Autonomix Medical, Inc. Common Stock (AMIX) 10-K2024 FY Annual report

References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “we," “us," ”its," “our” or the “Company” are to Autonomix Medical, Inc. (“Autonomix”), as appropriate to the context.

Cautionary Statement About Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (including the section regarding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Annual Report) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “should,” “would,” “could,” "will", “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” "seek", "contemplate", "project", “potential”, “continue”, or "ongoing" and the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements, which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, may include projections of our future financial performance based on our growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular, you should consider the numerous risks and uncertainties described under “Risk Factors” and in other filings made by us from time to time with the SEC.

While we believe we have identified material risks, these risks and uncertainties are not exhaustive. Other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K may describe additional factors that could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict all risks and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to conform our prior statements to actual results or revised expectations, and we do not intend to do so.

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

We caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K in the case of forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of the forward-looking statements. In addition, with respect to all of our forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

PART I

Item 1.         Business

Overview

We are a development stage medical device development company focused on advancing innovative technologies for sensing and treating disorders relating to the nervous system. Our first-in-class technology platform includes a catheter-based microchip-enabled sensing array that can detect and differentiate neural signals with a high degree of sensitivity as demonstrated in animal studies. We are initially developing our technology for patients with pancreatic cancer, a condition that can cause debilitating pain and needs a more effective solution. However, we believe our technology constitutes a platform with the potential to address dozens of indications in a range of areas including chronic pain management from all causes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and a wide range of other nerve-related disorders.

We calculate sensitivity in units of minimum signal detection voltage in micro volts (uV) time area of the electrode (square millimeters). It is a combined measure that is related to the signal resolving power and spatial resolution of the system. For the BSC Orion, the nearest device on the market, the metrics are 10uV for signal detection levels, and roughly 0.4mm by 0.5mm for the electrode dimensions. For the Autonomix device, the metrics are <1uV for signal detection levels and roughly 0.02mm by 0.03mm for the electrode dimensions. The differences in these metrics result in a calculation of 3,000 times greater sensitivity for the Autonomix device. We believe, if we can recreate these results in clinical trials, this will enable a method of transvascular targeting, treating, and confirming treatment of diseases involving the nervous system throughout the body that is not currently available and may be capable of filling a wide range of unmet medical needs.

Our development efforts can be divided into to two sub parts: diagnostic and therapeutic, where diagnostic is focused on sensing and identifying neuronal activity that may be associated with a disorder with enough precision to enable targeted therapy with ablation. Our sensing catheter has already been developed sufficiently to demonstrate in animal models successful identification of a signal from a specific nerve bundle before ablation and confirmation of termination of that signal from the treated nerves after ablation. We are now in the process of improving the design of this catheter to meet the standards required for human use. In parallel with this effort, we are conducting a first-in-human demonstration of transvascular ablation to relieve pain associated with pancreatic cancer, with the intent to bring sensing and treatment together in a future pivotal clinical trial to enable the commercial launch of our technology. We are a development stage company and there is no guarantee that the results of any trials will produce positive results or that the results will support our claims.

We believe one of the most demanding aspects of our commercialization plan will be scaling up from our existing sensing prototype to a robust commercial version. Today, our sensing device is hand built and includes a combination of hand-crafted and 3D printed parts. We have not yet assembled or tested what will be the commercial version of our proposed device. Even if our proposed device is cleared for commercial use, there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully build such device on a commercial scale.

As of March 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $39.0 million, negative cash flows from operating activities of $6.6 million and working capital of $8.6 million, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Further, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant costs in pursuit of our business plans. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in raising additional funds. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our Technology

Targeting the Peripheral Nervous System

The peripheral nervous system comprises a vast network of nerve fibers extending throughout the human body and interacting with every organ. Peripheral nerves can be further classified as autonomic (supplying sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve signals from the brain to tissue and organs, i.e., fear inducing production of adrenaline) and somatosensory (supplying signals to the brain from tissue and organs, i.e., the sensation of pain). Whether as a root cause or a manifestation of resulting symptoms, these nerves play a role in virtually all diseases.

Unfortunately, we believe that very few tools currently exist for the sensing and targeting of nerve fibers within the peripheral nervous system. At Autonomix, our primary goal is to provide a breakthrough in sensing technology that will become an indispensable tool for diagnosing, targeting, and treating disorders relating to the peripheral nervous system. And, although our Company’s name hails from the autonomic subgroup of the peripheral nervous system, our technology is intended for both the autonomic and somatosensory systems and could eventually find uses within the central nervous system.

Exploiting the Vascular Superhighway

The Autonomix system we are developing is primarily catheter based, meaning that our sensing equipment will be delivered to its targeted location via a lumen within the body. While this could include oral, urethral, and other natural openings of the body, our primary focus is using the vasculature, most often arteries, to reach our target. Fortunately, nature has endowed us with “superhighway” access in the form of our arterial structure, as most of the peripheral nerves travel along our arteries. As can be seen in this cross-sectional view of the kidney and renal artery, the web of peripheral nerve fibers (shown in yellow) parallels the renal artery, and this form of nerve pathway development is typical throughout the body.

Our sensing catheter has been designed to be introduced by a small incision into an artery (such as the femoral artery) and with a conventional guide wire or sheath be directed to any organ in the body where it will be close enough to the nerve fibers servicing that organ to sense, target and treat the nerves associated with that targeted disorder, and to confirm that the intended treatment was successful.

The Sensing Problem

Although this vascular superhighway has long been utilized for certain catheter-based evaluation and intervention, we believe its use throughout the body has been limited by the lack of adequate sophistication of catheter systems. According to a Markets and Markets report, titled “Electrophysiology Market Global Forecast to 2027” published in February 2023, the global electrophysiology market in terms of revenue was estimated to be $6.8 billion in 2021 and is expected to reach $11.6 billion by 2027. The report cites as a driver for such market the increased incidence of cardiovascular disease and the use of catheters to deliver corrective ablation in the field of cardiology. Most commonly, radio frequency (RF) energy is emitted from inside the walls of the heart or arteries sufficient to ablate (destroy) a cardiomyocyte or nerve within its path. This “transvascular” use of ablation forms the basis for treating atrial fibrillation, for example.

More recently, companies like Medtronic have successfully used transvascular ablation of the nerves surrounding the renal artery to treat refractory hypertension (high blood pressure that has been resistant to standard drug therapy). One of the challenges they face however is that the nerves they are targeting operate at much lower voltage levels than, say, the level emitted by a cardiomyocyte. In cardiology, there are sensing systems capable of sensing down to a level of about 10 to 15 microvolts. That’s more than enough sensitivity to detect (and target) a cardiomyocyte that is emitting 100 microvolts per pulse, but the nerves around the renal artery (and around most peripheral nerve targets throughout the body) are operating at around 1 to 2 microvolts; much too low to be detected by existing sensing technology.

What this means is that the ablation of nerves from within the renal artery is essentially conducted “blind.” Without a sensing system capable of detecting and targeting signals from nerves within the nervous system, clinicians cannot see the nerves causing hypertension in the patient. As a result, they are forced to hypothesize and treat one small area at a time, hoping they hit the desired target without hitting an unintended target. Over-treating the area could relegate the patient to life in a wheelchair by destroying their ability to regulate blood pressure.

The Autonomix Solution

We believe the reason no one has commercialized a sensing system capable of solving this problem is that the physics involved demanded a major technological breakthrough. By their very nature, electrical signals from the body are analog and even though a 10-microvolt signal can be detected and transmitted down the roughly 2 meters of wire required to travel along the catheter, outside the patient, and into the necessary processing equipment shown in this picture below of a typical catheter lab, this isn’t feasible with the 1 to 2 microvolt signal from a typical peripheral nerve. Given the cacophony of other signals emitted throughout the body and by other equipment in the lab as well as degradation of the signal due to the distance traveled along the catheter, these faint signals become lost or are rendered meaningless.

We are seeking to solve this problem through our design, which is still in development, of a proprietary microchip comprised of multiple key components. Each antenna is comprised of two small electrodes that can detect the presence of voltage down to as little as 0.5 microvolts giving us sufficient sensitivity to register the impulse of a nearby nerve bundle that might typically be generating 1.5 to 2.0 microvolts with each impulse. Our current design connects 8 antennae to our proprietary chipset (which is designed to handle up to 16 antennae) where an onboard amplifier and analog to digital converter convert each signal into a robust digital form. The chipset also includes a multiplexer intended to enable the transmission of data from each of the antennae simultaneously down the catheter body to the catheter handle. The Wi-Fi handpiece then transmits this data to a nearby laptop for viewing and analysis by the clinician.

In a typical catheter lab, these signal conversion functions are often carried out by “briefcase” sized devices processing the raw analog signals that must travel the full length of the catheter, outside the patient’s body and then from the patient to the equipment. While this is feasible for higher voltage signals from the heart, the signals from peripheral nerve bundles are often too faint to travel all this distance without loss or corruption and yet the typical catheter lab equipment is far too big to fit inside a catheter. The patented Autonomix solution shrinks these processes down to a microchip small enough to place immediately adjacent to the antennae detecting the signals, greatly reducing the distance the signals must travel. The picture of the “proprietary chipset” below is our actual chipset and is not a rendering.

As shown in the diagram below, this basket antenna array is built from a micro-thin, laser-cut flexible circuit board. We believe the special arrangement of the antennae will make it possible to effectively geolocate the nerve in 3-dimensional space for targeting treatment.

Sense, Ablate, Confirm

This sensing system is currently being developed to be deployed alongside a separate radio frequency ablation catheter system for a combined diagnostic and therapeutic solution which will require the use of two separate catheters that will be used during the procedure. However, our longer-term design is intended to combine the two catheters into one device so that the combined system could be capable of sensing, treating (ablating) and confirming successful treatment all with one relatively simple and minimally invasive procedure.

Focus on Pancreatic Cancer Patients

We believe the Autonomix sensing technology has the potential to provide a level of detail and resolution in navigating the peripheral nervous system that until now has simply not been possible. As such, we believe this platform, if shown to be effective, could be applied to a wide range of disorders throughout the body. With that said, our experience tells us that the best way to develop a new technology like this is to narrowly focus on a proof of concept that we think will reflect the capabilities of our system while providing the most expeditious pathway to regulatory clearance, commercialization and revenue generation.

For this reason, we are initially focusing on the treatment of pain associated with pancreatic cancer and we have designed our commercialization efforts around this as our first proposed indication for use.

We believe this is a good choice for several reasons:

Significant Unmet Need

According to a report by The Oncologist, titled “Pancreas Cancer-Associated Pain Management” first published April 22, 2021, “[p]ain is highly prevalent in patients with pancreas cancer,” “90% of these patients reported discussing pain with their health care provider,” and “50% of the respondents reported visits to the emergency room for symptoms related to pain.” One of the tragedies of this condition is that most pancreatic cancer patients have a short time to live and the debilitating pain resulting from the tumor can significantly reduce the quality of that remaining time. Moreover, we believe that prolonged pain can diminish a patient’s will to live, making that remaining time even shorter.

The standard of care treatment usually begins with opioids, but patients often become resistant, and the side effects of chronic opioid use can eventually outweigh the benefits.

The most common alternative method of treatment is a neurolytic celiac plexus blockade (“NCPB”), which is a percutaneous (via needle through the skin) ethanol injection guided by CT scan to attempt to direct the ethanol (which will destroy neural tissue on contact) to the area of the pancreatic tumor and related peripheral nerves. Regardless of this initial targeting, the varied structure of the abdominal cavity leads to the potential for ethanol to either miss the intended target or migrate to unintended areas creating unwanted side effects.

Furthermore, according to a study titled “Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block for Pain Control in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer” published by the American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2007, Vol.102 (2), p.430-438, Article 430, meta-analysis from multiple randomized controlled trials suggests that patient benefits from NCPB are only marginally better than opioids and may not be outweighed by the potential risks. The most common side effects are diarrhea, transient hypotension, constipation, nausea and vomiting, and lethargy while rare major adverse events reported in the literature include infectious complications, bowel perforation, intraabdominal hemorrhage, fistula formation, stomach paralysis, partial paralysis of the lower limbs or loss of other motor function, chronic diarrhea, arterial damage, water on the lung, and death.

In contrast, we believe the Autonomix procedure could represent a much safer and more reliable treatment. This has the potential to significantly increase remaining quality of life for pancreatic cancer patients, and in so doing, even potentially extend overall survival.

To begin with, our entire approach is via arterial catheter, inserted in most cases via the femoral or brachial artery. We believe this method of access that should significantly reduce the potential for complications as compared with NCPB. We believe our sensing technology has the potential to identify and target the nerves that are responsible for the pain signal and with the ability to focus the ablative energy on that target, we should have a much greater degree of accuracy, control and reliability as compared with NCPB.

When comparing to the use of opioids, we believe the potential benefits are even more obvious. The Autonomix procedure we are developing is, by design, targeted directly to the nerves responsible for the pain being treated and offers the potential for “one and done” durability, whereas opioids are systemic treatments subjecting the entire body to unnecessary exposure, requiring constant dosing, and inducing debilitating chronic systemic side effects as a consequence.

Beneficial Clinical Trial Dynamics/Expedited Regulatory Process

Despite the significant unmet need, there are very few clinical trials worldwide focused on improving pain management for pancreatic cancer patients and currently none that we are aware of in the proposed location of our planned first-in-human proof of concept study. We believe this means there is limited competition for such patients, making it theoretically easier to recruit for our trial.

At the same time, because we are focusing on palliative care for patients whose lives are being limited by a rare cancer, we believe regulatory authorities are willing to consider lower preclinical hurdles and smaller and simpler trial designs to help encourage trial sponsors to seek improved treatment options. However, these decisions are under the exclusive control of regulatory authorities and there is no guarantee that our trial designs will be approved. If regulatory authorities are willing to consider lower preclinical hurdles and smaller and simpler trial designs, this would translate into lower preclinical and clinical trial cost, as well as shorter completion times. Furthermore, study duration is also shortened by the very nature of the indication and primary efficacy endpoint: reduction of pain associated with pancreatic cancer.

