UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2019
or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File No. 001-09195
KB HOME
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
Delaware | 95-3666267 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90024
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 231-4000
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | | | |
Title of each class | | Trading Symbol(s) | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock (par value $1.00 per share) | | KBH | | New York Stock Exchange |
Rights to Purchase Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock | | | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer | ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
| | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on May 31, 2019 was $2,414,644,120, including 7,859,975 shares held by the registrant’s grantor stock ownership trust and excluding 24,264,256 shares held in treasury.
There were 89,606,551 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding on December 31, 2019. The registrant’s grantor stock ownership trust held an additional 7,630,582 shares of the registrant’s common stock on that date.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (incorporated into Part III).
KB HOME
FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| | Page Number |
|
Item 1. | | |
Item 1A. | | |
Item 1B. | | |
Item 2. | | |
Item 3. | | |
Item 4. | | |
Information about our Executive Officers | |
|
|
Item 5. | | |
Item 6. | | |
Item 7. | | |
Item 7A. | | |
Item 8. | | |
Item 9. | | |
Item 9A. | | |
Item 9B. | | |
|
|
Item 10. | | |
Item 11. | | |
Item 12. | | |
Item 13. | | |
Item 14. | | |
|
|
Item 15. | | |
Item 16. | | |
| |
PART I
General
KB Home is one of the largest and most recognized homebuilding companies in the U.S. We have been building homes for over 60 years, with more than 600,000 homes delivered since our founding in 1957. We build a variety of new homes designed primarily for first-time and first move-up, as well as second move-up and active adult homebuyers, including attached and detached single-family residential homes, townhomes and condominiums. We offer homes in development communities, at urban in-fill locations and as part of mixed-use projects. Our homebuilding operations represent the majority of our business, accounting for 99.7% of our total revenues in 2019. Our financial services operations, which accounted for the remaining .3% of our total revenues in 2019, offer various insurance products to our homebuyers in the markets where we build homes and provide title services in certain of those markets. Our financial services operations also provide mortgage banking services, including residential consumer mortgage loan (“mortgage loan”) originations, to our homebuyers indirectly through KBHS Home Loans, LLC (“KBHS”), an unconsolidated joint venture we formed with Stearns Ventures, LLC (“Stearns”).
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” used in this report refer to KB Home, a Delaware corporation, and its predecessors and subsidiaries. We also use the following terms in our business with the corresponding meanings: “home” is a single-family residence, whether it is a single-family home or other type of residential property; “homes delivered” are homes for which the sale has closed and title has passed to a customer; “community” is a single development in which new homes are constructed as part of an integrated plan; and “community count” is the number of communities we have open for sales with at least five homes/lots left to sell.
The following charts present homes delivered, homebuilding revenues, homebuilding operating income and pretax income for the years ended November 30, 2017, 2018 and 2019:
Markets
Reflecting the geographic reach of our homebuilding business, we have ongoing operations in the eight states and 42 major markets presented below. We also operate in various submarkets within these major markets. We may refer to these markets and submarkets collectively as our “served markets.” For reporting purposes, we organize our homebuilding operations into four segments — West Coast, Southwest, Central and Southeast.
|
| | | | |
Segment | | States | | Major Market(s) |
| | | | |
West Coast | | California | | Contra Costa County, Elk Grove, Fresno, Los Angeles, Hollister, Madera, Modesto, Oakland, Orange County, Riverside, Sacramento, Salinas, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Rosa-Petaluma, Stockton, Vallejo, Ventura and Yuba City |
| | Washington | | Olympia and Seattle |
Southwest | | Arizona | | Phoenix and Tucson |
| | Nevada | | Las Vegas |
Central | | Colorado | | Denver and Loveland |
| | Texas | | Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio |
Southeast | | Florida | | Daytona Beach, Fort Myers, Jacksonville, Lakeland, Melbourne, Orlando, Sarasota and Tampa |
| | North Carolina | | Raleigh |
Segment Operating Information. The following table presents certain operating information for our homebuilding reporting segments for the years ended November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollars in millions, except average selling price):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
West Coast: | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 3,214 |
| | 3,152 |
| | 3,387 |
|
Percentage of total homes delivered | 27 | % | | 28 | % | | 31 | % |
Average selling price | $ | 592,300 |
| | $ | 661,500 |
| | $ | 644,900 |
|
Homebuilding revenues (a) | $ | 1,912.2 |
| | $ | 2,085.3 |
| | $ | 2,186.4 |
|
Southwest: | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 2,346 |
| | 2,301 |
| | 1,837 |
|
Percentage of total homes delivered | 20 | % | | 20 | % | | 17 | % |
Average selling price | $ | 322,000 |
| | $ | 307,300 |
| | $ | 290,200 |
|
Homebuilding revenues (a) | $ | 764.8 |
| | $ | 707.1 |
| | $ | 533.1 |
|
Central: | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 4,291 |
| | 4,113 |
| | 4,136 |
|
Percentage of total homes delivered | 36 | % | | 36 | % | | 38 | % |
Average selling price | $ | 293,500 |
| | $ | 297,400 |
| | $ | 284,800 |
|
Homebuilding revenues (a) | $ | 1,267.9 |
| | $ | 1,239.3 |
| | $ | 1,188.8 |
|
Southeast: | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 2,020 |
| | 1,751 |
| | 1,549 |
|
Percentage of total homes delivered | 17 | % | | 16 | % | | 14 | % |
Average selling price | $ | 293,200 |
| | $ | 286,600 |
| | $ | 284,100 |
|
Homebuilding revenues (a) | $ | 592.8 |
| | $ | 502.1 |
| | $ | 448.0 |
|
Total: | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 11,871 |
| | 11,317 |
| | 10,909 |
|
Average selling price | $ | 380,000 |
| | $ | 399,200 |
| | $ | 397,400 |
|
Homebuilding revenues (a) | $ | 4,537.7 |
| | $ | 4,533.8 |
| | $ | 4,356.3 |
|
| |
(a) | Homebuilding revenues include revenues from housing and, if applicable, land sales. |
Additional financial and operational information related to our homebuilding reporting segments, including revenues, operating income (loss), pretax income (loss), inventories and assets, is provided below in Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 2 – Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Business Strategy
Our core business strategy, which we have evolved from KB2020 to KB Edge™, is to expand our scale primarily within our current geographic footprint to achieve a top-five position in each of our served markets (based on homes delivered). KB Edge is a systematic, fact-based and process-driven approach to homebuilding that is grounded in gaining a detailed understanding of consumers’ location and product preferences and product price-to-value perceptions. In our business, we use the term “product” to mean and encompass a home’s floor plan design and interior/exterior style, amenities, functions and features.
KB Edge consists of the following key principles with respect to customers, land, products and operations:
| |
• | Customers. With our customer-centered, Built-to-Order™ homebuying process, we provide each of our homebuyers with a highly personalized experience where they can make a wide range of structural and design choices for their future new home. Our community teams of sales representatives, design consultants and other personnel partner closely with each homebuyer through each major step in the design, construction and closing of their KB home. We believe this highly interactive, “customer-first” experience that puts our homebuyers firmly in control of designing a home with the particular features and amenities they want based on how they live and what they value, at an affordable price, promotes customer |
satisfaction and gives us a meaningful and distinct competitive advantage over other homebuilders and resale and rental homes.
| |
• | Land. We seek to manage our working capital and reduce our operating risks by primarily acquiring entitled land parcels within attractive submarkets as identified by our market research activities. We typically focus on metropolitan areas with favorable long-term economic and population growth prospects that we believe have the potential to sustain a minimum of 800 homes delivered per year, and target land parcels that meet our investment return standards. Identified consumer preferences and home sales activity largely direct where our land acquisition teams search for available land. We focus on investments that provide a one- to two-year supply of land or lots per product line, per community, and individual assets that are generally between 50 to 200 lots in size. Our primary focus continues to be our existing geographic footprint, encompassing markets we identified for their long-term economic and demographic growth potential. We leverage the relationships we have with land owners, developers and brokers to find and acquire land parcels, and use our experience in working with municipalities to efficiently obtain development approvals. |
| |
• | Products. We offer our customers a base product with a standardized set of functions and features that is generally priced to be affordable for the local area’s median household income level. As noted above, with our Built-to-Order approach, our customers have the opportunity to select their lot location within a community, floor plan, elevation and structural options, and to personalize their homes with numerous interior design options and upgrades in our design studios. Our design studios, generally centrally located within our served markets, are a key component of our Built-to-Order process, and the mix of design options and upgrades they offer are primarily based on the preferences identified by our market survey and purchase frequency data. We utilize a centralized internal architectural group that designs homes to meet or exceed customers’ price-to-value expectations while being as efficient as possible to construct. To enhance the simplicity and efficiency of our products and processes, our architectural group has developed a core series of high-frequency, flexible floor plans and elevations that we can offer across many of our served markets. Our standardized plans allow us to more effectively shift with local demand and developable land attributes, help us to better understand the cost to build our products and enable us to compare and implement best practices across divisions and communities. We also incorporate energy-efficient features into our product designs to help lower our homebuyers’ total cost of homeownership and reduce our homes’ impact on the environment, as further discussed below. |
| |
• | Operations. In addition to differentiating us from other high-production homebuilders, our Built-to-Order process helps drive low-cost production. We generally commence construction of a home only after we have a signed purchase contract with a homebuyer and have obtained preliminary credit approval or other evidence of the homebuyer’s financial ability to purchase the home, and seek to build a backlog of sold homes. By maintaining a substantial backlog, along with centralized scheduling and standardized reporting processes, we have established a disciplined and scalable operational platform that helps us sustain an even-flow production of pre-sold homes. This reduces our inventory risk, promotes construction efficiencies and enhances our relationships with independent subcontractors and other business partners, and provides us with greater visibility and predictability on future deliveries as we grow. |
There may be market-driven circumstances where we believe it is necessary or appropriate to temporarily deviate from certain of the above principles. These deviations may include starting construction on a small number of homes in a community before corresponding purchase contracts are signed with homebuyers to more quickly meet customer delivery expectations and generate revenues; or acquiring land parcels in peripheral neighborhoods of a core metropolitan area that otherwise fit our growth strategy and meet our investment return standards. In addition, other circumstances could arise in the future that may lead us to make specific short-term shifts from these principles.
Returns-Focused Growth Plan. In 2016, we implemented a Returns-Focused Growth Plan designed to generate higher revenues and improve our homebuilding operating income margin, return on invested capital, return on equity and leverage ratio, and to achieve certain related financial targets by the end of our 2019 fiscal year, principally through executing on our core business strategy, as discussed above, and improving our asset efficiency.
The 2019 financial targets under our Returns-Focused Growth Plan were as follows:
| |
• | Housing revenues greater than $5.0 billion. |
| |
• | Homebuilding operating income margin, excluding inventory-related charges, of 8.0% to 9.0%. |
| |
• | Return on invested capital in excess of 10.0%. |
| |
• | Return on equity of 10.0% to 15.0%. |
| |
• | Net debt to capital ratio of 40% to 50%, which we lowered in 2018 to a net debt to capital ratio of 35% to 45%, and further tightened in 2019 to a debt to capital ratio of 35% to 45%. |
As further discussed below under Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report, we achieved most of our Returns-Focused Growth Plan objectives, and intend to continue to follow its primary tenets in 2020 and beyond. This includes working to improve our asset efficiency by, among other things, calibrating home sales rates and selling prices at each of our communities to enhance profitability; further controlling our direct construction costs within our communities; accelerating inventory turns; structuring land acquisitions to minimize upfront costs, as further discussed below under “Community Development and Land Inventory Management”; reactivating communities that have been held for future development; and deploying excess cash flow from operations to help fuel additional revenue growth and/or reduce debt. The anticipated associated revenue and pretax income growth from this strategic approach should help drive the utilization of our deferred tax assets, which totaled $364.5 million at November 30, 2019, and allow us to realize substantial tax cash savings through 2020 that can be productively deployed in our business and/or to enhance our capital structure.
Promotional Marketing Strategy. To emphasize the distinct combination of innovative design, personalization, affordability and partnership we offer to our homebuyers and our focus on providing the highest possible degree of customer satisfaction, we have, since 2018, centered our external brand identity and messaging around the concept of Built on Relationships®. Built on Relationships also encapsulates the importance of other key relationships – with suppliers, trade contractors, land sellers and municipalities – to the success of our business.
Our intense customer focus drives, among other things, how and where we acquire land for our new home communities; the design and selection of our products; our investments in, and choice of suppliers of, advanced materials, systems, equipment and technologies intended to enhance the performance and resource efficiency of our homes; and our community development and home construction methods and processes, as described in this report. In addition, we aim to present our homebuyers with a simple path to owning their unique new home with the assistance of our community team members who partner closely with homebuyers through each major step in the design, construction and closing of their home. We believe our approach sets us apart from most other homebuilders and from resale homes, and is particularly well suited for the current as well as future generations of first-time buyers – historically our core customer demographic.
Homebuyer Profile. We focus on bracketing within a range around the median household income in a submarket in order to position our product and pricing to be attainable for the largest demand segments of that submarket. Across our portfolio, we offer an array of products, from smaller, higher density homes, with average selling prices typically suited for first-time homebuyers, to larger homes in premium locations with additional amenities, with higher average selling prices that generally attract a first or second move-up homebuyer. We also offer a variety of single-story floorplans that typically appeal to an active adult homebuyer age 55 and over, as well as multi-story floorplans that attract a wide range of homebuyers. For more than a decade, approximately 75% of our annual deliveries have been to first-time and first move-up homebuyers; in 2019, it was 77% of our deliveries, as shown in the following chart:
To help elevate the KB Home brand in the marketplace, particularly for the growing number of millennial homebuyers, our promotional marketing efforts increasingly involve digital marketing, including interactive Internet-based applications, social media outlets and other evolving communication technologies.
Customer Service. Our on-site construction supervisors perform regular pre-closing quality checks and our sales representatives maintain regular contact with our homebuyers during the home construction process in an effort to ensure our homes meet our
standards and our homebuyers’ expectations. We also have employees who are responsible for responding to homebuyers’ post-closing needs, including warranty claims. Information about our limited warranty program is provided in Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Operational Structure. We operate our homebuilding business through divisions with experienced management teams who have in-depth local knowledge of their particular served markets, which helps us acquire land in preferred locations; develop communities with products that meet local demand; and understand local regulatory environments. Our division management teams exercise considerable autonomy in identifying land acquisition opportunities; developing land and communities; implementing product, marketing and sales strategies; and controlling costs. To help maintain consistent execution within the organization, our division management teams and other employees are continuously trained on KB Edge principles and are evaluated, in part, based on their achievement of relevant operational objectives.
Our corporate management and support personnel develop and oversee the implementation of company-wide strategic initiatives, our overall operational policies and internal control standards, and perform various centralized functions, including architecture; purchasing and national contracts; treasury and cash management; land acquisition approval; risk and litigation management; accounting and financial reporting; internal audit and compliance activities; information technology systems; marketing; and investor and media relations.
Community Development and Land Inventory Management
Developable land for the production of homes is a core resource for our business. Based on our current strategic plans, we seek to own or control land sufficient to meet our forecasted production goals for the next three to five years. In 2020, we intend to continue to invest in and develop land positions within attractive submarkets and selectively acquire or control additional land that meets our investment return standards. However, we may periodically sell certain land interests or monetize land previously held for future development.
Our community development process generally consists of four phases: land acquisition, land development into finished lots for a community (if necessary), home construction and delivery of completed homes to homebuyers. Historically, our community development process has typically ranged from six to 18 months in our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment, with a somewhat shorter duration in our other homebuilding reporting segments. The development process in our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment is typically longer than in our other segments due to the municipal and regulatory requirements that are generally more stringent in California. Our community development process varies based on, among other things, the extent and speed of required government approvals and utility service activations, the overall size of a particular community, the scope of necessary site preparation activities, the type of product(s) that will be offered, weather conditions, time of year, promotional marketing results, the availability of construction resources, consumer demand, local and general economic and housing market conditions, and other factors.
Although they vary significantly in size and complexity, our single-family residential home communities typically consist of 50 to 200 lots per product line, with lots ranging in size from 2,000 to 9,000 square feet. In our communities, we typically offer three to 15 home design choices. We also generally build one to three model homes at each community so that prospective homebuyers can preview the various products available. Depending on the community, we may offer premium lots containing more square footage, better views and/or location benefits. Some of our communities consist of multiple-story structures that encompass several attached condominium-style units.
Land Acquisition and Land Development. We continuously evaluate land acquisition opportunities against our investment return standards, while also balancing competing needs for financial strength, liquidity and land inventory for future growth. When we acquire land, we generally focus on parcels with lots that are entitled for residential construction and are either physically developed to start home construction (referred to as “finished lots”) or partially finished. However, depending on market conditions and available opportunities, we may acquire undeveloped and/or unentitled land. We may also invest in land that requires us to repurpose and re-entitle the property for residential use, such as in-fill developments. We expect that the overall balance of undeveloped, unentitled, entitled, partially finished and finished lots in our inventory will vary over time, and in implementing our strategic growth initiatives, we may acquire a greater proportion of undeveloped or unentitled land in the future if and as the availability of reasonably priced land with finished or partially finished lots diminishes.
We generally structure our land acquisition and land development activities to minimize, or defer the timing of, expenditures in order to reduce both the market risks associated with holding land and our working capital and financial commitments, including interest and other carrying costs. We typically use contracts that, in exchange for a small initial option payment or earnest money deposit, give us an option or similar right to acquire land at a future date, usually at a pre-determined price and pending our satisfaction with the feasibility of developing and selling homes on the land and/or an underlying land seller’s completion of certain obligations, such as securing entitlements, developing infrastructure or finishing lots. We refer to land subject to such option or
similar contractual rights as being “controlled.” Our decision to exercise a particular land option or similar right is based on the results of our due diligence and continued market viability analysis after entering into such a contract. Information related to our land option contracts and other similar contracts is provided in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments and Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
The following table presents the number of inventory lots we owned, in various stages of development, or controlled under land option contracts or other similar contracts by homebuilding reporting segment as of November 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Homes Completed or Under Construction and Land Under Development | | Land Held for Future Development or Sale | | Land Under Option (a) | | Total Land Owned or Under Option |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
West Coast | 8,586 |
| | 8,671 |
| | 918 |
| | 1,291 |
| | 3,338 |
| | 2,718 |
| | 12,842 |
| | 12,680 |
|
Southwest | 6,841 |
| | 7,730 |
| | 384 |
| | 435 |
| | 2,801 |
| | 1,650 |
| | 10,026 |
| | 9,815 |
|
Central | 14,712 |
| | 14,821 |
| | 84 |
| | 105 |
| | 8,141 |
| | 7,311 |
| | 22,937 |
| | 22,237 |
|
Southeast | 4,991 |
| | 4,377 |
| | 1,523 |
| | 2,052 |
| | 3,379 |
| | 2,466 |
| | 9,893 |
| | 8,895 |
|
Total | 35,130 |
| | 35,599 |
| | 2,909 |
| | 3,883 |
| | 17,659 |
| | 14,145 |
| | 55,698 |
| | 53,627 |
|
| |
(a) | Land under option as of November 30, 2019 and 2018 excludes 9,212 and 11,185 lots, respectively, under contract where the associated deposits were refundable at our discretion. |
The following charts present the percentage of inventory lots we owned or had under land option contracts or other similar contracts by homebuilding reporting segment and the percentage of total lots we owned and had under option, including 9,212 lots under contract where the associated deposits were refundable at our discretion, as of November 30, 2019:
Home Construction and Deliveries. Following the acquisition of land and, if necessary, the development of the land into finished lots, we typically begin constructing model homes and marketing homes for sale. To minimize the costs and risks of unsold homes in production, we generally commence construction of a home only after we have a signed purchase contract with a homebuyer and have obtained preliminary credit approval or other evidence of the homebuyer’s financial ability to purchase the home. Other than model homes, our inventories typically do not consist of completed unsold homes. However, cancellations of home purchase contracts prior to the delivery of the underlying homes, the construction of attached products with some unsold units, or specific marketing or other strategic considerations will result in our having unsold completed or partially completed homes in our inventory. Our construction cycle time from home sale to delivery is typically five to six months.
We act as the general contractor for the majority of our communities, and engage outside general contractors in all other instances. We, or the outside general contractors we engage, contract with a variety of independent subcontractors, who are typically locally based, to perform all land development and home construction work through their own employees or subcontractors. We do not self-perform any land development or home construction work. These independent subcontractors also supply some of the building materials required for such production activities. Our contracts with these independent subcontractors require that they comply with all laws applicable to their work, including wage and safety laws, meet performance standards, and follow local building codes and permits.
Raw Materials. Outside of land, the principal raw materials used in our production process are concrete and forest products. Other primary materials used in home construction include drywall, and plumbing and electrical items. We source all of our
building materials from third parties. We attempt to enhance the efficiency of our operations by using, where practical, standardized materials that are commercially available on competitive terms from a variety of outside sources. In addition, we have national and regional purchasing programs for certain building materials, appliances, fixtures and other items that allow us to benefit from large-quantity purchase discounts and, where available, participate in outside manufacturer or supplier rebate programs. When possible, we arrange for bulk purchases of these products at favorable prices from such manufacturers and suppliers.
Backlog
Our “backlog” consists of homes that are under a purchase contract but have not yet been delivered to a homebuyer. Ending backlog represents the number of homes in backlog from the previous period plus the number of net orders (new orders for homes less cancellations) generated during the current period minus the number of homes delivered during the current period. Our backlog at any given time will be affected by cancellations, homes delivered and our community count. Backlog value represents potential future housing revenues from homes in backlog. Our cancellation rates and the factors affecting such rates are further discussed below in both Item 1A – Risk Factors and Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report.
The following charts present our ending backlog (number of homes and value) by homebuilding reporting segment as of November 30, 2018 and 2019:
Employees
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had approximately 2,140 and 2,005 full-time employees, respectively. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement.
Competition, Seasonality, Delivery Mix and Other Factors
Competition. The homebuilding industry and housing market are highly competitive with respect to selling homes; contracting for construction services, such as carpentry, roofing, electrical and plumbing; and acquiring attractive developable land, though the intensity of competition can vary and fluctuate between and within individual markets and submarkets. We compete for homebuyers, construction resources and desirable land against numerous homebuilders, ranging from regional and national firms to small local enterprises. As to homebuyers, we primarily compete with other homebuilders on the basis of selling price, community location and amenities, availability of financing options, home designs, reputation, home construction cycle time, and the design options and upgrades that can be included in a home. In some cases, this competition occurs within larger residential development
projects containing separate sections other homebuilders design, plan and develop. We also compete for homebuyers against housing alternatives to new homes, including resale homes, apartments, single-family rentals and other rental housing.
In markets experiencing heavy construction activity, including areas recovering from earthquakes, wildfires, hurricanes or other natural disasters, there can be severe craft and skilled trade shortages that limit independent subcontractors’ ability to supply construction services to us, which in turn tends to drive up our costs and/or extend our production schedules. Elevated construction activity, and reallocations of staff for public safety priorities after natural disasters or otherwise, has also contributed to measurable increases in the amount of time needed to obtain governmental approvals or utility service activations and, combined with tariffs recently imposed or increased by the U.S. and other governments, the cost of certain raw building materials, such as steel, Canadian lumber, drywall and concrete, input commodities or finished products. Since 2013, we also have seen higher prices for desirable land amid heightened competition with homebuilders and other developers and investors (both domestic and international), particularly in the land-constrained areas where we operate. We expect these upward cost trends to continue in 2020, if and as housing market activity grows and there is greater competition for these resources.
Seasonality. Our performance is affected by seasonal demand trends for housing. Traditionally, there has been more consumer demand for home purchases and we tend to generate more net orders in the spring and early summer months (corresponding to most of our second quarter and part of our third quarter) than at other times of the year. This “selling season” demand results in our delivering more homes and generating higher revenues from late summer through the fall months (corresponding to part of our third quarter and all of our fourth quarter), as illustrated in the following table:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
Net Orders | | | | | | | |
2019 | 21 | % | | 32 | % | | 26 | % | | 21 | % |
2018 | 25 | % | | 32 | % | | 25 | % | | 18 | % |
2017 | 24 | % | | 31 | % | | 24 | % | | 21 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Homes Delivered | | | | | | | |
2019 | 18 | % | | 23 | % | | 26 | % | | 33 | % |
2018 | 20 | % | | 24 | % | | 26 | % | | 30 | % |
2017 | 20 | % | | 24 | % | | 25 | % | | 31 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Housing Revenues | | | | | | | |
2019 | 18 | % | | 23 | % | | 25 | % | | 34 | % |
2018 | 19 | % | | 24 | % | | 27 | % | | 30 | % |
2017 | 19 | % | | 23 | % | | 26 | % | | 32 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Delivery Mix and Other Factors. In addition to the overall volume of homes we sell and deliver, our results in a given period are significantly affected by the geographic mix of markets and submarkets in which we operate; the number and characteristics of the communities we have open for sales in those markets and submarkets; and the products we sell from those communities during the period. While there are some similarities, there are differences within and between our served markets in terms of the quantity, size and nature of the communities we operate and the products we offer to consumers. These differences reflect, among other things, local homebuyer preferences; household demographics (e.g., large families or working professionals; income levels); geographic context (e.g., urban or suburban; availability of reasonably priced finished lots; development constraints; residential density); and the shifts that can occur in these factors over time. These factors in each of our served markets will affect the costs we incur and the time it takes to locate, acquire rights to and develop land, open communities for sales, and market and build homes; the size of our homes; our selling prices (including the contribution from homebuyers’ purchases of design options and upgrades); the pace at which we sell and deliver homes and close out communities; and our housing gross profits and housing gross profit margins. Therefore, our results in any given period will fluctuate compared to other periods based on the proportion of homes delivered from areas with higher or lower selling prices and on the corresponding land and overhead costs incurred to generate those deliveries, as well as from our overall community count.
Financing
Our operations have historically been funded by internally generated cash flows, public equity and debt issuances, land option contracts and other similar contracts, land seller financing, and performance bonds and letters of credit. We also have the ability to borrow funds under our unsecured revolving credit facility with various banks (“Credit Facility”). Depending on market conditions and available opportunities, we may obtain project financing, or secure external financing with community or other inventory assets that we own or control. By “project financing,” we mean loans that are specifically obtained for, or secured by, particular communities or other inventory assets. We may also arrange or engage in bank loan, project debt or other financial transactions and/or expand the capacity of the Credit Facility or our unsecured letter of credit facility with certain financial institutions (“LOC Facility”) or enter into additional such facilities.
Environmental Compliance Matters and Sustainability
As part of our due diligence process for land acquisitions, we often use third-party environmental consultants to investigate potential environmental risks, and we require disclosures, representations and warranties from land sellers regarding environmental risks. We may acquire property that requires us to incur environmental clean-up costs after conducting appropriate due diligence. In such instances, we take steps prior to our acquisition of the land to gain reasonable assurance as to the precise scope of work required and the costs associated with removal, site restoration and/or monitoring. To the extent contamination or other environmental issues have occurred in the past, we will attempt to recover restoration costs from third parties, such as the generators of hazardous waste, land sellers or others in the prior chain of title and/or their insurers. Based on these practices, we anticipate that it is unlikely that environmental clean-up costs will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. However, despite these efforts, there can be no assurance that we will avoid material liabilities relating to the existence or removal of toxic wastes, site restoration, monitoring or other environmental matters affecting properties currently or previously owned or controlled by us, and no estimate of any potential liabilities can be made. We have not been notified by any governmental agency of any claim that any of the properties owned or formerly owned by us are identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (or similar state or local agency) as being a “Superfund” (or similar state or local) clean-up site requiring remediation, which could have a material effect on our future consolidated financial statements. Costs associated with the use of environmental consultants are not material to our consolidated financial statements.
We have made a dedicated effort to further differentiate ourselves from other homebuilders and resale homes through our ongoing commitment to become a leading national company in environmental sustainability. We continually seek out and utilize innovative technologies and systems to further improve the energy and water efficiency of our homes, as well as engage in campaigns and other educational efforts, sometimes together with other companies, organizations and groups, to increase consumer awareness of the importance and impact of sustainability in selecting a home and the products within a home. Under our commitment to sustainability, we, among other things:
| |
• | build energy- and water-efficient new homes. Overall, we have built approximately 137,000 ENERGY STAR® certified homes, a milestone that exceeds any other homebuilder; |
| |
• | developed a KB Home Energy Performance Guide®, or EPG®, that informs our homebuyers of the relative energy efficiency and the related estimated monthly energy costs of each of our homes as designed, compared to typical new and existing homes; |
| |
• | include in our product offerings advanced home automation technologies, components (e.g., smart appliances) and systems that can increase convenience for our homebuyers; and |
| |
• | unveiled in 2019 the KB Home ProjeKt: Where Tomorrow Lives™, a collaboratively designed sustainable concept home that showcased, during the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Nevada, a vision for the future of the American home. |
For several years, we have been recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for our sustainability achievements, and have earned awards under all of the agency’s programs aimed at homebuilders: ENERGY STAR, which sets energy efficiency standards; WaterSense®, which establishes water efficiency standards; and Indoor airPLUS®, which focuses on indoor air quality. In 2019, we received the ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year — Sustained Excellence Award for the ninth consecutive year, and the WaterSense Sustained Excellence Award for water efficiency for the fifth consecutive year.
More information about our sustainability commitment can be found in our annual sustainability reports, which we have published on our website since 2008. We intend to continue to research, evaluate and utilize new or improved products and construction and business practices consistent with our commitment and believe our sustainability initiatives can help put us in a better position, compared to resale homes and homebuilders with less-developed programs, to comply with evolving local, state
and federal rules and regulations intended to protect natural resources and to address climate change and similar environmental concerns.
Access to Our Information
Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 and proxy statements, as well as all amendments to those reports are available free of charge through our investor relations website at investor.kbhome.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). They can also be found at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We will also provide these reports in electronic or paper format free of charge upon request made to our investor relations department at investorrelations@kbhome.com or at our principal executive offices. We intend for our investor relations website to be the primary location where investors and the general public can obtain announcements regarding, and can learn more about, our financial and operational performance, business plans and prospects, our board of directors, our senior executive management team, and our corporate governance policies, including our articles of incorporation, by-laws, corporate governance principles, board committee charters, and ethics policy. We may from time to time choose to disclose or post important information about our business on or through our investor relations website, and/or through other electronic channels, including social media outlets, such as Facebook® (Facebook.com/KBHome) and Twitter® (Twitter.com/KBHome), and other evolving communication technologies. The content available on or through our primary website at www.kbhome.com, our investor relations website, including our sustainability reports, or social media outlets and other evolving communication technologies is not incorporated by reference in this report or in any other filing we make with the SEC, and our references to such content are intended to be inactive textual or oral references only.
Although we have operated through a number of varying economic cycles, there are several risks that could affect our ability to conduct our business, which we discuss below. If any of these risks materialize, they could, among other things, (a) materially and adversely impact our results of operations and consolidated financial statements; and (b) cause our results to differ materially from the forward-looking and other statements we make in our SEC filings; in our news releases and other public reports and communications, including those we post on or make available through our websites or other electronic channels; or orally through our personnel and representatives. These risks, and other factors outside of our control, could also create or increase volatility in our common stock’s market price.
The risk factors described below are not our only salient risks. Political events, war, terrorism, civil unrest, weather or other natural/environmental disasters, and other risks that are currently unknown or seen as immaterial, could also have a material adverse impact on our business, consolidated financial statements and/or common stock’s market price.
Demand Risks. The following could negatively affect consumer demand for our products, thereby unfavorably impacting our net orders, homes delivered, average selling prices, revenues and/or profitability:
| |
• | Soft or negative economic or housing market conditions. Adverse conditions in our served markets or nationally could be caused or worsened by factors outside of our control, including, for example, U.S. trade disputes with other countries or a federal government shutdown, and financial markets’ reactions thereto. |
| |
• | Reduced employment levels and job and wage growth. Recent strong employment and wage growth trends may weaken or reverse in 2020. If they do, our core first-time and first move-up homebuyer segments could be particularly affected, impacting us more severely than homebuilders that target a different buyer demographic. |
| |
• | Lower population growth, household formations or other unfavorable demographic changes. These may be driven by, among other things, birth rate changes, economic factors or U.S. immigration policies. |
| |
• | Diminished consumer confidence, whether generally or as to purchasing a home. Consumers may be reluctant to purchase a home compared to housing alternatives (such as renting apartments or homes, or remaining in their existing home) due to location or lifestyle preferences, affordability perceptions (particularly in markets experiencing rapid home price appreciation), employment instability or otherwise. |
| |
• | Tightened availability or affordability of mortgage loans and homeowner insurance coverage. Most of our buyers need a mortgage loan to purchase their home. Their ability to obtain a mortgage loan is largely subject to prevailing interest rates, lenders’ credit standards and appraisals, and the availability of government-supported programs, such as those from the Federal Housing Administration, the Veterans Administration, Federal National Mortgage Association (also known as Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (also known as Freddie Mac). If mortgage interest |
rates increase, credit standards are tightened, appraisals for our homes are lowered, or mortgage loan programs are curtailed, potential buyers of our homes may not be able to obtain necessary mortgage financing.
