Verra Mobility (VRRM) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Amendment No.)

Check the appropriate box:

VERRA MOBILITY CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Verra Mobility Corporation

1150 North Alma School Road

Mesa, Arizona 85201

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held On May 25, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time

Dear Stockholder:

On behalf of the board of directors (our “Board”) of Verra Mobility Corporation, it is our pleasure to invite you to attend the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) on Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time.  The Annual Meeting will be a completely “virtual” meeting, held for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

These items of business are more fully described in the proxy materials accompanying this notice.  You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting as well as vote and submit your questions during the live webcast of the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VRRM2021 and entering the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), on your proxy card or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

The record date for the annual meeting is March 29, 2021 (the “Record Date”).  Only holders of our Class A Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date may vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

On or about April 12, 2021, we expect to mail our stockholders the Notice, which contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement and annual report.  The Notice also provides instructions on how to vote via the internet or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials by mail.

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting.  Your vote is important.  Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy by following the voting procedures described in the proxy card.  Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote during the Annual Meeting if you attend via the internet.  Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other agent and you wish to vote during the Annual Meeting, you must follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent.  We look forward to your participation.

By order of the Board,

/s/ Jacob Kotzubei

Jacob Kotzubei

Chairman of the Board

Mesa, Arizona

April 12, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Questions and Answers

About these Proxy Materials, Voting and the Annual Meeting

The information provided below is for your convenience only and is merely a summary of the information contained in this proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”).  You should read this entire Proxy Statement carefully before casting your vote.  Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement, and references to our website addressed in this Proxy Statement are inactive textual references only.  The use of the terms “Verra Mobility,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company,” in this Proxy Statement refers to Verra Mobility Corporation and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries.

Why am I receiving these materials?

Our board of directors (our “Board”) has made these materials available to you on the internet, or, upon your request, has delivered printed proxy materials to you, in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at Verra Mobility Corporation’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”).  The Annual Meeting will take place on May 25, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time and will be a completely “virtual” meeting of stockholders.  You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting if you are a holder of our Class A common stock (our “Class A Common Stock”) as of the close of business on March 29, 2021, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting.  If you are a holder of our Class A Common Stock as of the Record Date, you are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

What is a proxy?

A proxy means that you authorize persons selected by us to vote your shares of Class A Common Stock at the Annual Meeting in the way that you instruct.  All shares represented by valid proxies that are received and not revoked before the Annual Meeting will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the stockholders’ specific voting instructions.

What is the notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the internet?

We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet.  Accordingly, on or about April 12, 2021, we expect to send a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to all stockholders of record as of the Record Date entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.  The Notice will provide instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and annual report, along with how to vote via the internet or by telephone.  Instructions on how to request a printed copy of the proxy materials will also be provided in the Notice.  We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the internet to help minimize our costs associated with printing and distributing our proxy materials and lessen the environmental impact of our annual meetings of stockholders.

What information is contained in this Proxy Statement?

This Proxy Statement includes information about the nominees for directors and other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.  It also explains the voting process and requirements; describes the compensation of our directors and most highly compensated executive officers; and provides certain other information required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

What should I do with these materials?

Please carefully read and consider the information contained in this Proxy Statement and then vote your shares as soon as possible to ensure that your shares will be represented at the Annual Meeting.  You may vote your shares before the Annual Meeting, even if you plan to attend and participate.

How do I attend and participate in the Annual Meeting?

All stockholders as of the Record Date may attend the Annual Meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VRRM2021.  In order to vote or submit a question during the Annual Meeting, you will need to enter the control number included in the Notice and follow the instructions posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VRRM2021.  If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, your control number will be provided with your proxy card or the instructions that accompany your proxy materials.  

4

Broadridge Financial Solutions is hosting our virtual Annual Meeting.  If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting login page.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only holders of our Class A Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.  As of March 29, 2021, there were 162,360,367 shares of our Class A Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If, on the Record Date, your shares of Class A Common Stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, then you are a stockholder of record.  As a stockholder of record, you may vote online during the meeting or vote by proxy.  Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted.

Beneficial Owner:  Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank

If, on the Record Date, your shares of Class A Common Stock are held, not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and the Notice will be forwarded to you by that organization.  The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting.  As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account.  You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting.  Since you are not the stockholder of record, you may vote your shares online during the Annual Meeting only by following the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent.

What matters am I voting on?

There are three matters scheduled for a vote.  The following table sets forth a description of each of the proposals you are being asked to vote on, how you may vote on each proposal and how our Board recommends that you vote on each proposal.

What if another matter is properly brought before the Annual Meeting?

Our Board knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.  If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.

5

How do I vote?

The procedures for voting are as follows:

Stockholder of Record:  Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote electronically during the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy through the internet, over the telephone, or using a proxy card that you may request.  Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted.  Even if you have submitted a proxy before the Annual Meeting, you may still attend and vote during the Annual Meeting.  In such case, your previously submitted proxy will be disregarded.

If we receive your vote by internet or phone or your signed proxy card prior to 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time the day before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.

To vote, you will need the control number, which will be included in the Notice or on your proxy card if you are a stockholder of record of Class A Common Stock as of the Record Date, or included with your voting instructions received from your broker, bank or other agent if you hold your shares of Class A Common Stock in “street name.”

Beneficial Owner:  Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a Notice containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from us.  Simply follow the voting instructions in the Notice to ensure that your vote is counted.  To vote online during the Annual Meeting, you must follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent.

Internet proxy voting is provided to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions.  Please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your internet access.

Can I change my vote?

Yes.  Subject to the voting deadlines above, if you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the close of voting using one of the following methods:

6

If your shares are held by your broker or bank as a nominee or agent, you should follow the instructions provided by such party.

What happens if I do not vote?

Stockholder of Record:  Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record and do not vote during the Annual Meeting, or through the internet, by telephone or by completing your proxy card before the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted.

Beneficial Owner:  Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank

Broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker for a beneficial owner are not voted either because (i) the broker did not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner or (ii) the broker lacked discretionary authority to vote the shares.  Abstentions represent a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal, and occur when shares present at the meeting are marked “ABSTAIN.” Broker non-votes and abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but have no effect on the outcome of matters voted.

A broker has discretionary authority to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on “routine” matters without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares.  On the other hand, absent instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, a broker is not entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on “non-routine” matters.

Proposals 1 and 2 (the election of two Class III directors and the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement) are non-routine matters, so your broker or nominee may not vote your shares on Proposals 1 and 2 without your instructions.  Proposal 3 (the ratification of the appointment of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021) is a routine matter, so your broker or nominee may vote your shares on Proposal 3 even in the absence of your instruction.

Please instruct your bank, broker or other agent to ensure that your vote will be counted.

What if I return a proxy card or otherwise vote but do not make specific choices?

If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote but do not make specific choices, your shares will be voted FOR the election of the each of the nominees for Class III director, FOR the advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation, and FOR the ratification of the selection of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm.  If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his or her best judgment.

How many votes do I have?

Each stockholder will have the right to one vote per share of Class A Common Stock held as of the Record Date.

7

How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?

The following table sets forth the voting requirements with respect to each of the proposals:

How are votes counted?

You may either vote FOR each nominee to serve as a Class III director on our Board, or you may WITHHOLD your vote for the nominee to serve as a Class III director.  Regarding the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement, you may vote FOR or AGAINST or you may ABSTAIN from voting.  For the ratification of the selection of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm, you may vote FOR or AGAINST or you may ABSTAIN from voting.  Abstentions, withheld votes, and broker non-votes are not treated as votes cast either for or against a matter, and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote.

