OceanPal (OP) 20-F2023 FY Annual report (foreign)

Sulfur content standards are even stricter within certain “Emission Control Areas,” or (“ECAs”). As of January 1, 2015, ships operating within an ECA were not permitted to use fuel with sulfur content in excess of 0.1% m/m. Amended Annex VI establishes procedures for designating new ECAs. Currently, the IMO has designated four ECAs, including specified portions of the Baltic Sea area, North Sea area, North American area and United States Caribbean area. Ocean-going vessels in these areas will be subject to stringent emission controls and may cause us to incur additional costs. Other areas in China are subject to local regulations that impose stricter emission controls. In December 2021, the member states of the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution (“Barcelona Convention”) agreed to support the designation of a new ECA in the Mediterranean. On December 15, 2022, MEPC 79 adopted the designation of a new ECA in the Mediterranean, with an effective date of May 1, 2025. In July 2023, MEPC 80 announced three new ECA proposals, including the Canadian Arctic waters and the North-East Atlantic Ocean. If other ECAs are approved by the IMO, or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations.

Amended Annex VI also establishes new tiers of stringent nitrogen oxide emissions standards for marine diesel engines, depending on their date of installation. At the MEPC meeting held from March to April 2014, amendments to Annex VI were adopted which address the date on which Tier III Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) standards in ECAs will go into effect. Under the amendments, Tier III NOx standards apply to ships that operate in the North American and U.S. Caribbean Sea ECAs designed for the control of NOx produced by vessels with a marine diesel engine installed and constructed on or after January 1, 2016. Tier III requirements could apply to areas that will be designated for Tier III NOx in the future. At MEPC 70 and MEPC 71, the MEPC approved the North Sea and Baltic Sea as ECAs for nitrogen oxide for ships built on or after January 1, 2021. For the moment, this regulation relates to new building vessels and has no retroactive application to existing fleet. The EPA promulgated equivalent (and in some senses stricter) emissions standards in 2010. As a result of these designations or similar future designations, we may be required to incur additional operating or other costs.

As determined at the MEPC 70, the new Regulation 22A of MARPOL Annex VI became effective as of March 1, 2018 and requires ships above 5,000 gross tonnage to collect and report annual data on fuel oil consumption to an IMO database, with the first year of data collection having commenced on January 1, 2019. The IMO intends to use such data as the first step in its roadmap (through 2023) for developing its strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships, as discussed further below.

As of January 1, 2013, MARPOL made mandatory certain measures relating to energy efficiency for ships. All ships are now required to develop and implement a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plans (“SEEMPs”), and new ships must be designed in compliance with minimum energy efficiency levels per capacity mile as defined by the Energy Efficiency Design Index (“EEDI”). Under these measures, by 2025, all new ships built will be 30% more energy efficient than those built in 2014. MEPC 75 adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI which brings forward the effective date of the EEDI’s “phase 3” requirements from January 1, 2025 to April 1, 2022 for several ship types, including gas carriers, general cargo ships, and LNG carriers.

Additionally, MEPC 75 introduced draft amendments to Annex VI which impose new regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships. These amendments introduce requirements to assess and measure the energy efficiency of all ships and set the required attainment values, with the goal of reducing the carbon intensity of international shipping. The requirements include (1) a technical requirement to reduce carbon intensity based on a new Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (“EEXI”), and (2) operational carbon intensity reduction requirements, based on a new operational carbon intensity indicator (“CII”). The attained EEXI is required to be calculated for ships of 400 gross tonnage and above, in accordance with different values set for ship types and categories. With respect to the CII, the draft amendments would require ships of 5,000 gross tonnage to document and verify their actual annual operational CII achieved against a determined required annual operational CII. Additionally, MEPC 75 proposed draft amendments requiring that, on or before January 1, 2023, all ships above 400 gross tonnage must have an approved SEEMP on board. For ships above 5,000 gross tonnage, the SEEMP would need to include certain mandatory content. MEPC 75 also approved draft amendments to MARPOL Annex I to prohibit the use and carriage for use as fuel of heavy fuel oil (“HFO”) by ships in Arctic waters on and after July 1, 2024. The draft amendments introduced at MEPC 75 were adopted at the MEPC 76 session on June 2021 and entered into force on November 1, 2022, with the requirements for EEXI and CII certification coming into effect from January 1, 2023. MEPC 77 adopted a non-binding resolution which urges Member States and ship operators to voluntarily use distillate or other cleaner alternative fuels or methods of propulsion that are safe for ships and could contribute to the reduction of Black Carbon emissions from ships when operating in or near the Arctic. MEPC 79 adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI, Appendix IX to include the attained and required CII values, the CII rating and attained EEXI for existing ships in the required information to be submitted to the IMO Ship Fuel Oil Consumption Database. MEPC 79 revised the EEDI calculation guidelines to include a CO2 conversion factor for ethane, a reference to the updated ITCC guidelines, and a clarification that in case of a ship with multiple load line certificates, the maximum certified summer draft should be used when determining the deadweight. The amendments will enter into force on May 1, 2024.  In July 2023, MEPC 80 approved the plan for reviewing CII regulations and guidelines, which must be completed at the latest by January 1, 2026. There will be no immediate changes to the CII framework, including correction factors and voyage adjustments, before the review is completed.

To ensure compliance with EEXI requirements most owners/operators, including us, may choose to limit engine power, a solution less costly than applying energy saving devices and/ or effecting certain alterations on existing propeller designs. The engine power limitation is predicted to lead to reduced ballast and laden speeds (at scantling draft,) in the non-compliant vessels which will affect their commercial utilization but also decrease the global availability of vessel capacity. Furthermore, required software and hardware alterations as well as documentation and recordkeeping requirements will increase a vessel’s capital and operating expenditures. As of the date of this annual report and since January 1, 2023, official calculations had determined that our vessels were in compliance with the EEXI requirements.

We may incur costs to comply with these revised standards. Additional or new conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted that could require the installation of expensive emission control systems and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

The SOLAS Convention was amended to address the safe manning of vessels and emergency training drills. The Convention of Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (the “LLMC”) sets limitations of liability for a loss of life or personal injury claim or a property claim against ship owners. We believe that our vessels are in substantial compliance with SOLAS and LLMC standards.

Under Chapter IX of the SOLAS Convention, or the International Safety Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (the “ISM Code”), our operations are also subject to environmental standards and requirements. The ISM Code requires the party with operational control of a vessel to develop an extensive safety management system that includes, among other things, the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for operating its vessels safely and describing procedures for responding to emergencies. We rely upon the safety management system that we and our technical management team have developed for compliance with the ISM Code. The failure of a vessel owner or bareboat charterer to comply with the ISM Code may subject such party to increased liability, may decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.

The ISM Code requires that vessel operators obtain a safety management certificate for each vessel they operate. This certificate evidences compliance by a vessel’s management with the ISM Code requirements for a safety management system. No vessel can obtain a safety management certificate unless its manager has been awarded a document of compliance, issued by each flag state, under the ISM Code. DWM has obtained applicable documents of compliance and safety management certificates for all of our vessels for which the certificates are required by the IMO. The documents of compliance and safety management certificate are renewed as required.

Regulation II-1/3-10 of the SOLAS Convention governs ship construction and stipulates that ships over 150 meters in length must have adequate strength, integrity and stability to minimize risk of loss or pollution. Goal-based standards amendments in SOLAS regulation II-1/3-10 entered into force in 2012, with July 1, 2016 set for application to new oil tankers and bulk carriers. The SOLAS Convention regulation II-1/3-10 on goal-based ship construction standards for bulk carriers and oil tankers, which entered into force on January 1, 2012, requires that all oil tankers and bulk carriers of 150 meters in length and above, for which the building contract is placed on or after July 1, 2016, satisfy applicable structural requirements conforming to the functional requirements of the International Goal-based Ship Construction Standards for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers (“GBS Standards”).

Amendments to the SOLAS Convention Chapter VII apply to vessels transporting dangerous goods and require those vessels be in compliance with the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (“IMDG Code”). Effective January 1, 2018, the IMDG Code includes (1) updates to the provisions for radioactive material, reflecting the latest provisions from the International Atomic Energy Agency, (2) new marking, packing and classification requirements for dangerous goods, and (3) new mandatory training requirements. Amendments which took effect on January 1, 2020 also reflect the latest material from the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, including (1) new provisions regarding IMO type 9 tank, (2) new abbreviations for segregation groups, and (3) special provisions for carriage of lithium batteries and of vehicles powered by flammable liquid or gas. Additional amendments, which came into force on June 1, 2022, include (1) addition of a definition of dosage rate, (2) additions to the list of high consequence dangerous goods, (3) new provisions for medical/clinical waste, (4) addition of various ISO standards for gas cylinders, (5) a new handling code, and (6) changes to stowage and segregation provisions.

The IMO has also adopted the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (“STCW”). As of February 2017, all seafarers are required to meet the STCW standards and be in possession of a valid STCW certificate. Flag states that have ratified SOLAS and STCW generally employ the classification societies, which have incorporated SOLAS and STCW requirements into their class rules, to undertake surveys to confirm compliance.

The IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee and MEPC, respectively, each adopted relevant parts of the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Water (the “Polar Code”). The Polar Code, which entered into force on January 1, 2017, covers design, construction, equipment, operational, training, search and rescue as well as environmental protection matters relevant to ships operating in the waters surrounding the two poles. It also includes mandatory measures regarding safety and pollution prevention as well as recommendatory provisions. The Polar Code applies to new ships constructed after January 1, 2017, and after January 1, 2018, ships constructed before January 1, 2017 are required to meet the relevant requirements by the earlier of their first intermediate or renewal survey.

Furthermore, recent action by the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee and United States agencies indicates that cybersecurity regulations for the maritime industry are likely to be further developed in the near future in an attempt to combat cybersecurity threats. By IMO resolution, administrations are encouraged to ensure that cyber-risk management systems are incorporated by ship-owners and managers by their first annual Document of Compliance audit after January 1, 2021. In February 2021, the U.S. Coast Guard published guidance on addressing cyber risks in a vessel’s safety management system. This might cause companies to create additional procedures for monitoring cybersecurity, which could require additional expenses and/or capital expenditures. The impact of future regulations is hard to predict at this time.

In June 2022, SOLAS also set out new amendments that took effect on January 1, 2024, which include new requirements for: (1) the design for safe mooring operations, (2) the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (“GMDSS”), (3) watertight integrity, (4) watertight doors on cargo ships, (5) fault-isolation of fire detection systems, (6) life-saving appliances, and (7) safety of ships using LNG as fuel. These new requirements may impact the cost of our operations.

The IMO has negotiated international conventions that impose liability for pollution in international waters and the territorial waters of the signatories to such conventions. For example, the IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, (the “BWM Convention”), in 2004. The BWM Convention entered into force on September 8, 2017. The BWM Convention requires ships to manage their ballast water to remove, render harmless, or avoid the uptake or discharge of new or invasive aquatic organisms and pathogens within ballast water and sediments. The BWM Convention’s implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits, and require all ships to carry a ballast water record book and an international ballast water management certificate.

