Contingencies | Contingencies Highway products litigation We previously reported the filing of a False Claims Act (“FCA”) complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (“District Court”) styled Joshua Harman, on behalf of the United States of America, Plaintiff/Relator v. Trinity Industries, Inc., Defendant , Case No. 2:12-cv-00089-JRG (E.D. Tex.). In this case, in which the U.S. Government declined to intervene, the relator, Mr. Joshua Harman, alleged the Company violated the FCA pertaining to sales of the ET Plus. On October 20, 2014, a trial in this case concluded with a jury verdict stating that the Company and THP “knowingly made, used or caused to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim," and the District Court entered judgment on the verdict in the total amount of $682.4 million. On September 29, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit") reversed the District Court’s $682.4 million judgment and rendered judgment as a matter of law in favor of the Company and THP. On January 7, 2019, the United States Supreme Court denied Mr. Harman's petition for certiorari seeking review of the Fifth Circuit's decision. The denial of Mr. Harman's petition ended this action. Pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement related to the sale of THP, the Company agreed to indemnify Rush Hour for certain liabilities related to the highway products business, including those liabilities resulting from or arising out of (a) the proceedings set forth under “State actions” below and (b) any other proceedings to the extent resulting from or arising out of ET Plus systems or specified ET Plus component parts that were both (i) manufactured prior to December 31, 2021, and (ii) sold in the United States on or prior to April 30, 2022, or related warranty obligations with respect thereto. State actions Mr. Harman has a separate state qui tam action currently pending pursuant to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act ("VFATA") ( Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Joshua M. Harman v. Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Highway Products, LLC , Case No. CL13-698, in the Circuit Court, Richmond, Virginia). In this matter, Mr. Harman alleged the Company violated the VFATA pertaining to sales of the ET Plus, and he is seeking damages, civil penalties, attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest. The Commonwealth of Virginia Attorney General has intervened in the Virginia matter. On February 7, 2024, the trial court granted the Company's motion for summary judgment and ordered that the trial dates and hearing dates in this matter be removed from the court's docket. On July 11, 2024, the trial court denied the Commonwealth of Virginia’s motion for reconsideration of the order granting the Company’s motion for summary judgment. In a similar New Jersey state qui tam action ( State of New Jersey ex rel. Joshua M. Harman v. Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Highway Products, LLC , Case No.L-1344-14, in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division: Mercer County) that was previously dismissed by the trial court, Mr. Harman sought leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to the New Jersey False Claims Act. On February 16, 2022, the trial court denied Mr. Harman’s motion. On March 9, 2022, Mr. Harman filed a motion for reconsideration of the trial court’s order denying leave to file an amended complaint. On June 27, 2022, the trial court denied Mr. Harman’s motion for reconsideration seeking leave to file an amended complaint with prejudice. On August 9, 2022, Mr. Harman filed a Notice of Appeal of the trial court's order denying Mr. Harman's motion for reconsideration. Mr. Harman's appeal remains pending. The Company believes that it has substantial defenses in these matters and intends to vigorously defend against all allegations. Based on information currently available to the Company and previously disclosed, we currently do not believe that a loss is probable in the state qui tam actions described under "State actions," therefore no accrual has been included in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. Because of the complexity of these actions, as well as the current status of certain of these actions, we are not able to estimate a range of possible losses with respect to any one or more of these actions. While the financial impacts of these state actions are currently unknown, they could be material. Product liability cases The Company is currently defending product liability lawsuits that are alleged to involve the ET Plus as well as other products manufactured by THP. These cases are diverse in light of the randomness of collisions in general and the fact that each accident involving a roadside device, such as an end terminal, or any other fixed object along the highway, has its own unique facts and circumstances. The Company carries general liability insurance to mitigate the impact of adverse judgment exposures in these product liability cases. To the extent that the Company believes that a loss is probable with respect to these product liability cases, the accrual for such losses is included in the amounts described below under "Other matters". East Palestine, OH Train Derailment On February 3, 2023, a Norfolk Southern Railway freight train derailed 38 railcars in East Palestine, Ohio. In March 2023, the State of Ohio and the United States Environmental Protection Agency filed lawsuits against Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation (“Norfolk Southern”), which were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division in a civil action styled The State of Ohio, ex rel., Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, and the United States of America, Plaintiffs v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation, Defendants , Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-00517. In this action, on June 30, 2023, Norfolk Southern filed a third-party complaint against the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, TILC. Norfolk Southern also named as third-party defendants in this action Oxy Vinyls LP, GATX Corporation, General American Marks Company, SMBC Rail Services LLC, Dow Chemical Incorporated, and Union Tank Car Company. Norfolk Southern asserts third-party claims against TILC for recovery of response costs, contribution, and declaratory relief under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"); negligence; and equitable contribution. TILC was the owner of one tank car cited in this action, which was leased to a third party, who is also a third-party defendant in the litigation. On September 15, 2023, TILC filed a motion to dismiss Norfolk Southern’s third-party complaint. On March 6, 2024, the trial court granted TILC’s motion to dismiss Norfolk Southern’s Third-Party Complaint and entered an order dismissing Norfolk Southern’s complaint against TILC. On March 26, 2024, Norfolk Southern filed a Motion for Entry of Partial Final Judgment, which remains pending. In April 2023, multiple putative class action lawsuits filed against Norfolk Southern were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division in a civil action styled In re: East Palestine Train Derailment , Civil Action No. 4:23-CV-00242 ("Consolidated