8

Who counts the votes?

We have engaged Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) as our independent agent to tabulate stockholder votes.  If you are a stockholder as of the Record Date, and you choose to vote over the internet or by telephone, Broadridge will access and tabulate your vote electronically, and if you choose to sign and mail your proxy card, your executed proxy card will be returned directly to Broadridge for tabulation.  As noted above, if you hold your shares through a broker, your broker (or its agent for tabulating votes of shares held in “street name,” as applicable) will return one proxy card to Broadridge on behalf of all its clients.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the cost of soliciting proxies.  In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication.  Directors and employees will not be paid additional compensation for soliciting proxies.  We may reimburse brokers, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

When are stockholder proposals due for next year’s annual meeting?

Requirements for stockholder proposals to be brought before the 2022 annual meeting.

Our bylaws provide that, for stockholder director nominations or other proposals to be considered at an annual meeting, a stockholder must give timely notice thereof in writing to our Secretary at Verra Mobility Corporation, 1150 North Alma School Road, Mesa, Arizona 85201.  To be timely for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by our Secretary at our principal executive offices between January 25, 2022 and February 24, 2022; provided that if the date of the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders is earlier than April 10, 2022 or later than July 9, 2022, a stockholder must give the required notice not earlier than the 120th day prior to the meeting date and not later than the 90th day prior to the meeting date or, if later, the 10th day following the day on which public disclosure of that meeting date is first made.  A stockholder’s notice to our Secretary must also set forth the information required by our bylaws.

Requirements for stockholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials.

Stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and intended to be presented at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, must be received by us not later than December 13, 2021 in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for that meeting.

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting.  A quorum will be present if stockholders holding at least a majority of the aggregate voting power of the shares of Class A Common Stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are present at the meeting or represented by proxy.  Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you attend the Annual Meeting.  Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement.  If there is no quorum, the chairperson of the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date.

How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

The Notice will provide you with instructions regarding how to:

Our proxy materials are also available on the internet at www.proxyvote.com and on our investor relations website at https://ir.verramobility.com (information at or connected to our website is not and should not be considered part of this Proxy Statement).  Choosing to receive future proxy materials by email will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will lessen the impact of our annual meetings on the environment.  If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email message next year with instructions containing a

9

link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting website.  Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

We expect that preliminary voting results will be announced during the Annual Meeting.  In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts.  Please follow the instructions on each Notice to ensure that all your shares are voted.

What does it mean if multiple members of my household are stockholders but we only received one Notice or full set of proxy materials in the mail?

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries, such as brokers, to satisfy the delivery requirements for notices and proxy materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Notice or set of proxy materials addressed to those stockholders.  In accordance with a prior notice sent to certain brokers, banks, dealers or other agents, we are sending only one Notice or full set of proxy materials to those addresses with multiple stockholders unless we received contrary instructions from any stockholder at that address.  This practice, known as “householding,” allows us to satisfy the requirements for delivering notices or proxy materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single copy of these documents.  “Householding” helps to reduce our printing and postage costs, reduces the amount of mail you receive and helps to preserve the environment.  If you currently receive multiple copies of the Notice or proxy materials at your address and would like to request “householding” of your communications, or you would like to revoke your consent to future “householding” mailings, please contact your broker, bank or other agent or contact us at the following address:

Verra Mobility Corporation

Attn:  Investor Relations

1150 North Alma School Road

Mesa, Arizona 85201

(480) 443-7000

Other Information

We were originally incorporated in Delaware on August 15, 2016 as Gores Holdings II, Inc.  (“Gores”), as a special purpose acquisition company, formed to effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, or other similar business combination with one or more target businesses.  On January 19, 2017, Gores consummated its initial public offering, following which its shares began trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”).

On October 17, 2018, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 21, 2018 as amended on August 23, 2018 by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”) by and among Gores, AM Merger Sub I, Inc., a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Gores (the “First Merger Sub”), AM Merger Sub II, LLC, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Gores (the “Second Merger Sub”), Greenlight Holding II Corporation (“Greenlight”), and PE Greenlight Holdings, LLC (the “Platinum Stockholder”), the First Merger Sub merged with Greenlight as the surviving entity. Immediately following, and as part of the same overall transaction the Second Merger Sub merged with Greenlight, with the Second Merger Sub as the surviving entity.  “Business Combination” refers to these mergers, together with the other related transactions.

At the closing of the Business Combination, Gores changed its name to “Verra Mobility Corporation” and the Second Merger Sub changed its name to “Verra Mobility Holdings, LLC.” As a result of the Business Combination, we became the owner, directly or indirectly, of all of the equity interests of Verra Mobility Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries, including ATS Consolidated, Inc.  (“ATS”, now known as VM Consolidated, Inc.).  At the closing of the

10

Business Combination, we additionally changed our trading symbols from “GSHT,” and “GSHTW,” to “VRRM” and “VRRMW.” Currently, our Class A Common Stock is listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “VRRM”, and our Public Warrants (as defined below) trade on the over-the-counter market by the OTC Markets Group Inc.  (“OTC Markets”) under the symbol VRRMW.

As partial consideration for the Business Combination and pursuant to certain related transactions, the former majority securities holder of Greenlight Holding II Corporation, the Platinum Stockholder, and its affiliates including Platinum Equity, LLC (together with the Platinum Stockholder and its sponsored funds and other affiliated private equity vehicles “Platinum Equity”), received newly issued shares of Class A Common Stock constituting approximately 34% of our issued and outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock.

In connection to the Business Combination, we additionally entered into an investor rights agreement with the Platinum Stockholder (the “Investor Rights Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, subject to certain ownership thresholds, the Platinum Stockholder has the right to nominate up to three directors to our Board and, so long as one of the Platinum Stockholder’s nominees is elected as a director, one such nominee shall serve as the Chairman of the Board.  Jacob Kotzubei is a Platinum Stockholder nominee and currently serves as the Chairman of our Board.

11

Board of Directors and Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance

We believe that good corporate governance helps ensure that Verra Mobility is managed for the long-term benefit of its stockholders.  We have adopted corporate governance guidelines (our “Corporate Governance Guidelines”), which provide a foundation for Verra Mobility’s governance as a whole and describe the principles and practices that our Board follows in carrying out its responsibilities.  Our Corporate Governance Guidelines address, among other things:

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines will be reviewed by our nominating and corporate governance committee from time to time to ensure that they effectively promote the best interests of both Verra Mobility and our stockholders and that they comply with applicable laws, regulations and Nasdaq requirements.

Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

We have adopted a code of business ethics and conduct (our “Code of Ethics”) applicable to all of our directors, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) and employees.  Our Code of Ethics is available on our investor relations website (http://ir.verramobility.com/corporate-governance/governance-highlights) in the “Governance Highlights” section.  In the event that we amend or waive certain provisions of our Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer that require disclosure under applicable SEC rules, we will disclose the same on our website.

Director Independence

Our Class A Common Stock is listed on Nasdaq.  Under the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq, a majority of our Board must be comprised of independent directors.  In addition, the rules of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent.  Under Nasdaq rules, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.  Compensation committee members must not have a relationship with the company that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member.  Additionally, audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.  To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors or any other board committee accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries or be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

Our Board has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director.  Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our Board has determined that other than Jacob Kotzubei, Bryan Kelln and David Roberts, none of our directors has any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that such directors

12

are “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq.  Jacob Kotzubei and Bryan Kelln are not independent because of their affiliation with Platinum Equity and the Platinum Stockholder.  David Roberts is not independent given his position as our President and Chief Executive Officer.  Accordingly, a majority of our directors are independent, as required under applicable Nasdaq listing rules.  In making this determination, our Board broadly considered all relevant facts and circumstances, including information provided by the directors and by us with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management.  There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers.

