Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) 10-Q2022 Q2 Quarterly report

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Quarterly Report”) includes statements of our expectations, intentions, plans and beliefs that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. The statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking statements. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this document may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "will," "intend," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "should," "plan," "estimate," "potential," or similar expressions. However, the absence of these words or similar expressions does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future - including statements expressing general views about future operating results - are forward-looking statements. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made. However, caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements because such statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. Our Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our Company’s actual results to differ materially from historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: inflationary impacts, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, the outcome of the legal proceedings, including the proceedings against Immaculate Confections and the proceedings against the AB Value/Radoff Group (as defined herein), changes in the confectionery business environment, seasonality, consumer interest in our products, the success of our frozen yogurt business, receptiveness of our products internationally, consumer and retail trends, costs and availability of raw materials, competition, the success of our co-branding strategy, the success of international expansion efforts and the effect of government regulations. For a detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements contained herein, please see Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and the risks described elsewhere in this report and the section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2022 filed on May 27, 2022, as amended on June 28, 2022 as updated by the section.

Unless otherwise specified, the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries (including its operating subsidiary with the same name, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., a Colorado corporation (“RMCF”)).

PART I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.       Financial Statements

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Operations

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (a Colorado corporation), Aspen Leaf Yogurt, LLC (“ALY”), and U-Swirl International, Inc. (“U-Swirl”), and U-Swirl, Inc. (“SWRL”) (collectively, the “Company,” or “RMCF”).

The Company is an international franchisor, confectionery manufacturer and retail operator. Founded in 1981, the Company is headquartered in Durango, Colorado and manufactures an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery products. U-Swirl franchises and operates self-serve frozen yogurt cafés. The Company also sells its candy in selected locations outside of its system of retail stores and through ecommerce channels, and licenses the use of its brand with certain consumer products.

U-Swirl operates self-serve frozen yogurt cafés under the names “U-Swirl,” “Yogurtini,” “CherryBerry,” “Yogli Mogli Frozen Yogurt,” “Fuzzy Peach Frozen Yogurt,” “Let’s Yo!” and “Aspen Leaf Yogurt.”

The Company’s revenues are currently derived from three principal sources: (i) sales to franchisees and others of chocolates and other confectionery products manufactured by the Company; (ii) the collection of franchise fees and royalties from franchisees’ sales; and (iii) sales at Company-owned stores of chocolates, frozen yogurt, and other confectionery products.

The following table summarizes the number of stores operating under the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory brand and frozen yogurt cafés as of August 31, 2022:

During FY 2021 the Company initiated formal legal proceedings against Immaculate Confections (“IC”), the operator of RMCF locations in Canada. In its complaint, the Company alleged, among other things, that IC has utilized the Company’s trademarks and other intellectual property without authority to do so and that IC has been unjustly enriched by their use of the Company’s trademarks and intellectual property.

In June 2021 a court order was issued declaring the original 1991 Development Agreement for Canada between RMCF and IC had expired. In September 2021, the Company and IC reached a Settlement Agreement (the “IC Agreement”) whereby the parties agreed to a six month negotiation period to explore alternative solutions. The six month period lapsed in March 2022, however the parties have continued negotiations and negotiations continue as of the date of this filing. The IC Agreement contains provisions that would require IC to de-identify its locations if a solution is not reached. IC operates approximately 49 locations in Canada. During the three and six months ended August 31, 2022 the Company recognized approximately $0 and $30,000, respectively, of factory revenue from locations operated by IC in Canada compared with no revenue recognized from locations operated by IC in Canada during the three and six months ended August 31, 2021.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, and reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regulations. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (of a normal and recurring nature) which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the six months ended August 31, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year.

