New Mountain Guardian IV BDC L.L.C. 10-K2023 FY Annual report

During the Investment Period (as defined below), repayments and refinancings will be redeployed into new investments or used to pay down existing credit facilities. After the Investment Period, the Investment Adviser may pursue several options to return capital to investors. These may include running off the portfolio over subsequent years as investments are repaid, secondary sales in the market and other potential liquidity options. For the avoidance of doubt, we have no intention of pursuing an initial public offering and our documents will prohibit this type of event; however, unitholders may be given the opportunity (but would not be required) to elect to exchange their interests in us for interests in another investment vehicle managed by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates.

At all times consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and the 1940 Act, we conduct a valuation of our assets, pursuant to which our members' capital is determined.

As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a BDC must adhere to certain regulatory requirements. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to investments by a BDC in another investment company, as well as transactions between BDCs and their affiliates, principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters. A BDC must be organized and have its principal place of business in the United States, it must be operated for the purpose of investing in or lending to primarily private or thinly traded companies and it must make significant managerial assistance available to those companies whose securities are considered Qualifying Assets (as defined below) for the BDC.

We have a Board. A majority of our Board must be persons who are not "interested persons" of ours, as that term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act (the "Independent Directors"). As a BDC, we are prohibited from indemnifying any director or officer against any liability to us or our unitholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person's office. Additionally, to provide additional unitholder protection, we are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company.

As a BDC, we are required to meet a coverage ratio of the value of total assets to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings, and any preferred units we may issue in the future, of at least 150.0% (which means we can borrow $2 for every $1 of our equity). We monitor our compliance with this coverage ratio on a regular basis.

As a BDC, we will not generally be permitted to invest in any portfolio company in which the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates currently have an investment or make any co‑investments with the Investment Adviser or its affiliates without an exemptive order from the SEC. On August 30, 2022, the SEC issued an exemptive order (the "Exemptive Order") to the Investment Adviser and certain of its affiliates which superseded a prior orders issued on October 8, 2019 and December 18, 2017, which permits us to co‑invest in portfolio companies with certain funds or entities managed by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates in certain negotiated transactions where co‑investing would otherwise be prohibited under the 1940 Act, subject to the conditions of the Exemptive Order. Pursuant to the Exemptive Order, we are permitted to co‑invest with our affiliates if a "required majority" (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of our Independent Directors make certain conclusions in connection with a co‑investment transaction, including, but not limited to, that (1) the terms of the potential co‑investment transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to us and our unitholders and do not involve overreaching in respect of us or our unitholders on the part of any person concerned, and (2) the potential co‑investment

We may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC unless authorized by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities, as required by the 1940 Act. A majority of the outstanding voting securities of a company is defined under the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (a) 67.0% or more of such company's voting securities present at a meeting if more than 50.0% of the outstanding voting securities of such company are present or represented by proxy, or (b) more than 50.0% of the outstanding voting securities of such company. We do not anticipate any substantial change in the nature of our business.

In addition, as a BDC, we are not permitted to issue Units in consideration for services.

To qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things: (1) have an election in effect to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year; (2) have filed with our return for the taxable year an election to be a RIC or have made such election for a previous taxable year; (3) derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from (a) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities or foreign currencies, or fee income (including but not limited to gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock, securities, or currencies; and (b) net income derived from an interest in certain publicly traded partnerships that are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes and that derive less than 90% of their gross income from the items described in (a) above (each, a "Qualified Publicly Traded Partnership"); and (4) diversify our holdings so that, at the end of each quarter of each taxable year (a) at least 50% of the value of our total assets is represented by cash and cash items (including receivables), U.S. government securities and securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other secuirites of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our total assets, or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and (b) not more than 25% of the value of our total assets is invested in (I) the securities (other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs) of any one issuer, (II) the securities, other than securities of other RICs, of any two or more issuers which we control and which are determined to be engaged in the same or similar trades or businesses or related trades or businesses or (III) the securities of certain Qualified Publicly Traded Partnerships.

As a RIC, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our investment company taxable income (as that term is defined in the Code, but determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid) and net capital gains (the excess of net long‑term capital gains over net short‑term capital losses), if any, that we distribute in each taxable year to our unitholders, provided that we distribute dividends equal to at least 90% of our investment company taxable income plus 90% of our net interest income excludable under Section 103(a) of the Code. We intend to distribute to our unitholders, each taxable year, substantially all of our investment company taxable income and net capital gains.

Amounts not distributed on a timely basis in accordance with a calendar year distribution requirement are subject to a nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax. To prevent imposition of the excise tax, we must timely distribute during each calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) 98% of our ordinary income (not taking into account any capital gains or losses) for the calendar year, (ii) 98.2% of our capital gains in excess of our capital losses (adjusted for certain ordinary losses) for the one‑year period ending October 31 of the calendar year, and (iii) any ordinary income and capital gains net income that we recognized for previous years, but were not distributed during those years, and on which we paid no U.S. federal income tax. For these purposes, we will be deemed to have distributed any income or gains on which we paid U.S. federal income tax.

A distribution will be treated as paid on December 31 of any calendar year if it is declared by us in October, November or December with a record date in such a month and paid by us during January of the following calendar year. Such distributions will be taxable to unitholders in the calendar year in which the distributions are declared, rather than the calendar year in which the distributions are received.

If we fail to qualify as a RIC or fail to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement in any taxable year, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates on our taxable income (including distributions of net capital gains), even if such income were distributed to our unitholders, and all distributions out of earnings and profits would be taxed to unitholders as ordinary dividend income. Such distributions generally may be eligible (i) to be treated as "qualified dividend income" in the case of individuals and other noncorporate unitholders and (ii) for the dividends received deduction in the case

The investments we may make may result in a higher amount of risk, volatility or loss of principal than alternative investment options. These investments in portfolio companies may be highly speculative and aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our Units may not be suitable for investors with lower risk tolerance.

Our investors are placing their entire Capital Commitment in the exclusive discretion of, and are dependent upon the skill and experience of, New Mountain Capital and the Investment Adviser. Unitholders will be relying on the ability of the Investment Adviser to identify, structure and implement the investments to be made using the capital available to us. Unitholders have no rights or powers to take part in our management or making investment decisions and will not receive the amount of any portfolio company's financial information that is generally available to the Investment Adviser. The Investment Adviser, subject to the oversight of our Board, has sole and absolute discretion in identifying, structuring, negotiating, purchasing, financing and eventually divesting investments on our behalf (subject to specified exceptions). The Investment Adviser may be unable to find a sufficient number of attractive opportunities to meet our investment objectives. Our success will depend on the ability of the Investment Adviser to identify suitable portfolio investments, to negotiate and arrange the closing of appropriate transactions, and to arrange the timely disposition of portfolio investments. Our success will also depend in part upon the skill, expertise and ability of New Mountain Capital's investment professionals and, as more fully discussed below, the management of portfolio companies. The interests of these professionals in New Mountain Capital and the incentive fee should tend to discourage them from withdrawing from participation in our investment activities. However, there can be no assurance that such professionals will continue to be associated with New Mountain Capital or the Investment Adviser throughout our life and a loss of the services of key personnel could impair New Mountain Capital's ability to provide services to us. There is ever‑increasing competition among alternative asset managers, financial institutions, private investment firms, financial sponsors, investment managers and other industry participants for hiring and retaining qualified investment professionals. There can be no assurance that New Mountain Capital personnel or its senior advisors will not be solicited by and

In addition, we do not have a dedicated investment team and will share personnel and other resources with New Mountain Capital's other funds and operations. New Mountain Capital personnel will devote such time to us as shall be reasonably necessary to conduct our business affairs in an appropriate manner. However, such personnel will work on and devote substantial time to other projects, including New Mountain Capital's existing funds, vehicles and accounts and their investments, and, therefore, conflicts exist in the allocation of management time, services and functions. We will have no interest in such other investments, funds, vehicles and accounts where team members spend time. While there are a substantial number of investment team members who will devote such time to us as shall be reasonably necessary as described above, certain of the New Mountain Capital personnel devote, and are required to continue to devote, a majority and primary amount of his or her business time to New Mountain Capital's other funds, their respective portfolio companies and matters relating thereto, which will necessarily limit the amount of time such personnel are able to dedicate to us. As a result, the Investment Adviser and its affiliates' ability to access professionals and resources within New Mountain Capital for our benefit as described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K will be limited. Such access may also be limited by the internal compliance policies of New Mountain Capital or other legal or business considerations, including those constraints generally discussed herein.

The Investment Adviser is managed by an Investment Committee, which oversees our investment activities. The Investment Committee currently consists of six members. The loss of any member of the Investment Committee or of other senior professionals of the Investment Adviser and its affiliates without suitable replacement could limit our ability to achieve our investment objective and operate as we anticipate. This could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. To achieve our investment objective, the Investment Adviser may hire, train, supervise and manage new investment professionals to participate in our investment selection and monitoring process. If the Investment Adviser is unable to find investment professionals or do so in a timely manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The Investment Management Agreement has been approved pursuant to Section 15 of the 1940 Act. In addition, the Investment Management Agreement has termination provisions that allow the parties to terminate the agreement. The Investment Management Agreement may be terminated at any time, without penalty, by the majority of our Board or by the unitholders holding a majority of outstanding voting Units, upon 60 days' notice. If the Investment Management Agreement is terminated, it may adversely affect the quality of our investment opportunities. In addition, in the event the Investment Management Agreement is terminated, it may be difficult for us to replace the Investment Adviser. Moreover, it may be an event of default under the terms of the subscription facility and/or other credit facilities for us, if the Investment Adviser or an affiliate of the Investment Adviser ceases to manage us, which could result in the immediate acceleration of the amounts due under our credit facilities.