Board of Directors Leadership

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we currently separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board.  These positions are currently held by David Roberts, as our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jacob Kotzubei, as Chairman of our Board.  We believe this leadership structure is appropriate for our Company due to the differences between the two roles.  Our President and Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting our strategic direction, providing day-to-day leadership and managing our business, while the Chairman provides guidance to our President and Chief Executive Officer, chairs meetings of our Board, sets the agendas for meetings of our Board and provides information to the members of our Board in advance of such meetings.  As a result of this leadership structure, our President and Chief Executive Officer is able to focus on developing and implementing our business strategies and objectives, and our Chairman is able to provide independent oversight and serve as an independent liaison between our management and the members of our Board.  Due to Jacob Kotzubei’s extensive executive leadership experience, we believe Jacob Kotzubei is well-suited to serve in his role as Chairman.

Executive Sessions of Non-Employee Directors

To encourage and enhance communication among non-employee directors, and as required under applicable Nasdaq rules, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the non-employee directors will meet in executive sessions without management directors or company management on a periodic basis but no less than once a year.  The presiding director at executive sessions is the presiding independent director as elected by the independent directors, or another non-employee director otherwise designated by the non-employee directors.

Communications with our Board of Directors

Stockholders or interested parties who wish to communicate with our Board or with an individual director may do so by mail to our Board or the individual director, c/o General Counsel at 1150 North Alma School Road, Mesa, Arizona 85201.  The communication should indicate that it contains a stockholder or interested party communication.  In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, all such communication will be reviewed by our General Counsel, in consultation with appropriate directors as necessary, and, if appropriate, will be forwarded to the director or directors to whom the communications are addressed or, if none are specified, to the Chairman of our Board.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

We have adopted an insider trading policy that includes restrictions and limitations on the ability of our directors, officers and certain other employees to engage in transactions involving the hedging and pledging of our Class A Common Stock.  Under the policy, hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward-sale contracts, which allow an individual to lock in much of the value of his or her stock holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential for upside appreciation in the stock, and thus to continue to own our Class A Common Stock without the full risks and rewards of ownership, are prohibited.  In addition, the policy addresses the practices of holding our Class A Common Stock in a margin account, under which the securities may be sold by the broker without the customer’s consent if the customer fails to meet a margin call, and of pledging our Class A Common Stock as collateral for a loan, in which event the securities may be sold in foreclosure if the borrower defaults on the loan.  Because a margin sale or foreclosure sale may occur at a time when the pledgor is aware of material nonpublic information or otherwise is not permitted to trade in Verra Mobility securities, our directors, officers and certain other employees are prohibited from holding our securities in a margin account or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.

13

Committees of our Board of Directors

Our Board has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee which have the composition and responsibilities described below.  Our Board may establish other committees to facilitate the management of our business.  Copies of the charters of our audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees are available in the “Governance Highlights” section of our investor relations website (http://ir.verramobility.com/corporate-governance/governance-highlights).  Non-employee members of our Board serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board.

Audit Committee

Our audit committee consists of John Rexford, Patrick Byrne and Cynthia Russo.  Our Board has determined that John Rexford, Cynthia Russo and Patrick Byrne are independent under Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act.  The chair of our audit committee is John Rexford.  Our Board has determined that each member of our audit committee can read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with applicable requirements and are “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of SEC regulations.  In arriving at these determinations, our Board has examined each audit committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of their employment in the corporate finance sector.

The primary purpose of our audit committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our Board with respect to our accounting, financial and other reporting and internal control practices and to oversee our independent registered accounting firm.  Specific responsibilities of our audit committee include:

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee consists of Patrick Byrne, Douglas Davis and Cynthia Russo.  The chair of our compensation committee is Patrick Byrne.  Our Board has determined that all members of our compensation committee are independent under Nasdaq listing standards, are “non-employee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act and are “outside directors” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.  Our compensation committee may form subcommittees of at least two members for

14

any purpose that the committee deems appropriate and may delegate to such subcommittees such power and authority as the committee deems appropriate except such power or authority that is required by any law, regulation or listing standard to be exercised by the compensation committee as a whole.

The purpose of our compensation committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our Board to oversee our compensation and employee benefit plans and practices.  Specific responsibilities of our compensation committee include:

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our compensation committee is comprised of Patrick Byrne, Douglas Davis and Cynthia Russo, none of whom is or has been an officer or employee of the Company.  None of our executive officers currently serves, or during fiscal 2020 has served, as a member of the compensation committee or director (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire Board) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our compensation committee or our Board.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Douglas Davis and John Rexford.  The chair of our nominating and corporate governance committee is Douglas Davis.  Each member of our nominating and corporate governance committee is independent within the meaning of applicable listing standards, is a non-employee director and is free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of his independent judgment, as determined by our Board in accordance with the applicable Nasdaq listing standards.

The purpose of our nominating and corporate governance committee includes identifying and recommending to our Board the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders and developing and recommending our Corporate Governance Guidelines and policies to our Board.  Specific responsibilities of our nominating and corporate governance committee include:

15

Board of Directors and Committee Meetings and Attendance

Our Board is responsible for the oversight of our management and our strategy and for establishing corporate policies.  Our Board and its committees meet throughout the year on a regular schedule, and also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time.

Our Board met eight times and acted by written consent once during our last fiscal year.  Our audit committee met eight times and acted by written consent twice during our last fiscal year.  Our compensation committee met seven times and acted by written consent seven times during our last fiscal year.  Our nominating and corporate governance committee met three times and took no separate actions by written consent during our last fiscal year.  During our last fiscal year, each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of the meetings of our Board and of the committees on which he or she served.

We encourage our directors and nominees for director to attend our annual meetings of stockholders.  In 2020, all of our directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders.

Risk Oversight

Our Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, including strategic objectives, to improve long-term organizational performance, and to enhance stockholder value.  A fundamental aspect of risk management is not only understanding the most significant risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for a given company.  Our Board, as a whole, determines the appropriate level of risk for us, assesses the specific risks that we face and reviews management’s strategies for adequately mitigating and managing the identified risks.  Although our Board administers this risk management oversight function, the committees of our Board support our Board in discharging its oversight duties and addressing risks inherent in their respective areas.

Our audit committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken.  Our audit committee monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.  Our audit committee also monitors management’s preparedness for and responses to data security incidents.  Our nominating and corporate governance committee monitors the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.  Our compensation committee assesses and monitors whether our compensation philosophy and practices have the potential to encourage excessive risk taking and evaluates compensation policies and practices that could mitigate such risks.

At periodic meetings of our Board and its committees, management reports to and seeks guidance from our Board and its committees with respect to the most significant risks that could affect our business, such as legal risks and financial, tax- and audit-related risks.  In addition, among other matters, management provides our audit committee periodic reports on our compliance programs and practices.

Nominations Process and Director Qualifications

Nomination to our Board of Directors

Candidates for nomination to our Board are selected by our Board based on the recommendation of our nominating and corporate governance committee in accordance with the committee’s charter, our policies, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the criteria adopted by our Board regarding director candidate qualifications.  In recommending candidates for nomination, our nominating and corporate governance committee considers candidates recommended by directors, officers, and employees, as well as candidates that are properly submitted by stockholders in accordance with our policies and bylaws, using the same criteria to evaluate all such candidates.  Evaluations of candidates generally involve a review of background materials, internal discussions and interviews with selected candidates as appropriate and, in addition, our nominating and corporate governance committee may engage consultants or third-party search firms to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees.