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2022, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed on June 28, 2022. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Subsequent Events

On September 28, 2022, the Company initiated a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery that seeks declaratory relief and monetary damages against Bradley L. Radoff, Andrew T. Berger, AB Value Partners LP, AB Value Management LLC (collectively, the “AB Value/Radoff Group) and Mary Bradley. The Company’s complaint alleges that the AB Value/Radoff Group and Ms. Bradley conspired to fraudulently induce the Company into entering a cooperation agreement on August 13, 2022 (the “Cooperation Agreement”), which was intended to settle the contested election at the upcoming 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “2022 Annual Meeting”). The Cooperation Agreement specified that the Company would expand its Board of Directors to seven members by appointing the AB Value/Radoff Group’s nominee, Ms. Bradley, to the Board immediately following the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The complaint alleges that the AB Value/Radoff Group and Ms. Bradley knew before signing the Cooperation Agreement there was no contested election to resolve, because Ms. Bradley had notified the AB Value/Radoff Group that she would not serve as a director for even one day and was therefore ineligible for election at the 2022 Annual Meeting—but withheld this information from the Company and the public. The complaint seeks (i) a declaration that the Cooperation Agreement is rescinded, null, and void, and that Company has no obligations under the Cooperation Agreement including, but not limited, to the payment of $600,000 to the AB Value/Radoff Group, (ii) an award of damages for the Company’s costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, that the Company incurred to negotiate and execute the Cooperation Agreement after the AB Value/Radoff Group knew or should have known that Ms. Bradley was unwilling to serve as a Director of the Company, in an amount in excess of $500,000, (iii) an award of damages for the Company’s costs and expenses incurred in the contested election that was based on misrepresentations concerning Ms. Bradley’s qualifications in numerous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in an amount in excess of $1,000,000.

In connection with Mr. Dudley’s retirement, Mr. Dudley and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release (the “Separation Agreement”), dated as of September 30, 2022 (the “Effective Date”). Under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Dudley retired from the Company on the Effective Date and will be entitled, subject to the terms and conditions therein, to the following payments and separation benefits: (i) a cash separation payment amount in accordance with Mr. Dudley’s employment agreement dated May 21, 1999; (ii) acceleration of vesting of Mr. Dudley’s 12,499 unvested restricted stock units as of the Effective Date; (iii) an additional cash severance payment of $70,000; and (iv) Mr. Dudley has agreed to provide consulting services to the Company through December 31, 2022, to the extent requested by the Company, for which he will receive a cash payment of $56,250. In addition, the Separation Agreement includes covenants related to cooperation, solicitation and employment, as well as customary release of claims and non-disparagement provisions in favor of the Company.

Management evaluated all activity of the Company through the issue date of the financial statements and concluded that no subsequent events, except for those described above, have occurred that would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Except for the recent accounting pronouncements described below, other recent accounting pronouncements are not expected to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 significantly changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. ASU 2016-13 will require immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of many financial assets, which will generally result in earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses on loans and other financial instruments and affect the carrying value of accounts receivable. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning March 1, 2023 and subsequent interim periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2 – SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

NOTE 3 –REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

The Company recognizes revenue from contracts with its customers in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification® (“ASC”) 606, which provides that revenues are recognized when control of promised goods or services is transferred to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received for those goods or services. The Company generally receives a fee associated with the Franchise Agreement or License Agreement (collectively “Customer Contracts”) at the time that the Customer Contract is entered. These Customer Contracts have a term of up to 20 years, however the majority of Customer Contracts have a term of 10 years. During the term of the Customer Contract, the Company is obligated to many performance obligations that the Company has determined are not distinct. The resulting treatment of revenue from Customer Contracts is that the revenue is recognized proportionately over the life of the Customer Contract.

Initial Franchise Fees, License Fees, Transfer Fees and Renewal Fees

The initial franchise services are not distinct from the continuing rights or services offered during the term of the franchise agreement, and are treated as a single performance obligation. Initial franchise fees are being recognized as the Company satisfies the performance obligation over the term of the franchise agreement, which is generally 10 years.

