Tractor Supply (TSCO) SDConflict minerals disclosure

Conflict Minerals Report

For the reporting period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023

Introduction

This Conflict Minerals Report (“CMR”) of Tractor Supply Company (the “Company” or “Tractor Supply” or “we” or “our” or “us”) has been prepared pursuant to Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Conflict Minerals Rule”) for the reporting period January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. The purpose of this CMR is to describe the measures the Company has taken to exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of any columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite, or their derivatives, which are currently limited to tantalum, tin, and tungsten (collectively and together with gold, the “3TG Minerals”), related to certain products that the Company contracts to be manufactured.

Applicability of the Conflict Minerals Rule to Tractor Supply Company

The Company does not manufacture any of the products that it sells. A significant portion of the Company’s sales are from national brand merchandise. Our exclusive brand products represented approximately 29% of the Company’s fiscal 2023 net sales. The Company is subject to the requirements of the Conflict Minerals Rule because of the degree of influence that it exercises over the materials, parts, ingredients, or components that make up some of its exclusive brand products that contain necessary 3TG Minerals. However, for a portion of the Company’s exclusive brand products, it exercises no or minimal influence over the materials, parts, ingredients, or components of the products. Due to this minimal influence, the Conflict Minerals Rule does not require the Company to include those products and the related vendors in its conflict minerals disclosures. Since the Company contracts to manufacture certain exclusive brand products for which the 3TG Minerals are necessary to the functionality or production (the “Covered Products”), the Company has prepared and has filed this CMR and a Specialized Disclosure Report (“Form SD”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As 3TG Minerals are necessary to the Covered Products, the Company is committed to tracing the origin of the 3TG Minerals to ensure its sourcing practices do not support conflict or human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”) or an adjoining country.

The Company does not do any direct business with any smelters or refiners of 3TG Minerals, so it has limited influence over them. As a “downstream” company (which means a company between the consumer and the suppliers that interact directly or indirectly with the smelter or refiner), the Company must rely on its vendors to provide accurate, reliable information about 3TG Minerals in its supply chain and rely on industry efforts to influence smelters and refiners. The Company also believes that, in most cases, it is several or more vendor tiers removed from the smelters and refiners of 3TG Minerals used in its products. In addition, most of the vendors for the Company’s exclusive brand products are private companies, which are not otherwise required to comply with the Conflict Minerals Rule.

This CMR relates to the Company’s Covered Products during calendar year 2023. While the Company does not manufacture any of the products that it sells, we do have some degree of influence over the materials, parts, ingredients, or components that make up some of our exclusive brand products. Our due diligence included vendors of exclusively branded products, where we have influence over the manufacturing, which are primarily import vendors.

The major product categories listed below are the same five categories that we use for purposes of our periodic reports filed with the SEC that cover all of the products that we sell. While only a portion of the products that we

sell are exclusive brand products, they are spread across all of our major product categories. Our major product categories are:

To implement the RCOI, the Company’s suppliers that were identified as in-scope for conflict minerals regulatory purposes because they supplied materials or components that are necessary to the functionality or production of a product contracted by the Company to be manufactured were engaged to collect information regarding the presence and sourcing of 3TG Minerals used in the products supplied to the Company. Information was collected and stored using an online platform provided by a third-party vendor, Source Intelligence (the “Service Provider”).

The Company engaged its suppliers in this process through the following steps:

There was an escalation process for suppliers who continued to be non-responsive after the above contacts were made. The program utilized the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template as developed by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (the “RMI”) for data collection.

Supplier responses were evaluated for plausibility, consistency, and gaps both in terms of which products were stated to contain or not contain necessary 3TG Minerals, as well as the origin of those materials. Follow up was conducted with additional supplier contacts to address issues including implausible statements regarding no presence of 3TG Minerals, incomplete data on the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template, responses that did not identify smelters or refiners, responses which indicated sourcing location without complete supporting information from the supply chain, and organizations that were identified as smelters or refiners, but not verified as such through further analysis and research.

A total of 205 suppliers were identified as in-scope for conflict mineral regulatory purposes, and they were contacted as part of the RCOI process. The survey response rate among these suppliers was 100%. Of these responding suppliers, 3% responded “yes” as to having one or more of the 3TG Minerals as necessary to the functionality or production of the products they supply to the Company.

Our due diligence measures have been designed to conform, in all material respects, to the internationally recognized due diligence framework provided by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s

In this section, we provide a non-exhaustive description of the due diligence measures we took for 2023 pursuant to our 3TG Minerals compliance program, our Conflict Minerals Policy, the Conflict Minerals Rule and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.

The Company has an internal team of employees responsible for maintaining the compliance program, comprised of team members in accounting, internal audit, quality assurance, legal, and investor relations. The leadership of the Company received periodic updates regarding our 3TG Minerals compliance program.

The internal team has been trained on the Conflict Minerals Rule and our 3TG Minerals compliance program. Other team members within the Company are also informed about the Conflict Minerals Rule and our Conflict Minerals Policy. We supplemented our internal compliance team with outside professionals. We engaged our Service Provider to collect and aggregate data from vendors to complement our own internal management processes.

We used the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template to obtain information from our vendors concerning the sources of the 3TG Minerals used by them and other information concerning their compliance activities.