16

Additional information regarding the process for properly submitting stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on our Board is set forth above under “Questions and Answers About these Proxy Materials, Voting and the Annual Meeting.”

Director Qualifications

With the goal of developing an experienced and highly qualified Board, our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for developing and recommending to our Board the desired qualifications, expertise and characteristics of members of our Board, including qualifications that the committee believes must be met by a committee-recommended nominee for membership on our Board and specific qualities or skills that the committee believes are necessary for one or more of the members of our Board to possess.

In addition to the qualifications, qualities, and skills that are necessary to meet U.S. legal, regulatory and Nasdaq listing requirements and the provisions of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of our Board committees, our nominating and corporate governance committee considers the following qualifications for any nominee for a position on our Board:  (i) experience in corporate governance, such as an officer or former officer of a publicly held company, (ii) experience in, and familiarity with, our business and industry, (iii) experience as a board member of another publicly held company, (iv) personal and professional character, integrity, ethics and values, (v) practical and mature business judgment, including the ability to make independent analytical inquiries, (vi) academic expertise in an area of our operations and (vii) background in financial and accounting matters.  Our Board and nominating and corporate governance committee believe that an experienced and highly qualified Board fosters a robust, comprehensive and balanced decision-making process for the continued, effective functioning of our Board and our success.  Accordingly, through the nomination process, our nominating and corporate governance committee seeks to promote Board membership that reflects diversity, factoring in gender, race, ethnicity, differences in professional background, education, skill, and experience, and other individual qualities and attributes that contribute to the total mix of viewpoints and experience.  Our nominating and corporate governance committee evaluates the foregoing factors, among others, and does not assign any particular weighting or priority to any of the factors.

17

MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING

PROPOSAL 1:

Election of Class III Directors

Our Board has nominated Jacob Kotzubei and Michael Huerta to serve, and each has agreed to stand for election at the Annual Meeting, each as a Class III director to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected, or if sooner, until their death, resignation or removal.

Our Board consists of seven members.  At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election until the third annual meeting following the election.  Our directors are currently divided into the three classes as follows:

The division of our Board into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control.

Vote Required

Our directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors.  Accordingly, the two Class III director nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes will be elected at the Annual Meeting.  Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the two nominees named above.  If such nominees become unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, shares that would have been voted for that nominee will instead be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by our Board.

Nominees

Our nominating and corporate governance committee seeks to assemble a Board that, as a group, can best perpetuate the success of the business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its qualifications and experience in various areas.  To that end, the committee has identified and evaluated nominees in the broader context of our Board’s overall composition, with the goal of recruiting members who complement and strengthen the skills of other members and who also exhibit integrity, collegiality, sound business judgment and other qualities deemed critical to effective functioning of our Board.

18

The following table sets forth, for the Class III nominees and our other directors who will continue in office after the Annual Meeting, their ages and position/office held with us as of the date of this proxy statement:

Set forth below is biographical information for the nominees and each person whose term of office as a director will continue after the Annual Meeting.  This includes information regarding each director’s experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led our Board to recommend him or her for board service.

Nominees for Election Until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held in 2024

Jacob Kotzubei, age 52, has served as a member of our Board since the consummation of the Business Combination. Mr. Kotzubei is a Partner at Platinum Equity and currently serves as a member of their Investment Committee. He also serves as an officer and director of various portfolio companies of Platinum Equity. Mr. Kotzubei is currently a director of Vertiv Holdings Co. (NYSE: VRT), Key Energy Services, Inc. (NYSE: KEG) and Ryerson Holding Corporation (NYSE: RYI). Prior to joining Platinum Equity in 2002, Mr. Kotzubei worked for Goldman Sachs’ Investment Banking Division and as a Mergers and Acquisitions attorney at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in New York City. Mr. Kotzubei holds a bachelor’s degree from Wesleyan University and a J.D. from Columbia University School of Law. Mr. Kotzubei’s experience in executive management oversight, private equity, capital markets and transactional matters has led our Board to conclude that he has the expertise necessary to serve as a member of our Board.

Michael Huerta, age 64, served as Administrator for the United States Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) from 2013 to 2018. Before being named as Administrator, Mr. Huerta served as Acting Administrator of the FAA from 2011 to 2013 and FAA Deputy Administrator from 2010 to 2011. Mr. Huerta also served as Executive Vice President and Group President, Government Transportation, for Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., now Conduent, Inc. Mr. Huerta has served as an independent director of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (NYSE: DAL) since 2018, and is a member of Delta Air Lines’ Audit Committee and Safety, Security and Health Committee. Mr. Huerta holds a bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of California, Riverside and a Master’s in Public Affairs with a concentration in international relations from Princeton University. Mr. Huerta’s significant transportation and administrative experience makes him well qualified to serve as a member of Verra Mobility’s Board of Directors.

Our Board recommends a vote FOR each of the Class III director nominees to elect them to our Board.

Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Cynthia Russo, age 51, has served as a member of our Board since our annual meeting of stockholders in 2019.  Ms. Russo currently serves as director of PAR Technology Corporation (NYSE: PAR), UserTesting, Inc. and Verifone, Inc. Ms. Russo also serves as the audit committee chair and a member of the compensation and nominating and governance committees for PAR.  She previously served as PAR’s lead director.  She also serves as the chair of the audit committee for UserTesting, Inc. and Verifone, Inc. Ms. Russo previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cvent, Inc. (NYSE: CVT), a cloud-based enterprise event management platform, from

19

September 2015 to September 2018. Prior to that, Ms. Russo served in a variety of senior financial roles of increasing responsibility at MICROS Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: MCRS), including as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from April 2010 until MICROS Systems’ acquisition by Oracle in September 2014. Ms. Russo holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from James Madison University and is a Certified Public Accountant and Certified Internal Auditor. We believe that Ms. Russo’s significant financial accounting expertise, executive leadership, operational and risk management experience make her well qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Douglas Davis, age 59, has served as a member of our Board since our annual meeting of stockholders in 2019.  Mr. Davis currently serves as an independent director of Digital Aerolus and was previously a director of Blue Pillar, Inc, and HERE Technologies. Mr. Davis held various positions of increasing responsibility at Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) from 1984 to 2019, most recently as Senior Vice President of the Automated Driving Group and Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Internet of Things Group. Mr. Davis holds a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from New Mexico State University and an MBA from W.P. Carey Graduate School of Business at Arizona State University. We believe that Mr. Davis’ significant technological expertise and operational experience make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Patrick Byrne, age 60, has served as a member of our board since November 2, 2020. Mr. Byrne currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of GE Digital, the software division of General Electric Company.  He previously served as the Senior Vice President of Fortive Corporation from July 2016 to June 2019, when Danaher Corporation, where Mr. Byrne previously served as the Chief Technical Officer, completed the separation of its Test Measurement and Industrial Technologies segments. Mr. Byrne previously served as an independent director of Micron Technology, Inc. from January 2011 to January 2020, including as a member of Micron Technology’s Audit Committee from 2019 to 2020. Mr. Byrne also served as President of Tektronix, a subsidiary of Danaher Corporation, from July 2014 to July 2016. Mr. Byrne holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley and an MS in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. We believe that Mr. Byrne’s significant technological and operational experience makes him well qualified to serve as a member of the Company’s Board.