The following table summarizes contract liabilities as of August 31, 2022 and August 31, 2021:

At August 31, 2022, annual revenue expected to be recognized in the future, related to performance obligations that are not yet fully satisfied, are estimated to be the following:

Gift Cards

The Company’s franchisees sell gift cards, which do not have expiration dates or non-usage fees. The proceeds from the sale of gift cards by the franchisees are accumulated by the Company and paid out to the franchisees upon customer redemption. ASC 606 requires the use of the “proportionate” method for recognizing breakage. Under the guidance of ASC 606 the Company recognizes breakage from gift cards when the gift card is redeemed by the customer or the Company determines the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote (“gift card breakage”). The determination of the gift card breakage rate is based upon Company-specific historical redemption patterns.

Factory Sales of Confectionary Items, Retail Sales and Royalty and Marketing Fees

Confectionary items sold to the Company’s franchisees, others and its Company-owned stores sales are recognized at the time of the underlying sale, based on the terms of the sale and when ownership of the inventory is transferred, and are presented net of sales taxes and discounts. Royalties and marketing fees from franchised or licensed locations, which are based on a percent of sales, are recognized at the time the sales occur.

NOTE 4 – DISAGGREGATION OF REVENUE         

The following table presents disaggregated revenue by method of recognition and segment:

NOTE 5 – INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following:

NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment consists of the following:

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment totaled $185,897 and $370,733 during the three and six months ended August 31, 2022 compared to $185,404 and $363,978 during the three and six months ended August 31, 2021, respectively.

NOTE 7 – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill and intangible assets consist of the following:

Amortization expense related to intangible assets totaled $102,348 and $204,696 during the three and six months ended August 31, 2022 compared to $120,872 and $242,212 during the three and six months ended August 31, 2021, respectively.

At August 31, 2022, annual amortization of intangible assets, based upon the Company’s existing intangible assets and current useful lives, is estimated to be the following:

NOTE 8 – LINE OF CREDIT

Revolving Credit Line

The Company has a $5.0 million credit line (subject to certain borrowing base limitations) for general corporate and working capital purposes, of which approximately $4.6 million was available for borrowing and no amount was outstanding as of August 31, 2022. The credit line is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, except retail store assets. Interest on borrowings is at the Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 2.37% (4.66% at August 31, 2022). Additionally, the line of credit is subject to various financial ratio and leverage covenants. At August 31, 2022, the Company did not comply with all covenants. On September 30, 2022, the Company renewed the credit line with Wells Fargo Bank, NA and as part of the renewal the covenant that the Company was not compliant with at August 31, 2022 was eliminated and replaced by a covenant that the Company was compliant with at August 31, 2022 and at the date of renewal.

NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Warrants

In consideration of an exclusive supplier agreement and the performance of specific obligations therein, on December 20, 2019, the Company issued a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 960,677 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $8.76 per share. The Warrant Shares vest in annual tranches in varying amounts following each contract year under the exclusive supplier agreement, subject to, and only upon, the achievement of certain revenue thresholds on an annual or cumulative five-year basis in connection with performance under the exclusive supplier agreement. The Warrant expires six months after the final and conclusive determination of revenue thresholds for the fifth contract year and the cumulative revenue determination in accordance with the terms of the Warrant. As of August 31, 2022 no warrants have vested.

The Company determined that the grant date fair value of the warrants was de minimis and did not record any amount in consideration of the warrants. The Company utilized a Monte Carlo model for purposes of determining the grant date fair value.

Stock-Based Compensation

Under the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and restated) (the “2007 Plan”), the Company may authorize and grant stock awards to employees, non-employee directors and certain other eligible participants, including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units.

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity during the six months ended August 31, 2022 and 2021:

The following table summarizes stock option activity during the six months ended August 31, 2022 and 2021:

The Company did not issue any unrestricted shares of stock to non-employee directors during the three and six months ended August 31, 2022 compared to 2,000 unrestricted shares issued during the three months ended August 31, 2021 and 9,000 unrestricted shares during the six months ended August 31, 2021. In connection with these non-employee director stock issuances, the Company recognized $0 during the three and six months ended August 31, 2022, compared to $11,960 of stock-based compensation expense during the three months ended August 31, 2021 and $46,610 during the six months ended August 31, 2021.

