UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 6, 2022
ALSET EHOME INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | | 001-39732 | | 83-1079861 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | | (Commission File Number) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 210 Bethesda, Maryland | | 20814 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (301) 971-3940
Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
| ☐ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
| | |
| ☐ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
| | |
| ☐ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| | |
| ☐ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | | Ticker symbol(s) | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share | | AEI | | The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☒
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
As further described below, Alset EHome International Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Registrant”), and its wholly owned subsidiary, Alset, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 6, 2022 (the “Reincorporation Merger Agreement”), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Reincorporation Merger”). Pursuant to the Reincorporation Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time (as hereinafter defined), the Company will change its name to “Alset Inc.” from “Alset, Inc.” and succeed to the assets, continue the business and assume the rights and obligations of the Registrant existing immediately prior to the Effective Time. The Reincorporation Merger is expected to be consummated when the certificates of merger filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Texas (the “Texas Certificate of Merger”) on September 7, 2022 and the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware Certificate of Merger”) on September 12, 2022 become effective on October 4, 2022 (the “Effective Time”). Copies of the Texas Certificate of Merger and the Delaware Certificate of Merger are filed as Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2, respectively, and are each incorporated herein by reference. The Reincorporation Merger Agreement and transactions contemplated thereby were adopted by the shareholders of the Registrant at the annual meeting of the shareholders of the Registrant held on June 6, 2022 (the “Annual Meeting”). Pursuant to Rule 12g-3 under the Exchange Act, the shares of common stock of the Company, as successor issuer, will be deemed registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The shares of common stock of the Company will continue to be listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol “AEI”.
At the Effective Time, pursuant to the Reincorporation Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of common stock of the Registrant (“Predecessor Common Stock”), is to be automatically converted into one share of common stock of the Company (“Company Common Stock”) and the Company is to assume all of the Registrant’s outstanding convertible securities and each outstanding convertible security shall be converted into and become the right to purchase or receive the same number of shares of Company Common Stock, at the same exercise price or conversion price per share and upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions as set forth in the applicable security as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time.
Pursuant to the Reincorporation Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, the directors and officers of the Company immediately prior to the Reincorporation Merger, who are also the current directors and officers of the Registrant, will remain the directors and officers of the Company and continue their respective directorship or services with the Company on the same terms as their respective directorship or service with the Registrant immediately prior to the Effective Time.
As a result of the Reincorporation Merger, at the Effective Time the internal affairs of the Company will cease to be subject to the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) and governed by the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and restated to date (the “Delaware Certificate”), and Bylaws (the “Delaware Bylaws”). As of the Effective Time, the Company is to be subject to the Texas Business Organizations Code (“TBOC”) and governed by the Registrant’s Restated Certificate of Formation (the “Texas Certificate”) and its bylaws (the “Texas Bylaws”), which are included as exhibits to this Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.
The description of the Reincorporation Merger and the Reincorporation Merger Agreement contained in this Item 1.01, does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the Reincorporation Merger Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 2.1 hereto, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Comparison of Shareholder Rights Before and After the Reincorporation
The Reincorporation Merger will effect some changes in the rights of the Company’s stockholders. This is as a result of differences between the TBOC and the DGCL, as well as differences between each of the Company’s charter documents before and after the Reincorporation. Summarized below are the most significant differences between the rights of the Company’s stockholders before and after the Reincorporation Merger. The differences between the current Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws and the Texas Certificate and Texas Bylaws, as relevant to such rights, are noted within this summary. The summary below is not intended to be relied upon as an exhaustive list of all the differences or a complete description of the differences resulting from the Reincorporation Merger. Furthermore, this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the DGCL, the Company’s existing Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws, the TBOC, and the Company’s Texas Certificate and Texas Bylaws.