In addition, any Pre‑Incentive Fee Net Investment Income may be computed and paid on income that may include interest that has been accrued but not yet received. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously included in the calculation of the incentive fee will become uncollectible. The Investment Adviser is not obligated to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued income that we never received as a result of a default by an entity on the obligation that resulted in the accrual of such income, and such circumstances would result in us paying an incentive fee on income we never received.

We will be required to indemnify any person who has served as our director, officer or employee, the Investment Adviser and each of their respective affiliates and related parties, and each person serving, or who has served, as a member of New Mountain Capital's Executive Advisory Council or the advisory committee (collectively, the "Covered Persons") for liabilities incurred in connection with our affairs. Such liabilities may be material and have an adverse effect on the returns to unitholders. For example, in their capacity as directors of portfolio companies, the members, managers or affiliates of New Mountain Capital may be subject to derivative or other similar claims brought by stockholders of such companies. The indemnification obligation (including the advancement of expenses in connection therewith) would be payable from our assets, including the unfunded Capital Commitments of unitholders. Furthermore, as a result of the provisions contained in our Third A&R LLC Agreement, unitholders may have a more limited right of action in certain cases than it would in the absence of such limitations. For example, Covered Persons will not owe a duty of care equivalent to a "negligence" standard, but rather the Third A&R LLC Agreement provides that the Covered Persons will not be liable unless they act with "gross negligence." Further, members of the advisory committee will not be held to a "gross negligence" standard, but will only be liable for fraud, bad faith, or willful misconduct. In addition, under the Third A&R LLC Agreement, we are required to advance the costs and expenses of an indemnitee pending the outcome of the particular matter (including determinations as to whether or not the person was entitled to indemnification or engaged in conduct that negated such person's entitlement to indemnification), and as such, there may be periods where we are advancing expenses to an individual or entity with whom we are not aligned or is otherwise an adverse party in a dispute.

Subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, the Investment Management Agreement and Administration Agreement each include exculpation, indemnification and other provisions that will limit the circumstances under which the Investment Adviser and the Administrator, respectively, can be held liable to us. In addition, investors should note that the Third A&R LLC Agreement contains provisions that, subject to applicable law, reduce or eliminate the liability of Covered Persons and limit remedies of the unitholders. Additionally, certain service providers to us, the Investment Adviser, the Administrator, their respective affiliates and other persons, including, without limitation, the members of the advisory committee, may be entitled to exculpation and indemnification. As a result, the unitholders may have a more limited right of action in certain cases than they would in the absence of such limitations.

We and certain other affiliated entities have very limited operations and therefore have limited meaningful operating history upon which an investor may evaluate their performance. Moreover, New Mountain Capital has limited history in sponsoring or managing a private BDC pursuing the same investment objective and strategy as us. The prior investment performance described herein (in which we will not participate), as with all performance data, can provide no assurance of our future results. The investment performance of the previous credit funds managed by New Mountain Capital contained herein were achieved under different market conditions and with involvement from investment professionals that may not be involved with our investment activities. Moreover, we are subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any new fund, including the risk that it will not achieve our investment objective and that the value of one of our Units could decline substantially. The past performance of New Mountain Capital or the Investment Adviser's investment professionals is not a reliable indicator of our future performance. Accordingly, investors should draw no conclusions from the performance of any previous credit platform vehicles and should not expect to achieve similar results.

The Investment Adviser manages four other companies, other than us, that are regulated as BDCs and RICs. The 1940 Act and the Code impose numerous constraints on the operations of BDCs and RICs that do not apply to the other investment vehicles previously managed by the investment professionals of the Investment Adviser. For example, under the 1940 Act, BDCs are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets primarily in qualifying assets such as U.S. private or thinly traded companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Moreover, qualification for taxation as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code requires satisfaction of source‑of‑income, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. The failure to comply with these provisions in a timely manner could prevent us from qualifying as a BDC or as a RIC and could force us to pay unexpected taxes and penalties, which would have a material adverse effect on our performance. If we fail to maintain our status as a BDC or qualify as a RIC, our operating flexibility could be significantly reduced.

The Investment Adviser depends on its broader organization's relationships with private equity sponsors, investment banks and commercial banks, and we rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide us with potential investment opportunities. If the investment professionals of the Investment Adviser fail to maintain existing relationships or develop new relationships with other sponsors or sources of investment opportunities, we may not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom the investment professionals of the Investment Adviser have relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and, therefore, there is no assurance that any relationships they currently or may in the future have will generate investment opportunities for us.

We anticipate that our investment strategy may include both primary originations and secondary market purchases. While loans that we originate and loans we purchase in the secondary market face many of the same risks associated with the financing of leveraged companies, we may be exposed to different risks depending on specific business considerations for secondary market purchases or origination of loans. Primary originations require substantially more time and resources for sourcing, diligencing and monitoring investments, which may consume a significant portion of our resources. Further, the valuation process for primary originations may be more cumbersome and uncertain due to the lack of comparable market quotes for the investment and would likely require more frequent review by an independent valuation firm. This may result in greater costs for us and fluctuations in the quarterly valuations of investments that are primary originations. As a result, this strategy may result in different returns from these investments than the types of returns experienced from secondary market purchases of debt securities and may result in the partial or complete loss of your investment.

Investments in small and middle market businesses are highly speculative and involve a high degree of risk of credit loss. These risks are likely to increase during volatile economic periods, such as those the United States and many other economies have recently experienced. Among other things, these companies:

In addition, in the course of providing significant managerial assistance to certain of our eligible portfolio companies, certain of our officers and directors may serve as directors on the boards of such companies. To the extent that litigation arises out of our investments in these companies, our officers and directors may be named as defendants in such litigation, which could result in an expenditure of funds (through our indemnification of such officers and directors) and the diversion of management time and resources.

Our investments may include companies whose capital structures may have significant leverage. Such investments also involve a higher degree of risk and increase the investment's exposure to adverse economic factors such as rising interest rates, downturns in the economy or deteriorations in the markets generally. Moreover, any rise in interest rates may significantly increase the interest expense related to a portfolio investment, causing losses and/or the inability to meet debt obligations and covenants. Our investments may involve varying degrees of leverage, which could magnify the impact of circumstances such as unfavorable market or economic conditions, operating problems and other general business and economic risks and/or changes

A portfolio company's failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross‑defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company's ability to meet its obligations under the debt and/or equity securities that we hold.

We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, lenders in certain cases can be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by them when they become too involved in the borrower's business or exercise control over a borrower. It is possible that we could become subject to a lender's liability claim, including as a result of actions taken if we render significant managerial assistance to the borrower. Furthermore, if one of our portfolio companies were to file for bankruptcy protection, even though we may have structured our investment as senior secured debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re‑characterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to claims of other creditors.

We are subject to the risk that the investments we make in our portfolio companies may be repaid prior to maturity. When this occurs, subject to qualification for or maintenance of our RIC tax treatment, we will generally use these proceeds to pay down our credit facilities and later draw additional amounts under our credit facilities to fund new portfolio investments. Any future investment in a new portfolio company may also be at lower yields than the debt that was repaid. As a result, our

Subject to the limitations set forth in the Third A&R LLC Agreement and in accordance with the 1940 Act, we may, at any time before or after the end of the Investment Period, borrow funds to fulfill the working capital needs of the Company, including, without limitation, to (i) cover organizational and offering expenses and fund expenses, (ii) provide financing to consummate the purchase of portfolio investments; (iii) make repurchases of Units; or (iv) provide financing for debt investments, and may, to the extent consistent with RIC requirements, withhold from distributions amounts necessary to repay such borrowings. The interest expense and other costs incurred in connection with such borrowings may not be recovered by income from investments purchased by us. If investment results fail to cover the cost of borrowings, the value of the portfolio held by us will decrease faster than if there had been no such borrowings. Additionally, if the investments fail to perform to expectation, the interests of our unitholders will be subordinated to such leverage, which will compound any such adverse consequences. In connection with one or more credit facilities entered into by us, distributions to the unitholders may be subordinated to payments required in connection with any indebtedness contemplated thereby. Certain borrowings may be secured by assignment of the obligations of the unitholders to make capital contributions to us and a security interest in investments. Any default by us under such a credit facility could enable a lender to take action against any unitholder to the extent of its then‑remaining undrawn commitments. Additionally, in the event of a failure to pay or other event of default under any such credit facility, the lenders could require investors to fund their entire remaining unfunded commitments. Leverage may limit the unitholders' ability to use their interests in us as collateral for other indebtedness. If we default on secured indebtedness, the lender may foreclose and we could lose our entire investment in the security for such loan. A credit facility at the fund level may also place restrictions on payments to equity holders, including prohibitions on payments in the event of any default (or continuance thereof) under such credit facility.

The Investment Adviser may, and intends to, fund the making of portfolio investments and fulfilling other capital needs with proceeds from drawdowns under one or more revolving credit facilities (the collateral for which can be, for example, one or more of our assets, i.e., asset‑backed facilities, or the undrawn capital commitments of investors, i.e., subscription lines) after calling for capital contributions. Capital calls, including those used to pay interest on subscription lines, asset‑back facilities and other indebtedness, may from time to time be "batched" together into larger, less frequent capital calls or closings, with our interim capital needs being satisfied by us borrowing money from such credit facilities. The interest expense and other costs of any such borrowings will be fund expenses and, accordingly, decrease our net returns.

Leverage arrangements ("Leverage Arrangements") into which we may enter may include covenants that, subject to exceptions, restrict our ability to pay distributions, create liens on assets, make investments, make acquisitions and engage in mergers or consolidations. Such Leverage Arrangements may also include a change of control provision that accelerates the indebtedness under the facility in the event of certain change of control events. Complying with these restrictions may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would help us grow our business or are otherwise consistent with our investment objective. These restrictions could also limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or meet extraordinary capital needs or otherwise restrict corporate activities. In addition, the restrictions contained in a credit facility could limit our ability to make distributions to our unitholders in certain circumstances, which could result in us failing to qualify as a RIC and thus becoming subject to U.S. federal income tax (and any applicable state and local taxes).

