GMF Leasing 424B5Prospectus supplement for primary offering

Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)
Registration Statement No. 333-261801

$1,300,350,000 Asset-Backed Notes

GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2024-2

Issuing Entity (CIK No. 0002016902)

GMF Leasing LLC

Depositor (CIK No. 0001631055)

Sponsor and Servicer (CIK No. 0001002761)

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Prospectus dated May 7, 2024.

This document is not an offer to sell these securities, and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

We do not claim the accuracy of the information in this prospectus as of any date other than the date stated on the cover of this prospectus.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Important Notice about the Information Presented in this Prospectus

Where You Can Find More Information

The depositor, GMF Leasing LLC, as registrant, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the Commission, or the SEC, under the Commission file number 333-261801, a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, with respect to the notes offered pursuant to this prospectus. This prospectus, which forms a part of the registration statement, omits certain information contained in such registration statement pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission.

As long as the issuing entity is required to report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the issuing entity will file, or the servicer or the depositor will file for the issuing entity, annual reports on Form 10-K and distribution reports on Form 10-D, monthly asset-level data files and related documents on Form ABS-EE, any current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports with the Commission under the file number 333-261801-08. A copy of any reports may be obtained by any noteholder by request to the servicer.

The depositor engaged a third party to assist in certain components of the review of the lease assets that is described under “Depositor Review of Lease Assets.” The report produced by that third party is a “third-party due diligence report” pursuant to Rule 15Ga-2 of the Exchange Act and the findings and conclusions of that report were therefore furnished with the Commission on a Form ABS-15G on April 26, 2024 under file number 025-02258.

A number of items are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. See “Incorporation by Reference” for a description of incorporation by reference.

The Commission maintains a website containing reports, proxy materials, information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission. The address is http://www.sec.gov.

You may request a free copy of any of the filings incorporated by reference into this prospectus by writing or calling: GM Financial, 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3500, Fort Worth, Texas 76102; telephone (817) 302-7000. You may obtain more information about GM Financial at https://www.gmfinancial.com. The information about GM Financial’s website in the immediately preceding sentence and its content is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus.

1

Notice to Investors: United Kingdom

PROHIBITION ON SALES TO U.K. RETAIL INVESTORS

THE NOTES ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO, AND SHOULD NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO, ANY U.K. RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (“U.K.”). FOR THESE PURPOSES, THE EXPRESSION “U.K. RETAIL INVESTOR” MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) A RETAIL CLIENT, AS DEFINED IN POINT (8) OF ARTICLE 2 OF COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2017/565, AS IT FORMS PART OF U.K. DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 (AS AMENDED, THE “EUWA”), AND AS AMENDED; OR (2) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED, THE “FSMA”) AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THE FSMA (SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS AMENDED) TO IMPLEMENT DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/97, WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT, AS DEFINED IN POINT (8) OF ARTICLE 2(1) OF REGULATION (EU) NO 600/2014, AS IT FORMS PART OF U.K. DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA AND AS AMENDED; OR (3) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR (“U.K. QUALIFIED INVESTOR”) AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION (EU) 2017/1129, AS IT FORMS PART OF U.K. DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA (AND AS AMENDED, THE “U.K. PROSPECTUS REGULATION”). CONSEQUENTLY NO KEY INFORMATION DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY REGULATION (EU) NO 1286/2014, AS IT FORMS PART OF U.K. DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA (AND AS AMENDED, THE “U.K. PRIIPS REGULATION”) FOR OFFERING OR SELLING THE NOTES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO U.K. RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE U.K. HAS BEEN PREPARED; AND THEREFORE OFFERING OR SELLING THE NOTES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO ANY U.K. RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE U.K. MAY BE UNLAWFUL UNDER THE U.K. PRIIPS REGULATION.

OTHER U.K. OFFERING RESTRICTIONS

THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE U.K. PROSPECTUS REGULATION. THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN PREPARED ON THE BASIS THAT ANY OFFER OF NOTES IN THE U.K. WILL BE MADE ONLY TO A U.K. QUALIFIED INVESTOR. ACCORDINGLY, ANY PERSON MAKING OR INTENDING TO MAKE AN OFFER IN THE U.K. OF THE NOTES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY DO SO WITH RESPECT TO U.K. QUALIFIED INVESTORS. NEITHER THE ISSUING ENTITY, NOR THE DEPOSITOR, NOR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS HAVE AUTHORIZED, NOR DO THEY AUTHORIZE, THE MAKING OF ANY OFFER OF NOTES IN THE U.K. OTHER THAN TO U.K. QUALIFIED INVESTORS.

OTHER U.K. REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS

WITHIN THE U.K., THIS PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY BE COMMUNICATED OR CAUSED TO BE COMMUNICATED TO PERSONS (I) AUTHORIZED TO CARRY ON A REGULATED ACTIVITY UNDER THE FSMA, (II) WHO HAVE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE IN MATTERS RELATING TO INVESTMENTS AND WHO QUALIFY AS INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 19(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (FINANCIAL PROMOTION) ORDER 2005 (AS AMENDED, THE “FPO”), (III) WHO FALL WITHIN ARTICLE 49(2) OF THE FPO, OR (IV) WHO ARE PERSONS TO WHOM THIS PROSPECTUS MAY OTHERWISE LAWFULLY BE COMMUNICATED OR CAUSED TO BE COMMUNICATED (TOGETHER, “RELEVANT PERSONS”). IN THE U.K., THIS PROSPECTUS MUST NOT BE ACTED ON OR RELIED ON BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT RELEVANT PERSONS. IN THE U.K., ANY INVESTMENT OR INVESTMENT ACTIVITY TO WHICH THIS

2

PROSPECTUS RELATES, INCLUDING THE NOTES, IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO RELEVANT PERSONS AND WILL BE ENGAGED IN ONLY WITH RELEVANT PERSONS. THE COMMUNICATION OF THIS PROSPECTUS TO ANY PERSON IN THE U.K. OTHER THAN A RELEVANT PERSON IS UNAUTHORIZED AND MAY CONTRAVENE FSMA.

POTENTIAL INVESTORS IN THE U.K. ARE ADVISED THAT ALL, OR MOST, OF THE PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY THE U.K. REGULATORY SYSTEM WILL NOT APPLY TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES AND THAT COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE U.K. FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPENSATION SCHEME.

Notice to Investors: European Economic Area

PROHIBITION ON SALES TO E.U. RETAIL INVESTORS

THE NOTES ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO, AND SHOULD NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO, ANY E.U. RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA (THE “EEA”). FOR THESE PURPOSES, THE EXPRESSION “E.U. RETAIL INVESTOR” MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (11) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF DIRECTIVE 2014/65/EU (AS AMENDED, “MIFID II”); (2) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/97 (AS AMENDED), WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (10) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF MIFID II; OR (3) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR (“E.U. QUALIFIED INVESTOR”) AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION (EU) 2017/1129 (AS AMENDED, THE “E.U. PROSPECTUS REGULATION”).

CONSEQUENTLY NO KEY INFORMATION DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY REGULATION (EU) NO 1286/2014 (AS AMENDED, THE “E.U. PRIIPS REGULATION”) FOR OFFERING OR SELLING THE NOTES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO E.U. RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE EEA HAS BEEN PREPARED; AND THEREFORE OFFERING OR SELLING THE NOTES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO ANY E.U. RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EEA MAY BE UNLAWFUL UNDER THE E.U. PRIIPS REGULATION.

OTHER EEA OFFERING RESTRICTIONS

THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE E.U. PROSPECTUS REGULATION. THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN PREPARED ON THE BASIS THAT ANY OFFER OF NOTES IN THE EEA WILL BE MADE ONLY TO E.U. QUALIFIED INVESTORS. ACCORDINGLY, ANY PERSON MAKING OR INTENDING TO MAKE AN OFFER IN THE EEA OF NOTES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY DO SO WITH RESPECT TO E.U. QUALIFIED INVESTORS. NEITHER THE ISSUING ENTITY, NOR THE DEPOSITOR, NOR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS HAVE AUTHORIZED, NOR DO THEY AUTHORIZE, THE MAKING OF ANY OFFER OF NOTES IN THE EEA OTHER THAN TO E.U. QUALIFIED INVESTORS.

