- APH Dashboard
- Financials
- Filings
-
Holdings
- Transcripts
- ETFs
- Insider
- Institutional
- Shorts
-
DEF 14A Filing
Amphenol (APH) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy
Filed: 13 Apr 20, 9:59am
Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrantý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto | ||
Check the appropriate box: | ||
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
ý | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
o | Definitive Additional Materials | |
o | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Amphenol Corporation | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý | No fee required. | |||
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
(3) | Filing Party: | |||
(4) | Date Filed: |
NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING and PROXY STATEMENT |
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 358 HALL AVENUE WALLINGFORD, CONNECTICUT 06492 |
NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TIME AND DATE
11:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 20, 2020
PLACE
Amphenol Corporation
World Headquarters
Conference Center
358 Hall Avenue
Wallingford, CT 06492
(203) 265-8900
AGENDA
By Order of the Board of Directors
Lance E. D'Amico
Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
April 13, 2020
—IMPORTANT—
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN
THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY WHETHER OR
NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders Meeting to Be Held on May 20, 2020: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 are available atwww.edocumentview.com/APH.
2020 Proxy Summary | iii | |
Proxy Statement | 1 | |
Record Date | 1 | |
Proxies | 1 | |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners | 3 | |
Security Ownership of Management | 4 | |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance | 5 | |
ý Proposal 1. Election of Directors | 5 | |
Director Nominees | 7 | |
The Board of Directors and the Committees of the Board | 11 | |
• Governance Principles | 11 | |
• Director Independence | 11 | |
• Leadership Structure | 11 | |
• Board of Directors Summary Information | 12 | |
• Committees | 12 | |
• Director Selection Process; Board Diversity | 14 | |
• Meetings of the Board and Committees | 15 | |
• Risk Oversight | 15 | |
• Human Capital Management and Culture Oversight | 16 | |
• Director Compensation for the 2019 Fiscal Year | 17 | |
• Communications with the Board of Directors | 19 | |
• Board Member Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 19 | |
Executive Officers Who are not Directors | 20 | |
Report of the Audit Committee | 23 | |
Audit and Non-Audit Fees | 24 | |
Pre-Approval of Auditor Services | 24 | |
Hiring Restrictions on Former Employees of Auditor | 24 | |
ý Proposal 2. Ratification of Independent Accountants | 25 | |
Compensation Discussion & Analysis | 26 | |
• Overview of Compensation | 26 | |
• Say on Pay | 26 | |
• The Compensation Committee | 26 | |
• Role of Compensation Consultant in Compensation Decisions | 27 | |
• Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions | 27 | |
• Philosophy and Objectives of Compensation Program | 28 | |
• Elements of Compensation Program | 28 | |
Base Salary | 28 |
i
Performance-Based Incentive Plans | 28 | |
Stock Option Plans | 30 | |
Insurance Benefits | 31 | |
Retirement Benefits | 31 | |
Perquisites/Other | 31 | |
• Compensation of Named Executive Officers | 31 | |
Company Performance | 31 | |
Pay Mix | 33 | |
CEO Compensation | 33 | |
Other Named Executive Officers' Compensation | 34 | |
Compensation Committee Report | 37 | |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation | 37 | |
Summary Compensation Table | 38 | |
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code | 39 | |
Employment Agreements | 39 | |
Stock Option Plans | 40 | |
Repricing of Options/Granting of SARs | 40 | |
Grants of Plan Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2019 | 41 | |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year End | 42 | |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for the 2019 Fiscal Year | 43 | |
Pensions and Deferred Compensation | 43 | |
• Pension Plan | 43 | |
• Pension Benefits for the 2019 Fiscal Year | 44 | |
• Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for the 2019 Fiscal Year | 46 | |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control | 47 | |
CEO Pay Ratio | 50 | |
ý Proposal 3. Advisory Vote on Compensation of Named Executive Officers | 52 | |
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions | 53 | |
Prohibition on Short Sales, Transactions in Derivative Securities and Hedging | 53 | |
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors and Certain Executives | 53 | |
Investor Outreach | 53 | |
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) | 54 | |
Stockholder Proposals | 55 | |
ý Proposal 4. Stockholder Proposal | 56 | |
General and Other Matters | 59 |
ii
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement and the 2019 Amphenol Annual Report to Stockholders carefully before voting.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
• Time and Date | 11:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 20, 2020 | |
• Place | Amphenol Corporation World Headquarters, Conference Center 358 Hall Avenue Wallingford, CT 06492 | |
• Record Date | March 23, 2020 | |
• Voting | Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and for each of the other proposals to be voted on. |
Meeting Agenda and Voting Matters
| | Board Vote Recommendation | Page References (for more detail) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Election of Eight Directors | FOR EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEE | 5-19 | ||||
Other Management Proposals | ||||||
• | Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent accountants | FOR | 23-25 | |||
• | Advisory vote on compensation of named executive officers | FOR | 26-52 | |||
Stockholder Proposal | ||||||
• | Make Shareholder Right to Call Special Meeting More Accessible | AGAINST | 56-58 |
iii
Director Nominees
| | | | | Committee Memberships | | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director Tenure | Principal Occupation | Experience/ Qualifications | | Other Public Company Boards | |||||||||||||||
Name | Independent | AC | CC | EC | NCGC | PC | ||||||||||||||
Stanley L. Clark | Since 2005 | Lead Trustee and Senior | - Leadership | Y | C | X | X | |||||||||||||
Advisor of Goodrich, LLC | - Finance | |||||||||||||||||||
- Global | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Industry | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
John D. Craig | Since 2017 | Former CEO of EnerSys | - Leadership | Y | X | C | X | |||||||||||||
- M&A | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Technology | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
David P. Falck | Since 2013 | Former Executive Vice | - Leadership | Y | X | X | C | |||||||||||||
(Presiding Director) | President and General | - Compliance | ||||||||||||||||||
Counsel | - Risk | |||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle West Capital | Management | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | - M&A | |||||||||||||||||||
Edward G. Jepsen | 1989-1997; | CEO and Chairman of Coburn | - Leadership | Y | C,F | X | X | |||||||||||||
Since 2005 | Technologies, Inc. | - Finance | ||||||||||||||||||
- Global | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Industry | ||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Livingston | Since 2018 | Former CEO of Dover | - Leadership | Y | X,F | X | X | RPM | ||||||||||||
Corporation | - Global | International Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||
- Manufacturing | ||||||||||||||||||||
- M&A | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Finance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Martin H. Loeffler | Since 1987 | Former CEO of Amphenol | - Leadership | Y | ||||||||||||||||
(Chairman) | Corporation | - Global | ||||||||||||||||||
- Industry | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Technology | ||||||||||||||||||||
R. Adam Norwitt | Since 2009 | President and CEO of | - Leadership | N | ||||||||||||||||
Amphenol Corporation | - Global | |||||||||||||||||||
- Industry | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
- M&A | ||||||||||||||||||||
Anne Clarke Wolff | Since 2018 | Chairman Global Corporate | - Leadership | Y | X,F | X | C | |||||||||||||
Bank of America | - M&A | |||||||||||||||||||
- Global |
Attendance | In 2019, each of the Company's director nominees attended 100% of the Board and the Committee meetings on which such nominee sits. |
Governance Documents
The Company posts the following documents on its website atwww.amphenol.com under the heading "Investors", then "Corporate Governance", and then "Governance Documents":
Audit Committee Charter
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Compensation Committee Charter
Corporate Governance Principles
iv
Executive Committee Charter
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter
Pension Committee Charter
Political Activity Statement
Stock Ownership Guidelines—Directors
Stock Ownership Guidelines—Executives
A printed copy of any of these documents will be provided to any stockholder of the Company free of charge upon written request to the Company, c/o Secretary, Amphenol Corporation, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492.
Executive Compensation
At the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, the Company's stockholders cast a non-binding advisory vote regarding the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for that meeting. The Company's stockholders overwhelmingly approved the proposal with more than 92% of the shares voted being cast in favor of the proposal. These programs and policies remain unchanged, as described in detail beginning on page 26. The Company's core management compensation programs include base salary, an annual performance-based incentive plan payment opportunity, annual stock option awards (with 20% vesting each year over a five-year period), insurance benefits and retirement benefits.
Compensation programs for the named executive officers emphasize at-risk, performance-based elements. Fixed compensation elements, including base salary, retirement benefits and other compensation are designed to be market competitive for purposes of retention, and to a lesser extent, recruitment. However, it is intended that a larger part of the named executive officers' compensation be geared to reward performance that generates long-term stockholder value.
For the Company's Chief Executive Officer, fixed compensation elements including salary, retirement benefits and "all other compensation" comprised approximately 21% of his total 2019 compensation. His at-risk compensation linked to increasing stockholder value comprised approximately 79% of his total 2019 compensation. These at-risk elements include stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant which only generate value if the Company's share price increases after the grant date. The other at-risk compensation is incentive plan compensation which historically has required year-over-year earnings per share ("EPS") growth before any amount is paid in addition to other considerations designed to motivate the Chief Executive Officer to generate long-term stockholder value, and rewards the Chief Executive Officer when Company revenues and EPS grow. For the Company's other named executive officers as a group, fixed compensation elements comprised approximately 24% of total 2019 compensation while at-risk compensation comprised approximately 76% of total 2019 compensation. As with the Chief Executive Officer, the fixed compensation elements for the other named executive officers include salary, retirement benefits and "all other compensation", while the at-risk items include stock options and incentive plan compensation linked to goals that encourage growth in revenues and either EPS or operating income, depending on the role of the named executive officer.
The Board believes this compensation program is a valuable and appropriate tool which contributes to the Company's continuing success.
v
2019 Performance Highlights(1)
Amphenol delivered another strong year in 2019. Notwithstanding an uncertain and challenging economic environment, we achieved:
Amphenol's performance in 2019 enabled us to continue our track record of creating long-term value for our stockholders. Over the past ten years, Amphenol has delivered compound annual sales growth of 11%, Adjusted EPS growth of 15% and Adjusted Operating Margin expansion of more than 250 basis points. This superior performance has created sustained stockholder value as reflected in Amphenol's stock delivering an 18% compound annual return in the ten years ending December 31, 2019, significantly exceeding the performance of the S&P 500 during that same time period.
In 2019, the Company continued to have a flexible and balanced approach to capital allocation by:
Amphenol's unique operating culture enabled us to continue our track record of outperformance in 2019. While 2019 was marked by a high degree of uncertainty in the global economy, our team continued to capitalize on our value-creating technology solutions and the growth trends in our markets. Our unique Amphenolian culture of entrepreneurial accountability will continue to be the core of why we are successful.
2019 Company Performance Impact on Performance-Based Compensation
Considering the 2019 operating environment, and the results the Company was able to achieve in that environment, we believe the Company had a strong year with record Sales, record Free Cash Flow and strong Adjusted Operating Margins. However, Adjusted Diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $3.74, compared to our record performance of $3.77 in 2018. Due to this year-over-year decline of $0.03 or less than 1% in Adjusted Diluted EPS, the Company's threshold for an incentive plan payment award was not met. Accordingly, our CEO and CFO received no incentive plan compensation for 2019, reflecting the high performance nature of the Company's incentive plans and resulting in a significant year-over-year decrease in overall compensation for our CEO and CFO.
COVID-19
As a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic there is unprecedented disruption and uncertainty. Our team is working tirelessly to support the battle against the spread of the COVID-19 virus, including in particular by supporting our customers as they respond to urgent needs for a wide variety of medical
vi
equipment, to upgrade the coverage and bandwith of communications networks and to support first responders with necessary equipment, among many other initiatives. Concurrently, we are striving to ensure that our employees, their families, our communities, our customers and partners and our suppliers remain healthy and safe.
This proxy statement relates to 2019 financial performance and compensation, neither of which were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This proxy statement also describes compensation plans for 2020 that were implemented at the beginning of 2020 and assumes there will be no changes to such plans resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic could significantly impact 2020 financial results as well as compensation actions and outcomes.
Investor Outreach
Amphenol regularly engages with key stockholders to discuss, among other items, governance issues to ensure that management and the Board understand and address issues that are important to the Company's stockholders. Through these engagements the Company has obtained valuable feedback. For example, in 2016, the Board adopted an amendment to the Company's By-Laws that, among other things, implemented "proxy access", which, subject to the requirements of the By-Laws, permits any stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders that beneficially owns at least 3% of the Company's outstanding common stock continuously for three years to nominate candidates for election to the Board and to require the Company to list such nominees in the Company's proxy statement. In prior years, the Company has taken a variety of other significant actions in response to investor feedback, such as lowering the threshold to call special meetings of stockholders from 50% to 25%, declassifying the Board and providing for the annual election of directors, allowing stockholders to act by written consent and eliminating supermajority voting requirements in the Company's Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws. The Company has also continued to engage key stockholders to discuss other important topics, such as compensation practices and programs and our sustainability initiatives.
Environmental, Social and Governance
We are dedicated to building true, long-term value for our customers, employees and stockholders. We strongly believe that sustainable business practices are at the core of ensuring our success and longevity. For more information about our sustainability efforts, please visit the sustainability section of our website at https://www.amphenol.com/sustainability.
2021 Annual Meeting
Deadline for stockholder proposals to be included in the proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. | December 14, 2020 |
vii
This proxy statement (first mailed to stockholders on or about April 13, 2020) is furnished to the holders of the Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 per share ("Common Stock"), of Amphenol Corporation (the "Company" or "Amphenol") in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in the Conference Center at the Company's Corporate Headquarters at 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492 (telephone (203) 265-8900) at 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 (the "Annual Meeting").
The Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") has fixed the close of business on March 23, 2020 as the Record Date for the 2020 Annual Meeting (the "Record Date"). Only stockholders of record at the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments thereof, in person or by proxy. At the Record Date, there were 295,845,244 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
The proxy accompanying this proxy statement is solicited on behalf of the Board for use at the Annual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments thereof. Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held at the Record Date. The holders of record, present in person or by proxy, of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock shall constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for quorum purposes.
Shares will be voted in accordance with stockholder instructions. If a stockholder returns a signed proxy card that omits voting instructions for some or all matters to be voted on, the proxy holders will vote on all uninstructed matters in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. In addition, if a stockholder has returned a signed proxy card, the proxy holders will have, and intend to exercise, discretion to vote shares in accordance with their best judgment on any matters not identified in this proxy statement on which a vote is taken at the Annual Meeting. At present, the Company is not aware of any such matter.
For stockholders that hold their shares through an account with a broker and do not give voting instructions on a matter, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, the broker is permitted to vote in its discretion only on Proposal 2 (ratification of selection of the independent accountants) and is required to withhold its vote on each of the other proposals, the withholding of which is referred to as a "broker non-vote."
A proxy may be revoked. For shares that are held in "street name", the stockholder must follow the directions provided by its bank, broker or other intermediary for revoking or modifying voting instructions. For shares that are registered in the stockholder's own name, the proxy may be revoked by written notification to the Company Secretary prior to its exercise and providing relevant name and account information, submitting a new proxy card with a later date (which will override the earlier proxy) or voting in person at the Annual Meeting.
Votes on each of the proposals other than election of directors are advisory and therefore not binding on the Company. However, the Board will consider the outcome of these votes in its future deliberations.
The inspectors of election appointed for the Annual Meeting with the assistance of the Company's transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., will tabulate the votes.
The Company pays the cost of preparing, printing, assembling and mailing this proxy soliciting material. The Company has engaged the firm of Georgeson LLC to assist in the distribution of this Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and will pay Georgeson LLC its out of pocket expenses for such services. The Company will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and
1
fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to stockholders. Proxies may also be solicited from some stockholders personally, by mail, e-mail, telephone or other means of communication by the Company's directors, officers and regular employees who are not specifically employed for proxy solicitation purposes and who will not receive any additional compensation.
2
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Listed in the following table are those stockholders known to Amphenol to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent of the Company's Common Stock as of December 31, 2019.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMR LLC | 39,586,521 | (1) | 13.3 | % | |||
The Vanguard Group | 33,149,425 | (2) | 11.1 | % | |||
BlackRock, Inc. | 22,786,201 | (3) | 7.7 | % |
3
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
Set forth below is certain information with respect to beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock as of April 1, 2020 by each director, the named executive officers (listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38) and by all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group. Except as otherwise noted, the individuals listed in the table below have the sole power to vote or transfer the shares reflected in the table.
Name of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stanley L. Clark | 35,533(2)(3) | * | |||||
John D. Craig | 5,083(2) | * | |||||
David P. Falck | 16,931(2) | * | |||||
Jean-Luc Gavelle | 226,400(4) | * | |||||
Edward G. Jepsen | 240,393(2) | * | |||||
Craig A. Lampo | 675,700(4) | * | |||||
Robert A. Livingston | 9,333(2) | * | |||||
Martin H. Loeffler | 474,059(2) | * | |||||
R. Adam Norwitt | 3,366,163(1) | 1.14 | % | ||||
Zachary W. Raley | 693,000(4) | * | |||||
Luc Walter | 521,282(4) | * | |||||
Anne Clarke Wolff | 3,521(2) | * | |||||
All executive officers and directors of the Company as a group (18 persons) | 8,040,198 | 2.72 | % |
4
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that the Company's executive officers and directors, and any persons who own more than 10% of the Common Stock, file reports of initial ownership of the Company's Common Stock and subsequent changes in that ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file pursuant to Section 16(a). As a practical matter, the Company seeks to assist its directors and officers by monitoring transactions and completing and filing reports on their behalf.
Based solely upon a review of the filings with the SEC and written representations from directors and executive officers that no other reports were required, the Company believes that all executive officers and directors of the Company filed all required reports on a timely basis with respect to 2019.
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the By-Laws of the Company, taken together, provide for a Board consisting of not less than three or more than 15 directors. Currently, the number of directors of the Company is eight.
Our director, Diana G. Reardon, passed away in November 2019 after 31 years in the Amphenol family. Diana helped to forge Amphenol's high performance culture and to lead the Company's expansion, which ultimately generated significant value for our shareholders and stakeholders around the world. We will miss her dearly, but are confident that the values that she helped to instill in the Company will live on for many years to come.
Our directors are elected annually. Accordingly, action will be taken at the Annual Meeting for the re-election of eight directors: Stanley L. Clark, John D. Craig, David P. Falck, Edward G. Jepsen, Robert A. Livingston, Martin H. Loeffler, R. Adam Norwitt and Anne Clarke Wolff for a term of one year that will expire at the 2021 Annual Meeting.
It is intended that the proxies delivered pursuant to this solicitation will be voted in favor of the election of each director nominee, except in cases of proxies bearing contrary instructions. In the event that any of these nominees should become unavailable for election for any presently unforeseen reason, the persons named in the proxy will have the right to use their discretion to vote for a substitute.
5
Information regarding each director nominee, including individual experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to conclude that the director should serve on the Board, is set forth below. The Company's goal is to assemble a Board that works together and with management to deliver long term stockholder value. The Company believes that the nominees and directors set forth below, each of whom is currently a director of the Company, possess the skills and experience necessary to guide the Company in the best interests of its stockholders. The Company's current Board consists of individuals with proven records of success in their chosen professions and with the Company. They all have high integrity and keen intellect. They are collegial yet independent in their thinking, and have demonstrated the willingness to make the time commitment necessary to be informed about the Company and its relevant industry, including its customers, suppliers, competitors, stockholders and management. Members of the Board also have extensive experience in leadership, the management of public companies, risk assessment, accounting and finance, capital markets, sustainability, mergers and acquisitions, technology and global business practices and operations.
The following information details offices held and other business directorships of public companies during the past five years of each of the proposed director nominees. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of the current directors and the proposed director nominees is shown under the captionSecurity Ownership of Management on page 4.
6
Stanley L. Clark | Mr. Clark, age 76, has been a Director since 2005. Mr. Clark is Lead Trustee and Senior Advisor of Goodrich, LLC, where he also served as chief executive officer and trustee from 2001 until 2014. This role has provided him excellent insight into a broad range of markets and investment perspectives as well as financial analysis. He gained significant experience in general management of a complex manufacturing organization as chief executive officer of Simplex Time Recorder Company from 1998 to 2001 and director from 1996 to 2001, chief operating officer from 1996 to 1998 and group vice president from 1994 to 1996. Prior to working at Simplex Time Recorder Company, he held various positions with Raytheon Company over a period of 17 years, including service as the corporate group vice president for the commercial electronics group and as a director of New Japan Radio Company, a joint venture between Raytheon Company and Japan Radio. Mr. Clark also served four years in the United States Navy. He brings to the Board international experience as well as an understanding of the aerospace and defense industry, important markets for the Company. Mr. Clark is Chairman of the Compensation Committee and is a member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and the Pension Committee. | |
John D. Craig | Mr. Craig, age 68, has been a Director since 2017. Mr. Craig served as the Chief Executive Officer of EnerSys from 2000 to 2016 and also served as its President from 2000 to 2014. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Craig served as the president and chief operating officer of Yuasa Inc., the predecessor company to EnerSys. He joined Yuasa in 1994 as its vice president of operations and was promoted to executive vice president of operations in 1995. In 2000, he led the management buy-out of the Americas industrial battery business from Yuasa Corporation of Japan, which resulted in the creation of EnerSys. From 1994 until his retirement, Mr. Craig oversaw the acquisition and integration of 39 companies in all regions of the world. He led the IPO of EnerSys in 2004. Mr. Craig began his professional career as an engineer with Whirlpool Corporation in 1977. He served as the chairman of EnerSys from 2000 until 2016 and served as its director from 2000 to 2016. Mr. Craig brings to the Board his extensive experience leading a global manufacturing company, together with his deep exposure to many of the Company's end markets as well as a well-developed expertise in mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Craig is Chairman of the Executive Committee and is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Pension Committee. |
7
David P. Falck | Mr. Falck, age 67, has been a Director since 2013. Mr. Falck has more than 40 years of experience as a legal advisor to public and private companies. From 2009 to 2017, Mr. Falck was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation and its primary subsidiary, Arizona Public Service Company where he had responsibility for the company's legal affairs and corporate secretary functions. He continued as Executive Vice President, Law, through April 2018. From 2007 to 2009, he was senior vice president, law for New Jersey-based Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. and served as a member of its executive group. From 1987 to 2007, Mr. Falck was a partner in the New York office of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP where he provided strategic advice for a range of clients in the manufacturing, energy and telecommunications industries in the U.S. and abroad, including the Company. His well-developed legal and financial acumen bring great value to the Company, in particular with respect to corporate governance, mergers and acquisitions, financing, compliance, and legal matters. Mr. Falck is Chairman of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. Mr. Falck also serves as the Board's Presiding Director. | |
Edward G. Jepsen | Mr. Jepsen, age 76, has been a Director since 2005. Mr. Jepsen also served as a Director of the Company from 1989 through 1997. Mr. Jepsen has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Coburn Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of lens processing systems and equipment for the ophthalmic industry, since December 2010. Mr. Jepsen was employed as a non-executive Advisor to the Company from 2005 through his retirement in 2006. He was executive vice president and chief financial officer of the Company from 1989 through 2004. During his time as chief financial officer of the Company, Mr. Jepsen gained a deep familiarity with the operations, markets, technologies and other business matters of the Company, and in particular a comprehensive understanding of the Company related to accounting, auditing and controls. In addition, Mr. Jepsen brings to the Board significant experience in public accounting and auditing acquired as a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP prior to joining the Company. Mr. Jepsen is Chairman of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Executive Committee and the Pension Committee. In the past five years, but not currently, Mr. Jepsen also served as a director and chairman of the audit and finance committee and member of the nominating/corporate governance committee of ITC Holdings Corp. |
8
Robert A. Livingston | Mr. Livingston, age 66, has been a Director since 2018. Mr. Livingston served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Dover Corporation from 2008 through 2018 and also served as its Chief Operating Officer in 2008. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Livingston served as the president and chief executive officer of Dover Engineered Systems, Inc, and served as the president and CEO of Dover Electronics, Inc. from 2004 to 2007. He also served as the president of Vectron International Inc. in 2004. Mr. Livingston brings to the Board, among other things, a successful track record leading a large, publicly-traded U.S. multi-national company, together with his extensive experience in manufacturing, mergers and acquisitions and finance. Mr. Livingston is a member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee. Mr. Livingston also currently serves as Director and member of the compensation committee, the executive committee and is co-chairman of the operating improvement committee of RPM International Inc. In the past five years, but not currently, Mr. Livingston served as director of Dover Corporation. | |
Martin H. Loeffler | Mr. Loeffler, age 75, has been a Director since 1987 and Chairman of the Board since 1997. He had been an employee of the Company for 37 years when he retired in December 2010. He was executive chairman of the Company from 2009 to 2010, chief executive officer of the Company from 1996 to 2008 and president of the Company from 1987 to 2007. Prior to assuming the position of president, he oversaw the Company's international operations, and prior to that served in general management and operations roles in several European countries. He has a technology background with a PhD in physics and experience as a researcher in the field of semiconductors. His leadership, market knowledge, technology background, international and other business experience are of tremendous value to the Company. | |
R. Adam Norwitt | Mr. Norwitt, age 50, has been a Director since 2009, and an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries for approximately 20 years. He has been President since 2007 and Chief Executive Officer since 2009. Mr. Norwitt was chief operating officer of the Company from 2007 through 2008. He was senior vice president and group general manager, worldwide RF and microwave products division of the Company during 2006 and vice president and group general manager, worldwide RF and microwave products division of the Company from 2004 until 2006. Prior thereto, Mr. Norwitt served as group general manager, general manager and business development manager with various operating groups in the Company, including approximately five years resident in Asia. Mr. Norwitt has a juris doctor degree and trained as a corporate lawyer prior to joining the Company. He also has an MBA degree. He has studied in the United States, Taiwan, China and France. His vision, leadership, market knowledge, merger and acquisition experience, international exposure and other business experience, including his more than 11 years as our chief executive officer, are of significant value to the Company. |
9
Anne Clarke Wolff | Ms. Wolff, age 54, has been a Director since 2018. Ms. Wolff has been a Managing Director at Bank of America since she joined in 2011 and currently serves as Chairman Global Corporate and Investment Banking. Prior to that, from 2009 to 2011, Ms. Wolff held senior positions at JP Morgan Chase & Company and from 1998 to 2009 at Citigroup. Ms. Wolff began her career at Salomon Brothers, where she held positions of increasing responsibility from 1989 to 1998. Ms. Wolff has significant experience with global issues acquired through her work with a broad array of international clients together with her oversight of an extensive global organization. Her deep experience in banking and corporate finance, in particular with respect to all aspects of capital structure and deployment, including mergers and acquisitions, is extremely valuable to the Company. Ms. Wolff is Chairman of the Pension Committee and a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR EACH OF THE
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
10
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
Amphenol's Corporate Governance Principles meet or exceed the Listing Standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE Listing Standards"), including guidelines for determining director independence and reporting concerns to non-employee directors and the Audit Committee. The Company's most current Governance Principles, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are reviewed at least annually and revised as warranted. Amphenol's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all employees, directors and officers of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The Company posts the following documents on its website atwww.amphenol.com under the heading "Investors", then "Corporate Governance", and then "Governance Documents":
Audit Committee Charter
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Compensation Committee Charter
Corporate Governance Principles
Executive Committee Charter
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter
Pension Committee Charter
Political Activity Statement
Stock Ownership Guidelines—Directors
Stock Ownership Guidelines—Executives
A printed copy of any of these documents will be provided to any stockholder of the Company free of charge upon written request to the Company, c/o Secretary, Amphenol Corporation, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492.
The Board has adopted the definition of "independent director" set forth in the NYSE Listing Standards to assist it in making determinations of independence. In addition to applying these guidelines, the Board will consider all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination.
The Board considered Ms. Wolff's role as Chairman Global Corporate and Investment Banking at Bank of America ("BofA") and the Company's current financial relationships with BofA, including BofA's role as a lender under the Company's revolving credit facility, participation as an underwriter on certain of the Company's debt offerings and provider of traditional banking services including cash management and trading, and determined that these relationships do not impair her independence. The Board has determined that all of the directors are independent of the Company and its management with the exception of Mr. Norwitt who is considered an inside director because of his current employment with the Company.
Mr. Loeffler is Chairman of the Board and Mr. Falck is the Board's Presiding Director. As Presiding Director, Mr. Falck has the authority to call, schedule and chair executive sessions of the independent directors. After each Board meeting and executive session the Chairman and Presiding Director communicate with the Chief Executive Officer to provide feedback and to effectuate the decisions and recommendations of the directors.
11
The Board of Directors has determined that at the present time, its current leadership structure, including a Presiding Director, a Chairman of the Board who retired from employment with the Company in 2010 after 37 years of service and a Chief Executive Officer who is an inside director, is appropriate and allows the Board to fulfill its duties effectively and efficiently based on the Company's current needs. The Presiding Director and independent Chairman of the Board provide a means for the Board to effectively operate independently of the Company's management as necessary or desirable. This structure also allows the Board to draw upon the skills and extensive experience of a Chairman, who can ensure that the other directors' attention is devoted to the issues of greatest importance to the Company and its stockholders, while permitting the Chief Executive Officer to continue to set the strategic direction and drive the ongoing business operations and finances of the Company, all in consultation with the Board of Directors.
Board of Directors Summary Information
The following table sets forth basic information about the current structure of the Board including summary information for the nominees to the Board.
| | | | Committee Memberships | | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Director Tenure | Independent | Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | Executive Committee | Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee | Pension Committee | Current Service on Other Public Company Boards | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Martin H. Loeffler (Chairman) | Since 1987 | X | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stanley L. Clark | Since 2005 | X | Chair | X | X | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
John D. Craig | Since 2017 | X | X | Chair | X | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
David P. Falck (Presiding Director) | Since 2013 | X | X | X | Chair | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Edward G. Jepsen | 1989-1997 Since 2005 | X | Chair * | X | X | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Robert A. Livingston | Since 2018 | X | X* | X | X | RPM International Inc. | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R. Adam Norwitt | Since 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Anne Clarke Wolff | Since 2018 | X | X* | X | Chair | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Board has five standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Executive Committee, the Pension Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Board has determined that all the members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are independent and satisfy the relevant SEC and the New York Stock Exchange independence requirements for the members of such committees. The Board has determined that all members of the Executive Committee and the Pension Committee are independent
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. As described more fully in its charter, the principal oversight duties of the Audit Committee include the following: (1) review reports on the evaluation of the Company's internal controls for financial reporting and the Company's annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements and related disclosures therein under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"; (2) review the Company's earnings press releases; (3) select, engage, evaluate and replace, if deemed necessary, the independent auditors and approve all audit engagement fees and terms and pre-approve all
12
permissible tax and other non-audit services; (4) review the qualifications, performance and independence of the Company's independent auditors; (5) review and approve the scope of the annual audit of the Company's financial statements; (6) review the scope and coverage of the Company's internal audit plan; (7) review the results of internal audits and the procedures for maintaining internal controls; (8) review the integrity of the Company's financial reporting processes and the selection and quality of the Company's accounting principles; (9) review critical accounting principles and practices and applicable legal and regulatory standards and principles and their effect on the financial statements of the Company; (10) review significant audit issues identified by the Company's internal audit function or the Company's independent auditors and the Company's responses thereto; (11) review accounting adjustments noted or proposed by the Company's independent auditors, reports on the Company's internal controls, and material written communications with the independent auditors; (12) review and discuss the Company's guidelines and policies for risk assessment and management; (13) assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of cybersecurity-related matters; (14) establish Company hiring policies for employees of the Company's independent auditors; (15) establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of employee concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and (16) sustain a constructive dialogue with the independent auditors about significant matters relevant to the audit of the financial statements of the Company and of internal control over financial reporting. See alsoReport of the Audit Committee on page 23. The Audit Committee conducts an annual performance self-evaluation, the results of which it reports to the Board. The members of the Audit Committee are David P. Falck, Edward G. Jepsen (Chairman), Robert A. Livingston and Anne Clarke Wolff, each of whom is an independent director as defined under the NYSE Listing Standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Jepsen and Livingston and Ms. Wolff are audit committee financial experts as defined by the applicable rules of the SEC and the NYSE Listing Standards, and that each of the members of the Audit Committee is sufficiently proficient in reading and understanding the Company's financial statements to serve on the Audit Committee.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee establishes the principles related to the compensation programs of the Company. It approves compensation guidelines, reviews the role and performance of executive officers and key management employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, approves the base compensation, incentive plan target and award and the allocation of stock option awards, if any, for the Chief Executive Officer and reviews and approves the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer for base compensation and adjustments in base compensation, incentive plan targets and allocations and stock option awards, if any, for the direct reports to the Chief Executive Officer as well as the Company's other top 20 most highly compensated employees. See also theCompensation Discussion and Analysis on page 26 and theCompensation Committee Report on page 37. The Compensation Committee also oversees the compensation of the Board. The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and solicit the advice of compensation advisors. The Compensation Committee conducts an annual performance self-evaluation, the results of which it reports to the Board. The members of the Compensation Committee are Stanley L. Clark (Chairman), John D. Craig, David P. Falck, and Robert A. Livingston.
Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is empowered to exercise the powers and authority of the Board during the intervals between meetings of the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Executive Committee does not have power or authority to: (i) approve any transactions or expenditures in an amount exceeding $50 million; (ii) amend the Company's Charter or Bylaws; (iii) adopt an agreement or plan of merger, share exchange, or consolidation to which the Company is a party; (iv) recommend to the stockholders any action that requires stockholder approval including, but not limited to, (a) the sale, lease, or exchange of all or substantially all of the Company's property or assets or (b) a dissolution of the Company or a revocation of a dissolution of the Company; (v) remove any executive officer from his or her position, or appoint any new executive officer, (vi) declare a dividend or authorize the issuance of capital stock of the Company; or (vii) take any other action or exercise any authority prohibited by law or the Company's Charter or Bylaws. The Executive Committee meets as necessary and all actions of the
13
Committee are presented to the full Board at the next meeting of the Board. The Executive Committee conducts an annual performance self-evaluation, the results of which it reports to the Board. The members of the Executive Committee are John D. Craig (Chairman), Edward G. Jepsen and Robert A. Livingston.
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee's principal duties include the following: (1) assisting the Board in identifying appropriate individuals qualified to serve as directors of the Company and evaluating the qualifications of such individuals; (2) recommending to the Board for selection qualified candidates for all directorships to be filled by the Board or by the stockholders; (3) developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company; (4) overseeing and discussing, as necessary and appropriate, a plan for the continuity and development of senior management of the Company and (5) assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight of relevant sustainability and corporate social responsibility policies, strategies and programs. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee conducts an annual performance self-evaluation, the results of which it reports to the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also oversees the annual evaluation of the Board. The members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are Stanley L. Clark, David P. Falck (Chairman) and Anne Clarke Wolff.
Pension Committee. The Pension Committee administers the Company's various defined contribution 401(k) plans and the U.S. pension plan (the "Pension Plan"—for more information on the Pension Plan, see the section entitledPensions and Deferred Compensation beginning on page 43). The Pension Committee has oversight responsibility for funding and investments in the U.S. pension plan and consults with the Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer of the Company at least annually and with the actuarial consultants and other advisors and the trustee and investment managers of the assets of the Company's U.S. pension plan as it deems necessary and appropriate. The Pension Committee reviews the liabilities, assets and investments of the Company's U.S. pension plan as a Committee at least semi-annually. It also ensures there is an appropriate selection of diverse investments for employees of the Company participating in the various defined contribution 401(k) plans. The Pension Committee conducts an annual performance self-evaluation, the results of which it reports to the Board. The members of the Pension Committee are Stanley L. Clark, John D. Craig, Edward G. Jepsen and Anne Clarke Wolff (Chairman).
Director Selection Process; Board Diversity
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and other Board members, as well as by management and stockholders. A stockholder may recommend any person for consideration as a nominee for director by writing to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Secretary, Amphenol Corporation, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, CT 06492. Recommendations must be received by December 31, 2020 to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and must comply with the requirements in the Company's by-laws. Recommendations must include the name and address of the stockholder making the recommendation, a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of Common Stock, biographical information about the individual recommended and any other information the stockholder believes would be helpful to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in its evaluation of the individual being recommended by the stockholder as a nominee for director.
Potential candidates for the Board will be evaluated by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee on the basis of:
14
The Board believes it functions most effectively when comprised of a diverse set of members, including a healthy mix of short-, mid- and long-serving members. To that end, the Board is committed to a policy of regular refreshment and has regularly, including currently, engaged a reputable international search firm to identify appropriate candidates. During the last 36 months, we have added three new independent members to our Board including John Craig, the retired Chief Executive Officer of Enersys, Anne Clarke Wolff, the current Chairman Global Corporate and Investment Banking of Bank of America and Robert Livingston, the retired Chief Executive Officer of Dover Corporation.
Our Board also believes that diversity includes diversity in terms of background, skills, age, experience, and expertise, as well as gender, race and culture. To the extent used, search firms retained by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to assist in identifying qualified candidates will be specifically advised to seek diverse candidates from traditional and non-traditional environments, including women and minorities. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee may also consider such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate. It will make a recommendation to the full Board as to any persons it believes should be nominated by the Board, and the Board will determine the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The process for considering candidates recommended by a stockholder for Board membership will be no different than the process for candidates recommended by members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, other members of the Board or management. In connection with the identification and appointment of Mr. Craig, Ms. Wolff and Mr. Livingston the Board engaged a reputable international search firm.
Meetings of the Board and Committees
During 2019 there were five formal meetings of the Board. All director nominees participated in all meetings of the Board and the Committees on which they served in 2019. Directors also attended meetings as invited guests of Committees on which they did not serve. This included quarterly telephonic meetings of the Audit Committee during which quarterly results were discussed and quarterly press releases reporting operating results were reviewed and approved.
The independent directors of the Company meet in executive session as necessary. Such private meetings are currently presided over by the Chairman of the Board, the Presiding Director, the chairman of the committee or by the director who requests the opportunity to meet in executive session.
The full Board conducts a self-evaluation at least annually to determine whether it and its committees are functioning effectively. The full Board meets at least annually with the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Executive Committee, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and the Pension Committee to review and discuss each committee's self-evaluation, including its performance as measured against its charter and the continuing effectiveness of its charter. In particular, the Board discusses with the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee the corporate governance guidelines that it is responsible for developing and recommending to the Board.
The Board is actively involved in overseeing risk management for the Company. This oversight is conducted both directly and through the committees of the Board. At each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board, the Board reviews various risks facing the Company at such time.
15
The Audit Committee reviews the Company's portfolio of risk with management and the Company's independent accountants, discusses with management significant financial risks, the Company's policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management and the actions management has taken to limit, monitor and control financial and other risk exposures. The Audit Committee also reviews the Company's internal system of audit and financial controls and the process for maintaining financial reporting controls with management and the Company's independent accountants. The Committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of cybersecurity-related matters.
The Compensation Committee oversees risk management as it relates to compensation plans, policies and practices in connection with structuring the Company's executive compensation programs and incentive compensation programs for other employees. The Compensation Committee reviews with management whether the compensation programs, including the performance-based incentive plans and the stock option plans described in the section entitledElements of Compensation Program beginning on page 28, are reasonably likely to create incentives for employees that may cause such employees to take excessive or inappropriate risks which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee and management have concluded the Company's compensation programs are not reasonably likely to create incentives for employees that may cause such employees to take excessive or inappropriate risks which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee oversees risk management as it relates to executive and senior management continuity and development as well as political activity. It also assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight of relevant sustainability and corporate social responsibility policies, strategies and programs.
The Pension Committee oversees risk management as it relates to the Company's U.S. pension plan described beginning on page 43. The Pension Committee reviews with management the forecasted liabilities of the U.S. pension plan, the actuarial assumptions used in determining those liabilities, the investments funding those anticipated obligations, the periodic performance of those investments and, as necessary, reviews and recommends revisions to the general investment policies governing the investment of the assets of such pension plan. The Pension Committee also has responsibility for ensuring there is an appropriate selection of diverse investments for those employees participating in the various defined contribution, 401(k) plans sponsored by the Company.
Human Capital Management and Culture Oversight
The Board is actively involved in overseeing the Company's human capital management strategies and practices as well as the Company's culture. This oversight is conducted both directly and through certain of the Board's committees. At each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board, the Board reviews changes in key personnel and at least annually the Board meets with the Company's Senior Vice President, HR, to discuss various HR-related topics, including talent development, succession planning and culture. The Board has primary responsibility for succession planning for the CEO. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has primary responsibility for succession planning for other executives and senior management as well as their ongoing development. The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for executive and company-wide compensation policies and programs.
16
Director Compensation for the 2019 Fiscal Year
The following table contains information relating to compensation of the Company's directors who are not named executive officers. The only director who is a named executive officer is Mr. Norwitt. His compensation is described in more detail in the "Summary Compensation Table" on page 38 and in the section entitledCompensation of Named Executive Officers beginning on page 31. Currently, non-employee director compensation consists solely of an annual retainer fee, committee chairman fees and an annual grant of restricted stock.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2)* | Option Awards ($)(3)* | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(5) | All Other Compensation ($)(6) | Total ($) | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald P. Badie | 39,285 | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 39,285 | |||||||||||
Stanley L. Clark | 100,000 | 160,009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 260,009 | |||||||||||
John D. Craig | 96,098 | 160,009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 256,107 | |||||||||||
David P. Falck | 100,000 | 160,009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 260,009 | |||||||||||
Edward G. Jepsen | 105,000 | 160,009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 265,009 | |||||||||||
Robert A. Livingston | 90,000 | 160,009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 250,009 | |||||||||||
Martin H. Loeffler | 250,000 | 160,009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 410,009 | |||||||||||
John R. Lord | 39,285 | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 39,285 | |||||||||||
Diana G. Reardon | 82,240 | 160,009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 242,249 | |||||||||||
Anne Clarke Wolff | 90,788 | 160,009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 250,797 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
17
non-employee director has elected to receive fees in cash as earned. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate number of shares issuable to each of the directors for fees earned prior to 2019 is represented in the table immediately below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Outstanding Shares of Restricted Stock (As of 12/31/19) | | | | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Shares Issuable Pursuant to Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (As of 12/31/19) | Number of Outstanding Stock Options (As of 12/31/19) | ||||||||||||
Name | Vested | Unvested | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald P. Badie | 0 | 20,058 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stanley L. Clark | 1,788 | 17,633 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
John D. Craig | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
David P. Falck | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Edward G. Jepsen | 1,788 | 0 | 13,334 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Robert A. Livingston | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Martin H. Loeffler | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
John R. Lord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diana G. Reardon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Anne Clarke Wolff | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In October 2018, in connection with its ongoing review of Board compensation, the Board adopted changes to the fee amounts earned by the directors. These fees were last adjusted in 2016. In summary, commencing in January 2019, (i) the annual retainer fee was increased from $80,000 per year to $90,000 per year, (ii) the retainer fee for the Chairman of the Board was increased from $180,000 per year to $250,000 per year, (iii) the additional retainer fee for the Audit Committee Chairman was increased from $12,000 per year to $15,000 per year, (iv) the additional retainer fee for the chairpersons of the other committees of the Board was increased from $8,000 per year to $10,000 per year; and (v) the value of the annual grants of restricted stock awarded to the directors was increased from approximately $140,000 to approximately $160,000. In connection with such changes, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, in conjunction with the Compensation Committee, retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC ("Meridian"), an independent compensation consultant, to provide market data for director compensation at companies similar in size to Amphenol. Meridian also confirmed the final decision was generally aligned with market practice. For more information on Meridian, see the section entitledRole of Compensation Consultant in Compensation Decisions in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section.
The 2012 Directors Restricted Stock Plan of Amphenol Corporation (the "Directors Restricted Stock Plan") provides annual grants of restricted stock to the non-employee directors on the first business day after each annual meeting of stockholders and interim pro-rated grants for non-employee directors not initially elected at a regular meeting of the Company's stockholders. On the grant date, each non-employee director will be awarded shares of Common Stock subject to the restrictions and conditions in the Directors Restricted Stock Plan. In 2019, the number of shares granted as annual grants was determined by dividing $160,000 by the closing price for the Common Stock on the grant date and rounding up to the next whole share amount. The closing price of the Common Stock on May 23, 2019 was $89.49.
Going forward, the Compensation Committee will monitor and make recommendations to the Company and to the Board regarding the annual retainer fee, committee fees and equity compensation elements of the directors' compensation program to ensure that total director compensation is fair and reasonable and competitive for the purpose of attracting and retaining qualified directors. The Board believes that the equity compensation element of the directors' compensation program enables share ownership by directors further aligning their financial interests consistent with their oversight role for the Company.
18
Communications with the Board of Directors
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with members of the Board of Directors c/o Secretary, Amphenol Corporation, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, CT 06492. All communications will be promptly forwarded to the appropriate directors for their review, except that the Board has instructed the Secretary not to forward solicitations, bulk mail or communications that address improper or irrelevant topics or requests for general information.
Board Member Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders
In each of the last ten years, more than 85% of outstanding shares of Common Stock have been voted by proxy and no more than five non-employee stockholders (representing only a nominal number of shares) have personally attended any of the Company's Annual Meetings of Stockholders. Accordingly, the Company does not require members of the Board to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The only then current Board member who attended the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was Mr. Norwitt, as President and Chief Executive Officer.
19
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT DIRECTORS
Name and Age | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
---|---|---|
Martin W. Booker | Vice President of the Company since 2015, and Group General Manager, Industrial Products Group of the Company since 2014. He was general manager of the industrial operations division of the Company from 2000 to 2014. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Booker has been an employee of the Company for approximately 20 years. | |
Lance E. D'Amico | Senior Vice President since 2019 and Secretary and General Counsel of the Company since 2016. From 2014 to 2016, he was executive vice president, chief administrative officer and general counsel at UTi Worldwide Inc. and from 2006 to 2014 he was senior vice president and general counsel at such company. Prior to that he served for six years as general counsel and executive vice president at Element K Corporation. In addition, prior to that he was an associate for six years at the law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. D'Amico has been an employee of the Company for approximately four years. | |
William J. Doherty | Senior Vice President since 2018 and Group General Manager Information Communications and Commercial Products Group of the Company since 2017. Mr. Doherty was vice president from 2016 to 2017 and group general manager, IT communications products group of the Company from 2015 to 2016. He was general manager of the high-speed products division of the Company from 2012 to 2014 and general manager of the backplane connectors division from 2007 to 2012. Mr. Doherty was employed for approximately three years by the connection systems division of Teradyne, Inc., which was acquired by Amphenol in 2005. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Doherty has been an employee of the Company or businesses acquired by the Company for approximately 17 years. |
20
Name and Age | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
---|---|---|
Dietrich Ehrmanntraut | Vice President since 2017 and Group General Manager, Automotive Products Group of the Company since 2015. From 2014 to 2015, he was Managing Director and COO of AEG Power Solutions. Prior to that, he served in various roles at Yazaki, including as CEO of Yazaki of North America Inc. from 2010 to 2014. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Ehrmanntraut has been an employee of the Company for approximately five years. | |
Jean-Luc Gavelle | Senior Vice President since 2020 and Group General Manager, Interconnect and Sensor Systems Group of the Company (formerly the Global Interconnect Systems Group) since 2014. Mr. Gavelle was vice president from 2014 to 2019. From 2012 to 2014, he was CEO of the Connection Technologies/Souriau-Sunbank Division of Esterline Corporation. Prior to that he served in various executive roles at Huber+Suhner AG for 13 years, including as COO. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Gavelle has been an employee of the Company for approximately six years. | |
Yaobin (Richard) Gu | Vice President since 2017 and Group General Manager, Mobile Consumer Products Group of the Company since 2016. He was general manager Shanghai Amphenol Airwave Electronics Co. Ltd. from 2012 to 2015 and served in a variety of sales, business development and management roles for that unit from 2004 to 2011. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Gu has been an employee of the Company for approximately 16 years. | |
Craig A. Lampo | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 2015. Mr. Lampo was vice president and controller of the Company from 2004 to 2015. He was treasurer from 2004 through 2006. Mr. Lampo was a senior audit manager with Deloitte & Touche LLP from 2002 to 2004. He was an employee of Arthur Andersen LLP from 1993 to 2002. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Lampo has been an employee of the Company for approximately 16 years. |
21
Name and Age | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
---|---|---|
Zachary W. Raley | Senior Vice President of the Company since 2010 and Group General Manager, Worldwide RF and Microwave Products Group and the Cable Products group of the Company since 2007. Mr. Raley was vice president of the Company from 2007 to 2009. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Raley has been an employee of the Company for approximately 24 years. | |
David Silverman | Senior Vice President, Human Resources of the Company since 2019, vice president human resources from 2014 to 2018 and senior director, human resources from 2013 to 2014. He was general manager of the Amphenol Alden operating unit from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Silverman was corporate business development manager of the Company from 2007 to 2010. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Silverman has been an employee of the Company for approximately 13 years. | |
Luc Walter | Senior Vice President of the Company since 2004 and Group General Manager, Military and Aerospace Operations Group of the Company since 2016. Mr. Walter was group general manager, international military, aerospace and industrial operations group of the Company from 2004 to 2015. He was director, European military & aerospace operations from 2000 to 2003. He does not serve on the board of directors of any public company. Mr. Walter has been an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries for approximately 36 years. |
22
The Audit Committee has undertaken a review of its charter, practices and procedures in order to assure continuing compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulatory requirements promulgated by the SEC and the NYSE. Following that review, the Audit Committee confirmed its charter, practices and procedures. The Audit Committee Charter is available on the Company's website at www.amphenol.com by clicking on the heading "Investors",then "Corporate Governance", then "Governance Documents", then "Audit Committee Charter" or by entering the URL"https://s22.q4cdn.com/733286966/files/doc_downloads/governance_documents/audit.pdf" into your web browser's address bar. In addition, a printed copy of the most current Audit Committee Charter will also be provided to any stockholder free of charge upon written request to Amphenol Corporation, Secretary, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492.
The Audit Committee reports as follows:
Audit Committee Edward G. Jepsen, Chairman David P. Falck Robert A. Livingston Anne Clarke Wolff |
23
Fees billed to the Company by Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent auditor, for services rendered in 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
Type of Fees | 2019 | 2018 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 5,796 | $ | 5,971 | |||
Audit-Related Fees(1) | 191 | 14 | |||||
Tax Fees(2) | 93 | 82 | |||||
All Other Fees(3) | 115 | 255 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 6,195 | $ | 6,322 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDITOR SERVICES
The Audit Committee has adopted and implemented approval policies and procedures related to the provision of permissible audit, audit-related, tax and other non-audit services by the Company's independent accountants. Under these procedures, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the use of the independent accountants for specific types of services. These specific types of services include, but are not limited to, instances where total fees are not expected to exceed $25,000 plus reimbursable expenses in connection with audits, services provided in connection with audits, merger and acquisition due diligence, tax services, internal control reviews and reviews of employee benefit plans. The Audit Committee has elected to delegate pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. All engagements performed by the Company's independent accountants are to be reported to the Audit Committee on no less frequently than a quarterly basis. Any permitted services by Deloitte where the estimated cost of such services is expected to exceed $25,000 for any given project must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or the Chairman of the Audit Committee to ensure compatibility with maintaining the accountants' independence. In 2019, all fees for permitted services were pre-approved in accordance with these policies.
HIRING RESTRICTIONS ON FORMER EMPLOYEES OF AUDITOR
The Audit Committee has also reviewed and confirmed Company policies and procedures imposing restrictions on the hiring of certain individuals employed by or formerly employed by the Company's independent accountants including any employee or former employee of the Company's independent accountants who currently has or who has previously had any responsibility for the performance of any audit work for the Company or any involvement with the certification of the Company's financial statements.
24
PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has considered the performance and qualifications of Deloitte & Touche LLP and has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to act as independent accountants to examine the financial statements of the Company for the current fiscal year. Deloitte & Touche LLP has acted as independent accountants for the Company since 1997, and the Audit Committee and management have considered and believe it desirable and in the best interests of the Company to continue the engagement of that firm. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. Such representatives are expected to have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
If the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP is not ratified by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares, present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee will review its future selection of independent accountants in light of that result.
The Board is asking stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the 2020 Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent public accountants for the Company for the year 2020 is hereby RATIFIED.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION FOR RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
25
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Overview of Compensation. The Compensation Committee of the Board (referred to in this Compensation Discussion & Analysis as the "Committee") has responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence with the Company's compensation philosophy and guidelines. A primary goal of the compensation philosophy and these guidelines is to align the interests of management with the stockholders to drive stockholder value through performance. The Committee strives to ensure that the total compensation paid to executive officers and key management employees is appropriate and reasonable, while, at the same time, capable of attracting, motivating and retaining the executive officers and key management employees of the Company. The Committee endeavors to keep the structure of the Company's compensation programs simple, transparent, consistent and broad-based. The Company's core management compensation programs include base salary, an annual performance-based incentive plan payment opportunity, annual stock option awards, insurance benefits and retirement benefits.
Throughout this proxy statement, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer together with the three other individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38, are referred to as the "named executive officers". References to "executive officers and key management employees" in this proxy statement relate to the approximately 800 management personnel of the Company, including the named executive officers, who participated in the Company's core management compensation programs in 2019.
This proxy statement relates to 2019 financial performance and compensation, neither of which were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This proxy statement also describes compensation plans for 2020 that were implemented at the beginning of 2020 and assumes there will be no changes to such plans resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic could significantly impact 2020 financial results as well as compensation actions and outcomes.
The Committee has concluded that its compensation policies and programs are not reasonably likely to create incentives for employees that may cause such employees to take excessive or inappropriate risks which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Say on Pay. At the 2019 Annual Meeting, the Company's stockholders cast a non-binding advisory vote regarding the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The proposal received overwhelming support with more than 92% of the shares voted being cast in favor of the proposal. The Board appreciates this show of support, which reaffirms to the Board that the Company's current management compensation policies and programs support our stockholders' objectives. The Company believes the philosophy and objectives of its management compensation program, as well as the implementation of the elements of the compensation program, are appropriately geared towards aligning the interests of management with the stockholders to drive stockholder value. No material changes were made to the structure of the Company's core management compensation programs in 2019.
The Compensation Committee. The Committee is currently composed of four independent directors. The activities and actions of the Committee are subject to the review of the full Board. All actions of the Committee are reported to the Board no later than the next subsequent meeting of the full Board following any Committee action.
The Committee has responsibility, from time to time, but at least annually, to:
26
Role of Compensation Consultant in Compensation Decisions. The Committee has retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC ("Meridian"), an independent compensation consultant, to advise it from time to time on executive and board compensation matters. Meridian reports directly to the Committee and the Committee has sole authority to negotiate the terms of service, including all fees paid to Meridian. In 2019, in conjunction with the Committee's annual review of executive compensation, Meridian was also asked to provide market data for executive compensation at companies similar in size to Amphenol. Meridian does not make any decisions relating to the creation or implementation of compensation policies or programs. The Committee and Meridian both evaluated Meridian's independence in 2019 and concluded that Meridian is independent of the Company.
Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions. In establishing, reviewing and assessing the appropriateness of compensation levels and adjustments in compensation levels for the executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer) and key management employees, the Committee considers the recommendations of certain executive officers of the Company. Mr. Norwitt is particularly involved. Mr. Norwitt and certain executive officers of the Company review the performance and compensation of the executive officers and key management employees at least annually and any prospective senior management employees as necessary. As part of this process general compensation surveys may be considered. These surveys are generally comprised of widely available information which is generally accessible for purchase or provided without charge to the Company in exchange for participation in the survey. The Company's human resources department, including the Senior Vice President, Human Resources, provides data, information and feedback based on its general knowledge of compensation inside and outside of the Company. The accounting department and legal department, including the executive officers in those departments, also compile and analyze data and share this with Mr. Norwitt. The recommendations of these executive officers, including Mr. Norwitt, regarding any salary adjustments, annual incentive plan payments and annual option award amounts based on individual and operating unit performance, are presented to the Committee. The Committee exercises its discretion in modifying and approving any such recommendations. The Committee's compensation actions are then submitted to the full Board for ratification and approval. Mr. Norwitt consults with the Committee on essentially all compensation matters but does not participate in the evaluation or determination of his own compensation.
Mr. Norwitt does not vote on any compensation matters considered by the Committee. However, he is available to the Committee as an additional resource to respond to questions and discuss individual and
27
operating unit performance, as well as related compensation matters. The Committee also meets informally from time to time and in executive session following each meeting to discuss compensation matters without Company employees present.
Philosophy and Objectives of Compensation Program. The Committee continues to strive to develop, refine and implement a complete and straightforward compensation program that helps to attract, motivate and retain the executive officers and key management employees, and that remains competitive with comparable companies. The program is designed to promote decision making geared to increasing stockholder value by rewarding executive officers and key management employees who contribute to increasing stockholder value. The Committee believes that to further these objectives, executive compensation packages should include both cash and equity-based compensation as well as reasonable benefits.
Elements of Compensation Program. The Committee endeavors to provide an appropriate mix of different elements of compensation, including finding a balance among (i) fixed versus at-risk compensation, (ii) current versus long-term compensation, (iii) cash versus equity-based compensation and (iv) basic benefits. Cash payments primarily reward current year performance and equity-based awards encourage key management employees, including the named executive officers, to continue to deliver results over a longer period of time and serve as a retention tool. The Committee generally strives to provide equity-based compensation at a level sufficient to drive an appropriate amount of focus on the long-term performance of the Company. The compensation program for all executive officers and key management employees, including the named executive officers, includes the following elements:
Base Salary. The Company establishes base salary to provide fixed income at approximately the median level for executives of comparable companies with similar responsibilities. Several elements are considered in setting base salary, including the size, scope and complexity of the executive officer's or key management employee's responsibilities, as well as the tenure of the executive officer with the Company. Position, geography and economic and market conditions are also considered, particularly with respect to retention. Base salary must be reasonable, fair and competitive. The Committee also considers the historical, current and forecasted performance of the Company and individual operating units, and the contributions or expected contributions of each executive officer or key management employee to those results when considering proposed adjustments to base salary. Salary levels for all executive officers and key management employees are reviewed and typically adjusted annually. Salary levels are also typically reviewed and may be adjusted in connection with a change in job responsibilities.
Performance-Based Incentive Plans. Executive officers and key management employees, including the named executive officers (with the exception of key sales and marketing employees who typically have their own sales incentive or commission plans and from time-to-time certain key employees of newly acquired companies who had or have their own incentive plans), were eligible to receive payments pursuant to the 2019 Management Incentive Plan (the "2019 Management Incentive Plan"). The Committee has reviewed and approved the 2020 Management Incentive Plan (the "2020 Management Incentive Plan") with terms that are substantially the same as the 2019 Management Incentive Plan. The 2019 Management Incentive Plan and the 2020 Management Incentive Plan are collectively hereinafter referred to as the "incentive plan". Target payments under the incentive plan when added to fixed base salary are intended to generate total annual cash compensation for participating Company employees that the Company believes is
28
reasonable, fair and competitive with annual cash compensation paid to similarly situated employees in comparable positions at other companies with comparable size and performance.
Incentive plan payments, when made, have historically totaled in the aggregate less than 2% of the annual consolidated operating income for the Company. There were approximately 495 participants in the 2019 Management Incentive Plan. Approximately 245 participants were paid approximately $10.5 million representing approximately 0.6% of the Company's consolidated operating income for 2019. Approximately 250 participants received no incentive plan payment for 2019 performance, including three of the five named executive officers. This reflects the performance nature of the Company's incentive plan. There are currently approximately 500 participants in the 2020 Management Incentive Plan who, at achievement of 100% of 2020 performance targets and goals, would be paid an aggregate of approximately $20.9 million.
The incentive plan provides participants with a cash bonus opportunity if certain individual, operating unit and/or Company goals are achieved. A "responsibility unit" in the discussion below refers to the group or business unit for which the employee has management responsibility or to which he or she is assigned. For executive officers and key management employees with global headquarters roles (i.e., Company-wide responsibilities), such as Messrs. Norwitt and Lampo, the Company is considered the responsibility unit. For Messrs. Gavelle, Raley and Walter, the group over which each served as Group General Manager in 2019 is considered the relevant responsibility unit.
The incentive plan is intended to reward participants upon the achievement of the goals for their respective responsibility unit, with discretion for qualitative individual, operating unit and Company performance factors. No annual incentive payments will be made if a threshold performance level is not achieved, absent the occurrence of extenuating circumstances that, in the discretion of the Committee, merit an exception to the threshold performance requirement. As a general rule, the threshold performance requirement for consideration of any incentive plan payment for employees with Company-wide responsibilities is year-over-year growth in Company EPS and for other employees is year-over-year growth in the operating income of their respective responsibility units.
Incentive plan payment amounts are calculated by multiplying three factors together: (i) a participant's annual base salary, (ii) a participant's incentive plan target percentage and (iii) a participant's incentive plan multiplier.
Incentive plan target percentages for each participant are established at the beginning of each year, occasionally subject to adjustment mid-year. Incentive plan target percentages for participants in the 2019 Management Incentive Plan ranged from 5% to 140% of annual base salary.
The incentive plan multiplier is determined for each participant after the end of each year by analyzing a number of quantitative factors, subject to qualitative adjustment, as discussed in more detail below. The maximum incentive plan multiplier any recipient may be awarded is 200%. The incentive plan does not guarantee any minimum incentive plan multiplier to any participant. For 2019, participants received incentive plan multipliers ranging from 0% to 200%.
A participant's incentive plan multiplier is based primarily on responsibility unit performance against quantitative measures established at the beginning of each year. In addition, consideration is given, when appropriate, to certain qualitative factors to pass the test of reasonableness and consistency. The quantitative portion of the incentive plan multiplier is contingent upon the Company's achievement and/or the applicable responsibility unit's achievement of performance targets and/or goals.
The Company continues to believe that the key drivers to generating stockholder value are revenue growth, operating income growth and EPS growth. In 2019 the quantitative performance criteria for (i) participants with Company-wide responsibilities was based on Company revenue and Adjusted Diluted EPS growth in 2019 over 2018 and (ii) other participants was primarily based on responsibility unit revenue and operating income growth in 2019 over 2018 and actual performance in 2019 as compared to 2019
29
budget. Revenue growth and operating income growth are calculated in local currency for executive officers and key management employees with responsibility units outside the United States.
The specific targets to be achieved by Messrs. Norwitt and Lampo to attain a 100% quantitative portion of the incentive plan multiplier under the incentive plan in 2019 were (i) Company revenue growth of at least 7%, and (ii) Company Adjusted Diluted EPS growth of at least 11%. To achieve a 200% quantitative portion of the incentive plan multiplier under the incentive plan in 2019 would have required Company revenue growth and Company Adjusted Diluted EPS growth of at least two- and one-half times the levels required for a 100% quantitative portion of the incentive plan multiplier. In calculating the incentive plan multiplier, Company Adjusted Diluted EPS growth and Company revenue growth are given equal weighting. The specific targets to be achieved by Messrs. Gavelle, Raley and Walter to attain a 100% incentive plan multiplier under the 2019 incentive plan were (i) responsibility unit revenue growth of at least 7% and (ii) responsibility unit operating income growth of at least 11%.
In addition, for executives that do not have global headquarters roles, such as Messrs. Gavelle, Raley and Walter, the incentive plan multiplier is adjusted up or down based on responsibility unit achievement to responsibility unit budget. To achieve a 200% quantitative portion of the incentive plan multiplier under the incentive plan in 2019 would have required responsibility unit revenue growth and responsibility unit operating income growth of at least two- and one-half times the levels required for a 100% quantitative portion of the incentive plan multiplier. In calculating the incentive plan multiplier, responsibility unit operating income growth and responsibility unit revenue growth are given equal weighting. If there is no operating income growth or Adjusted Diluted EPS growth, as applicable, the impact to the incentive plan multiplier is at the discretion of the Committee, but generally has resulted in an incentive plan multiplier of 0%. For purposes of making all calculations for incentive plan purposes using these ranges, responsibility unit operating income is adjusted for other expenses recorded below operating income and for certain amortization expense.
Once the quantitative portion of the incentive plan multiplier is established, management and/or the Committee, as applicable, consider various qualitative factors and may adjust the incentive plan multiplier accordingly. The qualitative analysis is designed to ensure that a participant is rewarded for responsibility unit performance and individual performance, but also to provide a means to ensure the awards are fair and meet the other goals of the Committee in determining executive compensation. In 2019, there was no qualitative adjustment made with respect to any named executive officer.
In 2020 there is no change in the quantitative performance criteria for the 2020 Management Incentive Plan as compared to the 2019 Management Incentive Plan.
Stock Option Plans. In May 2017, stockholders approved and the Company adopted the 2017 Stock Purchase and Option Plan for Key Employees of Amphenol and Subsidiaries (the "2017 Option Plan"). Granting stock options serves to maintain the alignment of the interests of the Company's executive officers and key management employees with its stockholders and allows executive officers and key management employees to participate in the long-term growth and profitability of the Company. The Committee believes that granting stock options helps create competitive levels of compensation and provides an opportunity for increased equity ownership by executive officers and key management employees (including the named executive officers). All currently outstanding employee stock option grants have a five-year vesting period, with 20% vesting each year. The Committee believes this extended vesting schedule helps retain executive officers and key management employees and encourages them to make decisions that achieve a healthy balance between short and long-term Company performance. Assuming the minimum service requirements have been satisfied, vesting would be immediately accelerated upon death, or under certain circumstances, disability (as defined in the plans). The Committee has discretion to allow continued vesting of unvested options following termination of employment due to retirement at age 65 or older with at least five years of employment with the Company or following termination of employment due to retirement at age 55 or older with at least ten years of
30
employment with the Company. With respect to anyone who is not a direct report of the Chief Executive Officer, the discretion to continue vesting has been delegated to the Chief Executive Officer. Vesting stops under most other termination situations. The potential for continued vesting incentivizes the executives to prioritize both short and long-term performance for the Company. The total expense for options granted each year is typically in the range of approximately 3% to 5% of the Company's annual budgeted consolidated operating income for such year.
The employee stock option plan is administered by the Committee. The Committee will consider recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior management employees of the Company and determine those employees of Amphenol and its subsidiaries who will be eligible to receive options, the number and the terms and conditions of each option grant, the form of the option agreement and any conditions on the exercise of an option award. The Committee also considers the estimated dilutive effect of options granted each year.
In determining the number of options to be granted to an individual employee, a value is imputed for each option, with reference to the Company's then current stock price and the estimated Black-Scholes valuation for option grants. The Committee also considers information regarding the total amount of options available, an individual's base salary, the amount of stock options, if any, previously awarded to an individual, an individual's past and expected future contributions to the Company's financial performance and an individual's responsibilities for assisting the Company in achieving its long-term strategic goals.
The Committee has historically made annual awards of stock options in the second quarter of each year. Newly hired or promoted executive officers or key management employees have on occasion received an award of stock options at or near the date of appointment. The Committee does not grant stock options with an exercise price that is less than the closing price of the Common Stock on the grant date.
Insurance Benefits. Each executive officer and key management employee (including the U.S-based named executive officers) is offered the same health and life insurance benefits as other employees working at the same location. The Company also makes a contribution to group term life insurance on behalf of substantially all U.S.-based salaried employees (including the U.S.-based named executive officers) on the same terms and conditions as similarly situated U.S. based salaried employees for which the Company is required to impute compensation for amounts in excess of $50,000 net of employee payments, see table ofAll Other Compensation under footnote (4) on page 39. Key management employees outside of the U.S. participate in the same insurance programs on the same terms and conditions as similarly situated salaried employees.
Retirement Benefits. U.S.-based salaried employees (including the U.S.-based named executive officers) may participate in the Company's Pension Plan, Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan, or SERP, a non-qualified supplemental defined contribution program, or DC SERP, and in the Company's 401(k) programs on the same terms and conditions as similarly situated U.S.-based salaried employees. For more information on the Pension Plan, the SERP, the DC SERP and 401(k) programs, and each named executive officer's participation, see the section entitledPensions and Deferred Compensation beginning on page 43. As certain of the retirement programs are unfunded, i.e. the SERP and the DC SERP, the Company's executives are incentivized to look after the long-term health of the Company. Key management employees outside of the U.S. participate in the same retirement programs on the same terms and conditions as similarly situated salaried employees.
Perquisites/Other. Mr. Norwitt was provided with car and driver services in 2019. Mr. Norwitt continues to receive car and driver services in 2020.
Compensation of Named Executive Officers
Company Performance—When reviewing compensation, the Committee reviewed the Company's 2019 financial results. The Company's 2019 financial results were prepared in conformity with GAAP, and
31
reported in the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to reviewing relevant GAAP financial measures, the Committee considered non-GAAP measures which it believes are also relevant in gauging year-over-year performance. Thus, Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Diluted EPS and Adjusted Operating Margins were considered by the Committee.1
In 2019, the Company achieved sales of $8.225 billion, which compared to $8.202 billion for the 2018 period. For the year ended December 31, 2019, GAAP Diluted EPS was $3.75, compared to $3.85 in 2018. GAAP Diluted EPS in 2019 included (i) an excess tax benefit of $38 million ($0.12 per share) related to stock options exercised during the period, partially offset by (ii) acquisition-related costs of approximately $25 million ($0.07 per share) and (iii) refinancing-related costs associated with the early extinguishment of debt during the period of $14 million ($0.04 per share). In the comparable 2018 period, GAAP Diluted EPS included (i) the previously mentioned benefit resulting from the finalization of the provisional income tax charge related to the Tax Act and (ii) an excess tax benefit of $20 million ($0.06 per share) related to stock options exercised during the period, partially offset by (iii) the previously mentioned acquisition-related transaction costs. Excluding the effect of these items, Adjusted Diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $3.74 and $3.77, respectively, representing a year-over-year decline of $0.03 or less than 1%. Cash flow provided by operating activities ("Operating Cash Flow") was $1,502 million for 2019 compared to $1,112 million for 2018. In addition to Operating Cash Flow, the Company also considers Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure, as a key metric in measuring the Company's ability to generate cash, as well as to assess how much cash can be used to reinvest in the growth of the Company or to return to stockholders through either stock repurchases or dividends. Free Cash Flow in 2019 was $1,207 million compared with $802 million in 2018.
The non-GAAP financial measures should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP. See Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to the Company's 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details.
(1)Explanation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. In addition to assessing the Company's financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, management and the Committee utilize certain non-GAAP financial measures defined below when assessing employee compensation measures. Management and the Committee believe that these non-GAAP financial measures are helpful in assessing the Company's overall financial performance, trends and year-over-year comparative results, in addition to the reasons noted below. Non-GAAP financial measures related to operating income, operating margin, net income attributable to Amphenol Corporation and diluted EPS exclude income and expenses that are not directly related to the Company's operating performance during the applicable time period. Items excluded in such non-GAAP financial measures in any period may consist of, without limitation, acquisition-related expenses, refinancing-related costs, and certain discrete tax items including but not limited to (i) the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (the "Tax Act") and (ii) the excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation that may arise during such periods due to the Tax Act's reduction of a substantial portion of such future tax benefits.
32
Pay Mix—Compensation programs for the named executive officers emphasize at-risk, performance-based elements geared to encourage management to generate stockholder value, namely stock options and incentive plan compensation linked to goals that encourage growth in revenue, operating income and/or EPS. Fixed compensation elements, such as base salary, retirement benefits and other compensation are designed to be market competitive for purposes of retention, and to a lesser extent, recruitment.
For the Company's Chief Executive Officer, fixed compensation elements including salary and "all other compensation" comprised approximately 21% of his total 2019 compensation. His at-risk compensation linked to increasing stockholder value comprised approximately 79% of his total 2019 compensation. These at-risk elements include stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company's Common Stock on the date of grant which only generate value if the Company's share price increases after the grant date. The value ascribed to the options for purposes of calculating percentages in this paragraph is the grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718, as further described in footnote (1) to the Summary Compensation Table on page 38. The other at-risk compensation is incentive-plan compensation which historically has required year-over-year EPS growth before any amount is paid, and rewards the Chief Executive Officer when Company revenues and EPS grow. For the Company's other named executive officers as a group, fixed compensation elements comprised approximately 24% of total 2019 compensation while at-risk compensation comprised approximately 76% of total 2019 compensation. As with the Chief Executive Officer, the fixed compensation elements for the other named executive officers include salary, retirement benefits and "all other compensation", while the at-risk items include stock options and incentive plan compensation linked to goals that encourage growth in revenues and either EPS or operating income, depending on the role of the named executive officer.
CEO Compensation—Mr. Norwitt's annual base salary at the beginning of 2020 was increased by approximately 3% from $1,275,000 to $1,315,000. Mr. Norwitt's incentive plan target percentage pursuant to the 2020 Management Incentive Plan was increased from 140% to 150%. In its deliberations about whether and how to adjust these two elements of Mr. Norwitt's compensation, the Committee concluded that Mr. Norwitt's base salary should be increased in line with the average inflationary increase generally given to other salaried employees of the Company in the United States and the incentive plan target percentage should be increased to further emphasize incentive compensation. In arriving at its conclusions, the Committee also considered the annual base salary and target bonus percentages of chief executive officers of similarly-sized companies based on information provided by Meridian. Meridian also confirmed to the Committee that all such changes generally aligned with prevailing market levels.
Based on calculations described in the section entitledPerformance-Based Incentive Plans above, Mr. Norwitt did not earn an incentive plan payment under the 2019 Management Incentive Plan because the Company's Adjusted Diluted EPS for 2019 was lower than the Adjusted Diluted EPS for 2018, and thus the Company's threshold to earn an incentive plan payment was not met. This compared to a maximum possible payout under the 2019 Management Incentive Plan of $3,570,000 representing 280% of his 2019 base salary.
33
In May 2019, Mr. Norwitt was awarded 475,000 options pursuant to the 2017 Option Plan with an exercise price of $89.49. The option award reflects the Board's confidence in his leadership, and is designed to further align Mr. Norwitt's interests with the Company's stockholders to generate long-term stockholder value.
In 2019, Mr. Norwitt was provided with car and driver services. These services allow him to work more efficiently and facilitate his ability to communicate with the Company's global organization. The Company expenses associated with this car and driver were $24,252. The imputed value of compensation for group term life insurance provided to Mr. Norwitt in 2019 in excess of $50,000, net of employee payments, was $5,382. The Company continues to provide Mr. Norwitt with car and driver services and to contribute to his group term life insurance in 2020.
Mr. Norwitt continues to participate in the Pension Plan (further described in the section entitledPension Plan Background commencing on page 43), but his benefits under such Pension Plan were frozen effective December 31, 2006. Notwithstanding that Mr. Norwitt's Pension Plan benefits have been frozen, there was a change in his pension value because of changes in actuarial assumptions in 2019 as compared to 2018. In 2019, Mr. Norwitt received a 401(k) match of $16,566. The Company made notational contributions to a non-qualified supplemental defined contribution plan, or DC SERP, on behalf of Mr. Norwitt for 2019 of $203,775. Mr. Norwitt continues to participate in the 401(k) Plan and the DC SERP in 2020.
Other Named Executive Officers' Compensation. For each of the other named executive officers, in determining incentive plan payments and stock option awards for 2019, and base salary and incentive plan target adjustments for 2020, the Committee considered each executive's overall performance, as well as relevant data from Meridian. In the case of Mr. Lampo, the Committee evaluated the overall performance of the Company and his respective contributions to that performance. In the case of Messrs. Gavelle, Raley and Walter, the Committee evaluated their contributions to the performance and results of the group over which each served as Group General Manager.
Mr. Lampo. In January 2020, Mr. Lampo's annual base salary was increased by approximately 7% from $560,000 to $600,000. This increase reflects his ongoing development in the Chief Financial Officer role as well as market-based data provided by Meridian.
Mr. Lampo did not earn an incentive plan payment under the 2019 Management Incentive Plan because the Company's Adjusted Diluted EPS for 2019 was lower than the Adjusted Diluted EPS for 2018, and thus the Company's threshold to earn an incentive plan payment was not met. This compared to a maximum possible payout under the 2019 Management Incentive Plan of $840,000 representing 150% of his 2019 base salary.
Mr. Lampo's incentive plan target percentage pursuant to the 2020 Management Incentive Plan remains at 75% of his base salary in 2020. His potential 2020 Management Incentive Plan payment will range from 0% to 150% of his base salary.
In May 2019, Mr. Lampo was awarded 161,000 options pursuant to the 2017 Option Plan with an exercise price of $89.49.
The imputed value of compensation for group term life insurance provided to Mr. Lampo in 2019 in excess of $50,000, net of employee payments, was $2,945. In 2020, the Company continues to contribute to Mr. Lampo's group term life insurance. Mr. Lampo continues to participate in the Pension Plan, but his benefits under such Pension Plan were frozen effective December 31, 2006 as described in the section entitledPension Plan Background commencing on page 43. Notwithstanding that Mr. Lampo's pension plan benefits have been frozen, there was a change in his pension value because of changes in actuarial assumptions in 2019 as compared to 2018. In 2019, Mr. Lampo received a 401(k) match of $16,740. The Company made notational contributions to the DC SERP on behalf of Mr. Lampo for 2019 of $51,608. He also continues to participate in the 401(k) plan and the DC SERP in 2020.
34
Mr. Gavelle. Mr. Gavelle is employed by a Hong Kong-based subsidiary of the Company. For purposes of this proxy statement compensation amounts paid or calculated have been converted to US dollars.* In January 2020, Mr. Gavelle's annual base salary was increased by approximately 8% from $426,286 to $460,997 (using a budgeted exchange rate of 0.1277 as reported by Bloomberg on January 3, 2020), in recognition of his promotion to Senior Vice President and Group General Manager of the Interconnect and Sensor Systems Group.
Mr. Gavelle's payment pursuant to the 2019 Management Incentive Plan was $386,722, representing the product of his 2019 base salary of $426,184 in local currency (using a January 3, 2019 budgeted exchange rate of 0.1276), multiplied by his incentive plan target percentage of 60%, and his incentive plan multiplier of 150%. The amount was converted to US dollars using the Bloomberg rate of 0.1287 in January 2020, the month in which it was paid. This was approximately 91% of his 2019 base salary, as compared to a maximum possible payout under the 2019 Management Incentive Plan of 120% of his base salary
Mr. Gavelle's incentive plan target percentage pursuant to the 2020 Management Incentive Plan has been increased from 60% to 65% of his base salary in 2020, which represents a continued emphasis on performance-based compensation and in recognition of his promotion to Senior Vice President. His potential 2020 Management Incentive Plan payment will range from 0% to 130% of his base salary. This variable, at-risk compensation is designed to incentivize performance in line with the core goal of increasing revenue and operating income growth within Mr. Gavelle's group.
In May 2019, Mr. Gavelle was awarded 119,000 options pursuant to the 2017 Option Plan with an exercise price of $89.49.
Mr. Raley. In January 2020, Mr. Raley's annual base salary was increased by approximately 3% from $590,000 to $608,000, in line with the average inflationary increase given to other salaried employees of the Company in the United States.
Mr. Raley did not earn an incentive plan payment under the 2019 Management Incentive Plan because his group's Adjusted Operating Income for 2019 was lower than its Adjusted Operating Income for 2018, and thus the threshold to earn an incentive plan payment was not met. This compared to a maximum possible payout under the 2019 Management Incentive Plan of $767,000 representing 130% of his 2019 base salary.
Mr. Raley's incentive plan target percentage pursuant to the 2020 Management Incentive Plan remains at 65% of his base salary in 2020, which represents a continued emphasis on performance-based compensation. His potential 2020 Management Incentive Plan payment will range from 0% to 130% of his base salary. This variable, at-risk compensation is designed to incentivize performance in line with the core goal of increasing revenue and operating income growth within Mr. Raley's group.
In May 2019, Mr. Raley was awarded 119,000 options pursuant to the 2017 Option Plan with an exercise price of $89.49.
35
The imputed value of compensation for group term life insurance provided to Mr. Raley in 2019 in excess of $50,000, net of employee payments, was $3,107. In 2020, the Company continues to contribute to Mr. Raley's group term life insurance. Mr. Raley continues to participate in the Pension Plan, but his benefits under such Pension Plan were frozen effective December 31, 2006 as described in the section entitledPension Plan Background commencing on page 43. Notwithstanding that Mr. Raley's pension plan benefits have been frozen, there was a change in his pension value because of changes in actuarial assumptions in 2019 as compared to 2018. In 2019, Mr. Raley received a 401(k) match of $16,693. The Company made notational contributions to the DC SERP on behalf of Mr. Raley for 2019 of $31,236. He also continues to participate in the 401(k) Plan and the DC SERP in 2020.
Mr. Walter. In January 2020, Mr. Walter's annual base salary was increased by approximately 3%, from $618,000 to $637,000, in line with the average inflationary increase generally given to other salaried employees of the Company in the United States.
Mr. Walter's payment pursuant to the 2019 Management Incentive Plan was $803,400, representing the product of his 2019 base salary of $618,000 multiplied by his incentive plan target percentage of 65%, multiplied by his incentive plan multiplier of 200%. This was 130% of his 2019 base salary, which was the maximum possible payout under the 2019 Management Incentive Plan for Mr. Walter.
Mr. Walter's incentive plan target percentage pursuant to the 2020 Management Incentive Plan remains at 65% of his base salary in 2020, which represents a continued emphasis on performance-based compensation. His potential 2020 Management Incentive Plan payment could therefore range from 0% to 130% of his base salary. This variable, at-risk compensation is designed to incentivize performance in line with the core goal of increasing revenue and operating income growth within Mr. Walter's group.
In May 2019, Mr. Walter was awarded 119,000 options pursuant to the 2017 Option Plan with an exercise price of $89.49.
The imputed value of compensation for group term life insurance provided to Mr. Walter in 2019 in excess of $50,000, net of employee benefits, was $9,381. In 2020, the Company continues to contribute to Mr. Walter's group term life insurance. Mr. Walter continues to participate in the Pension Plan but his benefits under such plan have been frozen as described in the section entitledPension Plan Background commencing on page 43. Notwithstanding that Mr. Walter's Pension Plan benefits have been frozen, there was a change in pension value because of changes in actuarial assumptions in 2019 as compared to 2018. In 2019, Mr. Walter received a 401(k) match of $16,800. The Company made notational contributions to the DC SERP on behalf of Mr. Walter for 2019 of $67,080. Mr. Walter continues to participate in the 401(k) plan and the DC SERP in 2020.
36
The Compensation Committee consists of four directors who are independent directors as defined under the NYSE Listing Standards and the Company's Governance Principles. The Compensation Committee has undertaken a review of its Charter, practices and procedures. A copy of the current Compensation Committee Charter is available on the Company's website at www.amphenol.com by clicking on "Investors", then "Governance Documents" and then "Compensation Committee Charter".
The Compensation Committee reports that it has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Company's Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion & Analysis be included in this 2020 proxy statement.
Compensation Committee Stanley L. Clark, Chairman John D. Craig David P. Falck Robert A. Livingston |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Messrs. Clark, Craig, Falck and Livingston serve on the Compensation Committee. None of Messrs. Clark, Craig, Falck or Livingston is or formerly was an employee or officer of the Company. Mr. Norwitt is the only Board member who was also an employee of the Company during 2019. Mr. Norwitt does not serve on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other company whose executive officer served on our Compensation Committee or Board. Therefore, there is no relationship that requires disclosure as a compensation committee interlock.
37
The following table summarizes the total compensation provided by the Company to the named executive officers for 2017, 2018 and 2019, except in the case of Mr. Gavelle who was not a named executive officer prior to 2018.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($)(1) | Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compen- sation ($)(2) | Change in Pension Value and Nonquali- fied Deferred Compensa- tion Earnings ($)(3) | All Other Compen- sation ($)(4) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R.A. Norwitt | 2019 | 1,275,000 | 0 | n/a | 5,823,500 | 0 | 32,500 | 249,975 | 7,380,975 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
President & CEO | 2018 | 1,130,000 | 0 | n/a | 6,410,000 | 2,401,250 | 0 | 169,110 | 10,110,360 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 1,093,000 | 0 | n/a | 5,130,450 | 1,776,125 | 17,500 | 148,469 | 8,165,544 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
C.A. Lampo | 2019 | 560,000 | 0 | n/a | 1,973,860 | 0 | 9,800 | 71,293 | 2,614,953 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President & CFO | 2018 | 525,000 | 0 | n/a | 2,179,400 | 580,125 | 0 | 46,818 | 3,331,343 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 475,000 | 0 | n/a | 1,754,000 | 370,500 | 5,300 | 38,866 | 2,643,666 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
L. Walter | 2019 | 618,000 | 0 | n/a | 1,458,940 | 803,400 | 134,400 | 93,261 | 3,108,001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President | 2018 | 600,000 | 0 | n/a | 1,602,500 | 780,000 | 0 | 69,255 | 3,051,755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 580,000 | 0 | n/a | 1,280,420 | 603,200 | 80,800 | 52,928 | 2,597,348 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
J.L.Gavelle | 2019 | 426,286 | (5) | 0 | n/a | 1,458,940 | 386,722 | (6) | n/a | 0 | 2,271,948 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President | 2018 | 387,506 | (5) | 0 | n/a | 1,602,500 | 400,058 | (7) | n/a | 0 | 2,390,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Z.W Raley | 2019 | 590,000 | 0 | n/a | 1,458,940 | 0 | 83,300 | 51,036 | 2,183,276 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President | 2018 | 540,000 | 0 | n/a | 1,602,500 | 210,600 | 0 | 27,697 | 2,380,797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 520,000 | 0 | n/a | 1,280,420 | 0 | 45,200 | 57,779 | 1,903,399 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Gavelle does not participate in any Company sponsored retirement plan.
38
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Year | Imputed Compensation for Group Life Insurance in Excess of $50,000 Net of Employee Payments ($) | Car & Driver ($) | 401(k) Company Contribution ($) | DC SERP Company Contribution ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R.A. Norwitt | 2019 | 5,382 | 24,252 | 16,566 | 203,775 | 249,975 | |||||||||||||
2018 | 3,510 | 20,044 | 14,000 | 131,556 | 169,110 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 3,510 | 20,283 | 13,500 | 111,176 | 148,469 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
C.A. Lampo | 2019 | 2,945 | 0 | 16,740 | 51,608 | 71,293 | |||||||||||||
2018 | 1,793 | 0 | 14,000 | 31,025 | 46,818 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 1,616 | 0 | 13,500 | 23,750 | 38,866 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
L. Walter | 2019 | 9,381 | 0 | 16,800 | 67,080 | 93,261 | |||||||||||||
2018 | 9,095 | 0 | 13,750 | 46,410 | 69,255 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 5,728 | 0 | 13,500 | 33,700 | 52,928 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
J.L.Gavelle | 2019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Z.W.Raley | 2019 | 3,107 | 0 | 16,693 | 31,236 | 51,036 | |||||||||||||
2018 | 1,854 | 0 | 12,593 | 13,250 | 27,697 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 1,779 | 0 | 13,500 | 42,500 | 57,779 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
The Tax Act was signed into law December 22, 2017. Prior to the Tax Act, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limited the U.S. federal income tax deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid in one year to a corporation's Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers. Compensation that qualified as "performance-based" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code was exempt from this $1 million limitation. As part of the Tax Act, the ability to rely on this "qualified performance-based compensation" exception was eliminated with the exception of grandfathered contractual arrangements, and the limitation on deductibility was generally expanded to include the CFO and certain other previously named officers in addition to defined covered executive officers. Regardless of this significant change to U.S. tax policy, however, the Company does not intend to change its performance-based compensation philosophy.
In conjunction with accepting each stock option award, all option award recipients, including each of the named executive officers, becomes party to a management stockholder's agreement with the Company which contemplates, among other things, that a terminated employee may be paid, at the Company's discretion, fifty percent of base salary in the form of salary continuation following his/her termination for up to two years, in exchange for a firm undertaking from the terminated employee not to compete with the business of the Company.
39
Pursuant to an employment letter agreement with the Company dated March 22, 1999, the Company has agreed that if Mr. Walter is terminated by the Company without cause, the Company is obligated to (i) pay him lump sum severance equal to 100% of the base compensation he received in the twelve-month period preceding his termination and (ii) relocate him to France if he so chooses.
Except as set forth above, none of the named executive officers are parties to any employment agreements with the Company.
In May 2017, stockholders approved and the Company adopted the 2017 Option Plan. While options remain outstanding under the 2009 Stock Purchase and Option Plan for Key Employees of Amphenol and Subsidiaries, as amended (the "2009 Option Plan"), no further options will be granted under the 2009 Option Plan. The 2009 Option Plan and the 2017 Option Plan are collectively referred to herein as the "Company's Option Plans". The Company's Option Plans provide for the granting of an option to purchase shares not intended or not qualifying as an incentive stock option as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code.
No options can be granted at less than the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the date of the grant. The Company is not able to grant any restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, performance units, performance shares or any other stock-based grants other than non-qualified options under the Company's Option Plans, and stockholder approval is required for any material amendments. Option awards vest in equal annual installments over a five-year period and have a ten-year term. In the event of a death or disability (as defined in the plans), assuming the minimum service requirements have been satisfied, a participant will immediately vest in all outstanding options. The Compensation Committee has discretion to allow continued vesting of unvested options following termination of employment due to retirement at age 65 or older with at least five years of employment with the Company or following termination of employment due to retirement at age 55 or older with at least ten years of employment with the Company. Vesting stops under most other termination situations.
A total of 6,067,200 options were granted under the 2017 Option Plan in May 2019 at an exercise price of $89.49 to 725 employees of the Company including the named executive officers. An aggregate of 114,500 options at exercise prices ranging from $78.12 to $98.92 were also granted under the 2017 Option Plan at other times in 2019 to other employees. The 2017 Option Plan limits the number of options that may be granted to any one participant in any fiscal year to not more than 1,500,000 options, which may be doubled during the first fiscal year a participant commences employment with the Company and/or its subsidiaries.
Of the 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to the 2017 Option Plan, 11,044,360 shares are available for future option grants as of April 1, 2020.
The exercise prices of the 16,525,905 options outstanding as of April 1, 2020 under the 2009 Option Plan range from $21.50 to $64.86. The exercise prices of the 18,338,351 options outstanding as of April 1, 2020 under the 2017 Option Plan range from $72.90 to $102.63. On April 1, 2020, the market value per share of Common Stock was $69.52 (determined by reference to the closing price listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Composite Tape.)
Repricing of Options/Granting of SARs
During the last fiscal year, the Company did not reprice any options nor did it grant any SARs. The Company's Option Plans do not provide for the granting of SARs or any other stock-based grants.
40
GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL YEAR 2019
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Grant Date | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Under- lying Options (#) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) | Full Grant Date Fair Value ($)(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold # | Target # | Maximum # | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R.A. Norwitt | 1/30/19 | 0 | 1,785,000 | 3,570,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
5/23/19 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 475,000 | 89.49 | 5,823,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
C.A. Lampo | 1/30/19 | 0 | 420,000 | 840,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
5/23/19 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 161,000 | 89.49 | 1,973,860 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
L. Walter | 1/30/19 | 0 | 401,700 | 803,400 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
5/23/19 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 119,000 | 89.49 | 1,458,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
J.L. Gavelle | 1/30/19 | 0 | 255,710 | (3) | 511,420 | (3) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
5/23/19 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 119,000 | 89.49 | 1,458,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Z.W. Raley | 1/30/19 | 0 | 383,500 | 767,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
5/23/19 | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 119,000 | 89.49 | 1,458,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
41
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2019 FISCAL YEAR END
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Option Awards(1) | Stock Awards(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R.A. Norwitt | 560,000 | 0 | n/a | 39.00 | May 22, 2023 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
600,000 | 0 | n/a | 47.72 | May 21, 2024 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||
480,000 | 120,000 | (3) | n/a | 57.97 | May 20, 2025 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
390,000 | 260,000 | (4) | n/a | 57.99 | May 25, 2026 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
234,000 | 351,000 | (5) | n/a | 72.90 | May 18, 2027 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
100,000 | 400,000 | (6) | n/a | 87.98 | May 17, 2028 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
0 | 475,000 | n/a | 89.49 | May 22, 2029 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
C.A. Lampo | 44,000 | 0 | n/a | 39.00 | May 22, 2023 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
72,000 | 0 | n/a | 47.72 | May 21, 2024 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||
120,000 | 30,000 | (3) | n/a | 57.97 | May 20, 2025 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
108,000 | 72,000 | (4) | n/a | 57.99 | May 25, 2026 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
80,000 | 120,000 | (5) | n/a | 72.90 | May 18, 2027 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
34,000 | 136,000 | (6) | n/a | 87.98 | May 17, 2028 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
0 | 161,000 | (7) | n/a | 89.49 | May 22, 2029 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
L. Walter | 74,667 | 28,000 | (3) | n/a | 57.97 | May 20, 2025 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||
97,200 | 64,800 | (4) | n/a | 57.99 | May 25, 2026 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
58,400 | 87,600 | (5) | n/a | 72.90 | May 18, 2027 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
25,000 | 100,000 | (6) | n/a | 87.98 | May 17, 2028 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
0 | 119,000 | (7) | n/a | 89.49 | May 22, 2029 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
J.L. Gavelle | 25,700 | 0 | n/a | 48.58 | Aug 3, 2024 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
20,000 | 20,000 | (3) | n/a | 57.97 | May 20, 2025 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
50,200 | 60,800 | (4) | n/a | 57.99 | May 25, 2026 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
0 | 82,200 | (5) | n/a | 72.90 | May 18, 2027 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
25,000 | 100,000 | (6) | n/a | 87.98 | May 17, 2028 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
0 | 119,000 | (7) | n/a | 89.49 | May 22, 2029 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Z.W. Raley | 130,000 | 0 | n/a | 39.00 | May 22, 2023 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
140,000 | 0 | n/a | 47.72 | May 21, 2024 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||
112,000 | 28,000 | (3) | n/a | 57.97 | May 20, 2025 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
91,200 | 60,800 | (4) | n/a | 57.99 | May 25, 2026 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
58,400 | 87,600 | (5) | n/a | 72.90 | May 18, 2027 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
25,000 | 100,000 | (6) | n/a | 87.98 | May 17, 2028 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
0 | 119,000 | (7) | n/a | 89.49 | May 22, 2029 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
42
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED FOR THE 2019 FISCAL YEAR
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
R.A. Norwitt | 660,000 | 51,196,351 | n/a | n/a | ||||||
C.A. Lampo | 119,000 | 7,757,378 | n/a | n/a | ||||||
L. Walter | 93,333 | 2,453,655 | n/a | n/a | ||||||
J.L. Gavelle | 92,100 | 2,441,809 | n/a | n/a | ||||||
Z.W. Raley | 0 | 0 | n/a | n/a | ||||||
| | | | | | ��� | | | | |
PENSIONS AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION
Pension Plan Background. Certain employees of the Company and its U.S. subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation, referred to as the Pension Plan, which is a defined benefit pension plan. Benefits are calculated based on the section of the Pension Plan in which an employee participates. The Company also sponsors a supplemental employee retirement plan (the "SERP") which provides for the payment of the portion of an annual pension which cannot be paid from the Pension Plan as a result of limitations contained in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code").
In 2006, the Company amended the Pension Plan by freezing accruals effective December 31, 2006 for personnel with less extensive service (referred to as the "non-grandfathered participants"). In connection with the freezing of accruals under the Pension Plan, beginning in 2007, the Company implemented employer contributions to the Amphenol 401(k) Plan and to a related non-qualified supplemental defined contribution plan for non-grandfathered participants. Grandfathered participants will continue to accrue incremental benefits under the Pension Plan and the SERP and will continue to be eligible to participate in the Amphenol 401(k) plan with no employer contributions.
Mr. Gavelle does not participate in the Pension Plan or the SERP. The other named executive officers participate in the Pension Plan and the SERP as non-grandfathered participants. Non-employee directors do not participate in the Pension Plan, although Messrs. Loeffler and Jepsen and Ms. Reardon participated in the Pension Plan and the SERP during their prior employment with the Company.
General Provisions of the Pension Plan. The normal retirement date under the Pension Plan is the first day of the month following a participant's 65th birthday. A participant may also retire as of the first day of any month subsequent to the participant's 55th birthday and completion of either five or ten years of service, however, a participant's normal retirement benefit is reduced by as much as 50% if payment of retirement benefits commences upon early retirement. Retirement benefits are paid in the form of a life annuity (generally a reduced joint and survivor annuity for married participants). The Company has a policy that prohibits granting extra years of credited service under the Pension Plan.
For the section of the Pension Plan in which Mr. Norwitt participated, the annual normal retirement benefit is equal to the greater of: (i) 1.1% of the participant's final average pensionable compensation multiplied by the participant's years of credited service or (ii) 1.8% of the participant's final average pensionable compensation multiplied by the participant's years of credited service not in excess of 25 (1% for years in excess of 25) reduced by 2% of the participant's estimated annual social security benefit multiplied by the participant's years of credited service not in excess of 30. Average pensionable compensation is equal to the participant's average annual total compensation, excluding bonuses and incentive plan payments, during the three years prior to the Pension Plan being frozen.
43
For the section of the Pension Plan in which Messrs. Lampo, Raley and Walter participated, the annual normal retirement is equal to 2% of the participant's final average pensionable compensation multiplied by the participant's years of credited service not in excess of 25 less 2% of the participant's estimated annual social security benefit multiplied by the participant's years of credited service not in excess of 25. Average pensionable compensation is equal to the participant's average annual compensation, including bonuses and incentive payments, during the five years immediately prior to the Pension Plan being frozen.
Mr. Walter's Retirement Benefit Assuming He Elects Early Retirement. Mr. Walter meets the age and service requirements for early retirement under his section of the Pension Plan. If Mr. Walter were to have elected early retirement as of December 31, 2019, he could have elected to receive his accrued benefit starting at age 65 or a reduced benefit commencing as of his retirement date. The reduced benefit would be equal to the benefit that would otherwise be payable at his normal retirement date ($2,449 per month payable from the Pension Plan and $2,788 per month payable from the SERP), reduced by 1/180th for each of the first 60 months and by 1/360th for each of the months more than 60 by which Mr. Walter's hypothetical early retirement date precedes his normal retirement date (i.e. 65 months). Using this formula, Mr. Walter's early retirement benefit, if he had elected early retirement as of December 31, 2019, would have been $1,891 per month payable from the Pension Plan and $2,153 per month payable from the SERP.
Pension Benefits for the 2019 Fiscal Year
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Plan Name | Number of Years of Credited Service (#)(1) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(2) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
R.A. Norwitt(3) | Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation | 3.0 | 97,700 | 0 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amphenol Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan | 3.0 | 33,100 | 0 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
C. A. Lampo | Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation | 1.0 | 39,100 | 0 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amphenol Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
L. Walter(4) | Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation | 8.0 | 393,100 | 0 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amphenol Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan | 8.0 | 450,500 | 0 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
J.L. Gavelle(5) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Z.W. Raley | Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation | 7.0 | 255,700 | 0 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amphenol Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan | 7.0 | 83,800 | 0 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
44
Pension Plan and 401(k) Plan. Beginning on January 1, 2007, non-grandfathered participants in the Pension Plan, including Messrs. Norwitt, Lampo, Raley and Walter, and most U.S.-based employees who were not participants in the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2006, are provided a Company contribution to their Company qualified 401(k) savings plan (the "Amphenol 401(k) Plan") accounts equal to 2% of their covered earnings. No employee contribution is required for this 2% Company contribution. Covered earnings include base salary and incentive plan compensation. In addition, the Company matches 100% of the employee's first 3% contribution of their covered earnings to his or her Amphenol 401(k) Plan account, including the accounts of Messrs. Norwitt, Lampo, Raley and Walter.
Pursuant to the Amphenol 401(k) Plan, during the first four years of a participant's employment with the Company, the employer allocation vests 25% per year for each year of service. After four full years of employment with the Company, the employer allocation is fully vested historically and on a going forward basis. Each of Messrs. Norwitt, Lampo, Raley and Walter are fully vested in all employer allocations.
The Company also sponsors a non-qualified supplemental defined contribution plan (the "DC SERP") for selected non-grandfathered participants in the Amphenol 401(k) Plan. Each of our named executive officers except Mr. Gavelle participates in the DC SERP. Participants in the DC SERP are credited with a 5% employer allocation on compensation in excess of the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Each named executive officer is also permitted to defer up to 5% of his estimated compensation in excess of the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code to a DC SERP account. A participant may elect to defer base salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation under the DC SERP and a participant's election to defer compensation is made prior to the beginning of each year, and is binding for the applicable year. The participant concurrently selects the timing of the distribution of their deferred compensation. Distributions may occur upon termination of employment (which could include retirement, death or disability) or upon a specified future date while still employed (an "in-service distribution"), as elected by the participant. For the named executive officers, any distribution payable on account of termination of employment will not occur until after six months following termination of employment pursuant to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Compensation deferred by participants and any matching contributions made by the Company are credited to a bookkeeping account that represents the Company's unsecured obligation to repay the participant in the future.
45
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for the 2019 Fiscal Year
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(2) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(3) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)(4) | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R.A. Norwitt | 186,900 | 203,775 | 595,068 | 0 | 3,405,736 | |||||||||||
C.A. Lampo | 47,760 | 51,608 | 66,965 | 0 | 387,623 | |||||||||||
L. Walter | 0 | 67,080 | 33,160 | (72,808 | ) | 155,725 | ||||||||||
J.L. Gavelle(5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
Z.W. Raley | 28,536 | 31,236 | 159,204 | 0 | 874,171 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Amounts That Were Reported As Compensation in Prior Year Proxy Statements ($) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
R.A. Norwitt | 878,523 | |||
C.A. Lampo | 98,227 | |||
L. Walter | 277,084 | |||
J.L. Gavelle | 0 | |||
Z.W. Raley | 252,554 |
46
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The amount of compensation that may be payable to each named executive officer upon voluntary termination, early retirement, normal retirement, involuntary not-for-cause termination, for-cause termination, termination following a change of control and in the event of disability or death of the executive is shown on the tables on pages 48-50. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2019, and thus include amounts earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts which could have been paid out to the named executive officers in connection with their termination. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined in the event of and at the time of such executive's separation from the Company.
Payments Made Upon Termination. Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer's employment is terminated, he or she is entitled to receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment. Such amountsmight include:
Payments Made Upon Retirement. The plan administrator (currently the Compensation Committee) has the discretion to decide if options will continue to vest following normal retirement at age 65 with at least five years of employment with the Company or upon early retirement at or after age 55 with more than 10 years of employment with the Company. None of the named executive officers is currently eligible for normal retirement. Mr. Walter is eligible for early retirement with more than 10 years of employment with the Company.
Payments Made Upon Involuntary Not for Cause Termination or Involuntary for Good Reason Termination. In the event of involuntary not for cause termination or involuntary for good reason termination of any employee, including a named executive officer, in addition to the benefits which might be made as reflected under the headingPayments Made Upon Termination above, the Board has the discretion to decide if options that are not vested at the time of such termination shall vest and the terms of such vesting. The disclosure in the tables below for involuntary not for cause termination and involuntary for good reason termination assumes that the Board has exercised its discretion to continue vesting of all such options.
Payments Made Upon a Change in Control. Pursuant to the 2009 Option Plan, immediately prior to a change in control (as defined in the plan), all outstanding options held by any employee, including a named executive officer, immediately vest and become exercisable at the discretion of the Board. Pursuant to the 2017 Option Plan, the plan administrator (currently the Compensation Committee) has discretion to accelerate options upon a change in control (as defined in the plan). The disclosure in the tables below relating to change in control assumes that the Board has exercised its discretion to cause all shares to vest.
Payments Made Upon Death or Disability. In the event of the death or disability of any employee, including a named executive officer, in addition to the benefits which might be made as reflected under the headingPayments Made Upon Termination above, he or she may receive benefits and/or payments under the Company funded disability plan and/or group term life insurance plan, as appropriate. In the event of death or disability as defined in the Company's Option Plans, assuming the minimum service requirements have been satisfied, all outstanding options held by such individual will immediately vest. The disclosure in the tables below assumes that the minimum service requirements for all named executive officers have been satisfied.
47
Health Care Benefits. The Company does not currently offer any of the named executive officers any enhanced health care benefits on termination for any reason.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R. Adam Norwitt | Voluntary Termination ($) | Early Retirement ($) | Normal Retirement ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause Termination\ Involuntary for Good Reason Termination ($) | For Cause Termination ($) | Change in Control ($) | Disability ($) | Death ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Severance payment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Incentive plan compensation(1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Pay for covenant not to compete(2) | 1,275,000 | 1,275,000 | 1,275,000 | 1,275,000 | 1,275,000 | 1,275,000 | 1,275,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Company funded disability(3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 637,500 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Vesting of stock options(4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48,495,930 | 0 | 48,495,930 | 48,495,930 | 48,495,930 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Craig A. Lampo | Voluntary Termination ($) | Early Retirement ($) | Normal Retirement ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause Termination\ Involuntary for Good Reason Termination ($) | For Cause Termination ($) | Change in Control ($) | Disability ($) | Death ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Severance payment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Incentive plan compensation(1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Pay for covenant not to compete(2) | 560,000 | 560,000 | 560,000 | 560,000 | 560,000 | 560,000 | 560,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Company funded disability(3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 280,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Vesting of stock options(4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15,135,820 | 0 | 15,135,820 | 15,135,820 | 15,135,820 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
48
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jean-Luc Gavelle | Voluntary Termination ($) | Early Retirement ($) | Normal Retirement ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause Termination\ Involuntary for Good Reason Termination ($) | For Cause Termination ($) | Change in Control ($) | Disability ($) | Death ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Severance payment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Incentive plan compensation(1) | 386,722 | 386,722 | 386,722 | 386,722 | 0 | 386,722 | 386,722 | 386,722 | |||||||||||||||||
Pay for covenant not to compete(2) | 427,854 | 427,854 | 427,854 | 427,854 | 427,854 | 427,854 | 427,854 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Company funded disability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Vesting of stock options(3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,218,978 | 0 | 11,218,978 | 11,218,978 | 11,218,978 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Zachary W. Raley | Voluntary Termination ($) | Early Retirement ($) | Normal Retirement ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause Termination\ Involuntary for Good Reason Termination ($) | For Cause Termination ($) | Change in Control ($) | Disability ($) | Death ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Severance payment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Incentive plan compensation(1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Pay for covenant not to compete(2) | 590,000 | 590,000 | 590,000 | 590,000 | 590,000 | 590,000 | 590,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Company funded disability(3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 295,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Vesting of stock options(4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,811,840 | 0 | 11,811,840 | 11,811,840 | 11,811,840 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
49
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Luc Walter | Voluntary Termination ($) | Early Retirement ($) | Normal Retirement ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause Termination\ Involuntary for Good Reason Termination ($) | For Cause Termination ($) | Change in Control ($) | Disability ($) | Death ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Severance payment(1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 618,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Relocations expenses(2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 250,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Incentive plan compensation(3) | 803,400 | 803,400 | 803,400 | 803,400 | 0 | 803,400 | 803,400 | 803,400 | |||||||||||||||||
Pay for covenant not to compete(4) | 618,000 | 618,000 | 618,000 | 618,000 | 618,000 | 618,000 | 618,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Company funded disability(5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 309,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Vesting of stock options(6) | 0 | 12,012,800 | 12,012,800 | 12,012,800 | 0 | 12,012,800 | 12,012,800 | 12,012,800 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Norwitt, President and CEO (the "CEO").
The Company is a vertically integrated manufacturer with extensive labor-intensive operations in numerous low-cost countries. As of December 31, 2019, we estimate that our employee population consisted of approximately 74,000 individuals globally, with a majority of those employees based in low cost countries. The Company's disclosed ratio may be higher relative to other companies which rely more heavily on outsourced production or otherwise source products and components from low cost countries without operating their own manufacturing facilities. We believe our compensation levels are competitive with prevailing wage rates in the local markets in which we operate.
For 2019, our last completed fiscal year:
50
Based on this information, for 2019, the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to the annual total compensation of the Median Employee was estimated to be 511:1 and the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to annual total compensation of the Median US Employee was estimated to be 128:1.
The pay ratios above are reasonable estimates calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodologies described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee's annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. Moreover, there are a number of factors which make a meaningful comparison of pay ratios difficult, such as industry specific pay differentials, the geographic location of employee populations and a company's manufacturing strategy (e.g., outsourcing versus insourcing).
To identify the Median Employee, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the Median Employee, the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments and estimates that we used were as follows.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company completed a process of collecting surveys of compensation data from our global sites because the Company does not have a global Human Resources Information System ("HRIS"). The data provided statistical sampling of the average total compensation for direct labor, indirect labor, and salaried employees from 165 of our estimated 200 operating sites representing all regions globally. These data were sorted and it was determined that based on our representative survey, the Median Employee was a direct labor employee in one of our China plants with a total annual compensation of $12,179 (based on the average monthly US dollar to RMB exchange rate of 0.1481 in 2017 as reported by Bloomberg), including all compensation (determined in accordance with the summary compensation table rules).
In 2019, the Company concluded that there were not any changes in the employee population or our compensation practices that would significantly affect our pay ratio disclosure and, consequently, that no change to the Median Employee as identified in our 2017 compensation analysis was warranted.
The Median Employee's annual total compensation for 2019 was $14,441 (based on the average monthly US dollar to RMB exchange rate of 0.1448 in 2019 as reported by Bloomberg), including all compensation (determined in accordance with the summary compensation table rules).
In addition, with respect to US-based employees, in 2019, the Company re-analyzed data directly from our HRIS in the United States which currently contains nearly all compensation information for employees of our Company and its subsidiaries in the United States. The Median US Employee for 2019 (excluding the CEO) was determined to have annual total compensation of $57,878 (determined in accordance with the summary compensation table rules).
We elected to not exclude any of our employees from the calculation based on the 5% "De Minimis Exemption" adjustment as permitted under SEC rules.
51
PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON
COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Board is asking stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the 2019 Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.
The Board recommends a vote FOR this resolution because it believes that the compensation policies and practices of the Company described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis have been and continue to be effective in helping to achieve the Company's goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and leadership excellence, aligning the executive officers' long-term interests with those of the stockholders and motivating the executive officers to remain with the Company for long and productive careers.
Stockholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 26 of this proxy statement, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative, appearing on pages 38 through 51 which provide detailed information on the Company's compensation policies and practices and the compensation of the Company's named executive officers.
This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a "say-on-pay" resolution, is non-binding on the Board. Although non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when evaluating the Company's executive compensation program on an ongoing basis. The Board favors a policy of providing for annual say-on-pay advisory votes. It is anticipated the next say-on-pay advisory vote will occur at the Company's 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
At the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company's stockholders overwhelmingly approved the "say-on-pay" proposal with more than 92% of the shares voted being cast in favor of the proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY
RESOLUTION ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
52
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has adopted a written policy for the review and approval of transactions and arrangements between the Company and the Company's current directors, director nominees, current executive officers, greater than five percent stockholders, and their immediate family members. All transactions, regardless of amount, are required to be reported to and reviewed by the General Counsel of the Company who is required to report the results of his review to the Board or independent Directors, as appropriate. Following this review, the Board would determine whether any such transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, taking into consideration whether any such transaction is on terms no less favorable to the Company than those available with unrelated third parties and the related person's interest in the transaction. As required under the rules of the SEC, transactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to the Company or a related person must be disclosed in the Company's proxy statement.
A brother of Luc Walter, Senior Vice President of the Company, was employed at a foreign subsidiary of the Company through June 30, 2019. In 2019, Mr. Walter's brother received total compensation of less than $175,000, including salary and continued vesting of stock options. This amount is consistent with the compensation and benefits provided to other employees with equivalent qualifications, experience and responsibilities at the Company and its subsidiaries. This employment relationship was reviewed and ratified in accordance with the Company's policy.
No other related party transactions were identified during or subsequent to 2019 where the amount involved exceeded $120,000. As such, there are no other transactions to be reported in this proxy statement.
PROHIBITION ON SHORT SALES, TRANSACTIONS IN
DERIVATIVE SECURITIES AND HEDGING
The Company has a written policy prohibiting officers and directors from engaging in (i) short sales of the Company's securities, (ii) transactions in puts, calls or other derivative securities involving the Company's securities, (iii) hedging transactions involving the Company's securities, (iv) purchases of the Company's securities on margin (other than a cashless exercise of stock options under the Company's equity plans), and (v) any pledges of the Company's securities to secure margin or other loans.
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN EXECUTIVES
The Company has adopted stock ownership guidelines for its non-employee directors and certain of its executive officers. Each non-employee director is encouraged to own shares of the Company having a total value equal to at least 3x the annual cash retainer for Board service. The CEO is required to own shares of the Company having a total value equal to at least 5x base salary. The CFO is required to own shares of the Company having a total value equal to at least 3x base salary. Any new non-employee director or CEO or CFO will have five years from the date of his/her appointment to attain the required level of stock ownership. For purposes of this requirement, 60% of the value (assuming a cashless exercise) of vested but unexercised stock options count in determining stock ownership. Stock ownership does not include unvested stock options. There may be rare instances where the stock ownership guidelines would place a severe financial hardship on the director or executive. The Compensation Committee of the Board may, in its discretion, modify the stock ownership requirements in special circumstances.
Amphenol regularly engages with key stockholders to discuss, among other items, governance issues to ensure that management and the Board understand and address issues that are important to the Company's stockholders. Through these engagements the Company has obtained valuable feedback. For
53
example, in 2016, the Board adopted an amendment to the Company's By-Laws that, among other things, implemented "proxy access", which, subject to the requirements of the By-Laws, permits any stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders that beneficially owns at least 3% of the Company's outstanding Common Stock continuously for three years to nominate candidates for election to the Board and to require the Company to list such nominees in the Company's proxy statement. In prior years, the Company has taken a variety of other significant actions in response to investor feedback, such as lowering the threshold to call special meetings of stockholders from 50% to 25%, declassifying the Board and providing for the annual election of directors, allowing stockholders to act by written consent and eliminating supermajority voting requirements in the Company's Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws.
The Company has also continued to engage key stockholders to discuss other important topics, such as compensation practices and programs and our sustainability initiatives.
The Company's Board welcomes direct engagement with significant stockholders to discuss matters of interest to such stockholders. Any such an engagement can be arranged by calling Lance D'Amico, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, at (203) 265-8606.
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG)
We are dedicated to building true, long-term value for our customers, employees and shareholders, while also minimizing our impact on the environment and being a positive force in our communities around the world. At the core of this commitment is our strong belief that sustainable business practices ensure the Company's success and longevity. In order to better measure our environmental footprint and societal impact, we have made significant investments in the systems used to manage and track our progress in these important areas. These investments have allowed us to better capture and will continue to enhance our ability to convey the efforts already in place throughout the Company. Ultimately, we believe that ensuring long-term sustainable business practices is simply good business.
Energy. Energy use and its relationship to climate change are important areas of focus for us. We strive to improve our own carbon footprint while also manufacturing products that enable our customers to reduce their own energy use. We have also made meaningful investments in renewable energy, including re-purposing our legacy manufacturing plant in Sidney, NY into a utility-scale solar farm which will provide the region's grid with enough energy to power more than 800 homes annually.
Anti-Human Trafficking and Slavery. As stated in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics policy, we have zero tolerance for human trafficking and slavery. Additionally, we are a member of the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and adhere to the RBA's Code of Conduct, which prohibits the use of forced, bonded, and indentured labor and involuntary prison labor. We have also deployed a Supplier Code of Conduct throughout our supply chain and are in the process of rolling out enhanced data collection capabilities and enabling software to ensure our suppliers are adhering to our standards.
Ethics. We strive to conduct business in an ethical way everywhere around the world. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics policy is a core document that our global management team reviews and re-commits to each year. This is further supported by a robust ethics and compliance program, including an independent internal audit function, compliance training as well as a whistleblower and investigation process with a strict policy prohibiting retaliation.
Employees. Our employees are our most valuable asset and core to how we conduct business. The Company's culture is based on a deep-rooted philosophy of accountability which provides our management teams the tools to do their jobs and the authority and sense of ownership to do them effectively. Amphenol continues to invest in our people and strives to always ensure that they work in an ethical and highly rewarding environment. In particular, given the current COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has taken significant steps to ensure the safety of our employees amidst this unprecedented crisis. The safety of our
54
people is also critical, and we work together in a culture of mutual protection where worker safety is always a top priority. The depth and stability of our global workforce continues to be the core asset of Amphenol.
We recognize that sustainability practices and programs require transparency and accountability and we intend to publish an updated Sustainability Report on an annual basis. Our next updated Sustainability Report is expected to be published in the second quarter of 2020. Our current Sustainability Report is available on the home page of our website. For more information about our sustainability efforts, please visit the sustainability section of our website at https://www.amphenol.com/sustainability.
Information on or accessed through our website is not incorporated in this proxy statement, and you should not rely on such information in making a decision on how to vote.
Any stockholder wishing to include a proposal in the Company's proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting in accordance with Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act must submit their proposal in writing by mail to the Secretary of the Company at Amphenol Corporation, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492, Attention: Secretary no later than the close of business on December 14, 2020. Stockholder proposals that are sent to any other person or location or by any other means may not be received in a timely manner. In order to avoid controversy, stockholders should submit their proposals by means that permit them to prove the date of delivery. Any stockholder proposal received by the Secretary of the Company after the date specified will not be included in the Company's proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting. Further, all proposals submitted for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting must comply with all of the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.
Stockholders of the Company are also entitled by the Company's By-Laws to bring business before the Annual Meeting, including matters not specified in the notice of meeting (other than proposals submitted for inclusion in the Company's proxy material pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act), by giving timely notice in writing by mail to the Secretary of the Company at Amphenol Corporation, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492, Attention: Secretary. To be timely, notice must be delivered not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the annual meeting, provided however, if less than 70 days' notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting has been given or made to stockholders, notice of the stockholder's proposal must be received in writing by mail by the Secretary of the Company no later than the tenth day following the mailing of this proxy statement. Such a notice must also conform to the requirements of the Company's By-Laws, which stipulate that the proposal must include (i) a description of the business to be brought before the meeting, (ii) the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (iii) the name and record address of the stockholder together with the number of shares beneficially owned and (iv) a description of any material interest of the stockholder in such business.
In addition, the Company's By-Laws provide a proxy access right permitting stockholders who have beneficially owned 3% or more of the Company's Common Stock continuously for at least 3 years to submit director nominations via the Company's proxy materials for up to 20% of the directors then serving. Notice of proxy access director nominations for the 2021 annual meeting must be delivered in writing by mail to the Secretary of the Company at Amphenol Corporation, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, CT 06492, Attention: Secretary, no earlier than November 14, 2020 and no later than the close of business on December 14, 2020. In addition, the notice must set forth the information required by the Company's By-Laws with respect to each proxy access director nomination that a stockholder intends to present at the 2021 annual meeting.
A stockholder has given the Company notice of the intent to introduce the following proposal for consideration and action by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The stockholder proposal may contain assertions about the Company and its directors that the Company believes are incorrect. The Board has not attempted to refute all assertions and the Company has not corrected any errors in the stockholder proposal.
The Company will provide the name, address and share ownership of the stockholder proponent upon request.
55
PROPOSAL 4. STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
Proposal 4—Make Shareholder Right to Call Special Meeting More Accessible
Resolved, Shareowners ask our board to take the steps necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to give holders in the aggregate of 15% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareowner meeting. This proposal does not impact our board's current power to call a special meeting.
Special shareholder meetings allow shareholders to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors that can arise between annual meetings. This proposal topic won more than 70%-support at Edwards Lifesciences and SunEdison. This proposal topic, sponsored by William Steiner, also won 78% support at a Sprint annual meeting with 1.7 Billion yes-votes. Nuance Communications (NUAN) shareholders gave 94%-support to a 2018 shareholder proposal calling for 10% of shareholders to call a special meeting.
This same proposal received 43%-support at the 2019 Amphenol annual meeting. This 43%-support probably represented majority support from the Amphenol shares who had access to independent proxy voting advice.
Making the right to call a special meeting more accessible to shareholders is showing increased support. For instance this proposal topic won 51%-support at O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY) in 2019—up from 41% the year before.
The current stock ownership threshold of 25% can mean that more than 50% of shareholders must be contacted during a short window of time to simply call a special meeting. Plus many shareholders, who are convinced that a special meeting should be called, can make a small paperwork error that will disqualify them from counting toward the 25% ownership threshold that is now needed for a special meeting.
The shares that gave 43% to the 2019 proposal on this topic may question whether Amphenol has a meaningful right to call a special meeting. The Amphenol bylaws enumerate 6 restrictions (Items A through F) to not call a special meeting even if detailed procedural steps are followed.
Since special shareholder meetings allow shareholders to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors, adoption of this proposal might accelerate Board of Directors refreshment with a focus on naming new fully independent directors.
For instance, our Board of Directors had 4 members who were not fully independent. There were 2 inside directors—Diana Reardon and Richard Adam Norwitt plus 2 inside-related directors—Edward Jepsen and Martin Hans Loeffler. Plus Mr. Loeffler had 31-years long-tenure. And Edward Jepsen and Stanley Clark each had more than 14-years long-tenure. Long tenure can seriously erode the independence of directors to the disadvantage of shareholders. Plus Mr. Jepsen, an inside-related director, held 2 seats on our 3 most important board committees.
Please vote yes:
Make Shareholder Right to Call Special Meeting More Accessible—Proposal 4
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST PROPOSAL 4
The Board has carefully considered this proposal and believes that it isnot in the best interests of stockholders in light of Amphenol's existing special meeting right, which allows stockholders who own at least 25% of our capital stock to call a special meeting of stockholders (the "Existing Special Meeting Right"). The 25% special meeting ownership threshold is consistent with the predominant market practice. Moreover, at each of our 2018 and 2019 annual meetings of stockholders, our stockholders rejected a proposal very similar to the current proposal. Consequently, the BoardUNANIMOUSLY recommends a voteAGAINST this proposal for the following reasons.
56
A 25% ownership threshold provides a procedural safeguard against abuse, corporate waste and activist investors with short-term goals and is consistent with overwhelming market practice.
Amphenol's Existing Special Meeting Right strikes the appropriate balance between ensuring that stockholders have the ability to call a special meeting of stockholders to act on extraordinary and urgent matters, while at the same time protecting against a misuse of this right by a small number of stockholders whose interests may not be aligned with the remaining 85% of our stockholders.
Failure to aggregate sufficient stock ownership to reach the 25% ownership threshold is a strong indicator that a sufficient interest among the majority of stockholders does not exist to call a special meeting. Lowering this threshold risks giving a small group of stockholders a disproportionate amount of influence over the Company's affairs.
Convening a special meeting of stockholders imposes significant costs, both administrative and operational. The Board, management and employees must devote a significant amount of time and attention preparing for such meetings, which distracts them from their primary focus of maximizing long-term financial returns for stockholders and operating our business in the best interest of stockholders. In addition, with each special meeting of stockholders, we must incur significant expenses in order to prepare the disclosures required for such meetings, print and distribute materials, solicit proxies and tabulate votes. As a result, special meetings of stockholders should be limited to circumstances where a substantial number of stockholders believe a matter is sufficiently urgent or extraordinary to justify calling a special meeting.
Amphenol's Existing Special Meeting Right also serves as a protective mechanism against activist investors with short-term goals. Event-driven hedge funds or other activists may pursue a special meeting of stockholders with the goal of being disruptive to our business or to propose issues that prioritize their own short-term exit strategies over the long-term interests of the vast majority of our stockholders. A 25% special meeting threshold ensures that a special meeting of stockholders may only be called by a stockholder or group of stockholders with a substantial stake in our Company. The Existing Special Meeting Right appropriately safeguards stockholder interests and prevents corporate waste, while at the same time ensuring that stockholders have the ability to call special meetings when appropriate.
Moreover, a 25% special meeting ownership threshold is the overwhelming market practice. Within the S&P 500, 305 companies afford stockholders the right to call a special meeting of stockholders. Of those companies, 37% have a 25% ownership threshold for allowing stockholders to call a special meeting, while only 8% have adopted a 15% ownership threshold.
The Existing Special Meeting Right already provides our stockholders with a meaningful right to call a special meeting.
The 25% ownership threshold included in Amphenol's Existing Special Meeting Right already provides our stockholders with a meaningful right to call a special meeting of stockholders. Based on our current stockholder base, our top two stockholders hold an approximate 24.4% ownership and therefore they could act together with almost any other meaningful stockholder to call a special meeting. Either of those stockholders could also satisfy the 25% ownership threshold by partnering with other large stockholders to call a special meeting with more advocates. If stockholders holding just 15% of our capital stock had the ability to call a special meeting, then either of our two largest stockholders could act together or with just one additional stockholder to call a special meeting. This could lead to disproportionate influence over our business by a small number of stockholders.
57
The Existing Special Meeting Right reflects the input of many of Amphenol's stockholders, who have consistently and repeatedly rejected similar proposals.
At our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders defeated a proposal very similar to the current proposal, which sought to give holders of 10% of our capital stock the power to call a special meeting of stockholders. In response to the failure of that proposal, we engaged with many of our stockholders to discuss, among other items, the ability of our stockholders to call a special meeting. After careful consideration and in response to stockholder feedback, the Board amended the By-Laws in 2014 in order to lower the threshold of the Company's voting power required to call a special meeting of stockholders from 50% to 25%, creating the Existing Special Meeting Right. Most recently, at our 2018 and 2019 annual meetings of stockholders, our stockholders once again defeated proposals very similar to the current proposal, which sought to give holders of 10% of our capital stock the power to call a special meeting of stockholders.
We are committed to regular stockholder engagement and strong and effective corporate governance policies that provide sufficient avenues for stockholders to meaningfully engage in Company affairs.
Amphenol regularly engages with key stockholders to discuss, among other items, governance issues to ensure that management and the Board understand and address issues that are important to the Company's stockholders. Our existing governance policies provide stockholders with numerous avenues to address and discuss our business and governance policies with the Board, and demonstrate our responsiveness and willingness to engage with stockholders and provide them with a meaningful voice.
Based on stockholder feedback over the past years, the Board has approved amendments to the Company's By-Laws that, among other things:
These corporate governance policies provide our stockholders with many opportunities to be heard and to engage directly with the Board.
We believe our Board of Directors functions most effectively when comprised of a diverse set of members, including a healthy mix of short-, mid- and long-serving members. To that end, the Board is committed to a policy of regular refreshment. During the last 36 months, we have added three new independent members to our Board. We also note that one of our long-serving directors retired in 2016 and two of our long-serving directors retired in 2019.
In light of the existing opportunities for stockholder engagement, including the Existing Special Meeting Right, the Board believes that the adoption of this proposal will not make a meaningful difference in our stockholders' ability to engage with the Board or influence Amphenol's business or governance policies.
For the above reasons, the Board has determined that it isnot in the best interests of Amphenol or its stockholders to adopt this proposal. Doing so is unnecessary in light of Amphenol's Existing Special Meeting Right, which allows stockholders who own at least 25% of our capital stock to call a special meeting of stockholders.
For these reasons, the BoardUNANIMOUSLY urges stockholders to voteAGAINST the proposal to decrease the stockholder threshold to call a special meeting of stockholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST PROPOSAL 4.
58
At the date of this proxy statement, the Company knows of no business that will be brought before the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders other than the matters set forth above. However, if any further business properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy will vote them in accordance with their discretion and judgment on such matters.
The Company has herewith and/or heretofore provided each stockholder whose proxy is being solicited hereby, a copy of the Company's 2019 Annual Report, including financial statements. Written requests for additional copies should be directed to: Controller, Amphenol Corporation, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492. The Company's 2019 Annual Report, including financial statements, is also available from the Company's website at www.amphenol.com by clicking on "Investors", then "Financial Information" and then "Annual Reports".
If you need directions to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, please call 203-265-8606.
PLEASE DATE AND SIGN THE PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED
REPLY ENVELOPE ON WHICH NO POSTAGE NEED BE AFFIXED IF MAILED
IN THE UNITED STATES.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Lance E. D'Amico
Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
April 13, 2020
59
Notice of Annual Meeting
and
Proxy Statement
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, May 20, 2020
IMPORTANT: Your proxy is enclosed. Please fill in, date, sign and return your proxy promptly in the enclosed stamped envelope whether or not you plan to be present at the meeting. You may still vote in person if you attend the meeting.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders Meeting to be Held on May 20, 2020: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 are available atwww.edocumentview.com/APH.
MMMMMMMMMMMM Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q + 1. Election of Eight Directors: For Against Abstain For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 01 - Stanley L. Clark 04 - Edward G. Jepsen 07 - R. Adam Norwitt 02 - John D. Craig 05 - Robert A. Livingston 08 - Anne Clarke Wolff 03 - David P. Falck 06 - Martin H. Loeffler For Against Abstain 2. Ratification of Selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Accountants of the Company The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 4. For Against Abstain 4. Stockholder Proposal: Make Shareholder Right to Call Special Meeting More Accessible 3. Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation of Named Executive Officers NOTE: SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF. Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. + 1 U P X 4 5 1 3 6 2 038NXC MMMMMMMMM B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 2020 Annual Meeting Proxy Card
q IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — May 20, 2020 The undersigned, revoking previous proxies as relating to these shares, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated April 13, 2020 in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at 11:00 a.m. on May 20, 2020 at the World Headquarters of the Company, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492 and hereby appoints R. Adam Norwitt, Craig A. Lampo and Lance E. D'Amico, and each of them (with full power to act alone), the attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with power of substitution to each, to vote all shares of the Class A Common Stock of AMPHENOL CORPORATION (the “Company”) registered in the name provided herein which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would have if personally present, including discretionary authority to vote on any matters properly presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. Without limiting the general authorization hereby given, said proxies are, and each of them is, instructed to vote or act as follows on the proposals set forth in said Proxy Statement. SEE REVERSE SIDE. If you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations, just sign on the reverse side. You need not mark any boxes. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) AMPHENOL CORPORATION