During the six months ended August 31, 2022, the Company issued 36,144 stock options and issued up to 94,892 performance-based restricted stock units subject to vesting based on the achievement of performance goals. These issuances were made to the Company’s new Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as a part of the incentive compensation structure for Mr. Sarlls and Mr. Arroyo. The stock options were issued with an aggregate grant date fair value of $77,267 or $2.14 per share. The performance-based restricted stock units were issued with an aggregate grant date fair value of $298,582 or $6.29 per share, based upon a target issuance of 47,446 shares. The stock options granted vest with respect to one-third of the shares on the last day of the Company’s current fiscal year ending February 28, 2023, and vest as to remaining shares in equal quarterly increments on the last day of each quarter until the final vesting on February 28, 2025. The performance-based restricted stock units will vest following the end of the Company’s fiscal year ending February 2025 with respect to the target number of performance-based restricted stock units if the Company achieves an annualized total shareholder return of 12.5% during the performance period, subject to continued service through the end of the performance period. The Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the number of performance-based restricted stock units between 0-200% of the target number that will vest based on achievement of performance below or above the target performance goal.

The Company recognized $149,040 and $280,637 of stock-based compensation expense during the three- and six-month periods ended August 31, 2022, respectively, compared to $123,467 and $269,624 during the three and six month periods ended August 31, 2021, respectively. Compensation costs related to stock-based compensation are generally amortized over the vesting period of the stock awards. Except as noted above, restricted stock units generally vest in equal annual installments over a period of five to six years. During the six-month periods ended August 31, 2022 and 2021, 36,879 and 40,995 restricted stock units vested and were issued as common stock, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation expense of non-vested, non-forfeited restricted stock units and stock options granted as of August 31, 2022 was $860,588, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 2.30 years.

NOTE 10 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through the settlement of restricted stock units. Restricted stock units become dilutive within the period granted and remain dilutive until the units vest and are issued as common stock.

The weighted-average number of shares outstanding used in the computation of diluted earnings per share does not include outstanding common shares issuable if their effect would be anti-dilutive. During the six months ended August 31, 2022, 960,677 shares of common stock warrants and 109,251 shares of issuable common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. During the six months ended August 31, 2021, 960,677 shares of common stock warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE 11 – LEASING ARRANGEMENTS

The Company conducts its retail operations in facilities leased under non-cancelable operating leases of up to ten years. Certain leases contain renewal options for between five and ten additional years at increased monthly rentals. Some of the leases provide for contingent rentals based on sales in excess of predetermined base levels.

The Company acts as primary lessee of some franchised store premises, which the Company then subleases to franchisees, but the majority of existing franchised locations are leased by the franchisee directly.

In some instances, the Company has leased space for its Company-owned locations that are now occupied by franchisees. When the Company-owned location was sold or transferred, the store was subleased to the franchisee who is responsible for the monthly rent and other obligations under the lease.

The Company also leases trucking equipment and warehouse space in support of its manufacturing operations. Expense associated with trucking and warehouse leases is included in cost of sales on the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company accounts for payments related to lease liabilities on a straight-line basis over the lease term. During the six months ended August 31, 2022 and 2021, lease expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income was $408,849 and $409,897, respectively.

The lease liability reflects the present value of the Company’s estimated future minimum lease payments over the life of its leases. This includes known escalations and renewal option periods reasonably assured of being exercised. Typically, renewal options are considered reasonably assured of being exercised if the sales performance of the location remains strong. Therefore, the Right of Use Asset and Lease Liability include an assumption on renewal options that have not yet been exercised by the Company, and are not currently a future obligation. The Company has separated non-lease components from lease components in the recognition of the Asset and Liability except in instances where such costs were not practical to separate. To the extent that occupancy costs, such as site maintenance, are included in the Asset and Liability, the impact is immaterial. For franchised locations, the related occupancy costs including property taxes, insurance and site maintenance are generally required to be paid by the franchisees as part of the franchise arrangement. In addition, the Company is the lessee under non-store related leases such as storage facilities and trucking equipment. For leases where the implicit rate is not readily determinable, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate to calculate the lease liability that represents an estimate of the interest rate the Company would incur to borrow on a collateralized basis over the term of a lease. The weighted average discount rate used for operating leases was 3.4% as of August 31, 2022.