Forward-Looking Statements

Any projections, expectations and estimates in this prospectus are not historical in nature but are forward-looking statements based on information and assumptions the sponsor and the depositor consider reasonable. Forward-looking statements are about circumstances and events that have not yet taken place, so they are uncertain and may vary materially from actual events. Neither the sponsor nor the depositor is obligated to update or revise any forward-looking statements, including changes in economic conditions, portfolio or asset pool performance or other circumstances or developments, after the date of this prospectus.

3

Summary of Risk Factors

The following is only a limited summary of the risks related to this transaction. You should carefully read and consider the risk factors set forth under “Risk Factors,” as well as all other information contained in this prospectus.

4

5

Overview of Transaction Structure and Parties

The following diagram provides a simplified overview of the structure of this securitization transaction. You should read this prospectus in its entirety for a more detailed description of this securitization transaction.

6

Overview of Exchange Note Flow of Funds ⁽¹⁾

7

Overview of Notes Flow of Funds ⁽¹⁾

8

Summary of Prospectus

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Risk Factors

You should consider the following factors in connection with the purchase of the notes:

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

Use of Proceeds

On the closing date:

The Sponsor and the Servicer

GM Financial will be the sponsor and servicer for the notes. The sponsor was incorporated in Delaware on July 22, 1992. The sponsor’s principal offices are located at 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3500, Fort Worth, Texas 76102, telephone (817) 302-7000.

On October 1, 2010, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 21, 2010, AmeriCredit Corp. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Motors Holdings LLC. General Motors Holdings LLC is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Motors Company, or GM. AmeriCredit Corp. was subsequently renamed General Motors Financial Company, Inc., or General Motors Financial. The sponsor continues to be a wholly-owned subsidiary and the primary operating subsidiary of General Motors Financial.

The sponsor originated 100% of the Lease Assets included in the designated pool. The sponsor identifies the Lease Assets that are originated and sold to the titling trust by automobile dealers and has at times originated leases directly with consumers.

The sponsor services all leases that it originates, though some servicing functions are performed by affiliates of the sponsor, according to sponsor’s servicing policies as described below. As of March 31, 2024, the sponsor serviced a portfolio with a net book value of approximately $27.9 billion in North America. See “The Sponsor’s Automobile Leasing Program” for more information regarding the sponsor’s business and “The Sponsor’s Lease Securitization Program” for information regarding the sponsor’s securitization program.

The sponsor will identify the Lease Assets to be assigned to the designated pool by the titling trust. The sponsor will be the original holder of the exchange note which it will sell to the depositor pursuant to an Exchange Note Sale Agreement (as defined in the Glossary). The servicer will make certain representations and warranties to the depositor, the issuing entity and the indenture trustee regarding the designated pool. If it is discovered that the servicer has breached any such representation or warranty with respect to a lease or leased vehicle in the designated pool, the servicer will be obligated to redesignate the affected lease or leased vehicle from the designated pool to the extent the interests of the

39

noteholders are materially and adversely affected by such breach. Certain of the representations and warranties that the sponsor will make about the Lease Assets are subject to important qualifications or limitations, such as knowledge qualifiers, or relate to actions taken by a third-party, such as the related dealer. Therefore, the sponsor may not be able to independently verify the facts underlying certain representations and warranties that it will make. See “The Designated Pool—Representations about the Designated Pool and Obligation to Redesignate Ineligible Lease Assets Upon Breach” for more information regarding the representations and warranties that the servicer will make regarding the Lease Assets and its obligation to redesignate Lease Assets from the designated pool under certain circumstances.

The Transaction Documents (as defined in the Glossary) relating to the Lending Facility (as defined in the Glossary) and the transaction documents for each other designated pool relating to the Lending Facility also contain covenants requiring the redesignation of Lease Assets from the related designated pool by the servicer due to the breach of a related representation or warranty. During the three year period ended March 31, 2024, none of the servicer, the depositor, the collateral agent or the owner trustee received a demand to redesignate any Lease Assets from any designated pool, and there was no activity with respect to any demand made prior to such period. The sponsor discloses all fulfilled and unfulfilled redesignation requests for Lease Assets that were the subject of a demand to redesignate from the designated pool on SEC Form ABS-15G. The sponsor furnished its most recent Form ABS-15G pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 of the Exchange Act with the SEC on February 1, 2024. The sponsor’s CIK number is 0001002761. See “Where You Can Find More Information” for more information on obtaining a copy of the report.

Under the Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Glossary), the sponsor will service the Lease Assets in the designated pool and will be compensated for acting as the servicer. The servicer’s activities consist primarily of collecting and processing customer payments, responding to customer inquiries, initiating contact with customers who are delinquent in payment of an installment, maintaining the security interests in the leased vehicles, arranging for the disposition of any leased vehicles that are returned at the end of the related lease term, and arranging for the repossession of the leased vehicles and pursuit of deficiencies when appropriate. See “The Sponsor’s Automobile Leasing Program —Servicing of Lease Assets” for more information regarding the sponsor’s general servicing procedures. See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Servicing Compensation” for more information regarding the servicer’s duties under the Servicing Agreement.

The sponsor will be the initial servicer, but as described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Exchange Note Servicer Default” there are circumstances where the sponsor may be removed as servicer. Information regarding the manner in which the sponsor may be removed as servicer following the occurrence of an Exchange Note Servicer Default and the manner in which a successor servicer may be appointed is described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Exchange Note Servicer Default—Rights Upon Exchange Note Servicer Default.”

The Depositor

GMF Leasing LLC, the depositor, is the sponsor’s wholly-owned subsidiary and is a Delaware limited liability company, formed in January 2011. The depositor’s address is 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3500, Fort Worth, Texas 76102, telephone (817) 302-7000. The depositor met the registrant requirements set forth in paragraph I.A. of the General Instructions to Form SF-3 at the time the registration statement was filed.

The depositor is a special-purpose entity that was formed for the limited purpose of purchasing exchange notes from the sponsor and transferring the exchange notes to third parties and any activities incidental or necessary for this purpose.

40

The depositor will purchase the exchange note from the sponsor pursuant to an Exchange Note Sale Agreement and will transfer the exchange note to the issuing entity pursuant to an Exchange Note Transfer Agreement (as defined in the Glossary).

The sponsor and the depositor have structured this transaction so that the bankruptcy of the sponsor is not expected to result in the consolidation of the depositor’s assets and liabilities with those of the sponsor. On the closing date, the depositor will receive a legal opinion, subject to various facts, assumptions and qualifications, opining that if the sponsor were adjudged bankrupt, it would not be a proper exercise of a court’s equitable discretion to disregard the separate corporate existence of the depositor and to require the consolidation of the depositor’s assets and liabilities with those of the sponsor. However, there can be no assurance that a court would not conclude that the assets and liabilities of the depositor should be consolidated with those of the sponsor. Delays in distributions on the notes and possible reductions in distribution amounts could occur if a court decided to consolidate the depositor’s assets with those of the sponsor, or if a filing were made under any bankruptcy or insolvency law by or against the depositor, or if an attempt were made to litigate any of those issues.

In connection with the offering of the notes, the chief executive officer of the depositor will make the certifications required under the Securities Act about this prospectus, the disclosures made about the characteristics of the Lease Assets and the structure of this securitization transaction, the risks of owning the notes and whether the securitization transaction will produce sufficient cashflows to make interest and principal payments on the notes when due. This certification will be filed by the depositor with the SEC at the time of filing of this prospectus. Despite the fact that the chief executive officer will make these certifications, this does not reduce or eliminate the risks of investing in the notes.

The Issuing Entity

GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2024-2, the issuing entity, is a Delaware statutory trust formed under the Issuing Entity’s Trust Agreement (as defined in the Glossary) to consummate the transactions described in this prospectus. The issuing entity’s principal offices are in Wilmington, Delaware, in care of the owner trustee at the address listed under “The Owner Trustee.”

The depositor will, on or prior to the closing date, transfer to the issuing entity an amount equal to $1.00 as the initial capitalization of the issuing entity. In addition, the depositor will pay organizational expenses of the issuing entity as they may arise.