On December 4, 2013, the IMO Assembly passed a resolution revising the application dates of the BWM Convention so that the dates are triggered by the entry into force date and not the dates originally in the BWM Convention. This, in effect, makes all vessels delivered before the entry into force date “existing vessels” and allows for the installation of ballast water treatment systems on such vessels at the first International Oil Pollution Prevention (“IOPP”) renewal survey following entry into force of the convention. The MEPC adopted updated guidelines for approval of ballast water treatment systems (G8) at MEPC 70. At MEPC 71, the schedule regarding the BWM Convention’s implementation dates was also discussed and amendments were introduced to extend the date existing vessels are subject to certain ballast water standards. Those changes were adopted at MEPC 72. Ships over 400 gross tons generally must comply with a “D-1 standard,” requiring the exchange of ballast water only in open seas and away from coastal waters. The “D-2 standard” specifies the maximum amount of viable organisms allowed to be discharged, and compliance dates vary depending on the IOPP renewal dates. Depending on the date of the IOPP renewal survey, existing vessels must comply with the D-2 standard on or after September 8, 2019. For most ships, compliance with the D-2 standard will involve installing on-board systems to treat ballast water and eliminate unwanted organisms. Ballast water treatment systems, which include systems that make use of chemical, biocides, organisms or biological mechanisms, or which alter the chemical or physical characteristics of the ballast water, must be approved in accordance with IMO Guidelines (Regulation D-3). As of October 13, 2019, MEPC 72’s amendments to the BWM Convention took effect, making the Code for Approval of Ballast Water Treatment Systems, which governs assessment of ballast water treatment systems, mandatory rather than permissive, and formalized an implementation schedule for the D-2 standard. Under these amendments, all ships must meet the D-2 standard by September 8, 2024. Costs of compliance with these regulations may be substantial. Additionally, in November 2020, MEPC 75 adopted amendments to the BWM Convention which would require a commissioning test of the ballast water treatment system for the initial survey or when performing an additional survey for retrofits. This analysis will not apply to ships that already have an installed BWM system certified under the BWM Convention. These amendments have entered into force on June 1, 2022. In December 2022, MEPC 79 agreed that it should be permitted to use ballast tanks for temporary storage of treated sewage and grey water. MEPC 79 also established that ships are expected to return to D-2 compliance after experiencing challenging uptake water and bypassing a BWM system should only be used as a last resort. In July 2023, MEPC 80 approved a plan for a comprehensive review of the BWM Convention over the next three years and the corresponding development of a package of amendments to the Convention. MEPC 80 also adopted further amendments relating to Appendix II of the BWM Convention concerning the form of the Ballast Water Record Book, which are expected to enter into force in February 2025. A protocol for ballast water compliance monitoring devices and unified interpretation of the form of the BWM Convention certificate were also adopted.

Once mid-ocean exchange ballast water treatment requirements become mandatory under the BWM Convention, the cost of compliance could increase for ocean carriers and may have a material effect on our operations. However, many countries already regulate the discharge of ballast water carried by vessels from country to country to prevent the introduction of invasive and harmful species via such discharges. The U.S., for example, requires vessels entering its waters from another country to conduct mid-ocean ballast exchange, or undertake some alternate measure, and to comply with certain reporting requirements.

The IMO also adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (the “Bunker Convention”) to impose strict liability on ship owners (including the registered owner, bareboat charterer, manager or operator) for pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker fuel. The Bunker Convention requires registered owners of ships over 1,000 gross tons to maintain insurance for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in accordance with the LLMC). With respect to non-ratifying states, liability for spills or releases of oil carried as fuel in ship’s bunkers typically is determined by the national or other domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the events or damages occur. Ships are required to maintain a certificate attesting that they maintain adequate insurance to cover an incident. In jurisdictions, such as the United States where the Bunker Convention has not been adopted, various legislative schemes or common law govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or on a strict-liability basis.

In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships, or the “Anti-fouling Convention.” The Anti-fouling Convention, which entered into force on September 17, 2008, prohibits the use of organotin compound coatings to prevent the attachment of mollusks and other sea life to the hulls of vessels. Vessels of over 400 gross tons engaged in international voyages will also be required to undergo an initial survey before the vessel is put into service or before an International Anti-fouling System Certificate, or “IAFS Certificate”, is issued for the first time; and subsequent surveys when the anti-fouling systems are altered or replaced. Vessels of 24 meters in length or more but less than 400 gross tonnage engaged in international voyages will have to carry a Declaration on Anti-fouling Systems signed by the owner or authorized agent.

In November 2020, MEPC 75 approved draft amendments to the Anti-fouling Convention to prohibit anti-fouling systems containing cybutryne, which would apply to ships from January 1, 2023, or, for ships already bearing such an anti-fouling system, at the next scheduled renewal of the system after that date, but no later than 60 months following the last application to the ship of such a system. In addition, the IAFS Certificate has been updated to address compliance options for anti-fouling systems to address cybutryne. Ships which are affected by this ban on cybutryne must receive an updated IAFS Certificate no later than two years after the entry into force of these amendments. Ships which are not affected (i.e. with anti-fouling systems which do not contain cybutryne) must receive an updated IAFS Certificate at the next Anti-fouling application to the vessel. These amendments were formally adopted at MEPC 76 in June 2021 and entered into force on January 1, 2023.

We have obtained Anti-fouling System Certificates for all of our vessels that are subject to the Anti-fouling Convention.

Noncompliance with the ISM Code or other IMO regulations may subject the ship owner or bareboat charterer to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports. The USCG and European Union authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code by applicable deadlines will be prohibited from trading in U.S. and European Union ports, respectively. As of the date of this annual report, each of our vessels is ISM Code certified. However, there can be no assurance that such certificates will be maintained in the future. The IMO continues to review and introduce new regulations. It is impossible to predict what additional regulations, if any, may be passed by the IMO and what effect, if any, such regulations might have on our operations.

The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment from oil spills. OPA affects all “owners and operators” whose vessels trade or operate within the U.S., its territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in U.S. waters, which includes the U.S.’s territorial sea and its 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone around the U.S. The U.S. has also enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), which applies to the discharge of hazardous substances other than oil, except in limited circumstances, whether on land or at sea. OPA and CERCLA both define “owner and operator” in the case of a vessel as any person owning, operating or chartering by demise, the vessel. Both OPA and CERCLA impact our operations.

Under OPA, vessel owners and operators are “responsible parties” and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges of oil from their vessels, including bunkers (fuel). OPA defines these other damages broadly to include:

OPA contains statutory caps on liability and damages; such caps do not apply to direct cleanup costs. Effective November 12, 2019, the USCG adjusted the limits of OPA liability for non-tank vessels, edible oil tank vessels, and any oil spill response vessels, to the greater of $1,200 per gross ton or $997,100 (subject to periodic adjustment for inflation). On December 23, 2022, the USCG issued a final rule to adjust the limitation of liability under the OPA.  Effective March 23, 2022, the new adjusted limits of OPA liability for non-tank vessels, edible oil tank vessels, and any oil spill response vessels, to the greater of $1,300 per gross ton or $1,076,000 (subject to periodic adjustment for inflation).

These limits of liability do not apply if an incident was proximately caused by the violation of an applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or operating regulation by a responsible party (or its agent, employee or a person acting pursuant to a contractual relationship), or a responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. The limitation on liability similarly does not apply if the responsible party fails or refuses to (i) report the incident as required by law where the responsible party knows or has reason to know of the incident; (ii) reasonably cooperate and assist as requested in connection with oil removal activities; or (iii) without sufficient cause, comply with an order issued under the Federal Water Pollution Act (Section 311 (c), (e)) or the Intervention on the High Seas Act.

CERCLA contains a similar liability regime whereby owners and operators of vessels are liable for cleanup, removal and remedial costs, as well as damages for injury to, or destruction or loss of, natural resources, including the reasonable costs associated with assessing the same, and health assessments or health effects studies. There is no liability if the discharge of a hazardous substance results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war. Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5.0 million for vessels carrying a hazardous substance as cargo and the greater of $300 per gross ton or $500,000 for any other vessel. These limits do not apply (rendering the responsible person liable for the total cost of response and damages) if the release or threat of release of a hazardous substance resulted from willful misconduct or negligence, or the primary cause of the release was a violation of applicable safety, construction or operating standards or regulations. The limitation on liability also does not apply if the responsible person fails or refused to provide all reasonable cooperation and assistance as requested in connection with response activities where the vessel is subject to OPA.

OPA and CERCLA each preserve the right to recover damages under existing law, including maritime tort law. OPA and CERCLA both require owners and operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the USCG evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet the maximum amount of liability to which the particular responsible person may be subject. Vessel owners and operators may satisfy their financial responsibility obligations by providing a proof of insurance, a surety bond, qualification as a self-insurer or a guarantee. We comply and plan to comply going forward with the USCG’s financial responsibility regulations by providing applicable certificates of financial responsibility.

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico resulted in additional regulatory initiatives or statutes, including higher liability caps under OPA, new regulations regarding offshore oil and gas drilling, and a pilot inspection program for offshore facilities. However, several of these initiatives and regulations have been or may be revised. For example, the U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement’s (“BSEE”) revised Production Safety Systems Rule (“PSSR”), effective December 27, 2018, modified and relaxed certain environmental and safety protections under the 2016 PSSR. Additionally, the BSEE amended the Well Control Rule, effective July 15, 2019, which rolled back certain reforms regarding the safety of drilling operations, and the former U.S. President Trump had proposed leasing new sections of U.S. waters to oil and gas companies for offshore drilling.  In January 2021, U.S. President Biden signed an executive order temporarily blocking new leases for oil and gas drilling in federal waters. However, attorney generals from 13 states filed suit in March 2021 to lift the executive order, and in June 2021, a federal judge in Louisiana granted a preliminary injunction against the Biden administration, stating that the power to pause offshore oil and gas leases “lies solely with Congress.”   In August 2022, a federal judge in Louisiana sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, along with the other 12 plaintiff states, by issuing a permanent injunction against the Biden Administration’s moratorium on oil and gas leasing on federal public lands and offshore waters.  After being blocked by the courts, in September 2023, the Biden administration announced a scaled back offshore oil drilling plan, including just three oil lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico.  With these rapid changes, compliance with any new requirements of OPA and future legislation or regulations applicable to the operation of our vessels could impact the cost of our operations and adversely affect our business.

OPA specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, provided they accept, at a minimum, the levels of liability established under OPA and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for oil spills. Many U.S. states that border a navigable waterway have enacted environmental pollution laws that impose strict liability on a person for removal costs and damages resulting from a discharge of oil or a release of a hazardous substance. These laws may be more stringent than U.S. federal law. Moreover, some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for discharge of pollutants within their waters, although in some cases, states which have enacted this type of legislation have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessel owners’ responsibilities under these laws. The Company intends to comply with all applicable state regulations in the ports where the Company’s vessels call.

We currently maintain pollution liability coverage insurance in the amount of $1 billion per incident for each of our vessels. If the damages from a catastrophic spill were to exceed our insurance coverage, it could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operation.

The U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970 (including its amendments of 1977 and 1990) (“CAA”) requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic compounds and other air contaminants. The CAA requires states to adopt State Implementation Plans, or SIPs, some of which regulate emissions resulting from vessel loading and unloading operations which may affect our vessels.

The U.S. Clean Water Act (“CWA”) prohibits the discharge of oil, hazardous substances and ballast water in U.S. navigable waters unless authorized by a duly issued permit or exemption and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under OPA and CERCLA. In 2015, the EPA expanded the definition of “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”), thereby expanding federal authority under the CWA. Following litigation on the revised WOTUS rule, in December 2018, the EPA and Department of the Army proposed a revised, limited definition of WOTUS. In 2019 and 2020, the agencies repealed the prior WOTUS Rule and promulgated the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (“NWPR”) which significantly reduced the scope and oversight of EPA and the Department of the Army in traditionally non navigable waterways. On August 30, 2021, a federal district court in Arizona vacated the NWPR and directed the agencies to replace the rule with the pre-2015 definition. In January 2023, the revised WOTUS rule was codified in place of the vacated NWPR. On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case Sackett v. EPA that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a “continuous surface connection” to “traditional interstate navigable waters” are covered by the CWA, further narrowing the application of the WOTUS rule.  In August 2023, the EPA and the Department of Army issued the final WOTUS rule, effective on September 8, 2023, that largely reinstated the pre-2015 definition and applied the Sackett ruling.

