Farmers National Banc (FMNB) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

20 SOUTH BROAD STREET

CANFIELD, OHIO 44406

March 13, 2020

To Our Shareholders:

You are cordially invited to the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Farmers National Banc Corp. (“Farmers” or the “Company”) to be held on April 16, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting to provide a consistent experience to all shareholders regardless of location. We will provide a live webcast of the Annual Meeting atwww.meetingcenter.io/236769428, where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions during the meeting.

During the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to: (i) elect three Class I directors whose terms will expire at the Annual Meeting in 2023; (ii) elect one Class III director whose term will expire at the Annual Meeting in 2022; (iii) consider and vote upon anon-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and (iv) ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of CliftonLarsonAllen LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

Your vote on these matters is important, regardless of the number of shares you own, and all shareholders are encouraged to participate in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting. However, it is important that your shares be represented regardless of whether you plan to participate in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting. In order to ensure that your shares are represented, I urge you to execute and return the enclosed proxy, or that you submit your proxy by telephone or Internet promptly.

Sincerely,

KEVIN J. HELMICK

President and Chief Executive Officer

FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP.

20 SOUTH BROAD STREET

CANFIELD, OHIO 44406

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held Thursday, April 16, 2020

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Farmers National Banc Corp. (“Farmers” or the “Company”) will be held on April 16, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting to provide a consistent experience to all shareholders regardless of location. We will provide a live webcast of the Annual Meeting atwww.meetingcenter.io/236769428, where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions during the meeting.

The 2020 Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 6, 2020 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote during, the Annual Meeting. Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote“FOR” the election of each of the director nominees and“FOR” each of the other proposals.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

CARL D. CULP

Senior Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary

Canfield, Ohio

March 13, 2020

FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP.

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL INFORMATION

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Farmers National Banc Corp., an Ohio corporation (“Farmers” or the “Company”), of the accompanying proxy to be voted during the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”), and during any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held on April 16, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting to provide a consistent experience to all shareholders regardless of location. We will provide a live webcast of the Annual Meeting atwww.meetingcenter.io/236769428, where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions during the meeting. The mailing address of the principal executive offices of Farmers is 20 South Broad Street, Canfield, Ohio 44406; telephone number(330) 533-3341. This proxy statement, together with the related proxy and Farmers’ 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders (the “Annual Report”), are being mailed to the shareholders of the Company on or about March 13, 2020. This Proxy Statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote. Please read this information carefully.

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on Thursday, April 16, 2020: This proxy statement, theForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders are available atwww.farmersbankgroup.com.

1

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

When and Where will the Annual Meeting be Held?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting to provide a consistent experience to all shareholders regardless of location. We will provide a live webcast of the Annual Meeting atwww.meetingcenter.io/236769428, where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions during the meeting. To obtain more information regarding how to participate in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, please contact Shareholder Relations at (330)533-5127.

Why did I Receive these Proxy Materials?

You have received these proxy materials because the Board of Directors is soliciting a proxy to vote your shares during the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement contains information that Farmers is required to provide to you under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and is intended to assist you in voting your shares.

Who may Vote during the Annual Meeting?

The Board of Directors has set March 6, 2020 as the “record date” for the Annual Meeting. This means that only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to notice of, and to vote during, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. At the close of business on March 6, 2020, 28,316,997 Common Shares were issued and outstanding. Each Common Share entitles the holder to one vote on each item to be voted upon during the Annual Meeting and there is no cumulative voting.

What is the Difference between Holding Shares as a “Shareholder of Record” and as a “Beneficial Owner”?

If your Farmers’ shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the “shareholder of record” of those shares. Farmers has sent these proxy materials directly to all “shareholders of record.” Alternatively, if your Farmers’ shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, which is sometimes called “street name,” then you are the “beneficial owner” of those shares, and these proxy materials were forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your shares is the shareholder of record for purposes of voting the shares during the Annual Meeting. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct that organization how to vote the Common Shares held in your account by following the voting instructions the organization provides to you.

How do I Vote?

Shareholders of record may vote on matters that are properly presented during the Annual Meeting in four ways:

2

For the Annual Meeting, Farmers is offering shareholders of record the opportunity to vote their Common Shares electronically through the Internet or by telephone by following the procedures described on the enclosed proxy instead of submitting the enclosed proxy by mail. In order to vote via the Internet or by telephone, please have the enclosed proxy in hand, and go to the website listed on the proxy or call the number and follow the instructions. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholder identities, to allow shareholders to give their voting instructions, and to confirm that shareholder instructions have been recorded properly. Shareholders voting through the Internet should understand that they may bear certain costs associated with Internet access, such as usage charges from their Internet service providers.

If you hold your Common Shares in street name, you should follow the voting instructions provided to you by the organization that holds your Common Shares. If you plan to participate in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, you will have the opportunity to vote electronically during the meeting. If your Common Shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other shareholder of record, you must have a legal proxy from the shareholder of record indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on March 6, 2020 in order to vote during the live webcast of the Annual Meeting.

How will My Shares be Voted?

If you vote by mail, through the Internet, or by telephone, your Common Shares will be voted as you direct. If you submit a valid proxy prior to the Annual Meeting, but do not complete the voting instructions, your Common Shares will be voted:

Can Other Matters be Decided during the Annual Meeting?

On the date that this proxy statement was printed, Farmers was not aware of any matters to be raised during the Annual Meeting other than those included in this proxy statement. If you submit a valid proxy and other matters are properly presented for consideration during the Annual Meeting, then the individuals appointed as proxies will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

3

May I Revoke or Change My Vote?

Yes, proxies may be revoked at any time before a vote is taken or the authority granted is otherwise exercised. Revocation may be accomplished by:

If your Common Shares are held in street name and you wish to revoke your proxy, you should follow the instructions provided to you by the record holder of your shares. If you wish to revoke your proxy during the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, you must have a legal proxy from the shareholder of record indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the Common Shares on March 6, 2020. Participating in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy.

Who Pays the Cost of Proxy Solicitation?

The accompanying proxy is solicited by and on behalf of the Board of Directors, whose notice of meeting is attached to this proxy statement, and the entire cost of such solicitation will be borne by Farmers. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone, facsimile and electronic mail by directors, officers and employees of Farmers. Arrangements will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation material to the beneficial owners of Common Shares held of record by such persons, and Farmers will reimburse them for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection therewith.

How Many Common Shares Must be Represented at the Annual Meeting in Order to Constitute a Quorum?

The shareholders present in person (via the live webcast) or by proxy at the Annual Meeting representing not less thanone-third of Farmers’ outstanding Common Shares shall constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. Consequently, at least 9,438,999 Common Shares must be represented at the Annual Meeting in person (via the live webcast) or by proxy in order to constitute a quorum. Abstentions and “brokernon-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Street name holders generally cannot vote their Common Shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank or other shareholder of record how to vote their Common Shares using the voting instructions provided by it. If a street name holder does not provide timely instructions, the broker or other nominee may have the authority to vote on some proposals but not others. If a broker or other nominee votes on one proposal, but does not vote on another proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner, this results in a brokernon-vote. Brokernon-votes on a matter are counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum for the meeting, but are not considered entitled to vote on that particular matter.

4

What are the Voting Requirements to Elect the Directors and to Approve the Other Proposals Discussed in this Proxy Statement?

The vote required to approve each of the proposals that are scheduled to be presented during the Annual Meeting is as follows:

5

Under Ohio law, the Articles, and Farmers’ Regulations, the nominees for election as directors who receive the greatest number of votes cast will be elected directors. Each shareholder will be entitled to cast one vote for each Common Share owned, and shareholders may not cumulate votes in the election of directors. Common Shares as to which the authority to vote is withheld are not counted toward the election of directors. However, the Board of Directors has adopted a “Majority Vote Withheld Policy” in the event that “Withhold Authority”has been indicated by a majority of the votes cast with respect to any director in an uncontested election. A summary of this policy is set forth under the caption“CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Policies ofthe Board of Directors”beginning on page 11 of this proxy statement.