Specifically, we intend for each patient to need only one treatment and we expect we will be able to immediately determine if there is any reduction of pain from our procedure such that an initial indication of pain reduction will likely be provided by patients upon conclusion of that treatment. Although follow up visits will be required to assess continuing safety and durability of efficacy over a span of several months, an initial indication of efficacy will be available almost as quickly as patients are treated . For this reason, we are hopeful that the overall duration of this first trial will be measured in months rather than years, as is often the case for clinical trials with longer treatment durations or where a clinically significant response takes more time to be produced.

Meaningful Commercial Market

Although pancreatic cancer is considered a rare disease, according to the American Cancer Society “Key Statistics for Pancreatic Cancer” (https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/pancreatic-cancer/about/key-statistics.html), the American Cancer Society estimates in 2023 that approximately 64,000 will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in the U.S. on an annual basis and an article in the International Journal of Cancer (Int. J. Cancer. 2021;149:993–1001) indicates that annual new cases in the European Union reached 109,000 in 2019 and are expected to grow. A market analysis published by Precedence Research (https://www.precedenceresearch.com/ pancreatic-cancer-market) reported that the global market for treatment of pancreatic cancer in 2022 was estimated to be $2.2 billion. Published research by The Oncologist, titled “Pancreas Cancer-Associated Pain Management” stated that “90% of patients [with pancreatic cancer] reported discussing pain with their health care provider”. As a point of reference, a one-month course of Abraxane (a commonly prescribed drug for the treatment of pancreatic cancer) has a retail price of more than $10,000. While this should not be considered an indicator of how an Autonomix procedure will ultimately be priced, we believe it reflects the magnitude of potential market size and helps form the basis for expecting a significant revenue opportunity from this indication.

The incidence of pancreatitis, a non-cancerous condition that can also result in chronic pain, is estimated to be as much as three times that of pancreatic cancer. We believe that, if our procedure is cleared for use in treating pancreatic cancer pain, we should be able to eventually expand that clearance to include pain resulting from pancreatitis.

The Potential to Impact Cancer

Recent independent research has indicated that neural pathways may play an insidious role in cancer progression. An article published in Metastatic Cancer: Clinical and Biological Perspectives, titled “Sympathetic Nervous System Regulation of Metastasis” demonstrates that as pancreatic tumors progress to invade the liver (a common occurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer and a significant driver of morbidity) they do so by traveling along local neural pathways. Our development team speculated that disruption of these pathways might have the potential to slow or stop the progression of the primary tumor.

In collaboration with a specialist in pancreatic cancer, we conducted a study in mice to see if ablation (in this study, ethanol ablation was used, similar to its use with NCPB in humans) of the nerve fibers around the pancreas might have an effect on tumor progression. As can be seen in this study summary, there was a reduction in tumor progression in this model. This was a small study, and we can’t be certain that these results are indicative of the potential for impacting tumor progression in humans, but we do see this as encouraging further study and may represent a future opportunity beyond pain management.

Indicative of Additional Market Potential

We believe pancreatic cancer pain management is a “proof of concept,” and we believe success here will be indicative of the potential of our system in a wide range of disorders where the peripheral nervous system is involved.

Examples of future potential additional uses include renal denervation for treating hypertension, addressing other sources of pain including lower back and other joint locations, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (“CRPS”), other tumor related pain, and pelvic pain, pulmonary disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and urinary tract and digestive disorders, and enabling more targeted treatments in cardiology, just to name a few.

A Markets and Markets report, titled “Electrophysiology Market Global Forecast to 2027” published in February 2023 describes the global electrophysiology (EP) market as representing approximately $6.8 billion in 2021 in annual global revenue, and is expected to reach $11.6 billion by 2027. The vast majority of this market today is represented by cardiology related diagnosis and intervention. Our vision for the Autonomix technology is to help expand electrophysiology well beyond cardiology to include nearly all reaches of the peripheral nervous system and we believe doing so will ultimately result in a market opportunity much greater than the current projections for the EP.

We believe enabling targeted transvascular treatment of pain will enable us to access the $75 billion pain management market, as cited in the Mordor Intelligence Pain Management Market Industry Report (https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/pain-management-market). Additionally, facilitating a safer, more targeted method for renal denervation should enable us to access the $23 billion hypertension market, as indicated by Polaris Market Research (https://www.polarismarketresearch.com/industry-analysis/global-hypertension-drug-market). When additional indications such as COPD, irritable bowl syndrome, and overactive bladder are included, we believe the Autonomix platform has the potential to address more than $100 billion in market opportunities.

Commercialization Plan

Regulatory Pathway

The most likely approval pathway for our technology is referred to as “de novo” premarket notification. This is differentiated from the more common “510(k)” pathway, which is only applicable when there is a clear “predicate” device already on the market (doing the same thing in substantially the same way) and from the lengthier “PMA” process when there is no precedent at all for a technology. In our case, both sensing and ablation have established precedence, just not at this level of sensitivity or in our targeted indications.

Whether in the United States or EU, we must demonstrate that our technology is safe and effective. The safety standard is ultimately met through a combination of animal studies, independent laboratory testing, a design history file documenting compliance with established standards and, ultimately, human clinical trials. Many of these requirements are staged such that not all must be met on the front end of development. In addition, efficacy must be based on a sound scientific rationale and ultimately demonstrated in a human clinical trial.

Human trials are often designed to begin with a Proof of Concept (“PoC”); the US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) sometimes refers to these as Early Feasibility Studies (“EFS”) and then progress to a “Pivotal” or approval, trial. The design and endpoints of pivotal trials are often negotiated with the relevant regulatory authority (i.e., FDA in the United States, EMA or country-specific Competent Authority (“CA”) in Europe). Our regulatory package for authorization to conduct our first-in-human clinical trial was approved by the Ethics Committee (“EC”) at our intended clinical site hospitaloutside the United States. This approval allowed the clinical trial to begin The regulatory package submitted included not only a detailed clinical protocol for conducting the study, but also an extensive Investigator’s Brochure (“IB”) setting forth details about the equipment to be used, historical safety of human procedures conducted with this equipment and details of our animal studies using this equipment for the first time in the area of the pancreas.

We plan to present the relevant data from this study to the FDA in a pre-submission meeting to request “Breakthrough Status” in an effort to minimize the clinical requirements for clearance in the United States. The first trial is not designed to replace the trial that will be required by the FDA to support our submissions for clearance in the United States, but rather to potentially impact the size of that required trial.

According to an article by Applied Clinical Trials, titled “Medical Device Development: U.S. and EU Differences” published August 1, 2006 “[t]he way in which devices are regulated in the EU is very different from the way they are regulated in the United States,… [which] has introduced significant differences in time-to-market approval for the United States versus the EU, particularly in the case of high-risk Class III and Class IIb implantable devices.” While this is changing based on the advent of a new EU regulation called Medical Device Regulation (“MDR”) that is expected to make the EU process more like the FDA process, MDR is being rolled out country by country. We believe the approval process in some EU countries for utilizing CE marked devices off label is less demanding than in the US. As a result, we have decided to conduct the PoC in Europe instead of the US.

Once the PoC is established, however, there are compelling reasons to focus the approval process first and foremost in the US. One reason is that therapeutic procedures in the US will usually command higher prices and once those prices are set, EU pricing authorities will often index off of the US price. Another is that product launches are usually easier in the US where a single sales force can serve the entire region (as opposed to country-specific distribution teams in the EU) and where one regulatory standard applies across the board.

The development of the PoC data forms the basis for two FDA-related processes. First is the request of a “Pre-Submission” meeting to discuss the overall regulatory strategy, the primary focus of which is to agree on a pivotal testing protocol. Assuming promising PoC data, the second is to submit a request for “Breakthrough” status based on the significant unmet need. Breakthrough status affords us expedited access to FDA and a higher level of proactive interaction that may support faster approval.

Upon completion of the Pivotal Clinical Trial, we believe we will then be in a position to submit our de novo application to the FDA, the review of which is expected to require approximately 150 days. We believe this entire timeline supports an ultimate FDA clearance (applications like this are not technically “approved” but rather “allowed” or “cleared”) in the first half of 2027. The foregoing timeline is not a guarantee and is subject to many of the risks and uncertainties disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is subject to change.

Technology Development

Commercialization of our technology can be thought of in three distinct phases: (1) sensing, (2) ablation, and (3) the combination of these two technologies into an integrated device. We believe that commercial success can be achieved with either of the two technologies and is not dependent upon successful integration (meaning two distinct systems, one for sensing and one for ablation could also be viable, even if not optimal).

Similarly, our clinical development plan reflects the fact that the sensing and ablation systems are at different stages of development. Extensive testing in pigs (whose abdominal structure is considered similar to humans) has demonstrated that our sensing technology is capable of locating and targeting individual nerves around the renal artery. Considering the similarity in anatomy, both between pigs and humans and between the renal artery (supplying the kidneys) and the celiac and related arteries supplying the pancreas, we believe our sensing system may also be effective in humans and that the primary remaining risk relating to the sensing system is commercial execution.

Specifically, we believe one of the most demanding aspects of our commercialization plan will be scaling up from our existing sensing prototype to a robust commercial version. Today, our sensing device is hand built and includes a combination of hand-crafted and 3D printed parts, but we are actively engaged in the development of a more robust version which will meet requirements to be used in human clinical trials. We will divide this device into two subsets: (a) an electronics package (subassembly) that relies on semi-automated production of printed flexible circuit boards and electrical leads that is supplied to (b) a qualified catheter production process that will be contracted to a catheter production facility already experienced and certified in the “art” of catheter assembly. We expect the human clinical version to be completed by mid-2025 and the commerical scale up process to be completed by mid-2027, although there is no assurance that we will be able to meet such timeline.

Regarding the ablation system, safe and reliable off-the-shelf RF systems are currently available for use in cardiology and other electrophysiology indications. We are currently using one of these existing systems “off label” (in an area of the body for which the system is not yet approved by the relevant regulatory agency) in our proof-of-concept study to ablate the nerves near the pancreas of pancreatic cancer patients to demonstrate, for the first time ever, that transvascular ablation of those nerves may reduce pain. The regulatory package submitted includes not only a detailed clinical protocol for conducting the study, but also an extensive Investigator’s Brochure (IB) setting forth details about the equipment to be used, historical safety of human procedures conducted with this equipment and details of our animal studies using this equipment for the first time in the area of the pancreas. To be clear, this first PoC trial is being conducted without the benefit of our sensing system because it has not yet been cleared by the FDA for use in humans.

The fact that this first PoC is essentially being performed “blind” (as all denervation procedures are currently done) simply means that it will not be as accurate as it could be. However, we believe if we successfully demonstrate that transvascular ablation is capable of mitigating pancreatic cancer pain, this would be a medical “first” and would represent an important breakthrough for the electrophysiology community. Likewise, we believe it will help support a request to the FDA to be granted “Breakthrough” status, which could accelerate our future commercialization efforts.

Also, what we are learning in the trial, about how to optimize ablation catheters for use outside the cardiology space, is being incorporated into the design of a customized RF catheter design for use in our own therapeutic device.

It is possible to receive clearance from the FDA (and EMA) based on a prototype system that is not optimized for manufacturing and for the necessary design for manufacturability process to be running in the background with the goal of having the commercial version ready for launch shortly after the prototype platform is FDA cleared. We would then use our existing de novo cleared device as our own predicate for 510(k) clearance of the commercial version.

Our plan is then to launch the commercial version of our system, most likely to a controlled region or list of KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders) to debug and optimize the commercial strategy before committing to a national/global launch.

Accordingly, our planning considers both the possibility of a stand-alone commercial launch or a licensing arrangement with a larger player. As we get closer to an actual FDA device clearance, our strategy approach will be reviewed and adjusted for practicality. The Autonomix management team, however, has experience with both approaches.

The following graphic sets forth our planned development timeline, however, these timeframes are not guarantees and this timeline is subject to many of the risks and uncertainties disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is subject to change:

Revenue Model

We envision our device revenue model on several levels: (a) purely as a targeted therapy for disorders associated with pancreatic tumors (and pancreatitis), (b) as a standalone sensing technology for broad based diagnostics use and/or use in conjunction with other ablation systems or (c) as a combined sensing and ablation system targeting a wide array of disorders throughout the body.

There are four key elements of our device that will be provided to the user (hospital) to facilitate our technology: (1) a disposable sensing catheter with a handpiece (that connects to the catheter and could be partially or entirely disposable), (2) an RF catheter designed to reach the target nerves in the peripheral nervous system, (3) an RF energy source to power our custom RF ablation catheter, and (4) a user interface comprised primarily of software (translating data received from the catheter microchip and activating ablative energy in integrated systems) that could reside on existing hospital personal computer, or PC, systems or a dedicated PC system.

In general, we believe that hospitals place a high premium on disposability (maximizes patient safety, avoids complications of on-site sterilization) and that, if we can avoid the need for a significant outlay in “capital equipment” we should, since high-dollar capital equipment authorizations often involve additional bureaucracies within the hospital and complicate the sell-in process.

An important benefit of the Autonomix platform will be that it will rely on catheter systems and techniques that are familiar to interventional radiologists (our expected primary users) and should require a minimum of training for successful use.

Our selection of radio frequency as an energy source was made based upon what we believe is the well-understood status of the technology within the industry and the FDA. Additionally, we have found in pre-clinical testing that this energy source appears to provide a very effective method of ablating neural tissue. The software required in our device’s user interface will likely be provided at no or a nominal charge.

For the reasons described above, we believe the primary revenue model for Autonomix will be the sale of single-use disposable catheters to existing hospital catheter labs and that revenue volume will likely be a direct function of the number of procedures performed.

Intellectual Property

Patents and Pending Patent Applications

The Company has 18 patent families (representing various inventions relating to different aspects of its technology) comprising 82 issued patents (34 in the US thus far) and 43 pending patent applications. All patents and patent applications were originated by our co-founders, Mr. Toth and/or Dr. Schwartz, with filing dates ranging from 2012 through 2024.