| | | Delaware | | Texas |
| Business Combinations Statute | | The DGCL prohibits certain transactions between a Delaware corporation and an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date the interested stockholder acquired its stock. “Interested stockholder” is broadly defined as a person (including the affiliates and associates of such person) that is directly or indirectly a beneficial owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation. Prohibited transactions include: (i) mergers, (ii) consolidations, (iii) sales or other dispositions of assets having an aggregate market value of 10% or more of either the consolidated assets or the outstanding stock of a company, and (iv) certain transactions that would result in the issuance or transfer of stock of a company, increase the interested stockholder’s proportionate share of ownership in a company, or grant the interested stockholder disproportionate financial benefits. The DGCL provides an exception to this prohibition if: (i) the business combination or the transaction in which the stockholder became an interested stockholder is approved by that company’s board of directors prior to the date the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, (ii) the interested stockholder acquired at least 85% of the voting stock of that company in the transaction in which it became an interested stockholder, or (iii) the business combination is approved by a majority of the board of directors and the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by disinterested stockholders at an annual or special meeting (and not by written consent). The existing Delaware Certificate does not alter the effect of the Delaware business combinations statute. | | The TBOC prohibits specific mergers, sales of assets, reclassifications and other transactions between a Texas public corporation and an “affiliated shareholder” for a period of three years after the date the shareholder obtained “affiliated shareholder” status. “Affiliated shareholder” is defined as a person who beneficially owns (or has owned within the preceding three-year period) 20% or more of the outstanding stock of a Texas public corporation for a period of three years following the shareholder acquiring shares representing 20% or more of the corporation’s voting power. The TBOC provides an exception to this prohibition if: (i) the board of directors of the corporation approves the transaction or the acquisition of shares by the affiliated shareholder prior to the affiliated shareholder becoming an affiliated shareholder, (ii) two-thirds (or a higher if specified in the certificate of formation) of the unaffiliated stockholders approve the transaction at a meeting held no earlier than six months after the shareholder acquires that ownership, or (iii) if the affiliated shareholder was an affiliated shareholder before December 31, 1996, and continued as such through the date of the transaction. The Texas Certificate does not alter the Texas business combinations statute. The Texas Bylaws will enable the Company to opt out of the Texas business combinations statute. |
| Sales, Leases, Exchanges or Other Dispositions | | A Delaware corporation may sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of its property and assets when and as authorized by a majority of the outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon, unless the certificate of incorporation provides to the contrary. The existing Delaware Certificate does not address this issue. | | Generally, the sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, of the property and assets of a Texas corporation requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the corporation entitled to vote. No such approval is required, however, if the transaction is made in the usual and regular course of the corporation’s business. Under Texas law, the transfer of substantially all of a corporation’s assets in such a manner that the corporation continues directly or indirectly to engage in one or more businesses is deemed to be in the usual and regular course of its business. The Texas Certificate contains a provision setting the approval threshold at a majority of the outstanding shares. |
| | | | | |
| Approval of Mergers | | Under Delaware law, any merger with a third party must be approved by a majority of the stockholders. | | Under Texas law, any merger with a third party requires approval by two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Texas corporation unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the certificate of formation. The Texas Certificate contains a provision setting the approval threshold at a majority of the outstanding shares. |
| Appraisal Rights | | Under Delaware law, stockholders have no appraisal rights in the event of a merger or consolidation of the corporation if the stock of the Delaware corporation is listed on a national securities exchange (the Company currently meets this condition by virtue of its listing on the NASDAQ market) or if such stock is held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders. Stockholders of a Delaware parent corporation have no appraisal rights in a merger between that parent corporation and a subsidiary corporation wholly owned by that parent corporation. Even if appraisal rights would not otherwise be available under Delaware law in the cases described above, stockholders would still have appraisal rights if they are required by the terms of the agreement of merger and consolidation to accept for their stock anything other than: (1) shares of stock; (A) of the surviving corporation; or (B) of any other corporation which shares at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders; (2) cash in lieu of fractional shares; or (3) a combination of such shares and such cash. Otherwise, stockholders of a Delaware corporation have appraisal rights in consolidations and mergers. Under Delaware law, any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights will also be available as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation involving such corporation, or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. The existing Delaware Certificate has no such