To the extent we borrow money to make investments, our net investment income depends, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, a significant change in market interest rates may have a material adverse effect on our net investment income in the event we use debt to finance our investments. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which could reduce our net investment income. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. These techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act.

The 1940 Act, as amended by the Small Business Credit Availability Act, permits a BDC to reduce the required minimum asset coverage ratio applicable to it from 200.0% to 150.0% (which means we can borrow $2 for every $1 of our equity), subject to certain requirements described therein. We have elected to be subject to the reduced asset coverage ratio of 150% in order to maintain maximum flexibility with respect to our leverage strategy.

Some of our debt investments may have less restrictive covenant terms that provide us with fewer protections, called "covenant-lite" loans, that generally provide for fewer financial covenants on the borrowers. In particular, borrowers under such covenant-lite loans may have greater flexibility in how they manage their financial condition. As a result, we may face challenges in recovering on such covenant-lite loans, to the extent they go into distress, and may lack options that would normally be available to us as a lender under more traditional debt structures.

A purchaser of the Units must rely upon the ability of the Investment Adviser to identify, structure and implement portfolio investments consistent with our investment objectives and policies. The Investment Adviser may be unable to find a sufficient number of attractive opportunities to meet our investment objectives. Our success will depend on the ability of the Investment Adviser to identify suitable portfolio investments, to negotiate and arrange the closing of appropriate transactions, and to arrange the timely disposition of portfolio investments.

Our Board has the authority, except as otherwise provided in the 1940 Act, to modify or waive certain of our operating policies and strategies without prior notice and without unitholder approval. As a result, our Board may be able to change our investment policies and objectives without any input from the unitholders. However, absent unitholder approval, we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies and strategies could have on our business and operating results. Nevertheless, any such changes could adversely affect our business and impair our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.

We may participate in a limited number of portfolio investments and, as a consequence, our aggregate return may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of even a single portfolio investment. Moreover, there are no assurances that all of our portfolio investments will perform well or even return capital. Therefore, if certain portfolio investments perform unfavorably, for us to achieve above‑average returns, one or a few of our portfolio investments must perform well. There can be no assurance that this will be the case. In addition, other than us seeking to meet the diversification requirements by virtue of our intention to be a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, investors have no assurance as to the degree of diversification of our portfolio investments, either by geographic region, industry or transaction type. To the extent we concentrate portfolio investments in a particular issuer, industry, sub‑sector, security, investment type, or geographic region, we will become more susceptible to fluctuations in value resulting from adverse economic and business conditions with respect thereto. In addition, certain geographic regions, industries and/or sub‑sectors may be more adversely affected from economic pressures when compared to other geographic regions, industries or sub‑sectors.

A high concentration of our portfolio companies in a particular geographic area magnifies the effects of downturns in that geographic area and could have a disproportionate adverse effect on the value of our investments. If we have a concentration of portfolio companies in any particular geographic area, any adverse situation that disproportionately affects that geographic area would have a magnified adverse effect on our portfolio. Factors that may negatively affect economic conditions in these states or countries include: business layoffs, downsizing or relocations, industry slowdowns, and changing demographics.

Although we will primarily make debt and non‑control equity investments, we may make investments that allow us to exercise certain influence over management and the strategic direction of a portfolio company, subject to the restrictions under the 1940 Act. The exercise of influence over a company imposes additional risks of liability for environmental damage, product defects, failure to supervise management and other types of liability in which the limited liability characteristic of business operations may be ignored. The exercise of influence over an investment could expose our assets to claims by such portfolio companies, their stockholders and their creditors. While the Investment Adviser intends to manage us in a manner that will minimize the exposure of these risks, the possibility of successful claims cannot be precluded.

Investment in us requires a long‑term commitment with no certainty of return. Many of our portfolio investments will be highly illiquid, and we may not be able to realize on such portfolio investments in a timely manner. It is anticipated that there will be a significant period of time (up to six years) before we will have completed making investments in portfolio companies. Such portfolio investments are currently expected by New Mountain Capital to mature in approximately four to seven years (or longer) from the date of initial investment, although we expect many portfolio investments will be refinanced prior to their maturity. Although portfolio investments made by us are expected to generate current income, the return of capital and the realization of gains, if any, from a portfolio investment generally will occur only upon the partial or complete disposition or refinancing of such portfolio investment. While a portfolio investment may be sold or repaid at any time, it is not generally expected that this will occur for a number of years after the portfolio investment is made. Transaction structures typically will not provide for liquidity of our portfolio investments prior to that time. Often, there will be no readily available market for portfolio investments made by us, if at all. Disposition of such portfolio investments may require a lengthy time period.

In most cases, there will be no public market for the securities held by us at the time of their acquisition. We will generally not be able to sell the securities of portfolio companies through the public markets unless their sale is registered under applicable securities laws, or unless an exemption from such registration requirements is available. Additionally, there can be no assurances that investments can be sold on a private basis. Our ability to quickly sell or exchange any of our portfolio

We may experience difficulty in the sale of a portfolio company interest and could be forced to sell at a price that reduces the return to our investors. Markets are affected by many factors that are out of our control, including the availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, as well as supply and demand. As a result, we cannot predict whether we will be able to sell our interest in a portfolio company or whether such sale could be made at a favorable price or on terms acceptable to us. Negative market conditions may cause us to sell interests for less than their carrying value, which could result in impairments. We also cannot predict the length of time which will be needed to obtain a purchaser or to complete the sale of any interest. No assurances can be given that we will recognize full value, at a price and at terms that are acceptable to us, for any interest that we are required to sell for liquidity reasons. Our inability to respond rapidly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may make portfolio investments which may not be advantageously disposed of prior to the date we will be dissolved, either by expiration of our term or otherwise. Although the Investment Adviser expects that most portfolio investments will be disposed of prior to dissolution, the Investment Adviser has a limited ability to extend our term and therefore we may have to sell, distribute or otherwise dispose of portfolio investments at a disadvantageous time as a result of dissolution. In addition, although upon our dissolution, the Investment Adviser (or the relevant liquidating trustee or other representative) will be required to use its commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate all of our assets in an orderly manner, there can be no assurances with respect to the time frame in which the winding up and the final distribution of proceeds to the unitholders will occur. In addition, the Investment Adviser may establish necessary reserves prior to distributing any gains, further elongating the period before the unitholders will likely receive distributions of disposition proceeds or current income.

We compete for investments with other BDCs and investment funds (including private equity and hedge funds), as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors have greater experience operating under, or are not subject to, the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC or the source-of-income, asset diversification and distribution requirements that we must satisfy to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC. These characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and offer better pricing and more flexible structuring than we are able to do.

We may lose investment opportunities if our pricing, terms and structure do not match those of our competitors. With respect to the investments that we make, we do not seek to compete based primarily on the interest rates we may offer, and we believe that some of our competitors may make loans with interest rates that may be lower than the rates we offer. In the secondary market for acquiring existing loans, we expect to compete generally on the basis of pricing terms. If we match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased net interest income, lower yields and increased risk of credit loss. If we are forced to match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure, we may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. Part of our competitive advantage stems from the fact that we believe the market for middle market lending is underserved by traditional bank lenders and other financial sources. A significant increase in the number and/or the size of our competitors in this target market could force us to accept less attractive investment terms. We may also compete for investment opportunities with accounts managed by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates. Although the Investment Adviser allocates opportunities in accordance with its policies and procedures, allocations to such other accounts reduces the amount and frequency of opportunities available to us and may not be in our best interests and, consequently, our unitholders'. Moreover, the performance of investment opportunities is not known at the time of allocation. If we are not able to compete effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. Because of this competition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify and take advantage of attractive investment opportunities that we identify or that we will be able to fully invest our available capital.

Although we may take controlling positions in the portfolio companies from time to time, we generally do not control most of the portfolio companies, even though we may have board representation or board observation rights, and our debt agreements may contain certain restrictive covenants that limit the business and operations of the portfolio companies. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests as debt investors. Due to the lack of liquidity of the investments that we typically hold, we may not be able to dispose of our investments in the event that we disagree with the actions of a portfolio company as readily as we would otherwise like to or at favorable prices which could decrease the value of our investments.

We may, either alone or in conjunction with one or more partners or co‑venturers, make portfolio investments in restructurings, which involve portfolio companies that are experiencing or are expected to experience severe financial difficulties. These financial difficulties may never be overcome and may cause such companies to become subject to bankruptcy proceedings. Such portfolio investments could, in certain circumstances, subject us to certain additional potential liabilities, which may exceed the value of our original investment therein. For example, under certain circumstances, a lender who has inappropriately exercised control over the management and policies of a debtor may have its claims subordinated, or disallowed or may be found liable for damages suffered by parties as a result of such actions. In addition, under certain circumstances, payments to us and distributions by us to unitholders may be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance, preferential payment or similar transaction under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws. Furthermore, portfolio investments in restructurings may be adversely affected by statutes relating to,

The success of our investment strategy may depend on our ability to restructure and effect improvements in the operations of a portfolio investment or expand the operations of a portfolio investment. The activity of identifying and implementing restructuring programs and operating improvements at portfolio investments entails a high degree of uncertainty. There can be no assurance that any person will be able to successfully identify and implement such restructuring programs and improvements or that we will have control or influence over such decisions.