The EPA and the USCG have also enacted rules relating to ballast water discharge, compliance with which requires the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged or the implementation of other port facility disposal arrangements or procedures at potentially substantial costs, and/or otherwise restrict our vessels from entering U.S. Waters. The EPA will regulate these ballast water discharges and other discharges incidental to the normal operation of certain vessels within United States waters pursuant to the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (“VIDA”), which was signed into law on December 4, 2018 and replaces the 2013 Vessel General Permit (“VGP”) program (which authorizes discharges incidental to operations of commercial vessels and contains numeric ballast water discharge limits for most vessels to reduce the risk of invasive species in U.S. waters, stringent requirements for exhaust gas scrubbers, and requirements for the use of environmentally acceptable lubricants) and current Coast Guard ballast water management regulations adopted under the U.S. National Invasive Species Act (“NISA”), such as mid-ocean ballast exchange programs and installation of approved USCG technology for all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks bound for U.S. ports or entering U.S. waters. VIDA establishes a new framework for the regulation of vessel incidental discharges under Clean Water Act (CWA), requires the EPA to develop performance standards for those discharges within two years of enactment, and requires the U.S. Coast Guard to develop implementation, compliance, and enforcement regulations within two years of EPA’s promulgation of standards. Under VIDA, all provisions of the 2013 VGP and USCG regulations regarding ballast water treatment remain in force and effect until the EPA and U.S. Coast Guard regulations are finalized. Non-military, non-recreational vessels greater than 79 feet in length must continue to comply with the requirements of the VGP, including submission of a Notice of Intent (“NOI”) or retention of a PARI form and submission of annual reports. We have submitted NOIs for our vessels where required. Compliance with the EPA, U.S. Coast Guard and state regulations could require the installation of ballast water treatment equipment on our vessels or the implementation of other port facility disposal procedures at potentially substantial cost, or may otherwise restrict our vessels from entering U.S. waters.

The European Union has adopted several regulations and directives requiring, among other things, more frequent inspections of high-risk ships, as determined by type, age, and flag as well as the number of times the ship has been detained. The European Union also adopted and extended a ban on substandard ships and enacted a minimum ban period and a definitive ban for repeated offenses. The regulation also provided the European Union with greater authority and control over classification societies, by imposing more requirements on classification societies and providing for fines or penalty payments for organizations that failed to comply. Furthermore, the EU has implemented regulations requiring vessels to use reduced sulfur content fuel for their main and auxiliary engines. The EU Directive 2005/33/EC (amending Directive 1999/32/EC) introduced requirements parallel to those in Annex VI relating to the sulfur content of marine fuels. In addition, the EU imposed a 0.1% maximum sulfur requirement for fuel used by ships at berth in the Baltic, the North Sea and the English Channel (the so called “SOx-Emission Control Area”). As of January 2020, EU member states must also ensure that ships in all EU waters, except the SOx-Emission Control Area, use fuels with a 0.5% maximum sulfur content.

On September 15, 2020, the European Parliament voted to include greenhouse gas emissions from the maritime sector in the European Union’s carbon market, the EU Emissions Trading System (“EU ETS”) as part of its “Fit-for-55” legislation to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030. On July 14, 2021, the European Parliament formally proposed its plan, which would involve gradually including the maritime sector from 2023 and phasing the sector in over a three-year period. This will require shipowners to buy permits to cover these emissions. The Environment Council adopted a general approach on the proposal in June 2022. On December 18, 2022, the Environmental Council and European Parliament agreed to include maritime shipping emissions within the scope of the EU ETS on a gradual introduction of obligations for shipping companies to surrender allowances equivalent to a portion of their carbon emissions: 40% for verified emissions from 2024, 70% for 2025 and 100% for 2026. Most large vessels will be included in the scope of the EU ETS from the start. Big offshore vessels of 5,000 gross tonnage and above will be included in the ‘MRV’ on the monitoring, reporting and verification of CO2 emissions from maritime transport regulation from 2025 and in the EU ETS from 2027. In January 2024, the EU ETS was extended to cover CO2 emissions from all large ships (of 5,000 gross tonnage and above) entering EU ports regardless of the flag they fly and will apply to methane and nitrous oxide emissions beginning in 2026. Shipping companies will need to buy allowances that correspond to the emissions covered by the system. General cargo vessels and off-shore vessels between 400-5,000 gross tonnage will be included in the MRV regulation from 2025 and their inclusion in EU ETS will be reviewed in 2026. Furthermore, starting from January 1, 2026, the ETS regulations will expand to include emissions of two additional greenhouse gases: nitrous oxide and methane. Compliance with the Maritime EU ETS will result in additional compliance and administration costs to properly incorporate the provisions of the Directive into our business routines. Additional EU regulations which are part of the EU’s “Fit-for-55,” could also affect our financial position in terms of compliance and administration costs when they take effect.

The International Labor Organization (the “ILO”) is a specialized agency of the UN that has adopted the Maritime Labor Convention 2006 (“MLC 2006”). A Maritime Labor Certificate and a Declaration of Maritime Labor Compliance is required to ensure compliance with the MLC 2006 for all ships that are 500 gross tonnage or over and are either engaged in international voyages or flying the flag of a Member and operating from a port, or between ports, in another country. We believe that all our vessels are in substantial compliance with and are certified to meet MLC 2006.

Currently, the emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which entered into force in 2005 and pursuant to which adopting countries have been required to implement national programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with targets extended through 2020. International negotiations are continuing with respect to a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, and restrictions on shipping emissions may be included in any new treaty. In December 2009, more than 27 nations, including the U.S. and China, signed the Copenhagen Accord, which includes a non-binding commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris resulted in the Paris Agreement, which entered into force on November 4, 2016 and does not directly limit greenhouse gas emissions from ships. The U.S. initially entered into the agreement, but on June 1, 2017, the former U.S. President Trump announced that the United States intends to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, and the withdrawal became effective on November 4, 2020. On January 20, 2021, U.S. President Biden signed an executive order to rejoin the Paris Agreement, which the U.S. officially rejoined on February 19, 2021.

At MEPC 70 and MEPC 71, a draft outline of the structure of the initial strategy for developing a comprehensive IMO strategy on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships was approved. In accordance with this roadmap, in April 2018, nations at the MEPC 72 adopted an initial strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships. The initial strategy identifies “levels of ambition” to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including (1) decreasing the carbon intensity from ships through implementation of further phases of the EEDI for new ships; (2) reducing carbon dioxide emissions per transport work, as an average across international shipping, by at least 40% by 2030, pursuing efforts towards 70% by 2050, compared to 2008 emission levels; and (3) reducing the total annual greenhouse emissions by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 while pursuing efforts towards phasing them out entirely. The initial strategy notes that technological innovation, alternative fuels and/or energy sources for international shipping will be integral to achieve the overall ambition. These regulations could cause us to incur additional substantial expenses. At MEPC 77, the Member States agreed to initiate the revision of the Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG emissions from ships, recognizing the need to strengthen the ambition during the revision process. In July 2023, MEPC 80 adopted a revised strategy, which includes an enhanced common ambition to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping around or close to 2050, a commitment to ensure an uptake of alternative zero and near-zero greenhouse gas fuels by 2030, as well as i) reducing the total annual greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping by at least 20%, striving for 30%, by 2030, compared to 2008; and ii) reducing the total annual greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping by at least 70%, striving for 80%, by 2040, compared to 2008.

The EU made a unilateral commitment to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions from its member states from 20% of 1990 levels by 2020. The EU also committed to reduce its emissions by 20% under the Kyoto Protocol’s second period from 2013 to 2020. Starting in January 2018, large ships over 5,000 gross tonnage calling at EU ports are required to collect and publish data on carbon dioxide emissions and other information. Under the European Climate Law, the EU committed to reduce its net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 through its “Fit-for-55” legislation package.  As part of this initiative, regulations relating to the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from the maritime sector in the European Union’s carbon market are also forthcoming.

Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, the EU, the U.S. or other countries where we operate, or any treaty adopted at the international level to succeed the Kyoto Protocol or Paris Agreement, that restricts emissions of greenhouse gases could require us to make significant financial expenditures which we cannot predict with certainty at this time. Even in the absence of climate control legislation, our business may be indirectly affected to the extent that climate change may result in sea level changes or certain weather events.

Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in the United States, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security such as the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (“MTSA”). To implement certain portions of the MTSA, the USCG issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and at certain ports and facilities, some of which are regulated by the EPA.

Similarly, Chapter XI-2 of the SOLAS Convention imposes detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities and mandates compliance with the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (“the ISPS Code”). The ISPS Code is designed to enhance the security of ports and ships against terrorism. To trade internationally, a vessel must attain an International Ship Security Certificate (“ISSC”) from a recognized security organization approved by the vessel’s flag state. Ships operating without a valid certificate may be detained, expelled from, or refused entry at port until they obtain an ISSC. The various requirements, some of which are found in the SOLAS Convention, include, for example, on-board installation of automatic identification systems to provide a means for the automatic transmission of safety-related information from among similarly equipped ships and shore stations, including information on a ship’s identity, position, course, speed and navigational status; on-board installation of ship security alert systems, which do not sound on the vessel but only alert the authorities on shore; the development of vessel security plans; ship identification number to be permanently marked on a vessel’s hull; a continuous synopsis record kept onboard showing a vessel’s history including the name of the ship, the state whose flag the ship is entitled to fly, the date on which the ship was registered with that state, the ship’s identification number, the port at which the ship is registered and the name of the registered owner(s) and their registered address; and compliance with flag state security certification requirements.

The USCG regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures, provided such vessels have on board a valid ISSC that attests to the vessel’s compliance with the SOLAS Convention security requirements and the ISPS Code. Future security measures could have a significant financial impact on us. We intend to comply with the various security measures addressed by MTSA, the SOLAS Convention and the ISPS Code.

The cost of vessel security measures has also been affected by the escalation in the frequency of acts of piracy against ships, notably off the coast of Somalia, including the Gulf of Aden and Arabian Sea area. Substantial loss of revenue and other costs may be incurred as a result of detention of a vessel or additional security measures, and the risk of uninsured losses could significantly affect our business. Costs are incurred in taking additional security measures in accordance with Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy, notably those contained in the BMP5 industry standard.

The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and SOLAS. Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage and lending that a vessel be certified “in class” by a classification society which is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies, the IACS. The IACS has adopted harmonized Common Structural Rules, or “the Rules”, which apply to oil tankers and bulk carriers contracted for construction on or after July 1, 2015. The Rules attempt to create a level of consistency between IACS Societies. All of our vessels are certified as being “in class” by all the applicable Classification Societies (e.g., American Bureau of Shipping, Lloyd’s Register of Shipping).

A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys, drydockings and special surveys. In lieu of a special survey, a vessel’s machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Every vessel is also required to be drydocked every 30 to 36 months for inspection of the underwater parts of the vessel. In all cases, the interval between any two such examinations is not to exceed 36 months. If any vessel does not maintain its class and/or fails any annual survey, intermediate survey, drydocking or special survey, the vessel will be unable to carry cargo between ports and will be unemployable and uninsurable and could prevent us from obtaining secured financing on that vessel. Any such inability to carry cargo or be employed, or any such violation of covenants, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

The operation of any cargo vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, physical damage, collision, property loss, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, piracy incidents, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental mishaps, and the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. OPA, which imposes virtually unlimited liability upon shipowners, operators and bareboat charterers of any vessel trading in the exclusive economic zone of the United States for certain oil pollution accidents in the United States, has made liability insurance more expensive for shipowners and operators trading in the United States market. We carry insurance coverage as customary in the shipping industry. However, not all risks can be insured, specific claims may be rejected, and we might not be always able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.

While we maintain hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance, protection and indemnity cover and freight, demurrage and defense cover for our operating fleet in amounts that we believe to be prudent to cover normal risks in our operations, we may not be able to achieve or maintain this level of coverage throughout a vessel’s useful life. Furthermore, while we believe that our present insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.

Protection and indemnity insurance is provided by mutual protection and indemnity associations, or “P&I Associations,” and covers our third-party liabilities in connection with our shipping activities. This includes third-party liability and other related expenses of injury or death of crew, passengers and other third parties, loss or damage to cargo, claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party property, pollution arising from oil or other substances, and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck removal. Protection and indemnity insurance is a form of mutual indemnity insurance, extended by protection and indemnity mutual associations, or “Clubs.”