The following table shows our material patents and the expiration dates (assuming maintenance/annuity fees are paid as required) as of May 20, 2024:

Issued Patents

The following table shows our material pending patent applications as of May 20, 2024 (note that no expiration dates are specified for the pending patent applications since, in certain jurisdictions, e.g., United States of America, the patent expiration date is calculated at the time of issue/grant):

Pending Patent Applications

Trademarks

The Company has one trademark for the mark “AUTONOMIX” in the United States, Australia, China, the European Union, India, Japan, Mexico, and Singapore. The registrations of these trademarks are effective for varying periods of time and may be renewed periodically provided we comply with all applicable renewal requirements, including, where necessary, the continued use of the trademarks in the applicable jurisdictions in connection with certain goods and services.

License Agreement

In December 2021, we granted a company affiliated with certain early investors in the Company a license to our technology for use in the field of cardiology. During the term of the license agreement, we did not receive any fees from the licensee, and did not generate any revenue under the license agreement. On July 7, 2023, we entered into an Exclusive License Termination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with the Licensee in exchange for the issuance, upon the closing of our initial public offering (IPO) within one year of the agreement’s execution, of a warrant to purchase shares of the Company for a variable number of shares based on a value of $8.0 million. Upon the closing of our IPO on January 29, 2024, 1.6 million shares were issued valued at $5.00 per share for a fixed value of $8.0 million. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.001 per share and may be exercised any time after the issuance date, subject to a beneficial ownership limitation, and expire five years from the original issuance. The warrants provide dividend rights. The shares underlying the warrant will be subject to a lockup agreement for a period of six months after the closing of the IPO with respect to 12.5% of the shares issued and twelve months after the closing of the IPO for the remainder of the shares. One of our directors, David Robins, holds a 20% interest in the company receiving the warrant.

Competition

The electrophysiology market is served by a number of very large players including, for example, Medtronic and Boston Scientific, all of whom have substantially greater resources than Autonomix.

While the current standards of care for treating pancreatic cancer pain are comprised largely of generic drugs and injections, we are not aware of any person or company working on a transvascular method for treating this indication. Although competitors like Medtronic are expanding the use of transvascular ablation techniques, we are not aware of anyone developing a sensing technology similar in capability to our technology.

Recent tests using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Ablation to treat pancreatic cancer pain have claimed outcomes that may be better than NCPB, however this is still a percutaneous technique that we believe involves similar inherent risks of infection and internal damage as does NCPB. Conversely, we believe these risks are significantly reduced using a transvascular approach such as the Autonomix technology.

Description of Property

The Company leases office space as its headquarters in Texas and has access to a research and development facility in Pennsylvania.

Employees

As of March 31, 2024, we have eight individuals providing services to the Company, five on a full-time basis and three on a part-time basis. Accordingly, a high percentage of the work performed for our development projects is conducted by qualified part-time staff and independent contractors.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may become involved in litigation matters relating to claims arising from the ordinary course of business. While the results of such claims and legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, our management does not believe that there are claims or actions, pending or threatened against us, the ultimate disposition of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

Regulation of Our Business

Our product candidate and operations are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), and it’s implementing regulations, guidance documentation, and standards. Our sensing device and catheters are regulated by the FDA as medical devices. The FDA regulates the design, development, research, testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping, promotion, distribution, sale and advertising of medical devices in the United States to ensure that medical products distributed domestically are safe and effective for their intended uses. The FDA also regulates the export of medical devices manufactured in the United States to international markets. Any violations of these laws and regulations could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if there is a change in law, regulation or judicial interpretation, we may be required to change our business practices, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Unless an exemption applies, before we can commercially distribute medical devices in the United States, we must obtain, depending on the type of device, either prior premarket clearance or premarket approval (PMA), from the FDA. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes:

Our current product candidates are all class II devices and will require submission of a premarket notification.

510(k) Clearance Pathway

When a 510(k) clearance is required, we must submit a premarket notification demonstrating that our proposed device is substantially equivalent to a previously cleared 510(k) device or a device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 for which the FDA has not yet called for the submission of PMAs. By regulation, the FDA is required to clear or deny a 510(k) premarket notification within 90 days of submission of the application. As a practical matter, clearance may take longer. The FDA may require further information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence.

Any modification to a 510(k)-cleared device that would constitute a major change in its intended use, or any change that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, requires a new 510(k) clearance and may even, in some circumstances, require a PMA, if the change raises complex or novel scientific issues or the product has a new intended use. The FDA requires every manufacturer to make the determination regarding the need for a new 510(k) submission in the first instance, but the FDA may review any manufacturer's decision.

PMA Pathway

A PMA must be submitted to the FDA if the device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) process. A PMA must be supported by extensive data, including but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trials, manufacturing and labeling to demonstrate to the FDA's satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use. During the review period, the FDA will typically request additional information or clarification of the information already provided. Also, an advisory panel of experts from outside the FDA may be convened to review and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. The FDA may or may not accept the panel's recommendation. In addition, the FDA will generally conduct a pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities to ensure compliance with the QSRs.

New PMAs or PMA supplements are required for modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, including, for example, certain types of modifications to the device's indication for use, manufacturing process, labeling and design. PMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a PMA, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original PMA and may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel.

de novo Classification

Medical device types that the FDA has not previously classified as Class I, II or III are automatically classified into Class III regardless of the level of risk they pose. The FDA Modernization Act of 1997 established a new route to market for low to moderate risk medical devices that are automatically placed into Class III due to the absence of a predicate device, called the “Request for Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation,” or the de novo classification procedure. This procedure allows a manufacturer whose novel device is automatically classified into Class III to request down-classification of its medical device into Class I or Class II on the basis that the device presents low or moderate risk, rather than requiring the submission and approval of a PMA application. Prior to the enactment of the FDA Safety and Innovation Act of 2012, or the FDASIA, a medical device could only be eligible for de novo classification if the manufacturer first submitted a 510(k) premarket notification and received a determination from the FDA that the device was not substantially equivalent. FDASIA streamlined the de novo classification pathway by permitting manufacturers to request de novo classification directly without first submitting a 510(k) premarket notification to the FDA and receiving a not substantially equivalent determination. Under FDASIA, the FDA is required to classify the device within 120 days following receipt of the de novo application. If the manufacturer seeks reclassification into Class II, the manufacturer must include a draft proposal for special controls that are necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the medical device. In addition, the FDA may reject the reclassification petition if it identifies a legally marketed predicate device that would be appropriate for a 510(k) or determines that the device is not low to moderate risk or that general controls would be inadequate to control the risks and special controls cannot be developed.

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are generally required to support a PMA application and are sometimes required for 510(k) or de novo clearance. Such trials generally require an investigational device exemption application, or IDE, approved in advance by the FDA for a specified number of patients and study sites, unless the product is deemed a nonsignificant risk device eligible for more abbreviated IDE requirements. Clinical trials are subject to extensive monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements. Clinical trials must be conducted under the oversight of an institutional review board, or IRB, for the relevant clinical trial sites and must comply with FDA regulations, including but not limited to those relating to good clinical practices. To conduct a clinical trial, we also are required to obtain the patients' informed consent in form and substance that complies with both FDA requirements and state and federal privacy and human subject protection regulations. We, the FDA or the IRB could suspend a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a belief that the risks to study subjects outweigh the anticipated benefits. Even if a trial is completed, the results of clinical testing may not adequately demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the device or may otherwise not be sufficient to obtain FDA approval to market the product in the U.S. Similarly, in Europe the clinical study must be approved by a local ethics committee (EC) and in some cases, including studies with high-risk devices, by the ministry of health in the applicable country.

Pervasive and Continuing Regulation

After a device is placed on the market, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include:

Advertising and promotion of medical devices, in addition to being regulated by the FDA, are also regulated by the Federal Trade Commission and by state regulatory and enforcement authorities. Recently, promotional activities for FDA-regulated products of other companies have been the subject of enforcement action brought under healthcare reimbursement laws and consumer protection statutes. In addition, under the federal Lanham Act and similar state laws, competitors and others can initiate litigation relating to advertising claims. In addition, we are required to meet regulatory requirements in countries outside the U.S., which can change rapidly with relatively short notice. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials or training constitutes promotion of an unapproved use, it could request that we modify our training or promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or enforcement actions.

Furthermore, our products could be subject to voluntary recall if we or the FDA determine, for any reason, that our products pose a risk of injury or are otherwise defective. Moreover, the FDA can order a mandatory recall if there is a reasonable probability that our device would cause serious adverse health consequences or death.

The FDA has broad post-market and regulatory enforcement powers. Once we have a marketed product, we will be subject to unannounced inspections by the FDA to determine our compliance with the QSR and other regulations, and these inspections may include the manufacturing facilities of some of our subcontractors. Failure by us or by our suppliers to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in enforcement action by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, which may result in sanctions including, but not limited to:

Glossary

Unless we otherwise indicate, or unless the context requires otherwise, any references in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kto the following medical terms have the respective meanings set forth below:

ablation: the removal or destruction of a body part or tissue or its function. This is often conducted with energy-based devices utilizing radio frequency or pulsed electrical field energy.

cardiomyocyte: the cell responsible for the contraction of the heart.

catheter: a thin tube made from medical grade materials serving a broad range of functions; catheters are medical devices that can be inserted in the body to treat diseases or perform a surgical procedure.

celiac plexus: also known as the solar plexus because of its radiating nerve fibers, is a complex network of nerves located in the abdomen, near where the celiac trunk, and other arteries branch from the abdominal aorta.

electrophysiology: the branch of physiology that deals with the electrical phenomena associated with nervous and other bodily activity.

hypertension: high blood pressure.

microvolt: one millionth of a volt.

palliative care: specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness focused on providing relief from the symptoms and stress of serious illness.

renal artery: the main blood vessel that supplies blood to a kidney.

transvascular: across the wall of a blood vessel (or similar vessel).

unresectable: unable to be removed with surgery.

Available Information

Our Internet address is www.autonomix.com. On this website, we post the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): our Annual Reports on Form 10-K; our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; our Current Reports on Form 8-K; our proxy statements related to our annual stockholders’ meetings; and any amendments to those reports or statements. All such filings are available on our Web site free of charge. The charters of our audit, nominating and governance and compensation committees and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy are also available on our Web site and in print to any stockholder who requests them. The content on our Web site is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1A.         Risk Factors.

Risks Related to Our Overall Business

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

As of March 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $39.0 million, negative cash flows from operating activities of $6.6 million and working capital of $8.6 million, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Further, we have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, significant costs in pursuit of our business plans. We cannot assure you that our plans to raise sufficient capital to fund our business will be successful. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K do not include any adjustments that might result from our inability to raise additional capital or our inability to continue as a going concern.

We have no approved products, and we cannot assure you that we will generate revenue or become profitable in the future.

Our products may never be cleared by the United States Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) or become commercially viable or accepted for use. We have incurred significant losses since our inception and expect to continue to experience operating losses and negative cash flow for the foreseeable future. We expect to expend significant resources on hiring of personnel, continued scientific and product research and development, product testing and preclinical and clinical investigation, intellectual property development and prosecution, marketing and promotion, capital expenditures, working capital, general and administrative expenses, and fees and expenses associated with our capital raising efforts. We expect to incur costs and expenses related to consulting costs, hiring of scientists, engineers, science and other operational personnel, and the continued development of relationships with strategic partners.

We will need additional financing over the longer term to execute our business plan and fund operations, which additional financing may not be available on reasonable terms or at all.

We believe that the net proceeds we received in our IPO of $9.8 million, along with our existing capital resources, will be sufficient to fund our operations into the first quarter of 2025 without additional capital infusion.

We intend to utilize a single manufacturer for the manufacture of our lead product candidate and expect to continue to do so for commercial products. Risks associated with the manufacturing of our products could reduce our gross margins and negatively affect our operating results.

We do not have any manufacturing facilities or direct manufacturing personnel. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on a single manufacturer for the manufacture of our lead product candidate for commercial manufacture. As such, we are subject to numerous risks relating to our reliance on a single manufacturer. If they encounter problems in manufacturing our product candidate, then our business could be significantly impacted. These problems include:

If demand for our future products increases, our manufacturer will need to invest additional resources to purchase components, hire and train employees, and enhance their manufacturing processes. If they fail to increase production capacity efficiently, our sales may not increase in line with our expectations and our operating margins could fluctuate or decline. We do not have a long-term agreement with our manufacturer and there is no assurance that they will continue to provide us with manufacturing services in the future.

We are a developmental stage company and have not yet had a history of generating revenue.

As a development-stage entity, we have not generated any revenues. Investors are subject to all the risks incident to the creation and development of a new business and each investor should be prepared to withstand a complete loss of investment. We have not emerged from the development stage and may be unable to raise further equity. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our business may be adversely affected by the state of the global economy, uncertainties in global financial markets, and possible trade tariffs and trade restrictions.

Our operations and performance will depend significantly on worldwide economic and geopolitical conditions. Uncertainty about global economic conditions could result in potential customers postponing purchases of our future products in response to tighter credit, unemployment, negative financial news and/or declines in income or asset values and other macroeconomic factors, which could have a material negative effect on demand for our future products and, accordingly, on our business, results of operations or financial condition. For example, current global financial markets continue to reflect uncertainty, which has been heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the ongoing conflict in Israel. Given these uncertainties, there could be further disruptions to the global economy, financial markets and consumer confidence. If economic conditions deteriorate unexpectedly, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. For example, our future customers, including our distributors and their customers, may have trouble obtaining the working capital and other financing necessary to support historical or projected purchasing patterns, which could negatively affect our results of operations.

Recent global economic slowdowns could continue and potentially result in certain economies dipping into economic recessions, including in the United States. Additionally, increased inflation around the world, including in the United States, applies pressure to our costs. Continued economic slowdowns or recessions and inflationary pressures could have a negative impact on our business, including decreased demand, increased costs, and other challenges. Government actions to address economic slowdowns and increased inflation, including increased interest rates, also could result in negative impacts to our growth.