We invest primarily in privately held companies. There is generally little public information about these companies, and, as a result, we must rely on the ability of the Investment Adviser to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from, and risks related to, investing in these companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments. Also, privately held companies frequently have less diverse product lines and smaller market presence than larger competitors. They are, thus, generally more vulnerable to economic downturns and may experience substantial variations in operating results. These factors could adversely affect our investment returns.

Although we generally seek to invest in established companies with sound historical financial performance, we may also invest a portion of our assets in the securities of less established companies, or early stage companies. Portfolio investments in such early stage companies may involve greater risks than generally are associated with investments in more established companies. To the extent there is any public market for the securities held by us, such securities may be subject to more abrupt and erratic market price movements than those of larger, more established companies. Less established companies tend to have lower capitalizations and fewer resources and, therefore, often are more vulnerable to financial failure. Such companies also may have shorter operating histories on which to judge future performance and in many cases, if operating, will have negative cash flow. In addition, less mature companies could be deemed to be more susceptible to irregular accounting or other fraudulent practices. In the event of fraud by any company in which we invest, we may suffer a partial or total loss of capital invested in that company. The foregoing factors may increase the difficulty of valuing such investments. There can be no assurance that any such losses will be offset by gains (if any) realized on our other portfolio investments, and any such portfolio investment should be considered highly speculative and may result in the loss of our entire investment therein.

We may invest in portfolio companies that may (i) have an unfavorable financial history, (ii) be operating at a loss or have significant fluctuations in operating results, (iii) be engaged in rapidly changing business environments, or (iv) need substantial additional capital to set up internal infrastructure, hire management and personnel, support expansion or achieve or maintain a competitive position. Such portfolio companies may have a greater variability of returns, and a higher risk of failure, than more established companies. Such companies also may face intense competition, including competition from companies with greater financial resources, more extensive development, manufacturing, marketing and service capabilities, and a larger number of qualified managerial and technical personnel.

We may invest in companies in rapidly changing fields, which may rely on the use of proprietary technology and be materially impacted by technological changes. Technological advancement is characterized by rapid change, evidenced by rapidly changing market conditions and participants, new competing products and improvements in existing products. Accordingly, companies relying on such technology may face special risks of product obsolescence. There can be no assurance that products sold by portfolio companies will not be rendered obsolete or adversely affected by competing products or that portfolio companies will not be adversely affected by other challenges inherent in businesses that may be significantly impacted by technological change, including a failure to successfully protect and enforce intellectual property and other rights, or failure to successfully implement and market new technology or proprietary systems.

We may invest a portion of our aggregate Capital Commitments outside of the United States. Non‑U.S. investments involve certain factors not typically associated with investing in the United States, including risks relating to (i) currency exchange matters, including fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the various foreign currencies in which our foreign portfolio investments are denominated, and costs associated with conversion of investment principal and income from one currency into another; (ii) differences between the U.S. and foreign securities markets, including potential price volatility in and relative liquidity of some foreign securities markets, the absence of uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and disclosure requirements and less government supervision and regulation; (iii) certain economic, social and political risks, including potential exchange control regulations and restrictions on foreign investment and repatriation of capital, the risks of political, economic or social instability and the possibility of expropriation or confiscatory

In addition, portfolio companies located in non‑U.S. jurisdictions may be involved in restructurings, bankruptcy proceedings and/or reorganizations that are not subject to laws and regulations that are similar to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the rights of creditors afforded in U.S. jurisdictions. To the extent such non‑U.S. laws and regulations do not provide us with equivalent rights and privileges necessary to promote and protect our interest in any such proceeding, our investments in any such portfolio company may be adversely affected. While the Investment Adviser intends, where appropriate, to manage us in a manner that will minimize exposure to the foregoing risks, to the extent practicable, there can be no assurance that adverse developments with respect to such risks will not adversely affect our assets that are held in certain countries.

In connection with certain portfolio investments, we may employ hedging techniques designed to reduce the risk of adverse movements in interest rates, securities prices and currency exchange rates to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. While such transactions may reduce certain risks, such transactions themselves may entail certain other risks. Thus, while we may benefit from the use of these hedging mechanisms, unanticipated changes in commodity prices, interest rates, securities prices, currency exchange rates and/or other events relating to such hedging transactions may result in a poorer overall performance for us than if it had not entered into such hedging transactions. The Investment Adviser may not hedge against a particular risk because it does not regard the probability of the risk occurring to be sufficiently high as to justify the cost of the hedge, or because it does not foresee the occurrence of the risk. The successful utilization of hedging and risk management transactions requires skills that are separate from the skills used in selecting and monitoring investments. Costs related to hedging arrangements may be borne by us.

In 2020, the SEC adopted Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, which relates to the use of derivatives and other transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations by BDCs (and other funds that are registered investment companies). Under Rule 18f-4, for which compliance was required beginning in August 2022, BDCs that use derivatives are subject to a value-at-risk leverage limit, certain derivatives risk management program and testing requirements and requirements related to board reporting. These requirements apply unless the BDC qualifies as a "limited derivatives user", as defined in Rule 18f-4. A BDC that enters into reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions could either (i) comply with the asset coverage requirements of Section 18, as modified by Section 61 of the 1940 Act when engaging in reverse repurchase agreements or (ii) choose to treat such agreements as derivatives transactions under Rule 18f-4. In addition, under Rule 18f-4, a BDC may enter into an unfunded commitment agreement that is not a derivatives transaction, such as an agreement to provide financing to a portfolio company, if the BDC has a reasonable belief, at the time it enters into such an agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all of its unfunded commitment agreements, in each case as it becomes due. If the BDC cannot meet this requirement, it is required to treat the unfunded commitment as a derivatives transaction subject to the aforementioned requirements of Rule 18f-4. Collectively, these requirements may limit our ability to use derivatives and/or enter into certain other financial contracts. We qualify as a “limited derivatives user,” and as a result the requirements applicable to us under Rule 18f-4 may limit our ability to use derivatives and enter into certain other financial contracts. However, if we fail to qualify as a limited derivatives user and become subject to the additional requirements under Rule 18f-4, compliance with such requirements may increase cost of doing business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our investments are almost entirely rated below investment grade or may be unrated, which are often referred to as "leveraged loans", "high yield" or "junk" securities, and may be considered "high risk" compared to debt instruments that are rated investment grade. High yield securities are regarded as having predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer's capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligations and involve major risk

Certain debt investments that we make to portfolio companies may be secured on a second priority basis by the same collateral securing first priority debt of such companies. The first priority liens on the collateral will secure the portfolio company's obligations under any outstanding senior debt and may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be incurred by the company under the agreements governing the loans. The holders of obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation of and be entitled to receive proceeds from any realization of the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In addition, the value of the collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the debt obligations secured by the second priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the debt obligations secured by the second priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the company's remaining assets, if any.

We may also make unsecured debt investments in portfolio companies, meaning that such investments will not benefit from any interest in collateral of such companies. Liens on such portfolio companies' collateral, if any, will secure the portfolio company's obligations under our outstanding secured debt and may secure certain future debt that is permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under its secured debt agreements. The holders of obligations secured by such liens will generally control the liquidation of, and be entitled to receive proceeds from, any realization of such collateral to repay their obligations in full before we are so entitled. In addition, the value of such collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from sales of such collateral would be sufficient to satisfy our unsecured debt obligations after payment in full of all secured debt obligations. If such proceeds were not sufficient to repay the outstanding secured debt obligations, then our unsecured claims would rank equally with the unpaid portion of such secured creditors' claims against the portfolio company's remaining assets, if any.

The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the debt investments we make to the portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken in respect of the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first priority liens: the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against the collateral; the ability to control the conduct of such proceedings; the approval of amendments to collateral documents; releases of liens on the collateral; and waivers of past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected. In addition, a bankruptcy court may choose not to enforce an intercreditor agreement or other agreement with creditors.

Our investment in any mezzanine securities may not be protected by financial covenants or limitations upon additional indebtedness, may have limited liquidity and are not expected to be rated by a credit rating agency. Mezzanine investments generally are subject to various risks including, without limitation: (i) a subsequent characterization of an investment as a "fraudulent conveyance" under relevant creditors' rights laws, possibly resulting in the avoidance of collateral securing the investment or the cancellation of the obligation representing the investment; (ii) the recovery as a "preference" of liens perfected or payments made on account of a debt in certain periods before a bankruptcy filing; (iii) equitable subordination claims by other creditors; (iv) so‑called "lender liability" claims by the issuer of the obligations; and (v) environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations. Additionally, adverse credit events with respect to any portfolio entity, such as missed or delayed payment of interest and/or principal, bankruptcy, receivership or distressed exchange, can significantly diminish the value of our investment in any such company.

To the extent that we invest in original issue discount or PIK instruments and the accretion of original issue discount or PIK interest income constitutes a portion of our income, we will be exposed to risks associated with the requirement to include such non‑cash income in taxable and accounting income prior to receipt of cash, including the following:

Before making portfolio investments, the Investment Adviser typically conducts due diligence that they deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to each portfolio investment. Due diligence may entail evaluation of important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental, social, governance and legal issues. When conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an investment, the Investment Adviser relies on the

There can be no assurance that we will be able to detect or prevent irregular accounting, employee misconduct or other fraudulent practices during the due diligence phase or during our efforts to monitor the portfolio investment on an ongoing basis or that any risk management procedures implemented by us will be adequate. In the event of fraud by any portfolio company or any of its affiliates, we may suffer a partial or total loss of capital invested in that portfolio company. An additional concern is the possibility of material misrepresentation or omission on the part of the portfolio company or the seller. Such inaccuracy or incompleteness may adversely affect the value of our securities and/or instruments in such portfolio company. We rely upon the accuracy and completeness of representations made by portfolio companies and/or their former owners in the due diligence process to the extent reasonable when making our investments, but cannot guarantee such accuracy or completeness. We may elect to obtain a representations and warranties insurance policy that may provide protection to us in the event of losses arising from the inaccuracy or incompleteness of any such representation. However, there is no guarantee that we would be able to obtain recovery under any such insurance policy, or that such recovery will be sufficient. In addition, in a transaction where we have obtained such a policy, recourse to the former owners of a portfolio company may be severely limited or even eliminated, and recovery under such policy may effectively be the sole source of recovery for us in such circumstance. Under certain circumstances, payments to us may be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance or a preferential payment.

