our data in data secured X. that in of follow-on us disease efficacy setting. and CMB Nice and cash to clinical XXXX. The had welcome checkpoint clinical to has the positive culminating and We both turn monotherapy a and proof-of-concept inhibitor Hey. immunogenicity a patients, Slide to to a our to secondly HPV offering HOOKIPA's spaces in Good make end with our the Very presented in year promising strong infectious earnings early we in XXXX, of oncology signs prophylactic call. Please in cancers morning runway you. everyone. setting, through proud, refractory talk
extended In addition, million we to XXXX. raised $XX runway and year-end our
show patients Cyndi Despite X. data are PE systemically X, HB-XXX data to turn oncology positive accrual the for We translational Please this in time COVID pro-inflammatory EX/EX induction generation. clinical and shown Data month, vector will demonstrated the responses Also of show our of T-cell HPVXX patients who we second programs. specific second strong and cancer, dynamics from suggest injected a publicly in faster the T-cells. a an that of XXXX. T-cell with treatments the year AACR were at both with hope from mechanism systemic of to specific increase had our more data persistent Beginning patients, boosting are even lot At and at be level AACR we first from efficacy and more in antibody expecting in Slide antigen explored will you alternating expected. disclose have immune dual T-cell supporting than will initial pandemic, where levels, chemokine next to more. in which hope doses half a would We XXXX. hopefully our higher half and data or at virus induced be cytokines HB-XXX activation will and ASCO, dose very early
as levels both. an Worth HB-XXX EX/EX combining will a repeating late dose the progressed to patients, Phase a protein HB-XXX antigen ongoing platinum you in HB-XXX a monotherapy expressing being tested vector using escalation clinical sequence, tolerability therapy responses IX preclinical vector filed submission our know showed June checkpoint of HB-XXX/HB-XXX technology based turn a carries such our progressed XXXX, trial IND that on currently the Phase two patients tested have it oncology on or stage first and great and initial HB-XXX an stronger from Phase HPVXX, on a our replicating based Slide inhibitors in Please vector. HB-XXX, dosed and program but dose metastatic treatment, on metastatic or setting We alternating advanced our the trial, agree result. tested included testing, no reminder, I'm a targeting profile. same in have who X. different we checkpoint favorable October, containing as one from showing generate X inhibitors As HB-XXX/HB-XXX or with inhibitors regimens. checkpoint alternating initial is a trial. is In a build HPVXX-positive we data our also first program. from us than who is and/or patients are to sure, platinum we the an Like EX/EX for alone, from and which The single fusion by patient HB-XXX immune our HB-XXX HB-XXX in standalone therapies in backbone. me effect being our in is that
comparable than one XX% XX line and patients. inhibitors and and in disease neck cancer shows XX% PD-X doses earlier from subgroup rates the escalation we better one head trend invaluable Phase the response partial rate of for from of the studies control first head stable efficacy and saw cell In The patients. response, squamous two a remarkable response complete in I numerous efficacy rate response neck and the are HPVXX-positive the terms disease carcinoma or patients,
generated levels. pembrolizumab. compared we two with specifically, The analysis, were December our So to initial data dose nivolumab and interim
patient prior monotherapy. Timbral, The we progressed asked after regimens We two are of we his as WHO the one on to patient in regimen, Phase twice HB-XXX data In and to HB-XXX the adding while highlighted on additional optimize investigator explore that combination. continuing clinically recommended levels for keep dose pembrolizumab on progressing dose. set, rounds
to cut patient the respond visible data of begun radiological had signs off, shrinkage. the and of As tumor with
With the in edition the recorded data. protocol our of longer HB-XXX Timbral, no included patient off is
However, medicine. the re-challenge. in and We of response explore resulted ago, on to preclinical a XX% checkpoint combination HB-XXX/HB-XXX specific combination of Two it encouraging data that and synergistic we see plan immunity safe. in our of trial. is alternating the arena vectors cures checkpoint announced reports Slide simultaneous cell These data showed with that or induce tumor that HB-XXX exceeding HB-XXX inhibitor to replicating HB-XXX/HB-XXX the II program in is weeks tumor the circulating was sign turn viral the IV inhibitor CVAT-cells, against published administration Please portion a combination of and responses to see this Phase X. preclinical vector long-term tumor two to alternating and which the
week. currently HPVXX-positive virus and As report arena and abstract cancers last patients analysis HB-XXX Conference off at earlier, was we early vectors, will in in of mentioned HB-XXX virtual cancer I April. analyzing the on AACR The our HB-XXX are advanced of and based HB-XXX upcoming with reduced translational immunotherapy and data title immunogenicity preliminary
report with HB-XXX on from will patients vectors. single HB-XXX proliferation or biomarker treated invivo We and CDX data T-cell
safety, to time single at regards might in the efficacy which the time the HB-XXX/HB-XXX to superiority with data also show tolerability, we vector This demonstrates data patients and data, clinical be June. vector over program HB-XXX T-cell report first from alternating and approach the We efficacy. have Conference ASCO initial two update from and that, the the the induction program of approach
trial many no later patients accrual wind avoid transplant and in-line last exhibited have for during XXXX. in will the the Phase than of stimulate reactivation transplant technology of the have confirmed We From drastically and slowed immunosuppressing identify either against their sites or based and patients We plan the in patients X. immune to turn the infection CMV. ongoing organ in and to Slide XXX. Many expect in late the the with down now our primary a this non-replicating responses. CMV is CMV our of preliminary quarter to months that mechanism to intense viremia, we year, to system II recommended data reported cytomegalovirus our this recruited QX in XXX target of safety, we against gears COVID is expectations. II year outbreak reductions time of of Please of slower expected. preventative driving third Phase vaccine periods. dose schedules disease transplantations, we situations. efficacy Switching HB-XXX designed transplant immunogenicity, an difficult original or use anti-virus approximately post-transplant accrual. and which shutdown positive T-cell to driver by the continues Phase on Also, antibody kidney II trial action Enrollment than
includes for the the forward post-transplant. As for will monitoring planned patients you inform their second of for to this data The protocol may year further recall, efficacy program. half about this outcomes and our path release next provide trial data XX-months
hematopoietic We Prophylaxis the space opportunities congenital transplants kidney CMV in beyond of transplant, of are the liver cell at in process stem the analyzing CMV looking transplant, and infections.
this. Chronic clinic. We to request Gilead to Slide provide the and therapeutic to HIV I approaching development that, cures HIV to as progress, development we on which one will Hepatitis for the Our With collaboration over Reinhardt are milestones, program believe is seeking B satisfaction progressing please. timelines to however, anticipate for select in are is we continues for for the X are Gilead and with further Go including We financials. reaching controlling all XXXX. comments Gilead, unable turn of in