MBCA shall require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all shares entitled generally to vote on such matter by Articles of Organization, and in addition, a majority of the shares of any voting group entitled to vote separately on the matter pursuant to the MBCA, by Articles of Organization or by the Bylaws of the Corporation, or by action of the Board of Directors of the Corporation taken pursuant to Subsection (b) of Section 12.02 of the MBCA.
4. Voluntary Dissolution of the Corporation. Unless a greater percentage vote, or action by one or more separate voting groups, is required by Articles of Organization, by the Bylaws of the Corporation, by the provisions of the MBCA, or by the Board of Directors of the Corporation acting pursuant to subsection (c) of Section 14.02 of the MBCA, the approval of a proposal to dissolve the Corporation in accordance with Section 14.02 of the MBCA shall require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all shares entitled generally to vote on such matter by Articles of Organization, and in addition, a majority of the shares of any voting group entitled to vote separately on the matter pursuant to the MBCA, by Articles of Organization or by the Bylaws of the Corporation, or by action of the Board of Directors of the Corporation taken pursuant to Subsection (c) of Section 14.02 of the MBCA.
5. Domestication into Foreign Jurisdiction. Unless a greater percentage vote, or action by one or more separate voting groups, is required by Articles of Organization, by the Bylaws of the Corporation, by the provisions of the MBCA, or by the Board of Directors of the Corporation acting pursuant to subsection (3) of Section 9.21 of the MBCA, the approval of a plan of domestication of the Corporation to a foreign jurisdiction in accordance with Section 9.21 of the MBCA shall require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all shares entitled generally to vote on such matter by these Articles of Organization, and in addition, a majority of the shares of any voting group entitled to vote separately on the matter pursuant to the MBCA, by Articles of Organization or by the Bylaws of the Corporation, or by action of the Board of Directors of the Corporation taken pursuant to Subsection (3) of Section 9.21 of the MBCA.
6. Entity Conversion. Unless a greater percentage vote, or action by one or more separate voting groups, is required by Articles of Organization, by the Bylaws of the Corporation, by the provisions of the MBCA, or by the Board of Directors of the Corporation acting pursuant to subsection (3) of Section 9.52 of the MBCA, the approval of a plan of entity conversion to a domestic or foreign other entity in accordance with Section 9.52 of the MBCA shall require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all shares entitled generally to vote on such matter by Articles of Organization, and in addition, a majority of the shares of any voting group entitled to vote separately on the matter pursuant to the MBCA, by Articles of Organization or by the Bylaws of the Corporation, or by action of the Board of Directors of the Corporation taken pursuant to Subsection (3) of Section 9.52 of the MBCA.
7. Choice of Forum. Unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Business Litigation Session of the Superior Court for Suffolk County, Massachusetts and United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts sitting in Boston, Massachusetts shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Corporation, (b) any action asserting a claim for breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, employee, or agent of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Corporation’s shareholders, (c) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Massachusetts Business Corporation Act, the Articles of Organization, or the Bylaws of the corporation, or (d) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each case subject to said courts having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants therein, except that the United States District Court of Massachusetts in Boston shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any claim arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any claim for which such other courts do not have subject matter jurisdiction including, without limitation, any claim arising under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).