Consultants, legal advisors, appraisers, accountants, investment banks and other third parties may be involved in the due diligence process and/or the ongoing operation of our portfolio companies to varying degrees depending on the type of investment. For example, certain asset management, finance, administrative and other similar functions may be outsourced to a third‑party service provider whose fees and expenses will be borne by such portfolio company or us and will not offset the management fee. Such involvement of third‑party advisors or consultants may present a number of risks primarily relating to the Investment Adviser's reduced control of the functions that are outsourced. In addition, if the Investment Adviser is unable to timely engage third‑party providers, their ability to evaluate and acquire more complex targets could be adversely affected.

To maintain our status as a BDC, we are not permitted to acquire any assets other than in "qualifying assets" specified in the 1940 Act unless, at the time the acquisition is made, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets (with certain limited exceptions). Subject to certain exceptions for follow‑on investments and distressed companies, an investment in an issuer that has outstanding securities listed on a national securities exchange may be treated as qualifying assets only if such issuer has a common equity market capitalization that is less than $250 million at the time of such investment.

We may provide interim financing to, or make investments that are intended to be of a temporary nature in equity or debt securities of, any portfolio company or any affiliate thereof in connection with or subsequent to an investment by us in such portfolio company. Such bridge loans would typically be convertible into a more permanent, long‑term security; however, for reasons not always in our control, such long‑term securities issuance or other refinancing or syndication may not occur and such bridge loans and interim investments may remain outstanding. In such event, the interest rate or other terms of such financings may not adequately reflect the risk associated with the position taken by us. Such financings may be entered into at

The Investment Adviser will generally establish the pricing of transactions and the capital commitment amount to portfolio companies on the basis of financial projections for such portfolio companies. Estimates or projections of economic and market conditions, supply and demand dynamics and other key investment‑related considerations are key factors in evaluating potential investment opportunities and valuing our investment program. It is possible for such estimates and projections to be significantly revised from time to time, creating significant changes in the value of the company subject to such factors. Projected operating results are normally based primarily on management judgments. In all cases, projections are only estimates of future results that are based upon assumptions made at the time that the projections are developed. There can be no assurance that any projections, forecasts or estimates referred to will prove to be accurate or that projected, forecasted or estimated results will be obtained. Actual results may vary significantly from the projections, forecasts or estimates provided. General economic, political and market conditions, which are not predictable, can have a material adverse impact on the reliability of such projections, forecasts or estimates.

Climate change creates physical and financial risk and potential portfolio companies may be adversely affected by climate change. For example, the needs of customers of energy companies vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity. To the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, energy use could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any changes. Increases in the cost of energy could adversely affect the cost of operations of our portfolio companies if the use of energy products or services is material to their business. A decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect some of our portfolio companies' financial condition, through, for example, decreased revenues, which may, in turn, impact the valuation of such portfolio companies. Extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stresses, including service interruptions.

Our Units have not been registered under the Securities Act, or applicable securities laws of any U.S. state or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction and, therefore, cannot be resold unless they are subsequently registered under the Securities Act and any other applicable securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available. It is not contemplated that registration of the Units under the Securities Act or other securities laws will ever be effected. There is no public market for our Units and one is not expected to develop. Accordingly, it may be difficult to obtain reliable information about the value of our Units. Each unitholder must be an "accredited investor" (as defined in Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act) and is required to represent, among other customary private placement representations, that it is acquiring our Units for its own account and for investment purposes only and not with a view to resell or distribute and that it will only sell and transfer its limited liability company unit to an accredited investor under applicable securities laws or in a manner permitted by the Third A&R LLC Agreement and consistent with such laws. Subject to a few limited exceptions, a unitholder will not be permitted to directly or indirectly assign, sell, exchange, mortgage, pledge or transfer any of its Units or any of its rights or obligations with respect to its Units, except by operation of law, without the prior written consent of the Investment Adviser, which consent may be given or withheld in accordance with the Third A&R LLC Agreement. Except in limited

We have elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of BDCs. For example, BDCs are required to invest at least 70.0% of their total assets in qualifying assets such as U.S. private companies or thinly‑traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Failure to comply with the requirements imposed on BDCs by the 1940 Act could cause the SEC to bring an enforcement action against us and/or expose us to claims of private litigants. In addition, upon approval of a majority of the unitholders, we may elect to withdraw our election to be regulated as a BDC. If we decide to withdraw our election, or if we otherwise fail to qualify, or maintain our qualification, as a BDC, we may be subject to the substantially greater regulation under the 1940 Act as a registered closed‑end investment company. Compliance with these regulations would significantly decrease our operating flexibility and could significantly increase our cost of doing business.

Due to this uncertainty, our fair value determinations may cause our net asset value, on any given date, to materially differ from the value that we may ultimately realize upon the sale of one or more of our investments. In addition, investors purchasing our Units based on an overstated net asset value would pay a higher price than the realizable value that our investments might warrant.

We may adjust the valuation of our portfolio quarterly to reflect our Board's determination of the fair value of each investment in our portfolio. Any changes in fair value are recorded in our statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.

The Investment Adviser, subject to the oversight of our Board, has responsibility for our activities, and, other than as expressly set forth in the Third A&R LLC Agreement, the unitholders will generally not be able to make investment or any other decisions regarding our management. Other than as set forth herein and in the Third A&R LLC Agreement, the unitholders have no rights or powers to take part in our management or make investment decisions and will not receive the level of portfolio company financial information that is available to New Mountain Capital. Accordingly, no person should purchase a Unit unless such person is willing to entrust all aspects of our management to New Mountain Capital and our Board.

The Investment Management Agreement and the Administration Agreement were negotiated between related parties. In addition, we may choose not to enforce, waive, or to enforce less vigorously, our respective rights and remedies under these agreements because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with the Investment Adviser, the Administrator and their respective affiliates. Any such decision, however, could cause us to breach our fiduciary obligations to the unitholders.

As a BDC, we are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with certain of our affiliates without the prior approval of a majority of the independent members of our Board and, in some cases, of the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities will be our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act and generally we will be prohibited from buying or selling any securities from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval of our Board. The 1940 Act also prohibits us from participating in certain "joint" transactions with certain of our affiliates including New Mountain Finance Corporation, New Mountain Guardian III BDC, L.L.C., New Mountain Guardian IV Income Fund, L.L.C. and NMF SLF I, Inc. and other funds and accounts that the Investment Adviser manages, which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or closely related times), without prior approval of our Board and, in some cases, the SEC. If a person acquires more than 25% of our voting securities, we will be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such person or certain of that person's affiliates, or entering into prohibited joint transactions (including certain co‑investments) with such persons, absent the prior approval of the SEC. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers, trustees, investment advisers, sub‑advisers or their affiliates. As a result of these restrictions, we may be prohibited from buying or selling any security (other than any security of which we are the issuer) from or to any fund or any portfolio company of a fund managed by the Investment Adviser, or entering into joint arrangements such as certain co‑investments with these companies or funds without the prior approval of the SEC, which may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.

While we may co-invest with investment entities managed by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, the 1940 Act imposes significant limits on co-investment. On October 8, 2019, the SEC issued the Exemptive Order to the Investment Adviser and certain of its affiliates, as amended by a subsequent order granted on August 30, 2022, which superseded a prior order issued on December 18, 2017, which permits us to co-invest in portfolio companies with certain funds or entities managed by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates in certain negotiated transactions where co-investing would otherwise be prohibited under the 1940 Act, subject to the conditions of the Exemptive Order. Pursuant to the Exemptive Order, we are permitted to co-invest with our affiliates if a "required majority" (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of our Independent Directors make certain conclusions in connection with a co-investment transaction, including, but not limited to, that (1) the terms of the potential co-investment transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to us and our unitholders and do not involve overreaching by us or our unitholders on the part of any person concerned, and (2) the potential coinvestment transaction is consistent with the interests of our unitholders and is consistent with our then-current investment objectives and strategies.

Unitholders' rights to information regarding us will be specified, and strictly limited, in the Third A&R LLC Agreement. In particular, it is anticipated that the Investment Adviser will obtain certain types of material information from portfolio investments that will not be disclosed to unitholders because such disclosure is prohibited for contractual, legal, or similar obligations outside of the Investment Adviser's control. Decisions by the Investment Adviser to withhold information may have adverse consequences for unitholders in a variety of circumstances. For example, a unitholder that seeks to transfer its

Certain unitholders may request information from the Investment Adviser relating to us and our portfolio investments and the Investment Adviser may, subject to applicable law, including Regulation FD promulgated by the SEC, provide such unitholders with the information requested (subject to availability, confidentiality obligations and other similar considerations). Unitholders may also be entitled to receive additional or customized reporting relating to their investment in us pursuant to their side letters, which are particular to such unitholders and may not be available to other unitholders. Any such unitholders that request and receive such information will consequently possess information regarding our business and affairs that are not generally known to other unitholders. As a result, certain unitholders may be able to take actions on the basis of such information which, in the absence of such information, other unitholders do not take.

The Third A&R LLC Agreement may be amended from time to time, including by our Board without the consent of unitholders in circumstances set forth in the Third A&R LLC Agreement.

