this last the hot with Sure, off of in months. couple over been start topic years has just And experience let Robbie. diabetes. Obviously, XX-plus a by of me saying
therapies, very come these this to medications think every about There's are -- new the to impact and technologies great I this all have time going diabetes. think great. industries of disease to to new new it's in happen drugs investor I that a thanks of population, are And positive going lot these of Robbie, different treatment what's the potential to different and companies. on effect obviously address
a study or those it's a probably study I Medtech, is little feel moving with or publishment more that driven I of lot there to angst cetera. or by be headlines, new seem that the less say, any et like headlines investor would bit in domain of have publishing knowledge kind any
be we've happen few going it's these whether you So like naturally seen is from Medtech about in reduction going said, fear, valuations And decades significantly by sizes, technologies years to next differently it's guess the about the or impacted view in the market to in to my will cause that future. I new the I that understand now. happen in us there think
you're more now relates think I by about than And the future I GLP-X to generally Medtech think seeing data. initial those facts right are it today markets. and early and thoughts on, motion And impacted as that's what
the I mismatch we're and it versus impact fundamental think think there's and I bigger a -- a that if revenue you to patient patient picture, potential there's about on revenue long term here forecast here on think TAMs. seeing
the least bases to and people it's that looking U.S. public you which to at then they It's categories, I've here, range, seem one we've pricing, consensus largest you whether out seen. significant X mean, of into convert be But the X of I class to ever $XX be billion take and to pricing to at for numbers, the the the the that looking I forecast if into this the category. looked XX or lower X we're a years $XX pricing billion that drugs drug. X seen, in is user this think in international as pretty the next years probably on pricing, will XX at that million back million we've
maybe billion disease markets of diabetes, the that overlap of X small There's still, cardiovascular there's another diabetes X.X That's billion talking cardiovascular, of people. these that billion a and people fraction you're we're maybe real X.X people right? tens people billion people size or about medical with an X under and of of but maybe millions about, device talking got with with
how a So the the in to a I of think there equating of there's terms bit the revenue mismatch and seeing little of we're revenue growth pool TAM. patient impact this with potential
I that's big area, So one say. would
going have obviously, outcomes appropriate lot payers chains. that great I of do companies coverage. what's new seen and of the about payers. to these here is, achieve And the and outcome. great PBMs impact. just and drugs question And cost and Those there's the are I've payers a aren't think stories another about of to the question what pharmacy and then outcomes and discussions insurance question
and and for real think that employers companies payers companies And the look higher medical as are pay the costs, I The at inflation. these. you expense
I think to go going as year that's be into we a factor also. next
the I long I'd term. aspect think are, the bigger So here that's on -- those say,
diabetes side, seen you On mentioned, as business. as impact the positive the the on short on though, diabetes actually a term,
of the completed on both those those opening more number As I users. of were And are in are analysis products them users that recently showed the that compare showed other an these to significant Libre actually you we that both mentioned using a remarks, products data when using drugs.
more different, to procedures patients see in and medication And to long-acting procedure. I to my diabetes, meds, see compliance that you in that. use higher complementary common uncommon multiple because taking XX often, very GLP-X tend wear Robbie, seen was ultimately outcomes. tools to I insulin. fast-acting whether this either and They their not that's and oral said, therapy it and think Libre health you improve years, And great Medical have medications are it's this very And combination, not it's after where Device whether tend they in is like going Medtech I've before it insulin insulin relationship, sensors take their to It's that's more thing, a well. frequently.
And good so is for options I thing patients. here think more a treatment
drugs the real are addition mix. think to these I nice And a
this other areas some you some think that of but think interest though, forward, as I go are exploring. to related we're definitely topic -- I there
use this a launch to little gone we've Since de-identified as go world. we our to say we've thing us most collected that probably set advantage. the really bit is of far as to as Libre, through to the from one data think the base. more glucose I process user have data the data in robust I'd the is clear that probably the
I XX close to last billion monitoring think we've looked the I of at time got it, hours glucose data.
other. So is setting. just of more the evaluate a we here different ways a there's trial I outside of work many drug does time look at at work the they drugs terms do a look actually in controlled perfect profile Libre a over in so look terms job at real-world platform and And the more range. the in data, how it effectiveness to kind X than better of time, can think What
I we can a do again, So individual this do on population an level. this think on We level. can
say say, be So spectrum I'd -- with just health I portfolio portfolio kind that where diverse to to able to explore be, important that think And of us with has, full we from across to thing that's at I'd data finally going a care, the for going that. nutrition the here set forward treatment. then is an to diagnostics look use to Abbott
have the -- one it of ratio is problematic. say, muscle amount losing being with then think And drugs. are of as as the patients bring a there an provides using company explore to think drugs. area mass. these most we in opportunity increased that can this I loss be that we of side effects with there of and I And those here effects, are that nutrition, where further side can experience to mass muscle here value common I'd are that knowledge it's
is of effects, got other address mass muscle product to one it's be So or a an opportunity able that to can help develop, which we've here products side loss. these whether nutritional
also for So the for -- portfolio. there there's opportunities good us in
public science. it's So biology. short for in bottom term. fantastic think fantastic is line, health the This It's I great
raised, we there, think out term, overblown. some still And think marks I of I look long it's the a I think question there's are concerns I XX mean, lot so. in XX, want the facts the to think years, I that if -- I've of given