Item 8.01 | Other Information. |
On January 18, 2023, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) filed a preliminary prospectus supplement with the Securities and Exchange Commission under its effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-266523) (the “Preliminary Prospectus Supplement”) in connection with a proposed registered underwritten public offering of common stock.
The Preliminary Prospectus Supplement contains information relating to recent developments concerning the Company’s business and includes the following disclosure:
Recent Developments
Preliminary Unaudited Financial Update
On January 3, 2023, the Company disclosed that it had a preliminary unaudited amount of total revenue of approximately $36 million for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2022 and approximately $134 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. QINLOCK® (ripretinib) net product revenue is estimated to be approximately $33 million, including approximately $26 million in U.S. QINLOCK net product revenue and approximately $7 million in international QINLOCK net product revenue, in addition to approximately $3 million in collaboration revenue, for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2022. The Company’s U.S. QINLOCK net product revenue increased an estimated 20% over 2022. Approximately half of that growth was due to increased demand volume with the remainder from net price growth and a lower percentage of patients receiving free drug under the Company’s patient assistance program. The increased demand observed in 2022 was driven principally by an increasing average duration of therapy.
The Company also disclosed that it had a preliminary unaudited amount of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of approximately $339 million as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had 67,637,351 and 8,855,963 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants outstanding, respectively. These amounts are preliminary and are subject to completion of financial closing procedures. As a result, these amounts may differ materially from the amounts that will be reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022.
The preliminary financial data included in this Current Report on Form 8-K has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, the Company’s management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has not audited, reviewed, examined, compiled, nor applied agreed-upon procedures with respect to the preliminary financial data. Accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto.
Exploratory Efficacy Analysis using ctDNA in INTRIGUE Study
Background
On January 3, 2023, the Company announced findings of an exploratory analysis using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from its INTRIGUE Phase 3 clinical study of QINLOCK. The INTRIGUE Phase 3 clinical study is a randomized, global, multicenter, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QINLOCK compared to sunitinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) previously treated with imatinib. As previously reported, the INTRIGUE study did not achieve the primary efficacy endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by independent radiologic review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) 1.1 criteria. The statistical analysis plan included a hierarchical testing sequence that included testing patients with a KIT exon 11 primary mutation and then in the all patient intent-to-treat (AP) population. In patients with a KIT exon 11 primary mutation (n=327), QINLOCK demonstrated a mPFS of 8.3 months compared to 7.0 months for the sunitinib arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, p=0.360). Although not formally tested due to the rules of the hierarchical testing sequence, in the AP population QINLOCK demonstrated a mPFS of 8.0 months compared to 8.3 months for the sunitinib arm (HR 1.05, nominal p=0.715). QINLOCK was generally well tolerated. Fewer patients in the QINLOCK arm experienced Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events compared to sunitinib (41.3% vs 65.6%).