Motorola Solutions (MSI) SDConflict minerals disclosure

Exhibit 1.01

CONFLICT MINERALS REPORT OF

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD FROM

JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2023

I. Introduction

This is the Conflict Minerals1 Report (the “Report”) of Motorola Solutions, Inc. (which may be referred to as “Motorola Solutions,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) for the calendar year 2023 in accordance in all material respects with Rule 13p-1 (“Rule 13p-1”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”). The rule was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to implement reporting and disclosure requirements related to “conflict minerals” as directed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd- Frank Act”). Numerous terms in this Report are defined in Section 1502(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Form SD and the reader is referred to those sources, and also to SEC Release No. 34-67716 issued by the SEC on August 22, 2012 (the “Adopting Release”) for such definitions.

In accordance in all material respects with Rule 13p-1, we undertook efforts to determine the content and source of the minerals within our products. The Company designed its efforts in conformity, in all material respects, with the internationally recognized due diligence framework (the “OECD Framework”) in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas2 and related supplements for each of the conflict minerals.

The statements below are based on the due diligence activities performed to date and in good faith by Motorola Solutions and are based on the infrastructure and information available at the time of this filing. There are factors that could affect the accuracy of these statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, incomplete supplier data or available smelter data, errors or omissions by suppliers or smelters, evolving definition and confirmation of smelters, incomplete information from industry or other third-party sources, continuing guidance from the SEC, and other issues.

II. Design of Due Diligence Measures

The Company designed its overall conflict minerals policies and procedures based on the five-step OECD Framework and the supplements on tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold.

Our implementation of the five-step framework consists of the following activities which are discussed in further detail in Section III (“Management Systems and Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry”) and Section IV (“Due Diligence Measures Performed by Motorola Solutions, Inc.”) of this Report.

1. Development of Conflict Minerals Policies and Procedures

2. Risk Assessment of Potential Sources of Conflict Minerals in Our Supply Chain

3. Mitigation of Sourcing from Conflict Smelters/Refiners

4. Auditing of Smelters/Refiners to Ensure Conformant Status

5. Reporting of Results of the above Activities

Our efforts utilized multi-industry initiatives with the smelters and refiners of minerals who may provide those minerals to companies in our supply chain. The Company, as a purchaser of component parts, is many steps removed from the mining of conflict minerals. The Company does not purchase raw ore or unrefined conflict minerals, and conducts no purchasing activities directly in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the “DRC”) or an adjoining country (referred to as the “Covered Countries”).

III. Management Systems and Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry

The following outlines the measures taken in our “reasonable country of origin” inquiry to determine countries of origin.

OECD Step 1. Policy and Management System

a. Conflict Minerals Policy – As required by the OECD Framework, Motorola Solutions developed a policy which establishes the expectations of our suppliers to source responsibly from the DRC or the adjoining countries to support in-region mining. The policy resides in our Supplier Code of Conduct and can be found by accessing www.motorolasolutions.com selecting “About Us” and then selecting “Environmental, Social & Corporate Governance” and “Supply Chain.”

b. Company-level grievance mechanism – As required by the OECD Framework, Motorola Solutions utilizes our internal Ethics Line to provide a grievance mechanism. All Motorola Solutions employees as well as those outside the Company can communicate directly and confidentially (via phone/fax/email) with the Office of Ethics and Compliance without fear of retaliation.

OECD Step 2. Conduct Risk Assessment

The Motorola Solutions process relied on the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (“CMRT”) and Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (“RMAP”) developed by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (“RMI”). The following steps were taken as part of our risk assessment process.

a. Identify products in-scope – Our internal cross-functional group of employees assigned to our conformant minerals team reviewed the categories of products that we sell to determine the products that are in-scope of the conflict minerals rule. As part of this process, the Company identified direct suppliers that provide products potentially containing conflict minerals, and set a goal to collect CMRT data from suppliers representing 94% of the in-scope direct material spend.

b. Identify smelters/refiners – The Company provided the conflict minerals survey to our supply chain by using the most recent version of the industry- developed CMRT. We surveyed tier 1 direct suppliers that provide material and components for products that are within scope and, as needed, performed due diligence steps to identify the smelters and refiners who contribute refined conflict minerals to the Company.

c. Identify Countries of Origin – The Company conducted a “reasonable country of origin inquiry” (“RCOI”) by comparing the identified smelters and refiners with the RMI country of origin database (as we have access to the database due to our membership with the RMI). The countries of origin we identified are listed in Appendix I to this Report.

IV. Due Diligence Measures Performed by Motorola Solutions, Inc.

The following outlines the measures taken to exercise due diligence in conformance with the OECD Framework.

OECD Step 3. Mitigate Risk

As part of our risk mitigation process, we compared the list of smelters/refiners collected from suppliers to the RMI smelter database (as we have access to the database due to our membership with the RMI). The RMI smelter database provides members with information regarding third party audit programs including the RMAP, London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), and Responsible Jewelry Council (RJC). After completing this review, the Company communicated to suppliers that listed smelters and/or refiners that are not conformant smelters and refiners to migrate their supply chain to those smelters that are RMAP conformant.

The communication also includes a recommendation for a supplier to recommend that the smelter and/or refiner in their supply chain participate in the RMAP or other industry cross-recognized audit programs. In addition, suppliers that reported all smelters and/or refiners in their supply chain identified by the RMI as conformant were sent letters acknowledging their efforts to establish a conformant supply chain, and encouraging them to continue to maintain it as such.

OECD Step 4. Audit of Smelters/Refiners

Step 4 of the OECD Framework recommends that downstream companies implement audits by cooperating through their industry organizations, and that downstream companies participate in and contribute to such organizations. The Company is a member of the RMI. As a member, the Company has supported the execution of the RMAP and has relied on the RMAP to develop information on the country and mine or location of origin of conflict minerals in the Company’s products. The efforts to determine mine or location of origin through RMI are described on the RMI website at http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org.

OECD Step 5. Results of Due Diligence – Report Annually on Supply Chain Due Diligence

In our 2023 survey, we received CMRTs from 191 suppliers as per Table 1 and Table 2 below, which represent 95.5% of our 2023 in-scope direct material spend.

We have communicated with these suppliers through phone calls and/or emails and directed them to use the CMRT tool to collect and report their data on conflict minerals. Our procurement department is also involved in these communications.

A review of the data received showed that 237 of the smelters identified in our supply chain have been audited and found conformant with the relevant RMAP standard by the RMI. An additional 99 smelters are identified by the RMI but have not been certified as conformant or non-conformant with the RMAP audit standard. 30 smelters in our supply chain have been audited but are not currently identified as conformant with the relevant RMAP standard by the RMI. The Company has determined that materials in products were derived from the Covered Countries. Accordingly, this Conflict Minerals Report has been filed with the SEC and is available at (www.motorolasolutions.com/investors.html). See Appendix I to this Report for a list of countries of origin identified through the RCOI process.

V. Product Description

On the basis of the measures described above, the Company has determined that as of December 31, 2023, a portion of its necessary conflict minerals originated or may have originated in the Covered Countries. See Appendix I to this Report for a list of countries of origin identified through the RCOI process. For 2023, none of the necessary conflict minerals contained in our products subject to this disclosure were determined by us to directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries. However, we did not conclude that any of our products were “DRC conflict free.”

VI. Steps to Improve Due Diligence

We will continue to communicate our expectations and information requirements to our direct suppliers and our conflict minerals policy in our Supplier Code of Conduct will be periodically reviewed and updated, if necessary.

We will also continue to monitor changes in circumstances that may impact the facts or our determination. Over time, we anticipate that the amount of information globally on the traceability and sourcing of these ores will increase and improve our knowledge. We will continue to make inquiries to our direct suppliers and undertake additional risk assessments where potentially relevant changes in facts or circumstances are identified. If we become aware of a supplier whose due diligence needs improvement, we intend to continue the trade relationship while that supplier improves its performance. However, if we identify that an upstream supplier is sourcing from or linked to any party providing direct or indirect support to non-state armed groups in the DRC and the Covered Countries, we will work with our supply chain to suspend or discontinue engagement with that upstream supplier. We expect our suppliers to take similar measures with their suppliers to ensure alignment throughout the supply chain.

In our 2023 campaign, we communicated directly to smelters in our supply chain in addition to tier one suppliers in order to encourage these smelters to either maintain their RMAP-conformant status in the RMI’s program, or to encourage them to participate and become RMAP-conformant if they are not already.

In addition to the steps described above, the Company will undertake the following steps during the next compliance period to improve the due diligence conducted to further mitigate the risk that the conflict minerals in our supply chain do not benefit armed groups, including:

Table 1

SMELTERS OR REFINERS CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED AS RMAP CONFORMANT

Based on our due diligence process and the information received from our suppliers, the following facilities were identified by Motorola Solutions suppliers using the CMRT responses collected through March 19, 2024. The identified smelters/refiners have been confirmed as RMAP conformant smelters/refiners by the RMI as of March 21, 2024.

Table 2

SMELTERS OR REFINERS CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED BY THE RMI BUT NOT YET RMAP CONFORMANT

Based on our due diligence process and the information received from our suppliers, the following facilities were identified by Motorola Solutions suppliers using the CMRT responses collected through March 19, 2024. The following smelters/refiners are identified by the RMI but have not been certified as conformant or non-conformant with the RMAP audit standard as of March 21, 2024.

Table 3

SMELTERS AND REFINERS NOT RMAP CONFORMANT

Based on our due diligence process and the information received from our suppliers, the following facilities were identified by Motorola Solutions suppliers using the CMRT responses collected through March 19, 2024. The identified smelters/refiners have been confirmed as legitimate smelters/refiners not currently conformant to the relevant RMAP standard by the RMI as of March 21, 2024.

APPENDIX I – Countries of Origin

The information provided in this Appendix I is based on the RMI Country of Origin database and smelter information collected from Motorola Solutions suppliers.