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors — Independence

The Board of Directors is currently comprised of nine members, four of whom are nominees forre-election during the Annual Meeting. Additional information regarding the director nominees is set forth in “Proposal One — Election ofDirectors”beginning on page 16 of this proxy statement. In 2019, the Board of Directors affirmatively determined that each of the directors listed below is an “independent director” under the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”):

The only director (or director nominee) of Farmers who has been determined by the Board of Directors not to be independent is Kevin J. Helmick, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer.

During 2019, certain current directors and executive officers of Farmers, and their associates, were customers of, and had banking transactions with, various subsidiaries of the Company, including Farmers’ subsidiary bank, The Farmers National Bank of Canfield (“Farmers Bank”). All relationships between any director or executive officer and Farmers or any of its subsidiaries were conducted in the ordinary course of business. Farmers encourages its directors and executive officers to maintain these relationships and expects that these transactions will continue in the future. All loans and loan commitments included in such transactions were made and will be made: (i) in the ordinary course of business; (ii) on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to Farmers; and (iii) without more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. After reviewing the details of these relationships, the Board of Directors has determined that such relationships do not interfere with the exercise of any director’s independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities.

In assessing the independence of directors, the Board of Directors also considers the business relationships between Farmers and its directors or their affiliated businesses other than ordinary banking relationships, if any. Where such business relationships other than ordinary banking relationships exist, the Board of Directors evaluates the scope and nature of each business relationship. There were no such business relationships between Farmers and its directors or the directors’ affiliated companies that were so considered by the Board of Directors in 2019.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Farmers’ Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving, pursuant to the Company’s written policy, all related party transactions that are material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements or otherwise require disclosure under Item 404 ofRegulation S-K. Extensions of credit by Farmers or any of its subsidiaries to “insiders” of the Company or its subsidiaries are also regulated by Regulation O adopted under the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act. It is Farmers’ policy that any transactions with persons whom Regulation O defines as “insiders” (i.e., executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their related interests) are engaged

7

in the same manner as transactions conducted with all members of the public. Transactions are reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors either on acase-by-case basis (such as loans made by Farmers Bank to an insider) or, in the case of an ongoing relationship, at the outset of the relationship with periodic review. All loans outstanding to insiders of Farmers at any time since January 1, 2019: (i) were made in the ordinary course of business; (ii) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Company; and (iii) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Attendance at Meetings

The Board of Directors held 12 meetings during 2019. All incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the total of all meetings of the Board of Directors and any committees thereof on which such director served during the year. In accordance with Farmers’ Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Corporate Governance Guidelines”), directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board of Directors, although it is understood that, on occasion, a director may not be able to attend a meeting. Directors are encouraged to participate in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting. All of the current members of the Board of Directors attended the 2019 Annual Meeting held on April 18, 2019.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors has appointed Lance J. Ciroli as itsnon-executive Chairman. As Chairman, Mr. Ciroli presides over meetings of the Board of Directors, consults and advises the Board and its committees on the business and affairs of Farmers, and performs other responsibilities as may be assigned by the Board from time to time. The Board of Directors has also appointed James R. Smail as itsnon-executive Vice Chairman. As Vice Chairman, Mr. Smail presides over meetings of the Board of Directors in the absence of Mr. Ciroli, and also consults and advises the Board and its committees on the business and affairs of Farmers, and performs other responsibilities as may be assigned by the Board from time to time. Kevin J. Helmick, as President and Chief Executive Officer, is responsible both for overseeing Farmers’day-to-day operations and for establishing and leading the execution of the Company’s long-term strategic objectives, subject to the overall direction and supervision of the Board of Directors and its committees. Farmers does not have a formal policy with respect to separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, as the Board of Directors believes that flexibility in appointing the Chairman of the Board allows the Board of Directors to make a determination as to such position from time to time and in a manner that it believes is in the best interest of Farmers and its shareholders. The Board of Directors believes that the current structure best serves Farmers because it allows Mr. Helmick to focus on managing the Company’sday-to-day business while allowing Mr. Ciroli to lead the Board of Directors in its primary role of review and oversight of management. The Board of Directors also believes that its leadership structure has created an environment of open, efficient communication between the Board and management, enabling the Board to maintain an active, informed role in risk management by being able to monitor and manage those matters that may present significant risks to Farmers.

The role of the Board of Directors in Farmers’ risk management process includes reviewing regular reports from senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal, regulatory and strategic risks. The Board of Directors reviews these reports to enable it to understand and assess Farmers’ risk assessment, risk management and risk mitigation strategies. While the Board of Directors has the ultimate

8

oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of both management and the Board also have responsibility for risk management. In accordance with the Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee Charter, the Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of management’s implementation and enforcement of Farmers’ policies, procedures and practices relating to: (i) the management of enterprise-wide risk; (ii) compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the maintenance of appropriate regulatory and economic capital and reserve levels; and (iii) the Company’s long-term strategic plans and initiatives. In addition, the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in overseeing and monitoring management’s conduct of Farmers’ financial reporting process and system of internal accounting and financial controls. Finally, the Compensation Committee oversees the management of risks relating to executive andnon-executive compensation plans and arrangements. While each committee oversees certain risks and the management of such risks, the entire Board is regularly informed of such risks through committee reports.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors conducts its business through meetings of the Board and the following committees: (i) Audit Committee; (ii) Compensation Committee; (iii) Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee; (iv) Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee; and (v) Executive Committee. Each committee other than the Executive Committee meets on a regular basis and each committee reports their deliberations and actions to the full Board of Directors. Each of the committees has the authority to engage outside experts, advisors and counsel to the extent it considers appropriate to assist the committee in its work.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the accounting and financial reporting process of the Company. The Audit Committee also reviews, evaluates and approves all related party transactions. The Audit Committee members currently are Gregory C. Bestic (Chairman) , Lance J. Ciroli, Ralph D. Macali, and Edward W. Muransky, each of whom also served on the Audit Committee during 2019. During the 2019 calendar year, Gregg Strollo also served on the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Bestic qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.” Specifically, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Bestic has all of the attributes listed in the definition of an “audit committee financial expert” set forth in the Instruction to Item 407(d)(5)(i) ofRegulation S-K and in the NASDAQ listing requirements. Mr. Bestic has acquired these attributes through education and experience as a certified public accountant and, specifically, as a Principal in Schroedel, Scullin & Bestic, LLC, a certified public accounting and strategic advisory firm located in Canfield, Ohio. All of the Audit Committee members are considered independent for purposes of NASDAQ listing requirements. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, which is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors to reflect current Commission and NASDAQ rules, requirements and best corporate practices. A copy of the current Audit Committee Charter is available on Farmers’ website atwww.farmersbankgroup.com. The Audit Committee held 6 meetings during 2019.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee establishes policies and levels of reasonable compensation for the executive officers of the Company and generally administers the Company’s incentive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee members

9

currently are David Z. Paull (Chair), Anne Frederick Crawford, Terry A. Moore and James R. Smail, each of whom also served on the Compensation Committee during 2019. All members of the Compensation Committee are considered independent for purposes of NASDAQ listing requirements. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter, which is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors to reflect current Commission and NASDAQ rules, requirements and best corporate practices. A copy of the current Compensation Committee Charter is available on Farmers’ website atwww.farmersbankgroup.com. The Compensation Committee held 6 meetings during 2019.