Class Action"). In this action, on July 25, 2023, Norfolk Southern filed a third-party complaint against the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, TILC. Norfolk Southern also named as third-party defendants in this action Oxy Vinyls LP, GATX Corporation, and General American Marks Company. Norfolk Southern asserts third-party claims against TILC for negligence, joint and several liability, and contribution. On August 14, 2023, plaintiffs filed a First Amended Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint and Jury Demand (“First Amended Complaint”) asserting direct claims for negligence, gross negligence, and medical monitoring against Oxy Vinyls LP, GATX Corporation, General American Marks Company, and TILC ("Railcar Defendants"). TILC was the owner of one tank car cited in this action, which was leased to a third party, who is also a third-party defendant in the litigation. On September 15, 2023, TILC filed a motion to dismiss Norfolk Southern’s third-party complaint, and on September 26, 2023, TILC filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. On March 13, 2024, the trial court granted in part and denied in part TILC’s motion to dismiss Norfolk Southern’s third-party complaint and TILC’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. On April 9, 2024, plaintiffs and Norfolk Southern announced a settlement in principle of plaintiffs’ claims against Norfolk Southern and the Railcar Defendants. Norfolk Southern preserved its third-party claims against the Railcar Defendants. The proposed settlement is subject to the court’s approval. On May 22, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice Norfolk Southern’s third-party claims against TILC (the “Dismissal Motion”). On June 3, 2024, the court entered an order granting the Dismissal Motion (the “Dismissal Order”). The Dismissal Order dismisses, with prejudice, all of Norfolk Southern’s claims against TILC, including claims for negligence and contribution. On December 8, 2023, a lawsuit was filed against TILC titled Ambridge Area School District et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al. , Case No. 2:23-cv-01530-CB, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs in this putative class action lawsuit assert claims against Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Oxy Vinyls, LP, GATX Corporation, General American Marks Company, and TILC for negligence, negligence per se, strict liability, public and private nuisance, future health monitoring, trespass, and punitive damages. On February 23, 2024, TILC filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint, which remains pending. TILC was the owner of one tank car cited in this action, which was leased to a third party, who is also a defendant in the litigation. On March 8, 2024, a lawsuit was filed against TILC titled Patricia Almasy et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al. , Case No. 4:24-cv-00452, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (“Almasy Lawsuit”). Plaintiffs assert claims against Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Oxy Vinyls, LP, GATX Corporation, General American Marks Company, and TILC. Plaintiffs assert claims against TILC for negligence, gross negligence, future health monitoring, and willful and wanton conduct. TILC was the owner of one tank car cited in this action, which was leased to a third party, who is also a defendant in this lawsuit. On March 13, 2024, this lawsuit was consolidated into the Consolidated Class Action lawsuit. The Company believes it has substantial defenses and intends to vigorously defend itself against all allegations in the third-party and direct claims asserted against TILC. The Company or its subsidiaries could be named in similar litigation involving other plaintiffs, but the ultimate number of claims and the jurisdiction(s) in which such claims, if any, may be filed may vary. We do not believe at this time that a loss is probable in these matters, nor can a range of possible losses be determined. Accordingly, no accrual or range of loss has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company maintains liability insurance coverage and commercial contractual indemnity rights to protect the Company’s assets from losses arising from these types of litigation claims. Other matters The Company is involved in claims and lawsuits incidental to our business arising from various matters, including product warranty, personal injury, environmental issues, workplace laws, and various governmental regulations. The Company evaluates its exposure to such claims and suits periodically and establishes accruals for these contingencies when a range of loss can be reasonably estimated. The range of reasonably possible losses for such matters is $7.5 million to $19.0 million. This range includes any amounts related to the Highway Products litigation matters described above in the section titled “Highway products litigation." At June 30, 2024, total accruals of $8.5 million, including environmental and workplace matters described below, are included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company believes any additional liability would not be material to its financial position or results of operations. Trinity is subject to remedial orders and federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment and the workplace. The Company has reserved $1.3 million to cover our probable and estimable liabilities with respect to the investigations, assessments, and remedial responses to such matters, taking into account currently available information and our contractual rights to indemnification and recourse to third parties. However, estimates of liability arising from future proceedings, assessments, or remediation are inherently imprecise. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will not become involved in future litigation or other proceedings involving the environment and the workplace or, if we are found to be responsible or liable in any such litigation or proceeding, that such costs would not be material to the Company. We believe that we are currently in substantial compliance with environmental and workplace laws and regulations. Georgia Fire On January 16, 2024, a fire damaged a portion of the Company's facility in Cartersville, Georgia. We have incurred costs related to cleanup and damage remediation activities in order for the facility to resume limited operations, and we expect to return to normal production levels in the second half of 2024. We believe our insurance coverage is sufficient to cover property damage costs related to the event. To date, we have received advanced payments from insurance of approximately $1.5 million for cleanup and damage remediation activities. Additionally, at March 31, 2024, we recorded an insurance receivable of approximately $1.0 million for property damage recoveries that we have concluded are probable of collection, which remains outstanding at June 30, 2024. Any property damage insurance proceeds received in excess of the net book value of property lost and related cleanup costs will be accounted for as a gain. Additionally, the Company may be entitled to business interruption proceeds related to the event. We will not record these recoveries until settlements have been reached with the insurance company. |