, filing United States and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development and implementation of our business. We also rely on the skills, knowledge and experience of our scientific and technical personnel, as well as that of our advisors, consultants and other contractors. To help protect

our proprietary know-how that is not patentable, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect our interests. We require our employees, consultants and advisors to enter into confidentiality agreements prohibiting the disclosure of confidential information and requiring disclosure and assignment to us of the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions important to our business.

We file patent applications directed to our key products to establish intellectual property positions. These patent applications are intended to protect these products as well as their uses in the treatment of diseases.

The intellectual property portfolios for our most advanced products are summarized below.

Patents

We are the owner and inventor of one existing patent and five pending patents related to the electro-stimulation techniques related to our products and services. Our current patents cover a therapeutic electro-stimulation apparatus (the medical device) and the software used to create and administer the stimulation to the patient.

Recently, we developed a strategy to create a broad intellectual property estate focused on the stimulation techniques that our current technology is based on. Our legal team is currently working closely with our engineers on new claims and device improvements. These designs and claims will support a new portfolio of provisional patents related to non-invasive neurostimulation of the brain with specific arrays of frequencies and triangulating electrode placement.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MATRIX

We expect to file additional provisional and non-provisional patent applications and copyright protection pertaining to future Generation technology, proprietary software and trademarks. The patent claims associated with the non-provisional patent applications will be defined and prepared in the filings. The intention is to build an intellectual property portfolio asset. Future research and development projects related to advancements in neurostimulation and neuromodulation technology will be identified and investigated for future patent filings.

Patent Term and Term Extensions

The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term for patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries, including the United States, the patent term is twenty years from the earliest effective filing date of a non-provisional patent application. In the United States, a patent’s term may be lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates a patentee for administrative delays by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, in examining and granting a patent, or may be shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over an earlier filed patent. The term of a patent that covers a product may also be eligible for patent term extension when FDA approval is granted, provided statutory and regulatory requirements are met.

Similar provisions are available in foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved product. In the future, if and when our products receive approval by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, we expect to apply for patent term extensions on issued patents covering those products, depending upon the length of the clinical trials for each product and other factors. The expiration dates referred to above are without regard to a potential patent term extension or another market exclusivity that may be available to us. However, we cannot provide any assurances that any such patent term extension of a foreign patent will be obtained and, if obtained, the duration of such extension.

Our patents and patent applications are subject to procedural or legal challenges by others. We may be unable to obtain, maintain and protect the intellectual property rights necessary to conduct our business, and we may be subject to claims that we infringe or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of others, which could materially harm our business. For more information, see the section titled “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.”

Trademarks, Trade Secrets and Know-How

Our trademark portfolio currently consists of registered trademark rights for the mark NEXALIN TECHNOLOGY in the United States. In connection with the ongoing development and advancement of our products and services in the United States and various international jurisdictions, we routinely seek to create protection for our marks and enhance their value by pursuing trademarks and service marks where available and when appropriate. In addition to patents and trademark protection, we rely upon unpatented trade secrets and know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our proprietary information, in part, by using confidentiality agreements with our commercial partners, collaborators, employees and consultants, and invention assignment agreements with our employees. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and, in the case of the invention assignment agreements, to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed through a relationship with a third party. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that our commercial partners, collaborators, employees and consultants use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.

Competition

We plan to be the leader in brain-based health. We compete with traditional pharmaceutical therapies. All of these have side effects, such as drug dependency as well as adverse health risks.

We also compete with several neurostimulators at the high and low end of the market as well as implanted devices. All have either a high-risk profile or uncomfortable side effects with moderate efficacy. Our products were designed as a cost-effective option to all current reimbursed treatments available to the patient.

We believe that existing neurostimulation products are either high risk, high cost and difficult to administer. In addition, they are invasive, frequently requiring surgery and multiple visits to a physician. Since many of the conditions requiring ongoing treatments, the difficulty and cost of administering them make them of limited utility for broad application.

Our researchers and developers understood that specific electrical waveforms with specific frequencies that mimicked the natural electricity in the brain was the future of the treatment of mental health issues and health issues related to the nervous system. After successful research on rabbit brains and then human subjects, a new waveform was designed that utilized the alternating current and frequency patterns that evoked a specific chemical response associated with mental health.

To ensure the integrity of the waveform and penetration into deep mid-brain structures, the waveform needed to be undetectable to the human body. This refers to the alternating current configuration of the patented waveform. This would eliminate the major downfall with other stimulators that are limited in power because of patient discomfort associated with the treatment. A triangulating electrode system was also designed to ensure the entire brain was stimulated rather than a targeted area that may not be associated with the mental disorder. The specifics of our waveform are covered in our patents.

Pharmaceuticals

Drug-based therapies are sometimes associated with side effects, including drug dependency and additional adverse health risks. Pharmaceuticals include SSRIs, narcotics and benzodiazepines, all of which have issues with tolerance, dependence and withdrawal. Narcotics and benzodiazepines moreover have addictive properties. All these medications also raise significant issues when long-term use builds up tolerance in the body. This tolerance then requires more of the same medication or additional medications to achieve the same effect. With each medication stacked, a new set of side effects can occur.

Numerous reviews of clinical data have exposed lower overall effectiveness than the original data first published when the medication was introduced. In fact, most popular antidepressant studies with negative outcomes have never been published. According to a study in the New England Journal of Medicine, and then reported in the New York Times, based on the published literature, it appeared that 94% of the trials conducted on antidepressant agents were positive. The study in the New England Journal of Medicine found, however, that by contrast, the FDA analysis, which included studies that were not published, showed that 51% were positive. Many studies that have negative outcomes are never published and are removed from public access. This approach to publishing only positive clinical studies and then engaging in major media marketing campaigns has contributed to a prescription medication epidemic. In addition to patients that do not respond to psychiatric medications, there is another population of patients that report that side effects overwhelm any benefits the medications may offer.

After decades of prescription abuse by certain industry professionals, patients are now seeking alternative treatments that are effective without the serious side effects. Consumer influence and awareness, accompanied with digital technology advancements, are driving many physicians to adopt new treatment modalities like neurostimulators supported with lifestyle changes.

Antidepressants such as Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Celexa, Lexapro, Effexor, Pristiq, Wellbutrin and Cymbalta are probably the most studied antidepressants, but the following observations apply to most or all antidepressants: these drugs produce long-term apathy and loss of quality of life; they frequently produce a generalized loss of motivation or interest in many or all aspects of life; they frequently cause irreversible dysfunction and loss of interest in sexuality, relationship and love; withdrawal from all antidepressants can cause a wide variety of distressing and dangerous emotional reactions from depression to mania and from suicide to violence; after withdrawal from antidepressants, individuals often experience persistent and distressing mental and neurological impairments; and some people find antidepressant withdrawal to be so distressing that they cannot fully stop taking the drugs.

Benzodiazepines (benzos) or anti-anxiety drugs such as Xanax, Klonopin, Ativan, Valium, Librium, Halcion and others are nicknamed “benzos”. Benzos have been found to deteriorate memory and other mental capacities. Human studies demonstrate that they frequently lead to dementia after longer-term exposure. After withdrawal, individuals exposed to these drugs may also experience multiple persisting problems, including memory and cognitive dysfunction, emotional instability, anxiety, insomnia and muscular and neurological discomforts. Mostly because of severely worsened anxiety and insomnia, many cannot stop taking them and become permanently dependent.

Sleep Aids, such as Ambien, Intermezzo, Lunesta and Sonata, pose similar problems to the benzos, including memory and other mental problems, dependence and painful withdrawal. They can cause abnormal mental states and behaviors, including sleepwalking. Insufficient data is available concerning brain shrinkage and dementia, but these are likely outcomes considering their similarity to benzos. Recent studies show that these drugs increase death rate, taking away years of life, even when used intermittently for sleep.