The issuing entity will not engage in any activities other than:

Modifications to the Issuing Entity’s Trust Agreement, including to the foregoing permissible activities, may be made by the depositor and the owner trustee, upon notice by the depositor to the NRSROs that have been engaged to rate the notes and with the consent of, in certain cases, the holder of the issuer trust certificate and holders of a majority of the then Outstanding (as defined in the Glossary)

41

principal amount of the notes, and in all cases, subject to the limitations set forth in the Issuing Entity’s Trust Agreement.

The issuing entity will issue the notes to the depositor in exchange for the exchange note. In addition to the exchange note, the issuing entity will own other trust property, described in “Trust Property.”

The sponsor, in its capacity as administrator of the issuing entity and pursuant to the Administration Agreement (as defined in the Glossary), will perform certain of the issuing entity’s duties and obligations under the Transaction Documents.

The transfer of the exchange note by the depositor to the issuing entity will be treated as a financing rather than as a sale for accounting purposes. The depositor will represent and warrant that the indenture trustee, acting on behalf of the noteholders, will have a first priority perfected security interest in the exchange note and the other trust property by reason of the Indenture (as defined in the Glossary) and the filing of a UCC-1 financing statement by the issuing entity in the State of Delaware which will give notice of the security interest in favor of the indenture trustee. The issuing entity will be required to maintain such perfected security interest.

The issuing entity may not, without the prior written consent of the owner trustee: (a) institute any proceedings to be adjudicated as bankrupt or insolvent; (b) consent to the institution of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings against it; (c) file a petition seeking or consenting to reorganization or relief under any applicable federal or state law relating to bankruptcy with respect to it; (d) consent to the appointment of a receiver, liquidator, assignee, trustee, sequestrator (or other similar official) of the issuing entity or a substantial part of its property; (e) make any assignment for the benefit of the issuing entity’s creditors; (f) admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due; or (g) take any action in furtherance of any of the foregoing (any of the foregoing, a bankruptcy action). In considering whether to give or withhold written consent to any of these actions by the issuing entity, the owner trustee, with the consent of the Certificateholder (as defined in the Glossary), will consider the interests of the noteholders in addition to the interests of the issuing entity and whether the issuing entity is insolvent. The owner trustee will have no duty to give written consent to any of these actions by the issuing entity if the owner trustee has not been furnished a letter from an independent accounting firm of national reputation stating that in the opinion of such firm the issuing entity is then insolvent.

The owner trustee (as such and in its individual capacity) will not be personally liable to any person on account of the owner trustee’s good faith reliance on the provisions of the Issuing Entity’s Trust Agreement regarding a bankruptcy action or in connection with the owner trustee’s giving prior written consent to a bankruptcy action by the issuing entity in accordance with the Issuing Entity’s Trust Agreement, or withholding such consent, in good faith, and neither the issuing entity nor any Certificateholder will have any claim for breach of fiduciary duty or otherwise against the owner trustee (as such and in its individual capacity) for giving or withholding its consent to any such bankruptcy action. No Certificateholder has the power to commence any bankruptcy actions on behalf of the issuing entity or to direct the owner trustee to take any such actions on the part of the issuing entity. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the consent of the collateral agent must be obtained prior to taking any bankruptcy action by the issuing entity.

Furthermore, the issuing entity has structured this transaction so that the bankruptcy of the depositor or the sponsor is not expected to result in the consolidation of the issuing entity’s assets and liabilities with those of the depositor or the sponsor. On the closing date, the issuing entity will receive a legal opinion, subject to various facts, assumptions and qualifications, opining that if the depositor or the sponsor were adjudged bankrupt, it would not be a proper exercise of a court’s equitable discretion to disregard the separate corporate existence of the issuing entity and to require the consolidation of the issuing entity’s assets and liabilities with those of the depositor or the sponsor, as applicable. However,

42

there can be no assurance that a court would not conclude that the assets and liabilities of the issuing entity should be consolidated with those of the depositor or sponsor, as appropriate.

The issuer trust certificate (which represents the residual interest in the issuing entity) will be issued pursuant to the Issuing Entity’s Trust Agreement and will initially be held by the depositor, the entity that formed the issuing entity. The issuer trust certificate will constitute an “eligible horizontal residual interest” under Regulation RR of the Exchange Act because it is an interest in the issuing entity (i) with respect to which on any payment date on which the issuing entity has insufficient funds to satisfy its obligation to pay all contractual interest or principal due, any resulting shortfall will reduce amounts payable to the issuer trust certificate prior to any reduction in the amounts payable to any class of notes, and (ii) that has the most subordinated claim to payments of both principal and interest by the issuing entity.

Capitalization of the Issuing Entity

The following table illustrates the expected assets of the issuing entity as of the closing date:

The following table illustrates the expected liabilities of the issuing entity as of the closing date:

The issuing entity’s fiscal year ends on December 31.

The Titling Trust

ACAR Leasing Ltd., the titling trust, is a Delaware statutory trust formed under a trust agreement. The titling trust’s principal offices are in Wilmington, Delaware, in care of Wilmington Trust Company, as owner trustee of the titling trust. The titling trust is a wholly-owned subsidiary of APGO Trust, a Delaware statutory trust that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the sponsor.

The titling trust purchases Lease Assets from dealers. Each leased vehicle in the designated pool will be titled in the name of the titling trust and the collateral agent will be named as secured party on the certificate of title.

The titling trust finances its acquisition of Lease Assets with amounts borrowed from the sponsor pursuant to a Credit and Security Agreement (as defined in the Glossary), with funds indirectly contributed to it by the sponsor or with the collections received on its portfolio of Lease Assets. Under the Credit and Security Agreement, the titling trust is obligated to repay amounts advanced to it by the sponsor and may at any time, at the request of the sponsor, convert all or a portion of the amounts then

43

outstanding under the Lending Facility to one or more term notes evidenced by an exchange note. Each exchange note will be issued pursuant to an Exchange Note Supplement (as defined in the Glossary) to the Credit and Security Agreement that sets forth the terms governing that exchange note. The titling trust will be responsible for making payments on every such exchange note under the Credit and Security Agreement. The titling trust has appointed the collateral agent to hold the security interest in all Lease Assets that are pledged as collateral in accordance with the Credit and Security Agreement, including all Lease Assets in the designated pool.

Amounts due to the sponsor under the Lending Facility and all amounts due under Outstanding Exchange Notes (as defined in the Glossary), including the exchange note issued for the securitization transaction in which the notes will be issued, are secured by a single security interest in favor of the collateral agent, on behalf of the sponsor and the holders of all exchange notes, on all Lease Assets pledged under the Credit and Security Agreement and any proceeds of those Lease Assets. Whenever a new exchange note is issued, certain Lease Assets are allocated to a designated pool that backs that exchange note and generally only the Designated Pool Collections (as defined in the Glossary) on those Lease Assets will be used to make payments on that exchange note. For more information about the designated pool, see “The Designated Pool.”

The titling trust has issued an exchange note to serve as collateral for each of the outstanding term securitizations. No event of default or early amortization event has occurred under any of these prior transactions. Each such exchange note is backed by a distinct designated pool of Lease Assets and each exchange note is payable solely from collections on the Lease Assets included in its related designated pool. No Lease Asset can be allocated to multiple designated pools and the performance of one designated pool will not impact the performance of any other designated pool.

The Owner Trustee

Wilmington Trust Company—also referred to herein as the “owner trustee”—is a Delaware non-depository trust company originally incorporated in 1901. On July 1, 2011, Wilmington Trust Company filed an amended charter which changed its status from a Delaware banking corporation to a Delaware non-depository trust company. Wilmington Trust Company’s principal place of business is located at 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890. Wilmington Trust Company is an affiliate of Wilmington Trust, National Association, or WTNA, and both Wilmington Trust Company and WTNA are subsidiaries of M&T Bank Corporation. Since 1998, Wilmington Trust Company has served as owner trustee in numerous asset-backed securities transactions involving automobile lease contracts.

Wilmington Trust Company has provided the above information for purposes of complying with Regulation AB. Other than the above paragraph and except as described under “Legal Proceedings” Wilmington Trust Company has not participated in the preparation of, and is not responsible for, any other information contained in this prospectus.