General trade tensions between the United States and China have been escalating, and any economic and political uncertainty caused by the United States tariffs imposed on goods from China, among other potential countries, and any corresponding tariffs or currency devaluations from China or such other countries in response, may negatively impact, demand and/or increase the cost for our future products. Additionally, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 triggered significant sanctions from U.S. and European countries. Resulting changes in U.S. trade policy could trigger retaliatory actions by Russia, its allies and other affected countries, including China, resulting in a potential trade war. Furthermore, if the conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues for a prolonged period of time, or if other countries, including the U.S., become involved in the conflict, we could face significant adverse effects to our business and financial condition. For example, if our supply or customer arrangements are disrupted due to expanded sanctions or involvement of countries where we have operations or relationships in the future, our business could be materially disrupted. Further, the use of cyberattacks could expand as part of the conflict, which could adversely affect our ability to maintain or enhance our cyber-security and data protection measures.

The inability to obtain adequate financing from debt or capital sources in the future could force us to self-fund strategic initiatives or even forego certain opportunities, which in turn could potentially harm our performance.

We have no experience in assembling and testing our products and may encounter problems or delays in the assembly of our products or fail to meet certain regulatory requirements which could result in an adverse effect on our business and financial results.

We have no experience in assembling and testing our planned device and no experience in doing so on a commercial scale. To become profitable, we must assemble and test our planned device in commercial quantities in compliance with regulatory requirements and at an acceptable cost. Increasing our capacity to assemble and test our products on a commercial scale will require us to improve internal efficiencies. We may encounter a number of difficulties in increasing our assembly and testing capacity, including:

If we are unable to satisfy commercial demand for our planned device due to our inability to assemble and test our planned device, our ability to generate revenue would be impaired, market acceptance of our products could be adversely affected and customers may instead purchase or use, our competitors’ products.

Rapidly changing technology in life sciences could make the products we are developing obsolete.

The medical device and life-science industry in general is characterized by rapid and significant technological changes, frequent new product introductions and enhancements and evolving industry standards. Our future success will depend on our ability to continually develop and then improve the products that we design and to develop and introduce new products that address the evolving needs of our customers on a timely and cost-effective basis.

Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as actual events or concerns involving liquidity, defaults, or non-performance by financial institutions or transactional counterparties, could adversely affect our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations.

Actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance, or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the FDIC, as receiver. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank Corp., or Signature, and Silvergate Capital Corp. were each swept into receivership. Although the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC ensured that all depositors of SVB would have access to all of their money after only one business day of closure, including funds held in uninsured deposit accounts, borrowers under credit agreements, letters of credit and certain other financial instruments with SVB, Signature or any other financial institution that is placed into receivership by the FDIC may be unable to access undrawn amounts thereunder. Although we were not a borrower under or party to any material letter of credit or any other such instruments with SVB, Signature or any other financial institution currently in receivership, if we enter into any such instruments and any of our lenders or counterparties to such instruments were to be placed into receivership, we may be unable to access such funds. In addition, if any of our partners, suppliers or other parties with whom we conduct business are unable to access funds pursuant to such instruments or lending arrangements with such a financial institution, such parties’ ability to pay their obligations to us or to enter into new commercial arrangements requiring additional payments to us could be adversely affected. In this regard, counterparties to credit agreements and arrangements with these financial institutions, and third parties such as beneficiaries of letters of credit (among others), may experience direct impacts from the closure of these financial institutions and uncertainty remains over liquidity concerns in the broader financial services industry. Similar impacts have occurred in the past, such as during the 2008-2010 financial crisis. Inflation and rapid increases in interest rates have led to a decline in the trading value of previously issued government securities with interest rates below current market interest rates. Although the U.S. Department of Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board have announced a program to provide up to $25 billion of loans to financial institutions secured by certain of such government securities held by financial institutions to mitigate the risk of potential losses on the sale of such instruments, widespread demands for customer withdrawals or other liquidity needs of financial institutions for immediately liquidity may exceed the capacity of such program.

Our access to funding sources and other credit arrangements in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our current and projected future business operations could be significantly impaired by factors that affect us, any financial institutions with which we enter into credit agreements or arrangements directly, or the financial services industry or economy in general. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the ability to perform obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets or concerns or negative expectations about the prospects for companies in the financial services industry. These factors could involve financial institutions or financial services industry companies with which we have financial or business relationships but could also include factors involving financial markets or the financial services industry generally.

The results of events or concerns that involve one or more of these factors could include a variety of material and adverse impacts on our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations. These risks include, but may not be limited to, the following:

In addition, investor concerns regarding the U.S. or international financial systems could result in less favorable commercial financing terms, including higher interest rates or costs and tighter financial and operating covenants, or systemic limitations on access to credit and liquidity sources, thereby making it more difficult for us to acquire financing on acceptable terms or at all. Any decline in available funding or access to our cash and liquidity resources could, among other risks, adversely impact our ability to meet our operating expenses or other obligations, financial or otherwise, result in breaches of our financial and/or contractual obligations or result in violations of federal or state wage and hour laws. Any of these impacts, or any other impacts resulting from the factors described above or other related or similar factors, could have material adverse impacts on our liquidity and our current and/or projected business operations and financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, any further deterioration in the macroeconomic economy or financial services industry could lead to losses or defaults by our partners, vendors, or suppliers, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our current and/or projected business operations and results of operations and financial condition. For example, a partner may fail to make payments when due, default under their agreements with us, become insolvent or declare bankruptcy, or a supplier may determine that it will no longer deal with us as a customer. In addition, a vendor or supplier could be adversely affected by any of the liquidity or other risks that are described above as factors that could result in material adverse impacts on us, including but not limited to delayed access or loss of access to uninsured deposits or loss of the ability to draw on existing credit facilities involving a troubled or failed financial institution. The bankruptcy or insolvency of any partner, vendor or supplier, or the failure of any partner to make payments when due, or any breach or default by a partner, vendor or supplier, or the loss of any significant supplier relationships, could cause us to suffer material losses and may have a material adverse impact on our business.

We may incur substantial costs as a result of litigation or other proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property rights.

We may from time to time seek to enforce our intellectual property rights against infringers when we determine that a successful outcome is probable and may lead to an increase in the value of the intellectual property. If we choose to enforce our patent rights against a party, then that individual or company has the right to ask the court to rule that such patents are invalid or should not be enforced. Additionally, the validity of our patents and the patents we have licensed may be challenged if a petition for post grant proceedings such as inter-parties review and post grant review is filed within the statutorily applicable time with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). These lawsuits and proceedings are expensive and would consume time and resources and divert the attention of managerial and scientific personnel even if we were successful in stopping the infringement of such patents. In addition, there is a risk that the court will decide that such patents are not valid and that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the inventions. There is also the risk that, even if the validity of such patents is upheld, the court will refuse to stop the other party on the ground that such other party's activities do not infringe our intellectual property rights. In addition, in recent years the U.S. Supreme Court modified some tests used by the USPTO in granting patents over the past 20 years, which may decrease the likelihood that we will be able to obtain patents and increase the likelihood of a challenge of any patents we obtain or license.

Catastrophic events and disaster recovery may disrupt business continuity.

A disruption or failure of our systems or operations in the event of a natural disaster or severe weather event, including, but not limited to, earthquakes, wildfires, droughts, flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes or tsunamis, health pandemic, such as an influenza outbreak within our workforce, or man-made catastrophic event could cause delays in completing sales, continuing production or performing other critical functions of our business, particularly if a catastrophic event were to occur at our premises. Global climate change could result in certain natural disasters occurring more frequently or with greater intensity. Any of these events could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and, as a result, our operating results could be adversely affected. There may also be secondary impacts that are unforeseeable as well, such as impacts on our customers, which could cause delays in new orders, delays in completing sales or even order cancellations.

We may fail to meet the Sarbanes-Oxley regulations and may lack the financial controls and safeguards required of public companies.

Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Our management has concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting are ineffective and has identified material weaknesses in our internal controls in areas such as the lack of segregation of duties; general technology controls; and financial statement reporting. While management is working to remediate the material weaknesses, there is no assurance that such changes, when economically feasible and sustainable, will remediate the identified material weaknesses or that the controls will prevent or detect future material weaknesses. If we are not able to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, our financial statements, including related disclosures, may be inaccurate, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We may discover additional material weaknesses in our internal financial and accounting controls and procedures that need improvement from time to time.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. Management does not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company will have been detected.

We are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in connection with our future annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, commencing with the Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2025. We expect to expend significant resources in developing the necessary documentation and testing procedures required by Section 404. We cannot be certain that the actions we will be taking to improve our internal controls over financial reporting will be sufficient, or that we will be able to implement our planned processes and procedures in a timely manner. In addition, if we are unable to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline and make it more difficult for us to finance our operations and growth.

While our Company’s management is working to improve our internal controls and procedures, at present management has determined that our internal controls were deemed to be inadequate, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

●      pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

●      provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and/or directors of the Company; and

●      provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

We are required to include a report of management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We expect to incur additional expenses and diversion of management’s time as a result of performing the system and process evaluation, testing and remediation required in order to comply with the management certification requirements.

Presently, we do not have a sufficient number of employees to segregate responsibilities and may be unable to afford increasing our staff or engaging outside consultants or professionals to overcome our lack of employees. During the course of our testing, we may identify other deficiencies that we may not be able to timely remediate. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, each as amended to date, provide for indemnification of officers and directors at the expense of the Company and limit their liability that may result in a major cost to us and hurt the interests of our stockholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of officers and/or directors.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, each as amended to date, provide for the indemnification of our officers and directors. We have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore, unenforceable.

Risks Related to Government Regulation and Product Approvals

There is no guarantee that the FDA will grant 510(k) or de novo clearance or a premarket approval application (“PMA”) of our future products and failure to obtain necessary clearances or approvals for our future products would adversely affect our ability to grow our business.

Our lead product candidate will require FDA clearance of a 510(k) or de novo application or may require FDA approval of a PMA. The FDA may not approve or clear these products for the indications that are necessary or desirable for successful commercialization. Indeed, the FDA may refuse our requests for premarket clearance or premarket approval of new products, new intended uses or modifications to existing products. Failure to receive clearance or approval for our products would have an adverse effect on our ability to continue or expand our business.

If we fail to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals and clearances, or are unable to obtain, or experience significant delays in obtaining, FDA clearances or approvals for our device, our future products or product enhancements, our ability to commercially distribute and market these products could suffer.

Our products will be subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA and numerous other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. The process of obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals to market a medical device can be costly and time consuming, and we may not be able to obtain these clearances or approvals on a timely basis, if at all. In particular, the FDA permits commercial distribution of a new medical device only after the device has received clearance under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or is the subject of an approved premarket approval application, or PMA, unless the device is specifically exempt from those requirements. The FDA will clear marketing of a lower risk medical device through the 510(k) process if the manufacturer demonstrates that the new product is substantially equivalent to other 510(k)-cleared products or through a de novo process if substantial equivalence is not available. High risk devices deemed to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting, or implantable devices, or devices not deemed substantially equivalent to a previously cleared device, require the approval of a PMA. The PMA process is more costly, lengthy and uncertain than the 510(k) or de novo clearance processes. A PMA application must be supported by extensive data, including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trial, manufacturing and labeling data, to demonstrate to the FDA’s satisfaction the safety and efficacy of the device for its intended use. We believe our current product candidate will require clearance through the 510(k) or de novo process.

Modifications to our future products may require new regulatory clearances or approvals or may require us to recall or cease marketing our products until clearances or approvals are obtained.

Modifications to our future products may require new regulatory approvals or clearances, including 510(k) clearances or premarket approvals, or require us to recall or cease marketing the modified devices until these clearances or approvals are obtained. The FDA requires device manufacturers to initially make and document a determination of whether or not a modification requires a new approval, supplement or clearance. A manufacturer may determine that a modification could not significantly affect safety or efficacy and does not represent a major change in its intended use, so that no new 510(k) clearance is necessary. However, the FDA can review a manufacturer's decision and may disagree. The FDA may also on its own initiative determine that a new clearance or approval is required. Once we have a commercialized product, we may make modifications in the future that we believe do not or will not require additional clearances or approvals. If the FDA disagrees and requires new clearances or approvals for these modifications, we may be required to recall and to stop marketing our products as modified, which could require us to redesign our products and harm our operating results. In these circumstances, we may be subject to significant enforcement actions.

Where we determine that modifications to our products require a new 510(k) clearance or premarket approval application, we may not be able to obtain those additional clearances or approvals for the modifications or additional indications in a timely manner, or at all. Obtaining clearances and approvals can be a time-consuming process, and delays in obtaining required future clearances or approvals would adversely affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would harm our future growth.

The results of our future clinical trials may not support our product candidate claims or may result in the discovery of adverse side effects.

We have not completed any clinical trials and we cannot be certain that their results will support our product candidate claims or that the FDA will agree with our conclusions regarding them. Success in pre-clinical studies and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and we cannot be sure that the later trials will replicate the results of prior trials and pre-clinical studies. The clinical trial process may fail to demonstrate that our product candidates are safe and effective for the proposed indicated uses, which could cause us to abandon a product candidate and may delay development of others. Any delay or termination of our clinical trials will delay the filing of our product submissions and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize our product candidates and generate revenues. It is also possible that patients enrolled in clinical trials will experience adverse side effects that are not currently part of the product candidate’s profile.

We plan to conduct our initial Proof of Concept trial outside the United States and to present the relevant data from this trial to the FDA in an effort to minimize the clinical requirements for clearance in the United States. There is no assurance that the FDA will accept this data.

Human trials are often designed to begin with a Proof of Concept trial and then progress to a “Pivotal” or approval, trial. We intend our Proof of Concept trial outside the United States. Upon completion, we plan to present the relevant data from this study to the FDA in a pre-submission meeting to request “Breakthrough Status” in an effort to minimize the clinical requirements for clearance in the United States. The first trial is not designed to replace the trial that will be required by the FDA to support our submissions for clearance in the United States, but rather to potentially impact the size of that trial. There is no assurance that the FDA will accept the data from our international trial or that they will not require us to conduct additional studies to supplement this trial. Any additional trials that we are required to conduct will be costly and time-consuming, and may require us to raise additional financing, for which we have no commitments.