As of August 31, 2022, maturities of lease liabilities for the Company’s operating leases were as follows:

During the six months ended August 31, 2022 the Company entered into leases for equipment used in the Company’s trucking operations. These leases resulted in the Company recognizing a total future lease liability of $1.4 million.

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contested Solicitation of Proxies

During the three and six months ended August 31, 2022, the Company incurred substantial costs associated with a stockholder’s contested solicitation of proxies in connection with our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders. During the three and six months ended August 31, 2022, the Company incurred approximately $1.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of costs associated with the contested solicitation of proxies, compared with $907,000 and $917,000, respectively, of costs associated with a contested solicitation of proxies incurred in the three and six months ended August 31, 2021. These costs are recognized as general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company is likely to continue to realize material increased costs associated with the contested solicitation of proxies for the near future. The total possible costs are contingent upon the outcome of the contested proxy solicitation and negotiations with the contesting party.

Employment Agreement Payments upon a Change in Control

We have entered into employment agreements with certain of our executives which contain, among other things, "change in control" severance provisions. The employment agreement for Mr. Dudley generally provides that, if the Company or the executive terminates the executive's employment under circumstances constituting a "triggering termination," the executive will be entitled to receive, among other benefits, 2.99 times the sum of (i) the executive's annual salary using the highest annual base compensation rate in effect at any time during employment and (ii) the greater of (a) two times the bonus that would be payable to the executive for the bonus period in which the change in control occurred or (b) 25% of the amount described in clause (i).. The executive will also receive an additional payment of $18,000, which represents the estimated cost to the executive of obtaining accident, health, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for the 18-month period following the expiration of COBRA coverage.

A “change in control,” as used in the agreement for Mr. Dudley, generally means a change in the control of the Company following any number of events, but specifically a proxy contest in which our Board of Directors prior to the transaction constitutes less than a majority of our Board of Directors after the transaction or the members of our Board of Directors during any consecutive two-year period who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board of Directors cease to be the majority of the Board of Directors at the conclusion of that period. We have determined that a change in control has taken place on October 6, 2021. A “triggering termination” generally occurs when an executive is terminated during a specified period preceding a change in control of us, or if the executive or the Company terminates the executive’s employment under circumstances constituting a triggering termination during a specified period after a change in control. A triggering termination may also include a voluntary termination under certain scenarios.

As a result of the changes in our Board of Directors over the past 12 months, the Company may be liable to Mr. Dudley for change in control payments contingent upon a triggering termination event. As of August 31, 2022 the amount of the recorded cash severance payments and benefits contingent upon a subsequent triggering termination event are $859,000. This was recorded during the three months ended August 31, 2022 because of the severance payment becoming probable based upon a triggering termination becoming probable. The Company may further be liable for outplacement services obligations, consulting fees, and certain tax consequences associated with severance payments, benefits payments and stock awards. These additional obligations may have a material impact on the liability of the Company upon a triggering termination.

Mr. Sarlls’ employment agreement provides for the following upon “change in control”: If Mr. Sarlls’ employment is involuntarily terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason on or within 2 years following consummation of a change in control, the cash severance amount (15 months of base salary) which would otherwise be payable on the regular payroll schedule over a 15-month period following separation (if severance were due outside the change in control context) will be accelerated and paid in a lump sum promptly following separation. Mr. Sarlls’ agreement incorporates by reference the change in control definition set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5).

Mr. Arroyo’s employment agreement provides for the following upon “change in control”: If Mr. Arroyo’s employment is involuntarily terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason on or within 2 years following consummation of a change in control, the cash severance amount (9 months of base salary) which would otherwise be payable on the regular payroll schedule over a 9-month period following separation (if severance were due outside the change in control context) will be accelerated and paid in a lump sum promptly following separation. Mr. Arroyo’s agreement incorporates by reference the change in control definition set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5).

