we JAK body This the cancers. myelofibrosis the pelabresib, of that for heart. other and patients forward. we standard-of-care that have drive dedicated symptom may rather may are the most a affect of far potential and of am and Thank includes but bringing have only XX% their innovative work on in currently, I late-stage company's cause my of enhance myelofibrosis. pipeline. of the I to disease with with I'm pipeline make, pelabresib BET be as to medicines lose for experts never addressing and each disease. career treatment by What team cellular modification. patients approach. its is by adequately the true this being difficult-to-treat the with patients being this discovery treatment network very sight of our is. to living for on hope. treatment drew training investigated excited myelofibrosis, We suggests thus Starting our history side with the than you, first-line of Jean. is to have developer do cancer a was Today, current patients. potential inhibitor and standard-of-care direct the defects thereby change treated the here cancer how I findings myelofibrosis physician devastating first-line Because And inhibition, accomplished the and urgent some data myelofibrosis MorphoSys with seen pelabresib myelofibrosis. to families waiting for promising The our presented to me important in trajectory of patients a relief the root focuses
within physician the deal excitement about a community. there's result, pelabresib enthusiasm a and of great As
II track progressing Our Phase X and on trial well. MANIFEST is
continue across we to the will half data We committed of are patient reporting drive to in recruitment and first topline XXXX. geographies
plus relapsed that were the patients Moving five tafasitamab long-term treatment DLBCL This results L-MIND with who or presented on at tafasitamab, our from two In refractory targeting ongoing who study, for on or also immunotherapy. years to tafasitamab by were CDXX lenalidomide in more. for showing patients least six monotherapy treated provided September, we followed years. included efficacy
that We this from Additionally, therapy showed the with of the adverse after of events their therapies them that provides patients results the hear with declined confidence response monotherapy. discussing from combination to durability when frequency patients. transition oncologists
XX% the do these are treatment to standard-of-care work the make for does lymphoma. patients. the for as with By previously and for we and disease. of our lenalidomide as R-CHOP those types to not high-intermediate with untreated of DLBCL patients, Beyond have adding tafasitamab a DLBCL. in difference shop, approved potential currently we first-line believe about additional especially exploring well this is patients But tafasitamab patients for current high-risk we indication,
progressing Our have will we the Phase and X Society track Hematology and of year. well. December, tafasitamab we Annual XXXX are inMIND At on the studies, frontMIND data presented this early American in build Meeting on
supporting presented XX including that to and presentations, medical I data oral therapy sessions, this a data to-date. congress potential first-line have featured four in MorphoSys myelofibrosis Our for benefit will say most am proud pelabresib at DLBCL. tafasitamab of the and the in is new be
our from ongoing data will study. we X pelabresib, present For new Phase MANIFEST
safety weeks results combination ruxolitinib response We as pelabresib for of JAK-inhibitor-naive will well XX share highlighting as patients. beyond in durability with results in
evaluating and benefits results biomarker with release disease indicating or also clinical ruxolitinib. will changes, pelabresib following with combination modification, treatment in monotherapy We potential
will we DLBCL. release duration on diagnosed assessing Residual survival data data tafasitamab patients. with This rates, the in response first-line from patients of safety Disease progression-free plus tafasitamab rates in includes final and R-CHOP, lenalidomide and XX-month or Minimal the tafasitamab, study, of overall MRD-negative newly For in short update response
and also a surrogate outcomes We R-CHOP therapy with have of as and serve on presentations frontMIND after will DLBCL. lenalidomide MRD plus endpoint predictor negativity potential tafasitamab in
latest presentations better only to and showcase options solutions efforts. quality and of for committed These first-line potential treatment development are the more We out beyond. patients coming and helping focus research of science
designed let's to as Phase on investigational Last with Tulmimetostat. inhibitors and endometrial ASH meeting. as data. step study presented early next-generation was XXXX patients resulted a an Tulmimetostat as found longer life. encouraging we now well to patients with CPI-XXXX, details tolerated half first-generation unselected results and our and month, Slide to attention the important peripheral from potency, Symposium EZHX was referred longer more generally ongoing for at provides mid-stage ENA proof-of-concept are towards our lymphoma. to well to responses our Tulmimetostat and selected results in inhibitor. upon residence improve Now time on Tulmimetostat, also clinical These patients EZHX X/X turn with target increase known mesothelioma in ovarian in T-cell XX the be monotherapy demonstrating biomarker objective also cancer
Sung we for clinical data over call With over the very pipeline our a deliver the review the and new financials. to turn to now several potential, next are will I of that, We expect about years. excited