Our current protection and indemnity insurance coverage for pollution is $1 billion per vessel per incident. The 12 P&I Associations that comprise the International Group insure approximately 90% of the world’s commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s liabilities. The International Group’s website states that the Pool provides a mechanism for sharing all claims in excess of US$10 million up to, currently, approximately US$2.1 billion. As a member of a P&I Association, which is a member of the International Group, we are subject to Estimated Total Calls payable to the Associations based on our claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual associations and members of the shipping pool of P&I Associations comprising the International Group. Our vessels may be subject to Supplementary calls which are calculated as a percentage of the net Estimated Total Calls for each year and after deducting any applicable rebates, laid up returns and other deductions. A decision to levy Supplementary calls is made by the Board of Directors of the Association at any time during or after the end of the relevant Policy Year. There is no limit to the number or amount of Supplementary Calls that can be levied in respect of a Policy Year. Supplementary calls, if any, are issued when they are announced and according to the period they relate to.

OceanPal Inc. is the sole owner of all of the issued and outstanding shares of our subsidiaries. A list of our subsidiaries is filed as Exhibit 8.1 to this annual report on Form 20-F.

Our only material properties are the vessels in our fleet.

None.

The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to these financial statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements.” This discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, such as those set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report.

Vessels are generally acquired free of charter. Where a vessel has been under a voyage charter, the vessel is usually delivered to the buyer free of charter. It is rare in the shipping industry for the last charterer of the vessel in the hands of the seller to continue as the first charterer of the vessel in the hands of the buyer. In most cases, when a vessel is under time charter and the buyer wishes to assume that charter, the vessel cannot be acquired without the charterer’s consent and the buyer entering into a separate direct agreement (called a “novation agreement”) with the charterer to assume the charter. The purchase of a vessel itself does not transfer the charter because it is a separate service agreement between the vessel owner and the charterer.

Where we identify any intangible assets or liabilities associated with the acquisition of a vessel, we record all identified assets or liabilities at fair value. Fair value is determined by reference to market data. We value any asset or liability arising from the market value of the time charters assumed when a vessel is acquired. The amount to be recorded as an asset or liability at the date of vessel delivery is based on the difference between the current fair market value of the charter and the net present value of future contractual cash flows. When the present value of the time charter assumed is greater than the current fair market value of such charter, the difference is recorded as prepaid charter revenue. When the opposite situation occurs, any difference, capped to the vessel’s fair value on a charter-free basis, is recorded as deferred revenue. Such assets and liabilities, respectively, are amortized as a reduction of, or an increase in, revenue over the period of the time charter assumed.

To the extent that we purchase a vessel and assume or renegotiate a related time charter, among others, we will be required to take the following steps before the vessel will be ready to commence operations:

When we charter a vessel pursuant to a short, medium or long-term time charter agreement with varying rates, we recognize revenue on a straight-line basis, equal to the average revenue during the term of the charter.

The following discussion is intended to help you understand how acquisitions of vessels affect our business and results of operations.

Our business is mainly comprised of the following elements:

The management of financial, general and administrative elements involved in the conduct of our business and ownership of our vessels mainly requires the following components:

The principal factors that affect our profitability, cash flows and shareholders’ return on investment include:

We charter our vessels to customers pursuant to time charter trips with short to medium duration, although we may also charter our vessels in the spot market and on longer-term time charters.

Our results of operations are affected by numerous factors. The principal factors that have impacted the business during the fiscal periods presented in the following discussion and analysis and that are likely to continue to impact our business are the following:

Under our time charters, the charterer typically pays us a fixed daily charter hire rate and other compensation costs related to the charter contracts (such as ballast positioning compensation, holds cleaning compensation, etc.) and bears all voyage expenses, including the cost of bunkers (fuel oil) and port and canal charges. However, our voyage results may be affected by differences in bunker prices as we may incur gain/loss on bunkers when the cost of the bunker fuel sold to the new charterer is greater or less than the cost of the bunker fuel acquired. Our revenues are driven primarily by the number of vessels in our fleet, the number of days during which our vessels operate and the daily charter hire rates that our vessels earn under charters, which, in turn, are affected by a number of factors, including:

Vessels operating on time charters for a certain period of time provide more predictable cash flows over that period of time but can yield lower profit margins than vessels operating in the spot charter market during periods characterized by favorable market conditions. Vessels operating in the spot charter market generate revenues that are less predictable but may enable their owners to capture increased profit margins during periods of improvements in charter rates although their owners would be exposed to the risk of declining charter rates, which may have a materially adverse impact on financial performance. As we employ vessels on period charters, future spot charter rates may be higher or lower than the rates at which we have employed our vessels on period charters. Our time charter agreements subject us to counterparty risk. In depressed market conditions, charterers may seek to renegotiate the terms of their existing charter parties or avoid their obligations under those contracts. Should a counterparty fail to honor their obligations under agreements with us, we could sustain significant losses which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We incur voyage expenses that primarily consist of commissions and any gains or losses related to bunker prices as all our vessels are typically employed under time charters that require the charterer to bear voyage expenses such as bunkers (fuel oil), port and canal charges. Although the charterer bears the cost of bunkers, our voyage expenses may be affected by differences in bunker prices, and we may record a gain or a loss deriving from such price differences as well as bunker consumption costs during periods when our vessels are repositioning, off-hire or idle. When a vessel is delivered to a charterer, bunkers are purchased by the charterer and sold back to us on the redelivery of the vessel. Bunkers’ gain, or loss, results when a vessel is redelivered by her charterer and delivered to the next charterer at different bunker prices, or quantities. We pay commissions on each charter to one or more unaffiliated ship brokers for arranging our charters. In addition, we pay commissions to DWM and Steamship for the provision of management and brokerage services, pursuant to the terms of our management agreements (see also “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions – B. Related Party Transactions”.)

We remain responsible for paying the vessels’ operating expenses, including the cost of crewing, insuring, repairing and maintaining the vessel, the costs of spares and consumable stores, tonnage taxes, environmental and safety expenses. Our vessel operating expenses are expensed as incurred. Our vessel operating expenses generally represent fixed costs. Expenses for repairs and maintenance tend to fluctuate from period to period because most repair and maintenance works typically occur during periodic dry-dockings or special surveys. Our ability to control our vessels’ operating expenses also affects our financial results.

We incur general and administrative expenses which include compensation and fees towards our directors and consultants, restricted stock awards amortization cost, lumpsum brokerage fees, traveling, directors’ and officers’ insurance, promotional and other expenses of a listed public company, such as legal and professional expenses and other general corporate expenses. These expenses are relatively fixed and are not widely affected by the size of our fleet.

Time Charter Revenues. Time charter revenues decreased by $0.13 million, to $18.96 million in 2023, from $19.09 million in 2022, primarily as a result of the decrease in our average time charter rates during 2023, which was partially offset by the increase in our operating days to 1,691 in 2023 from 1,117 in 2022, due to the increased size of our fleet.

Voyage Expenses. Voyage expenses decreased by $1.74 million, to $1.94 million in 2023, from $3.68 million in 2022, mainly due to the decrease in bunker losses primarily arising from the price differences in the cost of bunker fuel paid by the Company to the previous charterers on vessel re-delivery and the bunker fuel sold to the new charterers on same vessel delivery under certain of our charters.

Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased by $3.54 million, to $10.42 million in 2023, from $6.88 million in 2022, mainly due to the increased ownership days related to the increased size of our fleet, as well as the increased repair, spares and stores costs for certain of our vessels.

Depreciation and amortization of deferred charges. Depreciation and amortization of deferred charges increased by $2.77 million, to $7.67 million in 2023, from $4.90 million in 2022, due to i) a $2.7 million increase in depreciation expense following the increase in the size of our fleet, and ii) an increase in dry-dock amortization costs, as a result of the dry-docks incurred during 2023 for two vessels in our fleet, compared to one vessel having undergone dry-dock during 2022. The increase in vessel depreciation expense was partially offset by the effect of the change in the estimated scrap rates of our vessels from $250 per lightweight ton to $400, effective July 1, 2023.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $2.20 million, to $5.28 million in 2023, from $3.08 million in 2022. This increase is mainly attributed to additional expenses incurred by the Company related to brokerage services’ fees as per the amended agreement terms, compensation cost of restricted convertible Series C preferred stock awarded in April 2022 and March 2023 under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, increased insurance costs, performance bonuses to a related party, as well as other professional charges essential for the conduct of our business.

Changes in fair value of warrant liability. Changes in fair value of warrants’ liability was $6.22 million for 2023, compared to $nil for 2022. The gain of $6.22 million during 2023 resulted from the fair value changes of the private placement warrants under the Concurrent Private Placement from their initial measurement date to their various settlement dates within 2023 (all private placement warrants were settled during 2023). There was no such transaction during 2022.

Interest income. Interest income was $0.50 million for 2023, compared to $nil for 2022. The amount relates solely to interest earned from time deposits.

Inflation and increased interest rates do not have a material effect on our expenses given current economic conditions and management does not consider inflation or interest rates to be a significant risk to direct costs in the current and foreseeable economic environment. In a shipping downturn, costs subject to inflation and increased interest rates can usually be controlled because shipping companies typically monitor costs to preserve liquidity and encourage suppliers and service providers to lower rates and prices during such periods.

As we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage or specified reduced reporting and other burdens that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

We may take advantage of these provisions until the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date we first sell our common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will cease to be an emerging growth company until the earliest of: (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenue exceeds $1.235 billion; (ii) the last day of the fiscal year during which the fifth anniversary of the date of the IPO occurs; (iii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that are held by nonaffiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter; or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities during any three-year period. In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to “opt out” of the extended transition period relating to the exemption from new or revised financial accounting standards and as a result, we comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth public companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

We have historically financed our capital requirements with cash flow from operations and proceeds from equity offerings. Our operating cash flow is generated from charters on our vessels, through our subsidiaries. Our main uses of funds have been capital expenditures for the acquisition of new vessels, expenditures incurred in connection with ensuring that our vessels comply with international and regulatory standards, and payments of dividends.

As of December 31, 2023, our contractual obligations related to (i) our Series C and Series D preferred shares dividends and, (ii) the aggregate contractual obligations of $2.75 million in connection with our investment in the construction of two chemical tankers (see also “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Investment in Methanol-Ready Chemical Tanker Newbuildings”), of which $1.375 million are expected to be due in the fourth quarter of 2024 and $1.375 million are expected to be due in the second quarter of 2025. Since January 1, 2024 and up to the date of this annual report, we paid a cash dividend on our Series C and D preferred holders as of record date January 12, 2024, amounting to $0.35 million in the aggregate, which amount was funded through available cash. We intend to fund our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2023, with available cash as well.

As of the date of this annual report, we do not have any debt or capital expenditures for vessel acquisitions, but we incur capital expenditures when our vessels undergo surveys. This process of recertification may require us to reposition these vessels from a discharging port to the shipyard, which will reduce our operating days during the period. We also incur capital expenditures for vessel improvements to meet new regulations and comply with international and regulatory standards. The loss of earnings associated with the decrease in operating days together with the capital needs for repairs and upgrades result in increased cash flow needs.

We will require capital to fund ongoing operations, vessel improvements to meet requirements under new regulations and the payment of dividends on our Series C and Series D preferred stock, as well as the chemical tankers’ investment. We intend to finance our future growth through a combination of cash generated from operations, proceeds from equity offerings, borrowings from debt transactions, as deemed appropriate by our management and board of directors.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, our principal sources of funds were the net proceeds from the 2023 Registered Direct Offering and Concurrent Private Placement, and cash from operations. As at December 31, 2023 and 2022, working capital, which is current assets minus current liabilities, amounted to $17.76 million and $11.71 million, respectively.