Insurance companies are increasingly drawing back from issuing, or are measurably raising premiums for, homeowner insurance policies in areas that have experienced, or are thought to be at risk of experiencing, significant wildfires, hurricanes, flooding or other natural disasters. If potential homebuyers are unable to obtain affordable homeowner insurance coverage, they may decide not to pursue purchasing a home or may cancel a home purchase contract with us.
| |
• | Poor lender performance. We depend on third-party lenders, including our KBHS partner Stearns, to provide mortgage loans to our homebuyers, unlike homebuilders with a wholly-owned mortgage lender. These lenders may be unable or unwilling to complete, timely or at all, the loan originations they start for our homebuyers. Poorly performing lenders can significantly delay home closings, disrupting our production schedules and delivery forecasts, or cause home purchase contract cancellations. While KBHS was not materially affected by Stearns’ parent company’s successfully completed bankruptcy process in 2019 (as discussed in Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report), if KBHS performs poorly and our customers use another lender, the income from and value of our KBHS equity interest would decline. |
| |
• | Adverse tax law changes. If federal or state laws are changed to eliminate or reduce the income tax benefits associated with homeownership, such as personal tax deductions for mortgage loan interest costs and real estate taxes, the after-tax cost of homeownership could measurably increase and diminish consumer interest in buying a home, as could increases in personal income tax rates. |
| |
• | Competition. We face significant competition for customers from other homebuilders, sellers of resale homes and other housing industry participants, including rental-housing operators. This competitive environment may, among other things, cause us to lower our home selling prices or offer incentives to attract or retain buyers. |
| |
• | Seasonality. As discussed in Item 1 – Business in this report, we historically have experienced fluctuations in our quarterly operating results with measurably more homes delivered and revenues generated in our third and fourth fiscal quarters. However, this pattern may not continue in the future at all or to the same degree as in the past. |
Supply Risks. The following could negatively affect our ability to increase our owned and controlled lot inventory, community count, operational scale and market share, and to grow our business, if at all:
| |
• | Lack of available land. Securing sufficient developable land that meets our investment return standards is critical for us to meet our strategic goals and profitably expand our business’ scale. Land availability depends on several factors, including geographical/topographical/governmental constraints, sellers’ business relationships and reputation within the residential real estate community, and competition from other parties, some of which can bid more for land. We expect to continue to face fierce competition for desirable land in our served markets in 2020, pressuring its availability and increasing its cost. |
| |
• | Insufficient financial resources. Our business needs considerable cash to, among other things, acquire and develop land, build homes and provide customer service. We expect to meet our needs with existing cash, future operational cash flow, our Credit Facility and LOC Facility, or outside sources, including project financing. However, outside financing may be unavailable, costly and/or considerably dilute stockholders. For instance: |
| |
◦ | Tight capital or financial market conditions may hinder our ability to obtain external financing, or use or expand our Credit Facility and LOC Facility, on favorable terms or at all. Also, if a rating agency downgrades our credit rating or outlook, external financing may be difficult and costly for us to obtain. |
| |
◦ | Noncompliance with our Credit Facility and senior notes’ covenants (see Note 14 – Notes Payable in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report) may restrict our ability to borrow; accelerate repayment of our debt, which may not be feasible for us; or cause our lenders to impose significant fees or cease lending to us. |
| |
◦ | As described in Note 14 – Notes Payable in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, if a change of control or fundamental change occurs before our senior notes mature, we may need to offer to purchase certain of them. This may require us to refinance or restructure our debt, which we may be unable to do at all or on favorable terms. |
| |
◦ | Our high debt and debt-to-capital levels could require us to dedicate substantial cash flow to debt service; inhibit our ability to respond to business changes or adjust our debt maturity schedule; curb execution on our current strategies; and/or make us more vulnerable in a downturn than our less-leveraged competitors. Our next senior note |
maturity is our $450.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due December 15, 2021 (“7.00% Senior Notes due 2021”).
| |
• | Decreased land inventory value. Our land inventory’s value depends on market conditions, including our estimates of applicable future demand and revenue generation. If conditions deteriorate during the typically significant amount of time between our acquiring ownership/control of land and delivering homes on that land; if we cannot sell land held for sale at its estimated fair value; or if we make strategic changes, we may need to record inventory-related charges. We may also record charges if we decide to sell land at a loss or activate or sell land held for future development. |
In addition, our business could be negatively affected if our home sales, homes delivered or backlog-to-homes delivered conversion rate falls; if often-volatile building materials prices or subcontractor rates increase, which has been the trend over the past few years; or if our community openings are delayed due to, among other things, prolonged development, our strategic adjustments, or protracted government approvals or utility service activations from staff or resource cuts or reallocations for public safety priorities (e.g., earthquakes, wildfires, hurricanes or other natural disasters).
| |
• | Trade disputes and defective materials. The federal government has imposed new or increased import tariffs, and other countries have implemented retaliatory measures, raising the cost and reducing the supply of several home construction items. In addition, shortages or rising prices of building materials may ensue from manufacturing defects, resulting in recalls of materials. If such disputes continue or recalls occur, our costs and supply chain disruptions could increase further. |
| |
• | Poor subcontractor availability and performance. Independent subcontractors perform essentially all of our land development and home construction work. Though we supervise such activities at our community sites, we have no control over our subcontractors’ availability or work methods. If qualified subcontractors are not available (due to general shortages in a tight labor market, competition from other builders or otherwise), or do not timely perform, we may incur production delays and other inefficiencies, or higher costs for substitute services. Also, if our subcontractors’ work or materials quality does not meet our standards, we could face more home warranty and construction defect claims, and they or their insurers may not be able to cover the associated repair costs. |
| |
• | Responsibility for duties owed to subcontractors’ employees. Governmental agencies have at times sought to hold contractors like us responsible for subcontractors’ employment-related obligations to their workforces. For instance, under California law, regulators or others could assert that we are responsible for wages and benefits that our subcontractors fail to pay to their employees, or, in certain circumstances, it could be alleged that employees of our subcontractors should be deemed to be our employees. Further efforts to impose such external labor-related obligations on us could create substantial exposure for us in situations beyond our control. |
Strategy Risks. Our strategies, and any related initiatives or actions, and any changes thereto, may not be successful in achieving our goals or generate any growth, earnings or returns. We may not achieve positive operational or financial results, or results equal to or better than we did in any prior period or in comparison to other homebuilders. Among other strategic risks, our business is presently concentrated in California, Florida, Nevada and Texas. Poor conditions in any of those markets could have a measurable negative impact on our results, and the impact could be larger for us than for other less-concentrated homebuilders. At the same time, we may not be successful in generating positive results from our recent expansion into the Seattle, Washington market, or if we choose to enter into any other new markets, based on our relative inexperience with the local homebuilding and economic environment and the need to make a significant investment to achieve effective scale and profitable returns, which we may not be able to accomplish.
Adverse conditions in California would have particular significance to our business. We generate the highest proportion of our revenues from and make significant inventory investments in our California operations. However, we may be constrained or delayed in entitling land and selling and delivering homes in California, and incur higher development or construction costs, from water conservation or wildfire protection measures (including precautionary and event-induced electricity blackouts, temporary or extended local or regional evacuations, development moratoriums in high-risk areas, and community resiliency design requirements) that are intended to address severe drought and climatic conditions that have arisen in recent years. In addition, as large-scale wildfires and flooding due to such conditions in California, as well as hurricanes, heavy rains and other climate change-driven natural disasters in other of our served markets, become more frequent and intense, we may experience greater disruption to our land development and homebuilding activities, delaying orders and home deliveries, among other impacts.
Also, California’s highly regulated and litigious business environment has made the state an increasingly challenging and uncertain place for us to operate. This includes the implementing regulations under the state’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) intended to lower greenhouse gas emissions. For instance, we will incur higher construction costs because of a state law requirement that effectively requires that all new homes permitted to build in 2020 and beyond have solar power systems, and we may be unable to offset (through customer leases) or cover such costs through selling price increases due to competition and
consumer affordability concerns. In addition, California and certain of its local governments are considering or have implemented restrictions on or disincentives with respect to the creation or size of new suburban and exurban residential communities generally in favor of higher-density, urban developments that can be attractive to some buyers, but in many cases are on smaller parcels with higher building costs and more complicated entitlement requirements and may be subject to greater local opposition and/or additional site remediation work. State and local municipalities have also considered banning natural gas use in new homes, among other possible steps as part of their approaches to reduce greenhouse gases. Depending on their scope, these efforts could significantly increase our land acquisition and development costs and, along with increasing competition from other homebuilders and investors for available developable land, limit our California operations’ growth, while making new homes less affordable to potential buyers in the state. Partially offsetting these trends, California’s governor and certain legislators have taken positions to promote new housing construction, including the adoption of the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (SB 330) intended to expedite the approval process for housing development in order to address the housing shortage in California.
Warranty Risks. Our homebuilding business is subject to warranty and construction defect claims. Though we have insurance coverage to partially reduce our exposure, it is limited and costly, in part due to a shrinking provider market, and we have high self-insured retentions that are expected to increase. We self-insure some of our risk through a wholly-owned insurance subsidiary.
Due to our dependence on independent subcontractors to perform our homebuilding activities and inherent uncertainties, including obtaining recoveries from responsible subcontractors and/or their or our insurers, our recorded warranty and other liabilities may be inadequate to address future claims, which, among other things, could require us to record charges to increase such liabilities. We may also record charges to reflect our then-current claims experience, including the actual costs incurred. Home warranty and other construction defect issues may also generate negative publicity, including on social media and the Internet, that detracts from our reputation and efforts to sell homes.
Deferred Tax Asset Recovery and Tax Position Risks. At November 30, 2019, we had deferred tax assets of $383.7 million, net of a $19.2 million valuation allowance. Realizing our deferred tax assets depends on our generating sufficient future taxable income, which may not occur. Also, our deferred tax assets’ value can increase or decrease with: (a) changes in the federal corporate income tax rate; in 2018, we recorded a $112.5 million non-cash charge to our provision for income taxes primarily due to the federal corporate rate being reduced from 35% to 21% under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”); (b) our undergoing a “change of ownership” under federal tax rules, which would significantly reduce and possibly eliminate their value; and (c) adjustments in statutory or taxing authority treatment of such assets. We have filed our tax returns based on certain positions we believe are appropriate, and we may owe additional taxes if taxing authorities disagree with those positions.
Human Capital Risks. Our directors, officers and employees are important resources. If we cannot attract, retain and develop talent at reasonable pay and benefits levels, which is becoming increasingly challenging in the current tight labor market, or, alternatively, if we need to implement personnel or compensation reductions, our performance, profitability and ability to achieve our strategic goals could be significantly impaired. In addition, in many of our served markets, we need to have personnel with certain professional licenses, including building contractor and real estate brokerage licenses. Our home selling and construction activities may be severely disrupted or delayed if we do not have sufficient licensed individuals in our workforce.
Information Technology and Information Security Risks. We use information technology (“IT”) resources to carry out important operational activities and maintain our business records. Third parties maintain many of our IT resources, including disaster recovery and business continuity services, under agreements with security and service level standards.
Our systems have faced a variety of phishing, denial-of-service and other attacks. We have administrative, physical and technical controls and processes in place to address cybersecurity risks and help protect our IT resources, including employee training and third-party assessments. We also rely on our service providers, Stearns and other mortgage lenders with whom we share some personal identifying and confidential information to secure our information and the homebuyer information they collect from us. Our IT security costs, including cybersecurity insurance, are significant and will likely rise in tandem with the sophistication and frequency of system attacks.
However, our, Stearns’ and our service providers’ measures may be inadequate and possibly have operational or security vulnerabilities that could go undetected for some period of time. If our IT resources are compromised by an intentional attack, natural or man-made disaster, electricity blackout, IT failure or systems misconfiguration, service provider error, mis-managed user access protocols, personnel action, or otherwise, we may be severely limited in conducting our business and achieving our strategic goals for an extended period, experience internal control failures or lose access to operational assets or funds. A substantial disruption, or security breach suffered by Stearns/KBHS or a service provider, could damage our reputation and result in the loss of customers or revenues, in sensitive personal information being publicly disclosed or misused and/or legal proceedings against us. We may incur significant expenses to resolve such issues.
We have invested significant resources over the past few years to develop and implement a new custom enterprise resource planning system designed to improve the efficiency of our internal operational and administrative activities. There are inherent
risks in undertaking this type of broad-based IT project and we have experienced complications and delays during the implementation process. We expect these will continue as we progress and expand the scope of the system in 2020 and that we will incur appreciable additional costs in doing so. In addition, the testing and use of the new system during this rollout could increase our exposure to the security risks and consequences discussed in the foregoing paragraph.
Legal and Compliance Risks. We are subject to substantial legal and regulatory requirements as to land development (including governmental permits, taxes and fees), the homebuilding process, worksite health and safety and environmental protection (from the effects of climate change or otherwise), which can delay our operational activities, raise our costs and/or prohibit or restrict homebuilding in some areas. For example, certain of our Texas operations are subject to rules mandating enhanced flood management practices stemming from recent large hurricanes and rainstorms. These requirements often provide broad discretion to government authorities, and they could be interpreted or revised in ways unfavorable to us. The costs to comply, or associated with any noncompliance, are, or can be, significant.
Under environmental laws, we may be responsible for removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances even where we were not aware of their presence or for land we previously owned. The actual or potential presence of those substances on or near our properties may prevent us from performing land development or selling homes. Also, we have been, and we may in the future be, involved in federal, state and local air and water quality agency investigations or proceedings for potential noncompliance with their rules, including rules governing discharges of materials into the air and waterways; stormwater discharges from community sites; and wetlands and listed species habitat protection, and we could incur penalties and/or be restricted from developing or building at certain community locations during or as a result of such agencies’ investigations or findings.
Additionally, we are involved in legal, arbitral or regulatory proceedings or investigations incidental to our business, the outcome or settlement of which could result in material claims, losses, monetary damage awards, penalties, or other direct or indirect payments recorded against our earnings, or injunctions, consent decrees or other voluntary or involuntary restrictions or adjustments to our business operations or practices. Any adverse results could be beyond our expectations, insurance coverages and/or accruals at particular points in time. Unfavorable outcomes, as well as unfavorable investor, analyst or news reports related to our industry, company, personnel or operations, may also generate negative publicity, including on social media and the Internet, damaging our reputation and resulting in the loss of customers or revenues.
To reduce the risks and expected significant costs of defending intra-corporate proceedings in multiple venues and to help ensure that such matters are considered within a well-established body of law, our By-laws provide that, subject to certain exceptions, Delaware state courts are the exclusive forum for specified internal corporate affairs actions. This may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in their favored forum. At the same time, if a court were to allow for an alternative forum, or we waive the provision’s application, for a particular matter, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving an otherwise relevant action in another jurisdiction(s).
The European Union and state governments, notably California and Nevada, have recently enacted or enhanced data privacy regulations, and other governments are considering establishing similar or stronger protections. These regulations impose certain obligations for securing, and potentially removing, specified personal information in our systems, and for apprising individuals of the information we have collected about them. We have incurred costs in an effort to comply with these requirements, and our costs may increase significantly if new requirements are enacted and based on how individuals exercise their rights. However, any noncompliance could result in our incurring substantial penalties and reputational damage.
KBHS’ operations are heavily regulated. If Stearns, which oversees KBHS’ operations, or KBHS is found to have violated regulations, or mortgage investors demand KBHS repurchase mortgage loans it has sold to them, or cover their losses, for claimed contract breaches, KBHS could face significant liabilities, which, if they exceed its reserves, could result in our recognizing losses on our KBHS equity interest.
Our financial results may be materially affected by the adoption of new or amended financial accounting standards, including those relating to revenue recognition and lease accounting, and regulatory or outside auditor guidance or interpretations.
| |
Item 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
None.
Our legal proceedings are discussed in Note 17 – Legal Matters in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
| |
Item 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable.
Information about our Executive Officers
The following table presents certain information regarding our executive officers as of December 31, 2019: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Age | | Present Position | | Year Assumed Present Position | | Years at KB Home | | Other Positions and Other Business Experience within the Last Five Years | | From – To |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey T. Mezger | | 64 | | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (a) | | 2016 | | 26 | | President and Chief Executive Officer (a) | | 2006-2016 |
Jeff J. Kaminski | | 58 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | 2010 | | 9 | | | | |
Matthew W. Mandino | | 55 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | | 2018 | | 8 | | Regional President, Southwest
Division President, Colorado | | 2016-2018
2011-2016 |
Albert Z. Praw | | 71 | | Executive Vice President, Real Estate and Business Development | | 2011 | | 23 | | | | |
Brian J. Woram | | 59 | | Executive Vice President and General Counsel | | 2010 | | 9 | | | | |
| |
(a) | Mr. Mezger has served as a director since 2006. He was elected Chairman of our board of directors in August 2016. |
There is no family relationship between any of our executive officers or between any of our executive officers and any of our directors.
PART II
| |
Item 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “KBH.” As of December 31, 2019, there were 552 holders of record of our common stock.
Information regarding the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans is provided below in Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters in this report.
The following table summarizes our purchases of our own equity securities during the three months ended November 30, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
September 1-30 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | 2,193,947 |
|
October 1-31 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,193,947 |
|
November 1-30 | | 107,800 |
| | 36.58 |
| | — |
| | 2,193,947 |
|
Total | | 107,800 |
| | $ | 36.58 |
| | — |
| | |
In May 2018, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase a total of up to 4,000,000 shares of our outstanding common
stock. This authorization reaffirmed and incorporated the then-current balance of 1,627,000 shares that remained under a prior board-approved share repurchase program. In 2018, we repurchased 1,806,053 shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization, at a total cost of $35.0 million. As of November 30, 2019, we had 2,193,947 shares authorized for repurchase.
The shares purchased during the three months ended November 30, 2019 were previously issued shares delivered to us by employees to satisfy withholding taxes on the vesting of restricted stock awards. These transactions are not considered repurchases under the board of directors’ authorization.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total return of KB Home common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones US Home Construction Index for the periods ended November 30:
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
Among KB Home, S&P 500 Index and
Dow Jones US Home Construction Index
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 |
KB Home | $ | 100 |
| | $ | 81 |
| | $ | 92 |
| | $ | 182 |
| | $ | 123 |
| | $ | 205 |
|
S&P 500 Index | 100 |
| | 103 |
| | 111 |
| | 136 |
| | 145 |
| | 168 |
|
Dow Jones US Home Construction Index | 100 |
| | 114 |
| | 100 |
| | 179 |
| | 128 |
| | 186 |
|
The above graph is based on the KB Home common stock and index prices calculated as of the last trading day before December 1 of the year-end periods presented. The closing price of KB Home common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $34.58 per share on November 30, 2019 and $21.11 per share on November 30, 2018. The performance of our common stock as presented above reflects past performance only and is not indicative of future performance. Total return assumes $100 invested at market close on November 30, 2014 in KB Home common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones US Home Construction Index, including reinvestment of dividends.
| |
Item 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The data in this table should be read in conjunction with Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this report.
KB HOME
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts and Average Selling Price)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | $ | 4,537,658 |
| | $ | 4,533,795 |
| | $ | 4,356,265 |
| | $ | 3,582,943 |
| | $ | 3,020,987 |
|
Financial services | 15,089 |
| | 13,207 |
| | 12,264 |
| | 11,703 |
| | 11,043 |
|
Total | $ | 4,552,747 |
| | $ | 4,547,002 |
| | $ | 4,368,529 |
| | $ | 3,594,646 |
| | $ | 3,032,030 |
|
Operating income: | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | $ | 331,380 |
| | $ | 345,721 |
| | $ | 283,403 |
| | $ | 152,401 |
| | $ | 138,621 |
|
Financial services | 10,756 |
| | 9,363 |
| | 8,834 |
| | 7,886 |
| | 7,332 |
|
Total | $ | 342,136 |
| | $ | 355,084 |
| | $ | 292,237 |
| | $ | 160,287 |
| | $ | 145,953 |
|
Pretax income | $ | 348,175 |
| | $ | 367,965 |
| | $ | 289,995 |
| | $ | 149,315 |
| | $ | 127,043 |
|
Net income (a) | 268,775 |
| | 170,365 |
| | 180,595 |
| | 105,615 |
| | 84,643 |
|
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 3.04 |
| | $ | 1.93 |
| | $ | 2.09 |
| | $ | 1.23 |
| | $ | .92 |
|
Diluted | 2.85 |
| | 1.71 |
| | 1.85 |
| | 1.12 |
| | .85 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share | .23 |
| | .10 |
| | .10 |
| | .10 |
| | .10 |
|
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | $ | 4,977,086 |
| | $ | 5,061,191 |
| | $ | 5,029,158 |
| | $ | 5,121,125 |
| | $ | 5,072,877 |
|
Financial services | 38,396 |
| | 12,380 |
| | 12,357 |
| | 10,499 |
| | 14,028 |
|
Total | $ | 5,015,482 |
| | $ | 5,073,571 |
| | $ | 5,041,515 |
| | $ | 5,131,624 |
| | $ | 5,086,905 |
|
Notes payable | $ | 1,748,747 |
| | $ | 2,060,263 |
| | $ | 2,324,845 |
| | $ | 2,640,149 |
| | $ | 2,601,754 |
|
Stockholders’ equity | 2,383,122 |
| | 2,087,500 |
| | 1,926,311 |
| | 1,723,145 |
| | 1,690,834 |
|
Stockholders’ equity per share | 26.60 |
| | 24.01 |
| | 22.13 |
| | 20.25 |
| | 18.32 |
|
Homebuilding Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 11,871 |
| | 11,317 |
| | 10,909 |
| | 9,829 |
| | 8,196 |
|
Average selling price | $ | 380,000 |
| | $ | 399,200 |
| | $ | 397,400 |
| | $ | 363,800 |
| | $ | 354,800 |
|
Net orders | 12,841 |
| | 11,014 |
| | 10,900 |
| | 10,283 |
| | 9,253 |
|
Ending backlog — homes | 5,078 |
| | 4,108 |
| | 4,411 |
| | 4,420 |
| | 3,966 |
|
Average community count | 250 |
| | 223 |
| | 233 |
| | 238 |
| | 244 |
|
| |
(a) | Net income for the year ended November 30, 2018 included a non-cash charge of $112.5 million to income tax expense for TCJA-related impacts. |
| |
Item 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Our discussion and analysis below is focused on our 2019 and 2018 financial results, including comparisons of our year-over-year performance between these years. Discussion and analysis of our 2017 fiscal year specifically, as well as the year-over-year comparison of our 2018 financial performance to 2017, are located in Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2018, filed with the SEC on January 24, 2019, which is available on our investor relations website at investor.kbhome.com and the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview. Revenues are generated from our homebuilding and financial services operations. The following table presents a summary of our consolidated results of operations (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, | | Variance |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | $ | 4,537,658 |
| | $ | 4,533,795 |
| | $ | 4,356,265 |
| | — | % | | 4 | % |
Financial services | 15,089 |
| | 13,207 |
| | 12,264 |
| | 14 |
| | 8 |
|
Total | $ | 4,552,747 |
| | $ | 4,547,002 |
| | $ | 4,368,529 |
| | — | % | | 4 | % |
Pretax income: | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | $ | 325,189 |
| | $ | 351,301 |
| | $ | 276,927 |
| | (7 | )% | | 27 | % |
Financial services | 22,986 |
| | 16,664 |
| | 13,068 |
| | 38 |
| | 28 |
|
Total | 348,175 |
| | 367,965 |
| | 289,995 |
| | (5 | ) | | 27 |
|
Income tax expense | (79,400 | ) | | (197,600 | ) | | (109,400 | ) | | 60 |
| | (81 | ) |
Net income | $ | 268,775 |
| | $ | 170,365 |
| | $ | 180,595 |
| | 58 | % | | (6 | )% |
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 3.04 |
| | $ | 1.93 |
| | $ | 2.09 |
| | 58 | % | | (8 | )% |
Diluted | $ | 2.85 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 1.85 |
| | 67 | % | | (8 | )% |
Housing market conditions were generally healthy in 2019, with strong employment levels, relatively high consumer confidence and a limited supply of homes available for sale. During the year, we continued to execute on our long-standing, customer-centric operating strategy and our Returns-Focused Growth Plan.
Within our homebuilding operations, housing revenues of $4.51 billion for 2019 were in line with the prior year, as a 5% increase in homes delivered was offset by a 5% decrease in the overall average selling price of those homes. Homebuilding operating income for 2019 decreased 4% year over year to $331.4 million, and, as a percentage of homebuilding revenues, declined 30 basis points to 7.3%. Our housing gross profits for 2019 grew 5% from 2018 mainly due to an 80 basis point increase in our housing gross profit margin to 18.3%.
The increase in our housing gross profit margin for 2019 primarily reflected lower amortization of previously capitalized interest, accounting changes from our adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”), effective December 1, 2018, and a decrease in inventory-related charges. This was partly offset by higher construction and land costs, the impact of fewer homes delivered from certain communities in our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment with relatively high average selling prices and housing gross profit margins as compared to the previous year, and an increase in sales incentives as a result of pricing pressure on our net orders in the 2018 fourth quarter and 2019 first quarter due to weaker market conditions during those periods. Our selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing revenues increased 120 basis points from the prior year to 11.0%, primarily reflecting our adoption of ASC 606 and higher marketing expenses to support new community openings. Further information regarding the accounting impacts from our adoption of ASC
606 is provided in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Our net income and diluted earnings per share for 2019 were up 58% and 67%, respectively, year over year, and included a $6.8 million loss on the early extinguishment of debt. In 2018, our net income and diluted earnings per share included a non-cash charge of $112.5 million for TCJA-related impacts.
Progress on Returns-Focused Growth Plan Targets. We initiated our three-year Returns-Focused Growth Plan in 2016 and, based on the business environment and our outlook at that time, established robust financial targets for 2019. The following table presents these targets and our actual results for the years ended November 30, 2019 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Years Ended November 30, |
Returns-Focused Growth Plan Financial Metrics | | 2019 Targets | | 2019 | | 2016 |
Housing revenues | | > $5.0 billion | | $ | 4,510,814 |
| | $ | 3,575,548 |
|
Homebuilding operating income margin, excluding inventory-related charges | | 8% to 9% | | 7.7 | % | | 5.7 | % |
Return on invested capital (a) | | > 10% | | 9.5 | % | | 5.2 | % |
Return on equity (a) | | 10.0% to 15.0% | | 12.2 | % | | 6.3 | % |
Debt to capital ratio (b) | | 35.0% to 45.0% | | 42.3 | % | | 60.5 | % |
| |
(a) | The calculation of return on invested capital is described below under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Return on equity is calculated as net income for the most recent 12-month period divided by average stockholders’ equity for the trailing five quarters. |
| |
(b) | Our original 2019 target was a net debt to capital ratio in the range of 40% to 50%, which we lowered to a range of 35% to 45% during 2018. In the 2019 second quarter, we further tightened our financial target to a debt to capital ratio in the range of 35% to 45%. |
We made significant progress toward achieving our Returns-Focused Growth Plan targets through the variable economic and industry conditions during the three-year period from 2016 to 2019, with all metrics showing measurable improvement over that span. In addition to substantially increasing our scale, with a 26% rise in housing revenues from 2016 to 2019, we generated significant cash flow, fueling our ability to invest $5.03 billion in land and land development, repay nearly $850.0 million of senior notes, and return cash to our stockholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases during the same period.
While we achieved our return on equity and debt to capital ratio targets for 2019, our housing revenues were below the target, largely due to our backlog at the beginning of the year (“beginning backlog”) being down 7% from the previous year, reflecting lower net sales in the latter part of 2018 stemming from restrained buyer demand that primarily resulted from affordability concerns driven by price appreciation trends and rising mortgage interest rates preceding and during that period. Also impacting our 2019 revenues were a lower proportion of homes delivered from our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment and a decline in this segment’s average selling price that stemmed from a mix shift toward lower-priced inland California markets and coastal communities at more affordable price points. This housing revenue result led to homebuilding operating income margin, excluding inventory-related charges, and return on invested capital results that were slightly below their respective 2019 targets.
We plan to continue to follow the primary tenets of our Returns-Focused Growth Plan in 2020 and believe we are well positioned to make further improvements as discussed below under “Outlook.”
Net Orders, Backlog and Community Count. The following table presents information concerning our net orders, cancellation rate, ending backlog, and community count for the years ended November 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
Net orders | | 12,841 |
| | 11,014 |
|
Net order value (a) | | $ | 4,890,153 |
| | $ | 4,291,481 |
|
Cancellation rate (b) | | 19 | % | | 22 | % |
Ending backlog — homes | | 5,078 |
| | 4,108 |
|
Ending backlog — value | | $ | 1,813,707 |
| | $ | 1,434,368 |
|
Ending community count | | 251 |
| | 240 |
|
Average community count | | 250 |
| | 223 |
|
| |
(a) | Net order value represents the potential future housing revenues associated with net orders generated during a period, as well as homebuyer selections of lot and product premiums and design studio options and upgrades for homes in backlog during the same period. |
| |
(b) | Cancellation rate represents the total number of contracts for new homes cancelled during a period divided by the total (gross) orders for new homes generated during the same period. |
Net Orders. In 2019, net orders from our homebuilding operations increased 17% from 2018, reflecting 12% growth in our overall average community count and a 5% increase in monthly net orders per community to 4.3. The year-over-year growth in our average community count is discussed below under “Community Count.” The value of our 2019 net orders rose 14% from 2018 as a result of the growth in net orders partly offset by a 2% decrease in the overall average selling price of those orders. The year-over-year increase in net orders and overall net order value reflected improvements in all four of our homebuilding reporting segments, with net order value increases ranging from 9% in our Southeast segment to 23% in our Southwest segment. In our West Coast segment, our largest segment based on housing revenues, net order value rose 10% due to a 19% increase in net orders stemming from the segment’s higher average community count, partly offset by a 7% decrease in the average selling price of those orders due to a shift in product and geographic mix toward our lower-priced inland California markets and coastal communities at more affordable price points.
Backlog. The number of homes in our backlog at November 30, 2019 increased 24% from the previous year. The potential future housing revenues in our backlog at November 30, 2019 grew 26% year over year, reflecting the higher number of homes in our backlog and a 2% increase in the average selling price of those homes. The increases in the number of homes in backlog and our backlog value reflected growth in each of our four homebuilding reporting segments. Substantially all of the homes in our backlog at November 30, 2019 are expected to be delivered during the year ending November 30, 2020.
Community Count. Our average community count for 2019 grew 12% from the previous year, with increases in all four of our homebuilding reporting segments, ranging from 1% in our Central segment to 24% in our West Coast segment. Our ending community count for 2019 rose 5% from the prior year. The year-over-year increases in both our average and ending community counts reflect the investments in land and land development we have made over the past several quarters.
We invested $1.62 billion in land and land development in 2019 to support home delivery and revenue growth in 2020 and beyond. In 2018, such investments totaled $1.89 billion. Approximately 39% of our total investment in 2019 related to land acquisitions, compared to approximately 50% in 2018.
HOMEBUILDING
The following table presents a summary of certain financial and operational data for our homebuilding operations (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Revenues: | | | | | |
Housing | $ | 4,510,814 |
| | $ | 4,517,244 |
| | $ | 4,335,205 |
|
Land | 26,844 |
| | 16,551 |
| | 21,060 |
|
Total | 4,537,658 |
| | 4,533,795 |
| | 4,356,265 |
|
Costs and expenses: | | | | | |
Construction and land costs | | | | | |
Housing | (3,683,174 | ) | | (3,728,917 | ) | | (3,627,732 | ) |
Land | (25,754 | ) | | (15,003 | ) | | (18,736 | ) |
Total | (3,708,928 | ) | | (3,743,920 | ) | | (3,646,468 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (497,350 | ) | | (444,154 | ) | | (426,394 | ) |
Total | (4,206,278 | ) | | (4,188,074 | ) | | (4,072,862 | ) |
Operating income | $ | 331,380 |
| | $ | 345,721 |
| | $ | 283,403 |
|
Homes delivered | 11,871 |
| | 11,317 |
| | 10,909 |
|
Average selling price | $ | 380,000 |
| | $ | 399,200 |
| | $ | 397,400 |
|
Housing gross profit margin as a percentage of housing revenues | 18.3 | % | | 17.5 | % | | 16.3 | % |
Housing gross profit margin excluding inventory-related charges as a percentage of housing revenues | 18.7 | % | | 18.1 | % | | 16.9 | % |
Adjusted housing gross profit margin as a percentage of housing revenues | 22.2 | % | | 22.5 | % | | 21.8 | % |
Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of housing revenues | 11.0 | % | | 9.8 | % | | 9.8 | % |
Operating income as a percentage of homebuilding revenues | 7.3 | % | | 7.6 | % | | 6.5 | % |
The following tables present homes delivered, net orders, cancellation rates as a percentage of gross orders, net order value, average community count, and ending backlog (number of homes and value) by homebuilding reporting segment (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, |
| | Homes Delivered | | Net Orders | | Cancellation Rates |
Segment | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
West Coast | | 3,214 |
| | 3,152 |
| | 3,542 |
| | 2,985 |
| | 19 | % | | 20 | % |
Southwest | | 2,346 |
| | 2,301 |
| | 2,658 |
| | 2,139 |
| | 13 |
| | 17 |
|
Central | | 4,291 |
| | 4,113 |
| | 4,565 |
| | 4,045 |
| | 21 |
| | 27 |
|
Southeast | | 2,020 |
| | 1,751 |
| | 2,076 |
| | 1,845 |
| | 23 |
| | 21 |
|
Total | | 11,871 |
| | 11,317 |
| | 12,841 |
| | 11,014 |
| | 19 | % | | 22 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, |
| | Net Order Value | | Average Community Count |
Segment | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Variance | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Variance |
West Coast | | $ | 2,087,293 |
| | $ | 1,893,597 |
| | 10 | % | | 67 |
| | 54 |
| | 24 | % |
Southwest | | 842,335 |
| | 682,172 |
| | 23 |
| | 41 |
| | 34 |
| | 21 |
|
Central | | 1,362,580 |
| | 1,169,397 |
| | 17 |
| | 92 |
| | 91 |
| | 1 |
|
Southeast | | 597,945 |
| | 546,315 |
| | 9 |
| | 50 |
| | 44 |
| | 14 |
|
Total | | $ | 4,890,153 |
| | $ | 4,291,481 |
| | 14 | % | | 250 |
| | 223 |
| | 12 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | November 30, |
| | Backlog – Homes | | Backlog – Value |
Segment | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Variance | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Variance |
West Coast | | 1,043 |
| | 715 |
| | 46 | % | | $ | 598,299 |
| | $ | 414,564 |
| | 44 | % |
Southwest | | 1,238 |
| | 926 |
| | 34 |
| | 389,597 |
| | 302,614 |
| | 29 |
|
Central | | 1,988 |
| | 1,714 |
| | 16 |
| | 590,936 |
| | 487,921 |
| | 21 |
|
Southeast | | 809 |
| | 753 |
| | 7 |
| | 234,875 |
| | 229,269 |
| | 2 |
|
Total | | 5,078 |
| | 4,108 |
| | 24 | % | | $ | 1,813,707 |
| | $ | 1,434,368 |
| | 26 | % |
Revenues. Homebuilding revenues of $4.54 billion in 2019 were essentially flat with 2018, reflecting housing revenues that were even with the previous year and an increase in land sale revenues.
Housing revenues in 2019 were on par with the previous year, as a 5% increase in homes delivered was offset by a 5% decrease in the overall average selling price of those homes. The year-over-year increase in homes delivered in 2019 reflected a 17% rise in our net orders during the year as our beginning backlog was down 7%, reflecting lower net sales in the latter part of 2018 stemming from restrained buyer demand that primarily resulted from affordability concerns driven by price appreciation trends and rising mortgage interest rates preceding and during that period. The overall average selling price of our homes delivered decreased in 2019 as compared to 2018, mainly due to a 10% decline in our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment that resulted from fewer homes delivered from certain communities with relatively high average selling prices, and a community mix shift toward lower-priced inland California markets and coastal communities at more affordable price points.
Land sale revenues for 2019 increased 62% from 2018. Generally, land sale revenues fluctuate with our decisions to maintain or decrease our land ownership position in certain markets based upon the volume of our holdings, our business strategy, the strength and number of developers and other land buyers in particular markets at given points in time, the availability of opportunities to sell land at acceptable prices and prevailing market conditions.
Operating Income. Our homebuilding operating income decreased 4% in 2019, as compared to the previous year, due to an increase in housing gross profits that was more than offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. Our homebuilding operating income included total inventory-related charges of $17.3 million in 2019 and $29.0 million in 2018, as discussed in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. Excluding inventory-related charges, our homebuilding operating income as a percentage of homebuilding revenues was 7.7% in 2019 and 8.3% in 2018.
In 2019, housing gross profits rose by $39.3 million, or 5%, to $827.6 million from $788.3 million in 2018. The year-over-year increase in 2019 reflected the higher volume of homes delivered and an increase in the housing gross profit margin. Housing gross profits for 2019 and 2018 included the respective inventory-related charges described above.
Our housing gross profit margin for 2019 increased 80 basis points from the previous year, primarily due to the favorable impacts of lower amortization of previously capitalized interest as a percentage of housing revenues (approximately 90 basis points), our adoption of ASC 606 (approximately 70 basis points), and a decrease in inventory-related charges (approximately 20 basis points). These items were partly offset by higher construction and land costs (approximately 70 basis points), an increase in sales incentives as a result of pricing pressure on our net orders in the 2018 fourth quarter and 2019 first quarter due to weaker market conditions during those periods (approximately 20 basis points), and higher fixed community-level expenses supporting community count growth (approximately 10 basis points). Our housing gross profit margin for 2019 was also negatively impacted in part by fewer homes delivered from certain West Coast homebuilding reporting segment communities with relatively high average selling prices and housing gross profit margins as compared to the previous year.
Excluding the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations of $156.1 million and $197.9 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively, and the above-mentioned inventory-related charges in the applicable periods, our adjusted housing gross profit margin decreased 30 basis points to 22.2% in 2019 from 22.5% in 2018. The calculation of adjusted housing gross profit margin, which we believe provides a clearer measure of the performance of our business, is described below under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
Selling, general and administrative expenses rose 12% in 2019 from the prior year, primarily due to our adoption of ASC 606 and increased marketing expenses to support new community openings. As a percentage of housing revenues, our selling, general and administrative expenses rose 120 basis points in 2019 as compared to 2018.
Interest Income. Interest income, which is generated from short-term investments, totaled $2.2 million in 2019 and $3.5 million in 2018. Generally, increases and decreases in interest income are attributable to changes in the interest-bearing average balances of short-term investments and fluctuations in interest rates.
Interest Expense. Interest expense results principally from our borrowings to finance land acquisitions, land development, home construction and other operating and capital needs. All interest incurred during 2019 and 2018 was capitalized as the average amount of our inventory qualifying for interest capitalization was higher than our average debt level for the period. As a result, we had no interest expense for 2019 or 2018.