We intend to pay quarterly distributions to the unitholders out of assets legally available for distribution. Such quarterly distributions will generally consist of cash or cash equivalents, except that we may make distributions of assets in kind with the prior consent of each receiving unitholder. We cannot assure you that we will continue to achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions or year‑to‑year increases in cash distributions. In addition, our ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by the impact of one or more of the risk factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we are unable to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC, our ability to pay distributions to the unitholders could be limited. All distributions are paid at the discretion of our Board and depend on our earnings, financial condition, maintenance of our RIC tax treatment, compliance with applicable BDC regulations and such other factors as our Board may deem relevant from time to time. The distributions that we pay to our unitholders in a year may exceed our taxable income for that year and, accordingly, a portion of such distributions may constitute a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We cannot assure unitholders that we will continue to pay distributions to the unitholders in the future.

We might be in danger of failing to maintain the required asset coverage of the preferred Units or of losing our ratings, if any, on the preferred Units or, in an extreme case, our current investment income might not be sufficient to meet the dividend requirements on the preferred Units. In order to counteract such an event, we might need to liquidate investments in order to fund a redemption of some or all of the preferred Units. In addition, we would pay (and the holders of Units would bear) all costs and expenses relating to the issuance and ongoing maintenance of the preferred Units, including higher advisory fees if our total return exceeds the distribution rate on the preferred Units. Holders of preferred Units may have different interests and rights than holders of Units and may at times have disproportionate influence over our affairs.

In accordance with the 1940 Act, holders of any preferred Units we might issue, voting separately as a single class, would have the right to elect two members of our Board at all times and in the event dividends become two full years in arrears would have the right to elect a majority of the directors until such arrearage is completely eliminated. In addition, preferred unitholders have class voting rights on certain matters, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open‑end status, and accordingly can veto any such changes. Restrictions imposed on the declarations and payment of dividends or other distributions to the holders of the Units and preferred Units, both by the 1940 Act and by requirements imposed by rating agencies, if any, or the terms of our Leverage Arrangements, if any, might impair our ability to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. While we would intend to redeem our preferred Units to the extent necessary to enable us to distribute our income as required to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC, there can be no assurance that such actions could be effected in time to meet the tax requirements.

Under the Investment Management Agreement, the Investment Adviser has the right to resign at any time upon 60 days' written notice, whether a replacement has been found or not. If the Investment Adviser resigns, we may not be able to find a new Adviser or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 60 days, or at all. If a replacement is not able to be found on a timely basis, our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay distributions are likely to be materially adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by the Investment Adviser and its affiliates, the coordination of our internal management and investment activities is likely to suffer. Even if we are able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, their integration into our business and lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The Administrator has the right to resign under the Administration Agreement upon 60 days' written notice, whether a replacement has been found or not. If the Administrator resigns, it may be difficult to find a new administrator or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms, or at all. If a replacement is not found quickly, our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions, are likely to be adversely affected. In addition, the coordination of our internal management and administrative activities is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a service provider or individuals with the expertise possessed by the Administrator. Even if a comparable service provider or individuals to perform such services are retained, whether internal or external, their integration into our business and lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Therefore, there can be no certainty regarding our ability to consummate investment opportunities thereafter. Similar risks exist if the Investment Period is cancelled earlier than anticipated pursuant to the terms of the Third A&R LLC Agreement. Moreover, it is possible that we may be dissolved and terminated prematurely, and as a result, may not be able to accomplish our objectives and may be required to dispose of our investments at a disadvantageous time or make an in‑kind distribution (resulting in unitholders not having their capital invested and/or deployed in the manner originally contemplated).

In response to increased regulatory concerns with respect to the sources of funds used in investments and other activities, we will request prospective and existing unitholders to provide additional documentation verifying, among other things, such unitholder's identity and the source of funds used to purchase interests in us. The Investment Adviser may decline to accept a prospective investor's subscription if this information is not provided or on the basis of such information that is provided. Requests for documentation may be made at any time during which a unitholder holds any interest in us. The Investment Adviser may be required to provide this information, or report the failure to comply with such requests, to governmental authorities, in certain circumstances without notifying the unitholder that the information has been provided. The Investment Adviser will take such steps as it determines may be necessary to comply with applicable law, regulations, orders, directives or special measures that may be required by government regulators. Governmental authorities are continuing to consider appropriate measures to implement anti‑money laundering laws and at this point it is unclear what steps the Investment Adviser may be required to take; however, these steps may include prohibiting such unitholder from making further contributions of capital to us, depositing distributions to which such unitholder would otherwise be entitled to an escrow account and causing the withdrawal of such unitholder from us.

The Investment Adviser may consult New Mountain Capital's Executive Advisory Council from time to time concerning general industry trends, related matters and specific investment diligence. Members of the Executive Advisory Council may be paid by us for project‑related consulting fees and reimbursed by us for their reasonable and documented out‑of‑pocket expenses in connection with specific diligence for a potential portfolio company.

We depend on the Investment Adviser to develop and implement appropriate systems for our activities. We rely daily on financial, accounting and other data processing systems to execute, clear and settle transactions across numerous and diverse markets and to evaluate certain financial instruments, to monitor our portfolios and capital, and to generate risk management and other reports that are critical to oversight of our activities. Certain of our and the Investment Adviser's activities will be dependent upon systems operated by third parties, and the Investment Adviser may not be in a position to verify the risks or reliability of such third‑party systems. Failures in the systems and processes employed by the Investment Adviser and other parties could result in mistakes made, including, among other things, in the confirmation or settlement of transactions, or in transactions not being properly booked, evaluated or accounted for. Operational risks result from inadequate procedures and controls, employee fraud, recordkeeping errors, human errors and other mistakes or failures by the Investment Adviser or a service provider. Disruption to third party critical service providers, such as our administrators, auditors, external counsel and custodian, may result in other disruptions in our operations. Disruptions in our operations may cause us to suffer, among other things, financial loss, the disruption of their businesses, liability to third parties, regulatory intervention or reputational damage. Any of the foregoing failures or disruptions could have a material adverse effect on us and the investors' investments therein.

We, and others in our industry, are the targets of malicious cyber activity, which we work hard to prevent. A successful cyber-attack, whether perpetrated by criminal or state-sponsored actors, against us or our service providers, or an accidental disclosure of non-public information, could have an adverse effect on our ability to conduct business and on our results of operations and financial condition, particularly if those events affect our computer-based data processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval systems, or destroy data. If a significant number of our managers were unavailable in the vent of a disaster, our ability to effectively conduct our business could be severely compromised.

The Investment Adviser and third-party service providers with which we do business depend heavily upon computer systems to perform necessary business functions. Despite the implementation of a variety of security measures, computer systems could be subject to unauthorized access, acquisition, use, alteration, or destruction, such as from the insertion of malware (including ransomware), physical and electronic break-ins or unauthorized tampering. The Investment Adviser may experience threats to their data and systems, including malware and computer virus attacks, unauthorized access, system failures and disruptions. If one or more of these events occurs, it could potentially jeopardize the confidential, proprietary, personal and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through the Advisers’ computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in operations, which could result in damage to our reputation, financial losses, litigation, increased costs, regulatory enforcement action and penalties and/or customer dissatisfaction or loss.

Third parties with which we do business are sources of cybersecurity or other technological risks. We outsource certain functions and these relationships allow for the storage and processing of our information, as well as client, counterparty, employee, and borrower information. Cybersecurity failures or breaches to the Investment Adviser and other service providers (including, but not limited to, accountants, custodians, transfer agents and administrators) and issuers of securities in which we invest, also have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, interference with our ability to calculate its NAV, impediments to trading, the inability of our unitholders to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputation damages, reimbursement of other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. While we engage in actions to reduce our exposure resulting from outsourcing, ongoing threats may result in unauthorized access, acquisition, use, alteration or destruction of data, or other cybersecurity incidents with increased costs and other consequences, including those described above. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future.

Privacy and information security laws and regulation changes, and compliance with those changes, may result in cost increases due to system changes and the development of new administrative processes. In addition, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are not fully insured.

We and our service providers may be impacted by operating restrictions, which may include requiring employees to continue to work from remote locations. Policies of extended periods of remote working, whether by us or our service

Cybersecurity refers to the combination of technologies, processes, and procedures established to protect information technology systems and data from unauthorized access, attack, or damage. We, the Investment Adviser, and the Administrator are subject to cybersecurity risks. Information cybersecurity risks have significantly increased in recent years and, while we, the Investment Adviser and the Administrator have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber-attacks or other information security breaches, we could suffer such losses in the future. The Investment Adviser’s and the Administrator’s computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other malicious code, network failures, computer and technology failures, infiltration by unauthorized persons and other security breaches, usage errors by their respective professionals or service providers, or other events that could have a security impact. If one or more of such events occur, this potentially could jeopardize confidential and other information, including nonpublic personal information relating to unitholders (and their beneficial owners) and sensitive business data (including material nonpublic information of our portfolio companies), processed and stored in, and transmitted through, the Investment Adviser’s and the Administrator’s computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or the operations of our customers or counterparties. Breaches such as those involving covertly introduced malware, impersonation of authorized users and industrial or other espionage may not be identified even with sophisticated prevention and detection systems, potentially resulting in further harm and preventing them from being addressed appropriately. This could result in significant losses, reputational damage, litigation, regulatory fines or penalties, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations and the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Investment Adviser, the Administrator and their affiliates. Privacy and information security laws and regulation changes, and compliance with those changes, may result in cost increases due to system changes and the development of new administrative processes. In the future, the Investment Adviser, the Administrator and our portfolio companies may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify their protective measures and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks. In addition, we, the Investment Adviser and the Administrator may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are not fully insured.