Pursuant to the Issuing Entity’s Trust Agreement, the owner trustee will perform limited administrative functions of the issuing entity including the execution and delivery of the Transaction Documents and any related certificate or other document to which the issuing entity is a party. The issuing entity will authorize and direct the indenture trustee to authenticate and deliver the notes and the owner trustee will be authorized but not obligated to take all other actions required of the issuing entity pursuant to the Transaction Documents. The fees, expenses and indemnities of the owner trustee will be paid by the issuing entity, to the extent those amounts are not paid or reimbursed by the administrator.

The administrator will indemnify the owner trustee and its officers, directors, successors, assigns, agents and servants against any and all loss, liability or expense incurred by the owner trustee in connection with the performance of its duties under the Transaction Documents, except that the administrator shall not be liable for or required to indemnify the owner trustee from any loss, liability or expense that results from the owner trustee’s willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence. The

44

owner trustee is obligated to perform only those duties that are specifically assigned to it in the Issuing Entity’s Trust Agreement. The owner trustee will not be liable for any action taken at the direction of the servicer or the Certificateholder. The owner trustee will not be required to expend its own funds or incur any financial liability in respect of any of its actions as owner trustee if the owner trustee has reasonable grounds to believe that reimbursement to it of such funds or for such liabilities is not reasonably assured. The owner trustee is not liable for any error of judgment made by it in good faith.

Wilmington Trust Company will be the owner trustee initially, but there are certain conditions under which the owner trustee may be removed or may resign, in which case a successor owner trustee will be appointed. See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Replacement of Owner Trustee” for information regarding the owner trustee’s removal, resignation and replacement.

The Indenture Trustee, the Administrative Agent and the Collateral Agent

Computershare Trust Company, N.A., or Computershare Trust Company, will be the indenture trustee (in such capacity, the indenture trustee) under the Indenture, the administrative agent (in such capacity, the administrative agent) under the Exchange Note Supplement to the Credit and Security Agreement and the collateral agent (in such capacity, the collateral agent) under the Exchange Note Supplement. Computershare Trust Company is a national banking association and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Computershare Limited an Australian financial services company with approximately $6.1 billion (USD) in assets as of December 31, 2023. Computershare Limited and its affiliates have been engaging in financial service activities, including stock transfer related services, since 1997, and corporate trust related services since 2000. Computershare Trust Company provides corporate trust, custody, securities transfer, cash management, investment management and other financial and fiduciary services, and has been engaged in providing financial services, including corporate trust services, since 2000. The transaction parties may maintain commercial relationships with Computershare Trust Company and its affiliates. Computershare Trust Company maintains corporate trust offices at 9062 Old Annapolis Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045-1951 (among other locations), and its office for correspondence related to certificate transfer services is located at 1505 Energy Park Drive, St Paul, Minnesota 55108.

On November 1, 2021, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, N.A. (collectively, “Wells Fargo”) sold substantially all of its Corporate Trust Services (“CTS”) business to Computershare Limited, Computershare Trust Company, and Computershare Delaware Trust Company (collectively, “Computershare”). Virtually all CTS employees of Wells Fargo, along with most existing CTS systems, technology, and offices transferred to Computershare as part of the sale. On and after November 1, 2021, Wells Fargo has been transferring its roles, duties, rights, and liabilities under the relevant transaction agreements to Computershare. For any transaction where the roles of Wells Fargo have not yet transferred to Computershare, Computershare, as of November 1, 2021, performs all or virtually all of the obligations of Wells Fargo as its agent as of such date.

Computershare Trust Company has provided corporate trust related services since 2000 through its predecessors and affiliates. Computershare Trust Company provides trustee services for a variety of transactions and asset types, including corporate and municipal bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, and collateralized debt obligations. As of December 31, 2023, Computershare Trust Company was acting in some cases as the named trustee or indenture trustee, and in most cases as agent for the named trustee or indenture trustee, on approximately 495 asset-backed securities transactions with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $131 billion (USD). Computershare Trust Company maintains a corporate trust office for correspondence purposes at 1505 Energy Park Drive, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, Attn: Asset-Backed Securities Department. As a result of Computershare Trust Company not being a deposit-taking institution, any cash credited to accounts that the indenture trustee is required to maintain pursuant to the Indenture will be held by one or more institutions in a manner satisfying the requirements of the Indenture, including any applicable eligibility criteria for account banks set forth in the Indenture.

45

Other than the above three paragraphs, Computershare Trust Company has not participated in the preparation of, and is not responsible for, any other information contained in this prospectus.

The fees, expenses and indemnities of the administrative agent, collateral agent and indenture trustee will be paid by the issuing entity, to the extent those amounts are not paid or reimbursed by the servicer or administrator.

The issuing entity will cause the administrator to indemnify the indenture trustee, collateral agent and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents against any and all loss, liability or expense (including attorneys’ fees, court costs and expenses, including any losses incurred in connection with (i) any action or suit brought by the indenture trustee or collateral agent to enforce any indemnification or other obligation of the issuing entity or administrator and (ii) a successful defense, in whole or in part, of any claim that the indenture trustee or collateral agent breached its standard of care) incurred by it in connection with the acceptance or the administration of the issuing entity and the performance of its duties under the Transaction Documents. Neither the issuing entity nor the administrator will be required to indemnify against any loss, liability or expense incurred by the indenture trustee or collateral agent through the indenture trustee’s or collateral agent’s own willful misconduct, negligence or bad faith. The indenture trustee is obligated to perform only those duties that are specifically assigned to it in the Indenture and the Servicing Agreement. The indenture trustee may conclusively rely on certificates and opinions furnished to it in accordance with the Indenture. The Indenture does not require the indenture trustee to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur financial liability if it has reasonable grounds to believe that repayment of such funds or adequate indemnity against such risk is not reasonably assured to it. The indenture trustee is not liable for any error of judgment made by it in good faith. The indenture trustee will not be liable with respect to any action it takes or omits to take pursuant to directions from the noteholders in accordance with the Indenture. See “Description of the Notes” for more information regarding the indenture trustee’s duties under the Indenture and the collateral agent’s duties under the Servicing Agreement.

Computershare Trust Company will be the indenture trustee and collateral agent initially, but there are certain conditions under which the indenture trustee and collateral agent may be removed or may resign, in which case a successor indenture trustee will be appointed. See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Replacement of Indenture Trustee” for information regarding the indenture trustee’s removal, resignation and replacement.

The Asset Representations Reviewer

Clayton Fixed Income Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or Clayton, will act as the “asset representations reviewer” under the asset representations review agreement. Clayton is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Covius Services, LLC. Clayton and its affiliates have provided independent due diligence loan review and servicer oversight services since 1989. Clayton has been engaged as the asset representations reviewer on more than 650 auto and equipment loan, lease and dealer floorplan and credit card securitization transactions since 2015.

Clayton and its affiliates are leading providers of targeted due diligence reviews of securitized assets and policies and procedures of originators and servicers to assess compliance with representations and warranties, regulatory and legal requirements, investor guidelines and settlement agreements. Clayton and its affiliates have performed over 17 million loan reviews and provided ongoing oversight on over $2 trillion of securitization transactions on behalf of investors, sponsors, issuers and originators, including government sponsored enterprises and other governmental agencies. These services have been performed primarily on residential mortgage loan and residential mortgage-backed security transactions, although Clayton and its affiliates have also performed these services for transactions involving auto loans, equipment loans and leases, credit cards, commercial mortgage loans, student loans, timeshare loans and boat and recreational vehicle loans.

46

The asset representations reviewer is an “eligible asset representations reviewer,” meaning that (i) it is not affiliated with the sponsor, the depositor, the servicer, the indenture trustee, the owner trustee or any of their affiliates, (ii) neither it nor any of its affiliates has been hired by the sponsor or the underwriters to perform pre-closing due diligence work on the Lease Assets and (iii) it is not responsible for reviewing the Lease Assets for compliance with the representations under the Transaction Documents, except in connection with a review under the asset representations review agreement, or for determining whether noncompliance with any representation is a breach of the Transaction Documents.

The asset representations reviewer’s main duties will be:

See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Asset Representations Review Triggers and Procedures—Asset Representations Review Procedures” for a description of the nature of the review to be performed by the asset representations reviewer.

The asset representations reviewer will not be liable for any action, omission or error in judgment unless it is due to willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence by the asset representations reviewer. The asset representations reviewer will not be liable for any errors in any review materials relied on by it to perform a review or for the noncompliance or breach of any representation made about the automobile lease contracts.