Management monitors the Company’s liquidity position throughout the year to ensure that it has access to sufficient funds to meet its forecast cash requirements. We anticipate that our primary sources of funds for at least twelve months from the date of this report will be available cash, internally generated cash flows from our anticipated revenues and equity offering proceeds. We believe that these anticipated sources of funds, as well as our ability to access the equity capital markets if needed, will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for at least twelve months from the date of this annual report.

Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2023, and 2022 was $14.84 and $8.45 million, respectively. We consider highly liquid investments such as time deposits and certificates of deposit with an original maturity of around three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are held in U.S. dollars.

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2023, amounted to $0.82 million representing a decrease of $0.69 million compared to $1.51 million in 2022. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was attributable to the decrease in 2023 in net income after non-cash items by $2.87 million compared to 2022, which was offset by the decrease in 2023 by $2.18 million in working capital outflows mainly as a result of the decrease in outstanding trade receivables by $4.7 million.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2023 amounted to $6.01 million and represents payments of (i) $4.00 million being the cash consideration of the purchase price regarding the acquisition of the M/V Melia in February 2023, in accordance with the terms of the relevant Memorandum of Agreement, (ii) $1.64 million regarding the first instalment and other transactions costs in connection with the chemical tankers investment, and (iii) $0.37 million relating to vessel improvement costs. Net cash used in investing activities in 2022 amounted to $5.09 million and represents payments of (i) $4.4 million being the cash consideration of the purchase price regarding the acquisition of M/V Baltimore acquired in September 2022, in accordance with the terms of the relevant Memorandum of Agreement, (ii) $0.60 million relating to the installation of the ballast water treatment system on M/V Protefs, (iii) $0.07 million relating to improvement costs of M/V Salt Lake City, and (iv) $0.02 million in connection with predelivery expenses of M/V Baltimore.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2023 amounted to $11.58 million and comprises from (i) net proceeds of $13.64 million from the issuance of units (comprising of shares of common stock or prefunded warrants and Class B warrants), the issuance of private placement warrants, and the exercise of pre-funded warrants under the 2023 registered Direct Offering and Concurrent Private Placement, (ii) $0.03 million proceeds in connection with the issuance of the newly designated Series E Preferred Stock, less $2.09 million of dividends paid to Series C and Series D preferred holders.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2022 amounted to $10.36 million and comprise from proceeds of $16.19 million from the issuance of units (comprising of shares of common stock or pre-funded warrants and Class A warrants), common stock and warrants, and the exercise of warrants, under the 2022 Underwritten Public Offering less (i) $4.00 million of dividends paid to common, Class A warrants, Series C and Series D preferred holders and, (ii) $1.83 million of equity issuance and financing costs during the same period.

Not applicable.

Our results of operations depend primarily on the charter hire rates that we are able to realize, and the demand for dry bulk vessel services. The Baltic Dry Index, or the BDI, has long been viewed as the main benchmark to monitor the movements of the dry bulk vessel charter market and the performance of the entire dry bulk shipping market.

We believe that the important measures for analyzing trends in our results of operations consist of the following:

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of those financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

Critical accounting estimates are those estimates made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material. For a description of our material accounting policies, please read “Item 18. Financial Statements” and more precisely Note 2 (“Significant Accounting Policies”) to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances (such as market conditions, obsolesce or damage to the asset, potential sales and other business plans) indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When the estimate of undiscounted projected net operating cash flows, expected to be generated by the use of an asset over its remaining useful life and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount plus unamortized dry-docking costs, the Company evaluates the asset for impairment loss. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset, determined mainly by third party valuations. The current conditions in the dry bulk sector with decreased charter rates and decreased vessel market values are conditions that the Company considers indicators of a potential impairment. In developing estimates of future undiscounted projected net operating cash flows, the Company makes assumptions and estimates about the vessels’ future performance, with the significant assumptions being related to future charter rates for the unfixed days and future fleet utilization rate. Other assumptions used, are charter rates calculated for the fixed days using the fixed charter rate of each vessel from existing time charters; the expected outflows for scheduled vessels’ maintenance; vessel operating expenses; estimated remaining useful life of each vessel and the vessels’ residual value if sold for scrap. The assumptions used to develop estimates of future undiscounted projected net operating cash flows are based on historical trends as well as future expectations, employment prospects under the then current market conditions and vessels’ age. In particular, for the unfixed days, the Company uses the most recent ten-year average of historical market charter rates available for each type of vessel over the remaining estimated life of each vessel, net of commissions. Historical ten-year average market charter rates are in line with the Company’s overall chartering strategy, they reflect the full operating history of vessels of the same type and particulars with the Company’s operating fleet and they cover at least a full business cycle, where applicable. In addition, for 2023, the effective fleet utilization is assumed to 98% in the Company’s exercise, in line with the Company’s historical performance and its expectations for future fleet utilization under its fleet employment strategy, which is additionally affected with the period(s) each vessel is expected to undergo its scheduled dry-docking and/or special survey maintenance works. This calculation is then compared with the vessels’ net book value plus unamortized dry-docking and special survey costs. The difference between the carrying amount of the vessel plus unamortized dry-docking and special survey costs and their fair value is recognized in the Company’s accounts as impairment loss.

Although no impairment loss was identified or recorded during the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, according to our assessment, the carrying value plus unamortized dry-docking and special survey costs, if any, of vessels for which impairment indicators existed as at December 31, 2023 and 2022, was $73.1 million and $64.5 million, respectively.

Historically, the market values of vessels have experienced volatility, which from time to time may be substantial. As a result, the charter-free market value of certain of our vessels may have declined below those vessels’ carrying value plus unamortized dry-docking and special survey costs, even though we would not impair those vessels’ carrying value under our accounting impairment policy. Based on: (i) the carrying value plus unamortized dry-docking and special survey costs of each of our vessels as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and (ii) what we believe the charter-free market value of each of our vessels was as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the aggregate carrying value of five and four of the vessels in our fleet as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, exceeded their aggregate charter-free market value by approximately $13.1 million and $11.5 million, respectively, as noted in the table below. This aggregate difference represents the approximate analysis of the amount by which we believe we would have to increase our loss if we sold all of such vessels at December 31, 2023 and 2022, on a charter-free basis, on industry standard terms, in cash transactions, and to a willing buyer where we were not under any compulsion to sell, and where the buyer was not under any compulsion to buy. For purposes of this calculation, we have assumed that these five and four vessels, respectively, would be sold at a price that reflects our estimate of their charter-free market values as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively.

* Indicates dry bulk vessels for which we believe, as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, the charter-free market value was lower than the vessel’s carrying value plus unamortized dry-docking and special survey costs. We believe that the aggregate carrying value plus unamortized dry-docking and special survey costs of these vessels exceeded their aggregate charter-free market value by approximately $13.1 million and $11.5 million, respectively.

Our estimates of charter-free market value assume that our vessels were all in good and seaworthy condition without need for repair and if inspected would be certified in class without notations of any kind. Our estimates are based on information available from various industry sources, including:

As we obtain information from various industry and other sources, our estimates of charter-free vessel market values, charter rates and vessel utilization are inherently uncertain. In addition, vessel values are highly volatile; as such, our estimates may not be indicative of the current or future charter-free market value of our vessels or prices that we could achieve if we were to sell them. We also refer you to the risk factor in “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors” entitled “A decline in the market values of our vessels could limit our ability to borrow funds in the future, trigger breaches of certain financial covenants contained in any future borrowing facilities we may enter into, and/or result in impairment charges or losses on sale.” and the discussion under the heading “Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Vessel Prices.”

Our impairment test exercise is sensitive to variances in the time charter rates and utilization rate. Our current analysis, which also involved a sensitivity analysis by assigning possible alternative values to these significant inputs, indicated that time charter rates and utilization would need to be reduced by 5.0% to 22.9% to result in impairment of individual long-lived assets with indication of impairment. In particular, a minimum decrease of 5.4% in the time charter rates for the unfixed days as shown in detail in the table below and a minimum fleet utilization rate of 93.0% used instead in our impairment test exercise would result in $4.09 million impairment charge for one of our vessels. However, there can be no assurance as to how long charter rates and vessel values will remain at their current levels. If charter rates decrease and remain depressed for some time, it could adversely affect our revenue and profitability and future assessments of vessel impairment.

A comparison of the average estimated daily time charter equivalent rate used in our impairment analysis with the average “break-even rate” for each major class of vessels is presented below:

Additionally, the use of the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year average blended rates would not have any effect on the Company’s impairment analysis and as such on the Company’s results of operations:

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value and provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets, liabilities and equity instruments classified in stockholders’ equity. The guidance creates a fair value hierarchy of measurement and describes fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability or the consideration to transfer equity interests issued in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. The fair value measurement assumes that an instrument classified in stockholders’ equity is transferred to a market participant at the measurement date. The transfer of an instrument classified in stockholders’ equity assumes that the instrument would remain outstanding, and the market participant takes on the rights and responsibilities associated with the instrument. In accordance with the requirements of accounting guidance relating to Fair Value Measurements, the Company classifies and discloses its assets, liabilities and equity instruments classified in stockholders’ equity carried at the fair value in one of the following categories: Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities or equity instruments; Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data; Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

On March 7, 2023, our Board of Directors approved the award and grant of 3,332 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to our directors, pursuant to the Company’s amended and restated equity incentive plan, for a fair value of $2.68 million, to vest over a service period of two years. The fair value of the Series C Preferred Stock was determined based on a valuation obtained by an independent third party for the purposes of the transaction. On February 8, 2023, the Company acquired the M/V Melia from Diana Shipping. The non-cash consideration part of the total purchase price paid in the form of 13,157 Series D Preferred Stock as of the vessel acquisition date has been recorded at a fair value of $10.0 million determined based on valuation obtained by an independent third party for the purposes of the transaction.

Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of our directors and executive officers. Our Board of Directors consists of 7 members that will be elected annually on a staggered basis, and each director elected will hold office for a three-year term and until his or her successor is elected and has qualified, except in the event of such director’s death, resignation, removal or the earlier termination of his or her term of office. Officers are appointed from time to time by our board of directors and hold office until a successor is appointed or their employment is terminated.

The term of our Class III directors expires in 2024, the term of our Class I directors expires in 2025, and the term of our Class II directors expires in 2026. The business address of each officer and director is the address of our principal executive offices, which are located at Pendelis 26, 175 64 Palaio Faliro, Athens, Greece.

Biographical information with respect to each of our directors and executive officers is set forth below.

Ioannis Zafirakis has served as a Director of the Company since April 2021. He has also served as the Company’s President, Secretary and Interim Chief Financial Officer from November 2021 to April 2023. Mr. Zafirakis is also member of the Executive Committee of the Company. He has served as a Director of Diana Shipping Inc. from February 2005 and as Chief Financial Officer (Interim Chief Financial Officer until February 2021) and Treasurer of Diana Shipping Inc. since February 2020 and he is also the Chief Strategy Officer of Diana Shipping Inc. Mr. Zafirakis is also member of the Executive Committee of Diana Shipping Inc. Mr. Zafirakis has held various executive positions such as Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice-President and Vice-President. In addition, Mr. Zafirakis is the Chief Financial Officer of Diana Shipping Services S.A., where he also serves as Director and Treasurer. From June 1997 to February 2005, Mr. Zafirakis was employed by Diana Shipping Agencies S.A., where he held a number of positions in finance and accounting. From January 2010 to February 2020 he also served as Director and Secretary of Performance Shipping Inc., where he held various executive positions such as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Strategy Officer. Mr. Zafirakis is a member of the Business Advisory Committee of the Shipping Programs of ALBA Graduate Business School at The American College of Greece. In 2024, Mr. Zafirakis attended and completed the Advanced Management Programme at INSEAD Business School in Singapore. Mr. Zafirakis has also obtained a certificate in “Blockchain Economics: An Introduction to Cryptocurrencies” from Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences in Greece. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Studies from City University Business School in London and a master’s degree in International Transport from the University of Wales in Cardiff.