Interest incurred declined 4% to $143.4 million in 2019, from $149.7 million in 2018, due to our lower average debt level, partly offset by a higher average interest rate. The lower average debt level in 2019 primarily reflected the repayment of certain senior notes during the year. The amount of interest incurred generally fluctuates based on the average amount of debt outstanding for the period and/or the interest rate on that debt.
Interest amortized to construction and land costs associated with housing operations totaled $156.1 million in 2019 and $197.9 million in 2018. The year-over-year decrease in interest amortized in 2019 mainly reflected the reduction in our interest incurred and the growth in our active inventory, which enabled us to allocate the lower level of interest over a larger population of owned lots. As a percentage of housing revenues, the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations was 3.5% for 2019 and 4.4% for 2018. Interest amortized to construction and land costs in 2019 and 2018 included $.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively, of amortization of previously capitalized interest related to land sales that occurred during those years.
Equity in Income (Loss) of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. Our equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $1.5 million in 2019, compared to equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures of $2.1 million in 2018. Further information regarding our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is provided in Note 9 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. Our $6.8 million loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2019 was associated with our optional redemption of $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 8.00% senior notes due 2020 (“8.00% Senior Notes due 2020”) prior to their maturity date.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This report contains information about our adjusted housing gross profit margin, adjusted income tax expense, adjusted net income, adjusted diluted earnings per share, adjusted effective tax rate, return on invested capital, and ratio of net debt to capital, none of which are calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are relevant and useful to investors in understanding our operations and the leverage employed in our operations, and may be helpful in comparing us with other companies in the homebuilding industry to the extent they provide similar information. However, because they are not calculated in accordance with GAAP, these non-GAAP financial measures may not be completely comparable to other companies in the homebuilding industry and, thus, should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to operating performance and/or financial measures prescribed by GAAP. Rather, these non-GAAP financial measures should be used to supplement their respective most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in order to provide a greater understanding of the factors and trends affecting our operations.
Adjusted Housing Gross Profit Margin. The following table reconciles our housing gross profit margin calculated in accordance with GAAP to the non-GAAP financial measure of our adjusted housing gross profit margin (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Housing revenues | $ | 4,510,814 |
| | $ | 4,517,244 |
| | $ | 4,335,205 |
|
Housing construction and land costs | (3,683,174 | ) | | (3,728,917 | ) | | (3,627,732 | ) |
Housing gross profits | 827,640 |
| | 788,327 |
| | 707,473 |
|
Add: Inventory-related charges (a) | 17,291 |
| | 28,994 |
| | 25,232 |
|
Housing gross profits excluding inventory-related charges | 844,931 |
| | 817,321 |
| | 732,705 |
|
Add: Amortization of previously capitalized interest (b) | 156,114 |
| | 197,936 |
| | 210,538 |
|
Adjusted housing gross profits | $ | 1,001,045 |
| | $ | 1,015,257 |
| | $ | 943,243 |
|
Housing gross profit margin as a percentage of housing revenues | 18.3 | % | | 17.5 | % | | 16.3 | % |
Housing gross profit margin excluding inventory-related charges as a percentage of housing revenues | 18.7 | % | | 18.1 | % | | 16.9 | % |
Adjusted housing gross profit margin as a percentage of housing revenues | 22.2 | % | | 22.5 | % | | 21.8 | % |
| |
(a) | Represents inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges associated with housing operations. |
| |
(b) | Represents the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations. |
Adjusted housing gross profit margin is a non-GAAP financial measure, which we calculate by dividing housing revenues less housing construction and land costs excluding (1) housing inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges (as applicable) recorded during a given period and (2) amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations, by housing revenues. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is housing gross profit margin. We believe adjusted housing gross profit margin is a relevant and useful financial measure to investors in evaluating our performance as it measures the gross profits we generated specifically on the homes delivered during a given period. This non-GAAP financial measure isolates the impact that the housing inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges, and the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations, have on housing gross profit margins, and allows investors to make comparisons with our competitors that adjust housing gross profit margins in a similar manner. We also believe investors will find adjusted housing gross profit margin relevant and useful because it represents a profitability measure that may be compared to a prior period without regard to variability of housing inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges, and amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations. This financial measure assists us in making strategic decisions regarding community location and product mix, product pricing and construction pace.
Adjusted Income Tax Expense, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share and Adjusted Effective Tax Rate. The following table reconciles our income tax expense, net income, diluted earnings per share and effective tax rate calculated in accordance with GAAP to the non-GAAP financial measures of adjusted income tax expense, adjusted net income, adjusted diluted earnings per share and adjusted effective tax rate, respectively (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| As Reported | | As Reported | | TCJA Adjustment | | As Adjusted | | As Reported |
Total pretax income | $ | 348,175 |
| | $ | 367,965 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 367,965 |
| | $ | 289,995 |
|
Income tax expense (a) | (79,400 | ) | | (197,600 | ) | | 112,500 |
| | (85,100 | ) | | (109,400 | ) |
Net income | $ | 268,775 |
| | $ | 170,365 |
| | $ | 112,500 |
| | $ | 282,865 |
| | $ | 180,595 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.85 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | | | $ | 2.82 |
| | $ | 1.85 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted | 93,838 |
| | 101,059 |
| | | | 101,059 |
| | 98,316 |
|
Effective tax rate (a) | 22.8 | % | | 53.7 | % | | | | 23.1 | % | | 37.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
(a) | For the year ended November 30, 2019, income tax expense and the related effective tax rate reflected the favorable impacts of $5.3 million of excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation, a $4.4 million deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversal and $4.3 million of federal energy tax credits we earned from building energy-efficient homes, partly offset by a $1.9 million non-cash charge due to the re-measurement of deferred tax assets based on a reduction in certain state income tax rates. For the year ended November 30, 2018, income tax expense and adjusted income tax expense, as well as the related effective tax rate and adjusted effective tax rate, included the favorable impacts of the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018, $10.7 million of federal energy tax credits we earned from building energy-efficient homes, a $2.1 million net benefit from a reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance, and $1.0 million of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation as a result of our adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”), effective December 1, 2017. |
Our adjusted income tax expense, adjusted net income, adjusted diluted earnings per share and adjusted effective tax rate are non-GAAP financial measures, which we calculate by excluding a non-cash charge of $112.5 million recorded in 2018 from our reported income tax expense, net income, diluted earnings per share and effective tax rate, respectively. This charge was primarily due to our accounting re-measurement of our deferred tax assets based on the above-noted reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate under the TCJA. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are our income tax expense, net income, diluted earnings per share and effective tax rate. We believe that these non-GAAP measures are meaningful to investors as they allow for an evaluation of our operating results without the impact of the TCJA-related charge.
Return on Invested Capital. The following table sets forth our calculation of return on invested capital as used under our Returns-Focused Growth Plan, together with a reconciliation of net operating profit after tax to net income, the most comparable GAAP measure (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, |
| | 2019 | | 2016 |
Net income | | $ | 268,775 |
| | $ | 105,615 |
|
Adjustments: | | | | |
Interest (income) expense, net | | (2,158 | ) | | 5,371 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | | 6,800 |
| | — |
|
Amortization of previously capitalized interest (a) | | 156,803 |
| | 161,285 |
|
Income tax impact (b) | | (36,800 | ) | | (48,800 | ) |
Net operating profit after tax | | $ | 393,420 |
| | $ | 223,471 |
|
| | | | |
Average notes payable | | $ | 1,945,458 |
| | $ | 2,627,689 |
|
Average stockholders’ equity | | 2,211,312 |
| | 1,669,731 |
|
Average invested capital | | $ | 4,156,770 |
| | $ | 4,297,420 |
|
Return on invested capital | | 9.5 | % | | 5.2 | % |
| |
(a) | Represents the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with homebuilding operations. |
| |
(b) | Represents the total adjustments to net income multiplied by our effective tax rate, which was 22.8% for 2019 and 29.3% for 2016. |
We define return on invested capital as net operating profit after tax, a non-GAAP financial measure, for the most recent 12-month period divided by average invested capital (average notes payable and stockholders’ equity for the trailing five quarters). In addition to its use in measuring our performance under our Returns-Focused Growth Plan against the corresponding three-year objective, we believe return on invested capital is a relevant and useful financial measure to investors in understanding how effectively we deploy our capital.
Ratio of Net Debt to Capital. The following table reconciles our ratio of debt to capital calculated in accordance with GAAP to the non-GAAP financial measure of our ratio of net debt to capital (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Notes payable | $ | 1,748,747 |
| | $ | 2,060,263 |
|
Stockholders’ equity | 2,383,122 |
| | 2,087,500 |
|
Total capital | $ | 4,131,869 |
| | $ | 4,147,763 |
|
Ratio of debt to capital | 42.3 | % | | 49.7 | % |
| | | |
Notes payable | $ | 1,748,747 |
| | $ | 2,060,263 |
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents | (453,814 | ) | | (574,359 | ) |
Net debt | 1,294,933 |
| | 1,485,904 |
|
Stockholders’ equity | 2,383,122 |
| | 2,087,500 |
|
Total capital | $ | 3,678,055 |
| | $ | 3,573,404 |
|
Ratio of net debt to capital | 35.2 | % | | 41.6 | % |
The ratio of net debt to capital is a non-GAAP financial measure, which we calculate by dividing notes payable, net of homebuilding cash and cash equivalents, by capital (notes payable, net of homebuilding cash and cash equivalents, plus stockholders’ equity). The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is the ratio of debt to capital. We believe the ratio of net debt to capital is a relevant and useful financial measure to investors in understanding the degree of leverage employed in our operations.
HOMEBUILDING REPORTING SEGMENTS
Below is a discussion of the financial results of each of our homebuilding reporting segments. Further information regarding these segments, including their pretax income (loss), is included in Note 2 – Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. The difference between each homebuilding reporting segment’s operating income (loss) and pretax income (loss) is generally due to the equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures, which is also presented in Note 2 – Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, and/or interest income and expense.
West Coast. The following table presents financial information related to our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment for the years indicated (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, | | Variance |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
Revenues | $ | 1,912,146 |
| | $ | 2,085,328 |
| | $ | 2,186,411 |
| | (8 | ) % | | (5 | ) % |
Construction and land costs | (1,591,896 | ) | | (1,720,776 | ) | | (1,835,504 | ) | | 7 |
| | 6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (141,324 | ) | | (123,254 | ) | | (131,182 | ) | | (15 | ) | | 6 |
|
Operating income | $ | 178,926 |
| | $ | 241,298 |
| | $ | 219,725 |
| | (26 | ) % | | 10 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 3,214 |
| | 3,152 |
| | 3,387 |
| | 2 | % | | (7 | ) % |
Average selling price | $ | 592,300 |
| | $ | 661,500 |
| | $ | 644,900 |
| | (10 | ) % | | 3 | % |
Housing gross profit margin | 16.8 | % | | 17.5 | % | | 16.0 | % | | (70 | )bps | | 150 | bps |
This segment’s revenues in 2019 and 2018 were generated from both housing operations and land sales. Housing revenues of $1.90 billion in 2019 decreased 9% from $2.09 billion in 2018, reflecting a lower average selling price of homes delivered, partly offset by an increase in the number of homes delivered. The decrease in the average selling price of homes delivered in 2019 reflected a product and geographic mix shift, particularly the impact from fewer deliveries from certain communities with relatively high average selling prices, and a greater number of homes delivered from lower-priced inland California markets and coastal communities at more affordable price points. The growth in the number of homes delivered mainly reflected a 19% rise in net orders during the year as this segment’s beginning backlog was down 19% compared to the year-earlier period, which reflected an 11% year-over-year reduction in the average community count in 2018 and softer market conditions that impacted net orders in the 2018 latter half.
This segment’s operating income in 2019 declined from the previous year, mainly reflecting lower housing gross profits and higher selling, general and administrative expenses. The decrease in housing gross profits reflected declines in both housing revenues and the housing gross profit margin. The decrease in the housing gross profit margin was primarily due to an increase in construction and land costs as a percentage of housing revenues as a result of a mix shift, with a lower proportion of homes delivered from communities with relatively high average selling prices and housing gross profit margins; reduced operating leverage on fixed costs due to lower housing revenues; and an increase in sales incentives. These cost increases were partly offset by lower amortization of previously capitalized interest, accounting changes resulting from our adoption of ASC 606, and a decrease in inventory-related charges. Inventory-related charges impacting the housing gross profit margin totaled $15.6 million in 2019, compared to $20.4 million in 2018. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing revenues for 2019 rose from the previous year, primarily as a result of our adoption of ASC 606, higher marketing expenses to support new community openings and reduced operating leverage on fixed costs due to lower housing revenues.
Southwest. The following table presents financial information related to our Southwest homebuilding reporting segment for the years indicated (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, | | Variance |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
Revenues | $ | 764,816 |
| | $ | 707,075 |
| | $ | 533,052 |
| | 8 | % | | 33 | % |
Construction and land costs | (585,880 | ) | | (568,194 | ) | | (445,451 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (28 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (67,223 | ) | | (50,897 | ) | | (42,329 | ) | | (32 | ) | | (20 | ) |
Operating income | $ | 111,713 |
| | $ | 87,984 |
| | $ | 45,272 |
| | 27 | % | | 94 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 2,346 |
| | 2,301 |
| | 1,837 |
| | 2 | % | | 25 | % |
Average selling price | $ | 322,000 |
| | $ | 307,300 |
| | $ | 290,200 |
| | 5 | % | | 6 | % |
Housing gross profit margin | 23.8 | % | | 19.6 | % | | 16.4 | % | | 420 | bps | | 320 | bps |
In 2019, this segment’s revenues were generated from both housing operations and land sales, with housing revenues totaling $755.4 million. In 2018, this segment’s revenues were generated solely from housing operations. Housing revenues increased 7% in 2019 as compared to the corresponding previous year, reflecting growth in the number of homes delivered and a higher average selling price of those homes. In 2019, the year-over-year increase in the number of homes delivered was attributable to our Nevada operations. The higher average selling price was mainly due to a product and geographic mix shift of homes delivered and generally favorable market conditions.
This segment’s operating income increased $23.7 million from 2018 due to higher housing gross profits, partly offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses. The year-over-year increase in housing gross profits reflected growth in housing revenues and an increase in the housing gross profit margin. The improvement in the housing gross profit margin was largely due to a greater proportion of homes delivered from newer, higher-margin communities, lower amortization of previously capitalized interest, and accounting changes resulting from our adoption of ASC 606. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing revenues for 2019 increased from 2018, mainly as a result of our adoption of ASC 606, as well as legal recoveries and a favorable legal settlement in 2018.
Central. The following table presents financial information related to our Central homebuilding reporting segment for the years indicated (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, | | Variance |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
Revenues | $ | 1,267,892 |
| | $ | 1,239,305 |
| | $ | 1,188,839 |
| | 2 | % | | 4 | % |
Construction and land costs | (1,015,415 | ) | | (1,010,674 | ) | | (963,202 | ) | | — |
| | (5 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (126,176 | ) | | (111,028 | ) | | (109,385 | ) | | (14 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Operating income | $ | 126,301 |
| | $ | 117,603 |
| | $ | 116,252 |
| | 7 | % | | 1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 4,291 |
| | 4,113 |
| | 4,136 |
| | 4 | % | | (1 | ) % |
Average selling price | $ | 293,500 |
| | $ | 297,400 |
| | $ | 284,800 |
| | (1 | ) % | | 4 | % |
Housing gross profit margin | 19.9 | % | | 18.6 | % | | 19.2 | % | | 130 | bps | | (60 | )bps |
In 2019 and 2018, revenues for this segment were generated from both housing operations and land sales. Housing revenues in 2019 increased 3% to $1.26 billion from $1.22 billion in 2018 due to an increase in the number of homes delivered, which was partially offset by a slight decrease in the average selling price of those homes. In 2019, the growth in the number of homes delivered was attributable to our Texas operations. The decrease in the average selling price reflected a shift in product and geographic mix, with fewer homes delivered from our Colorado operations, which typically have higher-priced communities relative to our Texas operations. Land sale revenues were $8.3 million in 2019, compared to $16.1 million in 2018.
In 2019, this segment’s operating income increased $8.7 million from 2018, mainly due to an increase in housing gross profits that was partly offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. Housing gross profits increased mainly due to improvement in the housing gross profit margin. The housing gross profit margin rose from the previous year primarily due to lower amortization of previously capitalized interest, and accounting changes resulting from our adoption of ASC 606. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing revenues for 2019 increased from the prior year, primarily due to our adoption of ASC 606 and higher marketing expenses.
Southeast. The following table presents financial information related to our Southeast homebuilding reporting segment for the years indicated (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, | | Variance |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
Revenues | $ | 592,804 |
| | $ | 502,087 |
| | $ | 447,963 |
| | 18 | % | | 12 | % |
Construction and land costs | (508,351 | ) | | (437,522 | ) | | (396,026 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (10 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (65,902 | ) | | (56,940 | ) | | (52,378 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (9 | ) |
Operating income (loss) | $ | 18,551 |
| | $ | 7,625 |
| | $ | (441 | ) | | 143 | % | | (a) |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 2,020 |
| | 1,751 |
| | 1,549 |
| | 15 | % | | 13 | % |
Average selling price | $ | 293,200 |
| | $ | 286,600 |
| | $ | 284,100 |
| | 2 | % | | 1 | % |
Housing gross profit margin | 14.3 | % | | 12.9 | % | | 11.7 | % | | 140 | bps | | 120 | bps |
| |
(a) | Percentage not meaningful |
This segment’s revenues in 2019 and 2018 were generated from both housing operations and land sales. Housing revenues in 2019 increased 18% to $592.3 million from $501.9 million in 2018. The year-over-year growth in housing revenues in 2019 reflected increases in both the number of homes delivered and the average selling price of those homes. In 2019, the increase in the number of homes delivered mainly reflected a larger beginning backlog, which was up 14% compared to the year-earlier period, and an increase in homes delivered from newer communities. The year-over-year increase in the average selling price in 2019 was mainly due to a greater proportion of homes delivered from higher-priced communities.
This segment’s operating income in 2019 rose $10.9 million from 2018 due to an increase in housing gross profits, partly offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. The year-over-year growth in housing gross profits reflected
increases in both the number of homes delivered and the housing gross profit margin. The housing gross profit margin improved primarily due to accounting changes resulting from our adoption of ASC 606, lower amortization of previously capitalized interest, and lower inventory-related charges. These improvements were partly offset by an increase in construction and land costs as a percentage of housing revenues as a result of homes delivered from lots we acquired in 2018 from a regional homebuilder in Florida. In 2019, inventory-related charges impacting the housing gross profit margin totaled $.5 million, compared to $5.6 million in 2018. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing revenues for 2019 decreased from the previous year, primarily due to a decrease in legal accruals, partly offset by our adoption of ASC 606.
FINANCIAL SERVICES REPORTING SEGMENT
The following table presents a summary of selected financial and operational data for our financial services reporting segment (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Revenues | $ | 15,089 |
| | $ | 13,207 |
| | $ | 12,264 |
|
Expenses | (4,333 | ) | | (3,844 | ) | | (3,430 | ) |
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures | 12,230 |
| | 7,301 |
| | 4,234 |
|
Pretax income | $ | 22,986 |
| | $ | 16,664 |
| | $ | 13,068 |
|
| | | | | |
Total originations (a): | | | | | |
Loans | 7,436 |
| | 5,659 |
| | 2,485 |
|
Principal | $ | 2,190,823 |
| | $ | 1,578,037 |
| | $ | 688,763 |
|
Percentage of homebuyers using KBHS | 70 | % | | 56 | % | | 25 | % |
Average FICO score | 719 |
| | 718 |
| | 719 |
|
| | | | | |
Loans sold (a): | | | | | |
Loans sold to Stearns/Nationstar | 6,224 |
| | 5,028 |
| | 1,872 |
|
Principal | $ | 1,827,917 |
| | $ | 1,419,140 |
| | $ | 514,307 |
|
Loans sold to other third parties | 772 |
| | 490 |
| | 196 |
|
Principal | $ | 202,349 |
| | $ | 120,815 |
| | $ | 51,425 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loan origination mix (a): | | | | | |
Conventional/non-conventional loans | 58 | % | | 56 | % | | 52 | % |
FHA loans | 26 | % | | 27 | % | | 31 | % |
Other government loans | 16 | % | | 17 | % | | 17 | % |
| | | | | |
Loan type (a): | | | | | |
Fixed | 98 | % | | 99 | % | | 99 | % |
ARM | 2 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % |
| |
(a) | Loan originations and sales occurred within KBHS. |
Revenues. Our financial services reporting segment generates revenues primarily from insurance commissions and title services. The year-over-year growth in our financial services revenues for 2019 reflected increases in both insurance commissions and title services revenues. In 2019, we also expanded our title services business to Arizona, Colorado and Nevada.
Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased in 2019, as compared to 2018, reflecting the growth in our financial services revenues.
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. The equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures rose on a year-over-year basis in 2019 primarily due to a substantial increase in the percentage of our homebuyers using KBHS.
On July 9, 2019, the parent company of Stearns, our partner in KBHS, filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, with Stearns included as a debtor in the case. KBHS was not included
in the filing. On October 24, 2019, the court confirmed Stearns’ parent company’s plan of reorganization under which, among other things, one of its largest owners took full control of the reorganized company and invested significant new equity capital in the business. The confirmed plan of reorganization became effective on November 5, 2019. During the pendency of the bankruptcy proceedings, KBHS provided mortgage banking services to our homebuyers consistent with its pre-filing performance and there was no consolidated financial statement impact. With the plan of reorganization now effective, we believe KBHS will be financially and operationally able to continue to provide such mortgage banking services in the ordinary course.
INCOME TAXES
Income Tax Expense. Our income tax expense and effective income tax rate were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Income tax expense | $ | 79,400 |
| | $ | 197,600 |
| | $ | 109,400 |
|
Effective income tax rate | 22.8 | % | | 53.7 | % | | 37.7 | % |
Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2019 reflected the favorable impacts of $5.3 million of excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation, a $4.4 million deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversal and $4.3 million of federal energy tax credits, partly offset by a $1.9 million non-cash charge due to the re-measurement of deferred tax assets based on a reduction in certain state income tax rates.
Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2018 included a non-cash charge of $112.5 million for TCJA-related impacts; the favorable effect of the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate under the TCJA; the favorable net impact of federal energy tax credits of $10.7 million that we earned from building energy-efficient homes; a $2.1 million net tax benefit from a reduction in our state deferred tax asset valuation allowance; and excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $1.0 million. The TCJA required us to use a blended federal tax rate for our 2018 fiscal year by applying a prorated percentage of days before and after the January 1, 2018 effective date. As a result, our 2018 federal statutory tax rate was approximately 22%.
The federal energy tax credits for the year ended November 30, 2018 resulted from legislation enacted on February 9, 2018, which, among other things, extended the availability of a business tax credit for building new energy-efficient homes through December 31, 2017. Prior to this legislation, the tax credit expired on December 31, 2016. In December 2019, federal legislation was enacted, which among other things, extended the availability of the credit through December 31, 2020. This extension is expected to benefit our income tax provision in future periods.
Excluding the above-mentioned charge of $112.5 million for TCJA-related impacts, our adjusted income tax expense and adjusted effective tax rate for 2018 were $85.1 million and 23.1%, respectively. The calculations of adjusted income tax expense and adjusted effective tax rate are described above under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
Under current accounting standards, we expect volatility in our income tax expense in future periods, the magnitude of which will depend on, among other factors, the price of our common stock and the timing and volume of stock-based compensation award activity, such as employee exercises of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock awards and performance-based restricted stock units (each, a “PSU”).
For each of the years ended November 30, 2019 and 2018, the amount of income taxes we paid was substantially less than our income tax expense primarily due to the utilization of our deferred tax assets to reduce taxable income. We anticipate this will continue for the next several years due to the sizable deferred tax assets remaining as of November 30, 2019.
Further information regarding our income taxes is provided in Note 13 – Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview. We have funded our homebuilding and financial services activities over the last several years with:
| |
• | internally generated cash flows; |
| |
• | public issuances of debt securities; |
• borrowings under the Credit Facility;
| |
• | land option contracts and other similar contracts and seller notes; |
| |
• | public issuances of our common stock; and |
| |
• | letters of credit and performance bonds. |
We also have the ability to borrow funds under the Credit Facility. We manage our use of cash in the operation of our business to support the execution of our primary strategic goals. Over the past several years, we have primarily used cash for:
| |
• | land acquisitions and land development; |
| |
• | principal and interest payments on notes payable; and |
•repayments of borrowings under the Credit Facility.
Our investments in land and land development totaled $1.62 billion in 2019 and $1.89 billion in 2018. Approximately 39% of our total investments in 2019 related to land acquisitions, compared to approximately 50% in 2018. While we made strategic investments in land and land development in each of our homebuilding reporting segments in each of these years, approximately 53% in 2019 and 56% in 2018 were made in our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment. In 2018, we significantly expanded our existing Jacksonville, Florida operations by acquiring approximately 2,100 owned or controlled lots from a regional homebuilder, and entered the attractive Seattle, Washington market. Our investments in land and land development in the future will depend significantly on market conditions and available opportunities that meet our investment return standards to support home delivery and revenue growth in 2020 and beyond.
The following table presents the number of lots we owned or controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts and the carrying value of inventory by homebuilding reporting segment (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | November 30, 2019 | | November 30, 2018 | | Variance |
Segment | | Lots | | $ | | Lots | | $ | | Lots | | $ |
West Coast | | 12,842 |
| | $ | 1,795,088 |
| | 12,680 |
| | $ | 1,727,993 |
| | 162 |
| | $ | 67,095 |
|
Southwest | | 10,026 |
| | 629,811 |
| | 9,815 |
| | 598,374 |
| | 211 |
| | 31,437 |
|
Central | | 22,937 |
| | 889,179 |
| | 22,237 |
| | 865,184 |
| | 700 |
| | 23,995 |
|
Southeast | | 9,893 |
| | 390,524 |
| | 8,895 |
| | 391,288 |
| | 998 |
| | (764 | ) |
Total | | 55,698 |
| | $ | 3,704,602 |
| | 53,627 |
| | $ | 3,582,839 |
| | 2,071 |
| | $ | 121,763 |
|
The number and carrying value of lots we owned or controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts at November 30, 2019 increased from November 30, 2018, primarily due to our investments in land and land development during 2019 and an increase in the number of homes completed or under construction. The number of lots in inventory as of November 30, 2019 and 2018 excludes 9,212 and 11,185 lots, respectively, under contract where the associated deposits were refundable at our discretion. Including these lots, our land under contract as a percentage of total lots was 41% at November 30, 2019 and 39% at November 30, 2018. Generally, this percentage fluctuates with our decisions to control (or abandon) lots under land option contracts and other similar contracts or to purchase (or sell owned) lots based on available opportunities and our investment return standards.
Liquidity. The table below summarizes our total cash and cash equivalents, and total liquidity (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | November 30, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 453,814 |
| | $ | 574,359 |
|
Credit Facility commitment | | 800,000 |
| | 500,000 |
|
Borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility | | — |
| | — |
|
Letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility | | (18,884 | ) | | (28,010 | ) |
Credit Facility availability | | 781,116 |
| | 471,990 |
|
Total liquidity | | $ | 1,234,930 |
| | $ | 1,046,349 |
|
| | | | |
Our cash and cash equivalents at November 30, 2019 and 2018 were invested in interest-bearing bank deposit accounts.
Capital Resources. Our notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| November 30, | | |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | Variance |
Mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans | $ | 7,889 |
| | $ | 40,038 |
| | $ | (32,149 | ) |
Senior notes | 1,740,858 |
| | 1,790,437 |
| | (49,579 | ) |
Convertible senior notes | — |
| | 229,788 |
| | (229,788 | ) |
Total | $ | 1,748,747 |
| | $ | 2,060,263 |
| | $ | (311,516 | ) |
The change in our notes payable balance at November 30, 2019 compared to November 30, 2018 primarily reflected our financing activities in 2019 that are described in Note 14 – Notes Payable in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Our financial leverage, as measured by the ratio of debt to capital, was 42.3% at November 30, 2019, compared to 49.7% at November 30, 2018. Our ratio of net debt to capital (a calculation that is described above under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”) at November 30, 2019 improved to 35.2%, compared to 41.6% at November 30, 2018.
LOC Facility. On February 13, 2019, we entered into a new LOC Facility. Under the LOC Facility, which expires on February 13, 2022, we may issue up to $50.0 million of letters of credit. We maintain the LOC Facility to obtain letters of credit from time to time in the ordinary course of operating our business. As of November 30, 2019, we had $15.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under the LOC Facility. We previously had a cash-collateralized letter of credit facility, which we terminated in 2019. We had no letters of credit outstanding under the cash-collateralized letter of credit facility at November 30, 2018.
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility. On October 7, 2019, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility that increased its borrowing capacity from $500.0 million to $800.0 million and extended its maturity from July 27, 2021 to October 7, 2023. The amount of the Credit Facility available for cash borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit depends on the total cash borrowings and letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility and the maximum available amount under the terms of the Credit Facility. As of November 30, 2019, we had no cash borrowings and $18.9 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is further described in Note 14 – Notes Payable in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain compliance with various covenants, including financial covenants regarding our consolidated tangible net worth, consolidated leverage ratio (“Leverage Ratio”), and either a consolidated interest coverage ratio (“Interest Coverage Ratio”) or minimum liquidity level, each as defined therein. Our compliance with these financial covenants is measured by calculations and metrics that are specifically defined or described by the terms of the Credit Facility and can differ in certain respects from comparable GAAP or other commonly used terms. The financial covenant requirements under the Credit Facility, as amended, are set forth below:
| |
• | Consolidated Tangible Net Worth – We must maintain a consolidated tangible net worth at the end of any fiscal quarter greater than or equal to the sum of (a) $1.54 billion, plus (b) an amount equal to 50% of the aggregate of the cumulative consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter commencing after May 31, 2019 and ending as of the last day of such fiscal quarter (though there is no reduction if there is a consolidated net loss in any fiscal quarter), plus (c) an amount equal to 50% of the cumulative net proceeds we receive from the issuance of our capital stock after May 31, 2019. |
| |
• | Leverage Ratio – We must also maintain a Leverage Ratio of less than or equal to .65 at the end of each fiscal quarter. The Leverage Ratio is calculated as the ratio of our consolidated total indebtedness to the sum of consolidated total indebtedness and consolidated tangible net worth, all as defined under the Credit Facility. |
| |
• | Interest Coverage Ratio or Liquidity – We are also required to maintain either (a) an Interest Coverage Ratio of greater than or equal to 1.50 at the end of each fiscal quarter; or (b) a minimum level of liquidity, but not both. The Interest Coverage Ratio is the ratio of our consolidated adjusted EBITDA to consolidated interest incurred, each as defined under the Credit Facility, in each case for the previous 12 months. Our minimum liquidity is required to be greater than or equal to consolidated interest incurred, as defined under the Credit Facility, for the four most recently ended fiscal quarters in the aggregate. |
In addition, under the Credit Facility, our investments in joint ventures and non-guarantor subsidiaries (which are shown, respectively, in Note 9 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and in Note 23 – Supplemental Guarantor Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report) as of the end of each fiscal quarter cannot exceed the sum of (a) $104.8 million and (b) 20% of consolidated tangible net worth. Further, the Credit Facility does not permit our borrowing base
indebtedness, which is the aggregate principal amount of our outstanding indebtedness for borrowed money and non-collateralized financial letters of credit, to be greater than our borrowing base (a measure relating to our inventory and unrestricted cash assets).
The covenants and other requirements under the Credit Facility represent the most restrictive provisions that we are subject to with respect to our notes payable. The following table summarizes the financial covenants and other requirements under the Credit Facility, and our actual levels or ratios (as applicable) with respect to those covenants and other requirements, in each case as of November 30, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Financial Covenants and Other Requirements | | Covenant Requirement | | Actual |
Consolidated tangible net worth | | > | $ | 1.64 | billion | | $ | 2.38 | billion |
Leverage Ratio | | < | .650 |
| | .424 |
|
Interest Coverage Ratio (a) | | > | 1.500 |
| | 3.946 |
|
Minimum liquidity (a) | | > | $ | 140.7 | million | | $ | 453.8 | million |
Investments in joint ventures and non-guarantor subsidiaries | | < | $ | 581.4 | million | | $ | 172.8 | million |
Borrowing base in excess of borrowing base indebtedness (as defined) | | | n/a | | $ | 1.31 | billion |
| |
(a) | Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are required to maintain either a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio or a minimum level of liquidity, but not both. As of November 30, 2019, we met both the Interest Coverage Ratio and the minimum liquidity requirements. |
The indenture governing our senior notes does not contain any financial covenants. Subject to specified exceptions, the indenture contains certain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur secured indebtedness, or engage in sale-leaseback transactions involving property or assets above a certain specified value. In addition, our senior notes contain certain limitations related to mergers, consolidations, and sales of assets.
Our obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest under our senior notes and borrowings, if any, under the Credit Facility are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by certain of our subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The guarantees are full and unconditional and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by us. We may also cause other subsidiaries of ours to become Guarantor Subsidiaries if we believe it to be in our or the relevant subsidiary’s best interests. Condensed consolidating financial information for our subsidiaries considered to be Guarantor Subsidiaries is provided in Note 23 – Supplemental Guarantor Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
As of the date of this report, we were in compliance with the applicable terms of all our covenants and other requirements under the Credit Facility, the senior notes, the indenture, and the mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans. Unless there is a default under the Credit Facility, there are no agreements that restrict our payment of dividends.
Depending on available terms, we finance certain land acquisitions with purchase-money financing from land sellers or with other forms of financing from third parties. At November 30, 2019, we had outstanding mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans payable in connection with such financing of $7.9 million, secured primarily by the underlying property, which had an aggregate carrying value of $29.2 million.
Credit Ratings. Our credit ratings are periodically reviewed by rating agencies. In July 2019, Moody’s Investor Service upgraded our corporate rating to Ba3 from B1, and changed the rating outlook to stable from positive. In January 2020, Standard and Poor’s Financial Services upgraded our credit rating to BB from BB-, and changed the rating outlook to stable from positive.
Consolidated Cash Flows. The following table presents a summary of net cash provided by (used in) our operating, investing and financing activities (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | | |
Operating activities | $ | 251,042 |
| | $ | 221,512 |
| | $ | 513,219 |
|
Investing activities | (40,944 | ) | | (20,107 | ) | | (15,744 | ) |
Financing activities | (330,359 | ) | | (347,147 | ) | | (369,614 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (120,261 | ) | | $ | (145,742 | ) | | $ | 127,861 |
|
Operating Activities. Operating activities provided net cash of $251.0 million in 2019 and $221.5 million in 2018. Generally, our net operating cash flows fluctuate primarily based on changes in our inventories and our profitability.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2019 mainly reflected net income of $268.8 million and a net decrease in receivables of $44.4 million, partly offset by a net increase in inventories of $165.3 million and a net decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $40.6 million. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2018 primarily reflected net income of $170.4 million adjusted for various non-cash items, including a net decrease of $191.8 million in our deferred tax assets, and a net increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $126.7 million, partly offset by a net increase in inventories of $270.1 million and a net increase in receivables of $49.8 million.
Investing Activities. Investing activities used net cash of $40.9 million in 2019 and $20.1 million in 2018. Our uses of cash in 2019 included $40.5 million for net purchases of property and equipment and $11.3 million for contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures. These uses of cash were partially offset by $5.8 million of proceeds from the sale of a building and a $5.0 million return of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures. In 2019, our net purchases of property and equipment increased from the previous year, primarily reflecting our adoption of ASC 606, as discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. In 2018, the net cash used in investing activities included $22.7 million for contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures and $7.4 million for net purchases of property and equipment. These uses of cash were partially offset by a $9.9 million return of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.