The issuing entity will, or will cause the servicer to, indemnify the asset representations reviewer for liabilities and damages resulting from the asset representations reviewer’s performance of its duties under the asset representations review agreement unless caused by the willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence (other than errors in judgment) of the asset representations reviewer or as a result of any breach of representations made by the asset representations reviewer in the asset representations review agreement.

The issuing entity will pay the upfront and annual fees and review fees of the asset representations reviewer and pay any indemnities due to the asset representations reviewer, to the extent those amounts are not paid or reimbursed by the servicer. The issuing entity will pay these amounts to the asset representations reviewer on each payment date, along with similar amounts owed to the indenture trustee, the collateral agent, the successor servicer and the owner trustee under the Transaction Documents (subject, in each case, to the applicable cap on such amounts described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Distributions—Payment Date Payments on the Notes”), before the issuing entity makes any other payments to items with a lower payment priority.

The asset representations reviewer may not resign, unless (i) it ceases to be an eligible asset representations reviewer, (ii) it becomes legally unable to act or (iii) the issuing entity consents to the resignation. The issuing entity may remove the asset representations reviewer if the asset representations reviewer becomes legally unable to act or becomes subject to a bankruptcy and will be required to remove the asset representations reviewer if it no longer is an eligible asset representations reviewer. No resignation or removal of the asset representations reviewer will be effective until a successor asset representations reviewer is in place. Any successor asset representations reviewer must be an eligible asset representations reviewer. Any transition expenses that are owed to a successor asset representations reviewer in connection with its assumption of its duties will be payable in accordance with the priority of payments set forth in “Description of the Transaction Documents—Distributions—Payment Date Payments on the Notes” to the extent they are not paid by the servicer.

47

If the during any collection period the asset representations reviewer resigns or is removed, replaced or substituted, or if a new asset representations reviewer is appointed, the date on which the event occurred and the circumstances surrounding the change will be indicated on the distribution report filed on Form 10-D relating to that collection period. Additionally, if a new asset representations reviewer has been appointed, information regarding that party will also be provided in the Form 10-D.

The Sponsor’s Automobile Leasing Program

General

The sponsor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Motors Financial Company, Inc., which is the wholly-owned captive finance subsidiary of GM and is a global provider of automobile financing solutions. The sponsor has been operating in the automobile finance business in North America since September 1992. The sponsor began a strategic relationship with GM in September 2009 and was acquired by GM in October 2010 in order to provide captive financing capabilities to strategic and underserved segments of GM’s markets. To fulfill this objective, the sponsor added leasing capabilities across North America in 2011 and became the exclusive lease provider to GM in 2015.

As the lender under the Credit and Security Agreement, the sponsor advances funds to the titling trust, its indirect subsidiary, to finance its purchase of Lease Assets from motor vehicle dealerships in the United States in the ordinary course of its business. As of the date of this prospectus, all of the Lease Assets owned by the titling trust are held by it pursuant to the Credit and Security Agreement. In its capacity as servicer, the sponsor services the Lease Assets that are subject to the Credit and Security Agreement pursuant to a Servicing Agreement and will enter into servicing supplements to that Servicing Agreement to set forth the specific terms governing its servicing of each designated pool. The sponsor services the Lease Assets owned by the titling trust at one or more regional centers using automated lease servicing and collection systems. The sponsor funds these lease finance activities in part through “warehouse” credit facilities and securitization transactions.

As GM’s captive finance subsidiary, the sponsor’s business strategy includes increasing the amount of new GM automobile sales by offering competitive financing programs. In addition to the lease financing product for new GM vehicles that is offered exclusively to GM-franchised dealerships in the United States, the sponsor also offers automobile loans to consumers and businesses. The relationships with the GM-franchised dealerships is maintained by the sponsor through its regional credit centers and market representatives (dealer account representatives).

Marketing

As a primarily indirect originator of Lease Assets, the sponsor focuses its marketing activities on GM-franchised automobile dealerships. The sponsor’s relationships with dealerships are actively monitored with the objective of maximizing the volume of lease applications received from each dealer that meet the sponsor’s underwriting standards and profitability objectives. Because the sponsor maintains non-exclusive relationships with dealerships, when a customer seeks to lease a vehicle from a dealer the dealer retains discretion to determine whether to obtain financing for that particular Lease Asset from the sponsor or from another financing source. The sponsor’s representatives regularly contact and visit dealerships to solicit new business and to answer any questions dealerships may have regarding the sponsor’s lease financing programs and capabilities. To increase the effectiveness of these contacts, marketing personnel have access to the sponsor’s management information systems which detail current information regarding the number of lease applications submitted by a dealer, the sponsor’s response and the reasons why any particular lease application was rejected.

Lease Assets purchased by the titling trust are generally purchased without recourse to the related dealer. However, the dealer typically makes certain representations as to the validity of the leases and

48

compliance with certain laws, and indemnifies the sponsor against any claims, defenses and set-offs that may be asserted against the sponsor because of assignment of the lease or the condition of the related leased vehicle. Recourse based upon those representations and indemnities would be limited in circumstances in which the dealer has insufficient financial resources to perform upon such representations and indemnities. The sponsor does not view recourse against the dealer on these representations and indemnities to be of material significance in its decision to have the titling trust purchase Lease Assets from a dealer. Dealerships have no liability to the titling trust or the sponsor for lessee defaults on the leases.

Origination Network

The titling trust uses funds borrowed from the sponsor to purchase Lease Assets, which are comprised of completed leases entered into between lessees and motor vehicle dealerships and the related leased vehicles. When a lessee leases a vehicle from a dealer, the lessee and the dealer agree on the terms of the lease based on available lease programs and the lessee’s purchase of any insurance, and other related products. If the lessee elects to lease the vehicle through the dealer, the lessee and the dealer decide on the lease term and mileage allowance, in conjunction with the sponsor’s residual value and payment terms for the lease. The sponsor then makes credit and purchase decisions regarding each Lease Asset on behalf of the titling trust.

The sponsor’s origination platform provides specialized focus on marketing and financing programs and underwriting leases. Responsibilities are segregated so that the sales group markets the programs and products to GM dealerships, while the underwriting group focuses on underwriting, negotiating and closing lease applications submitted by those dealerships. The sales and underwriting groups are further segregated with separate teams servicing GM-franchised dealerships and non-GM dealerships, where only a loan product is offered, providing GM-franchised dealerships with a broader array of loan, lease and commercial lending products. All underwriters are aligned with credit centers and may work remotely from a home office. Dealer account representatives are aligned with credit centers and work remotely in their service area. The sponsor believes that the personal relationships its credit underwriters and dealer account representatives establish with the dealer’s staff are an important factor in creating and maintaining productive relationships with its dealer customer base.

The sponsor selects markets for credit center locations based upon numerous factors, most notably proximity to the geographic markets and dealerships it seeks to serve and availability of qualified personnel. Credit centers are typically situated in suburban office buildings.

A credit center vice president, regional credit managers, credit managers and credit underwriting specialists staff credit center locations. The credit center vice president reports to a senior vice president in the sponsor’s corporate office. Credit center personnel are compensated with base salaries and incentives based on total company results. The credit center vice presidents, regional credit managers and senior vice presidents monitor credit center compliance with the sponsor’s underwriting guidelines. The sponsor’s management information systems provide these managers with access to credit center information enabling them to consult with credit center teams on credit decisions and assess adherence to the sponsor’s credit policies. The senior vice presidents also make periodic visits to the credit centers to conduct operational reviews.

Dealer account representatives typically work from a home office but are aligned with a credit center. Dealer account representatives solicit dealerships for applications and maintain relationships with the dealerships in their geographic vicinity, but do not have responsibility for credit approvals. The sponsor believes the local presence provided by the dealer account representatives enables it to be more responsive to dealer concerns and local market conditions. Applications solicited by the dealer account representatives are underwritten at the regional credit centers. The dealer account representatives are compensated with base salaries and incentives based on total company results. The dealer account

49

representatives report to regional sales managers who report to sales vice presidents. The sales vice presidents report to a senior vice president in the sponsor’s corporate office.

