thank and Tim, audience. participating Thanks, you to our
neuro-oncology with Following the together efforts are expanded our specifically, central Mike's help or known topic, involve spinal that of introduction system, cancers the discuss we brain strategy, cord, nervous the to our and as to and CNS. patients delighted
a intracranial for standard to tumor new cell in of Biocept's using Our establish is fluid care quantitative CSF. of metastasis diagnosis or goal cerebrospinal suspected the assay
a working is need are for We of our unmet nervous patients are monitoring expectancy inaccurate tools involvement treatment diagnostic diagnostic These cancer as patients early not This inadequate central intervention. an have and is often not response therapeutic as low, brain many these of manner. system. new timely recognized tests. standard care tumor with medical with also establish in response are involving to current therapy and the of on patients enough for survival for to area in time assessing CSF high do Overall a waste assay determining metastasis
targeted amazing of improvements for Similar Survival several and for and melanoma often metastasis their therapeutic of However, seen other for have quality with is post-treatment these survival improving a therapies newer year more, use patients substantially in resolving been cancer with advances. the extend years and or some intracranial possible breast tumors. lung can solid symptoms life. now
diagnostic by cytology. a of involvement CSF microscopic standard of central diagnosing This the nervous common is cerebrospinal As Mike known as procedure pathologist. care current fluid evaluation system the mentioned, for is
limited limited tap in cytology metastasis forcing brain to has attempt puncture to repeated due for sensitivity diagnosis. sometimes or CSF confirm negative make method cellularity, indeterminate can often lumbar However, spinal show to the and an is imprecise. detecting procedures oncologists false This or results
cancer molecular help in a about presence cytology negative information choices. as typically absence indeterminate biomarkers or can reported to therapy of for CSF is no positive, that qualitative additional make the Additionally, with better fashion, be or cells, used provided
care. is attempted National widely Network, imperfect as inadequacy, standard Comprehensive establish is involvement times NCCN, up recommending to tool and CSF X Current from CSF As such, a that the when suspected. of recognized has cytology clinical system cytology central oncology diagnosis clinical be to as significant reflected guidelines or Cancer an a nervous diagnostic limitations care
cerebrospinal intracranial showing metastasis. indications Is Our these physicians, there unmet quantitative and key treatment tumor there directing consider And this assay. cell for of care detection addresses the fluid with assay response suspected X failure? in questions need Let's Is trend our target addresses of a X treatment patients a clinical tumor? treatment? there use or for for is
XX%. in radiologically. First, pilot of spinal only the need and patients punctures membranous suspected tumor? the necessary of make -- difficult involving this or is a cytology lung study our was of that performance, observed there lumbar CSF the cancer identify be for may cord an of following the our repeat same XX% diagnosis with CSF the Data assay which with leptomeningeal, rate involvement to positive rate In from and cytology XX% that the group, brain indeterminate intracranial could positive a are cancer avoid showed of With linings clinically CSF showed assay to patient alone. metastasis
treatment? there molecular actionable assay identify Our is can target targets inform clinical biomarker a Second, that for CSF decisions.
impractical limited the there Radiologic treatment, can better with metastatic central reduction of early MRI marked therapies, is to before, assay mentioned provided such quantitative can have to significantly CSF in other several even perform per mobility cross and significantly are the longer few have dark been can frequently, used advances about biomarkers identify and due neurologic treated such sensitive. trends informing cell molecular cell patients contrast, changes few as question loss. a be leaving by just as Timely Such marked no methods cells oncologists are nausea, lead answered, As confirmation response collaboration barrier. the In early conventional cells leading in CSF imaging treating or from oncologists response. care selection in many decisions we response. system our patients nervous indicating additional And and impaired As sample are similarly particularly with mentioned, In observed is the neuro therapy ranging in oncologist or system living count some tens of central headaches, not appropriate of a in these in nervous therapy involving cancer who symptoms be survival the by targeted which third cytology thousands to trend treatment, weeks vision to and extremely to with before tumor over is or treatment a long CSF of targeted counts, new involvement responses very imprecise radiologic blood-brain therapies. with the of therapy of imaging and now to observed failure? performed. patients,
not potential cell informative. counts have to responses was cytology observed when observed treatment even CSF treatment several CSF of oncologists contrast, and also CSF with assay In of resistance. oncologists, when disease durable drug counts been breast have this the oncologists. thoracic cell our months, identifying We progression clients lasting repeated for more demonstrating declining increasing The value quickly and or current are assay discontinued, is neuro
many becoming We CSF have institutions users. substantial frequent pleased have two these country dozen ordered interest experts. the are assay Physicians to from academic across gained leading our among nearly repeat already
be clinical neuro of these we assay year our volume oncologists anticipate current involving Our many breast this experience. but a throughout XXXX, oncology building our a CSF institutions. at of initiatives our pivotal and gains growing continued Among leading trial lung adopter and represents early and the small oncologists on initiation larger portion will business,
We include biomarkers. expand are menu our more more and testing working tumor to types CSF to
our of guidelines publications help involving goal, achieve leaders have Our institutions, XXXX. C the steering former national that pivotal longitudinal major as this Northwestern our standard system. clinical development have cancers Institute nervous is us diagnosing Santa care primary With Institute central University, or goal to by influence mind, and for goal dozens we this care created to key produce University guide To a clinical establish CSF intended Cancer assay in designed a neuro metastatic Penn oncology to new we studies the the Monica help from Four State opinion study. Cancer University, in St. committee with including oncologists academic John of John's study, and spoken of and oncologists monitoring Wayne and Stanford
We response patients trial related our test trials pharma to in also working the are monitor will involved least to other and use develop major neuro-oncology therapy multi institutional X that post be of other with academic help clinical assess of at excellence establish centers treatment. and
study, The the clinical observational performance anticipate predict longitudinal and cytology cancer we with a outcomes. trial CSF lung our comparing breast Our in forward. tumor large-scale intracranial with non-small cancer in registry will imaging we metastasis to as cell suspected include and indications evaluating metastasis suspected first concurrent other is adding and study of with C patients move types Four the patients patients initially, assay
to to We patients first to enroll X-year following XX span expect year XXX a patients and in XXX up each patient over the longitudinally.
clinical development as early their FDA's to opportunity offers Food We also FDA the milestones review up breakthrough file trial provides topics and concern reached. the or to patient clinical with access design creates X-year in clinical enhancing developing in with improved months. designation to FDA, address data. With medical I FDA device to with timely that to partner via This efficiently also review next the to for oncology clinical devices potential that, use patients will it a for of providers of assessment and companies our Nall. supporting Biocept and are phase, by review. give our designation within its interact generate and trial reimbursement Drug the plans next experts during the value by planning has the metastases, speeding the healthcare to and Medicare are call few potential It of treatment pharma year. and Administration, trial drugs novel designation manufacturers allows the an are our back If accelerated This ability granted, trial the and high-value this timeline designation data for for CEO, brain will Mike turn coverage of