John Rexford, age 64, has served as a member of our Board since the consummation of the Business Combination. Mr. Rexford is the Managing Director of Ramona Park Consulting LLC, which he founded in 2016. Mr. Rexford also serves as director, and compensation committee member of Exela Technologies (NASDAQ CM: XELA). Mr. Rexford has over 36 years of finance experience that includes serving as Global M&A Head from 2010 to 2015 at Xerox Corporation (NYSE: XRX) and serving in various positions at Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (which was acquired by Xerox Corporation), including Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2007. Mr. Rexford holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Southern Methodist University and an MBA from the Cox School of Business at Southern Methodist University. We believe that Mr. Rexford’s significant finance experience and financial expertise make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

David Roberts, age 50, has served as a member of our Board since the consummation of the Business Combination on October 17, 2018. Mr. Roberts is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Verra Mobility. In such capacity, Mr. Roberts has established a high performing company that embraces consistent financial performance, market leadership and culture as the driver of performance. Prior to joining Verra Mobility, Mr. Roberts was President and Chief Executive Officer of BillingTree, a multi-channel electronic payment platform and President and Chief Executive Officer of Equity Methods, an employee stock option valuation software and services company which was later sold to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Mr. Roberts earned a BBA at Baylor University at the Hankamer School of Business and an MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business with concentrations in Finance and Strategy. Mr. Roberts has served as an Adjunct Professor at the W.P. Carey Graduate School of Business at Arizona State University. Mr. Roberts currently serves as an adviser for the Arizona Feed My Starving Children Leadership Committee. We believe that Mr. Roberts’ extensive Company experience and experience in the mobility industry makes him well qualified to serve as a member of the Company’s Board.

Non-Employee Director Compensation

We compensate our non-employee directors with a combination of (i) cash incentives and (ii) equity incentives in the form of time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”).  David Roberts, our President and Chief Executive Officer, also serves as a director and we compensate Mr. Roberts solely for serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer -

20

see “Executive Compensation” below - and do not provide additional compensation for his service as a director.  The following table describes our annual compensation arrangements with our non-employee directors for the year 2020.

The following table provides information for all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each person who served as a non-employee director in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. David Roberts is not included in the table below because he did not receive additional compensation for his service as a director.  The compensation received by Mr. Roberts as an employee is shown below in “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table.”

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned by or paid to our non-employee directors during fiscal 2020.

21

We currently reimburse our directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of our Board and committees.  We have granted equity awards to our non-employee directors as compensation for their services.  All of our non-employee directors hold RSUs.  In May 2020, each of the non-employee directors were granted 8,696 RSUs, which vest on the earlier of (a) the date immediately preceding the date of the next annual stockholder meeting following the grant or (b) one year from the grant date.  In connection with his appointment to our Board on November 2, 2020, Patrick Byrne was granted 5,469 RSUs, which vest on an identical timeline.  For services provided in 2021, we have increased the annual director compensation for our non-employee directors by increasing the grant date fair value of these RSU awards to such directors by $40,000 to $130,000.

22

MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING

PROPOSAL 2:

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.  We currently plan to conduct this non-binding vote to approve executive compensation annually, with the next advisory vote taking place at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

As described in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program is designed to drive and reward performance and align the compensation of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.  We believe that our compensation program effectively aligns the interests of our employees and our stockholders and rewards superior short-term and long-term financial and operational performance.  Please read the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 33 and the compensation tables and narrative disclosure that follow for specific details about our executive compensation program.  Your vote is not intended to address any specific item of our compensation program, but rather to address our overall approach to the compensation of our named executive officers described in this Proxy Statement.

Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote FOR the following resolution:

Resolved, that the stockholders hereby approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussions that accompany the compensation tables.

Vote Required

The approval of this advisory proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by our stockholders present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.

As an advisory vote, this proposal will not be binding on the Company, our Board or our compensation committee in any way.  As such, the results of the vote will not create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of any members of our Board.  Notwithstanding the advisory non-binding nature of this vote, our Board values the opinions of our stockholders, and will consider the outcome of the vote when setting the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation.

At our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, over 99% of the votes cast on the non-binding advisory vote (also known as a “say-on-pay” proposal) on the compensation of our named executive officers were voted in support of our executive compensation program, and our stockholders approved a proposal that we submit a say-on-pay vote to our stockholders on an annual basis.

Our Board recommends a vote FOR the approval, on an advisory non-binding basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

23

MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING

PROPOSAL 3:

Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our audit committee has appointed EY as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 and has further directed that management submit this selection for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.  EY has been our independent registered public accounting firm since the consummation of the Business Combination on October 17, 2018.

Representatives of EY are expected to be present during the Annual Meeting, where they will be available to respond to appropriate questions and, if they desire, make a statement.  Our Board is submitting this selection as a matter of good corporate governance and because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm.  Neither our bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm.  If the stockholders fail to ratify this selection, our Board will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm.  Even if the selection is ratified, our Board may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests of us and our stockholders.

Vote Required

An affirmative vote from holders of a majority in voting power of the shares present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to ratify the selection of EY.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table provides the aggregate fees for services provided by EY as our independent registered public accounting firms for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

Audit Committee Approval

Our audit committee approved all of the foregoing services.  Our audit committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm.  These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax and other services.  Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services.  Our independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to our audit committee regarding the extent of services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and

24

the fees for the services performed to date.  Our audit committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.  During 2019 and 2020, services provided by EY were pre-approved by the audit committee in accordance with this policy.

Our Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

25

Report of the Audit Committee

On behalf of our Board, our audit committee oversees the financial reporting process for which management has responsibility.  Our independent registered public accounting firm, EY, was responsible for performing an audit of our consolidated financial statements.

Our audit committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 with our management.  The audit committee has discussed with its independent registered public accounting firm, EY, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, as issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). Our audit committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from EY required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the EY’s communications with our audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with EY its independence. Based on the foregoing, our audit committee has recommended to our Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

The Audit Committee

John Rexford (Chair)

Patrick Byrne

Cynthia Russo

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

26

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Class A Common Stock as of March 29, 2021:

The percentage of shares beneficially owned shown in the table is based on 162,360,367 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding as of March 29, 2021, the Record Date for the Annual Meeting.  In computing the number of shares of capital stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of such person, we deemed to be outstanding all shares of our Class A Common Stock underlying warrants, stock options and time-based RSUs held by the person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 29, 2021.  However, we did not deem such shares of our Class A Common Stock outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

27

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. To our knowledge, except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our Class A Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The information contained in the following table is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose, and the inclusion of any shares in the table does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares. Except as otherwise noted below, the address for persons listed in the table is c/o Verra Mobility Corporation, 1150 North Alma School Road, Mesa, Arizona 85201. The information provided in the table below is based on our records, information filed with the SEC and information provided to us, except where otherwise noted.

28

29

30

Executive Officers

The following is biographical information for our executive officers, as of the date of this proxy statement and certain former executive officers who served in fiscal year 2020 as noted below:

David Roberts has served as Verra Mobility’s President and Chief Executive Officer since the consummation of the Business Combination and served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of ATS from May 2018 until the Business Combination.  He served as ATS’ Chief Operating Officer from August 2014 to May 2018.  Mr. Roberts brings more than 24 years of management experience to Verra Mobility.  Prior to Verra Mobility, from April 2012 to August 2014, Mr. Roberts was the President and Chief Executive Officer of BillingTree, a multi-channel electronic payment platform company.  Prior to joining BillingTree, from August 2008 to March 2012, Mr. Roberts was a Managing Director at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, leading the Equity Plan Services business.  Mr. Roberts joined Bank of America Merrill Lynch via its acquisition of Equity Methods, where he served as Chief Executive Officer.

