SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | Note 3 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, expressed in U.S. dollars. References to GAAP issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in these accompanying notes to the financial statements are to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. Unaudited Interim Condensed Financial Statements The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments including normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in accordance with GAAP. Operating results for interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2024. The interim financial statements presented herein do not contain all required disclosures under GAAP for annual financial statements. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited financial statements and related notes in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. Principles of Consolidation The Company owns a noncontrolling interest in an unconsolidated joint venture with GE Vernova, the AirJoule JV. The investment in the Company’s unconsolidated affiliate is accounted for using the equity method with the Company’s proportionate share of income or loss recognized within equity gain (loss) from investment in AirJoule JV in its condensed consolidated statements of operations. See further discussion of the Company’s unconsolidated affiliate in Note 5 - Equity Method Investment Use of Estimates The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Some of the more significant estimates include estimates of amortization and depreciation, fair values of liabilities associated with the Earnout Shares, True Up Shares and Subject Vesting Shares (as such terms are defined in Note 4 - Recapitalization Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Concentration of Credit Risk The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a weighted average maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The carrying values of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. As of September 30, 2024, there was $20.1 million held in money market funds on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. There were no Business Combinations The Company evaluates whether acquired net assets should be accounted for as a business combination or an asset acquisition by first applying a screen test to determine whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. If so, the transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition. If not, the Company applies its judgement to determine whether the acquired net assets meet the definition of a business by considering if the set includes an acquired input, process, and the ability to create outputs. The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method when it has obtained control. The Company measures goodwill as the fair value of the consideration transferred, including the fair value of any non-controlling interest recognized, less the net recognized amount of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities combined, all measured at their fair value as of the acquisition date. Transaction costs, other than those associated with the issuance of debt or equity securities, that the Company incurs in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred. Any contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date. A contingent consideration that does not meet all the criteria for equity classification is required to be recorded at its initial fair value at the acquisition date, and on each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of liability-classified contingent considerations are recognized on the condensed consolidated statements of operations in the period of change. Equity Method Investment In accordance with ASC 323, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures Initial Measurement of Asset Acquisitions Under the equity method of accounting, the Company’s investment is initially recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Upon initial investment, the Company evaluates whether there are basis differences between the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s proportionate share of the investee’s underlying net assets. The Company amortizes basis differences identified on a straight-line basis over the underlying assets’ estimated useful lives when calculating the attributable earnings or losses, excluding the basis differences attributable to in-process research and development and goodwill. If the Company is unable to attribute all of the basis differences to specific assets or liabilities of the investee, the residual excess of the cost of the investment over the proportional fair value of the investee’s assets and liabilities is considered to be equity method goodwill and is recognized within the equity investment balance. The Company subsequently records in the statements of operations its share of income or loss of the other entity within other income (expense), which results in an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the investment. If the share of losses exceeds the carrying value of the Company’s investment, the Company will suspend recognizing additional losses and will continue to do so unless it commits to providing additional funding. The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a decline in value has occurred that is other than temporary. Evidence considered in this evaluation includes, but would not necessarily be limited to, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, recent operating trends and forecasted performance of the investee, market conditions in the geographic area or industry in which the investee operates and the Company’s strategic plans for holding the investment in relation to the period of time expected for an anticipated recovery of its carrying value. If the investment is determined to have a decline in value deemed to be other than temporary it is written down to estimated fair value. Additionally, if an equity method investee recognizes a goodwill impairment charge in its separate financial statements, the Company will recognize its share of the impairment in its financial statements in the same manner in which it recognizes other earnings of the investee. Property and Equipment Property and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and includes expenditures that substantially increase the useful lives of existing property and equipment. Maintenance, repairs and minor renovations are charged to expense as incurred. When property and equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from their respective accounts, and any difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset is recognized as a gain or loss on disposal in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of depreciable assets. The lives used in computing depreciation for significant asset classes are as follow: Estimated Machinery and Equipment 3 years Vehicles 3 years The estimated useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed at each year-end, with the effect of any changes in estimates accounted for prospectively. All depreciation expenses are included within depreciation and amortization in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Leases The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The operating lease right-of-use asset (“ROU asset”) and short-term and long-term lease liability are included on the face of the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The ROU asset represents the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liability represents the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. An operating lease ROU asset and liability are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As typically the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date over the respective lease term in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has elected to not apply the recognition requirement of ASC 842, Leases Warrants The Company determines the accounting classification of warrants it issues as either liability or equity classified by first assessing whether the warrants meet the liability classification in accordance with ASC 480-10, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock If a warrant does not meet the conditions for stockholders’ deficit classification, it is carried on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as a warrant liability measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in the fair value of the warrant recorded in other non-operating gains (losses) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. If a warrant meets both conditions for equity classification, the warrant is initially recorded, at its relative fair value on the date of issuance, in stockholders’ equity (deficit) in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, and the amount initially recorded is not subsequently remeasured at fair value. Income Taxes Prior to the Business Combination on March 14, 2024, the Company was a limited liability company and treated as a partnership for income tax purpose. As a partnership, the Company was not directly liable for federal income taxes. As of the date of the Business Combination, the operations of the Company ceased to be taxed as a partnership resulting in a change in tax status for federal and state income tax purposes. The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under ASC 740, Income Taxes ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. Management has evaluated the Company’s tax positions, including its previous status as a pass-through entity for federal and state tax purposes, and has determined that the Company has taken no uncertain tax positions that require adjustment to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company’s reserve related to uncertain tax positions was zero no Research and Development Cost The Company accounts for research and development cost (“R&D”) in accordance with FASB ASC 730, Research and Development Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset, or the amount paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There is a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows: Level 1 — Inputs based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. Level 3 — Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are both unobservable for the asset and liability in the market and significant to the overall fair value measurement. In some circumstances, the inputs used to measure fair value might be categorized within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In those instances, the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company establishes the fair value of its assets and liabilities using the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. The recorded amounts of certain financial instruments, including accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. See Note 5 – Equity Method Investment Fair Value Measurements Earnout Shares Liability In connection with the reverse recapitalization and pursuant to the Merger Agreement, eligible former Legacy Montana Equityholders (as defined below) are entitled to receive additional shares of Common Stock upon the Company achieving certain milestones. See Note 4 – Recapitalization. We estimated fair value of the Earnout Shares with a Monte Carlo simulation using a distribution of potential outcomes for expected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and stock price at expected commission dates, utilizing a correlation coefficient for EBITDA and stock price, and assuming $50 million of Annualized EBITDA per production line, with each of the production lines commissioned over a five-year period. EBITDA was discounted to the valuation date with a weighted average cost of capital estimate and forecasted to each estimated commission date. Earnout mechanics at each estimated commission date were assessed, and if the earnout thresholds were achieved, the future value of the Earnout Shares was discounted to the valuation date utilizing a risk-free rate commensurate with the overall term. The commission dates used reflected management’s best estimates regarding the time to complete full construction and achieve operational viability of a production line, including all permitting, regulatory approvals and necessary or useful inspections. The five-year period and overall settlement mechanics for the Earnout Shares represent contractual inputs. Management’s valuation of the Earnout Shares liability involves certain assumptions requiring significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts. The Company determined the Earnout Shares associated with employees are accounted for as compensation expense under FASB ASC Topic 718, Share-based Compensation Derivative Financial Instruments and Other Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments, including the True Up Shares issued in connection with the Subscription Agreement and the Subject Vesting Shares issued in connection with the Business