Pursuant to the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee. In addition, the Compensation Committee may invite such members of management to its meetings, as it may deem desirable or appropriate, consistent with the maintenance of the confidentiality of compensation discussions. In addition, the Compensation Committee may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer, or another executive designee, the authority to approve salary and other compensation for employees below the executive officer level in accordance with overall pools, policy guidelines and limits approved by the Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to select, retain, terminate and approve the fees and other retention terms of special counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate, without seeking approval of the Board or management. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s role is set forth in the“COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS”section of this proxy statement, beginning on page 24.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s purpose is to: (i) identify and recommend individuals to the Board of Directors for nomination as members of the Board and its committees; (ii) promote effective corporate governance, including developing and recommending to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company; and (iii) lead the Board of Directors in its annual review of the Board’s performance and the performance of each of its committees. The members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee currently are Terry A. Moore (Chair), Gregory C. Bestic, Anne Frederick Crawford, and Ralph D. Macali, each of whom also served on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee during 2019. During the 2019 calendar year, Edward W. Muransky also served on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. All members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are independent for purposes of NASDAQ listing requirements. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Corporate Governance Guidelines, both of which are reviewed annually by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors to reflect current Commission and NASDAQ rules, requirements and best corporate practices. Copies of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on Farmers’ website atwww.farmersbankgroup.com. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee held 5 meetings during 2019.

Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee

The Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee oversees management’s implementation and enforcement of the Company’s policies, procedures and practices relating to the management of enterprise-wide risk. The members of the Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee currently are Lance J. Ciroli (Chair), Edward W. Muransky, David Z. Paull, and James R. Smail. During the 2019 calendar year, Gregg Strollo also served on the

10

Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee. The Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee operates under a written charter, which is reviewed annually by the Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee and the Board of Directors. A copy of the current Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee Charter is available on Farmers’ website atwww.farmersbankgroup.com. The Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee meets on a regular basis with Mr. Helmick and other executive officers of Farmers. The Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee held 4 meetings during 2019. Additional information regarding the Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee’s role is set forth in the“COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS”section of this proxy statement, beginning on page 24.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee is authorized to act on behalf of the Board of Directors on all corporate actions for which applicable law does not require participation by the full Board. All actions taken by the Executive Committee must be reported at the next meeting of the Board of Directors. The members of the Executive Committee are James R. Smail (Chair), Lance J. Ciroli, Kevin J. Helmick, and Terry A. Moore, all of whom also served on the Executive Committee during 2019. The Executive Committee operates under a written charter, which is reviewed annually by the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors. A copy of the current Executive Committee Charter is available on Farmers’ website atwww.farmersbankgroup.com. The Executive Committee held 13 meetings in 2019.

Policies of the Board of Directors

Majority Withheld Vote

The Board of Directors recognizes that, pursuant to Section 1701.55(B) of the Ohio Revised Code, director nominees who receive the greatest number of shareholder votes are automatically elected to the Board of Directors, regardless of whether the votes in favor of such nominees constitute a majority of the voting power of Farmers, because our Articles do not include alternative election standards. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors has adopted a policy that, in an uncontested election, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election (a “Majority Withheld Vote”), should promptly tender his or her resignation to the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Thereafter, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the tendered resignation and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept or reject it. In considering whether to recommend to the Board of Directors to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider all information and factors deemed relevant, including, without limitation: (i) the reasons (if any) given by shareholders as to why they withheld their votes, and (ii) the qualifications and performance of the tendering director(s) and his or her contributions to the Board of Directors and Farmers. The Board of Directors will act on any tendered resignation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote. Following the Board of Directors’ determination, Farmers will promptly disclose the Board’s decision whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation offer (and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer) in a press release and in a Current Report onForm 8-K. Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this provision shall not participate in the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s consideration or action by the Board of Directors regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. If a majority of the Board of Directors receives a Majority Withheld Vote at the same election, then the independent directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld Vote will consider the resignation offers and whether to accept or reject them.

11

Director Nominations

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider candidates for director, including those recommended by a shareholder who submits the person’s name and qualifications in writing. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has no specific minimum qualifications for a recommended candidate, and does not consider shareholder recommended candidates differently from other candidates. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the fit of an individual’s skills with those of other directors and potential directors in building a Board that is effective and responsive to the needs of the Company and its shareholders. The following attributes are considered important to such consideration, but all may not necessarily be possessed by any one director candidate:

While the Board of Directors does not have a formal diversity policy, diversity of viewpoints, background, experience and other demographics is one criterion on which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee bases its evaluation of potential candidates for director positions. When identifying first-time candidates or nominees for director, or in evaluating individuals recommended by shareholders, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider diversity, the current composition of the Board in light of the diverse communities and geographies Farmers serves, and the interplay of the candidate’s or nominee’s experience, education, skills, background, gender, race, ethnicity and other qualities and attributes with those of the other Board members. The inclusion of diversity in the listed criteria reflects the Board of Director’s belief that diversity is an important component of an effective Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates each potential director candidate on their specific skills, expertise and background, as well as traditional diversity concepts.

In addition to recommendations presented by shareholders, the Board of Directors maintains a current list of potential director candidates that fit the characteristics and qualifications of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which it uses from time to time to fill director vacancies or for director nominations. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee makes its recommendation regarding nominations to the Board of Directors, and nominees are selected by the Board of Directors.

Under the Regulations, a shareholder entitled to vote for the election of directors who intends to nominate a director for election must deliver written notice to the Secretary of Farmers no later than 90 days and no earlier than 120 days in advance of such meeting; provided, however, that if less than 90 days’ notice or prior disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to shareholders, written notice to the Secretary of the Company

12

must be delivered or mailed not later than the close of business on the seventh day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first given or made to shareholders. The Board of Directors has adopted a policy that annual meetings of shareholders will be held on the third Thursday of April of each year unless and until publicly announced otherwise, consistent with our general past practice and the Regulations. Accordingly, for purposes of the 2021 Annual Meeting intended to be held on April 15, 2021, a nomination of a director for election must be received by Farmers’ Secretary no earlier than December 16, 2020 and not later than January 15, 2021.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines also formalize certain aspects of Farmers’ shareholder nomination process. Pursuant to the Regulations and/or the Corporate Governance Guidelines, each shareholder notice must include the following information regarding a director candidate:

In addition, the shareholder notice must also include the following information regarding the shareholder making the nomination:

13

In the case of any investment fund or similar organization that is a nominating shareholder, these shareholder disclosure obligations shall also apply to the principal advisor to the fund. Also, if the shareholder is other than an individual, these disclosure requirements apply to the shareholder’s principal shareholders, executive officers and other controlling parties.

During the course of any candidate’s consideration, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may request additional information through written director questionnaires and further communications to assess whether the candidate satisfies, in the view of the committee, requirements of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Director Code of Ethics, and other policies applicable to members of the Board and its committees.

If a nominating shareholder or director candidate believes that information supplied in response to any of the above inquiries is confidential, the shareholder or nominee may request confidential treatment for such information. In such event, the information shall be maintained on a confidential basis unless the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is advised by counsel that disclosure is appropriate in connection with the solicitation of proxies relating to the director candidate.

14

In the event that it is subsequently determined that any of the information provided by the candidate or nominating shareholder is materially inaccurate, a director candidate who provided the materially inaccurate information or whose nominating shareholder provided the materially inaccurate information shall be required to resign from the Board of Directors, and, in the event of a refusal to resign, such a determination shall constitute grounds for removal from the Board, unless it is determined by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee that the inaccuracy was inadvertent.

Shareholder Proposals for 2021 Annual Meeting

Proposals by shareholders intended to be presented during the 2021 Annual Meeting must be received by the Secretary of Farmers no later than November 13, 2020, to be eligible for inclusion in Farmers’ proxy, notice of meeting, and proxy statement relating to its 2021 Annual Meeting. Farmers will not be required to include in its proxy, notice of meeting, or proxy statement, a shareholder proposal that is received after that date or that otherwise fails to meet the requirements for shareholder proposals established by the applicable Commission rules.

