As previously disclosed, on November 14, 2023, Graphite Bio, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Graphite”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among Graphite, Generate Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Graphite (“Merger Sub”), and Lenz Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“LENZ”), pursuant to which, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into LENZ (the “Merger”), with LENZ continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of Graphite and the surviving corporation of the Merger.
On December 6, 2023, Graphite filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a registration statement on Form S-4 (the “Form S-4”), as amended on January 18, 2024, February 5, 2024, and February 9, 2024, which contained a preliminary proxy statement/prospectus. The Form S-4 became effective on February 13, 2024, and a final proxy statement/prospectus (the “Proxy Statement/Prospectus”) was filed with the SEC on that day. The Proxy Statement/Prospectus solicits stockholder approval for, among other things, the Merger.
Certain Litigation
In connection with the Merger, one complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California captioned Glen Chew v. Graphite Bio, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-00613 (filed February 1, 2024) and one complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware captioned Kevin Turner v. Graphite Bio, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00241-UNA (filed February 22, 2024) (collectively, the “Complaints”). The Complaints generally allege that the Proxy Statement/Prospectus filed by Graphite with the SEC misrepresents and/or omits certain purportedly material information relating to LENZ’s financial projections, the analyses performed by the financial advisor to Graphite’s Board of Directors in connection with the Merger, potential conflicts of interest of the financial advisor to Graphite’s Board of Directors, potential conflicts of interest of Graphite’s officers, and Graphite’s liquidation analysis. The Complaints assert violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder against all defendants (Graphite, its Board of Directors and certain officers) and violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against Graphite’s directors and officers. The Complaints seek orders enjoining the proposed Merger, or in the event that the proposed Merger is consummated, an order rescinding the Merger or awarding rescissory damages, as well as costs, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees.
Graphite has also received twelve additional demand letters by purported Graphite stockholders from December 14, 2023 to February 28, 2024 seeking additional disclosures in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (the “Demands”).
Graphite cannot predict the outcome of any litigation or the Demands. Graphite and the individual defendants intend to vigorously defend against the Complaints, the Demands, and any subsequently filed similar actions. It is possible additional lawsuits may be filed or additional demand letters may be received arising out of the Merger between February 28, 2024 and consummation of the Merger. Absent new or significantly different allegations, Graphite will not necessarily disclose such additional filings or demand letters.
Graphite believes that the disclosures set forth in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus comply fully with all applicable laws, and denies the allegations in the Complaints described above. Nevertheless, in order to moot plaintiffs’ disclosure claims, avoid nuisance and possible expense and business delays, and provide additional information to its stockholders, Graphite has determined voluntarily to supplement certain disclosures in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus with the supplemental disclosures set forth below (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal merit of the Complaints or the Demands described above, or of the necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, Graphite specifically denies all allegations in the Complaints and the Demands that any additional disclosure was or is required or is material.