Patricia Chiodo has served as Verra Mobility’s Chief Financial Officer since the consummation of the Business Combination and served in the same capacity at ATS since June 2015.  Prior to joining Verra Mobility, Ms. Chiodo served as the Co-President and Chief Financial Officer of Origami Owl LLC from September 2013 to April 2015.  Ms. Chiodo also served as a director of Acme Lift Company from March 2013 to March 2015.  Prior to joining Origami Owl LLC, Ms. Chiodo was a consultant to privately held companies from May 2012 to August 2013, and was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for RSC Holdings, Inc. from April 2010 to April 2012.  Ms. Chiodo holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Arizona.

Garrett Miller served as Verra Mobility’s Executive Vice President, Government Solutions, from June 2019 until his resignation on March 26, 2021.  Because Mr. Miller was an executive officer during fiscal year 2020, information related to his 2020 compensation is included in this Proxy Statement.  Prior to joining Verra Mobility, Mr. Miller served as GE Current’s Chief Digital Officer from February 2017 to May 2019 and prior to that as its Chief Operating Officer, Digital, from May 2016 to January 2017.  Mr. Miller holds a bachelor’s degree in geology from Pomona College and a master’s degree in environmental engineering from Yale University.

Steve Lalla has served as Verra Mobility’s Executive Vice President, Commercial Services since February 2021. Prior to Verra Mobility, he spent more than 30 years leading global, transformational changes at technology providers such as Vertiv, Dell and Motorola. At Vertiv, as Executive Vice President, he oversaw a global portfolio that included services and software solutions for power, thermal and industrial products. At Dell, Mr. Lalla held leadership roles in Commercial PC, PC Accessories, and Cloud and Data Security. Prior to Dell, he led the Mass Market cellular phone business at Motorola.

Because Mr. Lalla was appointed as our Executive Vice President, Commercial Services in January 2021, he is not a “named executive officer” within the meaning of Item 402(m) of Regulation S-K. However, we view Mr. Lalla as an essential member of our executive officer team and we anticipate that Mr. Lalla will likely become a “named executive officer” within the meaning of the SEC rules for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. However, information relating to Mr. Lalla’s compensation is not included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”), as the CD&A only relates to compensation in this section awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

31

Rebecca Collins has served as Verra Mobility’s General Counsel since the consummation of the Business Combination and served in the same capacity at ATS since May 2016.  Prior to joining Verra Mobility, Ms. Collins served as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer at Contractor Management Services (now known as Openforce) from November 2015 to May 2016, which followed her role as Deputy General Counsel at NJOY, Inc. from August 2013 to October 2015.  Prior to working at NJOY, Inc., Ms. Collins served as Senior Associate General Counsel at General Dynamics C4 Systems, where she started in May 2001.  Ms. Collins holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. from the James E. Rogers College of Law at the University of Arizona.

Vincent Brigidi served as Verra Mobility’s Executive Vice President, Commercial Services from September 2014 until September 30, 2020. When Mr. Brigidi agreed to leave the Company in September 2020, he entered into the Separation Agreement which provided for, among other things, his employment in a special advisory role until October 30, 2020, during which time and in such role, he would assist with the transition of his responsibilities as the Company’s former Executive Vice President, Commercial Services. For a discussion of Mr. Brigidi’s Separation Agreement, please see the section titled “Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements—Vincent Brigidi.”

32

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

This CD&A describes the material elements of compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each of our named executive officers.  This CD&A also describes our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and design, as well as the manner in which the Company awards, and our named executive officers earn, such compensation.  Finally, this CD&A is intended to supplement the data presented in the Summary Compensation Table and other compensation tables that follow the CD&A.

Our named executive officers, consisting of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, the next two most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2020 (we did not have any other executive officers serving on December 31, 2020), and one executive officer who was among our three next highest compensated executive officers during 2020, but whose service terminated prior to December 31, 2020, are listed below. For purposes of this disclosure, we define “executive officer” as the president, any executive vice president in charge of a principal business unit or function, and any other officer or person who performs a policy making function for the Company.

Executive Summary

Our Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic posed considerable challenges to our business and operations.  Throughout the year, our Board and management focused on keeping our employees safe and protecting our financial health. For 2020, revenue declined 12% to 393.6 million and adjusted EBITDA declined 25% to 181.8 million.  In the fourth quarter of 2020, we experienced month-over-month improvements.  The numerous actions we took over the course of 2020 have allowed us to position ourselves for continued growth in 2021 as the COVID-19 pandemic recedes and the economy recovers.

Key Compensation Highlights

Verra Mobility’s executive compensation program was designed to be consistent with its executive compensation principles, objectives, and commitment to sound corporate governance, as summarized below.

33

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our compensation philosophy is primarily driven by our commitment to aligning our executive compensation with the interests of our stockholders by emphasizing performance-based incentive compensation focused on objectives that our Board believes have a significant impact on long-term stockholder value.  We recognize that an effective compensation strategy and philosophy is critical to recruiting, incentivizing, and retaining key employees who contribute to the achievement of our short-term and long-term success and thereby create value for our stockholders.  Therefore, our executive compensation program is designed to reinforce the following objectives:

Underpinning our compensation philosophy is our belief that Verra Mobility is a growth company with the potential to have a significant impact on the global smart mobility technology solutions and services industry.  Achieving that potential should result in value creation for our stockholders.  Thus, we believe that management’s incentives, our annual goals, and the long-term goals set by our compensation committee and our Board should reflect that growth orientation.

34

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Our compensation program in 2020 consisted of base salary, annual cash incentives, stock options, RSUs and PSUs. The following table summarizes the primary elements and objectives of our 2020 compensation program for executive officers, including our named executive officers.

Executive Pay Mix

Our compensation philosophy is to deliver a significant portion of compensation in the form of at-risk, performance-based components, and in 2020, a significant portion of our executive compensation consisted of variable, at-risk compensation.  Eighty-five percent of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for 2020 was delivered in variable compensation elements, and 76% of our other named executive officers’ overall compensation, on average, was delivered in at-risk variable compensation.

Compensation Decision-Making Process

Our compensation committee has numerous tools at its disposal to help Verra Mobility accomplish its short- and long-term performance goals.  Our compensation committee generally chooses to utilize those tools as follows in its administration and oversight of our executive compensation program.

Role of the Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee works closely with its independent compensation consultant and meets regularly, including in executive session without members of management present, to make decisions concerning our executive compensation program and on the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.  The committee reviews a variety of market data and information, including company, peers, compensation information in the technology industry and general economic trends, and considers the recommendations of its compensation consultant when making compensation decisions.  The committee chair reports on the committee’s actions  at each regular Board meeting.  The committee’s responsibilities include, among other things, reviewing and approving (or making recommendations to our Board, as applicable, regarding):

35

The full description of our compensation committee’s authority and responsibilities is provided in our compensation committee charter, which is available on our investor relations website, http://ir.verramobility.com/corporate-governance/governance-highlights.

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

Our compensation committee retained Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”) to serve as its independent compensation consultant for fiscal 2020. Semler Brossy was engaged to assist our compensation committee with a variety of tasks related to 2020 executive compensation, which included, among other things, evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on the committee’s compensation-related decisions; conducting and presenting the annual review of the total compensation packages for our executive officers, including base salary, cash bonuses, long-term incentives and total direct compensation; reviewing market data on compensation; reviewing and assessing the annual and long-term incentives currently provided to executives and future awards; aligning and testing performance-related pay; reviewing non-employee directors’ compensation; reviewing the Company’s peer group; and understanding and responding to market compensation trends.  Our compensation committee assessed the independence of Semler Brossy pursuant to the rules prescribed by the SEC and Nasdaq and concluded that no conflict of interest existed in 2020 that would have prevented Semler Brossy from serving as an independent consultant to our compensation committee.