Financing Activities. Financing activities used net cash of $330.4 million in 2019 and $347.1 million in 2018. In 2019, net cash was used for our total repayment of $980.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 8.00% Senior Notes due 2020, 1.375% convertible senior notes due 2019 (“1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019”) and 4.75% senior notes due 2019 (“4.75% Senior Notes due 2019”), payments on mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans of $41.1 million, dividend payments on our common stock of $20.4 million, and tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards of $7.3 million. The cash used was partially offset by cash provided by our public offering of $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.80% senior notes due 2029 (“4.80% Senior Notes due 2029”), concurrent public offerings of $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.875% senior notes due 2027 (“6.875% Senior Notes due 2027”) and an additional $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our existing series of 7.625% senior notes due 2023 (“7.625% Senior Notes due 2023”), and $30.5 million of issuances of common stock under employee stock plans.
In 2018, net cash was used for the repayment of $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 7 1/4% senior notes due 2018 (“7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018”), repurchases of shares of our common stock at a total cost of $35.0 million, payments on mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans of $14.8 million, dividend payments on our common stock of $8.9 million and tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards of $8.5 million. The cash used was partly offset by $20.0 million of issuances of common stock under employee stock plans.
Our board of directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $.025 per share of common stock in both the 2019 first and second quarters. In the 2019 third quarter, our board of directors approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend on our common stock to $.090 per share, and declared quarterly cash dividends at the new rate in the 2019 third and fourth quarters. Our board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $.025 per share of common stock in 2018. Cash dividends declared and paid during the years ended November 30, 2019 and 2018 totaled $.23 and $.10 per share of common stock, respectively. The declaration and payment of future cash dividends on our common stock, whether at current levels or at all, are at the discretion of our board of directors, and depend upon, among other things, our expected future earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, access to external financing, debt structure and any adjustments thereto, operational and financial investment strategy and general financial condition, as well as general business conditions.
Shelf Registration Statement. We have an automatically effective universal shelf registration statement that was filed with the SEC on July 14, 2017 (“2017 Shelf Registration”). Issuances of securities under our 2017 Shelf Registration require the filing of a prospectus supplement identifying the amount and terms of the securities to be issued. Our ability to issue securities is subject to market conditions and other factors impacting our borrowing capacity.
Share Repurchase Program. In May 2018, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase a total of up to 4,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock. This authorization reaffirmed and incorporated the then-current balance of 1,627,000 shares that remained under a prior board-approved share repurchase program. In 2018, we repurchased 1,806,053 shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization, at a total cost of $35.0 million. We did not repurchase any of our common stock under this authorization in 2019. The amount and timing of shares purchased under the remaining share repurchase authorization are subject to market and business conditions and other factors, and purchases may be made from time to time and at any time through open market or privately negotiated transactions. The remaining share repurchase authorization will continue in effect until fully used or earlier terminated or suspended by our board of directors.
Unrelated to the common stock repurchase program, as further discussed in Note 18 – Stockholders’ Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, our board of directors authorized in 2014 the repurchase of no more than 680,000 shares of our outstanding common stock solely as necessary for director compensation elections with respect to settling outstanding stock appreciation rights awards (“Director Plan SARs”) granted under our Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan (“Director Plan”). As of November 30, 2019, we have not repurchased any shares pursuant to the board of directors authorization.
We believe we have adequate capital resources and sufficient access to the credit and capital markets and external financing sources to satisfy our current and reasonably anticipated long-term requirements for funds to acquire assets and land, to use and/or develop acquired assets and land, to construct homes, to finance our financial services operations and to meet other needs in the ordinary course of our business. In addition to acquiring and/or developing land that meets our investment return standards, in 2020, we may use or redeploy our cash resources or cash borrowings under the Credit Facility to support other business purposes that are aligned with our primary strategic growth goals. We may also arrange or engage in capital markets, bank loan, project debt or other financial transactions. These transactions may include repurchases from time to time of our outstanding common stock. They may also include repurchases from time to time of our outstanding senior notes or other debt through redemptions, tender offers, exchange offers, private exchanges, open market or private purchases or other means, as well as potential new issuances of equity or senior or convertible senior notes or other debt through public offerings, private placements or other arrangements to raise or access additional capital to support our current land and land development investment targets, to complete strategic transactions and for other business purposes and/or to effect repurchases or redemptions of our outstanding senior notes or other debt. The amounts involved in these transactions, if any, may be material. As necessary or desirable, we may adjust or amend the terms of and/or expand the capacity of the Credit Facility or the LOC Facility, or enter into additional letter of credit facilities, or other similar facility arrangements, in each case with the same or other financial institutions, or allow any such facilities to mature or expire. Our ability to engage in such transactions, however, may be constrained by economic, capital, credit and/or financial market conditions, investor interest and/or our current leverage ratios, and we can provide no assurance of the success or costs of any such transactions.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. As discussed in Note 9 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, we have investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in various markets where our homebuilding operations are located. At November 30, 2019 and 2018, one of our unconsolidated joint ventures had outstanding secured debt totaling $40.7 million and $18.0 million, respectively, under a construction loan agreement with a third-party lender to finance its land development activities. The outstanding debt is secured by the underlying property and related project assets and is non-recourse to us. While the secured debt is scheduled to mature in February 2020, the loan agreement provides for two-12 month extensions beyond this date. We anticipate executing the first extension in the 2020 first quarter. None of our other unconsolidated joint ventures had outstanding debt at November 30, 2019 or 2018. While we and our partner in the unconsolidated joint venture that has the outstanding construction loan agreement at November 30, 2019 provide certain guarantees and indemnities to the lender, we do not have a guaranty or any other obligation to repay or to support the value of the collateral underlying the outstanding secured debt. We do not believe that our existing exposure under our guaranty and indemnity obligations related to the outstanding secured debt is material to our consolidated financial statements.
Land Option Contracts and Other Similar Contracts. As discussed in Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, in the ordinary course of our business, we enter into land option contracts and other similar contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities to acquire rights to land for the construction of homes. Our land option contracts and other similar contracts generally do not contain provisions requiring our specific performance. Our decision to exercise a particular land option contract or other similar contract depends on the results of our due diligence reviews and ongoing market and project feasibility analysis that we conduct after entering into such a contract. In some cases, our decision to exercise a land option contract or other similar contract may be conditioned on the land seller obtaining necessary entitlements, such as zoning rights and environmental and development approvals, and/or physically developing the underlying land by a pre-determined date. We typically have the ability not to exercise our rights to the underlying land for any reason and forfeit our deposits without further penalty or obligation to the sellers. If we were to acquire all of the land we had under land option contracts and other similar contracts at November 30, 2019, we estimate the remaining purchase price to be paid would be as follows: 2020 – $912.1 million; 2021 – $204.4 million; 2022 – $83.1 million; 2023 – $25.3 million; 2024 – $42.9 million; and thereafter – $80.5 million.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
The following table presents our future cash requirements under contractual obligations as of November 30, 2019 (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments due by Period |
| Total | | 2020 | | 2021-2022 | | 2023-2024 | | Thereafter |
Contractual obligations: | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | $ | 1,757.9 |
| | $ | 7.9 |
| | $ | 800.0 |
| | $ | 350.0 |
| | $ | 600.0 |
|
Interest | 553.0 |
| | 121.5 |
| | 224.5 |
| | 83.4 |
| | 123.6 |
|
Operating lease obligations | 37.2 |
| | 9.7 |
| | 13.6 |
| | 8.1 |
| | 5.8 |
|
Inventory-related obligations (a) | 29.1 |
| | 5.3 |
| | 8.9 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 13.4 |
|
Total | $ | 2,377.2 |
| | $ | 144.4 |
| | $ | 1,047.0 |
| | $ | 443.0 |
| | $ | 742.8 |
|
| |
(a) | Represents liabilities for inventory not owned associated with financing arrangements as discussed in Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, as well as liabilities for fixed or determinable amounts associated with tax increment financing entity (“TIFE”) assessments. As homes are delivered, the obligation to pay the remaining TIFE assessments associated with each underlying lot is transferred to the homebuyer. As such, these assessment obligations will be paid by us only to the extent we do not deliver homes on applicable lots before the related TIFE obligations mature. |
As discussed in Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, we had $793.9 million of performance bonds and $34.7 million of letters of credit outstanding at November 30, 2019. At November 30, 2018, we had $689.3 million of performance bonds and $28.0 million of letters of credit outstanding.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for a discussion of our significant accounting policies. The following are accounting policies that we believe are critical because of the significance of the activity to which they relate or because they require the use of significant estimates, judgments and/or other assumptions in their application.
Homebuilding Revenue Recognition. We recognize homebuilding revenue in accordance with ASC 606 by applying the following steps in determining the timing and amount of revenue to recognize: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, if applicable; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation.
Our home sale transactions are made pursuant to contracts under which we typically have a single performance obligation to deliver a completed home to the homebuyer when closing conditions are met. Revenues from home sales are recognized when we have satisfied the performance obligation within the sales contract, which is generally when title to and possession of the home and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the homebuyer on the closing date. Little to no estimation is involved in recognizing such revenues.
Land sale transactions are made pursuant to contracts under which we typically have a performance obligation(s) to deliver specified land parcels to the buyer when closing conditions are met. We evaluate each land sale contract to determine our performance obligation(s) under the contract, including whether we have a distinct promise to perform post-closing land development work that is material within the context of the contract, and use objective criteria to determine our completion of the applicable performance obligation(s), whether at a point in time or over time. Revenues from land sales are recognized when we have satisfied the performance obligation(s) within the sales contract, which is generally when title to and possession of the land and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the land buyer on the closing date. In instances where we have a distinct and material performance obligation(s) within the context of a land sale contract to perform land development work after the closing date, a portion of the transaction price under the contract is allocated to such performance obligation(s) and is recognized as revenue over time based upon our estimated progress toward the satisfaction of the performance obligation(s). We generally measure our progress based on our costs incurred relative to the total costs expected to satisfy the performance obligation(s). Certain land sale contracts may require management judgment in determining the appropriate revenue recognition, but the impact of such transactions is generally immaterial.
Inventories and Cost of Sales. Housing and land inventories are stated at cost, unless the carrying value is determined not to be recoverable, in which case the affected inventories are written down to fair value or fair value less associated costs to sell. Fair value is determined based on estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with the real estate assets,
or other valuation techniques. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process and other factors beyond our control, it is possible that actual results could differ from those estimated. Other than model homes, our inventories typically do not consist of completed unsold homes. However, as discussed above in Item 1 – Business, we have unsold completed or partially completed homes in our inventory.
We rely on certain estimates to determine our construction and land costs and resulting housing gross profit margins associated with revenues recognized. Construction and land costs are comprised of direct and allocated costs, including estimated future costs for the limited warranty we provide on our homes, and certain amenities within a community. Land acquisition, land development and other common costs are generally allocated on a relative fair value basis to the homes or lots within the applicable community or land parcel. Land acquisition and land development costs include related interest and real estate taxes.
In determining a portion of the construction and land costs recognized for each period, we rely on project budgets that are based on a variety of assumptions, including future construction schedules and costs to be incurred. It is possible that actual results could differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including construction delays, construction resource shortages, increases in costs that have not yet been committed, changes in governmental requirements, unforeseen environmental hazards or other unanticipated issues encountered during construction and other factors beyond our control. While the actual results for a particular construction project are accurately reported over time, variances between the budgeted and actual costs of a project could result in the understatement or overstatement of construction and land costs and homebuilding gross profits in a particular reporting period. To reduce the potential for such distortion, we have set forth procedures that collectively comprise a critical accounting policy. These procedures, which we have applied on a consistent basis, include assessing, updating and revising project budgets on a monthly basis, obtaining commitments to the extent possible from independent subcontractors and vendors for future costs to be incurred, reviewing the adequacy of warranty accruals and historical warranty claims experience, and utilizing the most current information available to estimate construction and land costs to be charged to expense. Variances to the budgeted costs after an estimate has been charged to expense that are related to project costs are generally allocated on a relative fair value basis to the remaining homes to be delivered within the community or land parcel, while such variances related to direct construction costs are generally expensed as incurred. The variances between budgeted and actual costs have historically not been material to our consolidated financial statements. We believe that our policies provide for reasonably dependable estimates to be used in the calculation and reporting of construction and land costs.
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments. Each community or land parcel in our owned inventory is assessed to determine if indicators of potential impairment exist. Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each community or land parcel on a quarterly basis and include, but are not limited to, the following: significant decreases in net orders, average selling prices, volume of homes delivered, gross profit margins on homes delivered or projected gross profit margins on homes in backlog or future deliveries; significant increases in budgeted land development and home construction costs or cancellation rates; or projected losses on expected future land sales. If indicators of potential impairment exist for a community or land parcel, the identified asset is evaluated for recoverability.
The following table presents information regarding inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges included in construction and land costs in our consolidated statements of operations (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Inventory impairments: | | | | | |
Number of communities or land parcels evaluated for recoverability (a) | 40 |
| | 57 |
| | 51 |
|
Carrying value of communities or land parcels evaluated for recoverability (a) | $ | 326,255 |
| | $ | 356,100 |
| | $ | 456,875 |
|
Number of communities or land parcels written down to fair value | 8 |
| | 13 |
| | 10 |
|
Pre-impairment carrying value of communities or land parcels written down to fair value | $ | 41,160 |
| | $ | 70,156 |
| | $ | 58,962 |
|
Inventory impairment charges | (14,031 | ) | | (26,104 | ) | | (20,605 | ) |
Post-impairment fair value | $ | 27,129 |
| | $ | 44,052 |
| | $ | 38,357 |
|
Land option contract abandonments charges | $ | 3,260 |
| | $ | 2,890 |
| | $ | 4,627 |
|
| |
(a) | As impairment indicators are assessed on a quarterly basis, some of the communities or land parcels evaluated during the years ended November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were evaluated in more than one quarterly period. Communities or land parcels evaluated for recoverability in more than one quarterly period are counted only once for each applicable year. In 2019, |
2018 and 2017, the inventory impairment charges reflected our decisions to make changes in our operational strategies aimed at more quickly monetizing our investment in certain communities by accelerating the overall pace for selling, building and delivering homes therein, including communities on land previously held for future development.
When an indicator of potential impairment is identified for a community or land parcel, we test the asset for recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. The undiscounted future net cash flows are impacted by then-current conditions and trends in the market in which the asset is located as well as factors known to us at the time the cash flows are calculated. These factors may include recent trends in our orders, backlog, cancellation rates and volume of homes delivered, as well as our expectations related to the following: product offerings; market supply and demand, including estimated average selling prices and related price appreciation; and land development, home construction and overhead costs to be incurred and related cost inflation.
As further described in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, given the inherent challenges and uncertainties in forecasting future results, our inventory assessments at the time they are made take into consideration whether a community or land parcel is active, meaning whether it is open for sales and/or undergoing development, or whether it is being held for future development or held for sale.
We record an inventory impairment charge on a community or land parcel that is active or held for future development when indicators of potential impairment exist and the carrying value of the real estate asset is greater than the undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. These real estate assets are written down to fair value, which is primarily determined based on the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risk associated with each such asset, or other valuation techniques. Inputs used in our calculation of estimated discounted future net cash flows are specific to each affected real estate asset and are based on our expectations for each such asset as of the applicable measurement date, including, among others, expectations related to average selling prices and volume of homes delivered. The discount rates used in our estimated discounted cash flows ranged from 17% in 2019, 17% - 19% in 2018, and 17% - 18% during 2017. The discount rates we used were impacted by one or more of the following at the time the calculation was made: the risk-free rate of return; expected risk premium based on estimated land development, home construction and delivery timelines; market risk from potential future price erosion; cost uncertainty due to land development or home construction cost increases; and other risks specific to the asset or conditions in the market in which the asset is located.
We record an inventory impairment charge on land held for sale when the carrying value of the real estate asset is greater than its fair value. These real estate assets are written down to fair value, less associated costs to sell. The fair value of such real estate assets is generally based on bona fide letters of intent from outside parties, executed sales contracts, broker quotes or similar information.
As of November 30, 2019, the aggregate carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment charges was $115.6 million, representing 19 communities and various other land parcels. As of November 30, 2018, the aggregate carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment charges was $156.1 million, representing 22 communities and various other land parcels.
Our inventory controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts is assessed to determine whether it continues to meet our investment return standards. Assessments are made separately for each optioned land parcel on a quarterly basis and are affected by the following factors relative to the market in which the asset is located, among others: current and/or anticipated net orders, average selling prices and volume of homes delivered; estimated land development and home construction costs; and projected profitability on expected future housing or land sales. When a decision is made not to exercise certain land option contracts and other similar contracts due to market conditions and/or changes in our marketing strategy, we write off the related inventory costs, including non-refundable deposits and unrecoverable pre-acquisition costs.
The estimated remaining life of each community or land parcel in our inventory depends on various factors, such as the total number of lots remaining; the expected timeline to acquire and entitle land and develop lots to build homes; the anticipated future net order and cancellation rates; and the expected timeline to build and deliver homes sold. While it is difficult to determine a precise timeframe for any particular inventory asset, based on current market conditions and expected delivery timelines, we estimate our inventory assets’ remaining operating lives to range generally from one year to in excess of 10 years and expect to realize, on an overall basis, the majority of our inventory balance as of November 30, 2019 within five years. The following table presents as of November 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, the estimated timeframe of delivery for the last home in an applicable community or land parcel and the corresponding percentage of total inventories such categories represent within our inventory balance (dollars in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 0-2 years | | 3-5 years | | 6-10 years | | Greater than 10 years | | |
| $ | | % | | $ | | % | | $ | | % | | $ | | % | | Total |
2019 | $ | 1,918.1 |
| | 52 | % | | $ | 1,555.3 |
| | 42 | % | | $ | 210.7 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 20.5 |
| | 1 | % | | $ | 3,704.6 |
|
2018 | 1,968.7 |
| | 55 |
| | 1,304.4 |
| | 36 |
| | 271.0 |
| | 8 |
| | 38.7 |
| | 1 |
| | 3,582.8 |
|
The inventory balances in the 0-2 years and 3-5 years categories were located throughout all of our homebuilding reporting segments, though mostly in our West Coast and Central segments. These categories collectively represented 94% of our total inventories as of November 30, 2019, compared to 91% as of November 30, 2018. The inventory balances in the 6-10 years and greater than 10 years categories were primarily located in our West Coast, Southwest and Central segments, and together totaled $231.2 million at November 30, 2019, compared to $309.7 million at November 30, 2018. The year-over-year decrease was primarily related to our decisions to accelerate the overall timing for selling, building and delivering homes through community reactivations, and generally favorable market conditions. The inventories in the 6-10 years and greater than 10 years categories were generally comprised of land held for future development and active, multi-phase communities with large remaining land positions.
Due to the judgment and assumptions applied in our inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment assessment processes, and in our estimations of the remaining operating lives of our inventory assets and the realization of our inventory balances, particularly as to land held for future development, it is possible that actual results could differ substantially from those estimated.
Deterioration in the supply and demand factors in the overall housing market or in an individual market or submarket, or changes to our operational or selling strategy at certain communities may lead to additional inventory impairment charges, future charges associated with land sales or the abandonment of land option contracts or other similar contracts related to certain assets. Due to the nature or location of the projects, land held for future development that we activate as part of our strategic growth initiatives or to accelerate sales and/or our return on investment, or that we otherwise monetize to help improve our asset efficiency, may have a somewhat greater likelihood of being impaired than other of our active inventory.
We believe that the carrying value of our inventory balance as of November 30, 2019 is recoverable. Our considerations in making this determination include the factors and trends incorporated into our impairment analyses, and as applicable, the prevailing regulatory environment, competition from other homebuilders, inventory levels and sales activity of resale homes, and the local economic conditions where an asset is located. In addition, we consider the financial and operational status and expectations of our inventories as well as unique attributes of each community or land parcel that could be viewed as indicators for potential future impairments. However, if conditions in the overall housing market or in a specific market or submarket worsen in the future beyond our current expectations, if future changes in our business strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our projections of future cash flows, or if there are material changes in any of the other items we consider in assessing recoverability, we may recognize charges in future periods for inventory impairments or land option contract abandonments, or both, related to our current inventory assets. Any such charges could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Warranty Costs. We provide a limited warranty on all of our homes. The specific terms and conditions of our limited warranty program vary depending upon the markets in which we do business. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under each limited warranty and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the revenue associated with the sale of each home is recognized. In assessing our overall warranty liability at a reporting date, we evaluate the costs for warranty-related items on a combined basis for all of our previously delivered homes that are under our limited warranty program.
Our primary assumption in estimating the amounts we accrue for warranty costs is that historical claims experience is a strong indicator of future claims experience. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes delivered, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our accrued warranty liability, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets, and adjust the amount as necessary based on our assessment. Our assessment includes the review of our actual warranty costs incurred to identify trends and changes in our warranty claims experience, and considers our home construction quality and customer service initiatives and outside events. Our warranty liability is presented on a gross basis for all years without consideration of recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any. Estimates of recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any, are recorded as receivables when such recoveries are considered probable.
While we believe the warranty liability currently reflected in our consolidated balance sheets to be adequate, unanticipated changes or developments in the legal environment, local weather, land or environmental conditions, quality of materials or methods used in the construction of homes or customer service practices and/or our warranty claims experience could have a significant impact on our actual warranty costs in future periods and such amounts could differ significantly from our current estimates. A
10% change in the historical warranty rates used to estimate our warranty accrual would not result in a material change in our accrual.
Self-Insurance. We maintain, and require the majority of our independent subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance (including construction defect and bodily injury coverage) and workers’ compensation insurance. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims related to our homebuilding activities, subject to certain self-insured retentions, deductibles and other coverage limits. We self-insure a portion of our overall risk through the use of a captive insurance subsidiary. In Arizona, California, Colorado and Nevada, our subcontractors’ general liability insurance primarily takes the form of a wrap-up policy under a program where eligible independent subcontractors are enrolled as insureds on each community. Enrolled subcontractors contribute toward the cost of the insurance and agree to pay a contractual amount in the future if there is a claim related to their work.
We record liabilities based on the estimated costs required to cover reported claims, claims incurred but not yet reported, and claim adjustment expenses. These estimated costs are based on an actuarial analysis of our historical claims and expense data, as well as industry data. Our self-insurance liabilities are presented on a gross basis without consideration of insurance recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any.
The amount of our self-insurance liability is based on an analysis performed by a third-party actuary that uses our historical claim and expense data, as well as industry data to estimate these overall costs. These estimates are subject to uncertainty due to a variety of factors, the most significant being the long period of time between the delivery of a home to a homebuyer and when a structural warranty or construction defect claim may be made, and the ultimate resolution of any such construction defect claim. Though state regulations vary, construction defect claims are reported and resolved over a long period of time, which can extend for 10 years or more. As a result, the majority of the estimated self-insurance liability based on the actuarial analysis relates to claims incurred but not yet reported. Therefore, adjustments related to individual existing claims generally do not significantly impact the overall estimated liability. Adjustments to our liabilities related to homes delivered in prior years are recorded in the period in which a change in our estimate occurs.
The projection of losses related to these liabilities requires the use of actuarial assumptions. Key assumptions used in developing these estimates include claim frequencies, severities and resolution patterns, which can occur over an extended period of time. These estimates are subject to variability due to the length of time between the delivery of a home to a homebuyer and when a construction defect claim is made, and the ultimate resolution of such claim; uncertainties regarding such claims relative to our markets and the types of product we build; and legal or regulatory actions and/or interpretations, among other factors. Due to the degree of judgment involved and the potential for variability in these underlying assumptions, our actual future costs could differ from those estimated. In addition, changes in the frequency and severity of reported claims and the estimates to resolve claims can impact the trends and assumptions used in the actuarial analysis, which could be material to our consolidated financial statements. A 10% increase in the claim frequency and the average cost per claim used to estimate the self-insurance liability would result in increases of approximately $28.5 million in our liability and approximately $17.1 million in our receivable as of November 30, 2019, and additional expense of approximately $11.4 million for 2019. A 10% decrease in the claim frequency and the average cost per claim used to estimate the self-insurance liability would result in decreases of approximately $25.9 million in our liability and approximately $8.4 million in our receivable as of November 30, 2019, and a reduction to expense of approximately $17.5 million for 2019.
Estimates of insurance recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of other parties, if any, are recorded as receivables when such recoveries are considered probable. These estimated recoveries are principally based on actuarially determined amounts and depend on various factors, including, among other things, the above-described claim cost estimates, our insurance policy coverage limits for the applicable policy year(s), historical third-party recovery rates, insurance industry practices, the regulatory environment, and legal precedent, and are subject to a high degree of variability from year to year. Because of the inherent uncertainty and variability in these assumptions, our actual insurance recoveries could differ significantly from amounts currently estimated.
Legal Matters Accruals. We record contingent liabilities resulting from claims against us when a loss is assessed to be probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Assessing the probability of losses and estimating probable losses requires analysis of multiple factors, including in some cases judgments about the potential actions of third-party claimants, regulatory agencies, mediators, arbitrators, responsible third parties and/or courts, as the case may be. Recorded contingent liabilities are based on the most recent information available and actual losses in any future period are inherently uncertain. If future adjustments to estimated probable future losses or actual losses exceed our recorded liability for such claims, we would record additional charges during the period in which the actual loss or change in estimate occurred. In addition to contingent liabilities recorded for probable losses, we disclose contingent liabilities when there is a reasonable possibility the ultimate loss will materially exceed the recorded liability. While we cannot predict the outcome of pending legal matters with certainty, we do not believe any currently
identified claim or proceeding, either individually or in aggregate, will have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Stock-Based Compensation. We measure and recognize compensation expense associated with our grants of equity-based awards at an amount equal to the fair value of such share-based payments over their applicable vesting period. We have provided compensation benefits to certain of our employees in the form of stock options, restricted stock and PSUs, and to our non-employee directors in the form of unrestricted shares of common stock, deferred common stock awards and Director Plan SARs. Determining the fair value of share-based awards requires judgment to identify the appropriate valuation model and develop the assumptions to be used in the calculation, including the expected term of the stock options or Director Plan SARs, expected stock-price volatility and dividend yield. We estimate the fair value of stock options and Director Plan SARs granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with assumptions based primarily on historical data. The expected volatility factor is based on a combination of the historical volatility of our common stock and the implied volatility of publicly traded options on our common stock. We believe this blended approach balances the forward-looking nature of implied volatility with the relative stability over time of historical volatility to arrive at a reasonable estimate of expected volatility. Additionally, judgment is required in estimating the percentage of share-based awards that are expected to vest, and in the case of PSUs, the level of performance that will be achieved and the number of shares that will be earned. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense could be higher and have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Income Taxes. As discussed in Note 13 – Income Taxes in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if adjustments to our valuation allowance are required based on the consideration of all available positive and negative evidence using a “more likely than not” standard with respect to whether deferred tax assets will be realized. This evaluation considers, among other factors, our historical operating results, our expectation of future profitability, the duration of the applicable statutory carryforward periods, and conditions in the housing market and the broader economy. The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends primarily on our ability to generate future taxable income during the periods in which the related deferred tax assets become deductible. The value of our deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheets depends on applicable income tax rates. We base our estimate of deferred tax assets and liabilities on current tax laws and rates. In certain cases, we also base this estimate on business plan forecasts and other expectations about future outcomes. Changes in positive and negative evidence, including differences between our future operating results and estimates, could result in the establishment of an additional valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results. Judgment is required in determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements and/or tax returns. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future results could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Also, changes in existing federal and state tax laws and corporate income tax rates could affect future tax results and the realization of deferred tax assets over time.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our consolidated financial statements as a component of the provision for income taxes. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, combined with accrued interest and penalties, is reflected as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Judgment is required in evaluating uncertain tax positions. We evaluate our uncertain tax positions quarterly based on various factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, tax laws or the status of audits by tax authorities. Changes in the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements in the period in which we make the change.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recent accounting pronouncements are discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
OUTLOOK
We believe long-term housing market fundamentals remain positive, including robust employment, a generally favorable economic environment and a relatively constrained supply of homes available for sale. We believe our highly customer-centric, personalized approach to homebuilding and operational capabilities will enable us to effectively adapt to evolving buyer preferences and needs and, together with an expected year-over-year increase in community count, help drive our business in 2020, subject to market conditions, as discussed below.
Our present 2020 outlook is as follows:
2020 First Quarter –
| |
• | We expect to generate housing revenues in the range of $910 million to $970 million, an increase from $798.2 million in 2019, and anticipate our average selling price to be approximately $375,000, representing a slight increase compared to the year-earlier period. |
| |
• | We expect our homebuilding operating income margin to be in the range of 4.9% to 5.3%, assuming no inventory-related charges, up from 4.3% for the year-earlier quarter. |
| |
◦ | We expect our housing gross profit margin to be in the range of 17.8% to 18.2%, assuming no inventory-related charges, compared to 17.6% for the corresponding 2019 quarter. |
| |
◦ | We expect our selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing revenues to be in the range of 12.7% to 13.1%, an improvement from the 2019 first quarter ratio of 13.4%. |
| |
• | We expect the effective tax rate will be approximately 20%, including an expected favorable impact from federal energy tax credits for building energy-efficient homes. The effective tax rate for the prior year quarter was 13%. |
| |
• | We expect our average community count to be up in the mid-single digit range from the 2019 first quarter. |
| |
• | We expect our net order growth to increase between 15% to 25% compared to the year-earlier period. |
2020 Full Year –
| |
• | We expect our housing revenues to be in the range of $4.90 billion to $5.30 billion, an increase from $4.51 billion in 2019, and anticipate our average selling price to be in the range of $380,000 to $400,000, an increase of up to 5% from 2019. |
| |
• | We expect our homebuilding operating income margin to be in the range of 7.9% to 8.5%, assuming no inventory-related charges, compared to 7.7% for 2019. |
| |
◦ | We expect our housing gross profit margin to be in the range of 18.7% to 19.3%, assuming no inventory-related charges, compared to 18.7% for 2019. |
| |
◦ | We expect our selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing revenues to be in the range of 10.5% to 11.1%, compared to 11.0% in the prior year. |
| |
• | We expect the effective tax rate will be approximately 23%, including an expected favorable impact from federal energy tax credits. The effective tax rate for 2019 was 23%. |
| |
• | We expect our average community count to be up in the low- to mid-single digit range from 2019. |
| |
• | We expect our return on equity to improve by more than 100 basis points from 12.2% for 2019. |
| |
• | We expect our debt to capital ratio to be below 40%, compared to 42.3% in 2019. |
We believe we are well positioned for 2020 due to, among other things, our planned new home community openings, investments in land and land development and current positive economic and demographic trends, to varying degrees, in many of our served markets. However, our industry continues to experience labor constraints and volatile raw material prices, exacerbated by U.S. trade policies, including tariffs and duties imposed on homebuilding materials and products. If these issues continue for an extended period, or worsen in 2020, our business and ability to generate positive growth would be negatively impacted.
As such, our future performance and the strategies we implement (and adjust or refine as necessary or appropriate) will depend significantly on prevailing economic and capital, credit and financial market conditions and on a fairly stable and constructive political and regulatory environment (particularly in regards to housing and mortgage loan financing policies), among other factors.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Investors are cautioned that certain statements contained in this report, as well as some statements by us in periodic press releases and other public disclosures and some oral statements by us to securities analysts, stockholders and others during presentations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “hope,” and similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that we may make or provide concerning future financial or operating performance (including without limitation future revenues, community count, homes delivered, net orders, selling prices, sales pace per new community, expenses, expense ratios, housing gross profits, housing gross profit margins, earnings or earnings per share, or growth or growth rates), future market conditions, future interest rates, and other economic conditions, ongoing business strategies or prospects, future dividends and changes in dividend levels, the value of our backlog (including amounts that we expect to realize upon delivery of homes included in our backlog and the timing of those deliveries), the value of our net orders, potential future asset acquisitions and the impact of completed acquisitions, future share issuances or repurchases, future debt issuances, repurchases or redemptions and other possible future actions are also forward-looking statements as defined by the Act. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and projections about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about our operations, economic and market factors, and the homebuilding industry, among other things. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we have no specific policy or intention to update these statements. In addition, forward-looking and other statements in this report and in other public or oral disclosures that express or contain opinions, views or assumptions about market or economic conditions; the success, performance, effectiveness and/or relative positioning of our strategies, initiatives or operational activities; and other matters, may be based in whole or in part on general observations of our management, limited or anecdotal evidence and/or business or industry experience without in-depth or any particular empirical investigation, inquiry or analysis.
Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. The most important risk factors that could cause our actual performance and future events and actions to differ materially from such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
| |
• | general economic, employment and business conditions; |
| |
• | population growth, household formations and demographic trends; |
| |
• | conditions in the capital, credit and financial markets; |
| |
• | our ability to access external financing sources and raise capital through the issuance of common stock, debt or other securities, and/or project financing, on favorable terms; |
| |
• | the execution of any share repurchases pursuant to our board of directors’ authorization; |
| |
• | material and trade costs and availability; |
| |
• | changes in interest rates; |
| |
• | our debt level, including our ratio of debt to capital, and our ability to adjust our debt level and maturity schedule; |
| |
• | our compliance with the terms of the Credit Facility; |
| |
• | volatility in the market price of our common stock; |
| |
• | weak or declining consumer confidence, either generally or specifically with respect to purchasing homes; |
| |
• | competition from other sellers of new and resale homes; |
| |
• | weather events, significant natural disasters and other climate and environmental factors; |
| |
• | any failure of lawmakers to agree on a budget or appropriation legislation to fund the federal government’s operations, and financial markets’ and businesses’ reactions to that failure; |
| |
• | government actions, policies, programs and regulations directed at or affecting the housing market (including the tax benefits associated with purchasing and owning a home, and the standards, fees and size limits applicable to the purchase or insuring of mortgage loans by government-sponsored enterprises and government agencies), the homebuilding industry, or construction activities; |
| |
• | changes in existing tax laws or enacted corporate income tax rates, including those resulting from regulatory guidance and interpretations issued with respect thereto; |
| |
• | changes in U.S. trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and duties on homebuilding materials and products, and related trade disputes with and retaliatory measures taken by other countries; |
| |
• | the adoption of new or amended financial accounting standards, including revenue recognition (ASC 606) and lease accounting standards, and the guidance and/or interpretations with respect thereto; |
| |
• | the availability and cost of land in desirable areas and our ability to timely develop acquired land parcels and open new home communities; |
| |
• | our warranty claims experience with respect to homes previously delivered and actual warranty costs incurred; |
| |
• | costs and/or charges arising from regulatory compliance requirements or from legal, arbitral or regulatory proceedings, investigations, claims or settlements, including unfavorable outcomes in any such matters resulting in actual or potential monetary damage awards, penalties, fines or other direct or indirect payments, or injunctions, consent decrees or other voluntary or involuntary restrictions or adjustments to our business operations or practices that are beyond our current expectations and/or accruals; |
| |
• | our ability to use/realize the net deferred tax assets we have generated; |
| |
• | our ability to successfully implement our current and planned strategies and initiatives related to our product, geographic and market positioning, gaining share and scale in our served markets and in entering into new markets; |
| |
• | our operational and investment concentration in markets in California; |
| |
• | consumer interest in our new home communities and products, particularly from first-time homebuyers and higher-income consumers; |
| |
• | our ability to generate orders and convert our backlog of orders to home deliveries and revenues, particularly in key markets in California; |
| |
• | our ability to successfully implement our Returns-Focused Growth Plan and other business strategies and achieve any associated financial and operational targets and objectives; |
| |
• | income tax expense volatility associated with stock-based compensation; |
| |
• | the ability of our homebuyers to obtain residential mortgage loans and mortgage banking services; |
| |
• | the performance of mortgage lenders to our homebuyers; |
| |
• | the performance of KBHS; |
| |
• | information technology failures and data security breaches; and |
| |
• | other events outside of our control. |
| |
Item 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We enter into debt obligations primarily to support general corporate purposes, including the operations of our subsidiaries. We are subject to interest rate risk on our senior notes. For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of the debt instrument, but not our earnings or cash flows. We generally have no obligation to prepay our debt before maturity, and, as a result, interest rate risk and changes in fair market value should not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt until we are required or elect to refinance or repurchase such debt. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates.