Psychiatric medication will always be a part of the global mental health treatment model. However, more consumers are aware of the risks and issues with these medications. From a global perspective, for various reasons, other societies are not as dependent on the pharmaceuticals model. Subsequently, consumer and physician trends now demonstrate demand for effective treatments without the risk and adverse side effects typically associated with drugs. In addition, the long-term costs associated with medication will eventually find their way into the treatment strategy of the world’s leading economies.

Neurostimulation Technology

Electroconvulsive Therapy

ECT is a medical treatment most commonly used in patients with severe major depression who have not responded to medication. The procedure is done under general anesthesia in which electric currents are passed through the brain that intentionally trigger a seizure. During the recovery phase of the induced seizure, the brain experiences a normalizing response in dysregulated areas of the brain associated with the mental disorder. Some have referred to this response as a “reset” in the brain.

The procedure can be effective with chronic MDD and suicidal patients. Surveys in the medical community indicate that the use of ECT remains controversial. As of 2001, it was estimated that about one million people receive ECT annually and that number will continue to escalate as major pharmaceutical companies abandon the anti-depressant market due to high research and development costs and lack of efficacy. According to published studies, the overall remission rate for patients given a round of ECT treatment was 50.9%. All literature on ECT states that most patients will still need medication.

Side effects of ECT may include:

The cost of ECT is estimated at $3,000 per session with eight to twelve sessions normally required. Including the costs of the procedure room, nursing staff and anesthesiologist, the average cost for a complete ECT program is $25,000. ECT is usually administered three times a week, on alternate days, over a course of two to four weeks.

ECT is for non-responders to medication who are diagnosed with severe mental disorders. It is the only real option for patients who have failed to find relief under the medication model and are still struggling. We believe that our opportunity comes from the fact that a majority of the population that is diagnosed with one of the major mood disorders either will not respond to medication or the side effects will overwhelm the benefits of the medications. Most of these patients will not have a mental disorder that is severe enough to warrant ECT, but some have decided to proceed with ECT anyways because, until recently, it was the only alternative treatment available. This population of patients that are looking for alternatives to medication is the primary focus of our marketing strategy.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation

The vagus nerve stimulation device consists of a generator the size of a matchbox that is surgically implanted under the skin below the person’s collarbone. Lead wires from the generator are tunneled up to the patient’s neck and wrapped around the left vagus nerve under the skin. When activated, the device sends electrical current along the left vagus nerve to the brainstem, which then sends signals to certain areas in the brain. Follow-up surgeries are required to replace the battery for the stimulation device.

Some of the side effects and health problems associated with implanted vagus nerve stimulation devices can include:

The cost of vagus nerve stimulation is estimated at $25,000 including implant and surgery expenses.

Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has primarily been used for treating Parkinson’s disease. However, DBS is now offered to treatment resistant patients with severe depression and suicidal intentions. The DBS system consists of three components: the implanted pulse generator (IPG), the lead and an extension. The lead is connected to the IPG by an extension, an insulated wire that runs below the skin, from the head, down the side of the neck. All three components are surgically implanted inside the body.

A hole about 14 mm in diameter is drilled into the skull and the probe electrode is inserted into the brain. The exact mechanism of action of DBS is not known. Its direct effect on the physiology of brain cells and neurotransmitters is currently debated, but it operates by sending high-frequency electrical impulses into specific areas of the brain. Generally, DBS is associated with 30–60% improvement in clinical evaluations.

Cost of DBS is reported to be between $50,000 and $60,000 to implant.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

tDCS is a contemporary, portable, non-invasive neurostimulator technique that delivers a low electric current to the scalp. A fixed current between 1 and 2 milliamps is typically applied. tDCS works by placing a positive (anode) and negative (cathode) current via electrodes to an area of the scalp or clips to the earlobe. The positioning of the anode and cathode electrodes is used to influence the direction of the current. The placement of these electrodes sets up a targeting system to stimulate a specific area of the brain that the clinician feels is the cause of the reported symptoms. The current delivered by tDCS is not considered strong enough to trigger an action potential in a neuron. The power of tDCS is limited in treatment due to the patient threshold of discomfort and pain are primarily due to the voltage carried in the DC current that is very uncomfortable to the patient. This limited power also makes it difficult to effectively stimulate deep areas of the mid-brain associated with trauma and various mood disorders.

Over the last ten years, several new manufacturers have attempted to improve the tDCS technology with various types of electrode placement patterns. Additionally, academic researchers have started studying tDCS in a controlled setting to catch up with the evolving neurostimulation industry. These same academic communities have developed strategies to isolate the newer tDCS technology from the hand-held plastic battery devices sold on the internet. These internet devices have created a lot of negative impressions in various professional communities. These impressions are the result of small manufacturers selling portable pocket devices they claim will treat, and sometimes cure, major mental health disorders. They have no medical or clinical supervision. A patient can buy the device and inject electricity from a battery into the skull without clinical oversight. The low efficacy is usually at the same level as the “placebo” response. Placebo implies that some patients will have a positive response just by having an expectation of treatment. The manufacturers of these devices often place a medical professional’s name on their website along with the results of a private study that states the device works and is safe to help build credibility among consumers.

The costs of the hand-held plastic battery devices sold on the internet usually range from $50 to $600 each.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

TMS is indicated for the treatment of MDD in adult patients who have failed to receive satisfactory improvement from prior antidepressant medication in the current episode. The FDA requires that the patients’ eligibility for TMS is based on their failure to respond to medication before they qualify for TMS.

TMS treatment emerged in the 1990s. Over the next decade, the venture capital and private equity investment community invested over $400 million into the validation and clinical strategy of TMS. A large percentage of these investors are closely tied to the pharmaceutical industry. The TMS clearance from the FDA supports the pharmaceutical treatment model first and then allows the TMS technology to step in when the medication model fails. The evolution of the TMS technology and marketing strategy has shifted the conversation and the acceptance of non-invasive stimulation of the brain for mental health disorders. The TMS industry business model requires an expensive investment and capital risk by the prescribing physician. The investment costs are then passed on to the patient and the payer community.

The TMS technology uses strong magnetic pulse energy that is induced by electrical current in a magnetic coil. The curved magnetic coil is positioned lightly on the head in the area of the brain associated with mood disorders. During the treatment the patient will hear a clicking sound and experience a tapping sensation on the head associated with the pulsed magnetic energy distributed from the coil. TMS therapy takes twenty to forty minutes and is administered five days a week for approximately four to six weeks.

The effectiveness of TMS is subject to debate. The accepted rate of response varies from 35% to 60% depending on the structure and site of the study. The data for rTMS is robust and supports a reimbursement co-pay from the insurance companies depending on the policy and the carrier.

Some of the side effects associated with TMS can include:

The Neurostar rTMS device cost ranges from $90,000 to $110,000. The disposable is a small single use magnet that attaches to the magnetic coil and is priced to the physician at approximately $100 each. The cost of rTMS devices without a disposable can range from $50,000 to $300,000.

The cost to the patient ranges from $6,000 to $12,000 for a complete round of TMS treatments.

The rTMS (Neurostar and Brainsway) community is the high end of the market because of issues related to efficacy, safety, side effects and financial investment. We believe that this therapy will occupy a specialized niche of the market.

Psychotherapy

Psychotherapy, or talk therapy, is another treatment modality that has traditionally been used to treat certain mental health disorders. The structure and frequency of psychotherapy implemented to treat any given mental health issue varies tremendously depending on the provider, patient and circumstances of the mental health issue. Barriers to the use of psychotherapy, however, include concerns related to stigma, accessibility, efficacy and costs.

Psychedelics

The use of psychedelics, like psilocybin, to treat certain mental health disorders is emerging as a new treatment modality in this field. However, barriers to such therapeutic drug use include concerns related to stigma, efficacy, safety and regulatory complexities.