provisions. | | Except for the limited classes of mergers, consolidations, sales and asset dispositions for which no shareholder approval is required under Texas law, stockholders of Texas corporations with voting rights have dissenters’ rights in the event of a merger, consolidation, conversion, sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, the property and assets of the corporation. However, a shareholder of a Texas corporation has no dissenters’ rights with respect to any plan or merger or conversion in which there is a single surviving or new domestic or foreign corporation, or with respect to any plan of exchange if: (1) the ownership interest, or a depository receipt in respect of the ownership interest, held by the owner is part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, that are, on the record date set for purposes of determining which owners are entitled to vote on the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate: (A) listed on a national securities exchange (the Company currently meets this condition by virtue of its listing on the NASDAQ market); or (B) held of record by at least 2,000 owners; (2) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration that is different from the consideration to be provided to any other holder of an ownership interest of the same class or series as the ownership interest held by the owner, other than cash instead of fractional shares or interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; and (3) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration other than: (A) ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, of another entity of the same general organizational type that, immediately after the effective date of the merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, will be part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, that are: (i) listed on a national securities exchange or authorized for listing on the exchange on official notice of issuance; (ii) held of record by at least 2,000 owners; (B) cash instead of fractional ownership interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; or |
| | | | | |
| | | | | (C) any combination of the ownership interests and cash above. |
| Shareholder Consent to Action Without a Meeting | | Under Delaware law, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, any action that can be taken at a meeting of the stockholders can be taken without such meeting if written consent thereto is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having the minimum number of votes necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were presented and voted. The existing Delaware Certificate allows for stockholder action by written consent. | | Under Texas law, any action that may be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if written consent thereto is signed by all the holders of shares entitled to vote on that action. The certificate of formation of a Texas corporation may provide that action by written consent in lieu of a meeting may be taken by the holders of that number of votes which would be required to take the action which is the subject of the consent at a meeting at which each of the shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. The Texas Certificate allows shareholder action by written consent in lieu of a meeting. |
| | | | | |
| Procedures for Filling Vacant Directorships | | Under Delaware law, unless the certificate of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. The existing Delaware Certificate requires the vote of two-thirds of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director to fill vacancies. | | Under Texas law, any vacancy occurring in the board of directors may, unless otherwise authorized by a corporation’s certificate of formation, fill a vacancy or a newly created vacancy in a director position only: (i) by the affirmative vote of the majority of the directors then in office, (ii) by the sole remaining director, or (iii) by the affirmative vote of the stockholders. A directorship to be filled because of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by the stockholders or by the board of directors for a term of office continuing only until the next election of one or more directors by the stockholders. The board of directors may not fill more than two such directorships during the period between any two successive annual meetings of stockholders. The Texas Certificate and Texas Bylaws are consistent with the TBOC. |
| Right to Call Meetings | | Delaware law provides that special meetings of the stockholders may be called by the board of directors or such other persons as are authorized in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws. The existing Delaware Certificate provides that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or the board of directors pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the directors. Stockholders may not, therefore, call a special meeting. | | Unlike in Delaware, under Texas law, stockholders are guaranteed the right to call special meetings. Unless otherwise specified in the corporation’s certificate of formation, holders of not less than 10% of all of the shares entitled to vote at the proposed meeting have the right to call a special stockholders’ meeting. The certificate of formation may allow for special meetings to be called by a number of shares greater than or less than 10%, but it may not set the required number of shares above 50%. The president, board of directors, or any other person authorized to call special meetings by the certificate of formation or bylaws of the corporation may also call special stockholders’ meetings. The Texas Certificate sets the percentage of stockholders required to call a special meeting at fifty percent of those stockholders entitled to vote on the subject matter for which the meeting is called (unlike the Delaware standard, where stockholders may not call a special meeting). The bylaws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may also be called by the President, the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, or the board of directors pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the directors. |