If a shareholder intends to submit a proposal during the 2021 Annual Meeting that is not eligible for inclusion in the proxy materials relating to the meeting, and the shareholder fails to give the Company notice in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), by January 27, 2021, then the proxy holders will be allowed to use their discretionary authority with respect to such proposal if the proposal is properly raised during the 2021 Annual Meeting. The submission of such a notice does not ensure that a proposal can be raised during the 2021 Annual Meeting.

In each case written notice must be given to Farmers, addressed to its Corporate Secretary, at the following address: 20 South Broad Street, Canfield, Ohio 44406.

Shareholder Communications with Directors

All written communications addressed to an individual director at Farmers’ address or to one of the offices of a subsidiary of the Company, except those clearly of a marketing nature, will be forwarded directly to the director. All written communications addressed to the Board of Directors at Farmers’ address or to one of the offices of a subsidiary of the Company will be presented to the full Board of Directors at a meeting of the Board of Directors.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires Farmers’ directors, officers and persons who own beneficially more than 10% of its Common Shares (“Section 16 Filers”) to file reports of ownership and transactions in the Common Shares with the Commission and to furnish the Company with copies of all such forms filed. Based solely on the review of copies of reports furnished to us or written representations that no reports were required, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were met in the last fiscal year by our Section 16 Filers.

15

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

In accordance with the provisions of Farmers’ Regulations, the Board of Directors has currently fixed the number of directors at nine. The Board of Directors is currently divided into three classes, each with three-year terms, and there are currently four directors serving in Class I, four directors serving in Class II, and one director serving in Class III.

Given the current imbalance between the number of directors serving in Classes I and II and Class III of the Board of Directors, respectively, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors deem it in the best interest of the Company to balance the number of directors serving in each of these three classes, with such balance to be achieved over the next two years.

This year, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors there-nomination of three of the Class I directors for election to serve as Class I directors for terms of three years to expire at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2023. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors there-nomination of one director, having previously served as a Class I director, for election to serve as a Class III director for a term of two years to expire at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2022.

Set forth below for each of the nominees for election and for each director whose term will continue after the Annual Meeting is a brief statement, including age, principal occupation and business experience during the past five years. In addition, the following information provides the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s evaluation regarding the nomination of the director nominees and the key attributes, skills, and qualifications presented by the director nominees and the continuing directors. The following information, as of March 6, 2020, with respect to the age, principal occupation or employment, other affiliations and business experience during at least the last five years of each director and director nominee, has been furnished to Farmers by each director nominee and director. Except where indicated, no corporation is a parent, subsidiary, or other affiliate of Farmers.

Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this proxy statement. If any nominee should become unavailable to serve for any reason, it is intended that votes will be cast for a substitute nominee designated by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has no reason to believe that any nominee named will be unable to serve if elected.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

16

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS CLASS I DIRECTORS

(Term Expiring in 2023)

17

18

NOMINEE FOR ELECTION AS CLASS III DIRECTOR

(Term Expiring in 2022)

CLASS II DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE

(Term Expiring in 2021)

19

20

CLASS III DIRECTOR CONTINUING IN OFFICE

(Term Expiring in 2022)

21

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth information as of March 6, 2020, regarding beneficial ownership of the Common Shares by each director, each director nominee, each of the named executive officers of Farmers appearing in theSummaryCompensation Table, all directors, named executive officers, and other executive officers of the Company as a group, and each person known to Farmers to own 5% or more of its Common Shares. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all persons named below can be reached at Farmers National Banc Corp., 20 South Broad Street, Canfield, Ohio 44406.

22

23

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information regarding Farmers’ executive compensation programs and includes the following segments: (i) Executive Summary, (ii) Compensation Philosophy and Objectives, (iii)2019Named Executive Officers Compensation, and (iv) Other Elements of our Executive Compensation Programs. For 2019, our named executive officers were:

Executive Summary

Farmers continued to deliver strong financial performance in 2019, in terms of both past performance and performance of our peer financial institutions. We also believe that the compensation of our executive team continued to reflect their successful efforts in strong alignment with the Company’s financial performance.

2019 Financial Performance Highlights

24

Linkages between our financial performance and the resulting payouts for our named executive officers under our annual and long-term incentive programs are described more fully under the caption “2019 Named Executive Officers Compensation” beginning on page 29 in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Portions of the foregoing and certain following financial presentations in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis include the use of both GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) andnon-GAAP financial measures. We use these financial measures to monitor and evaluate ouron-going performance and allocate resources, and we believe that these additionalnon-GAAP measures are useful to investors for financial analyses of Farmers. Reconciliations of suchnon-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure can be found on Appendix A to this proxy statement.

Significant Compensation Results in 2019

Each year we evaluate all of our compensation programs, policies and payouts to determine whether our compensation structure continues to align with ourpay-for-performance focus and promote long-term shareholder value. Based on this evaluation, we determined in 2019 to maintain the general structural elements of our executive compensation programs, as summarized below.

Annual Incentive Compensation

Long-term Incentive Compensation

25

Long-Term Incentive Compensation 2017-2019 Vesting Summary

Compensation Committee’s Philosophy on Executive Compensation

Our goal is to hire and retain an executive management team that we believe will create both short-term and long-term institutional success. We seek to achieve this goal by providing a fair, competitive compensation package that includes performance-based,at-risk pay components that align with the Company’s strategic and financial performance. We believe that our compensation plans drive successful annual and long-term performance that ultimately aligns with long-term shareholder value. We also seek to implement compensation programs that appropriately balance risk and financial results so that our compensation programs maintain and promote our overall safety and soundness.

Each named executive officers’ compensation currently consists of three primary elements: base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, and long-term incentive compensation. Named executive officers are also eligible to receive matching contributions to their 401(k) retirement plan accounts, discretionary additional contributions to voluntary deferrals of compensation in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, and limited perquisites. To help retain a stable executive management team, we have adopted an Executive Separation Policy and have entered into change in control agreements that provide severance benefits upon certain terminations of our executive officers.

26

The Role of the Compensation Committee in Determining Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee oversees the compensation of our named executive officers and establishes our executive compensation philosophy, policies, elements, plans, and arrangements. In addition, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of our chief executive officer and, with the input of our chief executive officer, our other executive officers, in order to determine appropriate compensation adjustments as well as future compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee annually evaluates the alignment of pay and performance of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. The Compensation Committee also reviews overall corporate policies regarding compensation and benefit programs that are generally available to all employees in connection with its annual assessment of risk-based compensation assessment and may make recommendations concerning those programs based thereon.

Although the Compensation Committee has authority to approve individual compensation arrangements, as well as authority to engage legal advisors and compensation consultants for advice on compensation issues, the Compensation Committee does not act entirely autonomously in considering and implementation of our compensation plans. For example, the Compensation Committee recommends the terms of plans such as our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, subject to final approval of the full independent Board of Directors, and may from time to time request management to provide financial, tax, accounting, or operational information relevant to Compensation Committee deliberations.

Role of Compensation Consultant

As permitted by the Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pay Governance, LLC (“Pay Governance”) as its outside independent compensation consultant since 2011. During 2019, the Compensation Committee conducted a request for proposals process from qualified independent compensation consultants, and based on such process determined to continue to engage Pay Governance. Pursuant to the terms of its engagement, Pay Governance generally reviews, analyzes and provides advice regarding our executive compensation and director compensation programs in relation to the objectives of those programs, including comparisons to designated peer group companies and to “best practices,” and also provides information and advice on competitive compensation practices and trends, along with specific views on our compensation programs. In their role as independent compensation consultants, Pay Governance representatives engage in discussions with the Compensation Committee and respond on a regular basis to questions from the Committee and the Committee’s other advisors, providing opinions with respect to the design and implementation of current or proposed compensation programs. During fiscal 2019, Pay Governance reported directly to the Compensation Committee and the Committee retains the sole authority to retain or terminate Pay Governance. Pay Governance did not provide additional services to the company or its affiliates in an amount in excess of $120,000 during 2019.