Purchase Contracts

The Company frequently enters into purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for chocolate and certain nuts. These contracts permit the Company to purchase the specified commodity at a fixed price on an as-needed basis during the term of the contract. Because prices for these products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts, but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall and it is unable to renegotiate the terms of the contract. As of August 31, 2022, the Company was contracted for approximately $53,000 of raw materials under such agreements. The Company has designated these contracts as normal under the normal purchase and sale exception under the accounting standards for derivatives. These contracts are not entered into for speculative purposes.

NOTE 13 – OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company classifies its business interests into five reportable segments: Franchising, Manufacturing, Retail Stores, U-Swirl operations and Other. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1 to these consolidated financial statements and Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2022, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed on June 28, 2022. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on operating contribution, which excludes unallocated corporate general and administrative costs and income tax expense or benefit. The Company’s reportable segments are strategic businesses that utilize common merchandising, distribution and marketing functions, as well as common information systems and corporate administration. All inter-segment sales prices are market based. Each segment is managed separately because of the differences in required infrastructure and the difference in products and services:

NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES

The Company provides for income taxes pursuant to the liability method. The liability method requires recognition of deferred income taxes based on temporary differences between financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, using current enacted income tax rates and regulations. These differences will result in taxable income or deductions in future years when the reported amount of the asset or liability is recovered or settled, respectively. Considerable judgment is required in determining when these events may occur and whether recovery of an asset, including the utilization of a net operating loss or other carryforward prior to its expiration, is more likely than not.

Realization of the Company's deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company generating sufficient taxable income, in the appropriate tax jurisdictions, in future years, to obtain benefit from the reversal of net deductible temporary differences. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable income are changed. valuation allowance to reduce the carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is established when it is more likely than not that we will not realize some portion or all of the tax benefit of our deferred income tax assets. We evaluate, on a quarterly basis, whether it is more likely than not that our deferred income tax assets are realizable based upon recent past financial performance, tax reporting positions, and expectations of future taxable income. The determination of deferred tax assets is subject to estimates and assumptions. We periodically evaluate our deferred tax assets to determine if our assumptions and estimates should change.

During the three month ended August 31, 2022 the Company incurred a significant loss before income taxes, primarily as a result of substantial costs associated with a stockholder’s contested solicitation of proxies in connection with our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders. Management evaluated recent losses before income taxes and determined that it is no longer more likely than not that our deferred income taxes are fully realized. Because of this determination, the Company reserved for $1,964,107 of deferred tax assets. As of August 31, 2022, the Company has a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

Item 2.         Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes included in Item 1 of Part I of this 10-Q and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contained in the 10-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2022, for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2022, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed on June 28, 2022. In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains certain forward-looking information. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” above for certain information concerning forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are an international franchisor, confectionery manufacturer and retail operator. Founded in 1981, we are headquartered in Durango, Colorado and manufacture an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery products. Our subsidiary, U-Swirl International, Inc. (“U-Swirl”), franchises and operates soft-serve frozen yogurt cafés. Our revenues and profitability are derived principally from our franchised/license system of retail stores that feature chocolate, frozen yogurt and other confectionary products. We also sell our candy outside of our system of retail stores and license the use of our brand with certain consumer products. As of August 31, 2022, there were two Company-owned, 100 licensee-owned and 162 franchised Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores operating in 37 states, South Korea, Panama, and the Philippines. As of August 31, 2022, U-Swirl operated three Company-owned cafés and 57 franchised cafés located in 22 states. U-Swirl operates self-serve frozen yogurt cafés under the names “U-Swirl,” “Yogurtini,” “CherryBerry,” “Yogli Mogli Frozen Yogurt,” “Fuzzy Peach Frozen Yogurt,” “Let’s Yo!” and “Aspen Leaf Yogurt”.