Government Regulation

United States

Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labelling, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, marketing and export and import of products

such as those that we have developed and are developing. The FDA previously regulated our Gen-1 device as a medical device through a 510(k) clearance, however, our Gen-2 device will require a PMA to be submitted to and cleared by the FDA. The Gen-1 device was cleared by the FDA at 4 milliamps and the re classification does not prevent providers from utilizing the devices. Providers may continue to use these devices for treatment purposes. We will work with the FDA to update our 510(k) application and obtain a PMA, as needed. We are also developing a plan to amend our prior applications related to our Gen-1 device to satisfy regulatory changes which were implemented by the FDA in December 2019 and which required us to cease marketing the Gen-1 device to providers.

We may also be subject to United States federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to prevent healthcare fraud and abuse, protect privacy, the environment and our domestic technology from unintended foreign exploitation and regulate certain business practices. We believe that our policies, practices and procedures are properly designed to prevent unreasonable risk related to these areas and consequential financial liability. Our operations may also be subject to various regulations under federal laws regarding the international transfer of technology, as well as to various federal and state laws related to business operations. In addition, we may be subject to federal contracting procedures, audit and oversight. Compliance with all of these laws, regulations and requirements has not had, and we believe will not have in the future, material effects on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

Medical Device Regulation

Medical devices commercially distributed in the United States require either FDA clearance of a 510(k) premarket notification submission, granting of a de novo request or PMA, unless an exemption exists. Under the FFDCA, as administered by the FDA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes — Class I, Class II or Class III — depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of manufacturer and regulatory control needed to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Regulatory control increases from Class I to Class III.

Relevantly, Class II devices are moderate risk devices and are subject to the FDA’s general controls, and special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device. Such special controls can include performance standards, post-market surveillance, patient registries and FDA guidance documents. Most manufacturers of Class II devices are required to submit to the FDA a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the FFDCA requesting permission to commercially distribute the device.

Class III devices are deemed the highest risk devices by the FDA and generally include life-sustaining, life-supporting or some implantable devices or devices that have a new intended use or use advanced technology that is not substantially equivalent to that of a legally marketed device. Class III devices require a PMA. For a device that is Class III by default (because it is a novel device that was not previously classified and has no predicate), the manufacturer may request that the FDA reclassify the device into Class II or Class I via a de novo request.

To obtain 510(k) clearance, a premarket notification submission must be submitted to the FDA demonstrating that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device. A predicate device is a legally marketed device that is not subject to premarket approval, i.e., a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (pre-amendments device) and for which a PMA is not required, a device that has been reclassified from Class III to Class II or I (e.g., via the de novo classification process), or a device that was previously cleared through the 510(k) process. The FDA’s 510(k) review process usually takes from three to six months but can take longer.

After a device receives 510(k) marketing clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness or that would constitute a major change or modification in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) marketing clearance or, depending on the modification, a de novo request or PMA approval. The FDA requires each manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change requires submission of a 510(k), de novo, or a PMA in the first instance. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s determination, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or request the recall of the modified device until FDA has cleared or approved a 510(k), de novo or PMA for the modification.

The PMA process is more demanding than the 510(k) premarket notification process. In a PMA, the manufacturer must demonstrate that the device is safe and effective, and the PMA must be supported by extensive data, including data from preclinical studies and human clinical trials. The PMA must also contain, among other things, a full description of the device and its components, a full description of the methods, facilities and controls used for manufacturing and proposed labelling. Following receipt of a PMA submission, the FDA determines whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review. If the FDA accepts the application for review, it has 180 days under the FDCA to complete its review of a PMA, although in practice, the FDA’s review often takes significantly longer, and can take up to several years.

The FDA will approve the new device for commercial distribution if it determines that the data and information in the PMA application constitute valid scientific evidence and that there is reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective for its intended use(s). The FDA may approve a PMA application with post-approval conditions intended to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device, including, among other things, restrictions on labelling, promotion, sale and distribution, and collection of long-term follow-up data from patients in the clinical study that supported PMA approval or requirements to conduct additional clinical studies post-approval. The FDA may condition PMA approval on some form of post-market surveillance when deemed necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and efficacy data for the device in a larger population or for a longer period of use.

Like in the context of 510(k) clearances, certain changes to an approved device, such as changes in manufacturing facilities, methods or quality control procedures, or changes in the design performance specifications, which affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, require submission of a PMA supplement. PMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a PMA, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original PMA and may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel. Certain other changes to an approved device require the submission of a new PMA, such as when the design change causes a different intended use, mode of operation and technical basis of operation, or when the design change is so significant that a new Generation of the device will be developed, and the data that were submitted with the original PMA are not applicable for the change in demonstrating a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.

Clinical trials are almost always required to support a PMA and are sometimes required to support a 510(k) submission. All clinical evaluations of investigational devices to determine safety and effectiveness must be conducted, unless exempt, in accordance with the FDA’s investigational device exemption (IDE) regulations. If the device presents a significant risk to human health, as defined by the FDA, the FDA requires the device sponsor to submit an IDE application to the FDA, which must become effective prior to commencing human clinical trials. A significant risk device is one that presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety or welfare of a patient and either is implanted, used in supporting or sustaining human life, substantially important in diagnosing, curing, mitigating or treating disease or otherwise preventing impairment of human health or otherwise presents a potential for serious risk to a subject. Clinical trials must further comply with the FDA’s good clinical practice regulations for institutional review board approval and for informed consent and other human subject protections

After a device is cleared or approved for marketing, numerous and pervasive regulatory requirements continue to apply. Relatedly, the FDA has broad regulatory compliance and enforcement powers. If the FDA determines that we failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can take a variety of compliance or enforcement actions.

China

The NMPA is the governmental authority principally responsible for the supervision and administration of medical devices in the PRC. Medical devices in the PRC (including manufacturing, marketing, and sale) are subject to a mandatory filing/registration regime regulated by the NMPA. The exact filing pathways are mainly determined by the classification of such devices — similar to the United States, a three-class classification system, from Class I (lowest risk) to Class III (highest risk). Local testing and clinical trials are generally required for Class II and Class III devices. Some imported devices may need to be registered with a higher-level government authority than domestic devices.

As determined by the NMPA the three classes for devices are:

Class I — Medical devices for which routine administration can ensure safety for users and the effectiveness of the device.

Class II — Medical devices that can only be safe and effective with further control in addition to routine administration.

Class III — Medical devices that are implanted into the patient’s body, pose a threat to the patient’s health, or provide sustenance or life support.

All medical devices must be registered with the NMPA. An overseas device company must submit product samples to test with the NMPA. In addition, all included product information, packaging, and labels, and related material

need to be translated into simplified Chinese. For a Class I devices, simple product filing to NMPA. However, for Class II and Class III medical devices, the manufacturing company must meet all the requirements in the latest regulation, guidelines, and standards.

As stated elsewhere in this prospectus, in September of 2021, the NMPA approved the Gen-2 device for marketing and sales for the treatment of insomnia and depression in China. These treatment indications and clearances from the NMPA have allowed us to market and sell the Gen-2 device in China. Our potential Joint Venture partner, Wider, will be responsible for obtaining future NMPA registrations and approvals related to the marketing and sales of our devices in China.

Other Healthcare Laws

Medical device developers are often subject to additional healthcare regulation and enforcement by the federal government and by authorities in the states and foreign jurisdictions in which they conduct their business. Such laws include, without limitation, United States federal anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, civil monetary penalties, consumer fraud, pricing reporting, data privacy and security and transparency laws and regulations as well as similar foreign laws in the jurisdictions outside the United States. Similar state and local laws and regulations may also restrict business practices in the medical device industry, such as: state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to business practices, including but not limited to, research, distribution, sales and marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers, or by patients themselves; state laws that restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state and local laws which require tracking gifts and other remuneration and items of value provided to physicians, other healthcare providers and entities or that require the registration of medical device sales representatives; state and local laws that require the registration of medical device sales representatives; and state and local laws governing the privacy and security of health information in some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not pre-empted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts. Violation of any of such laws or any other governmental regulations that apply may result in penalties, including, without limitation, significant administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, additional reporting obligations and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, the curtailment or restructuring of operations, exclusion from participation in governmental healthcare programs and imprisonment.

