Dr. Iman El-Hariry
Thank good Good Gil. morning, afternoon. you,
number abraxane the pivotal with study to or from again, approximately without start recall patients And XXX trial total survival, region at survival Phase randomizing was of second-line or Slide months contain conducted of of we looking generic the X, in was second-line with with X which irinotecan TRYbeCA-X setting, mainly The So a may eryaspase. fluoropyrimidine cancer, pancreatic six that key you in ratio X.X Onivyde. of X.XXX of two either was either chemo in endpoint that overall XFU or which primary months. either or as
at we you two from nominal ratio not arm. have for that we survival slide just as and the increase that a the that the can outcome noted but medical any months. have median baseline we ago, have is what of in the different what nine survival known this, Hazard the and at conference we met, characteristics, subsequent X.X sure for weeks robustness the of we're that two that terms be minimum the the found looked affected the fairs in have the far, not to in reported unfortunate looking see control which and was trial. factors from study Slide What have so compared primary that across in prognosis looked so treatment But months presented flaws X.XXX we at outcome, number will subgroups, outcome the we graphs confounding the of So, of we could seen not looked endpoint overall a strategies, primary X show X.XXX a
pre-planned Kaplan was number setting. eryaspase Slide eryaspase ratio and terms additional i.e. in was wanted the The check major what you survival have months, in improvement Belgium-based controlled was means Again, two with envisioned that treatment no there's there to with or at that patients and year fluoropyrimidine which subgroup. nominal part analysis, to Until overall in of the subgroups. received hazard we Moving X, -- again who irinotecan that irinotecan nominal an of seen is effect Abraxane any subgroup for can arm. that irinotecan/ compared the see you unprecedented interesting Meier, effect XFU we second-line improvement look XFU a the as also based improvement our the almost survival XXX eight in subgroups
nominal So, improvement indicators meet make XX, in did but did going a number efficacy we previously endpoints. not what significant. to Slide we indicated, to that clearly the strategy not ADS the subgroups saw enough any We statistically primary side additional with the again, -- not
can of subsequence actually were subdivision also well balanced survivors. as listed see the We well and which out bias clearly have as the characteristics,
we and toxicity tolerated, importantly the bands the of treatment see chemotherapy. backbone well generally was that So, not ADS enhanced also, did
data the a So, presenting we'll medical in conference. be
XX. So, Slide to going number
setting. We we it's the oncologist have, had communications sense And again, It would settings, need on consistency study, so nominal that And uncertainly look publically really series critical those it's feedbacks and with what the benchmark key hard, in you was essentially that survival in trial. the approve. attention options investigators in the seems this the factor patients. addition of of opinion to overall analysis GI decide very expected just leaders become at the have been based the second-line improvements, with in at in picking been and to a subsequent irinotecan/leucovorin the be results be the for to encouraging in the looking communicated of of trends a
that the look So, groups be there certainly in will into we to additional future. need
of For which insight full instance, the and give currently course, looking could potentially level of the are additional the an us results trial. of biomarkers activity we on understand the at output
ones. all the this about So, is typical
Slide investigator already in study line that at again dose the this our a was setting. we as using switching The goods eryaspase is trial gears dose expect identified is before. seal so, initiated just investigator to here And This communicated tolerated the program. maximum XX, are recap to in sponsored number a first
that the enrolling system to expand will subject And good news to patients study. in us. this up, the it So was currently is the for include
[indiscernible] original accepted would conferences for the be a and So we, be presentation. XXXX poster abstracts that general is to
So discuss XX. threaten switching to another gear to this is pancreatic disease negative again Slide on cancer be number
being know, in this patients you the recruiting background. is ongoing search As
just mentioned our minutes Gil own strategic ago what Given options. few about a
trial. patients the process We additional in of recruiting are hosting the in now
to half outcome so our the study to of some is time deficits this in report the plan XXXX. still, far will of that at be involved We in able first
which So just purposes patient then secure an gears for least is just again, action trial. to what the developed NOPHO-sponsored last data program, the hypothesis This Oncaspar. basis to that asparaginase, defeated. Efficiency switching to program the is to pegylated throw imitative prior this ALL us not And try have important but will definition. exposure
unmet be needs. to we're looking continues medical at patient So, this population, which
so, will analysis. And upcoming this for BLA a our to have we basis hope as
You course, that shortage. are newly know through time the as a two approved was an And, which in some which already ago. there the well approved few of approved Rylaze, supply is drugs always months ongoing as Erwinaze
that was daily. short the which And you we So also XXXX be was to why this and sustained study its presented, year very our go that's about may ASH durability. that excited for also tried activity last got and recall potential asparaginase
So submission Slide on me around I client supported final given XX mentioned based, to our for my sponsor get the as we be our by that BLA. the working the clock It programs. where would study are brings to NOPHO basically
would like as agency trials as that to at several well ALL, already have other We the see. trials
with communication have trial Fast-Track We meeting since we we had our the of pre-billing in sequentially the There continue have this agency year, took end started including to place designation. our which communication year. the and last
-- proposal indication. would chemotherapy So, patients if access who areas wise goes we our can have hypersensitivities -- for XXXX this will combination approval be patients to have developed proposed who with sometime asparaginase. get in everything our to we pegylated in hope in well hopefully in in The
decide Of course, agency this release to when up is always to proposal the our stage. to clinical
still agencies. having several are the communications with We
for button for got additional the hopefully from they BLA. FDA we once that able had, the to be press the we'll that information the So clearance
and transfer Operating our So, Soyer. I'll Financial Officer, I'll now stop here Chief to