Third parties with which we, the Investment Adviser, the Administrator, and our portfolio companies do business may also be sources of cybersecurity or other technological risks. We outsource certain functions, and these relationships allow for the storage and processing of our information, as well as customer, counterparty, employee and borrower information. While we, the Investment Adviser, the Administrator, and our portfolio companies engage in actions to reduce our exposure resulting from outsourcing, ongoing threats may result in unauthorized access, loss, exposure or destruction of data, or other cybersecurity incidents, with increased costs and other consequences, including those described above. Further, the continued remote working conditions initially resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have heightened ours and our portfolio companies' vulnerability to a cybersecurity risk or incident.

New Mountain Capital engages in a broad variety of activities on a global basis in respect of its managed funds, accounts and portfolio companies. These activities have and may in the future subject New Mountain Capital to risks of becoming involved in litigation by third parties or may subject New Mountain Capital to investigations or proceedings initiated by governmental authorities. It is difficult to determine what impact, if any, such litigation may have on New Mountain Capital and us. As a result, there can be no assurance that the foregoing will not have an adverse impact on New Mountain Capital or otherwise impede our ability to effectively achieve our objectives.

In addition, we may in the future seek to securitize other portfolio securities to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize loans, we would likely create a wholly‑owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary. We would then sell interests in the subsidiary on a non‑recourse basis to purchasers and we would retain all or a portion of the equity in the subsidiary. If we are unable to successfully securitize our loan portfolio our ability to grow our

We may also obtain capital through the issuance of additional equity capital. As a BDC, we generally are not able to issue or sell our Units at a price below then-current net asset value per Unit. If the Units trade at a discount to our net asset value per Unit, this restriction could adversely affect our ability to raise equity capital. We may, however, sell the Units, or warrants, options or rights to acquire the Units, at a price below our net asset value per Unit if our Board and Independent Directors determine that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of the unitholders, and the unitholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price that, in the determination of our Board, closely approximates the fair value of such securities (less any underwriting commission or discount). If we raise additional funds by issuing more Units, or if we issue senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, the Units, the percentage ownership of the unitholders may decline and you may experience dilution.

Changes in the laws or regulations or the interpretations of the laws and regulations that govern BDCs, RICs or non‑depository commercial lenders could significantly affect our operations and our cost of doing business. The portfolio companies are subject to U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations. New legislation may be enacted or new interpretations, rulings or regulations could be adopted, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, including with respect to the types of investments we are permitted to make, and your interests as unitholders potentially with retroactive effect. In addition, any changes to the laws and regulations governing our operations relating to permitted investments may cause us to alter our investment strategy in order to make available to ourselves, new or different opportunities. These changes could result in material changes to our strategies which may result in our investment focus shifting from the areas of expertise of the Investment Adviser to other types of investments in which the Investment Adviser may have less expertise or little or no experience. Any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and, consequently, the value of your investment in us.

The BMO Subscription Line permits us to borrow on a revolving credit basis an aggregate principal amount which cannot exceed $200.0 million or 55.0% of our remaining unfunded Capital Commitments.

The BMO Subscription Line had $60.8 million in debt outstanding as of December 31, 2023. All outstanding borrowings are due on BMO's demand within 15 days or on the date 6 months after each advance date, which varies throughout the period.

The UBS Credit Facility matures on January 25, 2028 and permits borrowings of $250.0 million as of December 31, 2023. The UBS Credit Facility had $250.0 million in debt outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

If we are unable to increase, renew or replace any such facilities and enter into new debt financing facilities or other debt financing on commercially reasonable terms, our liquidity may be reduced significantly. In addition, if we are unable to repay amounts outstanding under any such facilities and are declared in default or are unable to renew or refinance these facilities, we may not be able to make new investments or operate our business in the normal course. These situations may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as lack of access to the credit markets, a severe decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, an economic downturn or an operational problem that affects us or third parties, and could materially damage our business operations, results of operations and financial condition.

We may experience delays in investing our Capital Commitments, which may cause our performance to be worse than the performance of other investment vehicles with investment programs that are similar to our investment objectives. The Investment Adviser may not be able to identify a sufficient number of potential investments that meet our investment objectives or ensure that any investment that us makes will produce a positive return. The Investment Adviser may be unable to invest all of our Capital Commitments on acceptable terms within the Investment Period, which would reduce the returns to us.

Conversely, we may deploy a significant amount of or majority of our aggregate Capital Commitments over a short period of time, which would increase the likelihood that we will be adversely impacted by market dislocations, economic

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives, as well as our ability to conduct our operations, is based on laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, which are subject to change through legislative, judicial or administrative action. Future legislative, judicial or administrative action could adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives, as well as our ability to conduct our operations. Furthermore, if regulatory capital requirements from the Dodd‑Frank Act, Basel III, or other regulatory action are imposed on private lenders that provide us with financing (as defined below), the lenders may be required to limit, or increase the cost of, financing they provide to us. Among other things, this could potentially increase our financing costs and reduce our liquidity or require us to sell assets at an inopportune time or price.

There continues to be significant discussion regarding enhancing governmental scrutiny and/or increasing the regulation of the financial industry. On July 21, 2010, then‑President Obama signed into law the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd‑Frank Act"). A key feature of the Dodd‑Frank Act is the potential extension of prudential regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve") to nonbank financial companies that are not currently subject to such regulation but that are determined to pose risk to the U.S. financial system. The Dodd‑Frank Act defines a "nonbank financial company" as a company that is predominantly engaged in activities that are financial in nature. The Financial Stability Oversight Council (the "FSOC"), an interagency body created to monitor and address systemic risk, has the authority to subject such a company to supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve (including capital, leverage and liquidity requirements) if it determines that such company is systemically important, in that it poses a risk to the U.S. financial system. The Dodd‑Frank Act does not contain any minimum size requirements for such a determination by the FSOC, and it is possible that it could be applied to private funds, particularly large, highly‑leveraged funds, although no such funds have been designated as systemically important by the FSOC to date.

The Dodd‑Frank Act also imposes a number of restrictions on the relationship and activities of banking organizations with private investment funds and other provisions that have affected the private investment fund industry, either directly or indirectly. Included in the Dodd‑Frank Act is the so‑called "Volcker Rule," which contains restrictions on certain investors that are (or that have affiliates or certain interest in any entity that is) a bank or a bank‑related entity and/or have a connection to the United States in that regard from making and holding certain interests in private investment funds.

The Dodd‑Frank Act, as well as future related legislation, may have an adverse effect on the private investment fund industry generally and/or on New Mountain Capital or us, specifically. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any continued regulatory scrutiny or initiatives will not have an adverse impact on New Mountain Capital or otherwise impede our activities. These reforms and/or other similar legislation could increase our compliance costs and have an adverse effect on the private fund industry generally and/or on New Mountain Capital and us.

The current regulatory environment in the United States may be impacted by future legislative developments, such as amendments to key provisions of the Dodd‑Frank Act. On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued recommendations for streamlining banking regulation and changing key features of the Dodd‑Frank Act and other measures taken by regulators following the most recent financial crisis.

As a registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act, the Investment Adviser is required to comply with a variety of periodic reporting and compliance‑related obligations under applicable federal and state securities laws (including, without limitation, the obligation of the Investment Adviser and its affiliates to make regulatory filings with respect to us and our activities under the Advisers Act (including, without limitation, Form PF and Form ADV)). In addition, the Investment Adviser is required to comply with a variety of regulatory reporting and compliance‑related obligations under applicable federal, state and foreign securities laws (including, without limitation, reports or notices in connection with the Directive (as defined below) and/or CFTC as well as other international jurisdiction‑specific obligations). In light of the heightened regulatory environment in which we and the Investment Adviser operate and the ever‑increasing regulations applicable to private investment funds and their investment advisors, it has become increasingly expensive and time‑consuming for us, the Investment Adviser and its affiliates to comply with such regulatory reporting and compliance‑related obligations. Additionally, we may in the future engage additional third‑party service providers to perform some or a significant portion of the reporting and compliance‑related matters and functions under our supervision (including draft preparation and the filing of Form PF), which could result in increased compliance costs and expenses. Any further increases in the regulations applicable to private investment funds generally or us and/or the Investment Adviser in particular may result in increased expenses associated with our activities and additional resources of the Investment Adviser being devoted to such regulatory reporting and compliance‑related obligations,

Finally, increased reporting, registration and compliance requirements may divert the attention of personnel and the management teams of New Mountain Capital and/or portfolio companies, and may furthermore place us at a competitive disadvantage to the extent that New Mountain Capital or portfolio companies are required to disclose sensitive business information.

The European Union Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (the "Directive") as transposed into national law within the member states of the European Economic Area ("EEA"), imposes requirements on non‑EEA alternative investment fund managers ("AIFMs") who intend to market alternative investment funds ("AIFs") to investors within the EEA.

The Directive allows member states to permit the marketing of non‑EEA AIFs by non‑EEA AIFMs in accordance with local laws, provided that local laws meet the requirements of Article 42 (the so‑called national private placement regimes). There is no requirement for member states to operate or maintain a national private placement regime and, if they do, the member state is free to impose stricter rules than the minimum requirements. In summary, under Article 42, the AIFM must: (i) provide prescribed pre‑investment disclosures to investors; (ii) report prescribed information to regulators on a periodic basis; (iii) prepare an annual report containing prescribed information and make it available to investors and regulators; and (iv) if applicable: (a) comply with notification and disclosure requirements in relation to the acquisition and control of non‑listed companies and issuers; and (b) restrict early distributions or reductions in capital in respect of portfolio companies (the asset‑stripping rules).

In addition, there must be appropriate cooperation arrangements in place between the competent authorities of the relevant countries, and neither the country where the AIFM is established nor the country where the AIF is established can be listed as a non‑cooperative country and territory by the Financial Action Task Force (the "FATF").

At present, some EEA states do not operate a national private placement regime at all; some member states apply the minimum requirements described above; others require the minimum plus, e.g., the appointment of a depositary; and some require compliance with substantially all of the Directive.

Where the Investment Adviser has marketed us in a member state resulting in investors from that member state investing in us, the Investment Adviser's ongoing compliance with the laws of that member state will continue until all of such investors dispose of their interests in us.

The Directive has the potential to adversely affect our operations by (i) limiting the territories in the EEA in which we may seek investors, (ii) affecting the range of investment and realization strategies that we are able to pursue, (iii) disadvantaging us vis‑à‑vis non‑AIF competitors, and (iv) materially adding to the costs associated with compliance, monitoring and reporting over our life.

In the future, the Investment Adviser may be compelled to seek, or it may determine that it should seek, authorization as an AIFM in an EEA member state (should that option become available) or under a similar regime elsewhere. This would entail compliance with all requirements of the AIFMD (or with similar requirements of a similar regime). Alternatively, it might be determined in the future that we should be managed by an associate of the Investment Adviser that is an authorized AIFM and has its registered office in an EEA member state. In either circumstance, the AIFM would become subject to additional requirements, such as rules relating to remuneration, minimum regulatory capital requirements, restrictions on the use of leverage, requirements in relation to liquidity, risk management, valuation of assets, etc. Such requirements could adversely affect us, among other things by increasing the regulatory burden and costs of operating and managing us and our investments. Any required changes to compensation structures and practices could make it harder for the AIFM and its associates to recruit and retain key personnel.

The interpretation and application of the Directive is subject to change as a result of, e.g., the issuance of further national guidance by a member state, the issuance of binding guidelines by the European Securities and Markets Authority ("ESMA"), further legislation supplementing the Directive, or a change in the national private placement regime of any member state. Compliance with the Directive could expose the Investment Adviser and/or us to conflicting regulatory requirements in the United States.

We will bear the costs and expenses of compliance with the Directive and any related regulations, including costs and expenses of collecting and calculating data and the preparation of regular reports to be filed with EEA member states.

The offer of our interests, insofar as such interests can be offered to investors domiciled or established in a member state of the EEA (as described above) is restricted to professional investors. A professional investor is an investor that is considered to be a "professional client", or who may, on request, be treated as a "professional client" within the meaning of Annex II to the MiFID II. Notwithstanding that all marketing activity of the Investment Adviser toward investors domiciled or

Investors in us should understand that our business is dynamic and may change over time. Therefore, we may be subject to new or additional regulatory constraints in the future. This Annual Report on Form 10-K cannot address or anticipate every possible current or future regulation that may affect the Investment Adviser, us or their investments. Such regulations may have a significant impact on the unitholders or our operations, including, without limitation, restricting the types of investments we may make, preventing us from exercising our voting rights with regard to certain financial instruments, requiring us to disclose the identity of our investors or otherwise. The Investment Adviser may, in its sole discretion, cause us to be subject to such regulations if it believes that an investment or business activity is in our interest, even if such regulations may have a detrimental effect on one or more unitholders. Prospective investors are encouraged to consult their own advisors regarding an investment in us.

There is a risk that the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") will not concur as to the tax consequences of an investment in us.

The IRS may audit us and challenge any of the positions taken in regard to our formation, our investments or operations, and such audit may result in an audit of a unitholder's own tax returns and possibly adjustments to the tax liability reflected thereon.

Although we intend to continue to qualify annually as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code, no assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain our RIC tax treatment. To maintain RIC tax treatment and be relieved of U.S. federal income taxes on income and gains distributed to the unitholders, we must meet the annual distribution, source‑of‑income and asset diversification requirements described below.

If we fail to maintain our RIC tax treatment for any reason, and we do not qualify for certain relief provisions under the Code, we would be subject to corporate‑level U.S. federal income tax (and any applicable state and local taxes). In this event, the resulting taxes could substantially reduce our members' capital, the amount of cash available for distribution, and the amount of our distributions, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we include in our taxable income our allocable share of certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may occur if we receive warrants in connection with the

Because in certain cases we may recognize taxable income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty making distributions to the unitholders that will be sufficient to enable us to meet the annual distribution requirement necessary for us to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC. Accordingly, we may need to sell some of our assets at times and/or at prices that we would not consider advantageous. We may need to raise additional equity or debt capital, or we may need to forego new investment opportunities or otherwise take actions that are disadvantageous to our business (or be unable to take actions that are advantageous to our business) to enable us to make distributions to the unitholders that will be sufficient to enable us to meet the annual distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources to enable us to meet the annual distribution requirement, we may fail to qualify for the U.S. federal income tax benefits allowable to RICs and, thus, become subject to a corporate‑level U.S. federal income tax (and any applicable state and local taxes).

We may invest in certain debt and equity investments through taxable subsidiaries and the taxable income of these taxable subsidiaries will be subject to U.S. federal and state corporate income taxes. We may invest in certain foreign debt and equity investments which could be subject to foreign taxes (such as income tax, withholding and value added taxes).

We expect to invest in debt securities that are rated below investment grade by rating agencies or that would be rated below investment grade if they were rated. Investments in these types of instruments may present special tax issues for us. U.S. federal income tax rules are not entirely clear about issues such as when we may cease to accrue interest, original issue discount or market discount, when and to what extent deductions may be taken for bad debts or worthless instruments, how payments received on obligations in default should be allocated between principal and income and whether exchanges of debt obligations in a bankruptcy or workout context are taxable. These and other issues will be addressed by us, to the extent necessary, to preserve our status as a RIC and to distribute sufficient income to not become subject to U.S. federal income tax.

The Investment Adviser will use reasonable efforts to avoid having our assets constitute "plan assets" of any plan subject to Title I of the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA") or Section 4975 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In this regard the Investment Adviser intends to limit investment in the Units by "benefit plan investors" to less than 25% of the total value of each class of equity interests in us (within the meaning of the Plan Asset Regulations), in which case we may decline to accept subscriptions from, or approve transfers of Units to, certain investors in order to limit equity participation by benefit plan investors in us to less than 25% of the total value of each class of equity interests in us.

Under ERISA, upon the termination of a tax‑qualified single employer‑defined benefit pension plan, the sponsoring employer and all members of its "controlled group" will be jointly and severally liable for 100% of the plan's unfunded benefit liabilities whether or not the controlled group members have ever maintained or participated in the plan. In addition, the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") may assert a lien with respect to such liability against any member of the controlled group on up to 30% of the collective net worth of all members of the controlled group. Similarly, in the event a participating employer partially or completely withdraws from a multiemployer (union) defined benefit pension plan, any withdrawal liability incurred under ERISA will represent a joint and several liability of the withdrawing employer and each member of its controlled group.

A "controlled group" includes all "trades or businesses" under 80% or greater common ownership. This common ownership test is broadly applied to include both "parent‑subsidiary groups" and "brother‑sister groups" applying complex exclusion and constructive ownership rules. However, regardless of the percentage ownership that we hold in one or more of our portfolio companies, we ourselves cannot be considered part of an ERISA controlled group unless we are considered to be a "trade or business."

While there are a number of cases that have held that managing investments is not a "trade or business" for tax purposes, in 2007 the PBGC Appeals Board ruled that a private equity fund was a "trade or business" for ERISA controlled group liability purposes and at least one U.S. Federal Circuit Court has similarly concluded that a private equity fund could be a trade or business for these purposes based upon a number of factors including the fund's level of involvement in the management of our portfolio companies and the nature of any management fee arrangements.

If we were determined to be a trade or business for purposes of ERISA, it is possible, depending upon the structure of the investment by us and/or our affiliates and other co‑investors in a portfolio company and their respective ownership interests in the portfolio company, that any tax‑qualified single employer defined benefit pension plan liabilities and/or multiemployer plan withdrawal liabilities incurred by the portfolio company could result in liability being incurred by us, with a resulting need for additional capital contributions, the appropriation of our assets to satisfy such pension liabilities and/or the imposition of a lien by the PBGC on certain of our assets. Moreover, regardless of whether or not we were determined to be a trade or business for purposes of ERISA, a court might hold that one of our portfolio companies could become jointly and severally liable for another portfolio company's unfunded pension liabilities pursuant to the ERISA "controlled group" rules, depending upon the relevant investment structures and ownership interests as noted above.

In light of controversies and highly publicized incidents involving money managers, a number of states and municipal pension plans have adopted so‑called "pay‑to‑play" laws, regulations or policies which prohibit, restrict or require disclosure of payments to (and/or certain contacts with) state officials by individuals and entities seeking to do business with state entities, including investments by public retirement funds. The SEC also has adopted rules that, among other things, prohibit an investment advisor from providing advisory services for compensation with respect to a government plan investor for two years after the advisor or certain of its executives or employees make a contribution to certain elected officials or candidates. If the Investment Adviser or its employees or affiliates fail to comply with such pay‑to‑play laws, regulations or policies, such

We rely on the cybersecurity policies and procedures implemented by New Mountain Capital. New Mountain Capital has processes in place for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from potential unauthorized occurrences on or through our electronic information systems that could adversely affect the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information systems or the information residing on those systems. These include a wide variety of controls, processes, systems, and tools that are designed to prevent, detect, or mitigate data loss, theft, misuse, unauthorized access, or other security incidents or vulnerabilities affecting our data. Pursuant to New Mountain Capital’s Information Security Program, the New Mountain Capital Information Technology Steering Committee (“ITSC”) is responsible for the development, evolution, and implementation of policies and technical measures to reasonably prevent security incidents. At times New Mountain Capital may also engage assessors, consultants, auditors, or other third parties to assist with assessing, identifying, and managing cybersecurity risks.