Labor and Supply Chain

As a result of macro-economic inflationary trends and disruptions to the global supply chain, we have experienced and expect to continue experiencing higher raw material, labor, and freight costs. We have begun to see labor and logistics challenges, which we believe have contributed to lower factory, retail and e-commerce sales of our products due to the availability of material, labor and freight. In addition, we could experience additional lost sale opportunities if our products are not available for purchase as a result of continued disruptions in our supply chain relating to an inability to obtain ingredients or packaging, labor challenges at our logistics providers or our manufacturing facility, or if we or our franchisees experience delays in stocking our products. For additional information, see Item 1A. “Rick Factors - The Availability and Price of Principal Ingredients Used in Our Products Are Subject to Factors Beyond Our Control” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2022, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed on June 28, 2022.

Contested Solicitation of Proxies

During the three and six months ended August 31, 2022, the Company incurred substantial costs associated with a stockholder’s contested solicitation of proxies in connection with our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders. During the three and six months ended August 31, 2022, the Company incurred approximately $1.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of costs associated with the contested solicitation of proxies, compared with $907,000 and $917,000 of costs associated with a contested solicitation of proxies incurred in the three and six months ended August 31, 2021. These costs are recognized as general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Future costs associated with the stockholder’s contested solicitation of proxies and the related legal proceedings described under the caption “PART II. OTHER INFORMATION - Item 1. Legal Proceedings” in this Form 10-Q may have a material impact on the result of future periods. Additionally, as a result of the contested solicitation of proxies in the prior year and the resulting changes to the composition of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company incurred $859,000 of accrued severance costs during the three months ended August 31, 2022. As previously announced, Edward L. Dudley announced his retirement as Senior Vice President – Sales and Marketing of the Company effective in September 2022.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended August 31, 2022, Compared to the Three Months Ended August 31, 2021

Results Summary

Basic earnings per share decreased from $0.03 per share in the three months ended August 31, 2021 to a loss of $0.59 per share in the three months ended August 31, 2022. Revenues decreased 5.1% from $7.9 million in the three months ended August 31, 2021 to $7.5 million in the three months ended August 31, 2022. Income from operations decreased from $258,000 in the three months ended August 31, 2021 to a loss from operations of $2.2 million in the three months ended August 31, 2022. Net income decreased from $197,000 in the three months ended August 31, 2021 to a net loss of $3.6 million in the three months ended August 31, 2022.

Revenues

Factory Sales

The decrease in factory sales for the three months ended August 31, 2022, compared to the three months ended August 31, 2021 was primarily due to a 36.2%, $181,000, decrease in shipments of product to customers outside our network of franchised retail stores and a 3.7%, $172,000, decrease in sales of product to our network of franchised and licensed retail stores. The decrease in sales of product to our network of franchised and licensed retail stores was primarily the result of lower same store pounds purchased. Same store pounds purchased by domestic franchise and licensed locations decreased 15.4% during the three months ended August 31, 2022, when compared to the three months ended August 31, 2021.

Retail Sales

Retail sales at Company-owned stores increased 1.8% during the three months ended August 31, 2022, compared to the three months ended August 31, 2021, as a result of an increase in Company-owned same store sales. Same store sales at all Company-owned locations increased 1.8% during the three months ended August 31, 2022 when compared to the three months ended August 31, 2021.

Royalties, Marketing Fees and Franchise Fees

The decrease in royalties and marketing fees from the three months ended August 31, 2021 to the three months ended August 31, 2022 was primarily due to a decrease in same store sales at domestic Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory locations mostly offset by an increase in same store sales at U-Swirl Frozen Yogurt cafés. Same store sales at domestic franchise Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory locations decreased 3.1% and same store sales at U-Swirl Frozen Yogurt cafés increased 16.2% during the three months ended August 31, 2022 when compared to the three months ended August 31, 2021.

The increase in franchise fee revenue for the three months ended August 31, 2022, compared to the three months ended August 31, 2021 was the result of more franchise agreements outstanding and subject to revenue recognition.

Costs and Expenses

Cost of Sales

Gross Margin

Adjusted Gross Margin