As a foreign private issuer listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, we are required to disclose certain self-identified diversity characteristics about our directors pursuant to Nasdaq board diversity and disclosure rules. The Board Diversity Matrix set forth below contains the requisite information as of the date of this annual report.

Aggregate executive compensation (including amounts paid to Steamship Shipbroking Enterprises Inc.) for 2023 was $2.80 million. Since November 2021, the services of our officers have been provided by Steamship Shipbroking Enterprises Inc., a related party to the company, pursuant to the agreements described in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions — Related Party Transactions”. We consider part of these fees under these agreements to constitute the compensation paid to our executives.

All directors receive annual compensation in the amount of $30,000 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, each director serving as chairman of a committee, other than the executive committee, receives additional annual compensation of $20,000, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. Each director serving as member of a committee, other than the executive committee, receives additional annual compensation of $10,000, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. For 2023, fees and expenses of our directors amounted to $0.26 million.

We do not have a retirement plan for our officers or directors.

Our board of directors has approved, and the Company has adopted the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, pursuant to which the Company may issue up to 2,000,000 common shares, all of which remain available for issuance and 10,000 Series C Preferred Shares, of which 1,354 remain available to be granted as of April 10, 2024.

Under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, the Company’s employees, officers and directors are entitled to receive options to acquire the Company’s common stock. The 2021 Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors or such other committee of the Board as may be designated by the Board. Under the terms of the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, the Company’s Board of Directors is able to grant (a) non-qualified stock options, (b) stock appreciation rights, (c) restricted stock, (d) restricted stock units, (e) unrestricted stock, (f) other equity-based or equity-related awards, (g) dividend equivalents and (h) cash awards. No options or stock appreciation rights can be exercisable subsequent to the tenth anniversary of the date on which such Award was granted. Under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, the Administrator may waive or modify the application of forfeiture of awards of restricted stock and performance shares in connection with cessation of service with the Company. No Awards may be granted under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan following the tenth anniversary of the date on which the Plan is adopted by the Board.

Since 2023 and up to the date of this annual report, our Board of Directors awarded 3,332 in 2023 and 3,332 in 2024 of our Series C Preferred Shares to our directors, pursuant to our 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, as an annual incentive bonus. All restricted shares vest ratably over two years from their grant date. The restricted shares are subject to forfeiture until they become vested. Unless they forfeit, grantees have the right to receive and retain all dividends paid and to exercise all other rights, powers and privileges of a holder of shares.

In 2023, non-cash compensation costs under our restricted stock awards amounted to $1.89 million.

We have established an Audit Committee, comprised of two non-executive board members, which is responsible for reviewing our accounting controls, recommending to the board of directors the engagement of our independent auditors, and pre-approving audit, non-audit or non-assurance and audit-related services and fees. Each member has been determined by our board of directors to be “independent” under the rules and regulations of the SEC. As directed by its written charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the work of the internal audit function, for appointing, and overseeing the work of the independent auditors, including reviewing and approving their engagement letter and all fees paid to our auditors, reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s accounting and internal control procedures and reading and discussing with management, the internal audit function and the independent auditors the annual audited and quarterly financial statements. The members of the Audit Committee are Nikolaos Veraros (chairperson and financial expert) and Alexios Chrysochoidis (member and financial expert).

We have established a Compensation Committee comprised of two members, which, as directed by its written charter, is responsible for setting the compensation of executive officers of the Company, reviewing the Company’s incentive and equity-based compensation plans, and reviewing and approving employment and severance agreements. The members of the Compensation Committee are Grigorios-Filippos Psaltis (chairperson) and Styliani Alexandra Sougioultzoglou (member).

We have established an Executive Committee comprised of the Company’s Director and Chairperson, Mrs. Semiramis Paliou (Chairperson), Mr. Ioannis Zafirakis (member), and Mr. Eleftherios (Lefteris) Papatrifon (member). The Executive Committee has, to the extent permitted by law, the powers of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Company.

In December 2023, our Board of Directors adopted a policy regarding the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation (“Clawback Policy”) in accordance with the applicable rules of Nasdaq and Section 10D and Rule 10D-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In the event we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under U.S. securities laws or otherwise erroneous data or if we determine there has been a significant misconduct that causes material financial, operational or reputational harm, we shall be entitled to recover a portion or all of any incentive-based compensation, if any, provided to certain executives who, during a three-year period preceding the date on which an accounting restatement is required, received incentive compensation based on the erroneous financial data that exceeds the amount of incentive-based compensation the executive would have received based on the restatement.

Our Clawback Policy shall be administered by our Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee has the authority, in accordance with the applicable laws, rules and regulations, to interpret and make determinations necessary for the administration of the Clawback Policy, and may forego recovery in certain instances, including if it determines that recovery would be impracticable. The full text of our Clawback Policy is included as Exhibit 97.1 to this annual report.

We have no employees, but we pay Steamship for the services of our officers. DWM is responsible for identifying the appropriate officers and seamen mainly through crewing agencies. The crewing agencies handle each seaman’s training, travel and payroll. DWM ensures that all our seamen have the qualifications and licenses required to comply with international regulations and shipping conventions. As of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, 106, 86 and 63 seafarers, respectively, were employed by our vessel-owning subsidiaries.

With respect to the total amount of common shares, Series B Preferred Shares, Series C Preferred Shares, Series D Preferred Shares and Series E Preferred Shares owned by our officers and directors, individually and as a group, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions-A. Major Shareholders.”

Not applicable.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the SEC’s rules. In computing percentage ownership of each person, shares subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of the date of this annual report, are deemed to be beneficially owned by that person. These shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

Steamship, a related party that since January 2023 is controlled by our Chairperson, provides to us insurance, administrative and brokerage services pursuant to a Management Agreement for insurance-related services an Administrative Services Agreement; and a Brokerage Services Agreement.

Under each vessel-owning subsidiary’s Management Agreement for insurance-related services with Steamship, the vessel-owning subsidiary pays Steamship a fixed fee of either (i) $500 per month for each month that the vessel is employed or is available for employment or (ii) $250 per month for each month that the vessel is laid-up and not available for employment for at least 15 calendar days of such month. These Management Agreements may be terminated by either party on three months’ prior written notice.

Under our Administrative Services Agreement with Steamship, Steamship provides certain administrative services which may include budgeting, reporting, monitoring of bank accounts, compliance with banks, payroll services and any other possible service that we require to perform our operations. We pay Steamship a monthly fee of $10,000. This agreement may be terminated by either party on 30 days’ prior written notice.

Under our Brokerage Services Agreement with Steamship, we pay Steamship a lump sum commission of $150,000 per month, plus 2.5% on the hire agreed per charter party for each vessel (subject to required deductions and withholdings); provided, however, that we and Steamship may agree to commissions on a percentage basis for specific deals. This Brokerage Services Agreement had an initial term of twelve months commencing on January 1, 2023 (unless terminated earlier on the basis of any other provision contained therein) and is automatically renewed for further periods of one calendar year.

We have entered into a right of first refusal agreement with Diana Shipping, dated November 8, 2021, pursuant to which Diana Shipping granted us a right of first refusal over six dry bulk carriers then owned by Diana Shipping and identified in the agreement. As of the date of this annual report, one of the six identified vessels from Diana Shipping remains available for our purchase. Pursuant to this right of first refusal, we have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the remaining identified vessel when and if Diana Shipping determines to sell the vessel. Pursuant to the agreement, in connection with our right of first refusal in any vessel acquisition opportunity, our right to purchase the vessel will be at a price equal to the fair market value of such vessel at the time of sale, as determined by the average of two independent shipbroker valuations from brokers mutually agreeable to the Company and Diana Shipping. If we do not exercise our right to purchase this vessel, Diana Shipping has the right to sell the vessel to any third party for a period of three months from the date we received notice of the offer from Diana Shipping.

On February 1, 2023, we entered into a memorandum of agreement with Diana Shipping to acquire a 2005-built Panamax vessel, the M/v Melia, having a carrying capacity of 76,225 dwt, for a total consideration of $14.0 million. Of the purchase price, $4.0 million, was paid in cash upon signing of the memorandum of agreement, and the remaining amount was paid upon delivery of the vessel to us in 13,157 shares of our Series D Preferred Stock. Our purchase of this vessel was made pursuant to our exercise of a right of first refusal granted to us by Diana Shipping. The vessel was delivered to us on February 8, 2023. The acquisition of the vessel was approved by a committee of independent members of our Board of Directors.

We have entered into a non-competition agreement with Diana Shipping, dated November 2, 2021, pursuant to which Diana Shipping granted us (i) a right of first refusal over any opportunity available to Diana Shipping (or any of its subsidiaries) to acquire or charter-in any dry bulk vessel that is larger than 70,000 dwt and that was built prior to 2006 and (ii) a right of first refusal over any employment opportunity for a dry bulk vessel pursuant to a spot market charter presented or available to Diana Shipping with respect to any vessel owned or chartered in, directly or indirectly, by Diana Shipping. The non-competition agreement also prohibits the Company and Diana Shipping from soliciting each other’s employees. The terms of the non-competition agreement provide that it will terminate on the date that (i) Diana Shipping’s ownership of our equity securities represents less than 10% of total outstanding voting power and (ii) we and Diana Shipping share no common executive officers.

Diana Wilhelmsen Management Limited, or DWM, is a 50/50 joint venture of Diana Shipping and an unaffiliated entity of us, which provides management services to the vessels in our fleet pursuant to a management agreement, under which each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries pays, for each vessel, an aggregate of 1.25% on hire and on freight of the vessel’s gross income, plus either (i) $18,500 for each month that the vessel is employed or available for employment or (ii) $9,250 per month for each month that the vessel is laid-up and not available for employment for at least 15 calendar days of such month. The management agreement may be terminated by either party on three months’ prior written notice.

Not Applicable.

See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”

We have not been involved in any legal proceedings which may have a significant effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity, nor are we aware of any proceedings that are pending or threatened which may have a significant effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity. From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, principally personal injury and property casualty claims. We expect that these claims would be covered by insurance, subject to customary deductibles. Those claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. Pursuant to the Contribution and Conveyance Agreement between us and Diana Shipping, it has agreed to indemnify us and the Subsidiaries for any and all obligations and other liabilities arising from or relating to the operation, management or employment of our vessels prior to the effective date of the Spin-Off.

The declaration and payment of dividends, if any, are subject to the discretion of our board of directors. Our board of directors will review and amend our dividend policy from time to time in light of our business plans and other factors.

Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus or when a company is insolvent or if the payment of the dividend would render the company insolvent.

We believe that, under current law, any dividends that we may pay in the future from earnings and profits constitute “qualified dividend income” and as such are generally subject to a 20% United States federal income tax rate with respect to non-corporate United States shareholders. Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of a United States shareholder’s tax basis in its common stock on a dollar-for-dollar basis and thereafter as capital gain. Please see the section of this annual report entitled “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation” for additional information relating to the tax treatment of our dividend payments.

Cumulative dividends on shares of our Series C Preferred Stock and our Series D Preferred Stock are payable in cash or, at our election, in kind, quarterly on each January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15, or, if any such dividend payment date otherwise would fall on a date that is not a business day, the immediately succeeding business day. The dividend rate on shares of our Series C Preferred Stock is 8.0% per annum per $1,000 of liquidation preference per share (equal to $80 per annum per share) and is not subject to adjustment. The dividend rate on shares of our Series D Preferred Stock is 7.0% per annum per $1,000 of liquidation preference per share (equal to $70 per annum per share) and is not subject to adjustment.

Marshall Islands law provides that we may pay dividends only to the extent that assets are legally available for such purposes. Legally available assets generally are limited to our surplus, which essentially represents our retained earnings and the excess of consideration received by us for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares. In addition, under Marshall Islands law we may not pay dividends if we are insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend or the making of such redemption.

Not applicable.

Our common shares currently trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the ticker symbol “OP”.

Our common shares currently trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “OP”.