Compensation Consultant Independence

The Compensation Committee has the responsibility to consider certain independence factors before selecting compensation consultants and other compensation advisers. In connection with the foregoing, the Compensation Committee reviewed, considered and discussed the relevant factors established by NASDAQ to determine such independence, both through surveying Pay Governance and by soliciting input from members of the Compensation Committee through our annual director and officer questionnaires. Based on its review, consideration and discussion, the Compensation Committee determined that the work performed and to be performed by Pay Governance as the Committee’s compensation

27

consultant has not raised and does not raise any conflict of interest, and also determined that Pay Governance qualifies as independent for purposes of the Exchange Act and revised NASDAQ Corporate Governance Requirements.

Say-on-Pay Consideration

At the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved on an advisory basis the executive compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for that Annual Meeting, with over 93% of the Common Shares represented by shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the 2019 Annual Meeting voting “for” such approval. The Compensation Committee evaluated the results of this supportive advisory vote, together with the other factors and data discussed in this Compensation and Discussion Analysis, in determining Farmers’ executive compensation policies, making executive compensation decisions, and continuing implementation of the Committee’s compensation philosophy and objectives.

Peer Group Evaluation and Executive Compensation Benchmarks

The Compensation Committee has generally evaluated compensation practices at similarly situated financial institutions to help determine the levels of compensation for financial services executives in our geographic market. In addition, the Compensation Committee does not adhere to a strict formula in order to determine executive officer compensation packages, rather has relied on a variety of factors including experience, responsibility, individual performance, and our overall financial performance. However, given the competitive nature of the financial services industry generally and the fact that we compete in a market with many regional and national banking organizations that are significantly larger and that can provide attractive compensation packages to top executive talent, the Compensation Committee recognizes the need for Farmers to provide competitive overall compensation opportunities to retain our high-performing executives and attract new executive talent.

During 2015, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Pay Governance, undertook an extensivere-evaluation of our compensation peer group to consider changing the composition of the group due to the significant increase in the size and primary market of Farmers due to two recent acquisitions and to better reflect similarly situated financial institutions for purposes of determining competitive market positioning for purposes of executive compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee used several factors to identify, evaluate and select peer financial institutions including but not limited to (i) factors of size (e.g., assets (ranging from approximatelyone-half to two times the asset size of Farmers), revenues, employees, and market capitalization), (ii) factors of profitability and growth (e.g., net revenue and operating income), and (iii) geographic location (“Peer Group”). The Compensation Committee continued to utilize the following Peer Group of 16 companies to evaluate the competitiveness of our pay structures and levels for calendar year 2019, taking into account acquisitions of previously included institutions (the “2019 Peer Group”):

28

2019 Named Executive Officers Compensation

Base Salary

Base salaries are intended to reward the named executive officers based upon their roles with us and for their performance in those roles. For each named executive officer, their base salaries are reviewed annually subject to adjustments based upon our financial performance, the individual performance of the particular executive, and our overall compensation philosophy of providing base compensation levels for our executive officers within 10% of the median of our 2019 Peer Group. The Compensation Committee conducts an annual evaluation of the performance of Mr. Helmick in light of specified goals and objectives with input from each independent director. Based on such evaluation and input, the Compensation Committee determines the compensation of Mr. Helmick and discusses its determination with all independent directors. All other executive officers are evaluated on a variety of factors including leadership performance, strategic planning and execution, communication abilities, business knowledge, and awareness and accountability. Based thereon, Mr. Helmick determines whether a base salary increase or decrease is considered to be merited based upon individual performance and presents his base salary adjustment recommendations to the Compensation Committee. For 2019, the Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Helmick’s base salary from $445,000 to $460,000, an increase of approximately 3.4%, effective April 1, 2019. As a result of the evaluations and recommendations by Mr. Helmick, the following merit-based base salary adjustments were made in 2019 for the remaining named executive officers effective April 1, 2019: (i) Mr. Culp received a base salary increase of approximately 3.25% from $240,005 to $247,318; (ii) Mr. Witmer received a base salary increase of approximately 2.75% from $275,000 to $281,875; (iii) Mr. Graham received a base salary increase of approximately 2.5% from $182,228 to $186,728; and (v) Ms. Soukenik received a base salary increase of approximately 3.0% from $181,935 to $187,392.

Annual Incentive Plan

The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based annual cash incentives are an effective way to compensate executives for working together as a team to achieve short-term specific financial goals, which the Compensation Committee and management have established as near-term drivers of our long-term success, as well as certain individualized goals specific to an executive’s role and duties. The following is a discussion of the Annual Incentive Plan as it continued to be implemented by the Compensation Committee during 2019.

The Annual Incentive Plan is intended to foster superior financial results by providing equitable and attainable corporate-wide incentives that reward individual and team efforts to achieve specified performance objectives as determined and applied each fiscal year. The program provides our executive officers and certainnon-executive employees the opportunity to receive annual cash incentive payments based upon achievement of such corporate and individual performance goals. Our full-time and part-time, regular,non-commissioned-based associates and executives, as well as those of our subsidiaries, are generally eligible to participate in the Annual Incentive Plan.

29

In 2019, the Compensation Committee established the target bonus opportunities under the Annual Incentive Plan for each eligible named executive officer expressed as a percentage of base salary. The following table sets forth such target bonus opportunities for each participating named executive officer:

Payments under the Annual Incentive Plan are contingent primarily on the achievement ofpre-established performance goals relating to objective financial metrics established for each participating named executive officer by the Compensation Committee, and secondarily upon the results of a subjective evaluation of each individual executive’s performance. Each of the elements has an assigned weight and each of the objective financial criteria has a specific target or goal for the year. In the event that we (or the individual participant) do not meet the specified goal or target for a particular metric, then no compensation will be paid with respect to that objective portion of the Annual Incentive Plan.

The Compensation Committee established a threshold payout of 50% of target opportunity upon attaining a threshold level of the objective metrics, a target payout of 100% upon attaining 100% of the target level of the objective metrics, and a maximum payout of 150% of target opportunity upon attaining at or greater than a maximum level of the objective metrics. For performance falling within each of the percentile ranges, payouts are made on an interpolated basis.

In establishing the Annual Incentive Plan’s objective metrics and targets for 2019, the Compensation Committee utilized the Company’s budgeting model to set the performance at levels that were determined to be achievable with strong management performance. All named executive officers were allocated certain weightings of three core corporate financial measures: earnings per share (“EPS”), return on average assets (“ROA”), and efficiency ratio. Those were the sole objective performance criteria allocated to Messrs. Helmick, Culp, and Witmer. The named executive officers other than Messrs. Helmick, Culp, and Witmer had additional objective metrics based on their specific areas of responsibility and oversight. Finally, in addition to the objective performance metrics, a subjective metric was included for each of the named executive officers weighted at 20% for Messrs. Helmick, Culp, and Witmer, and 10% for Mr. Graham and Ms. Soukenik. The subjective factor is evaluated based on a scorecard assessment for each individual’s performance. Mr. Graham and Ms. Soukenik had additional objective metrics based on their respective areas of responsibility. The following tables set forth the applicable objective performance metrics, weightings, targets and percentage payouts on such objective metrics for each of the named executive officers under the Annual Incentive Plan in 2019:

Kevin J. Helmick, Carl D. Culp and Mark R. Witmer

30

Mark L. Graham

Amber Wallace Soukenik

In addition to the objective performance metrics described above, the Compensation Committee included a subjective metric for each of the named executive officers, weighted at 20% of the total bonus opportunity with payout ranging from 0% to 100% of this qualitative metric. The subjective metric for Mr Graham and Ms. Soukenik was weighted at 10% of their total bonus opportunity with payout ranging from 0% to 100%. Payouts under the subjective metric were based on evaluations of overall job performance during 2019 using an extensive performance review scorecard for each executive. For each named executive officer other than Mr. Helmick, the scorecards were completed by Mr. Helmick and he provided the basis of his evaluations to the Compensation Committee for the subjective portion of the executive’s bonus for 2019. For Mr. Helmick, each member of the Board of Directors provided input on Mr. Helmick’s performance under goals established in five areas of core competencies: Business Planning, Change/Crisis Management, Communications, Self-Management and Development, and Managing Executive Performance and Development. These evaluations were considered by the Compensation Committee in reaching its determination with respect to the subjective element of Mr. Helmick’s 2019 annual bonus. Based upon such reviews and recommendations, the Compensation Committee approved the following percentage payouts with respect to the subjective element of the total bonus opportunity: (i) Mr. Helmick, 100% of the possible 20% weighting; (ii) Mr. Culp, 100% of the possible 20% weighting; (iii) Mr. Witmer, 100% of the possible 20% weighting, (iv) Mr. Graham, 100% of the possible 10% weighting, and Ms. Soukenik, 100% of the possible 10% weighting.