Our clinical studies could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected by many factors, including difficulties in enrolling patients.

Clinical testing can be costly and take many years and the outcome is uncertain and susceptible to varying interpretations. Moreover, success in pre-clinical and early clinical studies does not ensure that large-scale studies will be successful or predict final results. Acceptable results in early studies may not be replicable in later studies. A number of companies have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical studies, even after promising results in earlier studies. Negative or inconclusive results or adverse events or incidents during a clinical study could cause the clinical study to be redone or terminated. In addition, failure to appropriately construct clinical studies could result in high rates of adverse events or incidents, which could cause a clinical study to be suspended, redone or terminated. Our failure or the failure of third-party participants in our studies to comply with their obligations to follow protocols and/or legal requirements may also result in our inability to use the affected data in our submissions to regulatory authorities.

The timely completion of clinical studies depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll a sufficient number of patients who remain in the study until its conclusion. We may experience difficulties in patient enrollment in our clinical studies for a variety of reasons, including:

If we have difficulty enrolling and retaining a sufficient number or diversity of patients to conduct our clinical studies as planned, or encounter other difficulties, we may need to delay, terminate or modify ongoing or planned clinical studies, any of which would have an adverse effect on our business.

Even if our products are cleared or approved by the FDA, if we or our suppliers fail to comply with ongoing FDA requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products, these products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.

Any product for which we obtain clearance or approval, and the manufacturing processes, reporting requirements, post-approval clinical data and promotional activities for such product, will be subject to continued regulatory review, oversight and periodic inspections by the FDA and other domestic and foreign regulatory bodies. In particular, we, and our suppliers, will be required to comply with FDA’s Quality System Regulations, or QSR, which covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of any product for which we obtain clearance or approval. FDA enforces the QSR and other regulations through periodic inspections. The failure by us or one of our suppliers to comply with applicable statutes and regulations administered by the FDA, or the failure to timely and adequately respond to any adverse inspectional observations or product safety issues, could result in, among other things, any of the following enforcement actions:

If any of these actions were to occur, it would harm our reputation and cause our product sales and profitability to suffer and may prevent us from generating revenue. Furthermore, our key component suppliers may not be in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements which could result in our failure to produce our products on a timely basis and in the required quantities, if at all.

Even if regulatory clearance or approval of a product is granted, such clearance or approval may be subject to limitations on the intended uses for which the product may be marketed and reduce our potential to successfully commercialize the product and generate revenue from the product. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials, labeling, training or other marketing or educational activities constitute promotion of an unapproved use, it could request that we cease or modify our training or promotional materials or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions. It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take action if they consider our training or other promotional materials to constitute promotion of an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines or penalties under other statutory authorities, such as laws prohibiting false claims for reimbursement.

In addition, we may be required to conduct costly post-market testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or effectiveness of our products, and we must comply with medical device reporting requirements, including the reporting of adverse events and malfunctions related to our products. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, manufacturing problems, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements such as QSR, may result in changes to labeling, restrictions on such products or manufacturing processes, withdrawal of the products from the market, voluntary or mandatory recalls, a requirement to repair, replace or refund the cost of any medical device we manufacture or distribute, fines, suspension of regulatory approvals, product seizures, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties which would adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.

Our products may in the future be subject to product recalls that could harm our reputation, business, and financial results.

The FDA and similar foreign governmental authorities have the authority to require the recall of commercialized products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. In the case of the FDA, the authority to require a recall must be based on an FDA finding that there is a reasonable probability that the device would cause serious injury or death. Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues. Recalls of any of our products would divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The FDA requires that certain classifications of recalls be reported to FDA within 10 working days after the recall is initiated. Companies are required to maintain certain records of recalls, even if they are not reportable to the FDA. We may initiate voluntary recalls involving our products in the future that we determine do not require notification of the FDA. If the FDA disagrees with our determinations, they could require us to report those actions as recalls. A future recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers and negatively affect our sales. In addition, the FDA could take enforcement action for failing to report the recalls when they were conducted.

If our products cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury, or malfunction in certain ways, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions.

Under the FDA medical device reporting regulations, medical device manufacturers are required to report to the FDA information that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or has malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction of the device or one of our similar devices were to recur. If we fail to report these events to the FDA within the required timeframes, or at all, FDA could take enforcement action against us. Any such adverse event involving our products also could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications, or agency action, such as inspection or enforcement action. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business, and may harm our reputation and financial results.

Certain parts used in the manufacturing of our equipment may experience shortages in global supply which could impact our ability to manufacture our device for customers or maintain research and development timelines.

There are a number of component parts used in the manufacture of our device that are used by many manufacturers in a variety of products. We will compete with other manufacturers for the supply of these components. Additionally, certain parts that are currently in our design may be discontinued by our supplier requiring us to find alternative parts. This issue may require us to change the design of our device or purchase significant inventories of these parts in order to protect against manufacturing delays. We may not be able to procure alternative components or adequate raw material inventories which would result in an inability to produce our device.

U.S. legislative or FDA regulatory reforms may make it more difficult and costly for us to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates and to manufacture, market and distribute our products after approval is obtained.

From time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the regulatory approval, manufacture and marketing of regulated products or the reimbursement thereof. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. Any new regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations may impose additional costs or lengthen review times of future products. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the agency in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted, or FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.

If third parties claim that our products infringe their intellectual property rights, we may be forced to expend significant financial resources and management time defending against such actions and our financial condition and our results of operations could suffer.

Third parties may claim that our products infringe their patents and other intellectual property rights. Identifying third-party patent rights can be particularly difficult because, in general, patent applications can be maintained in secrecy for a prolonged period after their earliest priority date. Historically, there has been substantial litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights in the medical device and related industries. If a competitor were to challenge our patents or other intellectual property rights, or assert that our products infringe its patent or other intellectual property rights, we could incur substantial litigation costs, be forced to make expensive changes to our product design, pay royalties or other fees to license rights in order to continue manufacturing and selling our products, or pay substantial damages. Third-party infringement claims, regardless of their outcome, would not only consume our financial resources but also divert our management’s time and effort.

If we are unable to protect the intellectual property used in our products, others may be able to copy our innovations which may impair our ability to compete effectively in our markets.

The strength of our patents involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain. These patent applications may be challenged or fail to result in issued patents, or if issued, these patents and our existing patents may be too narrow to prevent third-parties from developing or designing around our intellectual property and in that event, we may lose competitive advantage, which could result in harm to our business.

We may be subject to claims that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

As is common in the medical device industry, we may employ individuals who were previously employed at other medical device companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. We may be subject to claims that these employees, or we, have used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how, the value of our technology and products could be adversely affected.

In addition to patented technology, we rely upon, among other things, unpatented proprietary technology, processes, trade secrets and know-how. Any involuntary disclosure to or misappropriation by third-parties of our confidential or proprietary information could enable competitors to duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, potentially eroding our competitive position in our market. We seek to protect confidential or proprietary information in part by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and third-parties. While we require all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third-parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information and technology to enter into confidentiality agreements, we cannot be certain that this know-how, information and technology will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. These agreements may be terminated or breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such termination or breach. Furthermore, these agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets and know-how in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure. To the extent that any of our staff were previously employed by other pharmaceutical, medical technology or biotechnology companies, those employers may allege violations of trade secrets and other similar claims in relation to their medical device development activities for us.

Because of the specialized nature of our business, the termination of relationships with our key employees, consultants and advisors may prevent us from successfully operating our business, including developing our products, conducting clinical studies, commercializing our products and obtaining any necessary financing.

We are highly dependent on the members of our executive team, the loss of whose services may adversely impact the achievement of our objectives. While we have entered into employment or consulting agreements with each of our key executives, any of them could leave our employment at any time. We do not have “key person” insurance on any of our employees. The loss of the services of one or more of our current employees might impede the achievement of our business objectives.

The competition for qualified personnel in the medical device fields is intense and we rely heavily on our ability to attract and retain qualified scientific, technical, and managerial personnel. Our future success depends upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees. In order to commercialize our products successfully, we will be required to expand our workforce, particularly in the areas of research and development and clinical studies, finance, accounting and reporting, sales and marketing and supply chain management. These activities will require the addition of new personnel and the development of additional expertise by existing management personnel. We face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as academic and other research institutions. We may not be able to attract and retain these individuals on acceptable terms or at all. Failure to do so could materially harm our business.

Failure to secure and maintain adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payers could adversely affect acceptance of our products, if approved, and reduce our revenues.

Assuming we receive approval of our products, we expect that the vast majority of our revenues will come from third-party payers, either directly to us in markets where we plan to provide our device candidates to patients, or indirectly via payments made to hospitals or other entities, which may in the future provide our device candidates to patients.

In the U.S., private payers cover the largest segment of the population, with the remainder either uninsured or covered by governmental payers. The majority of the third-party payers outside the U.S. are government agencies, government sponsored entities or other payers operating under significant regulatory requirements from national or regional governments.

Third-party payers may decline to cover and reimburse certain procedures, supplies or services. Additionally, some third-party payers may decline to cover and reimburse our products for a particular patient even if the payer has a favorable coverage policy addressing our products or previously approved reimbursement for our products. Additionally, private and government payers may consider the cost of a treatment in approving coverage or in setting reimbursement for the treatment.

Private and government payers around the world are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. Additionally, the containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of governments around the world. Adoption of additional price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit our revenues and operating results. If third-party payers do not consider our products or the combination of our products with additional treatments to be cost-justified under a required cost-testing model, they may not cover our products for their populations or, if they do, the level of reimbursement may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products on a profitable basis.

Reimbursement for the treatment of patients with medical devices around the world is governed by complex mechanisms established on a national or sub-national level in each country. These mechanisms vary widely among countries, can be informal, somewhat unpredictable, and evolve constantly, reflecting the efforts of these countries to reduce public spending on healthcare. As a result, obtaining and maintaining reimbursement for the treatment of patients with medical devices has become more challenging globally. We cannot guarantee that the use of our products will receive reimbursement approvals and cannot guarantee that our existing reimbursement approvals will be maintained in any country.

Our failure to secure or maintain adequate coverage or reimbursement for our products by third-party payers in the U.S., or in the other jurisdictions in which we market our products, could have a material adverse effect on our business, revenues and results of operations.

We may not be successful in securing and maintaining reimbursement codes necessary to facilitate accurate and timely billing for our products or physician services attendant to our products.

Third-party payers, healthcare systems, government agencies or other groups often issue reimbursement codes to facilitate billing for products and physician services used in the delivery of healthcare. Within the U.S., the billing codes most directly related to our products are contained in the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (“HCPCS code set”). The HCPCS code set contains Level I codes that describe physician services, also known as Common Procedural Terminology codes (“CPT codes”) and Level II codes that primarily describe products. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) is responsible for issuing the HCPCS Level II codes. The American Medical Association issues HCPCS Level I codes.

No HCPCS codes or CPT codes currently exist to describe physician services related to the delivery of therapy using our products. We may not be able to secure HCPCS codes and CPT codes for physician services related to our products. Our future revenues and results may be affected by the absence of CPT codes, as physicians may be less likely to prescribe the therapy when there is no certainty that adequate reimbursement will be available for the time, effort, skill, practice expense and malpractice costs required to provide the therapy to patients.

Outside the U.S., we have not secured codes to describe our products or to document physician services related to the delivery of therapy using our products. The failure to obtain and maintain these codes could affect the future growth of our business.

If we are unable to establish good relationships with physicians, our business could be negatively affected.

Our business model will require us to build and maintain good relationships with physicians who will have a significant source of patients that will generate treatment revenues for both the physician and the Company. If we are unable to establish good relationships with physicians and maintain them, it will jeopardize our ability to generate future revenues.

There is no assurance that Medicare or the Medicare Administrative Contractors will provide coverage or adequate payment rates for our products.

We anticipate that a significant portion of patients using our products will be beneficiaries under the Medicare fee-for-service program. Failure to secure or maintain coverage or maintain adequate reimbursement from Medicare would reduce our revenues and may also affect the coverage and reimbursement decisions of other third-party payers in the U.S. and elsewhere.

Medicare may classify our medical device as durable medical equipment (“DME”). Medicare has the authority to issue national coverage determinations or to defer coverage decisions to its regional Medicare Administrative Contractors (“MACs”). The fact that only two MACs administer the entire DME program may negatively affect our ability to petition individual medical policy decision-makers at the MACs for coverage. The absence of a positive coverage determination or a future restriction to existing coverage from Medicare or the DME MACs would materially affect our future revenues.

Additionally, Medicare has the authority to publish the reimbursement amounts for DME products. Medicare may in the future publish reimbursement amounts for our products that do not reflect then-current prices for our products. Medicare fee schedules are frequently referenced by private payers in the U.S. and around the world. Medicare’s publication of reimbursement amounts for our products that are below our products’ established prices could materially reduce our revenues and operating results with respect to non-Medicare payers in the U.S. and our other active markets.

Even if our products were authorized by Medicare, CMS requires prior authorization for certain DME items. Claims for such items that did not receive prior authorization before they were furnished to a beneficiary will be automatically denied. In the event Medicare adds one of our products to the list of items requiring prior authorization, our ability to bill and secure reimbursement for patients who would otherwise be covered to use our product under the Medicare fee-for-service program may be reduced.

We cannot provide any assurance that we can access transitional, expedited, or expanded Medicare coverage for our products. CMS is expected to issue rules regarding coverage of emerging technologies; however, no specific information is available about the content of the expected rules and we cannot provide any assurance that any new rules regarding emerging technologies would be applicable to our future products.

Risks Related to Information Technology

Artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that can impact our business, including by posing security risks to our confidential information , proprietary information and personal data.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

Concentration of ownership of our common stock among our existing executive officers and directors may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.