Manufacturer Relationship

The sponsor coordinates with GM to establish marketing programs for lease products. These programs serve the sponsor’s goal of increasing new loan and lease originations and the manufacturers’ goal of making credit more available and more affordable to consumers purchasing vehicles sold by the manufacturer. Such programs may include subvention programs, under which the manufacturer provides the sponsor cash payments in order for the sponsor to offer lower customer payments on lease agreements and retail loan contracts that it purchases from the manufacturers’ dealership network. Subvention programs may be structured as special-rate financing programs available through the sponsor to customers leasing new GM vehicles or as support payments used to adjust residual components of the lease agreement. Under such subvention programs, the sponsor determines the appropriate amount to charge GM for the vehicles contracted under a specific subvented program; considering the subvented rate, supported residual value and contract term as well as an applicant’s risk profile. The combined subvented support payments are paid by GM directly to the sponsor and do not constitute cashflow that is available to make payments on any notes.

Credit Underwriting

The sponsor utilizes underwriting guidelines to achieve a given business strategy for lease originations. These guidelines are dependent upon risk tolerances which may, and often do, change depending on many different factors including, but not limited to, the sponsor’s strategic objectives; general market demand for lease finance; the sponsor’s access to, and the cost to the sponsor of, financing to support its lease originations; the general economic environment; consumer credit trends; and the volatility in used car pricing. The sponsor reviews profitability metrics on a consolidated basis, by the geographic region, origination channel, and lease levels. The following paragraphs discuss in more detail the sponsor’s proprietary credit scoring system, underwriting guidelines and the underwriting process.

Underwriting leases is a process that may include judgement. The sponsor utilizes a proprietary lease credit scoring system that produces a statistical assessment of each proposed lessee that is used to differentiate among credit applications and to statistically rank-order credit risk in terms of expected default rates. The lease credit scoring system incorporates data contained in the lessee’s credit application, credit bureau report and other third-party data sources, together with information about the proposed lease financing to the lessee. For example, the sponsor might decline to enter into a lease agreement with a consumer who has a relatively lower credit score because that could indicate a higher probability of the lessee defaulting on a lease made to such lessee. However, while the sponsor employs a credit scoring system in the credit approval process, credit scoring does not eliminate the credit risk that individual lessees may nonetheless default on their obligations under their leases. Adverse changes in certain macroeconomic factors after origination could also negatively affect the overall credit performance of the sponsor’s lease portfolio.

In addition to the proprietary credit scoring system described above, the sponsor also utilizes other underwriting guidelines when determining whether to originate a particular lease. These underwriting guidelines are comprised of numerous evaluation criteria which may be used in total or in part, including (i) identification and assessment of the applicant’s willingness and capacity to repay the lease, including consideration of credit history and performance on past and existing obligations; (ii) credit bureau data; (iii) collateral identification and valuation; (iv) payment, loan-to-value and debt ratios; (v) insurance information; (vi) employment, income and residency verifications, as considered appropriate; (vii) alternative data sources, and (viii) in certain cases, the creditworthiness of a co-lessee. These underwriting guidelines, and the minimum credit risk profiles of applicants that can be approved based on the rank-ordering determined by the credit scorecards described above, are subject to change

50

from time to time based on economic, competitive and capital market conditions as well as the sponsor’s overall origination strategies.

The sponsor originates leases through its underwriting specialists in regional credit centers. Underwriting personnel have a specific credit authority based upon their experience and established credit scoring parameters. More experienced specialists are assigned higher approval levels. If the suggested application attributes and characteristics exceed an underwriting specialist’s credit authority, each specialist has the ability to escalate the lease application to a more senior underwriter with a higher level of approval authority. Authorized senior underwriting officers may approve any lease application notwithstanding the underwriting guidelines as part of the overall underwriting process. Although the credit approval process is decentralized, the sponsor’s application processing system includes controls designed to ensure that credit decisions comply with the sponsor’s current credit scoring strategies and underwriting policies and procedures, including approval authorities.

The lease application packages that are completed by prospective lessees as part of the sponsor’s underwriting review process are received by the sponsor electronically, through web-based platforms that automate and accelerate the financing process. Upon receipt or entry of application data into the sponsor’s application processing system, a credit bureau report and other third-party data sources are automatically accessed and the sponsor’s proprietary credit score for the proposed lessee is computed.

Once the final financing terms for a lease are established, the lease application is assigned a final proprietary credit score by the credit scoring system, and a credit decision to approve or reject the lease application is made either through an automated system or by a credit underwriter or personnel with the required level of authority. Dealerships are contacted regarding credit decisions electronically. Declined applicants are also provided with appropriate notification of the decision.

For any Lease Assets that are approved for origination by the sponsor and that are identified for purchase by the titling trust, completed lease packages are sent to the sponsor by the related dealer. Lease documentation is scanned to create electronic images and electronically forwarded to the sponsor’s centralized lease processing department. A lease processing representative verifies certain contract and application information as appropriate. Lease terms, insurance coverage and other information may then be verified or confirmed with the customer or a third party. The originals of certain critical lease documents are subsequently sent to the sponsor and the sponsor contracts with a third party to maintain the original lease documents on the sponsor’s behalf.

Once a lease application has been approved and the origination process has been completed, the sponsor can direct the titling trust to purchase the related Lease Assets. The dealer signs an assignment agreement representing that it made all required disclosures to the lessee and that all such disclosures made by the dealer were complete and correct. For disclosures the sponsor cannot review because the error would not be apparent in the lease itself, it relies on the representations made by the dealer in the assignment agreement. The assignment agreement requires the dealer to apply immediately for a certificate of title for the leased vehicle naming the titling trust as the owner of the leased vehicle and naming the collateral agent as secured party. The sponsor reviews each certificate of title that it subsequently receives to confirm that the titling trust is identified as the leased vehicle’s owner and that the collateral agent’s security interest in the leased vehicle is properly noted.

Following the purchase of the leases by the titling trust, the sponsor’s credit review department analyzes a sample of leases to determine whether underwriting personnel exercised appropriate judgment consistent with the sponsor’s underwriting guidelines, authorization levels and overall corporate strategy.

The sponsor uses programs developed and maintained by service providers that allow the sponsor to complete the entire contracting process electronically. Approximately 60.25% of the automobile leases (based on the Lease Assets’ Aggregate Securitization Value as of the cutoff date) were originated as electronic automobile leases. Leases that are created electronically are electronically signed by the related

51

lessees and are stored in an electronic vault that is maintained by a third-party to facilitate the process of creating and storing those electronic leases. The third-party system uses a combination of technological and administrative features that are designed to: (i) designate a single copy of the record or records comprising an electronic lease as being the single authoritative copy of the lease; (ii) manage access to and the expression of the authoritative copy; (iii) identify the sponsor as the owner of record of the authoritative copy; and (iv) provide a means for transferring record ownership of, and the exclusive right of access to, the authoritative copy from the current owner of record to a successor owner of record. The sponsor typically does not maintain physical copies of any electronic leases.

Servicing of Lease Assets

The sponsor is responsible for servicing all of the Lease Assets owned by the titling trust, including the Lease Assets that are assigned to the designated pool. The sponsor’s servicing activities include collecting and processing lessee payments; responding to lessee inquiries; initiating contact with lessees who are delinquent in payment; arranging for the repossession of leased vehicles, liquidation of leased vehicles; pursuit of deficiencies when appropriate; and management of the end of lease process. As servicer, the sponsor will also prepare monthly investor reports, provide payment instructions to the indenture trustee and prepare annual compliance reports. GM Financial services under the “GM Financial” brand and may service under other GM and GM Financial affiliate brand names.

From late December 2017 into early January 2018, the sponsor completed a servicing system upgrade and conversion for its retail automobile loan contract and automobile lease portfolios. This conversion included transitioning from a system that utilized a variety of internal and third-party platforms to a system that utilizes a single platform. The transition required a scheduled, multiday system downtime, during which there was no customer contact because the servicing system was not accessible. Although the conversion of active accounts was completed successfully, full system functionality was delayed for several months following the conversion. Due to this reduced functionality, the monthly securitization data for the securitization trusts set forth in Annex A to this prospectus reflect anomalies in credit performance metrics.