Finally, the Compensation Committee continued to include a circuit breaker in the 2019 Annual Incentive Plan, based on Farmers’ “Texas ratio” for the year. The Texas ratio is determined by dividing the amount of Farmers Bank’snon-performing loans, other real estate owned, and loans delinquent for more than 90 days, by Farmers Bank’s tangible capital equity plus its loan loss reserves. If this ratio exceeds 15% for the year, no bonuses are payable under the Annual Incentive Plan. Farmers’ Texas ratio for 2019 was approximately 3]%, well below this circuit breaker level. The Compensation Committee believes that the use

31

of a circuit breaker in our annual bonus program helps maintain minimum levels of safety and soundness of our institution in the context of providing appropriate near-term incentives for achieving superior financial performance objectives.

As a result of the performance of Farmers with respect to the above-described objective metrics and each named executive officer’s individual performance evaluations, the Compensation Committee awarded the following payouts with respect to 2019 performance under the Annual Incentive Plan:

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plans

Under our LTI Cash Program, executive officers and certain other employees are eligible to receive awards for possible long-term cash incentive payments based on the achievement of prescribed corporate and/or individual performance metrics. The purpose of the LTI Cash Program is to foster and promote Farmers’ long-term financial success and value by motivating performance through long-term incentive compensation, pending review and approval by the Compensation Committee. The LTI Cash Program is also intended to attract and retain the services of talented individuals and motivate participants to achieve performance objectives that promote sound and financially healthy growth. The LTI Cash Program may continue until terminated by the Board of Directors.

Our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan was adopted by our Board of Directors and shareholders to promote Farmers’ long-term financial success and increase shareholder value by motivating performance through equity-based long-term incentive compensation. The 2017 Equity Incentive Plan was also intended to encourage participants to acquire ownership interests in the Company, attract and retain talented executives and directors, and enable participants to participate in the Company’s long-term growth and financial success.

In 2017, the Compensation Committee established the target award opportunities under the LTI Cash Program and 2017 Equity Incentive Plan for each eligible named executive officer, expressed as a percentage of a participant’s base salary, and established the following long-term incentive opportunity for each executive:

32

The following table sets forth the target level of long-term incentive compensation opportunity for each participating named executive officer at the time of grant in 2017:

The following table indicates the threshold, target and maximum performance levels (for performance falling within each of the percentile ranges, payout or vesting was to occur on an interpolated basis) and the results of our relative TSR and relative average annual ROE performance, as adjusted, for the Performance Period, with the percentage payouts for the LTI Cash Program and 2017 Equity Incentive Plan awards granted in 2017. For performance falling below threshold, no award payout or vesting was to occur. Percentage payout opportunities for the cash-based awards under the LTI Cash Program ranged from 20% vesting for performing at the threshold 25^th percentile of peer group, 100% for performing at the target 50^th percentile, and 200% vesting for performing at or above the 75^th percentile. The share-based awards under the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan were granted at the maximum payout level of 200% of target opportunity, so the percentage payout opportunities ranged from 10% vesting for performing at the threshold level of the 25^th percentile of peer group, 50% vesting for performing at the target 50^th percentile, and 100% vesting for performing at or above the 75^th percentile (equivalent to 200%, or maximum, of target opportunity). The following table summarizes the percentage payouts for our 2017 long-term performance awards. Although the Compensation Committee has certified performance and vesting levels for the 2017 long-term performance awards, the awards will not be settled until April 21, 2019. Payout amounts under the LTI Cash Program for each named executive officer are included in“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation,” column (g), of theSummary Compensation Table located on page 40 of this proxy statement.

Vesting Summary of 2017-2019 Long-Term Performance Awards

33

In 2019, the Compensation Committee established the long-term incentive compensation target opportunities for each eligible named executive officer under our LTI Cash Program and our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, expressed as a percentage of base salary at the time of grant, as follows:

In conjunction with establishing the target long-term incentive opportunity for our executive officers in 2019, the Compensation Committee, determined to maintain an allocation of 25% of our total long-term compensation opportunity to service-based awards, subject to three-year cliff vesting. We continued to allocate the remaining 75% of the target long-term incentive opportunity to performance-based awards, for which we continued to use relative TSR and relative average ROE as the performance metrics, with the same mix of cash-based and equity-based long-term performance awards as follows: (i) 25% in cash-based awards under our LTI Cash Program subject to vesting based on relative TSR compared to our peer group over a performance period ending December 31, 2021, and (ii) 50% in equity-based grants under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan subject to vesting based on relative average ROE compared to our peer group over a performance period ending December 31, 2021.

The following table indicates our intended payouts at the threshold, target and maximum levels for our 2019 long-term incentive awards under both the LTI Cash Program and the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, with relative performance compared to our 2019 Peer Group, consistent with grants of long-term incentive awards in recent years. The maximum award opportunity was established at 200% of the target opportunity.

For performance falling within each of the percentile ranges, payouts or vesting will occur on an interpolated basis. The amounts of the threshold, target and maximum award payouts or vesting that may be received by each of our named executive officers upon completion of the 2019-2021 Performance Period with regard to long-term incentive awards granted in 2019 under the LTI Cash Program and the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan is described in detail in theGrants of Plan Based Awards table located on page 42 of this proxy statement.

Clawback Policy

Farmers has adopted a clawback policy as part of its Incentive Compensation Guidelines. Pursuant to that policy, if the Company is required to restate all or a significant portion of its financial statements, the Board is empowered, in its discretion, to require reimbursement of

34

all or any portion of bonuses paid or incentive compensation awarded to any participant in an incentive compensation program (including equity-based awards), and/or effect the cancellation of all or any portion of unpaid awards which may be paid to such participants if: (a) the amount of the bonus or incentive compensation was calculated based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a material restatement, and (b) the amount of the bonus or incentive compensation that would have been awarded to the participant, had the financial results been properly reported, would have been lower than the amount actually awarded. The Company acknowledges under this policy that it is not intended to add any forfeiture obligations or financial responsibilities to the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer which are in addition to, or duplicative of, those obligations arising under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Furthermore, if a participant in any incentive compensation program engages in misconduct related to such program, regardless of whether any restatement of financial statements is required as a result thereof, the Board shall take such actions as it considers appropriate to address the misconduct. Such actions may include cancellation of any unpaid portion of incentive compensation awarded to such participant, reimbursement of any incentive compensation paid to such participant, and other disciplinary actions.