| | | | | |
| Voting by Proxy | | Under Delaware law, a stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder by proxy. A proxy is valid for three years from its date unless otherwise provided in the proxy. | | Under Texas law, a shareholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such shareholder by proxy. A proxy is only valid for eleven months from its date unless otherwise provided in the proxy. |
| Charter Amendments | | Delaware law provides that amendments to the certificate of incorporation must be approved by the holders of a majority of the corporation’s stock entitled to vote thereon, unless the certificate of incorporation provides for a greater number. The existing Delaware Certificate requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Company then entitled to vote in an election of directors, voting as a single class to amend the charter provisions relating management of the Company. | | Under Texas law, an amendment to the certificate of formation requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the corporation, unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the certificate of formation. The Texas Certificate provides that a majority may amend the certificate of formation. |
| Bylaw Amendments | | Under Delaware law, stockholders of a corporation entitled to vote have the right to amend, repeal or adopt the bylaws. If the corporation’s certificate of incorporation so provides, the corporation’s board of directors also has the have the right to amend, repeal or adopt the bylaws. The existing Delaware Certificate provides that the existing Delaware Bylaws may be amended, repealed, altered or adopted (i) by stockholder action with the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of all the shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class or (ii) by director action with the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office. | | Generally, under Texas law, the board of directors may amend, repeal or adopt a corporation’s bylaws. However, a corporation’s certificate of formation may reserve this power exclusively to a majority of the stockholders. Similarly, the stockholders, in amending, repealing or adopting a particular bylaw, may expressly provide that the board of directors may not amend, readopt or repeal that bylaw. Texas caselaw permits the corporation to increase the required threshold of stockholders necessary to amend the bylaws. The Texas Certificate, consistent with the Delaware Certificate, allows amendments to the bylaws by the vote of at least two-thirds of the board of directors or by two-thirds of the holders of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. |
| Removal of Directors | | Under Delaware law, subject to the exceptions discussed below, a majority of stockholders then entitled to vote at an election of directors may remove a director with or without cause. If the board of directors of a Delaware corporation is classified (i.e., elected for staggered terms), a director may only be removed for cause, unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. If a corporation uses cumulative voting and less than the entire board is to be removed, no director may be removed without cause if the votes cast against his or her removal would be sufficient to elect him or her if then cumulatively voted at an election of the entire board of directors. Where a corporation’s certificate of incorporation provides that separate classes or series of stockholders are entitled, as such a class or series, to elect separate directors, in calculating the sufficiency of votes for removal of such a director, only the votes of the holders of such a class or series are considered. Neither the existing Delaware Certificate nor Delaware Bylaws allow: (i) the removal of directors, other than for cause, (ii) cumulative voting, or (iii) the election of separate directors by separate classes or series of stockholders voting as such a class or series. | | Under Texas law, subject to the exceptions discussed below or as otherwise provided by the certificate of formation or bylaws of a corporation, the stockholders may remove a director, with or without cause, by a vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at an election of the directors. If the corporation’s directors serve staggered terms, a director may not be removed except for cause unless the certificate of formation provides otherwise. If the certificate of formation permits cumulative voting and less than the entire board is to be removed, a director may not be removed if the votes cast against the removal would be sufficient to elect him or her if cumulatively voted at an election of the entire board of directors. Where a corporation’s certificate of formation provides that separate classes or series of stockholders are entitled, as such a class or series, to elect separate directors, in calculating the sufficiency of votes for removal of such a director, only the votes of the holders of such a class or series are considered. The Texas Bylaws are consistent with the existing Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws on this issue. |
| Inspection of Books and Records | | Under Delaware law, any stockholder may inspect the corporation’s books and records upon written demand under oath stating the purpose of the inspection. If the corporation refuses to permit inspection or does not reply to the demand within five business days after the demand has been made, the stockholder may apply to the Court of Chancery for an order to compel such inspection. | | Under Texas law, a shareholder may, upon written demand stating a proper purpose, inspect the books and records of a corporation if such shareholder holds at least 5% of the outstanding shares of stock of the corporation or has been a holder of shares for at least six months prior to such demand. |
| | | | | |