The following tables present principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average effective interest rates and the estimated fair value of our long-term fixed rate debt obligations as of November 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of November 30, 2019 and for the Years Ending November 30, | | Fair Value at November 30, 2019 |
| 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | Thereafter | | Total | |
Long-term debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed Rate | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 800,000 |
| | $ | 350,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 600,000 |
| | $ | 1,750,000 |
| | $ | 1,921,563 |
|
Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate | — | % | | — | % | | 7.4 | % | | 7.5 | % | | — | % | | 6.0 | % | | 7.0 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of November 30, 2018 and for the Years Ending November 30, | | Fair Value at November 30, 2018 |
| 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | Thereafter | | Total | |
Long-term debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed Rate | $ | 630,000 |
| | $ | 350,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 800,000 |
| | $ | 250,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,030,000 |
| | $ | 2,082,863 |
|
Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate | 3.9 | % | | 8.5 | % | | — | % | | 7.4 | % | | 7.8 | % | | — | % | | 6.6 | % | | |
| |
Item 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
KB HOME
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Separate combined financial statements of our unconsolidated joint venture activities have been omitted because, if considered in the aggregate, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary as defined by Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Total revenues | $ | 4,552,747 |
| | $ | 4,547,002 |
| | $ | 4,368,529 |
|
Homebuilding: | | | | | |
Revenues | $ | 4,537,658 |
| | $ | 4,533,795 |
| | $ | 4,356,265 |
|
Construction and land costs | (3,708,928 | ) | | (3,743,920 | ) | | (3,646,468 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (497,350 | ) | | (444,154 | ) | | (426,394 | ) |
Operating income | 331,380 |
| | 345,721 |
| | 283,403 |
|
Interest income | 2,158 |
| | 3,514 |
| | 1,240 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | — |
| | (622 | ) |
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures | (1,549 | ) | | 2,066 |
| | (1,409 | ) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (6,800 | ) | | — |
| | (5,685 | ) |
Homebuilding pretax income | 325,189 |
| | 351,301 |
| | 276,927 |
|
Financial services: | | | | | |
Revenues | 15,089 |
| | 13,207 |
| | 12,264 |
|
Expenses | (4,333 | ) | | (3,844 | ) | | (3,430 | ) |
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures | 12,230 |
| | 7,301 |
| | 4,234 |
|
Financial services pretax income | 22,986 |
| | 16,664 |
| | 13,068 |
|
Total pretax income | 348,175 |
| | 367,965 |
| | 289,995 |
|
Income tax expense | (79,400 | ) | | (197,600 | ) | | (109,400 | ) |
Net income | $ | 268,775 |
| | $ | 170,365 |
| | $ | 180,595 |
|
Earnings per share: | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 3.04 |
| | $ | 1.93 |
| | $ | 2.09 |
|
Diluted | $ | 2.85 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 1.85 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | |
Basic | 87,996 |
| | 87,773 |
| | 85,842 |
|
Diluted | 93,838 |
| | 101,059 |
| | 98,316 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Net income | $ | 268,775 |
| | $ | 170,365 |
| | $ | 180,595 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments: | | | | | |
Net actuarial gain (loss) arising during the period | (10,268 | ) | | 8,216 |
| | (3,143 | ) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss | 218 |
| | 336 |
| | 142 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost | 1,556 |
| | 1,556 |
| | 1,556 |
|
Settlement loss | 356 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax | (8,138 | ) | | 10,108 |
| | (1,445 | ) |
Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income (loss) | 2,197 |
| | (2,749 | ) | | 578 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (5,941 | ) | | 7,359 |
| | (867 | ) |
Comprehensive income | $ | 262,834 |
| | $ | 177,724 |
| | $ | 179,728 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Shares)
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Assets | | | |
Homebuilding: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 453,814 |
| | $ | 574,359 |
|
Receivables | 249,055 |
| | 292,830 |
|
Inventories | 3,704,602 |
| | 3,582,839 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 57,038 |
| | 61,960 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 65,043 |
| | 24,283 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net | 364,493 |
| | 441,820 |
|
Other assets | 83,041 |
| | 83,100 |
|
| 4,977,086 |
| | 5,061,191 |
|
Financial services | 38,396 |
| | 12,380 |
|
Total assets | $ | 5,015,482 |
| | $ | 5,073,571 |
|
| | | |
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | | |
Homebuilding: | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 262,772 |
| | $ | 258,045 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 618,783 |
| | 666,268 |
|
Notes payable | 1,748,747 |
| | 2,060,263 |
|
| 2,630,302 |
| | 2,984,576 |
|
Financial services | 2,058 |
| | 1,495 |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
Preferred stock — $1.00 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock — $1.00 par value; 290,000,000 shares authorized at November 30, 2019 and 2018; 121,592,978 and 119,195,914 shares issued at November 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively | 121,593 |
| | 119,196 |
|
Paid-in capital | 793,954 |
| | 753,570 |
|
Retained earnings | 2,157,183 |
| | 1,897,168 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (15,506 | ) | | (9,565 | ) |
Grantor stock ownership trust, at cost: 7,630,582 and 8,157,235 shares at November 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively | (82,758 | ) | | (88,472 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost: 24,355,845 and 24,113,487 shares at November 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively | (591,344 | ) | | (584,397 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 2,383,122 |
| | 2,087,500 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 5,015,482 |
| | $ | 5,073,571 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 |
| Number of Shares | | Common Stock | | Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Grantor Stock Ownership Trust | | Treasury Stock | | Total Stockholders’ Equity |
Common Stock | | Grantor Stock Ownership Trust | | Treasury Stock | |
Balance at November 30, 2016 | 116,224 |
| | (9,432 | ) | | (21,720 | ) | | $ | 116,224 |
| | $ | 696,938 |
| | $ | 1,563,742 |
| | $ | (16,057 | ) | | $ | (102,300 | ) | | $ | (535,402 | ) | | $ | 1,723,145 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 180,595 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 180,595 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (867 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (867 | ) |
Dividends on common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,642 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,642 | ) |
Employee stock options/other | 1,652 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,652 |
| | 22,468 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 24,120 |
|
Stock awards | 70 |
| | 534 |
| | 28 |
| | 70 |
| | (6,556 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 5,791 |
| | 695 |
| | — |
|
Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,633 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,633 |
|
Tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards | — |
| | — |
| | (329 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6,673 | ) | | (6,673 | ) |
Balance at November 30, 2017 | 117,946 |
| | (8,898 | ) | | (22,021 | ) | | 117,946 |
| | 727,483 |
| | 1,735,695 |
| | (16,924 | ) | | (96,509 | ) | | (541,380 | ) | | 1,926,311 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 170,365 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 170,365 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,359 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,359 |
|
Dividends on common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,892 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,892 | ) |
Employee stock options/other | 1,196 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,196 |
| | 18,815 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20,011 |
|
Stock awards | 54 |
| | 741 |
| | 48 |
| | 54 |
| | (8,589 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 8,037 |
| | 498 |
| | — |
|
Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,861 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,861 |
|
Stock repurchases | — |
| | — |
| | (1,806 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (35,039 | ) | | (35,039 | ) |
Tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards | — |
| | — |
| | (334 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,476 | ) | | (8,476 | ) |
Balance at November 30, 2018 | 119,196 |
| | (8,157 | ) | | (24,113 | ) | | 119,196 |
| | 753,570 |
| | 1,897,168 |
| | (9,565 | ) | | (88,472 | ) | | (584,397 | ) | | 2,087,500 |
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 606 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,610 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,610 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 268,775 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 268,775 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5,941 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (5,941 | ) |
Dividends on common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (20,370 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (20,370 | ) |
Employee stock options/other | 2,341 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,341 |
| | 28,183 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30,524 |
|
Stock awards | 56 |
| | 526 |
| | 27 |
| | 56 |
| | (6,111 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 5,714 |
| | 341 |
| | — |
|
Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,312 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,312 |
|
Tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards | — |
| | — |
| | (270 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7,288 | ) | | (7,288 | ) |
Balance at November 30, 2019 | 121,593 |
| | (7,631 | ) | | (24,356 | ) | | $ | 121,593 |
| | $ | 793,954 |
| | $ | 2,157,183 |
| | $ | (15,506 | ) | | $ | (82,758 | ) | | $ | (591,344 | ) | | $ | 2,383,122 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 268,775 |
| | $ | 170,365 |
| | $ | 180,595 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures | (10,681 | ) | | (9,367 | ) | | (2,825 | ) |
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures | 6,450 |
| | 9,047 |
| | — |
|
Amortization of discounts, premiums and issuance costs | 4,426 |
| | 6,232 |
| | 6,573 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 27,158 |
| | 2,530 |
| | 2,791 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 73,303 |
| | 191,817 |
| | 105,348 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 6,800 |
| | — |
| | 5,685 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | (958 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | 18,312 |
| | 15,861 |
| | 14,633 |
|
Inventory impairments and land option contract abandonments | 17,291 |
| | 28,994 |
| | 25,232 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Receivables | 44,428 |
| | (49,778 | ) | | (12,508 | ) |
Inventories | (165,347 | ) | | (270,126 | ) | | 126,085 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | (40,583 | ) | | 126,710 |
| | 66,594 |
|
Other, net | 710 |
| | (773 | ) | | (4,026 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 251,042 |
| | 221,512 |
| | 513,219 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures | (11,290 | ) | | (22,671 | ) | | (18,694 | ) |
Return of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 5,001 |
| | 9,934 |
| | 11,035 |
|
Proceeds from sale of building | 5,804 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net | (40,459 | ) | | (7,370 | ) | | (8,085 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (40,944 | ) | | (20,107 | ) | | (15,744 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of debt | 705,250 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Repayment of senior notes | (986,231 | ) | | (300,000 | ) | | (270,326 | ) |
Payment of issuance costs | (11,128 | ) | | — |
| | (1,711 | ) |
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | 610,000 |
| | 70,000 |
| | — |
|
Repayments under revolving credit facility | (610,000 | ) | | (70,000 | ) | | — |
|
Payments on mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans | (41,116 | ) | | (14,751 | ) | | (106,382 | ) |
Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans | 30,524 |
| | 20,011 |
| | 23,162 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 958 |
|
Stock repurchases | — |
| | (35,039 | ) | | — |
|
Tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards | (7,288 | ) | | (8,476 | ) | | (6,673 | ) |
Payments of cash dividends | (20,370 | ) | | (8,892 | ) | | (8,642 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (330,359 | ) | | (347,147 | ) | | (369,614 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (120,261 | ) | | (145,742 | ) | | 127,861 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 575,119 |
| | 720,861 |
| | 593,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 454,858 |
| | $ | 575,119 |
| | $ | 720,861 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KB HOME
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| |
Note 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Operations. KB Home is a builder of attached and detached single-family residential homes, townhomes and condominiums. As of November 30, 2019, we conducted ongoing operations in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, North Carolina, Texas and Washington. We also offer various insurance products to our homebuyers in the same markets where we build homes, and provide title services in the majority of our markets located within our Southwest, Central and Southeast homebuilding reporting segments. Since June 2017, we have been providing mortgage banking services, including mortgage loan originations, to our homebuyers indirectly through KBHS, an unconsolidated joint venture we formed with Stearns.
Basis of Presentation. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and include our accounts and those of the consolidated subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have less than a controlling financial interest are accounted for using the equity method.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. We consider all highly liquid short-term investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our cash equivalents totaled $302.5 million at November 30, 2019 and $385.2 million at November 30, 2018. At November 30, 2019 and 2018, the majority of our cash and cash equivalents was invested in interest-bearing bank deposit accounts.
Receivables. Receivables are evaluated for collectibility at least quarterly, and allowances for potential losses are established or maintained on applicable receivables when collection is considered doubtful, taking into account historical experience, prevailing economic conditions and other relevant information.
Property and Equipment and Depreciation. Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives as follows: computer software and equipment – two to five years; model furnishings and sales office improvements – two to three years; office furniture and equipment – three to ten years; and leasehold improvements – life of the lease. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation expense totaled $27.2 million in 2019, $2.5 million in 2018 and $2.8 million in 2017.
Homebuilding Operations. We recognize homebuilding revenue in accordance with ASC 606 by applying the following steps in determining the timing and amount of revenue to recognize: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, if applicable; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation.
Our home sale transactions are made pursuant to contracts under which we typically have a single performance obligation to deliver a completed home to the homebuyer when closing conditions are met. Revenues from home sales are recognized when we have satisfied the performance obligation within the sales contract, which is generally when title to and possession of the home and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the homebuyer on the closing date. Under our home sale contracts, we typically receive an initial cash deposit from the homebuyer at the time the sales contract is executed and receive the remaining consideration to which we are entitled, through a third-party escrow agent, at closing. Customer deposits related to sold but undelivered homes totaled $22.4 million and $19.5 million at November 30, 2019 and November 30, 2018, respectively, and are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.
Concurrent with the recognition of revenues in our consolidated statements of operations, sales incentives in the form of price concessions on the selling price of a home are recorded as a reduction of revenues. The costs of sales incentives in the form of free or discounted products or services provided to homebuyers, including option upgrades and closing cost allowances, are reflected as construction and land costs because such incentives are identified in our home sale contracts with homebuyers as an intrinsic part of our single performance obligation to deliver and transfer title to their home for the transaction price stated in the contracts. Sales incentives that we may provide in the form of closing cost allowances are immaterial to the related revenues. Cash proceeds from home sale closings held by third-party escrow agents for our benefit, typically for less than five days, are considered deposits in-transit and classified as cash.
Land sale transactions are made pursuant to contracts under which we typically have a performance obligation(s) to deliver specified land parcels to the buyer when closing conditions are met. We evaluate each land sale contract to determine our
performance obligation(s) under the contract, including whether we have a distinct promise to perform post-closing land development work that is material within the context of the contract, and use objective criteria to determine our completion of the applicable performance obligation(s), whether at a point in time or over time. Revenues from land sales are recognized when we have satisfied the performance obligation(s) within the sales contract, which is generally when title to and possession of the land and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the land buyer on the closing date. Under our land sale contracts, we typically receive an initial cash deposit from the buyer at the time the contract is executed and receive the remaining consideration to which we are entitled, through a third-party escrow agent, at closing. In the limited circumstances where we provide financing to the land buyer, we determine that collectibility of the receivable is reasonably assured before we recognize revenue.
In instances where we have a distinct and material performance obligation(s) within the context of a land sale contract to perform land development work after the closing date, a portion of the transaction price under the contract is allocated to such performance obligation(s) and is recognized as revenue over time based upon our estimated progress toward the satisfaction of the performance obligation(s). We generally measure our progress based on our costs incurred relative to the total costs expected to satisfy the performance obligation(s). While the payment terms for such a performance obligation(s) vary, we generally receive the final payment when we have completed our land development work to the specifications detailed in the applicable land sale contract and it has been accepted by the land buyer.
Homebuilding revenues include forfeited deposits, which occur when home sale or land sale contracts that include a nonrefundable deposit are cancelled. Revenues from forfeited deposits are immaterial.
Within our homebuilding operations, substantially all of our contracts with customers and the related performance obligations have an original expected duration of one year or less.
Construction and land costs are comprised of direct and allocated costs, including estimated future costs for the limited warranty we provide on our homes, and certain amenities within a community. Land acquisition, land development and other common costs are generally allocated on a relative fair value basis to the homes or lots within the applicable community or land parcel. Land acquisition and land development costs include related interest and real estate taxes.
Inventories. Housing and land inventories are stated at cost, unless the carrying value is determined not to be recoverable, in which case the affected inventories are written down to fair value or fair value less associated costs to sell. Real estate assets, such as our housing and land inventories, are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparing the carrying value of an asset to the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. These impairment evaluations are significantly impacted by estimates for the amounts and timing of future revenues, costs and expenses, and other factors. If the carrying value of a real estate asset is determined not to be recoverable, the impairment charge to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the affected asset exceeds its estimated fair value. For land held for sale, if the fair value less associated costs to sell exceeds the asset’s carrying value, no impairment charge is recognized.
Capitalized Interest. Interest is capitalized to inventories while the related communities or land parcels are being actively developed and until homes are completed or the land is available for immediate sale. Capitalized interest is amortized to construction and land costs as the related inventories are delivered to homebuyers or land buyers (as applicable). For land held for future development or sale, applicable interest is expensed as incurred.
Fair Value Measurements. Fair value measurements are used for inventories on a nonrecurring basis when events and circumstances indicate that their carrying value is not recoverable. For these real estate assets, fair value is determined based on the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risk associated with each such asset, or other valuation techniques.
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, senior notes, convertible senior notes, and mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans. Fair value measurements of financial instruments are determined by various market data and other valuation techniques as appropriate. When available, we use quoted market prices in active markets to determine fair value.
Financial Services Operations. Our financial services reporting segment generates revenues primarily from insurance commissions and title services. Revenues from title services are recognized when policies are issued, which generally occurs at the time each applicable home sale is closed. We receive commissions from various third-party insurance carriers for arranging for the carriers to provide homeowner and other insurance policies for our homebuyers that elect to obtain such coverage. In addition, each time a homebuyer renews their insurance policy with the insurance carrier, we receive a renewal commission. Revenues from insurance commissions are recognized when the insurance carrier issues an initial insurance policy to our homebuyer, which generally occurs at the time each applicable home sale is closed. As our performance obligations for policy renewal commissions are satisfied upon issuance of the initial insurance policy, insurance commissions for renewals are considered variable consideration under ASC 606. Accordingly, we estimate the probable future renewal commissions when an initial policy is issued
and record a corresponding contract asset and insurance commission revenues. We estimate the amount of variable consideration based on historical renewal trends and constrain the estimate such that it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative recognized revenue will not occur. We also consider the likelihood and magnitude of a potential future reversal of revenue and update our assessment at the end of each reporting period. The contract assets for estimated future renewal commissions are included in other assets within our financial services reporting segment and totaled $20.6 million at November 30, 2019. Contract assets totaling $19.7 million were recognized on December 1, 2018 in connection with the adoption of ASC 606.
Warranty Costs. We provide a limited warranty on all of our homes. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under each limited warranty and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the revenue associated with the sale of each home is recognized. Our primary assumption in estimating the amounts we accrue for warranty costs is that historical claims experience is a strong indicator of future claims experience. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes delivered, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our accrued warranty liability and adjust the amount as necessary based on our assessment. Our warranty liability is presented on a gross basis for all years without consideration of recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any. Estimates of recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any, are recorded as receivables when such recoveries are considered probable.
Self-Insurance. We self-insure a portion of our overall risk through the use of a captive insurance subsidiary. We record liabilities based on the estimated costs required to cover reported claims, claims incurred but not yet reported, and claim adjustment expenses. These estimated costs are based on an actuarial analysis of our historical claims and expense data, as well as industry data. Our self-insurance liability is presented on a gross basis for all years without consideration of insurance recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any. Estimates of insurance recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any, are recorded as receivables when such recoveries are considered probable.
Community Sales Office and Other Marketing- and Model Home-Related Costs. Community sales office and other marketing- and model home-related costs are either recorded as inventories, capitalized as property and equipment, or expensed to selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred. Costs related to the construction of a model home, inclusive of upgrades that will be sold as part of the home, are recorded as inventories and recognized as construction and land costs when the model home is delivered to a homebuyer. Costs to furnish and ready a model home or on-site community sales facility that will not be sold as part of the model home, such as model furnishings, community sales office and model complex grounds, sales office construction and sales office furniture and equipment, are capitalized as property and equipment under “model furnishings and sales office improvements.” Model furnishings and sales office improvements are depreciated to selling, general and administrative expenses over their estimated useful lives. Other costs related to the marketing of a community, removing the on-site community sales facility and readying a completed (model) home for sale are expensed to selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred.
Advertising Costs. We expense advertising costs as incurred. We incurred advertising costs of $43.6 million in 2019, $37.3 million in 2018 and $34.4 million in 2017.
Legal Fees. Legal fees associated with litigation and similar proceedings that are not expected to provide a benefit in future periods are generally expensed as incurred. Legal fees associated with land acquisition and development and other activities that are expected to provide a benefit in future periods are capitalized to inventories in our consolidated balance sheets as incurred. We expensed legal fees of $16.7 million in 2019, $12.4 million in 2018 and $14.0 million in 2017.
Stock-Based Compensation. We measure and recognize compensation expense associated with our grant of equity-based awards at an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted under compensation arrangements over the vesting period. We estimate the fair value of stock options and Director Plan SARs granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with assumptions based primarily on historical data.
Income Taxes. The provision for, or benefit from, income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine if adjustments to the valuation allowance are required. This evaluation is based on the consideration of all available positive and negative evidence using a “more likely than not” standard with respect to whether deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends primarily on our ability to generate future taxable income during the periods in which the related deferred tax assets become deductible. The value of our deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheets depends on applicable income tax rates.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. The accumulated balances of other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets as of November 30, 2019 and 2018 were comprised solely of adjustments recorded directly to accumulated other
comprehensive loss related to our benefit plan obligations. Such adjustments are made annually as of November 30, when our benefit plan obligations are remeasured.
Earnings Per Share. We compute earnings per share using the two-class method, which is an allocation of earnings between the holders of common stock and a company’s participating security holders. Our outstanding nonvested shares of restricted stock contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and, therefore, are considered participating securities for purposes of computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. We had no other participating securities at November 30, 2019, 2018 or 2017.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements. In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-09, which simplified several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, treatment of forfeitures, and statutory withholding requirements. We adopted this guidance effective December 1, 2017. ASU 2016-09 requires excess tax benefits and deficiencies from stock-based compensation awards to be recognized prospectively in our consolidated statements of operations as a component of income tax expense, whereas these items were previously recorded in paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheets. This guidance also requires excess tax benefits to be classified within operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. We previously recognized excess tax benefits as a cash inflow from financing activities and a corresponding cash outflow from operating activities. In connection with the adoption of this guidance, we elected to continue to estimate forfeitures in calculating our stock-based compensation expense, rather than account for forfeitures as they occur. The impact of recognizing excess tax benefits and deficiencies in our consolidated statements of operations resulted in reductions in our income tax expense of $5.3 million for 2019 and $1.0 million for 2018. The remaining aspects of adopting this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue guidance in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific revenue and cost guidance in the accounting standards codification, including some cost guidance related to construction-type and production-type contracts. ASU 2014-09 and its related amendments collectively resulted in ASC 606. The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
On December 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606, using the modified retrospective method applied to contracts that were not completed as of the adoption date. Results for reporting periods beginning December 1, 2018 and after are presented under ASC 606, while results for prior reporting periods have not been adjusted and continue to be presented under the accounting guidance in effect for those periods. We recorded the following cumulative effect adjustment to increase beginning retained earnings as of December 1, 2018 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet | | Balance at November 30, 2018 | | Adjustments due to ASC 606 | | Balance at December 1, 2018 |
Assets | | | | | | |
Homebuilding: | | | | | | |
Inventories | | $ | 3,582,839 |
| | $ | (35,288 | ) | | $ | 3,547,551 |
|
Property and equipment, net | | 24,283 |
| | 31,194 |
| | 55,477 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net | | 441,820 |
| | (4,024 | ) | | 437,796 |
|
Financial services | | 12,380 |
| | 19,728 |
| | 32,108 |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | |
Retained earnings | | 1,897,168 |
| | 11,610 |
| | 1,908,778 |
|
Within our homebuilding operations, ASC 606 impacted the classification and timing of recognition in our consolidated financial statements of certain community sales office and other marketing- and model home-related costs, which we previously capitalized to inventories and amortized through construction and land costs with each home delivered in a community. With our adoption of ASC 606, these costs are capitalized to property and equipment and depreciated to selling, general and administrative expenses, or expensed to selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred. Upon adopting ASC 606, we reclassified these community sales office and other marketing- and model home-related costs and related accumulated amortization from inventories to either property and equipment, net or retained earnings in our consolidated balance sheet. As a result of the change in the classification of certain community sales office and other marketing- and model home-related costs from inventories to property and equipment, net, these costs are presented as a cash outflow from investing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows under ASC 606. Previously, such costs were classified as a cash outflow from operating activities. Forfeited deposits related
to cancelled home sale and land sale contracts, which were previously reflected as other income within selling, general and administrative expenses, are included in homebuilding revenues under ASC 606.
Within our financial services operations, ASC 606 impacted the timing of recognition in our consolidated financial statements of insurance commissions for insurance policy renewals. We previously recognized such insurance commissions as revenue when policies were renewed. With our adoption of ASC 606, insurance commissions for future policy renewals are estimated and recognized as revenue when the insurance carrier issues an initial insurance policy to our homebuyer, which generally occurs at the time each applicable home sale is closed. Upon adopting ASC 606, we recognized contract assets for the estimated future renewal commissions related to existing insurance policies as of December 1, 2018.
There were no significant changes to our business processes or internal control over financial reporting as a result of adopting ASC 606.
The impacts of adopting ASC 606 on our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended November 30, 2019 and consolidated balance sheet as of November 30, 2019 were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended November 30, 2019 |
Statement of Operations | | As Reported | | Amounts without the Adoption of ASC 606 | | Effect of Change Higher/(Lower) |
Homebuilding: | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 4,537,658 |
| | $ | 4,534,716 |
| | $ | 2,942 |
|
Construction and land costs | | (3,708,928 | ) | | (3,740,337 | ) | | (31,409 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | (497,350 | ) | | (464,105 | ) | | 33,245 |
|
Operating income | | 331,380 |
| | 330,274 |
| | 1,106 |
|
Financial services: | | | | | | |
Revenues | | 15,089 |
| | 14,211 |
| | 878 |
|
Total pretax income | | 348,175 |
| | 346,191 |
| | 1,984 |
|
Income tax expense | | (79,400 | ) | | (78,900 | ) | | 500 |
|
Net income | | 268,775 |
| | 267,291 |
| | 1,484 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | | 2.85 |
| | 2.85 |
| | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of November 30, 2019 |
Balance Sheet | | As Reported | | Amounts without the Adoption of ASC 606 | | Effect of Change Higher/(Lower) |
Assets | | | | | | |
Homebuilding: | | | | | | |
Inventories | | $ | 3,704,602 |
| | $ | 3,746,567 |
| | $ | (41,965 | ) |
Deferred tax assets, net | | 364,493 |
| | 369,017 |
| | (4,524 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | | 65,043 |
| | 26,067 |
| | 38,976 |
|
Financial services | | 38,396 |
| | 17,790 |
| | 20,606 |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | |
Retained earnings | | 2,157,183 |
| | 2,144,090 |
| | 13,093 |
|
Disaggregation of Revenues. Our homebuilding operations accounted for 99.7% of our total revenues for the year ended November 30, 2019, with most of those revenues generated from home sale contracts with customers. Due to the nature of our revenue-generating activities, we believe the disaggregation of revenues as reported in our consolidated statement of operations, and as disclosed by homebuilding reporting segment in Note 2 – Segment Information and for our financial services reporting segment in Note 3 – Financial Services, fairly depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows are affected by economic factors.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 will require lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases. Under this guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Lessor accounting remains substantially similar to previous lease accounting guidance. In addition, disclosures of leasing activities are to be expanded to include qualitative along with specific quantitative information. ASU 2016-02 is effective for us beginning December 1, 2019. We will adopt ASU 2016-02 and its related amendments (collectively, “ASC 842”) beginning December 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective method. Results for reporting periods beginning December 1, 2019 and after will be presented under ASC 842, while results for prior reporting periods will not be adjusted and will continue to be presented under the accounting guidance in effect for those periods. Upon adoption, we expect to record lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $31.0 million on our consolidated balance sheet for leases with terms of more than 12 months, which are primarily real estate leases for office space and design studios, as well as certain equipment leases. In addition, we plan to record a cumulative effect adjustment to increase beginning retained earnings as of December 1, 2019 by approximately $1.5 million, net of tax, to recognize a previously deferred gain on our sale and leaseback of an office building in 2019. We do not expect the adoption of ASC 842 to have a material impact on our consolidated statements of operations or cash flows.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”), which changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments from an incurred loss approach to a new expected credit loss methodology. ASU 2016-13 is effective for us beginning December 1, 2020 (with early adoption permitted). We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-02, “Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2018-02”), which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA, and requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. ASU 2018-02 is effective for us beginning December 1, 2019, and shall be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the corporate income tax rate in the TCJA is recognized. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-02 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications. Certain amounts in our consolidated financial statements of prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
| |
Note 2. | Segment Information |
An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and for which segment results are evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. We have identified each of our homebuilding divisions as an operating segment. Our homebuilding operating segments have been aggregated into 4 homebuilding reporting segments based primarily on similarities in economic and geographic characteristics, product types, regulatory environments, methods used to sell and construct homes and land acquisition characteristics. We also have 1 financial services reporting segment. Management evaluates segment performance primarily based on segment pretax results.
As of November 30, 2019, our homebuilding reporting segments conducted ongoing operations in the following states:
West Coast: California and Washington
Southwest: Arizona and Nevada
Central: Colorado and Texas
Southeast: Florida and North Carolina
Our homebuilding reporting segments are engaged in the acquisition and development of land primarily for residential purposes and offer a wide variety of homes that are designed to appeal to first-time, first move-up and active adult homebuyers. Our homebuilding operations generate most of their revenues from the delivery of completed homes to homebuyers. They also earn revenues from the sale of land. In 2018, we expanded into the Seattle, Washington market.
Our financial services reporting segment offers property and casualty insurance and, in certain instances, earthquake, flood and personal property insurance to our homebuyers in the same markets as our homebuilding reporting segments, and provides title services in the majority of our markets located within our Southwest, Central and Southeast homebuilding reporting segments. In 2019, we also expanded our title services business to include Arizona, Colorado and Nevada. Our financial services segment earns revenues primarily from insurance commissions and from the provision of title services.
In 2016, we and Stearns formed KBHS, an unconsolidated mortgage banking joint venture, to offer mortgage banking services, including mortgage loan originations, to our homebuyers. We and Stearns each have a 50.0% ownership interest, with Stearns providing management oversight of KBHS’ operations. KBHS was operational in all of our served markets as of June 2017. Our homebuyers may select any lender of their choice to obtain mortgage financing for the purchase of their home. The financial services reporting segment is separately reported in our consolidated financial statements.
Corporate and other is a non-operating segment that develops and oversees the implementation of company-wide strategic initiatives and provides support to our reporting segments by centralizing certain administrative functions. Corporate management is responsible for, among other things, evaluating and selecting the geographic markets in which we operate, consistent with our overall business strategy; allocating capital resources to markets for land acquisition and development activities; making major personnel decisions related to employee compensation and benefits; and monitoring the financial and operational performance of our divisions. Corporate and other includes general and administrative expenses related to operating our corporate headquarters. A portion of the expenses incurred by Corporate and other is allocated to our homebuilding reporting segments.
Our reporting segments follow the same accounting policies used for our consolidated financial statements as described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The results of each reporting segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented, nor are they indicative of the results to be expected in future periods.
The following tables present financial information relating to our homebuilding reporting segments (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Revenues: | | | | | |
West Coast | $ | 1,912,146 |
| | $ | 2,085,328 |
| | $ | 2,186,411 |
|
Southwest | 764,816 |
| | 707,075 |
| | 533,052 |
|
Central | 1,267,892 |
| | 1,239,305 |
| | 1,188,839 |
|
Southeast | 592,804 |
| | 502,087 |
| | 447,963 |
|
Total | $ | 4,537,658 |
| | $ | 4,533,795 |
| | $ | 4,356,265 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Pretax income (loss): | | | | | |
West Coast | $ | 178,078 |
| | $ | 240,337 |
| | $ | 217,649 |
|
Southwest | 111,016 |
| | 91,017 |
| | 45,540 |
|
Central | 126,304 |
| | 117,609 |
| | 116,098 |
|
Southeast | 18,550 |
| | 7,624 |
| | (509 | ) |
Corporate and other | (108,759 | ) | | (105,286 | ) | | (101,851 | ) |
Total | $ | 325,189 |
| | $ | 351,301 |
| | $ | 276,927 |
|
| | | | | |
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures: | | | | | |
West Coast | $ | (851 | ) | | $ | (966 | ) | | $ | (1,770 | ) |
Southwest | (697 | ) | | 3,033 |
| | 362 |
|
Central | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Southeast | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) |
Total | $ | (1,549 | ) | | $ | 2,066 |
| | $ | (1,409 | ) |
| | | | | |
Inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges: | | | | | |
West Coast | $ | 15,567 |
| | $ | 20,381 |
| | $ | 16,707 |
|
Southwest | 408 |
| | 432 |
| | 3,445 |
|
Central | 848 |
| | 2,558 |
| | 846 |
|
Southeast | 468 |
| | 5,623 |
| | 4,234 |
|
Total | $ | 17,291 |
| | $ | 28,994 |
| | $ | 25,232 |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Inventories: | | | |
West Coast | $ | 1,795,088 |
| | $ | 1,727,993 |
|
Southwest | 629,811 |
| | 598,374 |
|
Central | 889,179 |
| | 865,184 |
|
Southeast | 390,524 |
| | 391,288 |
|
Total | $ | 3,704,602 |
| | $ | 3,582,839 |
|
| | | |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures: | | | |
West Coast | $ | 51,740 |
| | $ | 56,128 |
|
Southwest | 2,792 |
| | 3,327 |
|
Central | — |
| | — |
|
Southeast | 2,506 |
| | 2,505 |
|
Total | $ | 57,038 |
| | $ | 61,960 |
|
| | | |
Assets: | | | |
West Coast | $ | 1,925,192 |
| | $ | 1,880,516 |
|
Southwest | 674,310 |
| | 631,509 |
|
Central | 1,035,563 |
| | 1,017,490 |
|
Southeast | 441,451 |
| | 463,224 |
|
Corporate and other | 900,570 |
| | 1,068,452 |
|
Total | $ | 4,977,086 |
| | $ | 5,061,191 |
|
| |
Note 3. | Financial Services |
The following tables present financial information relating to our financial services reporting segment (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Revenues | | | | | |
Insurance commissions | $ | 8,662 |
| | $ | 7,535 |
| | $ | 6,991 |
|
Title services | 6,421 |
| | 5,672 |
| | 5,268 |
|
Interest income | 6 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Total | 15,089 |
| | 13,207 |
| | 12,264 |
|
Expenses | | | | | |
General and administrative | (4,333 | ) | | (3,844 | ) | | (3,430 | ) |
Operating income | 10,756 |
| | 9,363 |
| | 8,834 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures | 12,230 |
| | 7,301 |
| | 4,234 |
|
Pretax income | $ | 22,986 |
| | $ | 16,664 |
| | $ | 13,068 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Assets | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,044 |
| | $ | 760 |
|
Receivables | 2,232 |
| | 2,885 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 14,374 |
| | 8,594 |
|
Other assets (a) | 20,746 |
| | 141 |
|
Total assets | $ | 38,396 |
| | $ | 12,380 |
|
Liabilities | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 2,058 |
| | $ | 1,495 |
|
Total liabilities | $ | 2,058 |
| | $ | 1,495 |
|
| |
(a) | Other assets at November 30, 2019 included $20.6 million of contract assets for estimated future renewal commissions due to our adoption of ASC 606 effective December 1, 2018, as described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. |
On July 9, 2019, the parent company of Stearns, our partner in KBHS, filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, with Stearns included as a debtor in the case. KBHS was not included in the filing. On October 24, 2019, the court confirmed Stearns’ parent company’s plan of reorganization under which, among other things, one of its largest owners took full control of the reorganized company and invested significant new equity capital in the business. The confirmed plan of reorganization became effective on November 5, 2019. During the pendency of the bankruptcy proceedings, KBHS provided mortgage banking services to our homebuyers consistent with its pre-filing performance and there was no consolidated financial statement impact.
| |
Note 4. | Earnings Per Share |
Basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Numerator: | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 268,775 |
| | $ | 170,365 |
| | $ | 180,595 |
|
Less: Distributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock | (123 | ) | | (51 | ) | | (56 | ) |
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock | (1,505 | ) | | (927 | ) | | (1,121 | ) |
Numerator for basic earnings per share | 267,147 |
| | 169,387 |
| | 179,418 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | |
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with convertible senior notes, net of taxes | 541 |
| | 3,190 |
| | 2,654 |
|
Add: Undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock | 1,505 |
| | 927 |
| | 1,121 |
|
Less: Undistributed earnings reallocated to nonvested restricted stock | (1,412 | ) | | (805 | ) | | (979 | ) |
Numerator for diluted earnings per share | $ | 267,781 |
| | $ | 172,699 |
| | $ | 182,214 |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Denominator: | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic | 87,996 |
| | 87,773 |
| | 85,842 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | |
Share-based payments | 4,415 |
| | 4,884 |
| | 4,072 |
|
Convertible senior notes | 1,427 |
| | 8,402 |
| | 8,402 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted | 93,838 |
| | 101,059 |
| | 98,316 |
|
Basic earnings per share | $ | 3.04 |
| | $ | 1.93 |
| | $ | 2.09 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.85 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 1.85 |
|
The diluted earnings per share calculations for the years ended November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 included the dilutive effect of our 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 based on the number of days they were outstanding during each period. We repaid these notes at their February 1, 2019 maturity. In 2019, outstanding stock options to purchase a nominal amount of common stock were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive. In 2018 and 2017, outstanding stock options to purchase .8 million and 1.6 million shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculations because the effect of their inclusion in each case would be antidilutive. Contingently issuable shares associated with outstanding PSUs were not included in the basic earnings per share calculations for the periods presented, as the applicable vesting conditions had not been satisfied.
Receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Due from utility companies, improvement districts and municipalities (a) | $ | 128,047 |
| | $ | 113,434 |
|
Recoveries related to self-insurance and other legal claims | 80,729 |
| | 138,261 |
|
Refundable deposits and bonds | 10,925 |
| | 14,115 |
|
Other | 37,846 |
| | 38,525 |
|
Subtotal | 257,547 |
| | 304,335 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (8,492 | ) | | (11,505 | ) |
Total | $ | 249,055 |
| | $ | 292,830 |
|
| |
(a) | These receivables typically relate to infrastructure improvements we make with respect to our communities. We are generally reimbursed for the cost of such improvements when they are accepted by the utility company, improvement district or municipality, or after certain events occur, depending on the terms of the applicable agreements. These events may include, but are not limited to, the connection of utilities or the issuance of bonds by the respective improvement districts or municipalities. |
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Homes completed or under construction | $ | 1,340,412 |
| | $ | 1,125,152 |
|
Land under development | 2,213,713 |
| | 2,219,936 |
|
Land held for future development or sale (a) | 150,477 |
| | 237,751 |
|
Total | $ | 3,704,602 |
| | $ | 3,582,839 |
|
| |
(a) | Land held for sale totaled $19.3 million at November 30, 2019 and $9.8 million at November 30, 2018. |
Homes completed or under construction is comprised of costs associated with homes completed or in various stages of construction and includes direct construction and related land acquisition and land development costs. Land under development primarily consists of land acquisition and land development costs. Land development costs also include capitalized interest and real estate taxes. When home construction begins, the associated land acquisition and land development costs are included in homes completed or under construction.
Land held for future development principally reflects land acquisition and land development costs related to land where development activity has been suspended or has not yet begun but is expected to occur in the future. These assets held for future development are located in various submarkets where conditions do not presently support further investment or development, or are subject to a building permit moratorium or regulatory restrictions, or are portions of larger land parcels that we plan to build out over several years and/or that have not yet been entitled. We may also suspend development activity if we believe it will result in greater returns and/or maximize the economic performance of a particular community by delaying improvements for a period of time to, for instance, allow earlier phases of a long-term, multi-phase community or a neighboring community to generate or extend sales momentum, or for market conditions to improve. In some instances, we may activate or resume development activity for such inventory to accelerate sales and/or our return on investment. We activated assets previously held for future development in certain markets in 2019, 2018 and 2017 as part of our Returns-Focused Growth Plan.
Land is generally considered held for sale when management commits to a plan to sell the land; the land is available for immediate sale in its present condition; an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell have been initiated; the sale of the land is expected to be completed within one year; the land is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and it is unlikely that the plan to sell will be withdrawn or that significant changes to the plan will be made. Interest and real estate taxes are not capitalized on land held for future development or sale.
During 2019 and 2018, we changed our strategy related to certain land parcels located in improving housing markets where we determined the incremental investment in development to be justified and decided to build and sell homes on these parcels. Such land parcels were classified as either land under development or land held for future development (in the case of later phases of a long-term, multi-phase community) as of November 30, 2019 and 2018. Land held for sale as of November 30, 2019 and 2018 consisted of land parcels that either have been contracted to sell or that we are continuing to actively market and/or intend to sell within one year.
Our interest costs were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Capitalized interest at beginning of year | $ | 209,129 |
| | $ | 262,191 |
| | $ | 306,723 |
|
Interest incurred | 143,412 |
| | 149,698 |
| | 171,486 |
|
Interest expensed | — |
| | — |
| | (622 | ) |
Interest amortized to construction and land costs (a) | (156,803 | ) | | (202,760 | ) | | (215,396 | ) |
Capitalized interest at end of year (b) | $ | 195,738 |
| | $ | 209,129 |
| | $ | 262,191 |
|
| |
(a) | Interest amortized to construction and land costs for the years ended November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 included $.7 million $4.8 million and $4.9 million, respectively, related to land sales during the periods. |
| |
(b) | Capitalized interest amounts reflect the gross amount of capitalized interest, as inventory impairment charges recognized, if any, are not generally allocated to specific components of inventory. |
| |
Note 7. | Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments |
Each community or land parcel in our owned inventory is assessed to determine if indicators of potential impairment exist. Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each community or land parcel on a quarterly basis and include, but are not limited to, the following: significant decreases in net orders, average selling prices, volume of homes delivered, gross profit margins on homes delivered or projected gross profit margins on homes in backlog or future deliveries; significant increases in budgeted land development and home construction costs or cancellation rates; or projected losses on expected future land sales. If indicators of potential impairment exist for a community or land parcel, the identified asset is evaluated for recoverability. We evaluated 40, 57 and 51 communities or land parcels for recoverability during the years ended November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The carrying value of those communities or land parcels evaluated during the years ended November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $326.3 million, $356.1 million and $456.9 million, respectively. The communities or land parcels evaluated during 2019, 2018 and 2017 included certain communities or land parcels previously held for future development that were reactivated as part of our efforts to improve our asset efficiency under our Returns-Focused Growth Plan. As impairment indicators are assessed on a quarterly basis, some of the communities or land parcels evaluated during these years were evaluated in more than one quarterly period. Communities or land parcels evaluated for recoverability in more than one quarterly period are counted only once for each applicable year. In some cases, we have recognized inventory impairment charges for particular communities or land parcels in multiple years. Inventory impairment charges are included in construction and land costs in our consolidated statements of operations.
When an indicator of potential impairment is identified for a community or land parcel, we test the asset for recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. The undiscounted future net cash flows are impacted by then-current conditions and trends in the market in which the asset is located as well as factors known to us at the time the cash flows are calculated. These factors may include recent trends in our orders, backlog, cancellation rates and volume of homes delivered, as well as our expectations related to the following: product offerings; market supply and demand, including estimated average selling prices and related price appreciation; and land development, home construction and overhead costs to be incurred and related cost inflation. With respect to the years ended November 30, 2019 and 2018, these expectations reflected our experience that, notwithstanding fluctuations in our company-wide net orders, backlog levels, homes delivered and housing gross profit margin during those periods, on a year-over-year basis, conditions in the markets where assessed assets were located were generally stable or improved, with no significant deterioration identified or projected, as to revenue and cost drivers that would prevent or otherwise impact recoverability. Based on this experience, and taking into account the generally healthy conditions in many of our served markets for new home sales, our inventory assessments as of November 30, 2019 considered an expected steady overall sales pace and average selling price performance for 2020 and beyond relative to the pace and performance in recent quarters. Our inventory is assessed for potential impairment on a quarterly basis, and the assumptions used are reviewed and adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the market conditions and trends and our expectations at the time each assessment is performed.
Given the inherent challenges and uncertainties in forecasting future results, our inventory assessments at the time they are made take into consideration whether a community or land parcel is active, meaning whether it is open for sales and/or undergoing development, or whether it is being held for future development or held for sale. Due to the short-term nature of active communities and land held for sale, as compared to land held for future development, our inventory assessments generally assume the continuation of then-current market conditions, subject to identifying information suggesting significant sustained changes in such conditions. Our assessments of active communities, at the time made, generally anticipate net orders, average selling prices, volume of homes delivered and costs for land development and home construction to continue at or near then-current levels through the particular asset’s estimated remaining life. Inventory assessments for our land held for future development consider then-current market conditions as well as subjective forecasts regarding the timing and costs of land development and home construction and related cost inflation; the product(s) to be offered; and the net orders, volume of homes delivered, and selling prices and related price appreciation of the offered product(s) when an associated community is anticipated to open for sales. We evaluate various factors to develop these forecasts, including the availability of and demand for homes and finished lots within the relevant marketplace; historical, current and expected future sales trends for the marketplace; and third-party data, if available. The estimates, expectations and assumptions used in each of our inventory assessments are specific to each community or land parcel based on what we believe are reasonable forecasts for their particular performance, and may vary among communities or land parcels and may vary over time.
We record an inventory impairment charge on a community or land parcel that is active or held for future development when indicators of potential impairment exist and the carrying value of the real estate asset is greater than the undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. These real estate assets are written down to fair value, which is primarily determined
based on the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risk associated with each such asset, or other valuation techniques. Inputs used in our calculation of estimated discounted future net cash flows are specific to each affected real estate asset and are based on our expectations for each such asset as of the applicable measurement date, including, among others, expectations related to average selling prices and volume of homes delivered. The discount rates we used were impacted by one or more of the following at the time the calculation was made: the risk-free rate of return; expected risk premium based on estimated land development, home construction and delivery timelines; market risk from potential future price erosion; cost uncertainty due to land development or home construction cost increases; and other risks specific to the asset or conditions in the market in which the asset is located.
We record an inventory impairment charge on land held for sale when the carrying value of a land parcel is greater than its fair value. These real estate assets are written down to fair value, less associated costs to sell. The estimated fair values of such assets are generally based on bona fide letters of intent from outside parties, executed sales contracts, broker quotes or similar information.
The following table summarizes ranges for significant quantitative unobservable inputs we utilized in our fair value measurements with respect to impaired communities, other than land held for sale, written down to fair value during the years presented:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, |
Unobservable Input (a) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Average selling price | | $315,000 - $1,045,400 | | $291,300 - $774,100 | | $207,100 - $1,576,500 |
Deliveries per month | | 1 - 4 | | 2 - 6 | | 1 - 4 |
Discount rate | | 17% | | 17% - 19% | | 17% - 18% |
| |
(a) | The ranges of inputs used in each period primarily reflect differences between the housing markets where each impacted community is located, rather than fluctuations in prevailing market conditions. |
Based on the results of our evaluations, we recognized inventory impairment charges of $14.0 million in 2019 related to 8 communities with a post-impairment fair value of $27.1 million. In 2018, we recognized inventory impairment charges of $26.1 million related to 13 communities with a post-impairment fair value of $44.1 million. In 2017, we recognized inventory impairment charges of $20.6 million related to 10 communities with a post-impairment fair value of $38.4 million. The impairment charges in 2019, 2018 and 2017 reflected our decisions to make changes in our operational strategies aimed at more quickly monetizing our investment in certain communities by accelerating the overall pace for selling, building and delivering homes therein, including communities on land previously held for future development. If we change our strategy or if there are changes in market conditions for any given asset, it is possible that we may recognize additional inventory impairment charges.
As of November 30, 2019, the aggregate carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment charges was $115.6 million, representing 19 communities and various other land parcels. As of November 30, 2018, the aggregate carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment charges was $156.1 million, representing 22 communities and various other land parcels.
Our inventory controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts is assessed to determine whether it continues to meet our investment return standards. Assessments are made separately for each optioned land parcel on a quarterly basis and are affected by the following factors relative to the market in which the asset is located, among others: current and/or anticipated net orders, average selling prices and volume of homes delivered; estimated land development and home construction costs; and projected profitability on expected future housing or land sales. When a decision is made not to exercise certain land option contracts and other similar contracts due to market conditions and/or changes in our marketing strategy, we write off the related inventory costs, including non-refundable deposits and unrecoverable pre-acquisition costs. Based on the results of our assessments, we recognized land option contract abandonment charges of $3.3 million in 2019, $2.9 million in 2018 and $4.6 million in 2017. Land option contract abandonment charges are included in construction and land costs in our consolidated statements of operations.
The estimated remaining life of each community or land parcel in our inventory depends on various factors, such as the total number of lots remaining; the expected timeline to acquire and entitle land and develop lots to build homes; the anticipated future net order and cancellation rates; and the expected timeline to build and deliver homes sold. While it is difficult to determine a precise timeframe for any particular inventory asset, based on current market conditions and expected delivery timelines, we estimate our inventory assets’ remaining operating lives to range generally from one year to in excess of ten years, and expect to realize, on an overall basis, the majority of our inventory balance as of November 30, 2019 within five years.
Due to the judgment and assumptions applied in our inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment assessment processes, and in our estimations of the remaining operating lives of our inventory assets and the realization of our inventory balances, particularly as to land held for future development, it is possible that actual results could differ substantially from those estimated.
| |
Note 8. | Variable Interest Entities |
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. We participate in joint ventures from time to time that conduct land acquisition, land development and/or other homebuilding activities in various markets where our homebuilding operations are located. Our investments in these joint ventures may create a variable interest in a VIE, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. We analyze our joint ventures under the variable interest model to determine whether they are VIEs and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. Based on our analyses, we determined that 1 of our joint ventures at November 30, 2019 and 2018 was a VIE, but we were not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Therefore, all of our joint ventures at November 30, 2019 and 2018 were unconsolidated and accounted for under the equity method because we did not have a controlling financial interest.
Land Option Contracts and Other Similar Contracts. In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into land option contracts and other similar contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities to acquire rights to land for the construction of homes. The use of these contracts generally allows us to reduce the market risks associated with direct land ownership and development, and reduce our capital and financial commitments, including interest and other carrying costs. Under these contracts, we typically make a specified option payment or earnest money deposit in consideration for the right to purchase land in the future, usually at a predetermined price.
We analyze each of our land option contracts and other similar contracts under the variable interest model to determine whether the land seller is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. Although we do not have legal title to the underlying land, we are required to consolidate a VIE if we are the primary beneficiary. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, we consider, among other things, whether we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Such activities would include, among other things, determining or limiting the scope or purpose of the VIE, selling or transferring property owned or controlled by the VIE, or arranging financing for the VIE. As a result of our analyses, we determined that as of November 30, 2019 and 2018, we were not the primary beneficiary of any VIEs from which we have acquired rights to land under land option contracts and other similar contracts. We perform ongoing reassessments of whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE.
The following table presents a summary of our interests in land option contracts and other similar contracts (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| November 30, 2019 | | November 30, 2018 |
| Cash Deposits | | Aggregate Purchase Price | | Cash Deposits | | Aggregate Purchase Price |
Unconsolidated VIEs | $ | 34,595 |
| | $ | 823,427 |
| | $ | 26,542 |
| | $ | 784,334 |
|
Other land option contracts and other similar contracts | 40,591 |
| | 600,092 |
| | 27,288 |
| | 586,904 |
|
Total | $ | 75,186 |
| | $ | 1,423,519 |
| | $ | 53,830 |
| | $ | 1,371,238 |
|
In addition to the cash deposits presented in the table above, our exposure to loss related to our land option contracts and other similar contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities consisted of pre-acquisition costs of $32.8 million at November 30, 2019 and $46.9 million at November 30, 2018. These pre-acquisition costs and cash deposits were included in inventories in our consolidated balance sheets.
For land option contracts and other similar contracts where the land seller entity is not required to be consolidated under the variable interest model, we consider whether such contracts should be accounted for as financing arrangements. Land option contracts and other similar contracts that may be considered financing arrangements include those we enter into with third-party land financiers or developers in conjunction with such third parties acquiring a specific land parcel(s) on our behalf, at our direction, and those with other landowners where we or our designee make improvements to the optioned land parcel(s) during the applicable option period. For these land option contracts and other similar contracts, we record the remaining purchase price of the associated land parcel(s) in inventories in our consolidated balance sheets with a corresponding financing obligation if we determine that we are effectively compelled to exercise the option to purchase the land parcel(s). In making this determination with respect to a land option contract, we consider the non-refundable deposit(s) we have made and any non-reimbursable expenditures we have incurred for land improvement activities or other items up to the assessment date; additional costs associated with abandoning the contract; and our commitments, if any, to incur non-reimbursable costs associated with the contract. As a result of our evaluations of land option contracts and other similar contracts for financing arrangements, we recorded inventories in our consolidated balance sheets,
with a corresponding increase to accrued expenses and other liabilities, of $12.2 million at November 30, 2019 and $21.8 million at November 30, 2018.
| |
Note 9. | Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
We have investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that conduct land acquisition, land development and/or other homebuilding activities in various markets where our homebuilding operations are located. We and our unconsolidated joint venture partners make initial and/or ongoing capital contributions to these unconsolidated joint ventures, typically on a pro rata basis, according to our respective equity interests. The obligations to make capital contributions are governed by each such unconsolidated joint venture’s respective operating agreement and related governing documents. Our partners in these unconsolidated joint ventures are unrelated homebuilders, and/or land developers and other real estate entities, or commercial enterprises. These investments are designed primarily to reduce market and development risks and to increase the number of lots we own or control. In some instances, participating in unconsolidated joint ventures has enabled us to acquire and develop land that we might not otherwise have had access to due to a project’s size, financing needs, duration of development or other circumstances. While we consider our participation in unconsolidated joint ventures as potentially beneficial to our homebuilding activities, we do not view such participation as essential.
For distributions we receive from these unconsolidated joint ventures, we have elected to use the cumulative earnings approach for our consolidated statements of cash flows. Under the cumulative earnings approach, distributions up to the amount of cumulative equity in earnings recognized are treated as returns on investment within operating cash flows and those in excess of that amount are treated as returns of investment within investing cash flows.
We typically have obtained rights to acquire portions of the land held by the unconsolidated joint ventures in which we currently participate. When an unconsolidated joint venture sells land to our homebuilding operations, we defer recognition of our share of such unconsolidated joint venture’s earnings (losses) until we recognize revenues on the corresponding home sale, which is generally when title to and possession of the home and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the homebuyer on the closing date. At that time, we account for the earnings (losses) as a reduction (increase) to the cost of purchasing the land from the unconsolidated joint venture. We defer recognition of our share of such unconsolidated joint venture losses only to the extent profits are to be generated from the sale of the home to a homebuyer.
We share in the earnings (losses) of these unconsolidated joint ventures generally in accordance with our respective equity interests. In some instances, we recognize earnings (losses) related to our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture that differ from our equity interest in the unconsolidated joint venture. This typically arises from our deferral of the unconsolidated joint venture’s earnings (losses) from land sales to us, or other items.
The following table presents combined condensed information from the statements of operations of our unconsolidated joint ventures (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Revenues | $ | 23,676 |
| | $ | 59,418 |
| | $ | 47,431 |
|
Construction and land costs | (23,659 | ) | | (46,288 | ) | | (47,459 | ) |
Other expenses, net | (2,644 | ) | | (2,674 | ) | | (4,749 | ) |
Income (loss) | $ | (2,627 | ) | | $ | 10,456 |
| | $ | (4,777 | ) |
For the years ended November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, combined revenues and construction and land costs were generated primarily from land sales. The higher combined revenues and income for 2018 as compared to 2019 and 2017, mainly reflected the sale of land by an unconsolidated joint venture in Arizona, and contingent consideration (profit participation revenues) earned by an unconsolidated joint venture in California.
The following table presents combined condensed balance sheet information for our unconsolidated joint ventures (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Assets | | | |
Cash | $ | 23,965 |
| | $ | 18,567 |
|
Receivables | 12 |
| | 9 |
|
Inventories | 139,536 |
| | 131,074 |
|
Other assets | 780 |
| | 521 |
|
Total assets | $ | 164,293 |
| | $ | 150,171 |
|
Liabilities and equity | | | |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | $ | 13,282 |
| | $ | 11,374 |
|
Notes payable (a) | 40,672 |
| | 17,956 |
|
Equity | 110,339 |
| | 120,841 |
|
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 164,293 |
| | $ | 150,171 |
|
| |
(a) | As of November 30, 2019 and 2018, we had investments in 5 and 6 unconsolidated joint ventures, respectively, 1 of which had a construction loan agreement with a third-party lender to finance its land development activities. The outstanding debt is secured by the corresponding underlying property and related project assets and is non-recourse to us. All of the outstanding secured debt at November 30, 2019 is scheduled to mature in February 2020. However, the loan agreement provides for two-12 month extensions beyond this date. None of our other unconsolidated joint ventures had outstanding debt at November 30, 2019 or 2018. |
We and our partner in the unconsolidated joint venture that has the above-noted outstanding construction loan agreement at November 30, 2019 provide certain guarantees and indemnities to the lender, including a guaranty to complete the construction of improvements for the project; a guaranty against losses the lender suffers due to certain bad acts or failures to act by the unconsolidated joint venture or its partners; and an indemnity of the lender from environmental issues. In each instance, our actual responsibility under the foregoing guaranty and indemnity obligations is limited to our pro rata interest in the unconsolidated joint venture. We do not have a guaranty or any other obligation to repay or to support the value of the collateral underlying the outstanding secured debt. However, various financial and non-financial covenants apply with respect to the outstanding secured debt and the related guaranty and indemnity obligations, and a failure to comply with such covenants could result in a default and cause the lender to seek to enforce such guaranty and indemnity obligations, if and as may be applicable. As of the date of this report, we were in compliance with the applicable terms of our relevant covenants with respect to the construction loan agreement. We do not believe that our existing exposure under our guaranty and indemnity obligations related to the outstanding secured debt is material to our consolidated financial statements.
| |
Note 10. | Property and Equipment, Net |
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | November 30, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
Computer software and equipment | | $ | 27,091 |
| | $ | 20,940 |
|
Model furnishings and sales office improvements (a) | | 82,117 |
| | — |
|
Leasehold improvements, office furniture and equipment (b) | | 16,173 |
| | 23,491 |
|
Subtotal | | 125,381 |
| | 44,431 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation (a) | | (60,338 | ) | | (20,148 | ) |
Total | | $ | 65,043 |
| | $ | 24,283 |
|
| |
(a) | The balance at November 30, 2019 reflects a change in the classification of certain community sales office and other marketing- and model home-related costs and related accumulated amortization from inventories to property and equipment, net due to our adoption of ASC 606 effective December 1, 2018, as described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. |
| |
(b) | In January 2019, we completed the sale and leaseback of our office building in San Antonio, Texas. The sale generated net cash proceeds of $5.8 million and a gain of $2.2 million, which is being recognized on a straight-line basis over a 10-year lease term until our adoption of ASC 842, when the remaining gain will be recognized as a transition adjustment to beginning retained earnings, as described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. |
Other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Cash surrender value and benefit receivable from corporate-owned life insurance contracts | $ | 73,849 |
| | $ | 73,721 |
|
Prepaid expenses | 5,944 |
| | 7,647 |
|
Debt issuance costs associated with unsecured revolving credit facility, net | 3,248 |
| | 1,732 |
|
Total | $ | 83,041 |
| | $ | 83,100 |
|
| |
Note 12. | Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Self-insurance and other legal liabilities | $ | 229,483 |
| | $ | 283,651 |
|
Employee compensation and related benefits | 163,646 |
| | 148,549 |
|
Warranty liability | 88,839 |
| | 82,490 |
|
Accrued interest payable | 32,507 |
| | 31,180 |
|
Inventory-related obligations (a) | 26,264 |
| | 40,892 |
|
Customer deposits | 22,382 |
| | 19,491 |
|
Real estate and business taxes | 14,872 |
| | 16,639 |
|
Other | 40,790 |
| | 43,376 |
|
Total | $ | 618,783 |
| | $ | 666,268 |
|
| |
(a) | Represents liabilities for financing arrangements discussed in Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities, as well as liabilities for fixed or determinable amounts associated with TIFE assessments. As homes are delivered, our obligation to pay the remaining TIFE assessments associated with each underlying lot is transferred to the homebuyer. As such, these assessment obligations will be paid by us only to the extent we do not deliver homes on applicable lots before the related TIFE obligations mature. |
Income Tax Expense. The components of the income tax expense in our consolidated statements of operations are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Federal | | State | | Total |
2019 | | | | | |
Current | $ | (200 | ) | | $ | (3,700 | ) | | $ | (3,900 | ) |
Deferred | (53,800 | ) | | (21,700 | ) | | (75,500 | ) |
Income tax expense | $ | (54,000 | ) | | $ | (25,400 | ) | | $ | (79,400 | ) |
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Federal | | State | | Total |
2018 | | | | | |
Current | $ | (3,600 | ) | | $ | (4,800 | ) | | $ | (8,400 | ) |
Deferred | (170,700 | ) | | (18,500 | ) | | (189,200 | ) |
Income tax expense | $ | (174,300 | ) | | $ | (23,300 | ) | | $ | (197,600 | ) |
| | | | | |
2017 | | | | | |
Current | $ | (2,800 | ) | | $ | (3,000 | ) | | $ | (5,800 | ) |
Deferred | (86,300 | ) | | (17,300 | ) | | (103,600 | ) |
Income tax expense | $ | (89,100 | ) | | $ | (20,300 | ) | | $ | (109,400 | ) |
Our effective tax rates were 22.8% for 2019, 53.7% for 2018 and 37.7% for 2017.
In 2019, our income tax expense and effective tax rate reflected the favorable impacts of $5.3 million of excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation, a $4.4 million deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversal and $4.3 million of federal energy tax credits we earned from building energy-efficient homes, partly offset by a $1.9 million non-cash charge due to the re-measurement of deferred tax assets based on a reduction in certain state income tax rates.
Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2018 included a charge of $112.5 million for TCJA-related impacts, as described below; the favorable effect of the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate under the TCJA; the favorable net impact of federal energy tax credits of $10.7 million that we earned from building energy-efficient homes; a $2.1 million net tax benefit from a reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance; and excess tax benefits of $1.0 million related to stock-based compensation. The TCJA required us to use a blended federal tax rate for our 2018 fiscal year by applying a prorated percentage of days before and after the January 1, 2018 effective date. As a result, our 2018 annual federal statutory tax rate was reduced to approximately 22%.
The federal energy tax credits for the years ended November 30, 2019 and 2018 resulted from legislation enacted on February 9, 2018, which among other things, extended the availability of a business tax credit for building new energy-efficient homes through December 31, 2017. Prior to this legislation, the tax credit expired on December 31, 2016. In December 2019, federal legislation was enacted, which among other things, extended the availability of a business tax credit for building new energy-efficient homes through December 31, 2020. This extension is expected to benefit our income tax provision in future periods.
In 2017, our income tax expense and effective tax rates reflected the favorable net impact of $4.9 million of federal energy tax credits we earned from building energy-efficient homes through December 31, 2016.
TCJA. The TCJA, enacted in December 2017, among other things: (a) reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018; (b) eliminated the federal corporate alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) and changed how existing AMT credits can be realized; and (c) eliminated several business deductions and credits, including deductions for certain executive compensation in excess of $1 million. In 2018, based on our analysis of the TCJA’s income tax effects, we recorded a total non-cash charge of $112.5 million to income tax expense, comprised of a provisional estimate of $111.2 million recorded in the 2018 first quarter and an additional $1.3 million charge in the 2018 fourth quarter. The following TCJA-related impacts were reflected in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended November 30, 2018:
| |
• | We recorded a non-cash charge of $106.7 million in income tax expense due to the accounting re-measurement of our deferred tax assets based on the lower federal corporate income tax rate under the TCJA. |
| |
• | As we may claim a refund of 50% of our remaining AMT credits annually through 2021 to the extent the credits exceed regular income tax for any such year, and receive a full refund of any remaining credits in 2022, we estimated our refund of AMT credit carryforwards will total approximately $50.0 million. As the refund was subject to a sequestration reduction rate of approximately 6.6%, we established a federal deferred tax valuation allowance of $3.3 million for 2018. Our accounting policy regarding the balance sheet presentation of the AMT credits is to maintain the balance in deferred tax assets until a tax return is filed claiming a refund of a portion of the credit, at which time such amount will be presented in receivables. |
| |
• | We recorded a non-cash charge of $2.5 million in income tax expense for disallowed executive compensation due to the TCJA’s eliminating the deductibility of certain performance-based compensation. The TCJA also modified who is a covered employee with respect to the deduction limitation, and provided a transition rule that would preserve the |
deductibility of certain 2018 performance-based compensation payable under written binding contracts in place prior to November 2, 2017 that had not been modified in any material respect.
Deferred Tax Assets, Net. Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the financial and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Significant components of our deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | |
Capitalized expenses | $ | 43,818 |
| | $ | 51,660 |
|
State taxes | 26,290 |
| | 31,246 |
|
Other | 4,132 |
| | 225 |
|
Total | 74,240 |
| | 83,131 |
|
| | | |
Deferred tax assets: | | | |
Tax credits | 180,737 |
| | 231,100 |
|
Net operating losses (“NOLs”) from 2006 through 2019 | 95,562 |
| | 121,432 |
|
Employee benefits | 53,294 |
| | 45,802 |
|
Inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges | 48,862 |
| | 67,416 |
|
Warranty, legal and other accruals | 40,954 |
| | 43,213 |
|
Capitalized expenses | 25,116 |
| | 27,894 |
|
Partnerships and joint ventures | 9,990 |
| | 6,368 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 479 |
| | 1,869 |
|
Other | 2,939 |
| | 3,457 |
|
Total | 457,933 |
| | 548,551 |
|
Valuation allowance | (19,200 | ) | | (23,600 | ) |
Total | 438,733 |
| | 524,951 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net | $ | 364,493 |
| | $ | 441,820 |
|
Reconciliation of Expected Income Tax Expense. The income tax expense computed at the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate and the income tax expense provided in our consolidated statements of operations differ as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| $ | | % | | $ | | % | | $ | | % |
Income tax expense computed at statutory rate | $ | (73,117 | ) | | (21.0 | )% | | $ | (81,689 | ) | | (22.2 | )% | | $ | (101,499 | ) | | (35.0 | )% |
Tax credits | 6,595 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 14,177 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 6,227 |
| | 2.2 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | 4,400 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 2,000 |
| | .5 |
| | 1,200 |
| | .4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 4,276 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 1,223 |
| | .3 |
| | 362 |
| | .1 |
|
NOL reconciliation | 3,111 |
| | .9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,210 | ) | | (.8 | ) |
State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | (20,927 | ) | | (6.0 | ) | | (20,155 | ) | | (5.5 | ) | | (14,450 | ) | | (4.9 | ) |
Non-deductible compensation | (4,653 | ) | | (1.3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
TCJA adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | (112,458 | ) | | (30.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Other, net | 915 |
| | .2 |
| | (698 | ) | | (.2 | ) | | 970 |
| | .3 |
|
Income tax expense | $ | (79,400 | ) | | (22.8 | )% | | $ | (197,600 | ) | | (53.7 | )% | | $ | (109,400 | ) | | (37.7 | )% |
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance. We evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if adjustments to our valuation allowance are required based on the consideration of all available positive and negative evidence using a “more likely than not” standard with respect to whether deferred tax assets will be realized. Our evaluation considers, among other factors, our historical operating results, our expectation of future profitability, the duration of the applicable statutory carryforward periods, and conditions in the housing market and the broader economy. In our evaluation, we give more significant weight to evidence that is objective in nature as compared to subjective evidence. Also, more significant weight is given to evidence that directly relates to our then-current financial performance as compared to indirect or less current evidence. The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends primarily on our ability to generate future taxable income during the periods in which the related deferred tax assets become deductible. The value of our deferred tax assets depends on applicable income tax rates.
Our deferred tax assets of $383.7 million at November 30, 2019 and $465.4 million at November 30, 2018 were partially offset in each year by valuation allowances of $19.2 million and $23.6 million, respectively. The deferred tax asset valuation allowances at November 30, 2019 and 2018 were primarily related to certain state NOLs that had not met the “more likely than not” realization standard at those dates. As of November 30, 2019, we would need to generate approximately $1.30 billion of pretax income in future periods before 2039 to realize our deferred tax assets. Based on the evaluation of our deferred tax assets as of November 30, 2019, we determined that most of our deferred tax assets would be realized. The decrease in the valuation allowance during 2019 primarily reflected our reversal of the above-mentioned $4.4 million deferred tax asset valuation allowance, partly due to the Internal Revenue Service’s announcement in January 2019 that refundable AMT credits will not be subject to sequestration for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. As noted above, in 2018, we established a federal deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $3.3 million due to the sequestration of refundable AMT credits, which was offset by a reduction of $3.3 million in our state deferred tax asset valuation allowance primarily to account for state NOLs that met the “more likely than not” standard or had expired. In 2018, the net tax benefit related to the reduction in the state deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $2.1 million. In 2017, we reduced our valuation allowance by $1.2 million primarily to account for state NOLs that met the “more likely than not” realization standard.
We will continue to evaluate both the positive and negative evidence on a quarterly basis in determining the need for a valuation allowance with respect to our deferred tax assets. The accounting for deferred tax assets is based upon estimates of future results. Changes in positive and negative evidence, including differences between estimated and actual results, could result in changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets that could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Changes in existing federal and state tax laws and corporate income tax rates could also affect actual tax results and the realization of deferred tax assets over time.
The majority of the tax benefits associated with our NOLs can be carried forward for 20 years and applied to offset future taxable income. Depending on their applicable statutory period, the state NOL carryforwards of $95.5 million, if not utilized, will begin to expire between 2020 and 2039. State NOL carryforwards of $1.2 million expired in 2018.
In addition, $77.4 million of our tax credits, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2027 through 2039.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits. Gross unrecognized tax benefits are the differences between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and the benefit recognized for accounting purposes. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Balance at beginning of year | $ | — |
| | $ | 56 |
| | $ | 56 |
|
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations | — |
| | (56 | ) | | — |
|
Balance at end of year | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 56 |
|
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our consolidated financial statements as a component of the provision for income taxes. As of November 30, 2019 and 2018, we had 0 gross unrecognized tax benefits. As of November 30, 2017, our gross unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties) totaled $.1 million. Our liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits at November 30, 2017 are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
As of November 30, 2019 and 2018, there were 0 tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but the timing of such deductibility is uncertain. Our total accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits was 0 at both November 30, 2019 and 2018. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect our annual effective tax rate, but would accelerate the payment
of cash to a tax authority to an earlier period. The fiscal years ending 2016 and later remain open to federal examinations, while 2015 and later remain open to state examinations.
The benefits of our deferred tax assets, including our NOLs, built-in losses and tax credits would be reduced or potentially eliminated if we experienced an “ownership change” under Section 382. Based on our analysis performed as of November 30, 2019, we do not believe that we have experienced an ownership change as defined by Section 382, and, therefore, the NOLs, built-in losses and tax credits we have generated should not be subject to a Section 382 limitation as of this reporting date.
Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans (at interest rates of 7% at November 30, 2019 and 2018) | $ | 7,889 |
| | $ | 40,038 |
|
1.375% Convertible senior notes due February 1, 2019 | — |
| | 229,788 |
|
4.75% Senior notes due May 15, 2019 | — |
| | 399,483 |
|
8.00% Senior notes due March 15, 2020 | — |
| | 347,790 |
|
7.00% Senior notes due December 15, 2021 | 448,164 |
| | 447,359 |
|
7.50% Senior notes due September 15, 2022 | 348,267 |
| | 347,731 |
|
7.625% Senior notes due May 15, 2023 | 351,748 |
| | 248,074 |
|
6.875% Senior notes due June 15, 2027 | 296,379 |
| | — |
|
4.80% Senior notes due November 15, 2029 | 296,300 |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 1,748,747 |
| | $ | 2,060,263 |
|
The carrying amounts of our senior notes listed above are net of debt issuance costs, premiums and discounts, which totaled $9.1 million at November 30, 2019 and $9.8 million at November 30, 2018.
