afternoon, Gil. you, United Good Thank morning, States. Europe. Good
we our are development in a So I’ll program. clinical give update you quick where
So control on advanced is a start strategy, And second-line of care which X irinotecan menu gentle standard or of pivotal this secondary course, the the is rate, could This be study is a without trial, usual and design. endpoint end two with eryaspase. survival. Slide generic naturally I’ll a [indiscernible] of III with As care come the status. The all And of is in safety, Stage rate, chemotherapy, irinotecan-based survival, age chemo Stage planned or of performance IV patients which points this receive big reminder a or you was just have quality standard life. number and response primary disease suspects is including with to enrolled progression, free overall it’s the good disease gemcitabine years of either a the of cancer. a randomized to chemotherapy the over XX The pancreatic study was abraxane such
biopsies collecting liquid analysis. We are extensive also and tissues biomarker for biomarker subsequent
are Hidalgo we studies the So in Manuel States. the the for think trials. almost I I is have we recruitment development probably best seen in doing one the Europe of two component PIs Professor, I’ve study of Pascal actually, to Hammel the the X, previous clinical XX number and for primary Slide have ever years, United Switching been European for and graphs and the this
of goals we trial. week almost week – this during our So life we were on really the met in
So of to and and a of progress year XXX months patients. target huge for enrollment a We patients last XXX sure. over-enrolled made back this we’ve we the total trial few past in the was size over enrolled December we completed slightly
was then of also IDMC we’ve the they reviews and to not those, Data but is Independent So three the And the month through the no recommended raise where the analysis, trial IDMC. safety which issues regarding and as safety. the without Committee was fourth were last last by gone where four any the first views raised also an did issues of plan, this Monitoring continue pure interim
So of the patients, than the continue of on beginning this that our we quarter the expect end will rather trial of quarter patient’s the first this that the results trial provide and still probably we to is patient fourth follow-up, that the quarter. at year, the continue of final
and of so X.XXX we have almost a an This hazard unmet need XX% certainly Just the study this trial the XXX with is medical be Phase that seen have design, patients, the in survival ratio that clearly overall to signal trial. in statistical hope that replicated power we this would quick in with improvement a disease. with of in detect X we a reminder
So to final you share results also you later as this mentioned the year. we ready are with
exciting a indication, gears switching one. also So to but different
developed the who in The who as clinical almost The the end asparagine a hypersensitivity reactions, of was reactions also arm trial lymphoblastic single across the well. countries. this X a Slide is patients patients XX the trial received investigator So group but and pharmacodynamic points additional XX, leukemia hypersensitivity pegylated NOPHO these the by primary included in sites prior Nordic endpoint conducted profile given the Phase acute this trial, with to Oncaspar. it’s was to number and asparaginase Baltic trial initiated the trial Nordic safety pharmacological have of
You which in may patients very XX last and was enrollment positive study ASH study August with nice you showing at of course, with really the in was completed presentation an that last that year was oral that December, presented results. of that the recall in study study again remember a total
trial. by the XX presented gears give conclusion investigators Slide then to number to switching it So this as leading the
importantly, the So days. excellent concentration the the activity to eryaspase study administration first the at met we all almost pharmacokinetic endpoint trough activity patients, was least primary its at of an the looking asparaginase with XX asparaginase for at primary and had endpoint
need you to evidence the trial. also additional Importantly, see in supporting
courses reactions be alternative patients trial to as This X and all randomized could population, prior this patients So almost treatment with asparaginase that with Safety to in in asparaginase. believe and with intended the in leukemia an attractive the and in acute to option lymphoblastic overall of this because in has that study receive used ALL. therapy evidence truncated could were important hypersensitivity potentially is lead patients shown able patient treatment. survival great asparaginase PIs inferior certainly Phase
that Slide treated approximately to estimate XX, action. them we this of is are number while an develop patients who hypersensitivity potential Moving important asparaginase ones will with indication. Basically,
and confirmed need FDA. constant been has is have dialogue FDA this certainly, unmet and with So this with the medical we
know you the facing As this approved you know, Erwinaze as several is the in over drug years. indication only past and supply been has Erwinaze shortage
So the replacement medical that raises being need unmet also the need challenge for an therapy. and a
investigator initiated asparaginase alternative whether patients based on be Europe. that that was We are now in trial evaluating eryaspase for can asparaginase, this these performed
United at support license FDA, in So whether States. we dialogue can the this application the have started with see
prepare whether update if We And months are we pre-BLA this the that will then quarter second in discussing we we a – we’ll will and will just some for in this indication hopefully the Once the to request the XXXX. expecting potential have this in Europe And also have particular in start BLA coming submission again, approaching in confirmed we of half in advice and potential of provide process approval. for second for Europe. you ongoing, CHMP filing for for Go/No-Go the meeting, year.
least approval which in trying trial trough NOPHO activity European It initiated similar the XX, again United So so reason this pharmacological platform in is across the concentration rather you purpose know this we’re concentration that point to was even or as going is through this The in trial. not Slide or the takes is asparaginase showing safety. investigator and than at XX% comparison, a population. that’s every in based why patient two importantly, here, on we the is really better similar, outcome a is our to Erwinaze is if whole that that here eryaspase, believe, number where previous size of trough have given was States me that to of proof-of-concept weeks. the – which But profile, and trial more make not but the and again, approval trial,
it would uses life. half otherwise for burden, asparaginase three of – of to which to short a days to every of so require a particularly come indications And shorter known the Erwinaze pediatric or makes the their receive all two or infrequent asparaginase another less we with have are
reasons to for that pieces really market. have jigsaw our case different the we clear our as ensure we So the path believe going a through that we these again, we will here. are are to have – of the approval, that guide And
proof-of-concept concludes the the It’s study. me at ALL the signal so And So that and number takes looking that in negative Slide that triple and trial to XX. again study objective disease a cancer. that therefore, switch basically gears And is – component control breast response is on detection to this rate. no must be to led see trial addition. measurable study in mutation BRCA advanced by cancer of to in and Patient, Awada a have it randomized The It’s Jules a effect European Professor is triple eryaspase with enrolling is they Bordet patients Belgium. the have negative to trial. breast disease asparaginase with able
provide Dr. eryaspase. receive this PK/PD. monitoring would without again with they trial expect care of response, a especially So of patients all standard ongoing to here, additional, results safety gemcitabine/carboplatin in and of trial. Enrollment to safety first-line conducted end led interest trial course, is adding again, the be Gil Noel. or by Marcus objective biomarkers tolerability one last in first looking again, is patients the and modify this and Georgetown, for, would of And quarter. investigator initiated which our towards we and the that this the is pancreatic this study, at of this being actually gears Then switch eryaspase the FOLFIRINOX mentioned with advanced time. cancer. in is And earlier And
they in this end standard the dose is the chemotherapy. naturally, point maximum So in with combination identifying primary tolerated
next first hope weeks. that will enrolls We cohort to start the running the pleased are the really cohort, coming the in and we trial in
well-tolerated that to far, dose. So believe that is trigger the the and we treatment next the escalation certainly would
I’ll update. to provide the on clinical and you. mic Thank updates will Eric to front, So finish the with this, the financial I the pass