Healthcare Reform Efforts

The United States is considering, and has recently enacted, several legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could affect our ability to sell our products profitably. Among policymakers, providers, payors and consumers in the United States and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, promoting value-based care and coordination, improving quality and expanding access. Current and future legislative proposals to further reform healthcare or reduce healthcare costs may change potential coverage of or alter possible reimbursement for the services and treatments associated with the use of our products. The cost containment measures that payors and providers are instituting and the effect of any healthcare reform initiative implemented in the future could impact our revenue from the sale of our products.

Historically, for example, the implementation of the ACA changed healthcare financing and delivery by both governmental and private insurers substantially and affected medical device manufacturers significantly. The ACA imposed, among other things, a 2.3% federal excise tax, with limited exceptions, on any entity that manufactured or imported Class I, II and III medical devices offered for sale in the United States that began on January 1, 2013. Through a series of legislative amendments, the tax was suspended for 2016 through 2019 and ultimately repealed. As a result of the repeal and the prior moratorium, sales of taxable medical devices after December 31, 2015 are not subject to the tax.

Other legislative changes that have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted have, among other things, included reductions to CMS payments to providers and impacted healthcare financing generally.

Our Team

Our team is critical to helping us achieve our goal of designing and developing innovative, safe and effective, neurostimulation products to treat patients suffering from various mental health disorders. Our informal human capital policies are structured to identify, recruit, retain and incentivize our existing and new employees.

We currently have three full time employees and 10-12 consultants at different times working on various projects. These consultants, and our legal and financial advisors assist us in various areas related to regulatory, engineering, research and development, sales and marketing, legal, financial and other miscellaneous tasks necessary to run our business on day-to-day basis and to facilitate the development of new products.

None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

We have historically utilized contractors to perform many of our services. Through this process, we believe that we have attracted highly qualified professionals.

Our Facilities

Our principle executive office is located at 1776 Yorktown, Suite 550, Houston, Texas 77056. We sub-lease this office space under an operating lease, and our rent expense totalled approximately $48,000 in 2021. Management and supporting staff are hosted at this location. Our lease payments for 2022 are $4,500 per month. We lease approximately 4,000 square feet of space. The sub-lease is due to expire in 2024.

We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of any of our products, nor do we have plans to develop our own manufacturing operations in the foreseeable future. We currently rely on a limited number of third-party contract manufacturers for all our required manufacturing.

We believe our current premises are sufficient for our needs at this time and for the foreseeable future.

Legal Proceedings

There are no material pending legal proceedings in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of its voting securities, or security holder is a party adverse to us or has a material interest adverse to the Company other than the following:

Sarah Veltz v. Nexalin Technology, Inc. et al.

Plaintiff, Sarah Veltz, filed a lawsuit in this matter on January 20, 2021 in Orange County, California Superior Court (Case No. 30-2021-01180164-CU-WT-CJC) (the “Complaint”) naming the Company and others as defendants. In her Complaint, Plaintiff contends that she was employed by defendants, including Nexalin, and has not been paid all wages, including overtime wages and other benefits allegedly due her. Plaintiff also contends that, during her employment, she was subjected to sexual harassment by the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer. Plaintiff seeks both compensatory and punitive damages. On March 12, 2021, the Company filed its answer to the Complaint. The court has set a jury trial in this matter for April 24, 2023. Management’s intent is to contest the allegations vigorously and, as of the date of this report, is unable to provide an evaluation of the potential outcome of the litigation within the probable or remote range or to provide an estimate of the amount of or a range of potential loss that might be incurred by the Company.

California Employment Development Department

Additionally, we are currently engaged in a dispute with the Employment Development Department (EDD) of the State of California. This matter involves issues related to previous management’s classification of certain work provided to or on behalf of the Company’s business as contract labor instead of employee labor. The EDD has subpoenaed six years’ worth of information from us and currently is claiming that the Company owes approximately $290,000 in past due employment related taxes. The Company has petitioned for reassessment and believe the hired workers at issue were indeed actual contractors and not employees. All Company operations in California have previously been terminated and it has terminated any physical relationship with the State of California. The Company has one part time worker that resides in California. An initial hearing before an EDD magistrate was held on April 15, 2022. A second hearing was held in June of 2022. We are now in negotiations with the EDD for a final settlement. Although the Company believes that it has adequate defenses to the state claims, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in its efforts to dispute the claim in whole or in part.

MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the name, age as of August 22, 2022, and position of the individuals who currently serve as our directors and executive officers. The following also includes certain information regarding the individual experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of our directors and executive officers as well as brief statements of those aspects of our directors’ backgrounds that led us to conclude that they are qualified to serve as directors.

Executive Officers and Significant Employees

Mark White, President and Chief Executive Officer, Board of Directors

Mr. Mark White has been with Nexalin since 2012, first as an independent consultant from 2012 to 2018, and then as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2018 to present. Mr. White is a versatile health technology executive with over twenty-five years in leadership roles spanning medical device development, clinical operations and business development. Prior to joining Nexalin, he owned and operated his own clinics and addiction centers, where he has saw first-hand the positive results the technology achieves. Early in his career, Mr. White spent several years building companies and recruiting successful management teams to accelerate growth across several industries. Mr. White attended the University of Houston.

David Owens M.D., Chief Medical Officer, Board of Directors

Dr. David Owens has been with Nexalin since 2017 when he was named Chief Medical Officer of the Company. Dr. Owens has been involved in numerous medical and software ventures over the past decade. Prior to joining Nexalin, he served with Empiric Systems, LLC, a software company specializing in radiology information systems and PACS viewing systems. He received a degree in chemistry and physics from Furman University and later a M.D from the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. He completed his residency and fellowship at Emory University Hospital in Neuroradiology and Interventional Neuroradiology.

Marilyn Elson, Chief Financial Officer

Ms. Marilyn Elson joined Nexalin as Chief Financial Officer in January, 2022 and has been a Certified Public Accountant for approximately 35 years providing services for a range of clients including real estate partnerships, corporations and high net worth individuals. Ms. Elson is a shareholder of the Company. She is a member of U.S. Asian Consulting Group, LLC, which renders advice and consulting services, including services to the Company.

Ms. Elson provides services from time to time to a boutique accounting firm whose predecessor Ms. Elson cofounded and of which she was a member. Ms. Elson terminated her ownership status with that firm in order to serve as Comptroller for a medical technology company guiding the company through a public offering and listing on a stock exchange. Ms. Elson received a BA in Accounting from Queens College in 1975 and a MS in Taxation from Pace University in 1988.

John Patrick Claude

Mr. John Claude, in conjunction with Dr. Yakov Katsnelson, designed and developed the original tACS waveform that is marketed as Nexalin Technology. Mr. Claude now leads all engineering, research and development at Nexalin Technology. Additionally, Mr. Claude has an extensive background in regulatory, compliance and quality management. Mr. Claude graduated from the University of Notre Dame with a BS in Physiology. He subsequently received an ME in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Mr. Claude has designed and built advanced technologies for NASA, NIH, Stanford Medical Center and the Palo Alto Veterans Administration.

Non-Employee Directors

Rick Morad, Chairman of the Board

Mr. Rick Morad is a founding investor and shareholder in Nexalin. He has served on our board of directors since 2018. Mr. Morad has been a successful business operator since 1987. Mr. Morad is also a licensed attorney. Mr. Morad received a B.S./B.A. in business administration, with a major in Finance and a minor in Accounting, from John Carroll University. He also received a J.D., and graduated with high honors, from John Marshall Law School.