Our current amended and restated articles of incorporation are filed as exhibit 1.1 hereto, and our current amended and restated bylaws are filed as exhibit 1.2 hereto. The information contained in these exhibits is incorporated by reference herein.

Information regarding the rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each class of our shares is described in Exhibit 2.10 to this annual report titled “Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.”

Under Marshall Islands, Panamanian, Cypriot and Greek law, there are currently no restrictions on the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls or restrictions that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our securities.

In the opinion of Seward & Kissel LLP, the following is a discussion of the material Marshall Islands and U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to the Company and U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders, each as defined below, of our common stock.

The Company is incorporated in the Marshall Islands. Under current Marshall Islands law, the Company is not subject to tax on income or capital gains, and no Marshall Islands withholding tax will be imposed upon payments of dividends by the Company to holders of its common shares that are not residents or domiciled or carrying any commercial activity in the Marshall Islands. The holders of our common shares will not be subject to Marshall Islands tax on the sale or other disposition of such common shares.

The following are the material United States federal income tax consequences to the Company of its activities and of ownership and disposition of our common shares to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders, each as defined below. The following discussion of United States federal income tax matters is based on the Code, judicial decisions, administrative pronouncements, and existing and proposed Treasury Regulations, all as of the date of this annual report, and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. The discussion below is based, in part, on the description of the Company’s business as described in “Business” above and assumes that the Company will conduct its business as described in that section.

Unless exempt from United States federal income taxation under the rules discussed below, a foreign corporation is subject to United States federal income taxation in respect of any income that is derived from the use of vessels, from the hiring or leasing of vessels for use on a time, voyage or bareboat charter basis, from the participation in a pool, partnership, strategic alliance, joint operating agreement, code sharing arrangement or other joint venture it directly or indirectly owns or participates in that generates such income, or from the performance of services directly related to those uses, which we refer to as “shipping income,” to the extent that the shipping income is derived from sources within the United States. For these purposes, 50% of shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States exclusive of certain U.S. territories and possessions constitutes income from sources within the United States, which we refer to as “U.S.-source shipping income.”

Shipping income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States is considered to be 100% from sources within the United States. We are not permitted by law to engage in transportation that produces income which is considered to be 100% from sources within the United States.

Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the United States. Shipping income derived from sources outside the United States will not be subject to any United States federal income tax.

In the absence of exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code, our gross U.S.-source shipping income would be subject to a 4% tax imposed without allowance for deductions as described below.

Under Section 883 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder, the Company will be exempt from United States federal income taxation on its U.S.-source shipping income if:

The Marshall Islands, the jurisdiction where the Company and its shipowning subsidiaries are incorporated, grants an “equivalent exemption” to United States corporations. Therefore, the Company will be exempt from United States federal income taxation in any taxable year with respect to our U.S.-source shipping income if the Company satisfies either the 50% Ownership Test or the Publicly-Traded Test for such taxable year.

The Company does not expect that it will be able to satisfy the 50% Ownership Test for any taxable year due to the widely-held nature of its stock.

The Company’s ability to satisfy the Publicly-Traded Test is discussed below.

The Treasury Regulations provide, in pertinent part, that the stock of a foreign corporation will be considered to be “primarily traded” on an established securities market in a country if the number of shares of each class of stock that is traded during the taxable year on all established securities markets in that country exceeds the number of shares in each such class that is traded during that year on established securities markets in any other single country. Our common shares will be “primarily traded” on the Nasdaq Capital Market, which is an established securities market for these purposes.

Under the relevant Treasury regulations, the Company’s common shares will be considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market if one or more classes of its stock representing more than 50% of our outstanding shares, by total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote and total value, is listed on the market (the “listing threshold”). Since the Company’s common shares are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Company satisfies the listing threshold.

It is further required that with respect to each class of stock relied upon to meet the listing threshold (i) such class of the stock is traded on the market, other than in minimal quantities, on at least 60 days during the taxable year (or 1/6 of the days in the case of a short taxable year); and (ii) the aggregate number of shares of such class of stock traded on such market is at least 10% of the average number of shares of such class of stock outstanding during such year (or as appropriately adjusted in the case of a short taxable year). The Company expects to satisfy the trading frequency and trading volume tests described in this paragraph. Even if this were not the case, the relevant Treasury Regulations provide that the trading frequency and trading volume tests will be deemed satisfied by a class of stock if, as the Company expects to be the case with its common shares, such class of stock is traded on an established market in the United States, such as the Nasdaq Capital Market, and such class of stock is regularly quoted by dealers making a market in such stock.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasury Regulations provide that, in pertinent part, a non-U.S. corporation’s common stock will not be considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market for any taxable year if 50% or more of the outstanding shares of such corporation’s common stock is owned, actually or constructively under specified attribution rules, on more than half the days during the taxable year by persons who each own 5% or more of the common stock the corporation (the “5% Override Rule”).

For purposes of being able to determine the persons who own 5% or more of a corporation’s stock (“5% Shareholders”) the Treasury Regulations permit a corporation to rely on Schedule 13-D and Schedule 13-G filings with the SEC to identify persons who have a 5% or more beneficial interest in such corporation’s common stock. The Treasury regulations further provide that an investment company that is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, will not be treated as a 5% Stockholder for such purposes.

It is possible that 5% Shareholders may own more than 50% of our common shares. In the event the 5% Override Rule is triggered, the Treasury Regulations provide that the 5% Override Rule will nevertheless not apply if the Company can establish that within the group of 5% Shareholders, there are sufficient 5% Shareholders that are considered to be “qualified shareholders” for purposes of Section 883 of the Code to preclude non-qualified 5% Shareholders in the closely-held group from owning 50% or more of the corporation’s common stock for more than half the number of days during the taxable year. To establish this exception to the 5% Override Rule, 5% Shareholders owning a sufficient number of our common shares would have to provide the Company with certain information in order to substantiate their status as qualified shareholders. If 5% Shareholders were to own more than 50% of our common shares, there is no assurance that we would be able to satisfy the foregoing requirements.

If the benefits of Section 883 of the Code are unavailable for any taxable year, the Company’s U.S. source shipping income, to the extent not considered to be “effectively connected” with the conduct of a United States trade or business, as described below, will be subject to a 4% tax imposed by Section 887 of the Code on a gross basis, without the benefit of deductions (“4% gross basis tax regime”). Since under the sourcing rules described above, no more than 50% of our shipping income is treated as being derived from United States sources, the maximum effective rate of United States federal income tax on our shipping income will not exceed 2% under the 4% gross basis tax regime.

To the extent the benefits of the Section 883 of the Code are unavailable and the Company’s U.S. source shipping income is considered to be “effectively connected” with the conduct of a United States trade or business, as described below, any such “effectively connected” U.S. source shipping income, net of applicable deductions, would be subject to the United States federal corporate income tax currently imposed at a rate of 21%. In addition, the Company may be subject to the 30% United States federal “branch profits” taxes on earnings effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments, and on certain interest paid or deemed paid attributable to the conduct of such United States trade or business.

The Company’s U.S. source shipping income would be considered “effectively connected” with the conduct of a United States trade or business only if:

The Company does not intend to have, or permit circumstances that would result in having, any vessel operating to the United States on a regularly scheduled basis. Based on the foregoing and on the expected mode of the Company’s shipping operations and other activities, the Company believes that none of its U.S. source shipping income will be “effectively connected” with the conduct of a United States trade or business.

Regardless of whether the Company qualifies for exemption under Section 883 of the Code, the Company will not be subject to United States federal income taxation with respect to gain realized on a sale of a vessel, provided the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States under United States federal income tax principles. In general, a sale of a vessel will be considered to occur outside of the United States for this purpose if title to the vessel, and risk of loss with respect to the vessel, pass to the buyer outside of the United States. It is expected that any sale of a vessel by the Company will be considered to occur outside of the United States.

As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of our common shares that is a United States citizen or resident, United States corporation or other United States entity taxable as a corporation, an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source, or a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

This discussion does not purport to deal with the tax consequences of owning common stock to all categories of investors, some of which, such as dealers in securities or commodities, financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, U.S. expatriates, persons liable for an alternative minimum tax, persons who hold common stock as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or integrated investment, U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not the United States dollar, persons required to recognize income for U.S. federal income tax purposes no later than when such income is reported on an “applicable financial statement,” investors subject to the “base erosion and anti-avoidance” tax and investors that own, actually or under applicable constructive ownership rules, 10% or more of the Company’s common stock, may be subject to special rules. This discussion deals only with holders who hold the common stock as a capital asset. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences arising in your own particular situation under U.S. federal, state, local or foreign law of the ownership of common stock.

If a partnership holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding our common shares, you are encouraged to consult your tax advisor.

Subject to the discussion of passive foreign investment companies below, any distributions made by the Company with respect to its common shares to a U.S. Holder will generally constitute dividends, which may be taxable as ordinary income or “qualified dividend income” to the extent of the Company’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess of the Company’s earnings and profits will be treated first as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in his common shares on a dollar-for-dollar basis and thereafter as capital gain. Because the Company is not a United States corporation, U.S. Holders that are corporations will generally not be entitled to claim a dividends received deduction with respect to any distributions such corporate U.S. Holders receive. Dividends paid with respect to the Company’s common shares will generally be treated as “passive category income” or, in the case of certain types of U.S. Holders, “general category income” for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for United States foreign tax credit purposes.

Dividends paid on the Company’s common shares to a U.S. Holder who is an individual, trust or estate (a “U.S. Individual Holder”) will generally be treated as “qualified dividend income”. Qualified dividend income is taxable to such U.S. Individual Holders at preferential tax rates provided that (1) the Company is not a passive foreign investment company for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the immediately preceding taxable year (which the Company does not believe it is, has been or will be), (2) the Company’s common shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States (such as the Nasdaq Capital Market, on which the Company’s common shares will be listed), (3) the U.S. Individual Holder has owned the common shares for more than 60 days in the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the date on which the common shares become ex-dividend, and (4) the U.S. Individual Holder is not under an obligation (whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make payments with respect to positions in similar or related property. There is no assurance that any dividends paid on the Company’s common shares will be eligible for these preferential rates in the hands of a U.S. Individual Holder. Dividends paid on the Company’s common shares prior to the date on which its common shares became listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market were not eligible for these preferential rates. Any dividends paid by the Company that are not eligible for these preferential rates will be taxed as ordinary income to a U.S. Individual Holder.

Special rules may apply to any “extraordinary dividend”, which is generally a dividend paid by the Company in an amount which is equal to or in excess of ten percent of a shareholder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market value in certain circumstances) in the Company’s common shares. If the Company pays an “extraordinary dividend” on its common shares that is treated as “qualified dividend income,” then any loss derived by a U.S. Individual Holder from the sale or exchange of such common shares will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of such dividend.

Assuming the Company does not constitute a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of the Company’s common shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized by the U.S. Holder from such sale, exchange or other disposition and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such stock. Such gain or loss will generally be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. Such capital gain or loss will generally be treated as U.S.-source income or loss, as applicable, for United States foreign tax credit purposes. A U.S. Holder’s ability to deduct capital losses is subject to certain limitations.

Special United States federal income tax rules apply to a U.S. Holder that holds stock in a foreign corporation classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes. In general, the Company will be treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder if, for any taxable year in which such holder held the Company’s common shares, either:

For purposes of determining whether the Company is a PFIC, the Company will be treated as earning and owning our proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively, of any of its subsidiary corporations, in which the Company owns at least 25% of the value of the subsidiary’s stock. Income earned, or deemed earned, by the Company in connection with the performance of services would not constitute passive income. By contrast, rental income would generally constitute “passive income” unless the Company were treated under specific rules as deriving rental income in the active conduct of a trade or business.