At the time of the origination of any lease, each leased vehicle is required to be covered by a comprehensive and collision insurance policy in accordance with the sponsor’s customary servicing procedures. Approximately twenty (20) days before a lessee’s monthly payment due date, the sponsor mails the lessee a billing statement directing the lessee to mail payments to a lockbox provider. Payment receipt data is electronically transferred from the lockbox provider for posting to the sponsor’s accounting system. Payments may also be received from lessees via electronic transmission of funds. Lessees participating in reward or loyalty programs sponsored by the sponsor or any of its affiliates may use points accrued under the program to offset a limited amount of their monthly payment, in which case the sponsor shall remit the offset amount out of its own funds to the servicer.

Collections

The sponsor services the lease portfolio through its operation centers in Arlington, Texas and San Antonio, Texas. A predictive dialing system is utilized to make telephone calls to lessees in the early stages of delinquency. The predictive dialer is a computer-controlled telephone dialing system that simultaneously dials phone numbers of multiple lessees from a file of records extracted from the sponsor’s database. Once a connection is made to the automated dialer’s call, the system automatically transfers the call to a collector and the relevant account information to the collector’s computer screen. By eliminating the time spent on attempting to reach lessees, the system gives a single collector the ability to contact a larger number of lessees daily.

Once an account reaches a certain level of delinquency, the account moves to one of the sponsor’s advanced collection units. The objective of these collectors is to resolve the delinquent account. The sponsor may repossess a leased vehicle if an account is deemed uncollectible; the leased vehicle is

52

deemed to be in danger of being damaged, destroyed or hidden; the sponsor determines that the lessee is dealing in bad faith; or the lessee voluntarily surrenders the leased vehicle to the sponsor.

Repossessions

Repossessions are subject to prescribed legal procedures, which include peaceful repossession, one or more lessee notifications, a prescribed waiting period prior to disposition of the repossessed leased vehicle and return of personal items to the lessee. Some jurisdictions provide the lessee with reinstatement or redemption rights. Legal requirements, particularly in the event of bankruptcy of the lessee, may restrict the sponsor’s ability to repossess a vehicle or dispose of the repossessed leased vehicle. All repossessions must be approved by the designated level of authority. The sponsor engages independent repossession firms to handle repossessions. Upon repossession and after any prescribed waiting period, the repossessed leased vehicle is sold at auction. The proceeds from the sale of the leased vehicle at auction, and any other recoveries, are credited against the remaining balance outstanding under the related lease. Auction proceeds from sale of the repossessed vehicle and other recoveries may not be sufficient to cover the remaining balance outstanding under the related lease, and the resulting deficiency is written-off. The sponsor pursues collection of deficiencies when it deems such action to be appropriate.

The sponsor’s policy is to charge off an account in the month in which the account becomes one-hundred twenty (120) days contractually delinquent if it has not repossessed the related leased vehicle. The sponsor also charges off accounts in repossession when the leased vehicle is repossessed and legally available for disposition. A charge-off represents the difference between the estimated net sales proceeds and the amount of the delinquent lease, including rental income. Accounts in repossession that have been written-off are removed from lease receivables on the sponsor’s consolidated balance sheet and the related repossessed leased vehicles are included in other assets at net realizable value on the consolidated balance sheet pending disposal. The value of the collateral underlying the sponsor’s lease portfolio is updated periodically with an asset-by-asset link to a third-party residual analytics company. This data, along with the sponsor’s own experience relative to mileage and vehicle condition, are used for evaluating collateral disposition activities.

Leased Vehicle Residual Values and Return Rates

The sponsor projects expected residual values and return volumes of the leased vehicles the titling trust owns. Actual proceeds realized upon the sale of returned leased vehicles at lease termination may be lower than the amount projected, which reduces the profitability of the lease transaction to the sponsor. Economic and market conditions can affect the value of the returned leased vehicles. Such factors include general economic environment, degree of new and used vehicle demand, and vehicle specific factors such as the perceived quality, safety or reliability of returned vehicles. All of these, alone or in combination, have the potential to adversely affect the profitability of the sponsor’s lease program and financial results.

Valuation of Automobile Lease Assets and Residuals

The titling trust is consolidated with the sponsor for accounting purposes and the sponsor accounts for the titling trust’s investments in Lease Assets as operating leases. In accounting for operating leases, the sponsor must make a determination at the beginning of the lease agreement of the estimated realizable value (i.e., residual value) of the leased vehicle at the end of the lease. Due to the manufacturer’s ability to support residual values, the customer’s Contract Residual Value (as defined in the Glossary), which is the residual value that is set forth in the lease agreement, may not represent the sponsor’s estimate of the market value of the leased vehicle at the end of the lease term. The sponsor predominantly uses the residual value forecasts published in independent industry guides that are used in the automotive finance industry, such as Automotive Lease Guide, or ALG, as the basis for the Contract Residual Value. The lessee is obligated to make payments during the term of the lease for the difference between the purchase price of the leased vehicle and the related Contract Residual Value, plus an implied

53

APR or money factor. However, since the lessee is not obligated to purchase the leased vehicle at the end of the lease term, the sponsor is exposed to a risk of loss to the extent the value of the leased vehicle at the end of the lease term is below the residual value set at the related lease’s inception. The sponsor will periodically perform a detailed review of the estimated realizable value of leased vehicles to assess the appropriateness of the carrying value of Lease Assets for its own accounting purposes, but no such adjustment to the carrying value will impact the treatment of, Securitization Value (as defined in the Glossary) of, or recoveries with respect to any Lease Assets assigned to a designated pool.

To account for residual risk, the sponsor depreciates automobile operating Lease Assets to their estimated realizable value on a straight-line basis over the related lease term. The estimated realizable value of a Lease Asset is initially based on the Contract Residual Value established at the lease’s inception. Over the life of the lease, the sponsor evaluates the adequacy of the estimate of the realizable value and may make adjustments to the extent the expected value of the leased vehicle at termination changes. Any such adjustments would result in a change in the depreciation rate of the Lease Asset for the sponsor’s accounting purposes but would not impact the treatment of, Securitization Value of or recoveries with respect to any Lease Assets assigned to a designated pool.

End of Lease Process

Approximately six (6) to twelve (12) months prior to a lease’s scheduled end date, GM Financial will notify the lessee of the current scheduled lease end date, the lessee’s options, obligations at lease end and the vehicle inspection process. At four (4) months prior to the scheduled lease end date, the sponsor will again notify the lessee of the current scheduled lease end date and summarize the end-of-term process. The dealer through which the lessee obtained the lease and/or the sponsor may also contact the lessee near the current scheduled lease end date to determine whether at the end of the lease the lessee intends to purchase the leased vehicle or to return the leased vehicle.

Because all of the leases are closed end leases, the titling trust, not the lessee, assumes the residual risk on the leased vehicle. The lessee may purchase the leased vehicle at lease end by paying the purchase price stated in the lease agreement, which equals the Contract Residual Value determined at origination of the lease, plus any fees and all other amounts owed under the lease. If the lessee decides not to purchase the leased vehicle, the lessee must return it to the dealer by the lease’s current scheduled lease end date. The servicer may agree to grant term extensions up to the number of months permitted by the servicer’s then-current servicing standards (which the servicer does not expect to exceed 12 months), in which case the Maturity Date (as defined in the Glossary) on their lease agreement is extended, and the lessee is responsible for additional Monthly Payments (as defined in the Glossary) until the leased vehicle is returned or purchased.

If the lessee plans to return the leased vehicle, the vehicle is inspected to determine its current condition. An inspection may occur up to one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to the current scheduled lease end date, but most commonly occurs forty-five (45) days before that date. The inspection is conducted by a third-party inspection company engaged by the sponsor. After the inspection is complete, the lessee is typically provided the results of the vehicle inspection and the amount the lessee would owe, in lieu of repairs, for excess wear and use on the leased vehicle. If the vehicle inspection is not completed before the vehicle is returned, the vehicle will be inspected shortly after it is returned. The sponsor utilizes its proprietary online grounding tool to expedite the lease turn-in process.

The sponsor seeks to maximize net sale proceeds, which equal gross auction proceeds less expenses such as auction fees and costs for reconditioning and transporting the leased vehicles. The sponsor sells returned leased vehicles through its exclusive online channel, which is available to the grounding dealer and other GM dealerships prior to broader dealer access and if necessary by disposition through the sponsor’s nationwide wholesale auction partners.