Alan Kazden

Mr. Alan Kazden was an original investor in Nexalin and has served as a Director since 2019. Mr. Kazden has over 30 years of diverse experience consulting with emerging growth companies in strategic business planning, partnering, raising capital, and acting as a virtual CFO. Prior to joining Nexalin, Mr. Kazden worked in various industries such as technology, manufacturing & distribution, real estate, health care, entertainment, and emerging growth companies. He also previously served as a consultant to the Mayor’s Office and Los Angeles City Council on local tax issues.

Ben V. Hu M.D.

Dr. Ben V. Hu is a founding investor and shareholder in Nexalin. Dr. Hu is currently in private practice in Ohio, focusing on Ophthalmology. Since 2018, he has advised the Nexalin executive team on market development strategies and clinical trial structures to support marketing and distribution at a global level. Dr. Hu is also an advisor and member of the Board of Directors to Med-logics Inc. a company developing a surgical technology for cataract surgery utilizing a new patented technology. Dr Hu was awarded his Doctor of Medicine in 1983 from Case Western University and his Chemical Engineering degree from MIT School of Chemical Engineering.

Medical Board Advisors

Our Medical Board advises our management team in planning, development and execution of scientific, clinical and research and development initiatives and strategies. Our Medical consists of experts across a range of key disciplines relevant to our initiatives.

Our current Medical Board advisors are:

Abe Scheer, M.D.

Dr. Abraham Scheer specializes in both neurology and psychiatry. Dr. Scheer has over forty years of experience in the field of neurosciences. Dr. Scheer has lectured extensively throughout the United States on neuromodulation devices. Dr. Scheer was part of the Speakers’ Bureau for both Medtronic’s and Cyberonic’s Neuromodulating Divisions. His clinical expertise includes Adult and Child Neurology, Brain Injury Medicine and Adult and Child Psychiatry. Dr. Scheer has trained and worked at the finest medical institutions in the United States, which include Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Cornell Medical College, George Washington University, Georgetown University, University of Connecticut and the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Scheer served as Director of Neurology and Stroke Services for Beebe Healthcare in Delaware. He is currently a neurohospitalist/neurointensivist for Bay Health in Delaware.

Dr. Scheer and the Company entered into consulting agreements whereby Dr. Scheer agreed to provide consulting services to the Company during the years ended December, 2021 and December 2022. For his services he was compensated with 10,000 shares of common stock of the Company for each year of service.

Irene Cergnul, M.D.

Dr. Irene Cergnul completed her postgraduate training at Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center in New York and after her final year as Chief Resident was recruited as Assistant Professor/Faculty in the Depart of Family Medicine. She worked as the Medical Director in the in-patient service and taught residents in training for the next four years. She was a Research Coordinator involving multiple studies on HIV, depression, as well as neuropathy, and is a co-author on several publications.

Dr. Cergnul has been involved in the field of addiction medicine, HIV care and mental health for the last seventeen years. She is committed to developing and integrating current and new modalities in the treatment of addictive disorders and has dedicated her working career to treating the underserved population in NY and NJ. Her private practice focuses on novel modalities used in treating addiction and dual diagnosis patients and has successfully incorporated Nexalin as an integral part of her treatment armamentarium.

Nancy White, Ph.D.

Dr. Nancy White is the Clinical Director of Unique Mind Care in Houston, Texas. She is recognized as an industry leader in the development of a brain-based approach to support neurobehavioral wellness. Dr. White has specialized in the diagnosis and treatment of functional brain disorders for more than twenty years. She is a Fellow, past President and Board member of the International Society for Neurofeedback and Research (ISNR), a Certified EEG Fellow of the Biofeedback Certification International Alliance (BCN) and a QEEG Diplomate and member of the Quantitative EEG Certification Board. Dr. White is a licensed Clinical Psychologist in the State of Texas as well as an Advanced Addictions Counselor.

Dr. White is a pioneer in the practical application of neuroscientific research to clinical practice, including the extension of advanced brain-based therapies to all psychiatric mood disorders including Post-Traumatic Stress, Autism and Addictions. She is a frequent presenter of her work at conferences, including the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine, the International Society for Neurofeedback and Research, the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Future Health and the National Academy of Neuropsychology. She also serves as a consulting editor of the Journal of Neurotherapy (Taylor and Francis).

Dr. White has dedicated seven years to the development of the clinical application of the Nexalin therapy. Her research and clinical data on the use of Nexalin therapy has been presented at international conferences. Dr. White is the mother of our Chief Executive Officer, Mark White.

Non-Medical Board of Advisors.

Nexalin has also established a non-medical Board of Advisors. The members of the Board of Advisors serve at the request of the Board and advise and make recommendations with respect to the strategic direction of the company and similar matters. The members of the Board of Advisors do not have, or shall be deemed to have, a fiduciary relationship in respect of the company. The members of the Board of Advisors are set forth below. We have entered into agreements with each member of the Board of Advisors, which set forth the terms and conditions relating to the individual’s service on the Board of Advisors. The agreements provide for an initial one-year term, which can be extended for an additional year. The agreements commenced December 24, 2021 and include confidentiality and protection of Company’s intellectual property, and indemnification protection. Under the agreements each advisor is entitled to receive $80,000 worth of our Common Stock. The initial compensation shares will be on December 23, 2022. The value of the shares issuable is $5.00 per share, which was the price of our Common Stock based upon transactions with unaffiliated third parties at such time.

Tucker Anderson

Tucker Andersen spent twenty-seven years with the private investment partnership Cumberland Associates, including fifteen years as a co-managing partner of the firm. Subsequent to his retirement from that position, he founded Above All Advisors, a consulting and investment firm. He is on several advisory and private company boards, including, Questech Corporation, Value Insight Partners, and Artificial Cell Technologies. He received his B.A. in Quantitative Studies from Wesleyan University in 1963. Tucker is the recipient of both the Wesleyan Distinguished Alumnus Award and the Exeter Founder’s Day Award. He is both a Chartered Financial Analyst and an Associate Member of the Society of Actuaries.

Leonard Osser

Leonard Osser has been a Director of Milestone Scientific, Inc. since he founded that company in 1989. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Milestone Scientific from the time of its founding until 2021, other than twice during the last 20 years when he intended to retire from that position. He served as Chairman of Milestone Scientific from 1991 until September 2009 at which time he resigned as Chairman of Milestone Scientific, but remained a director. Mr. Osser serves as Managing Member of U.S. Asian Consulting Group LLC, which provides various consulting services to the Company. Mr. Osser is a shareholder of the Company. He is a member of our non-medical Board of Advisors and serves as Director of China operations. Mr. Osser is the spouse of Marilyn Elson, our Chief Financial Officer.

Gian Domenico Trombetta

Gian Domenico Trombetta has been the President and CEO of Innovest S.p.A. an Italian corporation specializing in private equity and distressed assets since 1992. He was previously with Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc. focusing on strategy and acquisition services. Mr. Trombetta received B.A, from Luiss University in Rome in 1984. Mr. Trombetta is also an independent director of Milestone Scientific Inc.

Family Relationships

Ms. Marilyn Elson, our Chief Financial Officer, is the spouse of Leonard Osser, a member of our non-medical Board of Advisors and director of China Operations. Dr. Nancy White, a member of our Medical Board of Advisors is the mother of Mr. Mark White, our Chief Executive Officer. Other than as stated in the preceding two sentences, there are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.