Our executive officers and directors, and their affiliates, who are our principal stockholders, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 38.3% of our outstanding common stock as of the date hereof. As a result, these persons, acting together, would be able to significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors, any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other significant corporate transactions. The minority stockholders have no way of overriding decisions made by our principal stockholders. This level of control may also have an adverse impact on the market value of our shares because our principal stockholders may institute or undertake transactions, policies or programs that result in losses and may not take any steps to increase our visibility in the financial community and/or may sell sufficient numbers of shares to significantly decrease our price per share.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. Subject to any series of preferred stock we may issue in the future, we intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, shareholders may have to sell some or all of their shares of our common stock in order to generate cash flow from an investment in our common stock.

If our stock price fluctuates, you could lose a significant part of your investment.

The market price of our common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to, among other things, the risk factors described in this filing and other factors beyond our control, such as fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us. Furthermore, the stock markets have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, and market conditions, such as recessions, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock. In the past, many companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

Techniques employed by short sellers may in the future drive down the market price of our common stock.

Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed from a third-party with the intention of buying identical securities back at a later date to return to the lender. The short seller hopes to profit from a decline in the value of the securities between the sale of the borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received in the sale. As it is in the short seller’s best interests for the price of the stock to decline, many short sellers publish, or arrange for the publication of, negative opinions regarding the relevant issuer and its business prospects in order to create negative market momentum and generate profits for themselves after selling a stock short. These short attacks have led to selling of shares in the market. Issuers that have common stock with limited trading volumes and/or have been susceptible to relatively high volatility levels, can be particularly vulnerable to such short seller attacks. The publication of any such articles regarding us in the future may bring about a temporary, or possibly long-term, decline in the market price of our common stock. If we continue to be the subject of unfavorable allegations, we may have to expend a significant amount of resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend ourselves. While we would strongly defend against any such short seller attacks, we may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed against the relevant short seller by applicable state law or issues of commercial confidentiality. Such a situation could be costly, and time-consuming, and could be distracting for our management team.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about us, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our common stock, then our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us, our industry and our market. If no analyst elects to cover us and publish research or reports about us, the market for our common stock could be severely limited and our stock price could be adversely affected. As a small-cap company who has recently completed its IPO pursuant to Regulation A, we are more likely than our larger competitors to lack coverage from securities analysts. In addition, even if we receive analyst coverage, if one or more analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline. If one or more analysts who elect to cover us issue negative reports or adversely change their recommendations regarding our common stock, our stock price could decline.

As an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or JOBS Act, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements.

As an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements. We are an emerging growth company until the earliest of:

For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to:

We intend to take advantage of all of these reduced reporting requirements and exemptions.

We cannot predict if investors will find our securities less attractive due to our reliance on these exemptions. If investors were to find our common stock less attractive as a result of our election, we may have difficulty raising all of the proceeds in any future offering.

The market price of our stock may be highly volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The market for our common stock may be characterized by significant price volatility when compared to the shares of larger, more established companies that have large public floats, and we expect that our stock price will be more volatile than the shares of such larger, more established companies for the indefinite future. The stock market in general, and the market for stocks of technology companies in particular, has recently been highly volatile. Furthermore, there have been recent instances of extreme stock price run-ups followed by rapid price declines and stock price volatility following a number of recent initial public offerings, particularly among companies with relatively smaller public floats. We may also experience such volatility, including stock run-ups, which may be unrelated to our actual or expected operating performance and financial condition or prospects, making it difficult for prospective investors to assess the rapidly changing value of our common stock.

Our Certificate of Incorporation includes a forum selection provision, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiff(s) in any action against us.

Our Certificate of Incorporation includes a forum selection provision that requires any claims against us by stockholders not arising under the federal securities laws to be brought in the Court of Chancery State in the state of Delaware. This forum selection provision may limit investors’ ability to bring claims in judicial forums that they find favorable to such disputes and may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. In addition, this forum selection provision may impose additional litigation costs on stockholders in pursuing the claims identified above, particularly if the stockholders do not reside in or near the State of Delaware.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members.

As a public company, we incur accounting, legal and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. We incur costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. We also incur costs associated with corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules and regulations implemented by the United States Security and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Nasdaq. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. Furthermore, these rules and regulations could make it more difficult or costlier for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules and regulations and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

We may be at an increased risk of securities class action litigation.

Historically, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. This risk is especially relevant for us because biotechnology companies have experienced significant stock price volatility in recent years. If we were to be sued, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could harm our business.

Your ownership may be diluted if additional capital stock is issued to raise capital, to finance acquisitions or in connection with strategic transactions.

We intend to seek to raise additional funds, finance acquisitions or develop strategic relationships by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, which would reduce the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders. Our board of directors has the authority, without action or vote of the stockholders, to issue all or any part of our authorized but unissued shares of common or preferred stock. Our certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Future issuances of common or preferred stock would reduce your influence over matters on which stockholders vote and would be dilutive to earnings per share. In addition, any newly issued preferred stock could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the common stock. Those rights, preferences and privileges could include, among other things, the establishment of dividends that must be paid prior to declaring or paying dividends or other distributions to holders of our common stock or providing for preferential liquidation rights. These rights, preferences and privileges could negatively affect the rights of holders of our common stock, and the right to convert such preferred stock into shares of our common stock at a rate or price that would have a dilutive effect on the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity.

Risk Management and Strategy

There have been an increasing number of cyberattacks on companies around the world, which have caused operational failures, compromised sensitive corporate or customer data, and/or resulted in significant financial damages. These attacks have occurred over the internet, through malware, viruses or attachments to e-mails, or through inside actors with access to systems within the organization.

We have implemented security measures as part of an evolving cybersecurity posture and will continue to devote resources to address security vulnerabilities in an effort to prevent cyberattacks and mitigate the damage that could result from such an attack. Subsequent to March 31, 2024, all employees will begin receiving cybersecurity training and other education regarding their use of computers, information technology, and sensitive data, including specifically how to recognize common attack strategies. As the Company does not have a physical office location, it does not have a local network or in-house servers and proprietary applications. We therefore utilize third parties applications and resources to support our information technology (“IT”) needs. All applications utilized by the Company are Software as a Service (“SaaS”) offerings. As our applications are developed and managed by third parties, we are dependent on these providers for many functions including disaster recovery during a disaster or cyber incident. Our goal is to only utilize the most secure and trusted providers for our IT needs. To this end, we are currently reviewing the security credentials and certifications of our key application providers. Our business continuity plans are evaluated against evolving security and service level standards, which includes evaluating those cybersecurity threats associated with our use of key third party service providers.

Our cybersecurity management strategy will consist of utilizing a combination of employee education, preventative controls, detective controls and periodic third-party cybersecurity testing. During fiscal year 2024, we began to deploy and utilize enterprise scale technology to support an appropriate cybersecurity posture including: endpoint detection and response, firewalls, security information and event management, email security, multifactor authentication, and vulnerability management, with deployment of these tools to be completed prior to March 31, 2025. As part of the service offering from our outsourced IT security services provider, cybersecurity related alerts will be issued to us as relevant situations develop. These alerts will be evaluated in concert with our IT provider and in the event an alert requires action within our environment, such actions will be taken promptly. Our process and cybersecurity posture will continue to be refined based on the results of periodic cybersecurity assessments conducted jointly with our IT provider. Upon implementation of this strategy, we will report on cybersecurity in reports to the Audit Committee on a semi-annual basis.

To operate our business, we rely upon certain third-party service providers (the "Providers") to perform a variety of functions, such as outsourced business critical functions, clinical research, professional services, SaaS platforms, managed services, cloud-based infrastructure, content delivery, encryption and authentication technology, corporate productivity services, and other functions. We are in the process of developing vendor management processes designed to help to manage cybersecurity risks associated with our use of these Providers. Depending on the nature of the services provided, the sensitivity and quantity of information processed and the identity of the Provider, our vendor management process may include i) reviewing the cybersecurity practices of such Provider;ii) requiring their completion of written questionnaires regarding their services and data handling practices; and iii) obtaining a Security Operations Center ("SOC") report for the Provider's internal control structure. For our largest third-party provider, our Contract Research Organization (“CRO”) which is helping us manage our clinical trial(s), we will conduct a comprehensive security assessment and review, including their cybersecurity practices, protocols and protections and physical security.

Governance

The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of cybersecurity risk. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are the members of management responsible for managing and assessing our cybersecurity practices. The plan for the future is that they will report to the Audit Committee on cybersecurity on a semi-annual basis. Should any cybersecurity threat or incident be detected, our senior management team would timely report such threat or incident to the Audit Committee and provide regular communications and updates throughout the incident and any subsequent investigation, in order that the impact, materiality, and reporting requirements of such incident are appropriately identified and assessed for further necessary or appropriate action to be taken.

We believe we are appropriately staffed (as supported by our outsourced IT provider) to support a healthy cybersecurity posture given our size and scope. Our Chief Financial Officer, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer, is directly responsible for IT functions.

To date, there have been no risks identified from cybersecurity threats or previous cybersecurity incidents that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the company. However, despite all of the above aforementioned efforts, a cyberattack, if it occurred, could cause system operational problems, disrupt service to clinical trial sites, compromise important data or systems or result in an unintended release of confidential information. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for additional discussion of cybersecurity risks impacting our Company.

Item 2.  Properties.

We do not own any real property. Our corporate and executive offices are located in a facility in The Woodlands, Texas for which we are under a membership agreement. The current membership agreement terminates in March 2026. We believe that our facilities are sufficient to meet our current needs and that suitable space will be available as and when needed.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be involved in legal proceedings, the outcomes of which may not be determinable. The results of litigation are inherently unpredictable. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management time and result in diversion of significant resources. However, we are currently not a party to any pending legal actions. We have insurance policies covering any potential losses where such coverage is cost effective.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol “AMIX” since our initial public offering ("IPO") on January 29, 2024.

Holders of Common Equity

As of May 17, 2024, we had approximately 2,000 stockholders of record of our common stock. This does not include beneficial owners of our common stock. 

Dividends

We have never paid any dividends on our common stock. The payment of dividends in the future will be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition. It is the present intention of our board of directors (the "Board") to retain all earnings, if any, for use in our business operations and, accordingly, our Board does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the year ended March 31, 2024, we issued the following unregistered securities: i) $2.0 million in unsecured, non-interest bearing convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) and accompanying warrants (the “Bridge Financing Warrants”). The Notes provided that, on the closing date of the IPO, the outstanding principal would be automatically converted into common stock at the conversion price of $2.00. Each dollar in principal amount of Notes purchased were accompanied by a five-year Bridge Financing Warrant to purchase 0.25 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share; and ii) 35,000 shares of restricted stock (the "Shares") for a consultant for purposes of providing business advisory services. The issuance of the Notes, Bridge Financing Warrants and the Shares were made in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) for the offer and sale of securities not involving a public offering, and/or Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the year ended March 31, 2024.

Shares Forgone to Satisfy Minimum Statutory Withholdings

During the year ended March 31, 2024, shares of common stock were issued to shareholders as their warrants were exercised. The terms of the warrants provide that a holder may conduct a cashless exercise of the warrants. For the year ended March 31, 2024, 19,824 shares of common stock were forfeited by shareholders through cashless exercises with an average price paid per share of $1.50.

Stock Performance Graph

Autonomix is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and is not required to provide the information required under this item.

Item 6.  [Reserved]

Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, including those set forth under "Cautionary Statement About Forward-Looking Statements." Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those discussed and other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including but not limited to those discussed in this Item and in Item 1A - "Risk Factors.". Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those discussed in our forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a development stage medical device development company focused on advancing innovative technologies for sensing and treating disorders relating to the nervous system. Our first-in-class technology platform includes a catheter-based microchip-enabled sensing array that can detect and differentiate neural signals with a high degree of sensitivity as demonstrated in animal studies. We believe, if we can recreate these results in clinical trials, this will enable a method of transvascular targeting, treating, and confirming treatment of diseases involving the nervous system throughout the body that is not currently available and may be capable of filling a wide range of unmet medical needs.

We calculate sensitivity in units of minimum signal detection voltage in micro volts (uV) time area of the electrode (square millimeters). It is a combined measure that is related to the signal resolving power and spatial resolution of the system. For the BSC Orion, the nearest device on the market, the metrics are 10uV for signal detection levels, and roughly 0.4mm by 0.5mm for the electrode dimensions. For the Autonomix device, the metrics are <1uV for signal detection levels and roughly 0.02mm by 0.03mm for the electrode dimensions. The differences in these metrics result in a calculation of 3,000 times greater sensitivity for the Autonomix device.

We are initially developing our technology for patients with pancreatic cancer, a condition that can cause debilitating pain and need a more effective solution. However, we believe our technology constitutes a platform with the potential to address dozens of indications in a range of areas including chronic pain management from all causes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and a wide range of other nerve-related disorders.

Our development efforts can be divided into to two sub parts: sensing and treatment, where sensing is focused on identifying neuronal activity that may be associated with a disorder with enough precision to enable targeted therapy with ablation. While the treatment may vary depending on the disorder, in our initial indications this will involve energy-based ablation (deliberate tissue damage, also referred to as denervation) intended to stop unwanted neuronal activity.

Our sensing catheter has already been developed sufficiently to demonstrate in animal models successful identification of a signal from a specific nerve before ablation and confirmation of termination of the signal from the treated nerve after ablation. We are now in the process of improving the assembly of this catheter to meet the standards required for human use and developing an RF ablation catheter designed specifically for treatment in the vessels of the pancreatic region. In parallel with this effort, we are currently conducting a first-in-human demonstration of transvascular ablation (without the use of our sensing technology) to relieve pain associated with pancreatic cancer. Once these two efforts are completed, we plan to bring sensing and treatment together in a pivotal clinical trial to enable the regulatory clearance and commercial launch of our technology. As stated above, we are a development stage company and there is no guarantee that the results of any trials will produce positive results or that the results will support our claims.