Based on the Company’s anticipated operations and future projections, the Company does not believe that it is, nor does it expect to become, a PFIC with respect to any taxable year. Although there is no legal authority directly on point, and the Company is not relying upon an opinion of counsel on this issue, the Company’s belief is based principally on the position that, for purposes of determining whether the Company is a PFIC, the gross income the Company derives or is deemed to derive from the time chartering and voyage chartering activities of its wholly-owned subsidiaries should constitute services income, rather than rental income. Correspondingly, such income should not constitute passive income, and the assets that the Company or its wholly-owned subsidiaries own and operate in connection with the production of such income, in particular, the vessels, should not constitute passive assets for purposes of determining whether the Company is a PFIC. The Company believes there is substantial legal authority supporting its position consisting of case law and United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), pronouncements concerning the characterization of income derived from time charters and voyage charters as services income for other tax purposes. However, there is also authority which characterizes time charter income as rental income rather than services income for other tax purposes. Moreover, in the absence of any legal authority specifically relating to the statutory provisions governing PFICs, the IRS or a court could disagree with the Company’s position. In addition, although the Company intends to conduct its affairs in a manner to avoid being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, there can be no assurance that the nature of the Company’s operations will not change in the future.

As discussed more fully below, if the Company were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year which included a U.S. Holder’s holding period in the Company’s common shares, then such U.S. Holder would be subject to different U.S. federal income taxation rules depending on whether the U.S. Holder makes an election to treat the Company as a “qualified electing fund” (a “QEF election”). As an alternative to making a QEF election, a U.S. Holder should be able to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to the Company’s common shares, as discussed below. In addition, if the Company were to be treated as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder of our common shares would be required to file annual information returns with the IRS. In addition, if a U.S. Holder owns our common shares and the Company is a PFIC, such U.S. Holder must generally file IRS Form 8621 with the IRS.

A U.S. Holder who makes a timely QEF election with respect to our common shares (an “Electing Holder”) would report for U.S. federal income tax purposes his pro rata share of the Company’s ordinary earnings and of our net capital gain, if any, for the Company’s taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year of the Electing Holder. The Company’s net operating losses or net capital losses would not pass through to the Electing Holder and will not offset the Company’s ordinary earnings or net capital gain reportable to the Electing Holder in subsequent years (although such losses would ultimately reduce the gain, or increase the loss, if any, recognized by the Electing Holder on the sale of his common shares). Distributions received from the Company by an Electing Holder are excluded from the Electing Holder’s gross income to the extent of the Electing Holder’s prior inclusions of the Company’s ordinary earnings and net capital gain. The Electing Holder’s tax basis in his common shares would be increased by any amount included in the Electing Holder’s income. Distributions received by an Electing Holder, which are not includible in income because they have been previously taxed, would decrease the Electing Holder’s tax basis in our common shares. An Electing Holder would generally recognize capital gain or loss on the sale or exchange of our common shares.

A U.S. Holder who makes a timely mark-to-market election with respect to our common shares would include annually in the U.S. Holder’s income, as ordinary income, any excess of the fair market value of the common shares at the close of the taxable year over the U.S. Holder’s then adjusted tax basis in the common shares. The excess, if any, of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis at the close of the taxable year over the then fair market value of the common shares would be deductible in an amount equal to the lesser of the amount of the excess or the net mark-to-market gains that the U.S. Holder included in income in previous years with respect to the common shares. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in his common shares would be adjusted to reflect any income or loss amount recognized pursuant to the mark-to-market election. A U.S. Holder would recognize ordinary income or loss on a sale, exchange or other disposition of the common shares; provided, however, that any ordinary loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition may not exceed the net mark-to-market gains that the U.S. Holder included in income in previous years with respect to the common shares.

A U.S. Holder who does not make a timely QEF Election or a timely mark-to-market election with respect to our common shares (a “Non-Electing Holder”) would be subject to special rules with respect to (i) any “excess distribution” (generally, the portion of any distributions received by the Non-Electing Holder on the common shares in a taxable year in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by the Non-Electing Holder in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the Non-Electing Holder’s holding period for the common shares), and (ii) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of the common shares. Under these rules, (i) the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the Non-Electing Holder’s holding period for the common shares; (ii) the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC, would be taxed as ordinary income; and (iii) the amount allocated to each of the other prior taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed tax deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year. If a Non-Electing Holder dies while owning our common shares, the Non-Electing Holder’s successor would be ineligible to receive a step-up in the tax basis of those common shares.

A beneficial owner of our common shares (other than a partnership) that is not a U.S. Holder is referred to herein as a “Non-U.S. Holder.”

Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax or withholding tax on dividends received from the Company with respect to its common shares, unless such income is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If the Non-U.S. Holder is entitled to the benefits of a United States income tax treaty with respect to those dividends, such income is taxable only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States.

Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares, unless:

If the Non-U.S. Holder is engaged in a United States trade or business for United States federal income tax purposes, the income from the common shares, including dividends and the gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of the stock that is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business will generally be subject to regular United States federal income tax in the same manner as discussed in the previous section relating to the taxation of U.S. Holders. In addition, in the case of a corporate Non-U.S. Holder, its earnings and profits that are attributable to the effectively connected income, subject to certain adjustments, may be subject to an additional United States federal “branch profits” tax at a rate of 30%, or at a lower rate as may be specified by an applicable United States income tax treaty.

In general, dividend payments, or other taxable distributions, made within the United States to you will be subject to information reporting requirements. Such payments will also be subject to backup withholding tax if a U.S. Individual Holder:

Non-U.S. Holders may be required to establish their exemption from information reporting and backup withholding by certifying their status on an appropriate IRS Form W-8.

If a shareholder sells our common shares to or through a United States office of a broker, the payment of the proceeds is subject to both United States backup withholding and information reporting unless the shareholder certifies that it is a non-U.S. person, under penalties of perjury, or the shareholder otherwise establishes an exemption. If a shareholder sells our common shares through a non-United States office of a non-United States broker and the sales proceeds are paid outside the United States, then information reporting and backup withholding generally will not apply to that payment. However, United States information reporting requirements, but not backup withholding, will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United States, if a shareholder sells our common shares through a non-United States office of a broker that is a United States person or has some other contacts with the United States.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, a shareholder generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under backup withholding rules that exceed the shareholder’s United States federal income tax liability by filing a refund claim with the IRS.

Individuals who are U.S. Holders (and to the extent specified in the applicable Treasury Regulations, certain individuals who are Non-U.S. Holders and certain United States entities) who hold “specified foreign financial assets” (as defined in Section 6038D of the Code and the applicable Treasury Regulations) are required to file IRS Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets) with information relating to each such asset for each taxable year in which the aggregate value of all such assets exceeds $75,000 at any time during the taxable year or $50,000 on the last day of the taxable year. Specified foreign financial assets would include, among other assets, our common shares, unless our common shares were held through an account maintained with a United States financial institution. Substantial penalties apply to any failure to timely file IRS Form 8938, unless the failure is shown to be due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Additionally, the statute of limitations on the assessment and collection of United States federal income tax with respect to a taxable year for which the filing of IRS Form 8938 is required may not close until three years after the date on which IRS Form 8938 is filed. U.S. Holders (including United States entities) and Non-U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors regarding their reporting obligations under Section 6038D of the Code.

Long-standing international tax initiatives that determine each country’s jurisdiction to tax cross-border international trade and profits are evolving as a result of, among other things, initiatives such as the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directives, as well as the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting reporting requirements, mandated and/or recommended by the EU, G8, G20 and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, including the imposition of a minimum global effective tax rate for multinational businesses regardless of the jurisdiction of operation and where profits are generated (Pillar Two). As these and other tax laws and related regulations change (including changes in the interpretation, approach and guidance of tax authorities), our financial results could be materially impacted. Given the unpredictability of these possible changes and their potential interdependency, it is difficult to assess whether the overall effect of such potential tax changes would be cumulatively positive or negative for our earnings and cash flow, but such changes could adversely affect our financial results.

On December 12, 2022, the European Union member states agreed to implement the OECD’s Pillar Two global corporate minimum tax rate of 15% on companies with revenues of at least €750 million effective from 2024. Various countries have either adopted implementing legislation or are in the process of drafting such legislation. Any new tax law in a jurisdiction where we conduct business or pay tax could have a negative effect on our company.

In accordance with these requirements we will file reports and other information with the SEC. These materials, including this annual report and the accompanying exhibits are available at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, our filings will be available on our website www.oceanpal.com. This web address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. None of the information contained on these websites is incorporated into or forms a part of this annual report.

Shareholders may also request a copy of our filings at no cost by writing or telephoning us at the following address:

We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars and our operating expenses are mainly in U.S. dollars. For accounting purposes, including throughout this annual report, expenses incurred in other currencies are converted into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of each transaction. Because the portion of our expenses incurred in currencies other than the U.S. dollar is not significant, our expenses are not subject to fluctuations in exchange rates. Therefore, we are not engaged in derivative instruments to hedge those expenses.

Not applicable.

PART II.

As of the date of this annual report, we have committed substantially all the net proceeds of the January 2022 Underwritten Offering and the February 2023 Registered Direct Offering for general corporate purposes.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, being December 31, 2023. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the evaluation date.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Management has conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, is effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm because as an emerging growth company, we are exempt from this requirement.

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Nikolaos Veraros and Alexios Chrysochoidis qualify as audit committee financial experts.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to the Company’s officers, directors, employees and agents, which complies with applicable guidelines issued by the SEC. Our Code Ethics as in effect on the date hereof, has been filed as an exhibit to this annual report. Shareholders may also request a copy of our Code of Ethics at no cost, by writing to us at Pendelis 26, 175 64 Palaio Faliro, Athens, Greece.

In 2023 and 2022, our principal accountants, Ernst and Young (Hellas), Certified Auditors Accountants S.A., and our external consultants PricewaterhouseCoopers Business Solutions S.A. have also billed us for audit related services provided for the Company’s registration statements, which amounted to €103,000 and €153,750 or about $111,355 and $168,521, respectively.

During 2023 and 2022, we received tax services for which fees amounted to $9,000 and $12,500, respectively, and relate to the calculation of Earnings and Profits of the Company.

All the abovementioned fees and services are expressed in U.S Dollars.

Our Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, replacement, compensation, evaluation and oversight of the work of our independent auditors. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee pre-approves the audit and non-audit or non-assurance and audit-related services performed by the independent auditors in order to assure that they do not impair the auditor’s independence from the Company. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy which sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the independent auditors may be pre-approved.

Our Company’s corporate governance practices are in compliance with, and are not prohibited by, the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. We are exempt from many of Nasdaq’s corporate governance practices other than the requirements regarding the disclosure of a going concern audit opinion, submission of a listing agreement, notification of material non-compliance with Nasdaq corporate governance practices, and the establishment and composition of an audit committee and a formal written audit committee charter. The practices that we follow in lieu of Nasdaq’s corporate governance rules are described below.

Other than as noted above, we are in full compliance with all other applicable Nasdaq corporate governance standards.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Pursuant to applicable SEC transition guidance, the disclosure required by Item 16J will be applicable to us beginning in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.

We believe that cybersecurity is fundamental in our operations and, as such, we are committed to maintaining robust governance and oversight of cybersecurity risks and to implementing comprehensive processes and procedures for identifying, assessing, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats as part of our broader risk management system and processes. We maintain various cybersecurity measures and protocols to safeguard our systems and data and continuously monitor and assess potential threats to pre-emptively address any emerging cyber risks. We have implemented various processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats, which are integrated into our overall risk management framework. These risk assessments include identifying reasonably foreseeable potential internal and external risks, the likelihood of occurrence and any potential damage that could result from such risks, and the sufficiency of existing policies, procedures, systems, controls, and other safeguards in place to manage such risks. As part of our risk management process, we may engage third party experts to help identify and assess risks from cybersecurity threats.

The Company’s personnel are provided cyber security awareness training and are adequately trained to perform their information security-related duties and responsibilities consistent with related policies, procedures, and agreements. Where network connectivity is used, appropriate controls, including firewalls and intrusion detection exist and periodic assessment is performed to prevent unauthorised access.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we did not identify any cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. For more information about the cybersecurity risks we face, please see Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors — “A cyber-attack could materially disrupt our business.”