Board Composition

Our board of directors currently consists of five members. There are no contractual obligations regarding the election of our directors. Our nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors may therefore consider a broad range of factors relating to the qualifications and background of nominees. Our nominating and corporate governance committee’s and our board of directors’ priority in selecting board members is identification of persons who will further the interests of our stockholders through their established record of professional accomplishment, the ability to contribute positively to the collaborative culture among board members, knowledge of our business, understanding of the competitive landscape, professional and personal experiences and expertise relevant to our growth strategy. Our directors hold office until their successors have been elected and qualified or until the earlier of their resignation or removal. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that will become effective immediately prior to the closing of this offering also provide that our directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the votes that all our stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of directors, and that any vacancy on our board of directors, including a vacancy resulting from an enlargement of our board of directors, may be filled only by vote of a majority of our directors then in office.

Under our agreements with U.S. Asian Consulting Group LLC, U.S. Asian was granted a right to appoint one director to our Board of Directors. To date, U.S. Asian has not exercised this right.

Director Independence

Our board of directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors has determined that all of our directors (Rick Morad, Alan Kazden and Ben Hu M.D.) other than Mark White and Dr. Owens have no relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq. In making this determination, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining his or her independence, including the beneficial ownership of our share capital held by each non-employee director.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee, each of which will have the composition and responsibilities described below upon completion of this offering. From time to time, the board may establish other committees to facilitate the oversight of our business. The charters for each of our committees will be available on our website upon completion of this initial public offering (https://nexalin.com/)

Audit Committee

Effective upon completion of this offering, our audit committee will be composed of our three independent directors, Messrs. Alan Kazden, Rick Morad and Ben Hu M.D. Our board of directors has determined that each of these persons are independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq listing requirements and the independence requirements contemplated by Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Alan Kazden is the chairman of the audit committee and our board of directors has determined that he is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules and regulations. Our board of directors has determined that the composition of our audit committee meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of our audit committee complies with, the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, applicable Nasdaq listing requirements and SEC rules and regulations. We intend to continue to evaluate the requirements applicable to us and we intend to comply with the future requirements to the extent that they become applicable to our audit committee. The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee include:

Compensation Committee

Effective upon completion of this offering, our compensation committee will be composed of two directors, Alan Kazden and Ben Hu, M.D., each of whom is a non-employee member of our board of directors as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Alan Kazden is the chairman of the compensation committee. Our board of directors has determined that the composition of our compensation committee satisfies the applicable independence requirements under, and the functioning of our compensation committee complies with the applicable requirements of, Nasdaq listing rules and SEC rules and regulations. We intend to continue to evaluate and intend to comply with all future requirements applicable to our compensation committee. The principal duties and responsibilities of our compensation committee include:

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Effective upon completion of this offering, the nominating and corporate governance committee will be composed of three directors, Alan Kazden, Rick Morad, and Ben Hu, M.D. Alan Kazden is the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee. Our board of directors has determined that the composition of our nominating and corporate governance committee satisfies the applicable independence requirements under, and the functioning of our nominating and corporate governance committee complies with the applicable requirements of, Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. We will continue to evaluate and will comply with all future requirements applicable to our nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee’s responsibilities include:

Board Leadership Structure

Our board has determined that upon completion of this offering our corporate governance guidelines will provide that, if the chairman of the board is a member of management or does not otherwise qualify as independent, the independent directors of the board may elect a lead director. The lead director’s responsibilities will include,

but not be limited to: presiding over all meetings of the board of directors at which the chairman is not present, including any executive sessions of the independent directors; approving board meeting schedules and agendas; and acting as the liaison between the independent directors and the chief executive officer and chairman of the board. Our corporate governance guidelines will further provide the flexibility for our board of directors to modify our leadership structure in the future as it deems appropriate. We anticipate that Rick Morad will be the chairman of the board and he qualifies as an independent director.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

One of the key functions of our board of directors is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our board of directors will not have a standing risk management committee but will rather administer this oversight function directly through our board of directors as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our board of directors that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure and our audit committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. Our audit committee will also monitor compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Our nominating and corporate governance committee will monitor the effectiveness of our corporate governance practices, including whether they are successful in preventing illegal or improper liability-creating conduct. Our compensation committee will assess and monitor whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. While each committee will be responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, our entire board of directors will be regularly informed through committee reports about such risks.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Employees, Executive Officers and Directors

Effective upon completion of this offering, we will adopt a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or the code of conduct, applicable to all our employees, executive officers and directors. Following the completion of this offering, the code of conduct will be available on our website at www.nexalin.com. The nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors will be responsible for overseeing the code of conduct and must approve any waivers of the code of conduct for employees, executive officers and directors. We expect that any amendments to the code of conduct, or any waivers of its requirements for any executive officer or director, will be disclosed on our website.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our directors who currently serve as members of our compensation committee is or has at any time during the past year been, one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.

Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which will become effective immediately after the completion of this offering, and our amended and restated bylaws, which will become effective immediately prior to the completion of this offering, limits our directors’ liability, and may indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL. The DGCL provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except for liability for any:

These limitations of liability do not apply to liabilities arising under federal securities laws and do not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or recession.

The DGCL and our amended and restated bylaws provide that we will, in certain situations, indemnify our directors and officers and may indemnify other employees and other agents, to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any indemnified person is also entitled, subject to certain limitations, to advancement, direct payment or reimbursement of reasonable expenses (including attorneys’ fees and disbursements) in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding.

In addition, we have entered or will enter into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers. These indemnification agreements, among other things, require us to indemnify our directors and officers for certain expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by a director or officer in any action or proceeding arising out of their services as a director or officer, or any other company or enterprise to which the person provides services at our request.

We also maintain a directors’ and officers’ insurance policy pursuant to which our directors and officers are insured against liability for actions taken in their capacities as directors and officers.

We believe that these provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, these indemnification agreements and this insurance are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.

Insofar as indemnification of liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, may be permitted to our board of directors, executive officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2021, which consist of our principal executive officer and our other most highly compensated executive officers, were:

Summary Compensation Table

The following table presents the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our two (2) named executive officers, during the two (2) years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021.

Summary Compensation Table

Marilyn Elson was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer on January 11, 2022. Ms. Elson has entered into an employment agreement with the Company. The agreement provides for a term of three years commencing as of January 1, 2022 at an annual salary of $360,000 per annum. As the agreement and her employment did not take effect until 2022, Ms. Elson’s compensation is not included in the table above. The foregoing base salary payable to Ms. Elson does not include payments due to U.S. Asian, an entity which provides consulting services to the Company and of which Ms. Elson is a member.

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table

We review compensation annually for all employees, including our executives. In setting executive base salaries and bonuses and granting equity incentive awards, we consider compensation for comparable positions in the market, the historical compensation levels of our executives, individual performance as compared to our expectations and objectives, our desire to motivate our employees to achieve short- and long-term results that are in the best interests of our stockholders and a long-term commitment to our company. In addition, we have also engaged compensation consultants and take into consideration their assessments of our compensation.

The compensation committee of our board of directors has historically reviewed and made recommendations to our board of directors regarding our executives’ compensation. Our compensation committee typically reviews and discusses management’s proposed compensation with the chief executive officer for all executives other than the chief executive officer. Based on those discussions and its discretion, the compensation committee then recommends the compensation for each executive officer for approval by our board of directors. To date, our compensation committee has not adopted a peer group of companies for purposes of determining executive compensation.

On February 15, 2021, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mark White to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company for a three-year term. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. White is entitled to receive $200,000 in annual compensation and is eligible to receive up to $200,000 in additional cash and stock-based compensation upon achieving certain performance metrics. During the 2021 and 2020 years, Mr. White received cash compensation of $180,000 and $159,375, respectively. Additionally, on February 15, 2021, pursuant to the agreement, the Company issued shares of the Company’s common stock in an amount representing two (2%) percent of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares as of the effective date of the agreement, or 80,827 shares of the Company’s common stock. Mr. White has waived the deficit amounts otherwise payable under his employment arrangements.