Recent Developments

On January 26, 2024, we consummated our IPO. In the IPO, we sold a total of 2,234,222 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $5.00 per share for gross proceeds of $11.2 million and net proceeds of $9.8 million. On May 13, 2024, we cancelled 1,050 shares represented in the IPO for payment disputes. In connection with the closing of the IPO, a portion of our convertible notes were converted into 335,000 shares of our common stock. Upon the closing of the IPO, certain notes were to be automatically converted according to their terms into our common stock to the extent and provided that certain holders of these notes are not permitted to convert such notes to the extent that the holders or any of its affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of our common stock after such conversion. Due to this 4.99% limitation, principal representing $1.3 million, or 665,000 shares, of these notes remains outstanding.

On January 26, 2024, as part of our IPO, we issued a warrant to purchase 59,765 shares pursuant to the agreement with the selling agent in our IPO. These warrants equaled 2.675% of the 2,234,222 shares sold in our IPO.

On January 29, 2024, we issued a warrant to purchase 1,600,000 shares (the “Warrant”) pursuant to the Termination Agreement noted in Note 6 – Related Party Transactions. The shares underlying the Warrant are subject to a lockup agreement for a period of six months after the closing of the IPO with respect to 12.5% of the shares issued and twelve months after the closing of the IPO for the remainder of the shares. In connection with the Termination Agreement, the Company agreed to register the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the Warrant.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended March 31, 2024 Compared to the Year Ended March 31, 2023

Below is a summary of the results of operations (in thousands):

General and Administrative (G&A). G&A expenses increased by $4.0 million compared to the same period in 2023, primarily due to increases in advertising of $1.7 million related to our IPO, officer and employee compensation and benefits of $0.7 million, stock-based compensation of $0.6 million, professional fees of $0.6 million, legal fees of $0.2 million, insurance expense of $0.1 million and travel expense of $0.1 million.

Research and Development (R&D). R&D expenses increased by $1.5 million compared to the same period in 2023, primarily due to clinical trial execution and product development cost. We expect to incur increased research and development costs in the future as we continue our clinical trial and product development efforts.

Warrant expense – termination agreement

We had warrant expense of $4.6 million related to a license termination agreement. See Note 2 - Warrant Liability and Fair Value of Financial Instruments to the financial statements for additional information. Warrant Expense – termination agreement was $0 during the same period in 2023 as there was no comparable instrument.

Other Income/Expense

Warrant liability mark-to-market

We had expense for mark-to-market adjustments of warrants of $3.4 million. Warrant Liability - mark-to market adjustment was $0 during the same period in 2023 as there was no comparable instrument.

Interest expense

We had interest expense of less than $0.1 million, related to the amortization of debt discounts. Interest expense was $0 during the same period in 2023 as there was no comparable instrument.

Interest income

We had interest income of $0.1 million. Interest income for the same period in 2023 was $0.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On March 31, 2024, we had cash and working capital of $8.6 million. We have historically funded our operations from proceeds from debt and equity sales. In June 2023, we completed a financing with several accredited investors for the sale of 1,420,000 shares of common stock with gross proceeds of $2.8 million. Additionally, the Company received proceeds of $2.0 million in unsecured, non-interest bearing convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) and accompanying warrants (the “Bridge Financing Warrants”) (collectively, the “Bridge Offering”) that will mature on December 31, 2025. On January 26, 2024, we completed our IPO of common stock. In the IPO, we sold a total of 2,234,222 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $5.00 per share for gross proceeds of $11.2 million and net proceeds of $9.8 million. On May 13, 2024, we cancelled 1,050 shares represented in the IPO for payment disputes. We estimate our current cash resources are sufficient to fund our operations into but not beyond the first calendar quarter of 2025.

Our plan of operations is primarily focused on developing our product candidate, with the product candidate in the proof-of-concept stage at this time. We are initially focusing on the treatment of pain associated with pancreatic cancer and we have designed our commercialization efforts around this as our first proposed indication for use.

We will need to raise additional capital to meet our obligations and execute our business plan. We estimate that we will require additional financing of approximately $40 million to fund our operations through initial commercial launch. The timing and costs of clinical trials are difficult to predict and trial plans may change in response to evolving circumstances and as such the foregoing estimates may prove to be inaccurate. If we are unable to raise sufficient funds, we will be required to develop and implement an alternative plan to further extend payables, reduce overhead or scale back our business plan until sufficient additional capital is raised to support further operations. There can be no assurance that such a plan will be successful.

Summary of Cash Flows

Cash used in operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $6.6 million during the year ended March 31, 2024, consisting of a net loss of $15.4 million and a change in operating assets and liabilities of $0.1 million. The change in operating assets and liabilities included sources of cash from an increase in accounts payable of $0.3 million and accrued expenses of $0.3 million offset by a use of cash for other current assets of $0.5 million. The increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses were driven primarily by increased research and development costs for the development of our medical devices, general and administrative costs consisting of professional fees, officer compensation and legal expenses. The increase in other current assets was driven primarily by prepaid insurance costs. Non-cash items consisted of $4.6 million for warrant expense – termination agreement, $3.4 million for warrant liability – mark-to-market adjustment, stock-based compensation of $0.6 million and depreciation and amortization of $0.1 million.

Net cash used in operating activities was $1.9 million during the year endedMarch 31, 2023, consisting of a net loss of $2.0 million and an increase in operating assets and liabilities of $0.1 million, which primarily consisted of an increase in accounts payable.

Cash used in investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $19 thousand for the year ended March 31, 2024, related to the purchase of computer hardware and software.

Net cash used in investing activities was $0 for the year ended March 31, 2023.

Cash provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $14.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2024, consisting of $10.9 million of gross proceeds from the sale of common stock related to our IPO, $2.8 million from the sale of common stock and $2.0 million of cash proceeds from convertible notes. We also paid $1.3 million in issuance costs related to our IPO.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2023, comprised of $0.7 million from the sale of common stock.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

None.

Employment Arrangements

We have agreements with key employees to provide certain benefits, including salary and other wage-related benefits, in the event of termination. In addition, we have adopted a severance policy for certain key members of executive management to provide certain benefits, including salary and other wage-related benefits, in the event of termination without cause. In total, these benefits would amount to $0.8 million using the rate of compensation in effect at March 31, 2024.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

The financial statements in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements, including the notes thereto. We consider critical accounting policies to be those that require more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our financial statements, including the following: research and development expenses, warrants, and stock-based compensation. Management relies on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable in making its judgments and estimates. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Management believes its application of accounting policies, and the estimates inherently required therein, are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are periodically reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change.

Our accounting policies are more fully described under the heading “Description of the Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Note 1 to our Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Components of our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Operating expenses

We classify our operating expenses into three categories: (i) research and development, (ii) general and administrative and (iii) warrant expense – termination agreement.

Research and development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of:

We expect our research and development expenses to increase in the future as we advance our product into and through clinical trials, pursue additional regulatory approvals of our product in the United States, and continue commercial development of our device(s). The process of conducting the necessary clinical research to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time-consuming. The probability of success for our technology may be affected by a variety of factors including: the quality of our product, early clinical data, investment in our clinical program, competition, manufacturing capability and commercial viability. We may not succeed in achieving all necessary regulatory approvals for our product candidates. As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our research and development process or when and to what extent, if any, we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of our device.

General and administrative

General and administrative expenses consist of personnel related costs, which include salaries, as well as the costs of professional services, such as accounting and legal, facilities, information technology, stock-based compensation for general and administrative personnel, insurance, travel costs and other administrative expenses and costs to defend our patents. We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase due to the IPO, the anticipated growth of our business and related infrastructure, as well as accounting, insurance, investor relations and other costs associated with being a public company.

Advertising

It is our policy to expense advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses are included within general and administrative expenses within the statement of operations. For the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded $1.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation transactions are recognized as compensation expense in the statements of operations based on their fair values on the date of the grant. The expense for equity awards expected to vest is recognized over the applicable vesting period of the stock award using either the straight-line method or the accelerated method, depending on the vesting structure, and is included in general and administrative. We estimate the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This estimate uses assumptions regarding a number of inputs that require us to make significant estimates and judgments. The expected volatility assumption was based on industry peer information.

Accounting for Warrants

We issued warrants to purchase shares of common stock (i) in connection with the Bridge Offering, (ii) as part of selling agent compensation in 2024, and (iii) in connection with the Exclusive License Termination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”). We accounted for such warrants in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480-10, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity and ASC Topic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity. Based on this guidance, we determined that warrants issued in connection with the Termination Agreement should be accounted for as a liability and the remaining warrants issued meet the requirements for equity classification. Liability classified warrants are subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date, while equity classified warrants are valued at inception only.

Bridge Financing Warrants

The fair value of the Bridge Financing Warrants is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model with probability-weighted expected return method ("PWERM") based on the probabilities of different potential outcomes for the Notes issued with the Bridge Financing Warrants. The outcomes considered included (i) qualified financing as part of our planned IPO at various points in time and (ii) repayment in cash at maturity. Any increase in the amount of time expected until a qualified financing event and/or a reduction in the likelihood of a qualified financing event occurring during the term of the Notes would likely increase the fair value of the warrant, while the inverse of each scenario would have the opposite effect. The significant judgments and assumptions to the Monte Carlo simulation include the Company’s stock price, volatility based on a selection of publicly held peer companies, discount rate, and a discount for lack of marketability.

Common Stock Fair Value – The fair value of our common stock price was determined through a back solve, solving for the stock price that results in the average total value of the Notes and the warrants being equal to the cash proceeds received in the transaction it was issued at across one million iterations of the simulation.

Historical Volatility – We determine the expected volatility by weighing the historical average volatilities of publicly traded industry peers. Our intention is to consistently apply this methodology using the same or similar public companies until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our common stock becomes available. We will monitor our peer group for circumstances that may require a change to the composition or make-up of the entities and will identify if/when more suitable companies whose stock prices are publicly available would be utilized in the calculation.

Discount Rate - The rate is chosen based on private equity rates of return as described in the AICPA Practice Aid on Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity securities Issued as Compensation, choosing the rate at the lower end of the range.

Credit Rating – Our credit rating impacts the identification and calculation of the discount rate.

Discount for lack of marketability – Subsequent to the IPO, any shares issued pursuant to an exercise of the Bridge Financing Warrants, would be subject to a six-month lock-up. Consistent with AICPA’s Accounting and Valuation Guide: Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, the Finnerty model was used to estimate the discount for lack of marketability.

The fair value of the Notes and Bridge Financing Warrants is calculated such that they will combine to equal the cash purchase price of the Bridge Offering. Any changes in these assumptions will impact how the transaction price from the Bridge Offering is distributed between the Notes and the Bridge Financing Warrants.

Termination Agreement Warrants

The fair value of the Termination Agreement Warrants is estimated using a discounted cash flow model under various scenarios and used the probability-weighted expected return method (“PWERM”) comparing the probabilities of different outcomes. The outcomes considered included (i) qualified financing as part of our planned IPO at various points in time and (ii) possibility of default whereby the investor receives nothing. Any increase in the amount of time expected until a qualified financing event and/or a reduction in the likelihood of a qualified financing event occurring during the term of the warrant would decrease the fair value of the warrant, while the inverse of each scenario would have the opposite effect.

Additional significant assumptions and judgments used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include:

Discount Rate - The rate is chosen based on private equity rates of return as described in the AICPA Practice Aid on Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, choosing the rate at the lower end of the range.

Credit Rating – Our credit rating impacts the identification and calculation of the discount rate.

Any ongoing improvements in our credit rating would have the effect of driving down the discount rate used in the periodic re-measurement of the Termination Agreement warrants. Reductions in the Company’s discount rate would increase the fair value of the Termination Agreement warrants, while an increase in this factor will have an opposite effect.

Other Warrants

The fair value of equity-based warrants issued is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The significant judgments and assumptions used in applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model include the underlying common stock at the measurement dates, the expected term, expected dividend yield and historical volatility of comparable companies’ stock. 

Common Stock Fair Value – Prior to our IPO, we periodically sold shares of our common stock for cash in an arms-length transaction. We consider these transactions as indicative of the fair value of our common stock when applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Subsequent to our IPO, we base the value of our shares on observable share data.

Expected Term – The estimate of the expected term of awards was determined in accordance with the contractual term of the arrangement.

Expected Dividend Yield – We have not declared or paid any cash dividends and do not presently intend to pay any in the foreseeable future. We have no plans or expectations that this assumption will change in the foreseeable future.

Historical Volatility – We determine the expected volatility by weighing the historical average volatilities of publicly traded industry peers. Our intention is to consistently apply this methodology using the same or similar public companies until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our common stock becomes available. We will monitor our peer group for circumstances that may require a change to the composition or make-up of the entities and will identify if/when more suitable companies whose stock prices are publicly available would be utilized in the calculation.

A decrease in volatility and expected term will decrease the estimated fair value of the warrant, while an increase in these factors will have an opposite effect.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Financial Statements

Autonomix Medical, Inc.

Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

Autonomix Medical, Inc.

Statements of Operations

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

Autonomix Medical, Inc.

Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

Autonomix Medical, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

Autonomix Medical, Inc.

Notes to the Financial Statements

Note 1 – Description of the Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of the Business

Autonomix Medical, Inc (“we,” “our,” the “Company”) is a medical device company organized as a Delaware corporation on June 10, 2014. The Company is a pre-revenue, clinical stage life sciences company focused on advancing innovative technologies for sensing and treating disorders relating to the peripheral nervous system.

Liquidity and Going Concern

The Company's financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company is an early-stage company that is subject to all the risks associated with early-stage and emerging growth companies and has incurred losses since inception. For the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has net losses of approximately $15.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively and had net cash flows used in operating activities of $6.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The Company had no revenues for the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, accumulated deficit of $39.0 million and working capital of approximately $8.6 million as of March 31, 2024. The Company does not expect to generate positive cash flows from operating activities in the near future. These conditions, and the Company's ability to comply with such conditions, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

On January 26, 2024, the Company completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) of common stock. During the IPO, the Company sold a total of 2,234,222 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $5.00 per share for gross proceeds of $11.2 million and net proceeds of $9.8 million. On May 13, 2024, the Company cancelled 1,050 shares represented in the IPO due to payment disputes. As part of the IPO closing, $0.3 million was retained by the Company’s marketing partner as a holdback to be paid 90 days after the IPO. This $0.3 million was recorded in other current assets on the Company's balance sheet. In connection with the closing of the IPO, a portion of the Company’s convertible notes were converted into 335,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon the closing of the IPO, certain notes were to be automatically converted according to their terms into the Company’s common stock to the extent and provided that certain holders of these notes are not permitted to convert such notes to the extent that the holders or any of its affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s common stock after such conversion. Due to this 4.99% limitation, principal representing $1.3 million, or 665,000 shares, of these convertible notes remained outstanding. The Company's existing cash resources, unexercised warrants and the cash received from the IPO are not expected to provide sufficient funds to carry out the Company's operations and clinical trials through the next twelve months. 