| Distributions and Dividends | | Under Delaware law, a corporation may, subject to any restrictions contained in its certificate of incorporation, pay dividends out of surplus and, if there is not surplus, out of net profits for the current and/or the preceding fiscal year, unless the capital of the corporation is less than the capital represented by issued and outstanding stock having preferences on asset distributions. The existing Delaware Certificate provides that dividends may be declared and paid or set apart for payment upon the Company’s common stock out of any assets or funds of the Company legally available for the payment of dividends and may be payable in cash, stock or otherwise. | | Under Texas law, a distribution is defined as a transfer of cash or other property (except a corporation’s own shares or rights to acquire its shares), or an issuance of debt, by a corporation to its stockholders in the form of: (i) a dividend on any class or series of the corporation’s outstanding shares, (ii) a purchase or redemption, directly or indirectly, of its shares, or (iii) a payment in liquidation of all or a portion of its assets. Under Texas law, a corporation may not make a distribution if such distribution violates its certificate of formation or, unless the corporation is in receivership, if it either renders the corporation unable to pay its debts as they become due in the course of its business or affairs, or exceeds, depending on the type of distribution, either the net assets or the surplus of the corporation. |
| Stock Redemption and Repurchase | | Under Delaware law, a corporation may purchase or redeem shares of any class except when its capital is impaired or would be impaired by such purchase or redemption. A corporation may, however, purchase or redeem out of capital, shares that are entitled upon any distribution of its assets to a preference over another class or series of its stock, or, if no shares entitled to such a preference are outstanding, any of its own shares, if such shares are to be retired and the capital reduced. | | As noted above, under Texas law, the purchase or redemption by a corporation of its shares constitutes a distribution. Accordingly, the discussion above relating to distributions is applicable to stock redemptions and repurchases. |
| Indemnification of Directors and Officers | | Delaware law permits a corporation to indemnify directors, officers, employees, or agents against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with an action, suit or proceeding, other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, to which such director, officer, employee or agent may be a party, provided such a director, officer, employee or agent acted in good faith and reasonably believed: (i) in the case of a civil, administrative or investigative proceeding, that his or her conduct was in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, or (ii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, that he or she had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. In connection with an action by or in the right of the corporation against a director, officer, employee or agent, the corporation has the power to indemnify such director, officer, employee or agent for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such suit: (i) if such person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and (ii) if such person is found liable to the corporation, only if ordered by a court of law. Section 145 of the DGCL provides that such section is not exclusive of any other indemnification rights, which may be granted by a corporation to its directors, officers, employees or agents. The existing Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws provide for indemnification of directors and officers (including advancement of expenses) to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. | | Texas law permits a corporation to indemnify a director or former director, against judgments and expenses reasonably and actually incurred by the person in connection with a proceeding if the person: (i) acted in good faith, (ii) reasonably believed, in the case of conduct in the person’s official capacity, that the person’s conduct was in the corporation’s best interests, and otherwise, that the person’s conduct was not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, and (iii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, did not have a reasonable cause to believe the person’s conduct was unlawful. If, however, the person is found liable to the corporation, or is found liable on the basis he received an improper personal benefit, then indemnification under Texas law is limited to the reimbursement of reasonable expenses actually incurred and no indemnification will be available if the person is found liable for: (i) willful or intentional misconduct in the performance of the person’s duty to the corporation, (ii) breach of the person’s duty of loyalty owed to the enterprise, or (iii) an act or omission not committed in good faith that constitutes a breach of a duty owed by the person to the corporation. The Texas Certificate and Texas Bylaws provide for indemnification of directors and officers (including advancement of expenses) to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. |
| Procedure for Indemnification | | Delaware law provides that a determination that indemnification of a director or officer is appropriate must be made: (i) by a majority vote of directors who are not party to the proceeding, even though less than a quorum, (ii) by a committee of such directors designated by majority vote of such directors, even though less than a quorum, (iii) if there are no such directors or if such directors so direct, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (iv) by stockholder vote. | | Texas law provides that a determination that indemnification is appropriate must be made: (i) by a majority vote of the directors who, at the time of the vote, are disinterested and independent, regardless of whether such directors constitute a quorum, (ii) by a majority vote of a special committee of the board of directors if the committee is designated by a majority vote of the directors who at the time of the vote are disinterested and independent and is composed solely of one or more directors who are disinterested and independent, (iii) by special legal counsel selected by majority vote under (i) or (ii) above, (iv) by the stockholders in a vote that excludes those shares held by directors who, at the time of the vote, are not disinterested and independent, or (v) by a unanimous vote of the stockholders of the corporation. |