The Service Provider, on our behalf, sent communications to our vendors of Covered Products concerning the requirements of the Conflict Minerals Rule and our 3TG Minerals compliance program, including instructions on how to complete the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template. Through the Service Provider, vendors were also offered access to a vendor education portal, including e-mail addresses and telephone numbers for questions and guidance for responding to our information requests.

We decided to send the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template to each of our Covered Product vendors. We identified these Covered Products through a process involving our internal product development team and input from our Service Provider based on its experience with other retailers and other industries.

The Service Provider sent reminders to each non-responsive vendor requesting that they register with the Service Provider’s system and complete our Conflict Minerals Reporting Template. If a vendor continued to be non-responsive, the Service Provider was required to notify us. Our personnel followed up with the non-responsive vendors requesting the vendor’s participation.

If a vendor who used 3TG Minerals in its manufacturing process did not identify the smelters or refiners of 3TG Minerals in its Conflict Minerals Reporting Template, the Service Provider attempted to obtain information about the suppliers of 3TG Minerals for the vendor’s products by making inquiries of the vendor’s identified suppliers. Follow-up inquiries were made by the Service Provider to vendors to address other incomplete responses or where vendors indicated sources of their 3TG Minerals that were unknown to the Service Provider.

If an entity identified as a smelter or refiner by a vendor was confirmed by the Service Provider to be a smelter or refiner, the Service Provider examined whether the smelter or refiner was certified as conflict free by the RMI, the London Bullion Market Association (the “LBMA”) or the Responsible Jewellery Council (the “RJC”). If the identified smelter or refiner was not certified by one of these independent third-parties, the Service Provider attempted to directly contact the smelter or refiner to gain more information about its sourcing practices.

Summaries of vendor responses were provided to the Company. Under our internal procedures, if a vendor response indicates that a product we contracted to manufacture contained 3TG Minerals from the DRC or an adjoining country that was not verified by an independent third-party as coming from a conflict free smelter or refiner, the Company will be notified and the vendor contacted. The Company will take appropriate actions to transition the 3TG Minerals in the product to a source coming from outside of the DRC or an adjoining country or to a vendor having been verified by an independent third-party as a conformant smelter or refiner. We will track any future violations of our policy by the vendor who supplied the identified product and stop doing business with the vendor if it is unwilling or unable to comply with our policy. Based on vendor responses for 2023, no such notifications were made under these procedures.

In connection with our due diligence, we used information made available by the RMI, LBMA, and RJC concerning their independent third-party audits of smelters and refiners, but did not, and were not required to, obtain our own independent private sector audit of this CMR.

We do not do any direct business with any smelters or refiners of 3TG Minerals, so we have limited influence over them. As a “downstream” company (which means a company between the smelter or refiner and the consumer), we must rely on our vendors to provide accurate, reliable information about 3TG Minerals in our supply chain and rely on industry efforts to influence smelters and refiners. We also believe that, in most cases, we are several or more vendor tiers removed from the smelters and refiners of 3TG Minerals used in our products. In addition, most of the vendors for our Covered Products are private companies, which are not otherwise required to comply with the Conflict Minerals Rule.

We requested each of our “upstream” suppliers of Covered Products to complete the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template to identify the smelters and refiners it used with respect to its 3TG Minerals and associated countries of origin. Based on the information that was provided by our suppliers and otherwise obtained through the due diligence process, we believe that, to the extent reasonably determinable by the Company, the facilities that were used to process the 3TG Minerals contained in our Covered Products included the smelters and refiners listed below:

“Conformant” means that a smelter or refiner has been audited by an independent third-party and has been determined to be in compliance with the Responsible Mineral Assurance Process (“RMAP”) standards as established by the RMI. Conformant status also applies to smelters or refiners for which a re-audit is currently in process. Those smelters or refiners that are currently under re-audit were found to be conformant in their most recent audit cycle.

In connection with our due diligence, seven unique smelters and refiners were identified by our vendors of Covered Products as being part of the vendors’ supply chains during 2023. All smelters and refiners have been determined to be conformant. Smelters and refiners were not necessarily conformant for all or part of 2023 and may not continue to be conformant for any future period.

All of the smelter and refiner information was furnished to us by vendors based on the specific products supplied to us. Only products that we contract to manufacture that contain 3TG Minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of the products are subject to disclosure under the Conflict Minerals Rule. The certification status of the conflict free smelters and refiners noted above is based solely on the status as made publicly available by the RMI, LBMA, or RJC, without independent verification by us.

Although we do not have sufficient information to conclusively determine the countries of origin of the 3TG Minerals in our products, the identified countries of origin of the 3TG Minerals processed by the smelters and refiners listed in the table above may have included the countries listed in the table below. The listed countries of origin are derived from information provided by vendors or through the outreach, review of information, and additional research conducted by the Service Provider.

In addition, some of the listed smelters and refiners may have processed 3TG Minerals originating in whole or in part from recycled or scrap sources.

This Conflict Minerals Report contains forward-looking statements, which are based on our current assumptions and expectations. These statements are typically accompanied by the words “expect,” “may,” “could,” “believe,” “would,” “might,” “anticipates,” or words of similar importance. The principal forward-looking statements in this report include our expected refinements to our 3TG Minerals compliance program.