Role of Management

When making decisions on executive compensation, our compensation committee considers input from our Chief Executive Officer, who provides his evaluation of each executive officer’s performance to the committee, and makes recommendations with respect to base salary and target incentives, incentive awards and equity awards for each executive officer other than himself.  This recommendation is considered by our compensation committee, which makes its own ultimate determinations.  No member of management, including our Chief Executive Officer, is present during the deliberation of his or her own compensation decisions.

Competitive Market Information

Our compensation committee considered competitive market practices when setting total pay levels for 2020.  However, competitive market data is only one of several resources made available to the committee to assist it in setting executive compensation levels.  The committee also considers individual-specific factors, such as individual performance, experience and level and scope of responsibilities, company performance and economic conditions.  Our compensation committee does not use a formula or fixed target to determine compensation.

In setting compensation, our compensation committee compares base salaries, annual incentive opportunities, and long-term compensation for our executive officers against to a peer group of companies with similar business and size characteristics.  Our compensation committee regularly reviews the composition of the peer group and makes modifications as appropriate.  A comprehensive review was conducted in February 2019.  We believe these peer group companies on the whole are:

36

Our peer group consisted of the following companies:

In addition to these peer companies, the compensation committee also reviews pay data from compensation surveys, where relevant, as an additional reference point when setting executive compensation levels.

2020 Compensation Decisions

Base Salary

Base salary is a fixed element within a total compensation package intended to attract and retain the talent necessary to successfully manage our business and execute our business strategies.  Base salary for our named executive officers is established based on the scope of their responsibilities, taking into account relevant experience, internal pay equity, tenure and other factors deemed relevant.  The table below shows the annualized base salary for each named executive officer for 2020 and 2019. Base salary increases for 2020 were approved by our compensation committee in February 2020.

37

Annual Incentive Bonus Plan

During 2020, we sponsored our Verra Mobility Annual Incentive Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”) for employees who were active, full-time, salaried employees of Verra Mobility and who were approved for participation by our Chief People Officer and Chief Executive Officer.  Participation for our executive officers was determined by the Compensation Committee.  Participants in the Bonus Plan, which included our named executive officers, were eligible to receive cash bonus payments based on Company (or segment, as applicable) and individual performance.  For 2020, the bonus targets for the named executive officers were established as a percentage of base salary as follows:

Payment of annual bonuses to our named executive officers is based on the achievement of revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets for the Company and each of its segments for the plan year, as those revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets are determined by our Chief Financial Officer and approved by our compensation committee and, except in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, on individual performance. We define adjusted EBITDA as net (loss) income adjusted to exclude (i) interest expense, net, (ii) income taxes, (iii) depreciation and amortization, and (iv) as further adjusted to exclude the impact of certain non-cash and non-recurring items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance.

Our consolidated revenue for fiscal year 2020 was approximately $393.6 million, which correlated to approximately 75.1% against the consolidated revenue target.  Our consolidated adjusted EBITDA for fiscal year 2020 was approximately $181.8 million, which correlated to approximately 68.0% against the consolidated adjusted EBITDA target.  Our Commercial Services revenue for fiscal year 2020 was approximately $180.9 million, which correlated to approximately 60.5% against the Commercial Services revenue target.  Our Commercial Services adjusted EBITDA for fiscal year 2020 was approximately $97.2 million, which correlated to approximately 53.0% against the Commercial Services adjusted EBITDA target.  Our Government Solutions revenue for fiscal year 2020 was approximately $212.7 million, which correlated to approximately 94.4% against the Government Solutions revenue

38

target.  Our Government Solutions adjusted EBITDA for fiscal year 2020 was approximately $84.7 million, which correlated to approximately 101% against the Government Solutions adjusted EBITDA target.

Due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and operations, we did not meet our consolidated performance metric goals for 2020.  As a result, no payments were made for 2020 pursuant to the Bonus Plan. While our Government Solutions business unit exceeded its performance metric goals, no payments were made because the Company did not meet 85% of its consolidated Adjusted EBITDA goal, which was a gating item for payment.  Our compensation committee also decided not to make any discretionary adjustments to the 2020 plan results.

Verra Mobility Corporation 2018 Equity Incentive Plan

The Verra Mobility 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2018 Equity Plan”) was approved by our stockholders on October 17, 2018, after being adopted by our Board on July 10, 2018, subject to stockholder approval.  Awards made under the 2018 Equity Plan allow us to attract new key employees, to continue to retain existing key employees, directors and other service providers for our and our stockholders’ long-term benefit and to align the interests of our employees, directors and other service providers with the interests of our stockholders.  The 2018 Equity Plan authorizes the compensation committee to provide incentive compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock and stock units, performance shares and units, other stock-based awards and cash-based awards.  The maximum aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 Equity Plan is 10,864,000, and such shares shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares or any combination thereof.

2020 Long-Term Incentive Program

For 2020, our compensation committee approved awards of long-term incentives to our named executive officers comprised of RSUs, stock options and PSUs.  RSUs and stock options vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.  PSUs vest three years from the grant date based on the achievement of the Company’s three-year TSR relative to a select group of companies within the data processing and outsourced services industry.

The size of the annual award grants made in early March 2020 to our executives were increased by 40% for all but Garrett Miller on a one-time basis in order to account for the change in grant timing and the fact that no grants had been made to those executive officers since the Business Combination in 2018.

Restricted Stock Units

RSUs granted under the 2018 Equity Plan represent rights to receive shares of our Class A Common Stock at a future date determined in accordance with the participant’s award agreement.  One quarter of the 2020 RSU awards vested on the first anniversary of the grant date and one quarter of the award will vest annually thereafter, such that the entire award vests by the fourth anniversary of the grant date, subject to the participant’s continued service on each applicable vesting date.  RSUs may not be transferred by the participant.  Participants have no voting rights or rights to receive cash dividends with respect to RSUs until shares of stock are issued in settlement of such awards.  Unless otherwise

39

provided by our compensation committee, a participant will forfeit any RSUs which have not vested prior to the participant’s termination of service.

On March 5, 2020, we granted RSUs to our named executive officers in the following amounts:

When Vincent Brigidi left the Company, he forfeited all of his unvested RSUs granted on March 5, 2020. When Garrett Miller resigned in March 2021, he forfeited all of his unvested RSUs granted on March 5, 2020.

Stock Options

Stock options granted under the 2018 Equity Plan represent options to purchase certain shares of Class A Common Stock at a future date determined in accordance with the participant’s award agreement.  Stock options expire at the tenth anniversary of the grant date.  Stock options may not be transferred by the participant. Unless otherwise provided by the compensation committee, a participant will forfeit any stock options which have not vested prior to the participant’s termination of service.

On March 5, 2020, we granted stock options to our named executive officers in the following amounts:

When Vincent Brigidi left the Company, he forfeited all of his unvested stock options granted on March 5, 2020. When Garrett Miller resigned, he forfeited all of his unvested stock options granted on March 5, 2020.

Performance Share Units

The number of PSUs that may vest is based on the achievement of threshold (minimum required for a payout), target or maximum levels and may range from 50% to 150% of the target number of shares.

If Verra Mobility does not achieve the threshold level, then no shares will vest.  If Verra Mobility’s achievement falls between the threshold, target or maximum levels, the portion of the award that may vest will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.  If Verra Mobility’s absolute TSR is negative over the three-year performance period, the number of PSUs that may vest will be capped at 100% of the target number of shares.

On March 5, 2020, we granted PSUs to our named executive officers in the following amounts:

40

For the three-year period beginning in 2020, PSUs may be earned, if at all, based on the Company’s three-year annualized TSR performance against companies with market caps below $10 billion in the Russell 3000 index within the Data Processing and Outsourced Services industry.