On February 15, 2021, the Company entered into an employment agreement with David Owens, M.D. to serve as Chief Medical Officer of the Company for a three-year term. Dr. Owens was providing services to the Company prior to the date of his employment agreement. For the 2020 year, Dr Owens received compensation payable in shares of common stock in the amount of $197,117. Pursuant to the agreement, Dr. Owens is entitled to receive $150,000 in annual compensation that is payable to him by the issuance of Company common stock and he is eligible to receive bonus compensation based upon achieving certain performance metrics. In March, 2022, the Company entered into an amendment of the agreement with Dr. Owens to clarify certain matters related to his compensation. Dr. Owens has agreed that all shares issuable to him as compensation through December 31, 2021 (shares of common stock with a compensation value of $293,750) have been issued and he has been paid in full all amounts due to him for his prior service through December 31, 2001. For determining the amount of shares issuable to him for his 2022 services, the number of shares will be based upon offering price of the Company’s Common Stock in our initial public offering. Under the amendment agreement, in the event we do not complete our initial public offering during 2022, Dr. Owens has agreed that he will not be compensated. For the number of shares issuable during 2022 and 2023, the value shall equal, assuming that the Company has completed its initial public offering, the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock for the 30 trading days prior to December 23, 2023.

On January 11, 2022, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Marilyn Elson to serve as Chief Financial Officer of the Company for a three-year term. Pursuant to the agreement, Ms. Elson is entitled to receive $360,000 in annual compensation that is payable to her in cash.

Annual Base Salary

Base salaries for our executives are initially established through arm’s length negotiation at the time the executive is hired, taking into account such executive’s qualifications, experience, prior salary, the scope of his or her responsibilities and competitive market compensation paid by other companies for similar positions within the industry. Base salaries are reviewed annually in January by our compensation committee and approved by our board of directors in connection with our annual performance review process. Salaries may be adjusted from time to time to realign salaries with market levels after taking into account individual responsibilities, performance and experience. In making decisions regarding salary increases, we may also confer with a compensation consultant or draw upon the experience of members of our board of directors with other companies. Any approved salary increases are typically effective in May of the same year. The 2020 and 2021 base salaries of our named executive officers are as follows:

Health and Welfare Benefits

We do not currently provide medical or other benefit plans to our employees.

Non-Employee Director Compensation

Each non-employee director elected to our board of directors receives shares of our common stock equal to $35,000 per annum. Mr. Morad has received an aggregate of 21,000 shares of common stock for his services during 2019, 2020 and 2021. Dr Hu and Mr. Kazden have each received an aggregate of 14,000 shares of common stock for their two years of service during 2020 and 2021. In August 2022, Mr. Morad, Dr. Hu and Mr. Kazden were each issued 5,833 shares of the Company’s stock for their 2022 services.

Our policy of compensating our non-employee directors is intended to provide a total compensation package that enables us to attract and retain qualified and experienced individuals to serve as directors and to align our directors’ interests with those of our stockholders.

Rule 10b5-1 Sales Plans

Our directors and executive officers may adopt written plans, known as Rule 10b5-1 plans, in which they will contract with a broker to buy or sell shares of our common stock on a periodic basis. Under a Rule 10b5-1 plan, a broker executes trades pursuant to parameters established by the director or officer when entering into the plan, without further direction from them. The director or officer may amend a Rule 10b5-1 plan in some circumstances and may terminate a plan at any time. Our directors and executive officers also may buy or sell additional shares outside of a Rule 10b5-1 plan when they are not in possession of material non-public information subject to compliance with the terms of our insider trading policy. Prior to 180 days after the date of this offering, subject to early termination, the sale of any shares under such plan would be prohibited by the lock-up agreement that the director or officer has entered into with the underwriters for this offering.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The following is a description of transactions since our inception to which we have been a participant in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000, and in which any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our share capital, or any members of their immediate family, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation arrangements which are described under the section titled “Executive and Director Compensation.” Pursuant to our corporate reorganization, each share issued in connection with the transactions discussed below have been exchanged for 1/20^th of a share of common stock of Nexalin. See “Corporate Reorganization.”

Joint Venture

In September 2018, we entered into an agreement with Wider, pursuant to which we and Wider shall form the Joint Venture. Wider has an experienced medical technology team in China and when formed, the Joint Venture will design and implement a comprehensive business model and distribution plan for our devices in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. In May 2019 we entered into a separate agreement with Wider authorizing it to act as a distributor of our devices pending completion of the potential Joint Venture. We do not pay Wider any commissions or distributor related fees; it derives profit from its markup of devices it sells.

In March 2022, we entered into a second supplement to the Joint Venture agreement with Wider, whereby the parties confirmed that the Joint Venture had not yet been established and is subject to further review and analysis of regulatory issues in China and the United States, trade and political issues between the two countries and potential changes in the use and market for the Company’s products and technology. Pursuant to the second supplement, the parties agreed to use their commercial efforts to complete documentation by September 30, 2022. In light of general economic conditions in China and the United States and the continued impact of regulatory issues in China and the United States and trade and political issues between the two counties, the parties determined to further extend the time frame to complete establishment of the joint venture to September 30, 2023 and entered into a supplement 3 to the Joint Venture Agreement to memorialize such extension. The parties intend to continue to work together to complete the establishment prior to such extended time.

During the first half of 2022, we sold Gen-2 devices in China through Wider which agreed to act as a distributor on a limited basis pursuant to a separate agreement entered into in May 2019, pending formation of the Joint Venture. We do not pay Wider any commissions or distributor related fees; it derives profit from its markup of devices it sells.

The first phase of distribution in China includes a sales strategy for mainland China and other territories serviced by Wider. Treatment clearance by the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), the equivalent of the United States FDA, for the 15 milliamps power parameters was granted on August 13, 2021 for the treatment of primary insomnia and moderate to severe depression in China. In March 2021, in anticipation of NMPA approval and the formation of the Joint Venture, Wider, through a wholly owned subsidiary, executed a $5 million purchase order for 1,000 devices from us. Further, also in March 2021 in anticipation of NMPA approval, Wider executed a purchase agreement with us for the purchase of 50 devices. Advance deposits on this first order of 50 devices were received by us from Wider in 2021 and we delivered the initial 50 devices in 2022.We subsequently received a second order from Wider for 70 devices which have been delivered.

We will benefit financially by selling our devices to the Joint Venture when formed, in China because (i) we will have control of direct sales and profit flow and (ii) we will be entitled to receive 50% of net profits generated by the potential Joint Venture from sales in Asia. Moreover, all funding for our operations and research related to design and development of our products and services for sales in China will be funded solely by Wider. On behalf of, and in anticipation of the formation of, the potential Joint Venture, Wider is currently conducting four clinical studies in conjunction with Anding and Xuanwu Hospitals — two major neurological centers in Beijing, China. The studies will focus on the use of the new 15 milliamps waveform therapy for existing and new treatment indications. Such studies would require an investment of approximately $5 million if performed in the United States. Publications will be prepared and submitted by key opinion leaders (KOLs) to international peer-reviewed journals for all four studies and approval applications made to the NMPA.

As noted elsewhere in this prospectus, we will own 50% of the Joint Venture when it is established. Additionally, under the terms of the Joint Venture agreements, Wider will receive a one-eighth equity position in our company at a valuation of $40 million, one-third of which has been issued (which equalled an aggregate of 150,000 shares of Common Stock) and the balance of which is to be issued upon completion of the four clinical trials and at the time the potential Joint Venture is established and is fully funded by Wider.