Combination, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 and FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging The True Up Shares issued under one of the Subscription Agreements do not qualify as equity under ASC 815; therefore, the True Up Shares are required to be classified as a liability and measured at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative liability are recognized as a non-cash gain or loss on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the derivative liability is discussed in Note 11 — Fair Value Measurements The Subject Vesting Shares liability was an assumed liability of XPDB. The Subject Vesting Shares vest and are no longer subject to forfeiture as described in Note 4 – Recapitalization Fair Value Measurements Share-Based Compensation The Company accounts for share-based compensation arrangements granted to employees in accordance with ASC 718 by measuring the grant date fair value of the award and recognizing the resulting expense over the period during which the employee is required to perform services in exchange for the award. Equity-based compensation expense is only recognized for awards subject to performance conditions if it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. The Company accounts for forfeitures when they occur. The Company estimates the fair value of stock option awards subject to only a service condition on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Black-Scholes model requires the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions, including the option’s expected term, price volatility of the underlying stock, risk-free interest rate and the expected dividend yield of the underlying common stock, as well as an estimate of the fair value of the common stock underlying the award. The Company estimates the fair value of Earnout Shares awards to employees, which are considered compensatory awards and accounted for under ASC 718 using the Monte-Carlo simulation model . Net Income (Loss) Per Share Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss), which is allocated based upon the proportionate amount of weighted average shares outstanding, by each class of stockholder’s stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potential shares of common stock, including warrants, stock options, Earnout Shares, True Up Shares, Subject Vesting Shares and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), to the extent dilutive. Stock options and warrants with exercise prices greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the period are excluded from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Additionally, RSUs that vest based on service conditions that have not been achieved as of the end of the period are not included in the computation of basic or diluted earnings per share. Finally, Earnout Shares, True Up Shares and Subject Vesting shares are not included in the calculation of dilutive net income (loss) per share if their conditions are not deemed satisfied for issuance as of the reported period. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2024, the warrants, Earnout Shares, Subject Vesting Shares and RSUs were not included in the calculation of dilutive net income (loss) per share. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, due to a net loss, all potential shares of common stock were not included in the calculation of dilutive net loss per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2024, dilutive shares included in the calculation or net income (loss) per share of common stock, utilizing the treasury stock method, were 1,279,959 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and 280,102 shares of common stock issuable upon the triggering event of the True Up Shares in the third quarter of 2024. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, dilutive shares included in the calculation or net income (loss) per share of common stock, utilizing the treasury stock method, were 1,298,378 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options and 93,367 shares of common stock issuable upon the triggering event of the True Up Shares in the third quarter of 2024. The net loss per share of common stock presented in the condensed consolidated statements of operations is based on the following for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023: Three Months Ended September 30, 2024 2023 Class A Class B Class A Class B Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock Numerator: Allocation of net income (loss) $ 32,029,249 $ 2,987,609 $ (3,970,814 ) $ (577,539 ) Denominator: Basic weighted average shares outstanding 51,026,682 4,759,642 32,724,444 4,759,642 Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock $ 0.63 $ 0.63 $ (0.12 ) $ (0.12 ) Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock Numerator: Allocation of net income (loss) $ 32,110,525 $ 2,906,333 $ (3,970,814 ) $ (577,539 ) Denominator: Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 52,586,743 4,759,642 32,724,444 4,759,642 Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock $ 0.61 $ 0.61 $ (0.12 ) $ (0.12 ) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024 2023 Class A Class B Class A Class B Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock Numerator: Allocation of net income (loss) $ 208,427,150 $ 21,574,895 $ (7,349,855 ) $ (1,070,969 ) Denominator: Basic weighted average shares outstanding 45,981,155 4,759,642 32,664,496 4,759,642 Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock $ 4.53 $ 4.53 $ (0.23 ) $ (0.23 ) Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock Numerator: Allocation of net income (loss) $ 209,003,119 $ 20,998,926 $ (7,349,855 ) $ (1,070,969 ) Denominator: Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 47,372,900 4,759,642 32,664,496 4,759,642 Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock $ 4.41 $ 4.41 $ (0.23 ) $ (0.23 ) New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Issued Accounting Standards The Company is an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act. Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act, until such time as those standards apply to private companies. The Company has elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that it (i) is no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opts out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, these financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with the new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates. In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, |