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility. On October 7, 2019, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility that increased the borrowing capacity from $500.0 million to $800.0 million and extended the maturity from July 27, 2021 to October 7, 2023. The Credit Facility, as amended, contains an uncommitted accordion feature under which its aggregate principal amount of available loans can be increased to a maximum of $1.00 billion under certain conditions, including obtaining additional bank commitments. The Credit Facility also contains a sublimit of $250.0 million for the issuance of letters of credit. Interest on amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility is payable at least quarterly in arrears at a rate based on either a Eurodollar or a base rate, plus a spread that depends on our Leverage Ratio, as defined under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility also requires the payment of a commitment fee at a per annum rate ranging from .20% to .35% of the unused commitment, based on our Leverage Ratio. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain compliance with various covenants, including financial covenants relating to our consolidated tangible net worth, Leverage Ratio, and either an Interest Coverage Ratio or a minimum level of liquidity, each as defined therein. The amount of the Credit Facility available for cash borrowings or the issuance of letters of credit depends on the total cash borrowings and letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility and the maximum available amount under the terms of the Credit Facility. As of November 30, 2019, we had 0 cash borrowings and $18.9 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility. Therefore, as of November 30, 2019, we had $781.1 million available for cash borrowings under the Credit Facility, with up to $231.1 million of that amount available for the issuance of letters of credit.
LOC Facility. On February 13, 2019, we entered into an LOC Facility, which expires on February 13, 2022. Under the LOC Facility, we may issue up to $50.0 million of letters of credit. We maintain the LOC Facility to obtain letters of credit from time to time in the ordinary course of operating our business. As of November 30, 2019, we had $15.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under the LOC Facility. We previously had a cash-collateralized letter of credit facility, which we terminated in 2019. We had 0 letters of credit outstanding under the cash-collateralized letter of credit facility at November 30, 2018.
Mortgages and Land Contracts Due to Land Sellers and Other Loans. As of November 30, 2019, inventories having a carrying value of $29.2 million were pledged to collateralize mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans.
Shelf Registration. We have the 2017 Shelf Registration filed with the SEC. Issuances of securities under our 2017 Shelf Registration require the filing of a prospectus supplement identifying the amount and terms of the securities to be issued. Our ability to issue securities is subject to market conditions and other factors impacting our borrowing capacity.
Senior Notes. All of the senior notes outstanding at November 30, 2019 and 2018 represent senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future indebtedness. All of our outstanding senior notes were issued in underwritten public offerings.
The key terms of each of our senior notes outstanding as of November 30, 2019 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Redeemable Prior to Maturity | | Effective Interest Rate |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes Payable | | Principal | | Issuance Date | | Maturity Date | | |
7.00% Senior notes | | $ | 450,000 |
| | October 29, 2013 | | December 15, 2021 | | Yes (a) | | 7.2 | % |
7.50% Senior notes | | 350,000 |
| | July 31, 2012 | | September 15, 2022 | | Yes (b) | | 7.7 |
|
7.625% Senior notes | | 350,000 |
| | February 17, 2015/February 20, 2019 | | May 15, 2023 | | Yes (a) | | 7.5 |
|
6.875% Senior notes | | 300,000 |
| | February 20, 2019 | | June 15, 2027 | | Yes (a) | | 7.1 |
|
4.80% Senior notes | | 300,000 |
| | November 4, 2019 | | November 15, 2029 | | Yes (a) | | 5.0 |
|
| |
(a) | At our option, these notes may be redeemed, in whole at any time or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the notes being redeemed (exclusive of interest accrued to the applicable redemption date), discounted to the redemption date at a defined rate, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date, except that three months prior to the stated maturity dates for the 7.00% Senior Notes due 2021 and until their respective maturity, and six months prior to the stated maturity date for the 7.625% Senior Notes due 2023, 6.875% Senior Notes due 2027 and 4.80% Senior Notes due 2029 and until their maturity, the redemption price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date. |
| |
(b) | At our option, these notes may be redeemed, in whole at any time or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the notes being redeemed (exclusive of interest accrued to the applicable redemption date), discounted to the redemption date at a defined rate, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the notes being redeemed to the applicable redemption date. |
If a change in control occurs as defined in the instruments governing our senior notes, we would be required to offer to purchase all of our outstanding senior notes at 101% of their principal amount, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
On February 1, 2019, we repaid the entire $230.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 at their maturity.
On February 20, 2019, we completed concurrent public offerings of $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due 2027 at 100.000% of their aggregate principal amount, and an additional $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our existing series of 7.625% Senior Notes due 2023 at 105.250% of their aggregate principal amount plus accrued interest from November 15, 2018 (the last date on which interest was paid on the existing 2023 senior notes) to the date of delivery. Net proceeds from these offerings totaled $400.0 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and our expenses relating to the offerings.
On March 8, 2019, we applied the net proceeds from the concurrent public offerings toward the optional redemption of the entire $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 4.75% Senior Notes due 2019 before their May 15, 2019 maturity date.
On November 4, 2019, we completed a public offering of $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.80% Senior Notes due 2029 at 100.000% of their aggregate principal amount. Net proceeds from this offering totaled $296.3 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and our expenses relating to the offering.
On November 22, 2019, at our option, we redeemed the entire $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 8.00% Senior Notes due 2020 before their March 15, 2020 maturity date. We used the net proceeds from the 4.80% Senior Notes due 2029 and internally generated cash to fund this redemption. We paid $356.2 million to redeem the notes and recorded a charge of $6.8 million for the early extinguishment of debt.
On June 15, 2018, we repaid the entire $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018 at their maturity using internally generated cash.
The indenture governing our senior notes does not contain any financial covenants. Subject to specified exceptions, the indenture contains certain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur secured indebtedness, or engage in sale-leaseback transactions involving property or assets above a certain specified value. In addition, our senior notes contain certain limitations related to mergers, consolidations, and sales of assets.
As of the date of this report, we were in compliance with the applicable terms of all our covenants and other requirements under the Credit Facility, the senior notes, the indenture, and the mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans. Our ability to access the Credit Facility for cash borrowings and letters of credit and our ability to secure future debt financing depend, in part, on our ability to remain in such compliance. Unless there is a default under the Credit Facility, there are no agreements that restrict our payment of dividends.
Principal payments on senior notes, mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans are due during each year ending November 30 as follows: 2020 — $7.9 million; 2021 — $0; 2022 — $800.0 million; 2023 — $350.0 million; 2024 — $0; and thereafter — $600.0 million.
| |
Note 15. | Fair Value Disclosures |
Fair value measurements of assets and liabilities are categorized based on the following hierarchy:
| |
Level 1 | Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| |
Level 2 | Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or other means. |
| |
Level 3 | Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as pricing models, discounted cash flows, or similar techniques. |
Fair value measurements are used for inventories on a nonrecurring basis when events and circumstances indicate that their carrying value is not recoverable. The following table presents the fair value hierarchy and our assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | November 30, 2019 | | November 30, 2018 |
Description | | Fair Value Hierarchy | | Pre-Impairment Value | | Inventory Impairment Charges | | Fair Value (a) | | Pre-Impairment Value | | Inventory Impairment Charges | | Fair Value (a) |
Inventories (a) | | Level 3 | | $ | 41,160 |
| | $ | (14,031 | ) | | $ | 27,129 |
| | $ | 70,156 |
| | $ | (26,104 | ) | | $ | 44,052 |
|
| |
(a) | Amounts represent the aggregate fair value for real estate assets impacted by inventory impairment charges during the applicable period, as of the date that the fair value measurements were made. The carrying value for these real estate assets may have subsequently increased or decreased from the fair value reflected due to activity that has occurred since the measurement date. |
The fair values for inventories that were determined using Level 3 inputs were based on the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risk associated with each underlying asset.
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy, carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments, except those for which the carrying values approximate fair values (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | November 30, |
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Description | | Fair Value Hierarchy | | Carrying Value (a) | | Estimated Fair Value | | Carrying Value (a) | | Estimated Fair Value |
Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior notes | | Level 2 | | $ | 1,740,858 |
| | $ | 1,921,563 |
| | $ | 1,790,437 |
| | $ | 1,853,438 |
|
Convertible senior notes | | Level 2 | | — |
| | — |
| | 229,788 |
| | 229,425 |
|
| |
(a) | The carrying values for the senior notes and convertible senior notes, as presented, include unamortized debt issuance costs. Debt issuance costs are not factored into the estimated fair values of these notes. |
The fair values of our senior notes and convertible senior notes are generally estimated based on quoted market prices for these instruments. The carrying values reported for cash and cash equivalents, and mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans approximate fair values. The carrying value of corporate-owned life insurance is based on the cash surrender value of the policies and, accordingly, approximates fair value.
| |
Note 16. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Commitments and contingencies include typical obligations of homebuilders for the completion of contracts and those incurred in the ordinary course of business.
Warranty. We provide a limited warranty on all of our homes. The specific terms and conditions of our limited warranty program vary depending upon the markets in which we do business. We generally provide a structural warranty of 10 years, a warranty on electrical, heating, cooling, plumbing and certain other building systems each varying from two to five years based on geographic market and state law, and a warranty of one year for other components of the home. Our limited warranty program is ordinarily how we respond to and account for homeowners’ requests to local division offices seeking repairs of certain conditions or defects, including claims where we could have liability under applicable state statutes or tort law for a defective condition in or damages to a home. Our warranty liability covers our costs of repairs associated with homeowner claims made under our limited warranty program. These claims are generally made directly by a homeowner and involve their individual home.
We estimate the costs that may be incurred under each limited warranty and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the revenue associated with the sale of each home is recognized. Our primary assumption in estimating the amounts we accrue for warranty costs is that historical claims experience is a strong indicator of future claims experience. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes delivered, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our accrued warranty liability, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets, and adjust the amount as necessary based on our assessment. Our assessment includes the review of our actual warranty costs incurred to identify trends and changes in our warranty claims experience, and considers our home construction quality and customer service initiatives and outside events. While we believe the warranty liability currently reflected in our consolidated balance sheets to be adequate, unanticipated changes or developments in the legal environment, local weather, land or environmental conditions, quality of materials or methods used in the construction of homes or customer service practices and/or our warranty claims experience could have a significant impact on our actual warranty costs in future periods and such amounts could differ significantly from our current estimates.
The changes in our warranty liability were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 82,490 |
| | $ | 69,798 |
| | $ | 56,682 |
|
Warranties issued | 35,480 |
| | 37,792 |
| | 38,452 |
|
Payments | (23,531 | ) | | (23,300 | ) | | (25,336 | ) |
Adjustments | (5,600 | ) | | (1,800 | ) | | — |
|
Balance at end of year | $ | 88,839 |
| | $ | 82,490 |
| | $ | 69,798 |
|
Guarantees. In the normal course of our business, we issue certain representations, warranties and guarantees related to our home sales and land sales. Based on historical experience, we do not believe any potential liability with respect to these representations, warranties or guarantees would be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Self-Insurance. We maintain, and require the majority of our independent subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance (including construction defect and bodily injury coverage) and workers’ compensation insurance. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims related to our homebuilding activities, subject to certain self-insured retentions, deductibles and other coverage limits. We also maintain certain other insurance policies. In Arizona, California, Colorado and Nevada, our subcontractors’ general liability insurance primarily takes the form of a wrap-up policy under a program where eligible independent subcontractors are enrolled as insureds on each community. Enrolled subcontractors contribute toward the cost of the insurance and agree to pay a contractual amount in the future if there is a claim related to their work. To the extent provided under the wrap-up program, we absorb the enrolled subcontractors’ general liability associated with the work performed on our homes within the applicable community as part of our overall general liability insurance and our self-insurance.
We self-insure a portion of our overall risk through the use of a captive insurance subsidiary, which provides coverage for our exposure to certain construction defect, bodily injury and property damage claims and related litigation or regulatory actions, up to certain limits. Our self-insurance liability generally covers the costs of settlements and/or repairs, if any, as well as our costs to defend and resolve the following types of claims:
| |
• | Construction defect: Construction defect claims, which represent the largest component of our self-insurance liability, typically originate through a legal or regulatory process rather than directly by a homeowner and involve the alleged occurrence of a condition affecting 2 or more homes within the same community, or they involve a common area or homeowners’ association property within a community. These claims typically involve higher costs to resolve than individual homeowner warranty claims, and the rate of claims is highly variable. |
| |
• | Bodily injury: Bodily injury claims typically involve individuals (other than our employees) who claim they were injured while on our property or as a result of our operations. |
| |
• | Property damage: Property damage claims generally involve claims by third parties for alleged damage to real or personal property as a result of our operations. Such claims may occasionally include those made against us by owners of property located near our communities. |
Our self-insurance liability at each reporting date represents the estimated costs of reported claims, claims incurred but not yet reported, and claim adjustment expenses. The amount of our self-insurance liability is based on an analysis performed by a third-party actuary that uses our historical claim and expense data, as well as industry data to estimate these overall costs. Key assumptions used in developing these estimates include claim frequencies, severities and resolution patterns, which can occur over an extended period of time. These estimates are subject to variability due to the length of time between the delivery of a home to a homebuyer and when a construction defect claim is made, and the ultimate resolution of such claim; uncertainties regarding such claims relative to our markets and the types of product we build; and legal or regulatory actions and/or interpretations, among other factors. Due to the degree of judgment involved and the potential for variability in these underlying assumptions, our actual future costs could differ from those estimated. In addition, changes in the frequency and severity of reported claims and the estimates to resolve claims can impact the trends and assumptions used in the actuarial analysis, which could be material to our consolidated financial statements. Though state regulations vary, construction defect claims are reported and resolved over a long period of time, which can extend for 10 years or more. As a result, the majority of the estimated self-insurance liability based on the actuarial analysis relates to claims incurred but not yet reported. Therefore, adjustments related to individual existing claims generally do not significantly impact the overall estimated liability. Adjustments to our liabilities related to homes delivered in prior years are recorded in the period in which a change in our estimate occurs.
Our self-insurance liability is presented on a gross basis for all years without consideration of insurance recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any. Estimated probable insurance and other recoveries of $50.6 million and $56.9 million are included in receivables in our consolidated balance sheets at November 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These self-insurance recoveries are principally based on actuarially determined amounts and depend on various factors, including, among other things, the above-described claim cost estimates, our insurance policy coverage limits for the applicable policy year(s), historical third-party recovery rates, insurance industry practices, the regulatory environment, and legal precedent, and are subject to a high degree of variability from year to year. Because of the inherent uncertainty and variability in these assumptions, our actual insurance recoveries could differ significantly from amounts currently estimated.
The changes in our self-insurance liability were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 176,841 |
| | $ | 177,695 |
| | $ | 158,584 |
|
Self-insurance expense (a) | 16,685 |
| | 20,436 |
| | 20,371 |
|
Payments (b) | (15,761 | ) | | (21,290 | ) | | (22,933 | ) |
Adjustments (c) | — |
| | — |
| | 21,673 |
|
Balance at end of year | $ | 177,765 |
| | $ | 176,841 |
| | $ | 177,695 |
|
| |
(a) | These expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and are largely offset by contributions from independent subcontractors participating in the wrap-up policy. |
| |
(b) | Includes net changes in estimated probable insurance and other recoveries, which are recorded in receivables, to present our self-insurance liability on a gross basis. |
| |
(c) | The amount for 2017 reflected a change in estimate to increase our self-insurance liability based on an actuarially determined estimate that we believed had a higher probability of being adequate to cover future payments associated with unresolved claims, including claims incurred but not yet reported. This adjustment was included in selling, general and administrative expenses. |
For most of our claims, there is no interaction between our warranty liability and self-insurance liability. Typically, if a matter is identified at its outset as either a warranty or self-insurance claim, it remains as such through its resolution. However, there can be instances of interaction between the liabilities, such as where individual homeowners in a community separately request warranty repairs to their homes to address a similar condition or issue and subsequently join together to initiate, or potentially initiate, a legal process with respect to that condition or issue and/or the repair work we have undertaken. In these instances, the claims and related repair work generally are initially covered by our warranty liability, and the costs associated with resolving the legal matter (including any additional repair work) are covered by our self-insurance liability.
The payments we make in connection with claims and related repair work, whether covered within our warranty liability and/or our self-insurance liability, may be recovered from our insurers to the extent such payments exceed the self-insured retentions or deductibles under our general liability insurance policies. Also, in certain instances, in the course of resolving a claim, we pay amounts in advance of and/or on behalf of a subcontractor(s) or their insurer(s) and believe we will be reimbursed for such payments. Estimates of all such amounts, if any, are recorded as receivables in our consolidated balance sheets when any such recovery is considered probable. In 2017, we received insurance recoveries of $23.5 million, which exceeded the $11.6 million of estimated probable recoveries receivable we had previously recorded. The excess recoveries were included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Florida Chapter 558 Actions. We and certain of our subcontractors have received a growing number of claims from attorneys on behalf of individual owners of our homes and/or homeowners’ associations that allege, pursuant to Chapter 558 of the Florida Statutes, various construction defects, with most relating to stucco and water-intrusion issues. The claims primarily involve homes in our Jacksonville, Orlando, and Tampa operations. Under Chapter 558, homeowners must serve written notice of a construction defect(s) and provide the served construction and/or design contractor(s) with an opportunity to respond to the noticed issue(s) before they can file a lawsuit. Although we have resolved many of these claims without litigation, and a number of others have been resolved with applicable subcontractors or their insurers covering the related costs, as of November 30, 2019, we had approximately 477 outstanding noticed claims, and some are scheduled for trial over the next few quarters and beyond. In addition, some of our subcontractors’ insurers in some of these cases have informed us of their inability to continue to pay claims-related costs. At November 30, 2019, we had an accrual for our estimated probable loss for these matters and a receivable for estimated probable insurance recoveries. While it is reasonably possible that our loss could exceed the amount accrued and our recoveries could be less than the amount recorded, at this time, we are unable to estimate the total amount of the loss in excess of the accrued amount and/or associated with a shortfall in the recoveries that is reasonably possible.
Performance Bonds and Letters of Credit. We are often required to provide to various municipalities and other government agencies performance bonds and/or letters of credit to secure the completion of our projects and/or in support of obligations to build community improvements such as roads, sewers, water systems and other utilities, and to support similar development activities by certain of our unconsolidated joint ventures. At November 30, 2019, we had $793.9 million of performance bonds and $34.7 million of letters of credit outstanding. At November 30, 2018, we had $689.3 million of performance bonds and $28.0 million of letters of credit outstanding. If any such performance bonds or letters of credit are called, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the performance bond or letter of credit. We do not believe that a material amount of any currently outstanding performance bonds or letters of credit will be called. Performance bonds do not have stated expiration dates. Rather,
we are released from the performance bonds as the underlying performance is completed. The expiration dates of some letters of credit issued in connection with community improvements coincide with the expected completion dates of the related projects or obligations. Most letters of credit, however, are issued with an initial term of one year and are typically extended on a year-to-year basis until the related performance obligations are completed.
Land Option Contracts and Other Similar Contracts. In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option contracts and other similar contracts to acquire rights to land for the construction of homes. At November 30, 2019, we had total cash deposits of $75.2 million to purchase land having an aggregate purchase price of $1.42 billion. Our land option contracts and other similar contracts generally do not contain provisions requiring our specific performance.
Leases. We lease certain property and equipment under noncancelable operating leases. Office and equipment leases are typically for terms of three to five years and generally provide renewal options for terms up to an additional five years. In most cases, we expect that leases that expire will be renewed or replaced by other leases with similar terms. The future minimum rental payments under operating leases, which primarily consist of office leases having initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year, are as follows: 2020 — $9.7 million; 2021 — $7.5 million; 2022 — $6.1 million; 2023 — $4.5 million; 2024 — $3.6 million; and thereafter — $5.8 million.
Rental expense on our noncancelable operating leases was $9.8 million in 2019, $8.6 million in 2018 and $8.1 million in 2017.
We are involved in litigation and regulatory proceedings incidental to our business that are in various procedural stages. We believe that the accruals we have recorded for probable and reasonably estimable losses with respect to these proceedings are adequate and that, as of November 30, 2019, it was not reasonably possible that an additional material loss had been incurred in an amount in excess of the estimated amounts already recognized or disclosed in our consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our accruals for litigation and regulatory proceedings at least quarterly and, as appropriate, adjust them to reflect (a) the facts and circumstances known to us at the time, including information regarding negotiations, settlements, rulings and other relevant events and developments; (b) the advice and analyses of counsel; and (c) the assumptions and judgment of management. Similar factors and considerations are used in establishing new accruals for proceedings as to which losses have become probable and reasonably estimable at the time an evaluation is made. Our accruals for litigation and regulatory proceedings are presented on a gross basis without consideration of recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any. Estimates of recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any, are recorded as receivables when such recoveries are considered probable. Based on our experience, we believe that the amounts that may be claimed or alleged against us in these proceedings are not a meaningful indicator of our potential liability. The outcome of any of these proceedings, including the defense and other litigation-related costs and expenses we may incur, however, is inherently uncertain and could differ significantly from the estimate reflected in a related accrual, if made. Therefore, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of any proceeding, if in excess of a related accrual or if an accrual had not been made, could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
| |
Note 18. | Stockholders’ Equity |
Preferred Stock. To help protect the benefits of our NOLs and other deferred tax assets from an ownership change under Section 382, on January 22, 2009, we adopted a Rights Agreement (“Prior Rights Agreement”), and we declared a dividend distribution of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock that was payable to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 5, 2009. On April 12, 2018, we entered into an Amended and Restated Rights Agreement with Computershare Inc., as rights agent, (“2018 Rights Agreement”) following its approval by our stockholders at our 2018 Annual Meeting held on April 12, 2018. The 2018 Rights Agreement amended and restated the Prior Rights Agreement and extended the latest possible expiration date of the rights issued pursuant to the Prior Rights Agreement to the close of business on April 30, 2021, and made certain other related changes. Otherwise, the 2018 Rights Agreement’s terms are substantively the same as those of the Prior Rights Agreement.
Subject to the terms, provisions and conditions of the 2018 Rights Agreement, if these rights become exercisable, each right would initially represent the right to purchase from us 1/100th of a share of our Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $85.00 (“Purchase Price”). If issued, each fractional share of preferred stock would generally give a stockholder approximately the same dividend, voting and liquidation rights as does one share of our common stock. However, prior to exercise, a right does not give its holder any rights as a stockholder, including without limitation any dividend, voting or liquidation rights. The rights will not be exercisable until the earlier of (a) 10 calendar days after a public announcement by us that a person or group has become an Acquiring Person (as defined under the Prior Rights Agreement) and (b) 10 business days
after the commencement of a tender or exchange offer by a person or group if upon consummation of the offer the person or group would beneficially own 4.9% or more of our outstanding common stock.
Until these rights become exercisable (“Distribution Date”), common stock certificates and/or book-entry shares will evidence the rights and may contain a notation to that effect. Any transfer of shares of our common stock prior to the Distribution Date will constitute a transfer of the associated rights. After the Distribution Date, the rights may be transferred other than in connection with the transfer of the underlying shares of our common stock. If there is an Acquiring Person on the Distribution Date or a person or group becomes an Acquiring Person after the Distribution Date, each holder of a right, other than rights that are or were beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person, which will be void, will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise of a right and payment of the Purchase Price, that number of shares of our common stock having a market value of two times the Purchase Price. After the later of the Distribution Date and the time we publicly announce that an Acquiring Person has become such, our board of directors may exchange the rights, other than rights that are or were beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person, which will be void, in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock per right, subject to adjustment.
At any time prior to the later of the Distribution Date and the time we publicly announce that an Acquiring Person becomes such, our board of directors may redeem all of the then-outstanding rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $.001 per right, subject to adjustment (“Redemption Price”). The redemption will be effective immediately upon the board of directors’ action, unless the action provides that such redemption will be effective at a subsequent time or upon the occurrence or nonoccurrence of one or more specified events, in which case the redemption will be effective in accordance with the provisions of the action. Immediately upon the effectiveness of the redemption of the rights, the right to exercise the rights will terminate and the only right of the holders of rights will be to receive the Redemption Price, with interest thereon. The rights issued pursuant to the 2018 Rights Agreement will expire on the earliest of (a) the close of business on April 30, 2021 (b) the time at which the rights are redeemed, (c) the time at which the rights are exchanged, (d) the time at which our board of directors determines that a related provision in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation is no longer necessary, and (e) the close of business on the first day of a taxable year of ours to which our board of directors determines that no tax benefits may be carried forward.
Common Stock. On May 14, 2018, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase a total of up to 4,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock. This authorization reaffirmed and incorporated the then-current balance of 1,627,000 shares that remained under a prior board-approved share repurchase program. In 2018, we repurchased 1,806,053 shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization, at a total cost of $35.0 million. The amount and timing of shares remaining to be purchased under the the remaining share repurchase authorization are subject to market and business conditions and other factors, and purchases may be made from time to time and at any time through open market or privately negotiated transactions. The remaining share repurchase authorization will continue in effect until fully used or earlier terminated or suspended by the board of directors.
Unrelated to the share repurchase program, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of not more than 680,000 shares of our outstanding common stock, and also authorized potential future grants of up to 680,000 stock payment awards under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”), in each case solely as necessary for director elections in respect of outstanding Director Plan SARs. The 2014 Plan, which was amended in April 2016, is discussed in Note 20 – Employee Benefit and Stock Plans. As of November 30, 2019, we have not repurchased any shares and 0 stock payment awards have been granted under the 2014 Plan, as amended, pursuant to the respective board of directors’ authorizations.
Our board of directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $.025 per share of common stock in the 2019 first and second quarters. In the 2019 third quarter, our board of directors approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend on our common stock to $.090 per share, and declared quarterly cash dividends at the new higher rate in the 2019 third and fourth quarters. Our board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $.025 per share of common stock in 2018 and 2017. All dividends declared during 2019, 2018 and 2017 were also paid during those years.
Treasury Stock. In addition to the shares purchased in 2018 pursuant to our share repurchase program, we acquired $7.3 million, $8.5 million and $6.7 million of our common stock in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. All of the common stock acquired in 2019 and 2017 and a portion of the common stock acquired in 2018 consisted of previously issued shares delivered to us by employees to satisfy their withholding tax obligations on the vesting of PSUs and restricted stock awards or of forfeitures of previous restricted stock awards. Treasury stock is recorded at cost. Differences between the cost of treasury stock and the reissuance proceeds are recorded to paid-in capital. These transactions are not considered repurchases under the 4,000,000 share repurchase program described above.
| |
Note 19. | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
The following table presents the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss (in thousands):
|
| | | | | |
Postretirement Benefit Plan Adjustments | | | Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Balance at November 30, 2017 | | | $ | (16,924 | ) |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | 8,216 |
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | 1,892 |
|
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income | | | (2,749 | ) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | 7,359 |
|
Balance at November 30, 2018 | | | (9,565 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | | | (10,268 | ) |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | 2,130 |
|
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive loss | | | 2,197 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | (5,941 | ) |
Balance at November 30, 2019 | | | $ | (15,506 | ) |
The amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, |
Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments | | | | | | |
Amortization of net actuarial loss | | $ | 218 |
| | $ | 336 |
| | $ | 142 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost | | 1,556 |
| | 1,556 |
| | 1,556 |
|
Settlement loss | | 356 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total reclassifications (a) | | $ | 2,130 |
| | $ | 1,892 |
| | $ | 1,698 |
|
| |
(a) | The accumulated other comprehensive loss components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit costs as further discussed in Note 21 – Postretirement Benefits. |
The estimated prior service cost expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost during 2020 is $.4 million.
| |
Note 20. | Employee Benefit and Stock Plans |
Most of our employees are eligible to participate in the KB Home 401(k) Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”) under which we partially match employee contributions. The aggregate cost of the 401(k) Plan to us was $6.9 million in 2019, $6.0 million in 2018 and $6.2 million in 2017. The assets of the 401(k) Plan are held by a third-party trustee. The 401(k) Plan participants may direct the investment of their funds among one or more of the several fund options offered by the 401(k) Plan. As of November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, approximately 5%, 5% and 7%, respectively, of the 401(k) Plan’s net assets at each period were invested in our common stock.
Amended KB Home 2014 Plan. At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 7, 2016, our stockholders approved the Amended KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“Amended 2014 Plan”), authorizing, among other things, the issuance for grants of stock-based awards to our employees, non-employee directors and consultants of up to 7,500,000 additional shares above the original 4,800,000 shares our stockholders approved under the plan (or an aggregate issuance of 12,300,000 shares), plus any shares that were available for grant as of April 7, 2014 under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (“2010 Plan”), and any shares subject to then-outstanding awards under the 2010 Plan that subsequently expire or are cancelled, forfeited, tendered or withheld to satisfy
tax withholding obligations with respect to full value awards, or settled for cash. NaN new awards may be made under the 2010 Plan. Therefore, the Amended 2014 Plan is our only active equity compensation plan. Under the Amended 2014 Plan, grants of stock options and other similar awards reduce the Amended 2014 Plan’s share capacity on a 1-for-1 basis, and grants of restricted stock and other similar “full value” awards reduce the Amended 2014 Plan’s share capacity on a 1.78-for-1 basis. In addition, subject to the Amended 2014 Plan’s terms and conditions, a stock-based award may also be granted under the Amended 2014 Plan to replace an outstanding award granted under another plan of ours (subject to the terms of such other plan) with terms substantially identical to those of the award being replaced.
The Amended 2014 Plan provides that stock options and SARs may be awarded for periods of up to 10 years. The Amended 2014 Plan also enables us to grant cash bonuses and other stock-based awards.
Stock-Based Compensation. With the approval of the management development and compensation committee, consisting entirely of independent members of our board of directors, we have provided compensation benefits to certain of our employees in the form of stock options, restricted stock and PSUs. Certain stock-based compensation benefits are also provided to our non-employee directors pursuant to the Director Plan. Compensation expense related to equity-based awards is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
The following table presents our stock-based compensation expense (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Stock options | $ | 189 |
| | $ | 917 |
| | $ | 2,592 |
|
Restricted stock | 6,080 |
| | 4,600 |
| | 4,177 |
|
PSUs | 10,742 |
| | 8,790 |
| | 6,439 |
|
Director awards | 1,301 |
| | 1,554 |
| | 1,425 |
|
Total | $ | 18,312 |
| | $ | 15,861 |
| | $ | 14,633 |
|
Stock Options. Stock option transactions are summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Options outstanding at beginning of year | 7,237,544 |
| | $ | 16.02 |
| | 9,265,240 |
| | $ | 17.64 |
| | 12,731,545 |
| | $ | 18.95 |
|
Granted | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Exercised | (2,300,004 | ) | | 13.27 |
| | (1,195,926 | ) | | 16.73 |
| | (1,650,360 | ) | | 16.01 |
|
Cancelled | (774,059 | ) | | 40.43 |
| | (831,770 | ) | | 33.05 |
| | (1,815,945 | ) | | 28.31 |
|
Options outstanding at end of year | 4,163,481 |
| | $ | 13.00 |
| | 7,237,544 |
| | $ | 16.02 |
| | 9,265,240 |
| | $ | 17.64 |
|
Options exercisable at end of year | 4,163,481 |
| | $ | 13.00 |
| | 6,948,670 |
| | $ | 16.01 |
| | 8,307,632 |
| | $ | 17.86 |
|
Options available for grant at end of year | 5,567,467 |
| | | | 6,418,197 |
| | | | 7,495,792 |
| | |
There were no stock options granted in 2019, 2018 or 2017. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $37.1 million for the year ended November 30, 2019, $11.8 million for the year ended November 30, 2018 and $12.1 million for the year ended November 30, 2017. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was $89.9 million, $51.9 million and $136.3 million at November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The intrinsic value of stock options exercisable was $89.9 million at November 30, 2019, $50.5 million at November 30, 2018, and $121.3 million at November 30, 2017. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the price of the option.
Stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable at November 30, 2019 are summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable |
Range of Exercise Price | | Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
$ 6.32 to $11.05 | | 953,500 |
| | $ | 6.37 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 953,500 |
| | $ | 6.37 |
| | |
$11.06 to $14.62 | | 1,250,424 |
| | 13.66 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 1,250,424 |
| | 13.66 |
| | |
$14.63 to $15.44 | | 853,000 |
| | 14.92 |
| | 5.9 |
| | 853,000 |
| | 14.92 |
| | |
$15.45 to $16.22 | | 754,057 |
| | 16.21 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 754,057 |
| | 16.21 |
| | |
$16.23 to $45.16 | | 352,500 |
| | 17.12 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 352,500 |
| | 17.12 |
| | |
$ 6.32 to $45.16 | | 4,163,481 |
| | $ | 13.00 |
| | 4.3 |
| | 4,163,481 |
| | $ | 13.00 |
| | 4.3 |
|
At November 30, 2019, there was 0 unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock option awards as all of these awards were fully vested.
A tax shortfall of $3.3 million in 2017 resulting from the cancellation of stock awards was reflected in paid-in capital. In 2017, the consolidated statement of cash flows reflected $1.0 million of excess tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options.
Restricted Stock. From time to time, we grant restricted stock to various employees as a compensation benefit. During the restriction periods, these employees are entitled to vote and to receive cash dividends on such shares. The restrictions imposed with respect to the shares granted lapse in installments within, or in full at the end of, three years after their grant date if certain conditions are met.
Restricted stock transactions are summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Shares | | Weighted Average per Share Grant Date Fair Value | | Shares | | Weighted Average per Share Grant Date Fair Value | | Shares | | Weighted Average per Share Grant Date Fair Value |
Outstanding at beginning of year | 555,457 |
| | $ | 23.19 |
| | 503,926 |
| | $ | 21.69 |
| | 604,619 |
| | $ | 16.24 |
|
Granted | 282,523 |
| | 31.67 |
| | 303,030 |
| | 23.05 |
| | 321,835 |
| | 24.49 |
|
Vested | (319,687 | ) | | 34.66 |
| | (221,951 | ) | | 19.79 |
| | (364,670 | ) | | 16.09 |
|
Cancelled | (18,227 | ) | | 22.81 |
| | (29,548 | ) | | 21.76 |
| | (57,858 | ) | | 15.61 |
|
Outstanding at end of year | 500,066 |
| | $ | 20.66 |
| | 555,457 |
| | $ | 23.19 |
| | 503,926 |
| | $ | 21.69 |
|
As of November 30, 2019, we had $12.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards that will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately three years.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units. On October 3, 2019, we granted PSUs to certain employees. Each PSU grant corresponds to a target amount of our common stock (“Award Shares”). Each PSU entitles the recipient to receive a grant of between 0% and 200% of the recipient’s Award Shares, and will vest based on our achieving, over a three-year period commencing on December 1, 2019 and ending on November 30, 2022, specified levels of (a) cumulative adjusted earnings per share; (b) average adjusted return on invested capital; and (c) revenue growth performance relative to a peer group of high-production public homebuilding companies. The grant date fair value of each such PSU was $33.10. On October 5, 2018, we granted PSUs to certain employees with similar terms as the 2019 PSU grants, except that the applicable performance period commenced on December 1, 2018 and ends on November 30, 2021. The grant date fair value of each such PSU was $23.05. On October 5, 2017, we granted PSUs to certain employees with similar terms as the 2019 PSU grants, except that the applicable performance period commenced on December 1, 2017 and ends on November 30, 2020. The grant date fair value of each such PSU was $25.64.