401(k) Plan and Company Contributions

All of our employees who have completed at least one year of service and meet certain other eligibility requirements are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Profit Sharing Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, employees may voluntarily defer a portion of their annual compensation, subject to applicable federal restrictions and deferral limitations, and Farmers Bank matches a percentage of each participant’s voluntary contributions, up to 6% of gross wages. In addition, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, Farmers Bank may make an additional profit sharing contribution to the 401(k) Plan. During 2019, Farmers Bank provided 401(k) Plan matching contributions of 50% for each of the named executive officers (subject to a maximum of 3% of gross wages), but no additional profit sharing contributions were made.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

In 2015, we adopted an unfunded nonqualified retirement plan for certain of our executive officers (the “Nonqualified Plan”) pursuant to which such officers may voluntarily defer a greater portion of their compensation than permitted by applicable federal restrictions and deferral limitations in our 401(k) Plan. Participating officers are at all times 100% vested in their voluntary deferrals. The Company may also provide matching or discretionary credits to the accounts of eligible officers, as determined by the Company in its sole discretion. The Company currently intends to credit matching contributions equal to 50% of each participant’s voluntary deferrals to the Nonqualified Plan, up to 6% of gross wages (or a 3% match). Any matching or discretionary credits under the Nonqualified Plan vest and becomenon-forfeitable in accordance with a specified formula that provides for partial vesting starting after completion of two years and full vesting after six years. Upon aChange-in-Control (as defined in the Nonqualified Plan), participants’ benefits under the Nonqualified Plan become fully vested andnon-forfeitable. Benefits under the Nonqualified Plan represent unsecured general obligations of the Company to pay participating officers at some time in the future.

The Nonqualified Plan allows for discretionary additional annual contributions by the Company for the benefit of eligible participating officers, based on a percentage of each

35

participant’s total eligible compensation, as determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. With respect to calendar year 2019, the Compensation Committee approved a discretionary contribution of 2.5%, in the total amount of approximately $79,000, a slight increase from the 2% contribution approved for 2018.

The amounts accrued pursuant to the Nonqualified Plan for the benefit of our named executive officers for calendar year 2019 are disclosed in theSummary Compensation Table located on page 40 of this proxy statement. The Compensation Committee believes that maintaining this Nonqualified Plan helps to maintain the competitiveness of our entire executive retirement benefits.

Amounts payable to participating officers under the Nonqualified Plan will be distributed in accordance with the terms of the Nonqualified Plan and elections made by the participating officers. Benefits generally will be paid in a single lump sum unless the participating officer has elected to receive annual installments for a period of up to ten years. The benefits will be paid upon the earliest of a participating officer’s separation from service death or disability unless the participating officer has elected to receive payments as of a specified date (including the earlier of that date or the occurrence of a regular distribution event). The Nonqualified Plan is subject to requirements affecting deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and is being administered in compliance with the applicable regulations under Section 409A.

Perquisites and Other Compensation

Executive officers also participate in broad-based employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, supplemental disability, retiree health insurance and term life insurance programs. Except for matching contributions in connection with our Nonqualified Plan as described above, and country club memberships provided by Farmers Bank to the named executive officers for customer relationship development purposes, executive officers did not receive any perquisites or personal benefits in 2019 that are not available to all employees. The amounts of these benefits are included in the “All Other Compensation” column (i) of theSummary Compensation Table located on page 40 of this proxy statement.

Other Elements of Our Executive Compensation Programs

Employment Agreements, Separation Policy and Change in Control Arrangements

The Compensation Committee carefully considers the use and conditions of any employment related agreements. Although employment agreements that contain severance and change in control arrangements may be appropriate to attract prospective executives who forego significant other employment opportunities, we determined in 2013 to adopt an Executive Separation Policy that applies to all of our executive officers in lieu of employment agreements. In connection with that implementation, we entered into change in control agreements with each of our executive officers (“Change in Control Agreements”). The material provisions of the Executive Separation Policy and the Change in Control Agreements are discussed under the caption“EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION – Employment Agreements, Change in Control Agreements, Executive Separation Policy” beginning on page 48 of this proxy statement.

Overall, the Compensation Committee believes that the implementation of the Executive Separation Policy and Change in Control Agreements is appropriate to help ensure that

36

Farmers will have the continued dedication, undivided loyalty and objective advice from its key executives, even in the event of a potential transaction that could result in a change in control of Farmers. The Separation Policy offers certain protections in the event of certain terminations of employment, while the Change in Control Agreements provide certain protections in the event of a change in control event, butonly if the executive’s employment is terminated as a result of (or within a specified period after) a change in control (i.e., a double trigger). The Compensation Committee does not believe that executives should receive compensation benefits merely as a result of a change in control; rather, it believes that our Change in Control Agreements provide our executive officers with adequate protection to help ensure that change in control offers will be evaluated by our executive officers in the best interests of Farmers and our shareholders without regard to concerns that a transaction could eliminate his or her job without appropriate dispensation. The Compensation Committee recognizes that these agreements may also tend to discourage a takeover attempt as a change in control could trigger increased compensation expense as part of the transaction.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

As applicable for 2019, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) placed a limit on the tax deduction for compensation exceeding $1.0 million paid to the chief executive officer and four most highly compensated executive officers of a corporation. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which became effective on January 1, 2018, eliminated both the prior performance-based exception to the $1.0 millionper-executive annual limit on deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m) and the exclusion of the chief financial officer. While the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors will continue to determine the level and structure of compensation in the manner they determine to be appropriate in order to attract and retain executive leadership and serve the needs of Farmers and its constituents, such levels and structure of executive compensation will no longer be considered within the framework of the Section 162(m) performance-based exception.

Stock Ownership Guidelines and Anti-Hedging Policy

As part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, we have adopted stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executive officers which require that, within five years from the date a person first becomes anon-executive director, or within either eight years of March 15, 2016 or seven years from the date an executive officer is first included as a participant in our long-term incentive equity plans (unless, due to specific facts and circumstances, a different period of time is determined to be appropriate by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee), the following amounts of Common Shares be owned by that person:

Individuals subject to these guidelines are expected to satisfy certain milestones during the attainment periods to evidence that the individual is making appropriate progress toward achieving their respective ownership amount. In determining compliance with these

37

guidelines, the Compensation Committee considers the beneficial ownership of our executive officers and directors as required to be reported in a proxy statement.

In additional to these requirements, our executive officers and directors are prohibited under our insider trading policy and procedures from pledging our Common Shares, purchasing our Common Shares on margin, engaging in short sales, or engaging in any hedging transaction involving our Common Shares.

Director Compensation

The Compensation Committee is also responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors compensation for ournon-employee directors. Generally, director compensation is structured in a fashion to attract and retain high quality individuals to serve on the Board of Directors, to compensate such individuals for the time and energy expended in providing us their expertise, considering the size, nature and location of Farmers as a bank holding company competing in our markets. On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee requests that its compensation consultant evaluate our current director compensation levels relative to our peers. Generally, it is the overall goal of the Compensation Committee to position director compensation at a median market level. For calendar year 2019, the Compensation Committee recommended and the independent members of the Board of Directors approved continuing the following compensation levels fornon-executive directors (a) general annual retainer fee of $45,000, and (b) the following retainers for directors with additional duties: (i) $25,000 for the independent Board chair, (ii) $20,000 for the independent Board vice-chair, (iii) $10,000 for the Executive Committee chair, and (iv) $5,000 for all other committee chairs.

All director compensation amounts for 2019 are reflected in theDirectorCompensationtable located on page 54 of this proxy statement.

Oversight and Risk Management of Compensation Programs

The Compensation Committee oversees the implementation and enforcement of our policies, procedures and practices related to its various compensation programs as part of its duties. This is designed to monitor our compensation policies to ensure that the compensation packages offered to its employees and executive officers do not present such individuals with the potential to engage in excessive or inappropriate risk taking activities. In addition, the Board Enterprise Risk Management Committee works with the Compensation Committee in order to monitor our compensation policies, procedures and practices, as part of its duties to monitor enterprise-wide risk.