U.S. Asian Consulting Group, LLC

On May 9, 2018, the Company entered into a five-year consulting agreement with U.S. Asian Consulting Group, LLC (“U.S. Asian”). In March 2021 the Company agreed to extend the consulting agreement for an additional period of eight years upon the closing of this offering. The two members of U.S. Asian are shareholders in the Company, with Marilyn Elson having been appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company on January 11, 2022. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, U.S. Asian provides consulting services to the Company with regards to, among other things, corporate development and financing arrangements. The Company is to pay U.S. Asian $10,000 per month for services rendered and, on October 24, 2018, the Company issued 249,750 shares of the Company’s common stock to U.S. Asian. The Company recorded consulting expenses related to the consulting agreement of $120,000 and $120,000 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, on the Company’s statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, U.S. Asian was owed $399,320 and $299,320, respectively, for accrued and unpaid services. As of June 30, 2022, U.S. Asian was owed $457,419. We intend to use $207,419 of the proceeds of this offering to repay a portion the outstanding amount due to U.S. Asian. See “Use of Proceeds”.

Pursuant to the consulting agreement, U.S Asian was originally entitled to anti-dilution protection with respect to its share percentage ownership in the Company whereas U.S. Asian’s security holdings, during the term of the consulting agreement, would remain at 10% of the Company’s total number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, on a fully diluted basis. In March 2021, the Company entered into an agreement with U.S. Asian pursuant to which U.S. Asian waived and relinquished any rights of protection against dilution afforded to it, provided such dilution results from a transaction that (i) imputes a pre-money valuation to the Company of not less than $7 million, (ii) raises not less than $7 million, and (iii) imputes a post-money valuation to the Company of not less than $25 million. In exchange for the waiver and relinquishment of such rights, the Company issued shares of the Company’s common stock in an amount sufficient for U.S. Asian (together with its owners) to own an aggregate amount of fifteen (15%) percent of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of the date of issuance. On June 22, 2021, the Company issued 304,570 shares of common stock in satisfaction of the waiver. On November 29, 2021 and in August of 2022, the Company issued an additional 217,500 and 17,699 respectively shares of common stock to U.S. Asian in satisfaction of the waiver.

U.S. Asian has agreed to defer payment of $250,000 of the total aggregate due to it (approximately $457,000 as of June 30, 2022) until March 15, 2023.

Under our agreements with U.S. Asian Consulting Group LLC, U.S. Asian was granted a right to appoint one director to our Board of Directors. To date, U.S. Asian has not exercised this right.

Loan Payable — Officer

On October 11, 2019, the Company received a $50,000 loan from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The loan has a principal of $50,000, an interest rate of 16.5%, and a maturity date of October 11, 2020. The issuance of the loan resulted in an original issuance discount of $9,833. Total amortization on the debt discount was $6,750 and $1,500 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company paid this loan in full during the year ended December 31, 2020.

On November 1, 2021, the Company received a $200,000 loan from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The loan has a principal balance of $200,000, an interest rate of 9.0%, and a maturity date of the earlier to occur of the completion of this offering or October 31, 2022. Although we intended and were required by the terms of the loan to use a portion of the proceeds of this offering to repay this loan at completion of the Offering, Mr. White has agreed to defer payment of the loan until December 15, 2022. See “Use of Proceeds”.

Promissory Notes

On October 19, 2018, the Company issued an on demand promissory note payable with the Company’s Chairman of the Board for $10,000 with interest to begin accruing on January 1, 2020 at 5% per annum. Total interest expense on this note was $1,448 and $281 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Total interest expense on this note was $9,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2022.

On October 25, 2018, the Company entered in a promissory note payable with an accredited investor for $50,000 due on October 25, 2019. Pursuant to the note, the maturity date was extended to October 25, 2020. The promissory note bears interest at 100% per annum and the note holder was issued shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of interest. Total interest expense related to this note was $50,000 and $41,667 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Total interest expense related to this note was $11,543 for the six months ended June 30, 2022. On October 7, 2020, the Company entered into a Letter of Agreement Addendum with the note holder, whereby the Company agreed to make ten monthly principal payments beginning November 1, 2020 with the full principal amount to be paid in full by August 31, 2021. In addition, if the full principal amount is not paid in full by August 31, 2021 the Company issued an additional 2,500 shares of common stock to the noteholder. On November 11, 2021, the Company entered into a Second Letter of Agreement Addendum with the note holder, whereby the Company agreed to continue making monthly payments beginning on December 1, 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company paid $9,600 and $9,200, respectively, in cash towards the outstanding principal and $10,000 towards the principal in the six months ended June 30, 2022. The amount outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $27,200 and $36,800, respectively. The amount outstanding at June 30, 2022 was $17,200.

On September 11, 2017, the Company issued a promissory note in favor of Legacy Ventures International, Inc. (“Legacy”) as part of a commercial transaction with Legacy that was never consummated. The promissory note was issued in the original principal amount of $500,000, with interest at 4% per annum and a maturity date of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2021, this promissory note is in default. The Company recorded $20,000 of interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and $10,000 of interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2022. The principal amount outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $500,000. The principal amount outstanding at June 30, 2022 was $500,000. To the Company’s knowledge, the note may have been assigned to a third party. No collection efforts have been made on the note by the assignee.

Corporate Reorganization

As more fully described in the section of this prospectus titled “Corporate Reorganization,” We completed a corporate reorganization on December 1, 2021, pursuant to which Nexalin Nevada merged with and into a newly incorporated Delaware company of the same name, Nexalin and, as a result, Nexalin succeeded Nexalin Nevada and our existing shareholders exchanged each of their shares in Nexalin Nevada for one twentieth (1/20^th) of a common share of the newly formed Delaware corporation. Nexalin had nominal assets and liabilities and did not conduct any operations prior to the reorganization other than its incorporation.

Nexalin had nominal assets and liabilities and did not conduct any operations prior to the reorganization other than its incorporation.

Upon this completion of the corporate reorganization on December 1, 2021, the historical consolidated financial statements of Nexalin Nevada became the historical consolidated financial statements of Nexalin, the entity whose shares of common stock are being sold in this offering, though such historical financial data gives effect to the corporation reorganization. We expect that the corporate reorganization will not have a material effect on our financial statements.

Related Person Transaction Policy

Prior to this offering, we have not had a formal policy regarding approval of transactions with related parties. In anticipation of this offering, we created a Code of Ethics which includes a written related person transaction policy that sets forth our procedures for the identification, review, consideration and approval or ratification of related person transactions. The related person transaction policy is part of our Code of Ethics, a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

The policy will become effective immediately upon the execution of the underwriting agreement for this offering. For purposes of this policy, a related person transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which we and any related person are, were or will be participants in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000. Transactions involving compensation for services provided to us as an employee or director are not covered by this policy. A related person is any executive officer, director or beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, including any of their immediate family members and any entity owned or controlled by such persons.

Under the policy, if a transaction has been identified as a related person transaction, including any transaction that was not a related person transaction when originally consummated or any transaction that was not initially identified as a related person transaction prior to consummation, our management must present information regarding the related person transaction to our audit committee, or, if audit committee approval would be inappropriate, to another independent body of our board of directors, for review, consideration and approval or ratification.

The presentation must include a description of, among other things, the material facts, the interests, direct and indirect, of the related persons, the benefits to us of the transaction and whether the transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to or from, as the case may be, an unrelated third party or to or from employees generally. Under the policy, we will collect information that we deem reasonably necessary from each director, executive officer and, to the extent feasible, significant stockholder to enable us to identify any existing or potential related-person transactions and to effectuate the terms of the policy. In addition, under our code of business conduct that we expect to adopt prior to the completion of this offering, our employees and directors will have an affirmative responsibility to disclose any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest. In considering related person transactions, our audit committee, or another independent body of our board of directors, will take into account the relevant available facts and circumstances including, but not limited to:

The policy requires that, in determining whether to approve, ratify or reject a related person transaction, our audit committee, or other independent body of our board of directors, must consider, in light of known circumstances, whether the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, our best interests and those of our shareholders, as our audit committee, or other independent body of our board of directors, determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWENRS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our 4,964,961 shares of our common stock outstanding as of August 22, 2022 for: