agreement, the same 60% recovery ratio will apply to the remaining TKM costs, net of a previously agreed to disallowance. For Woolsey, SCE also proposed a process to recover claims paid after the date the application was filed. The best estimate of total losses remained unchanged this quarter as additional settlements have been in line with expectations.
Turning to EPS guidance, page 12 shows our 2024 core EPS guidance and modeling considerations. We are pleased with our very strong year-to-date performance, which also gives us the opportunity to continue pulling forward O&M for the benefit of customers. With nine months of results behind us and based on our outlook for the remainder of the year, we are very comfortable with narrowing our EPS guidance to $4.80 to $5.00.
Turning to page 13, we have refreshed the modeling considerations for 2025. I’ll note a couple of items. First, we’ve updated rate base EPS to reflect the CPUC decision on cost of capital that Pedro mentioned. Secondly, continuing the trend, we see favorable cost management flexibility, driven by the pace of O&M reinvestment and financing benefits. Lastly, I want to emphasize that we have not incorporated the benefits from the TKM settlement agreement into this refresh, which would be incremental to our forecasts.
I will now discuss the plan for updating our guidance and long-term outlook. At a macro level, let me note that the moderating interest rate environment removes a financing headwind we have faced in recent years. Additionally, cost recovery in the legacy wildfire proceedings provides a tailwind. Looking at our core operations, SCE’s GRC is the driver for our high-quality earnings growth. As Pedro mentioned, we are hoping to see a CPUC decision in the first half of next year. Once SCE gets a final decision from the CPUC on the GRC, we will update our capital plan, financing plan, 2025 EPS guidance, and EPS growth forecast, factoring in the TKM settlement.
So, what gives us confidence in achieving our 2025 core EPS guidance of $5.50 to $5.90 and growing earnings by 5 to 7% through 2028? There are two key factors. First is the strength of SCE’s GRC and progress throughout the proceeding. SCE made a strong case and even based on intervenors’ positions SCE’s rate base growth would still be in line with its range case