The Compensation and Board Enterprise Risk Management Committees believe that our current compensation structure for employees and executive officers does not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking to the extent that it would reasonably likely lead to a material adverse effect. It is the opinion of the Compensation and Board Enterprise Risk Management Committees that our current compensation programs appropriately balance risk and the desire to focus on our short-term and the long-term goals without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the last completed fiscal year, no member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of Farmers or any of our subsidiaries, or was formerly an officer of Farmers or any of our subsidiaries. None of our directors had any business or financial relationship with us requiring disclosure in this proxy statement.

38

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed this Compensation Discussion and Analysis with Farmers’ management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that this Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and our Annual Report onForm 10-K.

Compensation Committee:

David Z. Paull, Chair

Anne Frederick Crawford

Terry A. Moore

James R. Smail

39

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation

The following table provides summary compensation information for the individuals serving as our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers serving on December 31, 2019.

Summary Compensation Table

40

41

Grants of Plan Based Awards

42

2019 Named Executive Officer Compensation Components

The primary elements of each executive officer’s total compensation reported in theSummary Compensation Table are the executive officer’s base salary, annual incentive bonus, and long-term incentive compensation. Each executive officer also received certain other benefits as listed in the“All Other Compensation” column.

Base Salary

In 2019, the Compensation Committee continued to implement its base salary positioning philosophy of seeking to establish executive officer base salaries at or near the 50th percentile of our peer group banks. Base salary increases to our named executive officers in 2019 were consistent generally with baseline increases approved for all employees, except where further adjustments were warranted based on outstanding or poor personal performance or peer market median alignment. Each named executive officer’s base salary is reviewed annually and is subject to adjustments based upon our financial performance, individual performance and our overall compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee conducts an annual evaluation of the performance of Mr. Helmick in light of specified goals and objectives with input from each independent director. Based on such evaluation and input, the Compensation Committee determines the compensation of Mr. Helmick and discusses its determination with all independent directors. All other executive officers are evaluated on a variety of factors including leadership performance, strategic planning and execution, communication abilities, business knowledge, and awareness and accountability. Based thereon, Mr. Helmick determines whether a base salary increase or decrease is considered to be merited based upon individual performance and presents his base salary adjustment recommendations to the Compensation Committee. As a result of the evaluations by the Compensation Committee of Mr. Helmick, and the recommendations by Mr. Helmick regarding the remaining named executive officers as described above, the following merit-based base salary adjustments were made in 2019: (i) Mr. Helmick received a base salary increase of approximately 3.4% to $460,000; (ii) Mr. Culp received a base salary increase of approximately 3% to $247,318, based on a peer group based market adjustment and annual evaluation; (iii) Mr. Witmer received a base salary increase of approximately 2.5% to $281,875; (iv) Mr. Graham received a base salary increase of approximately 2.5% to $186,728; and (v) Ms. Soukenik received a base salary increase of approximately 3.0% to $187,392.

Annual Incentive Plan

Our Annual Incentive Plan provides certain of our executive officers andnon-executive employees the opportunity to receive annual cash incentive payments based upon achievement of certain corporate and individual performance goals. The Annual Incentive Plan is intended to foster superior financial results by providing corporate-wide incentives that reward individual and team effort to achieve specified performance objectives determined for

43

each fiscal year. The 2019 target bonus award opportunities (expressed as a percentage of base salary) and the 2019 bonus targets for each named executive officer under the Annual Incentive Plan are disclosed on page 30 of this proxy statement under “2019 Named Executive Officers Compensation –Annual Incentive Plan.”

Payments under the Annual Incentive Plan are contingent primarily upon the achievement ofpre-established performance goals during a fiscal year relating to objective financial metrics established by the Compensation Committee, and secondarily upon the results of a subjective evaluation of each individual executive’s performance. Each of the elements has an assigned weight and each of the objective financial criteria has a specific target or goal for the year. In the event that we (or the individual participant) do not meet the specified goal or target for a particular metric, then no compensation will be paid with respect to that objective portion of the Annual Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee established a threshold payout of 50% of target opportunity upon attaining a threshold level of the objective metric targets, a target payout of 100% upon attainment of 100% of the objective metric targets, and a maximum payout of 150% of target opportunity upon attaining at or greater than a maximum level of the objective metrics. For performance falling within each of the percentile ranges, payouts are made on an interpolated basis.

In establishing the Annual Incentive Plan’s objective metrics and targets for 2019, the Compensation Committee utilized the Company’s budgeting model to set the performance at levels that were determined to be achievable with strong management performance. All named executive officers were allocated certain weightings of the following three core corporate financial measures: earnings per share, efficiency ratio, and return on average assets. Those were the sole objective performance criteria allocated to Messrs. Helmick, Culp, and Witmer. The named executive officers other than Messrs. Helmick, Culp, and Witmer had significant additional objective metrics based on their specific areas of responsibility and oversight. Finally, in addition to the objective performance metrics, a subjective metric was included for each of the named executive officers, with a weighting of 20% of the total bonus opportunity for Messrs. Helmick, Culp, and Witmer, and a weighting of 10% for Mr. Graham and Ms. Soukenik. The objective performance metrics, weightings, targets and percentage payouts based on actual performance for each of our named executive officers under the Annual Incentive Plan in 2019 is set forth in detail in the tables beginning on page 30 of this proxy statement under “2019 Named Executive Officers Compensation –Annual Incentive Plan.”

Payouts under the subjective element for each named executive officer were based on evaluations of overall job performance during 2019 using an extensive performance review scorecard for each executive. For each named executive officer other than Mr. Helmick, the scorecards were completed by Mr. Helmick and provided the basis of his recommendations to the Compensation Committee for the subjective portion of the executive’s bonus for 2019. For Mr. Helmick, each member of the Board of Directors completed a scorecard which were reviewed by the Compensation Committee in reaching a determination with respect to the subjective element of Mr. Helmick’s 2019 annual bonus. Based upon such reviews, the Compensation Committee approved the following percentage payouts with respect to the subjective element of the total bonus opportunity for 2019: (i) Mr. Helmick, 100% of the possible 20% weighting; (ii) Mr. Culp, 100% of the possible 20% weighting; (iii) Mr. Witmer, 100% of the possible 20% weighting; (iv) Mr. Graham, 100% of the possible 20% weighting; and (v) Ms. Soukenik, 100% of the possible 10% weighting.

Finally, the Compensation Committee includes a circuit breaker in the Annual Incentive Plan based on our “Texas ratio” for the year, determined by dividing the amount of Farmers

44

Bank’snon-performing loans, other real estate owned and loans delinquent for more than 90 days, by Farmers Bank’s tangible capital equity plus its loan loss reserves. If this ratio exceeds 15% for the year, no bonuses are payable under the Annual Incentive Plan. Farmers’ Texas ratio for 2019 was approximately 3%, well below this circuit breaker level. The Compensation Committee believes that the use of a circuit breaker as part of our annual bonus program helps maintain minimum levels of safety and soundness of our institution while seeking to provide appropriate near-term incentives for achieving superior financial performance objectives.

As a result of the performance of Farmers with respect to the above-described objective metrics and each named executive officer’s individual performance evaluations, the Compensation Committee awarded the following payouts with respect to 2019 performance under the Annual Incentive Plan:

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

In 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the issuance to our named executive officers of (i) service-based long-term incentive awards, (ii) performance-based long-term equity incentive awards, and (iii) performance-based long-term cash incentive awards, under both our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan and our LTI Cash Program, the amounts of which are set forth in theGrants of Plan-Based Awards table located on page 42 of this proxy statement. The amounts of these long-term equity incentive awards and those granted in 2017 and 2018 are set forth below in theOutstanding Equity Awards atYear-End table.

A detailed discussion of the vesting criteria and other terms and conditions for such all long-term incentive plan awards is included under “2019 Named Executive Officers Compensation –Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plans” beginning on page 32 of this proxy statement.

45

Outstanding Equity Awards atYear-End