A relative TSR payout factor will be determined by calculating the Company’s three-year annualized TSR performance relative to the median performance of the comparator group. Performance is measured based on the difference between the Company’s three-year annualized TSR percentages and the median three-year annualized TSR of the comparator group. In setting the relative TSR goals, the Compensation Committee considered the historical results of the comparator group, and established goals that were aligned with the historical top and bottom quartiles at maximum and threshold, respectively. The TSR payout factor will be calculated with respect to the goals set forth below:

When Vincent Brigidi left the Company, he forfeited all of his unvested PSUs granted on March 5, 2020.  When Garrett Miller resigned, he forfeited all of his unvested PSUs granted on March 5, 2020.

Compensation Governance

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have formal stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors and certain employees, including our named executive officers as set forth below. Each director and executive must achieve the minimum equity investment within five years of the adoption of the guidelines or the date the employee first becomes subject to the guidelines.

Compensation Recovery Policy

Our Board adopted a clawback policy of incentive compensation that allows the Company to recapture amounts paid or equity issued to executive officers under certain circumstances.  This policy allows for recovery of certain incentive compensation if an executive officer:

The compensation elements subject to clawback or cancellation under the clawback policy include equity awards made pursuant to the 2018 Equity Plan, whether or not vested or restricted, shares acquired upon vesting or lapse of restriction, any profits realized from the sale of any such equity awards, short-term and long-term incentive bonus and similar cash compensation, discretionary bonuses, and any other awards or compensation under the Company’s compensation programs other than base salary; in each case, awarded, earned or paid out during the 36 months preceding the need for the financial restatement or the determination of actions that leads to a for cause termination. Our Board has the sole discretion, subject to applicable law, to determine the form and timing of the clawback, which

41

may include repayment from the executive officer or a reduction to the payment of future incentive compensation. This policy is in addition to the clawback policy in the Company’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan approved by shareholders.

Other Compensation

In addition to base salary and annual and long-term performance-based compensation, our named executive officers are also eligible for the following benefits on a similar basis as our other eligible employees:

Retirement Benefits

We maintain a 401(k) plan (our “401(k) Plan”) available to substantially all of our employees who meet certain eligibility requirements.  Our named executive officers may elect to have a portion of their compensation withheld, up to the statutory limit.  Our 401(k) Plan includes a matching contribution by us that vests immediately of up to 100% of our named executive officers’ first 3% contribution, and 50% of the next 2%, subject to the terms of the plan.  Other than the benefits described under our 401(k) Plan, we have not provided our named executive officers with any retirement benefits.

Accounting Considerations

We consider the accounting impact reflected in our financial statements when establishing the amounts and forms of executive compensation.  The forms of compensation that we select are intended to be cost-efficient.  Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards granted is determined based on the grant-date fair value of such awards.  We recognize these compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting term of the stock-based payment award.  Forfeitures are accounted for as they occur.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally sets a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct for federal income tax purposes in any given year with respect to the compensation of certain executives, including each of our named executive officers. Historically, compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code could be excluded from this $1 million limit. This exception was repealed with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, effective for taxable years beginning after 2017, unless certain transition relief is available.

While the compensation committee may consider the deductibility of compensation as a factor in determining executive compensation, the compensation committee retains the discretion to award and pay compensation that is not deductible as it believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to maintain flexibility in our approach to executive compensation and to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives, without regard to the deductibility of compensation under it.

Compensation Risk Assessment

As a publicly traded company, we are subject to SEC rules regarding risk assessment.  Those rules require a publicly traded company to determine whether any of its existing incentive compensation plans, programs or arrangements create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Verra Mobility.  We do not believe that our incentive compensation plans, programs or arrangements create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Verra Mobility.

42

Compensation Committee Report

The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed with management the CD&A included in this Proxy Statement.  Based on this review and discussion, the compensation committee has recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee

Patrick Byrne (Chair)

Douglas Davis

Cynthia Russo

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all of the compensation earned by our named executive officers during fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018.

43

Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table

The following is a brief description of the compensation arrangements we have with each of our named executive officers and other compensation paid to our named executive officers.  As described more fully below under “Greenlight Holding Corporation 2018 Participation Plan” and “Equity Award Inducement Grants,” respectively, certain of our named executive officers received certain lump-sum cash payments and time-vested equity awards during 2018 in connection with the Business Combination.  The cash payments were made in connection with agreements our named executive officers entered into to terminate performance units each of them held under a prior participation plan that was terminated immediately prior to the Business Combination closing.  The equity awards were made pursuant to the Merger Agreement, which required us, promptly following the closing of the Business Combination, to grant awards of RSUs equal to an aggregate of approximately three percent of our outstanding capital stock as of closing to certain individuals who entered into the termination agreements referenced above.  These RSUs

44

were granted as a material inducement to such individuals to continue their employment with us following the Business Combination.

Greenlight Holding Corporation 2018 Participation Plan

Certain of our named executive officers were granted performance units in 2018 under the Greenlight Holding Corporation 2018 Participation Plan (the “Participation Plan”).  These units were granted upon the termination of similar performance units previously granted in 2017.  The performance units represented the right to receive a payment upon the occurrence of a “Qualifying Event” (as defined in the Participation Plan) either in the form of a cash payment or a payment in securities, depending on the type of consideration paid in connection with the Qualifying Event.  In connection with the Merger Agreement, Greenlight Holding Corporation agreed to terminate the Participation Plan effective immediately prior to the closing of the Business Combination.  Participants in this plan, including David Roberts, Patricia Chiodo and Vincent Brigidi, entered into termination agreements pursuant to which they received a lump-sum payment after the closing of the Business Combination in exchange for a release of claims in favor of Greenlight Holding Corporation and its affiliates.  Pursuant to their respective plan termination letters, Mr. Roberts received a lump-sum payment of $7,306,909, Ms. Chiodo received a lump-sum payment of $3,584,469, and Mr. Brigidi received a lump-sum payment of $1,709,177 in fiscal 2018.

Equity Award Inducement Grants

The Merger Agreement required us, promptly following the closing of the Business Combination, to grant awards of RSUs equal to approximately three percent of our outstanding capital stock as of closing to certain of our executives who entered into termination agreements relating to their performance units granted under the Participation Plan.  These RSU awards were granted as a material inducement to the employees entering into employment with us and vest ratably over four years (subject to continued employment).  On October 23, 2018, we granted RSUs that vest ratably over four years to certain of our named executive officers in the following amounts:

Because these awards were made in October 2018, individuals who received such awards did not receive equity grants during 2019.  In June 2019, Garrett Miller joined the Company and was granted 21,159 RSUs that vest in the same manner and on the same conditions as the RSUs granted on October 23, 2018.  This grant represented a dollar value approximately equal to Mr. Miller’s annual base salary.  Mr. Miller resigned from his position as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Government Solutions, effective March 26, 2021. All unvested equity awards then held by Mr. Miller, including his unvested RSUs, were either terminated or forfeited in connection with his resignation.

When Vincent Brigidi agreed to leave the Company in September 2020 (effective October 30, 2020), he entered into the Separation Agreement which provided for, among other things, the continued vesting of the 2021 tranche of his 2018 RSUs, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the Separation Agreement.  All other unvested equity awards then held by Mr. Brigidi, including the 2022 tranche of his unvested 2018 RSUs, were either terminated or forfeited. For a discussion of Mr. Brigidi’s Separation Agreement, please see the section titled “Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements—Vincent Brigidi.”

45

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers during 2020.  Please see the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table below for additional information regarding the vesting parameters that are applicable to these awards.

46

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2020

The following table presents information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2020.  All awards were granted under our 2018 Equity Incentive Plan.