The Company paid a cash commission of 7.0% to the selling agent on sales of the shares of common stock in the IPO. In addition, the Company has issued the selling agent warrants to purchase up to a total number of shares of common stock equal to 2.675% of the total number of shares sold in the IPO at an exercise price equal to 125% of the public offering price of the shares sold in the IPO. The selling agent warrants will be exercisable at any time, and from time to time, in whole or in part, commencing from the date that is six months after the commencement date of sales in the IPO and expiring on the fifth anniversary of the commencement date of sales in the IPO. The selling agent warrants will have a cashless exercise provision and will provide for registration rights with respect to the registration of the shares underlying the warrants.

The Company estimates its current cash resources, including the approximately $9.8 million of net proceeds from the IPO is sufficient to fund its operations into but not beyond the first calendar quarter of 2025. The Company recognizes it will need to raise additional capital to continue to execute its business plan, including obtaining regulatory clearance for its products currently under development and commercializing and generating revenues from products under development. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed or that management will be able to obtain financing on terms acceptable to the Company. A failure to raise sufficient capital, generate sufficient product revenues, control expenditures and regulatory matters, among other factors, will adversely impact the Company’s ability to meet its financial obligations as they become due and payable and to achieve its intended business objectives. If the Company is unable to raise sufficient additional funds, it will have to scale back its operations.

Basis of Presentation

Use of Estimates in Financial Statement Presentation

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. The Company's significant estimates and assumptions include the valuation of equity related instruments, and initial and recurring fair value measurements for the warrant liability. Although the Company believes that its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available at the time the estimates and assumptions were made. Some of these judgments can be subjective and complex, and, consequently, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid accounts with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Periodically, the Company may carry cash balances at financial institutions in excess of the federally insured limit of $250,000. The Company has not experienced losses on these accounts and management believes, based upon the quality of the financial institutions, that the credit risk with regard to these deposits is not significant.

Offering Costs

Offering costs consist of professional costs incurred through the balance sheet date that are direct and incremental related to the Company’s anticipated IPO. These costs, together with the selling agent fees, were reclassified to additional paid-in capital upon completion of the Company’s IPO on January 26, 2024. Costs associated with salaries and other period costs were expensed as incurred. 

During the year ended March 31, 2024, the Company paid $1.3 million of offering costs related to its IPO.

Property and Equipment

Convertible Notes

The Company evaluates embedded redemption, conversion and other features within its debt to determine whether any embedded features should be bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a derivative at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in the statement of operations.

The Company’s debt is carried on the balance sheet on a historical cost basis net of unamortized discounts and premiums because the Company has not elected the fair value option of accounting. Costs associated with acquiring debt, including detachable warrants issued in connection with the financing, are capitalized as a debt discount. The debt discount is presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability. The costs are amortized over the estimated contractual life of the related debt instrument using the effective interest method and are included in interest expense in the statement of operations.

If the Company incurs costs associated with its convertible notes, in advance of the receipt of proceeds, the Company will record a deferred asset. Upon receipt of proceeds the Company will reclassify the deferred asset as a direct deduction from the carrying amount, as described above. In addition, since the instruments included a substantive conversion feature as of time of issuance, the issuance of equity securities were accounted for as a contractual conversion with no gain or loss recognized related to the equity securities issued to settle the instrument.  

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurements, defined as follows:

Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.

Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value and require significant judgment and estimation.

The carrying value of short-term instruments, including cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses and convertible notes included in long-term debt, approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.

Related Parties

The Company follows ASC 850, Related Party Disclosures, for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. See further discussion in the Notes below on this matter.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and the tax basis of reported assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company must then assess the likelihood that the resulting deferred tax assets will be realized. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. As of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 the Company determined a full valuation allowance was required to offset its deferred tax assets as a result of recurring operating losses.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740-10 which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, on its tax return. The Company evaluates and records any uncertain tax positions based on the amount that management deems is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination and ultimate settlement with the tax authorities in the tax jurisdictions in which it operates. As of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 the Company had no uncertain tax positions.

Stock-based Compensation

Employee share-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period. For awards with a performance condition, compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period if it is probable that the performance condition will be satisfied. For awards to non-employees, the Company recognizes compensation expense in the same manner as if the Company had paid cash for the goods or services. The Company estimates the fair value of options and equity classified warrants granted using an options pricing model. Expense is recognized within general and administrative and research and development expenses and forfeitures are recognized as they are incurred.

Warrants

The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in FASB ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”) and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own ordinary shares and whether the warrant holders could potentially require “net cash settlement” in a circumstance outside of the Company’s control, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the warrants are outstanding.

For issued or modified warrants that meet all of the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital at the time of issuance. For issued or modified warrants that do not meet all the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded at their initial fair value on the date of issuance, and each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of the warrants are recognized as a non-cash gain or loss on the statements of operations. The fair value of the warrants is estimated using a Black-Scholes pricing model or a Monte Carlo simulation.

The Company issued warrants to purchase shares of common stock (i) in connection with the Bridge Offering, (ii) as part of selling agent compensation in 2024, and (iii) in connection with the Exclusive License Termination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”). Based on the guidance noted above, we determined that warrants issued in connection with the Termination Agreement should be accounted for as a liability and the remaining warrants issued meet the requirements for equity classification. Liability classified warrants are subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date, while equity classified warrants are valued at inception only. As discussed in Note 2, the liability warrants subsequently met equity classification.

Loss Per Common Share

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Generally, the Company’s outstanding warrants are non-participating securities as they are not entitled to non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents during the vesting term and have no obligation to fund losses. The dilutive effect of convertible securities is calculated using the “if-converted method.” Under the if-converted method, securities are assumed to be converted at the beginning of the period, and the resulting common shares are included in the denominator of the diluted calculation for the entire period being presented. However, the warrants described in Note 2 are participating securities as they receive a right to dividends, but they are not obligated to fund losses. In periods of loss, since no income is allocated to these securities, the Company's use of the treasury stock method derives the same result.

For the twelve months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, dilutive securities that were not included in the calculations of the loss per common share because they would be anti-dilutive included the following:

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Advertising

It is our policy to expense advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses are included within general and administrative expenses within the statement of operations. For the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded $1.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

Fair Value of Common Stock

Prior to establishing a public market for the Company’s common stock, the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock was determined by the Company’s Board of Directors (the "Board") as of the date of each option grant, with input from management, considering the Company’s most recently available third-party valuations of common stock, recent sales of common stock to third parties, and the Company’s board of directors’ assessment of additional objective and subjective factors that it believed were relevant and which may have changed from the date of the most recent valuation through the date of the grant.

JOBS Act Accounting Election

The Company qualifies as an emerging growth company ("EGC"), as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). The JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an early-stage company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Segments

The Company currently operates in one reportable segment based on management’s view of its business for purposes of evaluating performance and making operating decisions. Based upon this business model, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, whom the Company has determined to be its chief operating decision-maker, reviews financial information as one operating segment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures,” which requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. The guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have any material impact on its financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which introduced a new model for recognizing credit losses on financial instruments based on an estimate of current expected credit losses (“CECL”). The new guidance applies to loans, accounts receivable, trade receivables, other financial assets measured at amortized cost, loan commitments and other off-balance sheet credit exposures. The new guidance also applies to debt securities and other financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income. Estimated credit losses under CECL consider relevant information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supporting forecasts that affect the collectability of financial assets. Given the non-revenue nature of the Company, the adoption of this standard did not result in an adoption adjustment or material impact.

The Company does not believe that any recently issued effective pronouncements, or pronouncements issued but not yet effective, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.

Correction of an Immaterial Error in the Prior Period Financial Statements

During the fourth quarter of 2024 ( March 31, 2024), the Company determined that the prior year financial statements had an error caused by an immaterial classification error of certain research and development expense in accordance with ASC 730. As a result, certain prior year amounts have been revised for consistency with the current year presentation. The Company assessed the materiality of this change in presentation on prior period financial statements in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, “Materiality,” (ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections). Based on this assessment, the Company concluded that these classification error corrections in its Statements of Operations are not material to any previously presented financial statements based upon overall considerations of both quantitative and qualitative factors. The corrections had no impact on the fiscal year 2023 Balance Sheet, Statements of Cash Flows, or Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity. Further, the immaterial corrections did not result in a change in operating losses, net loss, or basic or diluted earnings per share in the Income Statement. Accordingly, the Company corrected the previously reported immaterial errors for the year ended March 31, 2023 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

A summary of immaterial corrections reflecting the prior period impact to the Company’s Statement of Operations, for the year ended March 31, 2023 is shown below (in thousands):

Note 2 – Warrant Liability and Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. While the Company believes that its valuation methods are appropriate, the Company recognizes that the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The primary assumptions that would significantly affect the fair values are the probability weighting of the different settlement outcomes used. 

The Company did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value as of or during the 12-month period ending March 31, 2023. There were not any transfers into or out of Level 3 as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023.

The following table summarizes the activity of the Level 3 fair value measurements (in thousands):

The Company recognized the initial warrant expense as a component of operating expenses on the statement of operations under warrant expense – termination agreement for $4.6 million and the changes in the fair value under warrant liability – mark-to-market for $3.4 million. There were no changes to the valuation approaches or techniques used for Level 3 measurements.

Warrant Liabilities

As more fully detailed in Note 6 – Related Party Transactions, on July 7, 2023, the Company entered into an Exclusive License Termination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with a licensee in exchange for the issuance, upon the closing of the Company’s IPO within one year of the agreement’s execution, of a warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase shares of the Company for a variable number of shares.

The fair value of the warrant liability has been estimated using a discounted cash flow model under various scenarios and used the probability-weighted expected return method (“PWERM”) comparing the probabilities of different outcomes. The outcomes considered included (i) the closing of a qualified financing as part of the Company’s IPO at various points in time and (ii) the possibility of default whereby the licensee receives nothing. Key assumptions for the model were as follows for the initial measurement:

On January 29, 2024, the Company issued 1.6 million warrant shares pursuant to the Termination Agreement.

Note 3 – Convertible Notes Payable

On September 9, 2023, the Company's Board authorized an offering up to $2.0 million in unsecured, non-interest bearing convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) and accompanying warrants (the “Bridge Financing Warrants”) (collectively, the “Bridge Offering”) that will mature on December 31, 2025. The Notes provided that, on the closing date of the IPO, the outstanding principal would be automatically converted into common stock at the conversion price of $2.00. Each dollar in principal amount of Notes purchased were accompanied by a five-year Bridge Financing Warrant to purchase 0.25 shares of Common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The Company records the Bridge Financing Warrants as a discount to the Notes.

The Bridge Financing Warrants can be exercised from the date of Notes issuance through the five-year anniversary of the issuance of the Notes. The shares issuable pursuant to the Notes and Bridge Financing Warrants have a 180-day lock-up after the Company’s IPO. Thereafter, the foregoing lock-up agreement will cease to apply to 25% of the purchased shares each month for a period of four months. The Note holders are not permitted to convert their Notes when the holders or any of their affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s common stock after such conversion.

As of March 31, 2024, the Company received proceeds of $2.0 million of Notes executed from the Bridge Offering. Upon the closing of the IPO, certain notes were to be automatically converted according to their terms into the Company’s common stock to the extent and provided that certain holders of these notes are not permitted to convert such notes to the extent that the holders or any of its affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s common stock after such conversion. Due to this 4.99% limitation, principal representing $1.3 million, or 665,000 shares, of these notes remained outstanding. As discussed in Note 1, the remaining notes converted into common stock in accordance with their original terms on the IPO.

The table below summarizes the Company’s outstanding convertible notes payable as of March 31, 2024 (in thousands).

Warrants

The Company issued the Notes with detachable warrants for the purchase of shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company utilized a Monte Carlo simulation model to determine the fair value of each Bridge Offering Warrant. During the year ended March 31, 2024, the Company issued warrants valued at $0.6 million. The key inputs to the Monte Carlo simulation used to determine the fair value of each warrant include, the Company’s stock price fair value which was determined through a back solve calculation such that the stock price results in the average total value of the Notes and the Bridge Offering Warrants being equal to the cash proceeds received, volatility based on a selection of publicly held peer companies of 101.88%, expected term of 5 years, risk free rate of 4.40%, discount rate of 20.00% and a discount for lack of marketability of 15.77%.

During the year ended March 31, 2024, the Company recorded less than $0.1 million in interest expense related to the amortization of the debt discount.

The following table presents a summary of activity for the warrants issued in connection with the Company’s Notes:

*Aggregate Intrinsic Value = Excess of market value over the exercise price of all in-the-money warrants. 

Note 4 – Equity

On November 29, 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors and applicable shareholders approved to amend and restate the Company’s certificate of incorporation and increased the authorized shares to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $.001 per share. The specific rights of the preferred stock shall be determined by the Board of Directors.

Preferred Stock

As of March 31, 2024, the Company had no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

Restricted Stock

On February 15, 2024, the Company issued 35,000 restricted shares of common stock to the Company's marketing consultant at the closing price of $3.80 of the Company's common stock. The total value of these shares is $133,000. These shares vest monthly over a 12-month period beginning on the issue date.

For the year ended March 31, 2024, there was $116,375 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested Restricted Stock, which is expected to be recognized over the period April 2024 through February 2025.

A summary of activity regarding Restricted Stock issued is as follows: