scores, We're to novo The as Thank have fraction our Liver de of scores submitted those U.S. you, as the our request Francois. data MRI-PDFF Thermo UltraSound liver of System XX compared FDA liver fat Acoustic de submitted fat application part to in subjects. TAEUS known in extremely estimates same fraction as for the pleased also TAEUS. MRI to Enhanced subjects clinical novo known
only healthy, consistent with submitted U.S. data and UltraSound from obtained a was and fibrosis. at was excluded site and liver fatty fat the collected BMI because data severely which participants high XX, is liver is The where with of volunteers were our no normal of design BMI data study is The XX, ranging or to successfully. range fraction to significant from study severe was included liver that involved note disease. to study MRI normal the subjects subjects which It TAEUS, The obese.
highly scores approximately reference performance, liver the The specificity is XX%. sensitivity of R-value TAEUS of of with specificity cancer a To in TAEUS the detecting sensitivity with fraction fat X-ray fatty of mammography fraction MRI-PDFF X.XX. fat were breast correlated provide of system flip XX%. liver detecting estimates XX% of to was an liver XX% disease some of in with
sufficiently with correctly negative as it data in healthcare Negative de environment, of to of healthy with value, identify The an XX important a novo which a application. often as supports the it's measure identify cost We to our is being predictive constrained subjects important is submitted low predictive cost, because correctly correct, XX%. those performance value believe negative the disease. subjects is in probability test a was test the
differences to healthy individual with an disease. with estimating In flip an individual highly intra variability, this fraction operators were demonstrated liver very or fatty moderate fraction, difference an fat comparing additional submitted for a significant a individual disease study TAEUS data. found liver to system. of an This intra normal submit between fatty flip with liver with encouraging operator fat in either and in no liver the TAEUS happy the All statistical moderate operators system using individual extremely we're significant is statistically and
an fat point-of-care for is measures technology important ENDRA. system. among fat a fraction clinicians. Quantitative in now estimating fraction applications from liver milestone diagnostic of for and quantitative scatter premium interest There's incredibly available of growing This attenuation ultrasound are several vendors back
the is use interest imaging to in goes their these Although, beyond in limited radiology. radiology, far measures quantitative largely liver
fat four estimating thermoacoustic conventional when based assessing compared to ENDRA's advantages ultrasound to approaches for fracture. liver fat based unique approach provide potentially liver capabilities significant that leverages point-of-care
signal from of molecular approaches that signal chemistry underlies advantages in are that liver the thermoacoustic TAEUS tissue, these means contrast. that in Unlike related are disease. liver progression of of the differentiating is cells fat fatty fat molecules both changes MRI ultrasound to is sensitive directly when that lean to first and accumulation sensitive structural The tissue, to
inconsequential exclude In any The second proteins fibrosis relatively factor and to an accurately. approach of largely to presence of techniques extracellular In fibrosis. clinical the exams thermoacoustic. is excessive of thermoacoustic common fatty studies, our is thus lean to of that estimate for TAEUS with and of advantage hinders ability a is generation a liver is is comorbidity signal insensitive extracellular fibrosis. ultrasound disease. fraction for accumulation did fat our its not addition proteins contrast, significant confounding insensitivity the to based their is Fibrosis Fibrosis tissue, we
for of The reasons. of signals tissue that penetration. third obese significantly loss than depth lower two is advantage thermoacoustic patients ultrasound conventional of TAEUS The signal is in for
And estimating fat magnitude image distance secondly, the conventional half patients in be the fraction. First, orders Thus, distance signal thermoacoustic that ultrasound the travel TAEUS or approaches signals greater pulse thermoacoustic detected than with a can frequency that, receive transmit than signals the are flip patients large lower of system to ultrasound liver and is three conventional travels. much thermoacoustic. many the megahertz ultrasound standardized conventional of signal to half in obese attenuation difficulty in
As for fat subjects. high reasons high ultrasound based subjects quantifying effective fraction of no from to excluded potentially BMI. our more approaches than a methods thermoacoustic submission FDA in result, BMI We are
is the individuals individual's that calibration data calibration with and periodic fat fourth own measure. each TAEUS the its measurement devices. is across image size own approach has ensures across be of have liver advantage in require measurement estimating the in contained across Several present that uniformity And and varying patient ENDRA's device. in muscle not each other fat That within market from efficacy point-of-care the devices derived should integral unique calibration. TAEUS and fraction is to that TAEUS
In terms are there a process timeframes FDA considered. of should and review of next that going for be number forward, elements the steps
a a the applicants standardized resource eSTAR, is review request via the FDA's through facilitates complete way its submission submission format, process efficient the structured FDA. with submitted known in novo the ENDRA tool ensuring template that guides and which as submission First, de online and by the electronic
process operation ENDRA and and FDA we benefit our through that and expect investors may familiarity discussions interactive the principle the ENDRA Second, material Naturally, FDA's in our to XXX(k) clarification. as engages of with or review One interactions in with during back of routinely the we is forth submission. published remember FDA the updates FDA's review safety decision the that companies keep with our Investors additional previous that of XXX process is informed make in detailed within can should days seeking a goal will information submission technology's advance profile. factor FDA. dialogue that The process.
I'd to the of Irina Now, turn financial review like XXXX. results the for second over to quarter the to Irina? call