| | | | | |
| Mandatory Indemnification | | Delaware law requires indemnification for expenses actually and reasonably incurred with respect to any claim, issue or matter on which the director is successful on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding. | | Under Texas law, indemnification by the corporation for reasonable expenses actually incurred is mandatory only if the director is wholly successful on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding. |
| | | | | |
| Insurance | | Delaware law allows a corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in such a capacity or arising out of his status as such a person. This is so, regardless of whether the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against that liability. Under Delaware law, a corporation may also establish and maintain arrangements, other than insurance, to protect such persons, including a trust fund or surety arrangement. | | Texas law is substantially the same as Delaware law for this issue. |
| Persons Covered | | Delaware law provides the same indemnification rights to officers, employees and agents that it provides for directors. | | Texas law expressly and separately addresses the indemnification of officers, employees and agents. The corporation may indemnify and advance expenses to an officer, employee or agent as provided by the corporation’s governing documents, general or specific action of the board of directors, resolution of the stockholders, contract, or common law. The corporation must indemnify an officer to the same extent as a director. The procedure for indemnification under Texas law summarized above need not be followed for officers, employees or agents. |
| | | | | |
| Standard of Care | | In general, directors are charged with the duty in their decision-making process and oversight responsibilities to act as would a reasonably prudent person in the conduct of such person’s own affairs. | | Texas law is substantially the same as Delaware law for this issue. |
| | | | | |
| Limited Liability of Directors | | Delaware law permits the adoption of a provision in the certificate of incorporation limiting or eliminating the monetary liability of a director to a corporation or its stockholders by reason of a director’s breach of the fiduciary duty of care. Delaware law does not, however, permit any limitation of the liability of a director for: (i) breaching the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) failing to act in good faith, (iii) engaging in intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iv) obtaining an improper personal benefit from the corporation, or (v) declaring an illegal dividend or approving an illegal stock purchase or redemption. The existing Delaware Certificate eliminates the monetary liability of a director to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. | | Texas law permits a corporation to eliminate in its certificate of formation all monetary liability of a director to the corporation or its stockholders for conduct in the performance of such director’s duties. Texas law does not, however, permit any limitation of the liability of a director for: (i) a breach of the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) an act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a breach of duty of the person to the corporation or involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) a transaction from which the director obtains an improper benefit, or (iv) a violation of applicable statutes which expressly provide for the liability of a director. The Texas Certificate eliminates the monetary liability of a director to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. |
| Fiduciary Duties of Directors | | Delaware imposes duties of care and loyalty on directors of Delaware corporations, subject to the business judgment rule which provides a presumption that a director acted on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the corporation. Delaware imposes liability upon directors who willfully or recklessly disregard their duties as directors so as to constitute an utter failure to carry out their fiduciary duties. Directors of a Delaware corporation owe fiduciary duties both to the stockholders and the corporation. | | Texas imposes duties of loyalty, care and obedience on directors of Texas corporations, but will generally not, absent fraud, impose liability upon a non-interested director unless the action challenged is outside of the expressed purpose of the corporation or inconsistent with an express limitation on authority. Directors of a Texas corporation owe fiduciary duties only to the corporation. |
| | | | | |
| Shareholder Rights Plans | | Delaware courts have generally allowed the use of shareholder rights plans by a corporation if their adoption is reasonable in response to a reasonably identified threat posed. | | Texas statutorily approves shareholder rights plans. |
| | | | | |
| Considerations of Directors | | Delaware does not have a statute stating what constituencies the board may consider when making decisions. | | Texas corporate law includes statutory approval of directors considering both the long-term and short-term interests of the corporation and the stockholders. |
| | | | | |
| Shareholder Actions | | Delaware allows certain lawsuits to be brought against directors directly by stockholders, in some instances, without making a demand on the corporation’s board. Generally, lawsuits are tried before a Delaware chancellor without a jury. | | Texas generally requires that lawsuits against directors be brought derivatively by the corporation only after making demand on the corporation’s board setting out the contours of the demand. Texas law may, in certain circumstances, such as in a proceeding determining liability of directors, allow for a jury trial. |
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| | ALSET EHOME INTERNATIONAL INC. |
| | | |
| Dated: September 12, 2022 | By: | /s/ Rongguo Wei |
| | Name: | Rongguo Wei |
| | Title: | Co-Chief Financial Officer |