PSU transactions are summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Shares | | Weighted Average per Share Grant Date Fair Value | | Shares | | Weighted Average per Share Grant Date Fair Value | | Shares | | Weighted Average per Share Grant Date Fair Value |
Outstanding at beginning of year | 1,090,967 |
| | $ | 18.70 |
| | 925,232 |
| | $ | 20.09 |
| | 809,860 |
| | $ | 17.19 |
|
Granted | 468,957 |
| | 30.45 |
| | 603,424 |
| | 25.70 |
| | 424,797 |
| | 22.99 |
|
Vested | (297,260 | ) | | 22.67 |
| | (437,689 | ) | | 31.28 |
| | (278,460 | ) | | 16.67 |
|
Cancelled | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (30,965 | ) | | 14.92 |
|
Outstanding at end of year | 1,262,664 |
| | $ | 22.13 |
| | 1,090,967 |
| | $ | 18.70 |
| | 925,232 |
| | $ | 20.09 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The number of shares of our common stock actually granted to a recipient, if any, when a PSU vests will depend on the degree of achievement of the applicable performance measures during the applicable three-year period. The shares of our common stock that were granted under the terms of PSUs that vested in 2019 included an aggregate of 119,260 additional shares above the target amount awarded to the eligible recipients based on our achieving certain levels of the three above-described metrics over the three-year period from December 1, 2015 through November 30, 2018. The shares of our common stock that were granted under the terms of PSUs that vested in 2018 included an aggregate of 194,529 additional shares above the target amount awarded to the eligible recipients based on our achieving certain levels of the three above-described metrics over the three-year period from December 1, 2014 through November 30, 2017. The shares of our common stock that were granted under the terms of PSUs that vested in 2017 included an aggregate of 125,460 additional shares above the target amount awarded to the eligible recipients based on our achieving certain levels of average return on equity performance and revenue growth performance relative to a peer group of high-production homebuilding companies over the three-year period from December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2016. The PSUs do not have dividend or voting rights during the performance period. Compensation cost for PSUs is initially estimated based on target performance achievement and adjusted as appropriate throughout the performance period. Accordingly, future compensation costs associated with outstanding PSUs may increase or decrease based on the probability and extent of achievement with respect to the applicable performance measures. At November 30, 2019, we had $32.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested PSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately three years.
Director Awards. We have granted Director Plan SARs and deferred common stock awards to our non-employee directors pursuant to the terms of the Director Plan and elections made by each director. All of these awards were fully vested as of November 30, 2016. Director Plan SARs, which have not been granted since April 2014 as they ceased being a component of non-employee director compensation after that date, are stock settled, have terms of up to 15 years and may be exercised when a respective director leaves the board or earlier if applicable stock ownership requirements have been met. Deferred common stock awards will be paid out at the earlier of a change in control or the date a respective director leaves the board. All Director Plan SARs were granted at an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. At November 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the aggregate outstanding Director Plan SARs were 224,674, 308,880 and 308,880, respectively, and the aggregate outstanding deferred common stock awards granted under the Director Plan were 519,160, 490,240 and 456,875, respectively. In addition, we have granted common stock on an unrestricted basis to our non-employee directors on the grant date pursuant to the Director Plan and elections made by each director.
Grantor Stock Ownership Trust. We have a grantor stock ownership trust (“Trust”), administered by a third-party trustee, that holds and distributes the shares of common stock acquired to support certain employee compensation and employee benefit obligations under our existing stock option plan, the 401(k) Plan and other employee benefit plans. The existence of the Trust does not impact the amount of benefits or compensation that is paid under these plans.
For financial reporting purposes, the Trust is consolidated with us, and therefore any dividend transactions between us and the Trust are eliminated. Acquired shares held by the Trust remain valued at the market price on the date of purchase and are shown as a reduction to stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The difference between the Trust share value and the market value on the date shares are released from the Trust is included in paid-in capital. Common stock held in the Trust is not considered outstanding in the computations of earnings per share. The Trust held 7,630,582 and 8,157,235 shares of common stock at November 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The trustee votes shares held by the Trust in accordance with voting directions from eligible employees, as specified in a trust agreement with the trustee.
| |
Note 21. | Postretirement Benefits |
We have a supplemental non-qualified, unfunded retirement plan, the KB Home Retirement Plan (“Retirement Plan”), effective as of July 11, 2002, pursuant to which we have offered to pay supplemental pension benefits to certain designated individuals (consisting of current and former employees) in connection with their retirement. The Retirement Plan was closed to new participants in 2004. We also have an unfunded death benefit plan, the KB Home Death Benefit Only Plan (“DBO Plan”), implemented on November 1, 2001, for certain designated individuals (consisting of current and former employees). The DBO Plan was closed to new participants in 2006.
In connection with these plans and two other minor benefit programs, we have purchased cost recovery life insurance contracts on the lives of the designated individuals. The insurance contracts associated with the Retirement Plan and DBO Plan are held by a trust. The trust is the owner and beneficiary of such insurance contracts. The amount of the insurance coverage under the contracts is designed to provide sufficient funds to cover all costs of the plans if assumptions made as to employment term, mortality experience, policy earnings and other factors, as applicable, are realized. The cash surrender value of the Retirement Plan life insurance contracts was $44.7 million at November 30, 2019 and $44.4 million at November 30, 2018. We recognized investment gains on the cash surrender value of the Retirement Plan life insurance contracts of $2.1 million in 2019 and $3.9 million in 2017, and an investment loss of $.9 million in 2018. In 2019, 2018 and 2017, we paid $1.8 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in benefits under the Retirement Plan to eligible former employees. The cash surrender value of the DBO Plan life insurance contracts was $18.4 million at November 30, 2019 and $18.2 million at November 30, 2018. We recognized investment gains on the cash surrender value of the DBO Plan life insurance contracts of $.9 million in 2019 and $1.5 million in 2017, and an investment loss of $.3 million in 2018. In 2019, we paid $1.7 million in benefits under the DBO Plan. We did not pay out any benefits under the DBO Plan in 2018 or 2017.
The net periodic benefit cost of our Retirement Plan and DBO Plan consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Interest cost | | $ | 2,478 |
| | $ | 2,252 |
| | $ | 2,274 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost | | 1,556 |
| | 1,556 |
| | 1,556 |
|
Service cost | | 958 |
| | 1,085 |
| | 1,046 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss | | 218 |
| | 336 |
| | 142 |
|
Settlement loss | | 356 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | | $ | 5,566 |
| | $ | 5,229 |
| | $ | 5,018 |
|
The liabilities related to these plans were $69.3 million at November 30, 2019 and $60.8 million at November 30, 2018, and are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended November 30, 2019 and 2018, the discount rates we used for the plans were 2.7% and 4.1%, respectively.
Benefit payments under our Retirement Plan and DBO Plan are expected to be paid during each year ending November 30 as follows: 2020 — $2.3 million; 2021 — $2.5 million; 2022 — $2.6 million; 2023 — $2.9 million; 2024 — $3.2 million; and for the five years ended November 30, 2029 — $20.8 million in the aggregate.
| |
Note 22. | Supplemental Disclosure to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
The following are supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Summary of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year: | | | | | |
Homebuilding | $ | 453,814 |
| | $ | 574,359 |
| | $ | 720,630 |
|
Financial services | 1,044 |
| | 760 |
| | 231 |
|
Total | $ | 454,858 |
| | $ | 575,119 |
| | $ | 720,861 |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended November 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | |
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized | $ | (1,327 | ) | | $ | 8,338 |
| | $ | 7,581 |
|
Income taxes paid | 4,479 |
| | 11,949 |
| | 4,664 |
|
Income taxes refunded | 221 |
| | 220 |
| | 202 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: | | | | | |
Decrease in inventories due to adoption of ASC 606 | $ | (35,288 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Increase in property and equipment, net due to adoption of ASC 606 | 31,194 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Increase (decrease) in consolidated inventories not owned | (9,634 | ) | | 16,098 |
| | (44,833 | ) |
Increase in inventories due to distributions of land and land development from an unconsolidated joint venture | 9,662 |
| | 17,637 |
| | 6,650 |
|
Inventories acquired through seller financing | 8,967 |
| | 44,586 |
| | 49,658 |
|
| |
Note 23. | Supplemental Guarantor Information |
Our obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest on the senior notes and borrowings, if any, under the Credit Facility are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by certain of our subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The guarantees are full and unconditional and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by us. Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing the senior notes and the terms of the Credit Facility, if any of the Guarantor Subsidiaries ceases to be a “significant subsidiary” as defined by Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X using a 5% rather than a 10% threshold (provided that the assets of our non-guarantor subsidiaries do not in the aggregate exceed 10% of an adjusted measure of our consolidated total assets), it will be automatically and unconditionally released and discharged from its guaranty of the senior notes and the Credit Facility so long as all guarantees by such Guarantor Subsidiary of any other of our or our subsidiaries’ indebtedness are terminated at or prior to the time of such release. We have determined that separate, full financial statements of the Guarantor Subsidiaries would not be material to investors and, accordingly, supplemental financial information for the Guarantor Subsidiaries is presented.
The supplemental financial information for all periods presented below reflects those subsidiaries that qualified as Guarantor Subsidiaries as of November 30, 2019.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations (in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2019 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,161,511 |
| | $ | 391,236 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,552,747 |
|
Homebuilding: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,161,511 |
| | $ | 376,147 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,537,658 |
|
Construction and land costs | — |
| | (3,362,386 | ) | | (346,542 | ) | | — |
| | (3,708,928 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (100,630 | ) | | (375,199 | ) | | (21,521 | ) | | — |
| | (497,350 | ) |
Operating income (loss) | (100,630 | ) | | 423,926 |
| | 8,084 |
| | — |
| | 331,380 |
|
Interest income | 1,926 |
| | 23 |
| | 209 |
| | — |
| | 2,158 |
|
Interest expense | (137,327 | ) | | (746 | ) | | (5,339 | ) | | 143,412 |
| | — |
|
Intercompany interest | 328,361 |
| | (173,374 | ) | | (11,575 | ) | | (143,412 | ) | | — |
|
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | (1,549 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,549 | ) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (6,800 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6,800 | ) |
Homebuilding pretax income (loss) | 85,530 |
| | 248,280 |
| | (8,621 | ) | | — |
| | 325,189 |
|
Financial services pretax income | — |
| | — |
| | 22,986 |
| | — |
| | 22,986 |
|
Total pretax income | 85,530 |
| | 248,280 |
| | 14,365 |
| | — |
| | 348,175 |
|
Income tax expense | (16,300 | ) | | (58,100 | ) | | (5,000 | ) | | — |
| | (79,400 | ) |
Equity in net income of subsidiaries | 88,639 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (88,639 | ) | | — |
|
Net income | $ | 157,869 |
| | $ | 190,180 |
| | $ | 9,365 |
| | $ | (88,639 | ) | | $ | 268,775 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2018 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,198,969 |
| | $ | 348,033 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,547,002 |
|
Homebuilding: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,198,969 |
| | $ | 334,826 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,533,795 |
|
Construction and land costs | — |
| | (3,435,058 | ) | | (308,862 | ) | | — |
| | (3,743,920 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (101,152 | ) | | (311,815 | ) | | (31,187 | ) | | — |
| | (444,154 | ) |
Operating income (loss) | (101,152 | ) | | 452,096 |
| | (5,223 | ) | | — |
| | 345,721 |
|
Interest income | 3,273 |
| | 11 |
| | 230 |
| | — |
| | 3,514 |
|
Interest expense | (141,812 | ) | | (2,624 | ) | | (5,262 | ) | | 149,698 |
| | — |
|
Intercompany interest | 302,253 |
| | (142,882 | ) | | (9,673 | ) | | (149,698 | ) | | — |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | 2,066 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,066 |
|
Homebuilding pretax income (loss) | 62,562 |
| | 308,667 |
| | (19,928 | ) | | — |
| | 351,301 |
|
Financial services pretax income | — |
| | — |
| | 16,664 |
| | — |
| | 16,664 |
|
Total pretax income (loss) | 62,562 |
| | 308,667 |
| | (3,264 | ) | | — |
| | 367,965 |
|
Income tax expense | (62,100 | ) | | (101,200 | ) | | (34,300 | ) | | — |
| | (197,600 | ) |
Equity in net income of subsidiaries | 169,903 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (169,903 | ) | | — |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 170,365 |
| | $ | 207,467 |
| | $ | (37,564 | ) | | $ | (169,903 | ) | | $ | 170,365 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2017 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,034,057 |
| | $ | 334,472 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,368,529 |
|
Homebuilding: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,034,057 |
| | $ | 322,208 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,356,265 |
|
Construction and land costs | — |
| | (3,342,617 | ) | | (303,851 | ) | | — |
| | (3,646,468 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (91,120 | ) | | (298,498 | ) | | (36,776 | ) | | — |
| | (426,394 | ) |
Operating income (loss) | (91,120 | ) | | 392,942 |
| | (18,419 | ) | | — |
| | 283,403 |
|
Interest income | 1,232 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,240 |
|
Interest expense | (166,417 | ) | | (1,635 | ) | | (3,434 | ) | | 170,864 |
| | (622 | ) |
Intercompany interest | 266,784 |
| | (118,138 | ) | | 22,218 |
| | (170,864 | ) | | — |
|
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | (1,407 | ) | | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (1,409 | ) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (5,685 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5,685 | ) |
Homebuilding pretax income | 4,794 |
| | 271,770 |
| | 363 |
| | — |
| | 276,927 |
|
Financial services pretax income | — |
| | — |
| | 13,068 |
| | — |
| | 13,068 |
|
Total pretax income | 4,794 |
| | 271,770 |
| | 13,431 |
| | — |
| | 289,995 |
|
Income tax expense | (8,800 | ) | | (100,000 | ) | | (600 | ) | | — |
| | (109,400 | ) |
Equity in net income of subsidiaries | 184,601 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (184,601 | ) | | — |
|
Net income | $ | 180,595 |
| | $ | 171,770 |
| | $ | 12,831 |
| | $ | (184,601 | ) | | $ | 180,595 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2019 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Net income | $ | 157,869 |
| | $ | 190,180 |
| | $ | 9,365 |
| | $ | (88,639 | ) | | $ | 268,775 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments | (8,138 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,138 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss before tax | (8,138 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,138 | ) |
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive loss | 2,197 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,197 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (5,941 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5,941 | ) |
Comprehensive income | $ | 151,928 |
| | $ | 190,180 |
| | $ | 9,365 |
| | $ | (88,639 | ) | | $ | 262,834 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2018 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Net income (loss) | $ | 170,365 |
| | $ | 207,467 |
| | $ | (37,564 | ) | | $ | (169,903 | ) | | $ | 170,365 |
|
Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments | 10,108 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,108 |
|
Other comprehensive income before tax | 10,108 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,108 |
|
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income | (2,749 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,749 | ) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | 7,359 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,359 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 177,724 |
| | $ | 207,467 |
| | $ | (37,564 | ) | | $ | (169,903 | ) | | $ | 177,724 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2017 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Net income | $ | 180,595 |
| | $ | 171,770 |
| | $ | 12,831 |
| | $ | (184,601 | ) | | $ | 180,595 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments | (1,445 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,445 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss before tax | (1,445 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,445 | ) |
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive loss | 578 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 578 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (867 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (867 | ) |
Comprehensive income | $ | 179,728 |
| | $ | 171,770 |
| | $ | 12,831 |
| | $ | (184,601 | ) | | $ | 179,728 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets (in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| November 30, 2019 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 357,966 |
| | $ | 65,434 |
| | $ | 30,414 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 453,814 |
|
Receivables | 1,934 |
| | 181,047 |
| | 66,074 |
| | — |
| | 249,055 |
|
Inventories | — |
| | 3,400,307 |
| | 304,295 |
| | — |
| | 3,704,602 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | 57,038 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 57,038 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 24,250 |
| | 37,539 |
| | 3,254 |
| | — |
| | 65,043 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net | 96,301 |
| | 237,877 |
| | 30,315 |
| | — |
| | 364,493 |
|
Other assets | 78,686 |
| | 2,666 |
| | 1,689 |
| | — |
| | 83,041 |
|
| 559,137 |
| | 3,981,908 |
| | 436,041 |
| | — |
| | 4,977,086 |
|
Financial services | — |
| | — |
| | 38,396 |
| | — |
| | 38,396 |
|
Intercompany receivables | 3,624,081 |
| | — |
| | 186,022 |
| | (3,810,103 | ) | | — |
|
Investments in subsidiaries | 115,753 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (115,753 | ) | | — |
|
Total assets | $ | 4,298,971 |
| | $ | 3,981,908 |
| | $ | 660,459 |
| | $ | (3,925,856 | ) | | $ | 5,015,482 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding: | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | $ | 139,137 |
| | $ | 453,929 |
| | $ | 288,489 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 881,555 |
|
Notes payable | 1,715,748 |
| | 7,889 |
| | 25,110 |
| | — |
| | 1,748,747 |
|
| 1,854,885 |
| | 461,818 |
| | 313,599 |
| | — |
| | 2,630,302 |
|
Financial services | — |
| | — |
| | 2,058 |
| | — |
| | 2,058 |
|
Intercompany payables | 60,964 |
| | 3,520,090 |
| | 229,049 |
| | (3,810,103 | ) | | — |
|
Stockholders’ equity | 2,383,122 |
| | — |
| | 115,753 |
| | (115,753 | ) | | 2,383,122 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 4,298,971 |
| | $ | 3,981,908 |
| | $ | 660,459 |
| | $ | (3,925,856 | ) | | $ | 5,015,482 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| November 30, 2018 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 429,977 |
| | $ | 114,269 |
| | $ | 30,113 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 574,359 |
|
Receivables | 5,135 |
| | 198,465 |
| | 89,230 |
| | — |
| | 292,830 |
|
Inventories | — |
| | 3,314,386 |
| | 268,453 |
| | — |
| | 3,582,839 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | 61,960 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 61,960 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 18,450 |
| | 5,522 |
| | 311 |
| | — |
| | 24,283 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net | 84,564 |
| | 303,669 |
| | 53,587 |
| | — |
| | 441,820 |
|
Other assets | 77,288 |
| | 4,008 |
| | 1,804 |
| | — |
| | 83,100 |
|
| 615,414 |
| | 4,002,279 |
| | 443,498 |
| | — |
| | 5,061,191 |
|
Financial services | — |
| | — |
| | 12,380 |
| | — |
| | 12,380 |
|
Intercompany receivables | 3,569,422 |
| | — |
| | 158,760 |
| | (3,728,182 | ) | | — |
|
Investments in subsidiaries | 67,657 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (67,657 | ) | | — |
|
Total assets | $ | 4,252,493 |
| | $ | 4,002,279 |
| | $ | 614,638 |
| | $ | (3,795,839 | ) | | $ | 5,073,571 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding: | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | $ | 126,176 |
| | $ | 584,321 |
| | $ | 213,816 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 924,313 |
|
Notes payable | 1,995,115 |
| | 40,038 |
| | 25,110 |
| | — |
| | 2,060,263 |
|
| 2,121,291 |
| | 624,359 |
| | 238,926 |
| | — |
| | 2,984,576 |
|
Financial services | — |
| | — |
| | 1,495 |
| | — |
| | 1,495 |
|
Intercompany payables | 43,702 |
| | 3,377,920 |
| | 306,560 |
| | (3,728,182 | ) | | — |
|
Stockholders’ equity | 2,087,500 |
| | — |
| | 67,657 |
| | (67,657 | ) | | 2,087,500 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 4,252,493 |
| | $ | 4,002,279 |
| | $ | 614,638 |
| | $ | (3,795,839 | ) | | $ | 5,073,571 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2019 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 118,542 |
| | $ | 32,864 |
| | $ | 99,636 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 251,042 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | (11,290 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (11,290 | ) |
Return of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | 5,001 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,001 |
|
Proceeds from sale of building | — |
| | 5,804 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,804 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net | (6,365 | ) | | (23,618 | ) | | (10,476 | ) | | — |
| | (40,459 | ) |
Intercompany | 105,055 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (105,055 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 98,690 |
| | (24,103 | ) | | (10,476 | ) | | (105,055 | ) | | (40,944 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of debt | 705,250 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 705,250 |
|
Repayment of senior notes | (986,231 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (986,231 | ) |
Payment of issuance costs | (11,128 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11,128 | ) |
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | 610,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 610,000 |
|
Repayments under revolving credit facility | (610,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (610,000 | ) |
Payments on mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans | — |
| | (41,116 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (41,116 | ) |
Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans | 30,524 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30,524 |
|
Tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards | (7,288 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7,288 | ) |
Payments of cash dividends | (20,370 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (20,370 | ) |
Intercompany | — |
| | (16,480 | ) | | (88,575 | ) | | 105,055 |
| | — |
|
Net cash used in financing activities | (289,243 | ) | | (57,596 | ) | | (88,575 | ) | | 105,055 |
| | (330,359 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (72,011 | ) | | (48,835 | ) | | 585 |
| | — |
| | (120,261 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 429,977 |
| | 114,269 |
| | 30,873 |
| | — |
| | 575,119 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 357,966 |
| | $ | 65,434 |
| | $ | 31,458 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 454,858 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2018 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 236,892 |
| | $ | 9,668 |
| | $ | (25,048 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 221,512 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | (22,672 | ) | | 1 |
| | — |
| | (22,671 | ) |
Return of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | 9,934 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,934 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net | (6,584 | ) | | (674 | ) | | (112 | ) | | — |
| | (7,370 | ) |
Intercompany | (43,128 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 43,128 |
| | — |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (49,712 | ) | | (13,412 | ) | | (111 | ) | | 43,128 |
| | (20,107 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Repayment of senior notes | (300,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (300,000 | ) |
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | 70,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 70,000 |
|
Repayments under revolving credit facility | (70,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (70,000 | ) |
Payments on mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans | — |
| | (13,831 | ) | | (920 | ) | | — |
| | (14,751 | ) |
Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans | 20,011 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20,011 |
|
Stock repurchases | (35,039 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (35,039 | ) |
Tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards | (8,476 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,476 | ) |
Payments of cash dividends | (8,892 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,892 | ) |
Intercompany | — |
| | 27,724 |
| | 15,404 |
| | (43,128 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (332,396 | ) | | 13,893 |
| | 14,484 |
| | (43,128 | ) | | (347,147 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (145,216 | ) | | 10,149 |
| | (10,675 | ) | | — |
| | (145,742 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 575,193 |
| | 104,120 |
| | 41,548 |
| | — |
| | 720,861 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 429,977 |
| | $ | 114,269 |
| | $ | 30,873 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 575,119 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended November 30, 2017 |
| KB Home Corporate | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating Adjustments | | Total |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 70,683 |
| | $ | 366,005 |
| | $ | 76,531 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 513,219 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | (13,569 | ) | | (5,125 | ) | | — |
| | (18,694 | ) |
Return of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | — |
| | 4,119 |
| | 6,916 |
| | — |
| | 11,035 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net | (7,215 | ) | | (809 | ) | | (61 | ) | | — |
| | (8,085 | ) |
Intercompany | 311,857 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (311,857 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 304,642 |
| | (10,259 | ) | | 1,730 |
| | (311,857 | ) | | (15,744 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Repayment of senior notes | (270,326 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (270,326 | ) |
Payment of issuance costs | (1,711 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,711 | ) |
Payments on mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans | — |
| | (106,382 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (106,382 | ) |
Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans | 23,162 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,162 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | 958 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 958 |
|
Tax payments associated with stock-based compensation awards | (6,673 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6,673 | ) |
Payments of cash dividends | (8,642 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,642 | ) |
Intercompany | — |
| | (251,147 | ) | | (60,710 | ) | | 311,857 |
| | — |
|
Net cash used in financing activities | (263,232 | ) | | (357,529 | ) | | (60,710 | ) | | 311,857 |
| | (369,614 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 112,093 |
| | (1,783 | ) | | 17,551 |
| | — |
| | 127,861 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 463,100 |
| | 105,903 |
| | 23,997 |
| | — |
| | 593,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 575,193 |
| | $ | 104,120 |
| | $ | 41,548 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 720,861 |
|
| |
Note 24. | Quarterly Results (unaudited) |
The following tables present our consolidated quarterly results for the years ended November 30, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
2019 | | | | | | | |
Revenues | $ | 811,483 |
| | $ | 1,021,803 |
| | $ | 1,160,786 |
| | $ | 1,558,675 |
|
Gross profits | 139,604 |
| | 177,019 |
| | 216,029 |
| | 306,834 |
|
Inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges | 3,555 |
| | 4,337 |
| | 5,251 |
| | 4,148 |
|
Pretax income (a) | 34,511 |
| | 56,761 |
| | 91,936 |
| | 164,967 |
|
Net income | 30,011 |
| | 47,461 |
| | 68,136 |
| | 123,167 |
|
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | |
Basic | .34 |
| | .54 |
| | .77 |
| | 1.37 |
|
Diluted | .31 |
| | .51 |
| | .73 |
| | 1.31 |
|
| | | | | | | |
2018 | | | | | | | |
Revenues | $ | 871,623 |
| | $ | 1,101,423 |
| | $ | 1,225,347 |
| | $ | 1,348,609 |
|
Gross profits | 141,192 |
| | 189,222 |
| | 222,893 |
| | 245,931 |
|
Inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges | 4,985 |
| | 6,526 |
| | 8,414 |
| | 9,069 |
|
Pretax income | 46,045 |
| | 78,308 |
| | 114,676 |
| | 128,936 |
|
Net income (loss) (b) | (71,255 | ) | | 57,308 |
| | 87,476 |
| | 96,836 |
|
Earnings (loss) per share: | | | | | | | |
Basic | (.82 | ) | | .65 |
| | .99 |
| | 1.09 |
|
Diluted | (.82 | ) | | .57 |
| | .87 |
| | .96 |
|
| |
(a) | Pretax income for the fourth quarter included a $6.8 million loss on the early extinguishment of debt. |
| |
(b) | Net income (loss) included non-cash charges to income tax expense of $111.2 million in the first quarter and $1.3 million in the fourth quarter for TCJA-related impacts. |
Quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with per share amounts for the year.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of KB Home:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of KB Home (the Company) as of November 30, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at November 30, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated January 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption of ASU No. 2014-09
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue recognition, and real estate inventories and cost of sales effective December 1, 2018 due to the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and its related amendments.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
|
| |
| Valuation of Land Held for Future Development |
| |
Description of the Matter | As of November 30, 2019, the Company’s real estate inventories were $3.7 billion which includes land held for future development of $131.2 million. As disclosed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, land held for future development principally reflects land acquisition and land development costs related to land where development activity has been suspended or has not yet begun but is expected to occur in the future. As more fully described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses each community or land parcel to identify indicators of potential impairment. When an indicator of potential impairment is identified, the Company evaluates the recoverability of the asset based on its projected undiscounted future cash flows. When the carrying value of the asset is greater than its projected undiscounted future cash flows, the Company estimates the fair value of the asset based on its projected discounted cash flows and records an impairment charge. Inputs used in the Company’s impairment assessment for land held for future development consider then-current market conditions and expectations related to average selling prices and related price appreciation, volume of homes delivered, land development and construction costs to be incurred and related cost inflation, and discount rates reflecting the inherent risk associated with the asset. |
| |
| Auditing the Company’s impairment assessment for land held for future development involves a high degree of auditor judgment and increased extent of audit effort to evaluate management’s estimates underlying projected future cash flows and the determination of fair values based on subjective assumptions about expected future sales activity, risk specific to the asset or conditions in the market in which the asset is located. |
| |
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s land held for future development impairment assessment process. For example, we tested controls over the Company’s significant data and assumptions used in the Company’s estimation of cash flows and fair value analysis. |
| |
| To test the Company’s land held for future development impairment assessment, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the significant data and assumptions used to project future cash flows and estimate fair values for assets with identified indicators of impairment, including comparison of such data and assumptions to the Company’s accounting records and market data, and recalculation of the Company’s estimates. We also involved our real estate valuation specialists to assist in evaluating the key assumptions and methodologies used in the impairment assessments for certain projects, including assumptions related to average selling prices and related price appreciation, expected future costs and related cost inflation, and discount rate assumptions used to estimate fair values. |
| |
| Self-insurance Liabilities and Recoveries |
| |
Description of the Matter | At November 30, 2019, the Company’s self-insurance liability was $177.8 million and receivables for estimated probable insurance and other recoveries related to self-insurance claims totaled $50.6 million. As disclosed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s self-insurance liability for construction defects is based on an analysis prepared by a third-party actuary that uses historical claim and expense data as well as industry data to estimate the cost of all unpaid losses, including estimates related to claims incurred but not yet reported. Key assumptions used in developing these estimates include claim frequencies, severities and resolution patterns, which can occur over an extended period of time. Self-insurance recoveries are principally based on actuarially determined amounts and consider the claim cost estimates described above, applicable insurance policy coverage limits, historical recovery rates, and other factors. |
| |
|
| |
| Auditing the Company’s self-insurance liability and related recoveries is complex and highly judgmental due to the complexity of the actuarial methods used to estimate the losses and related recoveries and degree of subjective judgment required to assess the underlying assumptions, which required us to involve our actuarial specialists. These estimates are subject to variability due to the length of time between the delivery of a home to a homebuyer and when a construction defect claim is made and ultimately resolved; uncertainties regarding such claims relative to the markets and types of products built; and legal or regulatory actions and interpretations, among other factors. |
| |
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s self-insurance liability and recoveries estimation process including controls over the data and assumptions used in the analysis. |
| |
| To test the Company’s self-insurance liability and related recoveries, our audit procedures included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying claims and recovery data utilized by the Company’s third-party actuary, testing the existence and terms of third-party insurance policies, and involving our actuarial specialist to assist in our evaluation of the methodologies and assumptions applied by management’s third-party actuary. Additionally, we compared the Company’s recorded self-insurance liability and related recoveries to estimated ranges which our actuarial specialist developed based on independently selected assumptions. |
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1991.
Los Angeles, California
January 24, 2020
| |
Item 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
| |
Item 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“Principal Executive Officer”) and Chief Financial Officer (“Principal Financial Officer”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision and with the participation of senior management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of November 30, 2019.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
| |
(a) | Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control and that effective internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time. Under the supervision and with the participation of senior management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the evaluation under that framework and applicable SEC rules, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of November 30, 2019.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, has issued its report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2019, which is presented below.
| |
(b) | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of KB Home:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited KB Home’s internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, KB Home (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 2019 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated January 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 24, 2020
| |
(c) | Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended November 30, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
| |
Item 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
PART III
| |
Item 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The information for this item for executive officers is provided above in the Executive Officers of the Registrant section in this report. Except as stated below, the other information for this item will be provided to the extent applicable in the “Corporate Governance and Board Matters,” “Election of Directors,” “Ownership of KB Home Securities” and “Annual Meeting, Voting and Other Information” sections in our Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“2020 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by this reference.
Ethics Policy
We have adopted an ethics policy for our directors, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) and employees. The ethics policy is available on our investor relations website at investor.kbhome.com. Stockholders may request a free copy of the ethics policy from:
KB Home
Attention: Investor Relations
10990 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90024
(310) 231-4000
investorrelations@kbhome.com
Within the time period required by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, we will post on our investor relations website any amendment to our ethics policy and any waiver applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions, and our other executive officers or directors.
Corporate Governance Principles
We have adopted corporate governance principles, which are available on our investor relations website. Stockholders may request a free copy of the corporate governance principles from the address, phone number and e-mail address stated above under “Ethics Policy.”
| |
Item 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information for this item will be provided in the “Corporate Governance and Board Matters” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” sections in our 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.
| |
Item 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Except as provided below, the information for this item will be provided in the “Ownership of KB Home Securities” section in our 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.
The following table presents information as of November 30, 2019 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity Compensation Plan Information | |
Plan category | | Number of common shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | | Number of common shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding common shares reflected in column(a)) (c) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | | 4,163,481 |
| | $ | 13.00 |
| | 5,567,467 |
| |
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| (1 | ) |
Total | | 4,163,481 |
| | $ | 13.00 |
| | 5,567,467 |
| |
| |
(1) | Represents a prior non-employee directors compensation plan under which our non-employee directors received Director Plan SARs, which were initially granted as cash-settled instruments. As discussed in Note 18 – Stockholders’ Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, all non-employee directors serving on our board of directors have elected to receive shares of our common stock in settlement of their Director Plan SARs under the terms of the plan. We consider this non-employee director compensation plan as having no available capacity to issue shares of our common stock. |
| |
Item 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information for this item will be provided in the “Corporate Governance and Board Matters” section in our 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.
| |
Item 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information for this item will be provided in the “Independent Auditor Fees and Services” section in our 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.
PART IV
| |
Item 15. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) 1. Financial Statements
Reference is made to the index set forth on page 47 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
3.1 | | |
| |
3.2 | | |
| |
4.1 | | |
| |
4.2 | | |
| |
4.3 | | |
| | |
4.4 | | |
| | |
4.5 | | |
| | |
4.6 | | |
| | |
4.7 | | |
| | |
4.8 | | |
| | |
4.9 | | |
| | |
4.10 | | |
| | |
4.11 | | |
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
| | |
4.12 | | |
| | |
4.13 | | |
| | |
4.14 | | |
| | |
4.15 | | |
| | |
4.16 | | |
| | |
4.17 | | |
| | |
4.18 | | |
| | |
4.19 | | |
| | |
4.20 | | |
| | |
4.21† | | |
| |
10.1 | | KB Home Directors’ Legacy Program, as amended January 1, 1999, filed as an exhibit to our 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein. |
| |
10.2 | | Trust Agreement between Kaufman and Broad Home Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. as Trustee, dated as of August 27, 1999, filed as an exhibit to our 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein. |
| | |
10.3* | | |
| |
10.4* | | |
| |
10.5* | | |
| |
10.6* | | |
| |
10.7* | | |
| |
10.8* | | |
| |
10.9* | | |
| |
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
10.10* | | |
| |
10.11* | | |
| |
10.12* | | |
| |
10.13 | | |
| |
10.14 | | |
| |
10.15* | | |
| |
10.16* | | |
| |
10.17* | | |
| |
10.18* | | |
| |
10.19* | | |
| | |
10.20* | | |
| | |
10.21* | | |
| | |
10.22* | | |
| | |
10.23* | | |
| | |
10.24* | | |
| | |
10.25* | | |
| | |
10.26* | | |
| | |
10.27* | | |
| | |
10.28 | | |
| | |
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
10.29† | | |
| | |
21† | | |
| |
23† | | |
| |
31.1† | | |
| |
31.2† | | |
| | |
32.1† | | |
| | |
32.2† | | |
| | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
| | |
101.SCH | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
| | |
101.CAL | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.DEF | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.LAB | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.PRE | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
| | |
104† | | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document and included in Exhibit 101). |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which executive officers are eligible to participate.
† Document filed with this Form 10-K.
| |
Item 16. | FORM 10-K SUMMARY |
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | KB Home |
| | | |
| | By: | /S/ JEFF J. KAMINSKI |
| | | Jeff J. Kaminski |
| | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: | January 24, 2020 | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
/S/ JEFFREY T. MEZGER | | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | | January 24, 2020 |
Jeffrey T. Mezger | | | |
| | |
/S/ JEFF J. KAMINSKI | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | | January 24, 2020 |
Jeff J. Kaminski | | | |
| | |
/S/ WILLIAM R. HOLLINGER | | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | | January 24, 2020 |
William R. Hollinger | | | |
| | | |
/S/ DORENE C. DOMINGUEZ | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
Dorene C. Dominguez | | | |
| | | |
/S/ TIMOTHY W. FINCHEM | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
Timothy W. Finchem | | | |
| | | |
/S/ STUART A. GABRIEL | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
Stuart A. Gabriel | | | |
| | | |
/S/ THOMAS W. GILLIGAN | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
Thomas W. Gilligan | | | |
| | |
/S/ KENNETH M. JASTROW, II | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
Kenneth M. Jastrow, II | | | |
| | |
/S/ ROBERT L. JOHNSON | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
Robert L. Johnson | | | |
| | | |
/S/ MELISSA LORA | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
Melissa Lora | | | |
| | |
/S/ JAMES C. WEAVER | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
James C. Weaver | | | |
| | | |
/S/ MICHAEL M. WOOD | | Director | | January 24, 2020 |
Michael M. Wood | | | |