54

When a vehicle is sold after being returned at the end of the lease, there will be a residual gain on the vehicle if the net sale proceeds of the vehicle are greater than the vehicle’s estimated residual value as determined in accordance with the then-current Automotive Lease Guide upon origination of the related lease agreement. Conversely, there will be a residual loss on the vehicle if the net sale proceeds of the vehicle are less than the vehicle’s estimated residual value as determined in accordance with the then-current Automotive Lease Guide upon origination of the related lease agreement.

Early Termination

A lessee may terminate a lease prior to the original scheduled Maturity Date. For early terminations, the lessee must pay the lesser of (i) all remaining Monthly Payments due under the lease or (ii) the amount by which all remaining Monthly Payments due under the lease plus the Contract Residual Value under the lease exceeds the net sale proceeds received when the leased vehicle is sold. In either case, the lessee will also be obligated to pay any charges for excess mileage, excess wear and use, any early termination charges permitted under the lease and, in certain cases, a disposition fee. A lessee may also terminate a lease and purchase the related leased vehicle at any time by paying all remaining Monthly Payments due under the lease and the Contract Residual Value.

Risk Management

The sponsor’s credit risk management function is responsible for monitoring the lease approval process and supporting the supervisory role of senior operations management. Key variables, such as lease applicant data, credit bureau and credit score information, lease structures and terms and payment histories are tracked. The data science department regularly reviews the performance of the sponsor’s credit scoring system and is responsible for the development and enhancement of the sponsor’s credit scorecards.

The sponsor’s underwriting guidelines and credit decisioning models are regularly modified, updated and enhanced. Post-funding credit performance is also monitored and analyzed by the sponsor’s credit risk management department to determine if any process changes are required depending on the sponsor’s strategic objectives and/or economic conditions. Additionally, key variables such as lease applicant data, credit bureau and credit score information, lease structures and terms and payment histories are tracked by the sponsor. The sponsor’s credit risk management department regularly monitors the credit scorecards that it utilizes to evaluate lessee applications by tracking actual performance versus projected performance by credit score. The sponsor periodically revises and refines its proprietary scorecards based on new information, including identified correlations between portfolio performance and data obtained in the underwriting process. Credit performance reports track lease portfolio performance at various levels of detail including total company, credit center and dealership. Various monthly reports and analytical data are also generated to monitor credit quality as well as to refine the structure and mix of new lease originations. All of this ongoing analysis is regularly reviewed and analyzed by the sponsor to aid it in adjusting and improving its lease origination processes and decisioning.

The sponsor’s centralized credit review departments conduct regular targeted reviews of, and provide recurring reporting and monitoring of, new originations, including lease originations. The primary objectives of the reviews are to identify risks and associated controls, to measure compliance with the sponsor’s written policies and procedures and to examine the credit decisions that are generated during the originations process.

The Sponsor’s General Securitization Experience

Under the AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, or AMCAR, program, which primarily includes sub-prime automobile loan contracts, the sponsor has previously sponsored over 100 publicly offered securitizations since 1994. The sponsor also completed three publicly offered transactions under

55

the AmeriCredit Prime Automobile Receivables Trust, or APART, program between 2007 and 2009, which primarily included prime and near-prime automobile loan contracts. In 2015 the sponsor began to sponsor securitizations backed by dealer floorplan receivables under its GMF Floorplan Owner Revolving Trust, or GFORT, program; and in 2018, the sponsor began to sponsor publicly offered securitizations backed by prime automobile loan contracts under its GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust, or GMCAR, program.

The Sponsor’s Lease Securitization Program

Under the GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust, or GMALT, program, which primarily includes prime Lease Assets, the sponsor has previously sponsored 30 securitizations since the beginning of 2014.

Each of the sponsor’s previous lease securitizations had a similar legal structure to the current transaction. In each of those securitizations, the titling trust purchased Lease Assets from automobile dealers. The titling trust issued an exchange note backed by a designated pool of Lease Assets to the sponsor and the sponsor sold the exchange note to the depositor. The depositor then sold the exchange note to a newly-created owner trust that issued asset-backed securities that were backed by the related exchange note. The sponsor served and, with respect to the outstanding transactions, continues to serve as servicer on each transaction.

The Sponsor’s Static Pool Information

The characteristics of the Lease Assets described in Annex A may vary from the characteristics of the Lease Assets included in the designated pool. For additional details regarding the designated pool, please refer to “The Designated Pool—Composition of the Designated Pool.” These differences may make it unlikely that the designated pool described in this prospectus will perform in the same way that any Lease Assets described in Annex A have performed.

Static pool information for the designated pools of Lease Assets previously securitized by the sponsor in connection with publicly offered transactions is contained in Annex A. The static pool information in Annex A consists of prepayment, delinquency, termination and loss data and summary information about the original characteristics of the designated pool of Lease Assets previously securitized by the sponsor. There can be no assurance that the performance of designated pools in prior periods as described in Annex A will correspond to or be an accurate predictor of the performance of the Lease Assets included in the designated pool.

Trust Property

The issuing entity’s assets will principally include:

Under the Indenture, the issuing entity will grant a security interest in the trust property to the indenture trustee for the benefit of the noteholders. Any proceeds of the trust property will be distributed according to the Indenture.

56

The Designated Pool

Criteria for Selecting the Lease Assets in the Designated Pool

The Lease Assets in the designated pool were selected by the sponsor from the Lease Assets owned by the titling trust that meet the following selection criteria, as of the cutoff date:

The sponsor’s portfolio of leases changes over time as a result of changes in the sponsor’s underwriting guidelines for lease agreements and marketing programs sponsored by the sponsor.

Composition of the Designated Pool

The information relating to the designated pool presented in this prospectus shows the characteristics of the designated pool as of the cutoff date, which is the close of business on April 2, 2024. As of the cutoff date, the Lease Assets had an Aggregate Securitization Value (as defined in the Glossary) of $1,521,812,439.44.

The composition of the designated pool and distribution of the designated pool by credit bureau score at origination, original term, scheduled lease end date, vehicle type, vehicle make, vehicle model and geographic location are detailed in the following tables:

57

Composition of the Designated Pool

as of the Cutoff Date⁽¹⁾

58

Distribution of the Leases in the Designated Pool by Credit Bureau Score

as of the Cutoff Date⁽¹⁾

Distribution of the Leases in the Designated Pool by Original Term

as of the Cutoff Date⁽¹⁾

59

Distribution of the Leases in the Designated Pool by Scheduled Lease End Date

as of the Cutoff Date⁽¹⁾

Distribution of the Leases in the Designated Pool by Vehicle Type

as of the Cutoff Date⁽¹⁾

60

Distribution of the Leases in the Designated Pool by Vehicle Make

as of the Cutoff Date⁽¹⁾

Distribution of the Leases in the Designated Pool by Vehicle Model

as of the Cutoff Date^(1)*

*See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Characteristics and Performance of the Leases in the Designated Pool and the Related Leased Vehicles—Concentration of leased vehicles to particular vehicle models may increase concentration risks” for more information about the possible effect of the concentration of leased vehicles in Silverado, Equinox, Sierra, Blazer and Traverse vehicle models.

61

Distribution of the Leases in the Designated Pool by Geographic Location

as of the Cutoff Date^(1)*

*See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Characteristics and Performance of the Leases in the Designated Pool and the Related Leased Vehicles—Geographic concentrations of lease assets may increase concentration risks” for more information about the possible effect of geographic concentrations of leases in Michigan, New York, Florida, Ohio, Texas, New Jersey and California.

Distribution of the Leases in the Designated Pool by Powertrain

as of the Cutoff Date⁽¹⁾

62

Representations about the Designated Pool and Obligation to Redesignate Ineligible Lease Assets Upon Breach

The sponsor, in its capacity as servicer, will make representations about the Lease Assets in the designated pool on which the depositor and the issuing entity will rely in acquiring the exchange note. Generally, these representations relate to legal standards for origination of the Lease Assets and the terms of the leases. The sponsor will also represent that the Lease Assets in the designated pool satisfy the selection criteria, including those described under “The Designated Pool—Criteria for Selecting the Lease Assets in the Designated Pool.”

In addition, the sponsor will represent that: